Title: Florida forest steward
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00090040/00016
 Material Information
Title: Florida forest steward
Physical Description: Serial
Language: English
Creator: Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Publisher: Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: Spring 2000
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00090040
Volume ID: VID00016
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.


This item has the following downloads:

http___www ( PDF )

Full Text

Back to Back to Back to
Back to Florida Forestry Information
Extension Home Page Newsletter Index Extension Publications

The Florida Forest Steward

A Qurterly Newsletter for Florida Landowners and Resource Professionals

Volume 7, No. 1

Spring 2000

2000 A Forestry Milestone
The Longleaf Forest: Then and Now
Research Report: Effects of Fertilizers and Herbicides
on Water QuaJity-
Coming Soon: Spring Migrating Birds -
The Estate Tax: A Major Conservation Obstacle
Timber Price Update
SFRC and Forest Stewardship Program Workshop
Schedule (2000.)

A University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service and Florida Division of Forestry joint project:

Chris Demers (editor), School of Forest Resources & Conservation, UF, P.O. Box 110410, Gainesville, FL
32611-0410, (352) 846-2375 or cdemers .n:. ifas. ufl.edu
Alan Long (co-editor), School of Forest Resources & Conservation, UF, (352) 846-0891 or AJL@gnv.ifas.
ufl. edu
Todd Groh (co-editor), Florida Division ofForestry, 3125 Conner Blvd, Tallahassee, FL 32699-1650, (850)
414-9907 or groht@doacs.state.fl. us
Chuck McKelvy (co-editor), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 3125 Conner Blvd,
Tallahassee, FL 32699-1650, (850) 414-9911 or mckelvc@doacs.state.fl.us

Cooperative Extension Service
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences

2000 A Forestry Milestone

The year 2000 is a much-celebrated milestone for many. I remember thinking ahead as a
youngster in the 70's, "what will the world be like in the year 2000?" I recall popular futuristic
images of streamlined road machines and buildings of spectacular geometric design. Some of
these visions have been realized, while others have yet to be seen. I guess the flying cars will
come later.

This year is a good time to reflect on the ways forestry has changed in America since its arrival in
the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina in 1898, and to think about how communication
technologies have changed the way we get forestry information. This newsletter still comes to
your mailbox, but now you may be using a computer to supplement your forestry library. Based
on our survey last year, over half of you have Internet access and another third anticipate using the
Internet in the next year or so. As many have discovered, the Internet is a great way to get forestry
information. Most forestry colleges in the South are now using the Internet as an important
extension tool, making most of their publications available on the World Wide Web in electronic,
print-on-demand form. Simply typing in the words 'forestry' and 'Florida' in one of the popular
search engines can lead you to a host of forestry related web sites for Florida.

Many of you have participated in the Master Tree Farmer 2000 program, a south-wide satellite
broadcast of forestry workshops from Clemson University in South Carolina. Thanks to Dr.
George Kessler of Clemson and countless others, we successfully harnessed satellite technologies
to reach over 1,200 forest landowners across the south with important, fundamental forest
management information. The role of these technologies in natural resource communications will
continue to grow in the next decade.

A look to the future is always complemented with a look at the past. This year's Society of
American Foresters (SAF) / UF School of Forest Resources and Conservation (SFRC) Spring
Symposium will do just that. As a part of SAF's centennial year, "Historical Reflections, Future
Directions" will be a fascinating look at forestry's past and some up-and-coming technologies and
trends that may be prevalent in the future. Please note that the dates for the Spring Symposium are
May 23 and 24, 2000, at the new University of Florida Hotel and Conference Center in


The.Longleaf Forest:.Then and Now
By Rhett Johnson,_co-director of The Longleaf Alliance

At the time of European settlement, the uplands of the southern
coastal plain and portions of the mountains of Alabama and Georgia
were blanketed by what many forest historians consider the most
extensive single forest type in the history of the "New World". It is
estimated that nearly 90 million acres of the South were occupied by
longleaf pine, nearly 60 million of that almost pure longleaf forest.
This forest was created and maintained with fire, a natural
component in southern ecosystems. Lightning ignited extensive fires
and early native cultures used fire as a tool to manipulate both plant
and animal communities. We recognize today that the fire-
maintained longleaf pine ecosystem is significantly rich in plant and
animal species. Over the past 300 years, the area occupied by
longleaf has declined to less than 3 million acres across its range, a
loss of nearly 97 percent! The loss was due to several factors,
including a massive transformation of the landscape to agricultural
use, a misunderstanding of the role of fire in maintaining the system, poor understanding of or
lack of interest in longleaf regeneration, and a shift in the South's forest industry from naval
stores and solid wood products to pulp and paper. As the longleaf resource declined, many native
plant and animal species dependent on it declined as well. Several of those species are essentially
obligates of fire-maintained longleaf forests and are now protected by various state and federal
laws such as the Endangered Species Act.

Interest in the retention of longleaf in the southern forest landscape began to build in the 1950's,
but was limited in its effectiveness. Tens of thousands of acres were lost annually until the
1980's, when federal and state land managers began to work to retain existing longleaf and even
to re-establish it on the lands they controlled. Better nursery practices, vegetation management
techniques, and a better understanding of the role of fire increased the likelihood of regenerating
longleaf successfully. Even and uneven-aged natural regeneration systems were successfully
employed on thousands of acres across the south as well. Recognizing the increased potential for
success and the burgeoning interest in the species, a small group of people interested in longleaf
met in 1996 and formed The Longleaf Alliance, a non-profit organization whose focus is the
retention, management, and re-establishment of longleaf pine across its former range where it

meets landowners' desires. Relying on both the ecological and economic value of longleaf as
selling points, the Alliance works closely with private landowners, state and federal agencies,
forest industry, natural resource consultants, researchers, and environmental groups to provide
information and technical support. The group acts as a clearinghouse on longleaf matters,
publishing helpful pamphlets, booklets, and research reports; coordinating and facilitating
interactions between landowners, agencies, nurseries, and tree planters; conducting or
participating in workshops and conferences; and conducting pertinent research on longleaf pine.

Many groups, private and public, are involved in the effort to restore longleaf to the southern
forest mosaic. The focus of the Alliance has been two-fold: the re-establishment of longleaf on
acreage where it once occurred; and the retention, management, and restoration of existing or
newly created longleaf forests to the rich ecosystem that once existed there. The Longleaf
Alliance is currently based at Auburn University's Solon Dixon Forestry Education Center in
south central Alabama in the heart of the remaining longleaf resource.

For information on longleaf and the Alliance, write to the Longleaf Alliance at Rt. 7, Box 131,
Andalusia, AL 36420, call 334-222-7779, visit their web site at www.forestry.aubum.edu/la/, or e-
mail either hainds(@alaweb.com or johnson(@forestry.auburn.edu.


Research Report: Effects of Fertilizers and Herbicides on Water Quality

Harvest reductions on public forests and increased
restrictions on private lands associated with streamside
management zones and ecologically sensitive areas have
resulted in the need to focus intensive wood production on
the remaining acreage. Increased productivity usually
requires herbicide treatments and more frequent and
extensive use of forest fertilizers. Growing concerns about
non-point source pollution from these practices have
prompted studies on the effects of these treatments on
streamwater nutrient concentrations and aquatic
communities. The following are summaries of some recent
reports on these topics.

On average, concentrations of nitrate and phosphate are about 10 times greater in streams
draining agricultural lands than in those draining forests. In general, peak concentrations of
nitrate-N in streamwater increase for a brief period when precipitation follows fertilization
treatments, but these increases remain within acceptable limits of drinking water quality.
However, the average streamwater concentrations of nitrate-N remain at much lower levels than
those short-lived peaks that follow periods of rainfall. Also, streamside (or special) management
zones along waterways provide buffers to reduce the brief elevated nutrient concentrations after
fertilization. Relatively high concentrations of nitrate-N may also result from repeated
fertilization and the use of ammonium nitrate fertilizer (rather than urea). So far there is no
reported evidence of detectable effects of forest fertilization on the composition or productivity of
aquatic communities. However, more detailed studies are needed, particularly with respect to
those effects associated with phosphorus fertilization.

(From a Journal of Forestry (January 2000) summary of NCASI technical bulletin 782, Water
Quality Effects of Forest Fertilization.)

Hexazinone Herbicides
Hexazinone is the active ingredient in VelparTM and PrononeTM herbicides, and is very soluble
in water, allowing it to potentially move with soil water from forests into adjacent aquatic
communities. Actual chemical movement depends greatly on site-specific factors such as soil
type, topography, and post-application rainfall.

The majority of the studies of hexazinone's potential to affect aquatic organisms have been based
in the laboratory. However, USDA Forest Service scientists recently conducted a field study in
the watersheds of the Alabama Piedmont to determine the herbicide's dissipation in forest
ecosystems and impacts on aquatic communities. Test watersheds were treated with Velpar
ULWTM (pellet) and Velpar LTM (liquid) at 3 times the prescribed rate and an untreated
watershed served as a control. They found that exposure of macroinvertebrates (like mussels and
snails) to hexazinone did not alter aquatic community structure; and species richness, including
that of pollution-sensitive insects, did not differ significantly between the hexazinone treatment
and the control. Given the rate of hexazinone application used in this study (3X prescription) and
adherence to state best management practices, hexazinone is unlikely to be detrimental to these
components of aquatic ecosystems.

(From NCASI Forestry Environmental Program News Vol. 12, No. 1)


Coming Soon: Spring Migrating Birds
By B. Wayne Harris, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

Spring is a time of rejuvenation in Florida's natural world. The sap begins to rise in trees as they
prepare for the long summer, grasses sprout fresh growth, largemouth bass are bedding, and the
wild turkeys are gobbling. This is one of the best seasons for those of us who enjoy the
outdoors. In addition to the more notable changes of spring, many species of songbirds that
spend the winter in Central and South America begin to appear here. Some species are only
passing through on their way to more northern breeding areas while others will stay and raise
their young. Three common species that you may encounter by sight or song when afield in the
varying habitats of Florida include the yellow-billed cuckoo, great-crested flycatcher, and hooded

The yellow-billed cuckoo is a rather large songbird with a total length of about 11 inches. It has
a relatively long, downward curved yellowish bill. The underside of this bird is mostly white
with 4 black bands on the tail. The top of the head, back, and top of the tail are brown to
chestnut colored. There is little difference between the sexes, regarding coloration. The problem
with identifying cuckoos is that they are much more often heard than seen. They are easily
identified by song, once you know how they sound. A typical song consists of several guttural,
toneless cuck-cuck-cuck notes. Cuckoos are forest birds and tend to live in dense, understory
thickets. This type of cover is particularly useful to cuckoos where scrub oaks and black cherry
are the predominant trees. The zone where residual mixed hardwood stands meet 3 to 5 year old
clearcuts seems to be ideal. The preferred yellow-billed cuckoo food source is tent caterpillars,
found mostly in the oaks and cherries. They depend so much on these caterpillars that breeding
often coincides with caterpillar outbreaks. Recently, there has been much concern over possible
declines in population levels of this species.

The great-crested flycatcher is another common migrant that breeds in our area. Total length of
the great-crested flycatcher is about 7 inches. This species has a rather large, conspicuous,
crested head in relation to body size. The drab bill is also large and is surrounded by numerous
small "whiskers", which are actually specialized feathers for funneling flying insects into the
bill. The underside of this bird is yellowish to gray, the head and back are gray or brownish, and
the tail is a dark rusty, chestnut color. There is little variation in coloration between males and
females. The great-crested flycatcher is a bird of mixed hardwood and pine forest, parks,
orchards, and forest edges. They are commonly seen perched on snags (dead standing trees),
powerlines, and wire fences where they watch for insects. The main vocalization of the great-
crested flycatcher is a harsh, ascending wheeep.

Another migrant songbird that regularly breeds in Florida is the hooded warbler. This small but
beautiful bird is only about 4 12 inches in total length. Both the male and female are a relatively
uniform yellow underneath and brown on the back. The distinguishing and striking features on
the male are the bright yellow "face mask" and the jet black "hood". The song of the hooded

warbler is a sequence of loud, clear notes with an accented, slurred ending (chewy-chewy-chewy-
cheeeew). Hooded warblers prefer to nest and feed in the dense understory of moist, deciduous
woodlands. In Florida they have an affinity for ti-ti, gallberry, sweet pepperbush, and lyonia
thickets associated with the margins of wooded streams and ponds. They feed entirely on small
insects found in the understory.

Florida is blessed with a great variety of birds and other wildlife species. Some are large, some
are small, some are rare, and some are plentiful. With the predominance of wildlife habitat in
Florida being held by private individuals and corporations, responsible conservation and
stewardship by these landowners is a must if we are to retain our diverse wildlife populations and
protect our natural heritage.


The.Estate Tax: A Major Conservation. Obstacle

A compelling article in the last issue of Forest
Landowner (Vol. 58, No. 6) was, in my opinion,
one of the best discussions of the estate tax
problem, driving home the issue for those
concerned about the future of Florida's forests.
"The Anti-Environment Estate Tax", by Jonathan
H. Adler, examines the estate tax, or "death tax",
issue from a conservation perspective, stating
that the economic benefits of repealing the estate
tax are extremely important, but are not the only fe
reason for doing away with the tax. The
environmental benefits of repealing the tax are
loud and clear.

The "death tax" literally encourages conversion of forestland to other uses by taxing transfers of
property and assets that take place at the time of death at rates up to 55% of asset value!
According to the Joint Economic Committee, the average annual household income for a rural
woodlot owner is less than $50,000, yet the average woodlot has an appraised value of $2 million
or more. The estate tax leaves heirs of such properties with very few options. In order to pay the
tax, they must clear the timber or sell the land, which, in most cases, is not what they or their
forebears had in mind.

How can the impact of the estate tax be reduced? An obvious answer is reduce or repeal the tax
altogether. This will partly be achieved over the next few years as the unified credit exemption is

increased annually from its present value of $675,000 to $1,000,000 in 2006 and thereafter.
There are some more direct actions you can take to shelter your heirs from the brunt of the estate
tax. Provisions under the federal tax law allow property owners to protect their assets by creating
trusts or placing conservation easements on eligible land. These provisions can significantly
reduce the taxable estate inherited by your heirs. Talk to a tax law attorney or certified public
accountant in your area to explore your options. This is perhaps the most important step you can
take to secure the future of your forestland for your children and grandchildren, and for the many
plants and animals that depend on it for survival.


Timber Price Update..

The 4th quarter 1999 Timber-Mart
South report for Florida listed average
stumpage prices as $34/cord for pine
pulpwood, $93/cord for pine C-N-S,
$119/cord for pine sawtimber, and $122/ ,
cord for pine plylogs. Prices were up
for all four products compared to 3rd
quarter prices. Hardwood pulpwood
averaged $12/cord, which was down
slightly from the previous quarter.
Stumpage prices are highly variable and
the actual price for a particular timber ,. '
sale can be affected by characteristics such as tract size, timber density, access, proximity to
operating mills, and weather. A more complete summary of 4th quarter stumpage prices is
available at your County Extension Office. To determine current prices in your area, your best
source of information will be forestry consultants and timber companies that purchase timber in
your area.

Long-term Trends
The following graph charts quarterly Timber Mart-South stumpage prices for three major pine log
classes in northeast Florida since the beginning of 1990. Numbers on the horizontal axis indicate
the year (first digit) and quarter (second digit), so 31 would indicate the first quarter of 1993.
Average pulpwood prices have experienced many ups and downs, ranging from $30/cord to over
$55/cord, but the 7-year trend has been virtually flat. Although we saw a modest increase in
pulpwood prices last quarter, tree growers are still likely to encounter a relatively weak pulpwood
market in some areas due to an abundance of mid-rotation plantations at or near thinning age.
Both chip-n-saw and sawtimber have shown definite upward trends in average price over the

same period. According to F&W Newsletter No. 64 (Winter 1999-2000), the recent high prices
for sawtimber are a result of a robust home construction industry nationwide and reductions in
timber harvests on western public lands. Most forecasters predict that construction markets will
remain strong through this decade, but some expect the pace to slow a bit in the near future.
Despite the strong regional timber market, the persistent dry weather conditions in North Florida
have improved access to many harvest sites. The greater timber supply tends to moderate
stumpage prices. If the drought continues the likelihood of fires and burned timber on the market
may also affect prices.

Click on the link below to see the graph use the "Back" function to return here:
Long-term Trends

SFRC and Forest Stewardship Program Workshop Schedule (2000)

SFRC Continuing Education Schedule

March 28-29 (postponed until fall 2000): Regulatory Environment in Florida's Forests, Austin
Cary Memorial Forest, Gainesville.
Contact: Dr. Alan Long, 352-846-0891

May 23-24: SAF/SFRC Spring Symposium, "Historical Reflections, Future Directions",
University of Florida Hotel and Conference Center, Gainesville.
Contact: Cindy Love, 352-846-0849
Summer: Introduction to GIS and GPS Applications, Austin Cary Memorial Forest, Gainesville.

Summer: Forest Pest Management, Austin Cary Memorial Forest, Gainesville.

June 26-30: The Wildland-Urban Interface (Urban Forestry Institute), Daytona Beach.
Contact: Eliana Kampf Binelli, 352-846-0886

September 28: Forest Tree and Plant Identification, western Panhandle.

October 17-18: Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering for Foresters, Austin Cary Memorial
Forest, Gainesville.

November 14-15: Improving Public Relations (Getting the Message to the Public), Austin Cary

Memorial Forest, Gainesville.

January 2001: Environmental Impacts of Forestry Practices, Austin Cary Memorial Forest,

Forest Stewardship Workshop Schedule

April 25, 27: Herbicide Uses in Forestry, Jackson and St Johns Counties.
Contact: Chris Demers, 352-846-2375

May 5, 12: Stewardship Property Tours, northeast Florida.
Contact: Chris Demers, 352-846-2375

July 11, 13: TimberMarket/Investment
Opportunities, Bay & Lafayette
Contact: Chris Demers, 352-846-2375


University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs