Determinants of a demographic transition in predominantly rural countries

Material Information

Determinants of a demographic transition in predominantly rural countries
Series Title:
International working paper series
Lele, Uma J
Martin, Michael, 1954-
Expert Group Meeting on Population Growth and Demographic Structure, (1992
Place of Publication:
Gainesville Fla
Food and Resource Economics Dept., Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Publication Date:
Physical Description:
i, 24, [9] p. : ill. ; 28 cm.


Subjects / Keywords:
Demographic transition -- Developing countries ( lcsh )
Agriculture -- Economic aspects -- Developing countries ( lcsh )
Fertility, Human -- Developing countries ( lcsh )
bibliography ( marcgt )
non-fiction ( marcgt )


Includes bibliographical references (p. 22-24).
General Note:
"For the Expert Group Meeting on Population Growth and Demographic Structure organized by the United Nations, Paris, France, November 16-20, 1992."
General Note:
"November 1992"--Cover.
Electronic resources created as part of a prototype UF Institutional Repository and Faculty Papers project by the University of Florida.
Statement of Responsibility:
by Uma Lele and Michael Martin.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
The University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries respect the intellectual property rights of others and do not claim any copyright interest in this item. This item may be protected by copyright but is made available here under a claim of fair use (17 U.S.C. §107) for non-profit research and educational purposes. Users of this work have responsibility for determining copyright status prior to reusing, publishing or reproducing this item for purposes other than what is allowed by fair use or other copyright exemptions. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder. The Smathers Libraries would like to learn more about this item and invite individuals or organizations to contact Digital Services ( with any additional information they can provide.
Resource Identifier:
001784452 ( ALEPH )
27377019 ( OCLC )
AJK7834 ( NOTIS )

Full Text
-7-7, ooe'
Uma Lele and Michael Martin
IW92-31 November 1992
* Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida 32611

Uma Lele and Michael Martin'
The Expert Group Meeting On Population Growth and Demographic Structure Organized by the United Nations Paris, France
November 16-20, 1992
'Uma Lele Is Graduate Research Professor In the Food and Resource Economics Department and Director of International Studies and Programs, and Michael Martin is a Graduate Student at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, U.S.A.

Introduction ...................................................I1
Definition of Rural Countries ........................................ 4
Diversity of Population Growth Experiences and Need for Empirical Research ....................................5
Differential Population Performance ...................................7
Recent Trends in African Fertility ..................................... 9
Malthus Vs. Boserup ............................................ 12
Structural Adjustment ............................................ 15
Fertility and Democracy .......................................... 17
Gender Bias in China and South Asia ................................19
Summary.................................................... 20
Uist of Tables and Figures
Table 1: Population, GDP and Percapita GNP Growth Rates for*
Selected Regions, 1990
Table 2: Total Number of Poor for Selected Regions, 1985 2000 Table 3: Population Growth Rates for Selected Countries Table 4: Percent of Currently Married Women Who Want No More
Children and Percent Who Wish to Postpone Among Those
Who Want More Selected Sub-Saharan Countries Figure 1: Fertility by Per Capita GNP Figure 2: Fertility by Female Life Expectancy Figure 3: Fertility by Primary Education Figure 4: Percapita ODA

Determinants of A Demographic Transition In Predominantly Rural Countries'
Uma Leie and Michael Martin 2
Why focus on predominantly rural countries, which is the charge of this paper? It is because predominantly rural countries influence population growth and demographic transition differently than urbanized countries. Following Gary Becker, it is now generally believed by economists that human fertility and population growth rates are determined by income and education. Especially as women's access to income and education increases and with it the value of their time, they substitute quality of children for quantity. They invest more in fewer children. It is no wonder then that since the Bucharest Population Conference in 1974, the two most commonly advocated themes in population policy have been rapid and broad-based economic growth, to influence the demand for smaller families, and effective family planning to influence the supply of contraceptives which would control fertility (Ridker). The inverse relationship of fertility with income and women's literacy and, its positive relationship with infant mortality is by now well established (see figures 1-3). There are, nevertheless, numerous non-economic factors which enter into fertility decisions. These are particularly significant in predominantly rural
'A paper prepared for the Expert Group Meeting on Population Growth and Demoggraphic Structure organized by the United Nations, Paris, France, November 16-20, 1992.
'Uma Lele Is Graduate Research Professor In the Food and Resource Economics Department and Director of International Studies and Programs, and Michael Martin is a Graduate Student at the University of Florida, Gainesville. Florida 32611, U.SA

countries. Typically, they are low income countries in which non-market activities dominate. The level of education is limited, particularly for women. Agriculture dominates in income, employment, savings, investment, food, exports, etc. The rural sector absorbs the bulk of the population growth. Labor productivity is very low. Whereas nearly a third of the GNP in a predominantly rural economy originates in agriculture, between half to three quarters of the population resides in the rural sector. At best, per capita rural income is typically only a fifth to a third of the urban average.
Women's labor force participation tends to be high in food production, storage, processing, marketing, water and fuel wood collection. Yet their high labor force participation is typically not associated with low fertility levels. Predominantly rural countries tend to lack physical and institutional capital and the trained personnel necessary to provide quality public services such as clean water, education or health services. Access to information and factor and product markets tend to be imperfect, stressing the role for the government in activities which would otherwise be handled by the market, for example, the supply of contraceptives. The cost of providing such services, however, tends to be high due to the limited human and institutional infrastructure.
For analytical purposes, the economic development riddle can be divided into three independent but interrelated pieces: 1) vigorous overall economic growth involving income growth in both agricultural and the manufacturing sectors, a la East Asia; 2) vigorous growth in the food and the agricultural sectors without necessarily a stellar macro economic performance, a la South Asia; and, 3) investment in the social sectors,

with or without a strong macroeconomic performance, 6 la China, Kerala or Sri Lanka. All three can achieve varying degrees of decline in fertility rates, but the failure on the first two fronts for any length of time can make investment in the social sectors unsustainable and result in high levels of fertility as in Africa. The African situation raises the old Malthusian concerns by now largely rejected by the economic profession, as well as a variety of non-economic considerations such as tastes and preferences discussed later in this paper.
The paper reviews the recent empirical evidence to determine the extent to which income, residence (rural or urban) and women's education determine fertility levels and overall population growth rates. Macroeconomic and sectoral performance affecting fertility rates is reviewed first, followed by the micro level behavior of households. The experience of East and South Asia is explored where population policies and patterns of rural and overall economic growth have differed widely. Those differences have resulted in quite different outcomes with regard to the rates of population growth. The paper inevitably ends up with a treatment of Africa, where demographic transition has not yet occurred. On the basis of the evidence presented, Malthusian-Boserupean debate about population growth as a liability or an asset to economic development is explored. The paper identifies the need for more location specific, quantitative research at the household, community and regional levels. It illustrates why such research needs to transcend traditional sectoral and disciplinary boundaries to effectively address the interactions between demography, agriculture and the environment, and to explore its implications for policy (see for instance Lele and Stone).

Definition of Rural Countries:
How should one define predominantly rural countries? One way would be to choose an arbitrary cut off point such as t he share of the total population living in rural areas, e.g. 50 percent or more. According to WDR 1992, such a definition leads to inclusion of all low income countries, excluding China, with a total population of 1.9 billion and 22 million middle low income countries in Latin America, Africa and the Middle East (with the total population of 691 million). Exclusion of China, with 46 percent of the total 1.13 billion people reported to be in rural areas in 1990 (WDR 1992), may however be questioned. China's rural population exceeds the entire population of Sub-Saharan Africa. Moreover, the Chinese experience raises important policy issues for other developing countries. Its population growth has dropped to only 1.3 percent in 1985 compared to 2.2 in 1965. On the other hand, Africa and the Middle East explain the wide range of population projections by the World Bank until 2160. Their likely future population growth rates remain a matter of conjecture, and account for between 85 to 90 percent of the difference between the base case and alternative (higher) scenarios of population growth. The share of Sub-Saharan Africa alone is estimated to be nearly two thirds of the differences from the base case. The projections assume a rapid, continent-wide demographic transition in Africa, lagging Asia's transition by only a few decades. But whether such a decline will be induced by a deliberate policy or be a by-product of economic development is not made clear. This is a matter of particular interest. The World Bank's assessment of economic growth prospects for Africa remain pessimistic. On the other hand, some of the Bank's most influential analysts have accepted the revisionist view" which holds that rapid population growth is not an obstacle to economic development except under some special circumstances (Birdsall). A major new research project on

population growth is likely to throw considerable light on fertility behavior in Africa (Ainsworth). Concerns from other noneconomic disciplines need nevertheless to become an integral part of the World Bank's research on determinants of fertility in Africa.
A justification for the World Bank's position and that of the prestigious National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences on population is based on the fact that Total Fertility Rates (TFRs) and population growth rates have declined in all parts of the world except Africa. But TFRs have remained virtually unaltered at over six live births per woman in Africa (WDR, 1992). There is some recent evidence of decline in fertility in a few countries, e.g. Kenya.
The AIDS epidemic is projected to reduce Africa's population growth rate by one half percent to one percent in the early 21 st century (WDR 1992). Yet, TFRs in Africa remain higher than in other parts of the world even with similar levels of per capita income (Figure 1). It should be noted, however, that relationships of TFRs with life expectancy and female education follow standard inverse patterns (Figures 2 and 3). Yet,recent empirical evidence on fertility behavior in some African countries reviewed later offers results contrary to those normally expected, i.e. increased income and women's increased access to primary education seems to be associated with higher fertility rates.
Diversity of Population Growth Experiences and Need for Empirical Research: As the preceding discussion illustrates, there is great diversity among continents, individual countries and indeed even among regions within single countries (e.g. China, Kerala vs. the rest of India, or more recently the central province vs. the rest of Kenya).

This diversity makes generalizations difficult. Not only do countries differ widely in the size of populations (e.g. China vs. Chad), but also in population densities, development of physical, human and institutional capital, social norms as regards family size, the extent to which joint or nuclear families prevail, (the incidence of polygamy is still pervasive in Africa), the extent of settled or nomadic populations (in the latter case population growth rates are significantly lower), the extent to which female children are undervalued relative to male children as, for instance, in China and India, the nature of religious beliefs, most notably the role of Islam in reducing female labor force participation, and the differences in the levels of technologies and factor productivity. For example, value added of labor per hectare on a typical smallholder farm in Africa is about 85 percent (implying little or no use of capital) compared to 45 percent in India (despite India's labor abundance) reflecting the use of higher level of technology in Indian agriculture, i.e. animal draft power, chemical fertilizers, etc. (Delgado and Ranade).
Undercapitalization has resulted in high labor intensity per unit of land in African agriculture. However, low population densities, fragmented labor markets and acute seasonality of rainfed agriculture also cause labor shortages. Clearly, increasing labor productivity, especially of women that have the primary responsibility for food production is an important impetus for of reducing fertility. Yet, following the Asian model, much of the agricultural technology generation in Africa has focused on increasing land rather than labor productivity. Such new technology frequently generates considerable additional demand for labor (eg. in weeding, harvesting, storage, etc.) accentuating rather than alleviating labor bottlenecks and perhaps creating a justification for larger families.

The labor requirements of households increase considerably when collection of water (much less easily accessible in rural Africa than in rural Asia or rural Latin America), and fuel wood (much more extensively used in rural Africa than in rural Asia) are taken into account. Sheer survival calls for considerably more arduous labor and children constitute an important part of the rural labor force as transporters of water, gatherers of fuel wood and guardians of cattle and younger siblings. The cost of rearing children is relatively low where access to primary and secondary education is limited, although considerable strides have been made in the expansion of social services in Africa.
These various factors together affect rates of growth of population and per capita income. Yet the relative importance of cultural, technological, infrastructure, institutional and economic factors in rapid population growth is a highly debated issue. Also debated is whether rapid population growth and increased population densities are an asset or a liability for economic development, including in particular the effects of population growth rates on investment, factor productivity and ultimately on economic growth, debates to which we return later.
Differential Population Performance:
Table 1 shows the rates of population and GDP growth in the three continents in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. GDP growth rates were higher and population growth rates lower in East Asia leading to the highest rates of per capita GNP growth, followed by South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.
Table 2 also shows the number of people living in poverty Cie. with per capita incomes

less than one dollar per day) in the three continents and their projected numbers ff present economic trends continue. South Asia and Africa are the regions where the bulk of poverty will remain concentrated. Furthermore much of this poverty is concentrated in the rural areas and that is where the problem of rapid population growth will remain. Of the 1.13 billion living in poverty in 1990, nearly 750 million live in Asia and well over half a billion in South Asia alone. By the year 2000, the number of poor in East Asia is expected to decline from 169 million to 73 million, and in South Asia to 511 million, down from 562 million. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the number is expected to increase from 216 million to 304 million.
The Malthusian concern of population growth outstripping the rate of growth of food production has been virtually abandoned except perhaps in Africa, although it had much validity in East and South Asia until the mid 1960s, i.e. until technological change in the agricultural sector increased return to land and labor and accelerated the rate of growth of food production above the rate of population growth. The Green Revolution eliminated recurrent food shortages and, by keeping food prices and wage costs low, provided a boost to overall economic growth. Per capita income has been higher in each successive decade in South Asia. Yet South Asian countries have experienced slow growth of employment in the manufacturing sector and slow overall economic growth due to protective industrialization policy. But in East Asia, the effects of favorable performance in food production have been further reinforced by favorable macroeconomic policies which have ascribed high priority to export orientation, leading to a rapid growth in employment in the manufacturing, as well as, the agricultural sector. Such personal income growth has been combined with substantial expansion of public investment in the

social sectors leading to female access to primary education in Indonesia exceeding 100 percen3 in 1985 compared to 67 percent for India and only 46 percent for Bangladesh (WDR 1992). An even more certain determinant of fertility reduction, namely women's access to secondary education, stood at 23 percent in Indonesia compared to 22 percent in India, only 9 percent in Bangladesh and 7 percent in Senegal. But female literacy rates provide an even more favorable picture in Indonesia. They had been brought down to 32 percent in Indonesia compared to 66 percent in India, although in the early 1960s Indonesia's female access to education was 57 percent compared to India's 65 percent.
The examples of Sri Lanka and the Kerala state in India that have also brought down fertility rates considerably sho w that investment in the social sectors and the spread of primary education can result in sharp reduction in fertility rates at low levels of per capita income. Similar differences in economic and social sector strategies explain why India has done better than Bangladesh or Senegal (Table 3). Indeed, fertility rates in Indonesia and India, with per capita incomes of $ 520 and $ 350 respectively in 1990 were comparable to those in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia. The latter three had per capita incomes three to six times higher but their income distribution is more skewed, with significant incidence of poverty.
Recent Trends in African Fertility:
Demographic and health surveys in eleven countries in Africa show that while Total fertility Rates (TERs) are very high in Africa, nearly in every country they are significantly lower
3rhe figure exceeds 100 percent because it is based on an age cohort of primary school children, but people outside that cohort enrolled In school.

in urban than in rural areas, perhaps due to a higher concentration of women with secondary and higher levels of education in urban areas. Differences in fertility with only primary schooling are, however, smaller and sometimes in the opposite direction than those expected (1984 WDR, and Cochrane 1979, 1988) leading to a concern that the spread of primary schooling could result in increased fertility rates.
Use of contraception is strongly and positively related to the level of education. Recent survey data suggest that between four to 49 percent of married, nonpregnant women would like to stop child bearing, suggesting that policies that improve the access to contraceptives and encourage their use are likely to result in a substantial decline in fertility (Table 4).
Although lack of contraceptives is a problem in many African countries the primary reason for high fertility and low contraceptive use appear to be continued high demand for children (van de Walle and Foster 1990). The ideal family size on recent surveys remains at six to nine children per woman. This suggests that large scale expansion of family planning programs is unlikely to have much effect on fertility rates in Africa (Ainsworth). Indigenous culture clearly plays a role in the determination of family size, but low levels of education of women, and high child mortality also play a part. The recent increase in malaria and AlDs has resulted in increase in mortality rates (by year 2000 mortality of children under five is expected to increase by a fifth to 43 percent in ten severely affected countries (Ainsworth)), and this should be expected to keep fertility rates high.
Micro studies of fertility behavior show substantial differences among African countries.

For instance despite higher per capita income and higher level of urbanization fertility is higher in CMte d'lvoire than in Ghana, and appears not to have changed in recent years. Child mortality is very high in both countries. Women's education is strongly related to fertility decline in both countries and secondary education brings it down more substantially, but women's education is highly limited in both countries. Only 62 percent of the female population attends primary schools in CMte d'lvoire- and 67 percent in Ghana4. The rates are even lower for secondary schools, namely 20 percent and 39 percent respectively.
Income seems to have opposite effects in the two countries, in CMte d'lvoire it is positively related to fertility and negatively in Ghana (Kofi Benefo and T. Paul Schultz will cite as forthcoming). Urbanization seems to have only a limited effect in Ghana but seems to contribute to a fertility decline in CMte d'lvoire. Women's education is thus the most important determinant of fertility decline, other things being equal (Benefo and Schultz).
Even among high fertility rate countries differences among socioeconomic classes lead to a conclusion that high demand for children might well be a result of high rates of mortality and low levels of schooling of female children (Cochrane and Farid). Yet empirical support for the decline in fertility associated with decline in child mortality is weak in Africa. Frank and McNicoll argue that fertility rates in Kenya in particular and Africa in general may be reduced more quickly by directing attention to women most likely to be interested in ceasing childbearing (e.g., women who already have several children
4The data are from the years 1985 for Cte d'Ivoire and 1987 for Ghana.

or adolescents whose early pregnancies increasingly conflict with education) rather than spreading program attention over all child bearing families. They lament that economic and demographic models do not take into account the impact of local government organizations, delivery systems, land tenure institutions or ethnic factors that influence women's security and child bearing decisions.
Malthus Vs. Boserup:
The impetus for an active family planning program in India and China, discussed below, has been prompted by high population densities and exploitation of already quite marginal lands, with extensive landlessness. Boserup, on the other hand has argued, particularly in the case of Africa where population densities have been generally low until recently, that population growth and increased densities can stimulate intensification of agriculture by inducing technological change made possible by changes in relative factor proportions as well as by the development of factor and product markets, specialization and development of property rights, all in turn leading to greater investment in land. Lele and Stone have shown, however, that there is no universal guarantee of such. outcomes. Rather they are determined by the nature of public policy. For example, where land access is restricted to a privileged few and price, 'technology and infrastructural investments by the public sector discriminate against small farm production as in Malawi policie s can result in involution much as Gertz observed in Java in the 1950s. In contrast, more egalitarian and pro-active agricultural policies such as those pursued in Kenya can result in rapid intensification of agriculture through shift to high value crops and increased yields per ha.

Kenya's agricultural success notwithstanding, there is growing evidence in Kenya and other parts of Africa of stagnation or decline in per hectare yields of major crops, caused by increased population pressure on the land, a reduction in the bush fallow, absence of crop rotation and widespread migration of populations to the poorer lands (Lele and Stone). According to various recent international assessments (e.g. WDR 1992), prospects for economic growth are by far the least promising in Africa due to a combination of a rapidly growing population and an ineffective public policy.
Whether Boserup or Malthus prove right in the long run in Africa depends on the quality of public policy that is in turn influenced by a variety of external factors. For example, the world food situation has changed considerably relative to that which Asian countries faced in the mid 1960s. The depletion of US food surpluses by the end of the 1960s followed by a severe drought in 1973 resulted in a sharp rise in world food prices adversely affecting large food importers in South and East Asia (e.g. China, India and Indonesia). The increased food import dependence was an impetus for Asian policy makers to increase domestic food production. Concern about domestic political stability also weighed heavily in Asia.
In contrast, African countries are small importers. Even with a doubling share of world cereal imports they stood at only 12% in 1990. Moreover, the world food situation is now considerably more favorable with virtually all industrial countries having become major surplus producers. High levels of per capita aid have been easier to mobilize for small African countries (see Figure 5). There has been less impetus to get African agriculture in order. Technological breakthroughs have also been harder to achieve in rain-fed 13

African agriculture in contrast to the irrigated agriculture of Asia, with the result that increased population pressure has frequently had disastrous effects. The growing concerns about environmental sustainability has caused erosion of the traditional approach to intensify agriculture through the increased use of modern inputs. Because external dependence is much greater these concerns have had the inadvertent effect of keeping fertilizer consumption low in African agriculture.
Yet, the growing environmental concerns may well affect the world's ability to feed a growing population, even though Virtually every recent global study has concluded that the world has the necessary physical resources to feed a much larger population (Srinivasan). However, these studies do not factor in the economics of increasing food production. Changes in input prices which more correctly reflect the true environmental costs could increase the cost of food production considerably, thereby rendering it less profitable in developing countries than it has been in the last two decades. Yet the world food prices continue to decline following a virtually autonomous technical change in agriculture in industrial countries.
The emphasis on structural adjustment since the early 1980s has shifted the attention away from these micro level realities to macroeconomic policy reforms. Investment rates, including especially public investments in irrigation have dropped throughout the developing world, and growth of fertilizer use is expected to decelerate in a situation of devaluations, reductions in fertilizer subsidies and crowding out of the private sector access to institutional credit (Lele, 1992).

In summary, prospects for rapid increase in per capita food availability are believed to be less promising in the next two decades than they did in Asia in the 1960s and 1970s. This makes it all the more important and yet all the more difficult to reduce the rates of population growth in a situation of growing poverty.
Structural Adjustment:
The impact of structural adjustment on the social sectors is a matter of interest. A major IMF study of government expenditures covering the 1975-1986 period concludes that there has been a general upward shift toward higher educational spending in all regions of the developing world, eight to fifteen percent higher than levels predicted in relation to the structure of the economies and growth rates of GNP (Heller and Diamond). While gains in women's education have been more significant than average throughout the world, major variations exist among the lowest income countries (e.g., Kenya, Lesotho, Togo and Zaire are above the predicted level but Sudan, Cameroon and Tanzania are below).
The same IMF study finds that foreign debt is a major constraint on education expenditures. Furthermore, none of the demand factors (such as the size of dependent population, birth and population growth rates and poor access to clean water) have a significant influence on the share of health expenditures in GDP. Rather health expenditures too are most significantly and negatively related to the size of the foreign debt.
The higher cost of providing services in rural areas tends to raise the share of 15

expenditures. This may explain why the share of actual health expenditures to GDP ratios were higher than those predicted for Africa with its greater share of rural populations compared to Asia.
in a recent study, Sahn concludes that there is no conclusive evidence to suggest that countries reduce government expenditures either in real terms or as a percent of GDP as a consequence of receiving adjustment loans. In those countries where compression in government spending is noted in the 1980s, it preceded the beginning of adjustment programs. That, however, is little consolation since the interest is in knowing about the impact of adjustment (rather than of loan conditionality) on the access to social services. Sahn concludes that real spending on a per capita basis has declined. Precisely how a contraction in those expenditures has affected services is not known. It depends on: whether the balance of investment and recurrent expenditures has become more or less appropriate, within recurrent expenditures; whether the resources for operating expenses
--that tend to be the most constrained in the least developed countries-- improved or worsened; whether the quality of public services deteriorated; or whether expenditure cuts resulted in the marginal activities being eliminated.
The increased emphasis on cost recovery has been justified on grounds that subsidized services do not benefit the most deserving and result in rationing of supply by' constraining the budgetary resources allocated to those activities (Jimenez). There is little empirical evidence yet to indicate the actual increase in cost recovery in the social sectors, and whether it has resulted in expanded services. It is likely that the poor would be unable to pay for such services. If they did not benefit before the reforms were 16

introduced, they would not benefit from expansion of market based services either, particularly in the rural areas. Subsidies targeted specifically for the poor are clearly essential. More empirical research is needed on the quantity and the quality of social services than exists currently.
Fertility and Democracy:
The much faster decline in fertility rates in China than India raise additional policy issues especially in the context of the contemporary interest in the exercise of democracy. In both countries economic and social incentives to reduce fertility have been combined with exercise of compulsion, albeit more consistently in China than India, e.g. the one-child policy in China and the temporary use of forced sterilizations following the declaration of emergency in the early 1970s in India. India was unable to enforce compulsion on a sustained basis however. The unpopularity of sterilizations and the ensuing loss of election by Mrs. Gandhi set back the political will to actively promote family planning programs in India even where market demand for such services now outstrips supply.
China's better performance is a result of more effective economic incentives as well as stronger enforcement of compulsion. Through a revolution, China redistributed assets and ensured a much more broad-based access of households to productive services in the agricultural sector than India could manage through democratic means. China's policy of personal responsibility in agricultural production since the early 1980s accelerated and diversified agricultural production. China also greatly increased women's access to education and health services and expanded their labor force participation. Three quarters of women in China had access to contraceptives in 1985 compared to 45 17

percent in India in 1988, the latest years for which data are available. Contraceptives are virtually totally unavailable in rural areas of India according to some latest study. This is in no small measure due to an excessive emphasis on sterilizations aimed at women at the end of their child bearing stage as the means of controlling population growth.
The enforcement of the policy of universal primary school attendance has similarly been constrained in India by a general recognition that the opportunity cost of children's (and especially the girl's) time, is higher for poor households who rely on their income than the discounted future return to eduction. Compulsory schooling may boomerang at the ballot box although the discounted long run social return to such education may well be considerably higher. Not only will spread of primary and secondary education increase labor productivity and future streams of household income. It will result in reduced fertility rates and increased quality of child care. Moreover, the spread of primary education will curtail the widespread practice of the employment of child labor. Recent data show that, although female primary school attendance increased by 20 percent in India in the late seventies and early eighties, it began to decline in 1988 (WDR's 1965-92). More alarming is the fall in female labor force participation rate from 27 percent in 1965 to 20 percent in 1990, whereas female labor participation in other developing countries has increased. Regarding freedom of household choice and high social costs of female illiteracy, India and other developing countries facing these dilemmas clearly need to assert the more pro-active role of the state in the enforcement of primary and secondary education, in much the same way that it was done in the now industrialized democracies.

Gender Bias In China and South Asia
Whereas the supply of contraceptives may affect the motivation to plan families, the absence of a democratic environment at the household level also has effects on infant and child mortality. Both India and China are notorious for their discrimination against female children. Over 50 million females are estimated to be missing in China and India (Coale).
South Asia has fewer females to males in the total population (Visaria) due to discrimination against female children and their consequent excessive mortality (see for instance D'Souza and Chen, Wyon and Gordon, Levinson). Such differences are more pronounced in North than South India (Dyson and Moore). Moreover, whereas such discrimination should be expected to prevail in the rural areas, recent evidence suggests that increase in incomes, access to education including particularly women's access to education, and indeed even the general decline in fertility rates caused by overall economic growth has not eliminated discrimination against female children.
Girls in families with one or more surviving daughters are more likely to suffer discrimination. In the Punjab, girls face 2.36 times higher mortality than their male siblings. Expenditures on medical care are 2.34 times higher on boys before the age of two, as compared to girls. Boys also benefit from higher quality nutrition, better clothing etc (Das Gupta).
A strong preference for male children is accentuated by the reduction in the size of the family, and this has been noted in China (Arnold and Uu). Sten Johanssen and Ola 19

Nygren estimate the excess female infant deaths in China to be about 39,000 per year or about 4 per 1,000 live born births. They attribute the phenomenon of the so-called missing females to under-reporting of girls, differential abortion and female infanticide.
The main characteristic shared by predominantly rural countries is the low level of per capita income. Other social and economic conditions vary substantially, however, highlighting the need for location specific population research. Availing contraceptives to women has little impact if cultural or institutional constraints adversely influence economic incentives to bear children.
Due to its massive poverty in global terms, the biggest challenge of population growth is in Africa and South Asia. With respect to Africa, aspects and assumptions pertaining to the Boserup hypothesis merit critical examination to determine the extent to which population growth can actually assist economic development. The same conditions that averted a Malthusian crisis in Europe and more recently in Asia do not prevail in much of Africa. Promoting universal female education, health care, contraceptive materials and training is clearly critical. Agricultural research, extension, credit and labor productivity are also critical to increase agricultural productivity, income and thereby to lower fertility rates. International aid is important but past aid efforts focussing simplistically both on integrated rural development and structural adjustment without an economic development strategy have had a very limited impact (Lele, 1991). More aid to Africa without assessing its impact and implications for the future is therefore not a solution. Reduction of implicit domestic taxation of agriculture and intersectoral redistribution between agriculture and 20

industry attempted through structural adjustment is essential, but has not occurred in many African countries and in any case is not sufficient. It cannot generate sufficient revenue to alleviate the poverty that contributes to high fertility rates. The evidence from IMF studies indicates that large foreign debts and budget cuts have threatened essential social services. Predominantly rural countries also face higher per unit costs of delivering social services, given their poor infrastructures and the wide geographical dispersion of their populations.
In South Asia, female fertility rates have not declined as much as they could because, with the exception of Sri Lanka and Kerala in India, South Asia has not given the priority to investment in education and the social sectors that it deserves, including especially the focus on women. The often fatal discrimination of female infants in China and South Asia has been well recognized. Yet surprisingly little attempt has been made by the countries' policy makers and social and religious leaders to deal with the problem. There is a need to encourage public discussion and massive public education of men and women within the countries involved on an issue in which male national leaders must clearly take the lead. International agencies should assist their counterparts in countries where female infanticide occurs and offer support for whatever policy initiatives that diminish the problem.

Ainsworth, Martha, 1991, Economic and Policy Determinants of Fertility in Sub- =Saharan
Africa: A Research Proposal, Population, Health and Nutrition Division of the World
Arnold, Fred and Liu Zhoaxiang, 1986, "Sex Preference, Fertility and Family Planning in
China," Population and Development Review, 12(2) June: 221-246.
Becker, Gary S., 1981, A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard
University Press.
Benefo, Kofi and T. Paul Schulltz, 1992, Fertility and Mortality in C6te d'lvoire and
Ghana, Paper prepared for the African Technical Department, Population, Health
and Nutrition Division of the World Bank (forthcoming).
Birdsall, Nancy. 1980. "Population Growth and Poverty in the Developing World."
Population Bulletin 35,5 (December): 3-38.
Boserup, Ester, 1965, The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of agrarian
Change under Population Pressure, New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
1981, Population and Technical Change: A Study of Long Term Trends, Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
Caldwell, John C. and Pat Caldwell, 1978, "The Cultural Context of High Fertility in SubSaharan Africa," Population and Development Review, 13(3): 409-437.
Cleaver, Kevin and Gotz Schreiber, 1991, "The Population, Environment and Agriculture
Nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Bank, Western Africa Department,
Washington, DC.
Coale, Ansley J., 1991, "Excess Female Mortality and the balance of the Sexes in the
Population: An Estimate of the Number of Missing Females,'" Population and
Development Review, 17(3) September: 517-523.
Cochrane, Susan H. and Frederick T. Sai, 1991, "Excess Fertility," in Health Sector
Priorities Review (draft), Population and Human Resources Department, The World
Bank, Washington, DC.
Cochrane, Susan H. and Samir Farid, 1990,"Socioeconomic Differentials in Fertility and
their Explanation," in Population Growth and Reproduction in Sub-Saharan Africa: Technical Analysis of Fertility and its Consequences," (A World Bank Symposium) Eds. George T.F. Acsadi, Gwendolyn Johnson Acsadi and Rodolfo F. Bulatao,
Washington DC: The World Bank.

Cochrane, Susan Hill, 1988, "The Effects of Education, Health and Social Security on
Fertility in Developing Countries," Policy Planning and Research Working Paper
WPS 93, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
1979, Fertility and Education: What Do We Really Know?, World Bank Staff
Occasional Papers, No. 26, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Das Gupta, Monica, "Selective Discrimination against Female Children in Rural Punjab,
India," Population and Development Review, 13(1) March: 77-100.
Delgado, Christopher L and Chandrashekhar G. Ranade, 1987, "Technological Change
and Agricultural Labor Use" in Accelerating Food Production in Sub-Saharan Africa, Eds. John W. Mellor, Christopher L Delgado and Malcolm J. Blackie, Baltimore:
The Johns Hopkins University Press.
D'Souza, Stan and Lincoln C. Chen, 1980, "Sex Differentials in Mortality in Rural
Bangladesh,! Population and Development Review, 6(2) June: 257-270.
Dyson, T. and M. Moore, "On Kinship, Structure, Female Autonomy and Demographic
Behavior in India," Population and Development Review, 9(1) March: 35-60.
Jimenez, Emmanuel, 1987, Pricing Policy in the Social Sectors: Cost Recovery for
Education and Health in Developing Countries, A World Bank Publication,
Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Johansson, Sten and Ola Nygren, 1991, "The Missing Girls of China: A New Demographic
Account," Population and Development Review, 17(3) March: 34-52.
Heller, Peter S. and Jack Diamond, 1990, International Comparisons of Government
Expenditure Revisited: The Developing Countries, 1975-86, Occasional Paper 69,
Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Lele, Uma, 1991, Aid to African Agriculture: Lessons from Two Decades of Donors'
Experience, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
-, 1992, Structural Adjustment and Agriculture: A Comparative Perspective on
Performance in Africa, Asia and Latin America, Keynote address to the First Plenary Session of the European Association of Agricultural Economists' Seminar on Food and Agricultural Policies under Structural Adjustment, Hohenheim,
Lele, Uma, Robert E. Christiansen and Kundhavi Kadiresan, Fertilizer Policy in Africa:
Lessons from Development Programs and Adjustment Lending, 1970-87,
Discussion Paper #5.
Lele, Uma and Steven W. Stone, 1989, "Population Pressure, the Environment and
Agricultural Intensification: Variations on the Boserup Hypothesis," MADIA

Discussion Paper 4. Washington, DC, World Bank.
Levinson, F.J., 1972, Morinda: An Economic Analysis of Malnutrition Among Young
Children in Rural India, MIT/Cornell University Press.
Ridker, Ronald G., 1976, "Perspectives on Population Policy and Research," in Population
and Development, Ed. Ronald G. Ridker, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University
Sahn, David E., 1990, Fiscal Exchange Rate Reforms in Africa: Considering the Impact
Upon the Poor, Monograph 4, Cornell Food and Nutrition Policy Program.
Srinivasan, T.N., 1988, "Population Growth and Food: An Assessment of Issues, Models
and Projections" in Population, Food and Rural Development, Eds. Ronald D. Lee, W. Brian Arthur, Allen C. Kelley, Gerry Rodgers and T.N. Srinivasan, Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
van de Walle, Etienne and Andrew Foster, 1990, "Fertility Decline in Africa: Assessments
and Prospects," World Bank Technical Paper, No. 125, The World Bank,
Washington, DC.
Visaria, Pravin M. The Sex Ratio of the Population of India, Census of India 1961, Vol 1,
Monograph no. 10.
World Bank, 1992, Population and the World Bank: Implications from Eight Case Studies,
Washington, DC: Operations Evaluations Department.
1992, World Development Report 1992, Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
_ ,_ 1984, World Development Report 1984, Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
Wyon, John B. and John E. Gordon, 1971, The Khanna Study, Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.

Table 1
Population, GDP and Percapita GNP Growth Rates for Selected Regions, 1990
Region' Population GDP Per Capita GNP
1965-73 1973-80 1980-89 1965-73 1973-80 1980-89 1965-73 1973-80 1980-89 Sub-Saharan Africa4 2.6 2.7 3.2 4.8 3.2 2.1 1.7 0.6 42
East Asia 2.6 1.7 1.6 8.1 6.6 7.9 5.2 4.7 63
South Asia 2.4 2.4 2.3 3.6 4.2 5.1 1.2 1.9 29
Europe, Middle East 1.8 2.0 2.0 7.7 3.9 2.9 .. 1.8 (
& North Africa
Latin America & 2.6 2.4 2.1 6.5 5.0 1.6 4.7 2.3 (B
the Caribbean
'Source: World Development Report, 1991.

Table 2
Total Number of Poor
for Selected Regions, 1985 2000
Region' (millions by year)
1985 1990 2000
Sub-Saharan Africa 184 216 304
East Asia 182 169 73
South Asia 532 562 511
East Europe, Middle 65 78 93
East & North Africa
Latin America & 87 108 126
the Caribbean
'Source: World Development Report, 1991.

Table 3
Population Growth Rates for Selected Countries' (%1990)
Indonesia 1.9
India 2.0
Bangledesh 2.5
Brazil 2.0
Colombia 1.8
Mexico 2.1
Kenya 4.1
Senegal 2.9
'Source: Population and the World Bank: Implications from Eight Case Studies, World Bank, 1992.

Table 4
Percent of Currently Married Women Who Want No More Children and Percent Who Wish to Postpone Among Those Who Want More Selected Sub-Saharan Countries
Percent Who Percent Who Wish to
Want No More Postpone Among Those Country Year/Source Children Who Want More
Benin 1982 WFS 8 55
Botswana 1988 DHS 33 24
Burundi 1987 DHS 24 76
Cameroon 1978 WFS 8
Cote d'lvoire 1980 WFS 4 38
Ghana 1988 DHS 23 70
Kenya 1989 DHS 49 68
Lesotho 1977 WFS 14
Liberia 1986 DHS 17 48
Mali 1987 DHS 17 50
Mauratania 1981 WFS 11
Nigeria 1986 DHS 23 58
(Ondo State)
Senegal 1986 DHS 19
Sudan 1978 WFS 15
Togo 1988 DHS 25 71
Zimbabwe 1988 DHS 33 61
Source: Table 5, Cochrane and Sai, 1990. Note: Pregnant women excluded.

Figure 1
Fertility by Percapita GNP
Selected Countries
Lao.PDR Cote d'lvoire
Tanzania Kenya
6 Nig istan Cameroon
S5Algeria 5Haiti Zimbabwe
- Hait Belize
w Bangladesh Paraguay
El Salvador
0 4 India
4--, Peru
0 Philippines
I-- MexiCO -zi
H -unIosDominican Republic Mexic Brazil
3 Indonesia
Guyana Colob Jamaica
Ch i Lanka Thailand
Tni Lan ka
2 Mauritius
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Percapita GNP
Source: Social Indicators of Development 1991-92, A World Bank Book, Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.

Figure 2
Fertility by Fem ale Prim ary Education
Ethiopia Malawi
7 Niger
Afghanistan Zambia
Burkina FSMerra LectunbiaTanzania Kenya
Ghana Madagascar
6f 6 Chad Nigeria
Pakistan Nepal Cameroon
Papua New GL 'ia Honduras
5 Bolivia Zimbabwe
o Moroc cangladesh ParaguPtswana
- El Salvador
0 4 India Egypt, Arab Republic of
3 Indonesia
. China
Sri Lanka China
2 CutMturitius
1 t I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Female Primary Enrollment
Source: Social Indicators of Development 1991-92, A World Bank Book, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.

Figure 3
Fertility by Infant Mortality
'- 8
O Ethiopia Malawi
E 7Mali o oalia
Cote d'lvoire & '' 'ei Kenya ue dvoire & rkina Faso & Sierra Leone
Sudan Madagascar
6 -Niaeri
6 -Cameronr PaketpIl
(U Honduras & Nicaragua
c- 5 Zimbabwe Haiti
- El Salvador
4 Viet Nam Peru India
>\ Philippines
Mexico Brazil& Indonesia
L Colombia
) Sri Lgra
2 CubcMauritius
0 50 100 150 200
Infant Mortality (per 1,000 live births
Source: Social Indicators of Development 1991-92, A World Bank Book, Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.

Figure 4
Fertility by Female Life Expectancy
o Malawthiopia
O NigeAali
Afghanistan Burundi & Somalieote d'lvoire
. ..Bote d'lvoire.
Guinea MTzania Congo Kenya Syrian Arab Republic
Guna Mozam 1 au e .
W M S uan & Zairhana Jordan
Q) 6 Chad Nig rista
0 6 Chad Nigristaameroon & Namibia
/Nepal Lesotho
C Guatemala & Nicaragua
- Papua New Guinea Algeria
5 -Haiti .ngolia
Bangladesh & Cambodia Morocco Paraguay & Belize > El Salvador
4 India Peru Eidm
Peru EYgggym
Ios(D Brazil Mexico
I, 5 -Indonesia
Panama & Jamaica
0 Thailairi Lanka
4-j 5ri Lanka
0 2
2 Mauritius Cuba
40 50 60 70 80 90
Female Life Expectancy
Source: Social Indicators of Development 1991-92, A World Bank Book, Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.

Figure 5
70 Percopito ODA
50 Tanzan
U 30 UMalaw 0- Lesotho
Maurita 20 Hondur
Ethiopi Keny 949 asoy 10 -Ghao8 L'EFos
El S lvadeiti
0 a
0.60 1.60 3.60 6.40 6.60 7.40 8.20 9.20 9.90 11.40 14.60 16.40 20.00 24.50 25.70 45.90 48.20
Source: Social Indicators of Development 1991-92, A World Bank Book, Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.