Group Title: Research report - University of Florida Agricultural Research Center ; RC-1977-7
Title: Triple cropping forage system in south central Florida
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00074267/00001
 Material Information
Title: Triple cropping forage system in south central Florida
Series Title: Research report ;
Physical Description: 9 p. : ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Mislevy, P ( Paul ), 1941-
Agricultural Research Center, Ona
Publisher: Agricultural Research Center,
Agricultural Research Center
Place of Publication: Ona, FL
Publication Date: 1977
Copyright Date: 1977
 Subjects
Subject: Forage plants -- Harvesting -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Multiple cropping -- Field experiments -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Genre: government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )
 Notes
Statement of Responsibility: P. Mislevy ... et al..
General Note: Caption title.
General Note: "June 1977."
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00074267
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 85868345

Full Text
Agricultural Research Center, Ona *
-/ Research' Report RC-1977-7 June 1977

i s TRIPLE CROPPING FORCE SYSTEM IN SOUTH CENTRAL FLORIDA \.

i/V*- 1 P. Mislevy, J. Otte, A. J. Overman, H. L. Chapman,`J Jr.

and F. M. Peacock- \ .

Florida enjoys relatively favorable year-around temperatures, ardquate--'

moisture and high solar radiation. The "sunshine state" contains approximately

34 million acres of land area, with about 12 million acres in some form of native

or improved pasture. This land area provides feed for about 2.8 million cattle

thus 4.8 acres is required to provide feed per animal unit.

Perennial grass forage systems generally provide excessive forage throughout

t:he summer growth period (June-September). From fall to spring (October-May)

forage production is quite low, thus limiting the stocking capacity during this

period.

In recent years some 600,000 weaned beef calves have been shipped out of the

state annually to winter pastures and feed lots in other areas. If these calves

were retained for an additional 300 lb gain, it would represent an increase in

gross income of 50 million dollars to the beef cattle industry in south Florida.

In order to retain these calves through the winter in Florida, economical feed

must be available. Dairy producers, even to a greater extent, need a uniform

supply of high quality feed.

The purpose of this multicropping system is to explore the physical and

economic feasibility of annually producing two or three crops in succession, on

the same land area and determine its effect on nematodes, insects and nutrients.

Cattle performance and feeding data will also be obtained on crops produced and

stored from multicroppingsystems.


SAssistant Professor (Agronomy), Agricultural Research Center, Ona; Assistant

Professor (Farm Mgt. Spec.) and Professor (Nematology), Agricultural Research

and Education Center, Bradenton; Professor (Animal Nutrition) and Associate

Professor (Animal Husbandry), Agricultural Research Center, Ona.





2

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Agronomic Studies

The study was conducted on 30 acres of an Ona and Myakka fine sand, located

at the Agricultural Research Center (ARC) Ona, Florida.

Land clearing and seed bed preparation

Pine trees, stumps and palmettos were removed from the experimental area,

6 months prior to actual land preparation. Two weeks prior to seeding the area

was roto-tilled with a Ground Hawg (R) rotovator to a depth of 6 inches.

Water control

Irrigation was provided throughout the year as needed. The source of water

was a 6 inch, 300 ft. deep well propelled by a 15 hp motor on a turbine pump.

The well supplied about 170 gpm of water which terminated at 6 risers. A

traveling water gun connected to the 6 inch riser distributed water over a 250

foot diameter. Approximately 1.0 inch of irrigation water was applied on the

corn crop per application on a weekly basis.

A rim-ditch about 7' deep and 16 feet wide was constructed around the entire

30 acre site. Two small drainage ditches were also constructed from two sand

pond areas to the rim-ditch allowing good drainage of pond areas. The base of

the rim-ditch was sloped so.that all surface water entering the ditch after a

heavy rainfall would accumulate in one area. An automatic low lift (8 inch 450

angle axial flow propeller pump, 1500 GPM at 7 ft. Tdh., 12 ft. discharge pipe

and a 5 hp motor) pump was installed in that area to remove water.

Cropping sequence

The yearly cropping rotation practiced in this study in 1976-77 was corn,

Aeschynomene and oats. The above three crops were seeded in succession on the

same land area. 'Dekalb XL 395', corn was seeded on February 28, 1976, in 36

inch rows to a final population of 18,000 plants per acre. Immediately after

the removal of the whole corn plant as forage, hulled (naked) Aeschynomene was

no-till seeded with a grain drill at the rate of 12 Ib per acre. Following the




3
removal of Aeschynomene, 'Fla. 501' oats was seeded in mid-November at a rate

of 3 bu per acre. In late January, when the oats were 12,inches tall they

were grazed for several days and it was then plowed under, due to the limited

time remaining before corn was to be seeded.

Lime dnd fertilizer practices

Three tons per acre of dolomitic limestone were rotovated into the seed

bed about 2 weeks prior to seeding corn. Fertilization practices for corn
2/
were as follows: 50-100-200 lb/A N-P205-K20 + 30 Ib/A FTE 503 micronutrients-

at seeding; 100 Ib/A N was applied when corn was.8 inches tall; 100 Ib/A N

when corn was 24 inches tall. Fertility practices for Aeschynomene were

0-30-60 lb/A N-P205-K20 + 10 Ib/A CUO and 10 Ib/A ZNO when plants were 4 to

6 inches tall. Fertilization practices for oats were 50-50-100 Ib/A N-P205

K20 when oats were starting to tiller.

Weed and insect control

The insecticide-nematicide Furidan 10G(r) was applied in granular form at

the time of corn seeding, at a rate of 16 Ib/A formulation. This product acts

as a systemic to provide insect (lesser corn stalk bore, armyworm, wireworms,

etc.) control until plants attained a height of about 12 inches tall. The

herbicides used were AAtrex (R) at 2 Ib/A (formulation) and Lasso (R) at 2 qts/A

(formulation) applied pre-emerge over the entire 30 acre area. There was no

cultivation practice employed on the corn crop. No herbicides or insecti-

cides were used on the Aeschynomene or oat crops.

Harvesting and ensiling practices

The corn plant was direct-cut as forage when the ear was at the dent stage

of maturity with plants containing approximately 28% dry matter. The entire corn


/ FTE 503 have the following elemental content: Iron 18.0%; Zinc 7.0%;

Manganese 7.5%; Copper 3.0%; Boron 3.0%; and Mulybdenum 0.2%.






4

was cut back to a 4-5 inch stubble by a two-row forage harvester and chopped into

1/8 to 1/4 inch sections and preserved in oxygen free upright silos as silage.

Aeschynomene was harvested at the full bloom-seed stage with a haybine back to

a 3 inch stubble. Harvested plants were allowed to dry in windows until

moisture dropped from 72% to approximately 50%. Aeschynomene was then chopped in

about one inch sections and preserved in oxygen free upright silos as haylage.

No preservatives were added to either the corn or Aeschynomene forage during the

ensiling process. Corn, Aeschynomene and oats were sampled for dry matter

(D.M.), yield, in vitro organic matter digestion (IVOMD) and protein. Forage

yield of corn and Aeschynomene was obtained by weighing each wagon load of

harvested material when it entered the silo area. Samples for D.M. and chemical

analysis were obtained by randomly selecting 10 to 15 sub-samples placing them

into a large tub, mixing the material and selecting aboot 1 lb. Every 10th load of

corn forage and every 5th load of Aeschynomene forage was then analyzed for the

above variables. Corn grain yield and forage yield of oats was obtained by random

sampling the experimental area.

Economics

Cash and fixed costs were estimated in determining economic feasibility of

a multicropping forage program.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Agronomic Studies

Forage indices (dry matter, yield, IVOMD and protein) of corn, Aeschynomene

and oats are presented in Table 1. The commercial corn variety 'Dekalb XL 395',

which was harvested in mid-June at 28.4% dry matter produced 5.6 tons/acre dry

matter or 19.3 T/A of green forage. Grain production of this corn crop was 91.5

bu/A shelled corn @ 15.5% moisture. The yield of 5.6 tons per acre DM is an

average crop. When all production variables such as fertility, water, plant






population, proper variety, weed and insect,control are correct, dry matter yields

should range between 8 and 10 tons per acre. One of the problems with this

initial year corn crop was low pH (4.4). Since dolomite was applied only 2 weeks

prior to the seeding of corn, there was not adequate time for the lime to go into

solution and react with soil particles, which eventually would elevate the pH.

Therefore, it is speculated that aluminum toxicity was responsible for

various deficiency symptoms. Several acres of corn in the study showed

phosphorus deficiency symptoms. These symptoms eventually disappeared as the

corn root system increased, however yields in these areas were only one quarter

of normal production.

Corn is a highly digestible crop indicated by the 73.0% IVOMD (Table 1).

This corn crop produced 7829 lb/A of estimated digestible organic matter or

estimated TDN. The crude protein content was 9.0% with an average of 1008 Ib/A

crude protein produced.

Harvesting of Aeschynomene began in early October and continued through the

next 4 weeks. Plants were at the late flowering-early seed stage. The

Aeschynomene was cut with a haybine at 27.5% dry matter and allowed to wilt to

48.7% dry matter. A forage harvester with a pick up head then chopped the

Aeschynomene which was then ensilad as haylage. Dry matter yield of the

Aeschynomene was 2.6 tons/A with a 41.7% IVOMD. This was a very low digestible

forage and was probably due to plants being over mature. Less mature Aeschynomene

(i.e. 3 ft tall) may average 58% IVOMD and 16% crude protein. Therefore,

regardless, whether a plant is a grass or legume, if harvested at the improper

stage of maturity percentage IVOMD and protein will be low as well as pounds/

acre of IVOMD and protein (Table 1).

Serious bird damage was encountered on the oats, with birds consuming both

seed and germinating seedlings. Following the seeding of oats cool temperatures

were experienced for the next 60 days resulting in reduced plant growth. During






. 'the wec. of January 17 temperatures fell to'lows of 19 to 240F. By late January

the oats had only attained a height.of 12 inches. Forage at this stage of maturity

contained 15.7% dry matter and only yielded. 8 ton/A. However, this forage was

ebeedingly high in digestibility and crude protein averaging 85.7 and 25.0%,

respectively. Even though dry matter yields were only one third that of Aeschy-

nomene pounds per acre estimated digestible organic matter and crude protein for

oats was 56% and 74%, respectively. The low yield of oats did not justify mechani-

cal harvestiig so they were grazed for several days and. then plowed under to start

land preparation for the corn crop.

ESTIMATED COSTS

Estilathiig-production costs is an important step in determining economic

feasibility of a multicropping forage program. Table 2 shows estimated costs for

the 1976 Ona ARC multicropping project.

Cash costs are a grower's out-of-pocket expenses to grow a crop after he

has machinery and water control equipment installed on the.land Cash costs

include: labor, fertilizer, chemicals, seed, full and custom harvest. The oats

:rop was grazed for .several days and then plowed under, so no harvest cost was

-stimated.

Cash costs per ton of dry matter produced in 1976 ranged from a low of $31.01

per ton for Aeschynomene to a high of, $66.69 per ton for oats, Forages were

valued on their energy and protein content. Value of corn and Aeschynomene

covered cash costs in 1976, .No cash value.of oats was obtained since it was only

3razed, for several days with the remainder of the crop plowed under.

Fixed costs include: depreciation, interest, taxes and insurance on a

$57,560 investment in water control and a-$46,900 investment in pre-harvest

machinery. When total cash and fixed costs are considered, the value of the

crop covered total costs only for the corn-forage.

Expected 1977 yields and costs per ton of dry matter are also shown in




7

Table 2. The corn forage and oats yields are expected to increase in 1977, the

costs per ton will decrease. If yields increase in 1977, value of crop produced

will cover total costs for both corn and oats.

Expanding the acreage could spread fixed machinery and some water control

fixed costs over a larger total production. This would enhance the profitabil-

ity of the multicropping system,

All fixed machinery and water control costs were charged to the multicropping

activities. Allocating a portion of these fixed costs to other farm or ranch

activities would likely enhance the profitability of the multicropping system.

Animal Studies

Two feeding experiments were completed during the winter of 1976-77. The

first evaluated the use of corn silage in growing replacement heifers. During

the second, silage was utilized for fattening steers for slaughter. In addition

preliminary work was done with a corn silage poultry waste mixture and

currently feeding and digestibility studies are in progress to evaluate

Aeschynomene for beef cattle. Additional work is needed on using poultry wastes

with corn silage and it will be later this fall before the data is completed on

the Aeschynomene. This report contains available information about the two

corn silage experiments.

In the growing study forty yearling heifers of mixed breeding were divided

into two groups of twenty animals each on the basis of breeding and weight.

The groups were randomly allotted to the experiment presented in Table 3. Each

heifer was treated with Tramisol(R) prior to being placed on the experiment. The
3/
heifers were fed the corn silage and the Ona mineral #2- ad lib, in drylot.

Each group received an average of 1.3 Ib of 41% cottonseed meal per head daily.



SOna #2 mineral contains 12% calcium, 12% phosphorus, 25%cf common salt,

l%iron, .13% copper, .03% cobalt and 200,000 I.U. of vitamin A per pound.





8

In addition lot number one receiveb"n average of 1.3 lb and lot two 2.8 Ib of

corn grain per head daily. The cattle had a 15-hour shrink prior to initial and

final weights. The feeding trial lasted for 116 days.

As shown in Table 3 the cattle on the lower level of concentrate intake

gained 1.77 Ib per head daily as compared to 1.82 lbs for the cattle receiving the

higher level of corn grain. Corn silage consumption decreased as corn grain was

increased. Dry matter intake per pound of gain was approximately equal for

both groups of heifers.

During the fattening study 42 head of two-year old crossbred steers were

placed on test for 93 days in drylot. Each steer was wormed with Tramisol(R)'

prior to being placed on test. Silage and Ona mineral #2 were fed ad lib.

Three different levels of concentrate feed were fed, as shown in Table 4. The

concentrate mixture was comprised of 66.97 dried citrus pulp, 24.9% cracked corn,

6.7% standard cane molasses, and 1.5% urea 287. At the conclusion of the feeding
4/
test the cattle were sold and carcass evaluations were determined.-

The rate of gain increased directly with the level of concentrate feed

(Table 4). However, the additional rate of gain was not sufficient to recover the

additional feed cost involved, being only 0.3 of a Ib more for lot three as com-

pared to lot number one. As the level of concentrate increased the level of -

silage intake decreased and the dry matter intake required per pound of gain

increased. The average carcass data is shown in Table 5. There were small, but

non-significant differences in carcass data, related to level of concentrate

feed intake.




A. Z. Palmer, Professor (Meat Science) University of Florida, Gainesville,

Florida.









SUMMARY

In order to operate a triple cropping system economically successful,

timeliness of crop planting, proper fertility, water control, proper variety,

plant population, weed and insect control are of utmost importance. High

quality forages can be produced provided they are harvested at the proper

physiological stage.

Cattle performed well on corn silage, however no animal performance data is

available at present regarding Aeschynomene and oats.











Table 1. Forage indices of corn, Aeschynomene and oats grown in a 1976-77 triple cropping
system at ARC, Ona.


Harvest Dry matter
time Harvest Ensiling


Crop


Yield
Forage Corn
Green forage dry matter grain


IVOMD*

Actual Estimated Protein


------------T/A-------


bu/A


% Ib/A % Ib/A


Corn:
Forage June
Grain June

Aeschynomene:
Forage October

Oats:
Forage January


28.4
51.5


27.5



15.7


28.4


48.7


Corn grain yields were determined
based on 15.5% moisture.


19.3


5.6


2.6


---- 73.0

91.5* --


41.7



85.7


at the time corn was being harvested as forage.


** Values were determined by averaging in vitro organic matter digestion (IVOMD) and
collected from selective subs.Amples.


7829 9.0 1008


2068 8.7 452



1160 25.0 334


Grain yields are



crude protein


--------%-------








Table 2.-Estimated growing costs for corn silage, aeschynomene, and oats under multicropping.

Crop
Corn Aeschynomene Oats
Item $/A Item $/A Item $/A
Plow labor 2.60 300 lbs. 0-10-20 11.22 500 lbs. 10-10-20 26.15
Disk labor 2.60 Limea.' 4.00 Lime? 4.00
750 lbs. Am. Nitrate 51.83 Fertilizer spread labor 0.50 Fertilizer spread labor 0.50
1000 Ibs. 0-10-20 37.40 5. bs. naked seed 4.25 3 bu. seed 12.00
10 Ibs. Frit 2.30 Drill labor 1.60 Drill labor 1.60
Limea 4.00 Windrower labor 8.70 Fuel, oil and repairs 9.10
Fertilizer spread labor 1.50 Labor to harvest and blow Total cash cost $53.35
1/2 gal. LassoR 7.30 in silo 17.50
1/2 gal. AatrexR 7.15 Fuel, oil and repairs 9.10
20 lbs. Furadan 10 GR 12.80 Custom harvest 23.75
1/3 unit seed 16.67 Total cash cost $80.62
Custom plant 6.00
Irrigation labor 3.25
Harvest labor 18.00
Fuel, oil and repairs 18.20
Custom harvest 65.00
Total cash cost $256.60

Water control depreciatipn Water control depreciation 1ater control depreciation
.and interest 69.35 and interest 69.35 and interest 69.35
Machinery fixed cost 74.40 Machinery fixed cost 74.40 Machinery fixed cost 74.40
Total fixed cost $143.75 Total fixed cost $143.75 Total fixed cost $143.75
Total cash & fixed cost $400.35 Total cash & fixed cost $224.37 Total cash & fixed cost $197.10


Yields, costs per ton of dry matter
Yield dry matter 5.60/T
Cash cost/T.DM. $ 45.82
Cash & fixed cost/T.DM. $ 71.49
Crop value $448.00 @ $ 80.00/T


and feed values achieved 1976


Crop value $195.00 @


2.60/T
$ 31.01
$ 86.30
$ 75.00/T


Crop value $88.00 @


Yields, costs per ton of dry matter and feed values expected 1977
Yield dry matter 8.00T 2.60T 2.50T
Cash cost/T.DM. $ 32.08 $ 31.01 $ 21.34
Cash & fixed cost/T.DM. $ 50.04 $ 86.30 $ 78.84
Crop value $640.00 @ $ 80.00/T Crop value $195.00 0 $ 75.00/T Crop value $275.00 1 $110.00/T

a Estimate 1 T/Acre/Every 3 Years @ $12.00/T.
b No harvest costs included.
c Yield estimate based on grazing.


0.80/TC
$ 66.69
$246.38
$110.00/T





Table 3. Animal gain and feed intake
grown on corn silage (lbs).


data for yearling heifers


Number of heifers
Initial weight
Final weight
Total gain
Daily gain

Total feed intake
Corn silage
Corn grain
Cottonseed meal


Daily feed intake/heifer
Corn silage
Corn grain
41% cottonseed meal

Daily dry matter intake/heifer (estimated)-/
Corn silage
Corn grain
41% cottonseed meal
Total

Dry matter intake/lb gain


Lot 1

20
480
685
205
1.7


83,925
3,000
3,120


36.2
1.3
1.3


10.3
1.3
1.2
12.7

7.18


Lot 2

20
475
686
211
7 1.82


79,425
6,400
3,120


34.2
2.8
1.3


9.7
2.1
1.2
13.0

7.14


and corn grain and


I Based on corn silage containing 28.4% dry matter
cottonseed meal containing 90% dry matter.









Table 4. Animal gain and feed intake data of steers fattened on corn silage
and different levels of concentrate feed (Ib).


Number of steers
Initial weight
Final weight
Total gain
Daily gain

Total feed intake
Corn silage
Concentrate mixture

Daily.feed intake/steer
Corn silage
Concentrate mixture


Lot 1

14
708
962
254
2.73


60,760
5,964


46.7
4.6


Lot 2

14
729
994
265
2.85


53,130
11,598


40.8
8.9


Daily dry matter intake/steer (estimated)-
Corn silage 13.3 11.6
Concentrate mixture 4.1 8.0
Total 17.4 19.6


Dry matter intake/lb gain


6.37


6.88


Lot 3

14
718
1000
282
3.03


47,505
17,786


36.5
13.7


10.4
12.3
22.7


7.49


Based on corn silage containing 28.4% dry matter
mixture containing 90% dry matter.


and the concentrate


- --










Table 5. Average carcass data of steers fattened on corn
different levels of supplemental concentrate.


silage with


Lot Number
1 2 .


Dressing % -/

Lean tissue
Color
Texture
Firmness

Federal grade


Fat over ribeye (in)
Ribeye area (sq.in)
% KPH fat

Carcass maturity


54.6


2
2
2


0.23
10.2
1.7

A


/ Dressing percent =
Dressing percent =


Hot carcass weight
Final leve weight


55.4


2
2
2


0.27
10.0
1.9

A


55.8


2
2
2

G

0.36
10.4
2.1

A


X 100.


_ ___ _I ~___~_









- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


This research project has been supported by a number of
commercial organizations. Grateful appreciation is expressed to
the companies and individuals listed below who have contributed
gifts, grants, or assistance.


Asgrow Florida, Plant City, Florida
Henry Boyd, Lakeland Florida
Hollis Brannen, Dundee, Florida
Chain O'Lakes Groves, Inc., Winter Haven, Florida
Chemagro Agr. Div,, Mobay Chemical Corp. Kansas City, Mo.
Tom Christian, Bradenton, Florida
Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Deland, Florida
Cloverdale Dairy Farm, Myakka City, Florida
Dekalb Seed Company, DeKalb, Illinois
Dixie Lime and Stone, Ocala, Florida
E. I. Dupont de Nemours Company, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware
FMC Corporation, Tampa, Florida
Harold Fauver, Sanford, Florida
Florida Irrigation Service, Alturas, Florida
Harry Gause, Limestone, Florida
Gehl Company, West Bend, Wisconsin
Hardee County Agriculture Soil Conservation Service
Charles F. Hinton, Hillsborough County, Florida
International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Libertyville, Ill.
J & J Hauling, Nocatee, Florida
Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri
C. M. Payne & Son, Inc., Sebring, Florida
Shepard Spreader Service, Plant City, Florida
Smitty Groundhog, Inc., Sanford, Florida




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs