• TABLE OF CONTENTS
HIDE
 Front Cover
 Title Page
 Acknowledgement
 Table of Contents
 List of Tables
 List of Figures
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Erosion of South Beach at Jupiter...
 Methodology
 Results and analysis
 Summary and conclusions
 Appendix A: Sand tracer study
 Appendix B: Physical model experiments:...
 Appendix C: Monthly log-normal...
 References
 Biographical sketch






Group Title: UFL/COEL (University of Florida. Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering Laboratory) ; 91/015
Title: The Influence of seasonal variation in longshore sediment transport with applications to the erosion of the downdrift beach at Jupiter Inlet, Florida
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00078629/00001
 Material Information
Title: The Influence of seasonal variation in longshore sediment transport with applications to the erosion of the downdrift beach at Jupiter Inlet, Florida
Abbreviated Title: UFLCOEL
Physical Description: xiii, 138 leaves : ill. ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Harris, Philip S., 1966- ( Dissertant )
Thieke, Robert J. ( Thesis advisor )
Mehta, Ashish ( Reviewer )
Dean, Robert ( Reviewer )
University of Florida -- Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering Dept
Publisher: Coastal & Oceanographic Engineering Dept., University of Florida
Publication Date: 1991
 Subjects
Subjects / Keywords: Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering thesis M. Eng   ( local )
Dissertations, Academic -- Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering -- UF   ( local )
Genre: bibliography   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
 Notes
Abstract: Erosion of downdrift beaches Is a problem commonly associated with most tidal inlets. Thus, it is undoubtedly a major consideration when pursuing an effective tidal inlet management plan. Various sand bypassing simulations at Jupiter Inlet, Florida, were examined through the use of synthetic longshore transport rates generated from wind hindcast was data in incorporation with local sediment budgets. In order to determine whether sand from the downdrift beach was infiltrating around the south jetty and into the inlet during flood tide, a sand tracer study was conducted three different times over a one year period. Similarly, sediment transport patterns pertaining to the downdrift beach o Jupiter Inlet were also investigated throughout the use of a drogue study performed in a physical model located at the Coastal and Oceanographic Laboratory at the University of Florida. Finally, in an attempt to determine the most optimal jetty configuration at Jupiter Inlet, different jetty modifications were implemented into the drogue study. It was found that annual renourishment of the downdrift beach at Jupiter Inlet before the specified nonpumping window would be most beneficial. By renourishing the downdrift beach in early March, a larger beach would be present throughout the summer, aiding nesting turtle s and appealing to summer vacationers. It was also determined that the jetty adjacent to the downdrift beach at Jupiter Inlet was indeed “leaking” (and was migrating from the downdrift beach, around the downdrift jetty, and into the inlet). Traces of fluorescent colored sand were found inside the inlet on two different occasions, some of the sand remnants of a tracer experiment conducted eight months prior. Finally, it was concluded that the optimal jetty configuration s it concerns the downdrift beach would involve either an extension of the north jetty with a downdrift curvature or an arm-like attachment to the south jetty which would extend southward with the goal being to create a larger “shadow-zone” downdrift of Jupiter Inlet.
Statement of Responsibility: by Philip S. Harris.
Thesis: Thesis (M. Eng.)--University of Florida, 1991.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references (leaves 136-137).
General Note: Typescript.
General Note: Vita.
Funding: This publication is being made available as part of the report series written by the faculty, staff, and students of the Coastal and Oceanographic Program of the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00078629
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 25540966

Table of Contents
    Front Cover
        Front Cover
    Title Page
        Page i
    Acknowledgement
        Page ii
    Table of Contents
        Page iii
        Page iv
    List of Tables
        Page v
        Page vi
        Page vii
    List of Figures
        Page viii
        Page ix
        Page x
        Page xi
    Abstract
        Page xii
        Page xiii
    Introduction
        Page 1
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
    Erosion of South Beach at Jupiter Inlet
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
        Page 16
        Page 17
        Page 18
        Page 19
        Page 20
        Page 21
        Page 22
        Page 23
    Methodology
        Page 24
        Page 25
        Page 26
        Page 27
        Page 28
        Page 29
        Page 30
        Page 31
        Page 32
        Page 33
        Page 34
        Page 35
        Page 36
        Page 37
        Page 38
        Page 39
        Page 40
        Page 41
    Results and analysis
        Page 42
        Page 43
        Page 44
        Page 45
        Page 46
        Page 47
        Page 48
        Page 49
        Page 50
        Page 51
        Page 52
        Page 53
        Page 54
        Page 55
        Page 56
        Page 57
        Page 58
        Page 59
        Page 60
        Page 61
        Page 62
        Page 63
        Page 64
        Page 65
        Page 66
        Page 67
        Page 68
        Page 69
        Page 70
        Page 71
        Page 72
        Page 73
        Page 74
        Page 75
        Page 76
        Page 77
        Page 78
        Page 79
        Page 80
        Page 81
        Page 82
        Page 83
        Page 84
        Page 85
        Page 86
        Page 87
        Page 88
        Page 89
        Page 90
        Page 91
        Page 92
        Page 93
        Page 94
        Page 95
        Page 96
        Page 97
        Page 98
    Summary and conclusions
        Page 99
        Page 100
        Page 101
        Page 102
    Appendix A: Sand tracer study
        Page 103
        Page 104
        Page 105
        Page 106
        Page 107
        Page 108
        Page 109
        Page 110
        Page 111
        Page 112
        Page 113
        Page 114
        Page 115
        Page 116
    Appendix B: Physical model experiments: Drogue study
        Page 117
        Page 118
        Page 119
        Page 120
        Page 121
        Page 122
        Page 123
        Page 124
        Page 125
        Page 126
        Page 127
        Page 128
    Appendix C: Monthly log-normal probability plots
        Page 129
        Page 130
        Page 131
        Page 132
        Page 133
        Page 134
        Page 135
    References
        Page 136
        Page 137
    Biographical sketch
        Page 138
University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - Version 2.9.9 - mvs