Title: Memo re: Approval of Permit #72-110 of Florida Power & Light
CITATION PAGE IMAGE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00050695/00001
 Material Information
Title: Memo re: Approval of Permit #72-110 of Florida Power & Light
Alternate Title: Memo re: Approval of Permit #72-110 of Florida Power & Light with restrictions and conditions to be complied with as enumerated.
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
 Notes
General Note: Box 1, Folder 6 ( FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO. - LITTLE MANATEE RIVER ), Item 55
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00050695
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text




(

MEMORANDUM

TO: Donald R. Feaster, District Engineer

FROM: Oliver R. DeWitt, Chief, Permit Section

RE: Permit #72-110 Florida Power and Light


RECOMMENDATIONS:-" S.

1. Approve the permit with the following restrictions or conditions to be complied with.

A. Limit diversion to periods when flow is above 30 cfs during any month.

B. Install a staff and recording gage at the diversion site.

C. Determine the elevation at which a corresponding flow of 30 cfs will be
attained.

D. Develop an alternate partial make-up source of water supply.

E. All waste water is to be disposed of within the reservoir.

F. Material collected from trash screens is to be disposed of upon upland
property.

2. Explanation of 1. A. -- diversion limit of 30 cfs.
Chapter 373 authorizes the capture of water above the minimum average flow.
It does not require that all excess flow, or any excess flow, be authorized.

The decision to recommend restriction on pumping to above 30 cfs at this time
is an arbitrary one, based only upon a feeling that it would be detrimental for the
downstream reach to be constantly kept at the average minimum flow, particularly
when by definition, the average minimum flow is the average of the 5 lowest
monthly mean discharge over a 20 year period and represents flow during extreme
drought conditions.

Studies could be made to support the proposal to limit diversion or determine if
some other more or less restrictive diversion rate is warranted.


ORD:cca ^




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs