|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Mineral industry of Florida... |
CITATION
SEARCH
THUMBNAILS
PDF VIEWER
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mineral industry of Florida 1981
Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Copyright Copyright |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Mineral Industry of Florida This chapter has been prepared under a Memorandum of Understanding between the Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of the Interior, and the Florida Bureau of Geology for collecting information on all nonfuel minerals. By James R. Boyle1 and Charles W. Hendry, Jr.2 The value of nonfuel mineral production in 1981 in Florida was $1.7 billion, an increase of $216.3 million over that of 1980. Florida ranked fourth nationally in total value of nonfuel minerals produced, and nonmetals accounted for over 95% of the value of the State's mineral output. The State ranked first in the production of phosphate rock and was second in crushed stone, fuller's earth, masonry cement, and peat. Staurolite and zircon concentrates were produced only in Florida. Principal nonmetals, in order of value, were phos- phate rock, stone, cement, clays, and sand and gravel. Of the 53.6 million tons of phosphate rock produced in the United States, Florida was the predominant producer and for the 88th consecutive year supplied more than any other State. Florida and North Carolina supplied 86.3% of the domestic phosphate rock output; Florida supplied most of the exports. Table 1.-Nonfuel mineral production in Florida' 1980 1981 Mineral Q tity Value Value Quantity (thousands) Quantity (thousands) Cement: Masonry -----___________ thousand short tons._ 285 $22,074 288 $20,757 Portland ------------_--------- do.--._ 3,574 182,590 3,518 199,064 Clays -------- ---____---------_____ do---- 614 224,164 731 235,319 Gem stones------ -________ --------------- NA 5 NA 6 Lime_____________________ thousand short tons_- 195 12,434 191 11,343 Peat-------------______________do--_ 154 2,398 157 2,885 Sand and gravel------------------------ do-.._ r '14,412 r .28,766 P14,149 32,719 Stone(crushed) ---- ------ _____do--.. 66,209 215,972 65,067 226,192 Combined value of clays (kaolin), magnesium compounds, phos- phate rock, rareearth concentrate, sand and gravel ,industrial, 1980), staurolite, titanium concentrates (ilmenite and rutile), and zircon concentrates --------------. ---------XX rl,020,855 XX 1,197,304 Total ---- -- ----________ XX rl,509,258 XX 1,725,589 "Preliminary. rRevised. NA Not available. XXNot applicable. 'Production as measured by mine shipments, sales, or marketable production (including consumption by producers). 'Excludes kaolin; value included with "Combined value" figure. SExcludes industrial sand; value included with "Combined value" figure. MINERALS YEARBOOK, 1981 In 1981, Florida fared better economically than the Nation as a whole. Although residential construction and road mainte- nance programs decreased late in the year, nonresidential construction increased. The effect on individual mineral producers de- pended on the construction market sup- plied, with output mixed throughout the industry. Road maintenance programs decreased because of reduced Federal input. Alexander Grant & Co., a Chicago-based accounting firm, conducted a study, in coop- eration with the Conference of State Manu- facturers' Association, on the general man- ufacturing business climateof the 48 con- tiguous States. The study concluded that in 1981, Florida had the best overall business climate for manufacturing among the 48 States. Florida ranked 12th in 1979 and 8th in 1980. Table 2.-Value of nonfuel mineral production in Florida, by county' a(housands) County 1979 1980 Minerals produced in 1980 in order of value Alachua --_____-______ Bay--------------... Brevard ------______ Brward-_-___________ Calhoun-___-____-___ Charlotte _------______ Citrus---------- __ Clay --------________ Collier -------------_ Dde -_--.-__ _______ Beambbia -- ______ crdeden---_-_---____- Gldes -_____________ rManatee -_. - Gll an ---__________ n -___________ Jackson ---__-_______ Eake---_-----------______ -nd--_,__._________ La* --_--___________- ILA----------------- Lem ---------------- Im -W -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Manatme- -------------- Mearin ---__---___ __ iJNas ---_____-_____ Okalooms ------------- Palmsoic -------- Pco---_________-------------___ Ptolk ---------------- Palolta. -- -- -- -- --- Taiylo---____--___-- Walton ----------____ uist ributd ---_-_-__ _ $2,789 1,040 W 20,607 52 6,002 26,526 6,236 W 605 W W W W W W W W W 620 W W W 2,846 W 12,772 2.447 W 36 64 W W 676298 w W W W W 2.787 W 507884 $4,391 1,021 W 28,587 46 717 7,594 27,858 8,339 W 617 20,339 W w W W 534 W W W W W W W 3,985 W W 4,020 17 58 6,319 3,437 784,741 W W W W 777 3922 W Stone. Sand and gravel. Clays, stone, sand and gravel. Stone, sand and gravel. Sand and gravel. Stone. Stone, phosphate rock. Titanium, nrconium, staurolite, sand and gravel, clays, monazite. Stone. Cement, stone, sand and gravel. Sand and graveL Clays, sand and gravel. Sand and graveL Magnesium compounds, lime. Phospate rock. Stone. Cement, stone, lime, cays. Peat. Phosphate rock, cement, stone, peat Stone. Sand and gravel, peat, cays. Stone, sand and gravel. Sand and gravel. Stone. Cement, stone. Stone, days, phosphate rock. Stone. Sand and gravel. Do. Stone. Do. Phosphate rock, sand and gravel, peat, stone. Sand and gravel, days, peat. Sand and graveL stone. Do. Lime, stone. Stone. Do. Sand and gravel. 1,69,607 W Withhe avoid dicloin company prprietary dats; inuded with "UndistrOxited." ,r hoiwiouatiam sw hot ed beams no nonfal munelProdeio wa reported: Baker. Bradforid, Columbia, gSs zs. DFg r' Fr &raGDtB9obuRt e IJfdiaron lafyette, Liberty Madison, Maian. Do 9M SL a Pl a ,S a RaM Seminole, Union. Voluia, Wakulla and Washington chaigm e tom m and vat s indicated by y bl W. *D my not add to totals shown because of independent rounding Total ----...__.______ THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF FLORIDA 3 Table 3.-Indicators of Florida business activity 1980 1981 Change, percent Employment and labor force, annual average: Total civilian labor force -------------- thousands- 3,980.0 4,134.8 +3.9 Unemployment----- ------------------ do 199.0 300.9 +51.2 Employment (nonagricultural) Minin---- -------------------------------do--- 11.0 11.2 +1.8 Manufacturing ------- ------------------ ------ do---- 456.4 466.4 +2.2 Contract construction ------------------------------ doa--- 263.9 282.5 +7.0 Transportation and public utilities ---------------------do-. 220.8 228.6 +3.5 Wholesale and retail trade --------------------------do.---- 939.8 983.0 +4.6 Finance, insurance, realestate -----------------------do-- 254.2 271.9 +7.0 Services ----- ---------------------------do 811.3 863.4 +6.4 Government -----------------------------------do--. 618.8 614.6 -.7 Total nonagricultural employment -------------------do _- 3,576.2 23,721.7 +4.1 Personal income: Total ------- ------ ---------------- millionsa- $88,693 $102,333 +15.4 Percapita -----. -------.. -- ---------- ---- $8,993 $10,050 +11.8 Construction activity: Number of private and public residential units authorized --------------- 174,451 149,241 -14.5 Value of nonresidential construction --------.------------- millionsa- $2,199.0 $2,930.3 +33.3 Value of State road contract awards -------------------- --- do-- $316.0 $416.0 +31.6 Shipments of portland and masonry cement to and within the State thousand short tons-- 5,820 5,724 -1.6 Nonfuel mineral production value: Total crude mineral value -------------------------- millions- $1,509.3 $1,725.6 +14.3 Value percapita, resident population---------------------------- $155 $177 +14.2 Value per square mile -------- ------------------------ $25,764 $29,467 +14.4 PPreliminary. 'Includes oil and gas extraction. 2Data do not add to total shown because of independent rounding. Sources U.S. Department of Commerce, US. Department of Labor, Highway and Heavy Construction Magazine, and U.S. Bureau of Mines. 3.000 O' Q 2.000 .J -J 0 Z TOTAL d 1,000 o -- I_ I 1977 1980 1985 Figure 1.-Total value of nonfuel mineral production in Florida. __ _. ~ ___ __ MINERALS YEARBOOK, 1981 Trends and Developments.-The Port of Tampa, which handled over 45 million tons of cargo in 1981, shipped the major portion of exported phosphate. Phosphate rock and processed phosphate exports totaled 13 mil- lion tons, down from 16 million tons in 1980. These exports included 9 million tons of bulk phosphate, down from 12 million tons in 1980. Phosphate accounted for about 90% of all export cargo through the Port of Tampa. A new market in bagged phosphate chemicals developed in China, and nearly one-half million tons was exported through the port to that market. About 750,000 tons of aragonite was imported from the Baha- mas for use in the manufacture of cement, down from 1.2 million tons in 1980. In contrast, Port Manatee's phosphate exports increased when Beker Industries opened its new mine, with plans to export 1 million tons per year through the facility. Shipments from Beker were expected to increase up to 3 million tons per year in the next several years, according to the compa- ny. Texasgulf, Inc., started operations at its new $8 million sulfur terminal on Hooker's Point in Tampa. The terminal, on a 10-acre site leased from the Tampa Port Authority, can store 60,000 tons of liquid sulfur. The terminal is supplied by tankers from sulfur mines in Texas and Mexico.3 Occidental Petroleum Corp. (Oxy) resum- ed shipments of superphosphoric acid to the Soviet Union after the trade embargo was lifted in April. The original agreement called for Oxy to ship 1 million tons per year of superphosphoric acid to the Soviet Union in exchange for urea, potash, and anhydrous ammonia. The 20-year agree- ment would be worth about $20 billion. Plans called for Oxy to ship 72,000 tons per month for the balance of 1981. The Nation- al Safety Council awarded Oxy's White Springs Mine first place in safety for achiev- ing the lowest accident incident rate among member companies. Second place went to Oxy's Suwannee River Mine. Legiiation and Government Pro- grams.-Tne Florida Coastal Management Program was approved by the U.S. Depart- ment of Commerce Office of Coastal Zone Management in September 1981. The entire State and its territorial waters were includ- ed within the Coastal Zone Boundary. The Florida Coastal Management Program is based on existing State laws. Twenty-five statutes specifically serve as the authorities for a direct State control management tech- nique with the Department of Environ- mental Regulation as the designated State agency. Major first-year work projects in- clude hazard mitigation planning, port dredging and soil disposal, and technical assistance for areas designated as areas of critical State concern. The Florida phosphate industry impacted economically within the State and national- ly. The U.S. Bureau of Mines released a study in 1981 (IC 8850, "Economic Signifi- cance of the Florida Phosphate Industry") on the impact. The study assessed the eco- nomic significance of the Florida phosphate industry to selected counties in Florida, the State of Florida, and the Nation; it also included a brief survey of the industry's international impact. Based on forecasts of Florida phosphate production in 1981, and using constant 1977 dollars, estimates were given for 1981 for regional and national output, the value of this output, income, and employment created by the phosphate industry in Florida. Federal, State, and county tax revenues generated by the State's phosphate industry were also esti- mated for 1981. The concentrated impact of the phosphate industry on certain areas of Florida and on the State's regional indus- tries was examined using economic base analysis complimented by an industrial complex approach. The industry's impact at the State and national levels was examined through input-output analysis. In addition, an attempt to forecast for 1990 the effects of constraints on phosphate rock mining as a result of economic condi- tions and other factors was included as an appendix to the report. Also discussed was the phosphate industry's importance to the U.S. balance of trade; U.S. agricultural production, including forward linkages; the U.S. sulfur industry; and the phosphate industry's importance to the production of fluorine and uranium byproducts from fer- tilizer manufacturing. Other U.S. Bureau of Mines publications on phosphate included RI 8576, "Fluorine and Uranium in Phosphate Rock Processing and Waste Materials"; RI 8609, "Benefi- ciation of High-Magnesium Phosphate from Southern Florida"; and RI 8611, "Large- Scale Dewatering of Phosphate Clay Waste from Central Florida." The Bureau, in association with Agrico Chemical Co., initiated tests of borehole mining of deep phosphate ore in St. Johns County. The tests were made to determine if deep phosphate ores in St. Johns County could be mined economically and in an THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF FLORIDA environmentally compatible manner. Agri- co plans to start additional borehole mining experiments in 1983. Since 1972, the Bureau's Tuscaloosa Re- search Center has been involved in projects to eliminate holding ponds of phosphate waste slimes or develop an improved de- watering system. In-house Bureau project activity during the year included reseVrch on water recovery from phosphate clay slimes, continuous flocculation dewatering and floc formation studies, and reuse and purification of low-quality water for proc- essing. Research continued on devising new or improved beneficiation methods applica- ble to high-magnesium phosphate deposits. The Bureau reported that the apparent consumption of industrial explosives and blasting agents in the State in quarrying and nonmetal mining was 23.2 million pounds in 1981. Of that total, the top two types, water gels and slurries and other high explosives, accounted for 87% of the explosives used. During the year, the Florida Bureau of Geology completed six geologic projects in the State. Thirteen other projects were underway on stratigraphy, lithostratigra- phy, and geomorphology of specific forma- tions and in geographic areas; mineral de- posits, such as peat and dolomite, were also investigated. In addition, the Bureau of Geology maintained a geologic well log library and a computerized list of mineral producers and statistics. Six publications were issued during the year, including RI 91, "The Hawthorn Formation of Central Florida," and several publications in the map series were also issued. The Bureau of Geology, also involved in mined land recla- mation, developed a Master Reclamation Plan, proposed Chapter 16C-17, Florida Ad- ministrative Code, addressing lands mined or disturbed by the severance of phosphate prior to July 1, 1975. The plan, scheduled for adoption in 1982, provides procedures to reclaim approximately 86,000 acres of dis- turbed land. The Florida Institute of Phosphate Re- search funded six major projects during the year. The funded projects were a Virginia Polytechnic Institute study of a clay separa- tion process ($49,622), a University of South Florida investigation on the utilization of waste gypsum to produce cement ($26,857), and a National Council on Radiation Pro- tection and Measurements study of radia- tion exposure ($34,080). Three projects were with the U.S. Bureau of Mines: (1) a compre- hensive evaluation of slime treatment and storage methods ($269,000), (2) the develop- ment of techniques for utilization of high- magnesia phosphate ore ($12,000), and (3) the production of 12,000 ceramic tiles from phosphate slimes and fly ash to be tested at the Institute's new headquarter's sidewalks in Bartow ($5,000). The U.S. Geological Survey studies in- clude the geology, geochemistry, and re- sources of peat; geochemistry and hydro- chemistry of marine sediments, mineral resources, and ground water systems; re- search in geophysical data interpretation off southern Florida; and environmental geologic studies of the west Florida conti- nental shelf. REVIEW BY NONFUEL MINERAL COMMODITIES NONMETALS Cement.-Shipments of both portland and masonry cement remained at about the same level as those of 1980; portland cement shipments decreased slightly, while those of masonry cement increased slightly. Produc- tion of masonry cement in Florida ranked second nationally, while portland cement production ranked sixth. Four companies produced portland cement at five plants; masonry cement was also produced at five plants. A fifth company operated a grinding plant to produce portland cement from imported clinker. Most of the shipments of both portland and masonry cement were to users within the State; Florida was a net importer of cement, with about 1 million tons being imported. Portland cement ship- ments, mainly in bulk form, were made by truck and rail. Principal consumers were ready-mix concrete dealers, highway con- tractors, building material dealers, and con- crete products manufacturers, with the re- mainder being consumed by other contrac- tors and government agencies. Most raw materials used to manufacture cement were mined within the State and included limestone, clay, sand, and stauro- lite; the use of staurolite is diminishing because of higher value uses. Oilitic arago- nite imported from the Bahamas was used as well as small amounts of gypsum, clink- er, fly ash, clay, iron ore, and slag; most MINERALS YEARBOOK, 1981 were obtained from out-of-State sources. Eleven rotary kilns were operated at five plants. Of the 11. 10 were wet process, and 1 was dry process. About 447 million kilowatt- hours of electrical energy, in addition to natural gas, fuel oil, and coal, were consum- ed in the manufacture of cement. Moore McCormack Resources, Inc., con- tinued its $6W million expansion program at the Brooksville plant. The expansion in- cludes a second coal-fired kiln and enlarged grinding and storage capabilities, which, when operational in 1982, would double cement output to 1.2 million tons annually. The company also purchased two cement plants in Tennessee from Penn Dixie Indus- tries. Inc. Lonestar Florida Pennsuco, Inc., installed ai new finish mill and increased storage capacity at the 1.2-million-ton-per-year ce- ment plant at Hialeah. Conversion to coal at its wet-process plant was also completed. Clays.-Clays mined in Florida included common clay, fuller's earth, and kaolin. Total clay production and value increased I 17.0)0 tons and $11.2 million, respectively. Common clay output and value increased: Common clay was produced by four compa- nies at four pits in Clay, Gadsden, Hernan- do. and Lake Counties in the northern part of the State. The clay was used in the manufacture of cement and lightweight ag- gregaite. Florida continued to rank second in the Nation in fuller's earth production, with production increasing. Fuller's earth was mined by four producers from nine pits in Brevard. Gadsden, and Marion Counties. Main end uses were for pet waste and oil and grease absorbents, and in fertilizers, pesticides. and saltwater drilling muds. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corp. completed an expansion of its processing plant at Quincy. New facilities were installed for clay extrusion, bagging, dust collection, and pneumatic bulk loading. Kaolin was produced by one company at two pits in Putnam County; production increased slightly from that of 1980. A coproduct was silica, which was recovered for glass and other industrial uses. Princi- pal uses for kaolin were in electrical porce- lain, whiteware. and wall tile; major mar- kets were in the Southeast. rino.-Fe.-Fluorine in the form of fluo- silicic acid was recovered at six plants as a byproduct of wet-process phosphoric acid manufacture. Fluosilicic acid was used to produce cryolite, aluminum fluoride, sodi- um silicofluoride, and was also used in water fluoridation. Gypsum.-Imported gypsum was calcined at two plants in Duval County and one plant in Hillsborough County. United States Gypsum Co., Jim Walter Corp., and National Gypsum Co. calcined gypsum in kettles, a rotary kiln, and a holoflite unit, respectively, prior to wallboard manufac- ture. Production in 1981 remained at the 1980 level, with value decreasing. Florida gypsum wallboard was marketed primarily in south Georgia and Florida. Byproduct gypsum was recovered by Occidental Petro- leum Corp. at its plant in Hamilton County; output remained at about the 1980 level. Lime.-Both quicklime and dehydrated lime were produced in Florida. Quicklime was produced by Basic Magnesia, Inc., Gulf County; Chemical Lime, Inc., Hernando County; and Dixie Lime & Stone Co., Sum- ter County. Hydrated lime was also pro- duced by Chemical Lime, Inc. Production and value decreased 2.1% and 8.8%, respec- tively, from those of 1980. Lime was used for magnesia, water treatment, and sewage dis- posal systems. Magnesia.-Florida ranked second na- tionally in the recovery of magnesium com- pounds from seawater. Basic Magnesia, Inc., Port St. Joe, Gulf County, produced caustic calcined magnesia and refractory-grade magnesia from seawater; plant capacity is 100,000 tons of MgO equivalent. Shipments in 1981 increased 6.9%; value increased 17.7% over that of 1980. Peat.-Florida ranked second nationally in peat production in 1981. Production in- creased slightly, while unit value increased nearly 18%. Eight plants produced moss, reed-sedge, and humus peat from five coun- ties. Most of the peat, shipped in bulk, was used for general soil improvement and for potting soils. Perlite (Expanded).-Four companies produced expanded perlite from crude ore shipped into the State. Production decreas- ed to 29,900 tons, while value increased to $3.9 million. Perlite was expanded at plants in Broward, Duval, Escambia, and Indian River Counties and was used for construc- tion aggregate, horticultural purposes, insu- lation, and fillers. Phosphate Rock.-Florida ranked first in the Nation in the production of phosphate rock. Marketable production of phosphate rock in 1981 decreased slightly in quantity, but increased 17.6% in value. The phos- THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF FLORIDA phate industry continued to be the principal mineral industry in the State. Phosphate production decreased gradual- ly throughout the year. Inventories increas- ed, resulting in reduced operating levels and temporary closure of some mines and plants. By yearend, mining output was re- portedly at 47% of capacity, with chemical plants at about 59% capacity. Decreased demand and large inventories of processed phosphates resulted in prices frequently below stated production costs. The drop in sales of about 20% was attributed to high interest rates and low crop prices. Adequate phosphorus levels in the soil permitted deferments of applications. Exports, report- ed to be off as much as 3 to 4 million tons, were down because of increased competition and the strength of the U.S. dollar. In spite of reduced demand and increased invento- ries, reported expansions underway or planned for completion by 1985 exceeds $2 billion, with expenditures in 1981 approach- ing $600 million. Environmental con- straints and the low demand for phosphates may cause delays in meeting planned sched- ules. The Florida Phosphate Council estimated that about $78.5 million was collected in severance taxes from phosphate producers during the year. The $1.67-per-ton rate was to increase to $1.84 per ton in 1982. Discus- sions continued over returning a portion of severance taxes to the producing counties; at present, all monies go to the State treasury. Soft-rock phosphate was produced by four companies in 1981, operating five mines in Citrus and Marion Counties. The soft-rock phosphate was used for direct application to the soil and, if low in fluorine, as an animal food supplement. Land-pebble phosphate was produced at 21 mines by 12 companies in Hamilton, lIardee, Hillsborough, Manatee, and Polk Counties. In 1981, agricultural uses ac- counted for 75%; industrial, 1%; and ex- ports, 24%. Normal superphosphate, triple superphosphate, wet-process phosphoric ncid, and defluorinated phosphate rock were produced for agricultural uses. Indus- trial chemicals were produced from the production of elemental phosphorus. AMAX Phosphate, Inc., had its first full year of operations after purchasing the mining operations and phosphate reserves of Borden, Inc., in mid-1980. The company had one active mine, the Big Four Mine, in southeast Hillsborough County, with plans to expand capacity from 1.6 to 2.5 million tons per year by early 1982. Also planned for DeSoto County was a 4-million-ton-per- year mine near Pine Level. To guarantee environmental protection, county officials levied a tax to be used in developing a review procedure. AMAX will spend over $3 million at its Plant City defluorination plant to control fugitive dust. Wet scrubbers were also to be redesigned for improved efficiency. Beker Phosphate, Inc., started operating its Wingate Creek Mine and beneficiating plant late in the year, with two floating dredges removing overburden and matrix. Capacity should increase to 1 million tons per year, with output shipped through the company's new facilities at Port Manatee to the company's fertilizer plant in Louisiana. Manatee County officials questioned compa- ny transportation modes when they used trucks instead of rail to move the phosphate to the port. By yearend, negotiations were underway to settle the dispute. The C. F. Industries, Inc., proposed mine in Hardee County would require a Natural Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. The mine's capacity was to be 2 million tons per year for the first 4 years, possibly increasing to 4 million tons per year. Construction of the company's second phosphate plant in Hardee County contin- ued, with completion of the 2-million-ton- per-year facility expected by 1984. Estech, Inc., continued to plan develop- ment of its proposed 3-million-ton-per-year Duette Mine in Manatee County. In an effort to ensure no damage to the area's main water supply near the minesite, coun- ty officials adopted the toughest phosphate restrictions in the State and denied permit approval. The Governor and Cabinet agreed to granting of the permits, but the action was challenged in the courts by Manatee County officials. The court upheld the State's decision, and negotiations between county and company officials began. In Polk County, Estech began mining phosphate rock that was previously buried under slime ponds. By dewatering the ponds, about 3.5 to 4 million tons of phosphate will be recovered, extending the life of the mine nearly 2 years. Farmland Industries, Inc., continued ef- forts to develop its first mining operation in Hardee County; the company presently op- erates a chemical plant near Bartow. Jacobs Engineering Group was awarded a contract for engineering and design work for the MINERALS YEARBOOK, 1981 proposed mine and beneficiation plant En- gineering and design work was scheduled for completion by mid-1982, with plant startup for late 1983. The facility's capacity was rated at 2 million tons per year. W. R Grace & Co. continued construction and participated in two joint ventures; one with International Minerals & Chemical Corp. (IMC) in the Four Corners Mine and beneficiation plant, and the other with U.S.S. Agri-Chemicals, Inc. (USSAC), in a chemical complex. The Four Corners Mine is a $615 million investment to produce 5 million tons of phosphate per year. The mine, located in Hardee, Hillsborough, Manatee, and Polk Counties, was scheduled to start operating in 1983. The other project involves a $200 million phosphoric acid plant at Fort Meade, with completion sched- uled for July 1982. IMC, the world's largest private producer of phosphate and phosphate chemical prod- ucts. completed construction of its New Wales sulfuric acid plant in Polk County. Through the venture with W. R. Grace and purchase of other properties, IMC reported an increase in reserves by an estimated 270 million tons of phosphate rock. The new IMC 61-yard dragline, the largest in the area, began mining at the company's Clear Spring Mine. IMC, with funding by the Florida Institute of Phosphate Research, is working with the other phosphate compa- nies on a process to reduce the number of phosphate slime ponds. The experiment calls for pumping thickened clay, stored in a centralized slime pond for 6 months, to mining sites The clays would be topped with overburden. The objective is to restore the mining site and reduce the need for large storage areas. Early in the year, IMC signed an agreement to ship 360,000 tons of phosphate rock per year by unit train to Canada. Approximately 58 unit trains would be required each year. Mobil Chemical Co. proceeded with the permitting process to develop the South Fort Meade Mine scheduled for operation in 1984. The 3-million-ton-per-year mine will replace Mobil's Fort Meade Mine, scheduled to close in 1988. Mobil plans to construct a new phosphate rock terminal in Tampa. The terminal would have loading and un- loading facilities, a storage area, and berthing facilities for large ore carriers. The facility was scheduled to be operational in 1984. USSAC and W. R. Grace started con- structing a new phosphoric acid plant at Fort Meade. Completion and startup was scheduled for July 1982. The planned $24 million expansion of the company's Rock- land Mine has been deferred because of reduced market demands. Sand and Gravel.-To reduce reporting burdens and costs, the Bureau of Mines implemented new canvassing procedures for its surveys of sand and gravel producers. Beginning with the collection of 1981 pro- duction data, the survey of construction sand and gravel producers will be conducted for even-numbered years only; the survey of industrial sand and gravel producers will continue to be conducted annually. There- fore, this chapter contains only preliminary estimates for construction sand and gravel production but contains complete data on industrial sand and gravel. The preliminary estimates for production of construction sand and gravel for odd-numbered years will be revised and finalized the following year. Total sand and gravel production decreas- ed from that of 1980. The Florida Rock Industries, Inc., sand plant at Keuka was refurbished, and a new sand plant in Marion County went onstream during the year. Table 4.-Florida: Sand and gravel sold or used by producers 1980 1981 Quantity Value Value Quantity Value Value thousandd (thou- per (thousand (thou- per shorttons) sands) son short ton) sands) ton Construction Sand.. ..----.. --. ....- ____. r13,253 r$26,174 $1.97 NA NA NA Gravel. ------------------------ -_ 1,159 2.592 2.24 NA NA NA Totalor serage ---... -------.----. 14,41 r28,766 1.99 '13,800 '$28,800 P$2.05 Industrial Man ---d---..-- --. ---------._ W W r6.82 349 4,419 12.66 Grandtotal or average ........_ .._ W W r2.27 P14,149 32,719 P2.31 Preliminary. 'Rvis.d. NA Not available. W Withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data. THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF FLORIDA Staurollte.-Florida was the only State with a recorded production of staurolite. Staurolite was recovered as a byproduct of ilmenite processing at the Highland and Trail Ridge plants of E. I. duPont de Ne- imours & Co. and the Green Coves Springs plant of Associated Minerals (USA) Ltd., both in Clay County. Although production and total value decreased, unit value in- creased. Staurolite was mainly used in sandblasting, with minor amounts used in cement and as foundry sand. Stone.-Florida ranked second in the Na- tion in crushed stone production, which included limestone, marl, and oyster shell. Output dropped slightly, but unit value increased. Stone was produced by 88 companies at 131 quarries in 25 counties. The three lead- ing counties were Dade, Broward, and Her- nando, which supplied 70.1% of the State's total production. Thirteen companies pro- duced over 1 million tons each from 28 quarries and accounted for 67% of the production and 72% of the value. Crushed stone was transported mainly by truck and railroad and was used for dense- graded road base, concrete and bituminous aggregate, and cement manufacture. Six companies processed oyster shell for road- bed material. Companies supplying crushed stone throughout the State often utilized a dedicated train concept for markets over 60 miles distant, The Florida Rock Industries, Inc., mod- ernization and expansion program at the Gulf Hammock plant was completed during the year, with capacity tripling to 450 tons per hour of finished product. Table 5.-Florida: Crushed stone' sold or used by producers, by use (Thousand short tons and thousand dollars) Use 1980 1981 Quantity Value Quantity Value Agricultural limestone.----......---------.------ 1,729 8,299 1,264 7,064 Agricultural marl and other ell conditioners ------------ 115 632 136 840 Poultry grit and mineral food-... .------- -------- 497 3,064 W 2,748 Concreteaggregate--------------- ---..--.----- 14,583 57,691 15,168 65,208 Bituminous aggregate ------------- --- ---------- 4,604 17,010 8,465 14,565 Donse-graded ad base stone---------------------- 16,497 40,326 15,485 42,605 Surface-treatment aggregate .--------------------- 3,708 14,716 2,482 11,586 Other construction aggregate and road stone ------------ 12,164 32,946 18,088 37,739 Riprap and jetty stone ---- ----- ------------- 59 398 256 687 Filter stone ------- --- -------------------- W W 189 850 Manufactured fine aggregate (stone sand) -------------- 5,813 23,134 4,498 17,909 Cement manufacture------- -------------------- --- 2,337 5,615 2,432 7,816 Lime manufacture ------------------------ ---------- 449 1.120 387 1,062 Ahalt filler ----------------------- --- ------- 20 221 26 264 Oer fillers-------------------------------- 184 1,288 191 1,447 FilL.------------ -----------------------. 2,288 5,068 5,539 13,334 Glans manufacture -------- ------------------- 20 191 21 214 Other' -------- --------------- ----------- 1,140 4,257 490 304 Total------------------.--------..---..-- 66,209 215,972 65,067 226,192 W Withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data; included with "Other." 'Includes limestone, shell, and marl. 'Includes stone used for macadam aggregate, railroad ballast (1980), whiting or whiting substitute (1981), and other uses not specified (1981). Dsata may not add to totals shown because of independent rounding. Sulfur.-Florida ranked fifth in the Na- tion in the production of byproduct elemen- tal sulfur. Recovered sulfur from Exxon's natural gas desulfurization plants in Santa Rosa County decreased in 1981 compared with that of 1980. Vermiculite (Exfoliated).-Exfoliated vermiculite was produced by two operators at four plants in Broward, Duval, and Hills- borough Counties from crude ore shipped into the State. Production increased slightly over that of 1980, while unit value increased 19.6%. Principal uses were for concrete aggregate, horticulture, and insulation. MINERAL YEARBOOK, 1981 METALS Mineral Sands.-Du Pont and Associated Minerals (an Australian-based company) produced concentrates from their heavy mineral operations in Clay County. In 1980, Asociated Minerals acquired the Titani- um Enterpris operation at Green Cove Spring Since then, Associated Minerals has been modifying the operation to in- crease efficiency and capacity. Changes have been made in the dredging sequence, and wet mill facilities. Rutile shipments increased, while ilmen- ite shipments decrease Rare-Earth Mineras-Associated Min- erals produced monazite concentrates as a byproduct from its operations in Clay Coun- ty. Florida was the only domestic producer of rare earth from mineraL sands mining.1 Production and value increased substantial- ly over that of 1980. Titanium Concentrates.- Du Pont and Associated Minerals; in Clay County, pro duced titanium concentrates for use in tita. nium dioxide pigment manufacture. Zircon.-Production and value of zircor concentrates from Du Pont and Associatet Minerals, both in Clay County, increased i 1981. Florida was the only producer o zircon concentrates in the United States. 'State Liaison Officer, Bureau of Mine, Tuscaloosa, Alai 2State geologist, Florida Bureau of Geology, Tallahasseel Fla. AChemical Week. Mar. 18,1981, p. 25. Table 6.-Principal producers Commodity and company Address Type of activity County Cement General Portland. Inc ----- Lonetar Florida Pennuco. Inc Moore McCormack Besourmes, In. Binker Portland Cement Corp __ ard ~minerals Chemical Mid- Fa Minin- __-___- Pennsylvania Glaa Sand Corp Gypsum (calcinedk Jim Walter Corp - National Gypsum Co ___ United State Gypsum Co --- Limew Basic Magnesia Inc ------ Chemical Lime. Inc _----- Dixie Lime & Stone Co.1 ---- Basic MagnpiaInc -------- Peat F. E.Stearn Peat -_--- Peace River Pat Co ------- Superior Peat & Soil ----_. AiritPoceaing 9 Corp of Armstumng Cork ___Co _ ChemBGckCorp -------- W. R. Graue & Co . 12700 Park Central Place Suite 2100 Dallas TX 75251 Box 2035 PVS Hialeah, FL 33012 Box 23965 Tam FL 33622 Bax 650679 Miami, FL 33165 Menlo Park Edison NJ 08817 Box 68-F Lowell FL 32663 Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 _ Box 135 Jacksonville, FL 32226 4100 First Intl. Bldg. Dallas TX 75270 101 South Wacker Dr. Chicago, IL 60606 Box 160 Port St. Joe, FL 32456 Box 317 Leeburg.FL 32748 Drawer 217 Sumterville, FL 33585 Box 160 Port St. Joe, FL 32456 Route 1, Box 542D Dover, FL 33527 Box 1192 Bartow.FL33830 Box 1688 Sebrin, FL 33870 Route 2, Box 740 Vero Beach, FL 32960 Box 1991 Pensacola, FL 32589 End oOsage Street Nashville. TN 37208 62 Whittemore Ave. Cambridge, MA 02140 See Inotoes at end of table. Plants ------- Plant------ ---do ---- --- do ------ Open pit mines and lant. ---do ----- Plant ------ ----do---- ---do ---- ----do------ ---do ---- - o---- ---do ---- Bog --- Bog---- Bog---- Plant------ ---do----- ---do---- ----do----_ Dade and Hillsborough. Dade. Hernando. Dade. Brevard. Marion. Gadaden. DuvaL Hillsborough. Duval. Gulf. Hernando. Sumter. Gulf. Hillsborough. Polk. Highlands. Indian River. Escambia. Duval Broward. THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF FLORIDA Table 6.-Principal producers -Continued Commodity and company Address Type of activity County Phosphate rock: Agrico Chemical Co -- -- AMAX Phosphate, Inc ----- Beker Phosphate, Inc ------ Brewster Phosphates ------- C. F. Industries, Inc ------- Estech, Inc-----_-___ Gardinier, Inc---- ------ International Minerals & Chemical Corp. Mobil Chemical Co. Occidental Petroleum Corp -- - U.S. Agri-Chemicals, Inc --__ W. R. Grace & Co---------- Sand and gravel: Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Shands & Baker. General Development Corp - E. R. Jahna Industries, Inc., Ortona Sand Co. Div. Silver Sand Co. of Clermont Inc _ Staurolite: Associated Minerals (USA) Ltd., Inc. E I. duPont de Nemours & Co - Stone: Florida Crushed Stone Co ---- Florida Rock Industries, Inc -- Lone Star Florida, Inc ------ Rinker Southeastern Materials, Inc. Vulcan Materials Co------ . titanium concentrates: Associated Minerals (USA) Ltd., Inc. E I. duPont de Nemours & Co _ Box 3166 Tulsa, OK 74101 402 South Kentucky Ave. Lakeland, FL 33801 Box 9034 Bradenton, FL 33506 Bradley, FL 33835 _- __- _ Box 790 Plant City, FL 33566 Box 208 Bartow, FL 33830 Box 3269 Tampa, FL 33601 Box 867 Bartow, FL 38830 Box 311 Nichols, FL 33863 White Springs, FL 32096 ---- Box 867 Fort Meade, FL 33841 Box 471 Bartow, FL 33830 744 Riverside Ave. Jacksonville, FL 32201 1111 South Bayshore Dr. Miami, FL 33131 First & East Tillman Lake Wales, Fl 33853 Route 1, Box US 1 Clermont, FL 32711 Green Cove Springs, FL 32043 - DuPont Bldg. D-10084 Wilmington, DE 19898 Box 317 Leesburg, FL 32748 Box 4467 Jacksonville, FL 32201 Box 6097 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33310 Box 2634 Hialeah, FL 33012 Box 7324-A Birmingham, AL 35223 Green Cove Springs, FL 32043 DuPont Bldg. D-10084 Wilmington, DE 19898 Open pit mines and plants. Open pit mine and plant ---do ---- --- do---- --- do --- Open pit mines _ Open pit mine and plant Open pit mines _ ---o--- --- do ----- Open pit mine __ Open pit mine and plant Pits -----. ---do ----- ----do--- Pit -------- Mine and plant _ Mines and plants- Quarries ----- --do ------ Quarry -__-_- Quarries ----- ----do ----- Mine and plant- - Mines and plants- Polk. Hillsborough. Manatee. Hillaborough and Polk. Hardee. Polk. Do. Do. Do. Hamilton. Polk. Do. Clay, Glades, Lake, Lee, Marion, Polk, Putnam St Lucie and Sarasota. Glades, Lake, Hendry, Polk. Lake. Clay. Do. Hernando, Sumter, Taylor. Collier, Hernando, Lee, Levy, St. Lucie. Dade. Do. Broward and Dade. Clay. Do. 'Also stone. 2Also exfoliated vermiculite. SAlso elemental phosphorus. Sandie Ray, Sec FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BUREAU OF GEOLOGYf C. W. Hendry, Jr., Chief S. R. Windham, Assistant Chief retary Richard Seymore, S OIL AND GAS SECTION L. David Curry, Administrator Clarence Babcock, Engineer Gwen Manning, Clerk-Typist Robert Caughey, Geologist Charles Tootle, Engineer Cynthia Gordon, Geologist Jean Wehrmeyer, Secretary Joan Gruber, Secretary RECLAMATION REGULATION W. Ross McWilliams, Administrator Sus:e Coleman, Admin. Asst. Amber Mahaffey, Secretary Greg Daugherty, Environ. Super. Jack Merriam, Biologist Lee Edmiston, Engineer Spec. Harry Neel, Geologist Bruce Greenwood, Geologist Lou Neuman, Forester Randy Holcomb, Secretary Joan Ragland, Geologist Zoe Kulakowski, Geologist Lee Sherwood, Environ. Super. Jackle Lloyd, Geologist Wesley Wimmer, Engineer RECLAMATION RESEARCH J. William Yon, Administrator Mondell Beach, Environ. Spec. GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS SECTION Walter Schmidt, Administrator Albert Applegate, Geologist Ronald Hoenstine, Geologist E. W. Bishop, Geologist Julia Jones, Secretary Paulette Bond, Geologist Thomas Scott, Geologist Kenneth Campbell, Geologist TECHNICAL SUPPORT Ed Lane, Administrator Mary Ann Cleveland, Librarian James P. Jones, Draftsman Jessie Hawkins, Custodial Earl Maxwell, Statistician Justin Hodges, Engineer SImnie Murphy, Pressman Richard Howard, Sample Prep. Albert Phillips, Engineer Pauline Hurst, Draftsman Steve Spencer, Geologist Dorothy Janson, Iliustrator secretary FLRD GEOLOSk ( IC SUfRiW COPYRIGHT NOTICE [year of publication as printed] Florida Geological Survey [source text] The Florida Geological Survey holds all rights to the source text of this electronic resource on behalf of the State of Florida. The Florida Geological Survey shall be considered the copyright holder for the text of this publication. Under the Statutes of the State of Florida (FS 257.05; 257.105, and 377.075), the Florida Geologic Survey (Tallahassee, FL), publisher of the Florida Geologic Survey, as a division of state government, makes its documents public (i.e., published) and extends to the state's official agencies and libraries, including the University of Florida's Smathers Libraries, rights of reproduction. The Florida Geological Survey has made its publications available to the University of Florida, on behalf of the State University System of Florida, for the purpose of digitization and Internet distribution. The Florida Geological Survey reserves all rights to its publications. All uses, excluding those made under "fair use" provisions of U.S. copyright legislation (U.S. Code, Title 17, Section 107), are restricted. Contact the Florida Geological Survey for additional information and permissions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 58 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |