Title: Seymour Block
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00007762/00001
 Material Information
Title: Seymour Block
Series Title: Seymour Block
Physical Description: Book
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00007762
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.


This item has the following downloads:

GHS62 ( PDF )

Full Text

GHS 62
Interviewee: Seymour Block
Interviewer: L. Perry
Date: Unlisted

C: Your name is?

B: Seymour Stantin Block.

C: How old are you?

B: I am fifty-three.

C: What is your position at the University right now?

B: I am a professor of chemical engineering.

C: How long have you been living in Gainesville?

B: I have been living in Gainesville twenty-seven years.

C: Twenty-seven years, which would put it at 1944?

B: Yes.

C: Where were you living in Gainesville prior to coming here?

B: We lived at 629 Southwest Ninth Street.

C: Here in Gainesville?

B: Yes.

C: I am talking about prior to living in Gainesville.

B: Prior to living in Gainesville, I lived in Louisville, Kentucky.

C: Why did you move here?

B: I moved here because I got a job at the University. My parents had moved here.
My mother used to live here--not in Gainesville, but in Florida. It was a nice
place to live.

C: What was your position then back in 1944?

B: I was assistant professor.

C: Of what?

GHS 62
Page 2

B: Chemical engineering.

C: How large was the University then?

B: The University, when I came here, was right at the end of the war. We had only
700 students. That was not the usual size of the University. Prior to the war, it
was larger than that. During the war it was larger. Just at this time, the training
classes they had at the University had been cut out. So it was probably a low
point in the enrollment at the University.

C: Do you have any idea what it was prior to the war?

B: Yes, it was around 3,000.

C: You are involved in the ZPG. Is that correct?

B: That is correct.

C: What is your position?

B: I am currently a member of the National Board of Directors.

C: How long have you been in ZPG?

B: About three years. It is about the length of time that ZPG has been in existence.

C: That is when it started out right? Three years ago, what was the reaction at first
to a zero population move?

B: It was strange. People could not understand it, and some resented it. Most
people did not see the need for it.

C: How do you compare that to now?

B: I think it is quite well recognized today, particularly since both houses of the
Congress have a resolution before them sponsored by many senators and
representatives. One is a representative from Florida. [They want] to make
zero population growth a goal for the United States and the world.

C: When did you first start considering this? Had you thought about this prior to

B: Yes. I had read a book dealing with the subject of population and the
environment. It came out back in the early 1950s.

C: When did you start becoming not just concerned yourself, but involved in ecology

GHS 62
Page 3

and population control?

B: It went back about the time I started the ZPG.

C: About three years ago?

B: Yes.

C: Before that you were not involved?

B: I was involved in a different way. Not as a citizen, but I was involved
professionally. For example, I had a project for five years in which I was
concerned with taking waste materials--garbage, sewage stuff, and sawdust--and
trying to convert that to useful materials. In this case, I was trying to convert
them to mushrooms, and using it as a compost to grow mushrooms, which we
did quite successfully.

C: When was this project actually formed?

B: I started work on producing mushrooms from waste materials. Before I did that
from the garbage and sawdust, I did that from the citrus waste. I did that back in

C: Was this more an economic or an ecological project?

B: I think it was largely an economic problem rather than ecologic problems.

C: Was there any concern? Was it ecological at all, or was the majority of it for
economic reasons?

B: I think it was essentially for economic reasons. We had not awakened at that
time to the problem of the ecology.

C: How long was this project continued?

B: Five years. It was more than that. I started it about 1950, then I stopped for a
while. I would say that I worked on it for a period of ten years.

C: During the majority of this time it was for economic reasons?

B: Yes, that is right.

C: What was the earliest project that was more ecological than more economic?
Have there been any that you were involved in?

B: No. I am now in one that is strictly ecological. It was on the desulferization of

GHS 62
Page 4

coal. So that we could rule out air pollution from the coal. It was from the
sulferdioxide, which is the major pollutant of air. It was major in the sense that it
was not ecologically important, but because of health injury. It had certain
economic importance too. It was derived from coal, although we can get it also
from oil refinement. Most of it comes from coal, so that if it was eliminated from
the coal, it would reduce it in the air considerably.

C: When was this first started?

B: We started this in December. Of course you must understand my ability to work
on this project depended on not just my desire to work on it, but also my ability to
get governmental agencies to fund my work. In other words, to get money to be
able to do it. So while I may be interested in it and wrote the proposals some
time ago, it was only in December that the federal government was able to fund

C: Prior to your becoming involved in zero population growth and the environment
three years ago, did you attempt to get anything started at all?

B: No. ZPG was something that I actually did get started here at the University. I
started the population group before I had even heard of ZPG. Then when I
heard of ZPG, I joined them as a group. We were one of the first chapters to
join ZPG. They started in Connecticut and reached out to California. I did join
the Sierra Club, which is interesting. It is an organization for conservation of

C: You said there were not really any programs at the University involved in

B: No. There were programs involved in ecology. They were teaching ecology at
the University for many years. Ecology was a science. People were taught
ecology. It was not what they call the environment today, which is the
application of ecology to problems in civilization. It was ecology instead of
ecology of plants and relationships to how they live--plants and animals of the
forest. That is ecology. There are lots of things ecologists study. The
mushroom project back in the early 1950s was not ecology. He was a
mushroom expert who was interested in where the mushrooms grew, what time
of year they grew, and what were the other things that grew around them. That
was ecology of the mushrooms. What you are talking about is the problems of
the environment.

C: When was actually the first program or whatever at the University started?

B: It really is difficult for me to say. I do not doubt that people involved in various
problems as old as this University is. You might say there are ecology related

GHS 62
Page 5

problems. Anytime anybody would worry about where to put the garbage, that
was an ecology problem, you see--about what to do with it. When they had the
old garbage or refuse dump, they would burn the paper in an incinerator here on
the campus. They got rid of that because of the smoke. That was an
environmental problem. So I think what you are referring to is when was the
considered movement a popular movement. Is that right?

c: Yes. That is more or less what I mean. Is this just recent?

B: This is recent as far as I know. The formation of EAG, the Environmental Action
Group, ZPG, the Zero Population Growth, the natural conservation council, and
the Sierra Club chapter here at the University of Florida and in Gainesville are all
things that are recent vintageship within the last three years.

C: More or less the problem or popular things of the environment and zero
population growth are all recent.

B: That is true.

C: That is all I have to ask on that subject. I want to ask you a few questions about
Gainesville back when you first moved here. How large was the town then?

B: The town [size] was 20,000.

C: How does it compare to now as far as size, not just population-wise?

B: Do you mean the geographical area?

C: How were the areas built up now back then?

B: This area was pretty much wilderness. The golf course was there, but this was
country out here. West of here was all country. I live on Twenty-Ninth Street
and the corner of Newberry Road. East of town was pretty undeveloped out
towards Newnan's Lake. The area of Thirteenth Street was all undeveloped.
When you went up north of the University past Sixth Street it was undeveloped.
Out beyond Archer Road, there was a little bit of development, but not very

C: Were the majority of the people living in Gainesville then directly connected with
the University, or was there much business? Now there is a lot of commercial
business in Gainesville.

B: There was a lot of business not connected with the University at that time. The
University [population] was 3,000. The town total was 20,000. That is a small
percentage of the total population than it is today. The University is now 23,000

GHS 62
Page 6

and the town is 70,000.

C: How large was the faculty, or people employed by the University?

B: I do not know the number exactly. I believe it was something like 400 or 500.

C: Actually the University was not a major part of Gainesville. I mean as far as the
way the town was.

B: Yes, it was. It was where all the action was. It was a purposeful part of
Gainesville. Agriculture was important here. We had a_

C: Where is that?

B: We had a wood treating company. We treated coals and railroad tires. We had
a company that made charcoal and pine tree pistoletes and turpentine. We had
people that took the Spanish moss and made an air furniture tree. The box
company made wooden boxes.

C: Now the majority of the people directly connected with the University are in some
sort of a commercial business, some kind of store or something like this.

B: Which surprised the University.

C: What about then? Was the town more industrial than commercial and part of
the University?

B: I think it was pretty much the same. I think the University now has a bigger
share. Since the number of students are so much greater, the number of people
supplied to the University in one way or another is greater than it was before.
Agriculture played a bigger part in the development of the importance of the
economy of Gainesville percentage-wise.

C: I guess that is about all I have to ask. Thank you very much.

[End of the interview.]

University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs