Title: Memorandum re Recodification of SWFWMD Rules
CITATION PAGE IMAGE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00052814/00001
 Material Information
Title: Memorandum re Recodification of SWFWMD Rules
Alternate Title: Memorandum re Recodification of SWFWMD Rules, stating that there is no need to repeal 16J rules as the notices of recodification clearly state that the rules were recodified to Chapter 40, and 16J rules no longer in effect. SWFWMD Governing Board minutes
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
 Notes
General Note: Box 5, Folder 18 ( SF Rules, Standardization of Numbering ), Item 80
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00052814
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text





MEMORANDUM

May 1, 1980

T L

FR:

RE Recodification of SWFWMD Rules



Fred informed me that both Zane Leeper and Steve Nail have
suggested that the district repeal the 16J rules. Apparently,
they are concerned that submission of the 40D rules will not
repeal the 16J rules and two sets of rules will exist.

After reviewing Chapter 120 and discussing this, Tom and I
both agree that there is no need for repeal. The notices of
the recodification that ran in the February 8 issue of the
Florida Administrative Weekly specifically state that the
purpose of the amendments is to renumber and recodify the
rules from Chapter 16 to Chapter 40. The text of the rules
that were submitted to the Bureau of Administrative Code
contains references to the previous 16J numbers. There thus
appears to be adequate notice that the 16J rules are no
longer in effect once the 40D rules took effect.

If you do not concur, please let me know what steps we need
to take to repeal the 16J rules.


RMB/mb



/Y ^ /k^L/l~il ^^C^-<^^^

fiwci- / y ^-








l(ufl----








Minutes of the Meetyng March 4, 1980
Board of Governors Page Eleven


*Application No. 351445 Singletary Farms applicant had no previous
wells; irrigation property is leased with melons planted. Applicant
had the understanding the well driller was going to obtain all necessary
permits.

*Application No. 351871 Hiltop Growers, Inc. property was acquired
in December 1979 with no previous irrigation. Applicant needs water
available for melons being planted and young citrus trees to try and
avoid finanical and crop loss.

Following consideration, Mr. Campbell moved, seconded by Mr. Johns, to ratify
the Executive Director's prior action in approving Well Construction Permit
Nos. 351378, 351587, 351386, 351445, and 351871. Motion carried unanimously.

Briefing on Proposed Rule Recodification
Mr. Blain distributed a matrix containing uniformly numbered rules which have
been agreed upon by all water management districts. He said the District's
Rules will be renumbered 40D rather than 16J as before. Mr. Blain said the Board
needs to approve the Rule changes and authorize the staff to file the appropriate
documents with the Secretary of State for the purpose of renumbering the Rules.
He said the new Rules will then be printed by the Secretary of State into the
Administrative Code and copies will be made available to the general public.
Following discussion, Mr. Johns moved, seconded by Mr. Stubbs, to approve the
Rule Recodification and authorize the staff to send the necessary documentation
to the Secretary of State, with whatever minor changes may be necessary, as
recommended by the staff. Motion carried unanimously.

Enforcement Report
Mr. Kuhl presented the Enforcement Report and suggested that in the future the
report be reviewed by the Board with no staff presentation other than to answer
questions. Without objection, the Enforcement Report was accepted as presented.

Applications Received Not Presently Scheduled for Hearing
Following consideration and without objection, the Board approved continuance of
these applications to April 1, 1980 as recommended by the staff.

Mr. Ahern introduced the regulatory packet into the record as Exhibit No. 37.

Mr. Stubbs moved to continue the public hearings to April 1, 1980. Mr. Longino
seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.

At approximately 1:05 p.m. the Board proceeded with consideration of regular
business items on the agenda.

Alafia Phase III Aerial Mapping Project Final Payment
Mr. Campbell said final payment is in order to L. Robert Kimball, Inc., in
the amount of $3,103.80 for aerial mapping of approximately twenty-one square
miles of the Alafia Tributaries south of Alderman's Ford in Hillsborough
County, subject to Alafia Basin Board approval. Following consideration,
Mr. Campbell moved, seconded by Mr. Stephens, to approve final payment,
subject to Alafia River Basin Board approval, as recommended by the staff.
Motion carried unanimously.

Bay Pines, Gulfport, Oldsmar, Clearwater,
Tarpon Springs Aerial Mapping Project Final Payment
Mr. Stephens advised that Abrams Aerial Survey Corporation has completed
aerial mapping of approximately twenty-four square miles in the communities
of Bay Pines, Gulfport, Oldsmar, Clearwater, and Tarpon Springs. The staff
recommended approval of final payment in the amount of $3,139.20, subject
to Pinellas-Anclote River Basin Board approval. Following consideration,
Mr. Stephens moved to approve final payment to Abrams Aerial Survey
Corporation in the amount of $3,139.20, subject to Pinellas-Anclote
River Basin Board approval. Motion was seconded by Mr. Campbell and
passed unanimously.





University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs