<%BANNER%>
HIDE
 Front Cover
 Water control...


FGS



Water control vs. sea water intrustion ( FGS: Leaflet 5, 1966 )
CITATION SEARCH THUMBNAILS PDF VIEWER PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00001173/00001
 Material Information
Title: Water control vs. sea water intrustion ( FGS: Leaflet 5, 1966 )
Series Title: ( FGS: Leaflet 5, 1966 )
Physical Description: Book
Creator: Sherwood, C.B .
Grantham, R.G.
Publisher: Florida Geological Survey
Publication Date: 1966
 Subjects
Subjects / Keywords: Saltwater encroachment -- Florida
 Record Information
Source Institution: University of Florida
Rights Management:
The author dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law and all related or neighboring legal rights he or she had in the work, to the extent allowable by law.
Resource Identifier: notis - AAA0582
notis - AJW7430
System ID: UF00001173:00001

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:

UF00001173 ( PDF )


Table of Contents
    Front Cover
        Page i
    Water control...
        1
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
        Page 16
        Copyright
            Copyright
Full Text









VATER COAITROL
vs. /
SEA WATER


/
/


I TRUSI iA


LEAFLET NO. 5




STATE OF FLORIDA
STATE BOARD OF CONSERVATION
DIVISION OF GEOLOGY


FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Robert O. Vernon, Director









SECOND EDITION




LEAFLET NO. 5


WATER CONTROL VS. SEA-WATER
INTRUSION, BROWARD COUNTY,
FLORIDA

By
C. B. Sherwood and R. G. Grantham


Prepared by the
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
in cooperation with
BROWARD COUNTY
and the
FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TALLAHASSEE

1966



















PREFACE


Residents in coastal areas are aware of
the perpetual battle between man and the sea.
reports of beach erosion, destruction of pro-
erty, damage to ships, and loss of cargos are
bf common knowledge. However, one battle
between man and the sea is a silent struggle
that receives little publicity because it is
invisible and not spectacular. This invisible
struggle is waged to protect fresh-water sup-
plies in coastal areas from inroads by the sea.
This leaflet tells in general terms how the
problem of sea-water intrusion in the aquifer
in Broward County came about, what has been
done to control the intrusion, and what must
be done to conserve the fresh water and keep
he ocean where it belongs.
Although the leaflet deals specifically with
conditions in Broward County, the principles
described are valid in any coastal area having
a similar hydrology. For this reason, this leaf-
let is of interest to people living in other coas-
'al areas of Florida.







/766
WATER CONTROL VS. SEA-WATER
INTRUSION, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

By
C.B. Sherwood and R.G. Grantham

Broward County abounds in water--both
fresh and salt. With careful management, the
supply of fresh water is adequate for the present
and future needs of the area. The wealth of
salt water is a major asset--good for shipping
and recreation, such as swimming, boating,
and fishing. However, the ever present problem
is keeping salt water in its place. In fact, the
primary threat to the invaluable fresh-water
resources of the county is intrusion of.sea water
into coastal streams and into subsurface water-
bearing materials. Sea-water intrusion is a
silent menace. It can spread without raising
alarm; it can contaminate domestic wells and
destroy city water supplies; and it can kill!
crops arul render soils unusable for agriculture.
It not only can, but has. However, studies
indicate that with proper detection and control
measures, sea-water intrusion can be halted,!
and with time the sea water can be flushed out.
Broward County is underlain by the Bis-
cayne aquifer, a highly productive water-bearing
system of limestone, sandstone, and sand that
extends from land surface to depths of as much
as 200 feet near the coast. The aquifer yields
copious supplies of fresh water to municipal
well fields in the area, but the porous nature
of the materials exposed to the sea make it
also especially vulnerable to sea-water intru-
sion.
The inland extent of sea-water and salty-
water intrusion in Broward County in 1964 is
shown by red and pink shading on the map and
cross section below. Salty water as distin-
guished from sea water is a mixture of fresh
and sea water. The salty water body in the
aquifer is wedge-shaped, being thickest at the
coast, and thinning inland to an edge where it
underlies the fresh ground water at depths from
160 to 200 feet below the land surface.































Sea-water intrusion in Broward County in 1964 is
shown by pink shading. The salty water in the
tquifer is wedge shaped (see cross section), thick-
est at the coast aid thinning inland where it under-
lies fresh ground water at depths of 160 to 200 feet.
Greatest inland penetration is in the vicinity of
tidal canals.





Because sea water contains large amounts
of dissolved salts, it is slightly heavier than
fresh water. A 41-foot column of fresh water
is required to balance 40 feet of sea water.
Thus, sea water moves inland unless fresh-water
levels are appreciably higher than sea level.
In coastal streams and in porous subsurface
materials, there is a constant balancing between
the two. If fresh-water levels are high, sea water
is held near the coast. If fresh-water levels are
low, sea water moves up the tidal streams and
inland in the aquifer beneath the fresh ground
water. Theoretically, in a coastal aquifer, each
foot of fresh water above sea level would indi-
cate 40 feet-of fresh water below sea level.






HIGH FRESH-WATER LEVELS


Sea level-


LOW FRESH-WATER LEVELS


Se level -


Because sea water is heavier than fresh water i
tends to move inland unless balanced by high
fresh-water levels. When fresh water is abundant
stream flow and water levels are high and the sei
water is held near the coast. During drought, wheel
stream flow and fresh water levels are low, salt:
water moves up tidal streams and inland beneath
the fresh ground water.




Prior to drainage improvements in Broward
county the existing streams were shallow and
relatively ineffective as drainage channels.
Therefore, fresh-water levels were high and
little or no salt water intruded. In fact, old-time
residents reported flowing wells in salt-water
ays and inlets. Later, as deep, effective drain-
age canals were cut far inland to reduce flooding
of farms and urban areas, coastal water levels
were lowered greatly and salt-water intrusion
began almost unnoticed. In addition, the rapid


Sea water and fresh water in coastal area before
construction of canals.


The construction of uncontrolled tidal canals causes
sea-water intrusion in two ways: it lowers fresh-
,water levels, and it provides open channels to
convey sea water inland. The salt front in the aqui-
fer shifts inland adjacent to the new canal.






urbanization of the area brought an increased
demand for drainage and for coastal canals to
create attractive waterfront property. The de-
sirable aspects of these developments were
clearly apparent; the undesirable aspect--salt
intrusion--was difficult to detect until domestic,
industrial or irrigation supplies began to be
contaminated. Uncontrolled tidal canals influ-
enced the position of salt-fresh water contact
in two ways--they lower fresh ground-water
levels, thus reducing the opposition to inland
movement of salt water and they provide a
channel for sea water to move inland. The inland
penetration of the salt front in the New River
area of Fort Lauderdale was caused chiefly by
extensive construction of canals. Fortunately,
this type of intrusion can be corrected if a
salinity control structure is built near the coast
to raise the level of fresh water and to prevent
the upstream movement of salt water. Salinity
















Salinity control structures serve to hold sea water
out, prevent excessive drainage of fresh water, and
hold fresh-water levels high near the coast.


control structures have been constructed in
coastal reaches of all primary canals of the
Central and Southern Florida Flood Control
Project to combat sea-water intrusion and to
control water levels on an area-wide basis. In
the older canals the controls were located as
far seaward as the existing land use and marine
interests permitted--in the newer canals they
are placed very close to the coast.






























































































Salinity control structure S-37A on Cypress Creek

Canal (C-14) near Pompano Beach helps to prevent
the intrusion of sea water into the Fort Lauderdale

Prospect well field. When heavy rainfall occurs the

gates are opened to prevent flooding in the inland
areas. During dry periods the gates are closed to

conserve fresh water.


1?~
43;
~-`;rit'~sI
....
=-~r-
I .
'~~:
-I .

t
L'3~~r
Ll~l~r


i\;l
i






Ip~i
i '~--_--I
.1
,.. ~p-
'P
~~";lc^~L~':

~s~ac~sr-;~.: Q1
IleC' -- i:





In Broward County the inland movement of
the salt front is accelerated by the lowering of
fresh-water levels near the coast as a result of
large withdrawals of ground water. When esta-
blished, the municipal well fields generally
were located an appreciable distance inland.
However, the westward expansion of urbaniza-
tion necessitated drainage of larger areas by
canals which in many instances passed within
the area where ground-water levels were being
























An uncontrolled canal that extends into an area
of heavy pumpagc can convey salt water inland to
contamii nate frush water supplies.

lowered by well fields. In an area of heavy
pumpage the ground-water flow is toward the
well field, thus the combined effects of the
canal and the pumpage can induce salt water
to move into the well field. In contrast, a con-
trolled canal can provide a perennial source of
fresh water to replenish the well field and to
prevent salt intrusion by bringing in additional
fresh water from outside the area. Water-control
structures as correction measures are presently
being constructed in some critical areas where
municipal supplies are threatened.























In contrast a controlled canal can provide a peren-
nial source of fresh water to prevent salt-water intru-
sion and to replenish the well field by bringing in
fresh water from outside the area.



The map sequence below shows successive
adjustments to the salt front pattern, which have
occurred since 1941 in response to canal con-
struction, large scale pumping, and salinity
control works in the Middle River Prospect
well field area, near Fort Lauderdale.
In the early 1940's pumpage of ground
water was negligible and existing streams were
shallow and drained very little water; conse-
quently, fresh-water levels were high and salt-
water intrusion was confined to areas adjacent
to natural tidal channels. By the mid 1950's the
primary canals had been constructed, the Pros-
pect well field had been established, and exca-
vation of an extensive secondary canal system
by land developers was underway. Coastal
water levels were being lowered and a very
significant inland adjustment of the salt-front
pattern resulted.
In 1963 the effects of the construction of
the canal and control which integrated Cypress
Creek into the flood control system are shown.
Although pumpage had increased threefold,
ground-water levels remained high and the salt
front was essentially stabilized in the area
north of the well field. In contrast, south of the










1941









S0





EXPLANATION 0ou
CANAL AMO TROL 01T LAUDI[OALE
MUNICIPAL SUPPLY WILL


In 1941, prior to canal construction, fresh-water
levels were high and sea-water intrusion was con-
fined to areas adjacent to natural tidal channels.


1956


EXPLANATION
CAI AL AiD CONTROL O
MUNOICIAL SUPPLY WRLL




By 1956 the primary canals had been constructed,
the Prospect well field had been established, and
the excavation of an extensive system of secondary
drainage canals was underway. Coastal water levels
had been lowered excessively and the salt front
had moved appreciably inland.
































he canal and control which connected Cypress
reek into the flood-control system tended to sta-
ilize the salt front in that area despite a three-
old increase in pumpage. In contrast, the uncon-
rolled reach of the North Fork of the Middle River
)crmitted the salt front to move inland into the
well field.


I-- c^ -_ _.. __ _... PO..MPAN.

FUITTU E


PROSPECT WELL FIELD
30 MOG O
*


Predicted effects of a proposed fresh-water feeder
canal and salinity control designed to halt sea-water
intrusion and furnish fresh-water replenishment to
the Prospect well field.





well field the salt front adjacent to the tidal
portion of the North Fork of the Middle River
moved steadily inland into the well field. The
feeder canal shown in the fourth map has beer
proposed to provide higher fresh-water levels
for the control of salt intrusion and for recharge
to the well-field area.
Although the salinity-control structures in
major canals have retarded intrusion in some
areas, the rapidly increasing urbanization and
water use create an urgent need for legislation
to provide salinity control area wide. During
1963, the increased threat to ground-watei
supplies, accentuated by the contamination of
a major well field, resulted in legislation to
prevent the construction of additional salt-water
canals and to require salinity control structures
where needed in existing canals.
Expansion of the secondary drainage sys-
tem and increased water use to keep pace with
continued rapid development of coastal Broward
County will lower water levels and will increase
the danger of salt intrusion in the future. By the
year 2000 water use for municipal. supplies,
alone is predicted to exceed one-half billion:
gallons per day or more than ten times th,
present use. IHydrologic studies indicate tha
these water needs can be met by preventing
the construction of new avenues for salt intru
sion and by making the maximum use of th
regional water-management system (see below).
The primary water-control system of the
Central and Southern Florida Flood Control
District is designed to alleviate the effects of
both flood and drought. This is accomplished
by draining a part of the flood waters to the
sea and storing a part in conservation areas
for release during droughts. This system, sup-
plemented by a controlled secondary drainage
network and by proper water-management can
provide the solution to Broward County's salt-
intrusion problem and can assure the county o
a long-term water supply.
The hydrologic data which made possible
the long-term delineation and monitoring of the
salt front were collected in cooperation with
the City of Fort Lauderdale. The collection of
additional data in northern Broward County was



























MIAMI


'ho Central and Southern Florida Flood Control
Project is designed to alleviate the effects of both
flood and drought on a regional basis. This is accom-
plished by draining a part of flood waters to the
sea and storing the remainder in conservation areas
for releases during droughts. This system, when
supplemented by a network of controlled secondary
drainage canals, can provide control of sea-water
intrusion and assure a long-term water supply for
Broward County.

begun in 1960 in cooperation with the City of
Pompano Beach and in 1963 with the City of
Doerfield Beach.
The cooperative investigation of the water
resources of Broward County by the U.S. Geolo-
gical Survey includes several salinity and hydro-
logic studies designed to aid in detecting and
countering salt intrusion. Among these are: (1)
a continuing program of water level and salinity
data for observation wells and sampling points
on canals to monitor the movement of salt in
the aquifer and canals; (2) a test drilling pro-
gram to determine the extent of intrusion in the
aquifer; (3) electrical analog model studies to
lotermine the effects of proposed changes in
no canal system and increase in pumpage; and






(4) hydrologic studies to determine .the watei
levels required at salinity controls in canals
and the amount of fresh water flow required in
canals to stop salt intrusion.
The results of these cooperative studies
will be published by the Florida Geological
Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey. Reports
and data are currently available from the U. S.
Geological Survey, 51 S.W. First Avenue, Miami,
Florida. Further information on the mechanics
of salt intrusion in the southeastern coastal
area of Florida may be found in the references
listed below.








REFERENCES


Cooper, H.H., Jr.
1964 (and Kohout, F.A., Henry, H.R., and
Glover, R.E.) Sea water in coastal aqui-
fers: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply
Paper 1613-C.

Klein, Howard
1957 Interim report on salt-water encroachment
in Dade County, Florida: Fla. Geol. Sur-
vey Inf. Circ. 9.

ohout, F.A.
1960 Flow pattern of fresh water and salt
water in the Biscayne aquifer of the
Miami area, Florida: Internat. Assoc.
Sci. Hydro., no. 52.

1961 A case history of salt-water encroach-
ment caused by a storm sewer in the
Miami area, Florida: Am. Water Works
Assoc. Jour., v. 53, no. 11.

Parker, G.G.
1955 (and others) Water resources of south-
eastern Florida, with special reference
to the geology and ground water of the
Miami area: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-
Supply Paper 1255.

Sherwood, C.B.
1959 Ground-water resources of the Oakland
Park area of eastern Broward County,
Florida: Fla. Geol. Survey Rept. of Inv.
20.

1963 (and Klein, Howard) Use of analog plotter
in water-control problems: National Water
Well Assoc., Ground Water Journal, v.
1, no. 1.

Tarver, G.R.
1964 Hydrology of the Biscayne aquifer in
the Pompano Beach area, Broward County,
Florida: Fla. Geol. Survey Rept. of Inv.
36.

Vorhis, R.C.
1948 Geology and ground water of the Fort
Lauderdale area, Florida: Fla. Geol.
Survey Rept. of Inv. 6.










FLRD GEOLOSk ( IC SUfRiW


COPYRIGHT NOTICE
[year of publication as printed] Florida Geological Survey [source text]


The Florida Geological Survey holds all rights to the source text of
this electronic resource on behalf of the State of Florida. The
Florida Geological Survey shall be considered the copyright holder
for the text of this publication.

Under the Statutes of the State of Florida (FS 257.05; 257.105, and
377.075), the Florida Geologic Survey (Tallahassee, FL), publisher of
the Florida Geologic Survey, as a division of state government,
makes its documents public (i.e., published) and extends to the
state's official agencies and libraries, including the University of
Florida's Smathers Libraries, rights of reproduction.

The Florida Geological Survey has made its publications available to
the University of Florida, on behalf of the State University System of
Florida, for the purpose of digitization and Internet distribution.

The Florida Geological Survey reserves all rights to its publications.
All uses, excluding those made under "fair use" provisions of U.S.
copyright legislation (U.S. Code, Title 17, Section 107), are
restricted. Contact the Florida Geological Survey for additional
information and permissions.