• TABLE OF CONTENTS
HIDE
 Title Page
 Introduction
 In search of the traditional labour...
 Lima: City of kings and migran...
 Notes
 Bibliography






Title: Women at the "marginal pole" of the economy in Lima, Peru
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00086893/00001
 Material Information
Title: Women at the "marginal pole" of the economy in Lima, Peru
Physical Description: Archival
Language: English
Creator: Chaney, Elsa M.
Affiliation: Fordham University -- Department of Political Science
Publisher: Chaney, Elsa M.
Publication Date: 1976
 Subjects
Subject: South America   ( lcsh )
Spatial Coverage: South America -- Peru -- Lima
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00086893
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Table of Contents
    Title Page
        Title Page
    Introduction
        Page 1
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
    In search of the traditional labour worker
        Page 8
        Page 9
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
        Page 16
        Page 17
        Page 18
    Lima: City of kings and migrants
        Page 19
        Page 20
        Page 21
        Page 22
        Page 23
        Page 24
        Page 25
        Page 26
        Page 27
    Notes
        Page 28
        Page 29
    Bibliography
        Page 30
        Page 31
        Page 32
        Page 33
        Page 34
Full Text














WOMEN AT THE "MARGINAL POLE" OF


THE ECONOMY IN LIMA, PERU



Elsa M. Chaney, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Political Science
Fordham University
Bronx, New York 10458


















Paper Prepared for the Panel on Informal Labor
Markets, Conference on Women and Development,
Wellesley College, June 4, 1976. Margo Lane
Smith, Chairperson.









WOMEN AT THE "MARGINAL POLE" OF

THE ECONOMY: WORKING CLASS MOTHERS IN LIMA

This study deals with women workers at the "marginal pole"

of the economy -- domestic servants, street vendors, market sellers

and, for comparison and contrast, factory workers, in Lima, Peru.1

The "polo marginal," a concept elaborated in the work of Peruvian

sociologist Anibal Quijano Obregon, is that sector of the economy

related so precariously to the means of production that it forms a

new strata of persons who apparently may never enjoy stable, produc-

tive employment (Quijano, 1971: 1).

Need we justify a study of women in the workforce? Appar-

ently yes, since either (a) most often any considerations about

women workers are ignored, as analysts lump together female and

male economic activity, not recognizing that women's participation

patterns vary greatly from men's, or (b) considerations about women

workers are footnoted out, because analysts recognize the contradic-
tions but refuse to deal with them -- for example, to face the diffi-

culty of measuring women's participation since so many are unpaid

family workers or are techically "idle," even if they work long

hours in the home producing and reproducing the labor power of those

who are technically "employed."

We believe our working class mothers are a crucial population

to study not only because we in the social sciences know so little

about working women, but also because such research can contribute

to the current reassessment of modernization and labor market theories

as well as to the modification of strategies and policies related to






development in the Third World. Our project looks at many issues

related to what may be a new "subuniverse" of the permanently un-

deremployed.2

Quijano's formulations on this subuniverse bear some resem-

blance (in different terminology) to theories about the dual labor

market and the disadvantaged labor force of Doeringer and Piore

(1971: Ch. 8), demonstrating that marginal labor is not a problem
confined to the developing countries. Even the policy implications

(but not the solutions) are interpreted in somewhat similar fashion.

For Doeringer and Piore (p. 167) however, it is not the secondary

labor market itself that constitutes the policy problem (it may even

be functional, they say, for women who are interested in supplement-

ing family income by working on a temporary basis, and for teenagers)

but "(i)t is the permanent and involuntary confinement in the secon-

dary market of workers with major family responsibilities that poses

the problem for public policy."

Of special interest to a political scientist is the fact that

these persons have no control over their fate; they are powerless to

influence any of the vital decisions regulating their lives. This

fact also has important implications for public policy -- if these

persons indeed are not, as we have supposed, transitionalls" on

their way to becoming "moderns," then development theorists have

asked the wrong questions (e.g., how soon and in what manner can

these marginals be integrated into the economy and society?) and
given the wrong answers (through education and training, inculca-

ting achievement motivation and more universalistic norms). Such

an approach puts all the onus on the disadvantaged persons for their

backwardness and insufficient emphasis on the structures of economy






and polity -- as the large literature critical of the "culture of
poverty" thesis makes clear. These and other ideas will be elabora-

ted below (see also Lomnitzt 1975; I was influenced on these ques-

tions by an earlier exposition of her thinking outlined in a talk
in Mexico in 1974).
This study also examines three associated trends of women's

participation in the labor force in Lima, trends noted as general

throughout the developing world by Boserup (1970): there are more

women than men in service and market occupations, defined by Boserup

as traditional; the work force in the small modern sector in develop-
ing countries typically is no more than 5 to 15 percent female, the

jobs in "modern" occupations going almost exclusively to men; male

migrants from the rural areas are quicker to change over from tra-
ditional to modern type occupations (178; 179-80; 184).
Our data confirm Boserup's contentions women, although they

are 27 percent of the economically-active population in Lima (a

high percentage for Latin America), are the most disadvantaged work-
ers, and migrant women are even more disadvantaged as workers than
women who are Lima born. Not only are more women found in

the lowest-paid, lowest-status jobs in the traditional sector (while

men dominate the modern sector with its better salaries, greater job

security, pensions, health benefits and union protection), but they
are more likely to remain there. Some males -- among them signifi-

cant numbers of migrants -- move out of the traditional sector;

any movement of women tends to be lateral, for example, women move
from domestic service to street selling, but rarely from unskilled
jobs like these to factory employment. In other words, while women

in any case are significantly less likely than men to be found in

modern sector occupations, they have almost no access to these jobs






unless they are Lima born. In our study, many fewer obreras or

factory workers were migrants, and those who were had longer years

of residence in Lima (median = 16.3 vs 12 years) and/or more school-

ing (median 5.8 vs 3 years) than the maids.

Patterns of capital-intensive, dependent development are

spawning in the Third World a "subuniverse" of persons who apparent-
permanently
ly may never be integrated/into productive work. (This substratum

has spilled over into the advanced industrial nations which now re-

ceive large contingents of foreign contract labor [Western Europe].

or illegal Afro-Caribbean and Hispanic migrants [U.S. eastern sea-

board cities, western and southwestern states].) The complex factors

generating the rising indices of worldwide unemployment and under-

employment have been analyzed by many political economists and need

not detain us for long: capital-intensive production techniques util-

ized not only in manufacturing but in agriculture and mining push

people out of primary production with no possibility of more than a

fraction being absorbed either by the new mechanized agricultural

enterprises or, alternatively, by the modernized urban manufacturing

and service sectors. In Peru, most of the campesinos are small
holders, excluded.from the benefits of the new cooperatives created

by the agrarian reform. The modern sector accounts for two-thirds

of the GNP, but employs only one-third of the labor force.

(Fitzgerald, 1976).5 As a consequence, about 42 percent of the

work force in Peru was un or underemployed in 1975 (Suarez, 1975:

7). As noted by Dos Santos (1969: 75), in Latin America
marginality...is the result of the increasing contradiction
between new investments of a high technological level (and
consequently, low utilization of labor in relation to capital),
introduced by a technology foreign to the national structure,
and of the vegetative population increase, added to the in-
crease of rural-cityward migration accentuated by the crisis






in agriculture. The explanation of the phenomenon in it-
self demonstrates that the process of increasing marginality
is a direct subproduct of development sustained by invest-
ment capital, integrated internationally (translation mine).
Moreover, as Galbraith (1971s 234-35) notes, this low util-
ization of labor is not solely the result of the "technostructure

seeking] technical progressiveness for its own sake." Mechaniza-

tion adds to certainty, he says, because "machines do not go out
on strike." Both supply and cost are more firmly in control of the
firm than is labor. More white collar workers and more members of
the technostructure will be required for mechanization; however,

Galbraith says, white collar workers with few exceptions do not

join unions and they tend to identify themselves with the goals of
the technostructure with which they are fused (p. 235). Unskilled
and unequipped to ascend, surplus labor has not place to go except

to the tertiary sector. This is particularly true for women who,
even if they enter factory production in its first crude, labor-
intensive phases in some countries, are eased out of the most modern
sectors as tools become more sophisticated and the sources of in-

animate power more complex and expensive (for a further discussion
of the relationship of women to the sophisticated and productive
tools of society, see Chaney and Schmink, 1975). This had lead to
the now common observation that modernization benefits
only those middle-class women who have education or

professional training and thus find opportunity because skilled,

trained persons are in demand throughout the developing world,what-
ever their sex.6 (See Safa, 1975a and b for a further discussion.)
In the Third World however, as is also well documented by
now, the rural population has moved directly from agriculture to

the tertiary sector; women there almost never had great entree into






the secondary sector because late developers tend to leap over the
labor-intensive stages of manufacturing. Of course, not all ter-

tiary sector employment is marginal, but as Amin (1974: 61) observes,

only in developed countries does the service sector resemble the
secondary (in terms of productivity, wages, unionization and work-

ing conditions). In countries of the periphery the tertiary sector

has undergone a process of "hypertrophy," becoming swollen and dis-

torted so that the proportion of the work force occupied in ter-

tiary activity is much greater than in the secondary. On the peri-
phery, the tertiary sector contains a much greater number of marginal
occupations than in center countries. Historically, Amin notes
in the developed countries, the movement transferring the
active population from one sector to the other is not lineal;
from 1820 to 1880-90, the transference from agriculture to
the two other sectors was carried out in roughly equal propor-
tions....(t)he participation of each sector in the growth of
the national product was almost parallel, except in the 20th
century the contribution of the tertiary sector to the GNP grew
even more rapidly than the secondary sector's contribution.

In the Third World, on the contrary, the non-agricultural
segment of the work force has gone directly into the tertiary
sector before the secondary, and has done so since the begin-
ning of the process of urban modernization, linked to the inte-
gration of the world capitalist system.....To say it another way,
in the center model, industry as it gets underway, employs more
workers than the artisans it ruins. They also are recruited
from an agriculture in decomposition and from demographic in-
crease. In the periferic model, industry employs less workers
than the number of peasants freed from agriculture and ruined
artisans (Amin, 1974: 61-62; translation mine).
I would add a codicil to the historical analysis of Amin.
In later stages of capitalist development, as Piore (1973 and 1976)
.notes, there is a paradoxical shortage of workers for low level

jobs in advanced capitalist countries. Industrial society, he adds,

always has tended to generate a set of jobs unacceptable to the
native born; these have been filled in the U.S. first by immigrants,

then by black labor from the South, and more lately, by rural Puerto







Ricans (and in the south and southwest by Mexicans). Many de-

veloped countries "solve" this problem by importing contract labor

(or tolerating illegal immigration). Once inside the center coun-

tries, these imported workers greatly resemble the marginal labor

force of developing countries. Indeed, they are one and the same,

and that is why it is important to link this question of migrant

labor to the discussion here. The very persons who have become

"surplus" in their own Third World economic systems have become an

international labor pool, to be transferred like some new kind of

raw material from the hinterland of the international political/

economic system to the metropolitan centers. Not only do the metro-

politan centers continue to draw food and raw materials from the

periphery, but they now also draw laboring hands as needed to perform

the tasks their own citizens no longer are willing to do. Paine

(1974: 21) notes Nickolinakos' contention that "foreign workers con-
stitute the modern reserve army of labor whose presence is essen-

tial for sustained accumulation: their availability has rescued the

capitalist system from crisis."
Immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe who

go to Western and Northern Europe, and immigrants to the U.S. from

the American "colonies" of the Caribbean and South America provide

labor at little cost either to the metropolitan center or to the

employer. Even in the case of factory work, migrant labor is much

more economic at times than the other option: opening a branch of

a multi-national concern within the borders of a Third World country.

In using migrants, the metropolitan economy takes up slack capacity

already in place rather than having to build and equip new plants.

But only a comparative few find work in factories; typically, the
new immigrants take on the residue of low-skilled, low-salaried






jobs that defy automation -- as restaurant workers, day laborers

and construction workers, janitors and custodians, parking lot

attendants, baggage handlers, gypsy cab drivers and, particularly
for the women, domestic service. Moreover, with contract labor or

workers without documents, there is little pressure to pay the

social costs of expanding the labor supply, and imported laboring

hands are far less likely to organize in defense of their own inter-

ests than citizens. Finally, as is well documented by now, immi-

grant labor tends to go home in periods of economic contraction in

center countries. (For an extended discussion of migrant labor in

Western Europe, see Berger, 1975; Paine, 1974; Marshall, 1973. For

the Caribbean and Latin America, see Bryce-Laporte, 1976; Chaney,

1976; Cruz and Castaio, 1976; Dominguez, 1975; Hendricks, 1974.)

In Search of the "Traditional" Labor Market

Whether they work in the center or on the periphery, the

surplus persons we have been discussing above belong to what has
variously been called the informal or casual, secondary, traditional,

or manual labor market (in contrast to the formal, primary, modern,

non-manual sectors). None of these terms appears satisfactory;

moreover, the problem of specifying which persons belong to each
sector is even more difficult than the mere naming of the sector

in the first place. Perhaps this problem is analagous to describ-

ing an urban place; Mangin (1970: xiv) in his book Peasants in

Cities suggests that a city might be identified as "a place that

when you are in it you know, especially if you are downtown."
In the city of Lima, for example, often traditional sector

employment for women is considered to include domestic service,

street vending, market selling and prostitution, while white and






and blue collar workers are considered to belong to the modern sec-

tor (Villalobos de Urrutia, 1975: II-21; Testa-Zappert, 1974: 10-
11). Boserup (1970: 176-79) also analyzes women's occupations in
terms of bazaar (market) and service occupations, and modern occu-
pations. In Lima, the traditional sector by this definition in
cludes (according to the 1972 Census of Population) almost one-half
of all economically-active women: domestic servants (28 percent);

many of the own-account workers (17.9 percent) and a residual cate-

gory which includes prostitutes.7 Obreras total only 9.7 percent and

empleadas, 42.2 percent (factory workers and white collar employees).8
The rough census classifications do not, however, take into

account the fact that in Lima, one blue collar worker may enjoy
stable employment in a unionized factory, working a modern machine,
with a whole range of benefits including social security, free
hospitalization, child care (children under one year of age are
provided a free nursery at the factory) and paid maternity leaves,

while another obrera works intermittently in a small shop, perhaps
in artesania or knitting seaters on a primitive loom and enjoys none
of the social services enumerated above.9 Are both women to be
classified as working in the "modern" sector?
Several labor market theorists have addressed this question.

Browning (3972: 10-12) suggests adopting Economic Commission of
Latin America categories (ECLA, 1957 and ECLA, 1965) which divide
the manufacturing sector into "industry proper" and "handicrafts

and homecrafts" -- or "factory sector" and "artisan sector." While
Browning recognizes that not all artisanal employment is of low
productivity -- some persons in this category of occupation, he says,

are highly skilled and well paid -- still he argues that, on the

whole, productivity is considerably higher in the factory situation.






Along the same lines, Webb (1973:21) points out that techno-

logical dualism (he is writing of Peru, but his distinctions hold

true for most of Latin America) -- the coexistence of a modern sec-

tor of large-scale, capital-intensive firms within a traditional

sector of labor-intensive haciendas, small scale firms and small

farmers, makes any division into traditional or modern sectors im-

possible. His own definitions of urban/traditional, urban/modern

and rural/traditional, rural/modern cut across all sectors; except

for electricity and banking which Webb considers "all modern," he

argues that there are modern and traditional components in all other

economic activities. Here, too, enter considerations of productiv-

ity, rationalization, organization and division of labor which char-

acterize the factory system; their absence identifies the handi-

craft sector. While all these refinements are useful, one still

faces a formidable measuring problem, firm by firm and activity by
activity, to decide which enterprises are factory and which are

artisan. (For an interesting summary of analyses related to tech-
nological dualism, see Stewart, 1974.)

Testa-Zappert (1975:11), writing of women in the work force

in Lima, identifies traditional tasks as those which women typi-

cally perform in the traditional peasant society:

When performed in the urban setting, [these tasks] still have
the same basic requirements, and consequently attract a dis-
tinct group of female participants. These jobs require less
in the way of education and expertise, and are therefore often
the only jobs open to young, poor female migrants to the
urban area.
Boserup (1973: 174-79), conceptualizing along the same lines,

suggests that there are two steps in the process: women from the

countryside move into bazaar and other service occupations, re-

placing their rural subsistence activities by commercial production







for sale, small scale market trade, and services. (In a second

step, she says, employers recruit not from among recent women

migrants, but from the bazaar or service sector, thus vacating the
less attractive jobs for the new migrants from the agricultural

sector [see also Elizaga, 1974: 529-31; Macisco, 1975: 118 and

Table 7, 131] I would suspect, however, that in most places it

is the migrant woman's daughters who move, if anyone does; see

discussion below, pp. 24-27.
Yet there are some difficulties here, too, in deciding whe-

ther or not a woman belongs in the traditional or modern employment

category, even if what she is doing appears to form a continuum

with women's work in the rural sector. The following two activities
could be classified as an extension of typical rural occupations: a

street seller spreads a few wares, purchased that morning in the

wholesale market, on the ground outside a district market. She goes

home after 12 or 14 hours, having made only a few soles above her

small investment. Discouraged, she does not venture out again for

three days. Inside the market, another woman is in her accustomed

place in a fixed stall, for which she has paid her fees and rent;

her activity is regulated by the municipal authorities. By relative
standards, she makes a good income, and she usually concludes her

day's work by 1 or 2 p.m. Are both these women to be considered in

casual, informal, traditional employment?

Several have suggested that underemployment and subsistence
wages are the characteristics identifying informal or traditional
economic activities. Testa-Zappert's study, building on the work

of Gianella (1970), defines underemployment as working less than 35

hours a week and/or earning less than S/2000 a month (1975 rate of






exchange: S/43.38 = U.S. $1). While a domestic servant in Lima
could earn S/2000 or more (although few do so), it is doubtful that
she would work less than 35 hours a week -- especially at such a

high salary -- since the decree specifying that domestic servants

must be given 8 hours rest in every 24 hours hs been interpreted by

many patrons as a license to demand 16-hour work days. Is a domes-
tic servant who earns more than S/2000 and works 96 hours a week

then in a "modern" occupation?

Recognizing the futility of using hours worked as a measure
for women, Ledn de Leal and Lopez de Rodriguez (1975: 635-73) seek
elsewhere for a measure of traditional/modern: in the level of edu-
cation of the women, building on L6pez' work in two related studies

(Angulo and L6pez de Rodriguez, 1975a and 1975b). But there are some
formidable problems in taking education as the "criterion to split
women into traditional and modern" with the explicit implication

that less-educated women will be found in traditional employment
(probably true for the most part), and that the more-educated will

work in the modern sector (not certain). A recent review of the
participation of women in development in Latin America (U.N. Secre-
tariat, 1976: 23-34) discusses why recent studies have shown that
women's levels and patterns of employment may not be affected by
levels of formal education and training as they are in developed
countries, e.g., the division of labor in developing countries;
class variables; educational systems geared to the "female" market,
leaving women few other options; sex role stereotyping in the media.
In Lima, a division of women into traditional/modern by education

does not allow for trained women who work in traditional employment

either because they choose to do so (e.g., artesania because it is







"de modo" or creative or a genteel way to parttime earnings, or

because they cannot find employment on a level with their educa-

tional preparation. A journalism graduate of the Catholic Univer-

sity in Lima, to give a further example, vends meat in a primitive

market in the city's center because she cannot find work in her

field. Paradoxically, she calculates she can earn more working

less hours as a carnicera than as a journalist. If this were an

isolated case, we could leave it aside; however, indications are

that the educational level of many Lima market women would put

them at least into the lowest group of the "moderns."

All these difficulties of definition and classification of

women's work (and we have not touched upon the formidable problem

not directly connected to the present discussion of conceptualizing

and measuring the value of household labor) lead one to affirm the
and L6pez de Rodriguez'
principal conclusion reached in Leon de Leal/ own study: women's

participation in work outside the home is remarkable hetereogeneous.

Perhaps women's work simply is not classifiable in terms of any of

the criteria so far suggested. Long ago, Eli Ginzberg (1966) com-
plained that the varied career patterns even of educated women --

for example, their "late" start and their tendencies to interrup-

tions -- made it impossible to study their participation patterns

by male standards. "Participation" for women ranges from the tradi-

tional woman whose economic activity is so intermittent that she

scarcely distinguishes it from her domestic tasks, to the highly-

trained professional at the other end of the scale whose work in-

cludes the aspect of personal fulfillment. The first woman feels

little conflict between domestic tasks and "work" since one shades
same authors
unconsciously into the other and since, asthe / perceptively note,








the tasks for which she receives remuneration are simply the nor-

mal prolongation of her homemaking responsibilities, a carry-over

from the rural area where women are expected to make an economic
contribution to the household. The professional, on the other hand,
makes a conscious distinction between home and employment, carefully
measuring the opportunity costs of working and not working (Cf.
and L6pez de Rodriguez,
Leon de Leal/1975: 66-67 for a further developing of these and

related ideas).
A possible alternative in identifying the informal labor

market might be to leave aside for the present these attempts to

measure such variables as productivity, rationalization and organi-

zation and capital intensity of the activity, as well as (from the
worker's side) educational and skill levels, hours of work, salary
and level of benefits. The solution may be to turn to some combina-

tion of the Quijano/Doeringer-Piore concepts which place workers in

the primary and secondary labor markets according to their access
and "nearness" to the modern means of production. In Quijano's
view, as stated above, the "polo marginal" is that sector of the
economy whose members simply will never have stable access to the

technologically advanced tools of society. For this reason, they
do not form precisely a "reserve army of labor," as Quijano (1971:

5) points out, since this would imply that they at least potentially
were able to enter the workforce as the economy expanded. A large
part of this strata is a new permanent phenomenon, "surplus people"

ofskill levels so low and numbers so large that, as Quijano notes,
they form a sector that "is losing all possibility of access to

economic roles that characterize the dominant modes of the organiza-







tion of economic activity," and, in consequence, "are going

to lose also any possibility of an organized and stable relation

with the basic means of production"(Quijano, 1971: 1).
These are the people whom many of us have called "marginals," a

term which need not necessarily be discarded if we understand that

marginalization is produced by and intimately linked to the domi-

nant economic system. In our own study, we concentrate on women

marginal to the urban economic system in Peru, but it is important

to recognize that there is also a rural subuniverse, that is, rural

unemployed and underemployed who are marginal to the dominant

system in agriculture in the same way as their city counterparts,

that is, because of their precarious relation to the modern agri-
culture technology in the countryside.
As a matter of fact, Quijano says (.1971: 5), there is a

parallel subuniverse of employment that is growing alongside all

the modern sectors. This paradox of a "new" strata of traditional
economic activity is present in all three sectors of the economy,

he notes, a parallel development to the visible, scientific-techno-

logical system at the top. The artisan is not disappearing, nor

is the small comerciante. Rather, a whole other level of activities--
desperate people inventing jobs in the interstices of the dominant

economy in order to stay alive -- is growing and expanding.

The important part of Quijano's vision is that these persons

form a strata which must now be viewed as a permanent level of

economic activity. As he notes such activities have always ex-

isted, but it is only at the present time in Latin America that

they are tending not to disappear as conventional economic theory

predicted, but to expand and to differentiate themselves as a







totally separate level or strata: not a relic of the past, but a

new sector produced paradoxically by the present patterns of econo-

mic development and the modern economic structures. This sector

is intimately connected to the dominant economic system and pro-

foundly affected by it -- hence the idea of a "polo marginal" has

the advantage of expressing the margination of the workers without

implying that they occupy a labor market completely separated and
isolated and discontinuous from the dominant forms of economic

activity.

Doeringer and Piore (1971: 1-7) perform the important task

of specifying more exactly than Quijano does the nature of the re-

lationship between the secondary and primary labor markets.




In a capitalist

system, competition for jobs in the primary labor market, by and

large, is carefully controlled by internal labor markets, that is,

by the large, modern administrative units of the manufacturing

establishments, the agri-business complexes and the craft unions.

These units carefully maintain boundaries around the enterprises.
Within each of these internal labor markets, lines of progression

and job classifications are carefully regulated, and promotion is

generally from within. So far as recruitment is concerned, the in-

ternal labor markets are related to the external only at certain
points, typically at the lowest job classifications which act as

"ports of entry," the only way in to the sheltered, protected,

secure employment using advanced technology. Even in highly indus-

trialized countries, however, there are jobs which are not







contained within well-defined administrative units of any factory

or craft. Doeringer and Piore (1971: 4) identify the market for

migrant labor in California as the paradigm for the United States;

in a later conversation, Piore (1976) talked extensively of the

Caribbean migrant to the U.S. as also typical. The external market
includes a range of low-wage, marginal enterprises, and a set of

casual, unstructured work opportunities where workers with employ-

ment disadvantages tend to find work. These workers do not have

access to jobs in the internal, protected labor markets in any

freely competitive way; they form a "queue" in which they line up,

figuratively, according to skill level, productivity and reliabili-

ty. Those at the rear of the queue never make it to any port of

entry for stable, permanent employment. A key difference between

developed and developing countries would be how many persons are

lined up beyond the cut-off point in the queue, who therefore never

get close to the productive tools of scientific-technological so-

ciety, whether these are located in the factory, on the farm or in

the service sector (for example, computers, modern communications
technology, sophisticated office machines and the like).

Doeringer and Piore (.1971: 178-79) point out that the pri-

mary and secondary labor markets are interrelated and interact

with each other in complex ways -- mostly in terms of the utility

of secondary employment as the guarantee of flexibility and profi-

tability for the dominant enterprises. The external labor market

is divided into three employment situations, according to these

authors:
1. Completely unstructured employment, not related to
any internal market. Such jobs are the "polar opposite"
of those in internal labor markets. Examples: casual
laboring in .construction; domestic work; dishwashing in
restaurants.







2. Employment with some formal structure, but with many
entry ports and characterized by work which is generally
low paying, unpleasant or both. Examples: blue collar
work in foundries, stitching and pressing in apparel
plants, menial jobs in hospitals.

3. Secondary jobs with few possibilities of promotion or
transfer, attached directly to internal labor markets.
Examples: in pulp and paper mills, work in the wood
yard; in machine tool companies, foundry work; in
light manufacturing, temporary packaging lines.

In times of employment expansion, some of these workers get in

line for primary employment; however,
other workers in the secondary sector, the most seriously
disadvantaged, may not be included in the queue for entry
into primary employment at all. If primary employers reach
the end of the queue and refuse to expand employment further
by hiring the most seriously disadvantaged, other instruments
of adjustment to market conditions such as subcontracting,
technological change and the like may be utilized instead
(Doeringer and Piore, 1971: 169).

Even in the metropolitan center, jobs in the external market do
not carry with them job security, promotion opportunities, fringe

benefits -- and often the enforcement of minimum wage rates.

Applying these theories to women in the Lima labor market,
at the every end of the queue we would put beggars, and after
them, domestic servants (a study by Heyman [ 9741 shows that this

is how women themselves rank these occupations, domestic service and

begging coming out 35th and 36th on the list). With low skill
levels, little education, Indian or chola racial identity and (often)

recent migrant status, many women will never move up sufficiently

forward in the queue to stand at the "port of entry" of even the

lowest job classifications in primary employment. Typically they
move laterally, from job to job within domestic service, and
with the birth of a child, make another lateral move to street
vending if their patrona is not willing to keep them on.- A study

by Sagasti (1974) found that about 65 percent of a randomly-selected






sample of street sellers had started out as domestic servants; in

our study, 85 percent had done so. In terms of the "polo marginal,"

these women are located at the farthest distance from the modern

means of production, with scarcely any hope of moving into stable

employment in a factory job or in the service sector. Before turn-

ing to a more detailed examination of women and work in Lima, the

general urban situation will be sketched.

Lima: City of Kings and Migrants

It is important to look at the over-all statistics on Peru

and the participation of women in the work force before developing

further the analysis of women in the subuniverse of employment.

By the mid-1970's, Peru's population had reached 16 million; 60

percent reside in urban places.10 Per capital income is U.S. $710
per year, which positions Peru exactly at the median of the 19

American republics (Argentina is first, with a PCI of $1900; Boli-
via last, with $210).
Peru has a birth rate of 41 per thousand population, contri-

buting to an annual population growth rate of 2.9 percent and fore-

casting if present population trends continue a doubling time of

24 years (Population Reference Bureau, 1976). Between 1961 and

1972, however, Lima's population increased by more than 50 percent

to 3,317,648 persons; about one-quarter of the Peruvian population
lives in metropolitan Lima. As these figures show, Peru -- along

with all countries of Latin America -- has undergone heavy rural

to urban migration in the years since World War II. About 40 per-

cent of Lima's residents are migrants; moreover, survey data from

a CELADE study shows that again, about 40 percent of these were

"voluntary" migrants, i.e., not simply taken along as children to







Lima by their parents (Macisco 1975: 5-6). About 61 percent of

Lima's work force are migrants (Martinez, et al. 168).

Macisco's study also shows, as have many others, that fe-

males outnumber males among migrants, and that migrants in the

younger age groups (15 to 29 years) predominate for both men and
women (38.4 percent and 32 percent respectively). This is precisely

the age from which 80 percent of domestic servants come, according

to census data. There was a tendency (20 percent of all recent

female migrants) for the women migrants to come from towns of under

5,000 population, indicating less opportunity for women in the
smaller urban places; this tendency was not registered for the

males (Macisco, 1975: 18 and 27). In the country as a whole, 20.7

percent of all workers are women; in Lima, 27.3 percent. But

country-wide, only 20.1 percent of women 15 years of age and older
are economically active.
Several investigators estimate that about 60 percent of all

employed migrant females are domestic servants (Chaplin, 1970s 1;

Smith, 1971: 41). Moreover, as Chaplin also notes, because domestic
service has a fairly high turnover rate, the number of women who
have ever worked in this occupation is even higher -- perhaps as

high as 250,000 to 300,000 women.

The four tables on the pages following give essential data

on women in the work force: Table 1 gives an historical glimpse

of women's participation (note that the 1940 census figures must

be interpreted with caution); Table 2 gives the occupations of

females in the work force as percent of all women and of all workers;

Table 3 show sectoral changes in women's participation from 1961

to 1972 and finally, Table 4 gives the servant population for the
three census years.











Table 1

WOMEN'S WORKFORCE PARTICIPATION
1940, 1961 and 1972
(crude activity rates)


PEA/total in 000's
& % of total pop.
economically active


2,475


3,125


3,872


40.5


39.4


27.8


Active females
000's/% of all
workers


877


679


800


35.4


21.7


20.7


Active females
000's/% of all
women (men)

3,255 26.9 (64.3)


3,997 17.0 (62.2)


6,754 11.8 (45.2)


Sources: America en Cffras, 1972; Censo Nacional de Poblacion,
1972; Centro de Estudios de Poblacion y Desarrollo,
1972.
ICare must be exercised lest the drop in female participation
between 1940 and 1961 be exaggerated: apparently the numbers
in certain categories were over-enumerated in 1940 and under-
enumerated in 1961 because of definitional and other diffi-
culties. For a discussion, see CEPD, 1972: 259-62.


19401


1961


1972











Table 2

OCCUPATIONS OF WOMEN (AND MEN)
AS PERCENT OF ALL WOMEN AND ALL WORKERS
Peru/Lima, 1972
(15 years and older),


Category of
Occupation

White collar
(empleado)

Blue collar
(obrero)

Independent
worker

Domestic (tra-
bajador del
hogar)

Family worker
(trabajador
familiar)


Active females: Peru
Numbers/percent of
all workers


215,920


64,813


237,551


132,561


60,212


28.5


7.0


15.1


89.6


31.6


Distribution of females (and
males)by occupation
Peru Lima


28.3 (17.9)


8.2 (28.2)


31.2 (44.1)


17.3 ( .5)


42.2


9.7


17.9


27.9


7.9 ( 4.3)


Other
TOTALS


43,239
763, 151


28.6


. 65 ( 4.1)
100.0 100.0


Sources: Censo Nacional de Poblacion, 1972.


100.0


--.












Table 3

WOMEN IN THE WORKFORCE
SECTORAL CHANGES 1961 and 1972


SECTOR

Primary


Secondary


Tertiary

Not specified

TOTALS


1961
No.


216,872

116,981

318,178

27,117

679,152


31.9

17.3

46.8


1972
No.

.147,942

126,896

427,034

37,925

741,587"


4.0

100.0


Source: Villalobos de Urrutia, 1975: 1-21. I am unable to
explain the discrepancy in our totals for women in
the workforce, 1972 (see Table 2).
Table 4

SERVANTS IN PERU AND LIMA


No.Female/% Female
Nati onal/ National


85,300


143,340

132,561


73.0

81.5

89.6


No. Female
Lima

26,200

61,747


79,186


Sources: Smith, 1971: 61-62; CEPD, 1972; Villalobos de Urrutia,
1975: 36; Testa-Zappert, 1975: 49.


20.2


17.1


57.6

5.1
100.0


Year

1940

1961

1972






These tables show some interesting trends which will be

examined briefly here. Because the first division of labor, as

Engels pointed out, was between men and women, the implications and

consequences of forming part of the "polo marginal" are different

for men and women. On the one hand, one must be careful not to

imply that men of the popular classes in Latin America have access

to job training and stable employment, and are therefore happy and

free, while the women of these same classes are condemned to oppression

and misery. But it still is true that significantly more women are

found in the subuniverse of employment -- and because they generally
are further back in the employment queue than men, their chances of

moving out of the subuniverse are much more limited. Several stu-

dies now document for Lima what we have long argued about women in

the Third World, that is, that urbanization and modernization are

negatively related to the participation of women in productive work

(and consequently, to their general position and status). Heyman

(1974) documents a general deterioration of the position of women
in post-conquest Peru. Suarez'(1975) findings are particularly re-

vealing; in one of the few studies ever done on occupational mobility

in Latin America, she found that while 52.2 percent of migrant

males in her sample whose first occupation.in Lima had been in the

lowest category had moved up in their job classification as measured

by their present occupation, only 12 percent of migrant women experi-
enced occupational mobility between their first and present jobs

(again, it is well to remember that over 60 percent of the Lima

work force are migrants). Our own findings, to be examined more in

detail in the chapters that follow, confirm that women are worse off
than men in the subuniverse of employment for the following reasons:






1. Women are worse off because they tend to cluster in the
lowest echelons of the traditional employment sector --
in domestic service, and in the least-profitable street
vending and market selling. The numbers and proportion
of men in blue collar jobs are increasing somewhat; the
proportion of women in these sectors and their absolute
numbers, in Peru as well as in many other Third World coun-
tries, are decreasing.
2. Women are worse off -- particularly if they are migrants --
because they are locked into the traditional sector.
Women have differential access from the subuniverse of
employment to the modern sector, in comparison to males.
Admittedly, movement towards the ports of entry to modern
occupations is limited -- but some men do move upwards
out of the traditional sector to at lea-T somewhat better
occupations,and the overwhelming majority of women migrants
do not (see Suarez key table, p. 27). Nor do these women
have access to white collar jobs, a sector growing at a very
fast rate. The Testa-Zappert study mentioned above, which
utilized a survey of employees of two Five and Ten Cent-
type stores in Lima, shows that the women white collar em-
ployees come overwhelmingly from the middle class (not true
for the male employees); that they are more highly educated
than the men in comparable white collar jobs, and that they
are overwhelmingly Lima born. Not much chance for migrant
women here:

3. Women are worse off because they are expected, by and large,
to engage in economic activity that extrapolates their
motherly, nurturing and service functions within the home
to the marketplace. There is thus a certain image of the
kinds of economic activity proper to the female, and
this stereotyping reenforces the clustering of women in the
lowest-paid, least-skilled jobs within the service sector.
Domestic service, for example, simply is not seen anymore as
a male occupation; the Census of 1972 found that only 10.4
percent of domestic servants were male, with 28 percent of
all economically-active women but only .5 of active men
engaged in this occupation.
4. There are, of course, also structural and institutional
reasons for the concentration of women in the lowest-paid
more precarious forms of employment. Literacy rates for
women and their access to education are consistently lower
than for men in Peru (see Bourque and Warren, n.d., and
Stein, 1975 for a discussion). As many observers have
pointed out by now (see especially Nash, 1975), not only
are women discriminated against in training programs (only
last year were women in Peru admitted to the SENATI program,
a cooperative effort between government and industry to up-
grade factory workers' skills through on-the-job training),
but they are almost never included in agricultural training
courses even in regions where women grow the food crops
if not the extensive export crops -- Western experts go out
with a picture in their heads of agricultural workers as






male, and thus the women are left aside. But women also
are worse off because of advanced social legislation --
they are more expensive to hire, and thus they tend not to
be hired in the internal, protected, stable labor markets.

5. Finally, the fact that women are doubly exploited -- by
the economic system and by the patriarchal system -- makes
those women in the marginal subuniverse worse off. As
Youssef (1974) points out, women are seen first of all in
their roles in the family, and economic participation is
conditioned by this fact. Fidel Castro (1966 s 7 ) also has
addressed the double oppression of working class women; he
noted that they not only suffer economic exploitation at
the hands of all the men and women of other social classes,
but are exploited by the males of their own class as well.
In this sense, we can speak of working class women as the
colonized of the colonized, the oppressed of the oppressed.
Maintenance of patriarchal supremancy is most functional
for the maintenance of the present dependent economic sys-
tems of the Third World; thus, we come full circle to the
beginning of this discussion. Women are "worse off" be-
cause of capital-intensive, dependent development in the
Third World; but the "worse off" women are vital to the
maintenance of the very system which oppresses them.


S9 9 9












JCADRO No 32

MOVILIDAD ENTIRE LA PRIMERA OCUPACION Y LA ACTUAL
SEGUN SEXO
(PEA Ocupada)


Estratos de Estratos de S E X 0
origen en destino en .Total .
la primera la ocupaci6n
ocupaci6n actual Hombres Mujeres

MEs alto 83.3 83.6 82.3

Mas alto Medio alto 7.6 6.4 11.8
Medio bajo 4.2 5.4
Mas bajo 4.9 4.6 5.9


Mas alto 11.6 16.5 3.3
Medio alto 73.5 63.3 91.0
Medio alto
Medio bajo 9,5 13,1 3.3
Mas bajo 5.4 7.1 2.4


MIs alto 2.9 3.1 1.8
Medio alto 9.7 10.3 6.6
Medio bajo
Medio bajo 70.7 71.0 69,5
Mgs bajo 16.7 .15.6 22.1


MUs alto 3.5 4.6 6
Medio alto 9.2 12.0 4.7
MbS bajo
Ms bajo edio bajo 24.3 35.s 5.7

Mas bajo 63.0 47.8 88.0

Source: Suarez, 1975& 61.




28




NOTES

1. "La madre y el trabajo: women in the work force in Lima,
Peru," a research project being carried out by Ximena Bunster
B., Chilean anthropologist; Elsa M. Chaney, North American
political scientist; Hilda Mercado Avalos, Peruvian sociolo-
gist, and Gabriela Villalobos de Urrutia, Peruvian social
psychologist. The project has been funded by grants from the
Social Science Research Council; the NationalInstitute of Child
Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health;
the Interdisciplinary Communications Program, Smithsonian In-
stitution, and the local office of the Ford Foundation, Lima.
2. Who is "employed," "unemployed" or "underemployed" is elusive,
a question tied to time spent at work, intensity of work and
productivity. Edwards (1974), who chaired an international
work group on employment, lists the following forms of under-
utlization of labor: open unemployment (voluntary and involun-
tary); underemployment; visibly active but underutilized,
including disguised underemployment, hidden unemployment (those
working at. alternative jobs because positions in their own
field were not available) and the prematurely retired. Others,
he says, would add the impaired and the unproductive, i.e.,
those who work long hours, yet lack the complementary resources
for commensurate return.

3. Boserup's traditionalsector includes bazaar and service occupa-
tions which comprise own-account workers and family aids in
industry and trade, and all personnel in transport, domestic
and other service occupations; modern occupations include employ-
ees in industry and trade and all personnel in clerical adminis-
trative and professional occupations.
4. Among them, Amin, 1974; B owning, 1972; Cardoso and Reyna, 1969;
Cardoso and Faletto, 1969; Dos Santos, et al., 1969; Edwards,
1974; Frank, 1967 and 1969; Furtado, 1970; Galbraith, 1971;
Gianella, 1970; Gordon, 1972; Hinkelammert, 1970; Martinez, et
al., 1973; Nun, et al., 1967; Ramos, 1970).

5. Fitzgerald also points out that a highly unequal distribution
of income persists; whatever reforms the present military govern-
ment has carried out have been primarily in the modern sector.

6. Deere (1976: 3; 23-24) cites some evidence in the rural areas
that where modernization has taken place, the process has bene-
fitted rural women on the cooperatives (for example, in guaran-
teeing them the minimum wage and an eight-hour working day).
Thus, Deere notes, paradoxically the development of capitalist
relations of production over the servile relations prevailing
on the pre-capitalist hacienda in Peru has given women certain
advantages (although she further notes the effects are contra-






dictory, since other rural women -- for example, those on the
minifundia -- benefit only indirectly, and in some ways, their
lot becomes harder, i.e., they must work harder because neither
the men nor the women on the smallholdings can any longer supple-
ment their incomes by working on the hacienda in seed and harvest
time; the men seek wage labor further away from home and this
also increases the burden of the women who stay behind. Never-
theless, the increasing participation of minifundia women in
production and community affairs raises their status.

7. Prostitution is legal and regulated by the state in Peru; no
percentage can be assigned since the total was tabulated --
and hidden -- in the category "other services" in the Census
(Ministerio de Educaci6n, 1975s 3).
8. Laraine Testa-Zappert (1975) has discussed the reasons for the
large numbers of white-collar workers who are women in a study
which is a re-analysis of data from an investigation of employ-
ees of the Monterrey and Tia, Peruvian equivalents of the Five-
and-Ten-Cent store. Although the number of female white collar
workers is high, many are in the extremely low-paid, exploited
(and feminized) occupations of sales clerks, postal employees,
office workers in the private sector and governmentbureaucracies -
where, nevertheless, a white skin and "buena presencia," (good
looks) are requisites. Migrant, cholaa" women have no chance
of being hired in these positions. We would have liked very
much to include these women in our study, but were unable to do
so because of time and budget limitations.

9. It has been pointed out by many observers that social welfare
legislation has, by and large, militated against women. If the
costs (or a significant part of them) fall upon the employer,
it is logical that he will prefer to hire men. Moreover,
maternity leaves mean that a worker must be replaced before and
after the birth of her child, and her place kept for her (not
only in Peru, but in several other Latin American countries).
Chaplin, in his study of the textile industry in Peru, found
no factories that had hired a single new female employee since
the "enlightened" legislation was put into effect in 1956 (1967:
226-27). Boserup (1970: 113-14) notes that there is some evi-
dence that male-dominated governments and labor unions may con-
nive in demanding both equal pay for equal work and special
benefits for women, knowing that this will influence employers
to favor men for the best jobs in industry.

10. The definitions of rural/urban are somewhat confused in Peru.
In the 1961 Census, the population living in "populated centers,"
that is, district capitals, were considered as urban regardless
of the number of inhabitants. Additionally, the population liv-
ing in centers with "urban characteristics" (with population
equal to or higher than the administrative capital of the same
district) were also considered urban. See Note 3, p. 18 of
Macisco (1975).









BIBLIOGRAPHY

Amin, Samir
1974 El capitalism periferico. Tr. Gerardo Davila. Buenos
Aires: Editorial Nuestro Tiempo, S.A.

Angulo, Alejandro and Cecilia L6pez de Rodriguez
1975a Trabajo y fecundidad de la mujer colombiana. Bogota:
Fundacion para la Educacidn Superior y el Desarrollo.
1975b Female Participation in Economic Activity in Colombia.
Population and Employment Working Paper No. 9. Geneva:
International Labour Office.

Berger, John
1975 A Seventh Man: Migrant Workers in Europe. With photo-
graphs by Jean Mohr. New York: The Viking Press.

Boserup, Ester
1970 Woman's Role in Economic Development. London: Allen &
Unwin.

Bourque, Susan C. and Kay B. Warren
n.d. "Campesinas and Comuneras: Subordination in the Sierra.
Mimeographed.

Browning, Harley L.
1972 "Some Problematics of the Tertiarization Process in
Latin America." Paper presented to the 40th Congress of
Americanists, Rome, Italy.

Bryce-Laporte, Roy S.
1976 "The New Immigrants: Their Origin, Visibility and Chal-
lenge to the American Public--Impact of the Immigration
Act of 1965. Washington, D.C.: The Smithsonian Institu-
tion, typewritten.
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Enzo Faletto
1969 Dependencia y desarrollo en America Latina. Mexico,
D.F.: Siglo XXI Editores, S.A.

and Jose Luis Reyna
1969 "Industrialization, Occupational Structure and Social
Stratification in Latin America," pp. 68-103 in Cole
Blasier, ed., Constructive Change in Latin America.
Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Castro, Fidel
1966 "Women's Liberation: The Revolution Within a Revolution," in
Women in the Cuban Revolution. New York: Pathfinder.

Centro de Estudios de Poblaci6n y Desarrollo
1972 Informe demografico del Peru. Lima: CEPD.







Chaney, Elsa M.
1976 "Latin America Among Us: Colombians in New York City"
in Corporacidn Centro Regional de Poblaci6n, The Dynam-
ics of Migration: International Migration.to the U.S.
Washington, D.C.: Interdisciplinary Communications Pro-
gram, The Smithsonian Institution, in press.
and Marianne Schmink
1976 "Women and Modernizations Access to Tools," pp. 160-82
in June Nash and Helen Icken Safa, Sex and Class in
Latin America. New York: Praeger.

Chaplin, David
1970 "Domestic Service as a Family Activity and as an Occupa-
tion during Industrialization." Paper presented to the
International Sociological Association meeting, Varna,
Bulgaria.
1967 The Peruvian Industrial Labor Force. Princeton, New
Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Cruz, CarmenInes and Juanita Castaio .
1976 "Latin American Migration to the U.S." in Corporacion
Centro Regional de Poblaci6n, The Dynamics of Migration,
InterdisciplinaryCommunications Program, The Smithsonian
Institution, in press.

Deere, Carmen Diana
1976 "Changing Social Relations of Production and Peasant
Women's Work in the Peruvian Sierra." Paper presented
to the Seminar "Changing Roles of Women in Rural Societies,"
Fourth World Congress of Rural Sociology, Torun, Poland.


Doeringer,
1971

Dominguez,
1975


Peter B. and Michael J. Piore
Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington,
Massachusetts: D.C. Heath.

Virginia R.
From Neighbor to Stranger: The Dilemma of Caribbean Mi-
grants in the United States. New Haven: Antilles Re-
search Program, Yale University.


Dos Santos, Theotonio
1969 "El nuevo caracter de la dependencia," pp. 11-113 in Jose
Matos Mar, ed., La crisis del desarrollismo y la nueva
dependencia. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.


Edwards,
1974


Elizaga,
1971


Edgar 0.
"Employment in Developing Countries," pp. 1-45 in Edwards,
ed., Employment in Developing Nations. New York:
Columbia University Press.

Juan C. and Roger Mellon
Aspectos demograficos de la mano de obra en America
Latina: Santiago: Centro Latinoamericano de Demograffa.


"The Participation of Women in the Labour Force of Latin
America: Fertility and Other Factors," International La-
bour Review 109, 5-6 (May-June): 519-38.


1974







Fitzgerald, E.V.K.
1976 The State and Economic Development: Peru since 1968.
New York and London: Cambridge University Press.


Frank,
1967

1969


Andre Gunder
Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New
York: Monthly Review Press.
Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution. New York:
Monthly Review Press.


Furtado, Celso
1970 Economic Development in Latin America: A Survey from
Colonial Times to the Cuban Revolution. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Galbraith, John Kenneth
1971 The New Industrial State. New York: New American Li-
brary.

Gianella, Jaime
1970 Marginalidad en Lima metropolitan. Lima: Centro de
Estudios y Promoci6n del Desarrollo.

Gordon, David
1972 Theories of Poverty and Unemployment. Lexington, Massa-
chusetts: D.C. Heath.


Hendricks,
1974


Glenn
The Dominican Diaspora; From the Dominican Republic to
New York City -- Villagers in Transition. New York:
Columbia University Teachers College Press.


Heyman, Barry Neal
1974 Urbanization and the Status of Women in Peru. Ph.D.
thesis, University of Wisconsin

Hinkelammert, Franz
1970 Dialectica del desarrollo desigual. Buenos Aires:
Amorrortu Editores.


Macisco,
1975


John J., Jr.
Migrants to Metropolitan Lima; A Case Study.
Centro Latinoamericano de Demograffa.


Santiago:


Mangin, William
1970 "Introduction" pp. xii-xxxix in Mangin, ed., Peasants in
Cities: Readings in the Anthropology of Urbanization.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Marshall, A.
1973 The Import of Labour: The Case of the Netherlands.
Rotterdam:

Martinez, Hector, William Prado and Jorge Quintanilla
1973 El exodo rural en el Peru. Lima: Centro de Estudios de
Poblaci6n y Desarrollo.







Nash, June
1975 "Certain Aspects of the Integration of Women in the
Development Process: A Point of View." United Nations,
New York: World Conference on the International Women's
Year, Background Paper E/CONF.66/BP/5, June 9.

Nun, Jose, Juan Carlos Marin and Miguel Murmis
1967 "La marginalizaci6n en America Latina, Informe Preli-
minar." Santiago: ILPES/DESAL.

Le6n de Leal, Magdalena and Cecilia L6pez de Rodrnguez
1975 Hacia una definicion de la participacion de la mujer en
la fuerza de trabajo. Bogota: Asociacion Colombiana
para el Estudio de Poblaci6n.

Lomnitz, Larissa de
1974 Presentation on work in progress at the Seminar on
Feminine Perspectives in Social Science Research in
Latin America, Cuernavaca, Mexico, July.

1975 Como sobreviven los marginados. Mexico, D.F.: Siglo
XXI Editores, S.A.

Organizaci6n de Estados Americanos
1971 America en c'fras, 1970: Situaci6n social. Washington,
D.C.: Secretaria General.


Paine,
1974

Piore,
1973


1976


Suzanne
Exporting Workers: The Turkish Case. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Michael J.
"The Role of Immigration in Industrial Growth: A Case
Study of the Origins and Character of Puerto Rican
Migration to Boston," Paper No. 112, May. Mimeographed.
Talk at Fordham University Sociology Seminar,March.


Population Reference Bureau
1976 1976 World Population Data Sheet. Washington, D.C.:
Population Reference Bureau.

Quijano Obreg6n, Anibal
1971 "Polo marginal de la economic y mano de obra marginada."
Lima: Taller Urbano Industrial, Universidad Catdlica.

Ramos, Joseph R.
1970 Labor and Development in Latin America. New York.:
Columbia University Press.


Republica
1975


del Peru, Ministerio de Educaci6n
"Polftica de la revaloraci6n de la mujer," background
paper prepared for the Seminario de Motivaci6n y Difu-
sion sobre el Nuevo Sistema Educativo Peruano.


Safa, Helen Icken
1975a "The Changing Class Composition of the Female Labor
Force in Latin America." Paper presented at the Confer-
ence on Women and Development, Wellesley College, June.







1975b "Towards a Political Economy of the Family, Women,
Work, and Industrial Capitalism,"

Sagasti, Heli E. Ennis de
1974 "La mujer vendedora ambulante," Informe Final. Lima:
Report to the Ford Foundation, typewritten.

Smith, Margo Lane
1971 Institutionalized Servitudes Female Domestic Service in
Lima, Peru. Ph.D. thesis, University of Indiana.

Stein, William M.
1975 Modernization and Inequality in Vicos: An Examination
of the "Ignorance of Women." Buffalo, New Yorks State
University of New York. Mimeographed.

Stewart, Frances
1974 "Technology and Employment in Less-Developed Countries,"
pp. 83-132 in Edgar 0. Edwards, ed., Employment in De-
veloping Nations. New York: Columbia University Press.

Suarez, Flor
1975 La movilidad ocupacional en Lima metropolitan. Lima:
Ministerio de Trabajo, Direccion General del Empleo.

Testa-Zappert, Laraine
1975 "Women in the Urban Labor Force: The Case of Peru."
Lima, typewritten.

Villalobos de Urrutia, Gabriela
1975 Diagn6stico de la Situaci6n Social y Econ6mica de la
Mujer Peruana. Lima: Centro de Estudios de Poblacion
y Desarrollo.

Webb, Richard
1973 Government Policy and the Distribution of Income in
Peru, 1963-1973. Princeton, New Jersey: Woodrow Wilson
School of Public and International Affairs.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs
1962 Demographic Aspects of Manpower, Report 1. United
Nations, New York: ST/SOA/Ser.A/33.
Secretariat
1976 The Participation of Women in Development of Latin Ameri-
ca, Chapter I. United Nations, New York: Regional
Seminar on The Participation of Women in Economic, So-
cial and Political Development, Buenos Aires, March.
ESA/SDHA/AC.10/4.
Youssef, Nadia Haggag
1974 Women and Work in Developing Societies. Berkeley:
University of California Population Monograph Series.




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs