Front Cover
 Back Cover

Title: Pumpkin variety evaluation.
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00054228/00003
 Material Information
Title: Pumpkin variety evaluation.
Physical Description: Serial
Publisher: University of Florida.
Publication Date: Summer-Fall 1993
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00054228
Volume ID: VID00003
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 62627940

Table of Contents
    Front Cover
        Page 1
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
        Page 10
    Back Cover
        Page 11
Full Text

Gulf Coast Research
and Education Center
r r r r

?1AY 2 0 1994
,\ Diversity of Florida

5007 60th St. E., Bradenton, Florida 34203-9324

C &ss

4010 0

SUNIVERSITY OF Gulf Coast Research and
FLORIDA Education Center
5007 60th Street East
Bradenton, FL 34203
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences

GCREC Research Report BRA1994-1 (January)


D. N. Maynard1

Pumpkins are grown mostly for sale during October and November for decorative
purposes. Statistical data on production in Florida are not available, but it
is estimated that only a few hundred acres are grown in the entire state.
Production from this acreage is not nearly enough to satisfy the demand, hence
considerable tonnage is shipped into the state, primarily from the midwest.

Previous evaluations of pumpkin varieties in Florida were made by Greene (1974)
in Quincy, Howe and Waters (1983) in Bradenton, Gilreath and Maynard (1986) in
Manatee County, by Elmstrom et al., (1988) in Manatee County and at Leesburg, and
by Maynard (1992) in Manatee County. A number of new varieties have been
released since these trials were conducted.

Because of the potential for increased pumpkin production in Florida, an
evaluation of 40 commercially-available varieties and six advanced experimental
lines was conducted in the summer and fall of 1993 on a commercial farm in
Manatee County.
Materials and Methods

Entries in this trial (Table 1) were mostly typical Halloween pumpkin (Cucurbita
peDo) types even though fruit size ranged from miniature to very large.
Six varieties; 'Big Max', 'Big Moon', 'Cinderella', 'Prizewinner', 'Rouge Vif
D'Etampes', and 'Snowball', although frequently grown and used as pumpkins, are
actually squash (Cucurbita maxima). 'Buckskin' appeared to be still another
species (Cucurbita moschata).

This trial was conducted on a commercial farm in Manatee County using practices
employed by the grower for pumpkin production. Beds were formed in early July
by incorporating 200 Ibs 2-18-4 (N-P Os-K20) per acre and banding 1200 Ibs 10-0-
20 per acre on each shoulder of the ed prior to application of white on black
polyethylene mulch. The final beds were 8 inches high and 36 inches wide and
were on 13 ft centers. On 21-22 July, pumpkin seeds were planted through holes

'Professor of Horticultural Sciences and Vegetable Extension Specialist. The
cooperation of Hunsader Farms is gratefully acknowledged.

punched in the polyethylene mulch at 2 ft in-row spacing for short-vined
varieties 'Baby Bear', 'Baby Boo', 'Baby Pam', 'Jack-Be-Little', 'Jack-Be-
Quick', 'Little Lantern', 'Munchkin', 'Oz', and 'Sweetie Pie'- and 3 ft in-row
spacing for all other entries. Because of space limitations, five plant plots
were used for all of the experimental entries, 'Buckskin', 'Cinderella', 'Rouge
Vif D'Etampes', 'Spirit', and 'Trick or Treat'; ten plant plots were used for all
of the other varieties. Each plot was replicated three times in a randomized
block design. Yields were converted to a per acre basis prior to statistical
analysis to correct for different plot sizes.

Pumpkins were harvested 6 to 20 October. The miniature and very small-fruited
pumpkins were counted and weighed in bulk and larger fruit were weighed
individually. Five representative fruit from each plot were selected for
measurement with calipers and fruit rind color was assessed by comparison with
recognized standards (RHS Colour Chart). Later, these colors were converted to
a 0 (light yellow) to 5 (dark orange) scale for statistical analysis.

Results and Discussion

The number of fruit produced per acre ranged from 484 for 'Thomas Halloween' to
18,093 for 'Baby Boo' (Table 2). Thirty-four other entries produced a similar
number of fruit as 'Thomas Halloween', whereas only 'Jack-Be-Little' and 'Jack-
Be-Quick' produced as many fruit as 'Baby Boo'. The number of fruit produced per
plant varied from 0.4 for 'Thomas Halloween' to 10.8 for 'Baby Boo' and 'Jack-Be-
Little'. Thirty-three other entries had fruit production per plant similar to
that of 'Thomas Halloween', whereas 'Jack-Be-Quick' and PUXP 2001 produced as
many fruit per plant as 'Baby Boo' and 'Jack-Be-Little'. Fruit yield varied from
37.1 cwt/acre for 'Oz' to 279.7 cwt/acre for 'Prizewinner'. Thirty-two other
entries had yields similar to those of 'Oz', whereas only 'Cinderella' yielded
as well as 'Prizewinner'. Average fruit weight ranged from 0.2 lb for 'Baby Boo'
to 35.3 lb for 'Prizewinner'. Fourteen other entries had average fruit weight
similar to that of 'Baby Boo', whereas only 'Big Moon' and 'Atlantic Giant' were
as heavy as 'Prizewinner'. Eighteen entries had fruit with height:width ratios
of 1 or greater, whereas 28 entries produced fruit with height:width ratios less
than 1. The range was 0.53 for 'Rouge Vif D'Etampes' to 1.32 for 'October'.
Rind color was lightest in 'Atlantic Giant', 'Big Moon', and 'Jack-Be-Quick' and
darkest in 'Baby Pam', HMX 2690, 'Howden', and JSS9032F1 in the yellow/orange
rind entries. Six other entries had similar light color and 22 other entries had
similar dark rind color. 'Baby Boo' and 'Snowball' had white rinds and
'Buckskin' had a buff colored rind.

Pumpkin yields in this trial are typical of those obtained in most previous
trials in Florida (Elmstrom et al., 1988; Gilreath and Maynard, 1986; Greene,
1974, and Howe and Waters, 1983) but lower than those obtained at this location
in 1992 (Maynard, 1992). The general pattern of the highest per acre yields
being produced by entries that produce very large fruit and the largest number
of fruit being produced by entries that produce miniature fruit was repeated in
this trial.

The distribution of fruit according to weight (Table 3) provides an index of the
tendency of a variety to produce fruit of uniform or variable weight. For
example 'Baby Boo', HMX 2692, 'Jack-Be-Little', 'Jack-Be-Quick', 'Munchkin', PUXP

2001, PUXP 2003, and 'Sweetie Pie' fruit were all less than 1 lb and HMX 2690,
'Oz', and 'Spookie' fruit were all 1.1 to 5 lb each. On the other hand,
'Connecticut Field', 'Jackpot', and 'Jumpin Jack' plants produced fruit in five
of the weight classes.

Pumpkins of any size and shape are saleable for decorative purposes. For the
jack-o-lantern trade, however, pumpkins weighing at least 8 Ibs and not more than
18 Ibs are preferred. Larger fruit are useful for individual display purposes
and smaller fruit often are used in combination with other pumpkins and fall
decorations. In almost all cases, a bright or deep orange color is preferred to
a light orange or yellow.

Outstanding entries based on productivity, rind color, and suitability for the
decorative market in each size class were:

< 1 lb

1.0-5.0 lb

5.1-10.0 lb

10.1-20.0 lb

Very Large:
>20.0 lb

Baby Boo
HMX 2692
PUXP 2003

Baby Bear
Little Lantern

Autumn Gold
Big Autumn
Funny Face
HMX 2688

Big Tom
Connecticut Field
Jumpin Jack

Big Max
Big Moon


The information contained in this report is a summary of experimental results and
should not be used as recommendations for crop production. Where trade names are
used, no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is implied.

Literature Cited

Elmstrom, G. W., P. R. Gilreath, and D. N.
potential commercial crop for Florida.

Gilreath, P. R. and D. N. Maynard. 1986.
GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1986-1.

Maynard. 1988. Pumpkins: A
Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.

Pumpkin variety demonstrations.


Greene, G. L. 1974. Performance of pumpkin varieties at Quincy, Florida during
1971 and 1972. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 87:136-139.

Howe, T. K. and W. E. Waters. 1983. Pumpkin variety evaluation. GCREC Res.
Rept. BRA1983-3.

Maynard, D. N. 1992. Pumpkin variety evaluation, summer/fall 1992. GCREC Res.
Rept. BRA1992-21.

RHS Colour Chart. Flower Council of Holland. Leiden.

Table 1. Pumpkin cultigens, approximate
Fall 1993.

fruit size, type, and seed sources.

Entry Fruit size1 Type2 Sources

Atlantic Giant
Autumn Gold
Baby Bear
Baby Boo
Baby Pam
Big Autumn
Big Max
Big Moon
Big Tom
Connecticut Field
Funny Face
Half Moon
Happy Jack
HMX 2688
HMX 2690
HMX 2692
Jumpin Jack
Little Lantern
Pankow's Field
PUXP 2001
PUXP 2003
Rouge Vif D'Etampes
Seneca Harvest Moon
Sweetie Pie

Very Large
Very Large
Very Large
Very Large

op (PVP)
op (PVP)
op (PVP)
op (PVP)
op (PVP)
op (PVP)

Rupp, Burpee
Stokes, Harris
Rogers NK
Stokes, Rupp
Agway, Harris
Rogers NK, Burpee, Rupp
Harris Moran
Market More
Stokes, Market More
Market More, Burpee
Petoseed, Burpee, Rupp
Harris Moran
Harris Moran
Harris Moran
Harris Moran,Harris,Rupp
Market More
Harris Moran
Harris Moran
Market More
Harris Moran, Harris
Harris Moran, Harris
Stokes, Market More
Harris Moran
Harris Moran
Harris Moran
Petoseed, Burpee, Rupp

Table 1 (continued).

Entry Fruit size' Type2 Sources

Tallman Large op Stokes
Thomas Halloween Large op Agway
Trick or Treat Medium Fl Petoseed
Wizard Medium Fl Harris Moran, Harris

'Miniature = fruit less than 1 lb, Small = fruit 1 to 5 lb, Medium = fruit 5.1
to 10 lb, Large = fruit 10.1 to 20 lb, Very large = fruit larger than 20 lb
2F1 = hybrid, op = open pollinated, PVP variety protected by Plant Variety

Table 2. Pumpkin yields, average fruit weight, fruit per plant, height:width ratio and rind color.

Total Avg. Fruit
Fruit Weight Fruit per Height: Rind
Entry No./A' (cwt/A)' Wt (lb) Plant Width2 Color3

Prizewinner 819 h4 279.7 a 35.3 a 0.7 i 1.01 f-j 4.0 a-h
Cinderella 1564 h 226.2 ab 15.0 d 1.4 g-i 0.56 o 2.6 i-1
Big Moon 558 h 188.8 bc 31.2 ab 0.5 i 1.03 e-h 2.0 1m
Big Max 633 h 174.0 b-d 27.8 b 0.6 i 1.01 f-j 2.5 j-l
Connecticut Field 1489 h 173.7 b-d 11.5 d-h 1.3 g-i 0.91 g-1 3.5 f-i
Atlantic Giant 521 h 172.2 b-d 33.0 a 0.5 i 1.23 a-c 2.0 1m
Rouge Vif D'Etampes 819 h 164.9 b-e 20.0 c 0.7 i 0.53 o 3.6 e-h
JSS9032F1 1787 h 152.4 b-f 8.6 f-i 1.6 g-i 1.09 d-f 5.0 a
Funny Face 1713 h 150.7 b-f 8.9 f-i 1.5 g-i 1.02 e-i 4.0 a-h
Autumn Gold 2234 gh 150.3 b-f 6.8 h-l 2.0 f-i 0.90 h-l 4.9 ab
Big Tom 1042 h 139.1 c-g 13.9 de 0.9 g-i 1.01 f-j 3.2 h-k
HMX 2688 1489 h 132.8 c-h 9.0 f-i 1.3 g-i 1.03 e-h 4.7 a-d
Seneca Harvest Moon 1713 h 126.0 c-i 7.4 g-k 1.5 g-i 0.96 f-j 4.1 a-h
Spirit 1415 h 118.3 c-j 8.9 f-i 1.3 g-i 0.98 f-j 4.0 a-h
Jumpin Jack 745 h 116.1 c-j 15.5 d 0.7 i 1.29 ab 4.5 a-e
Big Autumn 1266 h 114.4 c-j 9.0 f-i 1.1 g-i 0.93 g-k 4.0 a-h
Frosty 1377 h 106.0 d-j 7.7 g-j 1.2 g-i 1.02 e-i 4.3 a-g
Spooktacular 5250 ef 105.9 d-j 2.0 m-o 4.7 e 0.81 k-m 4.4 a-f
Trick or Treat 1341 h 104.9 d-j 7.9 g-i 1.2 g-i 0.88 i-m 3.7 d-h
Ghostrider 1489 h 99.2 d-j 6.8 h-l 1.3 g-i 0.93 g-k 4.9 ab
Aspen 745 h 98.3 d-j 13.1 d-f 0.7 i 1.02 e-i 4.9 ab
Buckskin 1713 h 96.9 d-j 5.7 i-m 1.5 g-i 1.16 b-e Buff
Wizard 1675 h 91.8 d-j 5.4 i-n 1.5 g-i 0.99 f-j 4.7 a-d
Half Moon 1117 h 85.0 e-j 7.6 g-k 1.0 g-i 0.95 f-j 3.9 b-h
Jackpot 633 h 80.2 f-j 12.1 d-g 0.6 i 0.96 f-j 4.5 a-e
October 856 h 79.9 f-j 9.3 e-i 0.8 i 1.32 a 4.3 a-f
Howden 707 h 79.8 f-j 11.2 d-h 0.6 i 0.99 k-j 5.0 a
Spookie 2867 gh 78.9 f-j 2.8 k-o 2.6 fg 1.00 f-j 4.9 ab
Little Lantern 4244 fg 78.6 f-j 1.8 m-o 2.5 f-h 0.78 1m 4.5 a-e
Snowball 1005 h 77.2 f-j 7.8 g-j 0.9 g-i 0.92 g-1 White
Happy Jack 894 h 69.8 f-j 7.7 g-j 0.8 h-i 1.10 c-f 4.0 a-h
HMX 2692 7297 de 66.1 g-j 0.9 m-o 6.5 d 0.99 f-j 4.3 a-f

Fall 1993.

Table 2 (continued).

Total Avg. Fruit
Fruit Weight Fruit per Height: Rind
Entry No./A1 (cwt/A)1 Wt (lb) Plant Width' Color3

Baby Bear 5528 d-f 65.3 g-j 1.2 m-o 3.3 ef 0.75 mn 4.8 a-c
Pankow's Field 819 h 59.5 g-j 7.5 g-k 0.7 i 1.05 d-g 3.6 e-h
PUXP 2003 7670 d 58.4 g-j 0.7 no 6.9 de 0.65 no 4.3 a-g
HMX 2690 2011 gh 56.8 g-j 3.0 j-o 1.8 f-i 0.87 j-m 5.0 a
Tallman 521 h 52.1 h-j 11.3 d-h 0.7 i 1.18 b-d 3.8 c-h
Baby Pam 2904 gh 51.8 h-j 1.8 m-o 1.7 f-i 0.81 k-m 5.0 a
Thomas Halloween 484 h 50.6 h-j 10.2 e-i 0.4 i 1.10 c-f 3.3 g-j
Jack-Be-Little 18037 a 49.9 h-j 0.3 o 10.8 a 0.57 o 2.3 1k
Jack-Be-Quick 16585 a 48.6 h-j 0.3 o 9.9 a 0.61 o 2.0 Im
Baby Boo 18093 a 43.1 ij 0.2 o 10.8 a 0.62 o White
Munchkin 14017 b 41.7 ij 0.3 o 8.4 b 0.59 o 2.1 1m
PUXP 2001 10723 c 40.6 j 0.4 o 9.6 ab 0.55 o 2.2 1
Sweetie Pie 13681 b 37.3 j 0.3 o 8.2 bc 0.59 o 2.1 Im
Oz 1508 h 37.1 j 2.4 l-o 0.9 g-i 0.97 o 4.8 a-c

'Acre = 3350 Ibf.
21.0 = a round fruit.
31 = pale yellow to 5 = deep orange for yellow/orange rind entries.
'Mean separation in columns by Duncan's multiple range test, 5% level.

Table 3. Fruit weight distribution of the total yield of pumpkins. Fall 1993.

Fruit Weight (lb)
sl 1.1-5.0 5.1-10.0 10.1-15.0 15.1-20.0 >20
Entry Percentage of Fruit

Aspen 0 d' 0 h 10 jk 64 a 18 b-d 8 ef
Atlantic Giant 0 d 0 h 0 k 13 e-h 7 cd 80 b
Autumn Gold 0 d 19 d-g 74 a-d 7 gh 0 d 0 f
Baby Bear 27 b 73 b 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Baby Boo 100 a 0 h 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Baby Pam 3 d 97 a 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Big Autumn 0 d 3 gh 68 a-e 29 b-h 0 d 0 f
Big Max 0 d 0 h 7 jk 5 gh 23 a-c 65 c
Big Moon 0 d 0 h 7 jk 11 f-h 16 b-d 66 c
Big Tom 0 d 0 h 21 i-k 40 a-f 28 ab 11 ef
Buckskin 0 d 52 c 44 d-i 4 gh 0 d 0 f
Cinderella 0 d 0 h 29 h-k 31 b-g 11 b-d 29 d
Connecticut Field 0 d 2 gh 39 e-i 40 a-f 17 b-d 2 f
Frosty 0 d 16 d-h 62 a-e 22 d-h 0 d 0 f
Funny Face 0 d 2 h 66 a-e 32 b-g 0 d 0 f
Ghostrider 0 d 22 d-f 64 a-e 14 e-h 0 d 0 f
Happy Jack 0 d 13 e-h 61 a-f 26 c-h 0 d 0 f
Half Moon 0 d 6 f-h 75 a-c 19 e-h 0 d 0 f
HMX 2688 0 d 4 gh 56 a-h 30 a-f 0 d 0 f
HMX 2690 0 d 100 a 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
HMX 2692 100 a 0 h 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Howden 0 d 0 h 42 e-i 58 ab 0 d 0 f
Jackpot 0 d 3 gh 31 g-j 54 a-c 9 b-d 3 f
Jack-Be-Little 100 a 0 h 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Jack-Be-Quick 100 a 0 h 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
JSS9032F1 0 d 10 e-h 60 a-g 30 b-h 0 d 0 f
Jumpin Jack 0 d 6 f-h 6 j-k 29 b-h 39 a 20 de
Little Lantern 5 cd 95 a 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Munchkin 100 a 0 h 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
October 0 d 8 f-h 49 b-i 43 a-e 0 d 0 f
Oz 0 d 100 a 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Pankow's Field 0 d 12 e-h 68 a-e 20 e-h 0 d 0 f
Prizewinner 0 d 0 h 0 k 0 h 3 cd 97 a
PUXP 2001 100 a 0 h 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
PUXP 2003 100 a 0 h 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Rouge Vif D'Etampes 0 d 0 h 7 j-k 18 e-h 22 a-c 53 c
Seneca Harvest Moon 0 d 12 e-h 78 ab 10 f-h 0 d 0 k
Snowball 0 d 26 de 45 c-i 29 b-h 0 d 0 f
Spirit 0 d 17 dh 52 b-h 31 b-g 0 d 0 f
Spooktacular 3 d 97 a 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Spookie 0 d 100 a 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Sweetie Pie 100 a 0 h 0 k 0 h 0 d 0 f
Tallman 0 d 0 h 32 f-j 52 a-d 16 b-d 0 f
Thomas Halloween 0 d 0 h 46 c-i 54 a-c 0 d 0 f
Trick or Treat 0 d 5 gh 82 a 13 e-h 0 d 0 f
Wizard 10 c 30 d 52 b-h 8 gh 0 d 0 f

Duncan's multiple range test, 5% level.

'Mean separation in columns by

The Gulf Coast Research and Education Center

The Gulf Coast Research and Education Center is
a unit of the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sci-
ences, University of Florida. The Research Center
originated in the fall of 1925 as the Tomato
Disease Laboratory with the primary obir-ttiX\.: of
developing control procedures for an epidemic out-
break of nailhead spot of tomato. Research was ex-
panded in subsequent years to include study of sev-
eral other tomato diseases.

In 1937, new research facilities were established
in the town of Manatee, and the Center scope was
enlarged to include horticultural, entomological, and
soil science studies of several vegetable crops. The
ornamental program was a natural addition to the
Center's responsibilities because of the emerging in-
dustry in the area in the early 1940's.

The Center's current location was established in
1965 where a comprehensive research and extension
program on vegetable crops and ornamental plants is
conducted. Three state extension specialists posi-
tions, 16 state research scientists, and two grant
supported scientists from various disciplines of
training participate in all phases of vegetable and
ornamental horticultural programs. This interdisci-
plinary team approach, combining several research
disciplines and a wide range of industry and faculty
contacts, often is more productive than could be ac-
complished with limited investments in independent

The Center's primary mission is to develop new
and t ,Ij., Ilr existing knowledge and technology, and
to disseminate new scientific knowledge in Florida, so
that Ilt i 11l1.t remains I H, n, 11.-1t and economically

The secondary mission of the Center is to assist
the Cooperative Extension Service, IFAS campus
departments, in which Center faculty hold appropri-
ate liaison appointments, and other research centers
in extension, educational training, and cooperative
research programs for the benefit of Florida's pro-
ducers, students, and citizens.

Program areas of emphasis include: (1) genetics,
breeding, and .iiif', development and evaluation;
(2)hi, 1i iti a,1 chemical, and mechanical pest manage-
ment in entomology, plant pathology, nematology,
bacteriology, virology, and weed science; (3) produc-
tion efficiency, culture, management, and counteract-
ing environmental stress; (4) water management and
natural resource protection; (5) post-harvest physiol-
ogy, hjr -tini,. handling and food quality of horti-
cultural crops; (6) technical support and assistance to
the Florida Cooperative Extension Service; and (7)
advancement offundamental knowledge ofdisciplines
represented I, faculty and (8) directing graduate
student training and teaching special undergraduate

Location of
GCREC Bradenton

J The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences,
University of Florida.
I A statewide organization dedicated to teaching,
research and extension.
L Faculty located in Gainesville and at 13 research
and education centers, 67 county extension
offices and four demonstration units throughout
the state.
J A partnership in food and agriculture, and natural
and renewable resource research and education,
funded by state, federal and local government,
and by : i t and grants from individuals, founda-
tions, L~....'-iriI,- r t and industry.
" An organization whose mission is:
Educating students in the food, agricultural,
and related sciences and natural resources.
St nit 11-ht r, ing Florida's diverse food and
agricultural industry and its environment
through research.
,' rniij: niii for all Floridians, the application
of research and knowledge to improve the
quality of life statewide through IFAS exten-
sion programs.

University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs