| | Title Page |
| | Acknowledgement |
| | Table of Contents |
| | List of Tables |
| | List of Figures |
| | Abstract |
| | Chapter 1: Social and economic... |
| | Chapter 2: Background and the context... |
| | Chapter 3: Agroforestry and agroforestry... |
| | Chapter 4: Socioeconomic and enviromental... |
| | Chapter 5: Farming and forestry... |
| | Chapter 6: Summary, conclusions... |
| | Reference |
| | Biographical sketch |
|
| Full Citation |
| Material Information |
| |
Title: |
Agroforestry systems in Acre, Brazil variability in local perspectives |
| |
Physical Description: |
x, 154 leaves : ill. ; 29 cm. |
| |
Language: |
English |
| |
Creator: |
Cartaxo Nobre, Francisco Rildo, 1962- ( Dissertant ) Schmink, Marianne ( Thesis advisor ) Hildebrand, Peter E. ( Reviewer ) Buhr, Kenneth L. ( Reviewer ) Nair, Ramachandran P. K. ( Reviewer ) Wood, Charles A. ( Degree grantor ) |
| |
Publisher: |
University of Florida |
| |
Place of Publication: |
Gainesville, Fla. |
| |
Publication Date: |
1998 |
| |
Copyright Date: |
1998 |
| Subjects |
| |
Subjects / Keywords: |
Latin American Studies thesis, M.A ( lcsh ) Agroforestry -- Brazil ( lcsh ) Agroforestry -- Economic aspects -- Brazil ( lcsh ) Dissertations, Academic -- Latin American Studies -- UF ( lcsh ) |
| |
Genre: |
bibliography ( marcgt ) non-fiction ( marcgt ) |
| |
Spatial Coverage: |
Brazil--Acre |
| Notes |
| |
Abstract: |
This study presents the importance of agroforestry systems and the role they play in the livelihood of two types of producers in the state of Acre, located in the Western Brazilian Amazonia. The study built on PESACRE’s work, a local non-governmental organization, by carrying out a comparative analysis of two rural communities: Grupo Novo Ideal, an agricultural colonist group, and Comunidade Sao Joao of the Seringal Sao Miguel, a rubber tapper group. The work focused on how rubber tappers and agricultural colonist see agroforestry systems in relation to their current production systems, immediate needs and problems, as well as aspirations and hopes for the future. The main field research tools used were the land use feltboard, to map the social and physical smallholders’ resources, and field walks, as a pre=participant observation tool. By using participatory research tools, the study provided opportunities for all family members to express and share their opinions about their livelihood. To address key issues regarding agroforestry systems, it is fundamental to recognize that farmers’ decision-making behavior toward agroforestry systems adoption differs from farmer to farmer. For example, rubber tappers association agroforestry systems with their entire economic system and perceived more “in kind” benefits (food, aesthetic pleasure) of the agroforestry systems introduced by PESACRE than did colonists. The latter were more focused on plantation crop combinations geared toward cash generation and food production. Also, gender aspects were being influenced by the decisions about agroforestry strategies in achieving food security and cash income because non-traditional agroforestry systems seemed to demand more intensive labor from the household. As seen among smallholders in Acre the labor has been reorganized as a means to ensure the necessary labor force for the household’s innovations. Women have had a primordial importance in this “redimensioning” process, especially in the rubber tapper community, even though women have little participation in the decision-making process. Among colonists, women and men shared more equitably the responsibility of the overall production systems under the agroforestry approaches. Marketers also have influenced the development of agroforestry systems I both communities. However, distance to markets was not a major factor influencing agroforestry systems adoption, but rather access to them dictated the agroforestry composition and development. Then, when formulating agroforestry development projects, all questions must be analysed historically, regionally, and locally. Considering social as well as biophysical heterogeneity helps to discover hidden specificities of the effect of agroforestry on the household’s strategies. |
| |
Thesis: |
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Florida, 1998. |
| |
Bibliography: |
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 143-153). |
| |
Statement of Responsibility: |
by Francisco Rildo Cartaxo Nobre. |
| |
General Note: |
Typescript. |
| |
General Note: |
Vita. |
| |
Funding: |
Electronic resources created as part of a prototype UF Institutional Repository and Faculty Papers project by the University of Florida. |
| Record Information |
| |
Bibliographic ID: |
UF00054867 |
| |
Volume ID: |
VID00001 |
| |
Source Institution: |
University of Florida |
| |
Holding Location: |
University of Florida |
| |
Rights Management: |
All rights reserved, Board of Trustees of the University of Florida |
| |
Resource Identifier: |
aleph - 002366566 oclc - 39540382 notis - ALX1210 |
|
| Table of Contents |
|
Title Page
Page i
Acknowledgement
Page ii
Page iii
Table of Contents
Page iv
Page v
Page vi
List of Tables
Page vii
List of Figures
Page viii
Abstract
Page ix
Page x
Chapter 1: Social and economic strategies underlying agroforestry systems development in the state of Acre
Page 1
Introduction
Page 1
Problem statement
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Objectives of the study
Page 8
Research hypothesis
Page 9
Methodology
Page 10
Study sites
Page 10
Pre-research activities
Page 10
Approaches
Page 11
Secondary data collection
Page 11
Farm surveys
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Analysis, significance and limitations of the study
Page 16
Page 17
Plan of the study
Page 18
Page 19
Chapter 2: Background and the context of the study
Page 20
Introduction
Page 20
Physical, economic and social environment of acre
Page 20
Physical environment of acre
Page 20
Page 21
Political economy of Acre
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Agroforestry systems in the state of Acre: A brief history
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
The Seringueiros and the Seringal organization
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
The agricultural colonists and settlement organization
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Chapter 3: Agroforestry and agroforestry systems
Page 42
Introduction
Page 42
Agroforestry systems: a land use
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Agroforestry: A discipline
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Agroforestry: A socioeconomic strategy in Acre
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Chapter 4: Socioeconomic and enviromental context of smallholder livelihood systems
Page 54
Introduction
Page 54
Socioeconomic and environmental context
Page 54
Social origin
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Religion
Page 58
Social relations
Page 59
Page 60
Diet
Page 61
Settlement characteristics
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Environmental and socioeconomic farming contraints
Page 68
Biophysical constraints
Page 68
Page 69
Credit
Page 70
Page 71
Market and roads
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Labor
Page 78
Intra-household dynamics
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Farmers' goals and expectations
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Case 1
Page 90
Case 2
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Ideal farm
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Chapter 5: Farming and forestry systems of the communities
Page 97
Introduction
Page 97
Agriculture and forestry system
Page 97
Swidden fallow system
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Livestock production
Page 104
Pasture
Page 105
Home gardens
Page 106
Page 107
Plantation crop combination agroforesty systems
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Forestry activities
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Land use criteria
Page 116
Choice of land
Page 117
Page 118
Tillage
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Chapter 6: Summary, conclusions and recommendations
Page 129
Introduction
Page 129
Summary
Page 129
Agroforestry systems
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
The age factor
Page 133
Market relations
Page 133
Gender relations
Page 134
Ideal farm
Page 135
Conclusions
Page 135
Agroforestry adoption
Page 136
Food security and cash flow
Page 136
Institutional, political and biophysical constraints
Page 137
Market accessibility
Page 138
Gender relations
Page 139
Recommendations
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Reference
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Biographical sketch
Page 154
Page 155
|
|