• TABLE OF CONTENTS
HIDE
 Title Page
 Farming systems research in...
 References






Title: Farming systems research in Guatemala
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00080842/00001
 Material Information
Title: Farming systems research in Guatemala
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
Creator: Ortiz, Ramiro
Publisher: USDA
Publication Date: 1980
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00080842
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 183194558

Table of Contents
    Title Page
        Title Page
    Farming systems research in Guatemala
        Page 1
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
        Page 16
        Page 17
    References
        Page 18
Full Text












FARMING SYSTEMS RESEARCH


IN GUATEMALA



Ramiro Ortiz Dard6n

































Prepared for presentation at the "Symposium on Farming Systems Research".
USDA, Washington D.C. December 8-9, 1980.








FARMING SYSTEMS RESEARCH IN GUATEMALA


Ramiro Ortiz Dard6n*


INTRODUCTION

Technology generation alone, should not be the ultimate objective of a

national agricultural research program. Only when the technology is being

widely used by farmers has the objective been reached and the researcher

accomplished his mission. This is the challenge that a new breed of tech-

nicians in many developing countries of the world is accepting. These are

the technicians who are solving crop and animal production problems for small,

limited resource farmers, who in turn, comprise the largest proportion of

farmers in most countries but for whom little has been accomplished hereto-

fore.

The Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology (ICTA) in Guatemala

is an example of the above. Since its origin in 1973, ICTA has been develop-

ing a series of strategies to generate and promote the use of technology in

a systematic approach, appropriate to the interests and needs of the small

farmers of the country. This approach is the result of contributions of many

people based upon many years of experience and combined with participation of

institutions, international centers and government's true concern for develop-

ing an effective national program. It is also the result of young technicians

working in the field with a striving desire to succeed in generating a technol-

ogy that will soon be adopted by most farmers. The more relevant aspects of

this new approach for ICTA's Farming Systems Research program are the following:



Formely Technical Director, ICTA, Guatemala. Presently Research Assistant,
Agronomy Department, University of Florida.







1. A thorough knowledge of the agro-socioeconomic conditions of the farmers

in a region is required and is achieved by integrating biological and

social scientists who together identify farmers resource, constraints,

and other problems in order to design and conduct "reality-oriented"

projects.-

2. Most research is moved off experiment stations to farms where it is con-

ducted under the farmers' conditions. This has brought reliability to

the results since they capture the variation throughout a region.

3. The involvement of the farmer in the research process from the beginning,

giving him the main role in the final stages of evaluation of the new

technology. This is perhaps the major and most important change from

the traditional approach.

4. Extension agents are not only considered an excellent contact when first

arriving in a region, they can and have participated in surveying the re-

gion to determine what the research priorities should be. They also par-

ticipated in research projects by conducting a portion of the trials be-

fore transferring results to the farmers. The purpose of this has been

for them to know the "why's" and the "how's" technology is generated,

"getting the results first hand", and it has made them feel more moti-

vated to do their work; thus, the gap between research and extension

is closed.

5. Research programs are not committing themselves only to the extension

service, they are also establishing close linkages with organized groups

in the rural areas (cooperatives, farmers informal groups, etc.) and the

private sector.

The objective of this paper is to provide information about the organi-

zation and objectives of ICTA, and to describe the most important aspects of

its agricultural technological system.








THE NEED FOR A FARMING SYSTEMS PROGRAM


Historically, national agricultural research programs have been oriented

toward the solution of the problems of commercial agriculture1- under the as-

sumption that'the production technology designed for this type of agriculture

would be adopted with equal success by limited resource farmers in traditional

or subsistence agriculture.-/ This assumption has not been proven correct be-

cause, in most cases, the technology generated for commercial agriculture has

strongly clashed with the traditions of the small farmer. The reasons for

this are, 1) this technology is not compatible with the resources and the pro-

duction systems that are prevalent in subsistence farming, and 2) the risk

associated with this technology is too high and does not offer a sufficient

increase in income to offset the investment.

In trying to design a program to generate and promote the use of technology

appropriate to needs and incomes of small and medium farmers, the deficiencies of

traditional research and extension systems were studied in Guatemala (Waugh,

1975). Through the study of systems used in other countries it was hoped a

research and promotion model could be designed that would correct the defi-

ciencies identified in the models that failed. It was established that re-

search for traditional agriculture had failed mainly due to 1) the researcher

does not know the problems of the farmers nor.his production systems, 2) the


-Laird (1977), defines commercial agriculture as that practiced by farmers
that have medium or large holdings, who use modern technology and mainly pro-
duce for the market, and they receive medium or high agricultural incomes.

2/Laird (1977), defines this as being practiced by farmers with small land
holdings, who make only very limited use of modern technologies, who consume
a major part of their production on their own farm, and receive agricultural
incomes that are very low. They are characterized by lower levels of pro-
ductivity, and more labor and high levels of seasonal unemployment. Most
traditional agriculture is practiced under unfavorable ecological conditions
that limit productivity.








technology that is generated is not tested at the farm level, and 3) the

acceptability of the technology to the farmers is not evaluated. Generating

technology was the first step in the strategy to increase production through

an increase in productivity, but this first step had to be backed up by the

knoweldge that this technology would reach the clients. It was because of

this that in the model designed for ICTA, the component of promotion of the

use of technology had to be included. The deficiencies in the traditional

extension system, which until that time had also been a failure, were iden-

tified as 1) an appropriate technology is not available, 2) the technology

generated is not tested before recommending it, 3) there has been a loss of

contact with the researcher, 4) the technology of the farmer is unknown, and

5) an effective extension evaluation system does not exist.

Through this study of the deficiencies in the systems of traditional

research and extension, it was determined that the interrelation farmer-

extensionist-researcher is indispensable in planning and conducting a pro-

gram of technology generation and validation that is applicable to the needs

of the farmers of a region. This relationship is also necessary to insure

an effective transfer process of this same technology. In the design of

ICTA it was considered that the objective should not be only to generate

technology. Rather, the technology should serve as an instrument to in-

crease productivity and to improve farmers' incomes.


FUNCTIONS AND OBJECTIVES OF ICTA


ICTA was established May 10, 1973. The specific objectives and its

functions are clearly defined in article number 3 of its organic law (legisla-

tive decree #68-72). The Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology is

responsible for generating and promoting the use of agricultural science and




5


technology in the agricultural public sector. As a consequence it has the

responsibility to conduct research pertinent to the solution of problems

of rational agricultural exploitation that influence social well-being;

to produce materials and methods that increase agricultural productivity;

and to promote the use of technology at the farmer and regional levels.

Since the emphasis is directed to increase the production of basic grains,

the main group who benefit are the small and medium farmers who produce

almost all of these crops. This in no way means that commercial agricul-

tural is excluded since much of the technology generated by ICTA should

be applicable to their conditions also.

Even though the main responsibility of ICTA was to increase produc-

tion, there was also an interest in the well-being of the rural population.

In accordance to the characteristics of this population the logical strategy

to reach the general objective was to generate technology that was economi-

cally favorable. In this way, the production of food would be increased and

this in turn, would be the economic base to achieve development.

ORGANIZATION OF ICTA


Using as a guide the law which created ICTA, it was decided to create

a structure that was very simple. This simple structure is shown in figure 1.


Board of Directors. This is the highest authority in the Institute and

besides its President, who is the Minister of Agriculture, it is formed by

the Ministers of Economy and Finance, the Secretary General of Economic Plan-

ning, the Dean of the Faculty of Agronomy of the University of San Carlos and

a representative of the private sector.





( ICA I ll Z AT n O OF" C T A


Figure


BOARD OF DIRECTORS


AUDITING


GENERAL MANAGER


I SECRETARY


1


r


LEGAL ADVISOR


I


PUBLIC RELATIONS I


ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL
SERVICE UNIT





ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

PERSONNEL

FINANCES

ACCOUNTING
--1-- i

_ __ i _


TECHNICAL UNIT
FOR PRODUCTION


PROGRAM UNIT








GENERAL PLANNING


4 ,ll. 'l I
1LrfIIIC IIOrI N llL.R
"L lBOP OVAIl.E"
TECHNin OGY IE0lSING


R(IION II AND III


REGION IV
C.OORbINATOR
PRUIlI c ItlN CENTER
"CYtlITA" AND
"LA M/QUINJA"
TECHNOLOGY TESTING


REGION' VI
PRODUCTION CENTER
"CHIMAI.TENANGO"
AND "SAN JERONIHO"
TECHNOLOGY TESTING


REGION VI
COORDINATOR
PRODUCTION CENTER
"JUT IAPA"
TECHNOLOGY TESTING


I

REGION VII
PRODUCTION CENtER
"EL OASIS" AND
"CRISTINA"
TECHNOLOGY TESTING


I i CNTRALIZED ACTIVITIES
Sm "CGIONAL EXECUTION


-U CORN U o
BEANS _
wo z WHEAT -z
<0- RICE U ~
l SORGHUM H cc
AS 2 HORTICULTURE -
5; '-ANIMAL PRODUCE. g
, v, SESAME u "C
,, 1 J


I ,


I r, au. I


I I .


LI 1 I !







General Manager. The General Manager, representative of the Board of

Directors, is responsible for achieving the functions of ICTA and directing

the work plan jointly with the Deputy General Manager. The General Manager

presents the work plan and the budget to the Board of Directors and inter-

prets public policy to the work teams of ICTA. For the executive of its

functions, ICTA has three units: 1) the administrative and financial ser-

vice unit, 2) the program unit and 3) a technical unit of production.

TECHNICAL UNIT OF PRODUCTION


This unit is headed by the Technical Director whose principal activity

is coordination of all research activities including testing and transferring

technology. The Technical Director has consultants who are the Coordinators

of Programs and the Support Disciplines. This group is called Technical Coor-

dination. The groups within the technical unit are the following:

1) Production programs. These are national research programs for each crop

or product. Their work mainly involves the initial stages of research, i.e.,

identifying, generating, adaptation and the tests which are preliminary to

new technologies. The production programs of ICTA are the following: corn,

beans, wheat, rice, sorghum, vegetables, sesame seed, animal production and

fruits.

2) Support disciplines. These are groups which support the production pro-

grams and the regional teams. The majority of the technical personnel in the

different disciplines is assigned to the regional teams. The Support Disci-

plines are Technology Testing,-/ Rural Socioeconomics, In-Service Training and

Soil Management.


1/The true name of this discipline is technology testing and transfer. This
discipline works in groups as teams which form the regional team. Since a re-
grion is very big there.is a need for a team in order to take care of it. The
Coordinator of these groups at the regional level is the Regional Director. The
national coordinator of these groups is the Technical Director.








3) Technical services. These groups provide service to the Production Pro-

grams and Regional Teams. They comprise the following areas: Seeds, Commu-

nications,Soil Laboratory and the Production Centers.

4) Regional teams. These are groups formed of multidisciplinary technical

personnel. All the personnel who are assigned to a region, whether in Pro-

duction Programs, Support Disciplines, or In-service Training groups, are

all part of the regional team. This means that a technician can be assigned

to a regional team and at the same time be part of a program or discipline.

The regional team is managed by the Regional Director, the maximum authority

of the Institute within the region, who as the representative of the General

Manager and the Technical Director, is responsible for the coordination of

all activities of the Institute in the region.

All the groups in the Technical Production unit coordinates activities

based on a technological system (Waugh, 1977). ICTA has developed a research

model based on a series of strategies which are mainly directed to eliminate

the deficiencies of the traditional research and extension systems. Fumagalli

and Waugh (1977) call this series of strategies "A Technical System for Pro-

duction" or an "Agricultural Technological System".


AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEM


The operational flow chart shown in Figure 2 represents the Agricultural

Technological System. The technological system is continuous even though it

is shown and discussed in parts. The process does not necessarily move from

left to right. The most logical place to start is in the last block to the

right with the gathering of agrosocioeconomic information.

The tools used by ICTA are the identification of the agrosocioeconomic

characteristics of the region through a sondeo; research results from exper-

iment stations and farms; and the results of the evaluation of acceptability






Figure 2


AGRICULTURAL
SECTOR


TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE


AGRO-SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION


Farm
Experiments.

Generation,
adaptation-
and
technical
and
economic
evaluation


. NO


Farmers
Tests
Ev==luat=on
Evaluation


farmer


of"

acceptance


Promotion


Agriculture
Sector
Agencies


Organized
Groups
rr======-=


Private
Sector
Industry,
etc.


FEEDBACK OF INFORMATION


Promotion


Farmers


I








of technology. These are used in planning a regional program adapted to the

necessities of the farmers that live in the region. Perhaps the most impor-

tant characteristic of the regional teams is the fact that the members of the

regional team participate in and define their own work priorities. With the

multidisciplinary approach they work and live with the farmers of the region,

getting to know the different production systems and management practices. It

is the type of activities conducted by the Regional Teams and the way in which

they do it, that provides this team with an ample and objective experience con-

cerning the prevailing conditions. This has determined that the members of

this team, guided by the Regional Director and supported by a group with

recognized scientific and technological capacity (Technical Director and

Technical Coordinators) have the responsibility of defining the priorities of

agricultural research for the region within the context of the functions and

the objectives of ICTA and also of the national development plan. The main

components of this system are here described:


Identifying the Problems


When a new work area is determined, the first activity is a reconnais-

sance through a methodolgoy called "sondeo" (Hildebrand, 1979). This is a

type of modified survey developed by ICTA to provide information to be used

as a basis for guiding the work of the regional ICTA team. The objectives

of this reconnaissance are to identify a group of farmers that are "homoge-

neous" in the characteristics of the production systems and their traditional

production technology and define the limits of the area within which this

group is a main component of the population. The identification of the

prevalent production system and of a group of farmers who use the system have

been grouped through a natural selection process, responding in a similar way








to common limiting factors (Hildebrand, 1979). The Sondeo is carried out by

a multidisciplinary team comprised of the Technology Testing Team that will

develop the research program in the area and technicians from the Discipline

of Socioeconomics. Occasionally, technicians from the Productions Programs

of ICTA or agronomists of DIGESA have participated in the Sondeo.

The Sondeo methodology, developed by the discipline of Rural Socioeconom-

ics of ICTA, was designed in response to budget restrictions and time require-

ments as an efficient methodology for obtaining the agrosocioeconomic informa-

tion in a region where the generation and promotion of technology is to be

started (Hildebrand, 1979). This methodology gives the team in ICTA qualita-

tive information about a new area that is sufficient for planning and imple-

menting the activities for the first year. Nevertheless for following years

it is necessary to have quantitative information to orient or guide research.

After the second year, this information is available from the research re-

sults of the first year, the farm records and the evaluation of acceptability

of technology.


Generation of Technology

ICTA bases its technology generation approach on an understanding of the

production systems of the farmers and the management given them. The farmer

has, through the years, designed a technology that is a function of his re-

sources and his perception of the risk that exists given the conditions that

surround his production system. It is expected that when the technician knows

all the characteristics of a specific system he can identify some modifications

that could produce an increase in profitability. Therefore rather than design

"technological packages", ICTA has developed simple technological production

alternatives that farmers evaluate and select according to their own criteria.









It is very important to use all the resources that are available to

initiate this research program. Many of these resources, that form techno-

logical support in Figure 2 are outside institutions. Such resources are

materials, methodology and technologies in general which are developed in

international centers, universities, and other governments and national re-

search programs, industry (fertilizers, seeds, herbicides, etc.) and others.

Research planning is the most important activity of the regional teams

of ICTA during the year. It requires a week in the region to present the

results of research, what has been accumulated through the farm records, the

evaluation of acceptability of technology, and the conclusions of Sondeos

that have been done in new areas within the region. In these meetings,

that are.presided over by the Regional Director and in which the Technical

Director and members of Technical Coordination take part, the results are

discussed widely, in depth and objectively trying to reach conclusions that

are in agreement with the actual situation that is presented. This regional

Operational Plan is the work which the regional team will do for the follow-

ing year.

On the basis of the regional operational plan, the team carries out tech-

nology generation on the production centers (experiment stations) and on

farms. The tests are called "experiment" if done on a production center and

"farm trial" if conducted on a farm. This distinction has been very useful

to identify where activities are located. Today around 90% of the resources

are directed into working on farms. The production centers are mainly used for

work that requires controlled conditions (crosses, early generations of new

materials); for the evaluation of germ plasm when the reaction under local

conditions is unknown; and to evaluate a new practice that can be very risky

and could result in a loss in the crop of a farmer, such as tests with her-


bicides.








The main objective in the design of all farm trials in ICTA is obtain-

ing realistic results for technology design that reflect the conditions of

the farmers and result in substantial increases in productivity and/or pro-

fitability of the production system. The design of this appropriate tech-

nology is based on the concept that one must achieve maximum efficiency in

the use of resources that are available to the farmers or that they can

easily obtain.


Technology Testing and Evaluation of Acceptability


Without taking away the importance of the other aspects of the techno-

logical system of ICTA, this component without a doubt is the most important.

It is here where the results of the technology generation process, the pro-

duction alternatives, receive their test "under fire" when they are managed

completely by the farmer. Up to this point it has been the technician who

has evaluated the technology based on statistically reliable research re-

sults. Ultimately, it will be the farmer who will decide if the generated

technology is relevant to his production system based on his own choice

criteria.

The test of the generated technology is done through the "Farmer's

Test", which consists in using the technological alternatives developed

by ICTA on part of his land. The technician of ICTA acts as an advisor,

orienting, and being a friend of the farmer during this evaluation pro-

cess. But it is the farmer who will manage the test, during all its

phases so he really gets to know the new technology. This knowledge will

allow him to decide for himself if the technology is applicable to his

crops and if it pays for the resources used and if the technology trans-

lates into some increase in his yields and profits.








The Farmer's Test is the way to put technology in the hands of farmers

for their evaluation without exposing the farmer to too much risk, since the

technology has been evaluated technically and economically on farms by the

ICTA teams. It is important that the farmer, besides providing the land,

also pays for all the expenses of the test. This is done to assure the farm-

er's interest so that he will know all that is involved during the test and

will give as much attention to it as he does to the rest of his farm.

The evaluation of acceptability of the technology tested by the farmer

is done in the following agricultural cycle. The farmer, who, investing

his resources and his work, conducted the farmer's test, had theopportunity

to observe how the technological alternatives worked and decide which ones to

integrate in the management practices of his system.

The technical team of the Discipline of Rural Socioeconomics conducts

the evaluation with the assistance of the Technology Testing Team of the

area. These technicians determine the acceptability index (A.I.) of a tech-

nological alternative by identifying the farmers that adopted the alternative

and the proportion of their crop in which they applied it. Therefore the

A.I. measures the active acceptability of technology (from those farmers who

tested it the previous year) and is calculated as follows:


Acceptability Index = (%of the farmers that used the practice) x (% of the

area of the crop in which the practice was used) / 100


Besides determining the A.I. the ICTA team identifies the causes of

adopting or rejecting the new technology. The A.I. helps the regional team

determine if they should promote the use of technology. If it has not been

accepted but has technical and scientific merit and is promising, they feed-

back the reasons of non acceptance. With this information the researchers







modify the design so it will better fit the demands of the farmers and gain

acceptability.

Promotion and Transfer of Technology


Since the results of research are not the final ICTA product and because

ICTA is responsible for promoting the use of the technology that has been

generated, there must be a mechanism to make the transfer process more fluid.

ICTA has focused the promotion of technology towards the public agricultural

sector, organized groups and the private sector:

1. ICTA considers its main client to be the "promoters" of the General Directo-

rate of Agricultural Services (DIGESA). DIGESA is an institution responsible

for transferring technology generated by ICTA for the farmer. The communica-

tion between these two institutions has been strengthened progressively,

especially after the formation of the Regional Agricultural Development

Committees (COREDA). It is in these COREDA that the representatives of ICTA

and DIGESA discuss, at the regional level, the procedures and mechanisms that

will be used to achieve an efficient transfer of technology generated by ICTA.

Through the COREDAS an in-service training course has been institutionalized

in transfer of technology for the "promoters". The main objective of this

course, which takes a whole agricultural cycle, is to give to the promoters

the technology that ICTA has generated and validated. They, in turn, pass

it on to the farmers cn a large scale through technical assistance. In

these courses, which are specific for each agroeconomic region, the DIGESA
"promoters" dedicate one day a week to participate in conferences, seminars

agricultural encounters,-/ and field days. This type of activity conditions


-'This is an activity developed in a farmer's field where the group defines
and solves specific problems.








them to increase their knowledge of agricultural topics and improve verbal

communication. In addition,.they are responsible for working in a "teach-

ing plot" to develop their capacity as agronomists and to understand better

why they use certain practices. In other words, they have more contact with

day to day reality, at the same time, they must conduct Farm Trials, Farmers

Tests, and Commercial Trials 1- with farmers working next to them. This is

an efficient transfer mechanism. In general terms it has been proven that

these courses improve the technical capacityof the promoters and it makes

transfer activities much more effective when the "promoters" get to know

the system that generated the technology.

2. ICTA realizes that the services of the public sector will hardly bene-

fit all farmers, so it is working with private organizations hoping that

through them the technology will reach the farmers. The process has con-

sisted of signing letters of understanding with organized groups to forma-

lize projects with the objective of promoting the use of the better tech-

nology. In this case ICTA assigns a technician who, besides working in

technology generation and testing, trains and advises selected farmers to

conduct Farmers' Tests, and Commercial Tests on the land of other members

of the organized group. This creates a multiplier effect by directing the

technicians activities towards a whole group with the same resources that

were going before to help more isolated farmers.

3. The private sector has a very important role in the process of agricul-

tural technification. Much of ICTA's technology depends on the participa-

tion of the private industry. Its contribution radiates in a series of


/The technological alternatives are put into practice with the appropriate
use of technical assistance services and credit.








services through which the farmers obtain inputs such as fertilizer, seeds,

herbicides, etc. It is hoped that the collaboration of the private sector

will be to have inputs available at the right time with the correct instruc-

tions for their use.

The most interesting case of how the private sector has been incorpora-

ted in the transfer of technology is in the development of the seed industry

in Guatemala. This phenomenon is the result of the application of a strategy

of incentive used by ICTA who, through a series of mechanisms, has been able

to intervene in the private sector in the production and commercialization

of better seeds of basic grains (Ortiz, 1980).

The results of this strategy has been extraordinary. At the present

time all improved corn seed for the Guatemalan lowlands is composed of ICTA

materials. This can be compared to 1977 when ICTA materials contributed

less than 10% of the necessities of this seed and ICTA produced 60% of this

amount (OrtTz, 1980).



SUMMARY

ICTA does not consider itself only an institution of research. Neither

does it believe that research results are the final product; instead, it has

considered that the appropriate objective is that technology be widely used

by farmers. With this belief it has developed a practical approach based on

the needs and characteristics of the rural population of Guatemalan and

through its application has taken the first steps toward identifying the

solutions to farming systems problems in this country.







References


Fumagalli, A. and R.K. Waugh.
The Bellagio Conference.


Hildebrand, P:E.
de Ciencia y


1977. Agricultural Research in Guatemala.
Bellagio, Italy.


1979. A Summary of the Sondeo Methodology. Institute
Technologfa Agricolas (ICTA), Guatemala City, Guatemala.


Laird, R.J. 1977. Investigaci6n Agron6mica para el Desarrollo de la
Agriculture Tradicional. Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapingo, Mexico.

Ortiz, D.R. 1980. Mecanismos Utilizados para el Desarrollo de la Indus-
tira de Semillas de Granos Basicos en Guatemala. III Training Course
on Seed Technology, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT).
Cali, Colombia.

Waugh, R.K. 1975. Four Years of History. Institute de Ciencia y Technologfa
Agricolas (ICTA), Guatemala.




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs