• TABLE OF CONTENTS
HIDE
 Table of Contents
 The big picture
 Scientific analysis
 Site reports
 Techniques in archaeology
 Public outreach/education
 Natural history of the Aucilla
 The field crew
 FMNH museum news
 Letters to the editor
 Funding
 Far side of the Aucilla
 About the Aucilla River Times














Title: Aucilla River times
ALL VOLUMES CITATION PDF VIEWER THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00091521/00002
 Material Information
Title: Aucilla River times
Series Title: Aucilla River times
Physical Description: Serial
Language: English
Creator: Aucilla River Prehistory Project, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida
Publisher: Aucilla River Prehistory Project, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 1997
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00091521
Volume ID: VID00002
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:

http___www ( PDF )


Table of Contents
    Table of Contents
        Page 1
        Page 2
        Page 3
    The big picture
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
    Scientific analysis
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
        Page 16
        Page 17
        Page 18
        Page 19
        Page 20
        Page 21
        Page 22
        Page 23
    Site reports
        Page 24
        Page 25
        Page 26
        Page 27
        Page 28
        Page 29
        Page 30
        Page 31
        Page 32
        Page 33
        Page 34
    Techniques in archaeology
        Page 35
        Page 36
        Page 37
        Page 38
        Page 39
        Page 40
        Page 41
    Public outreach/education
        Page 42
        Page 43
        Page 44
        Page 45
        Page 46
        Page 47
        Page 48
        Page 49
        Page 50
        Page 51
        Page 52
        Page 53
    Natural history of the Aucilla
        Page 54
        Page 55
        Page 56
        Page 57
        Page 58
        Page 59
        Page 60
        Page 61
        Page 62
        Page 63
    The field crew
        Page 64
        Page 65
        Page 66
        Page 67
        Page 68
        Page 69
        Page 70
        Page 71
        Page 72
        Page 73
        Page 74
        Page 75
        Page 76
        Page 77
        Page 78
        Page 79
    FMNH museum news
        Page 80
        Page 81
        Page 82
        Page 83
        Page 84
        Page 85
        Page 86
    Letters to the editor
        Page 87
        Page 88
    Funding
        Page 89
        Page 90
        Page 91
        Page 92
        Page 93
        Page 94
        Page 95
        Page 96
        Page 97
        Page 98
    Far side of the Aucilla
        Page 99
    About the Aucilla River Times
        Page 100
Full Text


ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERY WITH


THE AUCILLA RIVER PREHISTORY PROJECT














-Vol X NO. 1 Ap-il 1997



INSIDE


THE BIG PICTURE
*. View from the bridge
ARPP strategic research design
SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS..
Fluted points in North America
Atl atl replicate study
African elephants: A modern analog
Missions, Timucuans & the Aucilla
SITE REPORTS
SPage/Ladson site Bolen level hearth
Bolen level interpretation
.,,Sloth Hole site update
Little River site updates







. TECHNIQUES IN ARCHAEOLOGY
SUnderstanding Carbon 14 dating
Geography's role in archaeology
New insights from isotopic ecology
. PUBLIC OUTREACH/EDUCATION
"New York Times" article
"Ft. Lauderdale Sun Sentinel" article
Spotlight on research diving
ARPP live presentations
ARPP reenacts "A Naturalist in Florida"
SDiving for fossils with Archie Carr
ARPP open house activities
Discovering artifacts in Florida rivers
NATURAL HISTORY OF THE AUCILLA
Wild world of the Aucilla
SWhat is a hammock?
Water moccasins and the ARPP
. THE FIELD CREW
SIn Mleimoriam Wilmer Wilson Bassett, Jr.
The class of'96
Volunteer spotlight Edward M. Green
Off-Season ARPP field active cities
World of experience
A Canadian volunteer's ARPP experience .
Call for volunteers and volunteer application form
. FMNH MUSEUM NEWS
Museum grand opening
Florida Hall of Fossils
World Wide Web information
Herrera receives award
Paleofest '96
Robin Brown receives award


pffi'





. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
. FUNDING,
SLegislative advocacy campaigns
Soliciting letters of support for '97
1996 funding support letter appreciation
Gift options
SDonor acknowledgment
Old Sugar Mill
. THE FAR SIDE OF THE AUCILLA
. ABOUT THE "AUCILLA RIVER TIMES"


Return to ARPP Homepage







Art for Science's Sake

Cover art "The Past Made Present" by artist Ken Kirkpatrick is a limited edition 17.5" x 25.0" signed
and serialized pencil rendering on white fiber linen text paper, utilizing offset printing.

One half of the profits from the sale of this art will be donated to the Aucilla River Prehistory
Project.

fT Close-up.
Click on close-up image for full rendering image.
Limited Edition.
Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery.

Send $25 check or money order (includes postage and handling)
to:

Ken Kirkpatrick
631 B Sparrow Ave.
Surside Beach, SC 29575
(803) 477-0177

Please make checks payable to Ken Kirkpatrick, and include your name address and phone
number with your request.

Go to "About the Aucilla River Times"

I CONTENTS I







View from the bridge

By Dr. S. David Webb

The purpose of the Aucilla River Prehistory Project (hereafter ARPP) is to increase
our knowledge of prehistory in the region of the Aucilla river. We conduct
Sophisticated underwater excavations in sediments of three periods, including those
Sldeposited before during and after the arrival of the Paleoindians, the first people to
populate the New World. Analyses of samples taken during these field activities
involve several disciplines, primarily archaeology, to study evidence of human
cultures, a paleontology, to analyze plants, animals, and their environments. (More
about ARPP's scientific rationale is presented by Dr. Milanich.). The first of the
three periods are the prehuman records, well-represented by the Latvis/Simpson Site in Little River. It
provides an excellent record of fossils and sediments representing Aucilla life in the range of 30,000
years ago. The most important sites for the ARPP are those that feature the earliest human cultures. We
have now identified at least five substantial Paleoindian sites, one or two in each of the three segments
of the Aucilla River. Each Paleoindian site demands more carbon dates, meticulous documentation and
thorough excavation. And thirdly, the ARPP has discovered several sites that represent human cultures
and their environments after the terminal Pleistocene extinctions of the big mammals, we know these as
late Paleoindian sites, best represented by the Bolen culture. The richest record comes from upper levels
of the Page/Ladson Site and is now the focus of a doctoral dissertation by Brinnen Carter. (See Brinnen
Carter's "Bolen level interpretation," in this issue). Thus the ARPP is pursuing three prehistoric periods
in three segments of the Aucilla River.

Our team takes great pride in the ARPP. It has grown steadily in stature to the point where, more than a
decade after the project began, the Aucilla River is recognized nationally and internationally as a major
prehistoric resource. Each year the ARPP team produces substantial new evidence of human, animal and
plant life spanning the past 30,000 years. The Aucilla River is now recognized and honored as a unique
treasure trove of stratified prehistoric records yielding lithics, wood, other plant remains, bones, teeth,
digesta, hairs and even hormones. This wonderful river has become our time machine, from which we
report our adventures.

Even as the ARPP looks proudly at its glowing accomplishments, it must also try to foresee its future.
There is much talk lately about the end of the millennium, which comes in December of the year 2000,
and it seems useful to put ARPP planning on the same millennial calendar. Our biggest job, and our
largest investment of money and manpower goes in to underwater field research. If we count down the
field research that requires long lead-times, it turns out that 1997 is our last year to undertake surveying
and prospecting in new parts of the river. We reserve that activity for the research of the newest of our
current students. That will leave three additional years to carry out substantial field operations at sites
selected from the survey data. Newly selected sites must be probed and dated efficiently, to permit
rational prioritization for major excavation. Fortunately the ARPP now has a body of experience,





equipment, and a well-trained cadre of underwater excavators to carry out these tasks.


Meanwhile, based on previous surveys and probings, the
ARPP has earmarked major sites in three segments of the
Aucilla River. For our many friends who have visited the
river, Nutall Rise makes a convenient reference point. The
middle segment is Little River which extends upriver from
just above Nutall Rise a distance of nearly a mile to the
point where the river surges out of the regional limestone
(Suwannee Formation). Many who know the river regard
Little River Rise as the most beautiful spot in the region.
The next long segment upriver is called Half-Mile Rise; it
runs a little more than half a mile and receives a tributary
from the Wacissa River before disappearing underground.
The third research area (indicated on the accompanying
map) is West Run which connects from the Wacissa River
to the main channel of the Aucilla nearly two miles below
Nutall Rise along the west side of Ward Island. In each of
these three segments of the Aucilla River, the ARPP has
discovered and probed several sites that produce valuable,
stratified evidence of prehistoric life. The one new area in
which the ARPP is conducting a major survey, is the area at
Nutall Rise.


WIulAKSE .

L. ~C;fto
L. Carlson


The ARPP program has succeeded only because we continue to attract and extraordinarily talented band
of professional and amateur personnel.

We present profiles of some of our wonderful members in the following pages. The range of ages and
talents is truly remarkable. We can never adequately thank our team of professionals, students,
volunteers and supporters. It is sad to report that on December 6th we lost Wilmer Bassett, our best
supporter (more about Wilmer in this issue). We are fortunate indeed that our supporters and participants
seem to regard the ARPP's challenges as their own reward. Perhaps we have discovered the paradoxical
theorem that drives this project: the quality of the volunteer is directly proportional to the challenge of
the job.

We lead a good life at the river. We face challenging work, sometimes with exciting results. We eat
well, or, at least, when you have worked up a good appetite, it seems so. Our comrades in arms are
wonderful people.

These are the ultimate reasons that most of us are involved in this project. We believe that it will enrich
the lives and perspectives of a wide range of human beings, including many as yet unborn. That is why
we continue to she new light on these ancient treasures.


Aucilla kver Sites







ARPP strategic research design


By Dr. Jerald T. Milanich








The ARPP, a multi-disciplinary research program launched a decade ago by the Florida Museum of
Natural History, is focused on recovering and interpreting information on prehistoric human cultures and
their environments. Surveys and excavations have revealed numerous late Pleistocene and early
Holocene sedimentary bodies that yield archaeological and paleontological sites. Most of these are
deeply inundated by the Aucilla River which has risen just during the past 5,000 years. The Aucilla sites
may be divided into the following three time intervals:

1. Pre-human sites giving evidence of animals and environments from about 25,000 to 40,000
years ago
2. Paleoindian sites giving evidence of human cultures, extinct animals and their environments
from as early as 12,300 to about 11,000 years ago
3. Late Paleoindian/Early Archaic sites giving evidence of later prehistoric human cultures,
extant animals and their environments from about 11,000 to 8,000 years ago.

In recent years, funded by grants from the National Geographic Society, the Florida Department of State
and the Florida Legislature, ARPP has entered a more detailed phase of recovering the rich prehistoric
legacy which lies below the waters of the Aucilla River. This paper outlines a general research design
for these investigations. The design conforms to the Florida Preservation Plan for Archaeology, a
document prepared by Florida archaeologists in conjunction with the Florida Bureau of Historic
Research (Payne and Milanich, 1989). This paper is an adaptable statement that is to be updated and
altered as field and laboratory research and analyses provide new information that will lead to additional
challenges and opportunities.

This broad strategy will be supplemented by tactical plans prepared each field season for each site. The
latter are prepared in conjunction with detailed, written dive plans that are continually reviewed to
ensure safety of field personnel and techniques as well as equipment appropriate to ambient conditions.

PALEOINDIANS IN FLORIDA

Paleoindians, the first people to live in Florida, were descended from the human populations who





entered North America from eastern Asia during the late Pleistocene about 12,500 years ago.

These first groups were composed of small, highly mobile populations who rapidly increased in number
as they spread throughout the Americas, leaving behind stone, bone and ivory tools that are remarkably
homogeneous, at least in North America. Because of the climatic changes which occurred at the onset of
the Holocene, late Pleistocene sites are usually difficult to find or are not found in contexts that can
easily be studied.

Because of this relative lack of contextual information scholarly debates continue to surround the
chronology and nature of the first migrations out of Asia, as well as the timing and geography of the
subsequent Paleoindian colonization of North America. In addition, the nature of Paleoindian sites,
especially the lack of preservation of non-lithic items of material culture, makes it difficult to describe
and interpret the lifeways of the Paleoindians over the three millennia they are believed to have lived in
Florida.

The sites in the Aucilla River under investigation by ARPP contain information that already has
contributed new understanding to these debates. Included within these new sources of data are multiple
radiocarbon dates documenting the presence of Paleoindians in Florida at least 12,300 years ago. ARPP
also has shown that the Aucilla sites contain artifacts of ivory, bone and wood, as well as plant remains,
items seldom found at other Paleoindian sites. The potential for leading about the environment in which
Florida Paleoindians lived and the manner in which they utilized it is enormous.

The water sources that were available must have been important to the Paleoindians as well as to many
of the animals they hunted. Catchment areas provided water for drinking; they also provided locations
where Paleoindians could hunt game.

If the correlation between karstic topography and water sources is secure, then we would expect that
evidence of Paleoindian camps and hunting and butchering activities -- artifacts and, perhaps, the bones
of animals hunted and eaten by humans -- will be found at former water holes and other perched water
sources, including shallow lakes and prairies, and at deep sinks in the karstic, Tertiary limestone regions
of Florida where such features existed in the past.

This correlation certainly appears to hold true. As early as the 1940s, collectors found Paleoindian
artifacts and the bones of extinct animals in the Ichetucknee River within the karstic region of northern
Florida. Since that time sport divers as well as archaeologists and paleontologists have collected literally
hundreds of Paleoindian stone artifacts from the bottom of Florida rivers from what are thought to be
inundated catchment areas. Such locales include the Santa Fe-Ichetucknee River basin, the Aucilla River-
Wacissa River basin, the Steinhatchee River, the Oklawaha River- Silver River system, the
Withlacoochee River (in west central Florida), the Hillsborough River, the Chipola River, and, to a
lesser extent, the St. Johns River. In these rivers the artifacts are in close association with the bones of
animals, presumably animals hunted, butchered, and eaten by the Paleoindians.





More support for what has been called the Oasis Theory of Paleoindian settlement came in the early
1990's when James Dunbar and Ben Waller mapped the distribution of Paleoindian Clovis and
Suwannee stone points found in Florida. They found that 92% of the known sample is from the region of
Tertiary limestone topography from Tampa Bay northward (Dunbar 1991).

What once were late Pleistocene water holes today are the bottoms of the rivers such as the Aucilla.
Consequently, Paleoindian camps and hunting and butchering locales are inundated in our modem
rivers. And although divers and archaeologists have found and documented the presence of Paleoindian
artifacts in the river bottoms, those artifacts for the most part, are materials that have been eroded out
of their original contexts. This raised the questions: Are there inundated in situ Paleoindian cultural
deposits in the rivers? Can they be excavated ?

The answer to both questions is "Yes," based on investigations in the Aucilla River at the Page/Ladson
site. The first 10 years of the ARPP were dedicated to demonstrating that in situ deposits exist and, in
some instances, are stratified.

ARPP surveys also have shown that the density of inundated Paleoindian sites is very large, probably
reflecting the reliance of Paleoindians on the late Pleistocene water holes that today occur within the
river banks. In the Half-Mile Rise section of the Aucilla River and two other locales in the same river
ARPP has recorded 26 Paleoindian sites, more inundated Paleoindian sites than were recognized in all of
Florida previously.

Further topics dealt with in detail under Paleoindian section of this research design are the following:
Climates and Sea-levels; Sites and Settlement Patterns (Testing the Oases Hypothesis); Sampling and
Carbon-Dating; Subsistence on Large Animals, Small Animals and Plants; and the Tool Kit, including
Lithics, Bone and Ivory, and Wood.


I PREVIOUS I CONTENTS NEXT I







Fluted points in North America

By Dr. Michael K. Faught












Fluted Paleoindian points are found all over North America, but -- as Ronald Mason first noted in 1962
-- their distribution is not uniform. This data has a number of important implications for the study of
early human occupation in North America, and it points out that Florida's robust Paleoindian record is
important from a continental perspective. Since the 1950s, many publications and manuscripts have been
written which tally the numbers of points known for individual counties and whole states. Regional
compilations of this data for several Eastern States was begun in 1982 and done recently by David
Anderson. These two publications demonstrated that fluted points are plentiful in the Eastern United
States. However, it seemed to me that there were far fewer fluted points in the West, but no published
compilation existed to compare the whole continent systematically. Therefore, I accumulated additional
data from the Central and Western states in 1993, as part of my own dissertation research.

Figure 1 represents the distribution of
all these points. The map was prepared
by using the data compiled by Anderson
(over 9,000 points) and Faught (over "
1000 points) for a total sample of -
10,198 points. The centroids of each of. f } ,
the 3,075 counties in the coterminous -
United States represent the locations of '
the data points and the values were
standardized to points per 1,000 square
miles, by dividing the area of the county
by the number of fluted points recorded. ) .
Areas outside of the modem coastline I \ ::
and within the glacial boundaries of
11,000 years ago were zeroed out. This . .a .
data was then contoured with SURFER
Fig. 1 Fluted Point Distribution in 2brth America




Id. 1401A


software and the image was manipulated Fig. 1 Fluted Point Distibution in b rth America
in AutoCAD for printing. It was fun once the preliminary data had been put together.

The sample shown here is largely restricted to fluted points, including Clovis, Folsom, Debert, Gainey,
and other variants in the West. Daltons and Quads, which are sometimes fluted (or basally thinned),
were not included in the contouring routine, though they would have made the Northern Alabama cluster
quite robust. On the other hand, Suwannee and Simpson points were included in the sample from
Florida.

When looking at the map it is immediately evident that there is a higher frequency of fluted points to the
East implying that more Paleoindians settled east of the Mississippi over time. Another curiosity is that
fluted points are unevenly distributed across the landscape, with pronounced accumulations in some
areas rather that others. Some of us think that this means that human populations were also unevenly
distributed and that communities of Paleoindians expanded out over the landscape by skipping over less
desirable locations and ending up in more desirable spots, probably places with water, chert, and animals
or other specific resources. This pattern is associated with the major rivers of the region, particularly
around the confluence of the Mississippi and Tennessee Rivers, and it counters the notion that these
people spread out gradually and evenly over the landscape as population growth increased. This pattern
more closely resembles a leapfrog, rather than wave-of-advance pattern.

These concentrations also offer insight into the emergence of subsequent Early Archaic cultural
traditions in the East, say between 10,000 and 8,000 radiocarbon years ago. Settlement and continuity of
people who made fluted points is not so apparent in the West. Tracing these developments is becoming
an exciting and current concern in North American archaeology, and such research focuses important
attention on the Southeast for the answers to questions about fluted point origins.

Several concentrations of fluted points are located near modern coastlines and thus near the continental
shelves, indicating places where inundated Paleoindian and Early Archaic sites might exist offshore. The
field research part of my dissertation focused on finding and excavating sites in the PaleoAucilla
channel, located offshore in the Apalachee Bay, just beyond the mouth of the Aucilla.

I also studied a robust sample of North American Paleoindian and Early Archaic sites for the
dissertation, not unlike the isolated fluted point study shown here, and found that the earliest examples
of Classic Clovis sites, which are the earliest fluted point sites known, are clustered in the Southern
Plains (Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico), where isolated fluted projectile point finds are somewhat
less dense than in the East. These sites date unequivocally from about 11,550 to 10,900 radiocarbon
years ago. The Northeastern-most cluster near Maine wasn't occupied until about 10,600 radiocarbon
years ago.

Recent summaries of Paleoindian archaeology have observed the lack of unequivocal radiocarbon
control for early Paleoindians from the Central and Southeastern regions of the United States. We need
better radiocarbon control from the Mississippi/Tennessee/Ohio river confluences and the Florida Karst.





The Page/Ladson site lies in this Karst region. Since the Page/Ladson site has one of the most complete
records of late Pleistocene/Early Holocene sediments in the Southeast and an almost continuous
Holocene stratigraphic record after that, it is probably the site with the most potential for the discovery
of in situ evidence of Paleoindians of any projects I know of in the Southeast. It could be that Page/
Ladson, or some other Paleoindian site in the Aucilla, will be the place where the unequivocal
chronology for the Southeastern region will begin to accumulate. Certainly, there are several provocative
things at Page/Ladson which suggest early human presence.

David Anderson and I have agreed to continue assembling and compiling more data on Paleoindian
artifacts and assemblages, and welcome information of this kind from state perspectives. Since there is
not room to list all of the references for the map shown here, I suggest reading Faught et. al. (1994).

Again, the fluted point map is a work in progress. Certainly, we wish to thank all of those people who
have contributed so far to the construction of this database, and encourage others to join in.

Adapted from North American Paleoindian Databases by M.K. Faught, D. G. Anderson and A. Gisiger,
1994.


I PREV 10US I QONTE NTS I 1J RX I







Atl atl replicate study

By Jim Dunbar

INTRODUCTION








This study was undertaken to test the assumption that the Florida assemblage of carved mammoth ivory
artifacts were utilized as spear foreshafts. Dr. S. David Webb and I (submitted for publication) contend
the Florida specimens were used as foreshafts rather than for some other function, such as osseous
(bone, antler or ivory) projectile points as was the case in the European Upper Paleolithic.

Webb and I found support for the foreshaft hypothesis based on the frequency and location of green
bone fractures on the Florida sample. Green bone fractures or breaks can be differentiated from breaks
which happen after a few seasons of weathering when the osseous (bone, brittle antler and ivory)
material relinquishes its elastic properties and becomes brittle. Of 39 measurable specimens 51% of the
sample displayed green bone fractures. Green bone fractures were most common on the beveled end
accounting for 76.2% of the green fractures. Fractures on the beveled platform displayed a jagged,
irregular tear indicative of compression fracturing. That is where we reckon that the base of a stone
spear point had been hafted to the foreshaft, causing breakage.

However, in developing the data on the ivory artifacts, Webb invited Heidi Knecht to inspect the Florida
specimens. Knecht, who had done her doctoral research on European Upper Paleolithic osseous points,
cautioned Webb that beveled end breaks similar to the breaks on the ivory shafts also occur when they
are used as projectiles. In her dissertation, Knecht discussed Gravettian single-bevel bone points, their
specifications, manufacture and use. In another study Dave Guthrie also found that breaks along single
beveled bone shafts used as projectiles occurred at both the pointed and beveled ends. Because of the
caution expressed by Dr. Knecht and the contradictory findings of Guthrie, an experiment using ivory
and other materials for foreshaft material was deemed necessary. Some preliminary results are presented
here. The idea was to propel spears with attached foreshafts using a spearthrower.

MANUFACTURE


A. SPEARTHROWER (ATL ATL)





Two spearthrowers or atl atls were used to propel the foreshaft-tipped spear, one with two finger notches
and the other with a straight hand grip. The finger notched or forward-grip atl atl is based on a modified
Key Marco design. The straight handled or side-grip atl atl is based on a replica of a European Upper
Paleolithic design. The forward-grip atl atl was constructed of pine wood and weighed 224 grams. It had
a central groove running down its length for a shaft rest. The groove also allowed the proximal spear
socket to be run up to the distal end of the atl atl where the spear socketed into a small upturned antler
spur. This design proved to be easier to load and maintained the spear in throwing position. The side-
grip atl atl was constructed of a composite of cypress wood and deer antler. The distal 1/5th is
constructed from a piece of curved antler having a small hook at the end. The wood and antler sections
were fastened by dowel-pin and socket joint and cemented with hide glue. This joint was bound with
false sinew and hide glue to provide strength. This atl atl weighed 142 grams. Its design requires the user
to visually observe the loading of the spear socket into the atl atl spur. It also requires the user to hold
the spear in place in a somewhat awkward position, tightly pinched between the thumb and forefinger,
before each throw. If the user is not attentive, the spear socket will dislodge from the atl atl spur
requiring the user to reload before making a throw. This spear thrower has no shaft rest to minimize
spear dislodging. In this experiment the forward-grip atl atl spanned a length of 38 cm from its distal
hand grip to its spur, while the side-grip atl atl extended 45.7 cm between corresponding points.

B. SPEARS

A functional antler socket was made from a section of elk antler tine. This socket is 7.51 cm long with a
conical socket 5.58 cm deep. It is also drilled on the opposite end with a straightsided hole 1.93 cm deep.
It was seated onto the wooden spear shaft with dowel pin and socket joint and required no glue or
hafting due to its tight fit. The conical hole was bored into the antler with a steel reamer which has the
same angle of taper as the mean of the data from our ivory foreshaft study. Several wooden spear shafts
were handmade but only the best one was used with a foreshaft attached. Many thanks are extended to
Captain Way Grisset of the Tallahassee Fire Department who also owns and operates a part-time saw
mill. He not only furnished the wooden shaft material, but also produced the first shafts and lessons on
how to hand whittle square stock into round dowels using a block-plane. Shafts of oak, cypress and pine
were made, but the oak shaft was fixed with the antler socket and used to carry the spear foreshafts to
their targets. This shaft is 1.778 m long by 1.5 cm in diameter. The fletching starts about 5.5 cm below
the proximal end of the spear shaft so that the feathers do not get damaged by the atl atl. Ken Home of
the Museum of Florida History fletched the shaft in a Cherokee style with turkey feathers. The
completed spear shaft used for testing foreshafts weighs 227 grams (with fletching, sinew binding and
antler socket without foreshaft).

C. STONE PROJECTILE AND SPEAR FORESHAFT

Many thanks to Claude Van Order who graciously demonstrated
his considerable stone flaking (flint knapping) and bone carving
skills. We met Claude at the Ginnie Springs youth camp
jamboree where he was demonstrating flint knapping, and Jimmy
Sawgrass spoke of the legends and lifeways of the 19th century q





Seminole indians. Wayne Grissett, Joe Latvis, Rob Patton, Jerry
Gramig, Chris Lewis, Dean Quigley and Mark Muniz were
among the group in attendance.

Silicified coral was prized by Archaic indians who routinely
fashioned spear points from it about 5,000 years ago. In Archaic
times it was heat-treated before it was flaked into final shape. J. D.~t
Claude, however, made a fluted Clovis point from unaltered g. s1 nen d. anat pper
silicified (agatized) coral (see fig. 1). His tools consisted of stone Caude Van Orr'sfangngaufled
hard hammers, bone and antler soft hammers, and an abrader Clov poyce point
rock to grind the flake extraction platforms.

Late that evening, at the Steamboat Hotel in downtown Branford, Claude replicated the manufacture of
an ivory foreshaft. I had already supplied him with a template of average dimensions for constructing a
foreshaft. I had already constructed one of oak wood using modern tools (a bench sander and various
saws). It was Claude's task to make one the old fashioned way.

Dr. Webb furnished a piece of ivory cut from the proximal end of an African elephant tusk which was
17 cm in length. The 17 cm length is actually short for foreshaft production but slats of that approximate
length had been sent to Claude who had pretreated them by soaking in water for about three days.

While Joe Latvis videotaped the sequence, Claude manufactured a replica foreshaft from a slat in about
20 minutes. He used a 454 gram uniface chopper to hack the foreshaft into rough shape. At first he had
problems trying to chop the ivory on the soft, cushioned surface of a rug. This problem was solved by
using a large block of pressure-treated wood as an anvil. Long shavings curled off the ivory during the
chopping process and were reminiscent of block plane shavings.

Once the general shape had been formed, he combined scraping, using the edges of the chopper and a
blade struck from a blade core. A very porous chert abrader was used in rasp-like fashion to smooth out
the chop-marks on the shaft.

The beveled end was finished by cutting gashes (basal roughening) into the face of the beveled platform
and around the diameter of the shaft in the platform area. These gashes were made on the beveled end by
using one edge of the elongate uniface chopper in knife-like fashion. The pointed end of the foreshaft
was polished by using an obtuse flake ridge on the chopper for heavy rubbing followed by sand grit on
leather, with the foreshaft stropped over the gritcovered surface.

ASSEMBLAGE

Four foreshafts with lithic projectiles were
constructed (see fig. 2). A Clovis (or
Cloviswaisted) fluted point 6.98 cm long of


i, I r,,~,~c, :- EA -





Suwannee Limestone formation "cannonball"
J. rmiar chert was hafted to an oak wood foreshaft with
ig. 2 p cfedpecf poioMreh o corn k,,a unwaxed dental floss and Elmers white glue.
Top: Civs point on iv yforesh bound .&y beargrams.
MiIdle: Wdfaed Clov i pni nto woodfore.sht bud by Total foreshaft-point weight 39.7 grams. This
d salooss. Bttokm: si,.psonpoai on algat or boe waisted Clovis fluted point (#1) was re-hafted
to the ivory foreshaft mentioned below. A
mastic of pine rosin and tallow was applied to the flute and to the beveled face of the foreshaft during
hafting. Total foreshaft-point weight 53.1 grams.

A Simpson point 11.43 cm long of Ocala Group Gulf Coastal Plains chert from Bushnell, Florida was
hafted to an alligator bone foreshaft 20.96 cm long using hafting mastic made from pine sap and animal
tallow, and bound together by deer sinew. This was the heaviest of the foreshaft-point combinations at
90.3 grams. It withstood three or four throws before impacting the target at an awkward angle caused it
to glance off and snap the lithic point at the intersection of the sinew binding. The sinew binding of the
haft remained very secure around the basal fragment of the point that snapped. The sinew binding was
later removed by letting the foreshaft soak in wan-n water for about an hour.

A parallel-sided "classic" Clovis fluted point 9.52 cm long of Suwannee Limestone formation Flint
River chert was hafted to an ivory foreshaft 15.54 cm long using hafting mastic made from pine rosin
and animal tallow, and bound by strands of bear-grass fibers. This foreshaft-point (#2) weighed 50.5
grams.

RESULTS
Summary of Results RESULTS

I Targtc: Slyrdoam (50-Gal. Drum)
A Iv a with Clcvi [#2)
3 hits c 12 meter
penetr dicri ([mcaimum 11.4 cm]
II Taget: Dead Palm Trunk
A Iv iy with Clv i [(#2)
1 hit at 12 meters
hoft tce dc
B. Wood with Clove (# 1)
1 hit t 9 metes
24hi-t at 12 metes
6 hits d 18 meters
2 hits d 25 meters
C, IK c/y with Clcc [; (#1)
8 hits d 9 metrs
8 hits d 12 meers

This initial experiment of tossing replica foreshafts tipped with Southeastern Paleoindian projectile
points produced 53 throws which hit and stuck into the targets as summarized in the graphic "Summary
of Results"






DISCUSSION


The purpose of this experiment was to duplicate the type of damage found on the assemblage of ivory
artifacts from Florida proposed to be Paleoindian spear foreshafts. Even though there is no evidence that
Paleoindians used the atl atl, it was used in this experiment because of the greater likelihood of
producing impact damage over hand-thrown spears.

The foreshafts not only withstood 53 direct hits into rugged targets but also survived many more plunges
into the dirt and, occasionally, into a hardwood tree. This suggests the foreshaft concept represents a
functional design that works with little fear of damage. With most hits the point not only stabbed the
palm tree, it also supported the weight of the spear shaft above the ground by its projectile point. On
about a dozen occasions the lithic point had to be freed from the palm wood with a wood chisel and
hammer.

Surprisingly, no damage was inflicted on the foreshaft replicas. Rather, the base of a Simpson point
broke in its haft at the torque point where Webb and I had predicted the foreshaft would fail.

A problem of lesser importance was maintenance of the haft. The plant fiber haft quickly failed. The
plant fiber hafting held up when the foreshaft penetrated beyond the haft, but the first time that the haft
was left exposed, the weight of the spear shaft severed the plant fibers. The unwaxed dental floss
stretched and wore and needed to be replaced or reinforced several times. The combination of animal
sinew and mastic seemed to provide the most durable hafting.

The wood foreshaft tended to jam into the antler socket, especially on humid days. The ivory foreshaft
jammed infrequently. On two occasions however it required pliers to dislodge the ivory shaft from the
socket. Perhaps not coincidentally, these occurred on a humid day.

More testing will be conducted. We suspect that serious breakage occurred rarely, perhaps when spears
hit bone.


I PREV 10US I QONTE NTS F N EXT -







African elephants: a modern analog


By Matthew Mihlbachler

Because Paleoindians most certainly exploited Proboscideans, they must have
shared an intricate ecological relationship that was important in shaping both the
lives of the people and the elephants. How and why they hunted these herbivorous
gargantuans is perhaps the most elusive aspect of their lives. In order to shed some
light on this conundrum, the ecology of the modem African elephant is a useful
analogy for the ecological role that mastodons and mammoths played at the end of
the Pleistocene in Florida. Due to the biological necessities of immense body size,
all Proboscideans have a unique ecological role defined by their need for great
quantities of food, water and habitat and by their great muscular strength.

These combined attributes give them an unparalleled ability to completely terraform any area that they
occupy. Proboscideans do not simply live in places that are suitable to them. They alter the land to suit
their needs.

East Africa, for example, is
known for many wildlife
parks where large elephant
herds can be seen. The
landscape of these parks
ranges from savanna to forest
scrub. The forest never grows
dense and the land remains
open. Animals are easily seen .
in this environment by M ". e
tourists. We can imagine the M thatl
same for prehistoric elephant
same for prehistoric elephant Fig. 1 Eaft.5frican elephants moving thrcug a
hunters. The elephants barren landscape they helped defoliate.
themselves are largely
responsible for building this unique sort of environment. We can expect that the Pleistocene
Proboscideans of Florida also created and maintained a unique habitat that no longer exists on this
continent.

The distribution of water sources is especially important in defining where elephants can roam. Modem
open country elephants of East Africa are left without water sources for the dry season. To avoid
dehydration they literally create watering holes in areas where there are none by digging holes until they
tap into ground water. They maintain these holes and the supply of vital water allows elephants to





remain in the area and consume the local vegetation.


In their never-ending quest for great quantities of herbage, they push over many trees, strip bark from
trees and, in the process, kill them. Smaller plants are torn right out of the ground and eaten whole.
Elephants also graze on grass, usually ripping the entire plant, roots and all, right out of the ground.

The late Pleistocene of Florida was certainly much drier than today. This scenario, along with the
presence of Probicideans tells us that here a similar phenomenon took place. Elephants utilized the
available water such as the sinkholes in the Aucilla river. Heavy trampling around the water holes kept
almost all vegetation out of the area. As a result, other animals probably were granted greater access to
these areas to drink, rest and wallow. These sinkholes became centers of congregation for many species
where Paleoindians could easily locate and exploit game.

For miles around, the elephants processed countless tons of vegetation. Mastodons probably pushed over
trees, such as palms, to eat leaves and fruits. They also could have browsed on shorter plants, pulling
them right out of the ground. Mammoths fed on all forms of graze, maintaining the open country of
Pleistocene Florida.

Together these two Proboscidean species shaped the paleoenvironment of Florida long before humans
discovered it. The earliest pioneers probably found open plains and areas that were sparsely populated
with trees. Great numbers of the trees were stripped of their bark and smaller trees were pushed over.

Modem elephants are capable of pushing over trees of over a foot in diameter. Mammoths and
mastodons of Florida were larger and could push over trees with even thicker trunks. A dense forest
simply could not survive under the weight of their influence and only clumpy groups of trees and scrub
could survive. The grasslands were tattered also. Elephants do not clip vegetation evenly as cattle do.
They pull it out with their trunks or kick it up with their front feet. Hence, open lands consisted of small
grass patches and bare, uprooted soil.

Elephants dig for minerals and create mud wallows that can eventually become large permanent holes.
The geographical shape of the land would have been altered by this. Soils would be greatly exposed and
erosion must have become more accelerated than at present.

This description evokes a more open landscape than the lust subtropical forest that surrounds the Aucilla
River today. In this view elephants may be no better than humans in creating wastelands and devastating
habitats. After an area is cleaned out, the elephants move on to lay waste to another area.

Today in East Africa overpopulation is a serious threat to elephant herds. Being restricted to national
parks, they are capable of destroying all of their available habitat at a faster rate than it can recover.
Modem elephant observations tell us that extinct Proboscideans could have destroyed their own
resources beyond recovery.





Despite the destruction, elephants are capable of maintaining an ecological system where their immense
size helps shape the physical surroundings. They also provide open habitats that are desirable for large
numbers of other animals. Prehistoric Florida was filled with many different huge animals that were all
quite successful. Giant sloths, bison, glyptodonts, horses, camels, tapir, peccary, deer, giant beaver,
capybara and a host of other mammals seemed to inhabit the altered Proboscidean landscape, and
presumably benefited from it.

When people entered these areas, they probably had to alter their survival strategies. They were no
longer dealing with arctic tundra or pine forest. Nor were they hunting the tundra dwelling Woolly
mammoth. Now they were dealing with the Colombian mammoth and the American mastodon.

In this new environment, more like an African savanna, with two species of Proboscideans never before
encountered, it is likely that a new hunting strategy had to be created and a new way of life formed. The
environment was open and filled with visible game. It is remarkable that early Floridians continued
hunting elephants at all given that there were slow moving sloths and smaller animals such as deer to
prey on. Because Proboscideans continued to be utilized by these people it shows how important
elephants really had become to the first New World inhabitants.


I PREVIOUS CONTENTS NEXT I







Missions, Timucuans and the Aucilla

By Dr. Jerald T. Milanich

In the early sixteenth century native people who spoke the Timucua language
occupied most of the northern one-third of peninsular Florida (east of the Aucilla
River), apparently not including the Gulf of Mexico coast. The Timucua also
inhabited southeastern Georgia as far north as the Altamaha River. In 1492 this
large area, about 19,200 square miles, was home to approximately 200,000 people.




The Timucua were never a single political unit.
Instead the people we refer to as the Timucua were
made up of 25-30 (or more) individual chiefdoms,
each consisting of at least 510 villages. The chief
of a chiefdom's main town served as overall leader.
Sometimes chiefdoms formed alliances with one i Mou1, ti ~i_ simon~ma ld
another for offensive or defensive military
purposes or for other reasons. 1 T-''

In 1528 and again in 1539 Spanish expeditions
marched through northern Florida, crossing the -,<
Aucilla River as they passed from Timucuan
territory to the province of the Apalachee Indians. ETI Uan; 5
These military incursions were among the
Timucua for only a matter of weeks. Shortly after p
the founding of the Spanish colonial settlement at ..
St. Augustine in 1565 the Timucua entered a new
phase in their interaction with people from Europe. J. Mil-ani
In 1573 Pedro Menendez de Aviles, founder and Fig. 1 region of the Timucua ndians
in 1492
governor of the La Florida colony whose capital
town was St. Augustine, arranged for Franciscan missionary friars to administer to the Timucua.
Missions were intended to save the souls of the Indians even while transforming the native people into
loyal Catholic subjects of the Spanish crown who could be forced to labor in support of the colony. After
several unsuccessful attempts, missionary efforts began in earnest in 1595.

By that year the Timucuan population had shrunk to about 50,000, a 75 percent drop fueled by epidemic
diseases introduced from Europe. The number of chiefdoms also had shrunk; only thirteen still existed:
the Mocama-Guadalquini chiefdom on the Georgia and northeast Florida coasts, where three early





missions were established (this chiefdom was apparently an amalgamation of earlier ones); Enecape just
north of Lake George, site of the mission of San Antonio de Enecape; Acuera in the Oklawaha drainage
with one mission; Ocale east of the Withlacoochee River (and west of Acuera) in Sumter and Marion
counties, where one mission was built; Potano in Alachua County, where four early missions were built
(two of which were gone by 1620); Utina in Columbia and Suwannee counties where four missions were
founded; Yustaga in Madison and Hamilton counties in Florida and southern Georgia (east of the
Aucilla River) among whom eight missions were built prior to 1623; Arapaha along the upper reaches of
the modern Alapaha River in Georgia with one mission; Utinahica near the intersection of the Ocmulgee
and Oconee rivers with one mission; Oconi in the Okefenokee Swamp with one mission; Ibihica to the
east, served by mission San Lorenzo; and the Cascangue/Icafui and the Yufera chiefdoms farther east in
southeast Georgia, both of whom disappeared very early in the seventeenth century.

Missionary friars moved systematically among each of these chiefdoms, founding a mission in each
main town and in some outlying major villages. Within Yustaga the mission of San Miguel de Asile,
would give its name to the Aucilla River.

If the 75-percent population decimation of the sixteenth century prior to the missions seems large, the
figure for the seventeenth century is positively horrendous. From 1595 to 1700, the period of the
missions, the Timucuan population suffered a 98 percent reduction, from 50,000 people to 1,000. And
when Spain relinquished Florida and St. Augustine to the British in 1763, only a single Timucua Indian
is listed on the roster of native people shipped to the town of Guanabacoa in Cuba.

Against the seventeenth-century backdrop of population erosion, the missions sought to incorporate the
Timucua into the Spanish colonial realm. Indeed, the missions were colonialism. It was the missions that
harnessed the Timucuan villagers to Spanish servitude. A system of labor quotas was organized through
mission villages, providing native backs to serve St. Augustine.

Because Florida was a poor colony, its very existence depended on native labor. When mission village
populations fell because of seventeenth-century epidemics, the colony's survival was threatened. To
assure bodies for labor, Spanish officials moved populations and amalgamated villages. At times the
remnants of once large chiefdoms were joined.

Some native laborers worked on Spanish haciendas located in the interior of northern Florida. One
hacienda, a farm, was near the Aucilla River near mission San Miguel. Begun about 1645 by then
governor of Spanish Florida Benito Ruiz de Salazar Vallecilla, the ranch grew wheat and corn; pigs were
raised for export.

The Aucilla farm had extensive fields cultivated with the help of horses, mules, and oxen. Several
documents, including an inventory taken after Rufz de Salazar's death, indicate the farm buildings
included a large wooden house, a separate wooden kitchen with oven and two footmills, a thatched
building for storing flour, a house with clay-daub walls, and several granaries. An African slave from
Angola named Ambrosio and the mulatto overseer, Francisco Galindo, helped to run the ranch and were





included in the inventory.

Also listed in the inventory were 22 oxen, 8 horses, and 45 head of swine. Tools, farm implements, and
furnishings included a whetstone, auger and bits, spades or hoes, hatchets, sickles, hand adzes, saws,
carpenter's planes, machetes, iron goads, iron chains, table and benches, an oil lamp, beds, one pewter
dish, and two bricks of chocolate, the latter used to cure dysentery.

Although native depopulation would eventually have doomed the missions and the colony to failure, that
end was hastened by the establishment of British colonies on the eastern seaboard. Beginning in the
1660s and increasing in the 1680s, raids on the Timucua and Guale Indian missions by Carolinian-
inspired native slavers,sometimes actively abetted by Carolinian militia, pressured the missions. Some
mission dwellers fled, more were captured, and villages were abandoned.

The end of most of the Timucua missions came in 1702-1705 when several large Carolinian raids
destroyed them (as well as those of Apalachee province). Survivors moved to new towns close to St.
Augustine, where the remaining Timucua continued to be administered by Franciscan friars.

But in those refugee towns the Timucuan quickly failed. A 1717 census lists three villages housing a
total of only 250 Timucua Indians. By 1726 that number had dropped to 157 Timucua, and two years
later it was 70. In 1752, 29 Timucua remained, all living in a single town. A decade later when Spain
withdrew from Florida there was only one Timucuan Indian still alive to accompany the Spaniards to
Cuba.


PREVIOUS I CONTENTS I NEXT I







Page/Ladson site Bolen level hearth









By Mark Muniz

They had arrived in the early evening after a long day's walk. There had been no luck hunting, the big
creatures no longer lived here and the smaller antlered ones had not been seen all day. No matter,
tomorrow was another day and they would try again, but for now, their thoughts turned to warmth as the
cool night began its descent. A number of rocks were gathered into a circle and a fire was lit within.
Over the next few days or weeks many a story would be told around this fire, meals cooked in it, bodies
warmed by it, until the group picked up and moved on to its next destination. In their trail they left
behind only a few tools, scraps from meals, and a ring of simple rocks. Perhaps next year they would use
the same camp again.

As the millennia passed, water levels rose, and sediment covered the camp, burying the activity surface,
sealing a hearth and the associated rocks and tools left there with it. Eventually archaeologists arrived
and uncovered the surface relatively intact, probing its mysteries in the attempt to reconstruct the
lifeways of a people 10,000 years behind us. However, there is much more to reconstructing the scene
than may first appear. As humans are a part of nature, there are natural forces influencing the
archaeological record as well. In the case of the Bolen surface at the Page/Ladson site, 8Je591, nature
has added both alluvial disturbance as well as erosional factors to be considered when interpreting the
10,000 year old occupation. To the archaeologist, these natural site formation processes can be
considered equivalent to the background static provided by cosmic radiation that astronomers must sort
through. Just as the background static can tell astronomers something about the formation of the
universe, it can also mask unique signatures given off by the stars and galaxies the astronomers wish to
study. The archaeologist also must be able to distinguish between the true cultural signature left by
humans and the natural "static" provided by geologic events. This natural static, however, provides a
great deal of information about the environment of the archaeological culture being studied. In the
scenario provided above, dealing with a feature (the hearth) comprised of a relatively unaltered natural
material (simple rocks) and exposed to 10,000 years of hydrologic and geologic processes, one can
understand how the interpretation of the human activity that was associated with the hearth can become
difficult. But do not be discouraged, for there are ways to decipher this ancient puzzle.


A total of 207 rocks were collected from units 0, P,





Q, T, U, and V. Together these units added an a
additional six square meters to the overall exposure iIh tp
of the Bolen surface (see fig. 1). While the hearth a '
itself was quite evident (its irregular shape was __ '
approximately 28cm x 41cm and 10cm deep with
charred wood embedded in its center), the particular
stones that were originally associated with it were
not as clear. While it was certain that there were
*0
some, fire cracked rocks among the 207 collected, a ,.AT k," R- Y
thorough analysis was begun to quantify M. Mnis
characteristics that would distinguish the fire
cracked rocks from those rocks that arrived on the Fi, 1 Pae/Ladson site Bolen levl hearth.
site due to natural processes of erosion or fluvial
transport. Unfortunately, there have not been very many analyses done similar to this one so that some
base of comparison could be derived. Too often an archaeologist will consider a scatter of rocks to be a
natural occurrence, dismissing attempts to quantify characteristics present in the assemblage as
pointless. With limited time and resources, one can understand how more attention is placed on artifact
analysis. If a paleoenvironmental reconstruction is attempted, however, analyzing something as simple
as a rock can lead to other useful information as well. The archaeologist may also discover patterns of
human behavior in a resource not previously considered.

Using a definition for fire-cracked rock provided by Steven K. Lovick in Fire-Cracked Rock as Tools:
Wear-Pattern Analysis (1983) characteristics for each specimen were determined as follows: rock type (i.
e. parent material); color; angularity; spericity; presence of use-wear; presence of thermal alteration
(evidence of fire cracking, blackening); weight; and length of longest axis. Twenty five of the 207 rocks
surrounding the hearth were determined to be fire cracked, and another 18 were considered to be
possibly fire cracked but equivocally so. Of the 25 fire-cracked rocks (FCR): 80% are dolomite, with the
remainder limestone; 24 of 25 are gray in color (occasionally with darker and lighter bands and mottles)
with one being mottled light tan-tan-dark tan; 100% exhibit angularity and low sphericity; 3 of the 25
may show signs of use wear (although this is difficult at best to determine on such an unmodified,
informal artifact); all, of course, showed signs of thermal alteration; weights ranged from 12.9g. to 560g.
with an average of 158.8g.; and lengths ranged from 5.1cm. to 17.4cm. with an average of 10.1cm.

As this issue of the Aucilla River Times goes to press, analysis is still in progress. A graph contrasting
fire-cracked rock weight and distance from the center of the hearth is being compared with a graph of
non-fire-cracked rock weight and distance from the center of the hearth, in an attempt to discover if
there is a significant difference in the two assemblages. The results from this study will also help us
understand how alluvial influences affected the site formation process at Page/Ladson, and thus may be
of use in the future interpretation of site assemblages in other parts of the Aucilla River. We have also
planned to examine both FCR and non-FCR using X-Ray diffraction in order to assess mineralogical
change that may be present in the FCR due to exposure to high temperatures while still a part of the fire
ring. We have also planned to treat the surfaces of the FCR and non-FCR with hydrochloric acid to
release charred carbon residue that may also be present from exposure to fire. These final measures are





being employed to better quantify fire-cracked rock on the Bolen surface in an effort to reconstruct the
occupation there as accurately as possible. Stay tuned as we will hopefully have this picture completed
before we return to the field in May, until then ...

PIREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







Bolen level interpretation

By Brinnen Carter











Mark Muniz's accompanying article has focused on connecting the artifacts we have located in the
bottom of the Aucilla with specific behaviors of individual Early Americans, what Lewis Binford would
term "middle range" archaeological analysis. However, there are broader questions that can be addressed
with this same data. One of the first is how the groups living through the climatic changes at the end of
the Pleistocene epoch changed their resource utilization strategies to accommodate a less diverse set of
faunal resources. This is a broad question, but it has very specific derivative questions. For instance, one
could easily ask -- How did hunting technology change from Early Paleoindian to Early Archaic times?
The side-notched points we find on the Page/Ladson soil are far more prevalent throughout Florida than
are the earlier lanceolate points. What does this reflect: a change in resource utilization from megafauna
to deer, a population expansion, the persistence of the side-notched tradition for a longer period of time,
or some combination?

Let us first look at the transition from megafaunal to deer utilization. It seems clear that, at least in the
Southeast, deer bone tools and food remains co-occur with Bolen-style points, indicating that they were
an important subsistence and industrial resource. However, side-notched points do not occur with
megafaunal remains. This suggests that Bolen-style points are potentially a specific adaptation to
hunting deer. It also suggests that the tools for which the points were intended were physically different
than those used with the lanceolate points. Data from the Page/Ladson site confirms this general picture,
with the technological transition appearing to occur prior to the early date of 10,200 BP we have on the
site. Other sites in the Southeast like Dust Cave and Stanfield/Worley Rockshelter in Alabama indicate
that the development of side-notched points, such as Dalton and Hardaway, came after the development
of some types of lanceolate points.

If the transition occurred sometime before the Bolen Surface at Page/Ladson was occupied, then we
know it was the people who manufactured side-notched points that survived some of the most dramatic
climatic shifts around 10,000 years ago. Expanding populations is another hypothesis used to explain
larger numbers of side-notched points in Florida. If a small hum group occupied the Page/Ladson site on
at least a seasonal basis, it would be the first evidence we have of a well-preserved campsite in Florida.





The site's physical location, on a relatively small river in North Florida, tends to support the proposal
that populations were expanding the range of habitats they used for food.

It is likely that overall population was the driving force to settle these previously only intermittently
used areas. As populations expanded in "core" settlement areas, off-shoot groups settled less desirable
areas.

Another alternative explanation is the persistence of the side-notched to comer-notched tradition over a
longer period of time than previous lanceolate traditions. Recent radiocarbon assays and calibrations
indicate there is a substantial plateau in dates of 10,400 and 10,000 years in age.

This means that this 400 years may represent as much as 1,000 chronometric years. This is easily
enough time to accumulate the larger number of side-notched points, even assuming no population
growth.

The impact of the late Paleoindian finds from the Page/Ladson site will be substantial, not only revising
our understanding about human use of the immediate area around the Aucilla River, but also altering our
ideas of regional settlement patterns and adaptations.


I PREVIOUS I CONTENTS I NEXT I







Sloth Hole site update

By Andy Hemmings











The excavations at Sloth Hole (8JE121) by the ARPP blossomed into a month long field season during
the May/June operations because of the discovery of what appears to be butchered mastodon bones
associated with a 12cm bifacial knife (see fig. 1) and a huge, battered hammer-stone. We also recovered
many other artifacts and mastodon remains from the alternating thin beds of sand and grey organic clay
we call level 4.

Level 4 is up to 20cm thick with as many as 74 microstratigraphic
layers. No datable vegetation has been recovered but we hope to submit .":
a bulk level 4 sample for a date on the fine organic clay. A single native 1*
vitis seed from the bottom of Level 3C was dated by BetaAnalytic to A'
4450+/-60 RCYBP. We know then that at the very least the sand layers .
have been capped and undisturbed for nearly 5000 years. Needless to/ /,
say these in-situ mastodon and artifacts generated a great deal of "i. i .
excitement around camp as well as with members of the scholarly j i. I .
community with whom we have discussed it.

On the
margin of
the site I I "' ^t'll
we set the
8Je3f2 EclwMnl A Lev. szAT.2 2x3 meter
rail track Fig. I Bfacial ch rt knife
in shallower water. While removing the
M 3Ab.mi
leaf overburden we found a Seminole,
Fig. 2 Roll'd co pper prqocfe point rolled copper point called a Kaskaskia
(see fig.2). William Owen Gifford saved this point on the screen. Thanks to his amazing breadth of
knowledge this rare artifact was correctly identified in the field. Farther down, in the 3rd level of Unit





21, Frank Willson and I found a complete greenstone, groundstone axe. Both of these artifacts are quite
a bit younger than what we are looking for. However, they do serve as excellent markers for the
stratigraphic sequence and its intactness. Clearly this site had been visited for many millennia. Levels 4
through 7 were grey clay and sand levels that had a number of lithic artifacts, but none as yet are
diagnostic.

At this point it does not appear that the rail track excavation contains a buried living surface. But it
makes an excellent stratigraphic control section of the right age. A carbon date of 12,300+/-50 RCYBP
was obtained on a piece of wood from the bottom of Level 7. One goal in the next field season at Sloth
Hole will be to open adjacent areas just above the 12,000 year old level and obtain a large number of
carbon dates.

One particularly interesting discovery in the lab was a tooth of an extinct llama form 58cm the 12,000-
year-old level. Although there is no evidence of cultural association it is still an important find. Very few
forms of extinct fauna from the late Pleistocene have such closely associated dates. At the very least we
hope to bracket the tooth with dates from layers above. This could be the "youngest" dated Paleollama in
the eastern United States.

A third unusual artifact was recovered near the mastodon while clearing back leaf and sand overburden
to the top of Level 3. Alyssa Martinelli pulled a complete bone fishhook from the screen full of leaves
before it was lost overboard.

Heretofore we had guessed that the upper peat and leaf layers were culturally sterile. This season's work
clearly demonstrates that this is not the case. These artifacts probably got to the site as lost or discarded
items. The fishhook being lost in use is logical and the copper point may have been fired and gone
astray. The axe is more difficult and rather defies explanation.

A third area that received attention was a middepth deposit of wood and clay that included a palm stump
still rooted in the ground. Unfortunately this inundated land surface dated to 30,920+/-230 RCYBP: The
stump itself was 34,760+/-1600 RCYBP. Above these ancient strata is a well developed sequence of
sand/gravel, peat, and leaf mold layers. Near the stump we found many bones of a single juvenile
mastodon. Some of this area had been disturbed and it seems unlikely that the skull is still there. This
mastodon has very few artifacts around it and at this time does not appear to be killed or butchered. One
fragment of a thin biface was found in this level and is probably a paleo type, possibly a Suwannee
preform.

A great many mastodon bones and several diagnostic artifacts from every level were recovered this year.
The potential we thought this site holds is starting to bear out. Admittedly we are rather tentative in our
discussion of a possible mastodon butchery but we are greatly encouraged by what we found last
summer. As soon as we can get back to Sloth Hole we have three areas to excavate that all seem ready to
help answer our questions about Paleoindians, extinct megafauna and their late Pleistocene associations.







Little River site updates

By Mark Muniz

The Green Lantern site was excavated from May 30 to June 3, 1996 as the third of
a series of excavations in Little River that had as their goal, the further exploration
of sites with a high potential for the preservation of Paleoindian activity. The third?
You are probably wondering. The first intensive survey/excavation of
7 archaeological site in Little River by the Aucilla River Prehistory Project was
conducted at the Matten/Childers site 8Je604 in 1990. The Latvis/Simpson site,
excavated in 1995, was the second large scale operation with which many of you
are intimately (if not regretfully) familiar (see C.A. Hemmings). From years of diver collection and
surface surveys, it was clear that Little River held multiple occurrences of artifacts in association with
extinct fauna, the only problem was (and still is) finding this association in a secure stratigraphic
context. Thus it was decided that 1996 would be the year to blitzkrieg Little River with the equivalent of
Phase 11 surveys of five sites, four of which had not been excavated before.

The Green Lantern and Crag Hole sites, 8Jel507 and 8Je638 respectively, were excavated almost as one
continuous site due to their immediate proximity. The primary goal for both sites was to determine if
there were any intact paleosols present, similar to that of the Bolen paleosol at Page/Ladson. A paleosol
is an ancient soil that was exposed to the air as a modern soil would be, but was then capped in such a
way that its structure and surface were preserved intact. Without a paleosol, or some other distinct intact
surface to associate artifacts and features with, cultural material would seem suspended in the space of
whatever matrix we encountered it and would offer us few clues as to its context or associations.

Other goals were to measure enough data
points to create a bathymetric
reconstruction of the sites (see fig. 1), and
to date the sediments present at each site.

June 7 was the last day spent at Crag Hole,
and I am proud to say that we accomplished
all of the goals we had set for the two sites.
Unfortunately we encountered no paleosols
or other subaereally exposed surfaces at the M. uZiz
targeted time frame (12,000-10,000 hp) but Fig. 1 Tree-di"me;,si ol ccn rter moclI of
this in itself was not at all a failure in any Green Latern( Je 1507) and Crag Hol.e (e 638)
sense. Going into these unexplored sites, site .Mhrmetry. View ook'ng northeast
there is no way of knowing if there will be any intact Paleoindian remains, therefore, even by learning
about a site that is not what you are looking for, much information is gained about the geologic history





of the river, effects of hydrology on the behavior of artifact and bone beds along the bottom of the river,
and the strategic elimination of another site that does not hold "da goods". Dates for the clays at Green
Lantern came back at >40,050 bp and 37,430 +/-560 bp. Although one sediment sample remains to be
carbon dated, it is likely to be too old. Dates on the clays at Crag Hole are 41,560+/- 920 bp, 37,690+/-
910 bp, 37,160+/710 hp and 32,660+/-1,230 bp. Interestingly these dates coincide with a glacial
maximum that was of shorter duration than the final Wisconsinan glaciation and may prove to be quite
influential in the sedimentation of the Aucilla River drainage.

The remainder of the June field season (June 9-14) was spent at 8Je604, the Matten/Childers site. This
site is home to "Priscilla," a nearly complete mastodon recovered from the bottom in the 1970s by Don
Serbousek. The site was also dove by Billy Mathen and Ron Childers in the 1980's for whom it was
named (with a slight misspelling that embedded itself in the site file name and unfortunately stuck). The
site was investigated by the ARPP in 1990 to rediscover the sediments that once held Priscilla and to
explore the possibility that cultural material would be found in association.

While the survey/excavation was successful in defining the area that held Priscilla, and recovered an
immense amount of bone pins from the area, no radiometric dating of the site was conducted, and all
assumptions regarding Priscilla's demise remain speculative. Evidence leading to human association
with the Mastodon included an impact fractured Clovis point, and ivory embedded into the distal end of
the left ulna of the mastodon! Clearly, more work needed to be done at 8Je604.

Three main areas of investigation were opened up in June of 1996: the first was well to the north of the
1990 excavations, in a lily pad bank along the west side; the second was just on the downstream side of
a shallow rocky shoal, due east of the Priscilla site itself, where a previously capped spring was
uncovered; and the third was due west of where Priscilla lay, along with a gradual slope of the channel.
Throughout the course of excavations, two more areas would also be looked at, but these primary three
loci would tell us the most information. While we were not able to reconstruct a bathymetric profile, a
map was made of the bottom features of the site which greatly enhanced the previously skewed
interpretation of exactly where the 1990 excavations were in relation to other channel features.

The final day at Matten/Childers witnessed a violent rainstorm that ended excavations early,
necessitating a third and final trip that is planned for May 1997. Radiometric dates from 8Je604 came
back as 1,450+/-70 bp on a sample taken from above the spring in a gray clay matrix immediately to the
east of the Priscilla locale; 100.5+/-0.6% bp from a sample taken at the bottom of a peat/sand stringer
sediment that covered artifacts and megafaunal remains on the gradual slope of the west side of the
channel; and finally, a date of 24,010+/-460 bp on a sample taken from the brown peaty clay that lay just
below the Priscilla mastodon in a trench excavated during the 1990 ARPP explorations. Although this
last date is quite old, it does not mean that the mastodon was not killed by people utilizing Clovis
technology, it only means that either the activity itself took place on an eroded land surface, or, there is
no longer any sediment remaining that dates between 12,000-10,000 bp. This question will be resolved
after the 1997 return visit.





The final two sites on our whirlwind tour of Little River are 8Je603, affectionately known as Little River
Rapids, and 8Je602 known as Ladson Rise. As we patiently waited for water levels to drop following a
late season tropical storm, there was little prospect of accomplishing anything at all on Little River. But
as the fates would have it we began excavation at 8Je603 on October 24 and ended 11 days later on
November 3. Unfortunately we were not able to thoroughly explore Ladson Rise, however, it will
probably turn out to be intimately connected with 8Je603, and incorporated within its overall excavation.

Little River Rapids was chosen as a priority site to excavate as a result of a surface collection conducted
by Craig Willis and the Paleontological and Archaeological Research Team of Florida (PART) in 1987.
This project collected 1,013 formal artifacts (over 950 of which were bone pins and bone pin fragments)
and 21.647 kilograms of debitage (much of which are unrecorded blades and utilized flakes).

With such a high number of artifacts and debitage, it is clear that this was the site of a major activity
center. Exactly what activities were occurring here will be the major thrust of my masters thesis, and
will require further site excavation and some re-analysis of the artifacts collected in the 1987 survey to
say with any certainty.

The October excavations allowed us to establish where intact strata remained and provided us with
radiometric dates of the ages of the strata. The ARPP crew also faced a challenge that had not yet been a
major factor on the river; the extreme current raging across the site as a result of Tropical Storm
Josephine's passage Although there is no white water on the surface, after one dive it is obvious why
they named this site Little River Rapids, as several divers (who will remain unnamed) have been seen
moving downstream at quite a rapid pace! I think everyone who dove during the October field season
(and especially those mad dogs who volunteered to dive doubles) should give themselves a pat on the
back for conquering a daunting task. Kudos to all!

Fortunately, further excavations at the site will take place in areas that are sheltered from the current
(along the west bank and on land). A very important outcome of the field season was that for the first
time we tracked the movement of artifacts from their original position in terra firma, into an erosional
collapse in two to three feet of water, down a series of shelves and out into the channel bottom.

Never before had this series of site formation processes that eventually lead to artifact and bone beds on
the bottom, been so accurately observed. I would like to mention a special thanks to Joan Herrera, whose
patience and perseverance (while digging in water so shallow her tank was dry) led to the discovery of
the first artifact in this transitional context.

While multiple carbon samples and cores were collected from the site, at press time we have only three
dates. From one meter below the channel bottom in Unit 5, wood was dated to 4,850+/-70 bp. This may
turn out to be a depositional sequence similar to that at Sloth Hole, and is definitely on the agenda for
the coring operation in 1997.

Another date of 36,370+/520 hp came from a wood sample taken from the very bottom of Unit 2. This





unit had several abrupt strata changes, and there may still be intact terminal Pleistocene sediments
present above the stratum that produced the date. final date is 28,490+/-240 bp on a sample of exposed
surface sediment at the bottom of the small sinkhole in the south-western area of the site.

In 1997 the site will undergo further testing with a coring project slated for early in the year, and a series
of land excavations to be held in the spring. As of yet, Little River still holds its secrets from us, but the
telltale signs are everywhere.

As we have seen, strewn across the bottom of the current is 40,000 years of history, but locked in the
banks is the key to understanding the great transition from the Pleistocene to the Holocene and the
people that survived it and went on to settle the Southeast.

PREVIOUS CONTENTS NEXT I







Understanding Carbon 14 dating

By Mary Hudson

The first of the three periods are the prehuman records, well-represented by the
Latvis/Simpson Site in Little River. It provides an excellent record of fossils and
sediments representing Aucilla life in the range of 30,000 years ago. The most
important sites for the ARPP are those that feature the earliest human cultures. We
i j have now identified at least five substantial Paleoindian sites, one or two in each of
the three segments of the Aucilla River. Each Paleoindian site demands more
carbon dates, meticulous documentation and thorough excavation. And thirdly, the
ARPP has discovered several sites that represent human cultures and their
environments after the terminal Pleistocene extinctions of the big mammals.

The interpretation of data in the field of archaeology is often subjected to intense scrutiny. And when the
interpretation of a site directly depends upon its estimated antiquity, the methods by which its age was
determined become crucial. The following discussion focuses on Carbon 14 dating, the most widely
used method of age estimation in the field of archaeology.

Carbon 14 (hereafter C 14) was developed by the American chemist, Willard F. Libby at the University
of Chicago in the 50's, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1960. C 14 dating
provided an accurate means of dating a wide variety of organic material in most archaeological sites, and
indeed in most environments throughout the world. The method revolutionized scientists' ability to date
the past. It freed archaeologists from trying to use artifacts as their only means of determining
chronologies, and it allowed them for the first time to apply the same absolute time scale uniformly from
region to region and continent to continent. Many older archaeological schemes were overturned with
the advent of C 14 dating. Today it is possible to date sites, such as those studied by the ARPP, well
back into the late Pleistocene with reliable and accurate chronologies.

The element carbon is abundant in nature, and .'B -. ee prdao
is a basic building block of all living things.
Like many elements, carbon exists in nature in C' -~' + P* 2 xcS proon
several different isotopic forms. An isotopic 'i + I gwn ptrn
form is an element with the same number of 'c u 98i.69
protons in its nucleus (and thus similar 'c ,, 1. i%
chemical behavior) but with a different atomic s
weight, due to a different number of neutrons
in the nucleus. For example Carbon 12 9N 4+- 3 e Resu nelan
(hereafter C 12), the most abundant isotope of IC -4 V + 4 4 wws neurons
carbon, has six protons and six neutrons in its
0 rri10 $ f"
rrw.N' M^ur-i^n^' Aflli1^- r"n^ tb~riStj ^y't Kn





nucleus. Its atomic number is six, and its
atomic weight is 12. C 14 has two extra ,* ,, S ', -. -- -*- .'
neutrons. C 12 accounts for 98.89% of all
carbon on earth (including carbon dioxide in Fig. I5sctopes of Carbon. Re-inted by
permission from The Physics of Radiology
the atmosphere). Seven other isotopes make upio The h cs of
1by Harold Eford Johns and John Robert
the other 1. 11% of the global carbon budget by Ha.d E d Jo t
Cunnr8ngham. PlZ'hshed by Charles C.
(see fig. 1). The abundance and stability of C Thomas
12 make it an ideal reference point for
comparing with its unstable isotope C 14.

C 14 forms in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays strike nitrogen. When nitrogen, with atomic
number 7 and atomic weight of 14, is struck by a high energy neutron, it absorbs the neutron and emits a
proton. This transforms it to a new element of atomic number 6, which, as we know, is carbon. But this
carbon isotope has the atomic weight 14. Its two excess neutrons cause it to be very unstable, and it will
eventually experience radioactive decay, changing back to the stable element nitrogen.

As C 14 circulates through the atmosphere, mostly as carbon dioxide, and is perhaps taken into the sea
or transformed into plant tissue by photosynthesis, it behaves just the same as C 12. Over time, however,
the number of unstable parent nuclei of C 14 decreases. This decay rate, as for other radioactive
isotopes, is a constant, which can be measured in the laboratory. The rate of radiation of a given sample
steadily reduces as the number of unstable nuclei steadily declines. That makes it convenient to measure
the decay rate in terms of half-lives. The half-life of C 14 is 5,730 years. That is one of the reasons that
C 14 dating is useful in archaeology, whereas potassium or uranium isotopes with much longer half-
lives are used to date really ancient geological events that must be measured in millions or billions of
years. The number of half lives that can be measured reaches practical limits at about nine or ten, when
there is too little radioactive material left. Thus, dates derived from carbon samples can be carried back
to about 50,000 years.

In recent years physical chemists working on carbon-dating have devised a new method of measuring C
14 decay. The TAMS method combines (in tandem) a particle accelerator and a mass-spectrometer (you
can figure out the acronym from this sentence, if you wish). The spectrometer recognizes the energy and
mass characteristics of any element, in this case C 14, and then submits the selected element to a particle
accelerator where the decay particles are individually counted. This very precise method can count
radioactivity from very small samples and does not bum the samples up, as with traditional dating
methods. For example, ARPP used TAMS to date the oldest gourd seeds featured in the National
Geographic Magazine.

The decision whether to use the older (beta counting) methods or the new TAMS method depends
largely on the size and value of the sample to be tested. In general only a few milligrams of carbon are
needed for TAMS dates, as compared to several grams of pure carbon for the older methods. Another
advantage is that in a composite carbon sample, a peat bed for example the TAMS method can date one
individual particle at a time. On the other hand, TAMS dates cost two or three times as much as ordinary
dates. And that is why (near the back of this issue) ARPP has solicited your help to afford some of these





very special new carbon dates.


Despite the wonderful new world into which C 14 dating has brought us in the past 40 years, the method
must be carefully integrated into the entire field operation. The carbon date is no better than the site
stratigraphy from which it was sampled. Stratigraphy, the science of how strata accumulate in the earth's
crust, forms the foundation of field archaeology. Dr. Vance Haynes' excavations and stratigraphic
analyses of Blackwater Draw in 1983-84 and 1990-94 provide an outstanding model of good field
archaeology. His procedures illustrate the intricate and important phasing of precise excavation,
exquisite attention to sedimentary detail, and an abundance of C 14 dates cleverly placed throughout the
fabric of the site. In his classic study of geoarchaeology at the Clovis Type Site in Blackwater Draw,
New Mexico, Profess Haynes includes in his field strategy "core drilling, archaeological test
excavations, stratigraphic profiling, sedimentary analysis, and radiocarbon dating" (Haynes, 1995).

The ARPP strives to emulate Professor Haynes in our underwater excavation of Paleoindian sites. We
must continue to follow Hayne's model for phase and detail of excavation, and we must acquire dates
and more dates at every phase. We have had an interdisciplinary approach from the start. Our entire
team, from scientists to graduate and undergraduate students, managers and supervisors, advisors,
volunteers and political and financial supporters are all topnotch. Important too, is ARPP's dedication to
education at all levels. We have what it takes to make this a world-class project.

Haynes, Vance. 1995. Geoarchaeology of Paleoenvironmental Change, Clovis Type Site, Blackwater
Draw, New Mexico. Geoarchaeology, 1995 volume.


I PREVIOUS I CONTENTS NEXT I







Geography's role in archaeology


By Lance Carlson


*-a




I 1,



So many times, people come to me and ask, "What does a college student of geography do?" The first
thing I must explain is that the field of geography is much different than the world it is portrayed to be
on shows like Jeopardy. Geography is more than memorizing the capitals of every state in the union and
the names of every country on earth. Such facts require mere memorization.

Geography used to be purely descriptive, 'drawing maps and representing places with symbols and
scales. Today, geography is one of the fastest moving disciplines, which explains, analyzes, manages,
and even predicts! Yes, in some ways geographers are like fortune tellers. They read special types of
maps to predict what may happen in the future. In business today, geography is one of the hottest topics.
In dealing with demographics, land values, site locations, environmental hazards, and much more,
geography is utilized and has a proven track record. After all, business wouldn't use it if it did not
produce a level of utility greater than what it costs. What does it do for archaeology?

Anything having to do with spatially referenced data falls under the auspices of geography. We have
implemented geography at the Aucilla and didn't even know it! The ARPP has obtained aerial
photography of the Aucilla River in stereo coverage. Stereo coverage simply denotes that when viewed
under a mirrored stereoscope or used in conjunction with a zoom transferscope, the z-coordinate jumps
out at the viewer; in other words, the viewer has a three dimensional perspective of the terrain. This has
proven helpful in finding archaeological sites in other projects.

Within the ARPP I have taken these photos, which are at a very large scale (1:9600), and transcribed
them onto paper. This has allowed us to gain much better information on sites for development of site
maps since the best maps heretofore were USGS 1:24,000 series. Detail in a such a smaller scale map
(small scale shows large area) is too crude for our purposes.

The next step in geographic technology is to develop a Geographic Information System (GIS). GIS is a





computer mapping and modeling program. A good example of this is ESRI's Arc/Info program which is
currently utilized by many planning agencies around the world. Many people compare GIS with
AutoCAD, because AutoCAD allows one to draw maps. But GIS is different and more powerful in the
sense that it can be manipulated by its database, and this gives GIS it's predictive capability. Beyond
obtaining hardware, software, and technical proficiency in a GIS program, one must ask what it can
really do. The process begins with the base map produced from the aerial photographs. This base map is
taken to a digitizing board integrated with the workstation that is running the Arc/Info software and
digitized. The important information to have at this point deals with obtaining solid ground control
points in the field. The way in which good ground control points are obtained is by utilizing a
Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS). DGPS reads latitude and longitude coordinates and can
be accurate to within a foot or less. Usually a solid topographical or man-made feature is chosen that can
be referenced on the map as well as the ground. This is where the coordinates are shot.

The next step comes in the computer lab. The lat./long. coordinates are transferred to Universal
Transverse Mercator coordinates (UTM), which the Arc/Info GIS reads. This is all done on the
digitizing tablet and the workstation. Now the base map is spatially referenced with ground control
points. The actual digitizing or drawing of the map comes next. Using the digitizing puck, the outline of
the map is traced by a sequence of many tics (like dots), often over 10,000 on a single base map. The
system draws the map by utilizing these tics, nodes, and polygons.

Once digitized, this map can be blown up, reduced, and manipulated in over a thousand ways. It is much
different then drawing a map by hand and having the final product being set in stone.

I hope to create a three dimensional computer model of the Nutall Rise basin, and obtain bathymetric
data that is also spatially referenced for inclusion into a GIS. This would allow us to pinpoint
excavations in the river. Then every time a unit is set or an artifact is found, a spatially referenced
measurement will be taken using a GPS and bathymetric profiler.

The important thing to keep in mind is that whether on land or under water, spatially referenced data
falls within the discipline of geography. And it is Geography that is poised to be on the most powerful
and useful tools in the near future. Its potential applications in archeology are just beginning to be
appreciated.


I PREVIOUS I C CONTENTS NEXT I







New insights from isotopic ecology

By S. David Webb











Field excavations in the Aucilla River provide the rich records of Florida prehistory upon which the
ARPP program is predicated. Recovery of such records, however, is only the first of three stages through
which our adventurous enterprise passes. The second stage involves a variety of processes in the
museum; these include conservation of the samples, computerization of field records, cataloguing of
specimens, and other curatorial procedures. The third stage includes all the analysis and interpretations
that ultimately enrich our understanding of our prehistoric heritage. These are now beginning to unfold,
and will be most evident when the ARPP produces its first full-fledged book, now contracted with
Plenum Press, but still about two years in the future.

One of the advanced studies that is providing new insights into the prehistory of the Aucilla River region
is known as isotopic ecology. Dr. Paul L. Koch and Ms. Kathryn A. Hoppe, an advanced graduate
student, both in the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of California in Santa Cruz, have
analyzed carbon and oxygen isotopes in tooth enamel of five species in late Pleistocene levels at the
Page/Ladson Site. The oxygen isotope ratios (between atomic weight 16 O and 18 0), microsampled in
one mammoth tooth, reflect temperature fluctuations, and the lower temperatures are correlated with
slow (winter) growth enamel bands. The stable isotopes of carbon (13 C and 12 C, not 14 C which is
unstable, i.e. radioactive) generally indicate the percentage of grass vs. leaves, or, in other words,
whether an animal was a grazer, mixed-feeder, or browser. Aucilla mammoth diets, according to these
results, consisted of about 90% tropical grasses. Mastodons, on the other hand, were almost purely
browsers. In this respect the carbon isotope data confirm the direct evidence, previously reported, from
presumed mastodon digesta.

A surprising result was that horses teeth had a mixed diet, about half browse and half tropical grasses.
Although this seems surprising, the Santa Cruz team obtained similar results from horse teeth from three
other late Pleistocene sites in the Florida peninsula. Tapirs and deer were even purer browsers than the
mastodon.

In another study, just begun, late Pleistocene deer diets will be compared with those from the early





Holocene, when, according to the Aucilla River site records, deer became the dominant large mammal
and was much more extensively hunted by early humans. Our hypothesis is that deer diet will reflect a
broader spectrum of fodder, including occasional grazing, after the extinction of the rest of the
megafauna.

IPREVIOUSI CONTENTS I NEXT I







Spotlight on research diving: Aucilla River Prehistory

Project

By Joseph Latvis, Project Operations Manager


SAMCAM ACAnDEM OIf UNDERWATER 4SCW


(t SLATE
MBE*TTi K M 4fe rmW A- agaIgpr r 0a UN06iWRO CmIMW


The earliest Paleoindian explorers to enter the New World over 12,000 years ago exploited their Ice Age
environment, particularly the menagerie of exotic animals they found here in such apparent abundance.
Yet by 10,000 bp undeniable climatic changes had occurred, sea level had risen dramatically and the
terminal Pleistocene extinction had taken its irrevocable toll on the great herds.

Since its inaugural year in 1983 the Aucilla (aw-sil'-uh) River Prehistory Project (ARPP) has annually
conducted underwater research into the archaeological, paleontological and paleoenvironmental aspects
of the Pleistocene/Holocene transition in Florida. Sponsored by the Florida Museum of Natural History,
the ARPP in 1995 continued its exploration of one of the New World's richest, best preserved records of
this important era.

The venue for this research is the Aucilla River drainage basin, located in the Gulf (of Mexico) coastal
lowlands of Florida's Big Bend area, 45 miles southeast of Tallahassee. Under the direction of
University of Florida co-chief scientists Dr. S. David Webb and Dr. Jerald T. Milanich submerged
sediment banks 24 feet thick continue to yield a wealth of information in exquisite detail. The
infinitesimal incremental rates of sediment deposition (grossly averaging 1 mm per year) include items
as fragile as intact grape tendrils and gourd seeds 30,000 years old. The state of anaerobic preservation
of such botanical materials enables radiocarbon dating techniques to firmly fix the timeline.

Underwater excavation is accomplished using traditional terrestrial troweling techniques, illuminated by
a surface-powered 1,000-watt Snooper light to penetrate the tannic stained darkness at 30-foot water
depths. A hydraulic dredge is employed by the excavator to carry away sediment tailings and to control
suspended particulate. The tailings are discharged onto a screendeck barge at the surface, where they are
continuously monitored and sampled. Fossils, artifacts and botanical materials exposed on the bottom
are mapped, still-photographed and videotaped in place before removal and conservation. In situ
sampling for bulk sediment analysis and radiocarbon dating is performed at stratigraphic intervals not
exceeding 20 cm.





Diving is accomplished using surface air supply to AGA masks, backed up by completely independent
scuba rigs. Wireless communication units fitted to the AGA masks coordinate routine activities of the
dive team with surface support personnel, as well as providing an additional layer of safety to the
operation.

University of Florida's Dive Safety Officer Dr. Robert Millott placed the resources of the Diving Science
and Safety Program at the disposal of last year's ARPP operation, certifying 15 new project volunteers,
including instructors, divemasters, research divers and divers-in-training, all to AAUS standards. Dive
locker support and trained personnel from the Academic Diving Program at sister institution Florida
State University also played a significant role in last year's success.

Approval in 1995 of a substantial multiyear grant from the Florida Department of State, Division of
Historical Resources, in addition to continued funding from National Geographic Society and
unprecedented private benefactor support greatly expanded the project's ability to safely and efficiently
explore these world class sites. During the sixteen weeks of field operations conducted last year a record-
breaking 557 dives were logged, accumulating 794.6 hours of total bottom time; all without a single
dive-related accident.

Volunteers are recruited from academia and the avocational community in order to maintain a crew of
10-12 divers and 2-4 non-divers every day of our monthlong, and six-weeklong campaigns. In 1995
forty-five hardy souls came from all walks of life across the nation, donating their time and talent for
anywhere from five days to six weeks. Volunteer application forms for the 1997 field season (May 6
through June 20 and October 6 through November 1) are available via the project's annual news
magazine, The Aucilla River Times. A free subscription is available upon written request from:

Florida Museum of Natural History
Attention: Dr. S. David Webb
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611

Volunteers from institutional members of AAUS are easily integrated into the project because of the
reciprocity umbrella.


PREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







ARPP Live Presentations


Place


Tallahassee (Downtown) Rotary Club


arch 7 Gainesville, FLMNH Paleo Lunch
Bunch at Museum
March 20 Gainesville, UF Geology Class
March29 Gainesville, UF Ecolunch
May 15 Allandale, SC Big Pine Tree Excavation
July 3 IPerry, FL Kiwanis
July 23 ITallahassee FL A&M University
October 10 Gainesville, UF Geology Class
October 17 ITampa Florida Fossil Fair
Perry, FL Taylor County Board of
October 22
October 22 Commissioners
New York, NY American Museum
November 2 Society of Vertebrate Paleontology,
Symposium on Evolution of Proboscidea


November 9


November 24


1996-1997
1996--
January 31


Gaineville, UF Paleofest (Florida
Paleontological Society)
Toronto, Ontario, Canada Marine
Museum of Upper Canada Save Ontario
Shipwrecks, Toronto Chapter


1997 --
January 1 Wakulla, FL Wakulla Historical Society
January 14


February 15


February 20

March 1


Seattle, WA American Association for
Advancement of Science, Archaeology
Symposium
Tallahasee, FSU Academic Diving
Program
Tampa, FL Tampa Bay Fossil Club


Dunbar Educational

Dunbar Popular





Presenter Type of Talk Attendance

Webb Popular 300

Carter Educational 30

Webb Educational 32
Webb Educational 28
Carter Educational 40
Latvis Popular 45
Dunbar Educational 11
Webb Educational 32
Dunbar Popular 1,200

Latvis Popular 100


Webb Educational 350





March 4


Tallahassee FSU


March 6 Wakulla, FL Explorer Scouts Post 909
Gainesville, UF Archaology Week
March 9 Museum Classroom, 2 pm
Gainesville, FL Rotary Club (Heritage
March 19 Club)
Club)
Nashville, TN Soc. American
April 5 Arc
Archaeology


May 21





Carter IEducational


Arlington, VA Airlie Conference Center Webb Educational


IPREV10USI CONTENTS I I4RX I


Dunbar Archaeology
Dunbar Educational

Webb Popular







ARPP reenacts "A Naturalist in Florida"


By Joan Herrera







Members of the Aucilla River Prehistory Project crew assisted filmmakers from WUFT, Dennis Gaston
(videographer) and Dennis Ogle (Engineer Sound Man), in reenacting scenes from the life of renowned
naturalist Dr. Archie Carr. A joint project of independent producer, Letitia Langord, and WUFT, this
one hour television documentary, based on Dr. Carr's literary work "A Naturalist in Florida: A
Celebration of Eden", will air later this spring on UF's channel five. The program will also be made
available to all channels in the state of Florida and around the southeast.

On April 10th Dr. David Webb, Joe Latvis, Andy Hemming, Lance Carlson and I joined Dennis and
Dennis at Rainbow Springs for filming. Dr. Webb made his acting debut, in the role of Archie Carr, skin-
diving among waving fronds of rivergrass and discovering fossil mastodon teeth among the shoals. Joe
Latvis, our head dive master, trusty underwater videographer and holder of innumerable other esteemed
titles (many of which mean he gets to do everything the rest of us won't) handled the filming of
underwater scenes, while Dennis Gaston shot film footage from the shore. Lance and I acted as safety
divers, watching the action, and making some effort to stay out of the scenes. Daytrippers swimming at
the springs fit into the picture nicely, but our tanks and bubbles did not jive with the scene because this
reenactment was from a time, before the advent of SCUBA gear, when local skin-divers, including Dr.
Carr, used a window pane stuck in a piece of innertube as a dive mask. Dr. Webb used a "relatively"
modern dive mask stuck in innertube for the reenactment. Andy was confined to the land crew with a
cast he had to keep dry (as dry as possible) and he acted as boat tender.

After spending an extended time filming in the 720 water, Dr. Webb, clad only in swim trunks and
looking rather blue, exited to the bank and spent the rest of his time trying to warm up. The rest of us,
toasty in our wetsuits, continued down the run scouting for fossils and artifacts, and allowing Joe the
chance to record footage of the spring's plant and animal life. We saw turtles and several species of fish,
including some large spotted gars.

Archie Carr is best known in scientific circles as a sea turtle biologist. He was a Professor of Zoology at
the University of Florida and one of the main Biological Sciences Buildings on the UF campus is named
in his honor. Carr Hall is home to the Archie Carr Sea Turtle Center and is located behind the Florida
Museum of Natural History. The Center continues his work and has ongoing research projects around





the world studying sea turtle biology and conservation. Dr. Carr was also well known as a naturalist and
the author of several books. He worked in many areas around Florida and on the beaches of Costa Rica.
Filming for this special on his life of was conducted at various sites around the state, including the
Everglades, Cork Screw Swamp, Melbourne Beach, and Ichetucknee Springs. The Archie Carr National
Wildlife Refuge is located just south of Melbourne. Some of Dr. Carr's popular works are available in
local bookstores and this legacy continues his mission by introducing new generations of readers to the
wonders of natural Florida and instilling in them an increased awareness of the environment and
conservation.

Since our time at Rainbow Springs, Dennis Gaston filmed an interview for the program with Dr. Webb
at Ichetucknee Springs. Stay tuned for more information on when the special will be aired. Our filming
on the Rainbow river was an exciting day and one I am sure we will never forget, especially Lance. We
on the Aucilla Project were privileged to be invited to participate in the telling of the story of a great
Floridian who made a real and lasting contribution to the conservation of endangered animals and
natural resources both in the State of Florida and around the world.


I PRF10US I C MONTE NTS 1 R57I







Diving for fossils with Archie Carr

By Archie Carr

Excerpted from Audubon, 85, no.2 (1983). Permission to reprint courtesy of National
Audubon Society.

It was back in a time before tubing; before the Crackers started storming up the spring runs in boats with
ten-horse Johnsons; before Cousteau perfected his first scuba regulator a time so far back that the face
mask through which I saw was only a circle of window pane in a headpiece cut from an inner tube. In
those days it was enough just to ride down with the stream and look for things to see and never see a
single beer can from Ichetucknee Springs to the Santa Fe. I hung belly down in the air-clear stream and
looked at the bottom slipping by, one moment a waving yellow-green of a naiad bed or the sudden red of
water purslane, or moving soft horns of pinktipped coontail set with slim cones of spiny snails.

It is a fine sight down through new spring water. One of the sad parts of my lot is that goggling needs
more drama than pretty plants to stir my slight metabolic fires and keep off the dire sickness of the
skinny skin diver the ague we used to call the "big shakes".

There was that day, for instance, a long run with no break in the water gardens no bone-strewn riffle or
shards of Indian pottery or Suwannee chicken cooter shying at my passing with nothing there but the
man-killing cool and the sweetness of a spring run at summer noon. The zeal began chilling out of me,
and I thought how welcome a fire on the bank would be, and a chocolate bar; and the bottom began to
look like only wet plants. Then an eddy swung me over a bed of stonewort and I felt the prickle of the
little leaves, and the smell made one of the queer smell-imprints that stick hard forever; so that now, to
me, the faintest scent of stonewort or even of some sorts of onion soup brings back the sight of the big
molar tooth lying there on swept sand beyond the stonewort bed, with all its roots and cusps, and its
enamel shining as if a big man had lost it the day before. It was the tooth of a mastodon, and the heat
came back in me at the sight. I worked back along the edge of the sluicing channel, dived and grabbed
the tooth and rode the current down to slack water. Then I stood there knee-deep in more musk grass,
turning the fossil in my hands, looking back plainly to a time when real giants lived in the Suwannee
Valley land. The tooth was half the size of a football too big for the bag that held my match bottle and
chocolate bars but its being so ponderous and such sure proof of different times had warmed me, and I
dropped back into the current to ride on down, with the four pound tooth held tightly in one hand. There
was a quarter-mile of smooth travel, with now and then a Suwannee bass rolling his red eye from under
a jutting log or a sprinkling of silver minnows all nose-upstream in the channel edge, or a moss-thatched
stinkjim craning his neck to scramble from under my slipping shadow. Then suddenly I slid over another
swept shallow and in a litter of meaningless pieces of brown bone saw bulk like a shaped lump of coal
half out of the dark sand bottom. I clawed back to a point upstream from the object, dived, and rooted
out the chunk of shiny black with my one free hand. Then I kicked away downriver to feel for shallow





water and see what the new find was. When my feet found bottom, I gulped air, scratched the mask off,
and stood studying the object.

It was clearly a piece of another tooth, but it was very different from the first. It had an undivided root,
and the crown was crossed by repeated low, wavy ridges instead of high cusps. One end was broken off,
and I was barely able to summon the lore to know that this, too, was a bit of Proboscidean, a relic of
some elephantkind of another sort. It was the grinding molar of the big Columbian mammoth. I thought
the matter through, and then stood there in the suck of the current with bits of two Florida elephants in
my two hands. I was so fired up by the coincidence and the triumph that the water stayed warm as new
milk for the whole mile down to the landing.

(This scenario from several decades ago was reenacted and videotaped underwater by ARPP personnel
last spring. Some of the footage will appear in a one-hour tribute to Archie Carr's life as Florida
naturalist to be aired on Public Broadcast System television stations late in 1997.)


I PREV10 US IQONTE NTS117 I







ARPP open house activities


By Alyssa Martinelli and Tammy Montes

The highlight of every field season is the open house. We
look forward to sharing our experiences with those who may
not be acquainted with the workings of the day-to-day
operations, as well as presenting the current season's
accomplishments. Our guests come from all over --
biologists, fossil buffs, sign painters, students, members of
the Florida Congress, attorneys, former volunteers and other
archaeologists.

One of our goals is to heighten the knowledge of the general public, as well as to show our sponsors and
dignitaries the importance of supporting underwater archaeology projects like this.

Some activities of the 1996 open houses include: On-site tours given by Project Director and Co-chief
Scientist Dr. S. David Webb; complete with a live action video presentation of what the divers were
doing so all of us non-divers could view the underwater site. We were especially fortunate in having
been able to host the fall Open House at all, considering that the Aucilla River had been above flood
stage for quite some time after Tropical Storm Josephine hit us head on.

Several presentations were made to outstanding members of the
project for their significant contributions to the project's success:












J. Simpxn
Mark Midz presents recognition
award to Bu~ter Hancock

Long-standing ARPP benefactors Buster Herlong and Bubber Bailey were each presented a display of





artifact replicas created by the project's student staff.


Jack Simpson was presented with his very own 'Gator' projectile point.

Joe Latvis was presented with an inscribed copy of A Naturalist in Florida: A Celebration of Eden by
Archie Carr.

Fossils, lithics and other artifacts including a fiberglass casting of a mastodon's footprint were on
display; compliments of Dr. S. David Webb, the Florida Museum of Natural History and Jack Simpson.

Learning to throw an atl atl has become a big hit at the open
houses, especially trying to spear the giant mastodon target. Just
imagining what it was like throwing this atl atl as a giant
mastodon came closer and closer toward you was quite awesome.
Official results of the June '96 Open House competition are
posted on this page.




J. Dubar


the riv odon tho fall.

Thanks to Jim Dunbar and Andy Hemmings for the use of their atl atls.

Our most favorite part of the day was eating Bill Gifford's good 'home cooked' food (Mastodon
burgers!). We were also treated to Bill's famous bar-b-que, hot dogs, various salads and a cake
smothered in 'Gator' colors.

All in all, we could not have asked for better weather
at both the spring and fall open houses. The sunny ear
warm weather made for a nice relaxing day spent by Spear-Throw ResuIts
the river observing the wonders below. Distance:
First Pbce: Andy Hemmings 78.5m
Run er-up: Ollie COarlton 53.5m
Accu racy at 30 rreters:
First P bce: Jerry Gramig, Jr.
Runner-up: lan Tuttle


We would like to thank everyone at ARPP for the wonderful opportunity to learn about this area's first





residents. Never in ten thousand years did we think of the friendships we would form right here at the
Aucilla River Prehistory project.

I PREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







Discovering artifacts in Florida Rivers

Florida has more than 11,000 miles of rivers and streams containing many submerged archaeological
sites. The older sites, once on dry land, were drowned when the water level gradually rose after the last
Ice Age. For years, people have been finding artifacts in Florida's rivers, especially with the growing
popularity of scuba diving. Many of the state's most significant finds have been made by sport divers
and amateur archaeologists, who reported and shared their discoveries with researchers (like the Aucilla
River Prehistory Project).

Ownership of Artifacts

Ownership of archaeological sites and artifacts located on state-controlled lands, including submerged
lands, is vested in the Division of Historical Resources. Written permission to conduct research and
recover activities at state-owned sites must be obtained from the Division's Bureau of Archaeological
Research, except for the recovery of isolated finds in Florida's rivers.

What is an Isolated Find?

An isolated find is an artifact that has become displaced from its original archaeological context through
erosion or water currents. These artifacts are not considered of primary archaeological significance,
since they have become isolated from their sites of origin.

Permission to Keep Isolated Finds

Under certain conditions, divers who recover and report the location of isolated finds can obtain
ownership of their discoveries from the Division. Isolated finds permission is granted to divers to collect
exposed or disassociated artifacts from state-owned, submerged bottom lands in Florida rivers, except
those that are part of state and federal parks, preserves, management areas or reserves where cultural
resources are specifically protected.

For information on the Isolated Finds Program see "Discovering Artifacts in Florida Rivers" available
from:

ISOLATED FINDS
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
BUREAU OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH
R.A. GRAY BUILDING, ROOM 312
500 SOUTH BRONOUGH STREET
TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-0250
PHONE (904)487-2299







Wild world of the Aucilla

By William Gifford

Three days prior to the 1996 May/June field season, Gene Rowe, Jack Simpson
and I met at Nutall Rise to prepare all the equipment required to run the project.
Although this is a lot of work, it does afford one the opportunity to enjoy the
beauty of the area in relative peace and quiet. Once those dredge motors,
generators and boats start running, the serenity of the Aucilla River is gone for the
vast majority of the day.



In the late afternoon of these quiet times you can observe the spectacular displays provided by the local
wildlife. Two birds that I had searched for unsuccessfully as an avid birdwatcher for over twenty years
are the Peregrine Falcon and the Mississippi Kite. During this time of year, both birds are in transition.
The Peregrine is preparing for its journey north for its breeding season, and the Mississippi Kite is
returning from its winter vacation in Central and Southern America. The open field next to the Ladson
house affords a unique opportunity to observe both of these species as they relentlessly scoured the
treetops in search of an easy meal.

The Peregrine hunts from a considerable height above the trees. Once they zero in on a small bird they
plummet from the sky in a dazzling display at speeds up to 260 mph. The Mississippi Kite hunts in
another manner. It skims the treetops looking for unwary insects, birds, rodents and reptiles. They are
beautiful to watch in action, but make you glad to be higher up on the food chain.

As the archaeological field season came into full swing we moved out to work on the river, and were
unable to watch these terrors of the sky. But the change in habitats offered new and interesting sights.

The first site we worked was Sloth Hole on the west run of the Aucilla River. This section of the river is
a transitional area where the habitat begins to change from southern bottomland hardwoods swamp to
marsh as the river meanders along to the Gulf of Mexico.

One of my duties as a divemaster on this project brings me to work closely with Joe Latvis on the
maintenance of the gear and to guard it at night on the river. Although this requires much extra time
traveling the river to take care of all our other duties back at Nutall Rise, it does allow us some of these
quiet moments that become so rare as the season progresses.

Awakening aboard the project's 20-foot pontoon barge to the early morning stillness of Sloth Hole
brought me in contact with another elusive bird that I had pursued for many years, the Prothonotary
Warbler. Their melodic song and golden orange color brightened my every morning at this site. They





nest in tree cavities and busily pursue insects and caterpillars to feed their young. Green caterpillars
seemed to be a great favorite, and they captured them by the hundreds. While watching them one
morning, I saw a warbler go for a black one. It rapidly spit it out and used the branch it was on to wipe
the apparently vile taste from its beak. An obvious lesson, I never observed this behavior again.

In the little bay on the west side of Ward Island where
we docked the boats that we worked off of were a wide
variety of the plants that characterize this area. A fallen
Carolina Ash became a nursery for three other types of
trees that used the rotting trunk as compost to get a
foothold on life. Farther along the shoreline, as the land
became wetter, was a small group of wildflowers known
as Lizard's tail. This showy little plant has a drooping
spike covered with hundreds of tiny white flowers. In
association was a grouping of Pickereweed with a
backdrop of hundreds of Spider Lilies. Behind the boats t
was a small stand of Red Maples on the shoreline giving
way to large groups of River Cane. The shores of the
river were at one time dominated by Tupelos and Bald J. dii
Cypress, but after the heavy foresting this area has seen, ,ll Gffo~bd surveys he Auclla shorehne
there are few prime examples today. for in erei~g b acal speci2m'es.

During a foray into the interior of Ward Island, (the division of the west and the east run of the Aucilla)
Mike Nolan encountered a rare inhabitant of the swamp, a Blue Striped Ribbon Snake. Found only from
east Wakulla county to the Withlacoochee River, it was a welcome change from the Water Moccasins
that seem to dominate the swamp.

One of the phenomena encountered by everyone that dives Sloth Hole is what we have affectionately
dubbed "black snow." Once you hit the bottom, a cloud of this organic particulate rises and snows on
you for the rest of your dive. While hampering your visibility (what doesn't), it is an important
component of the detrital food chain. Eight to ten tons of leaves per acre fall here every year. A
tremendous number of organisms feed on this energy rich mass. Crustaceans, insect larvae, and worms
feed and die here and add even more food for the thousands of organisms that follow. The feces that are
released into the water are known as fine particulate organic matter. Combined with dissolved organic
matter from the leaves they are the basis of the food chain that provides life to the myriad of organisms
for this ecological system.

Traveling from the site to the main camp at Nutall Rise every afternoon we were treated to the sights of
Kingfishers and Pileated Woodpeckers going about their daily routines with little regard to our invasion
of their homes.

Two wildflowers of note were the Swamp Rose and the False Dragonhead. Both are abundant along the





shoreline and added contrast to the vibrant greens of the swamp. The Swamp Rose grows in large
clumps of thorny vines that cascade into the water with multitudes of pale pink flowers. The False
Dragonhead has spikelike racemes with pink to rose purple flowers on three foot high stalks.

Upon finishing at Sloth Hole we moved back to Nutall Rise and transferred operations to Little River. I
moved back into my tent next to the Flamingo Lounge. The lounge is a screened in room that Steve
Glover and I erected to provide an area that gave a little respite from the constant chaos of the main
cabin. With our plastic flamingos and yard sheep, it was like home and offered solace to weary
divemasters at the end of the day. Little did we know that it would provoke a relentless stream of
practical jokes inflicted upon us by a small but determined group of student terrorists.

Needless to say that when John Davidson came into the cabin as I was cooking dinner one evening to
tell me of a large insect outside, I was reluctant to go see it. I had visions of Andy Hemmings swinging
out of a tree disguised as a large biting fly to inflict a nasty bite on my neck.

Only after ascertaining the whereabouts of Andy, John and their cohort Mark Muniz did I dare venture
outside to look for the insect.

Much to my delight I found a two inch long fly with a four inch wingspan and mandibles that reminded
me of a mastodon's tusks. I immediately captured it for closer examination and identification.

With the aid of Andy's insect guide we were able to determine that we had found an Eastern Dobsonfly.

The Eastern Dobsonfly breeds along rivers and streams east of the Rocky Mountains, laying a hundred
to a thousand eggs at a time on alders, willows or other woody vegetation. After dropping into the water
as larvae, they spend two to three growing seasons feeding on the bottom of the river. They emerge as
pupal cells to live through the winter among rocks or logs and emerge as adults in the summer.

Fortunately this was a male, as the female with shorter mandibles is capable of inflicting a serious bite.

The Little River section of the Aucilla is on the Ladson property and is a purer bottomland swamp than
the lower sections. As it was later in the summer we were visited daily by Swallow Tailed Kites that nest
in the adjacent areas.

One of the most graceful of raptors, their acrobatic flying skills always leave me with a sense of awe.

Due to editorial constraints, I cannot list all the plants in this section of river that I might like, but one
bush demands a little attention. The Buttonbush, a salt resistant shrub that grows throughout the state,
has rounded flowerheads covered with numerous tiny white flowers. This bush is particularly
significant, in that a twig from one of these bushes was used to carbon date our oldest evidence of
human occupation to date.





In the fall we returned for another exciting season of excavation on the river. On the first day of setting
up on the Sloth Hole site I looked up to see a flight of over three hundred Wood Storks headed south
along the coastline.

Shortly afterwards I wished I had been going with them. The unpredictable and sometimes fickle
weather of Florida dealt us another blow in the guise of Tropical Storm Josephine. Having already been
on the periphery of two hurricanes in my short time as a member of this project, I was not prepared for
the ferocity of the inundation we received.

When we were finally able to get back in the water at Little River Rapids the conditions were severe and
only through the hard work and determination of this excellent group of people could we bring to
conclusion another successful year of excavation.

Thanks to the continuing support of the Ladson family and our Site Manager Jack Simpson we will be
allowed to return to what some may think of as an insect and snake infested swamp but I find to be one
of the most special places on this planet.


I PREV 10USI C ONTE NTS I 1q RX I







What is a hammock?


By Rhonda M. Brewer

The Aucilla River is a beautiful place to work and to learn. The river and its surrounding flora and fauna
are good for the soul; a "classroom" backdrop such as this is conducive to learning, and hard work is
never dreary, simply because of the beautiful environment.

The crew is always on the lookout for birds to watch and plants to identify. Having grown up in the city
and suburbs of Cleveland my notion of wildlife consisted of the occasional squirrel and artificial deer
lawn ornaments. I quickly became aware of my ignorance concerning nature, especially Florida wildlife,
which was a constant source of amazement to me (I was astounded by the size of the insects, not to
mention the size of the bites they left on my body).

Many lively discussions take place after dinner when the work is done; topics vary from the intellectual
to the inane (a result of hard work). One night I was thumbing through a wildlife book as talk
surrounded a bird we had seen cruising over the boats earlier that day; I came across the word
"hammock." In an effort to get a quick answer, I asked the crew what a hammock was and received two
different definitions.

In order to clarify the meaning I did a little research and this is what I found.

According to Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, the word hammock is derived from hummock,
but the exact origin is unknown. It is defined as "a fertile area in the southern U.S. and esp. Florida that
is usually higher than its surroundings and that is characterized by hardwood vegetation and deep humus-
rich soil."

Victor Shelford echoes this definition in The Ecology of North America (1963) and adds a list of
important trees typically found in hammocks which include southern magnolia, American holly, redbay,
laurel oak, American beech, and live oak. Shelford also lists a number of trees, shrubs, vines and herbs
that comprise typical understory.

In his book, A Naturalist in Florida (1994), Archie Carr, zoology professor and naturalist, states that in
Florida a hammock refers to any hardwood forest, although the definition varies slightly depending on
geographical area. In coastal Georgia the term refers to "a little island in the salt marsh, usually with red
cedar, small live oaks, and saltbush growing on it" (Carr 1994:171).

In the Everglades a hammock refers to "isolated patches of small broadleaf trees, many of them West
Indian species, in the sawgrass or maidencane marsh or limestone pinelands" (Carr 1994:171).





In the remaining area of the south where the term applies, a hammock is "any predominantly evergreen
woods that is composed of nonconiferous trees" (Carr 1994:171). Because coniferous woods such as
pinelands and cypress swamps are so prevalent in the south, the term hammock is useful for
distinguishing between these forests and the hardwoods; however, the term is less useful nowadays
because so many of the hammocks are gone. Hammock soil is some of the most fertile in Florida; as a
consequence, most were cut down long ago so that fan-farmers could use the rich soil, and trees could be
used for lumber.

Hammocks are not extensive, and typically occur in narrow bands only a few hundred meters wide. The
hammocks found in northern Florida contain "the largest numbers of species of trees and shrubs per unit
area in the continental United States" (Platt and Schwartz 1990:194).

According to the article by Platt and Schwartz in Ecosystems of Florida (1990), although hammocks are
typically designated as xeric, mesic, or hydric (which refers to low, medium, and high soil moisture
respectively) these forests are more frequently defined by their location and vegetation than by moisture
zone. Platt and Schwartz thus describe hammocks by their location along the topographic gradient: high
xericc), midslope mesicc) and low hydricc). All three have typical overstory and understory associated
with them.

Thomas Barbour, naturalist at large, describes hammocks this way, "I love hammocks ... in the early
spring, when the yellow jasmine festoons the forest trees and when the redbud and giant dogwoods and
the maples are putting forth their vivid crimson foliage, I do not know of lovelier spots to sit listening to
birds and resting in the heat of the day" (Barbour 1944:165).

I anticipate my return to the Aucilla River where I may once again enjoy the natural splendors that
pristine Florida has to offer.


I PREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







Water moccasins and the ARPP


By Mary Hudson

Early one afternoon during the May/June season, Bruce Allbritton and John Davidson were excavating
down in the bottom of the railtrack, about 18-20 feet down, at the Sloth Hole Site. The weather was fair,
and underwater visibility was about one meter, pretty good for Sloth Hole. Bruce was using the trowel
and the dredge hose on the pit wall, while John held the light. After noticing that Bruce was waving the
trowel, John moved in for a closer look, just in time to see a snake wrapped around Bruce's forearm! No
sooner did this scary sight register, when the snake disappeared instantly up the dredge hose! Both
divers, wide-eyed and shaken, made a rapid, yet controlled ascent to the surface, to see what had
happened. Their first image upon surfacing was an empty, rocking screendeck ... and a lot of
commotion! Apparently, the screendeck crew wasted no time in abandoning ship, and jumped onto the
screendeck anchored alongside.

The snake had jettisoned from the dredge hose onto the screen, then bounced into the water, where it
swam under the screendeck, across the water in front of the still shaken divers, and onto the bank, very
close to the anchored pontoon boats, where it stayed. This snake was no weenie; even though it was
probably as scared as everyone else, it still stayed its ground.

The snake, incidentally, was a cottonmouth water moccasin. Its scientific name is Agkistrodon
piscivorous conanti. Known to be an aggressive snake, it is found throughout Florida, with a range
extending north to Virginia and west to Illinois, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas. Its habitat
encompasses wetlands and waterways, such as streams, springs, rivers, lakes, ponds, marshes, swamps,
sloughs, reservoirs, retention pools, canals, and even roadside ditches. Occasionally it can be found
rather far from the water, and has been found in trees and bushes. Cottonmouths feed primarily on fish,
frogs, mice, rats, and other small mammals.

Often, cottonmouths are confused with water snakes, non-poisonous snakes who share the same habitats.
These harmless water snakes are often killed out of fear and ignorance. Actually, cottonmouths are also
often killed for the same reasons. Except for self defense or positive identification in the case of
snakebite, it is best to leave all snakes alone. Snakes help keep the environment in balance. For instance,





a shortage of snakes means an increase in the mice and rat population, which brings on epidemics of
disease often fatal for humans. Also, picking up or attempting to kill a snake can be one sure way of
being bitten.

The cottonmouth moccasin, when threatened, coils and opens its mouth wide, displaying its fangs and
exposing the white interior of its mouth and throat, thus the name cottonmouth. The adults are dark
colored, almost black, and are heavy-bodied. They range in size from 20-48 inches, with a record of 74.5
inches (over 6 feet.) Juveniles are brightly colored with reddish brown crossbands which contain many
dark spots and speckles, and have a sulfur colored tail, which is held erect and wiggled like a caterpillar
to attract prey within striking range. The pattern darkens with age, so adults retain only a hint of the
banding or are uniformly black. Both adults and juveniles have a broad, dark facial stripe which
camouflages the eye. The juvenile cottonmouth is often confused with copperheads because of their
similar appearance. However, copperheads do not have the distinctive dark band over the eye, and the
crossbands of the copperhead contain no spots and speckles. Further, the range of the copperhead in
Florida is primarily in the panhandle, mostly along the Apalachicola River and its tributaries and in the
western tip of the panhandle.

Cottonmouths are members of the pit viper family, which also includes Copperheads and Rattlesnakes.
Pit vipers have several characteristics which distinguish them from non-poisonous snakes:

1. Half-inch hollow fangs which contain complex, poisonous venom.
2. There is a deep facial pit between the nostril and the eye.
3. The head is thick, triangular, and distinctly broader than the neck.
4. When viewed from above, the eye cannot be seen.
5. The top of the head in front of the eyes is covered with large platelike scales.
6. The pupil is elliptical instead of round.
7. Single, non-divided belly scales from the head to the tip of the tail.
8. Short, stubby tail instead of long and whiplike (Only Rattlesnakes have rattles).

In the past, snakes were rarely encountered by members of the ARPP. The 1996 May/June season,
however, contained several incidents of water moccasin contact with ARPP members during routine
endeavors. The notion that the noise of the motorized equipment and the presence of so many people
would keep snakes away has been abandoned in a reality check, especially concerning the brazen and
bold water moccasin described above. The very real possibility arises that someone may be bitten. In
light of this realization, it is prudent to consider the implications of such a scenario. Education about pit
vipers, what happens to a person who has been bitten, and emergency medical procedures in the field
must be addressed for everyone's safety. The following information is contained in Protocol For
Emergency Room Procedures And Hospital Management of Snakebites, written by Maynard
"Snakeman" Cox, herpetologist and world-recognized poisonous bite expert.

Statistically, about 48,000 people a year bitten in the United States. Of these, about 8,000 are from
poisonous snakes and an average of 10 people a year die because they are cared for improperly.





Worldwide, about 40% of the time people are bitten by poisonous snakes no venom passes and 85% of
the time only enough venom passes to make the victim sick. 15% require critical care in the acute phase
of the poisoning Proper medical management is still not well understood by many people.

In the Florida series, about 10 people per year were bitten by a cottonmouth while reaching over the side
of a boat to pull up a string of fish. Cottonmouths inflict most of their bite under the water, on top of the
water, or near the water.

The height of snake season is between April and October, peaking between July and August. Snakes are
generally less active at temperatures less than 50-60 degrees, or greater than 80 degrees. 70-77% of all
bites occur between 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM, peaking between 3:00 PM and 6:00 PM. Anatomically 60%
of all bites occur to the lower extremity 38% to the upper extremity, and 2% to unidentified sites.

The cardinal signs and symptoms of pit viper envenomation include: burning pain (the commonest,
earliest sign), puncture wound (50% of the time accompanied by a bloody ooze), swelling, skin
discoloration, nausea and vomiting, minty, metallic, rubbery taste in the mouth, sweating, chills,
numbness and tingling of the mouth, face, scalp, and wound site, ecchymosis and production of blebs
and blisters, erythema and edema progressing from the wound site, weakness, vertigo, haematemesis
epistaxis, muscle fasiculations, paralysis, shock, convulsions, loss of sphincter control, melena
haematuria, and renal shutdown. Envenomation may include some or all of these symptoms, depending
on the severity of envenomation.

Death can occur up to several days following the bite, or in as little as two hours. In pit viper
envenomation the average death occurs in two days. If the bite is inflicted in an artery, vein, lymphatics,
or a nerve, death will occur in 30 seconds to 10 minutes. If the victim does not die within the first 10 to
30 minutes, you have excess of 12 hours to get to proper medical help; in most cases, severe
complications or death will not occur if proper medical protocol is followed.

Maynard recommends the following:


A. Do not apply a tourniquet!
B. Do not cut and suck !
C. Do not apply ice !


1. Treat for shock.
2. Wash the wound with soap and water.
3. Call 911 or transport to the nearest medical facility.
4. Call Maynard at (904) 272-6398

Snakebites from poisonous snakes are extremely dangerous. Following proper emergency medical





procedure in the field and prompt transport to proper medical care in a medical facility is essential.
Avoiding being bitten in the first place by leaving snakes alone is good common sense. In the event that
contact with a poisonous snake is unavoidable, as in Bruce's case, non-aggressive action is best. Bruce
did not strike or aggravate the cottonmouth that was wrapped around his forearm, and luckily, the snake
went up the dredge. Luckier still, the snake bounced off the screen into the water and no one topside was
hurt. Additionally, although both Bruce and John were frightened by the snake, they did not bolt up to
the surface. Being good divers, they kept their wits about them and tried to ascend in a controlled
manner. Adding the complication of being bent to a possible snakebite would not bode well.

Hopefully, there will be no incidents of snakebites at the ARPP. Respect for our fellow snakes and using
caution when around them will aid in avoiding such misfortune.

In the event a snakebite does occur, we know what to do, and more importantly, what not to do! Let's
Dive!


I PREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







In memorial: Wilmer Wilson Bassett, Jr. 1915-1996

The Aucilla River Prehistory Project will deeply miss its wonderful friend and supporter, Wilmer W.
Bassett, Jr., who passed away at the age of 81 on December 6, 1996. Born in Monticello and educated at
the University of Florida, Wilmer was a leader in Florida Agriculture. He received many honors
including the Bronze Star for his service as lieutenant colonel in artillery in World War II, induction into
the Florida Dairy Hall of Fame, and the Distinguished Alumnus Award from the University of Florida.

With regard to the Aucilla River Prehistory Project, Wilmer provided the river cabin and other valuable
funding. That cabin made all the difference in the project's effectiveness, for it allowed us not only to
produce better meals but also to hold substantial educational activities in the evenings.


Much to our delight, Wilmer
himself played an active role
in many ARPP activities. As
an educator who had spent
his life observing Florida
natural history, Wilmer took
an intense interest in the
project's scientific endeavors
and also showed genuine
concern for the progress of its
students. On his weekly trip
through north Florida, he
almost always spent an
evening or two with our
group, and this was always a
big morale booster. It was
also literally a "treat,"
because he insisted on
providing three freshly baked
pies. Aucilla River
J. Hunt participants will long
remember his "Dooby" pies,
which uniquely provided
enough calories to carry on


Longtime ARPP ethusiast .Wlmer Bassett
with Page/Ladson mastodon tuask 1993
the next day's dive.


Wilmer also led project members to garner support in legislative offices, and introduced them to civic
organizations in Monticello, Gainesville and Tallahassee.





The ARPP and its readership wish to convey our love and support to his wife, Melda, his son, "Bill," his
daughters Lucy, Mary and Carolyn, and to their families.

An outstanding naturalist, educator and businessman, Wilmer Bassett provided outstanding leadership to
the ARPP, which we will never forget.

PREVIOUS Q CONTENTS NEXT I







The Class of '96


By Mary Hudson and Dawn Pinder

We are always amazed by the wide variety of volunteers who show up at the Aucilla each year. A diverse
group of individuals is always there to lend their expertise, personalities and enthu\iahm to the project.
The "Class of'96" is no exception. Here is a glimpse of this multi-talented group of individuals.

BRUCE ALLBRITTON.

II u l1.. In1T iPREJ RIs'g PRwiJ}:(- TIM BARBER, 50, a retired race
ryo d oBaunuotstr car technician, now works as a
I .-i c- divemaster and underwater
taae n W "l a photographer in Tampa. He has
Song been an avocational
paleontologist. Tim says "for me,
the project is an opportunity to
learn from a great group of folks."

JODY BARKER, of Orlando
works as a welder. Jody sees the
J. smiSrm Aucilla Project as "a great chance
to enhance the cooperative spirit
gi of th meany evgr-changinggfigd c rms fom 1996. Ntandingffro2 left. between the professional and
ana s Clen, Brook org, Brus Allb'ritton, Lance Carlsoprofessional andd
Thulmwn, Andy Irmmings, MelvIn uggs. Knodng. back row: .oe Lats, amateur.
Mary G uchnour ihdson, rian o ds, yayal Farr, Ed G_ en, Phil
DLCiGrolao, kneelingfront row: Jo Ann ~ gg am ~nder, Mark Muni VINCENT BIRDSONG, 27, of
John DL idson and Ln Munrog. Tallahassee is currently working
toward a Master's Degree in anthropology at Florida State University. He has worked on a number of
archaeological projects ranging from archaic through late 19th century in the Mid Atlantic Region.
Vincent sees the Aucilla Project as "truly unique."

RHONDA BREWER, 30, of Jacksonville is a first semester graduate student in archaeology/
anthropology at Florida State University. In addition to this project she has also been involved in work at
Fort Jefferson, Dry Tortugas.

LANCE CARLSON, 21, of Gainesville is a fulltime student at the University of Florida. In May, he
will graduate summa cum laude (highest honors) in both anthropology and geography. He has been
involved with other projects including the Cornell University underwater archaeology field school in
Portsmouth, Maine. Lance served as Underwater Technology Specialist to the ARPP for the '96 season.






BRINNEN CARTER, 29, from Deland, holds a B.A. degree from Bowdin College, an M.A. degree
from Texas A&M and is pursuing a Ph.D. from the University of Florida. He has been with the project
since 1988.

DIANA DAVIS COLEMAN, 34, is an environmental attorney with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection in Tallahassee. Diana is an avid diver and amateur paleontologist. She says
"participating on this project was quite an adventure. I enjoyed the camaraderie and willingness of the
crew to answer questions."

BOB COUGHTER, 22, ofGainesville earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in Anthropology from the
University of Florida. He has also been involved in a project in Panama and a survey in southwest
Florida. Bob states "the project (ARPP) continues to prove its importance as a source for gaining insight
into the lifeways of the 'earliest Floridians.'"

JOHN DAVIDSON, 32, of Melbourne, has a B.A. in Anthropology from the University of Florida. He
says "I've volunteered to do lab work several times at the Florida Museum of Natural History, but this is
my first chance to actually do field work "

JASON DEES, 17, of Orlando is currently a high school sophomore. He has spent a great deal of time
visiting museums and hunting for fossils. Jason "had a great time and can't wait to get back" to the
ARPP field season.

PHILIP DIGIROLAMO, 27, currently a resident of Gainesville, received a Bachelor of Science
Degree in Geology from the University of Massachusetts, and is now working toward a Master's Degree
in Vertebrate Paleontology at University of Florida. He is excited to apply himself in the great tradition
of volunteer/scientific research on the Aucilla River Prehistory Project.

PETER FRANK EDWARDS, 28, of Tallahassee has a B.A. in Anthropology from the College of
Charleston and is completing an M.A. in anthropology from Florida State University. He has also spent
time as a volunteer at Dill Plantation and the Nathaniel Russell House site in Charleston, South Carolina
and on an unidentified wreck at Dry Tortugas.

GRAYAL FARR, 53 of Winter Haven, retired from the Army after 26 years of service. He holds a B.A.
in history from Florida State University and has completed his first year of graduate school, majoring in
archaeology at FSU. Grayal says he "never wanted to be anything but a soldier or an archaeologist."

BROOK GEORGE, 24, of St. Petersburg, FL, holds a B.A. in Religious Studies and is currently
working on a Master's Degree in the same field of study. He worked two field seasons at the excavation
at Sepphoris, Israel. Brook is currently writing a book on the development of religion from a socio-
behavioral standpoint, which is proving quite controversial.





WILLIAM GIFFORD, 47, of DeLeon Springs is a dive instructor. He has participated on over 25
natural science projects.

STEVE GLOVER, 48, has a B.A. degree in English. He is retired from an advertising and graphic arts
career. After spending time on the project Steve comments "I now have a notion of the magnitude of the
work we have to do."

EDWARD GREEN. See VOLUNTEER SPOTLIGHT, page 26.

ANDY HEMMINGS holds a B.A. in Anthropology from the Univeristy of Arizona in Tucson and is
currently working on his Master's Thesis featuring the archaeology and paleontology of Sloth Hole. He
has been involved in a number of projects in the western United States and Florida.

JOAN HERRERA holds a B.S. Degree in Animal Science, a M.Ed. in Secondary Science Education
and Curriculum, and is currently completing a Ph.D. in Zoology at the University of Florida. She has
served as Divemaster for several University projects.

STAN HORD, 36, of Barberville, FL, is a broker and grower of decorative foliage. He has been
involved in several Florida projects including the DeLeon Springs survey and the Markham Florida
Riverboat survey. While in junior high school Stan did work for the West Texas University
Paleontology Department.

MARY GOUCHNOUR HUDSON, 37, is a Radiation Therapist in Gainesville. She is currently
enrolled at Santa Fe Community College as an Anthropology major and plans to continue studies at the
University of Florida. Mary says an opportunity to be a part of this project is "a privilege and a
blessing." As a newlywed, Mary is currently diving into new territory.

TOM KELLEY, 46, of Miami, currently lives in Tallahassee where he is a residential contractor. When
not pursuing his interest in archaeology, Tom loves to fish.

ALYSSA MARTINELLI, 25, is an undergraduate in anthropology at Florida State University. The
ARPP is her first field experience. She is "very proud to be associated with this project and learned a lot
during my time here."

BILLY MAY, 69, works as a dentist in Richmond, VA. He has been involved with many projects all
over the world including the Dry Tortugas, Bermuda, Ethiopia, Kenya, Belize, Turks and Caicos. Of this
project he says it's the "greatest experience of my life."

LINDA MCCANDLESS, 44, works for USDA Agricultural Research Service Center for Medical/
Veterinary Entomology as a research technician for stored grain pests. Recently she participated in
Paleofest at the Museum of Natural History. She says she "is very glad to be part of the circus."






CHUCK MEIDE, 25, is working on his Master's Degree in Anthropology at Florida State University.
He is studying underwater archaeology and teaches several underwater field research classes at FSU.
Chuck has worked on dozens of underwater sites including shipwrecks in the Dry Tortugas, Mobile Bay,
Alabama, and Texas.

MATTHEW MIHLBACHLER, 24, of Sigel, IL, has a B.A. degree in Anthropology and is currently
working toward a Master's degree in Zoology at the University of Florida. He has been involved with
various projects in Illinois and Maboko Island in Kenya. Matt sees the ARPP project as "an opportunity
for students to leap ahead of their peers in research ability."

KIMBERLY MONK, 21, of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, currently works as a scuba instructor. She plans
to pursue a degree in Anthropology. Kimberly feels that ARPP "has to be the greatest project experience
that an aspiring nautical archaeologist could ever be a part of."

TAMMY MONTES.

MARK MUNIZ, 23, of Gainesville, is currently enrolled in graduate studies at University of Florida,
seeking a Master's Degree in Archaeology. During the '96 season Mark headed research on Little River.
He believes work done on the Aucilla River will have a major impact on current knowledge of
Paleoindians in the Western Hemisphere.

DON MUNROE, 46, holds a degree in Nuclear Engineering and works at the University of Florida as a
radiation safety officer. This is Don's third year working on the project.

MICHAEL NOLAN, 34, of Pierson, FL is a broker and grower of decorative foliage. He has also
volunteered with the DeLeon Springs Survey. In the fall of '96 Mike became the proud father of a
beautiful baby boy.

THADRA PALMER, 21, is a full-time student at Florida State University working towards a B.A. in
Anthropology. She has been involved in a variety of other projects while at FSU including Little Salt
Springs and Marathon wrecks. Thadra is excited about the ARPP project and "can't wait 'til next
season."

TANYA PERES, 23, is a graduate student in Anthropology at Florida State University. She is currently
analyzing faunal material from the Page/Ladson site for her thesis. Tanya is an Archaeological
Technician with the National Park Service, Southern Archaeological Center.

DAWN PINDER, 39, is President of Innovation Consultation, Inc., a Jacksonville consulting firm. She
holds a Master's Degree in Social Work from Florida State University. This is her second year with the
project where she lends her talents to managing the field office when not working the screendeck.





EUGENE ROWE, 67, a retired veterinarian from Richmond, VA., has been on close to 50 scientific
projects worldwide, most with Earthwatch of Watertown, MA. The ARPP is one of his favorites because
of the "good science and methods." Gene thinks "we are near some important revelations."

BRAD STACKPOOLE.

JO ANN SUGGS, of Brandon, FL, is a full-time housewife who raises turkeys and is "big on flowers."
She and her husband Melvin have a second home on the Aucilla where they plan to retire. Jo Ann
showed quick reflexes during the summer field session when she dodged a snake that came up through
the dredge and onto the screen.

MELVIN SUGGS, of Brandon, FL, works as a technician (mechanic) with Reynolds Metal Company.
He loves to fish and turkey hunt, and raises turkeys to gain insight into their behavior in the wild. Melvin
and his wife Jo Ann plan to retire to the Aucilla River. Melvin says while at the ARPP, he "didn't meet
anybody he didn't like."

DAVID THULMAN, 41, is an environmental attorney with the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection in Tallahassee. He has always been interested in paleontology and prehistoric archaeology,
and this project is a perfect mix of both. "The people are terrific and the science is great, and except for
the bugs, the setting is beautiful." He hopes to participate for years to come.

SUSAN TUTTLE, 52, holds a B.A. in Anthropology from the University of Florida and a Master's
Degree in Special Education from FSU. This is her first experience in the field, and she says "it is
wonderful to be there." In her spare time Susan enjoys sailing, painting and flying.

BINION WILLIAMS, 54, of Jacksonville is a Production Controller at Jacksonville Naval Air Station.
He holds a B.S. in Business Administration. Bin likes to spend his free time outdoors hunting, boating,
fishing and camping. The ARPP gives him one more excuse to pitch his tent.

FRANK WILLSON, 69, of Lake County, FL, has a B.S. in chemical engineering and is retired from the
petrochemical industry. This is the second year on the project for Frank and his wife Lois. Frank has
also volunteered for the DeLeon Springs Project.

LOIS WILLSON, 65, is a retired legal secretary. Lois is always welcome on the project because of her
incredible cooking skills. The crew never goes hungry when Lois is on "kitchen duty."

BRIAN WOODS, 29, of Northern Ireland now lives in Minneapolis, MN, where he works in the
banking industry. He holds a B.A. in history from the University of Minnesota and an M.B.A. from the
University of St.Thomas in Minneapolis.


I PREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







Volunteer spotlight on Edward M. Green

By Dawn Pinder

If you work the screen on the Aucilla River Prehistory Project, the first person you
meet (and most knowledgeable and helpful teacher on the project) is Ed Green. His
vast years of experience have lead to the development of screendeck observational
techniques that provide valuable insights into sediment characterizations as reported
by diving excavators. Ed shares his knowledge with each new screendeck volunteer.


Ed has been a loyal and steady volunteer to the ARPP since 1989, when he volunteered to assist with
land surveys. He recalls finding three projectile points while digging his first test pit on the site.

Edward M. Green is a longtime serious avocational
archaeological researcher. He first became interested in
archaeology in the 1930's, when as a child he began hunting for
arrowheads in Michigan. About 1960 that interest was renewed
when he was invited to join an archaeology club where he met
with Detroit students, college professors and collectors. He spent
weekends with friends surface collecting, always keeping careful
records.









design and build.
Edward Al Ceen works tRe



Ed helped organize numerous Paleo workshops for the River Raisin chapter of the Michigan
Archaeological Society, flying in experts like Dennis Stanford and Vance Haynes.

In 1970 Ed became President of the Michigan Archaeological Society. He also served a number of years
on the MAS Editorial Board. Before retiring to Florida, he was active in two society chapters and also
served a term as President of the Aboriginal Research Club of Detroit. He has traveled to meetings and
conventions all over the country.





Ed also has an interest in Mayan culture and has traveled to the Yucatan. He is most fascinated with the
Mayan language. Mayans were the only culture of their time to have a phonetic written language. He
continues to keep up on the latest literature and says the Mayan language is "a big mystery that is now
being solved."

Ed is a graduate of Michigan State University with a B.A. in History. He also served in the U.S. Army's
Counterintelligence Corps during the Korean conflict.

Ed is retired from Ford Motor Company and now lives in Springhill, Florida. He has been married to his
wife, Lynn, for the past 41 years. They raised three children, two girls and a boy, and now have two
grandchildren.

When not working on the ARPP, he officiates as president of the Hunters Lake Association, which he
has done for the past five years. Ed also enjoys looking for great finds at flea markets and reading. He
has a vast library of hard to find articles and books on archaeology and anthropology, particularly
Paleoindian and Mayan studies. Ed keeps up to date on the latest literature and is always searching for
new information.

Ed is famous for his delicate indian beadwork, one of the many passions that occupy his time. Each
piece he creates takes several weeks, months, or sometimes years to complete and they are true
masterpieces. Ed is an invaluable member of the Aucilla River Prehistory Project team. He spends
months during the off season repairing and rebuilding the dredge screens and doing maintenance on
equipment. To the screen crew, Ed is more than a valuable volunteer, he is our hero.


I PREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







Off-season ARPP field activities


By John Davidson

Those of you familiar with the Aucilla River Prehistory Project are aware of the
hard work put forth by dozens of staff and volunteers during our two major field
seasons every spring and fall. What many people do not realize is that the success
of a field season can be attributed to the advance work done by many dedicated
individuals in the off season.




When the field season ends it is time to repair, maintain and modify the equipment in preparation for the
next field season.

One off season project that made life a lot easier for the ARPP was the addition of a bay to the pole barn
at Nutall Rise. The new bay was built in December 1995 by Ed Green, Jack Simpson, Joe Latvis and
Bruce Allbritton. The bay provides ample space for the ARPP to store most of its equipment at Nutall
Rise instead of hauling it across the state every season.

Another important activity accomplished in the off season is the preliminary surveying of potential sites.
In March 1996, Andy Hemmings, Mark Muniz, Lance Carlson, David Webb, Bill Gifford, Joe Latvis
and Jack Simpson braved the frigid waters of the Aucilla and Wacissa rivers. The purpose of this
excursion was to collect Carbon-14 samples from the Sloth Hole site and to get a general assessment of
the sites on Little River. The band of hardy adventurers also took a trip down the Wacissa river in search
of possible sites.

Special thanks must go to Jody Barker and Jason Dees for the excellent work they did on the project's 20-
foot pontoon barge during the summer hiatus. For those who remember it, one of the pontoons was
flooded, and two air-filled plastic 55-gallon drums were needed to keep the vessel afloat during the
spring '96 field season. Thanks to Alpha Welding's handiwork, the "Aucilla Queen" was river worthy for
the October '96 season. Jody and Jason also refurbished the trailer and brought it back to better than new
condition.

The most important activity that occurs during the off season is the maintenance, repair and modification
of equipment essential to project operations. Much of this work has fallen on Gene Rowe and Ed Green.
Gene has put a great deal of time and effort into the servicing of the many gas engines that are used by
the ARPP. Likewise,. Ed has spent countless hours repairing other equipment such as snooper lights and
screen decks. He has also modified and fabricated several pieces of equipment to aid in the project's





underwater activities. Ed and Gene deserve a big thank you and a pat on the back, because without their
assistance the ARPP's operations would be severely hindered.

And last but not least special thanks should be given to Dawn Pinder, Bin Williams, Tim Barber, Bill
Gifford, Joe Latvis and Jack Simpson. This small skeleton crew remained at Nutall Rise during and after
Tropical Storm Josephine. They went back to Sloth Hole the day after the storm and collected the
pontoon boats and equipment that was left behind, and transported it all back to Nutall Rise. During the
two week delay cause by the storm, this crew was able to service and repair the gas engines, fix an oil
leak on the jeep, repair the rear deck on Ed's boat and paint one of the little green boats. Then everything
was packed and stored away.

So, just because the field season is over doesn't mean the work is done. There is plenty to do to get ready
for the next field season. With the continued assistance of many dedicated and talented individuals,
future field seasons will be successful.


I PRF- 10 US I C ONTINTS 1







World of experience

By Thadra Palmer

The following list of research projects participated in
during 1996 by ARPP crew members illustrates the
wealth of experience that this outstanding group of
people brings from beyond the Aucilla:


ARPP MEMBER SITE/SPONSOR LOCATION
Chip Birdsong IFSU Shipwreck Loggerhead Key, FL

Chip Birdsong Little Salt Springs Florida

Chip Birdsong National Park Service Great Smokey Mtns
Chip Birdsong Marathon Keys Florida
IRhonda Brewer IO'Connell Site Tallahassee, FL
IRhonda Brewer FSU Shipwreck Loggerhead Key, FL

Rhonda Brewer Little Salt Springs Florida

Brinnen Carter Big Pine Tree Allandale County, SC

Brinnen Carter Santa Elena South Carolina

IBrinnen Carter Bureau of Arch. Research Bay County, FL
Diana Davis
Diana i Bureau of Arch. Research Bay County, FL
Coleman
Peter Frank
Peter Frank O'Connell Site Tallahassee, FL
Edwards
Peter Frank
Peter Frank FSU Shipwreck Loggerhead Key, FL
Edwards


Peter Frank
Edwards


Little Salt Springs Florida


DESCRIPTION
Shipwreck
Submerged Archaeological
Site
Archaeological Site
Shipwreck Survey
Spanish Mission
Shipwreck
Submerged Archaeological
Site
11,000-6,000BP
Archaeological Site
First Spanish Capital of La
Florida
Shipwreck Survey

Shipwreck Survey

Spanish Mission

Shipwreck

Submerged Archaeological
Site





Grayal Farr
Grayal Farr


!O'Connell Site
F SU Shipwreck


Tallahassee, FL
Loggerhead Key, FL


Grayal Farr Little Salt Springs Florida

Michael Faught Fannin Springs Survey Levy County, FL
IMichael Faught Bureau of Arch. Research Bay County, FL
Michael Faught La Mula & Lake Alajuela Panama

IBill Gifford Blackwater Draw Clovis, NM
IBill Gifford Fannin Springs Survey Levy County, FL
Steve Glover lBlackwater Draw Clovis, NM
IAndy Hemmings lBlackwater Draw Clovis, NM
SAndy Hemmings Fannin Springs Survey Levy County, FL
Joan Herrera Research Cruises Offshore Florida

S USF & Fla. Inst. Offshore Tarpon Spgs,
Joan HerreraOceanography
Oceanography FL


Joe Latvis
Joe Latvis
Joe Latvis
Alyssa Martinelli
Billy May
Billy May
Chuck Meide

Chuck Meide


IChuck Meide
]Kimberly Monk
Tammy Montes
]Mark Muniz
Mark Muniz
]Mark Muniz
Thadra Palmer


Blackwater Draw
Fannin Springs Survey
Bureau of Arch. Research
O'Connell Site
Packfic Whale Fdn.
NC State University
FSU Shipwreck

Little Salt Springs


ILa Salle's La Belle
Point Pelee Nat'l Park
O'Connell Site
lBlackwater Draw
Fannin Springs Survey
IBureau of Arch. Research
FSU Shipwreck


Clovis, NM
Levy County, FL
Bay County, FL
Tallahassee, FL
Maui, HI
Bahamas
Loggerhead Key, FL

Florida


Matagorda, TX
Leamington, Ontario
Tallahassee, FL
Clovis, NM
Levy County, FL
Bay County, FL
Loggerhead Key, FL


Spanish Mission
Shipwreck
Submerged Archaeological
Site
Spring/Run Survey
Shipwreck Survey
Paleoindian Site Visits/Tool
Study
Clovis Type Site
Spring/Run Survey
Clovis Type Site
Clovis Type Site
Spring/Run Survey
Marine Eco./Bio./
Oceanography
Seagrass Beds &
Echinoderms
Clovis Type Site
Spring/Run Survey
Shipwreck Survey
Spanlish Mission
Reef Survey
Nassau Grouper Study
Shipwreck
Submerged Archaeological
Site
Shipwreck
Shipwreck Surveys
Spanish Mission
Clovis Type Site
Spring/Run Survey
Shipwreck Survey
Shipwreck





Submerged Archaeological
Florida Site
Site
Florida Shipwreck Survey
Cane River Nat. Hist. agnola
PakMagnolia Plantation
Park
Tallahassee, FL Spanish Mission
a Faunal Analysis (Bolen
Tallahassee, FL Level)
Level)
Yellowstone Nat'l Park Wolf Health/Census
Rookery Bay, FL Invasive Tropical Plants
Deer Overpopulation
Shenadoah Valley, VA Reser
Research


ugene Rowe


Virginia Blue Crab Health
Shipwreck Survey


IPREV10USI CONTENTS I N EXT


IEugene Rowe IEarthwatch IEastern Shore of VA
IDavid Thulman Bureau of Arch. Research Bay County, FL







A Canadian volunteer's ARPP experience

By Kimberly Monk









So, how is it that a Canuck ended up on the ARPP? Well, I believe the bottom line came down to
determination... and a very good, long distance phone plan! I must have talked with ten different
organizations throughout the Southern USA before I reached Dr. David Webb at the Florida Museum of
Natural History in Gainesville. I explained that I was interested in a career of Nautical Archeology, and I
wished to gain some field experience in underwater excavation. I hesitated to mention that I was only an
undergraduate entering first year anthropology with absolutely no training in archaeology whatsoever.
Dr. Webb described a project which he was involved with, located in North Florida on the Aucilla River.
He went on to explain that I would be able to receive underwater archaeology experience, without any
previous formal training. My determination had paid off, and I had finally found field work. And better
yet, I wouldn't have to mortgage the house in order to take part!

At this point in time, Canada unfortunately doesn't offer many opportunities to learn skills in underwater
archaeology. Sure we have great shipwrecks, which are incredibly preserved due to the cold, freshwater
lakes. However, shipwrecks are a time capsule, of some documentation. I believe the true detective work
remains in such prehistoric sites as the Aucilla.

It's not every day that you stumble across mastodon bones, prehistoric fishhooks and fossilized alligator
dung, or so I thought. Such was not the case on the Aucilla. For every day was a new adventure and a
new find, as artifacts were constantly being found and studied. It was a wonderful experience to rotate
assignments between the screendeck, divemaster and diving positions because you were able to see the
project from a variety of different standpoints. Thanks to such a professional and knowledgeable crew, I
learned more from my "Aucilla River Teachers" than from any history course which I had taken.

I returned to Toronto later that month with a wealth of stories and information to tell my Canadian
friends. But more than just my friends, I wanted to share my experiences with the local diving
community.

This led me to increase my involvement in an organization known as Save Ontario Shipwrecks. SOS is a
non-profit volunteer organization with many local chapters across the province.





Along with public education and shipwreck research, the local chapter members undertake projects to
promote the conservation efforts of SOS.

As the current Toronto chapter president, I appreciate the experience which I received on the ARPP as I
attempt to guide the chapter in adopting projects of our own.

As a result of my experience with the Aucilla River Prehistory Project, I came to understand that all
great volunteer projects are much like a recipe. It takes one part location, another part group activity, and
the most important ingredient of all ... the special people who work together to make the project a
success. It is these people whom I must thank for all the great memories, which I will never forget.

See y'all Americans at the rise in '97, eh?

Call for Volunteers Information and Application Form


I PREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







Museum Grand Opening


@ BELLSOUTHfN'


POWELL HALL OPENS: NEW EXHIBITION AND EDUCATION
BRANCH OF FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
INAUGURATED ON UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA CAMPUS


UQe 'A


Front cover of Gainesville phone
book feauringFLMNH's y7w
Fowell Hall and Acilla Rver
Dispqy.5s.


On February 21st, 1997 Powell Hall, the Museum's new Exhibition and Education Facility, was
dedicated. In attendance were the Powell Brothers of West Palm Beach, Florida, University of Florida
President and Mrs. John Lombardi, the Board of Regents, the local legislative delegation and numerous
other supporters of the Florida Museum of Natural History. The first exhibition featuring Dinosaur
Families, The Story of Egg Mountain runs from January 25th through April 27th. The new building is
located in the southwestern comer of the UF campus, at 34th Street and Hull Road, accessible from
Interstate 75 via the Archer Road exit. The phone number is (352) 846-2967. The museum's research
and collection facilities continue to reside in Dickinson Hall near the center of the UF campus on
Museum Road at Newell Drive.


PREVIOUS CONTENTS NEXT I







Florida Hall of Fossils

The stellar focal point of the Pleistocene
segment of this exciting new Powell Hall
exhibit will be a 14-foot tall mammoth
(Mammuthus columbi) skeleton. Articulation
of this skeleton gleaned from the Aucilla River
will provide drama and excitement to our story
of Florida's first peoples who came from Asia
with mammoth-hunting traditions. A fullscale
k. diorama will encircle the skeleton depicting the
hunt. The planned scenario includes a woman
sitting at a campfire softening mammoth hide
with a beamer made of a mammoth radius
bone. The radius and other bone, stone and
F-MNH.5 n w orr"da HaB 1 o Foss"sfeafu r"ng ivory tools are visible in a case nearby.
.4ucilla Rver fossils and aBrtfacts. Conceptual
drawing b, Barbara H armon Samples of early geometric art on ivory, as
well as photographs of Eurasian paleolithic
artwork will be displayed. A video of underwater recovery techniques used for the mammoth and
Paleoindian discoveries made in connection with the Aucilla River Prehistory Project will be available
for viewing. Pollen and plant records, mastodon stomach contents, gourd seeds, worked wooden stakes
and charcoal evidence of human fire activity will help to tell our story of this age. An electronic map
will designate major Paleoindian sites in Florida, all of which are now underwater because sea level has
risen so dramatically in the last 12,000 years. In order to exit from the hall, visitors will pass under a
long tusk arch, set on stacks of mammoth mandibles.


I PRF10USI CONTENTS I 1FRN I







FLMNH Web site wins gold

On January 21, 1997, NetGuide selected the Florida Museum of Natural History's Web site as a Gold
Site -- one of the best on the Web. The Gold Award recognizes Web sites that meet stringent criteria for
overall excellence.

NetGuide screened over 100,000 URLs and their Gold Award goes to only 15,000 of the Web's best
sites. That is why the museum now displays the Gold Award logo on its site.

The ARPP would like to recognize Dr. Wayne King, office of museum technology supervisor, and
webmaster Dick Ruble on their success.

Visit NetGuide at

http://www.netguide.com

Office of Museum Technology
Florida Museum of Natural History
Gainesville, FL 32611
Tel. (352) 392-5132
Fax (352) 846-0287


Visit the ARPP Web site at:


http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/natsci/vertpaleo/arpp.htm

Congratulations to Michael Nolan, John Turney, Stan Hord, Joan Herrera and Russ McCarty for
formatting the Aucilla River Times onto our website.


I PREVIOUS CONTENTS NEXT I







Joan Herrera wins oceanography award

Joan Herrera, a veteran of many ARPP field seasons, is currently completing her Ph.D. Dissertation in
Zoology at the University of Florida. Her doctoral research, which also calls upon her diving skills,
investigates the Diversity of Energetic Strategies Among Echinoid Larvae and the Transition from
Feeding to Nonfeeding Development. For her research, Joan received, from the Florida Institute of
Oceanography, the Vice Admiral William W. Behrens, Jr. Award. This award was presented by Dr. Carl
Luer from the Mote Marine Lab in Sarasota, as announced in the Florida Scientist (vol. 59, p. 140,
1996).

PREVIOnUSI CONTENTS NEXT I







Paleofest96


S. Blom eley
FLMNH Cura.rc Dr. Bruce Ma Fadden
with Leisey Equuz horse skeleton

On the weekend of November 8th and 9th, the Florida Museum of Natural History (FLMNH) on the
University of Florida campus in Gainesville held Paleofest96, a festival celebrating Florida
Paleontology. It was our first attempt at such a venture, and fortunately the success of this event
exceeded our most optimistic expectations.

Over 350 registrants participated in this two-day event, which was organized by FLMNH staff Marc
Frank, Douglas Jones, Bruce MacFadden, Carol Pooser, Roger Portell and co-sponsored by the
FLMNH, The Paleontological Society and Florida Paleontological Society. Over 75 volunteers,
including many UF students and the FLMNH Museum Associates, worked very hard and thereby
ensured the overall success of this event. Paleofest96 activities included a Friday night reception social
and dedication of the Florida 40 Million Years Ago exhibit and Leisey Equus horse skeleton (see photo).
Saturday's events included 32 workshops, mostly on Florida fossils, special displays by many of the
states fossil clubs and related organizations, a fund-raising happy-hour and auction, and book-signing
and public lecture entitled "Discovering Dinosaurs" by noted dinosaur paleontologist and author (of
Lone Star Dinosaurs and Quest for African Dinosaurs) Dr. Louis L. Jacobs III, geology professor and
museum director at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, TX. In addition to the Paleofest96
registrants, another 300 children and adults from the surrounding community attended the Saturday
evening dinosaur lecture.

On many fronts, Paleofest96 was a resounding success: It brought together Florida paleofolks, allowed
us to introduce the FLMNH to many first-time visitors, provided community visibility for our museum's
programs, allowed a fun learning environment, and, last but certainly not least, the net proceeds from
Paleofest96 totaled 13,500, which will be used to support the paleontological activities and educational





programs here at the FLMNH. Many of those in attendance are supporters of the Pony Express program,
and we sincerely thank you for attending the event. We hope that Paleofest96 allowed you an additional
opportunity to enjoy Florida fossils (including horses, of course) and to make new paleofriends.

PREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







Robin Brown receives 1996 Converse Award


FLMNH Curator Dr. Bruce MacFadden presents Converse Award to celebrated author of
"Florida's First People" (and longstanding ARPP enthusiast) Dr. Robin Brown.

Dr. Robin Brown, Pony Express Charter Member, long-standing ARPP enthusiast, paleontologist, and
author extraordinaire, was presented with this year's Howard Converse Award. Dr. Bruce McFadden
presented the award to Robin during the Saturday morning session at Paleofest96. Robin is recognized
for his strong support of the museum and his numerous specimen donations. His most outstanding
contribution is, of course, his famous book on Florida's fossils, which is in its second edition and fourth
printing, with over 10,000 copies sold.

The Converse Award is presented yearly to recognize an individual from the non-professional
paleonotological ranks who has made outstanding contributions to Florida paleontology. The award is
named in honor of Howard Converse, former preparator at the museum. Award recipients are selected
by the museum paleontology staff and are presented with a personalized wall plaque. Their names are
also inscribed on a large permanent plaque which hangs in the museum.


I PREV 10US I QONTE NTS I N RY T







Letters To The Editor


Pioneer Ohmes applauds
Sloth Hole research

The assurance that Sloth Hole will at last receive the thorough scientific study it deserves is to me
inexpressibly gratifying. Perhaps I'm unduly optimistic but I believe that it, and perhaps the entire West
Run, may in the end prove of greater archaeological significance than the fantastic river it nourishes.
The prodigious concentration of ivory must be the clue to something unique about that location. May
you solve that mystery.

Your telephone call set me a'dither at the prospect of meeting you and the divers who will be doing the
work, (How wonderful it would have been for Don and me back in the '60s had such an opportunity
existed!). But alas, it's not to be. Circumstances here prevent any prolonged absence of more than a day
or two.

My hope is that someone in your crew does videos, or photos.

Many thanks again.

Sincerely,
Dick Ohmes
Bremerton, WA
P.S. This dog lover was touched by
your requiem for Miss Fossil.




Blackwater Draw site thanks ARPP

The status of Blackwater Draw Site is good if you look at the positive
side. I finished the excavation of the trenches for the foundation (of a
building designed to shelter excavations from the elements and permit
visitors to observe the excavation in progress) on November 25th. The
stratigraphic profiles were completed by December 16th, and I am trying
to finish the stabilization of the arroyo and secure the fabric (which
prevents site erosion) for the final time.
O 1 2 3 4 6
.*mmm
J. Dickenson

Middle-Archaic aged
double-barbed point
from Blackwater Draw.




j. LcKensonrL


Mi~dle-Archaic aged
double-barbed point
from Blackwater Draw.



Of the 1,160 artifacts recorded this year in our trenches 500 are lithics. Burned bone and caliche make
up a fourth of that number. (I haven't counted the actual figures yet.) The large bone beds were on the
lower slopes. Very small fragments came from the screen of the upper level trenches, and half were
burned to a blue color. Flakes number around 350 yet to analyze. Four utility tan pottery pieces and 5
fragments of projectile points were found in the tan sand on an old washed surface between the weak
soil development and tan sand that covered the top of the lake. One middle-Archaic age point is different
from the rest. A photo is included. The whole point has two barbs on each lateral side. The raw material
is gray chert. More closeups will be taken as soon as I get a number on it.

The group of people evidently were collectors also. In that same level a midsection of an Eden, a base of
a Plainview and two tips of large bifacial points (one Paleoindian) were found among the burned and
caliche pebbles. They were not in rodent burrows either.

Now to the construction of the building. hope to let the bid for construction by February 1st.)
Completion date has been pushed back to Memorial Day.

Thank you Dr. Webb for supporting your (Aucilla River Prehistory Project) workers while they do
volunteer work. (Mark Muniz, Andy Hemmings, Bill Gifford, Steve Glover and Joe Latvis) were such a
help to me, and we appreciate people like you. You will have to come and let me show you the Site
sometime.

Thanks too for the casts sent of the points.

Warmest regards,

Joanne Dickenson, Curator
Blackwater Draw Site
Eastern New Mexico University
608 New Mexico 467
Portales, New Mexico 88130


I PREVUS I _CONTE NTS I NEXT I







Legislative Advocacy Campaigns

The Special Category Grant Funding process administered by the Florida Department of State, Division
of Historical Resources, occasions legislative advocacy campaigns to Tallahassee twice each year in
support of the funding package that contains the ARPP proposal.

Aucilla River Prehistory Project staff and
volunteers from around the state converge on the
offices of the Governor, Secretary of State,
Senate and House of Representatives, presenting
their case with the skill, experience and
enthusiasm that so many team members possess.







Office of Secretaiy of Stat
ARPPprincipals ( to r): Joseph Latvis, Dr. S David
Webb ard Jack ,Smpscn present Secretary of %ate
SanrBa Mcrthawn with display f Aucilla river
artfact replicas.

Hailing from project host institution FLMNH, Project Director Webb and Co-chief Scientist Milanich
are the point men in this process, their eloquent efforts augmented by a host of dedicated partisans: In
1996, Jody Barker and Dean Sligh voiced Orange County's support; Wilmer Bassett, David Janet and
Jack Simpson represented Jefferson County's interests; Lance Carlson and Matthew Mihlbachler
communicated UF undergraduate support; Brinnen and Jennifer Carter and David Thulman articulated
Leon County's preferences; Bill Gifford and Steve Glover delivered Volusia County's perspective; Ed
Green and Joe Latvis advocated Hernando County's priorities; Andy Hemmings and Mark Muniz
reflected UF graduate student sentiment; and Alyssa Martinelli and Tanya Peres vouched for FSU's
graduate student interests.

In addition to the enthusiastic support we have come to enjoy from perennial boosters like Governor
Lawton Chiles, Secretary of State Sandra Mortham, and Representatives Allen Boyd and Marjorie
Tumbull, we also received substantial encouragement from Senators W.D. Childers, Charles Bronson
and Rick Dantzler, as well as Representatives Buzz Ritchie, Alzo Reddick, Shirley Brown and Cynthia
Chestnut

Transcending party affiliation, all agree that the world class research and extensive public outreach





conducted by the Aucilla River Prehistory Project is an enlightened investment of public funds that will
pay dividends for generations to come.

PREVIOUS CONTENTS I NEXT I







Soliciting letters of support for '97

Your letters made the difference last year (see below). This year we need them even more urgently.
These letters will allow us to maintain our momentum on the river excavations, and they will allow our
graduate students to continue their research programs.

Please, if you enjoyed this new magazine and the exciting prehistoric research it represents, write us a
letter. Please sit down and do it now. Any letter in your own words about what intrigues or appeals to
you about the ARPP will be just fine. You could mention that you would like to see the ARPP continue
its recovery of this unique part of our Florida Heritage.

To be part of our application for a grant, we ask that you address your letter to: Mr. George Percy,
Special Category Grants, Division of Historical Resources, Department of State, but mail your letter
to:

Dr. S. David Webb
FLMNH
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-7800

That is because I must compile these letters in a particular format and then bundle them all as an
appendix in support of the grant.

Thanks for writing and sending your letter to me at this museum address before May, 1997.


I PREVIOUS I ClONTENTS NEXT I







1996 funding support letter appreciation

We are deeply indebted to friends of the ARPP who wrote letters to the granting agency within the
Department of State in support of our project. There were 43 such letters from a wonderful range of
supporters. Most letters naturally were generated by residents of the state of Florida, but there were also
six excellent epistles from neighboring states, western regions and even Canada. Nothing reaches the
hearts of our review board members more than these letters. That is why we thank you most sincerely.
That is also why we solicit and even greater wave of support this spring for our future funding.

PREVIOUS Q CONTENTS NEXT I







Gift Options

Boating, scuba diving, archaeology and camping are all equipment intensive activities. The science of
remote-site underwater archaeology, requiring a synthesis of all these disciplines, is of necessity
extremely "gear" intensive. The Aucilla River Prehistory Project has survived since its inaugural year of
1983 solely because volunteers have contributed not only their considerable talent, but also their
expensive personal equipment as well.

While we salute the many individuals, institutions and organizations for their generous support, we
believe that if we are to continue exploring these world-class archaeological sites safely, professionally,
and efficiently, the ARPP must itself acquire the equipment and services necessary to accomplish its
missions.

In the course of preparing funding request documents, we have designated the project's long term
objectives. Fulfilling these objectives requires specialized equipment and a variety of services.

While we have proposed substantial requests to a number of private, state and federal agencies, we also
count on your continued support by private donations.

If you wish to help our multidisciplinary team of professionals and volunteers accomplish any of these
objectives, we will be deeply indebted. Listed below are some key goals. Donations in any amount or
form are administered through the University of Florida Foundation, and are tax deductible to the limits
of the law. Please contact:

Dr. S. David Webb
FLMNH
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-7800

Suggested Gifts

Need: To upgrade Aucilla River site data recording.
Item: CAD-CAM software
Cost: $500

Need: To mail Aucilla River Times.
Item: Bulk mailing and labeling
Cost: $250


Need: Diver's safety recall device





Cost: $600

Need: To excavate tough clays on river bottom.
Item: Six Marshalltown trowels
Cost: $50

Need: Direct date on rare bone artifact.
Item: Carbon date on bone apatite
Cost: $1100 at Boulder, CO, lab

Need: Modern oxygen delivery system
Item: DAN oxygen first-aid kit
Cost: $400


I PREVlIOUSI CONTENTS I WRYT 11







Donor Acknowledgment

The Aucilla River Prehistory Project gratefully acknowledges support by the State of Florida Division of
Historical Resources, Florida Department of State, Tallahassee, Florida. During 1996 ARPP received its
second major grant for its archaeological research on First Floridians and Last Megafauna.

The ARPP also received major funding from National Geographic Society, Committee on Research and
Exploration. Neither of these funding organizations was liable for injury or property damage that might
have resulted from ARPP activities. Nor are they responsible for opinions or interpretations derived
from the archaeological and paleontological research conducted under these grants.

The Aucilla River Prehistory Project also acknowledges vital support from several dozen volunteer
scuba divers from Florida and beyond, who freely dedicate their time, energies and personal dive gear to
participate in this important research. The University of Florida also provides fundamental offices, labs,
collections, equipment, vehicles and personnel to carry forward this project. We especially thank the
Ladson family for their continuing hospitality, encouragement and support of this project's activities on
their land. Finally we are deeply indebted to many individual friends of the project who have contributed
both emotional energy and material gifts to its success. We offer our heartfelt thanks to the following list
of private and corporate boosters.


Sustaining Boosters
$5,000-24,999

CSX Transportation

Supporting Boosters
$1,000-4,999
George Bailey
Byron Herlong
Pat and Sam Lamar
(for The Canoe Shop)
Contributing Boosters
$100-999
Jody Barker
(for Alpha Welding)
Dr. H.L. Cheney


Contributing Boosters Boosters
$100-999 $10-99
Ed Green .
Ed G T Juanita Akin
(for Hungry Howie's Pizza)

Jim Hunt IDavid G. Bishop

Colonel Wm. F. Ladson Dr. Edwin C. Carlson
Dr. Dan F. Morse Mary Hudson
Randy Ogden
Hank Kratt
(for Daffin Food Service)

Randy Rush Don Lincoln

Patty Schwarze .
Patt wa rzi Robert F. Phillips
(for Old Sugar Mill)
Jack Simpson Dawn Pinder






Kurt Cox
(for Chevron USA, Inc.)

Al and Jimmy Cribbs
(for Cribbs & Sons Tire & Automotive)

M.C. David

Bill Gifford

Steve and Jane Glover


Joe Sink
SS Dean Quigley
(for Brownie's
Third Lung)

James K. Toomey Dr. Andrew J. Rogers

J.R. Walker
JR. Wle Mark T. Sanders
(for J.R.'s Aucilla River Store)
Bill Wright. .
(for Perry Peps B Williams
(for Perry Pepsi Cola)
I I


I PREV 10USI C ONTE NTS I 1j RX7







Down by the old mill stream

By Phillip M. Pollock

In the proudest ofFlorida gastronomic traditions, more than 50 ...
field crew members in 1996 on more than one occasion 1
celebrated a breakfast at Nutall Rise main camp c mulil ting of
delicious pancakes made from a batter mix of Old Sugar Mill's
finest stone ground grains (generously donated by Patty
Schwarze). F












An old sugar mill is nestled alongside DeLeon Springs in western Volusia County. Although the spring
has been spilling millions of gallons of water into Spring Garden Creek for as long as anyone can
remember, the mill wheel itself, once powered by the water's immense force, is now silent. A gray and
cracked matrix of spokes and paddles rests motionless.

Now a family of sixth-generation gristmillers own the mill -- it is a restaurant whose specialty is
pancakes that you can grill yourself on griddles in the center of rectangular tables. Guests ladle out
batter made of grain that is stone-ground on the site and then let their senses direct when the meal is
ready.

The atmosphere at the mill is rustic. Inside, old tin syrup containers, wooden tools and grinding
apparatus displayed along the walls add visual flavor to meals. Outside, beyond the wooden frame of the
mill, ruddy-colored brick is still visible from more prosperous milling days.

Stone tool and pottery remains indicate that as far back as 6,500 years ago, humans found the area a
desirable location for many activities. Further evidence of occupation does not appear until the late
1700s when historical accounts reflect Creek and Seminole Indian settlement. By 1832, the spring was
part of a large sugar cane plantation owned by Colonel Orlando Rees.

With the assistance of a Scottish engineer, Rees built a mill along the spring's outflow to extract sugar





from the large cane stalks. Four years later, the mill was destroyed during the Second Seminole War. A
wealthy slaveholder, Thomas Starke, later traded fifty slaves for the property rights to the mill site and
rebuilt it in 1840. Starke utilized the mill through the start of the Civil War, then aided the Confederacy
and became a target for retaliation by Union forces -- the mill was disabled in the latter period of the war.

Most of the wooden structure of the mill that exists today dates to 1878; however, only the metal hub for
the wooden wheel remains from the original mill construction in 1832. Inviting smells of country
cooking that drift outside remind visitors that both the mill and springs possess a unique, shared history.

This article from Florida Heritage magazine reprinted courtesy of Florida Department of State, Diviionn
ofHistorical Resources.

PREVIOUS Q CONTENTS NEXT I






Aucilla


Who was that exotic, mysterious new
divemaster during the Spring '96 field
campaign?


I PREV 10USI C ONTE NTS 1 14 RN7







About the Aucilla River Times

Editorial Staff

Editor: Joseph Latvis
Text Layout: Gregory Hardy
Graphical Layout: Joe Ciaramella
Consultant: Kristin Herzog
Website Formatting: Joan Herrera

Editorial Board

Dr. S. David Web, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology, Florida Museum of Natural
History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7800
Dr. Jerald T. Milanich, Curator of Anthropology, Florida Museum of Natural History,
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7800

Cover Art

"The Past Made Present" by Ken Kirkpatrick

The Aucilla River Times is published on an annual basis to update a readership interested in the
status of the Aucilla River Prehistory Project. This ongoing archaeological/paleontological
research is sponsored by the Florida Musuem of Natural History. This newsletter is published by
the project management based at:

The Florida Museum of Natural History
Attention: Dr. S. David Webb
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida 32611-7800

Subscription to the Aucilla River Times is FREE. Address changes or new subscriptions may be
requested by writing to the address above.

Cover Art: Permission to publish courtesy of the artist.


I PREVIOUS I CONTENTS




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs