Group Title: TropSoils field research brief ;, 2
Title: Effect of green manuring on food crop response to lime and P fertilization
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00080580/00001
 Material Information
Title: Effect of green manuring on food crop response to lime and P fertilization
Series Title: TropSoils field research brief ;, 2
Physical Description: 3, 1 leaves : ill. ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Heryadi.
Wade, M. K. (Michael Karl)
Soil Management Collaborative Research Support Program.
Publisher: Soil Management Collaborative Research Support Program, North Carolina State University,
Publication Date: 1985?
 Subjects
Subject: Green manuring.
Soil management.
Liming of soils.
Spatial Coverage: Asia -- Indonesia -- Sumatra
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00080580
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 156887394

Full Text


TROPSOILS
PUSLITTAN
!WEST SUMATERA

TROPSOILS- ndonesi a
Field Research Brief No. 2

TITLE: Effect of Green Manuring on Food Crop Response to Lime
and P Fertilization.

RiESEARCHERS: Heryadi and Mike Wade

OBJECTiVES: 1. Study the effect of green manure on active Al
and the subsequent lime requirement.
2. Study the effect of green manure and lime on
the availability of soil P.
3. Determine if green manuring can be cost
effective in reducing or eliminating the need for
lime and P fertilizer.

SOIL: Haplorthox, located in Sitiung lie, cleared by bulldozer
six years ago, with annual cropping of upland rice since
clearing. pH=4.1, A1+H=2.6 meq, Ca+Mg=0.5 meq, Al sat=82%,
P=5 ppm (Olsen).

TREATMENTS: Partial Factorial design, RCB, 3 replications, 5X5m plots
Lime Rates P Rates
0 10 kg P/Fha
-1 T/ha 25
2 50 "
3 "10 "+ 20 T/ha (fresh
weight)Pueraria so


Trt No. 1-16 all combinations of above
17 np lime, P or green manure
-18 2 T/ha lime, no P or green manure.


CROP: First planting, upland rice (cv. Sentani), October, 1984
Spacing, 25 X 25cm
Base fertilizer, 100kg urea, 100 kg KC1, 50 kg MgSO4/ha
Harvested February, 1985.

RESULTS: First of all, a three week drought at grain fill and
a serious infestation of neck blast caused grain yields to be
very erratic and low. Therefore rice straw yields are used to
represent the influence or-effects of the various treatments.

Figure 1 illustrates the most striking response of the
trial. The no-lime plots showed consistent and strong Al
toxicity (or Ca deficiency) symptoms throughout the growing
cycle. Early the rice was quite stunted and showed yellowing and
drooping of the older leaves. During times of moisture stress,
the unlimed plots exhibited plants with rolled and placid
leaves several days before the other treatments. All of these
symptoms however were absent in the plots that had received green
manure, regardless of the lime rate. The non-manured plots
responded well to lime and were not significantly different from
the green manured plots when lime was applied. The first










increment (1 T/ha) was sufficient to overcome the soil acidity
problem. So it appears that the green manure was comparable to
lime aleviating soil acidity as a limiting factor for rice
growth.

The non-manured rice also responded well to applied P (Figure
2). However the green manured plots, which all had a constant 10
kg P/ha, are noticeably far above the response line of the non-
manured treatments. Since the green manured plots did not have a
P variable, a response curve can not be drawn, and we can only
conjecture what such a curve might look like. However it seems
likely that F was not limiting in the green manured plots despite
the fact that only 10 kg P/ha was added as inorganic fertilizer,
whereas that amount was definitely limiting in the non-manured
plots.

There was no significant correlation between dry matter
yield and either Al saturation or extractable P. However a
multiple linear regression, (based on the non-manured plots only)
Y = 1.51 0.012 Al sat. + 0.075 ext. P,
has a significant R2 = 0.54. While that is not exceptionally
high, it is quite reasonable considering the water and pest
problems as well as the inherent high soil microvariability that
exists in this area. The manured plots do not fit this regres-
sion; as all green manure treatments did relatively well regar-
dless of the soil analysis for Al or P.

It seems apparent that the green manure has seriously al-
tered the influence of soil acidity and possibly available P on
the growth of upland rice. However in Table 1 we see that the
green manure has not affected the Al saturation (KCI extractable)
nor available P (Olsen extractable). It is consistent with
current knowledge of Al-organic matter relationships that the
green manure is releasing some compound that complexes soil Al
and renders it unavailable or non-toxic to plant roots. However
if this is the case the standard KC1 extract appears to still
measure the completed Al. This matter should be further investi-
gated to clarify our knowledge and understanding of the useful-
ness of green manure as a potential lime substitute.







lime


Table 1. Extractable P (Olsen) and Al saturation as affected by
lime rates, P rates, and green manure.


Lime Rate
(T/ha)


P Rates (-k P/ha)
10 25 50 1 o)m X


Sppm P -
6 12 7
8 17 8
4 14 11
6 8 6


Al saturation
---------- ----*.--- ------


X 54 53 46 50







R;ce
'over
(P7y rm457- ;


Wi/ o en


k /o n ^


vn an uIAP


Efe ^ !ime s j w/,, .d, '.-'i oU
r' een '17cn,.p on Rice f/ oPa .


2.0


t Djve
TRe


/.0



0-


( a peen manure





W/o Peen rne e


0 Io


PRe (kl3P

Ft e 2 cl(ec of P a-ls ot R/ce
Dpy hlac t4o- P-oducfi?


o I/ 3


Fl re o.
el







University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs