Title: Horance G. "Buddy" Davis
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00006124/00001
 Material Information
Title: Horance G. "Buddy" Davis
Series Title: Horance G. "Buddy" Davis
Physical Description: Book
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00006124
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.


This item has the following downloads:

UF 198 ( PDF )

Table of Contents
        Page 1
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
Full Text


This Oral History is copyrighted by the Interviewee
and the Samuel Proctor Oral History Program on
behalf of the Board of Trustees of the University of

Copyright, 2005, University of Florida.
All rights, reserved.

This oral history may be used for research,
instruction, and private study under the provisions
of Fair Use. Fair Use is a provision of United States
Copyright Law (United States Code, Title 17, section
107) which allows limited use of copyrighted
materials under certain conditions.
Fair use limts the amount of material that may be

For all other permissions and requests, contact the
the University of Florida

Horance G. "Buddy" Davis, Jr. was interviewed by Jean Chance on January 27, 1992.

C: I thought we would talk about one phase of your career, specifically the period that

was highlighted by the announcement in 1971 that you were the winner of the Pulitzer

Prize, the most coveted prize in American journalism, in editorial writing. What was the

subject area, and how long had you been writing?

D: I started writing for the Gainesville Sun as a moonlighting proposition in the fall of

1962. I did not write extensively--that is, maybe three or four times a week--until 1967

when... my son was approaching the age of eighteen, the draft age, and the Vietnam War

was going on. Until that time I had written exclusively on local topics and on state topics. I

really did not feel very qualified to write about anything larger than that. So that inspired

me to begin writing more frequently.... So around 1967 I began to acquire a lot more

information and research materials from magazines, etc.... I would say from 1967 until I

ceased writing--editorials, that is--in 1985 or so, I probably wrote 98 percent of the


So the two factors that got me into extensive writing were the Vietnam [conflict], which I

was disturbed about, and having adequate facilities. I had to do all of this at home. I did

nothing at the University of Florida; [the University] had nothing to do with this. They [my

work with the University and with the Gainesville Sun] were two completely separate

operations altogether.

The issue that led to the awarding to the Pulitzer Prize was school integration. The

[U.S.] Supreme Court, of course, over a long period of time had been edging the South and

everybody into integrating the public schools. This had been going deplorably slowly.

-1 -

Gainesville and this area, Alachua County, was probably more advanced than most, in

fact, by permitting blacks, if they wished, to go to white schools.

But suddenly (I believe right before Christmas of 1969, if I remember correctly) the

courts ordered integration essentially over the Christmas holidays. [That] is what it

amounted to. It was a very short period. The Sun had supported this all along, so it was

not shocked or surprised, nor did it require any editorial change at all [when this occurred].

C: My recollection-- about 1963 and 1964--is that you used to write letters to the editor.

That early period, prior to 1963 and prior to your becoming an editorial writer, were you

not someone who sent letters to the Sun?

D: Absolutely. I irritated them very much with the letters... I criticized such things as

space spent [on frivolous stories]. A great deal of space [was allotted to trivial matters]....

During my long association with the Gainesville Sun we had periods of estrangement, and

I would quit. Since it was more of a hobby with me... than anything else, I could afford to

quit. I had a livelihood other than that. Unfortunately, I quit during the [Barry] Goldwater

campaign [for president in 1964]. I was very frustrated by that particular campaign, so I

wrote a complete series of letters. If I remember right, they were satirical. They pretended

to support Goldwater, but they really made it rough. They pointed out what would happen if

he were elected: we would be in war. I signed them Spartacus. Since Ed Johnson [editor,

Gainesville Sun, 1963-1985] and I had a relationship, and I had written editorials for him,

he permitted that pseudonym, which in later years would not be done. So we had a series

of camouflaged anti-Goldwater letters.... It reminded me a great deal of a college paper

prank more than anything else.


C: Now, after that period, 1963-1964, when racial tension was so great in this

community, can you describe events and what was happening? My recollection is that

there were sit-ins and efforts to desegregate the theaters and the restaurants, for


D: When the Cowles chain acquired the Sun and I started writing editorials, I... in effect,

reversed the editorial position--if they had one--on the race issue. That was in the fall of

1962 and then 1963. Well, that fallout was just amazing. I learned later that the

newspaper cancellations up in the north end of the county were just tremendous. But to

the credit of the Sun's management, they never said a word to me. I did not know that

there was such a negative reaction.

There was a great deal of local anguish. I remember a letter to the editor by the wife

of a very prominent local political figure. She wrote, "Mr. Pepper, what have you done to

us?" It was a very, very negative reaction. Knowing what I know now, you see, I would

have eased into it and accomplished the same thing in a year or two instead of overnight.

However, you should remember that the editorials in 1963 won two national awards:

they won the Sigma Delta Chi Distinguished Service Award and the Sidney Hillman Award,

which is a very prestigious national award. So we did this courageous thing. We lost

circulation and probably a lot of the readership. That probably was not a wise way to do it.

Let us put it that way....

C: Were there threats to the newspaper at that period?

D: I have a hard time placing the years, but we got slapped on both sides. The

segregationists on the right wing were always on our back, and then, of course, the radical

black movement moved in. They even had a publication called the Flaming Spear. They


did not think the Sun went far enough. I remember one group--Jomo, I think they called

themselves, from St. Petersburg or Tampa--said they were going to come up here with

baseball bats. I remember writing an editorial welcoming them, saying that we had the ball,

and that we would play ball with them.

But there were threats, yes. There was ...a time or two when I did worry about two

or three things. I went outside and put a lock on my fuel tank because I was afraid

somebody would put a match in it. You worry about those things maybe when you should

not worry, but the Sun was under attack by both sides. Of course, the black side tended to

be more violent. During some of the really bad times, like in 1968 with the Martin Luther

King slaying and all that, you did not know to whom to address editorials. When they are

burning the town down, you wonder, To whom do I write? An arsonist is not going to read

the paper. But then I said, "Well, if I can write something the black preachers would read in

the pulpit, maybe then I can reach them." You begin to think in terms like that in an effort to

reach an audience that will do some good.

C: You mentioned talking about who is going to read this [and] to whom do I address

this. When you sit down to write an editorial, a column or opinion piece, what goes through

your mind doing this kind of writing?

D: Well, the first thing you think is you want it read. That is something that I do not think

many editorial writers think much about, unfortunately. I was primarily concerned with

being read. Another thing you had to do is make up your mind. This business of either/or,

which is also a favorite device, [is just poor editorial practice]. What you try to do is look

down the road and say: "This thing is going to end up this way, or it should end up this

way, regardless of how radical it looks from where you sit now. This thing would end up in


this direction, so why not go ahead and make that jump rather than being pushed into

it.".... So you make up your mind and be decisive. Of course, this is what many people

objected to the Sun about: It was too dogmatic, too decisive, and did not make allowances

for everybody's thoughts and so forth. [Having that kind of foresight and] being read are

the two factors.

Another thing I believe in is thoroughly researching an editorial. I did not believe in

simply rewriting the news because I felt that the reader would be acquainted with that. And

I did not think they were interested in an anonymous opinion, oddly enough. I thought they

could be persuaded with a factual presentation. I probably put in more research on

editorials than anybody that you can imagine....I did it by reading obscure publications--I

mean, publications to which most people were not exposed--and, frankly, by stealing a

great many ideas from publications people had never heard of or knew nothing about. I

also kept extensive clippings....

C: Would you describe the climate of newspapers in terms of their opinion pages during

this time? How did the Sun fit in with newspapers of this day?

D: I was extremely disappointed with most papers. The Miami Herald I did not follow

very closely because we got an early edition. Papers like the Tampa Tribune, Florida

Times-Union, and the Orlando Sentinel were just totally behind the times. The only paper

in Florida as far as I was concerned that was really up on the times was the St. Petersburg

Times.... I think for the times those two papers, with possibly also the Daytona Beach

Journal, were the most progressive papers in Florida. Some of them were just absolutely

disgraceful. I forget the name of the old man who ran the Orlando Sentinel, but it was a

really, really bad newspaper. The editing and the cut lines were racist and anti-


intellectual. They were against colleges, against kids. ... That paper, of course, under the

University of Florida graduates, thankfully, has come many, many, many steps since then

and is a much better paper.

C: In the late1960s, how did the community react to this ultimate order by the Supreme

Court to desegregate?

D: The community did not want to integrate. I think we can say that. I remember reading

and using in an editorial a statement by a member of the school board in Dade County, I

think. He said: "When I was a kid I was bused past black schools. I do not see anything

wrong with busing kids to schools." I took quotes like that. Here was a white Southerner

who said there was nothing wrong with busing students. Busing was the key word, of

course. I took things like that and puffed them up in editorials to say, "Here is a

Southerner, raised in this milieu, a responsible official in a big county, and look at what he


We had bad role models like Claude Kirk [Jr., governor of Florida, 1967-1971]. On

the other hand, of course, Claude Kirk made a very, very great instrument for an editorialist

like me. When a guy wants to make a jackass out of himself and threaten to stand in doors

and push U.S. marshals out, when he pulls a George Wallace, you can really stay on him.

I remember Kirk visited the kids here [in Gainesville] one day. There were mistakes

made [in the local desegregation process]. We know there were mistakes. One of the

mistakes made here was the order to close Lincoln High. Lincoln High had a football team,

a band, with esprit [de corps], with everything that a high school needed. [It was] black.

[The order to close it was done with] the white assumption that white people would not

attend a black school, so school officials closed it. Well, the blacks started vandalizing their


school. They had a little riot or whatever, and there was a little tear gas down there. Kirk

was in town, and I wrote an editorial [in which I said I] was hoping he smelled it. It gave me

a way to get into this topic very well....

Somewhere pretty early in the 1960s, I think it was, the blacks began to agitate

primarily because they wanted to get into the theaters. We had a few pushes and shoves

down there where white people would be on the sidewalk trying to get through, and they

would give a black a shove into the gutter and one thing or another. It was pretty hot.

Active in this was a very sensible black leader, Charles Chestnut, the young Chestnut. He

is now on the [Alachua County] School Board. He was a leader of moderation, of

progressive, non-violent activity. I remember he was the first black I had ever come into

such close contact with since I was a boy. We had him speak to our professional society.

That sort of thing was unusual in those days, to have a black talk to a white group. Finally,

somebody got around to asking the crucial question: What do you want? [laughter] It had

not occurred to anybody before that time, see. So that made them [the blacks] think a little


They sat down and made up ten [demands]. They chose to call them demands,

which was probably a mistake. [There were] ten demands, and one of them was admission

to the theaters. So what? That was what the scrapping was over. Another was so

sensible: can we have a school crossing guard on 6th Street where all the black children

have to cross the street to go to school? That was one of the so-called demands.

Gainesville, in its wisdom, had never built a white swimming pool.... We had two

swimming facilities; one was Glen Springs, which was a private facility and you paid to get

in, and the other was a [city-built] black swimming pool over in east Gainesville. So the


blacks had a swimming pool; the whites did not. That is the whole story. So one of the ten

demands was to integrate the swimming pool, and I wrote an editorial saying, "Oh, the

blacks are going to give us a swimming pool!" [laughter] There were some things like that

which made it very, very interesting to be writing during that period.

C: Did you like to use satire and humor to make a point, and was that something that

you tried to build in to your editorials?

D: Yes. I was an admirer of Harry Golden, and I subscribed to the Carolina Israelite as

long as he published it. From the time I started teaching in 1954 until he folded that

publication I took the Carolina Israelite. He was a master at that sort of writing....

C: You have been interested in history and religion, dating back to your college days.

How do you think that colored your perspective, philosophically, as a writer?

D: I think the ethical message in the religion courses was valuable for providing a

perspective [for] getting out of the narrow provincialism of Christianity. After all, we were

exposed to Buddhism, Hinduism... and the whole bit. You realize that there are certain

parallels, certain ethical messages, that are common. That gives you sort of a

cosmopolitan feeling about religion.

[Regarding] history, I did rely a great deal upon my work as a reporter in state

government before I came here. Also, beyond history I felt like I had credentials to be

progressive on race and similar matters because I was a product of this area. Now, that is

not exactly history, but the fact that no one could accuse me of being an intruding northern

foreigner or whatever I thought gave me a little more credentials to write. Of course, I was

accused of being a Communist and everything else, but there was no validity to that....


C: When did you first realize that Ed Johnson (the editor of the Sun) or the

management of the Sun considered putting together a collection of your editorials for the

Pulitzer Prize?

D: I did not know that Ed had put this package together.... I do not know how many of them

[editorials] there were--seven or eight--but it was only a fragment of the editorials that dealt

with race. I do not think I even knew anything about it until Ed said something to the effect

that we had ... survived the preliminary judging, along with the Washington Post. When he

told me that, I said, "Well, we will not go any higher than that." [laughter] That is an honor.

That is pretty good. That is all I knew.

Then Ed called me some day in May and invited us to his house for drinks... and he

gave me a copy...of A History of Florida [by Charlton W. Tebeau], and Ed had written an

inscription in it about winning the prize. I did not tell anybody. I just could not believe it; I

guess I refused to believe that situation.

The next day, which was to be the announcement, he called in the morning and said

that I should come down there to the Sun, and I refused.... I said, "No, I am not going to go

down there and hang around and be embarrassed." Finally, he called me and said: "OK. It

is on the wire. You can come down." ... by the time I got down there they were already

drinking champagne out of paper cups and celebrating.... I accepted telephone calls from

the AP and I guess the UPI, but I did not accept any from broadcasting. [laughter] Not a


I think you should realize... that I was told that there was a petition circulating among

the faculty of the College of Journalism to rein me in. I do not know what it proposed. I do


not know whether it recommended [to] the dean that I be forced [to quit writing for the

Gainesville Sun]. I had obeyed all the rules, by the way. I filed the extra employment forms

and all that sort of business because I knew if anybody ever wanted [to], boy, they would

go after me. But I understand there was a petition going around to force me to quit

writing....So you can imagine, with this petition going around, the impact of the Pulitzer

Prize upon that group.[laughter] I understand the petition stopped dead in its tracks. I never

saw it, I did not know the approach, I did not know who signed it....

C: What other topics were subjects for your editorials?

D: [May 4,] 1970, remember, was [the killing of four students by National Guard troops

during a protest against the Vietnam War at] Kent State [University in Kent, Ohio]. Kent

State shocked me so much when it happened that I came in and wrote a hard-hitting

editorial. I made automatic assumptions. I automatically assumed that whoever put bullets

in those rifles would be hauled up, court martialed, piled in prison, or something. I

presumed that the soldiers would be discharged. I assumed all sorts of things because my

contact was with the students. I sided with the students. After all, I had defended Vietnam

demonstrations and that sort of thing, anyway....

C: How were your relations with President Stephen C. O'Connell [President of the

University of Florida, 1967-1973]?

D: I got along very well with O'Connell. I think O'Connell understood media, but he

was offended sometimes. I was offended by his continued membership in the Gainesville

Golf and Country Club, which was segregated, and [in my editorials] I did not let him forget

it. I was forced into that for another reason, too, in that the Gainesville Chamber of


Commerce was a member of that club, and public money was sent to the chamber to

promote the city--county money and city money. I said, "This does not make sense for the

city and the county to support an agency that belongs to a segregated club." Well, once

you take a position like that, then anybody that is a public figure and belongs to that club is

suspect, and he fell into that category. He dogmatically stated that he had a civil right to

belong to that club, which he did. But, of course, I made the point that from a public

relations standpoint it was atrocious. So I editorialized on that and stayed on his back.

You have to realize that on other occasions we defended him. I mean, he was

speaking on campus one time, and some kid jerked the cord of the microphone out. Well,

we deplored that sort of antic, so we were not above defending him, either. I think we

raised hell, though, about the arrest of sixty-six students in his office; we said, "This was

ridiculous." But then, of course, we applauded it when he would not sign a complaint or

whatever it was and let them out. They got off, anyway. [The reference is to a group of

black students who forced their way three times into President O'Connell's office with a list

of demands on May 20, 1971. The third time they were warned that their failure to depart

the office would result in arrest. Seventy-two people were arrested, including sixty-six UF

students. Since the demonstration was non-violent, the students opted for a two-quarter

probation instead of facing criminal charges....So it was a 50/50 proposition. We tried to

give him credit for what he did and knocked him around for what he did not do....

C: Can you describe any ways that you perceived that winning the Pulitzer Prize

changed you? Jack Harrison [Cowles Communication executive in charge of the

Gainesville Sun and other newspapers] predicted that winning the Pulitzer would change

your life.

-11 -

D: My response was not if I could help it. I had been exposed to the journalistic big

shots....Anyway, I have been exposed to these people, and some of them who had the big

heads just simply did not impress me at all. I knew that I could exploit this opportunity and

pole vault into some other university.... I had that kind of tentative offer-type situation.

People would tell me, "When you want to change, talk to me," that sort of thing, which I

never let go any further. But when you are fairly content where you are and you do not

have any money problems and you get along with everybody [you tend to want to stay put].

Also, there were two strong factors involved in this whole thing. One was that in

academia, which is really where I spent most of my time, you have intellectual leeway. If

anybody stomped on you, you stomped back. ... You literally had no boss. I had tenure,

for example, and I could not get fired without due process. You did not feel like you were

run over, and you could survive things, you could get back at people, and you had

independence. So that was a great relationship. I never really [considered leaving the

University].... I turned down jobs where I would be under one person and would have to

obey their edict. ...

The other thing was the relationship with the Sun. I would write 350 or 360 editorials

a year or more... and at the end of the year I would find three or four that did not get

printed. That is all!... And no one was telling me what to write. Very infrequently was

anybody telling me, "Do this," or, "Do that," or "Let us take this position," or whatever. That

was an intellectually free-wheeling situation. So why would I want to go to a new college

and break in somebody and start all over again?....


Then another thing is that you have to realize that this was a moonlighting job. I

started at $7.50 per editorial, and we would have a falling out and I would quit. Harrison

would take me back, and I would "jaw" him up (if that is a proper word) about $5.00 or

whatever. At the time I won the Pulitzer Prize I think the arrangement was--I do not know

why it worked out this way; it did not make much sense--that for the first fifteen editorials I

got $17.50 each, and for any over fifteen I would get $22.50. Another thing is that I never

spent any of that money. I invested it in stock, and as a result of that I have a hell of a lot of

stock right now. Anyway, I did not spend it at all.

Then shortly after I won the Pulitzer, the New York Times bought Cowles

Communications [properties, and with it] the Gainesville Sun.... [Arthur Ochs] "Punch"

Sulzberger [publisher and chairman of the New York Times Company] showed up, so we

had lunch with Punch Sulzberger. He told me at lunch, "I never bought a paper and won a

Pulitzer Prize at the same time,"...Anyway, as a result of that, he was so embarrassed, I

think, that he put me on the payroll for a salary....

C: How about the faculty and the administration--not just in the college, but starting with

the college and then throughout the University?

D: Well, what happened right away--Rae Weimer [dean emeritus, College of Journalism

and Communications] told me this--was that Steve O'Connell said: "We are making him a

distinguished alumni this year because he is not going to get it for any other reason. He

never is going to do anything else." [laughter] So they named me--not the college, now;

this was the whole University--a distinguished alumnus of the University. So I was proud of

that. That was nice, and I went up and got a little plaque for that....


C: After the Pulitzer Prize how did your writing change, if at all?

D: I do not think it changed. When I really felt cramped was [in 1985] when I quit writing

editorials and started writing [a] column. That took a change in pace that was tough for me.

And then there was a new management on the Sun that would not back me up. And the

minute you do not have backing ... I always said that Ed had the courage of my

convictions. Ed was a flack catcher. If he let it go by him, he stood up for it. The minute

we got a new publisher in there... and I did not get the backing that I felt I needed, things

went to pieces..... Whenever we got in a dispute with anybody, which as you know I run

that kind of a column, he took the other side. That was so alien to me that I could not take

it, which is why I quit writing.



University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs