Materials and methods
 Results and discussion

Group Title: Research report - North Florida Experiment Station, University of Florida - NF 87-4
Title: Stink bug damage in relation to soybean phenology and stink bug numbers
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00073733/00001
 Material Information
Title: Stink bug damage in relation to soybean phenology and stink bug numbers
Series Title: Research report
Physical Description: 8 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Teare, I. D ( Iwan Dale ), 1931-
Funderburk, J. E ( Joseph E. ), 1954-
North Florida Research and Education Center (Quincy, Fla.)
Publisher: North Florida Research and Education Center
Place of Publication: Quincy FL
Publication Date: 1987
Subject: Soybean -- Diseases and pests -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Stinkbugs -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Genre: bibliography   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references (p. 7-8).
Statement of Responsibility: I.D. Teare and J.E. Funderburk.
General Note: Caption title.
Funding: Research report (North Florida Research and Education Center (Quincy, Fla.)) ;
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00073733
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: Marston Science Library, George A. Smathers Libraries, University of Florida
Holding Location: Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the Engineering and Industrial Experiment Station; Institute for Food and Agricultural Services (IFAS), University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved, Board of Trustees of the University of Florida
Resource Identifier: oclc - 83792024

Table of Contents
        Page 1
    Materials and methods
        Page 2
    Results and discussion
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
Full Text

Stink Bug Damage in Relation to Soybean Phenology and Stink Bug Numbers'/

I. D. Teare and J. E. Funderburk2/
"J ~Introduction

Southern green stink bug (SGSB) is the most important pentatomid pest of
soybean in the Americas. The host range is wide, but the pest prefers certain
plants, particularly some of the legumes (Todd and Herzog 1980). The life
history has been studied in many parts of the world. Harris and Todd (1980a,
b, c, d) present information on the species in the southern U.S. Five
generations are typical in the region (Todd and Herzog 1980). Adults
overwinter in above-ground habitats (Jones and Sullivan 1981), and several
wild and cultivated plants serve as primary hosts during the rest of the year
(Jones and Sullivan 1982). The relationship of SGSB to soybean has been
extensively studied. Reviews of the published information are contained in
Panizzi and Slansky (1985). The population dynamics of SGSB in relation to
soybean phenology are understood. Soybean phenological stages are according
to descriptions by Fehr and Caviness (1977). Adult SGSB exhibit distinct
preferences for soybean during the early reproductive podding stages. Adults
from other habitats move into the crop during this period of crop growth, with
peak oviposition occurring during R4 (Schumann and Todd 1982). An entire
generation of the pest then develops in the crop. The largest populations
occur from this generation which will be primarily late nymphal instars and
young adults during crop senescence (Schumann and Todd 1982, Menezes et al.
1985). Numerous control tactics have been developed for controlling the pest
in soybean. The most common practice is insecticidal control, but a cultural
control tactic also has been worked out (e.g., Newsom and Herzog 1977).

Numerous studies have been published relative to the effects of SGSB and
other stink bugs on soybean yield and/or seed quality. Todd and Turnipseed
(1974) measured % seed injury, seed yield, and seed size of soybean infested
with 3rd, 4th, and 5th instars and adults at 3, 6, and 9 weeks after crop
blooming. Only adults infested three weeks after bloom resulted in signifi-
cant yield reductions, but seed damage occurred for most treatments. Seed
size was not affected. Yeargan (1977) caged the green stink bug, Acrosternum
hilare (Say), on soybean maintaining the same specified numbers at two
densities from early pod development to harvest maturity. Significant effects
on yield and seed quality were noted. McPherson et al. (1979) maintained
three densities of SGSB and other stink bugs on soybean in cages during
pod-filling stages, with seed yield and quality influences detected. Todd and
Mullinnix (1985) put 5th-instar nymphs in cages for 14-21 days to investigate
the interactive effects of SGSB and velvetbean caterpillar, noting yield and
seed-quality effects. Thomas et al. (1974) put adult SGSB on caged soybean
during several reproductive soybean growth stages. The first infestation
period most closely represented the actual dynamics of the pest in soybean,
and this was the only time that significant effects on yield and seed quality
were noted. The effects of the initial adult populations and subsequent
developing populations were not separated.

1/Contribution from the Inst. of Food and Agric. Sci. Florida Exp. Stn., Univ.
of Florida, and the North Florida Res. and Educ. Ctr., Quincy, FL 32351.
Research Report NF 87-4.

2/Research Scholar/Scientist of Agronomy and Assistant Professor of Ento-
mology, respectively, Univ. of Florida.

Todd and Turnipseed (1974) quantified significant reductions in germin-
ation, emergence, and seedling survival by all degrees of SGSB damage. Jensen
and Newsom (1972) showed that the amount and location of stink bug damage to
soybean seeds affected seed emergence and subsequent yield. Numerous other
workers have reported similar findings. The chemical composition of the seed
also is altered (e.g.; Todd and Turnipseed 1974, Todd 1976).

Although numerous studies have been conducted concerning the effects of
stink bugs, especially SGSB, on seed yield and quality, none have accurately
reflected the actual ecological relationship between the crop and the pest.
The effects of stink bugs on soybean parameters other than seed yield and
quality have not been studied. Therefore, we propose research to rectify
these informational shortfalls.

The objectives of this research is to quantify the effects of SGSB stress
on soybean growth, yield, and seed quality according to plant/insect dynamics
and to develop economic injury levels for southern green stink bug on soybean
according to plant/insect dynamics.
Materials and Methods

This study was conducted at the North Florida Research and Education
Center at Quincy, Florida (1986) on an Orangeburg loamy sand clayeyy, kaolini-
tic, thermic, Typic Paleudult). The experimental site was treated with .56
Kg/ha lb ai/A Treflan 4E and .42 Kg/ha Sencor 50WP herbicides (5-23-86). The
field was rough cut once before the preplant herbicide was applied then smooth
harrowed twice to incorporate the herbicide. On 5-27-86 Braxton soybean were
planted. The field was later cultivated twice with a 2-row rolling culti-

The experimental design was a randomized complete block with rows planted
0.76 m apart, and seeds planted 8 per 0.30 m of row. At early stage R4 of
soybean development, 64-0.91 x 1.22 x 1.22 m insect cages were randomly placed
in the plots. The cages were wood framed and wire (screen) mesh, entry ports
on either side were covered with 0.30 m of surgical cotton tubing. This
allowed entry into the cage to collect dropped leaves, petioles, pods and dead
stink bugs but contained the live stink bugs. Cages were firmly anchored and
their bases sealed with soil. Adjacent soXbean plants were left undisturbed.
The cage reduced PAR from 1.700 pmol m2 s to 1.1 imol m2 s- on 8-19-86 at
11:20 EDST or approximately 35%.

SGSB adults were introduced into the cages during early R4 at four densi-
ties. These SGSB were collected as 5th instars and young adults from other
hosts in the ecosystem, primarily corn, seven days prior to infestation. They
were kept in the insectary where they were fed corn and allowed to mate. This
procedure simulates actual conditions that occur in soybean where feral adults
infest the crop at the appropriate time from other habitats in the ecosystem
(Schumann and Todd 1982). Previous food source has been shown to affect SGSB
adult biology (Kester and Smith 1984). On July 26, 1986 the 16 cages in Rep 1
were infested with stink bug numbers of 0, 2, 6, and 12 per 1.22 m of soybean
row sex ratio 1:1. Reps 2, 3, and 4 were infested in the same manner on July
29, Aug. 4 & 5, respectively. The cages were checked twice weekly for stink
bug death, leaf and petiole drop, and cage damage. Dead stink bugs were
replaced for two weeks after initial infestation.

The first harvest was taken August 22, 1986. Sixteen cages were
harvested, one from each stink bug number in each replication. Stink bug
number, sex and stink bug stage of development were recorded. The plants were
cut at ground level, soybean stage of development recorded and then the
foliage was partitioned into leaves, petioles, stem and pods, dried at 700 C
and weights recorded when weight became constant. The second harvest was
taken on September 12, when 16 additional cages were harvested and processed
in the same manner. Harvest at maturity was based upon the appearance of the
plants in relation to leaf drop. Maturity date and living and dead stink bug
numbers were recorded and soybean harvested and processed as before.

The analyses of seed damage and vigor is in the processing stages. Seed
damage is being determined based on Jensen and Newsom's work (1971).

The soybean seeds are being separated into five categories, determined by
visual damage. Group one seeds have no visual damage. Group two are slightly
damaged seeds with a puncture wound. No shriveling of seed coat, yet some
discoloration. Approximately 1/3 of the seed coat damaged. Group three
contains the seeds with about 2/3 of the seed coat shriveled and discolored.
Group four contains the seed with total damage, the entire seed coat shriveled
and discolored. Group five consists of seed which are damaged, however, not
by stink bugs. These seed contain earworm damage or fungal disease, i.e.,
purple or brown stain.

The slightly damaged seeds will be separated further into groups based on
the location of the sting on the seed. This is to determine if the stink bug
has a preference as to where they sting the seed. The four categories are the
embryo sting, hypocotyl sting, top of the hypocotyl, and the hilum sting.

Once the seeds have been separated in the various categories, a
germination technique will be applied. However, this technique has not been

There will also be a viability test using 2, 3, and 5 Triphenzltetrazolium
chloride. This procedure has been outlined by Delouche et al. (1962).

Results and Discussion

A preliminary study was conducted by the authors in 1986 to develop
appropriate methodology for studying the effects of SGSB on physiology and
morphology of soybean in relation to time. Early populations of migrating
adults from 0 to 4X the current Florida threshold did not affect stem weight,
petiole weight, leaf weight, pod weight, seed weight, or harvest maturity
(Table 1). Populations of the subsequent generation greatly affected soybean
morphology (Table 2).

Table 1. Effects of early adult southern green stink bug populations at four
densities on stem weight, petiole weight, leaf weight, pod weight,
seed weight, and maturity date of soybean at harvest maturity. (No
numbers in the same vertical column are significantly different at P

Southern Green Stink Stem Petiole Leaf Pod Seed Maturity
Bug Density Wt. Wt. Wt. Wt. Wt. (DAP)*

0 123.3 5.9 2.8 48.6 155.1 143.4

2 120.1 8.1 1.8 57.8 151.3 143.7

6 138.9 5.8 1.4 56.8 176.0 144.8

12 122.0 12.1 4.2 53.2 169.7 145.6

*DAP = Days after planting soybean

Table 2. Mathematical relationships between subsequent southern green stink
bug numbers of the generation developing from eggs laid R4-R5 (X)
and soybean morphological parameters and maturity date (Y).

Soybean Parameter (Y) Function R2

Stem weight(g) at harvest Y = 124.1 + 0.205X 0.22

Petiole weight (g) at harvest Y = 6.56 + 0.230X 0.77

Pod weight(g)* at harvest No significant function

Leaf weight(g) at harvest Y = 0.50 + 0.292X 0.92

Seed weight(g) at harvest Y = 161.5 0.594X 0.67

Maturity date** Y = 8.19 + 0.243X 0.00079X2 0.41

*Pod weight after seed removal

The subsequent SGSB was positively related to stem weight, petiole weight,
leaf weight, and harvest maturity were positively related to SGSB numbers
(Fig. 1, 2, 3, 4). Seed weight was negatively related to subsequent SGSB
numbers (Fig. 5), while pod weight (seeds removed) was unaffected (Fig. 6).

Leaf drop in relation to time is shown in figure 7, where stink bugs were
excluded from the soybean. The curve shows the greatest leaf drop on October
3. Figure 8 shows leaf drop in relation to time and a high stink bug number
at harvest. On October 3 when you expect a large number of leaves to drop
only small number of leaves were dropping. Stink bug numbers in relation to
time are

shown for that caged area in figure 9.
119 live adult stink bugs in the cage.
days were 116.

At harvest on November 3 there were
Stink bug deaths for the previous 10

This information will allow for calculating the influences of SGSB on
carbohydrate partitioning. The immediate importance of this information to
management of the pest is obvious, but numerous other parameters, both
morphological and physiological, need to be measured. Additional years of
data also are vitally important.



T 128 + 0.219X

S= 0.24



Y = 5.29 + 0.324X

2'= 0.77


X = 5S.O


0 30 s60 0 (2 150
Stinkbug No. at Harvest.

Y = 146 + 0.431X 0.00225X2

12 Q.76



Y 173 0.913X

2'= 0.85

x x


No significant function


0 30 60 90 120 M0
Stinkbug No. at Harvest

Figure 1. Morphological soybean changes in relation to stink bug number
at harvest, 1986.





T Y -1.22 0.390X

ti1 0.69


'- 0,

r 120.
g: 60:

. 100

n 60


., A

m 60



B 1 15 L 22 Z6 12 13 17 22 24 28 31


Figure 2. Leaf drop in relation to time for cage A where 6 southern green stink bugs (SGSB)
infested the cage, 119 stink bugs were found alive at harvest and 116 were found
dead 10 days before harvest vs cage B where 0 stink bugs infested the cage, 1986.

' ` ~ ' ` -I-


Daugherty, D. M. 1967. Pentatomidae as vectors of yeast spot disease of
soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 60:147-152.

Jensen, R. L., and L. D. Newsom. 1972. Effect of stink bug damaged seeds on
germination, emergence, and yield. J. Econ. Entomol. 65:261-264.

Harris, V. E., and J. W. Todd. 1980a. Duration of the immature stages of the
southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.), with a comparative review
of the previous studies. J. Georgia Entomol. Soc. 15:114-24.

Harris, V. E., and J. W. Todd. 1980b. Comparative fecundity, egg fertility and
hatch among wild-type and three laboratory-reared generations of the
southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (L.) (Hemiptera:Pentatomidae). J.
Georgia Entomol. Soc. 15:245-253.

Harris, V. E., and J. W. Todd. 1980c. Temporal and numerical patterns of
reproductive behavior in the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula
(Hemiptera:Pentatomidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 27:106-116.

Harris, V. E., and J. W. Todd. 1980d. Male-mediated aggregation of male and
5th-instar southern green stink bugs and concomitant attraction of a
tachinid parasite, Trichopoda pennipes. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 27:117-126.

Jones, W. A., and M. J. Sullivan. 1981. Overwintering habits, spring emergence
patterns, and winter mortality of some South Carolina hemiptera. Environ.
Entomol. 10:409-414.

W. A., and M. J. Sullivan. 1982. Role of host plants in population dynamics of
stink bug pests of soybean in South Carolina. Environ. Entomol.

Kester, K. M., and C. M. Smith. 1984. Effects of diet on growth, fecundity,
and duration of tethered flight of Nezara viridula. Entomol. Exp. et Appl.

Kiritani, K. 1970. Studies on the adult polymorphism in the southern green
stink bug, Nezara viridula (Hemiptera:Pentatomidae). Res. Popul. Ecol.

Lane, P. W., I. D. Teare, J. W. Jones, and K. J. Boote. 1986. Hardware and
software organization for measuring photosynthesis and evapotranspiration
in the field. Res. Rep. No. NF86-3, Univ. Florida, Inst. Food and Agric.
Sci. 21pp.

McPherson, R. M., L. D. Newsom, and B. F. Farthing. 1979. Evaluation of four
stink bug species from three genera affecting soybean yield and seed
quality in Louisiana. J. Econ. Entomol. 72:188-194.

Menezes, E. B., D. C. Herzog, I. D. Teare, and R. K. Sprenkel. 1985. Pheno-
logical events affecting southern green stink bug on soybean. Soil and
Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc. 44:227-231.

Miner, F. D. 1966. Biology and control of stink bugs on soybeans. Ark. Agric.
Exp. Sta. Bull. 708:1-40.

Newsom, L. D., M. Kogan, F. D. Miner, R. L. Rabb, S. G. Turnipseed, and W. H.
Whitcomb. 1983. General accomplishments towards better pest control in
soybean, pp. 51-98. In: Carl B. Huffaker (Ed.) New Technology of Pest
Control in soybean. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley and
Sons, New York.

Newsom, L. D., and D. C. Herzog. 1977. Trap crops for control of soybean
pests. Louisiana Agric. 20:14-15.

Panizzi, A. R., and F. Slansky, Jr. 1985. Review of phytophagous pentatomids
(Hemiptera:Pentatomidae) associated with soybean in the Americas. The
Florida Entomol. 68:184-214.

Pedigo, L. P., S. H. Hutchins, and L. G. Higley. 1986. Economic injury levels
in theory and practice. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 31:341-368.

Ragsdale, D. W. 1977. Isolation and identification of bacteria and fungi
transmitted during feeding and from various organs of Nezara viridula (L.)
M. S. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. 48pp.

Ragsdale, D. W., A. D. Larson, and L. D. Newsom. 1979. Microorganisms associ-
ated with feeding and from various organs of Nezara viridula. J. Econ.
Entomol. 72:725-727.

Schumann, F. W., and J. W. Todd. 1982. Population dynamics of southern green
stink bug (Heteroptera:Pentatomidae) in relation to soybean phenology. J.
Econ. Entomol. 75:748-753.

Sterling, P. (Ed.). 1983. Southeastern Branch Insect Detection, Evaluation,
and Prediction Report, 1981. Southeastern Branch of Entomological Society
of America 6:10.

Thomas, G. D., C. M. Ignoffo, C. E. Morgan, and W. A. Dickerson. 1974.
Southern green stink bug: Influence on yield and quality of soybeans. J.
Econ. Entomol. 67:501-503.

Todd, J. W. 1976. Effects of stink bug feeding on soybean seed quality, pp.
611-618 In World Soybean Research Conference I:Proceedings. Westview
Press, Boulder, Colorado.

Todd, J. W., and B. G. Mullinix. 1985. Effects of insect-pest complexes on
soybean, pp.624-634 In: World Soybean Research Conference III: Proceed-
ings, R. Shibles, ed., Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

Todd, J.W., and S. G. Turnipseed. 1974. Effects of southern green stink bug
damage on yield and quality of soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 67:421-426.

Wilkerson, G. G., J. W. Jones, K. J. Boote, K. T. Ingram, and J. W. Mishoe.
1983. Modeling soybean growth for crop management. Trans. ASAE 16:63-73.

Yeargan, K. V. 1977. Effects of green stink bug damage on yield and quality of
soybean. J. Econ. Entomol. 70:619-622.

Yukawa, J., and K. Kiritani. 1965. Polymorphism in the southern green stink
bug. Pacific Insects 7:639-642.

University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs