Title: Memorandum from Northwest Florida Water Management District
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00051113/00001
 Material Information
Title: Memorandum from Northwest Florida Water Management District
Alternate Title: Memorandum from Northwest Florida Water Management District commenting on Chapter 17-40, State Water Policy.
Physical Description: 4p.
Language: English
Publication Date: February 24, 1981
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
General Note: Box 2, Folder 3B ( STATE WATER POLICY ), Item 103
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00051113
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text

February 24, 1981
Page Four

17-40.10 Implementation

Change (9): The Department and Districts should assist "educational institu-
tions" (as opposed to State Universities) in the development of
educational curricula and "/or" research programs which meet
Florida's present and future water management needs.

Discussion: Assistance by the Department and Districts should not be limited
to only university level personnel nor university level research
programs. Valuable assistance can be given to schools which teach
kindergarten through high school levels as well.


February 24, 1981
Page Three

Discussion: Waste treatment and management is an integral component of a
regional water resources policy and should be included.

17-40.07 Surface Water Management

Add to (I): The construction and operation of facilities designed to manage
or store surface waters, or of other facilities which drain,
divert, impound, discharge into, or otherwise impact waters in
the State, or improvements served thereby, shall not be harmful
to water "or land" resources or inconsistent with the objectives
of the Department or District.

Change (2)(d): The ability of the facilities and related improvements to
"reduce or" avoid increasing flood damage to offsite property
or the public "as a result of:" (as opposed to "through")

Change (2)(d)(i): floodplain "management" (as opposed to "development"),
encroachment or other alteration

Discussion: "Management" encompasses a wider variety of floodplain uses.
"Development" might be classified as a subset of management

17-40.08 Minimum Flows and Levels

Add to (2)(a): The "consideration," construction and operation of Water Re-
source Projects;

Discussion: Minimum flows must be considered prior to the construction and
operation of a Water Resource Project.

17-40.09 District Water management Plans

Add to (1): A water management plan shall be prepared by each district which
is consistent with the provisions of this chapter and which iden-
tifies specific geographical areas where water resource problems
"are fast approaching or" have reached critical levels.

Add to (2): A course of remedial action shall be specified for each "fast-
approaching or already" critical problem. Measures may include,
but are not limited to. ..

Discussion: Paragraph (3) has been combined with paragraph (2) since they are
so closely related. Paragraph (4) should be omitted as it has been
superceded by the inclusion of the words "fast approaching" in
paragraph (1) above. Its retention in this context is redundant.

February 24, 1981
Page Two

Discussion: The inclusion of "land" resources is essential in that detri-
mental affects can be suffered by land as a result of draining,
diverting or altering the flow of both surface and ground water.
Considering only the effects on the water resource is not ade-
quate when evaluating a complex environmental system.

Add to (10): Minimum water flows and levels should be established "and main-
tained" to protect water resources and the environmental values
associated with coastal, estuarine, fresh water, and wetlands

Add to (11): Both structural and non-structural alternatives "must" be given
"equal" consideration in water resource project decisions. "This
must also include consideration of both supply augmentation and
demand management procedures."

Discussion: For example, if a structural alternative has been chosen to relieve
some water supply problem such as a water treatment facility, the
use of that facility should be evaluated for both its supply aug-
mentation potentials (for instance water reuse) and its possible
role in demand management (such as seasonal or peak time rates).

17-40.04 Water Use

Add to (4): "Beneficial" conservation of water shall be a requirement of each

17-40.05 Water Transport

Add to (2)(a) Comprehensive water conservation and reuse programs "have been
considered or" implemented and enforced in the area of need.

Discussion: There may be cases when water conservation and reuse programs
are impractical or inadequate for the needs of an area. There-
fore, evaluating the extent to which these programs have been
implemented may be inapplicable in this case. What is essential
in this case is that these alternatives have at least been
explored first before choosing to transport water.

Add to (2)(b) The major costs, benefits, environmental impacts "and intangibles"
are adequately determined for both the supplying, receiving "and
intermediary" areas.

Change (2)(d) The present and projected water needs of the supplying area are
reasonably determined "and satisfied" (as opposed to "and can be
met") if the transport takes place;

Add to (2)(e) The transport plan incorporates a regional approach to water
supply, distribution "and waste management" including, where
appropriate, plans for eventual interconnection of water supply
sources; and

Wafet el vanayemewr VVUwwize
Route No. I. Bov 31 00. Havana. Florida 32333 047

J. William McCartney (904
Executive Director M E M 0 R A N D U M

TO: Chuck Littlejohn, Office of Special Projects, DER

FROM: Bonnie Kranzer

DATE: February 24, 1981

SUBJECT: Comments on Chapter 17-40, State Water Policy

17-40.03 General Policy

Add to (3): Uses of water authorized by a permit should be limited to
reasonable-beneficial uses and "beneficial" water conservation
should be a condition of water use. The "economically effi-
cient" use and reuse of water of the lowest acceptable quality
for the purpose intended should be encouraged.

Discussion: Without the terms "beneficial" and "economically efficient,"
the above statement implies that water conservation must be
exercised at whatever the price. Water conservation, unfortu-
nately, is generally thought of as the practice of reducing
the amounts of water used. In a strict sense, conservation
should be defined as a "beneficial reduction" in water use.
This places the decision to conserve or not on a more quantita-
tive basis which can be evaluated in a specific time frame
either in the long or short run. The "beneficial" in the above
definition implies a benefit-cost ratio of greater than one.

Add to (8): Floodplains should be delineated and managed to "reduce and/or"
prevent flood damage.

Discussion: A sound water policy should also attempt to reduce, not just
prevent, flood damage. Current land and water management
practices often maintain flood damage potential. It is in the
best interest of the State to attempt to reduce future flood
damage in areas where this already occurs.

Add to (9): Facilities which drain, divert or otherwise alter the flow of
surface waters should be managed to "decrease or" prevent in-
creased flooding or drainage which is harmful to water "and land"

Chairman Pensacola Vice Chairman Port St. Joe Sec/Treas. Tallahassee
Marianna Destin Graceville Tallahassee Jay Pensacola

University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs