Front Cover
 Table of Contents
 The economically active female...
 Opportunities for expanding nonfarm...
 A strategy for mobilizing rural...
 Back Cover

Title: Jobs for women in rural industry and services
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00086657/00001
 Material Information
Title: Jobs for women in rural industry and services
Physical Description: 54 p. : ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Dixon-Mueller, Ruth
United States -- Agency for International Development. -- Office of Women in Development
United States -- International Development Cooperation Agency
Conference: World Conference on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development, (1979
Publisher: Office of Women in Development, Agency for International Development :
Distributed by Office of Women in Development, Agency for International Development, International Development Cooperation Agency
Place of Publication: Washington D.C
Publication Date: 1979
Subject: Rural women -- Employment   ( lcsh )
Women -- Employment   ( lcsh )
Genre: federal government publication   ( marcgt )
bibliography   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references (p. 46-54).
Statement of Responsibility: Ruth B. Dixon.
General Note: Cover title.
General Note: "Prepared for the Office of Women in Development of the U.S. Agency for International Development, in conjunction with the Conference on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, July, 1979."
General Note: "September 1979."
General Note: "AID/otr/147-79-52."
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00086657
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 07038987

Table of Contents
    Front Cover
        Front Cover
        Page i
        Page ii
    Table of Contents
        Page iii
        Page 1
        Page 2
    The economically active female population: A statistical portrait
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
        Page 10
    Opportunities for expanding nonfarm employment
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
        Page 16
        Page 17
        Page 18
        Page 19
        Page 20
        Page 21
        Page 22
        Page 23
        Page 24
        Page 25
        Page 26
        Page 27
        Page 28
    A strategy for mobilizing rural women for employment
        Page 29
        Page 30
        Page 31
        Page 32
        Page 33
        Page 34
        Page 35
        Page 36
        Page 37
        Page 38
        Page 39
        Page 40
        Page 41
        Page 42
        Page 43
        Page 44
        Page 45
        Page 46
        Page 47
        Page 48
        Page 49
        Page 50
        Page 51
        Page 52
        Page 53
        Page 54
    Back Cover
        Page 55
Full Text


O R r' b iA .-- '"- -''i-,,
0_ --. 'V `. 0 S '-




OME, JULY 199.


The views and interpretations in this publication are those
of the author and should not be attributed to the Agency
for International Development or to any individual acting itj
its behalf.
: .I
E .- 1. u~


Increasing landlessness in combination with other economic and

demographic forces has created a compelling need in most developing

countries for the expansion of nonagricultural employment in rural areas.

Because women tend to be particularly vulnerable to displacement from

land and from traditional income-generating activities by the commerciali-

zation of agriculture for cash crops and by investment in capital-inten-

sive industries, policies of agrarian reform and rural development will

need to design support systems to:(1) raise the productivity of labor
in which rural women currently engage; (2) transform subsistence activities

into income-generating activities; and (3) create new employment oppor-

tunities for women, particularly outside of agriculture.

A review of international statistics on the representation of women

in the labor force, classified by employment status and by occupation,

reveals that women are underrepresented among the economically active

population -- and especially in the paid labor force (excluding unpaid

family workers) -- in all but a handful of countries. Women constitute

20 percent or less of the paid labor force in 20 of the 56 countries for

which recent data are available, ranging in some countries as low as 4 or

5 percent. Even though women's economic productivity is undoubtedly

underreported in census statistics, a convincing argument can be made

that the low rate of participation of women in many countries in the paid

labor force perpetuates their economic and social dependency and retards

the development process.


A number of strategies for expanding nonagricultural employment

for rural women are proposed in this paper. A two-pronged effort includes

both national measures to promote investment in rural areas, encourage the

diversification of rural economics, and correct other economic inbalances

undermining rural development, and grass-roots measures to organize employ-

ment schemes for rural women in nonagricultural production (particularly

small industries and rural construction), sales, service, and administra-

tive/professional positions.

Planners might consider a six-step approach to creating employment

for women in the rural sector: (1) identifying groups of women who are

most in need of income-generating employment (particularly the landless,

stigmatized racial, religious, or ethnic groups, and households headed

by women); (2) defining the range of economic activities in which these

women are currently engaged, with a view to raising their output and
income-generating capacity or shifting them into more productive activities;

(3) locating indigenous social networks around which groups of women could

be mobilized to work together; (4) establishing sources of credit, techni-

cal assistance, and training to reach these traditionally ineligible

groups; (5) determining needs for technology to reduce domestic burdens;
and (6) identifying and overcoming other cultural or structural obstacles

that deny women control over the products of their labor. In combination

with agrarian reform policies to reduce major inequalities in access to

material and social sources within rural areas as well as between the

rural and urban sectors, such strategies can provide women with essential

support systems enabling them to become active agents and beneficiaries

of the development process.

I. The Economically Active Female Population; .A.Statistical,
Portrait . . . . . . 3

II. Opportunities for Expanding Nonfarm Employment. . 11

Nonagricultural Production. .. . . .... 13
Sales Workers . . . . . 22
Service Workers . . . 25
Administrative, Clerical, and Professional Occupations 27

III. A Strategy for Mobilizing Rural Women for Employment. 29

Employment for Whom?. .. . . . 29
Building on Current Production. . . . .. 31
Mobilizing Groups of Women Workers. . . . 32
Credit and Technical Assistance . . . 34
Labor-Saving Technology . . . . 37
Control Over Earnings ..... . . . 38

IV. Conclusions . . . . .. . 40

Footnotes . . . . .. . 43

References. . . . . .. . 46


Conditions intensifying the need in almost every developing country

for greatly expanded nonagricultural employment in rural areas are, by

now, familiar: increasing landlessness due to loss of tenancy rights,

land foreclosures, and other factors; declines in average size of farm

holdings; ceilings on the extension of arable land and on its productivity;

low agricultural wages and displacement of labor by mechanization; high

rates of natural increase in rural populations; limits on the capacity of

already overcrowded cities to absorb landless migrants from the country-
side, and so on. Although the redistribution of land into smaller,

individually owned parcels or larger collective farms offers a partial

solution to rural unemployment in areas where land ownership remains

highly concentrated, diversification of the rural economy everywhere

requires expansion of the nonagricultural sector to provide year-round

or seasonal employment for landless workers and small farmers or


Less familiar, however, are the arguments for expanding nonagricultural

employment for rural women. Yet the need is undoubtedly greater. Because
women are less likely than men to own land or to have legal rights to

its use, they are especially vulnerable to eviction at the time of

divorce, desertion, or widowhood. Female agricultural laborers earn less

than males and are more likely to be unemployed. As men gain control over

new technology and other agricultural inputs, the widening productivity

gap between the sexes frequently undermines women's earning capacity.

The declining size of holdings increases the pressure on women in farm

families to supplement agricultural incomes with nonfarm activities.

Higher survival rates of children intensify household demands for

investments in children (food, school fees, marriage exchanges) that

are of special concern to women. Opportunities for urban employment for

female migrants in many countries are even more limited than they are

for males; thus, many remain in the villages without regular remittances
from their absent menfolk. Even land redistribution schemes bypass them

when title is granted to the male household head. On collective farms,

women may not be allowed to perform certain agricultural tasks carrying

higher wages or workpoints. All of these arguments, and more, point to

the need for a policy of rural development and agrarian reform that pays
particular attention to expanding income-generating employment for rural

women not only within, but outside, the agricultural sector.

Rural women everywhere engage in economic production; the question
here is whether their labor generates income in cash, kind, or trade over

which they have some control. A growing body of literature attests to the

ingenuity and diversity of women's productive activities, particularly

in the informal sectors of ,the economy: making beancakes at home for

sale in the market, fattening cattle, husking a neighbor's paddy for a

share of the rice, weaving rugs or mats, lending out small quantities of

grain at interest. The central argument of this paper is that development

programs will succeed in reaching the poor more directly if ttrey design

support systems to (1) raise the productivity of labor in which rural

women currently engage; (2) transform subsistence activities into income-

generating activities; and (3) create new employment opportunities,

particularly outside of agriculture. A number of primarily grass-roots

strategies for doing so, viewed in the context of more sweeping macro-

economic policies to encourage rural diversification, are suggested in
the sections that follow.

I. The Economically Active Female Population:

A Statistical Portrait

A 55-year-old Tamang woman from the Nuwakot District of Nepal,
northwest of the Kathmandu Valley, tells her life story to an anthro-

pologist.1 Having been forced as a young woman into corvee labor for the
"Rana Prime Ministers" who required her to carry mangoes on her back from

their orchards near her house to the Rana palaces in Kathmandu (a week-

long round trip by foot), and having been married off by her parents to

a very poor man, she describes how she parlayed a few small coins into

enough money to buy land.

I've never gone trading salt as far as Kyirong [in Tibet],
but I've gone as far as Sertung [near the Nepal-Tibet border].
I bought thread for one anna [fraction of a rupee] a skein
and wove a man's turban. For that turban I got five mohars
[1/2 rupee each, or 2-1/2 rupees]. I left one mohar with
my mother, then I took the other two rupees to Sertung. On
the way to Sertung I found corn at three pathis [about one
gallon] for a mohar. So I bought 12 pathis and came back home
within nine days. I loaned out the nine pathis of corn in
bidiya [a type of loan on which the interest is paid in grain
each year]. Thellater I collected on those loans and took
the grain to Kathmandu where I sold it for 20 rupees. Then
with that money and a little more I accumulated, I bought the
[unirrigated] land my middle son is now living on for 25 rupees.
...From the thread I bought for an anna a skein I made a
turban which I sold for 2-1/2 rupees. Then I turned those
2-1/2 rupees into 20 with my corn dealings. From that I bought
25 rupees of land. But what a struggle it was for me to put
together those 25 rupees.

The difficulty of measuring and classifying economic activity,

obvious enough in industrialized economies, is clearly compounded in the

rural sectors of developing countries. Even the counting of persons as
employed or unemployed, yet alone estimating the degree of their under-

employment, is problematic (Brannon and Jesse 1977; Bruton 1979). When

we consider that women are more likely than men to work without pay,


to engage in marginal and less viable types of activities in the informal

economy, and to shift seasonally or even daily between and among subsis-

tence and market activities, the problems become overwhelming.
The stery of the Tamang woman is typical of the ingenuity and

complexity of economic roles that are so central to women's survival yet

so defiant of formal measurement. Weaving a single turban for sale, she

would not be defined as economically active; weaving many, she is an "own-

account" worker in manufacturing. When she buys corn, lends it out at

interest, then sells the grain, she is a sales worker. When she buys land

and works it, she is an own-account worker in agriculture or an unpaid

family laborer. Perhaps she is not even classified in the labor force if
the farm produce is consumed rather than sold, since census takers dis-

tinguish between subsistence and market work in defining persons as econ-
omically active (Boulding et al., 1976: 295-335). Not only do official

definitions of economic activity exclude much of women's production from

consideration (their value-added contribution to crop processing or food

production, for example), but census takers, male household heads, and

women alike tend to underreport and undervalue their productive roles

(Deere 1977a).

Censuses, with all their faults, nevertheless remain our primary

sources of comparative statistics on labor force participation. Table 1

includes data from 56 developing countries on the percentages of all persons
classified as "economically active" who are female, both by employment

status and by occupation. In calculating the percentages of workers within

different employment and occupational categories who are women (an "index

of femaleness") we hope to avoid some of the problems of noncomparability

Table 1. Percentage of the Economically Active Population that is Female,

by Employment Status and Occupation (where known), 56 Countries.

Employment status Occupation (excl. family workers)

>i (8 V oC 5 3 -o 0 O-

Region/ 4 &. 0 4. P4 AS 0 0 P4 X co H X e oo
Scountryyear o H $ 4 )
country/year E B 3 wSZ < 0 c < o -,4-

Sub-Saharan Africa (10)

Botswana 64 50
Tanzania 67 48
Ghana 70 44
Sierra Leone 63 36
Liberia 62 36
South Africa 70 33
Zambia 69 30
Mozambique 70 26
Nigeria 63 24
Mauritius 72 20


23 55
9 53
12 53
6 13
6 18

6 33

21 14

34 9 43 63



52 9 19 57 14 39
52 6 10 18 9 24
36 30 88 23 14 24
10 6 42 6 14 27
16 3 33a 1a 12 27
29a a 27a 67a 42a 46a
12 a 4 14 10 19a 21

10 23 60a 26a 9 15
23 6 13 52 19 37

32 23 6 27 23 14 27

North Africa/Middle East (10)

Turkey 65
Tunisia 75
Morocco 71
Kuwait 75
Syria 75
Iran 72
Libya 73
Jordan 61
Egypt 66
Algeria 66

10 4 73
13 20 55c
14 6c 21
13 0 1
13 4 62
11 7 17
6 1 60
6 4 16
8 3 11
5 2 9


5 9 1 7 13 21
6b 24a a 28 19 22a
11 15 4 38a 23 15'
b 0 1 20 10 34

2b 22a a 15a 10 26a
2 1 1 10 4 19
5a 4a a a 51a 30
5 4 1 11 5 30
3 3 6 14 9 24
1- 4 1 13 11 21


10 10 4 37

South/Southeast Asia (11)

Thailand 76 38
Rep. Korea 76 38
Hong Kong 76 35
Philippines-75 34
Indonesia 71 33
Malaysia 70 32

32 24 66
29 27 69
37 16 63
39 22 45
28 24 52
24c 635 63c

8 4 4 1 14 10 22

27 20 30 31 46 27 44
28 21 29 33 56 21 24
34 20 37 20 33 36 41
31 10 32 59a 67 42 59
27 32b 27a 44 43 10a 32
32 20 16 18a 32 22a 34

Table 1 (continued)

Employment status Occupation (excl. family workers)

Ho -H 0
0 P -o O4 H H

> 0 1 0 -H H 0 0 s:
c-H 5 4OV 0 c
Region/ -4-H o HC 0 a a t =
country/year E C J : P | C
4~ m bfO~ c 0 m ,

South/Southeast Asia (continued)

Singapore 76
Nepal 71
Sri Lanka 71
India 71
Pakistan 61

33 14 55
11 30 49
26 9 47
11 10 21
5 5 35

12 26 20 45 44 38
30 9 12 16 4 8
26 15 6 23 30 41
20 8 6 17 4 18
5 6 2 15 1 10

32 28 22 52

28 20 26 20 33 22 34

Central/South America (25)

Haiti 71 47
Jamaica 61 40
Barbados 70 39
Puerto Rico 77 33
Trinidad/Mob.74 30
Venezuela 75 28
Uruguay 75 28
Guyana 65 27
Dominican Rep.70 26
Panama 70 26
Argentina 70 25
Chile 70 23

Bolivia 76
El Salvador 71
Mexico 75
Nicaragua 71
Brazil 70
Paraguay 72
Peru 72
Colombia 64
Costa Rica 73
Cuba 70
Ecuador 74
Honduras 74
Guatemala 73

43 34 64
39 32 42

35 12 70
27 25 36
30 21 38
26e 22e 15e
23 27 40
25 15 24
34 10 26
28 16 27
24 20 15

24 21 -
22 16 10
23 18 24
25 19 9
26 11 23
28 18 15
23 15 32
25 13 135
24 6 4
20 1 3
21 12 13
22 12 5
19 10 6




15 28 65 86 40 64
37 17a 58 65a 52a 40
3 22 25 49 43 51
25 11 44 50 48 43
4 14 25 58 41 50
4 20a 29 60a 33 58
16 9a 43 58a 25a 41
17 27 20 62 30 47
4 11 31 65 50 51
6 11 24 60 40 55
3 14 29 69 29 50

12 15 55 59 35 40
4 19 55 82 35 42
6 15 33 50 40 38
3 16 50 78 32 43
10 11 14a 72 26a 59
6 27 41 61 25 55
7 14 30 58 34 26
3 18 24 74 20 41
2 12 -21 65 30 46

4 16 27 66 31 43
1 24 57 73 28 47
2 14 35 60 30 40

Median 23 25 16 23 23 4 15 29 62 33 47



23 25 16 23

23 4 15 29 62 33 47

Table 1 (continued)

Sources: Yearbook of Labour Statisticst 1970, 1974, and 1977, Tables

2A and 2B (Geneva: International Labour Office).


Includes unpaid family workers.

Estimates, excluding unpaid family workers.

Employment status data are from 1960.

Includes Bangladesh. Although recent data do not show employment status

and occupation, women were 25 percent of the total economically active

population in Bangladesh in 1974 and 7 percent in Pakistan in 1976.

SEmployment status data are from 1963.


across countries in the ways in which workers are distributed across

employment or occupational categories (the "distribution index") and in

methods of deciding whether or not they are economically active

(Boulding et al 1976: 7).

Women constitute the highest percentages of the overall labor force

including unpaid family workers (column 1) in the 10 sub-Saharan and 11

South and Southeast Asian countries for which recent data are available,

with medians of 34 and 32 percent, respectively. The 25 Central and South

American countries show a lower median -- 23 percent -- with the 12 North

African and Middle Eastern countries showing the lowest at 10 percent.

There is considerable overlap across regions, however, except that the

lowest percentages of women among the economically active population

(10 percent or fewer) are all in North Africa or the Middle East (Iran,

Libya, Jordan, Egypt, and Algeria), whereas the highest (40 to 50 percent)

are in sub-Saharan Africa or the Caribbean (Botswana, Tanzania, Ghana,

Haiti, and Jamaica).

Employment status refers to the classification of workers as

employees, self-employed, or unpaid family workers, regardless of their

occupation. When we compare the extent to which women are represented

within these three categories of workers relative to the labor force as

a whole, distinct regional patterns emerge.

The status of employee reveals the most about women's direct access

to incomes. It includes persons working for private or public employers

who are paid in kind or in wages, commissions, or tips. Among these

are agricultural laborers, women doing piece-work at home for employers,

and domestic servants. Women constitute the highest percentage of employees

on average in Asia and Central/South America with medians of 28 and 25


percent, respectively, and the lowest in North Africa/Middle East and

sub-Saharan Africa with medians of 10 and 9 percent. Although women in

the first three regions are generally not significantly underrepresented

among wage earners relative to their numbers in the total labor force,

in sub-Saharan Africa (Tanzania and Ghana in particular) where women

concentrate in agriculture or marketing as self-employed or unpaid workers,

they are remarkably so.

Self-employed workers are the large and small enterpreneurs --

employers who own their own businesses or run a trade that employs at least

one paid worker -- and workers on their own account, including persons
working at home for profit (women who take in laundry or sewing, say, or

make handicrafts for sale) and farm owners or renters without paid employees

(owner-holders and tenant-holders). Regional differences in the percentage

of women among the self-employed are marked. Sub-Saharan Africa shows the

highest median at 43 percent; South/Southeast Asia and Central/South America

considerably lower at 22 and 16 percent; and North Africa/Middle East

the lowest at 4 percent. The extremely low figures are not all in North

Africa or the Middle East, however, for 10 percent or fewer of the self-

employed are female in Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Panama, Costa Rica, and Cuba.

The highest figures for women entrepreneurs (40 to 63 percent) are in

Botswana, Tanzania, Ghana, and Malaysia.

The category of unpaid family worker remains the most elusive.

Technically it includes persons who work without pay for a specified

minimum time (for women, usually one-third of the "normal" work period)

in an "economic enterprise" (again, the market economy, not subsistence)

operated by any member of the household. In some countries it also

includes other unpaid workers such as apprentices, or family members who

are paid in cash or kind. The classification is most problematic (and

most frequent) in agriculture. The United Nations recommends that the

following types of farm work be considered as economic activity:

"planting, cultivation, harvesting, preparation of products for sale, care

of livestock and repair of farm equipment;" excluded are "household duties

such as the preparation of food and the care of chickens and livestock

which are used for consumption instead of exchange (Boulding et al

1976: 318). Clearly these definitions are difficult to apply in the face

of the multiplicity of tasks in which rural women commonly engage, and

especially in their frequent mix of exchange and consumption.

Relative to their labor force participation as a whole, women are

overrepresented in this category of worker in about two-thirds of the

countries for which we have information. Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia

once again show the highest percentages of women among all unpaid family

workers with medians of 63 and 52 percent; North Africa/Middle East 37

percent; Central/South America 23 percent. In a few countries, however,

they constitute 10 percent or fewer of unpaid family workers -- Kuwait,

Algeria, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Cuba, Honduras, and Guatemala.

Considerable reporting bias may account for their scarcity in the Latin

American countries.

Given these variations in the percentages of woman among unpaid

family workers and the ambiguity of the category, we would expect the
exclusion of unpaid workers from the economically active population to

alter considerably the picture of women's participation. Surprisingly,

however, column 5 shows dramatic changes in only six countries.


Botswana, Tanzania, Ghana, and Jamaica retain their position at the top

of the scale with women making up almost half of the paid labor force,

while Libya, Jordan, Algeria, and Pakistan cluster at the bottom with a

paid labor force that is only 5 percent female.

These figures conceal important differences between rural and urban

conditions in each country, across geographical areas, and among major

subgroups of the population (class, ethnicity, age, marital status, etc.).

Nevertheless, they do point in a general way to the underrepresentation of

women in the paid labor force in almost all countries and to the particular

"ecological niche" that economically active women occupy.

Better measures of women's productive roles would undoubtedly change

the picture considerably, but less so in the paid than the unpaid categories.3

From a policy viewpoint, the data are helpful in pointing out where programs

are most needed to draw women into the economically active population and,

where necessary, to permit women to shift out of unpaid family work,

marginal self-employment, or exploitative agricultural wage labor into

employment bearing higher direct returns.

II. Opportunities for Expanding Nonfarm Employment

Although this paper emphasizes grass-roots designs for expanding

female employment, such an approach is doomed to failure if it must

struggle against larger currents that consistently undermine the capacity

of the rural sector to employ its workers. Any employment generation

scheme for women, therefore, must be framed in the context of overall

development policies emphasizing the diversification of rural economics

and the elimination of the urban bias of past development efforts

(Lipton 1977).


Increasing agricultural production is central to employment-oriented

development because of its direct effects in increasing farm employment

(under appropriate capital-labor ratios) and its indirect effects in

stimulating related industries and services and the demand for consumer

goods (Mellor 1976). Massive investments are required not only in

yield-increasing technology but also "in the physical infrastructure of

rural communication and irrigation systems as well as the institutional

infrastructure for servicing agriculture with research, education, credit,

input supply, and marketing systems" (Ibid.: 16).

Most agrarian reforms intended to expand overall agricultural

employment should increase the demand for female as well as male labor,

such as the redistribution of underutilized large landholdings into

privately owned plots or collective farms, the intensification of farm

production through irrigation and other inputs, crop diversification, the

imposition of heavy taxation and import duties on labor-displacing farm

machinery where appropriate, the abolition of food price controls as an

incentive for agricultural production, and the provision of low-interest

loans for small farmers. Investments in physical and institutional

infrastructure and in decentralized rural industry should have similar


We cannot assume that such development efforts will inevitably

benefit women, however, for experience has revealed a history of negative

consequences under a variety of socioeconomic conditions.4 Development

plans will need to devise special measures to ensure that women have

equal access with men to resources such as land, credit, and training;

that women are not displaced from traditional income-generating economic


roles by social or technological changes; and that new employment oppor-

tunities for rural women are created in both agricultural and nonagricultural

sectors. In this section we suggest policies for expanding female employment

in nonagricultural production, sales, service, and clerical/managerial/

professional occupations.

Nonagricultural Production

This broad category includes persons engaged in small and large-scale

manufacturing, transport workers, construction workers, artisans and crafts

workers, miners, and unskilled laborers outside of agriculture. The

percentages of nonagricultural producers (wage-earners or self-employed)

who are female range from zero in Kuwait to 37 in Hong Kong (column 7 of

Table 1). The South and Southeast Asian region has the highest median

(26 percent) and Central and South American the second highest (15 percent).

In both regions, the percentages of women among nonagricultural producers --

particularly in the urban-based textile, garment-making, and electronics

industries of some Southeast Asian and Latin American countries -- typically

exceed by a considerable margin their representation among agricultural

workers. SubSaharan Africa, in contrast, shows a median of only 6 percent

of women among nonagricultural producers, far lower than in agriculture,

while North Africa and the Middle East is the lowest at only 4 percent.

Rural women classified as nonagricultural producers -- aside from

those in construction work -- typically specialize in small-scale, home-

based manufacture of handicrafts or foodstuffs. The activities are

usually labor-intensive, poorly remunerated, undercapitalized, individualized,

based on traditional skills rather than formal training, and dependent on

primitive technology and child labor (see Simmons 1976 for a good example

from Northern Nigeria). For these reasons and more, women in most types

of rural nonagricultural production are particularly liable to displacement

by modernization, including those very infrastructure improvements such

as electrification and roads that are generally recommended for rural


African women who brew beer in their village, for example, looking

forward to the day when a new road will carry their products to the regional

center, find to their dismay that the road brings them imported beer instead.

Women who smoke and sell fish discover that new refrigerated warehouses

and freezer plants undermine their business (Cloud 1978: 72; Robertson

1975-76: 162). Other locally produced foods and condiments give way to

factory made products (Milone 1978: 159; Simmons 1975: 159-60). Machine

textiles replace handwoven goods; metal and plastic utensils replace earth-

ware; synthetics replace cotton. The process is intensified by the spread

of capital-intensive urban-based industrial technology that threatens a

wide range of cottage industries and artisanal activities that have long

provided income to women -- handweaving, rice pounding, oil pressing,

tobacco, foods (Boserup 1970: 106-18; Chinchilla 1977; Committe on the

Status of Women in India 1974: 169-71).

Although the processes outlined above affect all workers in small-

scale handicraft and related industries, additional forces work specifi-

cally against women. The new heavy industries typically demand male

labor, while even in light industries -- except where women are thought

to be uniquely suited to certain skills -- men often replace women as

techniques are upgraded. While Moroccan women make pottery by hand at

home, men use the wheel in shops (Davis 1978: 424); while Indonesian

women make batiks by hand, men operate the screen printers and machine

rollers (Milone 1978: 160). The policy issue here, as in agriculture, is

not to resist the encroachment of new labor-saving techniques simply for
the sake of preserving traditional sources of marginal income for women,

for these activities are often burdensome and relatively unproductive.
Rather, women should be trained to operate the machines in the new rural

industries that replace their old techniques, thereby maintaining control

over the returns from their labor.

The question of relative efficiency of rural-based, labor-intensive
small and medium-sized industries has stimulated considerable debate.

Clearly there is little point in recommending the expansion of a sector

that cannot compete with large-scale, capital-intensive centralized produc-

tion. But there is mounting evidence that decentralized firms offer a

number of advantages: they are usually "substantially more 'efficient'
in terms of the intensive use of scarce capital and the extensive use of
abundant labor, as reflected in lower capital-output and capital-labor

ratios" (Ranis 1979: 5); require less foreign exchange; improve income

distribution between the landless and landed classes in rural areas and

between the countryside and the cities; offer greater opportunities for an
uneducated labor force; sometimes occupy a particularly advantageous posi-

tion in the export market; and create important linkages with agriculture

(Meyer and Larson 1978).6 In China, for example, rural industries specialize

in "serving agriculture" by manufacturing farm equipment and fertilizers
and by processing non-food crops and fruits and vegetables (American Rural

Small-Scale Industry Delegation 1977).7 By taking advantage of local

resources, labor supplies, and markets, they cut down on transportation

costs and on the complications of poor roads, scarce vehicles, and

expensive fuel.


National measures to promote new rural industries include a strong

commitment to the decentralization of industry; trade and taxation policies

encouraging labor-intensive production by removing the distortions that

artificially lower the cost of capital relative to labor (resulting,

among other things, in the import of inappropriate technologies); and the

abolition of incentives that currently favor large firms over small in

their access to credit, technical assistance, and other supports.8 Types

of industries especially suited to rural decentralizations include those

having few economies of scale (ready-made garments), processing a dispersed

raw material (such as agricultural products), servicing agriculture

(manufacture and repair of farm equipment), producing consumer goods for

local markets (wood products, soft drinks), or specializing in simple mdnu-

facturing operations such as assembly, mixing, or finishing (Staley and

Morse 1965: 112-127).

The small industries described below illustrate a range of activities

that could be expanded to employ more rural women, depending on the avail-

ability of resources, labor, markets, and so on.9 Although many activities

could be performed by women at home as own-account workers or wage-paid

employees in a putting-out system, the emphasis here is on drawing women

out of their homes into a centralized workplace to take advantage of

improved technologies, opportunities for literacy and skills training,

regulation of wages and working conditions, and the potential for social

interaction and collective decision-making.

Food processing. Although women everywhere process food for household

consumption, in some regions home-based food processing has also become

a major source of income.10 Potential food industries include dairy products

such as yoghurt, cheese, butter, and ghee; bottling fruit drinks and

carbonated beverages; brewing beer; sun-drying fruit and vegetables;

baking bread and snack foods; canning poultry, meat, fruit, and vegetables;

smoking and drying fish; preparing confections; grinding spices and mixing

herbs; pressing cooking oils; mixing condiments; making noodles or tortillas;

and so on. In the vicinity of Bombay, for example, village women's coopera-

tives totalling about 3,000 members make papads for local consumption and

export, a snack food mixed from locally grown pulses, oil and spices

(Dixon 1978: 63-9). Rural food processing industries frequently stimulate

demand for local agricultural products, encourage diversification of crops,

and improve the variety of foods available at local markets throughout

the year.

Processing other agricultural products. Much of the processing of

crops for export to urban or foreign markets could be performed at the

rural site, with the added advantage that byproducts are usually well

suited to local use. Women-run centers for milling or drying grains,

pressing oils, or grinding spices would enable women to maintain control

over this traditional method of earning money; other possibilities include

the production of animal feeds, fertilizers, and fuel from a variety of

crop byproducts (corn husks, coconut shells, sugar cane stalks, bran, etc.)

A women's cooperative in Tonga fires split coconut logs for charcoal

from trees cleared for an airport approach from 200 acres, which they

leased to plant bananas, pineapps, papaya, and other low-growing cash

crops (International Women's Tribune Centre, January 1978: 14). Because

women are typically responsible for processing crops in the home as well

as for gathering fuel and fodder, these commercial activities serve the

important dual purpose of providing employment while simultaneously

manufacturing products that reduce domestic drudgery.


Manufacturing. A number of industries produce items for local consump-

tion based on indigenous resources (clay, coir, bamboo, wood, cotton,

jute, etc.) such as simple household and agricultural implements, fishnets,
ropes, baskets, mats, building materials, pottery, furniture, jute sacks,

soap, cotton thread and cloth, cigarettes and cigars. Where transportation

systems are good and a steady supply of raw materials from outside the

village can be assured, other industries can be established for manufacturing

items with a wider market such as bottles, cans, other storage containers

or packaging materials, paper, small consumer items such as umbrellas or
dry-cell batteries, plastic and metal products, heavier agricultural

equipment, wool and silk cloth, ready-made garments, carpets, and other

items. Some of these serve the local market, others are exported to urban

or foreign markets.
Most income-generating programs for women have drawn on traditional

crafts such as sewing or embroidery (although tailoring and weaving are

men's work in many countries), often to the detriment of workers who find

themselves unable to make a satisfactory living because of poor quality

controls, lack of marketing outlets, unreliable sources of raw materials,
and exploitation by employers or agents (Dhamija 1975; ILO 1975; Major

1975; Opondo n.d.). Yet certain handicrafts do offer potential for expan-

sion, even in the face of industrialization, if production can be up-
graded through improved techniques and marketing; these include

artistic metalworking, basketry, jewelry making, and specialized hand-

weaving (Staley and Morse 1965: 56). In some areas the carpet weaving

industry is undergoing a renaissance; in Syria, for example, the government

has set up a network of rural carpet-weaving centers throughout the country


where young women learn vocational and literary skills while contributing

to the family budget on a regular basis (ILO 1973: 21).

Some critics argue that programs building on traditional skills are

likely to have only limited appeal to rural women; more attractive would

be industries that are "least rural and least womanish" -- that is, that

offer genuine opportunities for social and economic transformation

(Ahmed 1975: 29):

These opportunities are to be found in the decentralized
manufacture of processed primary products, consumer goods
and light engineering goods -- commodities that are labour
intensive, resource based, and require simple technology,
small investment, cheap or little fuel.

A rural network of medium industry or agro-industry, producing
both for export and home consumption, should teach the wearers
of galabias, saris and sarongs to get into workmen's overalls
and tinker with small machines. They should be absorbed not
merely as unskilled or semiskilled operators, but taught
repair, maintenance, supervision, management, accountancy,
storekeeping, salesmanship and all other accoutrements
of industrial enterprise.

One example of this approach is found in Kerala State, India, where

the Government's crash program to develop 10,000 units in the small-scale

industrial sector includes a number of cooperatively owned enterprises

reserved for women only (Menon 1976). Shareholders are drawn mainly from

the "economically and socially backward groups." Along with more tradi-

tional industries for garment-making, surgical cotton and bandages, fruit

preservation, cloth dyeing and printing, the program has trained young

women for work in a foundry; an electroplating, galvanising and anodising

unit; a transformer unit; and an ancilliary to a battery factory. Heavier

rural industries also offer important opportunities for women, either

in separate teams or working side by side with men.

Rural construction. In addition to opportunities in industry, the

development of rural infrastructure means new jobs in irrigation and

drainage projects; land clearance, soil conservation, and reforestation;

road, bridge, dam, and levee construction; and village works such as

housing, schools, clinics, community centers, wells, and water catchment

systems. In some countries these rural works form a prime ingredient of

government policies to alleviate rural unemployment and poverty, e.g.

India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Brazil,

Mexico and Peru (FAO 1979: 60).

Not only have women traditionally participated in the heavy labor

of many volunteer community work teams such as the communas in Latin

America, Harambee in Kenya, and the Shramadana in Sri Lanka, but the

decline of agricultural wage labor in many areas has driven landless women

increasingly into road building and construction. In Java, from 15 to 30

percent of workers on certain construction sites are women (Milone 1978:

161). In India, too, women commonly carry earth and bricks on construction

projects, while the skilled labor is done exclusively by men (Committee

1974: 172-3).

Large internationally funded projects such as the Food-for-Work

schemes have attracted women to build dams, lay water supplies, terrace

hills and plant trees, build village roads, and clear land. In Africa

and Latin America, in particular, women commonly work alongside men in

many of these schemes. Sometimes they do all the work, as in one road-

building project in Lesotho and in the forestry development scheme of

Maharashtra, India, where tribal women (Adivasis) plant and maintain

reforested areas (World Food Programme 1976: 31). Elsewhere they work


in special women's teams on large projects. In Bangladesh an average of

20,000 women per day worked on Food-for-Work schemes between January and

March of 1978, almost all on women's teams or projects.

Because the work is extremely arduous and generally considered status-

degrading, rural works tend to attract only the poorest and most stigmatized

groups -- the scheduled tribes and castes of South Asia, for example, or

destitute wives or widows of higher castes (Chen and Ghuznavi 1978; Sinha

1975). Employers often prefer women because they are cheaper than male

workers, "more docile by nature and better disciplined," and will work at

jobs that men are "reluctant to accept" (Sinha 1975: 24). Conditions are

usually highly exploitative with little or not monitoring of wages, hours

of work, housing and sanitation facilities, accident compensation, or

child care. Portions of workers wages are typically withheld to ensure

that they do not leave the site before the work is completed; payment is

irregular. The work is generally seasonal and often requires workers to

migrate considerable distances from their villages.

There is potential for expanding women's opportunities for employment,

however, if rural works projects could be redesigned to emphasize female

employment on sites in or near their villages that require year-round

work such as road repair, local small-scale construction, reforestation,

planting animal fodder on banks and cleared areas, terracing, fisheries

development, and so on (Chen and Ghuznavi 1978: 25). A cooperative

housing society in Guyana is training women as well as men in carpentry,

masonry, steel bending, plumbing, and other skills to enable them to build

and maintain their own housing and other community facilities (Interna-

tional Women's Tribune Centre January 1978: 13). Continuous all-women

projects, in conjunction with separate activities (such as seeding or

sodding) for women's teams on large mixed projects, would permit separate

work norms for women if they are necessary to bring wages up to the level

required for reasonable subsistence.11 In addition, basing work nearer

the village permits more effective monitoring of wages and working condi-
tions by official agents and local committees.

Sales Workers

The differences across countries in the percentages of sales workers
who are female are remarkable, ranging from only 1 percent in seven countries
of North Africa and the Middle East to 59 percent in the Philippines,

60 percent in Nigeria, 65 percent in Jamaica, and 88 percent in Ghana

(Table 1, column 8).

Rural women in sales are overwhelmingly concentrated in the informal
sector of local exchange systems. Forming an important link between the
subsistence sector and the commercial economy, they frequently operate

with sufficient capital for only one day's trading, buying goods in the

morning (perhaps on credit), sometimes processing them in a typical mix
of economic activities (grinding corn, for example), and selling in

the afternoon. The sexual division of market labor is clear. Typically,

women sell goods from their homes or in daily or weekly local markets
while men engage in long-distance trade;12 women carry goods on their

backs or heads while men used wheeled transport; women work in small
family-owned retail shops while men control the large retailing and

wholesaling enterprises; women trade in foodstuffs and small household
items while men sell equipment, appliances, cash crops, and other major

items in local or urban markets and in the export trade.

Once again, modernizing forces displace women from their traditional

role in the marketplace as the distance between producer and consumer

lengthens, transport becomes a major difficulty and expense, factory

production and imported goods undermine local production, and capital

requirements increase (Mintz 1971; Mullings 1976; Robertson 1975-76;

Stoler 1977; Sudarkasa 1973). The expansion of men's commercial activities,

particularly in the import/export business, poses an additional threat

to female trading (Mintz 1971: 264-5).

On a national level, measures are needed to protect smaller markets

from the encroachment of large wholesalers and retailers, such as the

reversal of taxation and pricing policies or access to government services

that discriminate against small shops and marketplaces in favor of larger

ones. Extension services providing technical assistance to small farmers

and industries need to include small businesses and independent traders.

Credit is also crucial. One of the major problems facing the majority

of own-account women traders is lack of sufficient capital to invest in

greater quantities of merchandise, improved transport, or sales and

storage facilities. As a consequence, women cannot expand into larger

operations or the lucrative import/export market. Their small profits

often go for daily subsistence, children's school fees, or other kinship

obligations (marriage exchanges, gifts) rather than for business expansion

(Mintz 1971: 253; Stoler 1977: 83-4).

In Indonesia, although wealthy women traders can borrow money at

relatively low interest rates from formal lending institutions such as

the Bank Pasar (Market Bank) or from one of the women's cooperative unions

sponsored by the Indonesian Women's Congress, poor rural women with


insufficient collateral rely instead on suppliers, relatives, or money-

lenders who charge high rates of interest (Milone 1978: 107-15). Resource-

ful Haitian market women will sometimes get their trading capital by

"buying wholesale on credit, selling retail at reduced prices, lending

their earnings in even smaller amounts at higher rates of interest --

5 percent for three days' use is not unusual -- and then repaying their

suppliers, showing a profit at the end of such a maneuver" (Mintz 1971:

259). Rural development banks specifically serving low-income women

borrowers, as individuals or groups could increase their productivity


Direct access to transport and markets is also crucial if women are

to maintain control over the products of their labor. Where women are not

permitted in the marketplace, male family members who sell their goods

receive the cash or else agents skim off the profit. In a cattle-fattening

project in Dosso, Niger, women pay men to sell their cattle because by

custom they cannot engage in animal trading.13 In the silk-weaving industry

in Banares, India, cloth produced at home and sold by the husband to inter-

mediaries leaves the women with "no control nor a separate share of the

earnings" (Committee 1974: 181).

Women in some areas have adapted to the requirements of female

seclusion by trading out of their homes with children as intermediaries

(Simmons 1975) or by organizing their own markets. In the north-eastern

hill areas of India, for example, women sell various items of dress,

furnishings, and food products as well as their own weaving from purchased

stalls in the urban women's market and in smaller rural women's markets

throughout Manipur district (Committee 1974: 181). The creation of

additional women's markets in culturally conservative areas is an


effective means of extending more control to women who are currently

excluded from the public sphere both as producers and consumers. Markets

in which virtually all of the sellers and buyers are women are, of course,

common in African and Caribbean countries as well as in others where men

and women mingle freely in public. But even under these conditions, the

officials responsible for renting or selling stalls and for setting regu-

lations are almost always men (Ibid.; Sudarkasa 1973: 60). Policies for

expanding women's employment in the sales sector should not only support

women's access to markets, but also facilitate their entry into the wage-

paid labor force of larger sales enterprises -- in part to reduce the

competition among self-employed women in the informal sector.

Service Workers

If there is a group of occupations that women can claim as their own

in most parts of the world, it is personal service -- house-keepers, cooks,

maids, waiters, hairdressers, dishwashers, laundry workers, seamstresses,

child minders. Only a few service jobs, such as police:work, fire-

fighting, men's tailoring, or barbering, are all but closed to women.

Although countries of subSaharan Africa typically show somewhat

lower proportions of women among service workers compared with their

numbers in the labor force (a median of 23 percent, ranging from 6 percent

in Sierra Leone to 67 percent in South Africa), in the other three regions

women are significantly overrepresented in service occupations. In North

Africa and the Middle East, even though such work usually exposes girls

and women to potentially dishonoring contact with men (Youssef 1974:

26-30), females comprise a median of 14 percent of all service workers,

ranging from 7 percent in Turkey to 38 percent in Morocco. South and


Southeast Asia, with a median of 33 percent of service workers female,

ranges from 15 percent in Pakistan to 67 percent in the Philippines.

It is in Latin America that women's role in service becomes most

vivid. Comprising 23 percent of the paid labor force in the region,

females hold 62 percent of all paid service jobs. At least half of all

service workers are female in every one of the 23 countries listed in

Table 1. If there is a typical woman worker in Latin America, she is the

domestic servant who -- poor and uneducated -- leaves her village as a

young girl in search for work in town or city (Chaney 1977; Jellin 1977;

Smith 1973).

Although live-in domestic work is a major source of employment for

women in rural areas throughout the developing world where class distinc-

tions divide wealthy landowner and commercial households from landless

workers and marginal subsistence farmers, other service arrangements are

also common. Rural women walk from house to house in daily or weekly

rounds to clean, do laundry, or wash dishes, or they go to private homes

when summoned as seamstresses or hairdressers, or take in washing or other

work in their own homes. Municipalities may hire them to sweep roads and

public places or clean drains and latrines, work typical of outcast

"sweeper" women in India, for example (Committee 1974: 178). They also

work as wage-earners in a variety of public and private service establishments.

The availability of cheap female labor enables more prosperous house-

holds to achieve an artificially high standard of living; in their absence,

"personal services would have to be purchased from established enterprises

(restaurants, laundry and drycleaning services, etc.) at considerably

higher prices" (Jellin 1977: 140). This situation suggests three


approaches. First, the expansion of women's employment in small industries

could draw a significant number out of personal service occupations, resulting

in upward pressure on the wages of those who remain and in the substitution

of labor-saving devices (simultaneously creating a demand for small indus-

trial output). Second, policies should encourage the organization of service

workers into associations to improve their bargaining power over wages and

working conditions that are almost invarably oppressive, although house-

hold servants are particularly difficult to organize because of their

isolation and personal dependency on their employers. A third tactic

would be to provide women currently working in the homes of their employers,

or taking in work in their own homes, with the means to start group

enterprises such as child care centers, laundries, restaurants, catering

businesses, or hostels where they could learn business skills, set regular

hours, and earn better wages charging reasonable prices for their services.

Administrative, Clerical, and Professional Occupations

Although grouped together here for convenience, administrative/

managerial/clerical occupations in developing countries typically have

lower proportions of women workers than do the professional/technical

occupations that include teachers and health workers. In the former

category, 18 countries of Africa, the Middle East and Asia show fewer

than 15 percent female while only two in Central America (Barbados and

Panama) show half or more female. Among professional/technical occupa-

tions, however, only six countries show fewer than 15 percent female

(Nigeria, Morocco, Libya, Nepal, Pakistan, India) while ten show half or

more female (Philippines, Jamaica, eight Latin American countries). The

relatively high participation of women in the professions in North Africa


and the Middle East in comparison with their representation in the labor

force as a whole is due, paradoxically, to "the restrictions of the

purdah system [that] creates new opportunities in the 'contact services,'

such as medicine and education, for educated women serving a female

clientele" (Papanek 1971: 522; see also Youssef 1974: 34-6).

Higher rates of illiteracy as well as higher dropout rates after the

first few years of school form the major obstacles to the integration of

village women into professional occupations at the local or district level.

Yet the expansion of institutional infrastructures in rural areas creates

new jobs in education, health services, agricultural extension, legal

services, cooperative management, and other fields for which women need

advanced training. Clearly a rural development policy needs to deal with

this dilemma.

First, incentives are needed to promote girls' attendance at

elementary school and their continuation to secondary and post-secondary

vocational training. Second, trained women from urban areas could be

induced to serve rural people through incentives such as higher pay for

rural postings, the provision of housing, and more rapid advancement to

positions of responsibility through rural rather than urban career ladders.

These women would simultaneously motivate their rural counterparts to take

advanced training. Third, persons with little or no formal schooling

can be employed in many technical and managerial capacities. Rural

development planners emphasizing the expansion of primary education and

health care are increasingly turning to the Chinese model of training

"barefoot doctors" or veterinarians and even "barefoot managers" to

provide a wide range of basic services to rural people. The Bangladesh

Rural Advancement Committee, for example, trains villagers with very


few years of schooling as paramedics who can diagnose and treat the most

prevalent forms of illness, referring more serious cases to higher level

medical personnel.14 Reducing the sometimes unnecessarily high educa-

tional qualifications for certain government jobs in rural areas could

facilitate women's access to this source of employment.

III. A Strategy for Mobilizing Rural Women for Employment

In Section II we discussed policies for expanding employment for

rural women specific to the nonagricultural sectors of production, sales,

service, and clerical/technical/professional occupations. In this section

we will outline a general strategy for mobilizing rural women for employ-

ment both within and outside agriculture. At least six tasks are involved:

(1) identifying groups of women who are most in need of income-generating

employment; (2) defining the range of economic activities in which these

women are currently engaged; with a view to raising their output and in-

come-generating capacity or to shifting them into more productive activities;

(3) locating indigenous social networks around which groups of women could
be mobilized; (4) establishing sources of credit, technical assistance

and training for group enterprises; (5) determining needs for technology
to reduce domestic burdens; and (6) identifying and overcoming other

cultural or structural obstacles that deny women control over the

products of their labor.

Employment for Whom?

The first task is to locate, through analysis of national or district

socioeconomic surveys and through local interviews, groups of women who

are most in need of income-generating employment. The purpose here is to

concentrate benefits among the poorest sectors of the population in areas

selected for intensive investment, particularly among the landless and

small subsistence farmers. These include households in a diversity of

circumstances -- laborers, cultivators, pastoralists -- who differ in their

access to productive resources and in the security of their livelihoods,

but share their poverty (Esman 1978: 56-61). Within these landless and

near-landless classes, the most destitute are likely to be those who belong

to stigmatized racial, religious, or ethnic groups as well as households
headed by women (Birdsall and McGreevey 1978; Buvinic and Youssef 1978).

For women in subsistence farm families as well as for the landless,

the creation of off-farm employment is crucial in offsetting seasonal
fluctuations and limitations on agricultural incomes. Considering that

in most countries the average size of farm holdings is declining, the

increase in agricultural output slowing, and the real wages of agricultural

workers dropping, it is not surprising to find that farm incomes are

frequently insufficient to meet household expenses even among land-owning

families (FAO 1979: 1-6). In one village of central Java, for example,

over three-quarters of all households depended primarily or totally
on income-producing activities outside of the ownership and cultivation

of rice land -- that is, on "agricultural wage labor, various forms of

market trade, handicraft production, and mixed garden cultivation for sale

and consumption" (Stoler 1977: 79). In the northern Peruvian Sierra,
only 16 percent of the total net income of minifundio households in one

survey came from agricultural or animal production; males took additional

wage labor as harvesters or construction workers while females engaged

in petty commodity production (handicrafts or food processing) or in small

scale marketing and commerce (Deere 1977b: 62).

Land tenure systems with highly concentrated ownership appear to

offer minimal agricultural employment opportunities for both men and

women. In Chile, for example, women have been gradually displaced from

directly remunerated agricultural jobs; on the large estates, they (and

their children) "...represent a reserve labor force available during times

of peak demand, but the landowner need employ only one person Ethe male

household heacf on a permanent basis..." (Garrett 1976: 33). Women on

the estates could benefit from additional employment, either in home.based

production such as poultry raising or handicrafts that could not be

appropriated by the landowner, or in village-based industries producing
consumer goods for which there is a steady demand.

Building on Current Production

The second task is to identify economic activities in which the

"target groups" of women are currently engaged: the time spent on each

activity, its output, the level of skill required, source of raw materials,

the type of technology, whether the goods or services are performed for

household consumption or are sold or exchanged, whether the level and

type of activity fluctuate seasonally, and so on. Good quality data are

extremely important. Time-use studies of village women's activities

usually point to a remarkable range of skills and'local resources upon

which to upgrade productivity, transform currently unpaid work into in-

come-generating employment, and, if necessary, introduce entirely new

economic activities such as small industries where raw materials and

markets can be assured.

A survey of the skills and resources of rural women in several

districts of Sri Lanka, hoping to identify opportunities for employment


both within and outside agriculture, provides a good example of the type

of base-line data that are needed for employment planning (Wijayaratre

et al 1978). The survey was designed:

() To examine the division of labor in the farm households;
2 To ascertain the present skills and experiences of rural
women which could be utilized in possible income generating
(3) To examine the opportunities for more intensive employment
of rural women in agriculture;
(4) To identify the infra-structure existing (or) needed for
the development of employment opportunities outside
agriculture for rural women;
(5) To ascertain the scope of activities of voluntary and
non-voluntary organizations assisting rural women in
gainful employment;
(6) To identify specific income generating activities on or
off the farm for rural women for further development by
the Farm Women Extension Service of the Department of
Agriculture (Ibid.: 1-2).

Mobilizing Groups of Women Workers

Although some development programs offer direct assistance to

individuals or households for home-based production, organized groups working

outside the home have a number of advantages: economies of scale, reduced

competition, easier access to credit and technical assistance, experience

in collective decision-making, and the creation of a base of social

solidarity and political action. The central workplace provides an effec-
tive setting for the delivery of services such as functional literacy

classes, training in accounting and simple management, health care,

family planning, and the communal care of infants and children. In

addition, moving employment out of the home permits easier enforcement

of minimum wages and working conditions. Although the history of govern-

ment enforcement of labor laws in most countries is woefully inadequate

for public settings such as factories, plantations, or rural work projects,

the condition of women employed at home is usually worse, often

exploiting child labor as well (Committee 1974: 70-71).15

Employment-generating schemes in some areas have evolved quite

naturally out of indigeneous social networks such as rotating credit

and savings associations ("money clubs") or the tradition of voluntary

contributions of labor for community building projects or religious

activities, while others have been introduced as new organizational

structures, sometimes taking root, often not. Appropriate strategies

for mobilizing women for employment depends on the social characteristics

of the workers themselves (whether they share a history of mutual trust

or prior collective work experience, for example), the type of work to

be organized, and the nature of other social, economic and political

institutions in the community, among other considerations (Nash et al

1976; Worsley 1971).

Work teams on Chinese collective farms, for example, evolved from

traditional peasant customs of exchanging help at harvest time, later

formalized in the first liberated areas into permanent mutual-aid or

work-exchange teams, many of them exclusively female (Davin 1975: 264).
The Korean Mothers' Clubs -- some of whom have undertaken income-generating

activities such as fruit and vegetable gardens, small livestock projects,

mullberry production for silk worms, ropemaking and noodle factories,

and garment making -- were frequently based on indigenous rotating credit

associations (Park et al 1976: 278). In Kenya, women in Nakuru and its

surrounding hinterlands formed a Farmers Cooperative Society which purchased

a large commercial farm growing wheat, barley, pyrethrum, and sheep; a

"Machete and Hoe Self-Help Group" to buy a farm from proceeds of group

hoeing and weeding; and a "Hoe and Carrying Basket" association recruited

from a traditional dance group to earn money for property by hoeing or

brewing beer (Wachtel 1975-76: 71-5; see also Stamp 1975-76: 33).

Most formal cooperatives have been organized along Western

universalistic principles rather than on the particularistic norms of

nonWestern societies. Although many women's associations suffer from

problems that have plagued the cooperative movement in general --

political interference, mismanagement, membership apathy, domination by

the elite -- in some areas women's producer cooperatives show consider-

able promise (International Cooperative Alliance 1974, 1975). The

Bangladesh Integrated Rural Development program, for example, is initiating

small-scale market gardening, poultry, and fish raising associations to

improve women's earnings; throughout Bangladesh, village women's coopera-

tives produce jute handicrafts for export (Ahmad 1976; Dixon 1978: 42-74;

Zeidenstein 1975).

Along less formal lines, the Colombian Institute of Agrarian

Reform has organized women in "the most marginal of rural populations;

the migrants, rural labour and small peasant families" into dairy and

horticulture projects and a variety of small industries (Cebotarev 1976).

Given the opportunity, women appear eager to undertake income-earning

projects if they can work together and have access to supports such as

credit, training, and production and marketing advice. Agrarian reform

programs that create new linkages between households through land

redistribution or collective farming provide valuable institutional bases

facilitating the organization of agricultural and nonagricultural

work teams of women.

Credit and Technical Assistance

The fourth task is to establish sources of credit and technical

assistance that will funnel benefits directly to the women who need them


most (Buvinic et al 1979). Because these women lack bargaining power,

their access to resources will have to be mediated (at least initially)

by a strong advocate -- an individual or sponsoring institution -- who

links them with service agencies and represents their interests.

A United Nations study of rural cooperatives concluded that the more

effective groups had strong ties with outside agencies such as central

associations that provided training, credit, accounting, and other

services.(UNIRSD 1975: 17).

National policies to expand the network of district training centers

for rural research and administration, to tailor curricula to local needs,

and to direct rural extension services to small-scale nonfarm as well as

farm enterprises will benefit sectors employing women, but special

measures will be needed to ensure that women receive training and technical

assistance in all fields at every level.16

Similarly, national policies to extend credit or loans to low-income

rural populations through government or cooperative banks will require

flexible and innovative procedures to reach low-income women; without these,

women's productivity as farmers, traders, and small enterpreneurs will be

depressed. The People's Bank of Indonesia, for example, with branches

throughout the country, makes loans against collateral such as land or

cash crops (rice, maize, soybeans, sugar, cotton) but not for fruits,

vegetables, or household equipment which are typically women's assets

(Milone 1978: 107-112). Although the loans are at low rates of interest,

most rural women -- especially landless labourers -- are ineligible.

Programs that attempt to deliver credit and technical assistance

to small-scale enterprises and marginal workers differ considerably in

their strategies. Some extend services directly to individuals or


households, as in a Bangladesh scheme offering loans to nuclear families

with annual incomes below 800 taka per capital (about $56) enabling women

to start handicrafts or rice-husking businesses (Amachar 1979: 24). Others

extend benefits to individuals through groups. Some of these have a

history of collective action, such as the traditional funeral society in

Shinualu, Western Kenya that makes commercial loans to dozens of small

businesses (restaurants, bars, maize mills, etc.), many operated by women

(Ramey 1976). Some have no such history. The Self-Employed Women's

Association (SEWA) of Ahmedabad, India, included by mid-1975 about 6,000

previously unorganized street vendors, cart pullers, junk-smiths, garment
makers, and other independent workers (Bhatt 1976; Jain n.d.). An out-

growth of the Textile Labour Association of Ahmedabad (a large labor

union), SEWA operates a savings bank which makes low-cost loans to

members, many of whom are in debt to moneylenders charging up to 10

percent per day for operating capital.

A third type of program extends credit, training, and services to

organized groups, making the group as a whole responsible for repayment.

Ideally, group loans have the advantage of reaching the poorest workers who

are otherwise individually ineligible, reducing borrowers' and lenders'

costs, cutting loan default through joint liability, and facilitating

technical assistance (Adams and Matienzo 1978). These range from informally

constituted groups in Upper Volta requesting assistance for small projects

with income-earning potential (poultry raising, milling machines, cash

crops) (US Aid 1976) to large, formal producers' cooperatives. State

governments in India, for example, offer a number of advantages to

registered cooperatives such as low interest or interest-free loans, tax

concessions, subsidies of some staff salaries, government purchase of


cooperative shares, technical assistance of various kinds through govern-

ment agencies such as the All-India Handicraft Board and All-India Hand-

loom Board, and access to cooperative wholesalers and the government it-

self as buyers of cooperatively made products (Beriwal 1976: 34).17

Labor-Saving Technology

The fifth consideration is to identify the most arduous and time-

consuming domestic tasks in order to release women for more productive work.

In a village in Pakistan, for instance, women spend an average of almost

four hours every day collecting, carrying, and preparing fodder for their

animals; almost two hours in animal care; and another hour milking and

churning (Anwar and Bilquees 1976: 51). In the Sahel region of Africa,

women of sedentary farm families spend two to three hours every day

threshing grain and pounding it into flour (Cloud 1978: 68). Similar

stories are told by women who walk long distances to carry goods to the

market, carry farm produce home from the fields, collect water from

distant wells or rivers, and search for increasingly scarce firewood

(Fagley 1976).

A policy to reduce domestic drudgery would focus both on the social

organization of work and on its technology. Collective work groups could

undoubtedly organize some tasks more efficiently as well as creating a

more congenial working environment. Some activities normally pezDormed

at home (e.g., husking, milling, oil pressing, spice grinding) could form

the basis for culturally organized small industries. In China, a policy

of reducing domestic drudgery in order to free women for renumerative work

has resulted in the creation in many communes of small industries such as

shoemaking and "sewing stations." Replacing time-consuming home production,

the work acquires public value and enters the income-generating workpoint
system (Davin 1975: 256). Similarly, nurseries and day-care centers,

while freeing women for more productive work outside the home, offer new

employment for child minders, permit daughters who might otherwise be

forced to take care of younger siblings at home to stay in school, and
allow women to continue breastfeeding infants at their worksite, with

important birth-spacing and nutritional consequences.

The literature on "appropriate" or "intermediate" technology points
to a variety of innovative labor-saving solutions uniquely suited to rural

women's needs and local resources: alternative fuel sources, water supply

systems, crop processing and storage techniques, household and farm imple-

ments, building construction, transport, and small industries.18 United
Nations agencies in Africa offer excellent examples of research and program

possibilities. The Women's Centre of the Economic Commission for Africa,

for example, held a series of workshops in 1977 on village technologies

for extension workers (Carr 1978: 72). Approximately 30 village projects

for testing improved technology were generated. Other African projects
include special training programs in village technology, the creation of

small research units within universities and government departments, inter-
national study tours, demonstration and testing units, and regional research

projects to identify technologies that will simultaneously free women from
less productive activities and create new possibilities for income-

generating employment ibidd. passim ).

Control Over Earnings

Whereas women who work for wages or on their own account generally
receive payment in cash or kind directly, unpaid family laborers are often


forced into a state of economic dependency on their male kin even when

their own labors contribute a substantial proportion of household earnings.

Efforts at land reform or "green revolutions" often leave women's basic

state of dependency untouched: "They remain enclosed within the work cell

of the family as unpaid laborers, unrelated to larger systems of inter-

dependence" (Ahmed 1975: 30). Even large-scale reforms such as the

ujamaa villages of Tanzania fail to integrate women into cooperative

forms of production on an equal basis with men. Women tend to grow food
on the small private plots that are registered in their husbands' names,

while men earn valued collective work points growing cash crops on

communally held lands (Storgaard 1975-6; Brain 1976). The traditional

sexual division of labor between food and cash crops, as well as between

unpaid and paid family labor, remains intact.

Other examples of women's economic dependency despite their produc-

tivity can be cited from a variety of settings: women and children in

India who weave saris at home commissioned by contractors who deal with

the husband; women and children who labor on estates or plantations along-

side the male household head who is paid for the whole family's work;

women who make handicrafts or foodstuffs at home but depend on their

husbands to market the goods. In these situations "the husband is also

the employer, and terms of employment are unchangeable" (Ahmed 1975: 30).
Access to moveable property probably permits greater freedom from

husbands' control than does working in family enterprises.\4here women

have rights to moveable property such as an inheritance of money or a

dowry of jewelry or small animals, they can show considerable ingenuity
in transforming a small portion into a larger one through a combination

of trade, production, and lending over the years. In Northern Nigeria,


for example, the women's "chickens, sheep, and goats serve as stores of

value, bearing interest in the form of offspring and available for liquida-

tion when cash is required' (Simmons 1975: 158). Earnings of this type

are generally considered the woman's own. Similarly women who earn

wages may have more autonomy in determining how their money is spent.

Of greater importance to development planners, however, is the evidence

that the loss of female control over earnings that were traditionally

theirs sometimes subverts the goals of an entire program.19

An organizational strategy that brings women together in collective

work groups can successfully circumvent male control over resources by

enabling women to sell goods and services directly. Where women work

with men, policies need to be developed to ensure that workers are paid

individually for their labors, whether in cash, in kind, or credit (e.g.,

workpoints). This issue of direct remuneration for work performed, which

is tied so closely to collective recognition of the value of the work,

was raised in China as early as 1948. Women on the collectives demanded

not only that they earn the same number of workpoints as men for the same

amount of work (although not necessarily the same work), but also that

"points of men and women in the same family should be recorded separately"

so that husbands could no longer control their wives' earnings (Davin

1975: 265).


Although female employment patterns differ widely from country to

country, both in the proportions defined as economically active and in

their employment status and occupational distribution, some common themes

emerge. In spite of their heavy labors, rural women are far less likely


than men to be considered economically active, and, in most countries,

far more likely to be unpaid family workers rather than wage-earners or

self-employed. More so than for men, the meager economic returns are

highly disproportionate to their labor inputs, a situation defined in

one United Nations report as "an extreme case of unequal exchange" (UN

General Assembly 1978: 7).

Even in those countries where women have played vital and independent

roles in agriculture, cottage industries, or trade, a complex of inter-

national and national economic forces has been steadily undermining

their productivity and earnings. Rural women's traditional income-

generating activities are particularly vulnerable to displacement by

imported products, capital-intensive industrialization, the commerciali-

zation of agriculture and the expansion of large wholesaling and retailing

enterprises. As agricultural and non-agricultural production and sales

become more technologically advanced, men increasingly take over jobs

that women once performed. New industries (with some exceptions) and

agribusinesses frequently prefer male employees over females. For rural

women, the disparity between labor and earnings -- the pattern of unequal

exchange -- intensifies.

Given women's special vulnerability to loss of earnings as well as

the decline of traditional social and economic protections offered by

marriage and extended kinship, it is extremely important that policies

of agrarian reform and rural development incorporate specific measures

to ensure that women are fully integrated into the entire range of new

employment opportunities. These include not only agricultural and indus-

trial production but also the entire institutional and physical infra-

structure on which rural development depends:

...the creation of rural development agencies, agricultural
research centres, extension and training networks, the setting
up of cooperatives, credit systems, food storage facilities,
the expansion of food distribution networks, industries to
supply farm equipment and agricultural inputs such as ferti-
lizers, and pesticides, watershed management and irrigation
systems, rural road building and schools, health and family
planning facilities (FAO 1979: i).

Although the strategies outlined in this paper for generating female

employment in both the agricultural and nonagricultural sectors have

emphasized grass-roots programs for organizing women into work groups,
providing training and access to credit, setting up small industries or

agricultural enterprises, and so on, this approach makes sense only in

the context of broad national and international policies that eliminate
the net flow of capital from rural to urban areas and from developing

countries to industrialized ones. Otherwise, agriculture (especially

food crops for domestic consumption) and rural industries -- large poten-
tial employers of additional female labor -- will face worsening competi-

tion, lower wages, and intensified outmigration. On the national level,

policies that reverse past priorities favoring urban-industrial and export
sectors in investment, pricing, taxation, and terms of trade are bound to
have positive impact on rural women in domestic agriculture and small

industries. Similarly, the revision of international terms of trade and

private foreign investment to encourage domestic labor-intensive processing

of raw materials, manufacturing, and food production should also stimulate
greater demand for female labor in the countryside. In combination with
agrarian reform policies to reduce major inequalities in access to

material and social resources within rural areas as well, such grass-roots

strategies can provide women with essential support systems enabling them

to become active agents and beneficiaries of the development process.

11 am indebted to Kathryn March, Cornell University, for this
translation of her interview.
2The percentages of females among the economically active pop-ulation
in Sierra Leone and Liberia drop from 36 in both to 11 and 14 percent,
respectively; in Turkey from 38 to 6 percent; in Thailand and Korea
from 38 in both to 27 and 28 percent; and in Pakistan from 12 to 5 percent.

A United Nations report declares that "As long as money is involved,
the person is always classified as employed" (Boulding et al 1976: 297).
This statement does not apply to those who did not earn wages or profits
in the specified time period, however, so seasonal or sporadic income
generation characteristic of women's economic roles might not be included.
4The theme of negative impact of development on women is explored in
Boserup 1970, Chaney and Schmink 1976, Mullings 1976, Nash 1977, Tinker 1976,
For bibliographies see Buvinic 1976, Rihani 1978, Non-Formal Education
Information Center, 1978b. For policy recommendations see Boserup and
Liljencrantz 1975, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
1975, Germain 1976-77, Papanek 1977, United Nations Dept. of Economic and
Social Affairs 1973, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa 1975,
United Nations General Assembly 1978.
5Many of these are "offshore industries" -- foreign investors taking
advantage of cheap female labor and prolonged tax holidays in the host
country (United Nations General Assembly 1978, pp. 40-41).
6For additional arguments and evidence see Anderson and Leiserson
1978; Kilby 1978; Liedholm and Chuta 1976; Staley and Morse 1965; White
7It should be noted that some of these so-called small industries
employ as many as 500 workers, however, and are quite highly mechanized.

8In Sierra Leone, for example, local small firms could not qualify
for tax exemptions designed to encourage foreign investment in the country
(similar tax incentives for large firms are found widely in Africa,
Asia, and Latin America) (Liedholm and Chuta, 1976: 111-114), and import
taxes were prohibitively high on some basic items essential to small-
scale industrial production. See also White 1978.

9A variety of income-earning projects both within and outside
agriculture are discussed in the following publications, among others:
American Council of Voluntary Agencies for Foreign Service 1976; Interna-
tional Women's Tribune Newsletter 4 (March-April 1977) and 5 and 6
(January 1978); New Transcentury Foundation July 1978 and January 1979;
Misch and Margolin 1975; Rihani 1978, United Nations Development Programme
1978; United States Agency for International Development 1978.

10In Zaria Province of Northern Nigeria, for example, 90 percent
of the village women interviewed in one study were currently engaged in
at least one food-related activity for economic gain, usually processing
grain, legumes, or starchy roots into convenient ready-to-eat foods
(Simmons 1975: 156).

11In an attempt to equalize men's and women's daily wages on Food-
for-Work schemes in Bangladesh, separate women's projects uniformly pay
a higher piece rate to women for carrying earth. The differential rates
are designed to compensate for women's lesser physical capacity, particu-
larly among nontribal women, and to pay a daily wage that meets subsis-
tence requirements for a family of five. Not only does the differential
wage rate raise problems of equality, however, but it acts as an incentive
for contractors to hire men instead of women on the women's projects.
For this reason, some agencies have been reluctant to undertake women-
only construction projects (Judith Tendler, personal communication).
12With a few exceptions, such as the legendary long-distance woman
traders of West Africa.
13Marilyn Hoskins, personal communication.

14Based on the author's visit to BRAC projects in Sulla, Bangladesh,
February 1976.
15A 1948 International Labour Organization study of home industries
(garment making, spinning and weaving, and so forth) in Europe and North
America, in which workers were mostly women and children, concluded that
"...industrial homework is one of the least regulated, least supervised,
and most hazardous systems of industrial production" (quoted in Staley
and Morse 1965: 76).
16For a review of nonagricultural training programs, including
small industry development assistance, see American Council on Education
1977; American Council of Voluntary Agencies 1976, Coombs 1974, Nonformal
Education Information Center 1978a. Most train women in sewing, embroidery,
and other traditional female occupations rather than in carpentry, bicycle
repair, veterinary services, and so on.
17Registration requirements have proved far too complex for the
majority of small women's cooperatives, however, the members of whom are
mostly illiterate, and managerial and accounting regulations are beyond
the experience of most rural organizers (Dixon 1978: 151-4). To be
genuinely responsive to women's needs, the cooperative movement and govern-
ment agencies alike will need to relax registration requirements, hire
women registrars and cooperative extension workers, and organize women's
classes at cooperative training centers in order to extend benefits
directly to this group of workers.


18Surveys of the literature include Carr 1976; Eckaus 1977;
International Women's Tribune Center July 1978 and April 1979; Jequier
1976; O'Kelley 1978; the journal Appropriate Technology, and the special
issue on alleviating women's burdens of Les Carnets de 1'Enfance/Assignment
Children 36 (Oct.-Dec. 1976).

19A classic example comes from the reorganization of a marketing
cooperative in the pyrethrum industry in Kenya. Whereas women had been
growing the crop and selling the dried flowers directly, the new coopera-
tive paid formal members of the society who were mostly men. Not
surprisingly, the women became discouraged with the loss of direct economic
returns and, "rationally and realistically in the circumstances, their
output fell" (Apthorpe 1971: 73).


Adams, Dale W. and Rodolfo M. Matienzo. "Editorial comment: group
lending among small farmers," Newsletter on Rural Financial Market
Research and Policy, No. 10 (July-Sept. 1978). (Agricultural
Finance Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210)

Ahmad, Perveen. "The role of women in cooperative development in Bangla-
desh," 23-27 in International Cooperative Alliance, Regional
Conference on the Role of Women in Cooperative Development, Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia, 21-28 July 1975. New Delhi: International
Cooperative Alliance, 1976.

Ahmed, Wajihuddin. "The husband is the employer," Ceres, 8, 2 (March-
April 1975), 28-31.

Amachar, Peter. "IUCW Women's Programmes," ADAB News, 6, 2 (February 1979).
24-25. (Agricultural Development Agencies in Bangladesh, 79 Road
11A, Dhanmondi, Dacca-9, Bangladesh)

American Council of Voluntary Agencies for Foreign Service, Inc.,
Technical Assistance Information Clearing House. Small Industry:
Development Assistance Abroad December 1976. New York: ACVAFS,
December 1976.

American Council on Education, Overseas Liaison Committee. "Small-Scale
Industries," Rural Development Network Bulletin, No. 7 (September
1977). (American Council on Education, 11 Dupont Circle, Washington,
D.C. 20036).

American Rural Small-Scale Industry Delegation. Rural Small-Scale Industry
in the People's Republic of China. Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1977.

Anderson, Dennis, and Mark W. Leiserson. Rural Enterprise and Nonfarm
Employment, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, January 1978.

Anwar, Seemin and Faiz Bilquees. "The attitudes, environment and activities
of rural women: a case study of Jhok Sayal," Research Report No. 98.
Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, April 1976.

Apthorpe, Raymond. "Some evaluation problems for cooperative studies,
with special reference to primary cooperatives in highland Kenya"
pp. 67-82 in Peter Worsley (ed.) Two Blades of Grass: Rural
Cooperativesiin Agricultural Modernization. Manchester: Manchester
University Press, 1971.

Beniwal, Kamla. "Background paper on women and the cooperative movement
in India," 33-38.in International Cooperative Alliance, Regional
Conference on the Role of Women in Cooperative Development, Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia, 21-28 July 1975. Delhi: International Coopera-
tive Alliance, 1976.

Bhatt, Ela. "Organizing the self-employed women workers into labour
and cooperatives: an experiment," paper presented at All India
Conference on Women and Cooperatives, New Delhi, 22-23 March 1976.
New Delhi: National Cooperative Union of India, 1976.

Birdsall, Nancy and William P. McGreevey. "The second sex in the third
world: is female poverty--a development issue?" Paper prepared
for the International Center for Research on Women Policy Round-
table, June 21, 1978. (ICRW, 1010 16th St., N.W., 3rd floor,
Washington, D.C. 20036).

Boserup, Ester. Woman's Role in Economic Development. New York: St.
Martin's Press, 1970.

and Christina Liljencrantz. Integration of Women in Development:
Why, When, How. New York: United Nations Development Programme,
May 1975.

Boulding, Elise, Shirley A. Nuss, Dorothy Lee Carson, and Michael A.
Greenstein, Handbook of International Data on Women. New York:
Halstead, 1976.

Brain, James L. "Less than second-class: women in rural settlement schemes
in Tanzania," 265-282 in Nancy J. Hafkin and Edna Bay (eds.) Women
in Africa: Studies in Social and Economic Change. Stanford, Ca.:
Stanford University Press, 1976.

Brannon, Russel H. and David L. Jesse. "Unemployment and Underemployment
in the Rural Sectors of the Less Developed Countries." Occasional
Paper No. 4. Washington, D.C.: Technical Assistance Bureau, US
Agency for International Development, January 1977.

Bruton, Henry J. "Employment growth as an indicator of poverty allevia-
tion" Paper presented at the Employment Seminar of the Asia Bureau
of the US Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C.
July 1979.

Buvinic, Mayra. Women and World Development: An Annotated Bibliography.
Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council, 1976.

_Jennefer Sebstad, and Sondra Zeidenstein."Credit for
rural women: some facts and lessons"' Paper prepared for the
Office of Rural Development of the US Agency for International
Development, August 1979.

and Nadia H. Youssef with Barbara Von Elm. Women-Headed
Households: The Ignored Factor in Development Planning. Washington,
D.C.: International Center for Research on Women, March 1978.

Carr, Marilyn. Appropriate Technology for African Women. The African
Training and Research Centre for Women of the Economic Commission
for Africa. ECA/SDD/ATRCW/VTGEN/78. Addis Ababa: United Nations,

Economically Appropriate Technologies for Developing Countries:
An Annotated Bibliography. London: Intermediate Technology Publica-
tions, 1975.

Cebotarev, E.A. "Rural women in non-familial activities: credit and
political action in Latin America (A Colombian Example)" paper
presented at Conference on Women in Development, Wellesley College,
Wellesley, Mass. June 2-6, 1976.

Chaney, Elsa M. "Agripina: domestic service and its implications for
development" Paper presented at the Primer Simposio Mexicano-
Centro-Americano de Investigaction Sobre la Mujer, Mexico D.F.
November 7-10 1977. Washington, D.C.: Office of Women in Develop-
ment, U.S. Agency for Tnternational Development.

.and Marianne Schmink. "Women and modernization: access to
tools," 160-182 in June Nash and Helen I. Safa (eds.) Sex and
Class in Latin America. New York: Praeger, 1976.

Chen, Marty and Ruby Ghuznavi. "Women in food-for-work: the Bangladesh
experience," paper prepared for the World FRod Programme, Dacca,

Chinchilla, Norma S. "Industrialization, monopoly capitalism and women's
work in Guatemala," Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and
Society, 3, 1 (Autumn 1977), 38-56.

Cloud, Kathleen. "Sex roles in food production and food distribution in
the Sahel," 62-68.in Proceedings and Papers of the International
Conference on Women and Food, University of Arizona, January 8-11,
1978. Vol. I. Tucson, Arizona: Consortium for International
Development, University of Arizona, 1978.

Committee on the Status of Women in India. Towards Equality: Report of
the Committee on the Status of Women in India. -New Delhi:
Government of India, Department of Welfare, December 1974.

Coombs, Philip H. with Manzoor Ahmed. Attacking Rural Poverty: How
Non-Formal Education Can Help. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University
Press, 1974.

Davin, Delia. "Women in the countryside of China," 243-273.in Margery
Wolf and Roxane Witke (eds.) Women in Chinese Society, Stanford,
Ca.: Stanford University Press, 1975.

Davis, Susan Schaefer. "Working women in a Moroccan village," 416-433
in Lois Beck and Nikki Keddie (eds.) Women in the Muslim World.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978.

Deere, Carmen Diana. "The agricultural division of labor by sex: myths,
facts and contradictions in the Northern Peruvian Sierra."
Paper presented at the Joint National Meeting of the Latin American
Studies Association and the African Studies Association, Houston,

"Changing social relations of production and Peruvian
peasant women's work," Latin American Perspectives 4, 1-2 (Winter-
Spring 1977), 48-69.

Dhamija, Jasleen. "Handicrafts: a source of employment for women in
developing rural economies," International Labour Review, 112, 6
(Dec. 1975), 459-465.

Dixon, Ruth B. Rural Women at Work:
South Asia. Baltimore: Johns
Resources for the Future, 1978.

Strategies for Development in
Hopkins University Press for

Eckaus, Richard S. Appropriate Technologies for Developing Countries.
Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1977.

Esman, Milton J. Landlessness and Near-Landlessness in Developing
Countries. Ithica, New York: Cornell University, Center for
International Studies, Aug. 1978.

Fagley, Richard M. "Easing the burden of rural women: a 16-hour workday"
Les Carnets de l'Enfance/Assignment Children, 36 (October-December
1976), 9-28.

Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. "Review and
analysis of agrarian reform and rural development in the developing
countries since the mid-sixties," paper prepared for the World
Conference on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development, Rome, 12-20,
July, 1979. WCARRD/INF. 3.

"The role of women in rural development," report prepared
for the United Nations World Conference of the International
Women's Year. E/CONF.66/BP/11, 24 March 1975.

."Themes for world conference on agrarian reform and rural
development provisional agenda," Land, Food and People, No. 3
(Dec. 1978 Jan. 1979).

Garett, Patricia M.
A activities of
University of

"Some structural constraints on the agricultural
women: the Chilean hacienda," Madison, Wis.:
Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center, December 1976.

Germain, Adrienne. "Poor rural women: a policy perspective," Journal
of International Affairs, 30, 2 (Fall/Winter 1976-77), 161-172.

International Cooperative Alliance. Report on the Proceedings of the ICA
Regional Women Cooperators Seminar, Kampala, 14-18 January 1974.
Moshi, Tanzania: ICA Regional Office for East and Central Africa, 1974.

Regional Conference on the Role of Women in Cooperative
Development, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 21-28, 1975. New Delihi:
ICA, 1976.

International Labour Office. "Report on the workshop on participation
of women in handicrafts and small industries, Zambia, December 1974."
ILO/TF/AFR/R.19. Geneva: ILO, 1975.

S"Status of rural women, especially agricultural workers,"
report prepared for-:Economic and Sodial Council, Commission on
the Status of Women, 25 Session. E/CN.6/583/Add,l. New York:
United Nations, 17 December 1973.

International Women's Year Tribune Project, IWY/TP Newsletter 4 (March-
April 1977). (345 East 46th St. Room 815, New York, New York 10017)
International Women's Tribune Center (formerly International Women's
Year Tribune Project) Newsletter 5 and 6 (January 1978), 7
(July 1978), 8 (January 1979), 9 (April 1979).

Jain, Devaki. "From dissociation to rehabilitation: report on an
experiment to promote self employment in an urban area." Indian
Council of Social Science Research, Women in a Developing Economy 1.
New Delhi: Allied Publishers, n.d.

Jellin, Elizabeth. "Migration and labor force participation of Latin
American women: the domestic servants in cities," Signs: Journal
of Women in Culture and Society, 3, 1 (Autumn 1977), 129=141.
Jequier, Nicholas (ed.). Appropriate Technology: Problems and Promises.
Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1976.

Kilby, Peter and Paul Bangasser Jr. "Assessing technical co-operation:
the case of rural industry," International Labour Review, 117, 3
(May-June 1978). 343-353.

Liedholm, Carl and Enyinna Chuta. "The economics of rural and urban
small-scale industries in Sierra Leone," African Rural Economy
Paper No. 14. East Lansing, Mich.= Michigan State University,
African Rural Economy Program, 1976.

Lipton, Michael. Why Poor People Stay Poor: Urban Bias in World Development
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977.

Major, Alan. "Third world craftswomen and development: report of a
seminar held June 20, 1975 at International Women's Year Tribune,
Mexico City," paper prepared for Planning Assistance Inc., 1975
(2067 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10023).

Mellor, John W. The New Econmics of Growth: A Strategy for India and
the Developing World. Ithica: Cornell University Press, 1976.

Menon, Leela Damodara. "A brief report on women industrial enterprises
in Kerala," unpublished paper, 1976. (Secretariat for Women in
Development, New TransCentury Foundation, 1789 Columbia Road N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009).

Milone, Pauline. "A preliminary study in three countries: Indonesia
report," paper prepared for the Office of Women in Development,
U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C.
September 1978.

Mintz, Sidney. "Men, women, and trade," Comparative Studies in Society
and History, 13, 3 (July 1971), 247-269.

Misch, Marion Ruth, and Joseph B. Margolin. Rural Women's Groups as
Potential Change Agents: A Study of Colombia, Korea and the
Philippines, PN-AAB-473. Washington, D.C. U.S. Agency for
International Development, 1975.

Mullings, Leith. "Women and economic change in Africa," 239-264 in
Nancy J. Hafkin and Edna G. Bay (eds.) Women in Africa: Studies
in Social and Economic Change. S.: ford, Ca.: Stanford University
Press, 1976.

Nash, June. "Women in development: dependency and exploitation,"
Development and Change, 8 (1977), 161-182.

Jorge Dandler, and Nicholas S. Hopkins. Popular Participation
in Social Change: Cooperatives, Collectives, and Nationalized
Industry. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.

New Transcentury Foundation. Directory of Projects Involving Women,
July 1978, Jan. 1979, Secretariat for Women in Development, New
Transcentury Foundation (1789 Columbia Rd. N.W., Washington, D.C.

Non-Formal Education Information Center. "Skills Training Programs for
Adults," The NFE Exchange, Issue No. 11 (1978/1). East Lansing,
Mich.: Michigan State University, Institute for International
Studies in Education.

S"Women in Development," The NFE Exchange, Issue No. 13
(1978/3). East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan State University,
Institute for International Studied in Education.

O'Kelley, Elizabeth. Rural Women: Their Integration in Development
Programmes and How Simple Intermediate Technologies Can Help Them.
(3 Cumberland Gardens, Lloyd Square, London WC1X 9AF. 1978.

Opondo, Diana. "Handicraft industries as a development strategy,"
paper prepared for International Cooperative Alliance, Regional
Office for East and Central Africa (P.O. Box 946, Moshi, Tanzania),

Papanek, Hanna. "Development planning
Women in Culture and Society, 3,

for women," Signs: Journal of
1 (Autumn 1977), 14-21.

"Purdah in Pakistan: seclusion and modern occupations for
women," Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 3 (August 1971),

Park, Hyung Jong, D. Lawrence Kincaid, Kyung Kyoon Chung, Dal Sun Han,
and Sea Baick Lee. "The Korean Mother's Club Program," Studies:
in Family Planning, 7, 10 (October 1976), 275-283.

Ramey, Richard L. "Shinualu: credit for small rural businesses,"
PASITAM Design Notes, No. 9 (September 1976). (Bloomington,
Indiana: Indiana University)

Ranis, Gustav. "Industrial technology choice and employment: a review
of developing country evidence!" Paper prepared for the Employment
Seminar of the Asia Bureau, US Agency for International Development,
Washington, D.C. July 1979.

Rihani, May.
with a

Development as if Women Mattered: An Annotated Bibliography
Third World Focus. Occasional paper No. 10. Washington,
Overseas Development Council, 1978.

Robertson, Claire. "Ga women and change in marketing conditions in
the Accra area," Rural Africana, No. 29 (Winter 1975-76), 157-171.
(East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan State University, African Studies

Simmons, Emmy B. "The small-scale rural food-processing industry in
Northern Nigeria," Food Research Institute Studies 14, 2 (1975).
147-161. Stanford, Ca.: Stanford University, Food Research

"Economic research on women in rural development in
Northern Nigeria" Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education,
Overseas Liaison Committee, Paper No. 10 (Sept. 1976).

Sinha, G.P.
and S.N

"Women construction workers -- Bihar,"
I. Ranade, Women Construction Workers:
. Bombay: Allied Publishers Private I

17-71 in G.P. Sinha
Reports of Two
Ltd., 1975.

Smith, Margo L. "Domestic service as a channel of upward mobility for
the lower-class woman: the Lima case," 191-207 in Ann Pescatello
(ed.) Female and Male in Latin America: Essays. Pittsburgh, Pa.:
University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973.

Staley, Eugene and Richard Morse. Modern Small Industry for Developing
Countries. New York: McGraw Hill, 1965.

Stamp, Patricia. "Perceptions of change and economic
Kukuyu women of Mitero, Kenya," Rural Africana,
1975-76), 19-43. East Lansing, Mich: Michigan
African Studies Center.

Stoler, Ann.

strategy among
No. 29 (Winter
State University,

"Class structure and female autonomy in rural Java,"
Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 3, 1 (Autumn 1977),

Storgaard, Birgit. "Women in Ujamaa Villages,"
(Winter 1975-76), 135-155. East Lansing,
University, African Studies Center.

Rural Africana, No. 29.
Mich.: Michigan State

Sudarkasa, Niara. Where Women Work: A Study of Yoruba Women in the
Marketplace and in the Home. Anthropological Papers, Museum of
Anthropology, No. 53. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1973.

Tinker, Irene. "The adverse impact of development on women," 22-34 in
Irene Tinker and Michele Bo Bramsen (eds.) Women and World
Development. Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council, 1976.

United Nations Department of
Inter-regional Meeting
in Development. Sales

Economic and Social Affairs. Report of the
of Experts on the Integration of Women
No. E.73.IV.12. New York: United Nations,


United Nations Development Programme. Building Leadership from the
Grass Roots: Report of a Seminar on Women's Participation in
Development, Islamabad, Pakistan, 10-15 November 1975. DP/UN/

United Nations, Economic Commission for Africa. "The role of women in
African development" paper prepared for the United Nations World
Conference of the International Women's Year. E/CONF.66/BP/8.
10 April 1975.

United Nations, General Assembly. "Development and international economic
co-operation: effective mobilization of women in development.
Report of the Secretary-General." A/33/238. 26 October 1978.

United Nations, Research Institute for Social Development. Rural Cooper-
atives as Agents of Change: A Research Report and a Debate.
Report No. 74,3. Beneva: United Nations Research Institute
for Social Development, 1975.

United States Agency for International Development.
Women's Roles in Development," Project paper,

Upper Volta, 1976

_, Office of Women in Development. Report on Women in Development.
Washington, D.C. August 1978.


Wachtel, Eleanor. "A farm of one's own: the rural orientation of
women's group enterprises in Nakuru, Kenya," Rural Africana, No. 29,
(Winter 1975-76), 69-80. East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan State
University, African Studies Center.

White, Lawrence J. "The evidence on appropriate factor proportions for
manufacturing in less developed countries: a survey," Economic
Development and Cultural Change, 27, 1 (October 1978), 27-59.

Wijayaratne, C.M., A.M.T. Gunawardana, and Samir Asmar. Study of Income
Generating Activities for Farm Women. Colombo, Sri Lanka:
Agrarian Research and Training Institute, February 1978.

World Food Programme. Food Aid and the Role of Women in Development.
Rome: World Food Programme, 1976.

Worsley, Peter. (ed.). Two Blades of Grass: Rural Cooperatives in
Agricultural Modernization. Manchester, England: Manchester
University Press, 1971.

Youssef, Nadia Haggag. Women and Work in Developing Societies. Popula-
tion Monograph Series No. 15. Berkeley: University of California,
Institute of International Relations, 1974.

Zeidenstein, Sondra. "IRDP pilot project on population planning and rural
women's cooperatives: report and commentary on the first year,"
paper prepared for Integrated Rural Development Programme, Dacca,
October 1975.

University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs