Title: A solution to the problem re renumbering the "Water Crop" rule
CITATION PAGE IMAGE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00052812/00001
 Material Information
Title: A solution to the problem re renumbering the "Water Crop" rule
Alternate Title: Letter to Ms. Liz Cloud from L. M. Blain suggesting a solution to the problem re renumbering the "Water Crop" rule (Rule 16J-2.11, F.A.C.) at the same time that a Hearing Officer has declared it invalid but is now on appeal
Physical Description: 1p.
Language: English
Publication Date: May 8, 1980
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
 Notes
General Note: Box 5, Folder 18 ( SF Rules, Standardization of Numbering ), Item 78
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00052812
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text




LAW OFFICES
BLAIN & ,CONE, P. A.

L.M. BLAIN 202 MADISON STREET
THOMAS E. CONE, JR. May 8, 1980 P. BOX 399
RUSSELL M. BLAIN TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601
GARY A. GIBBONS (813) 223-3888
FRED A. McCORMACK
222 SOUTH MONROE STREET
P. O. BOX 10449
TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301
Ms. Liz Cloud (904) 222-0960
Chief, Bureau of Administrative Code
The Department of State REPLY TO: Tampa
The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32304

Dear Ms. Cloud:

Pursuant to our conversation in Jim Antista's office on
Thursday, May 1, 1980, we propose the following solution
to the problem we appear to be having with the renumbering
of the Southwest Florida Water Management District rules
from the 16J series to 40D, Florida Administrative Code.

The problem rule, of course, is subsection (3) of Rule 16J-
2.11, F.A.C., the District's so-called "Water Crop" rule
which has now been renumbered as subsection (2) of Rule 40D-
2.301. The hearing officer's Order declaring the invalidity
of this rule was rendered April 9, 1980, two days after we
submitted our renumbering of Chapter 16J to you.

We face serious problems during the pendency of our appeal
of this Order if the rule is deleted from the Florida
Administrative Code. We ask that you include all of Rule
40D-2.301 in Chapter 40D, with a historical note explaining
that "subsection (3) is included for informational purposes.
It has been declared invalid by a D.O.A.H. Order which is
being appealed. It remains a part of Rule 16J-2.11 pending
the outcome of such appellate procedure."

We would like to arrange a conference with you, Mr. Webb,
Mr. Leeper and Mr. Antista to discuss this. Mr. Fred McCormack
will be contacting you further about this.

Sin' ere y


M. Bla n


LMB/skb
cc: Mr. Carroll Webb
Mr. James Antista
Mr. Donald R. Feaster
Mr. Fred McCormack





University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs