Title: City of St. Petersburg, Florida v. SWFWMD
CITATION PAGE IMAGE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00051153/00001
 Material Information
Title: City of St. Petersburg, Florida v. SWFWMD
Alternate Title: City of St. Petersburg, Florida v. SWFWMD. Memo of procedures for Oral Arguments in File No. 19721 on Cosme-Odessa and Section 21 Wellfields.
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
 Notes
General Note: Box 2, Folder 4 ( ST. PETERSBURG, CITY OF V. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ), Item 30
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00051153
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text
4 1P



3/30/77 File No. 19721

MEMO


TO: LMB
FR: TEC
RE: St. Pete Appeal of SWF Orders on Cosme-Odessa
and Section 21 Wellfields


Oral arguments are scheduled before the Second District
Court in Lakeland at 9:30 A.M., Monday, April 11, 1977.
This case is first on the calendar.

Under applicable rules of appellate procedure not more
than 30 minutes to the side will be permitted. The Clerk's
office advises that no specific time has been reserved for
the case.

Except by special permission (which has not been requested)
not more than two attorneys to the side will be allowed to
argue. Do you wish to talk to Clint Brown about his role,
if any?

St. Pete will argue first, since it is the "appellant". It
will be the City's responsibility to state the following matters
for the Court. If it doesn't, we should do it to prevent
confusion:

(1) position of appellant in the proceedings
below .i.e. permit applicant, etc.;

(2) the nature of the order appealed from .
order granting consumptive use permits; etc.;

(3) short statement of facts which support
the order;

(4) points relied upon for reversal.

Attached are the Briefs in the case. They are:

1. Brief of Petitioner Supporting Certiorari
2. Brief of Respondent in Support of Motion
to Strike Point One of Petitioner's Brief
Supporting Certiorari
3. Brief of Petitioner in Opposition to
Respondent's Motion .
4. Brief of Respondent Opposing Certiorari
on the Merits
5. Reply Brief of Petitioner
6. Brief of Amicus Curiae Hillsborough County
7. Brief of Amicus Curiae Pinellas County
(without Appendix)
8. Brief of Amicus Curiae Pasco County









Memo to LMB
Page 2


I will prepare a synopsis relating the chronology of the case,
the positions of the parties and the arguments presented to
the Court. I will mail this to you in Tallahassee.

I will keep Sunday evening (4/10/77) free for a conference
with you if you wish.



TECjr: jf
Attachment





University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs