• TABLE OF CONTENTS
HIDE
 Title Page
 Executive summary
 1. Introduction
 Soil fertility decline against...
 3. Improving soil fertility and...
 4. Linking adaptive and process...
 5. Exploiting interactions between...
 6. Institutional change in research...
 7. References
 Appendix
 Back Matter
 Copyright






Group Title: Network research working paper ; no. 1
Title: Soil fertility management research for the smallholder maize-based cropping systems of southern Africa
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00080084/00001
 Material Information
Title: Soil fertility management research for the smallholder maize-based cropping systems of southern Africa a review
Series Title: Network research working paper
Physical Description: 34 p. : ill. ; 30 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Kumwenda, John David Tabangoni, 1952-
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center -- Maize Improvement Program
Soil Fertility Network for Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Countries of Southern Africa
Publisher: CIMMYT Maize Programme
Place of Publication: Harare Zimbabwe
Publication Date: 1992
 Subjects
Subject: Soil fertility -- Research -- Africa, Southern   ( lcsh )
Corn -- Soils -- Research -- Africa, Southern   ( lcsh )
Cropping systems -- Research -- Africa, Southern   ( lcsh )
Genre: bibliography   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )
Spatial Coverage: Malawi
Zimbabwe
 Notes
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references (p. 27-34).
Statement of Responsibility: by John D.T. Kumwenda ... et al..
General Note: Cover title.
General Note: "December 1995."
General Note: At head of title: Soil Fertility Network for Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Countries of Southern Africa.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00080084
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 43466321
lccn - 97980344

Table of Contents
    Title Page
        Title Page
    Executive summary
        Page 1
        Page 2
    1. Introduction
        Page 3
    Soil fertility decline against a background of widespread adoptuion of improved maize
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
    3. Improving soil fertility and productivity - What are the practicable technology options for farmers?
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
    4. Linking adaptive and process research for improved technology development and dissemination
        Page 16
        Page 17
        Page 18
        Page 19
        Page 20
        Page 21
    5. Exploiting interactions between soil fertility technologies and other inputs and management factors
        Page 22
        Page 23
    6. Institutional change in research and development institutions
        Page 24
        Page 25
        Page 26
    7. References
        Page 27
        Page 28
        Page 29
        Page 30
        Page 31
        Page 32
        Page 33
        Page 34
    Appendix
        Page 35
        Page 36
        Page 37
        Page 38
        Page 39
    Back Matter
        Page 40
    Copyright
        Copyright
Full Text
22.//7
22 /7 57


Soil Fertility Network for Maize-Based Cropping Systems in
Countries of Southern Africa



NETWORK RESEARCH WORKING PAPER Number 1

December 1995


Soil Fertility Management Research for the Smallholder
Maize-Based Cropping Systems of Southern Africa: A Review


By

John D.T. Kumwenda, Stephen R. Waddington,
Sieglinde S. Snapp, Richard B. Jones
and Malcolm J. Blackie


CIMMYT


CIMMYT Maize Programme








SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH FOR THE

SMALLHOLDER MAIZE-BASED CROPPING SYSTEMS

OF SOUTHERN AFRICA: A REVIEW


John D. T. Kumwenda, Senior Agronomist, Maize Commodity Team, Ministry of
Agriculture and Livestock Development, Malawi

Stephen R. Waddington, Agronomist, CIMMYT Maize Program, Zimbabwe

Sieglinde S. Snapp, Postdoctoral Fellow, The Rockefeller Foundation, Southern Africa
Agricultural Sciences Program, Malawi

Richard B. Jones, Agroforestry Commodity Team/Washington State University,
Ministry ofAgriculture and Livestock Development, Malawi, and

Malcolm J. Blackie, Senior Scientist, The Rockefeller Foundation, Southern Africa
Agricultural Sciences Program, Malawi





Executive Summary

The dominant smallholder cropping systems of southern Africa are based on maize.
Increasing human population density and declining land availability have made shifting
cultivation obsolete. Maize is now grown in continuous cropping rather than as part of a
fallow which traditionally restored soil fertility and reduced the build-up of pests and
diseases. The soil resource is now being degraded with a consequent reduction in crop yield.

There have been notable successes in the adoption of high yielding maize by smallholders in
Africa. Although improved germplasm is now grown on 33-50% of Africa's maize area,
national per-hectare increases in maize productivity are disappointing. Losses of mineral
nutrients from soil generally exceed nutrient inputs. The productivity-with-sustainability
challenge is so large that farmers will need to combine gains from improved germplasm with
complementary improvements in their management of soil fertility. This now requires a shift of
research and extension emphasis onto the complex issues involved with the build-up and
maintenance of soil fertility under the income and other constraints faced by smallholders.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems









Inorganic fertilizers are expensive and their use, frequently recommended as blanket
applications even in semi-arid areas, is not very profitable. For farmers that can afford
fertilizer, there is an urgent need to increase the profitability of this input by better targeted
recommendations and improved fertilizer management techniques that are appropriate for
smallholders. The efficiency of fertilizer use is often low because of the declining level of
organic matter in tropical soils. The proportion of locally produced organic materials must be
increased to maintain soil organic matter and halt the downward spiral of soil fertility.
Improving the efficiency of inorganic fertilizer use will consolidate and expand the base of
fertilizer users.

For many households the cash requirement needed to buy inorganic fertilizer far exceeds their
total annual cash income. The lack of cash dominates decision making at the household level
and is central to the development of adoptable technologies. Many households are often forced
to sell their labor in return for food or cash which, in turn, compromises their own
agricultural efforts. For this expanding group more emphasis on organic sources of nutrients,
especially legumes, that capitalize on the freely available nitrogen in the atmosphere, is the
best strategy for increased soil fertility.

Legumes are not new to farming systems. Grain legumes, intercropping, rotations, green
manures, improved fallows, agroforestry, cereal residues and animal manures are all
technologies that can enhance soil fertility and sustain the resource base. However, in broad
terms, the larger the likely soil fertility benefit from a legume technology, the larger the initial
investment required in labor and land, and the fewer short term food benefits it has. The
potential of such technologies is rarely realized on farmers' fields. Combinations of low rates
of several inputs show promise, especially those that combine inorganic with organic
fertilizer. But such combinations still involve a cash cost. Innovative mechanisms are needed
to help farmers begin to access such inputs. One promising approach involves providing
farmers with start-up grants of cash paid into savings schemes, from which farmers can
access loans.

Process-based research provides the foundation for extrapolating from site-specific trials to
agronomic recommendations for specific agro-ecological zones and farmer groups. Past crop
husbandry research is often neglected because the results are distilled into a few
recommendations that ignore the important interactions in the system and fail to address the
widespread diversity that exists among smallholders. Institutional memory needs to be
maintained and expanded to a wider group, in part through computer databases and effective
networks. Emphasis in both research and extension needs to move away from the rigid and
prescriptive to a flexible problem-solving format leading to conditional recommendations.
This will facilitate the evolution of a demand-driven technology development process by
smallholders. Without concerted action to develop such a process through better interaction,
the consequence will be a degrading natural resource base and a continuing decline in the
standard of living of rural communities reliant on agriculture in southern Africa.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems







1. Introduction
In this paper we contend that varietal maize (Zea mays L.) improvement will have a transitory
impact on smallholder farming in Africa unless widespread declines in soil fertility are
addressed by research and farmers. There is a relative scarcity of adoptable technology to
sustain soil fertility. But without such technology, the productivity of smallholder maize-based
farming systems in Africa will fail to improve. We use examples from southern Africa,
particularly Malawi and Zimbabwe. Those countries have been chosen because of our
experience there, and also because they contrast an agriculture in crisis, increasingly unable to
meet national food needs (Malawi), with a country widely regarded to have one of the most
successful agricultural bases in sub-Saharan Africa (Zimbabwe). These experiences are
applicable more widely in sub-Saharan Africa. We propose a soil fertility research and
extension model that combines organic with inorganic sources of soil fertility and actively
involves farmers and other clients in an integrated, long-term process.


2. Soil Fertility Decline Against A Background Of Widespread
Adoption Of Improved Maize

2.1 The Dominance Of Maize And Characteristics Of Smallholder Maize
Systems
Today, the dominant smallholder cropping systems of southern (and eastern) Africa are based
on maize. Maize is grown from sea level (the coastal zones of Mozambique and Tanzania) to
elevations above 2400 m. Overlaid on altitude is rainfall which varies from less than 400 mm
(southern Zimbabwe, southern Mozambique) to well watered (higher elevation equatorial
zones). Maize accounts for 60 % or more of the cropped area in Malawi, Zimbabwe and Zambia
and is almost as dominant in countries such as Mozambique, Tanzania and Kenya. Overall,
maize is the staple food of the region, accounting for about 50 % of the calories consumed. In
Malawi, with an average population density reaching 215 persons per square kilometer in the
southern region, maize is the main crop in nearly 90 % of the area and contributes 80 % of daily
food calories. Carr (199.4) attributes the increase in popularity of maize in Malawi to its
efficiency as a per-hectare calorie producer compared to the other available food plants. As land
availability declines, so the efficiency of calorie production per hectare becomes of greater
importance to the farmer. Thus the food security of resource-poor households is critically
dependent on the productivity and sustainability of maize-based cropping systems.

Most farm households in southern Africa use family resources, especially labor, to produce
maize on 0.5 3.0 ha of land held under traditional tenure arrangements. In parts of the region,
particularly southern Zambia, Botswana and Zimbabwe, animal (mainly ox) traction is used to
prepare the land and help with weeding. In Malawi, northern and eastern Zambia, northern
Mozambique, and many parts of Tanzania, human labor using hand-held hoes is the
predominant power source (Low and Waddington, 1990; Waddington, 1994). Maize is grown in
loose rotations with such crops as groundnuts and sunflowers. Increasingly it is grown on the
same land year after year, often sparsely intercropped with beans, groundnuts, cowpeas or
pumpkins. Formal intercropping is common only where high human population density means
average land holdings per family are small, e.g., 0.8 ha per family in parts of southern Malawi.



Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper I: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 3







1. Introduction
In this paper we contend that varietal maize (Zea mays L.) improvement will have a transitory
impact on smallholder farming in Africa unless widespread declines in soil fertility are
addressed by research and farmers. There is a relative scarcity of adoptable technology to
sustain soil fertility. But without such technology, the productivity of smallholder maize-based
farming systems in Africa will fail to improve. We use examples from southern Africa,
particularly Malawi and Zimbabwe. Those countries have been chosen because of our
experience there, and also because they contrast an agriculture in crisis, increasingly unable to
meet national food needs (Malawi), with a country widely regarded to have one of the most
successful agricultural bases in sub-Saharan Africa (Zimbabwe). These experiences are
applicable more widely in sub-Saharan Africa. We propose a soil fertility research and
extension model that combines organic with inorganic sources of soil fertility and actively
involves farmers and other clients in an integrated, long-term process.


2. Soil Fertility Decline Against A Background Of Widespread
Adoption Of Improved Maize

2.1 The Dominance Of Maize And Characteristics Of Smallholder Maize
Systems
Today, the dominant smallholder cropping systems of southern (and eastern) Africa are based
on maize. Maize is grown from sea level (the coastal zones of Mozambique and Tanzania) to
elevations above 2400 m. Overlaid on altitude is rainfall which varies from less than 400 mm
(southern Zimbabwe, southern Mozambique) to well watered (higher elevation equatorial
zones). Maize accounts for 60 % or more of the cropped area in Malawi, Zimbabwe and Zambia
and is almost as dominant in countries such as Mozambique, Tanzania and Kenya. Overall,
maize is the staple food of the region, accounting for about 50 % of the calories consumed. In
Malawi, with an average population density reaching 215 persons per square kilometer in the
southern region, maize is the main crop in nearly 90 % of the area and contributes 80 % of daily
food calories. Carr (199.4) attributes the increase in popularity of maize in Malawi to its
efficiency as a per-hectare calorie producer compared to the other available food plants. As land
availability declines, so the efficiency of calorie production per hectare becomes of greater
importance to the farmer. Thus the food security of resource-poor households is critically
dependent on the productivity and sustainability of maize-based cropping systems.

Most farm households in southern Africa use family resources, especially labor, to produce
maize on 0.5 3.0 ha of land held under traditional tenure arrangements. In parts of the region,
particularly southern Zambia, Botswana and Zimbabwe, animal (mainly ox) traction is used to
prepare the land and help with weeding. In Malawi, northern and eastern Zambia, northern
Mozambique, and many parts of Tanzania, human labor using hand-held hoes is the
predominant power source (Low and Waddington, 1990; Waddington, 1994). Maize is grown in
loose rotations with such crops as groundnuts and sunflowers. Increasingly it is grown on the
same land year after year, often sparsely intercropped with beans, groundnuts, cowpeas or
pumpkins. Formal intercropping is common only where high human population density means
average land holdings per family are small, e.g., 0.8 ha per family in parts of southern Malawi.



Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper I: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 3









The last 25 years have seen farmers in many parts of Africa, including southern Africa, switch
from traditional maize landraces to improved germplasm. Byerlee (1994) calculated that
improved varieties and hybrids now cover 33-50 % of the maize area in Africa. But there is little
evidence of an increase in maize productivity per hectare (CIMMYT, 1992, 1994; Lele, 1992).
Even in countries where there has been a substantial increase in the use of fertilizer by
smallholders, productivity increases are disappointing (see Conroy, 1993).


2.2 Soil Fertility Constraints To Maize Production
The most widespread and dominant limitation on yield, and on the sustainability of the maize-
based systems of southern and eastern Africa, is the decline in soil fertility. Although the
increase in maize area in drought prone semi-arid areas has contributed to reduced average
yields per unit of land (e.g., Gilbert el al., 1993), the greater influence is a decline in soil fertility
in the wetter, higher yield potential areas. The more densely populated and erosion prone
countries in eastern and southern Africa (where maize is a major food crop), tend to be those
with the greatest aggregate nutrient loss. Smaling (1993) and Stoorvogel et al. (1993) estimated
annual net nutrient depletion exceeding 30 kg nitrogen (N) and 20 kg potassium (K) ha'' of
arable.land in Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda and Zimbabwe.

The old and already highly leached soils of humid and sub-humid zones in Africa have
inherently low nutrient levels. Sandy and sandy loam soils derived from granite, with organic
matter <0.5% and very low cation exchange capacities are widespread in Zimbabwe, southern
Zambia and western and southern Mozambique. Deficiency of N is ubiquitous on these soil
types, while deficiencies of phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), magnesium (Mg) and zinc (Zn) are
common (Grant, 1981). On the common sandy loam and clay loam soils in Malawi, in addition
to chronic deficiencies of macronutrients, micro nutrients such as S, Zn and boron (B) are
reported as limiting at many sites (Wendt et al., 1994). In Zambia and Mozambique there are
large areas of acidic soils with free aluminum (A13+).

Traditional African agricultural systems were largely based around extended fallows and the
harvesting of nutrients stored in woody plants. The site to be cultivated was cleared by cutting
and slashing plant growth, ant then by burning the dried plant material (e.g., Araki, 1993;
Blackie and Jones, 1993; Blackie, 1994). Extensive exploitation of land by few families
characterized these systems. For example, in the chitemene slash-and-bum system in the
miombo woodland of northern Zambia, land was fallowed for 50-70 years, followed by
cropping in the center of the clearing for a few years (Araki, 1993). Today, in most arable areas
of Malawi, Zimbabwe and Kenya, fallowing has almost disappeared from the now sedentary
agricultural system. The length of the fallow period continues to decline significantly in
Zambia, Mozambique and Tanzania. Continuous cropping of maize, with a consequent
downward spiral of soil fertility, has led to a decline in crop yields and soil erosion (Araki,
1993). In some areas, such as the wetter communal lands of northern Zimbabwe, soil depletion
is so severe that commonly maize will give near zero grain yield without fertilizer.

Buddenhagen (1992) estimates that, discounting erosion effects, the weathering of minerals and
biological nitrogen fixation will enable, at most, 1000 kg grain ha'' year"' on a sustainable basis
in the tropics. It will be less in hot lowland areas, such as Ghana, where this equilibrium was
estimated at 600-800 kg of maize grain ha-' year"' (Greg Edmeades, pers. comm.). Loss of soil
through erosion (and soils cultivated with annual crops in the upland tropics are very prone to


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems







erosion) will reduce this level considerably. With farmers locked into low crop productivity per
unit of land from a degrading natural resource base, there is increased pressure to open new land
for agriculture. Farming will increasingly encroach on ecologically fragile environments such
as the Zambezi and Luangwa valleys (with their unique ecosystems, and remnant habitats for
several endangered large mammals) and on the many hilly areas where loss of protective
vegetation will quickly lead to severe soil erosion.

Two approaches can be recognized in managing soil fertility (Sanchez, 1995). The best known
is that of overcoming soil constraints to fit plant requirements through the application of
purchased inputs. The bulk of food produced in the world is based on this approach and its
application in the Green Revolution is responsible for much of the increased yield especially in
Latin America and Asia (Pinstrup-Andersen, 1993). The second approach relies more on
biological processes to optimize nutrient cycling, minimize external inputs and maximize the
efficiency of their use. Knowledge and understanding of the principles underlying the second
more complex approach are not well developed, and understanding from temperate areas may
be inappropriate for smallholder agriculture in the tropics. These two approaches, and a more
sustainable but practicable middle way that combines the best features of both, will be discussed
in detail.


2.2.1 Low Use Of Inorganic Fertilizer
In most parts of the world, chemical fertilizers play a major role in maintaining or increasing
soil fertility. However, in sub-Saharan Africa chemical fertilizer use is very low. FAO (1988)
gave seven kg of fertilizer nutrients ha'' of arable land plus permanent crops year"' as the
average for sub-Saharan Africa. More recent calculations (for 1993) by Heisey and Mwangi
(1995), using similar criteria, give an average of ten kg of fertilizer nutrients ha"' year"'. Use is
higher in some countries of southern Africa (notably Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi) where the
commercial farming sector is relatively well developed and fertilizer-responsive maize an
important crop. For maize, Heisey and Mwangi (1995) calculated application rates of 70 kg
fertilizer nutrients ha"' of maize crop year'' in Zambia, 55 kg in Zimbabwe and 26 kg in Malawi.
Nevertheless, this is well below crop and soil maintenance requirements and is likely to remain
so since fertilizer is probably the most costly cash input used by the typical smallholder in
southern Africa.

Fertilizer recommendations are frequently unattractive to smallholders. They often ignore soil
and climatic variation found in smallholder farming areas, are incompatible with farmer
resources, or are inefficient. This leads to farmers incurring unnecessary expense. For example,
the Zimbabwe recommendation for basal fertilizer on maize is to apply it in the planting hole at
planting. Yet farmers almost always apply it just after crop emergence because that is easier and
less risky, with negligible loss of yield under farm conditions (Shumba, 1989). Their practice
allows them, on a given rain, to plant more area more quickly (important on a drying sandy
soil), get better crop emergence and have more labor available for other operations. There is
rarely a response to K on the predominant granite soils in smallholder areas of Zimbabwe
(Mashiringwani, 1983; Hikwa and Mukurumbira, 1995), yet the compound fertilizer
recommended contains K, as well as N and P. There is some potential for applying cheaper
straight N just after planting and cheaper forms of P at other times.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems









The efficiency of fertilizer use on-farm, as measured by the grain yield response to the addition
of chemical N and P fertilizers, is often poor (e.g., Jones and Wendt, 1995). Those authors,
summarizing on-farm data from Malawi and Zambia, calculated that farmers using current
fertilizer practices can expect just 9.5-16 kg of maize grain per kg of nutrient applied when
growing local unimproved maize and 17-19 kg of maize grain per kg of nutrient applied when
using hybrids. Research on farmers' fields in Malawi shows that, at farmers' levels of
fertilizer application, with improved timing and application methods the maize response to
nitrogen can be increased from 15 to 20 kg grain per kg N applied for unimproved maize and
from 17.4 to 25 for hybrid. However, the poor profitability of inorganic fertilizer reduces the
attractiveness of this crucial input to smallholder maize production. In Malawi, value:cost ratios
of 1.8 for fertilizer use on hybrid maize and 1.3 for unimproved maize have been reported for
moving from zero fertilizer applied to the current recommendation (Conroy and Kumwenda,
1995). An economic analysis of fertilizer policy in Malawi (see HIID, 1994) concluded that
these improvements in fertilizer use efficiency could substantially outweigh feasible price
changes in either fertilizer or maize in making fertilizer financially attractive to smallholders.


2.2.2 Declines In Soil Organic Matter
Soil organic matter (SOM) maintenance and management is central to the sustainability of soil
fertility on smallholder farms in the tropics (see Swift and Woomer, 1993; Woomer et al.,
1994). In low input agricultural systems in the tropics, SOM helps retain mineral nutrients (N,
S, micronutrients) in the soil and make them available to plants in small amounts over many
years as SOM is mineralized. SOM increases soil flora and fauna (associated with soil
aggregation, improved infiltration of water and reduced soil erosion), complexes toxic Al and
manganese (Mn) ions (leading to better rooting), increases the buffering capacity on low-
activity clay soils and increases water holding capacity (see Woomer et al., 1994). Current
SOM inputs are insufficient to maintain SOM levels in tropical agricultural soils. Continuous
cropping of land with its associated tillage are well known to lead to initial rapid declines in
SOM which then stabilizes at a low level (e.g., see Woomer et al., 1994).

The conventional mechanisms for addressing loss of SOM in tropical, rainfed, low input
systems are fallowing, rotations (especially involving legumes), the addition of animal manures,
forms of intercropping (including with hedgerow legumes) and reduced tillage. Some of these
techniques are used in temperate agriculture but there is more reliance on purchased inputs in
those places. As pressure for arable land rises in tropical areas, cropping encroaches into areas
previously used for grazing. Agricultural intensification in southern Africa is often associated
with a decline in the availability of animal manures as livestock are squeezed out. This is more
of a problem in the unimodal rainfall areas of southern Africa where the long dry season
makes zero grazing techniques difficult or impossible for smallholders than in the bimodal
rainfall areas of eastern Africa. Manure from cattle and other animals is very important for most
farmers in Zimbabwe, less so in Zambia, but is rarely available in Malawi (where animals are
scarce). But even in the best areas, its supply (and, as importantly, its quality) is inadequate to
maintain soil fertility on its own.

Where animals are scarce, farmers have turned to other sources of SOM. Leaf litter from trees
can make significant contributions in areas close to woodlands but deforestation associated
with the demand for arable land and for building and firewood work against this option as
population rises. Composted crop residues are used in wetter areas and where crop biomass


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper I: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 6






production is relatively high but composts are rarely sufficient for more than a modest part of
the cultivated area, and, like manures, quality is often poor. These technologies require a
substantial labor commitment on the part of farmers (e.g., in Zimbabwe, Huchu and Sithole,
1994; Carter, 1993). The reality is that there is rarely sufficient organic matter to maintain SOM,
and in the low rainfall marginal areas it is impossible to grow enough biomass to maintain
SOM. In addition, organic manures alone will only rarely provide the productivity boost
needed by smallholders. They will need to be combined with the judicious use of chemical
fertilizers, improved pest and weed management techniques, and high yielding crop varieties.

The success of the germplasm led Green Revolution in Asia, under very different conditions
and with more fertile and uniform soils, has biased the research agenda in Africa away from
crop nutrition studies towards emphasis on gains from plant breeding. Improved maizes make
better use of available nutrients, but in the absence of added nutrients, the gains from genetic
improvement alone are small. Under low N conditions maize scavenges the N that is available
in the soil very effectively and there is little left to take up by the time flowering is reached
(Greg Edmeades, pers. comm.). As an example, the results from an extensive program of on-
farm demonstrations conducted over four seasons in the major maize growing areas of Malawi
showed that on relatively fertile soils and under good management, hybrids without fertilizer
yielded just 1.4 t ha'' compared with 0.9 t ha"' for unimproved maize (Jones and Wendt, 1995;
Conroy and Kumwenda, 1995; Zambezi et al., 1993). The productivity-with-sustainability
challenge is so large that farmers need to combine gains from improved germplasm with
complementary improvements in their management of soil fertility.

The central issue is how to build up and maintain soil fertility under the income and,
increasingly, land and labor constraints faced by smallholders. We now look at what those
technology improvements to raise fertilizer efficiency might entail.


3. Improving Soil Fertility And Productivity What Are The
Practicable Technology Options For Farmers?
Concurrent adoption ofboth improved germplasm and better management practices are
essential for sustainable and long term productivity gains. The analysis in Figure 1 shows three
possible scenarios, based on "best bet" estimates of technology adoption for Malawi. For each
scenario, a maize deficit or surplus is calculated based upon the balance between maize
production and consumption in a year. Assumptions include a 3.2% annual population growth
rate and a per capital annual maize consumption of 230 kg. A constant area of 1.4 million ha is
planted to maize (Malawi already has almost all of the arable land available to smallholders
under continuous maize cultivation so the opportunities for an expansion of maize area are
limited), of which, at the start of each scenario, 20% is planted to improved maize. Maize grain
yield data used are national average yields of hybrid and unimproved maize for the period 1982-
1992, including fields that received fertilizer and those that did not (Ministry of Agriculture
Crop Estimates, quoted by Conroy, 1993). In all scenarios, unimproved maize yields 1000 kg
ha''. In scenario one, improved maize yield is held constant at 2500 kg ha'' and the area planted
to improved maize does not change. This represents a continuation of the status quo where
national maize production is already in a widening deficit. In scenario two, the situation is
modeled where hybrid adoption increases at 20% (compounded) each year but hybrid yields
remain at 2500 kg ha'' because there is little change in soil fertility and other management. Here
maize production will move into modest surplus by 2002, moving back into deficit just six


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 7








years later. And, finally, scenario three represents the combination of the adoption of improved
(hybrid) maize (from scenario two) and achieved efficiency gains from better fertilizer
management on-farm of about 44% (as described in section 2.2.1) combined with other likely
management improvements, particularly timely weeding (Kabambe and Kumwenda, 1995). We
assumed a yield increase of 68% when farmers use this set of improved management practices
with their hybrid maize. In this scenario large surpluses are achieved to 2015. Likely declines
in the rate of human population growth will enable grain surpluses to be maintained for longer
than given in that scenario. Thus this analysis is very positive that productivity improvements
will make a difference well into the 21st century.

So, while there is little argument about the need for more sustainable soil fertility management,
there is less clarity on how it might be achieved. In a major overview of past impacts and future
prospects for maize research in sub-Saharan Africa, Byerlee et al. (1994) contrast the high
adoption of improved maize by farmers against a relative lack of resource management
technology for maintaining soil fertility and increasing labor productivity. Many technologies
are potentially available but few are easy for farmers to adopt.

We first look at the circumstances under which many smallholder farmers in Africa must
operate, then review existing soil fertility-enhancing technology to suggest how the technology
might be made more attractive to farmers. We then proceed to outline, based on examples
drawn from practice, improvements in technology development and the transfer process to
facilitate the adoption of better soil fertility management practices.


3.1 Smallholder Diversity, Labor, Cash and Soil Fertility Management
The smallholder farming sector is characterized by considerable variability in individual access
to land (in quality and quantity), resources and skills. Levels of literacy and numeracy are poor.
The population involved in agriculture goes from small-scale commercial farmers, through
progressive farmers, to the vast majority of poorer people who endeavor to subsist, with varying
levels of success, in hostile ecologies where the sustainability of life, livelihood, and
environment is hazardous.

The two major costs faced by smallholders in producing maize are labor and fertilizer. The lack
of cash dominates the choices available to the farmer. Labor may be provided by the family, it
may be bought in from other farmers, and it may be sold to others for food or cash. Often the
household is headed by a woman, with small children. The older children may be at school, or
have moved to town. If she is fortunate, her husband and children living away will send cash or
kind to help support the rural household. If not, she will be attempting to support herself and her
children from what she can grow or sell. She will be living on a piece of land that has been
cultivated many times before. What inherent fertility was there has long been extracted from the
soil. Weeds, increasing including the parasitic weed Striga, will have established themselves
and will compete strongly with whatever she plants for light, water, and nutrients.

Given a hectare or more of land, she may be self-sufficient in food if her health is good and the
weather favorable. But the start of the rains bring diarrhea and malaria. Often, illness of herself
or her children will result in late planting. With a poor rainy season (and to many Africa and
drought are synonymous) her crop may fail. The odds are that in some, often many, years, she
will find herself unable to produce enough food for her family's needs. This requires her to


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 8







work for neighboring farmers who will then feed or pay her (and any children that work with
her) for the days that she puts in. Typically this work will be planting, weeding, or fertilizing the
neighbor's crop which means that her own is left unplanted, unweeded, and unfertilized until
later in the season. Late planting and poor weeding mean a poor harvest and once again she
finds herself without food before the crop comes in.

An increasing number of rural families in Africa are in this position; unable to produce
sufficient food for their own annual needs (Weber et al., 1988). This is the downward spiral that
the next maize revolution has to break. Malawi illustrates an advanced case of this scenario with
some 60% of rural households (and 41% of the total population) producing less than they need
to feed themselves through the year. Of these households, the cash requirement needed to buy
inorganic fertilizer far exceeds their total annual cash income (HIID, 1994). African
smallholders, almost wherever they live, face conditions of difficulty and stress for which both
tradition and science have few real answers. While there are technically sound solutions to
many of the problems faced by most smallholders, all too often these turn out to be financially
or managerially unsound.


3.2 Increasing Fertilizer Use And Fertilizer Use Efficiency

3.2.1 Increasing The Number of Smallholders Using Fertilizers
Since the 1960s, fertilizer use has been growing in sub-Saharan Africa at around 6.7% annually
(see Heisey and Mwangi, 1995), but many farmers do not use fertilizers. That base of fertilizer
users needs to be consolidated and expanded. But fertilizer will remain a high cost item for
African farmers for the foreseeable future. Expansion will depend on generating better returns
from fertilizer through greater efficiencies in its use. Much greater use will need to be made of
organic sources of fertility to raise fertility management and reduce cost. We continue,
therefore, by considering how to help existing fertilizer users, and those who are likely to be
able to afford some fertilizer, to achieve increases in fertilizer use efficiency. A three pronged
technology strategy is envisaged:
1. careful tailoring of inorganic fertilizer use and type to the conditions faced by
smallholders;
2. increasing the proportion of locally produced organic materials. Organic fertilizer not
only reduces the cash cost of fertilizer to the farmer but also increases the efficiency of
inorganic fertilizer use; and,
3. making greater use of agronomic and economic factors in breeding priorities for maize
and legumes to fit future improved materials to the circumstances of smallholders.

3.2.2 Increasing Inorganic Fertilizer Use Efficiency
Central to expanding the base of inorganic fertilizer users will be the task of making best use of
the limited amounts of fertilizer that the typical smallholder is able to purchase. Increasing
fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) will require a significant shift in thinking for both researchers and
policy makers in Africa. Experience from Zimbabwe illustrates this point. Zimbabwe has a
history of agricultural research on inorganic fertilizers going back over 50 years but most was
geared towards users who could afford relatively large quantities of fertilizer (the large
commercial farms and growers of cash crops). This research ignored the needs of those who


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 9









could not. Although. since Independence, a great deal of work has been done to look at the
appropriateness of inorganic fertilizer types, amounts, timing and placement for food crops
produced by smallholders (see Grant, 1981; Metelerkamp, 1988; and summarized recently by
Hikwa and Mukurumbira, 1995), inorganic fertilizer recommendations fail to take adequately
into account the cash constraints and the risk faced by resource poor farmers in marginal areas.
In Zimbabwe, of the 32% of farmers applying the recommended package of fertilizer to their
maize crop in the near average 1990/91 season, 48% failed to recover the value of the fertilizer
(Page and Chonyera, 1994).

Micronutrient Supplementation
By supplementing soil micronutrients, the yield response to macronutrients (N and P) can be
improved on deficient soils. Relatively cheap additions of nutrients such as Zn, B, S and Mg,
that can often be included in existing fertilizer blends, when targeted to deficient soils can
dramatically improve fertilizer use efficiency and crop profitability. During the 1950s, 60s
and 70s S, Mg, and, less commonly, Zn and B deficiencies were detected for maize on sandy
soils in Zimbabwe (Grant, 1981; Metelerkamp, 1988). Enhanced yields were obtained by
including selected micronutrients in fertilizer blends (Grant, 1981). Recent experience in
Malawi provides a striking example of how N fertilizer efficiency for maize can be raised by
appropriate micronutrients on a location specific basis. Supplementation by S, Zn, B and K
increased maize yields by 40% over the standard NP recommendation alone (Wendt, et al.,
1994). New basal fertilizers with S and Zn were formulated and verified through widespread
testing on-farm. Region specific recommendations on their use are now in place with
extension. This experience is developed in more detail in section 4.1. to illustrate an
integrated long-term research process necessary to improve soil fertility and maize
production.

Organic x Inorganic Fertilizer Interactions
There is evidence that the most promising route to improving inorganic fertilizer efficiency in
smallholder cropping systems is through the addition of small amounts of high quality organic
matter to tropical soils (Ladd and Amato, 1985; Snapp, 1995). High quality organic manures
(narrow C/N ratio, low percent lignin) provide readily available N, energy (carbon), and
nutrients to the soil ecosystem, and build soil fertility and structure over the long-term. Their
use will increase soil microbial activity and nutrient cycling, with reduced nutrient loss from
leaching and denitrification (De Ruiter et al., 1993; Doran et al., 1987; Granastein et al., 1987;
Snapp. 1995). Two long term cropping studies carried out in Kenya and Nigeria indicate that
organic plus inorganic inputs sustain fertility at a higher level than the expected additive effects
of either input alone (Dennison, 1961). Nutrient effects alone do not explain the benefits derived
from modest organic manure inputs combined with inorganic fertilizers. High quality carbon
and nitrogen provide substrate to support an active soil microbial community, which is not so
much a direct nutrient supplier, but enhances the synchrony of plant nutrient demand and soil
supply by reducing large pools of free nutrients (and consequent nutrient losses from the
system) thus maintaining a buffered, actively cycled supply of nutrients (De Ruiter et al., 1993;
Snapp, 1995). Research is now generating examples of yield gains available on-farm in
southern Africa through inorganic/organic combinations. Table 1 gives three recent examples
from our work. Often the largest gains are demonstrated on research stations where soil fertility
is already high. On-fanr the gains are usually lower because of inherent low soil fertility, water
deficits and management compromises but still worthwhile. Many farmers already recognize


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems






these effects and combine, where possible, small amounts of high-quality organic inputs with
inorganic nutrients.


3.3 Increasing Availability And Use Of Organic Sources Of Fertility
Organic inputs available to most smallholders are rarely sufficient to maintain SOM. The rapid
introduction of more organic materials is needed. Options include rotations, green manures,
animal manures, intercropping, strip cropping, relay cropping, and agroforestry.

3.3.1 The Role Of Legumes
Most of the promising routes to raised SOM involve legumes. Legume-based agriculture has
been the focus of well meaning efforts to transform smallholder African agriculture since the
turn of the century. The efforts of Alvord in Zimbabwe are typical of the genre. Green manures
were heavily researched in the 1920s-1940s (Metelerkamp, 1988) and widely used by large
commercial farmers in Zimbabwe until a decline in the real price of inorganic fertilizers in the
1950s made the practice uneconomic. With the rise in real prices of inorganic fertilizers and
concern over the sustainability of current cropping systems, green manures have attracted new
research interest (see Hikwa and Mukurumbira, 1995). Annual legumes are used as sole crops
in rotation with cereals, are intercropped, or occasionally used as green manures. Perennial
legumes are sometimes retained in farmers' fields and are just beginning to be incorporated as
hedgerow intercrop or alley crop systems. Giller et al. (1994) conclude that biological N
fixation from legumes can sustain tropical agriculture at moderate levels of output, often double
those currently achieved. Under favorable conditions green manure crops generate large
amounts of organic matter and can accumulate 100-200 kg N ha"' in 100-150 days in the
tropics.

But legumes remain marginal in many of the maize-based systems of the region. Low P levels
in the soils inhibit legume growth and so at a minimum P must be added. Much of the work
underlying legume-based technologies has been done on research stations. Insufficient account
has been taken of the need to tailor these technologies to farming circumstances where labor is
short. The necessary fertilizer to "kick start" the system may be too costly or unavailable, and
there are often difficulties in obtaining legume seeds (e.g., Giller, et al., 1994). Finally, the
family may not be able to release land from staple food crops.

There is often a direct conflict between the short term requirement to meet today's food supply
and building up the long term fertility of the soil to meet tomorrow's food needs. Farmers
discount the value of a benefit that will only be achieved in several years time from investments
made today. The most suitable legumes, from the soil fertility perspective, are often the hardest
for the farmer to adopt. Broadly speaking, the larger the likely soil fertility benefit from a
legume technology, the larger the initial investment required in labor and land, and the fewer
short-term food benefits it has.

Grain Legumes
Grain legumes have the fewest adoption problems; and are widely grown by farmers, mainly for
home consumption of the seed and sometimes leaves. But the more productive high harvest
index grain legumes add relatively little organic matter and N to the soil since most of the
above-ground dry matter and almost all the N is removed from the field in the grain (see Giller,


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 11









et al., 1994). Species that combine some grain with high root biomass and shoot-leaf biomass
such as pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and dolichos bean (Dolichos lablab) offer a useful
compromise of promoting farmer adoption and improving soil fertility (Giller pers. comm.).

Carr (1994) reports that, on severely depleted soils in Malawi, soybeans (Glycine max) will
produce more calories per unit of land than unfertilized maize, in addition to fixing N from the
atmosphere. Also in Malawi, Kumwenda (1995) reported average soybean yields of 2200 and
860 kg h'a1, respectively, in monoculture and intercropping from a self-nodulating
(promiscuous) variety 'Magoye'. Promiscuous soybeans are attractive to smallholders because
they do not have to be inoculated with Rhizobium spp. bacteria to fix N and they also have good
root and above-ground biomass. Magoye soybean is grown very widely in Zambia and is now
grown by thousands of smallholders in Malawi, but Malawi has not yet approved
recommendations for its use and Zimbabwe does little research on them. The bias in regional
soybean development is towards the high grain yield types favored by large-scale producers
whose interest in soil fertility improvement is secondary.

Intercropping
Intercropping, where two or more crops are grown mixed together on the same ground for all or
most of their life cycle, is a wide-spread traditional African agricultural practice (Andrews and
Kassam, 1976). Legumes in intercropping systems often contribute some residual nitrogen to
the following crop (Willey, 1979). However, low growing legumes are often shaded by taller
cereals (Dalal, 1974; Chang and Shibles, 1985; Manson et al., 1986) and under smallholder
management in low fertility conditions, poor emergence and growth of the legume in the
intercrop is common. This limits the N and organic matter contribution of the legume on-farm
to levels well below the potentials found on research stations (Kumwenda et al., 1993;
Kumwenda, 1995).

One of the more promising intercrops is late maturing pigeonpea. Even though early growth of
the legume is reduced when intercropped with maize, pigeonpeas compensate by continuing to
grow after the maize harvest and produce large quantities of biomass (Sakala, 1994). In Malawi
Sakala (1994) reported a pigeonpea dry matter yield of 3 t ha'' from leaf litter and flowers when
intercropped with maize. Pigeonpea is easily intercropped with cereals and, even if the seed is
harvested for food, the leaf fall is sufficient to make a significant contribution to N
accumulation. The disadvantage is that pigeonpea is highly attractive to livestock. Thus it is
rarely practical to grow where, as in many African smallholder systems, livestock are left to
roam the fields uncontrolled after harvest.

The importance of intercrops in densely populated regions is widely recognized. This is due to
the stabilizing effect of intercrops on food security, and enhanced efficiency of land use.
However, in semi-arid areas, plant densities (and thus potential yield ha'l) have to be reduced
(Shumba, et al., 1990b). Those authors, working in southern Zimbabwe, found that cowpea-
maize intercrops can greatly reduce the grain yield of maize in dry years. Natarajan and
Shumba (1990), reviewing intercropping research in Zimbabwe, comment that cereal-legume
rotations appear to offer greater prospects of raising the yield of cereals than do intercrops.
While maize benefits from being grown after groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea), maize-groundnut
intercrops often reduce maize yield (see Hikwa and Mukurumbira, 1995). Cowpea-maize
(lVigna unguiculala) intercrops out-yield either maize or cowpea sole crops on a land equivalent
basis in wetter areas of Zimbabwe (Mariga, 1990).

Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 12







Rotations


Legume rotations are an important practice for restoring soil fertility for farmers with larger
land holdings. Rotations allow crops with different rooting patterns to use the soil sequentially,
as well as reducing pests and diseases harmful to the crops, sustaining productivity of the
cropping system. The amount of N returned from legume rotations depends on whether the
legume is harvested for seed, forage or incorporated as green manure. In Malawi, MacColl
(1989) estimated net N of 23 to 110 kg ha"' from pigeonpea, 23 to 50 kg ha' from Dolichos
bean, and 25 kg ha'' from groundnuts. In Nigeria, Jones (1974) and Giri and De (1980)
estimated 60 kg N ha" from groundnuts. The yield response of a cereal crop following a legume
can be substantial. In Malawi, MacColl (1989) showed that grain yield of the first crop of maize
following pigeonpea averaged 2.8 t ha" higher than that of continuous maize that received 35
kg N ha each year. In Zimbabwe, Mukurumbira (1985) showed large maize yields following
groundnuts and bambara nuts (Voandzeia subterranean without supplemental inorganic
nitrogen. Similar studies in Tanzania by Temu (1982) showed that maize yields after sunnhemp
(Crotolaria spp.) with residues removed or incorporated were 3.65 and 4.82 t ha', respectively.
The latter gave a yield that was equivalent to an application of 80 kg N ha' from inorganic
fertilizer. Supplementing sunnhemp green manure by incorporation with 40 kg N ha'" gave a
yield of 6.83 t ha' which was equivalent to an application of 160 kg ha"' of inorganic N
fertilizer.

Fallowing
Natural short fallowing of overworked lands in Zimbabwe results in little or no improvement in
soil fertility (Grant, 1981). Extra investment in the fallow is required for a significant
improvement in soil fertility. Improved fallows, using Sesbania sesban as a way of adding
significant amounts of N and organic matter to soil, have been evaluated in Eastern Province,
Zambia where short duration (2-3 year) fallows are common. On station, maize yielded between
3 and 6 t ha'1 of grain for each of four years following a two-year improved fallow compared to
1-2 t ha' in the unfertilized control (Kwesiga and Coe, 1994). Farmers in eastern Zambia now
use little fertilizer since subsidies have been removed (Place et al., 1995). From these data
Place et al., (1995) calculated that when inorganic fertilizer is not used (common farmer
practice in eastern Zambia, Place et al., (1995)) it was profitable for farmers to invest in the
improved fallow. The use of improved fallows avoids the competition effect between trees
and crops (Kwesiga and Coe, 1994). But where land is limiting, the feasibility of fallow
systems is yet to be proved.

Agroforestry
Agroforestry refers to land-use systems in which woody perennials (trees, shrubs, etc.) are
grown in association with herbaceous plants (crops, pastures) and/or livestock in a spatial
arrangement, a rotation or both, and in which there are both ecological and economic
interactions between the tree and non-tree components of the system (Young, 1989). Given
the widespread decline in soil fertility, the use of leguminous multi-purpose trees for soil
fertility improvement has been a major thrust of agroforestry research in the region.






Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 13









Alley cropping, sometimes referred to as hedgerow intercropping, was developed in the late
1970s at IITA and is the best known agroforestry system developed for soil fertility
improvement (Kang et al., 1990). The logic of this technology assumes that moisture and
nutrients at depth in the soil, and below the roots of annual crops, are used by the deeper
rooted tree crop. The tree crop is then pruned to supply nutrients to the soil and these are used
by shallow rooted annuals. Jones et al. (1995a); Wendt et al. (1995); and Bunderson et al.
(1991) showed that the application of Leucaena leaf prunings in an alley cropping system
raised maize grain yield and increased soil pH, organic C, total N, S, and exchangeable
calcium (Ca), Mg and K.

However important aspects of the technology are problematic. Inorganic P may be needed to
realize increased maize yields. Leucaena leucocephala (the most widely researched hedgerow
species) suffers from a number of problems including susceptibility to termite attack at the
seedling stage, severe defoliation by the recently arrived Leucaena Psyllid and poor biomass
production under low fertility and on soils of low pH. Saka et al. (1995) have estimated that
the cost of producing N from Leuceana biomass is comparable to that from inorganic sources.
The technology is labor intensive and management sensitive. Competition between the trees
and associated crops can occur for moisture, and for nutrients and light (Mbekeani, 1991;
Ong, 1994). Observations suggest that competition for soil moisture is particularly acute at
the beginning of the rainy season before soil moisture reserves have built up. Without a better
understanding of the competitive effects, especially those below ground, the potential of alley
cropping is unproven at the farmer level.

There has been progress on some aspects of the above problems. Research has identified
alternative species that are better adapted and produce more biomass than Leucaena
leucocephala (Bunderson, 1994). Gliricidia sepium and Senna spectabilis have both shown
potential to produce more biomass in a wider range of ecologies.

Other agroforestry technologies offer promise. Faidherbia albida is a vigorous leguminous
tree, long used by African farmers for improving crop yields where the tree is naturally
abundant. The species has the unique characteristic among African savanna tree species of
retaining its leaves in the dry season and shedding them at the onset of the rains. The resultant
fine mulch of leaf litter undergoes rapid decomposition enriching the topsoil in plant nutrients
and organic matter. Saka et al. (1994) have described how natural stands of the tree have been
used in maize production systems in Malawi. Although the value of F. albida is recognized by
farmers, the tree has not been integrated systematically into maize growing areas.


3.3.2 Cereal Residues And Animal Manure
The burning of crop residues remains common. Where it is a deliberate farmer practice (mainly
in areas with few livestock), it is used to release nutrients quickly, ease land preparation and
reduce pest and disease pressures. Although the nutrient content of maize stover is relatively
low, stover can contribute to the productivity of the soil. Careful management of such residues
is required, since N can be immobilized at the time of peak maize N requirements which can
result in poor crop growth (Nandwa et al., 1995); a fact well known to farmers.

In unimodal rainfall areas where stover breakdown in the soil tends to be slow, and on sandy
soils where soil N is very low, maize stover is usually fed to livestock. As well as keeping


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 14







animals alive, this is an important way of cycling the residues in a way that makes them more
beneficial to the crop. Where, as in Zimbabwe, cattle are common in smallholder areas, farmers
often apply cattle manure to fields that will be planted to maize. Losses of N from such systems
are, however, often high. Cattle manure is applied in a dried, aerobically decomposed form,
often with a high sand content, and N contents frequently less than 1.2% (Mugwira and
Mukurumbira, 1984). It is broadcast-applied and ploughed into the soil before planting. Survey
discussions with farmers and informal assessments show amounts applied are around 8-20 t ha"
with applications every 3-5 years (Mugwira and Shumba, 1986). Research shows that the most
efficient use of manure is to combine it with some inorganic fertilizer (Murwira, 1994). This is
common farmer practice. Station-placement or dribbling into the planting furrow, rather than
broadcast application, are promising ways of increasing the crop yield benefits from cattle
manure (e.g., Munguri et al., 1995).


3.4 Maize Genotype Improvement For Low Soil Fertility
In addition to altering the soil to better support maize crops, maize genotypes are becoming
available that perform better under limiting soil fertility. Slight improvement of N-use
.efficiency (NUE) has been reported in tropical maize, with prospects of further gains (Lafitte
and Edmeades, 1994a and b). At CIMMYT in Mexico, three cycles of full-sib recurrent
selection for grain yield under low soil N, while maintaining grain yield under high soil N, was
conducted in a lowland tropical population, Across 8328 (Lafitte and Edmeades, 1994a, 1994b).
This resulted in a per cycle increase in grain yield under low N of 75 kg ha' (2.8%), with
similar yield improvements under high N (Lafitte and Edmeades, 1994b). If maintained over
another 3-5 cycles of selection these improvements will be substantial. Similar work at
CIMMYT-Zimbabwe in the population ZM609, adapted to mid-altitude areas of southern and
eastern Africa, led to large initial gains in NUE (Short and Edmeades, 1991), but recent progress
has been inconclusive (Pixley, 1995).

Also, significant progress in developing tropical maize for tolerance to high A13+ saturation in
acidic soils using full-sib recurrent selection is reported by Granados et al. (1993). These
materials should be tested and modified to suit African conditions and breeding work
established to develop niaize that yields well in soils that have high concentrations of H+ but
without A13 or Mn toxicity. Breeding for tolerance to micronutrient deficiencies may be
another worthwhile long-term goal.

Agronomists and social scientists continue to have a role in encouraging breeders to persevere
with work on soil fertility issues. Most breeders are more comfortable with biotic constraints
and feel they can make more progress on those issues. However, the edaphic constraints found
on smallholder farmers' fields need to be addressed. There is an urgent need for improved
germplasm adapted to nutrient deficiencies and other edaphic stresses. Most of the gains in
NUE through breeding have come from improved N utilization to produce more biomass and
grain yield with no increase in total N uptake (Lafitte and Edmeades, 1994b). Nevertheless there
is some concern that future genotypes bred for low soil fertility may gain their advantage from
extracting more micro- and macro-nutrients from the soil. The outcome of such a strategy is
uncertain and therefore it is important not to rely solely on crop improvement.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems







3.5 Synthesis And The Way Forward
The technologies needed to manage soil fertility in southern Africa do not differ from those
developed for other parts of the world. Inorganic fertilizers are a key element of fertility
management as the need for added external nutrient inputs is inescapable. But, such fertilizers
should not be the sole source of nutrients. There are sources of organic fertility, mainly based
around the use of legumes in the cropping system, which can usefully complement inorganic
fertilizers. But for both sources of fertility, important practical questions for smallholders
remain unanswered. Information on the optimum use of small amounts of inorganic fertilizers,
on the best combinations of organic and inorganic fertilizers, on how to produce sufficient
amounts of organic manures under low fertility conditions, on the best management
compromises in the use of labor between critical seasonal tasks, and on adjusting fertility
management according to the seasonal rainfall and other external factors, is largely lacking.
This is despite some attempts through adaptive research in the 1980s and early 1990s (e.g.,
Waddington, 1994).

Yet these are the very questions to which smallholders are seeking answers. Typically, farmers
are looking for ways of combining these inputs and employing them in ways that minimize the
requirements for additional cash, labor and land. There is little past, or ongoing experimentation
to guide them through the choices, and little counsel from extension.

Flexible soil fertility recommendations that better address actual nutrient deficiencies, take
advantage of cropping system opportunities, are efficient in the highly variable rainfall regime
faced by most smallholders, and are compatible with farmer socio-economic circumstances are
required. Combinations of technologies (involving organic and inorganic sources), often with
each component employed sub-optimally, will be needed. Organic manures are highly variable
and usually in short supply. Mixing high quality organic sources with inorganic fertilizer can
make substantial improvements to nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity. The resultant
practices will be practicable and profitable, and thus are candidates for wider adoption.

Transferring experience in fertility management from other regions requires not only adaptation
but also a much greater understanding of the processes through which fertility can be managed
under African conditions. It is to this concurrent requirement for both adaptive and process
research that the following sections will be devoted. We, therefore, now turn to consider
improvements in the technology development and dissemination process itself to ensure more
effective technology combinations are available to farmers.


4. Linking Adaptive And Process Research For Improved
Technology Development And Dissemination
African crop management research requires two critical thrusts to be carried out in a
collaborative and highly focused manner:
1. basic research to understand better the soil fertility cycle, its inputs and its losses, on African
farms so that technology can be effective, and,
2. an integrated sequence of follow-through from basic research, through adaptive work with
farmers and other clients.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems







The methodologies for each type of research are different and it is rare for scientists working in
process research to have a full grasp of the skills needed for adaptive research (and vice versa).
Fertility changes have long term effects on productivity changes in agriculture are typically
incremental rather than spectacular. Understanding the changes that are taking place needs a
consistent and long term effort by scientists. But it is important that they share a common vision
of the problems faced by the farmers so that the research agenda remains fixed on priority
productivity problems and does not get side tracked into challenging, but less relevant, avenues.

Many of the key characteristics of the applied agricultural research process are well described in
literature on adaptive on-farm research (e.g., Tripp, 1992). We propose here to build on this
foundation. The focus is now on adapting the techniques to embrace a long term perspective,
where investigation, review, and interaction with producers and other concerned parties leads to
a coherent research strategy running consistently over time. In the section following we give
one example of such a process already underway. We then proceed to show how progress in
applied or adaptive research requires careful underpinning with high quality, but carefully
prioritized basic studies.


4.1 A Case Study Overcoming Micronutrient Deficiencies On Maize In
Malawi'
Research on the relief of micronutrient deficiencies with maize in Malawi is an example of the
commitment needed for "successful" soil fertility research. A study by Conroy (1993) over a
three season period from 1990 to 1992, showed that smallholders following existing fertilizer
recommendations (a single blanket recommendation of 92 Kg N and 40 Kg P205 per hectare
was used for all farming areas of Malawi) achieved only about 3 t ha" maize grain, using
hybrids with yield potentials that exceed 10 t ha". Over 40 % of smallholders that applied the
recommended rates of fertilizer failed to cover the cost of fertilizer application.

Table 2 shows the research sequence and outputs, moving from the problem of low maize yields
in the presence of adequate levels of N fertilizer, through to producing fertilizers that were
useful to farmers. The process embraced soil chemical analysis, through investigative trials with
missing micronutrients at a relatively small number of on-farm sites, to the formulation of new
fertilizer blends (including Zn and S) with a fertilizer manufacturer. This last step was combined
with simple on-farm verifications of increased yield and profitability when the new
formulations were used and required the active involvement of the extension service and of
farmers.

In 1987, informal farmer surveys indicated that low yields were not generally due to poor
planting or weeding practices or to adverse climatic conditions. But the farmers had been
growing continuous maize (sometimes with a minor legume intercrop) with minimal rotation
for many years. As a possible solution, researchers hypothesized that low yields might be due to
deficiencies of nutrients other than N and P. Two initial goals were identified:
1. To determine yield response, in a given soil type and agro-ecozone, to fertilizers that
addressed local soil nutrient deficiencies.

The work synthesized here is the result of efforts by many persons and organizations in Malawi. In particular,
credit for much of this research goes to John Wendt and Richard Jones, Rockefeller Foundation Post-Doctoral
Scientists attached to the Department of Agricultural Research in Malawi from 1989 to 1993.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 17






2. To determine the relationship of soil fertility analytical values to maize yield response to
fertilizer added. This relationship is influenced by climate, soil type and profile.
From the literature and other sources of information, it was established that absence of one or
more of a range of nutrients (besides N and P) could potentially depress yields significantly. It
was also apparent that several of these could be discarded. Either the deficiency was unlikely, it
was already addressed in the existing fertilizer formulation, or it was impractical to deal with in
the Malawi context.

A series of on-farm trials were started in 1989 to evaluate deficiencies of N, P, K, S, Zn, and B
at several sites throughout Malawi. A "missing nutrient, minus one" trial design was used to
evaluate the relative contribution of each nutrient to maximizing yields. Because of the need to
keep the clients sharply in mind, the bias was towards work conducted on smallholder farmers'
fields. New methods used included tissue sampling (ear leaves were taken from all plots at
silking and analyzed for N, P, Ca, Mg, K, S, Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe, and B). The soil and plant
analytical data collected were correlated with yield data to determine minimum soil analytical
criteria for the elements studied.

There was a regular process of review. The treatments and treatment methods evolved from year
to year, based on experience from previous years. By the 1991/92 season, a general review
concluded that yield data indicated regional deficiencies of'B, Zn, S, and K. In deficient regions,
average yields improved by 40% over the existing N and P application when the deficiencies
were satisfied. Lime applications were necessary at some sites. Soil and plant analytical data
showed P application was unnecessary at some sites, while at other sites the recommended P
fertilizer rate was insufficient.

To refine these observations, the research team liaised with an existing fertilizer demonstration
project run by the extension service and FAO. In 1992/93, the program saw the addition of
micronutrient supplement treatments on selected extension fertilizer demonstrations throughout
the country. From the analysis of soil samples from 400 smallholder sites, preliminary maps of
areas with S, Zn, K, copper (Cu), P nutrient deficiencies for maize in Malawi were developed
(Wendt et al., 1994).

The next step was to work with a local fertilizer company to produce practical fertilizer blends
that addressed these regional deficiencies. Two types of fertilizers were jointly agreed in
1993/94 and, in 1994/95, based on further experience, another formulation was produced.
Concurrently the nutrient deficiency characterization exercise was greatly expanded to better
refine the nutrient deficiency maps. Over 3000 soil samples were collected, and analyzed for
pH, P, Ca, K, Mg, Zn, Cu, B, soil organic matter and soil texture. The sample locations were
geo-referenced (elevation, longitude and latitude) to develop a computer database that could be
used with a Geographic Information System (GIS). Farm management information was also
collected. A series of verification trials, in co-operation with the extension service, were then
(1993/94 onwards) put in place to verify the new fertilizer formulations as used under farmer
conditions, and also to demonstrate more efficient fertilizer use methods. This work was done
in conjunction with the extension service, but with guidance and assistance from DAR. In
1994/95 work was started to define new response curves for N and P with hybrid maize where
the micronutrients were added. The fertilizer company has advertised the new
20:20:5+4S+0.1Zn fertilizer and procedures are in place to incorporate new fertilizers into
standard recommendations.

Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 18







Clearly blanket recommendations for fertilizer use are inadequate. They result in the inefficient
use of an expensive and usually imported commodity which is costly for the farmer and for the
nation. This is uncontroversial. But progress in dealing with this evident and crucial problem
has been slow. The preceding example illustrates how progress is possible with modest
resources but a clear sense of direction. It exploits the potential, through modem fertilizer
blending systems, to produce small "runs" of fertilizer to given specification. It shows how,
through a focused investigative and verification program, fertilizer recommendations can be
developed for localized areas at a surprisingly reasonable cost. And it opens the door to refine
these recommendations further through modem data base management techniques.


4.2 Basic Process Research
The applied work outlined in the preceding section must be underpinned by high quality
research aimed at comprehending the basic processes underlying nutrient flows in tropical soils.
Nutrient budgets and process-level research track the consequences of crop management
strategies in smallholder farming systems. Synthesizing our understanding of processes
involved in nutrient cycling efficiency is the goal, to be able to predict which agronomic
technologies enhance yield potential over the long-term. The challenge is enormous, as
detectable changes in soil organic matter and other soil fertility parameters occur very slowly.
Soil organic C was not altered after 10 years of widely differing residue input rates in a
Malawi hedge-row intercrop trial conducted at Bunda College of Agriculture, University of
Malawi, (Materechera and Snapp, unpublished, 1995).

To develop further improved organic matter technologies the first step is to quantify nutrient
losses and inputs at different scales and extrapolate among them. Typical scales include the plot
level, the farm level, the watershed level and the regional level (Fresco and Kroonenberg, 1992).
To evaluate the effects of technologies on soil fertility the definitive test is measurement of
yields over the long term. Studies conducted over decades in a systematic, rigorous manner are
clearly needed in sub-Saharan Africa and for the tropics generally. However, because farmers
need improved technologies now, faster methods are required. To date, regional assessment of
soil nutrient status and losses have necessarily been almost entirely based on extrapolation of
plot estimates (Smaling, 1993) but with unreliable results.

New methods in soil analysis and modeling are promising tools to assess nutrient flows across
the heterogeneous landscape of tropical, smallholder farms (Barrios et al., 1994; Jones et al.,
1995b; Parton, 1992; Snapp et al., 1995). Powerful tools of the trade include nutrient
monitoring, new methods in soil analysis, modeling, and networked or chrono-sequence trials to
allow rapid insight into soil fertility processes (Anderson and Ingram, 1993; Jackson et al. 1988;
Parton, 1992; Snapp et al., 1995). Investigations must be conducted on representative sites of
well-characterized agro-ecosystems. Networked trials and standardized analytical
methodology, are needed to quantify the consequences of different management regimes for
the soil resource base (Anderson and Ingram, 1993). This type of basic research holds out the
promise of supporting a major shift in tropical agronomy, from empirical testing to design of
crop management strategies. The work requires a continuing commitment to building bridges
among fields such as agronomy, ecology, soil biology, chemistry and physics.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems







4.2.1 Nutrient Budgeting
Nutrient budgeting can be used to develop improved ways of using available nutrients. Earlier
sections underlined the importance of organic matter management on the leached and depleted
soils of Africa. Using conventional methods derived from temperate zones, SOM is difficult to
maintain and requires substantial amounts of organic inputs to enhance in tropical cropping
systems (Jenkinson, 1981). Recent findings suggest that small additions of high quality organic
material can increase nutrient cycling efficiency. High quality organic materials are high in
available N and provide a source of energy (available carbon) to soil microorganisms.
Enhanced activity of soil microbes can increase nutrient turnover rates, enhancing nutrient
availability to crops, while minimizing nutrient losses from leaching and volatilization (De
Ruiter et al. 1993; Doran et al. 1987; Granastein etal. 1987; Ladd and Amato, 1985).

This suggests an opportunity in the tropics to use active microorganism populations to buffer (or
reduce nutrient losses from) low input cropping systems. Although the pool of inorganic
nutrients is small in such systems, the nutrient supply may be sufficient to support crop growth,
due to constant re-supply of nutrients by microbial mediated turnover rates. Nutrient losses due
to leaching and volatilization are reduced (See Figure 2). Crop nutrient budget methodology
(after Jackson et al., 1988), focusing on N losses (N is the nutrient most limiting growth, and
most vulnerable to losses from smallholder farms in S. and E. Africa) is being developed to test
this theory.

Related process studies have recently been initiated in Malawi, including '5N isotope labeling,
to quantify the effects of small amounts of organic residues applied with inorganic nutrients
under field conditions (Jones et al. 1995b). Researchers in Zimbabwe have undertaken a range
of intensive studies of N efficiency, using 5N isotope and novel N monitoring techniques
(TSBF, 1995; Tagwira, 1995). While the results from these studies remain preliminary, the
initial findings are exciting.


4.2.2 Methodology Development
New techniques have recently been developed for separating SOM into fractions that may be
biologically meaningful, and that appear to have predictive value for agronomists and land
managers. Physically-based isolation of SOM fractions can be achieved rapidly and easily by
sieving soil and separating SOM on the basis of size (Cambardella and Elliot 1994; Christensen
1992). Early indicators are that a fraction of SOM known as the light/large (LL) fraction
provides a good indicator of active SOM.

Use of SOM fractionation, and measurement of LL-associated organic C and N, is being
evaluated in Zimbabwe, Kenya and Malawi (Barrios et al., 1994; Okalebo et al., 1993; Snapp et
al., 1995). Organic C in the LL fraction was higher in two Malawi soils amended with
Gliricidia sepium or Leucaena leucocephala (a perennial legume grown as a hedge-row
intercrop with maize), compared to a control (continuous maize with no fertilizer) or an
intercrop with a non-N fixing legume, Senna spectabilis (Saka et al., 1995).


4.2.3 Root Studies
Roots play an important role in regulating nutrient cycling efficiency. A vigorous, effective crop
rooting system is essential for efficient nutrient acquisition, particularly for mobile nutrients


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 20






such as nitrate N. Nitrogen losses from tropical cropping systems have not been well
documented but are expected to be substantial, over 30-70% of N inputs. Major N losses are
thought to occur early in the cropping season due to high initial mineralization rates, inorganic
N accumulation during the dry season and limited root growth of young crop plants (Myers et
al., 1994).

Understanding root behavior is also essential to minimize competition associated with
intercropping technologies. Several important agroforestry systems are based on the
presumption that the trees reduce nutrient losses by scavenging nutrients from beneath crop
rooting depth (Young, 1989). Preliminary findings from two significant maize/perennial
legume intercrop systems for Malawi Senna spectabilis and Gliricidia sepium alley cropped
with maize (Itimu and Giller, pers. comm., 1995) suggest that ridge planting of maize (the
current wide-spread practice of Malawi smallholders) reduced competition between maize and
the perennial legumes. However, the data strongly pointed to intense crop/tree root
competition, and modest deep rooting of the perennials. The soil environment influenced
rooting patterns to as great a degree as genotype. Thus reducing negative interactions
between tree roots and annual crops, and enhancing benefits from tree roots, may be
fundamental to the success of the technology (Giller et al., 1995).

4.2.4 Nutrient Release Synchrony
Nutrient release synchrony with crop demand is another approach that has been advocated to
increase nutrient cycling efficiency (Anderson and Ingram, 1993). Synchronizing the release of
nutrients from organic materials with crop requirement for nutrients can increase nutrient
cycling efficiency (Myers et al., 1994). This central hypothesis of TSBF suggests that organic
inputs of varying quality can be used to manipulate nutrient supply. Laboratory incubation
studies show that high quality residues (e.g., narrow C/N ratio, low percent lignin) supplied in
conjunction with low quality residues (e.g., wide C/N ratio and/or high lignins) can provide a
continuous nutrient supply, with N being released from high quality residues first (Itimu and
Giller, pers. comm., 1995; Snapp et al., 1995; TSBF, 1995). Preliminary field data supports
these findings. This was indicated for three out of four Malawi soils, in which soil inorganic N
levels were enhanced in soil amended with high quality Gliricidia sepium residues, compared to
controls (no fertilizer or organic inputs), or soil amended with moderately-high quality residues
of Senna spectabilis (Snapp et al., 1995). Nevertheless, synchronizing nutrient release with
nutrient demand using organic residues is technically demanding. Just how practicable this is
for farmers on their fields every year has yet to be shown.

Quality of residues is difficult to define. The SOM fractionation methods discussed earlier may
provide one method to assess residue quality after it is incorporated into soil, and most
importantly, a means to quantify the consequences for soil quality. Preliminary indications are
that plants with high lignins, polyphenolics and other anti-quality factors may not release
nutrients for many growing seasons and thus these residues may be undesirable to use as
organic soil amendments (Myers et al., 1994). Studies have been initiated in Zimbabwe and
Malawi to test the synchrony hypothesis under field conditions (TSBF, 1995; Materechera and
Snapp, 1995).


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems









5. Exploiting Interactions Between Soil Fertility Technologies And
Other Inputs And Management Factors
In southern Africa, the defining feature of the ecology is the 7-8 month dry season. This means
that farm operations, particularly planting, weeding, and fertilizing are concentrated in the
critical early weeks of the season. The options for addressing soil fertility are influenced by crop
choices, by the season, the climate, and by a range of other factors some of which the farmer
can control or modify, and some of which he or she cannot. Thus it is the interaction of soil
fertility technology with other, possibly more readily adoptable farmer inputs and management
practices that needs particular consideration. Interactions can be expected with weed control
practices, with moisture availability, with fertilizer responsive and efficient maize, with labor,
and with draught power.


5.1.1 Interactions With Weed Management
Kabambe and Kumwenda (1995) examined the interaction between weed growth and fertilizer
use efficiency in Malawi. Their results show that farmers who weed twice at the critical periods
for maize can achieve a higher yield, with half the amount of fertilizer, than farmers who only
weed once (see Figure 3). Where animal draught power is available, the options for exploring
interactions with weed management methods are increased (see Low and Waddington, 1990).
Results from Zambia show that combining basal and top-dress fertilizer, applied when weeding
the 20 cm tall maize resulted in a saving of six person days ha' during the peak demand period
for family labor. The practice also gave a 19 % yield increase compared with the standard
farmer practice of a basal application just after planting, followed by late weeding and top-
dressings (see Low and Waddington, 1990; 1991). These results were developed into separate
recommendations for ox-cultivators and for farmers who used hand hoes for weeding. Ox-
cultivators should weed with oxen two weeks after emergence while covering the mixed basal
and topdress fertilizer (applied immediately before) in the same operation. This should be
followed by hand weeding on the crop row within the subsequent two weeks. Hand-hoe
weeders were recommended to combine the first hoe-weeding with a mixed basal and topdress
fertilizer application, beginning 10 days after emergence. The second weeding would follow
two weeks later.

Soil fertility decline may cause the build-up of weeds (and pests and diseases) and thereby may
indirectly further affect crop production. A well-known example is Striga spp.. This parasitic
weed tends to build up when soils are depleted (although once it is established it is hard to
control just through improved soil fertility). Data from long-term trials in Kenya have shown
that incorporated crop residues play an important role in reducing Striga parasitism (Odhiambo
and Ransom, 1995).


5.1.2 Interactions With Moisture
The climate of southern Africa means that moisture is a frequent constraint to maize yield and
to yield response to fertilizer. The efficiency (measured through grain production) of both water
use and N use is raised when both are in adequate supply. But the high risk of poor response to
fertilizer in dry years is a major reason why most farmers in semi-arid areas use little or no
fertilizer. Over-dependence (as in Zimbabwe) on developing site specific fertilizer
recommendations through soil chemical analyses alone (see Grant, 1981; Metelerkamp, 1988),


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 22







and the concept of regular maintenance dressings (for K and P) has resulted in unrealistically
high recommendations for smallholder farms, especially those in semi-arid areas, that are rarely
used. Uncertainty exists on appropriate NPK fertilizer recommendations for semi-arid areas.
The utility and economics of fixed recommendations for such areas is increasingly questioned
(e.g., Mataruka et al., 1990; Shumba et al., 1990a; Piha, 1993; Page and Chonyera, 1994).

Smallholder farmer practice in Zimbabwe reflects the need for substantially revised fertilizer
recommendations. The frequency of application of inorganic fertilizer and the amounts applied
by farmers is strongly influenced by seasonal rainfall. Almost all smallholder farmers apply
some inorganic fertilizer to maize in the wetter areas (Natural Regions II and III). In a survey of
10 communal lands in such wetter areas Waddington et al. (1991) found that farmers applied an
average of 65 kg N ha'' to their earlier plantings of maize. But with late plantings (of lower
yield potential), N rates were cut to about 60% of those for earlier plantings.

In semi-arid areas, inorganic fertilizer use is low. Rohrbach (1988) found that in Chivi
communal area (which is representative of these conditions) less than 10% of farmers regularly
applied fertilizer. What fertilizer was used was usually low rates of topdress N. Zimbabwe data
from the 1991-4 seasons in Gutu (Natural Region IV) communal area show 80% of farmers
using an average of 19 kg N ha'' on fields that were monitored. In Chivi (Natural Region IV-V),
only 23% of farmers applied fertilizer at an average rate of 8 kg N ha'' (DR&SS/CIMMYT
unpublished). In intermediate areas such as Shurugwi-Chiwundura and Wedza most farmers
(79-91%) use topdress N but less than half applied basal fertilizer (see Huchu and Sithole,
1994).

A partial solution to excessive risk constraining fertilizer use in dry areas can be found in
"response farming" techniques (Stewart and Kashasha, 1984; Stewart, 1991) that use early
rainfall events to decide on the amounts of fertilizer to apply. Piha (1993) has explored the
interaction between nutrient use and rainfall in Zimbabwe. His data show how, by adjusting
fertilizer use to the evolving rainfall pattern in any one season, the profitability of fertilizer use
can be significantly increased. Trials over 5 years on farmers' fields, show that his approach
gave 25 42 % more yield and 21 41 % more profit than did existing fertilizer
recommendations. He arso showed that existing recommendations were too risky for lower
rainfall areas and needed to be adjusted downwards to be profitable.

Such techniques can be refined through use of crop simulation models to predict outcomes
under variable water and N conditions. When coupled to GIS, outputs can be used to delineate
target agro-ecological areas or groups of farmers for which a particular input level is appropriate
(e.g., Dent and Thornton, 1988; Keating et al, 1992). As an example, Keating et al. (1991),
using a version of the CERES-Maize simulation model modified for Kenya, was able to
quantify the economic risks associated with N application for Machakos and Kitui districts in
Kenya. The risk of economic loss from fertilizer application clearly rose as crop available
moisture declined.

The significance of the recent work by Piha (1993) and other similar efforts (see Stewart and
Kashasha, 1984; Stewart, 1991) is that productive and profitable agriculture is reliably possible
on poor soils, and in semi-arid conditions, with the judicious use of inorganic fertilizers. Many
of Africa's smallholders live in such environments.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems







6. Institutional Change In Research And Development Institutions

6.1 Addressing Smallholder Diversity
To deal with the variability in the smallholder farming community and to put in place affordable
programs that can address the many and different problems involved, the population needs to be
carefully and thoughtfully characterized into strata of coherent and useful size (see Blackie,
1995, for an example of stratification in this context). There are several ways in which
knowledge of the characteristics of different strata might be exploited to improve the impact of
new technologies. Two of these are explored as illustrations in the following sections.


6.1.1 Enhanced Farm Management Advice
There is no single route to improved maize productivity for African farmers. In the 'developed'
world, farmers were guided in the use of new and expensive technologies by carefully
formulated farm management advice. Such counsel is rarely available to African farmers. While
clearly the cost of having highly qualified farm management advisors readily available to all
African farmers is prohibitive, so too are the costs (both social and economic) of accepting the
cofitinuing decline in African farm productivity. Through joint ventures with donors and with
private sector input suppliers, farm management advice can be made available to those farmers
already using inputs and to those whose efficiency can be improved so as to make inputs
profitable.

The emphasis moves from making inputs "affordable" (by which is typically meant in a
subsidized form, with all the inherent problems and contradictions) to making them profitable.
It also moves from the diagnostic (typified by efforts in Farming Systems Research and various
forms of rapid rural appraisal) and the prescriptive (from top down extension efforts to the
training and visit (T+V) system favored by the World Bank) to a problem solving format in
which the farmer is actively involved. This will involve recommendations that are conditional
on circumstances and include IF and THEN decision making. It provides a framework for
effective research/extension linkages and facilitates the evolution of a demand driven
technology development process by smallholders.


6.1.2 Improving Productivity Of Those Farmers With The Fewest Resources
Particular attention needs to be paid to the agricultural production problems of the resource-
poorest farmers. This group is analogous to the long term unemployed who occupy the welfare
rolls of the developed world (and who remain an intractable problem for those better endowed
countries). It will include the old, the work-shy, the handicapped, and many single mothers and
widows. Their numbers may be substantial (as high as 40% of the smallholder population in
Malawi) and are growing. These are typically farmers who do not reliably feed themselves and
their families year on year. The poverty trap faced by the poorest families precludes their active
participation, under present circumstances, in a market economy (except as distress sellers of
labor and, sometimes, food). Both equity and reason indicate that they should not be ignored -
which, in fact, they are by the conventional technology development and extension process.

Cash crops can play an important role in priming the soil fertility input pump, by bringing extra
income to the farmer. In Malawi, for example, burley tobacco may be the only viable crop that


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize.BaMd Syte 24






can generate sufficient income for smallholders from their tiny land holdings to significantly
improve cash availability (Carr, 1994). But in many situations it is unrealistic to expect
sophisticated and possibly risky cash cropping to provide the first step to a better life for this
group of farmers. They are desperately short of cash, cannot afford the luxury of
experimentation, and often lack the confidence and the ability to deal, unaided, with many
aspects of modem society. Moreover, cash cropping depends on reliable and honest markets for
the inputs and outputs, and targeted production advice on a new commodity is essential for
farmers.

Credit is often proposed as a solution but is only of value to individuals who are periodically
S short of cash to purchase inputs. For those farmers who are chronically short of cash, other
alternatives will need to be sought. In some richer African countries, the informal financial
sector (which commonly includes such groups as Savings Clubs, and Rotating Savings and
Credit Associations) can be quite large. Clubs designed and operated by smallholders meet their
special needs for financial services. In Malawi, where individual savings are minute, an
innovative effort using a combination of start-up grants and savings mobilization has been
remarkably successful in reaching the poorest farmers around Dowa in central Malawi (VEZA
.project). It has introduced them to improved maize technologies, quickly moving them to
financial viability. Savings rather than credit, therefore, provides the mechanism for introducing
cash poor smallholders to improved technologies (Chimedza, 1993). The conventional wisdom
holds that most households in the smallholder sector have a low marginal propensity to save,
and therefore are not able to invest from savings. Experience has shown that the capacity to save
is rather larger than typically assumed which gives an important leverage point when dealing
with rural poverty. A sound macro-economic policy that maintains low monetary inflation is
important to support such efforts.


6.2 Institutional Change To Support Smallholder Productivity Increases
The successful implementation of the technology development and transfer processes outlined
in this paper requires commitment of substantial resources over extended periods. While the
private sector and the non-governmental organization (NGO) community will be essential
partners in this effort, high quality public sector research and extension will remain a critical
element to the process (see Blackie, 1994 for discussion on the role of the private sector). The
poor funding base of most African National Agricultural Research Systems (NARSs) means
that these institutions face high staff turnovers and often suffer from low morale on the part of
scientists remaining in post due to both poor financial incentives and the lack of resources with
which to undertake research. Hence the NARSs, on their own, are ill equipped to take on the
difficult task of maintaining institutional memory.

The agricultural technology development system in Africa is not well adapted to
comprehending and responding to the long term problems of the continent. Institutional
A memories are poor, inadequate budgets (and the poor use of the funds that are available) lead to
4 short lived, disparate project-orientated research which rarely is able to "follow through" to the
farmer. To an extent, in plant breeding, the international agricultural research system has been
: able to address these deficiencies. The results are apparent in the uptake of improved
germplasm. Structures for the maintenance of institutional memory for germplasm development
are comparatively well developed. The International Agricultural Research Centers have a long
and successful history of assisting NARSs in the development of improved varieties through


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems









drawing on international experience of varietal development. The Centers maintain a
comprehensive set of data on varietal characteristics, on breeding environments, and on pest and
disease pressures. A process of collaboration and training with NARS scientists exists and is
extensively used by plant breeders in developing countries.

By contrast, the effort to maintain a similar corpus of knowledge on crop management is
minuscule. The role of agronomists and social scientists in the international research community
is more poorly defined than that of plant breeders. Their numbers and influence are substantially
less, with the research vision and agenda for crop management being largely left in the hands of
the NARSs. The justification is that management issues are location specific and do not lend
themselves to the kind of broad brush support that has proved so useful in crop breeding.
Possibly this derives from the initial successes of the Green Revolution in Asia where improved
germplasm, with broad adaptability, was taken up and incorporated into improved productivity
packages by national scientists. In the African context, with a highly variable ecology and
farming community, ignoring management factors avoids the heart of the problem. The
continuing under-investment in long term support for high quality crop management technology
development has compromised the ability of the research community to answer the real
problems facing the African smallholder. Some effective ways of organizing an increased
commitment follow.


6.2.1 Maintaining Institutional Memory
Crop management research is typically reported in a highly distilled format in the form of
farmer recommendations. Such recommendations suffer from two important flaws. Firstly, as
has been well documented in the literature, they frequently fail to take into account the diversity
of farmer circumstances. Secondly, because of their highly distilled nature, they are not a good
repository for long term information. The data from which the recommendations are derived
may be lost long before the recommendation is discarded. Progress in soil fertility management
will require that information can be retrieved and shared efficiently amongst those concerned
with the promotion and development of improved technologies. Recent advances in computer
databases make this task easier. With the small size of many African research and extension
services, and their limited capacities, obvious opportunities arise from regional collaboration.
Some efforts in this direction have already been made (a recent example is the Southern African
Center for Cooperation in Agricultural Research and Training (SACCAR)) but have failed to
realize their potential.

To get the needed impacts from soil fertility work will require a long term commitment to
research and extension by interdisciplinary, inter-institutional and inter-country groups of staff
that not only include technical scientists but also social scientists, extensionists, the private
sector, and NGO staff. Opportunities need to be created for such staff to work closer together on
common topics and trials. A climate of mutual review and criticism is essential. Financial
constraints mean no one country or institution can bring sufficient resources to bear on these
widespread, complex issues. There is a clear need for continuity in resources focused on soil
fertility improvement, efficiencies from regional co-operation in the use of those resources, and
better regional access to results. One way of developing a more integrated approach is through
formal networks. A variety of networks related to soil fertility are underway at several levels.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems






The most important process-orientated soil fertility research network in Africa is AfNet run by
the Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Program (TSBF). AfNet brings together African
scientists to work on improving the synchronization of soil nutrient supply to nutrient demand
by the crop, through site characterization and the use of common methods (e.g., Seward, 1995).

A good example of a more applied soil fertility research and extension network is the network
established in late 1994 by the Rockefeller Foundation with national research and extension
programs in Malawi and Zimbabwe, and CIMMYT. This Network emphasizes joint research
priority setting, planning and integration through meetings and peer review; the conduct of
priority research, including network trials across maize-based agro-ecologies; information
exchange and training for network scientists, and the distribution and use of output information
through enhanced interaction between the farmer, extension and research (Waddington, 1995).

The above examples overcome some of the negative attributes of previous networking efforts;
they are internally driven by the participating scientists rather than by outside donors. But this is
not a sufficient condition for success in addressing client needs. We need to move forward
further to networks that take the lead on integrating farmers, NGOs, extension services and
policy makers with research in the testing and dissemination of appropriate soil fertility
technology.

Acknowledgments

We thank Paul Heisey, Greg Edmeades, Derek Byerlee and Carl Eicher for many helpful
suggestions on earlier drafts of this review.


7. References
Anderson, J.M. and Ingram, J.S.I. (eds.) 1993. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of
Methods, 2nd Ed. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.
Andrews, D.J. and Kassam, A.H. 1976. The importance of multiple cropping in increasing world food
supplies. In: Multiple Cropping. Special Publication no. 27. American Society of Agronomy,
Madison, USA.
Araki, S. 1993. Effect on soil organic matter and soil fertility of the chitemene slash-and-bum practice
used in northern Zambia. In: Mulongoy, K. and Merckx, R. (eds.) Proceedings Soil Organic
Matter Dynamics and Sustainability of Tropical Agriculture. Wiley-Sayce, Chichester, UK. pp.
367-375.
Barrios, E., Buresh, R.J. and Sprent, J.I. 1994. Soil organic matter size and density fractions in
contrasting annual and perennial legume systems. Paper presented at the XV International
Congress of Soil Science, Acapulco, Mexico.
Blackie, M.J. 1994. Maize productivity for the 21st century: the African challenge. Outlook on
Agriculture 23, 189-195.
Blackie, M.J. and Jones, R.B. 1993. Agronomy and increased maize productivity in southern Africa.
Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 9, 147-160.
Blackie, M.J. 1995. Identifying smallholder farmer target groups at a local, national or regional level:
A food security based approach. In: Waddington, S.R. (ed.) Report on the First Meeting of the
Network Working Group. Soil Fertility Research Network for Maize-Based Farming Systems in


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems







Selected Countries of Southern Africa. The Rockefeller Foundation Southern Africa
Agricultural Sciences Programme, Lilongwe, Malawi and CIMMYT Maize Programme,
Zimbabwe.
Buddenhagen, I. 1992. Prospects and challenges for African agricultural systems: an evolutionary
approach. Paper presented at the Carter Lecture Series on Sustainability in Africa: Integrating
Concepts. University of Florida, Gainsville, USA.
Bunderson, W.T. 1994. Comparative maize yields under alley cropping with different hedge species in
the Lilongwe Plains. Mimeo.
Bunderson, W.T., Saka, A.R., Itimu, O.A., Mbekeani, Y. and Phombeya, H.S.K. 1991. Management
of alley cropping with maize (Zea mays) and Leucaena leucocephala in Malawi. In: Saka,
A.R., Bunderson, W.T. and Maghembe, J. (eds.) Proceedings, Agroforestry Research and
Development in Malawi. Department of Agricultural Research, Lilongwe, Malawi. pp. 171-
182.
Byerlee, D., with Anandajayasekeram, P., Diallo, A., Gelaw, B., Heisey, P.W., Lopez-Pereira, M.,
Mwangi, W., Smale, M., Tripp, R. and Waddington, S. 1994. Maize Research in Sub-Saharan
Africa: An Overview of Past Impacts and Future Prospects. CIMMYT Economics Working
Paper 94-03. Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Cambardella, C.A. and Elliot, E.T. 1994. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics of soil organic matter fractions
from cultivated grasslands. Soil Science Society ofAmerica Journal 58, 123-130.
Carr, S. 1994. The unique challenge of Malawi's smallholder agricultural sector. Mimeo.
Carter, S.E. (ed.) 1993. Soil fertility management in Mutoko communal area, Zimbabwe. Report of a
Field Exercise, August 12 September 3, 1992. TSBF, Nairobi, Kenya, 75pp.
Chang, J.F. and Shibles, R.M. 1985. An analysis of competition between intercropped cowpea and
maize. II. The effect of fertilizer and plant population. Field Crops Research 12, 145-152.
Chimedza, R.M. 1993. A study of the savings behaviour of rural households using asset portfolio
analysis: The case of Zwimba Communal Area in Zimbabwe. PhD Thesis, Department of
Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Zimbabwe.
Christensen, B.T. 1992. Physical fractionation of soil and organic matter in primary particles and
density separates. Advances in Soil Science 20, 2-90.
CIMMYT 1992. CIMMYT 1991/92 World Maize Facts and Trends. Maize Research and Impacts in
Developing Countries. Mexico, D.F.,. CIMMYT, Mexico.
CIMMYT 1994. CIMMYT 1993/94 World Maize Facts and Trends. Maize Seed Industries
Revisited:Emerging Roles of Public and Private Sectors. Mexico, D.F., CIMMYT, Mexico.
Conroy, A.C. 1993. The economics of smallholder maize production in Malawi with reference to the
market for seed and fertilizer. PhD Thesis. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Conroy, A.C. and Kumwenda, J.D.T. 1995. Risks associated with the adoption of hybrid seed and
fertilizer by smallholder farmers in Malawi. In: Jewell, D., Waddington, S.R., Ransom, J.K. and
Pixley, K.V. (eds.) Maize Research for Stress Environments, CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Dalal, R.C. 1974. Effects of intercropping maize with pigeonpea on grain yield and nutrient uptake.
Experimental Agriculture 10, 219-224.
De Ruiter, P.C., Moore, J.C., Zwart, K.B., Bouwmann, L.A., Hassink, J., Bloem, J., De Vos, J.A.,
Marinissen, J.C.Y., Didden, W.A.M., Lebbink, G. and Brussaard, L. 1993. Simulation of
nitrogen mineralization in the below ground food webs of two winter wheat fields. Journal of
Applied Ecology 3 0, 95-106.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems








Dennison, E.B. 1961. The value of farmyard manure in maintaining fertility in northern Nigeria.
Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 29, 330-336.
Dent, J.B. and Thornton, P.K. 1988. The role of biological simulation models in farming systems
research. Agricultural Administration and Extension 29, 111-122.
Doran, J.W., Fraser, D.G., Culik, M.N. and Liebhardt, W.C. 1987. Influence of alternative and
conventional agricultural management on soil microbial processes and nitrogen availability.
American Journal ofAlternative Agriculture 2, 99-106.
FAO 1988. FAO Year Book, FAO, Rome.
Fresco, L.O. and Kroonenberg, S.B. 1992. Time and spatial scales in ecological sustainability. Land Use
Policy. Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 155-168.
Gilbert, E., Phillips, L.C., Roberts, W., Sarch, M-T., Smale, M. and Stroud, A. 1993. Maize Research
Impact in Africa: The Obscured Revolution. Report prepared for the Division of Food,
Agriculture and Resources Analysis, Bureau for Africa, US Agency for International
Development.
Giller, K.E., McDonagh, J.F. and Cadisch, G. 1994. Can biological nitrogen fixation sustain agriculture
in the tropics? In: Syers, J.K. and Rimmer, D.L. (eds.) Soil Science and Sustainable Land
Management in the Tropics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. pp. 173-191.
Giller, K.E., Itimu, 0. and Masamba, C. 1995. Nutrient sourcing by agroforestry species and soil
fertility maintenance in maize associations. Paper presented at the Second Meeting of the Soil
Fertility Network Working Group for Maize-Based Farming Systems, 17 21 July 1995,
Kadoma, Zimbabwe.
Giri, G. and De, R. 1980. Effects of preceding grain legumes on growth and nitrogen uptake of dryland
pearl millet. Plant and Soil 56, 459-464.
Granados, G., Pandey, S. and Ceballos, H. 1993. Response to selection for tolerance to acid soils in a
tropical maize population. Crop Science 33, 936-940.
Granastein, D.M., Bezdicek, D.F., Cochran, V.L., Elliot, L.F. and Hammel, J. 1987. Long-term tillage
and rotation effects on soil microbial biomass, carbon, and nitrogen. Biology and Fertility of Soils
5, 265-270.
Grant, P.M. 1981. The fertilization of sandy soils in peasant agriculture. Zimbabwe Agricultural Journal
78, 169-175.
Heisey, P.W. and Mwangi, W. 1995. Fertilizer and maize production in sub-Saharan Africa: Use and
policy options. Paper presented at a workshop on The Emerging Maize Revolution in Africa: The
Role of Technology, Institutions and Policy, 9-12 July 1995, Michigan State University, East
Lansing, USA.
HIID 1994. Fertiliser policy study:market structure, prices and fertilizer use by smallholder farmers.
Harvard Institute for International Development and Economic Planning and Development
Department, Office of the President and Cabinet, Government of Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Mimeo.
Hikwa, D. and Mukurumbira, L. 1995. Highlights of previous, current and proposed soil fertility
research by the Department of Research and Specialist Services (DRSS) in Zimbabwe. In:
Waddington, S.R. (ed.) Report on the First Meeting of the Network Working Group. Soil Fertility
Research Network for Maize-Based Farming Systems in Selected Countries of Southern Africa.
The Rockefeller Foundation Southern Africa Agricultural Sciences Programme, Lilongwe,
Malawi and CIMMYT Maize Programme Harare, Zimbabwe. pp. 21-33.
Huchu, P. and Sithole, P.N. 1994. Rates of adoption of new technology and climatic risk in the
communal areas of Zimbabwe. In: Craswell, E.T. and Simpson, J. (eds.) Soil Fertility and


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 29









Climatic Constraints in Dryland Agriculture. ACIAR Proceedings No.54, Canberra, Australia,
pp. 44-50.
Jackson, L.E., Strauss, R.B., Firestone, M.K. and Bartolome, J.W. 1988. Plant and soil nitrogen
dynamics in California annual grassland. Plant Soil 110, 9-17.
Jenkinson, D.S. 1981. The fate of plant and animal residues in soil. In: Greenland, D.J. and Hayes,
M.H.B. (eds.), The Chemistry of Soil Processes. John Wiley and Sons, pp. 505-561.
Jones, M.J. 1974. Effects of previous crop on yield and nitrogen response of maize at Samaru, Nigeria.
Experimental Agriculture 10, 278-279.
Jones, R.B. and Wendt, J.W. 1995. Contribution of soil fertility research to improved maize production
by smallholders in southern Africa. In: Jewell, D., Waddington, S.R., Ransom, J.K. and Pixley,
K.V. (eds.) Maize Research for Stress Environments, CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Jones, R.B., Wendt, J.W., Bunderson, W.T. and Itimu, O.A. 1995a. The effects of N and P
application on soil properties, maize yield, and nutrient uptake in a Leucaena alley cropping
system. Mimeo.
Jones, R.B., Snapp, S.S., Giller, K.G. and Phombeya, H.S.K. 1995b. Effect of organic matter quality
on N fertilizer use efficiency as measured by 5N recovery in maize and soil. Paper to be
presented at Driven by Nature Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition Conference, Wye
College, UK.
Kabambe, V.H. and Kumwenda, J.D.T. 1995. Weed management and nitrogen rate effects on maize
yield in Malawi. In: Jewell, D., Waddington, S.R., Ransom, J.K. and Pixley, K.V. (eds.) Maize
Research for Stress Environments, CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kang, B.T.. Reynolds, L. and Atta-Krah, A.N. 1990. Alley farming. Agronomy Abstracts 43, 315-359.
Keating. B.A., Godwin, D.C. and Watiki, J.M. 1991. Optimizing nitrogen inputs in response to climatic
risk. In: Muchow, R.C. and Bellamy, J.A. (eds.) Climatic Risk in Crop Production: Models and
Management for the Semiarid Tropics and Subtropics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp.
329-358.
Keating, B.A., Wafula, B.M. and Watiki, J.M. 1992. Development of a modeling capability for maize in
semi-arid Eastern Kenya. In: Probert, M.E. (ed.) A Search for Strategies for Sustainable Dryland
Cropping in Semi-arid Eastern Kenya. ACIAR Proceedings No.41, Canberra, pp.26-33.
Kumwenda, J.D.T. 1995. Soybean spatial arrangement in a maize/soybean intercrop in Malawi. Paper
presented at the Second African Crop Science Conference for Eastern and Central Africa, 19-24
February 1995, Blantyre, Malawi.
Kumwenda, J.D.T., Kabambe, V.H.K. and Sakala, W.D.M. 1993. Maize-soybean and maize-bean
intercropping experiments. Maize Agronomy Annual Report for 1992/93. Chitedze Agricultural
Research Station, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Kwesiga, F. and Coe, R. 1994. The effect of short rotation Sesbania sesban planted fallows on maize
yield. Forest Ecology and Management 64, 199-208.
Ladd, J.N. and Amato, M. 1985. Nitrogen cycling in legume-cereal rotations. In: Kang, B.T. and van der
Heide, J. (eds.), Nitrogen Management in Farming Systems in Humid and Sub-Humid Tropics.
IITA and ISF, The Netherlands, pp. 105-127.
Lafitte, H.R. and Edmeades, G.O. 1994a. Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical
maize. I. Selection criteria. Field Crops Research 39, 1-14.
Lafitte, H.R. and Edmeades, G.O. 1994b. Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical
maize. II. Grain yield, biomass production, and N accumulation. Field Crops Research 39, 15-25.
Lele, U. 1992. Aid to African Agriculture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research ror Maize-Based Systems 30







Low, A.R.C. and Waddington, S.R. 1990. On-farm research on maize production technologies for
smallholder farmers in southern Africa: Current achievements and future prospects. In:
Gebrekidan, B. (ed.), Maize Improvement, Production and Protection in eastern and southern
Africa. CIMMYT, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 491-511.
Low, A., and Waddington, S.R. 1991. Farming systems adaptive research: Achievements and prospects
in southern Africa. ExperimentalAgriculture 27, 115-125.
MacColl, D. 1989. Studies on maize (Zea mays L.) at Bunda, Malawi. II. Yield in short rotation with
legumes. ExperimentalAgriculture 25, 367-374.
Manson, S.C., Leighner, D.E. and Vorst, J.J. 1986. Cassava-cowpea and cassava-peanut intercropping.
III. Nutrient concentration and removal. Agronomy Journal 78, 441-444.
Mariga, I.K. 1990. Effect of cowpea planting date and density on the performance of a maize-cowpea
intercrop. Zimbabwe Journal ofAgricultural Research 28, 25-131.
Mashiringwani, N.A. 1983. The present nutrient status of the soils in the Communal Farming Areas of
Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Agricultural Journal 80, 73-75.
Mataruka, D.F., Makombe, G. and Low, A. 1990. The contribution of economic analysis in developing
promising research agendas: A maize nitrogen x phosphorus trial in Zimbabwe. Farming Systems
Bulletin, Eastern and Southern Africa 5, 1-5.
Materechera, S.A. and Snapp, S.S. 1995. Novel assay method to quantify residue decomposition in
Malalwi cropping systems. Paper presented at Driven by Nature, Plant Litter Quality and
Decomposition Conference, Wye College, UK.
Mbekeani, Y. 1991. Effects of spacing on water relations, light interception and biomass partitioning in
a Leucaena-maize alley cropping system. MSc thesis, Washington State University, Pullman,
USA.
Metelerkamp, H.R.R. 1988. Review of crop research relevant to the semiarid areas of Zimbabwe. In:
Proceedings of a workshop on Cropping in the Semiarid Areas of Zimbabwe.
Agritex/DR&SS/GTZ, Harare, Zimbabwe, pp. 190-315.
Mugwira, L.M. and Mukurumbira, L.M. 1984. Comparative effectiveness of manures from the
communal area and commercial feedlots as plant nutrient sources. Zimbabwe Agricultural
Journal 81, 241-250.
Mugwira, L.M. and Shumba, E.M. 1986. Rate of manure applied in some communal areas and their
effect on plant growth and maize grain yields. Zimbabwe Agricultural Journal 83, 99-104.
Mukurumbira, L.M. 1985. Effects of rate of fertilizer nitrogen and previous grain legume crop on maize
yields. Zimbabwe Agricultural Journal 82, 177-179.
Munguri, M.W., Mariga, I.K. and Chivinge, O.A. 1995. The potential of optimizing cattle manure use
with maize in Chinyika Resettlement Area, Zimbabwe. Paper presented at the Second Meeting of
the Soil Fertility Network Working Group for Maize-Based Farming Systems, 17-21 July 1995,
Kadoma, Zimbabwe.
Murwira, H. 1994. Nitrogen dynamics in a sandy Zimbabwean soil under manure fertilization. In: TSBF
1994 Annual Report, Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Myers, R.J.K., Palm, C.A., Cuevas, E., Gunatilleke, I.U.N. and Brossard, M. 1994. The synchronization
of nutrient mineralization and plant nutrient demand. In: Woomer, P.I. and Swift, M.J. (eds.), The
Biological Management of Tropical Soil Fertility, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK. pp. 81-
116.
Nandwa, S.M., Anderson, J.M. and Seward, P.D. 1995. The effect of placement of maize stover and N
fertilization on maize productivity and N use efficiency in the semi-arid and sub-humid agro-


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 31







ecological zones of Kenya. In: Jewell, D., Waddington, S.R.,Ransorn,*J.K. aid Pixley, K.V.
(eds.), Maize Research for Stress Environments, CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe.;
Natarajan, M. and Shumba, E.M. 1990. Intercropping research in Zimbabwe: Current status and outlook
for the future. In: Waddington, S.R, Palmer, A.F.E. and Edje, O.T. (eds.)'Research Methods for
Cereal/Legume Intercropping, CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F., Mexico, pp.190-193.
Odhiambo, G. and Ransom, J.K. 1995. Long term strategies for Striga control. In: Jewell, D.,
Waddington, S.R., Ransom, J.K. and Pixley, K.V. (eds.) Maize Research for Stress Environments,
CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe. ; -,. ,
Okalebo, J.R., Gathua, K.W. and Woomer, P.L. 1993. Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis:
A Working Manual. KARI and TSBF, Nairobi, Kenya. i ;'
Ong, C. 1994. Alley cropping ecological pie in the sky? Agroforestry Today 6, 8-10.
Page, S. and Chonyera, P. 1994. The promotion of maize fertilizer packages: a cause of household food
insecurity and peasant impoverishment in high rainfall areas 'of Zimbabwe. Development
Southern Africa 11, 301-320.
Parton, K.A.. 1992. Socio-economic modelling of decision making with respect to choice technology by
resource-poor farmers. In: Probert, M.E. (ed.) A Search for Strategies for Sustainable Dryland
Cropping in Semi-arid Eastern Kenya. ACIAR Proceedings No.41, Canberra, pp. 110-118.
Piha, M.I. 1993. Optimizing fertilizer use and practical rainfall capture in a semi-arid environment with
variable rainfall. Experimental Agriculture 29, 405-415.
Pinstrup-Andersen, P. 1993. World food trends and how they may be modified. International Food
Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C., USA.
Pixley, K.V. 1995. CIMMYT mid-altitude maize breeding program. Report of activities during 1993/94.
In: Annual Research Report CIMMYT-Zimbabwe, November 1993 to October 1994. CIMMYT,
Harare, Zimbabwe, pp. 7-39.
Place, F., Mwanza, S. and Kwesiga, F. 1995. A cost-benefit analysis of improved fallows in Eastern
Province, Zambia. (Mimeo).
Rohrbach, D.D. 1988. The growth of smallholder maize production in Zimbabwe: Causes and
implications for food security. PhD thesis, Michigan State University, USA.
Saka, A.R., Bunderson, W.T., Itimu, O.A., Phombeya, H.S.K. and Mbekeani, Y. 1994. The effects of
Acacia albida on soils and maize grain yields under smallholder farm conditions in Malawi.
Forest Ecology and Management 64, 217-230.
Saka, A.R., Phombeya, H.K.S., Jones, R.B., Minae, S. and Snapp, S.S. 1995. Agroforestry
Commodity Team Annual Report 1993/94 Season. Department of Agricultural Research,
Lilongwe, Malawi.
Sakala, W.D.M. 1994. Crop management interventions in traditional maize pigeonpea intercropping
systems in Malawi. MSc Thesis, Bunda College of Agriculture, University of Malawi,
Lilongwe, Malawi.
Sanchez, P.A. 1995. Tropical soil fertility research: Towards the second paradigm. Mimeo.
Seward, P.D. 1995. The Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility (TSBF) Program in southern Africa. In:
Waddington, S.R. (ed.) Report on the First Meeting of the Network Working Group. Soil Fertility
Research Network for Maize-Based Farming Systems in Selected Countries of Southern Africa.
The Rockefeller Foundation Southern Africa Agricultural Sciences Programme, Lilongwe,
Malawi and CIMMYT Maize Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe. pp.13-20.
Short, K.E., and Edmeades, G.O. 1991. Maize improvement for water and nitrogen deficient
environments. In: MacRobert, J.F. (ed.) Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of Zimbabwe


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 32








Twenty-First Anniversary Crop Production Congress. Crop Science Society of Zimbabwe,
Harare. pp. 63-68.
Shumba, E. 1989. Maize technology research in Mangwende, a high potential communal area
environment in Zimbabwe. Part 2: The on-farm experimental program. Farming Systems
Bulletin, Eastern and Southern Africa 1, 1-13.
Shumba, E.M., Dhliwayo, H.H., Kupfuma, B. and Gumbie, C. 1990a. Response of maize in rotation
with cowpea to NPK fertilizer in a low rainfall area. Zimbabwe Journal ofAgricultural Research
28,39-45.
Shumba, E.M., Dhliwayo, H.H. and Mukoko, O.Z. 1990b. The potential of maize-cowpea intercropping
in low rainfall areas of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal ofAgricultural Research 28, 33-38.
Smaling, E. 1993. Soil nutrient depletion in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Van Reuler, H. and Prins, W. (eds.)
The Role of Plant Nutrients for Sustainable Food Crop Production in sub-Saharan Africa.
Leidschendam: VKP.
Snapp, S.S. 1995. Improving fertilizer efficiency with small additions of high quality organic inputs. In:
Waddington, S.R. (ed.), Report on the First Meeting of the Network Working Group. Soil Fertility
Research Network for Maize-Based Farming Systems in Selected Countries of Southern Africa.
The Rockefeller Foundation Southern Africa Agricultural Sciences Programme, Lilongwe,
Malawi and CIMMYT Maize Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe. pp. 60-65.
Snapp, S.S., Phombeya, H.S.K. and Materechera, S. 1995. An agroforestry based test of new
fractionation methods in soil organic matter analysis. Crop Science Society of Zimbabwe. 25th
Anniversary Symposium. June, 1995. Harare, Zimbabwe.
Stewart, J.I. 1991. Principles and performance of response farming. In: Muchow, R.C. and Bellamy,
J.A. (eds.) Climatic Risk in Crop Production: Models and Management for the Semiarid Tropics
andSubtropics, CAB International, Wallingford, UK. pp.361-382.
Stewart, J.I. and Kashasha, D.A.R. 1984. Rainfall criteria to enable response farming through crop-
based climate analysis. East African Agriculture and Forestry Journal, Special Issue, pp.58-79.
Stoorvogel, J.J., Smaling, E.M.A., and Janssen, B.H. 1993. Calculating soil nutrient balances in Africa
at different scales. I. Supranational scale. Fertilizer Research 35, 227-235.
Swift, M.J. and Woomer, P. 1993. Organic matter and the sustainability of agricultural systems:
Definition and measurement. In: Mulongoy, K and Merckx, R. (eds.) Soil Organic Matter
Dynamics and Sustainability of Tropical Agriculture. Wiley-Sayce, Chichester, UK. pp.3-18.
Tagwira, F. 1995. Current and proposed soil fertility research at Africa University. In: Waddington, S.R.
(ed.). Report on the First Meeting of the Network Working Group, Soil Fertility Research
Network for Maize-Based Farming Systems in Selected Countries of Southern Africa. The
Rockefeller Foundation Southern Africa Agricultural Sciences Programme, Lilongwe, Malawi
and CIMMYT Maize Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe, pp. 39-41.
Temu, A.E.M. 1982. Rotational green manuring with Crotalaria in the southern highlands of Tanzania.
Southern Highlands Maize Improvement Program, Progress Report, Tanzania.
Tripp, R. 1992. Expectations and realities in on-farm research. Farming Systems Bulletin, Eastern and
Southern Africa 11, 1-13.
TSBF 1995. The biology and fertility of tropical soils. Report of the Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility
Program 1994. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Waddington, S.R. 1994. Overview of the current situation and previous impact of adaptive agricultural
research in southern Africa In: Craswell, E.T. and Simpson, J. (eds.) Soil Fertility and Climatic
Constraints in DrylandAgriculture. ACIAR Proceedings No.54, Canberra, Australia, pp. 7-14.



Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems 33









Waddington, S.R. 1995. (ed.) Report on the First Meeting of the Network Working Group. Soil Fertility
Research Networkfor Maize-Based Farming Systems in Selected Countries of Southern Africa.
The Rockefeller Foundation Southern Africa Agricultural Sciences Programme, Lilongwe,
Malawi and CIMMYT Maize Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe, 110pp.
Waddington, S.R., Mudhara, M., Hlatshwayo, M. and Kunjeku, P. 1991. Extent and causes of low yield
in maize planted late by smallholder farmers in sub-humid areas of Zimbabwe. Farming Systems
Bulletin, Eastern and Southern Africa 9, 15-31.
Weber, M., Staaz, J., Holtzman, J., Crawford, E. and Bernsten, R. 1988. Informing food security
decisions in Africa: empirical analysis and dialogue. American Journal of Agricultural
Economics 70, 1045-1054.
Wendt, J.W., Jones, R.B., and Itimu, O.A. 1994. An integrated approach to soil fertility improvement in
Malawi, including agroforestry. In: Craswell, E.T. and Simpson, J. (eds.) Soil Fertility and
Climatic Constraints in DrylandAgriculture. ACIAR Proceedings No.54, Canberra, pp. 74-79.
Wendt, J.W., Jones, R.B., Bunderson, W.T. and Itimu, O.A. 1995. Residual effects of Leucaena leaf
application, leaf removal, and P application on maize yields, maize nutrient uptake, and soil
properties in an alley cropping system. Mimeo.
Willey, R.W. 1979. Intercropping its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield
advantages. Field Crops Abstracts 32, 1-10.
Woomer, P.L., Martin, A., Albrecht, A., Resck, D.V.S., and Scharpenseel, H.W. 1994. The importance
and management of soil organic matter in the tropics. In: Woomer, P.L. and Swift, M.J. (eds.)
The Biological Management of Tropical Soil Fertility. Wiley-Sayce, Chichester, UK, pp.47-80.
Young, A. 1989. Agroforestry for Soil Conservation. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 276pp.
Zambezi, B.T. Kumwenda, J.D.T. and Jones, R.B. 1993. Closing the maize yield gap in Malawi. In:
Munthali, D.C., Kumwenda, J.D.T. and Kisyombe, F. (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on
Agricultural Research for Development. Department of Agricultural Research, Lilongwe and
Chancellor College, Zomba, Malawi.


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems


















Figure 1. Malawi Maize Production Scenarios for 1995-2015


-2.50


to CD r- Co o O CD C M 'r (-O tD o- O o 0) 0 a) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0- o- o o- -
0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0- T- C- C- C- N N C4 N NN 4N N% NM r CN N N


Year
I-i (Scenario 2) Hybrid Maize Area Increases
-e- Population (Millions)


m(Scenario 3) As 2 + Better Management
-- (Scenario 1) Current Maize & Management


20

18

16

14
0
= 12
E
C 10

5 8
0.
CL 6

4

2


1.50


1.00


0.50 c
o
0.00


-0.50

-l.oo
-1.00 C.


-1.50 .


-2.00


I _









Table 1. Examples of gains in maize yield through inorganic/organic fertilizer combinations at
levels practicable on-farm in Malawi and Zimbabwe. These gains are from the first cropping
season after fertilizer application. Additional gains can be expected in following seasons.


Organic Inorganic Location
Fertilizer Fertilizer and Season Maize Grain Yield (t ha')

No Organic Inorganic Organic + Yield of
Fertilizer Alone Alone Inorganic combination as
Combination a percent of
alone
treatments


Leucaena 30 kg N ha" Chitedze 2.24 3.32 2.72 3.60 119
leucocephala alley applied to Research
cropped with maize crop Station,
maize. 1.5 2.5 t Malawi
ha' Leucaena leaf 1988-1990
prunings applied
to maize

Pigeonpea 48 kg N ha' Lunyangwa 0.87 1.70 1.98 2.31 126
intercropped with applied to Research
maize previous maize crop Station,
season. Pigeonpea Malawi
residues 1993-1995
incorporated into
soil

Cattle manure 112kg N, 17 6 communal 0.79 1.11 1.30 1.93 160
13-25 t ha"' kg P and 16 farms in
broadcast and kg K ha" as a Wedza and
ploughed in before split basal and Chinyika,
planting topdress Zimbabwe
1994/95, a
drought year


Soil Fertility Network Results Working Paper 1: Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Systems








Table 2. The relief of micronutrient deficiencies on maize in Malawi, as an example of a long term research process.

1987 89 1989 90 1990 91 1991 92 1992 93 1993 94 1994 95 and onwards


Activities and Methods
* Review Missing nutrient trials at 10 on farm &
past trials station sites in selected areas
and conduct Soil and tissue chemical analysis at sites
farm surveys


Key Outputs
* Micronutrient Regional deficiencies of S, Zn, B &K found
deficiency Yields increase by 40 % over standard NP
likely cause when micronutrient deficiencies satisfied
of yields < 3t P not needed at some sites while others
per ha with need more than current recommendation
current NPK More verification with farmers needed
recommendation


Organizations


* Nutrient
supplement
treatments to
on farm demos
* Soil analysis
at 400 sites in
central Malawi







* Near universal
S & Zn deficiency
in some ADDs
* Confirmed yield
responses
* Optichem to
produce 20:20:5
+4S+0.1Zn and
15:10:5+4S+0.1Zn


* Map regional nutrient deficiencies
* Formulate new basal fertilizers and distribute
* Collect and analyze soil from 3000 geo-
referenced sites throughout Malawi
* Verification trials of new fertilizers at several
hundred on-farm sites, involving farmers
Use GIS to map sites
Better target verifications
to sites deficient in S & Zn,
involve extension & farmers
N response trials at sites
where micronutrient
deficiencies satisfied


* Good yield
response to
basal ferts
containing S
,* Responses at
low Zn sites
were poor,
0.1Zn is
insufficient


* Optichem to produce comp-
ound fertilizer with 1Zn
* Include results from better
targeted verifications in
new recommendations
* Results from response
economics
* Results from N response
trials where micronutrients
relieved


* Maize and Soils Commodity Research Teams in the Department of Agricultural Research, Ministry of Agriculture
* Smallholder Farmers
FAO/MoA/UNDP project
Fertilizer Maker (Optichem)
MoA Extension Service


*I-"* - -- *





























1. INORGANIC ONLY 2. INORGANIC + ORGANIC
Figure 2. The role of high quality organic inputs in improving the efficiency of inorganic
fertilizer use. Rapid cycling between inorganic N and soil microbe N allows the plant to
take up N without a large pool of inorganic N which is vulnerable to leaching.









Figure 3. Effect of weeding frequency and N application on
maize grain yield


90


kg N ha-1


Weeding
at 21, 45
and 54


Weeding I
at 21 Weeding
at 21 at 28 No
and 45 weeding


Weeding times (days after planting)












Source: Kabambe and Kumwenda, 1995
















































Soil Fertility Network for Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Countries of
Southern Africa


Soil Fertility Network Coordinator
CIMMYT Maize Research Station
P.O. Box MP 163
Mount Pleasant
Harare, Zimbabwe

Phone: (263) 4 301807
Fax/Phone: (263) 4 301327


The University of Zimbabwe Farm
12.5 km Peg
Mazowe Road



E-Mail: CIMMYT-Zimbabwe@CGNET.com











COPYRIGHT NOTICE

CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center

The CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement
Center holds all rights to the source text and shall be
considered the copyright holder for the text and images of
these publications.

The CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement
Center has made this publication available to the University of
Florida, for purposes of digitization and Internet distribution.

The CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement
Center reserves all rights to this publication. All uses,
excluding those made under "fair use" provisions of U.S.
Code, Title 17, Section 107 are restricted.

Contact the CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat
Improvement Center for additional information and
permissions.




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs