|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Front Cover | |
| Index | |
| Officers and representatives of... | |
| Photos. Society page | |
| President's message by A.... | |
| Gibbons 1957 catalogue, Part... | |
| Fifth international philatelic... | |
| Revenue catalogue | |
| Airpost stamps of USSR overprinted... | |
| Polish consular post in Odessa... | |
| Notes on Russian offices in Turkey... | |
| Illustrations - regular postage... | |
| The regular postage stamp issues... | |
| Railway postmarks of Imperial Russia... | |
| New York section by Victor... | |
| Exorpts from Pall Mall Gazette-134... | |
| China section bulletin of city... | |
| Russian post in the Far East by... | |
| Illustrations - Russian errino... | |
| Russian errinophilia by E.... | |
| Addenda to Russian troops in France,... | |
| Atlas of the Russian Empire | |
| Illustration for the articles of... | |
| Air post of Vladivostock - July... | |
| Russian Turkestan by W. S.... | |
| Review of current Ukrainian philatelic... | |
| Ukraine - theatre revenue stamps... | |
| Russian post in Turkey by... | |
| Notes on Russian philately by A.... | |
| Finlandia | |
| Literary review | |
| Interesting cancellations, etc.... |
ALL VOLUMES
CITATION
SEARCH
THUMBNAILS
PAGE IMAGE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Front Cover
Cover Index Page 1 Officers and representatives of the society, honorary members Page 2 Photos. Society page Page 3 Page 4 President's message by A. A. Chebotkevich Page 5 Gibbons 1957 catalogue, Part II Page 5 Fifth international philatelic exhibition. Fipex Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Revenue catalogue Page 9 Airpost stamps of USSR overprinted "North Pole-Moscow 1955" by P. Matishev Page 10 Polish consular post in Odessa in 1919-20 by S. Gibrick Page 11 Notes on Russian offices in Turkey by R. S. Blomfield Page 12 Illustrations - regular postage stamps of USSR Page 13 The regular postage stamp issues of USSR by Kurt Adler Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Railway postmarks of Imperial Russia by W. E. C. Kethro & John Barry Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 New York section by Victor Cerny Page 28 Exorpts from Pall Mall Gazette-134 (July 20, 1956) Page 28 China section bulletin of city of London philatelic society, special issue on Mongolia Page 28 Russian post in the Far East by A. I. Masloff Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Illustrations - Russian errinophilia Page 32 Page 33 Russian errinophilia by E. Marcovitch Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Addenda to Russian troops in France, 1916-1917 by J. Posell Page 38 Atlas of the Russian Empire Page 39 Illustration for the articles of J. Posell, Far Eastern airpost, Shramchenko, Rosselevitch, and Sklarevski Page 40 Page 41 Air post of Vladivostock - July 28, 1923 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Russian Turkestan by W. S. E. Stephen Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Review of current Ukrainian philatelic press by Capt. S. de Shramchenko Page 51 Ukraine - theatre revenue stamps of 1918 by Capt. S. do Shramchonko Page 51 Page 52 Russian post in Turkey by A. Rosselevitch Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Notes on Russian philately by A. Rosselevitch Page 56 Finlandia Page 56 Literary review Page 57 Page 58 Interesting cancellations, etc. by R. Sklarevski Page 59 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE JOURNAL of the ROSSICA SOCIETY of RUSSIAN PHILATELY Silver Medals at Belgrade National Exhibition "Zefib 1937" and the International Exhibition, Koenigsberg "Ostropa 1935" Bronze Medals at the International Exhibition "Praga 1935" and Vienna International Exhibition "WIPA 1933" .- ,- . I I l," :, rEM ,T,'b. Dr. Gregory B. Salisbury S 49th and Locust 'reets -. "* "Philadelhia 39 Pa-. U. S. A. i l I C 3 .,- 1" '1 ^- -. -' ----l -'i No. 47/0o 1954 Editor Dr. Gregory B. Salisbury ; .... 49th and Locust Streets. " Philadelphia 39, Pa., U. S.A. EDITOR in CHIEF, English and Russian Language Editions. ' Dr. Gregory B. Salisblury. 49th. & Locust Sts,, Philadelphia -39, Pa. Publisher & Asst. Editor English Ed, Publisher & Asst. Editor Russian Ed. R. A. Sklarovski. 640 N. Charles St. A. N. Lavrov 252 Sherman St., Passaic, Avenue, Towson 4, Md, N.J. EDITORIAL BOARD A. A. Chebotkevitch.E. Marcovitch.Capt. S. de Shramchenko .E L. Wisewell, Jr. I N D 'E X Pages 2 Officers & Representatives of the Society, Honorary Members. 3 Photos. Society Pege. 5 -President's Message* A. A. Chebotkevich 5 Gibbons 1957 Catalogue, Part II,. 6-9 Fifth International Philatelic Exhibition. Fipex, 9 Revenue Catalogue. 10 Airpost Stamps of USSR Overprinted "North Polo-Moscow 1955". P. Matishe- 11 Polish Consular Post in Odessa in 1919-20. S. Gibrick. 12 Notes on Russian Offices in Turkey. R. S. Blomfield. 13 Illustrations-Regular Postage Stamps of USSR. 14-22- The Regular Poatago Stamp Issuesof USSR. Kurt Adler. 23-27- Railway Postmarks of Imperial Russia. W.EC. Kethro & John Barry. 28 -Now York Section. Victor Cerny. 28 Excerpts frop PALL MALL GAZETTE-'-Russial" of H. C.. Goss. 28 China Section Bulletin of London Philatelic Society. Mongolia. 29-31- Russian Post in the Far East. A. I. Masloff. 32-33- Illustrations. Russian Errincphilia. 34-37- Russian Errinophilia. E. Marcovitch.. 38-39-Addenda to Russian Troops in France, 1916-1917. J. Posell. 39 Atlas of the Russian Empire. 40-41- Illustration for the articles of J. Posell, Far Eastern Airpost, Schramchenko, Rossolovitch and Sklarevski. 42-47- Air Post of Vladivostock July 28, 1923. 48-50- Russian Turkestan. W. S. E. Stephen, 51 Review of Current Ukrainian Philatelic Press. Capt. S. de Shramchenko. 51-52- Ukraine Theatre Revenue Stamps of 1918. capt. S. de Shramchenko. 53-55- Russian Post in Turkey. A.Rossolevitch. 56 Notes on Russian PHilately. A. Rosselovitch. 56 Finlandia 1956. 57-58- Literary Review 59 Interesting Cancellations, etc. R. Sklarevski #49/50 Page 1 OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY PRESIDENT A. A. Chebotkevich 40 E. Old Mill Rd. Ridge Farm, Lake Forest, Ill. SECRETARY Russian Speaking Section A. N. Lvrov SECRETARY English Speaking Section Dr. G. B. Salisbury : ":' HONORARY MEMBERS A. A. Chebotkevich V. A. Rachmanoff N. I. Kordakoff A. M. Rosselevitch. .. A.-N. Lavrov '.Dr. G. B. Salisbury ... B. Legky N. V. Savitzky E. I. .Jarcovitch H. M. Shonitz R. A. Sklarevski REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SOCIETY NEW YORK GROUP V. Corny 841 W. 177th.St. Apt. 3J, New York 33, N.Y. WESTERN U.S. A, I. Masloff 671 S. Norton Ave,, Los Angeles 5, California. GREAT BRITAIN J. Barry 77A St. James Rd., Sutton, Surrey, England. . :, BELGIUM B. Legky 16 Sq. Gutenberg, Brussels, Belgium. "GEBMMtIY Dr. B. Woropinsky 16 Auorbach-Bonsheim, Banhofstr. Relag, S.Germany.. ISRAEL A. Trumpeldor Arba Artzot 25, Tel Aviv, Israel SFr. MOROCCO V. N. BUtkov 49 Rue Laperouse, Casablanca, French Morocco. CAIADA P. Demianenko ,354j Yong St. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. VENEZUELA E. I. Marcovitch Edif. uCamuri" Apto. No. 25 Callo Real de --...'Sabana Grande, Caracas, Venezuela. BRAZIL P. Beloff Rua Pedrozo 238, Caixa Post 2960, San Paulo, Brazil ARGENTINA B. Riasnianski Lerrazabal 2870, Buenos Aires, Argentina. FRNCE A. Liashenko 1 Rue du.Bocage, Paris 15, France. AUSTRALIA V. Tvolkmnyor 45 Garnerts Ave., Marrickville, Sydney, S- .N.S.W., Australia, -- ------------------------------------------------ -------- ----------- Membership dues are. $3.00 per annum for all countries. Application forms, which must be filled out, are available upon request. Journal, membership lists, code, bulletins, and supplements to the membership will .be sent out annual. Please make checks payable to A. Lavrov instead of Rossica: or Dr. G. B. Salisbury. We elcomo advertisements from members, non-members and dealers. Full page $30.00. Half page $15.00. Quarter page $7.50. Twelfth page $2.50, (5 lines). Members of Rossica pay only 50% of the cost. With a discount the cost per line to members is only 25 cents. By helping yourself, you also help us.. .. . ------#---------9/50 2 #49/50 SOCIETY PAGE 1934 1955 IN NEW YORK A.ACHEBOTKEVICH E.M.ARKHAN6UELSKY A.A.CHEBOTKEVICH KURT ADLER V. CERNY IN FRO T OF ROSSICA JOURNALS MR. DOWNS, EDITOR OF"STAMPS DR.SAuLSBURY'S MEDAL WINNING ON AND OUR MEMBERMRS.DOWNS COLLECTION OF IMPERIAL RUSSIA EXHIBITION SHELVES AND HELEN GUERRA .-.. .. .." .,- ^ '..,, ,- -o .. - -. .. ..l - 193.J4 1955 IN NEW YORK R. POLCHANOTKEVINOF E..ARKAND HKYS OUR ARTHUR SHIELDS KURT ADLER SON SOAKING OFF STAMPS. FAMOUS ACTOR OF HOLLYWOOD, STAGE, in JUGOSLAVIAR ADIO AND T TELEVISION. AMIN&,f t C m K a | F, I P EAF I .EFPE V. CERNY IN FRONT OF ROSSICA JOURNALS MR. DOWNS, EDITOR OF'-SAMPS* DR.SALISBUY'S MEDAL WINNING ON AND OUR MEMBER,MRS. DOWNS COLLECTION OF IMPERIAL RUSSIA EXHIBITION SHELVES AND HELEN GUERRA PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE by A. Chobotkovich :.! -:... This is the fiftieth number of the Rossica Journal, and a Jubilee of this event is in order. It is a double number, rich in content, and the editorial board, as well as the authors should be congratulated for their efforts. .As you know, the Fifth International Philatelic Exhibition, "Fipexa was held in New York, not so long ago, this year. We congratulate our members, listed eoXowhere, who participated and won high honors and medals, thus elevating the prestige of our society. A note of sorrow must be added, about ,the philatelic itoraturecontest, in which major and do-luxe publications, representing thousands of members wore pitted against modest, but important in content, publications, representing but several hundred members, usually printed by mimoography, This unfair situation is adequately covered in the editorial by our Editor in Chief Dr. Gregory B. Salisbury. Yet, at the pre- vious international shows, which placed journals in proper categories, for correct and fair judging, our journal won great accolades. We must mention .at this point the fact that we issued at that time only one edition, and not two, in Russian and in English, as we do now. Two editions of every number mean a wider use and enjoyment, and an opportunity for philatelists all over the world to understand all of the contents, previously available only to th4so few emigres who know the Russian language. Yet, this means double effort, and I for one know that in order to produce this issue alone, Dr. Salisbury and Rimma Sklarovski spent an entire summer and fall editing, translating, preparing stencils, because I had to pitch in and help on "several occasions. All this is beside the point now. When we were given a fair opportunity, we won at international exhibitions, silver medals at OSTROPA 1935, Koenigsberg; ZEFIB 1937, Belgrade; and bronze medals at WIPA 1933, Vienna; and IRAGA 1938, at Prague. World War II ended our activities shortly afterwards. It is our hope that with the revival of Rossics Journal, *we shall compete in future international shows, under better circumstances, than we did at FIEX,. We received to-day a letter and a brochure from our Hon. Member V. A. Rachmanoff. It was a reprint of his famous article "Poland No. 1* in the Polonus Bulletin, from the Collectors Club Philatelist. Our congratulations. We hope that he will write for Rossica a similar article on Russia No. 1 (As he did for Collectors Club, sometime ago) for our Jubilee issue next year, celebrating 100 years of Russia No. 1 stamp. We likewise wish to congratulate our Hon. Member A. Rosselovitch for his lecture before the uCorcle 'dEtudos Philatoliquo" in Belgium, and for his subsequently published article 0Stamps of the North West Army" This will appear in our journal at a later date. Our doep thanks too to Mr. Vansovich our member in Rio do Janeiro, for his groat efforts in enrolling now members, and a salute to our two now representatives, A. N. Liashonko in France and V. Tvelkmoyor of Australia. We wish them good luck oooo0 oooooQooooooo GIBBONS 1957 Cataloguo, Part II has boon published. Armenia has been completely rewritten, Azorbaijan revised and added to. Russian Civil War Issues have boon regrouped. Listing of RSFSR small heads have boon rewritten and various changes have boon mado in listings of RSFSR and early issues of USSR. Our S friends and members of Rossica in England were responsible for those changes* ooo oo9000o00000000 #49/50 5 PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE by A. Chobotkovich :.! -:... This is the fiftieth number of the Rossica Journal, and a Jubilee of this event is in order. It is a double number, rich in content, and the editorial board, as well as the authors should be congratulated for their efforts. .As you know, the Fifth International Philatelic Exhibition, "Fipexa was held in New York, not so long ago, this year. We congratulate our members, listed eoXowhere, who participated and won high honors and medals, thus elevating the prestige of our society. A note of sorrow must be added, about ,the philatelic itoraturecontest, in which major and do-luxe publications, representing thousands of members wore pitted against modest, but important in content, publications, representing but several hundred members, usually printed by mimoography, This unfair situation is adequately covered in the editorial by our Editor in Chief Dr. Gregory B. Salisbury. Yet, at the pre- vious international shows, which placed journals in proper categories, for correct and fair judging, our journal won great accolades. We must mention .at this point the fact that we issued at that time only one edition, and not two, in Russian and in English, as we do now. Two editions of every number mean a wider use and enjoyment, and an opportunity for philatelists all over the world to understand all of the contents, previously available only to th4so few emigres who know the Russian language. Yet, this means double effort, and I for one know that in order to produce this issue alone, Dr. Salisbury and Rimma Sklarovski spent an entire summer and fall editing, translating, preparing stencils, because I had to pitch in and help on "several occasions. All this is beside the point now. When we were given a fair opportunity, we won at international exhibitions, silver medals at OSTROPA 1935, Koenigsberg; ZEFIB 1937, Belgrade; and bronze medals at WIPA 1933, Vienna; and IRAGA 1938, at Prague. World War II ended our activities shortly afterwards. It is our hope that with the revival of Rossics Journal, *we shall compete in future international shows, under better circumstances, than we did at FIEX,. We received to-day a letter and a brochure from our Hon. Member V. A. Rachmanoff. It was a reprint of his famous article "Poland No. 1* in the Polonus Bulletin, from the Collectors Club Philatelist. Our congratulations. We hope that he will write for Rossica a similar article on Russia No. 1 (As he did for Collectors Club, sometime ago) for our Jubilee issue next year, celebrating 100 years of Russia No. 1 stamp. We likewise wish to congratulate our Hon. Member A. Rosselovitch for his lecture before the uCorcle 'dEtudos Philatoliquo" in Belgium, and for his subsequently published article 0Stamps of the North West Army" This will appear in our journal at a later date. Our doep thanks too to Mr. Vansovich our member in Rio do Janeiro, for his groat efforts in enrolling now members, and a salute to our two now representatives, A. N. Liashonko in France and V. Tvelkmoyor of Australia. We wish them good luck oooo0 oooooQooooooo GIBBONS 1957 Cataloguo, Part II has boon published. Armenia has been completely rewritten, Azorbaijan revised and added to. Russian Civil War Issues have boon regrouped. Listing of RSFSR small heads have boon rewritten and various changes have boon mado in listings of RSFSR and early issues of USSR. Our S friends and members of Rossica in England were responsible for those changes* ooo oo9000o00000000 #49/50 5 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL PHILATELIC EXHIBITION-FIPEX The exhibition is now ancient history, and we can now look back and calmly view it from our particular angle. There is a great deal to say, both in criticism and in praise. We shall try to be fair. It was the largest philatelic gathering to-date, it set all records in statistics, and we must praise the workers, for the stupendous amount of effort in behalf of our wonderful hobby. The committeemen and volunteers who slaved so much to make the show a success deserve our thanks. First day attendance was 60,000, as compared to 30,000 of Cipex, 1947, there were 11,900,745 items sold by the New York Post Office, and 1,700,000 processed first day covers. The automobile and the camera shows held at the same time, in the New York Coliseum, drew less than a half of the attendance at our show. This speaks well for our hobby. Before we go into details, we must explain several important points to our readers who wrote indignantly to my office about the absence of Rossica journals and your Editorts monograph from the Catalogue of Fipex Exhibition. Our money was paid, $30.00 out of your Editor's own pocket, to Fipex, .immediately when the prospectus was sent out last year. Both editions and the Monograph on the Romanov Tercentennary Issue, printed in British Journal of Russian Philately, were sent along with the 160 pages of exhibition material, at the earliest date allowed. The stamps were mounted in the frames and were shown, listed in the catalogue, and later received a medal. The Rossica Journals and the Monograph were not exhibited on the first day, and were not listed in the catalogue We were told that they were not re- S ceived, then, when your Editor found them in the bin room, he was told that they-came too late, then, when affidavits were shown to the contrary, they were allowed to be placed on shelves, along with other journals, like grocer- ies, instead of being placed behind suitable frames. Some buckled, slid off, our two were picked up twice by passers by, and would have been stolen, had not your Editor grabbed them back. They aro shown, as evidence, in a photo- graph, on the Society Page, as being shown at Fipex. At this point, we were informed that Judges would not consider them, because they were. not in the catalogued At this point they became an important issue, as we did not wish to suffer for the negligence of the bin committee. We consulted the head of the Fipex, and were finally told that the judges would examine our publication. Did they fulfill this promise. Wo have our doubts We shall not gripe obout the fact that we did not receive a medal for our journals. The Fipex rulers unfairly decided that all journals should compete against each other, instead of being judged on merit, in proper categories, as was done recently at NORVEX, and STOCKHOIMIA. One cannot compare incomparablest Journals like Collectors Club Philatelist, American Philatelist should have competed in their class, having hundreds or thousands of members, huge treasuries, de-luxe publications; stamp weeklies should have their own group and a medal, and publications like ours, mimeographed for only three hundred or so members should have had a competition all of their own. Had we known the basis on which judging would be done, we would have re- frained from entering our journals, and suspect others would have d6ne the same. We would have expected the judging to be done on contents and special- ized material offered which is truly not offered by any other journals. We do not say that those which received awards were less than ours in this S 6 #49/50 respect; we do say that we, and others who wore ignored, are doing an equivalent service to the hobby in our fiold, and merited equal consideration. Wo can only regretfully conclude that the philatelic section was included chiefly to get the added revenue at $10 an entry, with no proper thought given to how they were to be fairly judged. It is obvious that in any future show the philatelic literature section should be eliminated; nothing could "have proved this fact better than what happened at FIIEX. There wore 3,202 frames at the show, and only two exhibitors showed "ORussia", and both presented *Imperial Russia". We can proudly state that both won modalst Paul M. Davidson, of Chicago, Illinois, our member, won the Gold Modal, while Dr. Salisbury received the Bronze Medal, Incidentally, our member Mr. Samuel Ray prepared and wrote up the Davidson Collection, as well as many others, and Mr. Rayls work received five major awards. Trophy for Best in Section.......................China. Gold Modal...... .....................Imperial Russia. Silver-Gilt Modal.........................Brazil "Dom Pedros"u Silver-Gilt Medal.... ............Newfoundland Airposts. Silver-Gilt Medal.........................Danzig. This is based on his ad in the STAMPS and the American Philatelist. -Mr. Davidson's Collection was fabulous. We admired his highly spoacial- ized collection of #1 with paper and plate varieties, various cancellations, many rare, both on and off cover, in superb condition. A complete write up of this will appear shortly in our journal. He also showed a specialized S collection of "Small Arms" Issues, including essays, proofs, varieties, S errors, off and on cover, 14 kop. bisect on cover, full sheets of 32 and 7 rubles without thunderbolts, and numerous inverted centers. Somi-postals wore also shown (wo were amazed to see a block of 3 kop. plus 1 kop. 1914 S Orange shown as a proof, or an essay, we forget which, when it is definitely known to be the product of a chemical change by the forgers of Odessa & Paris). The somi-postals were also highly specialized shown as essays, proofs, ''varieties, and on cover, as well as fabulous groupings of "OBRAZETS". The finest part of the show was the wonderful array of essays, proofs of the Romanov Torcontennary Issue of 1913 as well as the varieties and imperforates. This magnificent display blended nicely with the ten frames of 160 sheets of your editors Romanovts, selected from a ten volume collection of one issue. Needless to state, this section of FIPEX attracted all .of our members, and served as a meeting place for the Rossica and BSRP groups, throughout the show. Our Hon. Member Vladimir Rachmanoff received a Gold Medal for his great display of 18th. Century Polish Stamploss Covers, and for Poland No. 1, a specialized collection with many varieties, including a block of four on cover, and the imperforate variety, one on cover. Our member, Dr. L. Kozakiewicz of Chicago, received a silver gilt medal for Poland No. 1, including essays, proofs, and cancellations, featuring the only known block of six, and a sudy of colors and varieties. Another member of ours, Charles W. Dougan, of Glendale, California, received a Solver Modal for Tibet. He is incidentally very active on the West Coast and is the proud owner of a highly specialized collection of China* Our well known member, Fred Barovick, Vice President of SPA, received #49/50 7 a Bronze Modal for his Souvenir and Miniature Shoots of the World. Our : member, and most active Global Cover Society leader, J. C. Wheat, also received a Bronze Medal, and his award was given for a fabulous collection of early stampless covers of the world up to 1850 as well as first issues. Our member, Dr. H. C. Pollack, a distinguished lecturer and research man, from Chicago, spoke at the Exhibition, and displayed #X-Rays in Philatelic Research". Many Imperial Russian stamps were shown in this collection, as objects of study by the roontgen rays. Member. Samuel Ray of Chicago, showed Mongolia, also Egypt, the former being of utmost interest to us, as it con- tained forerunners, regular stamps, and varieties, as well as a study of the overprints. Many Russian postmarks wore shown. ; SWe zust compliment our member, Bernard Davis, Director of the National Philatolic Museum, for his extraordinary display of U. P. U. issues at Fipext and for his groat taste and philatelic knowledge, in presentation. If this exhibit were placed in competition, it would have won a major award Our congratulations. S Member F. Fritz Billig should be commended for the very fine handbook, Handbook No. 25 which he placed in competition. .He should have shown all of his wonderful handbooks, published in the past, for they have been of. immense service to our hobby .. *. . Before we leave the list of our members who were active at the Fipex, we must state that one of the busiest ladies there was our own Mrs. Charlotte N, Downs, Editor of STAMPS and a member of various.Fipex committees. Her work prior to the opening of the show, such as mounting exhibits, and organizational duties, as well as her helpful efforts from the "headquarters" i at the STAMPS booth, should win her a special medal.. We must note, with pride, that in nearly every case where Russian material was shown, as part of an exhibit, of another country, or theme, the exhibit won a medal! Let us mention some of the exhibitors, our friends, and as yet, not our members, who won medals: . .Gold Modal with Diamond Insert. '. Sam Rodvien, N,Y.-Air Mails of the World Silver Gilt Medal. Sol Rozman, Brooklyn, N.Y.-Foreign Posts in Palestine. Edward M. Tolman, N.Y.-Mongolia Ira Seebacher, Roslyn, N.Y.-Sports on Stamps. *, Silver Modal. Otto Hoffman, Jorusales, Israel-Postal History of Holy Land S, N. Shuro, Chicago-Palestine Bronze Medal. Eugene Kotyk, Jersey City-Ukraino Dr..J. A. Buchness, Baltimore, Md.-Lithuania Airmails Lt. Col. R. Ahonius, Helsinki-Finnish Field Mail W.Kolakowski, Great Neck, N.Y.-Poland ... . O .GK B. Holstrom, Stockholm-Mongolia "8 #9/50 We should mention two others, who did not win medals but presented fine collections of interest to us. One was by Wolfgang Fritzcho, of Geneva, "* ,. N. Y. showing Russia-Pleskau World War II local mail sorvico under German occupation, from August 1941 to April 1942, as well as official Ostland Stamps. Another was the collection of Floyd S. Leach of Rowayton, Conn, who.presented "Siberia" including the first and the. last days of Shanghai cancellations, first day Siberian, Russian, Y. M. C. A. cover, We must also mention E. Rosenfeld of N. Y. who showed most' interesting air mails from Przomysl, besieged 1914.15, and military courier air service Vienna- Kiov. .. . -It is our sincerest hope that the exhibitors mentioned will write up their wonderful collections for the future issues of our journal, thus giving philately a permanent record of their treasures. We must note the trends at Fipox toward postal history, revenues, postal stationery, and. foreign. Research collections were few, truly mature topicals were scarce, and scarcest of all were the people to view thomt MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO ATTENDED WERE MILLING AROUND THE DEALER'S BOOTHS, while huge display rooms full of treasures, in the frames, were poorly attended Amen, S. ooooooooooooooooooooo S. R E V E N U E C :A'T ATALOGU E ; We are proud to announce the completion of the revenue catalogue by Emile Marcovitch, the author of the wonderful catalogue of labels, which S. is being published by us serially in our journal. At first, we intended to print it as a separate book, in a book form, and some of you were contacted to donate to the fund, needed for the production. The costs involved, and the small response have altered the plans.. We intend to publish this monumental work in a serialized form, beginning with the #51. The great cost of illustrations can not be borne by the society treasury, and we are applying the money in the Fund, toward the cost of the photos. The amount we have is inadequate, and we appeal to all of the members for contributions. Needless to state, the catalogue of Forbin is obsolete, inadequate, incomplete, in many places most inaccurate, it covers but a portion of the needed material, and......... it is almost-impossible to purchase. Your editor paid $25.00 for a poor copy of a 1905 edition Here is your chance to add a valuable addition to your, library. .* '. .: .' ' Mr. Marcovitch received valuable aid from R. A. Sklarevski, J. Posell, .J. Reynolds, Dr. G. B. Salisbury, and from many other collectors of revenues. .Your financial aid at this point will enable this journal to be of great service to Rossica, and.to our great hobby. S.C .. NTIBUTORS TO THE FUND ":": Sf. .. .. ; : J. Posell.........$25. 00. ,.. Dr. Salisbury.... ..$25.00 S. F. J. Fohs..........$15.00" . ; - :' J... Wintorhalter.q...$ 5.00 L. Zaikowski.,...... 1.75 Salo of books.....$13.00 -.: #49/50 9 AIRPOST STAMPS OF USSR OVERIRINTED "NORTH POLE-MOSCOW 1955 by P. Matishev During the second half of 1955 (November) Soviet Union commemorated the opening of two scientific drifting stations near the North Pole, the Stations ""North Pole 4" and "North Pole 5", by overprinting two previously issued air post stamps of 1 and 2 ruble values. The overprint in Russian and its . English equivalent is:- ,,CeB. nolAcOC NOR, POL-er M- Moi-.B -- Moscow 1. 55 r, 1 9.5 Y. The overprint on 1 r. stamp is in red-brown, while on the 2 r. it is red. These stamps issued in a limited quantity, 15,000 series, were on sale in Moscow for only several hours, and are already extremely scarce. Although their nominal value was 75 cents, they sold at first in U.S.A. for $6.25, later the price fell to $3.00 a set, then rose to $3.50. In the Soviet Union, among the philatelists, the set sells for 80 rubles. ?thuble . -a-The upper curve of numeral "9" is defective, pushed down from above. This variety occurs once in a sheet, on a stamp located at the left border of the sheet. b-Both u5's" of the date "1955" are closed and resemble Russian letter "b c-First "5" of the date "1955" is closed & the lower half of the letter "aB" in the word uMOCKBA" is completely filled in. This can not be mis- taken for stamps with shifted overprint in which the lower half of the letter "B" falls on one of the ships in the design of the basic stamp, Sand which may give the same appearance as the above variety. 2 Rubles 4 a-First "5" of the date "1955" is closed. We must note here that the red color used in overprinting the 2 ruble' value is clearer than the brown-red color used in overprinting the 1 ruble stamp, thus we conclude that the overprint on 2 ruble value was more apt to spread. The variety of 1 ruble stamp gives the impression of an error in cliche, while that of 2 rubles I believe is due to the spreading of ink. SI may add that I have two varieties which do not correspond to any of the above. 1 ruble-First "5' of "19551 is closed, however all else is normal. 2 rubles-Both "5Is" of "1955" are closed. Editorial Comments:-Our member #4S, T. Wroublevsky of.France, informs member R. Polchaninoff that forgeries of this series have appeared in France. This may explain the ease with which one can buy these series of stamps in USA, although the author found but 10 series in Sweden, and that only 15,000 sets supposedly were issued. Your editor has many sets of this series, both in singles and in strips. He has been offered many, in long strips and blocks. These overprints seemed to be genuine by comparison, however data is needed on counterfeits. We must also consider the fact that since the same overprint was used on both values there is a possibility of ink spreading, because of the tpne of the overprint getting dirty and not being cleaned often enough and that some letters of the type may have been droken or damaged. As yet we have not seen any cancelled copies nor any covers, 00000000000000 10 #49/50 POLISH CONSULAR POST IN ODESSA IN 1919-1920 Sb Soymour Gibrick When we study the history of Ukrainian philatoly, we como upon one interesting fact, the evidence of influence on its postal history, in 1919- 1920 of the foreign military forces and diplomatic envoys. One example of duch influence is the postal emission of stamps of tho Polish Consulate in Odessa, in November 1919, frequently unknown to many collectors of Ukraine. "Capt. S. do Shramohonko states that this post was actually opened in September, 1919, at No. 25, Sophiovskaya, Odessa, and the following unover- printed, Polish stamps wore used:- 5 fen green (#94) 25 fen olive green (#100) 10 fen rod violet (#95) 1 mark violet (#103) 15 fon deep rose (#97) 15 hel vermilion (#124) -One sheet of 100 20 fen deep blue (#99) 25 hel light blue (#126)-0no sheet of 100 In November 1919 Odessa was occupied by the White Army of General Anton Denikin, which after the unsuccessful campaign against Moscow, during the spring and summer of 1919, retreated into the southern part of Ukraine, under the pressure from Bolsheviks. Odessa was isolated from the land sector and had almost nc postal communications. A considerable number of Polish refugees "gathered in the city, and influenced the Polish Consul there to organize a special consular post to Poland. This consul was designated there, during the regime of the Ukrainian Government in 1918. p In November 1919 a number of Polish postage stamps of 1919, perforated 11j were overprinted in black and red with the word uOdesa" in Latin characters, (Notice that Odessa is spelled with one us"), and the overprint on "fen" values was smaller than on the "marka" value. Officially these stamps wore in use, to Poland, from December 12, 1919 to January 31, 1920. 1-10 fon, rod violet (#95)------595 4-50 fen, deep greoon (#102)------606 a-inverted overprint--------------3 a-inverted overprint---------------6 b-red overprint---------------50 b-red overprint---------------50 2-20 fen, deep blue (#99)-------596 5-1 mark, violet (#103)---------700 a-inverted overprint--------------5 a-inverted overprint--------------6 3-25 fen, olive green (#100)----208 6-15 hel, vermilion----------------6. a-inverted overprint------------- 5 The quantities issued and their short and limited use show the rarity of those stamps, especially on covers. Because of this, dangerous forgeries exist Those and unovorprinted stamps were cancelled by an elongated 3-line killer, with word "Odosal in the center. Billig in his handbook No. 1, lists all of the above stamps. This post ended shortly after Odessa was occupied by rod troops. We are inclined to think that those stamps were highly speculative,, and. because of their limited use are not listed in any standard catalogue. #49/50 11 NOTES ON RUSSIAN OFFICES IN TUTKEY Sby R. Seymour BPlonfieold I note that the Journal carries a list of philatelic articles, handbooks, "-: etc. of Russian interest. It this connection I have an important article to 'report. The Club Philatoliouo d'Egypto publishes a fine quarterly journal: ":ULlOrient Philatolique." On p. 351 of #-86 (April 1954) is an article: Los Bureaux Postaux Russos a Aloxandrio et a Port Said", by Ibrahim Chaftar, FR.P.S.L.-R.D.P. The closing of the Russian Offices in Egypt is fully covorod. Tho author has had access to the old Egyptian postal records and has published his findings in the above journal. In this article reforrod to above he gives the text of several letters and telegrams covering the closing of the Russian Offices in Alexandria and Port-Said and shows that they were closed on October 1, 1875. . SIn 'my collection of Egypt I have a cover with Scottts Russian Offices in Turkey #5, cancelled with Numeral 785 in triangle formed of dots and on the back a circular Russian marking in blue, reading "PORT ALEXAT RIA -8 MAY'. SI also have d strip of 3 of the same stamp, on pieco, just barely tied by the same blue circular marking dated: "67 I-22(dato reversed)," Another cover with two 2 kop. P.O. in Turkey #21 is addressed to Aleppo and has two Turkish stamps on the back cancelled "Alop I Juillot 18801 The late date worried meo so I made a careful examination and found the blue S circular marking on the face reads "JAEXANDRETTA 21 JUIE" in Russian. The stamps are tied by a similar blue marking, pretty smudged, but the wording B seems different,. perhaps "SMIIRlE (Russian)"l. A friend of mine, Charles Fox : of Now York, also an Egyptian specialist, has a cover with a circular "PORT SAID -.10 DEC. 1872" (Russian) on face. I believe this is a very scarce marking. - i . 0000000000000 Extensive stock,.,.......,.... . "RUSSIA '& STATES' & OFFICES Stamploss covers, postal stationery, stamp rarities and regular issues, proofs, essays, varieties, cancellations, covers, .Inquiries invited. "'. A MU E L R A Y Also, professional mounting and writing-up of collections. 0 12 #49/50 THE REGULAR POSTAGE STAMP ISSUES OF THE USSR B Y KU RT A D LE R SCOTT'S TYPES A 58 1, 4, 5, 8,14, 20 K. A 59 3,7, 8,10,18,40 K. AND I R. TPo. rTHO. A60 2,6,9,15,30,50K. A 62 2 R. i ci...CE. c; "SMALt.ll AN LAR"IY A 63 3 R,. THINNE. NDmLc.Kt. Kpyj .we w KP7 a.o A64 5 R.. .Tn.... T" s.. T t RO. I JIATO. (a TYPO. LiNe fUTHenR FROM L T0O. FRAmK. L;ine .ae TO VrR4 IUTCyix pkbjt* or u,. x H -.Arne oT PANK9. PAMUK. ~~sc VI* L *TCM TH1ICK- -rericaL rt'TN lK -`"Ct*?~C TO*.'Y.'C* eTpwCTpe Hb 10140 Tm e. KOn3 7 KOnOn. Kol Kon Kon0 an Kon on NO PenioS irt O P Fti,o To4p (I K 11 T TMno. 2 JI TO. 2a TMfO. 3 JliTro. 3 Ty PC I TYP&E I nu l TOP TO Bp, Y.p b. .I TMO. K P 0 /tL, sHoRi ro i f i f L or, a.,. ; ToUcmh OaS NOT TOUC . PrAKu. THt FRAMt. -- nAa PMK... M OO "A T TM4o. 5 1MTO. 5o A4 PA PAMK t. 4 40 "TV PO. K 1..X NeAonATr AO WlTPx OKOJC PA>.. .n. ',^n TI .....- --A ..... 0 A 6. . S6 lo Jt1TO. 60 7.'14.* L, P 6 I A^.I FRAME P .j.. S.Ellillit T7I IL FoN 6. JIVTO. 64 THE REGULAR POST STAMP ISSUES OF THE USSR by Kurt Adlor Before the appearance of the Commemorative Stamp, the Charity stamp, the whole array of topical issues, the multicolored propaganda labels, all destined at bost to remind the population of a nations historical and cultural heritage, and at worst to advertise slogans and sell ideas, and also to hypnotically draw the stamp collector's monoy out of his pockets, it was up to the simple postage stamps which we today call the regular or defi- nito stamps to servo as means of franking the mail. Their issue was a ne- cossity and, since they were used extensively they had to be reprinted, re- issued and, if postal rates changed, re-valued or surcharged. Additional values had to be issued, other printings in different colors, by different printing methods and with different perforations and watermarks followed. All this was usually spread over a number of years before another definite issue with different designs appeared. These regular, definite, or standard issued, somewhat neglected by the contemporary collector in favor of the above mentioned commemorativos, contain a lot of most interesting varieties, most of them well in reach of the average collector's pocket book, and are apt to open a whole array of most fascinating material for research by the specialist collector. Russia,'with its more than 200 million inhabitants had an especially urgent need for these standard series and has changed and re-issued them with regular frequency. Since the formation of the USSR in 1923 and the intro- duction of the Gold Standard, there has been 8 distinctively different l-rge series of postage stamps which the Russians themselves name Standard Series. Unlike the Commemorative sets, all values of the standard set are available at all post offices and no possibility of buying these sets for speculative purposes is being feared since the number of stamps printed is too high to S be hoarded. The Russians are, therefore,justified in calling them mass issues. Qf course, every issue has some rare varieties, some extremely so, and we will try to give as complete a picture as possible. Each catalogue offers bits of information, none is complete. The basis for this article is found in the different Soviet Catalogues, Scottts and various foreign cata- loguos, and in the specialized philatelic literature in that field. A bibli- ography will follow at the end of this study. We will begin our research with tne first sot issued by the newly formed Union of Soviet LScialist Republics in October 1923. The definite issues released by the RSFSR prior to introduction of the Gold Standard concern mostly the inflation issues and would necessitate separate study. THE FIRST STANDARD SERIES OF USSR 1923-1927, This set usually goes under the name of "Omall head" stamps, and was excellently described by H. L. Aronson in his study "The Small Head Issues of Russia" in the Russian-American Philatelist, We will use his research as a basis and augment it in regard to new discoveries since the time of the publication of that article in 1943. The design of this sot is not new. It had boon modified and simplified from former issues and depicts the three main strata of the population, the Worker, the Peasant, and the Rod Army Soldier. The artist-dosignor, I. D. S Ivanov-Shadr, had worked on this project very conscientiously. He chose live 14 #49/50 models from his homo town of Shadrinsk and made sculptures of those three Types. Those sculptures were thon photographed from all sides and the best "view was selected to serve as the design for the stamps. All of the stamps S of the small head series boar the inscription CCCP (USSR), the value, and the word uZolotom" which means "in gold". For the first months, however, Until March 1924, whon the new Ruble based on Gold Standard was finally introduced, purchasorsof those stamps at the post office had to pay in currency which fluctuated from day to day, the value being established "through-the daily official stock market (bourse) quotations. In the early twenties the two major printing processes used in Russia "were lithography and typography. The small heads were printed by both processes. Before we list the different designs, both in lithographic and Stypographic printing, we will explain and illustrate their differences and Sthe distinguishing marks. This is not always easy, and four values, the 1, S 2, 6 and 20 kop. present veritable difficulties of identification. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LITHOGM:PHED AiD TYPQOMGPHED STAMPS The typographed stamps, generally, show up in slight relief on the reverse sid6. This pertains mainly to the letters and figures in the tablet .and the frame lines, not unlike typewritten letters which show in relief on the reverse side., This distinguishing mark, however, is only reliable on mint gummed stamps;.on cancelled stamps the slight relief becomes undistinguis' able. The typographed stamps, generally, are from + to nmm. shorter than the .lithographed. Should the identification of some stamps of this imperforate "typographod and litHographed issue become too difficult, an easily obtain- able"perforated stamp of the opposite printing process may be used for com- S prison, by putting it side by side with the imperforate' one which is to be S identified. .. , The Worker design (Scott Type A58), the 1, 5 and 20 kop. lithographed can be distinguished from typographed stamps only by absence of the slight "relief impression on the reverse side of the mint gummed stamps, which is "-present on the typographed stamps. Typographed 1, 4 and 20 kop. are imm. shorter and 5 kop. -mm. shorter than the lithographed. The 4 kop. can be easily separated, because the vertical stem of figure 4"n is much thicker .on the typographed stamps.and thus gives "4" a shorter appearance, and typographod are 19.75mm. high againnft 20.25mm. for lithographed. (Fig.3 ) (Fig. 3a) The Peasant Desig (Scott Type A60), the 2, 6 and 50 kop. values can also be best recognized by the above mentioned relief impression, which is found on mint gummed typographed stamps only. The design is also much smoother ond clearer on typographed stamps, and 2 and 6 kop. values are imm. shorter, while 50,kop. value is imm. shorter than lithographed. The little circles in the squares in the upper corners are smaller and thinner on the typographod stamps. (Fig.1 ) (Fig. la) The Soldier Desian (Scott Type A59), offers the easiest way of iden- tification. All stamps of this design, of which the 3, 10 kop. and 1 ruble wore the original values have the white line of the soldiorts blouse go to "the frame of the design on tho lithographed stamps, while on typographod this line does not reach the frame. (Fig. 7). The tvnographod stamps are .in. shorter than lithographed, being 19.75mm. against 20.25mm. #49/50 15 The 3 kop. lithographed has a period after "kop" at the left side of the stamp, while the typographod does not have it. The 1 ruble lithographed has periods after both "Rub." while the typographod does not; the white frame line on both sides of the stamp stops at the bottom tablet on lithographed printing while on typographed it goes all around, thus framing the design completely. (Fig.7) ----------- ----------------- - The stamps of the lithographed and typographed issues were printed on white or-yellowish paper which varies in thickness from 0.5 to 0.7mm. All small size Small Heads were printed in sheets of 100, 4 panes of 25 (5x5) stamps, while the 3 and 5 ruble values were printed in sheets of 50 (10x5). There are numerous shades of some of the values, a few of them quite rare in mint state. We will mark the difficult to obtain stamps with R, RR, and RRR. The small heads wereofirst issued lithographed and imperforate. The first stamps appeared in September 1923, the last (1 ruble) at the beginning of 1924. The typographed imperforate and the first perforated stamps followed during 1924. FIRST REGULAR ISSUE. LITHOGRAPHED, I1MPfMFOPRATE UNIIATERMARKED. Scott's catalogue numbers are given before each value those of S. G. in parenthesis. Shades are disregarded in numbering. (Figs. la to 5a & 7a) 250-1 kop. orange (335) 256-10 kop. dark blue (341) orange yellow blue 251-2 kop. dull green (336) 257-20 kop. dark green (342) green yellow green yellow green green S 252-3 kop. red brown (337) 30 kop. violet (1955 Soviet Catalogue) brown red 258-50 kop. brown (343) 253-4 kop, rose red (338) light brown rose 259- 1 rub. red & light brown (344) 254-5 kop. lilac (339) light red & light brown dull purple 255-6 kop. blue (340) deep blue Varieties 1933 Edition of the Soviet Catalogue states that some varieties exist with unofficial perforation (ERR).- 'TYPOGRABHED, IMPERFCRATE. UNWATERMARKED. 2 kop. green (IR) (345) 275-10 kop. dark blue (351) yellow green indigo 273-3 kop, dull rod brown (346) grey blue brown red 20 kop, green (RR) 274-4 kop. rose (347) light green red rose pale green rod rose on pink back-275A-50 kop. brown (ER Mint) (354) ground. light brown (RR Mint) 5 kop. lilac (RER) 1 rub. red & light brown (RR) 6 kop. blue (R) light rod & light brown (RR) light blue (RR) (See Figures 1 to 4 & 7) 16 #49/50 The 2, 5, 20 kop. and 1 ruble typographod stamps of this sot were never "used-for postage, and 5 kop. was only recently discovered. It was first listed in 1948 Soviet Catalogue and continued in the later editions. The author has never seen a copy of this.stamp and lists it here tentatively. 6 kop. exists as a color proof in black. (R).. Additional values of this imporforate set, printed by typography, were issued in 1925, mainly to complete the sot for philatelic purposes. However# the stamps could be used for postage, but are rare thus. TYPOGRATHED, IMPERFORATE, UNWATERl'.KED (Additional values issued in 1925) The original set issued in 1924 (See above) consisted only of 9 values. Eight more values wore issued in 1925, but in much smaller number of sheets. Those 8-values, mint and cancelled to order could only be bought at the stores of the Soviet Philatelic Association and at increased price. In the years during and after the Second World War the Soviets sold the remainder of their stocks so that today the set is not quite as rare as it used to be. Since these 8 additional values (like 5 of the original cmes-those not listed by the Scottls catalogue) were not sold at the post office they are very un- common used on cover perhaps with the exception of 7 kop. which appeared in two shades and can be found here and there on cover. Philatelists, how- ever placed these stamps on covers, and they are quite rare, especially in connected pieces or in blocks. Many cancelled copies, on or off cover were prepared by clipping the perforations off the perforated stamps which have large margins all around. The genuine imperforate stamps have very wide margins and should be accepted only if at least one margin is more than usually wide. This applies both for mint and cancelled copies. One additional factor in their 'identification is that the paper on which they were printed is white. SThe 30 and 40 kop. typographed can be distinguished from the same values lithographed by the following characteristics, described in the table below and illustrated on Figures 5 & 6 (Typo.) and 5a & 6a (Litho.). ..Valua--- Typographed -...... -.-.ithographed . 1 EIGHT 19.5mm. 20.0mm. FIGURE 30a Smaller Larger I 3 30 KOP. Straight Top Curved Top S I r 1 Narrower Wider See Illustratiop Figur 5 5Fig0a HEIGHT 19.5mm. 19.5mm. STEM OF 40a / 0 kop. Higher Smaller ""KOF' i Larger & Wider Smaller & NarrOwer SSee Illustration Figure 6 Figure 6a VALtE TYPE I i TYE II . S.. - "..The uppor of the two ho-ri- 4 The white lines are both sontal lines dividing the long and of even length, and i soldierss figure from the 'both roach the soldier's S -tablot is shorter than the shoulder. U3 UBES Ilower one and does not run 1 S nto the dark line of the I soldier's shoulder. S(Soo Figure 4) (S Figure 4q) #49/50 17 TYPOGRAPHED. IPERFORATE. UNTATERFMRKED (Additional values issued in 1925) 7 kop, brown (348) 40 kop. slnto grey (353) choc:clato on.thin paper. 2 rub. carmino & groon (355) 8 kop. brown olive (349) 3 rub. dark brown & groon (Typo I)(356) W 9 kop. light rod orange (350) dark brown & groon (Typo II) dark orange rod,on thin 5 rub. dark blue & brown (357) papor* 30 kop. violet (352) (See Figs. 4, 4a, 5 nd 6) The varieties, marked with an asteriT (*) are mentioned in the latest Soviet Catalogue (1955), but have not yet boon soon by the author. 3 RUBIES-F. Julius Fohs, noted philatelist revises his notes on the "small "'hoad l typos, originally printed in #17 issue of the Russian American Philatolist, and we quote: 'Thoro is a distinct variety of the 3 Rub. value so far noted only on an imperforato, typographod stamp, issued on unwatormarked paper, green & dark brown, on which part of the shading is less marked, and there is a distinct white line on the "* lower right side which connects the nock and the collar. All other copies of the 3 Rub. stamps of this issue that I have are light brown." 5 Rubles-The background is light yellowish brown, but occasionally it has a darker background. There are two types of design, TYPE I-The right side of the face and the neck are light with short shading strokes, The white space on the cap, upper right is / narrow. TYPE II-The shading is heavier on both right side of face and nock, and the shading lines are longer. White space on the cap, is broader and more pronounced. Both types occur on unwatormarkod paper. On watermarked paper, S Typo II appoers on perforated copies, while Typo I appears on an imperforate copy. It is probable that Type I also shall be found on perforated watormarkod copies. Although the clarity of the design improved with the change of the printing process to typography, some of the lithographod stamps wore perforated along with the typographod stamps, when perforating was ordered. The first lithographod stamps were perforated in Juno, 1924 in two different sizes. LITHOGRAHED, PBERFORATED. UNWATERMAfRKED (Issued in Juno. 1924) Perforated l4xl11- Perforated ll-xl2i 1 kop. orange (RRa) (X) 3 kop. red brown (RRR) 3 kop, rod brown (IRR) * 4 kop. rod rose (378) (R mint & oanc.) 4 kop. red rose (0PMR) * 10 kop. dark blue (379) (R mint) 20 kop. green (UMR) * 263-30 kop. violet (380) 264-40 kop. slate grey (381) 1 rub. rod & light brown (RiER) 1 rub. red & light brown (iRR)(x) red & dark brown (IlR) * S- Sea note above. (See Figures 2a to ,a) and (5a to 7a) 18 #49/50 X)-H. L. Aronson mentions two of those stamps, the 1 kop. narrow perforation and the 1 ruble, wid. perforation, but considers thon privately S: perforated or frauds. The latest tabulation seems to prove tho genuineness .of Mr. Aronsonts copies. With the exception of 3, 4, 10 kop. and 1 ruble in narrow perforations, no other value has boon soon cancelled. They were hardly over put into circulation .. .. S"30 kop. exists in strips of 5 perforated-with the word "OBRAZETS" (Russian word for specimen) over 5 stamps. Likewise the 40 kop. S TYPOGRArHED, PERFORITEDl/Axll& exceptt 3 & 5 rubles), UNWATEMLKED S All-of the kopek values were perforated 14/xl/4 and included two ad- ditional values, namely the 14 and 15 kop. The 3 and 5 ruble values were perforated 13-, which is a new perforation for the small hoads to that date. 'll sets, with the exception of one single stamp in 1926 were now printed by typography. Some values of this sot are extremely rare mint and seem to have boon used up completely. The are missing in most collections even as single stamps, to say nothing about connected pieces or blocks of four. ":276-1 kop.orango (R Mint) (382) 285 -10 kop. dark blue (391) "yellow blue 277-2 kop. greeoon (383) indigo deep green 286 -14 kop. grey blue (392) S' yellow green 287-15 kop. lemon yellow (RRR Mint)(393) S278-3 kop. red brown (384) 288 -20 kop. green (394) brown red dark green 279-4 kop. red rose (385) grey green bright rose 288A-30 kop. violet (RI Mint) (395) 280-5 kop. lilac (386) vivid violet (RR Mint) '"- violet 288B-40 kop. slate grey (R Mint) (396) 281-6 kop. blue (387) deep slate grey light blue 289 -50 kop .brown (397) pale blue 290- 1 rub, rod & light brown (398) 282-7 kop. brown (388) light rod & light brown chocolate 291 2 rub. carmine & groon (399) 283-8 kop, brown olive (389) 292 3 rub, dark brown & groon, porf. olive grey 13O-, Type II. (416) black olive (RR Mint) 293 5 rub, dark blue & brown, perf. 284-9 kop. red orange (390) 13-. (417) light red orange dark blue & light brown, S...perf. 13-. SVA RIETIES -6 kop.-color proof in black. -A few values exist with perforation through the middle (Printers Waste). -Some values exist with slight double impression, printed on gummed side, misplaced centers, strong shifts of perforations and partly printed. -The 2, 3, 7, 8, 20, 30 kop. and 1, 2 rub. exist in strips of 5, perforated . with word COBRAZETS" (Specimen) on five stamps. #40/50; 9 -Romeko Catalogue lists 3 rubles, perforated 10 on one vertical side (Romeko #264a), which may be a later line perforation of a part imporforato stamp -The 3 ruble exists also as a pair, imporforate between (S. Gibbons #416a). S *5 ruble has boon soon as a pair, imporforato between: horizontally & vorti- cally, with double perforation through the contoer TYPOGRPHED, PERFORATED II 121 (except 3 & 5 rubles), UNTATRMARKED. S Shortly after the completion of the proceeding sot, the Postal Authori- ties changed the perforations to llixl2+ gauge which they already had used in 1923 on some of the pro-gold standard small heads and on the three rare variotios, i. e. the 3, 4 kop. and 1 rub. of the lithographed set of 1924. From now on, with the exception of 3 stamps later on, only the I1xl2- gauge was used on the small heads. The 6 kop. and the 2 rub. values wore not issued in the ll xl2w perforation. This perforation appears in two ways: large holes, small tooth, and the opposite small holes and wide tooth. The perforations 10 and 10| appear for the first time, however, on the 3 and 5 ruble values, respectively. As in the proceeding sets, some values, but not necessarily the same ones as before, are exceedingly raro in mint state, A good example of this is the 9 kop. stamp which was first issued in purple, the same shade as in the 1414 set. There were some intermediate S shades of this stamp, however, and at the other end of the colorscale there was the exceedingly rare lavender and slate grey shades of this stamp. But later when the small heads became popular with collectors outside of Russia and the Soviet Fhilatolic Association sent them over in groat quantities, "they did so in sots of mixed perforations and the 5 kop. stamp was always in the slate grey shade. Today, the purple shade of 5 kop. is very hard to obtain mint, while it is abundant in cancelled state, while the lavender and slato grey shades are much harder to find used. The black olive shade of the 8 kop. which is a rare stamp perforated 13x12 anyway, is extremely rare mint and has never been soon hero thus, while it abounds in used copies. The 5 ruble Stamp ,-perforated lOi, used to be very rare and is still listed thus in all catalogues. However, all 5 S rublo stamps in the available mixed perforation sets are of 102 gauge and the 13- perforation is becoming increasingly rare, Other comparatively rare values are the 4 and 20 kop. mint, and the 1 rub. very rare mint. The 3 rubles perforated 10, which is of TypoII, has never boon soon hero mint. It must also boon exceedingly rare at the point of origin since no Soviet Catalogue up to 1955 priced it mint. Evidently, all copies had bogn used up in the mails. There exists a compound variety of 3 rubles, perforated 13-x10 which was listed for years in foreign catalogues but has only lately boon included in the Soviet Catalogue. Its price is 50 rubles mint. While it is rare mint it is unobtainable cancelled. It is also of Type II. Those examples show how diversified and interesting the collecting of S small heads can boe Soo the following papo for listinp of stamps described on this pago. 20 #49/50 "TYPOCRAPHED, PERFORATED 12x12- (oxcopt' & 5 rubles), UNWATERMUJKED S276a-1 kop. orange (400) 284a-9 kop, rod orange (407) orange yellow brown orange 277a-2 kop. light groon (401) 285a-10 kop. dark blue (408) groon blue dark groon 286a-14 kop. groy blue (409) 278a-3 kop. rod brown (402) 287a-15 kop. lemon yellow (410) brown rod 288a-20 kop, black groon(411) (R Mint) 279a-4 kop, rod rose .. olive groon bright roso .. : gray groon 280a-5 kop. purple (404) 288Aa-30 kop. violet (412) /- violet groy violet palo violt bright violet lavender :'288Ba-40 kop. slato groy (413) "slate grey 289a-50 kop. brown (U 4) 282a-7 kop. brown (405) dark brown chocolate 290a- 1 rub. rod & light brown (415) 283a-8 kop. brown olive (406)((R Mint) RR mint, R used. dark olive (R Mint) 292a- 3 rub. dark brown & groon (419) .black groon (RER Mint) Porf. 10, Typo II (RRR Mint, .3 rub. dark brown & groon (418) The paper of this sot is again Porf. 13-xlO, Typo II, of varied thickness. No major .(RR Ueod). varieties -other than those listed .293a-5 rub. dark blue & brown are known to-exist in this sot, Perforated 10- Fraudulent perforations of the 3 and 5 ruble stamps, made from imperforat( specimens have appeared on the market. The 3 ruble can do distinguished by its faked very small pinholes and very wide tooth, approximately perforated 10, the 5 ruble has the compound perforation 10O-01 ;. TYPOGRAPHED, PELRFORATED 11-x1l2- (oxcopt 3 & 5 rubles), WATERMARKED From 1925 on, all Soviet stamps were printed on paper watermarked "Grook Border and Rosottos", and it took two years to complete the small heads on this paper, The increased demand made it necessary to re-issuo some of the denominations from now plates by different printing processes, and also in now colors (10 kop. light blue, issued in 1927). This new color was made necessary because the dark blue color was found to mako postmarks unintelligible. An :entiroly now value, appoarod, tho 18 kop., porforitod 13x1l2i. The 3 and 5 ruble values are perforated 13-, and the former also exists in perforation 121-. There are many color shades. Color proofs oxist, but the only one known to mo, however, is the 2 kop. in black, the same shade as the 6 kop. color proof of the unwatormarkod issues. 304-1 kop. orange (430) 308-5 kop. lilac (434) orange yellow purple 305-2 kop. groon (431) 309-6 kop. light blue (435) yellow green 310-7 kop. brown (436) 306-3 kop. rod !brown (432) chocolate- vivid rod brown 311-8 kop. olive (437) 307-4 kop. rod rose (433) dark brown olive * bright rose 312-9 kop. rod orange (438) #40/50 21 TYPOGRAPIED, PEFORATED 13-x2l2 (oxcopt 3 & 5 rubles), WATERMARKED Listing continued front. procoodin jag.o) 313-10 kop. dark blue (439) 319-40 kop. dark slato grey (445) blue slate grey 10 kop. light bluo(439a) (1927) 320-50 kop. brown (446) 314-14 kop. gray bluo (440) light brown 315-15 kop. lemon yellow (441) 321- 1 rub. dark red & dark brown (447) yellow light red & light brown 316-18 kop. dark violet (.442) 323- 2 rub. carmino & groon (448) .grey violet 324- 3 rub.;dark brown & groon, Type II, 317-20 kop. dark green (443) prf. 132 (449) / green 324a-3 rub. light brown & groon, Typos I grey groan and II, porf. 122 (449a) 318-30 kop. bright violet (444) 325 -5 rub. dark blue & brown, perf. 13-, lilac (450) pale lilac blue violet TYPOGRAPHED,, PERFORATED 14kx1/-, WATERMARKED 8 kop., 1 aDd 2 rubles on watermarked paper were issued with old perforation of 14-xl42-, the 8 kop. only recently discovered by the Soviets has never boon seen here. The 1 ruble is very rare mint. 8 kop. olive (RRR) 323a-2 rub. carmino & green (448a) 321a- 1 rt, red/brown (RRR Mint, 8 kop. is listed hero tentatively. "R used) (447a) S TYPOGRAPHED. IMPERFORATE, WATER.MARKED As was the case with the unwatermarked set, the above were also issued imperforate and sold at a premium over face. The quantity of stamps printed as given -by Romeko Catalogue is almost certainly wrong. While the printing was comparatively small, the stamps do not deserve to be called rare. What has boon said about margins, falsifications, and usage of the imporforate, unwatermarkod additional values applies also to this sot. It was issued in 1926 and did not contain the 18 kop, value at that time, possibly, as H. L. Aronson guesses, because the 18 kop, perforated was issued a little later. The 18 kop. imporforate does exist, however, and is listed in the latest Soviet Catalogue as very rare, both mint and cancelled. The paper of this issue is again very white. No color shades of this issue are known, and it is the most uniform set of the small head issues. 1 kop, orange (430a) 15 kop. lemon yellow (441a) 2 kop. green (431a) 18 kop shade of violet (issued later) (RRR) 3 kop, rod brown (432a) 20 kop. green (443a) 4 kop, rod rose (433a) 30 kop. dark violet (444a) 5 kop. lilac (434a) 40 kop. slate gey (445a) 6 kop. blue (435a) 50 kop. brown (446a) 7 kop. brown (436a) .1 rub. rod & brown (447a) 8 kop. olive (437a) 2 rub, carmine & green (448a) 9 kop. red orange (438a) 3 rub. dark brown & groon, Type I, (449b) 10 kop. dark blue (439a) 5 rub, dark blue & brown (450a) 14 kop. grey blue (440a) 22 #49/50 Su AITW J FOSTMWlKS OF IMPERIAL RUSSIA W, Er C. Kothro & John Barry -----Prigara lists 84 routes; there are a few others but all are very scarce. H3-----Prigara mentions four postmarks of the above type carryingg three place names each. BIELOVEZH GAINOVKA BIELSK (all Grodno Govt.) ZDOLBUNOVO OZERIANI MIZOCH (all Volhynia Govt.) KREIENETS KAMENITSA DUBNO (all Volhynia Govt.) RION KUTAIS 3KBIBULI (all Kutais Govt.) SH4 --We also found an oval with town at the top and the name of the S railway at the bottom:- TOP BOTTOM CENTER NIZHNE NOVGOROD MOSK. NIZHNE. ZH. D. 1905 MINS LIBAVO-ROMENSK ZH. D. 1913 Whilst noting both the above are capital towns of their Governments, we cannot say if this has any significance. H5---*Another oval did not fit in with the scheme of things. It was of similar size to the others but read- KREMENETS (star) 1 (star) DUBNO with a star at the bottom; date 5, 4. 11. It left Kremenets on SApril 5th. and arrived at Yekaterinoslav April 7th, Presumably "1it? is the number of the mailcoach as in the case of the Lodz- Koliuhki discussed earlier, DOUBLE CIRCLE TYPE There is a double circle type which is mysterious as it doe not fit in with the ovals with route numbers, In the latter, 126 is Pernov-Pskov. We have Ilinskii Pogost 126 Orekhovo. One would therefore expect an Orekhovo 125 Ilinskii Pogost, but the only (part) 125 we have reads t ezuevo 125 a but there is no trace of a station with that ending on the route, R ROUTE NUMBERS "The list given with this article applies to the oval cancellations. The number of ovals examined covered quite a range and, with the exception of the minor variations already mentioned, they conform to the list. Investigation was necessary to see how far the list applied to the pre-ovals. To do so in detail would require a vast, varied selection of material that would be impossible for one collector to accumulate, but with the material at our disposal we have at least been able to shed some light on the matter. #49/50 23 ROUTE 31 -32 The first obvious difference was observed on route 31 -32 (KRALIATORSKAIA. POPASNAIA). Covers from places in Poland to Lodz had the unlikely habit of going via the Ukraine, arriving the same day as dispatched! Analysis showed clearly that 31-32 applied at one period to LODZKOLIUSHKI (Lodz-Fabrich: Railway). We have already stated that this route had its own postmark in 1903 so it is possible 31 -.32 was switched to another route. In 1913, No. 31 was KRAMATCRSKAIA-POPASNAIA; we have inspected a clear copy. A-cover from NATALIEVKA, 1886, which is on Kramatorskaia-Popasnaia line, to St. Petersburg carries a 73 (KHARKOV-VOROZHBA). ROUTE. 8 7 8 (oval) (OREL DVINSK) appeared on a cover from Odessa to Marseille (1870). The usual route was Odessa, Zhmerinka and Volochisk. To go via Orel Dvinsk was unlikely therefore we have a doubt about 7 8. ROUTE 9 -10 S9 10 (DVINSK RADZIVIIISHKI). This was found on covers:- Dvinsk Riga 1874/ S.P.B. Rga Mitau 1875 Riga Leipzig 1876 S ovno Polotak . It is likely that 9 10 applied to Riga Dvinsk pr possibly Riga-Orel. ROUTE 57 = 58 57 58 (oval) (CHUDOVO STARAIA RUSSA). We have a clear oval showing this to be correct but "57 58" appears clearly on the cover from Minsk to Berlin in 1874. This route number therefore had a different significance in pre-oval days. LIST OF OVAIS We have found the following agree with-the oval list ranging from 1868- 1892. The missing numbers in the list given below are mostly due to lack of evidence. 1-2 11-12 21-22 .41-42 51-52 61-62 71-72 3-4 13-14 23-24 43-44 53-54 63-64 73-74 5-6 15-16 25-26 55-56 17-18 27-28 37-3847-48 77-78 19-20 29-30 39-40 59-60 69-70 24 #49/50 MISCELLANE OUS It is very difficult to discover under what system the route number were applied. Some covers travelling over several routes bear only one, others bear four or five. . ...............................- i-,: .......... Selecting a few examples:- K S 879' BUGURUSLAI' RAVA (Poland) carried first a 61, followed by 41, then 30 and finally 27 (Warsaw Aleksandrovo); on this latter route it ...was dropped off at Skernevitsi fordelivery to Rava, 25 versts from the "station. *. 1880 HAPSAL FIRIATIN, travelled via'S.t.'P.B'. thence to IMoscow where S it received the "i'oscow Yuzhn. Zh. D." postmark. It then travelled to NIEZHIN on the Moscsw-Kiev route. Niezhin is bne station beyond the junction (Kruti) for Piriatin. .... ." - 1891 KASIN (Tver) GOLOVAaEVSK (Podolia) went by the Kharkov-Odessa route to Golta. Golta is just beyond the junction (Podgorodnaia) gor Golovanevsk. . ... .' * Judging by these last two covers, the mail was not necessarily trans- ferred at a junction, but at some place deemed more suitable, where it was left in the hands of the town authority for forwarding by the next route. The study of these postmarks which had interchangeable route numbers and stops presented some hazards! At times the date was where the stop should have been or vice versa. RUute numbers were not always changed, sometimes they were put in upside down. The stop numbers were inverted, sideways, to the left of the date, right of the date, etc. CLOSING NOTES From our experience, we can say that the route numbers most frequently S .encountered from 1879 onwards are those used in Russia in Europe. Nos. 3, 4, 25, 27 and 40 appear to be the commonest with 27 leading (Warsaw - ...Aleksandrovo), this being the main artery to the West. There are, of "course, European route numbers which are seldom seen, whilst those of Siberia, the Far North and Central Asia are definitely uncommon. Imperial stamps, mostly the late imperforate issues, are found cancelled with ovals bearing the new Soviet route numbers. Changes of frontier, ,construction of new railways, etc* caused a revision of the list; son's of the original members were retained, others switched to new routes, etc. Undoubtedly this study needs a considerable-amount of material much more than one man is likely to accumulate. It is hoped readers will eond in any information they have to add to the subject. Just as this article was going to press, ir. Gordon Torrey (Michigan) sent for inspection a very distinct "VAIK 271 ALT-SCHWAIENBURG" dated 1917. This route is listed as Valk-Stokmanshof. These odd items of information will all help to complete the intricate but exceedingly interesting story of the Railway Postmarks. S #49/5o 25 APFENDIX 1 Dates of opening of Russian Railways .. Tho following list of Russian Railway lines with year datos of their opening, in chronological order, was originally printed in "Lists of Routes in Russia & Abroad (RR lines, ship lines, stage-coaches, post, tolograph, watering places)" in St. Petersburg in.May, 1870. It was reprinted by Prigara in his handbook in Russian, in two parts. Part 1. List off RR opened for service in 1870, Part 2. List of RR in process of construction, and the proposed dates of their opening. It was again reprinted, but in English, in #4 Issue of B.J.R.P. The original and Prigara listings differ from the one given below, in that's (a)-They give exact date of opening (year, month & day). (b)-Th6 length of each route. (c)-For Kolushki-Lodz, the Russian versions give Fabrichno-Lodz. The discrepancy is probably because Kolushki a factory (Fabrika) town may have been called Fabrichno, a word derived from Fabrika. (d)-You will also note that this and all of the other listings give for 1870c, f, g, and 1871c the name of the RR line, and do not give tormini of each line. ! 1838--St.. Petorsburg-Pavlovsk (Tsarskoselskia) .... 1848--Warsaw-Vienna 1851--St. Petersburg-Moscow (Nikolaevskaia) 1857--St. Potersburg-Oranienbaum (1864) (Peterhofskaia) 1861--Riga-Dvinsk 1862--(a) -Volga-Don (d)-Warsaw-Bromborg (b)-Moscow-Nizhnogorod (e)-St. Petersburg-Warsaw (with branches (c)-Moscow-Yaroslavl (to to Prussian border) Sorgeev Posad) (f)-Helsingfors-Tavastehus 1864--Moscow-Riazan "1866--(a) olushki-Lodz (c)-Warsaw-Terospol (b) Riazan-Kozlov (d)-Dvinsk-Vitebsk 1867--(a)Odossa-Balta (with branches to Tiraspol, Porte, & Kyalnitski Estuary). (b) -Riga-Morshansk 1868--(a)-Kozlov-Voronozh (f)-Balta-Yelizavetgrad (b)-Grushevsk-Rostov on Don(g)-Riga-Mitava (c)-Orol-Griazi (from Yoletsh)-Orlov-Vitobsk to Griazi) (i)-Kursk-Kiev (to station Bovari) (d)-Shuya-Ivanovsk (Ist. Section) (e) Moscow ursk 26 #49/50 A8j2--(a) Kursk Kharkov) (d)-Kozlov-Tambov (b)-Kiev-Balta (with branches) (e)-Kremonchug-Yolizavetgrad "* (c)-Griazi-Tsaritsin (from (f)-Kharkov-Azov S Griazi to Borixogliebsk): . 1870---(a)-Orel-Griazi (Orol-Yelots) (e)-Rybinsk-Bologoe b)-Moscow-Yaroslavl (f)-Novotorzhskaia -- c)-Finlandskaia (g)-Baltic d)-Tiraspol4Kishenev .. .- , , , List of Railroads being built 1870--(a)-Tambov-Saratov (c)-Griazi-Tsaritsin (from Borisogliobsk (b)-Moscow-Smolensk to Tsaritsin) (d)-Shuya-Ivanovsk (2nd. Section) l71--(a) -Kharkov-Kremonchug (c)-Skoponskaia (b)-Poti-Tiflis (d)-Terospol to Brest-Litovsk 1871-72--Vor onezh-Gruzhovsk 1872-73--Kovno-Libau 1872-Brest-Litovsk to Graevo g -Breet-Litovsk to Smolensk S -*- List of the Railroads being built at the time of the publication of the handbook. ooooooooooooooooooo S Additicna.. Information and Cortacnts. Under 1868d-Baodoa:or Eivcs Ivancvo-Vbznos-ns-k instead of Ivanovsk. 1870c, f, g andi l71c are the hrzSes cf th-e :- .'ins, c.s Tsarslo- slelsaia for St. Petors'urg-Pavlovsk line, stc. I'ether ends of the iK lines cas given for the 4, lines. :;.-' Other appendices wi1ll follow. . oococooocoo ALE XANDER B I SK 280 Riverside Drive. New York 25, N.Y. . EUROPEAN COUNTRIES, ETC. Want lists for collectors and dealers filled by return mail. Better grade approval books by country also available. Many rarities and oddities for specialists, RUSSIA. UKRAINA. BENELUX,. BAIKANS._ CENTRAL WESTERN & EASTERN -EUROPE, SCANDINAVIA, ETC. Other Continents at hand, although weaker. #9/50 27 NEW YORK SECTION N. Y. Section of Rossica mat on September 30th. at 2:30 pm. (Sunday), in the home of "Free Russia", 349 W. 86th. St., N.Y.C. Regular meetings will be hold every last Sunday of each month at 2:30 pm. Victor Corny Exorpts from PALL MALL GAZETTE-134 (July 20, 1956). "H.C.Goss" collection for sale, price 123,500, Includes many of the finest rarities from Forrari, Fabergo and Rothschild collections. 700 pro-adhosives include about 100 covers from Poland. Early postal stationery includes all of the great rarities, proofs and essays. Over a 100 different of #1, including many strips, pairs, and covers, Also the largest colloctior of essays & proofs of 1913 Romanov issue. Wenden, Russian Levant and Russian Offices in China are included. The following single rarities are included: INVERTED CENTERS:-Scott 23b, 29a, 36b, 51a, 62b, 64a, 65a,. 0a (mint), 69a, and 1909 7r. mint. INVERTED BACKGROUNDS:-19d (mint), 19e, 26b, 31 & 34 (unlisted in Scott), 35b (pair'on pioco), 50b, and 59a (in a mint block of 25). Some of those varieties were listed and written up in Rossica #48. IMPERFORA-TE:-23c, 27a & 28b (on cover). CENTERS OMITTED:-61b (mint pair, one normal), and 1 r. (mint) CHINA SECTION BULLETIN OF CITY OF LONDON PHILATELIC SOCIETY, SPECIAL ISSUE ON MONGOLIA. Juno 1956, No. 65, (Vol.4, #1). Describes Fipex and our Rossica winners: Richard W. Canman of Illinois for his best of Section 5, Asia, Africa and Oceania-(Forwarding Agents of China), and Silver Gilt Medal to our member C. W. Dougan of California for Tibet Postal History. It includes articlos:-The Chinese Postal Service in Mongolia in 1909-21 by Mr. G. S. Russell, "Mongolia 1924-27" by A. Cronin and a "Preliminary . Note on Mongolian Cancellations, 1924-560 by James Negus. All are illustrate I am continuing my sale of my collection and duplicates of the stamps of Europe. You can obtain, at reasonable prices sets and singles of Russia, USSR, Austria, Germany, French Occupation Zone, Saar, France, Triesto A, & B and other countries. Also the Varms" of provinces of Venezuela. Stamps are in superb condition, Many errors, varieties. Send your want lists. VICTOR CERNY--841 WEST 177th. ST. NEW YORK 33, N. Y. 28 #49/50 28 #49/50 NEW YORK SECTION N. Y. Section of Rossica mat on September 30th. at 2:30 pm. (Sunday), in the home of "Free Russia", 349 W. 86th. St., N.Y.C. Regular meetings will be hold every last Sunday of each month at 2:30 pm. Victor Corny Exorpts from PALL MALL GAZETTE-134 (July 20, 1956). "H.C.Goss" collection for sale, price 123,500, Includes many of the finest rarities from Forrari, Fabergo and Rothschild collections. 700 pro-adhosives include about 100 covers from Poland. Early postal stationery includes all of the great rarities, proofs and essays. Over a 100 different of #1, including many strips, pairs, and covers, Also the largest colloctior of essays & proofs of 1913 Romanov issue. Wenden, Russian Levant and Russian Offices in China are included. The following single rarities are included: INVERTED CENTERS:-Scott 23b, 29a, 36b, 51a, 62b, 64a, 65a,. 0a (mint), 69a, and 1909 7r. mint. INVERTED BACKGROUNDS:-19d (mint), 19e, 26b, 31 & 34 (unlisted in Scott), 35b (pair'on pioco), 50b, and 59a (in a mint block of 25). Some of those varieties were listed and written up in Rossica #48. IMPERFORA-TE:-23c, 27a & 28b (on cover). CENTERS OMITTED:-61b (mint pair, one normal), and 1 r. (mint) CHINA SECTION BULLETIN OF CITY OF LONDON PHILATELIC SOCIETY, SPECIAL ISSUE ON MONGOLIA. Juno 1956, No. 65, (Vol.4, #1). Describes Fipex and our Rossica winners: Richard W. Canman of Illinois for his best of Section 5, Asia, Africa and Oceania-(Forwarding Agents of China), and Silver Gilt Medal to our member C. W. Dougan of California for Tibet Postal History. It includes articlos:-The Chinese Postal Service in Mongolia in 1909-21 by Mr. G. S. Russell, "Mongolia 1924-27" by A. Cronin and a "Preliminary . Note on Mongolian Cancellations, 1924-560 by James Negus. All are illustrate I am continuing my sale of my collection and duplicates of the stamps of Europe. You can obtain, at reasonable prices sets and singles of Russia, USSR, Austria, Germany, French Occupation Zone, Saar, France, Triesto A, & B and other countries. Also the Varms" of provinces of Venezuela. Stamps are in superb condition, Many errors, varieties. Send your want lists. VICTOR CERNY--841 WEST 177th. ST. NEW YORK 33, N. Y. 28 #49/50 28 #49/50 NEW YORK SECTION N. Y. Section of Rossica mat on September 30th. at 2:30 pm. (Sunday), in the home of "Free Russia", 349 W. 86th. St., N.Y.C. Regular meetings will be hold every last Sunday of each month at 2:30 pm. Victor Corny Exorpts from PALL MALL GAZETTE-134 (July 20, 1956). "H.C.Goss" collection for sale, price 123,500, Includes many of the finest rarities from Forrari, Fabergo and Rothschild collections. 700 pro-adhosives include about 100 covers from Poland. Early postal stationery includes all of the great rarities, proofs and essays. Over a 100 different of #1, including many strips, pairs, and covers, Also the largest colloctior of essays & proofs of 1913 Romanov issue. Wenden, Russian Levant and Russian Offices in China are included. The following single rarities are included: INVERTED CENTERS:-Scott 23b, 29a, 36b, 51a, 62b, 64a, 65a,. 0a (mint), 69a, and 1909 7r. mint. INVERTED BACKGROUNDS:-19d (mint), 19e, 26b, 31 & 34 (unlisted in Scott), 35b (pair'on pioco), 50b, and 59a (in a mint block of 25). Some of those varieties were listed and written up in Rossica #48. IMPERFORA-TE:-23c, 27a & 28b (on cover). CENTERS OMITTED:-61b (mint pair, one normal), and 1 r. (mint) CHINA SECTION BULLETIN OF CITY OF LONDON PHILATELIC SOCIETY, SPECIAL ISSUE ON MONGOLIA. Juno 1956, No. 65, (Vol.4, #1). Describes Fipex and our Rossica winners: Richard W. Canman of Illinois for his best of Section 5, Asia, Africa and Oceania-(Forwarding Agents of China), and Silver Gilt Medal to our member C. W. Dougan of California for Tibet Postal History. It includes articlos:-The Chinese Postal Service in Mongolia in 1909-21 by Mr. G. S. Russell, "Mongolia 1924-27" by A. Cronin and a "Preliminary . Note on Mongolian Cancellations, 1924-560 by James Negus. All are illustrate I am continuing my sale of my collection and duplicates of the stamps of Europe. You can obtain, at reasonable prices sets and singles of Russia, USSR, Austria, Germany, French Occupation Zone, Saar, France, Triesto A, & B and other countries. Also the Varms" of provinces of Venezuela. Stamps are in superb condition, Many errors, varieties. Send your want lists. VICTOR CERNY--841 WEST 177th. ST. NEW YORK 33, N. Y. 28 #49/50 28 #49/50 RUSSIAN POST IN THE FAR EAST (A short history of the former Post Offices in China & Manchuria). by A. I. Masloff These historical notes are written with an idea that other members of Rossica interested in the Far East will add their own knowledge on this subject and in that way will help us to get a more complete historical as well as philatelic history of this interesting region. The author has not lost hope in finding historical documents & data, and also will write more detailed monograms on various themes touched upon in these notes. These notes are divided into two parts:- 1-Chinese Eastern Railway. a-Before Boxer Rebellion in 1900. b-After Boxer Rebellion & until Russo-Japanese War in 1904-05. c-After the termination of Russo-Japanese War & until the beginning of World War I. 2-During World War I and until Russian Revolution, 1914-1923. RUSSIAN POST OFFICES IN MANCHURIA In Rossica Journal #45 & B.J. of R.P. #17, both published in 1955, Messrs. Stephen & Seichter in their article Russian P. 0. in Manchuria & Russian P. 0. Abroad covered well this very interesting subject and gave detailed lists of all Russian P. 0. in Manchuria, China & Abroad. SThe theme of this subject is so vast and covers an interval of almost Half a century. Sources of information, both in general and philatelic literature are very limited or hard to obtain, and four wars on the heels of S each other, greatly changed the originally proposed postal functions of the Russian Post Offices in Manchuria, as well as abroad, Having spent, a great deal of my life in the Far East, & witnessing great deal of changes I wish to add a few of my observations on this subject, which I am sure is still taking a great deal of thought of various individuals wishing to increase historical and philatelic knowledge of this vast territory. SHORT HISTORICAL REFERENCE. INTRODUCTION. On August 27, 1896 Russian and Chinese Imperial Governments terminated negotiations for Russo-Chinose Bank to build and exploit Manchurian RR, and eventually to obtain a long term lease of Kwantung peninsula. Further negotiations resulted in giving the Bank the right to build the city of DALNY and the Fortress of Port Arthur on the bank of Pachili Dulf in Talien- van Bay so that a Southern Branch of the RR. could be built from these two points to Harbin, which according to the above negotiations was crossed by the main RR line starting at Station Manchuria, Transbaikal Oblast and which was the end of the Transbaikal Rail Road, the latter's route traversing all of Manchuria to Station Pogranichnaya in Manchuria. On June 29, 1899 for concocting Ussuri Region with Vladivostock, the Chinese Eastern was given the rights to build shipping in the Pacific Ocean, to ply between Vladivostock, Port Arthur and Shanghai, as an addition to regular routes travelled by vessels of Russian Volonteer Floot between Odessa S & Vladivostock, with a regular stop in Shanghai and with occasional stops at Hankow and Port Arthur, #49/50 29 Leaving the details of various functions of tho Russo-Chinese Bank and the work of the Russian Government in exploiting the rail road and the sea routes, the Russo-Chinose trade and exploitation of Manchuria, at that time sparcoly populated, I wish to point out that all of the rail road lines, beginning to be constructed in Manchuria were official known as "Chinese Eastern Rail Road", and were under the jurisdiction of the ministry of Finance of the Russian Empire. In that way, at the end of the last century, in numerous points and at the same time begun an intense effort to construct railroads and at the same time opening of POST OFFICES in Port Arthur, Dalny, Kharbin, at the termi- nating stations of the main line, and at the newly constructed rail road stations when completed and when the traffic begun. ORGANIZATION OF POSTAL COMMUNICATIONS IN THE FAR EAST, generally in MANCHURIA. As we know, all of the Postal Telegraph business in Russia was under the Ministry of Internal affairs. Forgetting at this time the establishment of Postal Offices in China, prior to building of Chinese Eastern and the agree- ments made with the Ministry of the Internal Affairs, which requires a separate description' I wish to state that all postal organizations and their business transactions in Manchuria were according to strict regulations of the Russian Empire. In other words the receipt, sending, etc., of all postal communications was prepaid by same stamps, and at the rates established for the internal correspondence by the Postal Telegraph Administration of the Ministry of the Internal Affairs, and the Rail Road Administration of the Ministry of the Internal Affairs let know its needs and left the rest tothe Postal Telegraph S Administration. During the construction of the rail road, the administration of the postal affairs was given to Khabarovsk Postal Telegraph Office, including the supplying of stamps to various offices, except to Post Offices in Port Arthur and Dalny, during the early period, which were sent directly from St. Petersburg, and also to Post Office at the Station Manchuria, which was under the jurisdiction of Irkutsk Postal Telegraph Office. The main office for the organization of the postal operations at the railroad stations was located at Port Arthur, with branches in the Eastern and Western sections of Kharbin where new stations were under construction. At the same point was located the Main Office of the Chinese Eastern Railroad, while the administrative office, until World War I, was located in St. Petersburg. Due to the fact that the administrative offices of both departments were located in St. Petersburg, the postal functions on the Chinese Eastern Railroad were developed rapidly. FIRST PERIOD OF RR COMMUNICATIONS and POSTAL COMMUNICATIONS. In the Southern section (Port Arthur-Kharbin), until 1900, the construct- ion of the railroad lines was completed, and the traffic commenced between the above points, and further to the West, from Kharbin to Station Manchuria. S 30 #49/50 The Western section was completed before the Southern. At the same time the carrying of Posts was commenced from Port Arthur, via Kharbin, to Siborian border of Manchuria, and thence to various points in the Empire. Postal cars wore attached to regular trains at Port Arthur and Kharbin and moved separately from Kharbin to Station Manchuria. The travelling was slightly slowed down because all of the large bridges across the rivers Sungari and Nonni, etc. as well as Khingan Tunnel (on the Western Line) were not complatoly finished. Construction of Western section, Kharbin-Station "Pogranichnaya, was completed considerably later due to the fact that this region was mountainous, although the construction of the railroad section of Ussuri RR. from Nikolsk Ussuriisk to Station Pogranichnaya was completed sooner. Likewise before 1900 postal cars were attached to regular trains from Station Manchuria, through Kharbin, Station Pogranichnaya to Nikolsk- Ussuriisk. This was the beginning of Historical Epoch of carrying of various types of postal communications from the Far East to countries of Europe consider- ably faster than existing before sea communications from Far East to the East, including all of the Far East to Singapore; only in this city, the mail, depending on passing vessels, was addressed UVia Suez"; while from all other points mail begun to be addressed uVia Siberia". The Epoch of "Via Siberia'1 was in full swing until the beginning of the World War I, although the increased speed of the newly constructed vessels still depended J on the Express trains crossing Siberia, which was soon organized on all of the line to Moscow and St. Petersburg. THE EFFECTS OF THE BOXER REBELLION ON DEVELOPMENT OF RR TRANSPORTATION.- .In summer of 1900 the Boxer Rebellion in China completely paralyzed train movement of the Chinese Eastern Railroad, and completely destroyed in many places not only the stations b-t the rails, and also the rail road bods. From 1300 versts completely fin-3hod only approximately 400 versts remained, and some of those wore at distant points. WHAT PURELY PHILATELIC INTEREST THIS FIRST JRIOD OF RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION INTERESTS PHILATELISTS. Without documents in a short space it is impossible to arrive at the conclusion. Also the study of the documents of Russian Post Offices in Manchuria will lead us to study Russian Offices in China, the routes of Russian Mail vessels between Port Arthur & Vladivostock, Shanghai, etc. We can not exclude a study of postal communications on Russian-Chineso-Korean border (Khun Chun), as well as Russian-Mongolian-Chinese postal communications (Mai Mai Chin, Kiakhta, etc.) Therefore it is necessary to completely describe separately 8 postal offices in Manchuria and finally those in China, both from historical as well as philatelic point of view. -to be continued- S ^#49/50 31 RUSSIAN ERRINOPHILII by E.MRRCOVITCH 4= M TO HorpA4noF;Ka l ,i't d ,pa,! BbIC(hABNA 4. ,i',d ,iii,' tl li "Itr -1 I I 1 r 3 MIIb 1{'] -- . -" -, I - *I g 4 5 6 8 1OPAR POMRCcKAA 9 OAIMflIAAA 96wo- PH1r61o ImIOA ii z fO f 12 13 EKATEPHHOCJlABb OB IA T i" B IC1IAPCK BTA 15 16 15 149 5- St I CAT Q A 20 21 17 18 19 il I r T 0 22 *20 21 RUSSIAN ERRINOPHILIA by E. Marcovitch S. VIGNETTES ISSUED IN RUSSIA 1-The sizes of frames are given in mm. 2-All Russian text appearing on etiquettes is translated into English. "Other than Russian inscriptions are given in full, and translated where possible into English. Most of the vignettes are illustrated, others, a few in number, of similar type are described. Since most of the eti- quettes have no indicated value, this heading is omitted, except in cases where the value is indicated. Unless otherwise stated all are perforated (gauge not indicated). ------------ I -EXHIBITION OR EXPOSITION VIGNETTES. St. Petersburg (Figs. Ito 5) (1) 1882 Management of All Russian Industrial Art Exposition. Size-31mm. square. Design-double headed eagle.- (Fig. 1). a-black & yellow. (2) 1912 I. R. T. 0. Exposition International de Materiel et dtInstallations Scolaires. St. Petersburg. (International .School Manufacturing Exposition arrangement and outfitting of School). Siz-54x42mm. (Fig. 2) a-multi-color'ed. (3) -1912 Photographic Exhibition, April 12 to May 4, 1912. St. SPetersburg, Morskaia No. 38. Inscriotion-(bottom right corner)- "Committee for arrangement, St. Petersburg, Kazanskaia No, 511. Size-26x37.5mm. (Fig. 3). a-black, gray brown, blue and red.. (4) -1913. Ist. International Art-Manufacturing Exposition-Fashion World. Fobruary-March, 1913. Inscription-(bottom)- ISB. No. 42 Kamennoostrovski." Sizo-55x37.5mm. (Fig. 4). a-black, green and orange. SImperial (5) 1913. 1613-1913. All Russian Jubilee Exposition of Fruit Raising in St. Petersburg. Organized under patronage of His-Highness the Emperor. Inscription-(bottom) J-Russian Imperial Society of Fruit Growers. 1913" Size-29.5x39.5mm. (Fig. 5). a-black, and yellow orange. Moscow (Fig. 6) 1912. Refrigiration Section of the Sheep breeding Exposition in "Moscow from 20th. to 25th. of Sept. 1912. Inscription-(bottom)- "*Smolenski Boulovard, Agricultural School Building." Size-31.5x 43mm. (Fig. 6) a-dark green. 34 #49/50 Ria (Figs. 7 to 10) (1) 1079, Comite der 3 T. Baltischen Landwirtschaftlichen Contralausstel- lung zu Riga 1879. (Central Conmittoe for Baltic Agricultural Expo- sition in Riga in 1879). Oldest Russian vignette. Size-28mm. dia. (round) with scalloped perforations. Embossed. (Fig. 7). a-brick rod.. (2) 1901. Jubilaums Ausstellung Riga 1901. (Jubilee Exposition Riga 1901). Inscripition-(below framo)-Silberne Modaille (silver medal). Picturing S two silver medals. Sizo-23.5x36mm. (Fig. 8). "a-dark blue, pale blue and gold. 'Same as (a), except the medals are gold and the inscription reads,- Goldene Medaillo (gold medal). (Fig. 8). b-dark blue, pale blue and gold. ,- Jubilee Exposition Riga. 1901. Size-20.5x30mm. (Fig. 8) c-black, dark blue, rod and yellow. SSame as (c), except the inscription is in Latvian and reads "Jubilejas Isstahde 1901" Jubileo Exposition 1901). (Fig. 8). e-black, dark blue, red and yellow. (3) 1912 Riga 1912. Ausoilung. Modern Plastik. 15 30 November. (Riga 1912. Modern Plastic Exposition. November 15 to 30). Both vignettes (a) and (b) are printed in the same shoot teto-beche. Sijz-59.5x45mm. (Fig. 9). a-green and yellow. b-red and green. . S (4)" 1914 Second Russian Olympiad in City of Riga. July 6- 20, 1914. Inscription-(bottom left corner, below the frame)-V. F. Gekker, Riga- name of either designer or the printer. Size-31x48mm. (Fig. 10) a-black on orange background. ---------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Kiev (Figs. 11 to 14). Either in'French, German or Russian. 1913. Manufacturing, Scientific, Handicraft and Agricultural Exposition in Kiev, 1913. Anumbor of series of various designs exists, in several "colors, as well as bi-colorod. My collection, which is described below contains 23 varieties. Complete collection consists of over 40 varieties. Size-29x4Omm, Porforated-ll..0. (1) -Ist. Series-Inscription in Russian. Picture of an angelin rectangular frame. (Fig. 11). a-violet brown d-black, yellow background. g-green, yellow b-ultramarine o-black, blue background. background. c-yollow, rose f-brown, orange rod background. (2) -2nd. Serious. Inscrintion-Exposition in Kiov-(at top)-1913. Picture of an angel, in a rovnd frame. (not illustrated). a-black c-black, greon, a-violet brown. Sb-yellow d-light blue. #49/50 35 (3)-3rd. Series. Inscription-Exposition in Kiev, 1913. Branch-Horse Breeding. in center-horses, (not illustrated). a-violot brown, b-violet blue, (4)-lwth Series, Inscription-Exposition- in Kiev, 1913. Branch-sports. In center-sulky racing, automobile and bi-plane. (not illustrated). a-ultramarine. (5)-5th. Series. Inscription-Exposition a Kiew 1913 (French) (Exposition in Kiov, 1913). Allogoric representation of Russia by a woman sitting on a throne, besides an angel, also peasants bringing presents. (Fig. 12). a-framo-gray violet, center-black, b-frame-yollow, center-black. (6)-6th. Series. Design as in 5th. series. Inscription-"Austellung in Kiew, 1913." (German). a-light gray, center violet, c-frame-orange, center-dark blue, b-framo-gray violet, center green. (7)-7th. Series. Contor-Three Russian women. Inscription as in Series 6. (Fig. 13) a-frame-light gray, denter-violet. c-frame-olive-yellow, center-rose. b-frame-blue,. center-ultramarine. S Odessa Russian Inscriptions. (Fig. 14, etc.) .Industrial Art Exposition, Odessa. Perforated-ll. (1)-1910 1st. Sorios. Inscription-Industrial Art Exposition, Odessa 1910, May-October. Picturing two workers with hammer and Anvil. Size-28x46mm. Fig. 14). a-black, yellow, rose and green, b-black, yellow) rose and.rod. (2)-2nd. Series. Inscription-1910, May 15 October 1, Exposition in Odessa. ,Picturing-allegorical sitting woman. Sizo-46x28mm. Sa-black and green. -' Ekatorinoslav-Inscription in Russian, French or German. Regional Exposition S 1910. (Fig. 15, etc.). S(1)-Inscription-Ekatorinoslav 1910, July 1 September 25. Regional Expo- sition. Picturing-Factory smoke stacks, agricultural implements and .... peasant woman. Perforated ll and Imperforate, Size- 48.5x24.5mm. (Fig. 15). a-rod. b-groon " (2)-Same as (1), Inscription-"Ekatorinoslaw 1910 1.VII 25.IX. Exposition regional du midi do la Russio". (French). a- rod b-groon. (3)Same as (1), Inscription-"Ekatorinoslawl910 1.VII 25. IX. Sudrussischq Austollung." (German). a- red b-green 36 #49/50 Niini-Novgorod. Inscrptions dn Russian & French. (Fig. 16). (1)-1896. Inscription-All Russian Industrial Art Exposition in Nijni-Novgorod 1896. Pavilion of tho Czar.-"Exposition Nationalo a Nijni-Novgorod, 1996. (French)". Picturing pavilion of the Czar & coat of arms of Nijni-Nov- gorod. Perforated 11 and imperforated. Sizo-44x37mm. (Fig. 16). Sa-violet brown Omsk. Inscription in Russian. (Fig. 17). (1)-1911. Inscription-Juno 15, 1911. Ist. Western-Siberian Exposition. Picturing a bridge over a river. Perforatod-rough, and Imporforated, Siz.o41x32.5rm. (Fig. 17). a-black, yellow, red and groen.;: . Astrakhan. Imscription in Russian. (Figure 18). (1)-1912. Inscription (at top)-"Astrakhan Society of Horticulture, Truck Farming and Husbandry". (in center)-From 8 to 29 Sept. 1912 will be hold in city of Astrakhan 2nd. Gubernia exposition of Horticulture, truck farming and husbandry and also a convention of Horticulturists, truck farmers, and husbandrymon of Astrakhan Gubernia." (below) "Information from the Society." (bottom, below design)-"Lithography of Shelgorn & Co., Saratov." Imporforated. Size-75x56mm. (Figure 18). a-red, blue and bronze. Rostov on Don-Inscription in Russian. (Figure 19). (1)-1914. Inscription-(at top)-"Imperial. Don.-Kub. Tor. Society of Agricultur (left) -Rostov ."-(right)-"on Don."-(bottom)-*Agricultutal and Industrial Exposition. 5 21 September, 1914." Portraying-silhouettos of worker with a hammer and a farmer with scythe. At top-double headed eagle. S Size-39.5x64mm. (Figure 19). a-black & rose. Khabarovsk-Inscription in Russian. (Figures 20 and 21) (1)-1913. Inscription "Exposition of Priamur Region. Year 19i3." (top), Khabarovsk (bottom). In center bi-colored coat of arms of Khabarovsk. Size-39x55mm. (Figure 20) (2)-Inscription same as in (1), except in addition at the left-uCommemorating", (right)-"300th. anniversary" and at (bottom)-uof House of Romanovs". Sizo-38x47.5mm. (Figure 21). a-multicolored. ------------------------------------ --------------------- JUBILEE VIGNETTES (Figure 22) (1)-1914. Issued in honor of unveiling of Monument to Alexander I. Inscription-"1812-1912 In honor of unveiling of Monument to Emperor Alexander I. 16 V 1914." Design-Head of Alexandor I, in a circle. Scalloped perforations, and imperforate. Sizo-23x31mm. (Figure 22). a-Imp., black brown, center green. d-Porco, black, center gray. b-Imp., black brown, center blue. o-Shoot of 4, porf. black with centers, c-Porf., rod brown, center gray. in 4 difforont colors. f-Samo as (o), except imporforato and in green. # to be continued #49/50 37 ADDENDA TO RUSSIAN TROOPS IN FRANCE 1916-1917 by J. Posoll Through the kindness of Messrs. H. Shonitz and A. Kotlar we are able to illustrate additional cancellations on cards and onvolopes which pertain to the period of the Russian Brigades in France during World War I : Tho card (Illustration 1) pictures soldiers and the flags of the allied nations. The cancellation on the left.reads "Campagno de 1914 France - Russie Belgiquo Anglotorre". The double ring cancellation on the right roads "Camp Botrancho do Paris. Arrive dos Russos a Vincennos 4 Sept. 1914". The reason for the presence of Russian Military in Paris as early as September 1914 has not boon determined, but it is certain that they were not part of the expeditionary forces as tho did not arrive until the spring of 1916. Mr. Shonitz has offered the opinion that possibly a special task advance detachment was sent to France from Russia to establish preliminary contact with French military authorities and to study French military methods. This is a quite logical explanation as ho says he remembers that in the early fall and winter months of 1914-15, officers of the Belgian army could be seen occasionally in the streets of St. Petersburg. They we supposedly there to assist in training Russian contingents in the latest technique of trench warfare. The two adhesives on the loft part of the card are part of a set of labels issued in 1904 in France. Cancellation shown on Illustration 2 is from a cover, originating from the commanding captain of an ammunition plant in the south of Franco. Next "to it (Illustration 3) is a corner of a post card, such as was illustrated in the original article (Rossica #48), which bears two cancellations: the "largo oval reading, "Control par authorities militairo", and round, dated 6-1-17. Illustration 4 reproduces the cancellation of the Commissary of the Imperial Russian Troops in France, and is found on the flap side of the cover. Illustrations 5 and 5a are from a cover. Cancellation shown by "5" roads, "Commander of the Company de Depot do la Legion Russe", while "5a" reproduces a cancellation, dated "24-8-18". This and the cancellation, from a card, reproduced by Illustration 6 are both interesting, because of the late cancellation dates. The letter is from a folded pictorial card, in collection of Mr. Kotlar. The cancellation at the top roads, "Travoillours Militairos Russos 7th. Regiment do la officior Francais (Russian Military workers of the 7th. regiment)u. The date of usage is 27-12-18 and the rocangular boxed cancellation roads "Achoominoment Impossible (delivery impossible)". Mr. Polchaninoff submitted a card of the typo shown by Illustration 3, with Imperial Eagle completely obliterated with black ink. This was probably made during the period of revolutionary zeal which prevailed at the time. The card is dated Oct. 3, 1917 and while the 2nd. revolution had not taken place, it is evident that the double-headed eagle was already quite unpopular during the Keronskyls regime. According to other authentic source Russian Brigades under Gon Lokhvitsky entered Marseilles with triumphant welcome. This triumph however was costly, as the regiments received from the French bills for the entertainment and decorations t 8 oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 38 #49/50 ADDENDA No. 2 TO "RUSSIAN TROOPS IN FRANCE IN 1916-1917" Mro Herman Shenitz kindly submits the following information which may cast some further light upon this episode. "In the spring and summer of 1919 I was in Odessa which was occupied by the Red forces early in the summer. In the late summer a transport arrived with Russian troops from France, all well fed, with clean new French uniforms, new strong shoes (French Army style) extra pairs of which appeared on the open city markets a couple of days later. They also brought a lot of extra frozen beef with them (an unusual luxury over there at that time). People were saying that another transport had arrived about the same time at Sevas- topol in Crimea, which was within Gen. Denikin's jurisdiction at that time." "nThus I can personally testify that not all of them (Russians from France) were sent to Gen. Denikin. Also many were sent to Holland where they were kept and fed at the expense of funds in the hands of the Russian Embassy there. These were offered a choise to stay in Western Europe or go home to Rucsia (Soviet); the military attache at the Embassy and his assist- ants taking care of all feeding, housing and repatriating organization." Since the author was not a first hand witness to any of the events described in the original article (Rossica #48), any information by readers who were on hand at the time is greatly welcomed. oooooooooooooooo Boris Riasnianski, Larrazabal 2870, Buenos Aires, Argentina. I have 124 Zemstvo stamps for sale, which are valued at 155 rubles by Chuchin........................ My price is $150.00.. I have 260 revenuestamps. This lot includes a few privately i issued Charity stamps.......................y price is 50.00., I buy air post stamps of the entire world, mint and cancelled in complete sets only. Price should not exceed 30% of valuation according to Scott's catalogue. Geo. Djako 8026 Emily Detroit 34, Mich, ATLAS OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE It has been the good fortune of our Editor, Dr. Salisbury to purchase a 1835 edition of a Russian Atlas, consisting of large detailed maps of 51 gubernias, 4 territories or oblasts, the Kingdom of Poland and tha Duchy of Finland and of RUSSIAN AMERICA. The map of the Russian Possessions in North Amarica is extremely interesting and because of its details is very important, and it is the first informative map of its type seen by the owner. Every map gives large and small postal and village roads, with the distances in versts, and also shows the smallest villages, monasteries, stations, postal establishments and forts. The atlas was originally in the library of His Excellency Count Dmitry Petrovich Soverin, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of the Court of Russia to the Court of Bavaria. #49/50 39 A- fDD EN Df TO "RUSSIAN TROOPS IN FRANCE" SBY J. POSE LL wAR mItUE RTE POS 4-~ ILLUSTRATION 1 I LLUSTRATION 6 S. __ .- ILLUS. 2- .LLUS ,. 3 iLLUS. + ILLUS. -5 ILL ,ScA ILLUSTRATIONSfa "INTERESTING CA NCELLATIONS" BY RIMMf SKLfIREVSKI iP E g Fi'& f Fi& .6 FiG- / Fi& 8 T : P- TY P E 3 -- y PE- 2p NLJI-91 QAC.#P 91SIL ILLUSTRATIONS FOR RUSSIIlN LEVRNT"6 Rf.ROSSELEVITCH FiF.- Fi&. 5 FIe 4 PRfIWN BY RiMMff SKLTfREVSKI Boei~oijitciom 2 1-OA91 5AV-7 15ENS 40 PHOTOSTAT of PAGEfrom 1923 SOVIET JOURNfLofVLADIVOSTOK AI R POST STAMPS o/VLADIVOSTOK JULY 28, 1923 Fgiy-frrp MaphM lpMMopch0o B03flyUWHMO nflOTbl. -- no Mbns TOB. Cla-KiOBa, B HC K cH rn a kpacHio KpaCKe, 6mn iJane fiH l w B BccaiW'HrT tnOT2 Kra praHOii3n ana cne.iycwiux MarcKx: "- npctHa B3naviJ Ha n ra Mny Bnann Odpa3uia---1'09 r. OCOOM, (ilr.bc -Vecypo cKon H Cnac. 1 Kon. menrai 5 10T. C>OM. 4 aen. pson. 50 WT ,"-*C'- CoraHn'i)u sn 3ror3 Pena C(na nCpyqe- 5 non. nincean . S-. H' l nlOp :Op:oy ty6 MnoMrony 10 Non. CHmnH . 5 LI. ""P" Bcnpoc 'un cnrnai.oBalH c 1HapCen b 1 J Reon. inHno. c c2H 00 u r. ... r Fy Io H IO( < oTKpuna otiUIl 20 KOn. CwHRs c p3OSIM 1(1 IUT a, wui cCtM Ina?1ymUIH norTb 35 Kon. IOnosa c 3c'neinir W 1IT. S_ _w_ re pnany cnenHanj ib naon. nHnoB c aeehbUl 125 UJT HbX n, apo. ( Ton -'ce 5 ur. c n",:.j n ,- ,U' c -,a n. lio caHa Ha asponnaH 29 nepeBepnyTo M rpRSOM) nr.. O H e >a no Ha3na ,eeHno a 70 on. m OpqiH. c opaHw.. 25 IT Cnaco n K-YCccypWHCKRA 06pa3ua 1'L6 1917 rr. Iepe o3a ymUHOA nOHTu a3TM H 107 Hon. C"HHn ... 25 WT. o--pa5u;HIo 20 14 rnn rwaHn er '933 MapKH, AnyWenHHUe anAn 3To UenH, 06pasLa 1918 r. (dr, 3y6.) GuCTpo a nHnaICb KOnneKUnOHepaMK, H 1 Kon. menTan 25 ,iT. HeKOTO a HX O:TanacT B JaoMnoM- 2 Kon. eneHaa 25 UT. rone aIa 3 aon. caeTnopc3oBaR ." SBce 6mno sblnymeHo 10)O 15 Kon. ninoBae c CHAI' 5 WT. 1ury. i CniMpcKHe 1919 r. [p. u Koers a3o6pameH HUme 35 2 Kon C 3y6mi . wr i0 s t f I I OY "'/S&ES'w0 car--d l: :41t 1^.',00 C.10 iAOA QrtKPJ S... -" 1 .C0q f B.Ir.0 C- 0i. a t 7. i .J ;. 0 In a" A.- 3C P ",.. x.-N 00Q"O IROT a C 3, ; . -'O 8" E I N.I. C ... ;7 .',e aI '0loss at 8119(1111, C /l // 9 (OQU w^gOK i{ ,' O ia-I 0f ..,;:.a 5. 2 B .'.:, ,c 1 9 'I- ""19 3' O1 B / i '-., . __ __J 1 ni :!i i 20 .l1*" -. .. 3 1/. ,l.f T C1 l. . N ? 2O/ 0fin ': o a ,. !, .;,o ... -, -.-co., ... .-- Fpa5 a a I A...t .3 0 C- (,0Ca4A.- H A Ha mapK. i S0,(uneHHe nOrioBO-rCnetp. KOr p ; np cMe B3 --H. nKOiB. SR FORGED OVERPRINT ON ROMANOV N ,--FROM DR. SFLISBURY COLLECTION) EVERYTHING FORGED EXCEPT THE STAMPS! (PR. SALISBURY COLLECTION) .q ROSSELEVITCH - DESIGN OF 1ST STRMP OF ILLUSTRATIONS FOR RUSSIAN LENT Cl1PT. SHRAMCHENKO'S ___ ARTICLE FIG. I FIG.2 FIG. 3- 41 AIR POST STAMPS OF VLADIVOSTOCK-JULY 28. 1923 Excerpts from Soviet Pross & Editorial Comments. It is often difficult after a passage of time to arrive at the truth, even in PHILATELY. Before discussing this controversial issue we will give chronologically all the background notes of information appearing in Soviet "-philatelic press, that was available to us, and that appeared during the approximate issuance of these stamps, and later. Before going into various items of information it will be very interest- ing to bring out the following facts. In 1920!s Soviet philately was very active. Soviet Philatelic Association was formed in Moscow, with branches in various areas of the Soviet Russia. A great deal of research was being made into various phases of Russian philately, handbooks and journals were being published all over Russia. Postage stamps were issued for various purposes, such as to raise funds t for the hungry", for the "workers", etc. Hundreds of labels wore issued by various groups, majority of which wore applied to the mail, but having no postal value. Each philatelic group was very active in collecting philatelic material, which was sent to Soviet Philatelic Association in Moscow and used to raise money. -In other words philately was used in various ways, to its utmost capacity to raise funds for one cause or another. Ovorenthusiasm and creative ability often attributed to philatelists or those creating varieties for them was at its height. P. P. Stankov, the" initiator of this issue was in 1923, the represent- ativo of the Soviet Philatelic Association in Vladivostock. ooooooooooooooooooooo Decree of July 24, 1923 Vladivostock (This document was evidently used to show that in accordance with an official, but not post office, order the series in question were produced). We the undersigned certify that in accordance with an order of Primgub- kompomgol (abbreviation for the Priamur Gubornia Committee for Helping the Hungry) an overprint in rod was made on stamps of old type on panes of 25 stamps at the lithography "Russian Printing Society" in the following quanti- ty: 3/ on 15 kop. 13 panes (includes 1 pang, imp.) 2/ on 35 kop, 2 panes 3/ on 4 kop. 2 panes 4/ on 2 kop.., imp. 1 pane 5/ on 3 kop., imp. 1 pane 6/ on 1 kop. 4 panes 7/ on 5 kop. 1 pane (includes 1 pane, imp.) 8/ on 10/7 kop. 1 pane 9/ on 10 kop. 1 pane 10/ on 20/14 kop. 1 pane 11/ on 20 kop. 4 panes 12/ on 35/2 kop. Siberia 5 panes 13/ on 50 kop. 5 panos(includes one pane with inverted overprint) 14/oon 70 kop. 1 pane 42 #49/50 Altogether 42 panes or 1050 stamps. Upon completing the overprinting, the overprint impressions were washed from thoestono, in the preoonco of the Dolegate of Kompomgol Comrade Stankov. .Original signed by:-N. Shanin and K. Volkov, roprosontatives of Lithography, "The Russian Printing Society". -P. P. Stankov, Superintendent of Philately of Primgub- S'kompomgol. Verified by:-Nikolaov, President of Provincial Children's Committoo. Socretary:-Evsoov ; : P. P. Stankov-Representativo for Philately and Numismatics. for "Special Soction of tho Far East. (An official seal appears at the left of the signatures) :000000000000000000 We are reproducing a page out of 1923 issue of the "Soviot Journal of Vladivostock", which illustrates a flight cover, the overprint, a short history of this issue, and an advertisement of the Vladivostock Post Office. Cover:-At th6 top, bears the following inscription in English-Paul P. SStankov, Fnilatolist, Vladivostock, Siberia. Below the imprint, handwritten, in Russian-Air- Mail, Spask, Primorsk. Spask Ueodni Kompomgol (Spask local committee to help the hungry). Received July 28 at 11:/+5. The stamps is tied to.the cover with a cancel- lation which roads "Vladivostock 28-3-23". S Article: -Stamps of Primorsk Air-Mail. Through the efforts of Comrade Stankov, during the Air Fleet Week a trial air-mnil flight was organized between Vladivostock, Nikolsk-Ussuriisk and Spask. The organization of this project was given to Primosrsk Gubkompomgol -(abbreviation for Primorsk Gubornia Committeo for the Hungry). Gubernia Post Office orenod official collection of air mail on July .28th, and also the sale of special postage stamps. The mail was delivered to the plano on July 29th, and directed as specified to Spask and Nikolsk-Ussuriisk. Stamps issued for this purpose, wore soon bought up by collectors, and a certain quantity was left with Kompomgol for sale. The total quantity issued was 1050, The overprint, the illustration of which is shown below, was applied in rod on the following stamps: Tpe of 1909 1 kop. yellow 75 stamps 20 kop. blue & rose 100 stamps 4 kop. rose 50 stamps 135 kop. lilac & green 50 stamps 5 kop. lilac 25 stamps 150 kop. lilac & green 125 stamps includedd 10 kop. blue 25 stamps jin this quantity is 25 with inverted overprint). 15 kop. lilac & blue300 stamps 7O kop. brown & orange 25 stamps #49/50 43 ,., .,< TYo of 191.6-17 "107 kop. blue 25 stamps 20/14 kop. bluo-& roso 25 stamps S Typo of -198 (imperforato) S t...1 kop.. yellow 25 stamps 3 kop. light rose 25 stamps S2 kop. green 25 stamps 15 kop. lilac & blue 25 stamps Tpo of Siberia 1919 j35/2 kop, perforated 125 stamps Documont;-The document is reproduced with B. Raovskyts article which is S reprinted in full.. :- .: .: ; . Next we give two references to Paul P. Stankov, which are found in the Soviet Philatolic press. Soviet Philatolist #7-8, July-August, 1923. "Undor heading "What our readers write about us"' is a letter dated Vladivostock, July 1, 1923, and signed by P. P. Stankov. "We quote a letter from P. P. Stankov, our MSanage of Philately in tho Far East: this letter has been forwarded to us from Vladivostock by the Priamur Governmental "Committoo of the Public Famino Relief Organizations". Since this letter has no bearing on the issue, in question we omit it. hero., Soviet Philatolist #9-l'1 So0tembo-COctober, 1923. In the article originating in Vladivostock, P. P. Stankov writes of cleaning up of Philately in Siboria. It is a highly political article. ooooooooooooooo.ooo.oo ... OOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOO :- Next reference to this issue is a full length article in March, 1924 issue of Soviet Philatelist, #3 (19) from the pen of B. Raovsky, which we reproduce in full, only omitting the information given elsewhere. ,. Air-Mail Stamps of Vladivostock ".II July, 1923, during the Air Fleet Weok, Primorsk Gubkompomgol organized trial air-post flight between Nikolsk-Ussuriisk and Spask. For that purpose a flight, carrying mail, was made on July 29th. from Vladivostock. For the purpose of prepayment of mail carried on this flight, special stamps wore prepared in 4 days, overprinting remainders of various postage stamps in Vladivostock Post Office in red, with aeroplane and a 3 line over- print reading 12Vladivostock-1923-20 kop.V., On July 28th. Vladivostock Post Office started to accept mail for the special flight, with the following decree which was posted at the Vladivostock Post Office. . -. -,-- .: . "It is brought to the attention of public, that on this dato opened one day sale of specially overprinted postage stamps for the benefit of the Air: Float .* 44 #49/50 "1Lotters prepaid with those stamps addressed to NIkolsk-Ussuriisk and Spask will be mailed to-morrow, July 29th., and carried on a plano, betwoon 10 am. and noon. Letters placed in post office box after the departure of S the plano, and tied with the above stamps, will be regarded as unpaid, similar to the lotters,.addressed to localities, other than Nikolsk or Spask." Postmastor: SOffico Manager: Vladivostock, July 28s 1923. . 00000000000000000000, Next he gives the list of the stamps issued, which we omit hero. Total 16 stamps, and if inverted variety is counted the total is seventeen. The quantities issued and the number of varieties can not be blamed on the pur- ported fact that the time was short and that the remainders were very small. Even if the quantities wore truly small at the Vladivostock post office, the initiators of these special stamps should never have mado the overprints, but should have taken remainders that were in largo supply and issued only one stamp, since, because of the nature of the overprint, only one type of Correspondence was accepted, prepaid by 20 kop. Generally speaking it must be stated, that the abovo described stamps, must not be counted as postage stamps. This is proven by the text of the decree, stating uStamps, issued to raise funds for the Air Fleet are avail- able for franking letters, sent only by aeroplane on special day to specified point, and after certain time, the letters with those stamps addressed else- whore are invalid." This indicates, that post office did its part for the benefit of the Air Fleet, by'accepting letters, and then turning them over to officials of the Air lFleet. Therefore we feol, this stamp has no postal value, since the Post Office did not rbcoivo any money for sending the letters by air mail. oooooooooocooooooo Soviet Philatelist, #4 (20), April, 1924 in the list of counterfeits, fanta- sies, and unofficial government issues makes the following statement. "It was a private issue by a group of collectors in Vladivostock. Not a postage stamp .. ..... 00000000000000000000 Soviet Journal of Vladivostock, 1924. A letter dated April 20, 1924, from Tientsin, written by P. P. Stankov is published. This letter authenticates the letter he sent by air-mail from Vladivostock on July 28, 1923, and which is illustrated in this article. 0000000000000000 oooooooooooooooo ^ Capt. S. do Shramchonko states that P. P. Stankov, from 1923 resided in Tiontsin, China, eventually moving to South Amorica. This confirms the fact that last direct reference to him in Soviet press, while still in residence in Soviet Russia was in September-October, 1923. oo0000000000000000 #49/50 45 Four years later the Soviet Philatolist #2 (78), February, 1928 has an article in English, "The Postage Stamps of the Far East .During the Civil War." One intorosting sentence roads "they wore used to pay additional air-mail postago rates." 000000000000000oooooooooooooooooooooo "Now it is a well known fact that the publication Soviot Philatelist was the voice of the Soviet collectors, and although #4 (20) as we stated before, labels them as an unofficial issue, we soo that a 1935 Price List of the Soviet Philatelic Association has them advertised for sale, without any comments. (a)-Set #609 17 varieties-Far Eastern Republic airs -price on demand. S (b)-Set #610 Short sot $162.00 per sot, 0ooooooooooo Now for discussion. Sanabria in his catalogue lists'-2 additional varieties, namely:- - #302a-4 kop. carmine- (inverted overprint) .#312a-35/2 kop. gray groen-(invertod overprint) Official records do not mention either one, and since many counterfeits of this issue exists, these stamps may fall in this category. B. J. R. P. page 149 illustrates a cover in collection of C. Stibbo (cancelled July 28, 1923). Page 307 of the same journal states that in 1952 a set of 16. was auctioned off for L 120. Pappadopulo in his handbook "Russia in Asia" states that in 1921 (February) all of the stocks of stamps found in Vladivostock or in various post offices in Priamur wore overprinted with initials D. V. R. The low values were soon exhausted & postal savings stamps were then overprinted. We are not trying to prove that the stocks of the old Czarist stamps in Vladivostock wore non oxistant, just mentioning what Pappadopulo states. The Chita issue of the Far Eastern Republic, Scott's Nos. 49 to 61 wore widely used in Vladivostock, as late as 1924, when Soviet stamps were already in use also. We have registered covers dated April 4, 1923 and January 12, 1924 with Chita issue and many cancelled copies used in Vladivostock. "Analyzing the information printed above, we come to the following conclusions. . (1)-All the known facts printed in philatelic press originated from various Soviet sources published between July, 1923 and April, 1924. (2)-We consider this issue as a private, and highly speculative, because the Vladivostock Post Office did not receive any money from the sale of those stamps, and evidently only acted as the go-between the military plane officials that made the flight and the organizers of the flight. Also the decree of July 24, 1923 certifying that an order was given for printing those stamps and that the order was completed has no mention of the postal officials. The official post 46 #49/50 office decree announcing the sale of those stamps was posted at the Vladivostock post office only on the day of the sale and evidoitly had a minimum amount of advertising. We assume that the public --- bought only a few of those .stamps. . It is stango that the issue being so small, there is no mention anywhere, that the sale to public was limited or not, for at that time 20 kop. was vory little, From the scarcity of genuine flown covers known to us, not more than six, we assume that the plane Carried very little mail. There is no record of any of these covers being backstamped at Nikolsk-Ussuriisk approximately 55 miles away, or Spask about 115 miles away. There is also no mention for provisions of returning the flown covers. We can not J imagine any one sending a cover with a stamp that we know will be valuable and not trying to got it back. The only record we have of a cover being returned to the sender is the one that is illus- trated, which was sent by P. P. Stankov to some one else. (3)-The amount of money raised for the fund if all of the issue was sold out at 20 kop. face would have been 210 rubles. It is quite improbable also that the Vladivostock Post Office donated 225.50 rubles worth of stamps, which is more than their new face value, for nothing. Actually as is stated in one of the decrees, only part of the issue was sold to the public, the remainders wore turned to the Society sponsoring this fiasco, and eventually ending; in the stock of the Soviet Philatolic Association. Undoubtedly the stamps of this issue that were sold by the Soviet Philatolic Association in 1935 were the remainders mentioned above. The short J. set of 7 sold by them evidently included one of each of the stamps e that were issued in the quantities of 50 or more. It is probably the source of most of the mint sets existing in collections to-day. The Soviet Philatelic Association took the advantage of the great boom in Aero-Philately and unloaded their -supply. (4)-The reason references to P. P. Stankov were printed in this article is to show that he was in position to promote this issue. We think he actually was moro of a promoter and coordinator of philatelic activities in the Far East than a philatelist, for all of his articles are political in nature and show no actual knowledge of Sphilately. ._ ....0 00ooooooooooooo o0 10% DISCOUNT on all purchases 15% DISCOUNT on all purchases of $2.00 and up. of $10.00 and up. NE W ISSUES ERRORS VERS VARIETIES Z TQS LOCAIS I L. & F. STAMP SERVICE Box #1, Grand Lodget Michigan. 1. Stamples covers from 1812 to 1870 in stock. Also postal stationery. 2. Price list furnished on request. 3. Approvals at about 70% discount from Scotts on Russia, States & Poland.' S 4. I also have Zemstvos in stock. #49/50 47 RUS S I AN T URK ES T.AN : " .., .by W. S. E. Stephen Turkestan has never been a productive field for the student of postal history, nor can one find much literature on this subject. Possibly this can be accounted for by.the fact that Turkestan was one of the very latest countries to be added to the Russian Empire. It was not until the 27th. of June 1865, that the Russian forces under General Tcherniaev finally succeeded in the capture of Tash.ent. Rapidly the other provinces and khanates were brought under subjugation by General Kaufmann, who had been appointed Governor General of this part of Cental Asia* . ... The country being largely agricultural, with few commercial enterprises, it is not difficult to understand the comparative rarity of covers or even postmarks. Much of the correspondence seen, practically all emanating from the larger cities, seems to have been conducted with India and Persia, and very little fkund its way into the Western Hemisphere. The earlier means of entry into the country were rather limited, one being the route from Orenburg through Kazala at the mouth of Syr Darya thence "along that river via Perovsky, Turkestan and Tchimkont to Tashkent, the other from the Caspian Sea, from Krasnovodsk via Askhabad, Merv, Chardzhui and Samarkand. There existed also an alternative route from Semipalatinsk via Vorny, Aulie-ata and Tchimkont but this route was seldom used. From the East, there was the"Silk Road"from China. SPrior to the opening up of the country by the railways all transport was by moans of camel transport, the two main rivers, the Syr Darya and the Amu Darya, only being navigable to shallow drafted paddle steamers and to native kayuks, with their largo square sails, not unlike the foluacas common to Egypt. Travel in this area has never boon encouraged by the authorities owing largely to the continual warring of tho.native tribesmen and caution had to be oxorcisod in the issue of permits allowing travellers to visit the moro outlandish areas. SAlthough the country had largely been brought under the rulo of the Imperial Russian Government, two of the larger khanatos, Bukhara and Khiva enjoyed a certain amount of autonomy. This was granted under the Treaties of Khiva, signed August 24, 1873, and of Bukhara signed Soptombor 28, 1873. By treaty of Khiva, the boundaries woro defined, Russia was granted the right to establish ports, factories and depots on the left bank of the Amu Darya, whilst Russia annexed all of.the right bank; the town and villages of the khanato wore to be open to Russian trade and commerce, Russian merchants wore to be free from any trado duty, and finally, slavery was to be abolished. Khiva was to pay Russia an indemnity of 2,200,000 rubles. The treaty of Bukhara was of similar nature with the addition that it granted Russian steamers the right to navigate the Amu Darya. It must therefore be understood that only these two Khanatos are entitled to the status of "Used Abroads". This has boon made quito clear by P. Traks in his article in the R. J. of R. P. No. 12, pages 373/4. 48 #49/50 A brief history of the conquest of tho Central Asian Provinces may eo appropriate. Peter the Groat and Nicholas I in vain attempted the ccnqoast of Khiva and Bukhara, tho one in 1717, tho other in 1839. In 1863 Vamoory, disguised as a dervish, succodod in visiting Bukhara and Khiva. It was not S until 1865 that Tashkent eventually foil into the hands of Russians and later in 1866-68 that the combined power of Bukhara and Kokand was overthrown and along with those Samarkand and Khodzhont passed into Russian hands. Consider- able trouble was experienced by General Kaufmann, who was Governor and Control. lor of the district, in quelling tho recalcitrant tribesmen and it was not until 1873 that Khiva was finally humbled. Later in 1876 the remnant of the Khanato of Kokand was finally incorporated in the Russian Empire under the name of Forghana Oblast. In 1881 General Skobolov successfully overthrow the Tokko Turcomans (Tokintzi) and in 1884 the Turcomans of Morv submitted without a struggle. In 1895 the greater part of the Pamir plateau was annoxod, so that Russia was now soporatod from British India only by a strip of nominally Afghan territory a few leagues in widthU EARLY POSTAL SERVICES Of the early postal services, Prof. Eugene Schuylor, in his history of provinces, states "The native Governments strongly objected to the establish- mont of postal routes within their territories, and unless a letter was brought by special mossongor, it had to be sent by some native, who may for days forgot it or who may simply in passing throw it in at the door, usually in a mutilated state, as it had usually boon opened by the frontier or city authoritiesU. Expenditure largely exceeded rovonuos, the postal revenue for 1868, the year of its inception, being.only 9,800 rubles, while in 1872 the revenue was 65,300 rubles against an expenditure for that year of 696,000 rubles. ARAL FLOTILLA . An interesting description of this flotilla, as given by Schuyler, deserves recording. The commencement of building the Aral Flotilla was made in 1847 when the two masted schooners "NIKOLAT" and "MDHAEL" were constructed at Oronburg. Later the "KONSTANTIN' a larger vessel, was built and in this vessel Lieutenant Butakoff, in 1848 and 1849, completely surveyed the Aral Soa, In 1850, two steamers wore ordered from Sweden, the "FEROVSKY" and the "OBRUTCHEF". The "%ROVSKYI was launched on the Syr Darya in 1853, and the "0OBRUTCHEF" two years later. In 1860, two new vessels were ordered from Liverpool, built of corrugated iron, glat bottomed and stern wheelers. At the same time a pantoon deck was also ordered. The steamers wore brought in pieces from Orenburg, on the backs of camels, put together at Kazala, and launched in the autumn of 1862. Those were named the "SYR DARYA" and the "ARAL". Further additions, all larger vessels, were the "SIAMARKAND" built at Cockorill's Works in Belgium in 1866 and the "TASHKENT" built in Russia in 1870. All those vessels plied the Aral Sea and Syr Darya with passengers and freight. Well knowing the proclivity of the Russian Postal Administration for the granting of special postmarks to steamship companies, it would be interesting to speculate whether similar facilities wore extended to the steamship companies on the Aral Sea. It is known that mails wore transported on the Issyk Kul, a largo lake to the east of the Aral Sea, on the borders of Sin-Kiang and Turkostan. This service operated between the ports of Kutocnm'-di at the west and and Proobrazhcnsky at the east end of the lako, calling at the smaller townships at the lake side with mails and freight. #49/50 49 RAILWAY SERVICE A railway service operates two trains daily from Krasnovodsk to Tashkent covering the 1748 vorsts or 1159 milos in 58 hours. General Annonkov commoncod the building of this lino in August 1880 when it was known as the Central Asiatic or Transcaspian Railway. It reached Morv in 1886, Samarkand in 1888 and Tashkont and Andizhan in 1898. The routo was KRASNOVODSK-4KRA TENGIR- BELEK-DZHEBEL-BALLA ISHEIM-PEEVIi-K.AZDZHIK -KIZIL AfRVlT-BL1I-ARTCHMAN- BKIHARZAN-GECK TEIE-BEZMEIN-.ASKhL D-LNAU-I.RTIK-KA1XHl A-DUSHLK -TEDZHEN-MIRV (a branch lino runs thrice weekly to KUSHKA on Afghan bordor)-BIR'AM AL I- UTCH ADZHI-REPETEP-BAEKHANI-CHARDZHUI-FfIRABK/LRKUL-KAGAN or NEW BUKHARA, tho railway station for Bukhara which is 8 miles distant by road-KIZIL TEIE- KERMINEH-KLJTTI KURGANI-SAJVRKILND-ROSTOVTZEVO-DZHIZAK- TCHERNLYEVO-SYS DARINKEAYA-TLSHKENT. . : From TCHERTAYEVO a branch lino runs to ANDIZHAN via KHODZHENT-KCKAND- .and GORTCHKIXOVO. ".A highway loads from Andizhan aouthoast to Osh .tho starting point for "travel in tho Pamir Platoau and in the Chinese Turkostan. From Osh, a road loads 280 milos southeast to Kashgar via Gultcha-SUFI KURGIA-TALLDUIK PASS- IRKESHTA1... SThe railway from Oronburg to Tashkont was opened in 1905 and through express carriages run from St. Petersburg and Moscow. ORENBTURG-ILETZK-AK BULAKJX TYUBINSK-E1BA-BER TCHOGUR-TCHEIKAR- "SAJULSK AYA-ARLLSK OYE MORE-KAZAiLINSK-DZHIISZ -KALRA UZYLK-FEROVSC-TCHIILI-. TUMrESTAN-T&M-A-RUIS-KABUL SAI-TASHiENT. S, -to beo .continuod- Sooooooooooooooooooooo SI am interested in buying complete sets of SOVIET PHILTTELIST and SOVIET COLLECTOR, plus other Russian PHILATELIC PUBLICATIONS that I do not have in my library. -Those publications are very important in my studios of Russian stamps. . Dr. Gregory B. Salisbury 49th. & Locust Sts.- .Philadelphia 39, Pa. MNE PHILLATELIC LITERATURBE PRICE LIST 52 pagos, just out 25c doductable from first order. FIITZ BILLING 168-39 Highland Aveo,. Jamaica 32, N. Y. MONTHLY PUBLIC AUCTIONS Over 2500 lots.and 28 photo pages. Covering most fields of Philately. Cataloguo frooe on request. Billig & Rich 55 West 42nd. Street. Now York 36, N, Y. S 50 #49/50 REVIEW OF CURRENT UKRAINIAN PHILATEIC PRESS by Capt. S. do Shramchonko There are 3 journals at present devoted to Ukrainian philately: NEWS OF THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE UKRAINIAN COUNCIL, DER UKRAINE PHILATELIST, and THE PHILATELIST. We shall discuss them briefly. NEIS OF THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE UKRAINIAN NATIONAL COUNCIL, Munchen, Dankholstrasso 4/o. West Germany. No.2/5-Mlay 1955. This issue, edited by G. Tkachcnko has the following: (a)-Status of Ukrainian Stamp Collections Throughout the World by Dr. Sombai(Buenos Aires), valuable for its postal history, (b)-tDio Ukrainischo Ganzeachen" by Dr. R. Seichter (Soltau), President of Ukraine Philateliston Verband-(German Section) beginning of an article, with a table of 34 tridents. (c)-F. Kordub (Munchen)-neterogeneous Nature of Stamps. (dc')-Capt. S. do Shramchonko-Ukrainian Philatoly & Humor. (e)-R. Polchaninoff-Philately Used as Propaganda. (f)-Dr. D. Schmidt-Ein Interessanter Vergleich. Cost of Journal-Twenty Cents, plus postage. DER UKRAINE PHILATELIST, Hamburg, Duvenstedt, Rogenoort 12, West. Germany, editor Dr. D. Schmidt. Organ of U.P.V. No.5(7), September, 1955. Contains (a)-Society news, (b)-Now Literature of Ukrainian Philately which lists the following:-Dr. H. Schultz s "Doutsche Dienptpost 1939-1945", issued serially, "Deutsche Post Osten, General Government (Part2), "Galizien" (Part 3), and soon to appear uUkraine". C. W. Roborts's book, "The Trident Issues of Ukrain. Part I, Kiev, PartII, Odessa, III-Kharkov, Ekatorinoslav & Poltava, IV-Podolia. & Postal Stationery. Another book "Local Issues" will soon appear. (c)-Dr. Seichter's answers to questions & information on new discoveries, and (d)- k List of Tridents of Odessa, from the Trachtenberg material. Among the ads we S find offers of sale of photostats of valuable German publications on Ukraine, from 1918. THE PAILATELIST, 315 Van Wincle Ave, Jersey-City 6, N.J., USA. Editor, Eugene Kotyk. Journal oftho Society of Ukrainian Philatelists, in Ukrainian, with an English column. Price $1.00. Vol.V (Whole #15),. 1955, contains (a)-E. Kotyk-Famous Exports of Ukrainian Stamps, (b)-D. Buchinsky-History of Blue and Rod Mauritius, (c)-E. Ertol-My Recollections of Ukraino (notes by a German officer philatelist who witnessed first overprints of Kiev I), (d)- E. Kotyk-Now Data About Stamps of West Oblast YHP, (o)-Dr. Sombai-Roview of the maj or work of Ukrainian Stamps of Volynia, 1918-1920 & 1941-44, written by Capt. S. de Shramcherko in "Litopis Volini", (f)-Write up of Rossica Journal and Dr. G. B. Salisbury. English section includes Dr. Soichter's tridents of Kiev I, Chernigov I, Jitomir I with tables of tridents "The Handstamp Comb Combinations of Kiev Type I" and also Editorts Review. ooooooooooo000000000000000 KRAINE THEATRE REVENUE STAMPS OF 1918 by Capt. S. de Shramchenko Mr. Jacques Posoll, member of Rossica sent me for expertising his collection of Ukrainian revenue stamps, among which I found a sot of Ukrainian theatre revenue stamps. They have the following history: In Imperial Russia, the tax on theater tickets was paid by a receipt part of the special charity stamps of the "Empress Mario Society", which was pasted on each theater ticket. At the top of each theater ticket was the inscription "Tickot with- out stamp is invalid. The stamps consisted of two parts (no perforations in between), thus when the ticket was separated from the other half of the #49/50 51 Page 51 REVIEW OF CURRENT UKRAINIAN PHILATEIC PRESS by Capt. S. do Shramchonko There are 3 journals at present devoted to Ukrainian philately: NEWS OF THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE UKRAINIAN COUNCIL, DER UKRAINE PHILATELIST, and THE PHILATELIST. We shall discuss them briefly. NEIS OF THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE UKRAINIAN NATIONAL COUNCIL, Munchen, Dankholstrasso 4/o. West Germany. No.2/5-Mlay 1955. This issue, edited by G. Tkachcnko has the following: (a)-Status of Ukrainian Stamp Collections Throughout the World by Dr. Sombai(Buenos Aires), valuable for its postal history, (b)-tDio Ukrainischo Ganzeachen" by Dr. R. Seichter (Soltau), President of Ukraine Philateliston Verband-(German Section) beginning of an article, with a table of 34 tridents. (c)-F. Kordub (Munchen)-neterogeneous Nature of Stamps. (dc')-Capt. S. do Shramchonko-Ukrainian Philatoly & Humor. (e)-R. Polchaninoff-Philately Used as Propaganda. (f)-Dr. D. Schmidt-Ein Interessanter Vergleich. Cost of Journal-Twenty Cents, plus postage. DER UKRAINE PHILATELIST, Hamburg, Duvenstedt, Rogenoort 12, West. Germany, editor Dr. D. Schmidt. Organ of U.P.V. No.5(7), September, 1955. Contains (a)-Society news, (b)-Now Literature of Ukrainian Philately which lists the following:-Dr. H. Schultz s "Doutsche Dienptpost 1939-1945", issued serially, "Deutsche Post Osten, General Government (Part2), "Galizien" (Part 3), and soon to appear uUkraine". C. W. Roborts's book, "The Trident Issues of Ukrain. Part I, Kiev, PartII, Odessa, III-Kharkov, Ekatorinoslav & Poltava, IV-Podolia. & Postal Stationery. Another book "Local Issues" will soon appear. (c)-Dr. Seichter's answers to questions & information on new discoveries, and (d)- k List of Tridents of Odessa, from the Trachtenberg material. Among the ads we S find offers of sale of photostats of valuable German publications on Ukraine, from 1918. THE PAILATELIST, 315 Van Wincle Ave, Jersey-City 6, N.J., USA. Editor, Eugene Kotyk. Journal oftho Society of Ukrainian Philatelists, in Ukrainian, with an English column. Price $1.00. Vol.V (Whole #15),. 1955, contains (a)-E. Kotyk-Famous Exports of Ukrainian Stamps, (b)-D. Buchinsky-History of Blue and Rod Mauritius, (c)-E. Ertol-My Recollections of Ukraino (notes by a German officer philatelist who witnessed first overprints of Kiev I), (d)- E. Kotyk-Now Data About Stamps of West Oblast YHP, (o)-Dr. Sombai-Roview of the maj or work of Ukrainian Stamps of Volynia, 1918-1920 & 1941-44, written by Capt. S. de Shramcherko in "Litopis Volini", (f)-Write up of Rossica Journal and Dr. G. B. Salisbury. English section includes Dr. Soichter's tridents of Kiev I, Chernigov I, Jitomir I with tables of tridents "The Handstamp Comb Combinations of Kiev Type I" and also Editorts Review. ooooooooooo000000000000000 KRAINE THEATRE REVENUE STAMPS OF 1918 by Capt. S. de Shramchenko Mr. Jacques Posoll, member of Rossica sent me for expertising his collection of Ukrainian revenue stamps, among which I found a sot of Ukrainian theatre revenue stamps. They have the following history: In Imperial Russia, the tax on theater tickets was paid by a receipt part of the special charity stamps of the "Empress Mario Society", which was pasted on each theater ticket. At the top of each theater ticket was the inscription "Tickot with- out stamp is invalid. The stamps consisted of two parts (no perforations in between), thus when the ticket was separated from the other half of the #49/50 51 Page 51 ticket (the part that remained in theatre), loft portion of the stamp remained on the ocountorfoil"and the right portion on the ticket. S Theatre stamps of the "Empress Marie Society" wore in use in Ukraine until June 14, 1918, when a decree issued by the Ukrainian government, replaced thom with Ukrainian thottrestamps. The design of these stamps is in pure Ukrainian style, and evidently the work of Professors Uri Ivanovich Narbut and Vasili Fedorovich Krichevsky. They were printed in Kuljenko Typography in Kiev, on very thin paper of regular Ukrainian stamps and the 20 griven regular postage stamp. Complete set consists of 9 stamps, issued imperforate and with the following inscrptions in various combinations. a- "Zakon 14 chorvnia 1918 r."1 ... : b-"Talon dlia ostatka." counterfoill) .2, 7, 8 and 9 had a strident" incorporated in its design, while the .remaining numbers have Ukrainian swastika in four corners. No. 1 20 shagiv-blue, rod, gray. Background of 50 shagiv revenue stamp. No. 2 .40.shagiv-bluo, gray, orange. -.u -, 50 9 5 . No.' 3-; 70 shagiv-brown, green. t it 50 . No. 4 80 shagiv-green, yellow. n I 40 tu u No.-5 -100-shagiv-rod, green. n" U 40: , .No. 6"-160 shagiv-bluo, red. a-50 :. . No. 7 -.. 1 karbovanots- yel. green & Yellow. 40 S NNo. 8 1 karb. 120 shagiv- bl. green & u .44 No. 9 r- 2 karbovanets-bluo green 40 : - "Three types of designs are illustrated-Figure 1 (hw: and 2), Figure 2 (##3,4,5 and'6), and Figure 3 (##7,8 and 9). ... Incidentally, Poltava Postal-Telegraph Office overprinted the theatre "stamps of "Empress Marie Society" with a trident in violot, and these stamps besides its normal usage were used as postage stamps. I have. in my collection stamps of 5. 20, 30 on 2 kop. and also a block of four of 5 kop. cancelled "Poltava. 2. 12. 18." Also at various auctions in Europe I came across complete covers with those stamps, although infrequently. Likewise Podolia Postal-Telegraph Office, in Kamonets-Podolsk overprinted the theatre tax - stamps with black trident of Type "I", and as with overprints in Kharkov Postal-Telegraph Office, I have never seen them in postal use. Evidently they wero used only for theater ticket tax. S :000 .00000 A. Cronin doubts the postal usage, described above, in Poltava. Mr. H. Dumont of S.M.H.E.A., Coona, NEW, Australia, a former Red Army officer, who left Russia for Lithuania in 1923, remembers seeing the postal usage Sol:, some theatrical" stamps in the Crimea in 1919-1920 during the Civil War period on covers, but can remember no further details, 00 oooooooo -. Vo are greatly interested in additional information on "Theatrical" tax stamps of Ukraine, especially for POSTAL USE. .. 00000000 -. - S 52 #49/50 Page 5. RUSSIAN POST IN TURKEY by A. Rosselovitch It is known that besides the special stamps issued for the needs of Russian post offices in Asia Minor, in Turkey and Palestine, between 1864 & 1919, ordinary adhesive stamps of the Russian Empire were used in various post offices of Russian Levant & were cancelled either with dot postmarks, having a numeral in the center, or with ordinary circular cancellation having the name of the town and the date. These cancellations are more or less rare, and are generally found on stamps of 1859-68 issues, mostly the 10 kop. on wove or with horizontally laid lines, and less rarely on 20 & 30 kop. values, SAs far as I know, the earlier regular issues of Russia have not been seen cancelled in Russian Levant. Not too long ago I was fortunate enough to find Russia No. 1 cancelled with dot cancellation in blue, having numeral "780"in center, This number is for Smyrna. I found this stamp unexpectedly in Paris, and the dealer told me he acquired it at an auction, and that there were at that time several stamps like this one with similar postmarks, and that they were bought by Various individuals. Undoubtedly this is one one of the rarest cancellations on Russia No. 1. We shall now consider the forgeries of Russian Levant, & the methods of their identification. I consider it very important to inform the readers that my information is prepared for collectors, who do not have reference material for comparison, nor modern methods of expertization. Likewise I recommend that serious collectors, who are specialists in this field are consulted, whenever rare and expensive stamps are to be purchased. Falsi- fication methods are continuously being perfected, and it is possible to come across forgeries superior to the ones seen so far. SUnlike the stamps of Russian Offices in China, in which each overprint may be fake, the stamps of Russian Levant have series which have not been forged, thus we shall discuss only those which have been forged. The stamp of large format, Scott No. I, has been forged several times. The sources of these forgeries, and the characteristics of various forgeries vary. It is very important to stress here that the genuine stamps were printed by typography, and are distinguished by thinness & delicacy of details of the design, while the forgeries were lithographed, and are cruder and have many important deviations from the originals. Examples are mot with the overprint "Ufacsimilo" or with traces of it. Washing off,of the word "facsimile",and retouching the parts of the stamp whoroitracos of this process remained was one of the methods used by forgers. I First we will describe the differences in genuine & forgeries on the parts of the stamps indicated on illustration by Russian letters Ua" & f". a-Found where the 3rd. & 4th. double lines of the outer frame are broken by the large outer circle, 1-On genuine these lines end sharply. 2-On forgeries they are dull. S #49/50 53 Page 53 o-In the lower corner is found a small white circle with an ornament inside of it....In the upper part, on both sides of the circle and parallel to the large circle are found four blue lines. 1-On genuine stamps, on both sidos,is also found a first "parasite" line, thinner than the others. In the lower left corner, in the like position, a similar, short & barely noticeable thin line is Also found. 2-On forogries this line is missing, or is found on one side of the incomplete white circle with ornament. Besides the two important characteristics just mentioned, which may be successfully used on the more modern forgeries we shall describe other differences found on genuine and the counterfeits. GENUINE 1-In the funnel-shaped opening of the left post horn, under the eagle, will be found 2 tiny lines, & on the right post horn 2 lines. 2-In the part above letters "OTtIF" shown on illustration by letter '" ", the outer ring is interrupted and is in form of points or dots for an approximate distance of 2mm. 3-Inside"half circles", placed around the large disc with the eagle, shown on illustration as ab" are in form of dots and tiny lines or dashes, giving an impression of a rubbed-out ornament. 4-The stamp is in shape of a perfect square, 42.5nm. on each side. The measurements of a sheet of dark blue stamps of 3rd. printing are 12.2x15.6cm., the distances between stamps are 4 to 42mm. Also the top pair of the sheet of 4 is not parallel to the lower pair. FORGERIES 1-Lines are either absent or their number is different than on genuine. 3-Do not have the characteristics of genuine. The first stamp of Russian Levant is considerably scarcer cancelled and therefore it is clear than counterfeit cancellations may be found both on genuine and forged stamps. When the forgeries were cancelled a fantastic cancellation was used, and it is usually found on the corner or on the edge of the stamp. On the other hand the fake cancellations found on the genuine stamps are similar to genuine cancellations. Description of the differences between the genuine and fake cancellations is very difficult, & thus it is necessary to refer to a competent expert for expertizing the post- mark. Only one issue, namely the dark blue on ordinary (not thin) paper, was over put into circulation, and thus require no exportization of postmark when found cancelled. This stamp had 3 printings, general information about which is well known. It was issued in sheets of 4. 1st. Printing-Vertical strips of 4. 2nd. Printing-Blocks of 4. Each stamp in the sheet differs from the others in minute details, thus giving 4 typos. These variations in typo likewise can serve in separating genuine from the forgeries. (In the description of the types, which follow, the English equivalent of the Russian words is given. See the illustrations 2, 3, and 4 for Russian equivalent). S 54 #49/50 Page 54 Typo o Thoro is a break in tho outer frare in the lower right corner. (Soo Illustration). Typo 2 In the word "lota", tho dot forming the bottom of the left stroke of the Russian letter "L"is apart front the'strokoe Typo 3 In the word "Bandorolnoo" the top horizontal stroke of the Russian letter "T' bonds at the right with a dot or a period. Tyoe L The bottom of the scepter is divided by a white line, and in the blue circle under the word Ukop" is a white "parisito" line. The second issue, Scott's Nos. 2 & 3, issued in 1865, wore lithographed and unlike the first issue do not distinguish themselves either by thinness or delicacy of design, thus making the job of forgers easier & in consequence a number of good forgeries have appeared on the market. Taking into the consideration the rarity of the genuine stamps, and the fact that both genuine and the forgeries were lithographed, and expert study is essential, as it is impossible to list all the minute differences, and also, an important factor is the comparison with the already oxportizod stamps, which may not be in possosion of many collectors. Nevertheless we list below several features which may enable one to identify the cruder counterfeits., GENUINE 10 Para 1-The periods after letters are square. 2-Light brown net is small & 3-Below the ship, on the right side, in- thin. side of the white curl is two thicken- ings, and in the waves is a white dot. COUNTERFEITS 10 Para & 2 Piastres 2-The not is not clear, nor is it well defined. 4-Papor is thin to very thin, with traces of color on the .reverse side. 5-Letter'"0" is more square than on the genuine. (2 pi.) 6-Small dashes or lines, on an incline, in the frame around the ship are either absent, or present in small numbers. (2 pi.) 7-Dashos, representing the waves, are in considerably smaller number. Both of those stamps were reprinted, both officially and privately, on yellowish paper, in shades different than originals, without gum, and surrounded by a thin line 1.5mm. from the edge of the design. These reprints are found with forged cancellations and forged gum. Other issues of Russian Levant will be discussed in the next installment. 0000000ooo00000... ... Your WANT-LISTS HAVE A GOOD CHANCE OF BEING FILLED FROM MY SPECIALIZED stock of Russia---- -Czarist and Soviet-----mint--used---errors, also Soviet covers. I will be interested to learn what interests you. Lester S. Glass (A.S.D.A., APS, SPA.) P. 0. Box 36646, Wilshire-La Brea Station, Los Angeles 36, California S #49/50 55 Page 55 NOTES ON RUSSIAT PHIITELY by A. Rossolovitch - In tho previous number of the Journal, #48, writing about forgorios in the field of color of stamps, I disclosed the appearance rocontly of 3 kop, Charity stamps of 1915, in which the paper was artificially colored sky blue, so as to be palmed off as a rarity. At this time, it is possible to give additional data about those sta;rps. Study of those stamps under the rays of Wood lamp, show that this sky blue color has a different chemical make up than the sky blue background of the 10 kop. of 1914. Further investigation and questioning of informed persons gave the following data. Sky blue background of the stamp was put on artificially on several shoots and blocks of 3 kop, on white paper (1915), but not in Russia, and not during the revolution, as I had considered, but comparatively recently, by a Russian migrant, living in Franco. At first, he covered with sky blue color a large quantity of shoots of 10 kop. on white paper, of same issue of 1915, trying to cash in on the dif- ference in price betwoon the two issues, especially those perforated 13-12 which on stamps of 1914 are worth 15 times higher than those on white paper of 1915. After that venture passed off successfully, the same individual wont on to other experiments, namely: coloring of the previously mentioned 3 kop. of 1915 with sky blue color, and into rose color the samo stamp on white paper with perforation 13-. The same man was responsible for large quantities of the forgeries of the following stamps: .1-Stamps of Gen. Wrangol, in singles, blocks, complete sorios, including preparation of ontires, letters with genuine or forged cancellers. 2-Phrygian cap and swords overprints, on almost all stamps on which this overprintt exists, except. those of 35 & 50 kop. of the Romanov Jubilee series of 1913, which he fortunately could not obtain, in mint state, and in blocks. 3-Rarities of Mongolia, mainly the Mongolian arms typos with the overprint: very highly priced in catalogues. The stamps woro completely forged, as well as the ovorprints. /4-Proviously mentioned forgarios of color background on the charity stamps of 1915. 5-Overprints of Ukraino, Armonia, etc. Since, it is quite possible that many of those forgeries have spread to various countries, one should pay special care when encountering the above mentioned stamps. They have boon offered for sale in North and South America, whoro "stamps", especially of Mongolia are very popular. Duo to lack of space, continuation of the study of the forgeries of the Russian stamps will follow in the near future. ooooooooooooooooo S' : FILTLDIA 156 Our member, Bernard Davis, Director of National Philatelic Musoum was one of the members of the International Jury. Following members won medals: C. Dougan of California (Bronze), F. Fritz Billig (Silver) for literature, National Philatelic MVusouT of Philadelphia (Silver gilt cortificato). Sir Johm Wilson, Koopor of Quoon Elizaboth II stamp collection, exhibited "Russia1 in the Court of Honor. ooooooooooooooooo 56 #49/50 Page 56 NOTES ON RUSSIAT PHIITELY by A. Rossolovitch - In tho previous number of the Journal, #48, writing about forgorios in the field of color of stamps, I disclosed the appearance rocontly of 3 kop, Charity stamps of 1915, in which the paper was artificially colored sky blue, so as to be palmed off as a rarity. At this time, it is possible to give additional data about those sta;rps. Study of those stamps under the rays of Wood lamp, show that this sky blue color has a different chemical make up than the sky blue background of the 10 kop. of 1914. Further investigation and questioning of informed persons gave the following data. Sky blue background of the stamp was put on artificially on several shoots and blocks of 3 kop, on white paper (1915), but not in Russia, and not during the revolution, as I had considered, but comparatively recently, by a Russian migrant, living in Franco. At first, he covered with sky blue color a large quantity of shoots of 10 kop. on white paper, of same issue of 1915, trying to cash in on the dif- ference in price betwoon the two issues, especially those perforated 13-12 which on stamps of 1914 are worth 15 times higher than those on white paper of 1915. After that venture passed off successfully, the same individual wont on to other experiments, namely: coloring of the previously mentioned 3 kop. of 1915 with sky blue color, and into rose color the samo stamp on white paper with perforation 13-. The same man was responsible for large quantities of the forgeries of the following stamps: .1-Stamps of Gen. Wrangol, in singles, blocks, complete sorios, including preparation of ontires, letters with genuine or forged cancellers. 2-Phrygian cap and swords overprints, on almost all stamps on which this overprintt exists, except. those of 35 & 50 kop. of the Romanov Jubilee series of 1913, which he fortunately could not obtain, in mint state, and in blocks. 3-Rarities of Mongolia, mainly the Mongolian arms typos with the overprint: very highly priced in catalogues. The stamps woro completely forged, as well as the ovorprints. /4-Proviously mentioned forgarios of color background on the charity stamps of 1915. 5-Overprints of Ukraino, Armonia, etc. Since, it is quite possible that many of those forgeries have spread to various countries, one should pay special care when encountering the above mentioned stamps. They have boon offered for sale in North and South America, whoro "stamps", especially of Mongolia are very popular. Duo to lack of space, continuation of the study of the forgeries of the Russian stamps will follow in the near future. ooooooooooooooooo S' : FILTLDIA 156 Our member, Bernard Davis, Director of National Philatelic Musoum was one of the members of the International Jury. Following members won medals: C. Dougan of California (Bronze), F. Fritz Billig (Silver) for literature, National Philatelic MVusouT of Philadelphia (Silver gilt cortificato). Sir Johm Wilson, Koopor of Quoon Elizaboth II stamp collection, exhibited "Russia1 in the Court of Honor. ooooooooooooooooo 56 #49/50 Page 56 L IT E R A R Y REVIEW Due to lack of space we shall limit ourselves to a listing of the published material, appearing since our last effort, P. 17, #46/47. We urge our readers to mail in all additional matorial in the world phila- tolic press, not mentioned here and dealing with our specialty. . STAMPS Doc. 10, 1955. G. B. Sloane-Alexandria, USA-Alexandria, USSR. P. 417 Dec. 10, 1955. G. B. Sloano-Alexandria Story-Addition. P. 453 Jan. 7,'1956. Russia, Finnish Occupation,.Scott N1 to N8. .. P. 12 Jan. 28, 1956. G. B. Sloano-Alexandria, USA and USSR. P. 121 Mar. 3, 1956. Transition from Stampless Mailing to Stamps in the / Kingdom of Poland-Stephen G. Rich. P. 302 Mar. 24, 1956. Railway Stamps of Finland. P. 426 Apr. 21, 1956. A. Moyses-Check List of Souvenir Miniature Sheets P. 90 Apr. 21, 1956. Drifting Station-North Pole (cover, notes). P. 105 THE COLLECTORS CLUB PHILATELIST Sept. 1955. V. Rachmanoff-Poland Number One. P. 237 SPA JOURNAL - July 1955. E. Tolkowsky, H. Girst-The Postal Markings of Jerusalem Old City Since 1948. P. 535 July 1955. A. Bledsoe-Early Issues of the Baltic States. P. 554 February 1956. Wolfgang Fritzsche-Pleskau. P. 275 April 1956. W. Engelhardt, MD.-Early Preca'cels,Finland. P. 408 Lay 1956. M. Zinsmeister-UPU Additions, Changes since January 1953. P. 462 June 1956. J. Jakubecki-Poland, Local Issues of 1918. P. 487 "AMERICAN IILATELIST Dec. 1955. E. Tolkowsky-Early Posts in Holy Land, P. 181 February 1956. T. Bozarth-Revival of Military Decorations by the SSoviets. P.302 May 1956. R. Larson-Pioneer of Revenues Alfred Forbin. : P. 542 AERO PHILATELIST ANNALS January 1956. H. M. Goodkind-Russia, An Air Mail Cover Found with Error (Sanabria #39, Scott #449a). P. .75 MERCURY STAMP JOURNAL September1955. Siberia, 1922 Priamur Issue (Scott##85 to 115). P. 260 BULLETIN OF THE POLONUS PHILATELIC SOCIETY Septemberl955. V. Rachmanoff-Duchy of Warsaw and Its Postal Markings. P. 131-I Septomberl955. S. Gibrick-Ukrainian Field Post of 1920. Reprint from the Rossica Journal. P. 131-3 (Complete chock list of material of interest to us, in the previous issues of Polonus Bulletin will be published later.) #49/50 57 Pa-e 57 P HILATELIC LITERATURE REVIEW Ist, Quarter 1955. R. Sklarevski-Philatolic Litorature of Russia. Reprinted from Rossica Journal. P. 34 WEEKLY PHILATELIC GOSSIP March 17, 1956. W. Edgar-London Chat-Machuria. P. 74 April 7, 1956. Front Page-Cover of Pleskau. Front Page April 14, 1956. F. Warner-Viva Mongolia. P. 218 May /5, 1956. W. Edgar-London Chat-Mongolia. P. 317 May 12, 1956. H. Jones-White and Rod Opera, Philatelic Story of Russian Opera. P. 353 June 30, 1956. F. Warner-Assignment: Azerbaijan. P. 574 WESTERN STAMP COIJUECTOR August 13, 1955. Soviet Propaganda Organs Foature Stamps Again. MEKEEL WEEKLY STAMP NE'S Outer Mongolia, Terra Incognita-Reprint from Scott-s Monthly Journal of December 1955. CHINA SECTION BULLETIN. CITY OF LONDON H1JLATELIC SOCIETY Docombor 1955. Mongolia-illustrations, notes on Mongolia display. P. 45 February 1956. Sir D. Rosoway-Sinkiang. P. 47 February 1956. W. H. Afdgey-Edgar.-The Postal & Airmail Routes of Manchuria, with a map of the routes. P. 62 GERMAN FHILATELIC REVIEW March 1955. E. Koiler-The Dionstpost Forerunners of the Ukraine 1941/42, profusely illustrated. P. 35 CORREO DEL ORINOCO VENEZTUELA " December 1955. E. M. Guerra-Sollos Moneda y Monedos-Sollo. P. 28 STMP COLLECTING ENGLA'DND July 8, 1955. A. Niven-Stamps of the Ukraine OUndorground Post"P. 535 December 30, 1955. Pall Mall Gasotto-Tho Crimean War Letters. P. 547 February 10, 1956. A. Nivon-Continental Clues "Why no Russians." P. 735. June 22, 1956. W. Kilroy-Antarctic Pioneering. P. 443 PHILATELY. ENGLAND. June 1956. E. Glasgow-The Post in Finland. P. 198 THE STAMP LOVER. ENGILND May 1956. M. Bojanowicz-Poland Number One. P. 190 THE HOLY LAND PHILATELIST September 1955. Birobijan. P : 284 58 #49/50 Page 58 INTERESTING CANCELLATIONS, ETC. by R. Sklarovski S"'STAMPS" for Decomber 6, 20, 27 1941 and January 3, 10, 17, 24 1942 published a complete story of "Rudolph Thomas Counterfeit Cancellations of Europe". It seems that Rudolph Thomas was very active in applying counterfeit cancellations on numerous stamps of various countries. P. 174 of Stamps (January 31, 1942) illustrates 39 examples, while P. 209 of Stamps ( February 7, 1942) illustrated 29 more. Russia did not escape his efforts, although due to unfamiliar characters his efforts in that direction wore very small. We have never came across any of Thomas's postmark counterfeits of Russia or any of the other countries. Wo wish to point out that in all instances the counterfeit cancellations were made with only one date. From the illustrations we can see that they are very crude. On Fig. 1 (St. Peters- burg), Fig. 2 (looks like a Russian cancellation), Fig. 3 (Moscow). ----------------- Fig. 4 illustrates a cancellation found on a cover addressed in Turkish & with #1l4a, Russian Offices in Turkey tied with "Port Trebizond Aug. 9 (no year date)" and also I'Konstant-Polsk Agency, April 13, 1873" both in blue. We also have a post card dated "17-9-16 Tientsin Russian Post" addressed to Peschanka. The Post Card has imprinted on it "To Prisoner of War" in Russian in black. (Fig. 5). Any information will be welcomed. --- ----------------- W. S. E. Stephen of Scotland & author have been having a lively correa- pondonce in reference to cancellations illustrated on Fig. 6 & 7. Fig. 6, which although shows only a part of the cancellation and which is on 1 kop. orange of 1884, of Russian Offices in Turkey, in black, is undoubtedly from Ordu. Similar cancellation illustrated on Fig. 7 is from Kerrasund. Fig. 8 illustrates the standard cancellation of Russian Company of Trade & Navigation, the initials of which .are shown at the top of the oval. Cane. 6 & 7 have 3 additional initials, namely "O.Z.D." Mr. Stephen states nIt is certainly cannot be a railway post office as neither place is serviced by railway and most certainly not during the years 1887-91. Possibly it may have some connection with a subsidiary of Russian Company of Trade and Navigation operating an iron works in the vicinity of either Korrasund or Ordu. Strangely enough the Ordu cancellation (Fig. 8) of this period is rather common on Lovant stamps considering the small size of the place. Can any one offer any suggestions as to what the last three top letters represent. " The last two letters uZ. D." on Russian cancellations represent the initials of the words "Zheloznaya Doroga" or Rail Road. Possibly in this case they have entirely different moaning. oooooooooooooo000ooo S#49/50 59 Page 59 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 45 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |