<%BANNER%>

FLAG IFAS UFIR



Agronomy notes
ALL VOLUMES CITATION PDF VIEWER
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00066352/00140
 Material Information
Title: Agronomy notes
Uniform Title: Agronomy notes (Gainesville, Fl.)
Physical Description: v. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Florida Cooperative Extension Service
Publisher: Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
Place of Publication: Gainesville
Publication Date: October 2011
 Subjects
Subjects / Keywords: Crops and soils -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Crop yields -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Agriculture -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Agronomy -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Genre: serial   ( sobekcm )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
periodical   ( marcgt )
 Notes
Additional Physical Form: Also available to subscribers via the World Wide Web.
Additional Physical Form: Electronic reproduction of copy from George A. Smathers Libraries, University of Florida also available.
General Note: Description based on: January 1971; title from caption.
Statement of Responsibility: Florida Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.
 Record Information
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: aleph - 000956365
notis - AER9014
System ID: UF00066352:00140

Downloads

This item is only available as the following downloads:

( PDF )


Full Text

PAGE 1

Agronomy Notes Oct 2011 Volume 35:10 Features: Forage: Startup Fertilizer for Winter Legumes ........................Page 3 Y. Newman, Extension Forage Specialist ( ycnew@ufl.edu) ; J. Ferrel, Extension Weed Specialist (jferrel@ufl.edu); R. Schnell, Extension Cropping System Specialist (rschnell@ufl.edu ); B. Sellers, Extension We ed Specialist (sellersb@ufl.edu); F. Fishel, Pesticide Information Officer (weeddr@ufl.edu); D.C. Odero, Extension Weed Specialist (dcodero @uf l.edu). The use of trade names does not constitute a guarantee or warrant of products named and does not signify approval to the exclusion of si mil ar products. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Employment Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function without regard to rac e, color, sex, age, handicap or national origin. For information on obtaining other extension publications, contact your county Cooperative Extension Offi ce. Florida Cooperative Extension Service/Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences/University of Florida/Millie Ferrer Chancy, Interim Dean. Miscellaneous: Weeds and Pesticides: Fall: the Ideal Time for Blackberry Control .................Page 4 Ragweed Parthenium. .................................................Page 5 USDA Releases 2009 Pesticide Data Summary .........Page 6 Calendar of Events.....................................................Page 5 Crops: Potassium Nutrition and Leafspot Disease in Cotton ...Page 2

PAGE 2

4 2 Crops Dr. Ronald Schnell, Extension Cropping System Specialist West Florida REC, Jay rschnell @ufl.edu Potassium Nutrition and Leafspot Disease in Cotton Potassium (K) is an important nutrient for cotton growth and development. Potassium deficiency symptoms in plants generally are evident on lower or older leaves due to translocation of the mobile nutrient to newly developed tissue. However, late season potassium deficiency symptoms in cotton can be observed upper and lower plant canopy in the form of leafspot disease. The leaf spots are caused by fungal pathogens (Stemphylium, Alternaria, or Cercospora) that are able to attack weakened cell walls due to inadequate levels of potassium. Symptoms observed in the upper plant canopy are likely a result of increased K demand during peak periods of fruit set. Reproductive parts of the cotton plant appear to have priority over vegetative plant parts for carbohydrates and nutrients, limiting K movement to newer leaves. Severe cases can result in premature defoliation and could decrease yield. Generally, leafspot development is correlated with low levels of K in the soil and plant tissue. Petiole sap testing is a good way to determine K deficiency in cotton. Proper soil testing and fertilization is the best method for preventing K deficiency and onset of leafspot in cotton. However, dry weather can reduce uptake of K by plants even when soil K levels are adequate by limiting movement of K in soil. For sandy soils, split application of K is recommended, at planting and again at peak bloom (first four weeks of bloom). Foliar applications of K may be considered but must be made before the fourth week of bloom and before symptoms become severe. Fungicide sprays will likely not be effective since the underlying cause is K deficiency. Therefore, the best option for managing leafspot disease in cotton is through prevention. Sound fertility programs and favorable weather conditions are essential to avoid leafspot in cotton and we should focus on the factors we can control. Close up (top) and field view of cotton affected by leaf spot (bottom). Photos by Ronnie Schnell

PAGE 3

4 3 Startup Fertilizer for Winter Forage Legumes One of the benefits of growing winter legumes is that they fix nitrogen. Nitrogen fixation by legumes is an alternative to the increasing cost of N fertilization. When growing winter legumes, effective nodulation takes place within 4 weeks or one month after planting. The implication is that during those first 3 to 4 weeks the plant relies mainly on the soil nutrients, included nitrogen, because the nodules are not fully functional. Fertilizing with small amounts of N and a complete fertilizer formula will help out the legume seedlings only during the first weeks. In the first couple of weeks after emergence, clovers develop a good root system that can take up the startup fertilizer while the nodules become functional. What is considered a startup N fertilization? Anything under 20 to 25 lb N/acre. All other nutrients should be applied according to soil test recommendations. Since legumes fix nitrogen, N applications to established legumes is not recommended because their N fixing nodules would shut down and become ineffective at fixing nitrogen. It is only during establishment that small additions of Nitrogen fertilizer will increase nodulation. In general, do not apply N fertilizer to legume stands, except low amounts during establishment, and follow with the recommended fertilization of other elements, specially phosphorus and micronutrients. Forages Dr. Yoana Newman, Extension Forage Specialist ycnew @ufl.edu Legume seedlings and emerging root systemthat can benefit from startup N fertilization while nodules become functional. Photo by Yoana Newman Calendar of Events Oct. 3 5 Southeast Herbicide Applicator Conference Panama City Beach, FL http://conference. ifas.ufl.edu/sehac/index.html Oct. 16 19 American Society of Agronomy Annual meeting, San Antonio, TX https://www.acsmeetings.org Oct. 18 20 Sunbelt Ag Expo, Moultrie, GA info@subeltexpo.com. Nov. 7 2011 Sugarcane Field Day, North FL REC, Quincey, FL http://gadsden.ifas.ufl.edu/

PAGE 4

4 4 Fall: the ideal time for blackberry control Blackberry is a perennial weed in pastures all across Florida. This weed is problematic, not only because it deing his breeding performance. But like all weeds, most ranchers want to control blackberry in the spring along with everything else. Unfortunately, spring applications rarely work very well. Fall is a much better time to spray blackberry. Why is fall best? Blackberry is a perennial. This means that the root system stores energy and gets bigger each year. It is from this root, not from seed, that blackberry emerges each year. In the spring, energy from this root system is moving upward to form new canes and leaves. If a herbicide is applied at this time, translocation of the herbicide to roots can be limited since all the energy is flowing away from the roots. But, after the canes and leaves are made and mature (late summer and fall), all the energy captured by the leaves flows back to the root system so it can increase in size and be prepared for the next season. Spraying in the fall, when the plant is nourishing the root/rhizome, will likely allow more herbicide to translocate underground. Blackberry is a very difficult species to control. Spraying in the fall is not an instant recipe for success and more than one application will likely be necessary. But, numerous experiments have shown that control from fall applied herbicides is more common that when applied in the spring. For more information and specific herbicide recommendations, see Blackberry and Dewberry: biology and control ( http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ ag238 ). Weed Science Dr. Jason Ferrell, Extension Weed Specialist jferrell@ufl.edu Dr. Brent Sellers, Extension Weed Specialist sellersb @ufl.edu Blackberry plant. Photo by Jason Ferrell

PAGE 5

5 Weed Science Dr. D. Calvin Odero, Extension Weed Specialist dcodero @ufl.edu Ragweed Parthenium The occurrence and frequency of detection of ragweed parthenium ( Parthenium hysterophorus ) in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) of south Florida has increased over the last several years. Ragweed parthenium is a herbaceous plant of tropical and subtropical environments in the Asteraceae (sunflower) family that can grow and flower throughout the year in the subtropical environment of south Florida. Its seedling forms a basal rosette with deep clefts on leaves. Mature ragweed parthenium plants are erect, much branched, with hairy stems and leaves. Flowers are small, white, and form a five side disk shape In the EAA, ragweed parthenium is commonly found along ditch and canal banks, field edges, roadsides, near buildings, and disturbed sites. This weed species has been encroaching into adjacent sugarcane and vegetable fields where it is posing great risks to production especially of vegetables. Consequently, control of ragweed parthenium is very important in the EAA to forestall its spread into cultivated fields. Weed control in noncropland areas in the EAA associated with ragweed parthenium is usually achieved using non selective herbicides, particularly glyphosate. However, lack of response of ragweed parthenium to glyphosate has been observed in the EAA and several areas in south Florida. It is not clear whether this is attributed to tolerance or resistance of ragweed parthenium to glyphosate. This necessitates the need for use of alternative burndown herbicides in combination with glyphosate for its control in noncropland areas. Sharpen, a new broadleaf herbicide can be tank mixed with glyphosate to achieve control of ragweed parthenium populations that are not controlled by application of glyphosate alone. The labeled use rate of sharpen applied alone in noncropland areas is 2 to 4 and 4 to 6 fluid ounces per acre for weed sizes less than 6 inches and weed sizes greater than 6 inches, respectively. For accelerated burndown of ragweed parthenium in combination with glyphosate, sharpen should be applied at 1 to 2 fluid ounces per acre. Figure 1. Parthenium Photo by D. Calvin Odero Figure 2: Parthenium 12 hours after treatment.. Photo by D. Calvin Odero

PAGE 6

4 6 USDA Releases 2009 Pesticide Data Summary wide range of commodities in the U.S. food supply. PDP tests fresh and processed fruit and vegetables, grains, beef products, catfish, groundwater, and treated and untreated drinking water for pesticide residues. These data are important to ensure the implementation of the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) is followed. The FQPA requirements include stricter safety standards, especially for infants and children, and a complete reassessment of all existing pesticide tolerances. Twelve states participated in 2009, including Florida. Sound conclusions about the U.S. food supply can be drawn from the PDP results because these states represent all regions of the U.S. and more than half the population. During 2009, PDP tested 13,244 samples for various insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Of the 13,244 total samples collected and analyzed, 10,792 were fresh and processed fruit and vegetables. The remaining samples consisted of organic lettuce, catfish, beef, rice, groundwater, and drinking water. For fresh fruit and vegetables, the percentage of total residue detections ranged from 0 to 3.2 percent with a mean of 1.5 percent. The percentage of total residue detections for all processed fruit and vegetables was approximately 0.02 percent. PDP laboratory operations are designed to detect the smallest possible levels of pesticide residues possible, even when those levels are well below the safety margins established by EPA. It is important to note that the mere presence of a pesticide on food does not indicate the food is unsafe. For samples containing residues, the vast majority of the detections were well below established tolerances and/or action levels. Before allowing the use of a pesticide on food crops, EPA sets a tolerance, or maximum residue limit, which is the amount of pesticide residue allowed to remain in or on each treated food commodity. The reporting of residues present at levels below the established tolerance serves to ensure and verify the safety of the U.S. food supply. Of all samples collected and analyzed, 69.7 percent were fresh fruits and vegetables, many of which are often eaten in a fresh, raw state. Health experts and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration agree washing fresh fruit and vegetables before eating is a healthful habit. Consumers can reduce pesticide residues, if they are present, by washing fruit and vegetables with cool or lukewarm tap water. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/pdp Pesticides Dr. Fred Fishel, Pesticide Information Director weeddr @ufl.edu