Title: Vegetarian
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00087399/00434
 Material Information
Title: Vegetarian
Series Title: Vegetarian
Physical Description: Serial
Creator: Horticultural Sciences Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Publisher: Horticultural Sciences Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Horticultural Sciences Department
Publication Date: December 2000
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00087399
Volume ID: VID00434
Source Institution: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.


This item has the following downloads:

december ( PDF )

Full Text


Vegetarian Newsletter

A Vegetable Crops Extension Publication
University of Florida
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
Cooperative Extension Service
Vegetarian 00-12
December 2000

`Index Page

Adobe Acrobat



Utilizing the Plant's Natural Defense Systems: Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR) or Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR)

Is Inorganic Growing in Your Future

Carfentrazone (Aim) Labeled for Use in Sweet Corn

Some New and Exciting Fungicide Labeling for Plant Disease Control in Vegetables


Cool-Season Vegetables for Florida Gardens

List of Extension Vegetable Crops Specialists

(Note: Anyone is free to use the information in this newsletter. Whenever possible, please give credit to the authors. The purpose of trade names in
this publication is solely for the purpose of providing information and does not necessarily constitute a recommendation of the product.)

...... ..... ........... .. I..

2001 FL107 In-Services:
Feb. 13: Strawberry in-service training. GCREC-Dover. Contact: John Duval.

Page 1


March 5-8: Florida Postharvest Industry Tour. Contact: Steve Sargent.
April 23-25: Beneficials and Biorationals for Vegetable Pest Management. Contact: Susan Webb.

..-. l.L ,,----- '----- ,-. -.--,-- ,-------- ,------..,-'-...-p..-'- -.--',.---'-'-- -'.1

Utilizing the Plant's Natural Defense Systems: Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR) or

Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR)

Protecting plants from disease is frequently discussed using the terminology of war, such as "winning the battle" against plant disease. New
weapons emerge periodically in the age-old battle against plant diseases. The arsenal now includes such diverse weapons as novel genes
transferred via biotechnology, new fungicidal chemistry such as the strobilurin compounds, and compounds that activate a plant's own
defense system. The plant's defensive reaction is the topic of this article.

Plants do not have an immune system such as humans and animals posses, but plants definitely have an immediate, complex, induced
defense response against pest and pathogen invaders. This response was recognized as early as 1933 and first termed "acquired
physiological immunity." Other terms used to describe this response are "induced systemic resistance" and, the term we use here,
"systemic acquired resistance".

The plant SAR has several distinguishing characteristics. First, it is an induced or activated plant reaction of host defense mechanisms in
response to stimuli such as an invading bacterium. The plant reaction is both localized at the site of the invasion and is also transferred
systemically to other tissue not in direct contact with the invader. Although the response is induced by a particular agent, the reaction is
non-specific and can provide resistance to a wide variety of organisms, such as fungi, bacteria and viruses. The response involves turning
on plant SAR genes that result in both biochemical and cytological changes within the plant cell. The SAR reaction can last for several
weeks after activation, so that the plant is resistant to future invaders.

The SAR response is exploited for disease control by applying an inducer to activate the plant's SAR and turning it on prior to attack by
some pathogen. The plant, in a sense, is armed and waiting. The SAR response can be broken down into three stages. First is the
application of an inducer. The inducer can be a pathogen, synthetic chemical, and metabolic products such as a protein of either the host or

The second part of the response involves activation of a plant signaling pathway that alerts the plant of the inducer's presence. Again, there
are several plant pathways that the inducer can activate. The salicylic acid (= aspirin) pathway is probably the most well known plant
signaling pathway for SAR, but at least four other signaling systems are known. The take-home message is that not all SAR inducers or the
signaling pathways they activate are the same. This means that an inducer may work well or not at all depending on the plant host. As an
example, a product may work well on tomato but not on bell pepper.

The last component of the SAR is the actual biological and cytological plant cell changes made after the activation of the SAR genes.

Agrichemical companies capitalize on the plant's own natural defenses by marketing inducers of the SAR. These products by themselves
do not have any toxicity to pests. Some of the products currently available are MessengerTM, ActigardTM, and KeyPlex DPTM. The obvious
conclusion from this is that plants treated with these products may have reduced disease incidence and or severity. This does seem to be
the fact; however, in our trials, the disease suppression sometimes is not enough to be noticed by the naked eye. These products will most
likely have to be used in conjunction with other fungicidal or bactericidal chemicals. In one SWFREC trial, clear differences in downy mildew
severity were noted between watermelons treated with both an SAR inducer and fungicide compared to plants that were treated with a
fungicide alone. The most tangible benefit from these products may be the enhanced side effects of increased plant vigor and early yield.
This slight edge may be just what's needed to keep profitability in the post-methyl bromide era. Producers using these products should keep
track of early yield and overall yield compared to non-treated plants to determine if the product gives an economical bonus.

We are currently testing several SAR inducers for their effect on plant vigor and control of bacterial spot and root-knot nematode in tomato
in both controlled greenhouse studies and in the field. Preliminary results indicate that there are differences in the tomato plant's response

Page 2


to some compounds, and we have seen both disease and plant growth enhancement occur. By the end of these trials, we hope to have a
better understanding of what to expect in the performance of a broad spectrum of SAR products.

(Pamela Roberts and Vavrina, Vegetarian 00-12)

Is Inorganic Growing in Your Future

The Natural Floods Merchandiser reports that organic sales have risen 20% or more for nine consecutive years. Produce has lead the way
with 25% to 33% gains nationwide. Why are people buying organically produced produce? Lots of reasons for choosing organic products are
given. Many people say organically grown foods taste better. One of the main reasons shoppers give for buying organic food is avoiding
chemicals. When organic products are bought, farmers do use environmentally friendly methods which keep chemicals out of the soil,
water, and air.

Food industry leaders such as General Mills, Heinz, Gerber, Gallo, Dale, M&M/Mars, and Tanimura and Antle have noted the organic
industry by either buying an organic company or having organic SKU available. They are putting their company in a position to take
advantage of the opportunity in organic produce sales. In this growing market, is there an opportunity for you as a producer?

In the organic produce world a grower needs to plan ahead, learn how to produce a consistent quality crop, start small and find a buyer or
outlet. In the west and northeast, a new market opportunity has emerged. Many of the organic growers are looking to purchase organic
transplants rather than producing their own. There may be a market need in your area for organic transplants for vegetables, herbs, and/or
cut flowers. Growers nationwide need organic certified transplants. The only known producer of certified transplants serving the New
England and Mid-Atlantic states has nearly 200 customers supplied from his 12,000 square foot greenhouse located in Maryland. In the
West, organic transplants are easier to buy and a much higher volume are being produced. Most customers are longtime and local within a
three state area. Is there a need or market in the southeast? If interested, there are special considerations. Growing organic transplants
takes careful, attentive growing. If a disease becomes a problem, there are no fungicides to bail you out. Growers need to be certified. Many
commercial soil mixes contain wetting agents which may not be allowed by organic certifiers. Organic fertilizers can include fish emulsion,
fish meal, blood meal, rock phosphate, greensand, and compost. Ongoing fertilization is usually done with fish/kelp soluble fertilizers. Some
organic fertilizers have a tendency to settle and may clog emitters during irrigation. A fountain pump and no-clog emitters should keep the
solution mixed. Also pH and salt levels can run high and need to be checked. Plant pests usually are not major problems in transplant
production. Aphids can be controlled with Neemix, Impede, or insecticidal soaps.

The future for organic produce is expected to continue to grow. Many think it will not be linked to whether consumers can afford the extra
cost of organic, but will be a life style choice for safety and nutrition.

Organic information sources:







(White, Vegetarian 00-12)

Carfentrazone (Aim) Labeled for Use in Sweet Corn

Page 3


Aim (carfentrazone-ethyl) has received labeling for use in corn (all types) to control a wide range of actively growing broadleaf weeds from 30
days before planting, to emerged corn up to the 8-leaf collar growth stage. Several of the weeds controlled are: common lambsquarter (up to
3 inches), iveyleaf and pitted morning glories (2-3 true leaves), black nightshade (up to 4 inches) and redroot pigweed (up to 4 inches). The
use rate is 1/3 ounces of product (0.008 Ib ai) per acre. The use of nonionic surfactant at 0.25% v/v is recommended. Crop oil concentrate
also may be used, but may increase leaf speckling on the treated corn leaves.

The manufacturer (FMC) states that not all sweet corn varieties have been tested, and the use of Aim herbicide on sweet corn is the
responsibility of the grower.

In limited trials in Florida, leaf burn did occur on the older leaves of sweet corn when applied over the top. This was more evident when
applied to corn older and taller than the labeled height. No yield reduction was seen due to the leaf burn, however. Aim may be tank mixed
with several herbicides, to enhance control of many weeds. Carefully read the label before use.

(Stall, Vegetarian 00-12)

Some New and Exciting Fungicide Labeling
for Plant Disease Control in Vegetables

Attaining new pesticide labeling for essential needs is at an all time slow pace. It might best be described as being in the "slow to stop
gear." Thus, any new labeling is usually welcomed by those interested in providing safe and healthy vegetables. Two products, Actigard 50
WG and Quadris 2.08 FL, have attained labeling that should provide benefits for farmers.

Actigard 50 WG provides a new mechanism for plant disease control. This product induces systemic acquired resistance (SAR) within the
plant by activating specific biochemical pathways. This is not a new concept; the newness of this product relates to the commercial
exploitation of this phenomenon. Traditional fungicides provide chemical protection on the outside of the plant or within the plant, but they
are generally not considered as activators of chemical processes within the plant that impair the infection process caused by fungi, bacteria,
or viruses.

Actigard has attained national labeling for control of bacterial spot and bacterial speck in tomato. One must read the label carefully because
the use pattern is not typical of most plant protection chemicals. For example, in order to allow the product to perform to its maximum
without delaying the onset of the earliest harvest in tomato, the spray concentration must not exceed 1/3, 1/2, & 3/4 oz. (of product, not a.i.)
for spray rates per acre of 30-50, 60-70, and 70-100 gpa of water, respectively. The lower spray volumes are to be used on the plants when
they are small. While the label provides rates in relation to product/spray volume, the maximum rate allowed per spray is 3/4 oz./acre and
the maximum rate/crop/season is 4 ozs./acre.

Although I am not thrilled with this type of label (i.e. providing rates for spray volumes confounded with land areas), Novartis (soon to be
Syngenta) is trying to prevent growers from using too high a spray concentration, particularly when the plants are small, which may delay the
onset of harvest. Also, rate per spray volume, rather than rate per acre, is apparently the way the growers wanted to have this product
labeled. Further confusion exists with the statement on the label: "Use the higher rate over time, even if the volume does not increase. If
gallonage at any particular application is higher than in the example, increase Actigard accordingly, i.e., keep the concentration the same
but do not exceed 3/4 oz./100 gals. concentration." One interpretation of this statement is that more than 3/4 oz./acre can be used if the
spray volume is over 100 gpa of spray. Yet, earlier in the label it is clearly stated that 3/4 oz/acre is the highest label rate. Mixing these two
parameters (volume and land area) for the purpose of calculating spray loads by different people will be interesting; I envision interpretation
by different individuals to vary. A maximum of six applications/crop/season can me made on tomato.

Actigard 50 WG is also labeled on spinach, but this use is for Texas. The labeling of Actigard on tobacco is on a national basis and that
use pattern is clearly presented on the label. Actigard has a 30 day plant back restriction except for the crops for which it is labeled. The
PHI on tomato is 14 days and it is labeled for field use only. It is not to be applied via chemigation.

The second product with new labeling is Quadris 2.08 FL which was developed by Zeneca and will be part of the Sygenta product line when
the merger of Novartis and Zeneca is complete. Quadris has been on the market for several years. For vegetables, it was initially labeled on
tomato and later labeling for a few other crops was established. Recently, a highly expanded label allows for use on over 90 different
vegetable crops, including many of the herbs. The label is clearly written and provides information on how to utilize this product with good
stewardship for resistance management. The mode of action of this product is specific and thus resistant (insensitive) strains of target

Page 4


pests are likely to occur.

The label for Quadris provides use patterns and restrictions for use of this product as treatment for designated foliar diseases and
designated soilborne diseases. Although this composite use pattern is not a new concept for fungicides, it provides for some interesting
possibilities for suppression of certain soilborne diseases in vegetables. Will this use be a substitute for methyl bromide + chloropicrin? The
answer is clearly no.

To access the newest chemical recommendations for vegetables, as well as many other bits of information related to plant diseases and
their control, go to the web site http://plantpath.ifas.ufl.edu and then click on Extension Publications. I would recommend that County
Extension faculty bookmark this site for easy referencing on plant diseases in the future.

(Tom Kucharek, professor, Plant Pathology Department, Vegetarian 00-12)


Cool-Season Vegetables for Florida Gardens

The cool-season vegetables are those of which the primary parts eaten are the vegetative parts- roots, leaves, buds, or immature flower
parts. That is a general rule, for there are exceptions: sweet potato roots and New Zealand spinach tops are warm-season, while pods of
English peas and broad beans are cool-season vegetables.

Here are some major ways cool-season vegetables differ from the warm season vegetables (generally, not always):

1. They are cold hardy or frost-tolerant.
2. Seeds germinate at cooler soil temperatures.
3. Root systems are more shallow.
4. Plant size is smaller.
5. They respond more to nitrogen fertilizer.
6. They must be watered more frequently.
7. Some are susceptible to pre-mature seed stalk development.
8. Most are stored at or near 32 degrees F (except potato); sweet corn is a warm-season exception that is also stored at 32 F. Many
warm-season vegetables suffer chilling injury between 32 and 50 F.
9. Some seeds like lettuce and celery are favored by light at germination.
10. For asparagus, very cold temperatures are required for dormancy and re-growth.

List of Cool-season Vegetables:

Artichoke, globe Chard, Swiss Kohlrabi Shallot

Artichoke, Jerusalem Chicory Leek Spinach

Asparagus Chinese cabbage Lettuce Turnips

Bean, broad Chive Mustard Watercress

Beet Collard Onion

Page 5



Corn salad


Brussels sprouts Cress Parsnip

Cabbage Dandelion e

Cardoon Endive Potato

Carrot Florence fennel Radish

Cauliflower Garlic Rhubarb

Celery Horse-radish Rutabaga

Celeriac Kale Salsify

Planting Dates for Cool-season Vegetables in North Florida

Some of these crops can be planted as temperatures approach the proper range. Cool-season crops grown in the spring must have time to
mature before temps are too warm. In the fall, they can be started in warm weather if they mature when it is cooler. However, if seeds are
germinated in the garden, they must have cool enough soil temperatures for sprouting properly.

There is a fairly wide range of soil temperatures for seed germination, from about 40-80 for lettuce to 60-105 for turnip, 50-70 for parsnip,
50-85 for parsley and watermelon is 70-95. Gardeners should follow the suggested planting dates in the Florida Planting Guides Stephens.

(Stephens, Vegetarian 00-12)

Extension Vegetable Crops Specialists

Daniel J. Cantliffe
Professor and Chairman, Horticultural Sciences Department
Timothy E. Crocker
Professor, deciduous fruits and nuts, strawberry
John Duval
Assistant Professor, strawberry
Chad Hutchinson
Assistant Professor, vegetable production
Elizabeth M. Lamb
Assistant Professor, production
Yuncong Li
Assistant Professor, soils
Donald N. Maynard
Professor, varieties

Stephen M. Olson
Professor, small farms

Mark A. Ritenour
Assistant Professor, postharvest
Ronald W. Rice
Assistant Professor, nutrition
Steven A. Sargent
Professor, postharvest
Eric Simonne
Assistant Professor and Editor, vegetable nutrition
William M. Stall
Professor, weed control
James M. Stephens
Professor, vegetable gardening
Charles S. Vavrina
Associate Professor, transplants
James M. White
Associate Professor, organic farming

Page 6

A -~


FastCounter by LinkExchange
This page is maintained by Susie Futch.... if you have any questions or comments, contact me at
zsf@mail.ifas.ufl. edu

Page 7

University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs