|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Copyright | |
| Title Page | |
| Table of Contents | |
| Abstract and introduction | |
| Public supply | |
| Irrigation | |
| Self-supplied industrial water... | |
| Thermoelectric power | |
| Consumptive use | |
| Summary of all uses | |
| Trends in water use, 1950-70 | |
| Selected references |
CITATION
SEARCH
THUMBNAILS
PDF VIEWER
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Downloads | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright
Copyright Title Page Title Page 1 Title Page 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Table of Contents 2 Abstract and introduction Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Public supply Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Irrigation Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Self-supplied industrial water... Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Thermoelectric power Page 20 Page 21 Consumptive use Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Summary of all uses Page 25 Page 26 Trends in water use, 1950-70 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Selected references Page 30 Page 31 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FLRD GEOLIOWC( ICA SURflViEWY~ COPYRIGHT NOTICE [year of publication as printed] Florida Geological Survey [source text] The Florida Geological Survey holds all rights to the source text of this electronic resource on behalf of the State of Florida. The Florida Geological Survey shall be considered the copyright holder for the text of this publication. Under the Statutes of the State of Florida (FS 257.05; 257.105, and 377.075), the Florida Geologic Survey (Tallahassee, FL), publisher of the Florida Geologic Survey, as a division of state government, makes its documents public (i.e., published) and extends to the state's official agencies and libraries, including the University of Florida's Smathers Libraries, rights of reproduction. The Florida Geological Survey has made its publications available to the University of Florida, on behalf of the State University System of Florida, for the purpose of digitization and Internet distribution. The Florida Geological Survey reserves all rights to its publications. All uses, excluding those made under "fair use" provisions of U.S. copyright legislation (U.S. Code, Title 17, Section 107), are restricted. Contact the Florida Geological Survey for additional information and permissions. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Randolph Hodges, Executive Director DIVISION OF INTERIOR RESOURCES R. 0. Vernon, Director BUREAU OF GEOLOGY C. W. Hendry, Jr., Chief Information Circular No. 83 ESTIMATED USE OF WATER IN FLORIDA, 1970 By R. W..Pride Prepared by the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY in cooperation with BUREAU OF GEOLOGY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and other state, local, and federal agencies Tallahassee, Florida 1973 F63S~iM roi F3 CONTENTS Page Abstract ................... .. ................. .. ........... 1 Introduction . . . .................... ........... . 1 Previous investigations .......................... .............. 3 Present investigation ........... . . . .......... . 3 Acknowledgments .. ...... .... .. .. . ............ 4 Terminology ... ..... ...... .. .... . ........... . 4 Public Supply ....... ...................... .... ........... . 5 Source and reliability of data ................ .................... 5 W ater withdrawn ............................................ 6 Consum ptive use ................................. ........... 6 Irrigation ................ .. ..... .......... .............. 8 Source and reliability of data ............. ......... ............. 8 W ater withdrawn ................. ..... .......... ........... 10 Consum ptive use ............................................ 12 Self-supplied industrial water, excluding thermoelectric power use .............. 16 Source and reliability of data ................................... 16 Water withdrawn ................ ..... .......... ............ 16 Consum ptive use ........... .................. ........... 16 Thermoelectric power ........................................... 20 Source and reliability of data ................... ................. 20 W ater withdrawn ............................ .. ............ 20 Consumptive use ............ ................ ................. 22 Rural supply .............. ...... ... ..... ................... 22 Domestic use ................. ... ............. ............ 23 Livestock ........... ............... ..... ..... ........... 25 Sum mary of all uses ............................................ 25 Trends in water use, 1950-70 .................. ................... 27 Selected references .................. ...... ...... ............. 30 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Approximate Water Resources Council subareas in Florida delineated along county boundaries ............................... .............. 2 2. Water withdrawn for public supplies by counties in Florida, 1970 ........... 9 3. Water withdrawn for irrigation (including conveyance losses) by counties in Florida, 1970 ...... ..................................... 15 4. Self-supplied industrial fresh-water withdrawals (excluding thermoelectric power use) by counties in Florida, 1970 .................................. 19 5. Water withdrawn for thermoelectric power by counties in Florida, 1970 ....... 23 6. Trends in population and withdrawals of water in Florida, 1950-70 .......... 29 TABLES Table Page 1. Hydraulic equivalents ......................................... 5 2. Water used for public supplies, by counties in Water Resources Council subregions in Florida, 1970 ............................................ 7 3. Irrigated crop acreage in Florida, 1970 ............................. 11 4. Annual rate of water application for selected crops, 1970 ................. 13 5. Water used for irrigation, by counties in Water Resources Council subregions in Florida. 1970 .............. . . . . . . . . 13 6. Self-supplied water for industrial use, by counties in Water Resources Council subregions in Florida, 1970 ..................................... 17 7. Water used for thermoelectric power, by counties in Water Resources Council subregions in Florida, 1970 ..................................... 21 8. Water for rural usu oy Water Resources Council subregions in Florida, 1970 ..... 24 9. Summary of estimated water withdrawal and consumption by Water Resource Council subregions in Florida, 1970 ......... .................. 26 10. Population and estimated water use in Florida, 1950-70 .................. 28 ESTIMATED USE OF WATER IN FLORIDA, 1970 By R. W. Pride ABSTRACT Estimates of water use in Florida for 1970 indicate that about 15,300 mgd (million gallons per day) was withdrawn for all purposes, including public supply, rural domestic and livestock, irrigation, and industrial (including thermoelectric power). About 9,500 mgd of the total use was saline water withdrawn from bays and estuaries. The remainder, or 5,800 mgd, was fresh water, withdrawn in nearly equal quantities from surface and ground sources. Most of the saline water was used for thermoelectric power generation. The average per capital use of all water in 1970 was 2,250 gpd (gallons per day) an increase from 332 gpd in 1950. Considering fresh water only, the average per capital use was 849 gpd in 1970. The quantity of water consumed-that is, water made unavailable for further possible withdrawal because of evaporation, incorporation into products and crops, and other causes-was estimated to be 1,930 mgd in 1970, most of which was fresh water. The quantity consumed was about one third of the total fresh water withdrawn from the source. The largest use of fresh water in Florida in 1970 was for irrigation, 2,070 mgd. The counties in southern Florida, comprising Water Resources Council subregion 0309, used 75 percent of all water used for irrigation. The second largest use of fresh water was by industry, other than thermoelectric power plants, which required 926 mgd of self-supplied water and 166 mgd from public supply systems. The third largest use was for public supplies, 884 mgd. INTRODUCTION The basic amounts of water in Florida remain relatively unchanged while population growth and urban and industrial development continue to put increased demands on the available supply. For this reason it is important to gather basic data showing quantitatively the present water requirements of the various major users. Periodic assessments of withdrawal from available water sources not only show the changes in volume of water used but also indicate trends in use. Planning for the future necessitates that estimates be made of future water requirements based on assessments of past usage. Water-use data include both the purpose for which the water is used and the quantities used for each purpose; each type of use has a different effect on the BUREAU OF GEOLOGY available supply and on the remaining supply. Water used for irrigation, for example, is subject to pollution by pesticides and fertilizers, and a large part of the water withdrawn is evaporated and transpired. Water used by industry commonly picks up pollutants of various types depending on the product produced, but. in general, only a small amount of water is consumed-that is, removed more or less permanently from the local supply. Water-use data for this report are presented by principal use and by source for each of the 67 counties in Florida and by Water Resources Council subregions or parts of subregions in Florida. See figure I for subregion delineation. The major categories of water use for which data are given are for public supply, rural domestic and livestock supply, irrigation, and self-supplied industry, including thermoelectric power generation. Nonwithdrawal uses, which include hydroelectric power generation, navigation, water-based recreation, propagation of fish and wildlife, and dilution and conveyance of sewage and other liquid and solid wastes are not tabulated in this report. 0314'' 0 I 1 3 _ Figure 1. Approximate Water Resources Council subareas in Florida delin- eated along county boundaries eated along county boundaries INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS Compilations of water-use data from readily available sources were started on a -nationwide basis in 1950 by the U. S. Geological Survey. These compilations have been continued at 5-year intervals, and the results for 1950, 1955, 1960, 1965, and 1970 are contained in reports by MacKichan (1951, 1957); MacKichan and Kammerer (1961); Murray (1968); and Murray and Reeves (1972). These reports contain estimates of water use by categories for each state but contain no information for smaller subareas, such as counties. In 1956 the Florida Water Resources Study Commission compiled water-use data by counties and by categories of use as part of their report to the Governor of Florida and the 1957 Legislature. That report represents the earliest documentation of water use on a county-by-county basis in Florida, A water-use inventory of southwest Florida was made in 1962 by the Florida Division of Water Resources and published in their report on land and water resources (1966). Water-use data for northeast Florida for 1965 were compiled by Snell and Anderson (1970) and were given also in the water and related land resources report of the St. Johns River basin by the Florida Department of Natural Resources (1970). The 1965 water-use data for Florida were published in a map report, (Pride, 1970). Additional water-use data on public supplies of selected municipalities for 1970 are given in a report by Healy (1972). PRESENT INVESTIGATION This report was prepared to document the results of the 1970 water-use survey made by the U. S. Geological Survey as part of the Statewide cooperative program with the Bureau of Geology, Florida Department of Natural Resources, and as part of programs with the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District, the Southwest Florida Water Management District, and with other state, local, and federal agencies. The report presents estimates, based on data from many sources, of the amount of water diverted and consumed in Florida, by categories of water use. Water use is reported by counties and by Water Resources Council subregions for the following categories: public supplies, rural domestic and livestock, irrigation, and self-supplied industrial (including thermoelectric power produc- tion). (Thermoelectric power is electrical energy generated in steam-electric plants including those that use nuclear fuel.) Source of the water (ground and surface) is given as determined by the Geological Survey. BUREAU OF GEOLOGY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The assistance of municipal water department officials; county agricultural agents; plant, institutional, and utility managers; and officials of county, state, and federal agencies in furnishing data pertinent to this report is gratefully acknowledged. Sincere appreciation is expressed to George Baragona of the Florida Department of Natural Resources for assistance in coordinating the data obtained from many sources. The assistance of Professor Dalton S. Harrison of the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences at the University of Florida in furnishing information on irrigated crop acreage during 1970 is also acknowl- edged with thanks. Many individuals in the field offices of the U. S. Geological Survey in Florida participated in the county-by-county inventories to obtain the information on which to base these estimates of water use. Special thanks are given C. A. Pascale of the Tallahassee Subdistrict, A. F. Robertson of the Tampa Subdistrict, J. E. Hull of the Miami Subdistrict, and the late L. J. Crain of the Ocala Subdistrict for their assistance in directing the data collection and coordinating the results obtained in their areas of operation. The investigation was made and the report prepared under the general supervision of C. S. Conover, District Chief, Florida District. TERMINOLOGY When the term "water use" appears in this report, withdrawal use (the amount of water withdrawn from its source) is implied; this is equivalent to "intake" or "water diversion," as used in industry and agriculture, respectively. Water diverted from a source for agriculture is generally more than delivered or conveyed to the crop because of "conveyance losses" and may be more or less than the optimum amount required by a crop. If the water is reused it will do the work of a greater quantity of water; the amount of this greater quantity, which is commonly called the "gross water use," is not evaluated in this report. If, however, the water is returned to a stream, lake, aquifer, or other source and then withdrawn anew, the summation of successive withdrawals gives the total withdrawal use. The terms "water consumed," "consumptive use," or "consumption," as used in this report, refer to that part of the water withdrawn that is no longer available because it has evaporated, has been incorporated into products and crops, consumed by man or livestock, or otherwise removed from the water environment. Water that is discharged into salt water bodies after being used and is not recoverable from a practical standpoint is not classed as consumed. Water with more than one thousand parts per million dissolved solids is classed as "saline" irrespective of the nature of the minerals present. INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 5 Water obtained from a water utility that serves the public is classed as a "public supply"; if a public supply is either not available or not used, the water is "self-supplied." Water used by individual families and by small communities not served by a water utility is classed as "rural." The term "nonwithdrawal uses" refers to water used within recognized stream channels. Some non- withdrawal uses are navigation, sport fishing, fresh-water discharge into estuaries to maintain proper salinity, and the disposition and dilution of waste water. Water-use data are reported as the average quantities used daily as derived from the annual use. The average use is generally expressed in million gallons per day; for irrigation, the amount is also given in units of 1,000 acre-feet per year. An acre-foot of water is the amount required to cover an acre (43,560 square feet) to a depth of 1 foot (43,560 square feet or 325,851 gallons). One million gallons per day is 3.07 acre-feet per day. One thousand acre-feet per year is nearly equal to a flow of a million gallons per day for a year (1,000 acre-feet per year equals 0.89 mgd). Common equivalents of these units are given in table 1. Table 1. Hydraulic equivalents. (Equivalent values, to three significant figures, are on the same horizontal line) Million Billion Thousand Million gallons gallons Thousand Thousand gallons cubic per day per day acre-feet cubic feet per meters (mgd) (bgd) per year per second minute per day 1.0 0.001 1.12 0.00155 0.694 0.00379 1,000 1.0 1,120 1.55 694 3.79 .893 .000893 1.0 .00138 .620 .00338 646 .646 724 1.0 449 2.45 1.44 .00144 1.61 .00223 1.0 .00545 264 .264 296 .409 184 1.0 PUBLIC SUPPLY SOURCE AND RELIABILITY OF DATA Estimates of water used for public supply in 1970 were obtained from information furnished by the Bureau of Sanitary Engineering, Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, and by personal communica- tion with water department officials of most municipalities served by public water supply systems. BUREAU OF GEOLOGY Most municipalities maintain a record of water pumped from the source or delivered to customers. For such systems the data used in this report are considered to be reliable. A few utility companies keep no pumpage records. For these systems the amount of water used during 1970 was estimated on the basis of the number of customers served. WATER WITHDRAWN Water withdrawals in Florida for public supplies in 1970 were estimated to be 884 mgd. of which 759 mgd was from ground-water sources and 125 mgd was from surface-water sources. Population served by public water supplies was estimated to be 5,420,000. Estimates indicate that 166 mgd of water from public supplies was used by industrial and commercial establishments, of which 46 mgd was for air conditioning. See table 2 and figure 2 for county-by-county withdrawals for public supply in 1970. The average per capital use was 163 gpd, considering the total water withdrawn by public supply systems including that used for industry and commerce. Considering only the public supply water for domestic use, the average per capital use was 132 gpd. In Bay County, where the gross per capital use was 982 gpd, about 33 mgd of water from public supply systems was used for industry and commerce. The average per capital use of public supply water for only domestic use in Bay County was 134 gpd. CONSUMPTIVE USE Water consumed is approximately the difference between intake at the waterworks and effluent from the sewage plant, if there are no large leaks into or out of the sewers, no industries discharging self-supplied water to the sewers, nor extensive use of septic tanks in areas served from the public water supply. Only a few cities measure the effluent from the sewage plant. Thus estimates of consumption were based mostly on knowledge of the local situation. Public supply water consumed in Florida during 1970 was estimated at 235 mgd, about 27 percent of the total amount withdrawn. INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 Table 2. Water used for public supplies, by counties in WRC Subregions in Florida, 1970 Population served Water withdrawn Water delivered Water Ground Surface All Indust. and commer. uses Domestic On"- water water water Ground Surface All Per Air condi- Except All use and sumed County (thou- (thou. (thou- water water water capital ioning air cond. uses losses sands) sands) sand) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (gpd) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) 2.6 2.6 0.5 0.5 192 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 8.9 8.9 2.0 2.0 225 0.1 .5 .6 1.4 .5 11.5 11.5 2.5 2.5 217 .1 .6 .7 1.8 .7 204.0 204.0 a/1.2 12.7 12.7 1.6 345.3 345.3 67.8 2.8 2.8 .3 42,2 42.2 10.0 28.4 28.4 3,9 290.0 290.0 c/65.8 14.0 14.0 2.7 10,0 7.0 17.0 1.4 58.9 58.9 6.3 142.3 142.3 19.2 - a/11.2 b/130 - - 1.6 126 - - 67.8 197 5.0 - .3 107 - - 10.0 237 .1 - 3.9 137 - - c/65.8 b/140 - 2.7 193 - 1.1 2.5 147 - 6.3 107 .1 19.2 135 .1 26.5 5.3 .2 .2 1.4 .5 10.0 15.0 52.8 13.6 .3 .1 1.9 2.0 8.0 5.0 1.2 1.2 2.7 .4 5.0 5.0 45.5 12.0 2.7 1.4 .1 .1 2.4 .1 .6 .7 5.6 1.9 3.7 3.8 15.4 4.5 WRC Subreg. 0307 Baker Nassau Subreg. Total WRC Subreg. 0308 Brevard Clay Duval Flagler Lake Marion Orange Putnam St. Johns Scminiole Volusia Subreg. Total WRC Subreg, 0309 Broward Collier Dade Glades Ilindry Ilighlands Indian River Lee Martin Monroe Okeechobee Osceola Palmn Beach Polk St. Lucie Subreg. Total WRC Subreg. 0310 Charlotte Cirtus DeSoto Ilardeec Hernando I llshbo oughl Levy Manatee Pasco Pincilas Sarasoli Sumtert Subreg. Tolal WRC Subreg. 0311 Alachua Bradford Columbia Dixie Gilchrist IlainilIon Lafayette Madison Suwallliee Union Subteg. Total 1,150.6 7.0 1.157,6 190.2 1.1 191.3 166 5.3 22.7 28.0 163.3 44.8 550.0 550.0 102.0 1.0 103.0 188 5.0 5.3 10.3 92.7 20.0 26.0 3.5 29.5 5.0 .9 5.9 200 .3 .3 .6 5.3 1.4 1.384.0 1,384.0 d/212.1 d/212.1 b/149 10.0 11.2 21.2 185.7 42.0 1.5 2.9 4.4 .1 C/ e/.l b/63 .2 .1 1.8 4.7 6,5 .2 1.2 1.4 215 .7 .7 .7 .4 20.8 2.6 23.4 4.1 .6 4.7 201 .9 .9 3.8 4.4 21.0 21.0 3.1 3.1 148 .3 .3 2.8 .8 65.5 26.0 91.5 6.7 1.6 8.3 91 1.6 1.6 6.7 2.5 12.0 12.0 1.6 1.6 133 .1 .1 1.5 .4 f/48.9 f/15.0 63.9 g/ 1.6 h/1.6 b/106 .3 .4 .7 6.1 1.4 7.6 7.6 i/.6 i/.6 b/66 .1 .1 .4 .2 14.5 14.5 2.7 2.7 186 .1 .1 2.6 .6 165.5 94.5 260.0 34.9 20.4 55.3 213 4.0 12.0 16.0 39.3 28.0 170.0 170.0 27.7 27.7 163 4.2 4.2 23.5 11.0 34.0 34.0 4.3 4.3 127 .2 .2 4.1 1.0 2,515.5 156.8 2.672.3 404.5 27.9 432.4 162 19.6 37.4 57.0 375.4 114.2 2.0 14.0 16,0 j/0.4 2.2 j/2.6 b/169 0.1 0.1 2.6 0.1 2.5 2.5 .2 .2 80 .05 .05 .2 .1 6.0 6.0 .5 .5 83 .5 .2 6.5 6.5 .7 .- .7 108 .7 .3 5.0 5.0 .6 .6 120 .1 .1 .5 .1 65.0 305.0 370.0 k/35.2 44.6 k/79.8 b/140 0.2 3.9 4.1 47.7 11.8 7.4 7.4 .9 .9 122 .9 .3 3.5 61.3 64.8 .3 9.6 9.9 153 .6 1.4 2.0 7.9 .3 24.3 24.3 2.0 2.0 82 .4 .4 1.6 1.2 413.0 413.0 1/32.0 1/32.0 b/145 6.0 6.0 12.0 48.0 24.0 101.2 3.1 104.3 in/I 1.0 .3 m/I 1.3 b/107 1.0 1.1 2.1 9.1 .5 4.8 4.8 .8 .8 166 .8 .2 641.2 383.4 1.024.6 84.6 56.7 141.3 138 7.8 13.0 20.8 120.5 39.1 79.1 79.1 22,3 22.3 282 10.5 10.5 11.8 12.2 5.8 5.8 .7 .7 121 .1 .1 .6 .4 16.6 16.6 1.7 1.7 102 .1 .3 .4 1.3 .4 2.0 2.0 .4 .4 200 .4 .1 1.2 1.2 .1 .1 117 .1 .1 4.3 4.3 .5 .5 116 .2 .2 .3 .2 .9 .9 .1 .1 1 11 .1 .1 6.4 6.4 .6 .6 94 .1 .1 .5 .1 7.8 7- 8 .6 .6 77 .1 .1 .5 .2 1.6 1.6 .1 .1 62 .1 .1 125,7 1257 27.1 27.1 216 10.6 .8 11.4 15.7 13.9 continued 8 BUREAU OF GEOLOGY Table 2. Water used for public supplies, by counties in WRC subregions in Florida, 1970 Population eamrd Watr withdrawn Water dtetltd Wate Cuo r Surfac Al Indust. and commer. vM Domstlc con wat water water Ground Surface Al Per Air condl- Except All ue and med Cmun (thou- (hou- (thou. water water water caplta toning ar cond. uses IouM mda) sam) sada) (mgd) (ind) (mg) (gpd) (mid) (mnd) (mid) (mgd) (m1d) WRC Subreg. 0312 Franklin Gadsden Jefferwon Leon Liberty Taylor Wakulla Subreg. Total WRC Subses. 0313 Calhoun Gult Jackson Subreg. Total WRC Subres. 0314 Bay Escambia Holmes Okalousa Santa Ros Walton Washington Subreg. Total State Total 4.0 4.0 0.5 0.5 125 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 7.9 9.1 17.0 .8 1.2 1.0 118 .6 .6 1.4 .6 2.7 2.7 .4 ,.4 148 .1 .1 .3 .2 77.7 77.7 12.0 12.0 154 1.2 3,8 5.0 7.0 4.0 1.6 1.6 .2 j.2 125 .2 .1 10.4 10.4 1.2 1.2 114 .6 .6 .6 .3 2.4 2.4 .2 .2 83 .2 .1 106.7 9.1 115.8 15.3 1.2 16.5 142 1.2 5.2 6.4 10.1 5.4 3.2 3.2 .2 .2 62 .2 .1 1.5 4.5 6.0 .1 .4 .5 83 .02 .03 .05 .4 .2 15.0 15.0 1.6 1.6 107 .2 .2 1.4 A 19.7 4.5 24.2 1.9 ,4 2.3 95 .02 .23 .3 2.0 .7 7.9 30.9 38.8 .7 37.4 38.1 982 .6 32.3 32.9 5.2 4.8 158.4 158.4 20.3 20.3 128 .9 4.7 5.6 14.7 8.1 3.0 3.0 .3 .3 100 .3 .1 60.8 60.8 7.9 7.9 130 .1 2.3 2.4 5.5 2.0 14.8 14.8 2.4 2.4 162 .6 .6 1.8 .6 9.2 9.2 .7 .7 76 .1 .1 .6 .3 3.8 3.8 .4 .4 105 .4 .1 257.9 30.9 288.8 32.7 37.4 70.1 243 1.6 40.0 41.6 28.5 16.0 4.828.8 591.7 5,420.5 758.8 124.7 883.5 163 46.2 120.0 166.2 717.3 234.8 a/ Does not include 15.3 mgd imported from Orange County. b/ Net use m County. c/ Includes 15.3 mgd exported to Brevard County. d/ Includes 5.2 mgd exported to Monroe County. el Does not include 0.1 mgd imported from City of Okeechobee in Okeechobee County. f/ Prorated using average per capital for each source. g/ 5.2 mgd imported from Dade County. h/ Does not include 5.2 mgd of ground water imported from Dade County. i/ Includes 0.1 mgd exported to Glades County. ]/ Does not include 0.1 mgd imported from Sarasota County. kW Includes 28.0 mgd exported to Pinellas County. Ii Does not include 28.0 mgd imported from Hillsborough County. m/ Includes 0 1 mgd exported to Charlotte County. IRRIGATION SOURCE AND RELIABILITY OF DATA Estimates of water used for crop irrigation during 1970 were made by Survey hydrologists from information obtained by personal communication with local (county) and State representatives of agricultural agencies, and from some grove owners and/or farmers. The county agricultural agent, the county SCS (Soil Conservation Service) director, or the county ASCS (Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service) director was usually interviewed to obtain estimates of irrigated acreage and depth of water applied for each crop , irrigated in a county. INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 Figure 2. Water withdrawn for public supplies by counties in Florida, 1970 Total crop acreage in each county, as taken from the 1970 annual report by Florida ASCS and the 1970 Florida Agricultural Statistics summary reports by the Florida Department of Agriculture, was used as a guideline for estimating the irrigated crop acreage. The percentage of the total crop acreage that was irrigated in 1970 varied by crop and by locale. As an example, sugar cane in four counties adjacent to Lake Okeechobee was 100 percent irrigated. On the other hand, only a small percentage of field crops, such as corn grown in northern Florida, was irrigated. Estimates of irrigated crop acreage, as determined for this report, were coordinated with estimates by other Federal and State agencies. Representa- tives of the following agencies participated in the review and verification of estimates of irrigated crop acreage: U. S. Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Natural Resources, Institute of BUREAU OF GEOLOGY Food and Agricultural Sciences at the University of Florida, Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District, and Southwest Florida Water Management District. The Division of Interior Resources, Florida Department of Natural Resources, was the principal coordinating agency and gave significant assistance in reviewing and verifying the irrigation acreage on the basis of independent estimates made as part of their water and related land-resource assessments of river basins. Although precise records of water use for irrigation were not available for most of the State, the estimates given herein are probably valid because information from all reliable sources was coordinated. WATER WITHDRAWN Estimates of water used for irrigation are reported as the amounts diverted from the source and include that applied to the crop plus conveyance loss, if any. Depth of water applied to each crop was estimated by determining the number of applications during 1970 and the average depth per application. Depth of application was estimated in inches and then converted to feet in order to compute acre-feet of water applied during the year. In some areas where irrigation water was conveyed by open ditch from the source to the point of application, the conveyance loss due to seepage was added to the water applied to estimate the total water withdrawn. Most of the reported conveyance loss was in southern Florida. Wat9r use for irrigation, as reported by the U. S. Geological Survey, is estimated as the amount withdrawn from the source during a specific year or other period. The SCS and other agricultural agencies usually report water use for irrigation based on optimum use for crop requirements from the Blaney-Criddle method. On a long-term average the results obtained by the different approaches should be reasonably consistent, though water withdrawn usually exceeds optimum use, especially in Florida where water is generally plentiful. County estimates of the quantities of water used for irrigation were much higher in the southern part of the State than elsewhere, both for acres irrigated and for the depth of water applied. The total irrigated crop acreage, tabulated by counties and Water Resources Council subregions, is given in table 3. Of the total acres irrigated in 1970, about 1,134,000, or 71 percent were in WRC subregion 0309, which includes the southernmost counties. Citrus was the major irrigated crop, accounting for 40 percent of the total irrigated acreage. The rate of water use (water applied in feet per year) was also greater in southern Florida than elsewhere. The range in application rates for the major irrigated crops in those counties where irrigation was practiced in 1970 is' shown in table 4. INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 Table 3. Irrigated crop acreage in Florida, 1970 &top (trigated cets) Truck Supr Toita Otus (egetables) Paturenecan Other (a crops) Witt Subrgion kid County Subreg. 0307 Baket Nassau Subreg. total Subreg. 0308 Brevard Clay Duval plaglet Lake Marion Orange _ Putnam St, Johns Seminole Volusia Subreg, total Subteg, 0309 litoward Collier Dade Glades Hendry Highlands Indian River Lee Martin Monroe Okeechobee Osceola Paint Beach Polk St. Lucle Subteg. total Subreg. 0310 Charlotte Citrus DeSoto Hardee lernando IHillsborougli Levy Manatee Pasco Pinellas Satasota Sustler Subteg. total Subreg. 0311 Alachuaa Btadl'ord Columbia Dixie Gilchrist Hamillton Lafayette Madison Suwannee Union Subreg. total 200 400 0 5,600 8,000 4.000 6,000 5,500 17,000 4,000 1,000 51,700 10,000 12,000 29,300 1,500 11,000 1,400 2,100 7,000 1,900 0 3.500 0 88,000 1,000 350 16,400 3,000 0 2,400 2,500 600 1,000 0 2,000 200 0 28,100 0 5,000 4.100 35,000 30,000 35,000 20,000 6,000 10,000 0 40,000 5,000 127,000 500 17,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,000 48.500 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 116.500 0 0 0 0 a/1,400 0 0 a/700 0 b/700 0 400 c/I1,700 4,900 a/14,000 a/2,000 d/8,800 0 0 a/600 0 a/3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,600 3,400 1,400 8,230 46,500 13,700 39,000 11,200 19,000 10,600 4,700 182,330 29,000 24,000 47,700 50,500 116,500 74,000 72,100 23,000 54,900 0 46,000 20,000 351,500 129.500 94.850 422,000 169,050 335,100 179,000 28.400 1,133,550 6.000 3,000 7.000 0 a/I,200 17,200 3,000 900 0 0 0 3,900 16,000 3,200 30.000 0 0 49,200 25,500 4.500 14,000 0 0 44,000 1,050 270 0 0 0 1.320 37,500 7.700 1.000 0 a/800 47,000 0 500 400 0 a/300 1,200 10,000 5,000 13,000 0 a/900 28,900 10,800 1.000 2,600 0 0 14,400 3,000 0 0 0 0 3,000 1,800 2,100 12,000 0 a/1.200 17.100 0 4,650 1,000 0 0 5,650 114,650 32,820 81.000 0 4,400 232.870 0 6,000 500 0 el 1.000 7.500 0 230 0 0 c/70 300 0 0 320 0 e/120 440 0 0 0 0 f/180 180 0 430 160 0 a/50 640 0 50 50 0 g/1,780 1,880 0 100 0 0 h/l,400 1,500 0 0 0 0 i/3.380 3,380 0 0 140 0 j/7,730 7.870 0 0 0 0 e/250 250 0 6.810 1,170 0 15.960 23.940 continued 8,000 0 0 230 36,000 8,400 32,000 5,000 0 6,000 2,000 97,630 5,000 5,000 5,506 2,000 27,000 37,000 50,000 7,000 41,000 0 2,500 15,000 20,000 128,000 77,000 BUREAU OF GEOLOGY Table 3. Irrigated crop acreage in Florida, 1970 CMUp (r arm)s) WRC Suamoa Tack Sugr Total d Comant Oats (ptabeo) FPntanr can* Other (Aa scop.) Subreg. 0312 Franklin Gadsden Jefferson Leon Liberty Taylor Wakulla Subreg. total Subet. 0313 Calhoun Gulf Jackson Subreg total Subreg. 0314 Bay EcEambia Holmes Okaioosa Santa Rosa Walton Washlngton Subreg. total Florida total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 700 0 0 k/2,720 3,420 0 0 0 0 1/1,240 1,240 0 10 0 0 m/70 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/240 240 0 0 0 0 o/20 20 0 710 0 0 4,290 5,000 0 0 0 0 p/240 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q/1,750 1,750 0 0 0 0 1,990 1,990 0 0 0 0 r/700 700 0 160 0 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 s/100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t/780 780 0 0 0 0 u/13,560 13.560 0 0 0 0 0/100 100 0 160 0 0 15.240 15,400 634.280 261.250 445,370 179,000 75,180 1,595,080 a/ Not identified. b/ 500 acres of flowers; 200 acres of ferns. cl 1.400 acres of ferns; 300 acres not identified. di Fruit other than citrus. el Tobacco. Uf 130 acres of tobacco; 50 acres of watermelons. g/ t .380 acres of tobacco; 300 acres of corn; 100 acres of watermelons. hi 800 acres of tobacco; 600 acres of watermelons. I/ 1,500 acres of corn; 1,050 acres of tobacco; 830 acres of peaches. V 4.620 acres of corn; 2.480 acres of tobacco; 590 acres of soybeans; 40 acres of watermelons. k/ 2.560 acres of tobacco; 160 acres of corn. 1/ 500 acres of watermelons; 450 acres of nurseries; 230 acres of corn; 60 acres of tobacco. mi 50 acres of nurseries; 20 acres of tobacco. n/ 170 acres of tobacco; 50 acres of corn; 20 acres of pine seedlings. o/ Watermelons. pi 160 acres of gladiolus; 80 acres of corn. qj 1.550 acres of corn; 200 acres of gladiolus. ri 410 acres of corn; 120 acres of soybeans; 80 acres of rye; 40 acres of wheat. s% 60 acres of tobacco; 40 acres of corn. t/ 730 acres of corn and beans. u/ 7.870 acres of corn; 5.690 acres of soybeans. Water-use for irrigation in Florida in 1970 was nearly 2,319,000 acre-feet or 2,070 million gallons per day (table 5 and figure 3). Subregion 0309 used 75 percent of the total irrigation water in 1970. Palm Beach County, which irrigated 351,500 acres of citrus, truckfarms, pasture, and sugar cane, used 459,000 acre feet of irrigation water and was the largest county user of irrigation water. CONSUMPTIVE USE No measurements of consumptive use of irrigation water were made by the Geological Survey. Estimates given in this report were computed by INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 13 Table 4. Annual rate of water application for selected crops, 1970. North and South Crop Central Florida Florida (feet) (feet) Citrus 0.4 1.3 0.7 2.0 Truck (vegetables) .2 1.7 1.0 2.4 Pasture .2 1.3 .7 2.6 Sugar Cane 1.1 2.3 Corn .3- .9 Soybeans .3 .7 Tobacco .4- 1.0 Table 5. Water used for irrigation, by counties in WRC subregions in Florida, 1970. Total water withdrawn Total water withdrawn S A ,re / ee+ CConvey-. Con- Con- Con- AIncreI ee sup- m 6m D vey. sump- IOs tive us ance tive Acres Surface Ground Other All (Ac-ft (Ac-ft Surface Ground Other All loss use County trrigteed water water water water per yt) per yr water water water water (mgd) (mgd) WRC Subreg. 0307 Baker 0 Nassau 0 Subreg. total 0 WRC Subreg. 0308 trevard 24,600 Clay 3,400 Duval 1.400 Flagler 8,230 Lake 46,500 Marion 13,700 Orange 39.000 Putilam 11,200 St. Johns 19.000 Seminole 10,600 Volusia 4.700 Subreg. total 182.330 WRC Subreg, 0309 Uioward 29,000 Collier 24,000 Dade 47,700 Glades 50,500 Ilendrty 116,500 Illghlands 74,000 Indian River 72.100 Lee 23,000 Martin 54,900 Munroc 0 Okeechobcc 46.000 Oseeola 20,000 Palm IBeach 351,500 Polk 129,500 St. Lucle 94,850 Subteg. total 1.133,550 53,600 s/31,500 4,590 - 4,100 - 200 10,100 - 8,600 15,000 - 1.230 6,440 - 10.000 12,500 - 2,300 8,550 - 24,800 - 2,970 3,850 - 320 7.780 -B 25.620 151,310 a/31.500 44,600 33,600 - 500 52,700 - 50,200 5,800 46,000 - 248.000 28,000 - 39,700 25,100 - 38,000 109,100 - 9,000 30,600 - 83,900 17,300 - 6,600 32,400 - 6,000 9,000 - 321,000 138,000 - 19,400 174,800 10 145,000 29,000 - 967,500 775,800 10 b/53,600 4,590 4,100 10,300 23,600 7,670 22,500 10,850 24,800 6,820 8.100 - 38,000 3,400 3,100 7,200 400 18,000 5,800 17,000 8,100 17,000 820 4,500 5.700 b/176,930 1.220 127,800 78,200 20,000 35,000 53.200 13.200 32.000 50,200 30,000 51,800 4,700 30,000 276,000 25,100 IS0,000 64,800 5,900 41.000 147,100 96,000 39,600 500 23.000 101,200 9,200 55.000 39,000 3,600 23,000 15,000 1,500 11,200 459,000 41,700 250,000 194,210 145,000 174.000 15,800 95.000 47.9a/28.1 b/47.9 4.1 4.1 - 3 7' 3.7 - 9.0 9.2 - 13.4 21.1 0.4 5.7 6.8 - 11.2 20.1 7.6 9.7 - 22.1 22.1 3.4 6.1 .7 6.9 7.2 - 23.0 135,0a/28 39.8 .4 - 5.2 221.4 35.4 33.9 8.0 74.9 5.9 5.4 286.6 17.3 129,5 1,743,310 141,200 1.016.200 863.7 30.0 47.1 44.8 41.1 25.0 22.4 97.4 27.3 15.4 28.9 8.0 123.2 156.1 25.9 .1 b/158.0 1.1 114.1 - 69.8 17.9 31.3 - 47.5 11.8 28.6 - 44.8 26.8 - 46.3 4.2 26.8 - ?46.4 22.4 133.9 - 57.8 5.3 36.6 - 131.3 85.7 - 35.3 .4 20.5 - 90.3 8.2 49.1 - 34.8 3.2 20.5 13.4 1.3 10.0 - 409.8 37.2 223.2 .01 173.4 129.5 - 155.4 14.1 84.8 692.6 .1 1,556.3 126.0 907,3 continued --- ---- ---------: --- ---- ---- ---------- ---- 14 BUREAU OF GEOLOGY Table 5. Water used for irrigation, by counties in WRC subregions in Florida, 1970. Total water witdnawn Total water withdrawn (million gallons per day) (Ac-ft per year) Convey- Con- Con- Con- ance sump- vey. sump- loss tive use ance ive Acse Surface Ground Other All (Ac-ft (Ac-ft Surface Ground Other All loss use County rim ted water water water water per yr) per y) water water water water (mgd) (mpd) WRC Sabreg. 0 Charlotte Citrus DeSoto Hankee Hlernando Hilltborough Levy Manatee Pco PmellUa Sarasota Sumrnter Subreg. total WRC Subreg. 0 Alachua Bradford Columbia Cdchnst Hamilton Lwaiyette M'dison Suwannee Unton Submre total WRC Subreg. Q Franklin Gadshden Jlefervon Leon Liberty raylor Wakulla Subreg. total WRC Subreg. 0 Calhoun Gulf JIakson Subreg. total. WRC Subtre 0 Bay Escmbia Holnes, Okaooum Santa Row Walton Washington Subrcg. zut.l State Ta.tal II 10 17.200 33.900 49.200 44,000 1.320 47.000 1.200 28300 14.400 3.000 17OO0 5.650 800 0so 20 5.700 so 5200 -- 31.600 5.450 72.400 70.000 1.850 71.900 440 55.400 10.700 4,450 30.600 5.160 32,400 5,500 72.400 70,000 1,870 77,600 440 55.400 10,700 4.500 33.200 5,160 21.000 4,100 50,000 50,000 1,400 54,000 330 38.800 8.000 3.200 22.000 3.900 0.7 .04 .02 5.1 .04 2.3 _ 28.2 4.9 64.7 62.5 1.7 64.2 .4 49.5 9.6 4.0 27.3 4.6 28.9 4.94 64.7 62.5 1.72 69.3 .4 49.5 9.6 4.04 29.6 4.6 232,870 9220 359.950 369170 26,730 8.20 321.6 329.8 229.1 I31 7.500 750 3,000 3,750 200 200 .7 2.7 3.4 2.5 300 75 75 150 100 .07 .07 .14 .1 440 250 250 190 .2 .2 .2 180 40 60 100 70 .04 .05 .09 .1 640 200 200 150 .2 .2 .1 1.380 180 540 720 540 .2 .5 .7 .5 1.500 260 1.020 1.280 960 .2 .9 1.1 .9 3.380 110 1.770 1,880 1,440 .1 1.6 1.7 1.3 7.870 4.56060 4560 3,400 4.1 4.1 3.0 25 10 25 0 125 90 .02 .09 .11 .1 23.940 1,440 11.575 13,015 9.740 1.33 10.41 11.7 8.8 312 0 - 3.420 2.300 600 2,900 2,200 2.1 0.5 2.6 2.0 1240 50 470 520 400 .04 .4 .44 .4 so 10 50 60 40 .01 .04 .05 .0 0 - 240 110 110 80 .1 .1 .1 20 5 5 5 .0 5.000 2.365 1.230 3,595 2,725 2.15 1.04 3.2 2.5 313 240 30 150 180 140 .03 .13 0 3 .1.16 .1 0 .0 1.750 20 730 750 560 .02 .7 .72 .5 1.990 50 880 930 700 .05 .83 .9 .6 314 700 300 300 220 .3 .3 .2 160 110 110 80 .1 .1 .1 100 50 50 40 .04 .04 0 0 - 780 200 200 150 .2 .2 .1 13.560 11.300 11.300 8.500 10.1 10.1 7.6 100 25 25 20 .02 .02 0 15.400 11.985 11985 9,010 10.76 10.76 8.0 1.595.080 1.006.195 1.312,730 a/31,510 b/2,318,935 142,420 1.422.905 898.43 1,172.24 28.11 2.070.66127.1 1.270.4 a1 27.000 ac.ft of aline ground water and 4.500 ac-fl of saline surface water for marsh flooding for mosquito control. bi I-reh water only. multiplying the amount of water applied to the crop by a consumptive-use coefficient developed by the U. S. Soil Conservation Service. Table 2 of Technical Release No. 21 "Irrigation Water Requirements" by the Soil Conservation Service, shows consumptive-use crop coefficients for the normal growing season for several crops. Consumptive-use coefficients, as applied in this report, ranged from 0.60 to 0.75. The total consumptive use of irrigation water in Florida was estimated to be 1,423,000 acre-feet in 1970. The difference between the total water withdrawn, 2,319,000 acre-feet, and the amount consumed, 1,423,000 acre-feet, is 896,000 acre-feet, which returned to the source and was available for reuse. INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 S 1 0 G I a EXPLANATION AROUND WATER SURFACE MATER (3 OD Dillimona L 0 circle Sj Diometer of circle NOTE: Small circles l*1 designate \ithdrawak less than 5 mgd. r Figure 3. Water withdrawn for irrigation (including conveyance losses) by counties in Florida, 1970 BUREAU OF GEOLOGY SELF-SUPPLIED INDUSTRIAL WATER, EXCLUDING THERMOELECTRIC POWER USE SOURCE AND RELIABILITY OF DATA Estimates of self-supplied industrial water (which excludes that obtained from public supplies) in Florida in 1970 were obtained by personal communication with officials of industrial plants and institutions in Florida that supply their own water. Most of the self-supplied industrial use of water in Florida, excluding thermoelectric power use, was for mining phosphate, processing pulp and paper products, mining limerock, processing chemicals, manufacturing or processing other miscellaneous products, and institutional use, including air conditioning. Estimates of self-supplied industrial water use were coordinated with estimates by the Florida Department of Natural Resources, made as part of their water and related land-resource assessments of river basins. Results given herein are considered to be valid. WATER WITHDRAWN Self-supplied industrial water withdrawn in Florida in 1970 was estimated to be 926 mgd of fresh water and 132 mgd of saline water. Of the fresh water used, 735 mgd or nearly 80 percent of the total, was ground water, and the remainder was surface water. Most of the self-supplied industrial saline water was used in Hillsborough County (table 6 and figure 4). The largest industrial use of fresh water was 318 mgd for phosphate mining and processing, most of which was in Polk and Hillsborough Counties. Pulp and paper processing required 237 mgd, the second largest industrial use of fresh water. All the pulp and paper processing plants are in the northern part of the State. Processing of chemical products required 97 mgd of fresh water, and processing of citrus products required 86 mgd of fresh water. Water withdrawn for limerock mining was estimated to be 29 mgd. All other self-supplied industrial users of fresh water required nearly 158 mgd. CONSUMPTIVE USE About 163 mgd, or about 18 percent, of the total fresh water self supplied by industry was consumed. Although most of the water withdrawn was returned to a source for possible reuse, the water quality may have been INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 Table 6. Self-supplied water for industrial use, by counties in WRC subregions in Florida, 1970. Water withdrawn Fresh-water use by major classifications (million gallons per day) (million pllons pe day) Water Pulp and Chemical Con- Pho- paper Ctnu Lime- products Ground water Surface water Ground and Surface sumed phate procea proce- rock proces- County Fresh Saline Fresh Saline Fresh Saline fresh mining Ing ing mining fng Other WRC Subreg. 0307 Baker Nassau Subreg. total WRC Subreg. 0308 Brevard Clay Duval Flagler Lake Marion Orange Putnam St. Johns Seminole Volusia Subreg. Total WRC Subreg. 0309 Broward Collier Dade Glades Hendry Highlands Indian River Lee Martin Monroe Okeechobee Osceola Palm Beach Polk St. Lucie Subreg. total WRC Subreg. 0310 Charlotte Citrus DeSoto Hardee Hernando Hillsborough Levy Manatee Pasco Pinellas Sarasota Sumter Subreg. total WRC Subreg. 0311 Alachua Bradford Columbia Dixie Gilchrist Hamilton Lafayette Madison Suwannee Union- Subreg. total 50.0 2.0 50.0 2.0 2.5 50.0 - 50.0 2.0 50.0 2.0 2.5 50.0 - .4 .4 .2 .2 .2 1.5 1.5 .2 1.5 60.9 20.0 60.9 20.0 4.0 19.0 11.4 30.5 2.0 2.0 - 19.4 19.4 .5 14.1 5.3 2.1 0.1 2.2 .1 1.5 .7 7.0 7.0 .5 7.0 - 15.5 16.0 5.0 31.3 5.0 1.2 31.5 - .5 .5 5 .2 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 107.8 16.1 27.0 123.9 27.0 7.2 50.5 22.8 11.4 39.2 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 .5 .5 .1 .5 7.7 2.7 10.4 4.1 10.4 .4 .4 .2 .4 .1 .2 3 .3 .1 .1 .1 .1 - .5 .5 .1 .5 - .3 0.4 4.0 4.3 0.4 .2 4.0 .3 .5 .5 .2 .5 .2 .2 .1 .2 .1 .1 .1 1 .1 26.6 1.8 28.4 7.3 28.4 236.0 71.0 307.0 48.0 271.0 28.6 7.4 1.2 1.2 1.0 .6 .6 276.2 .4 80.7 356.9 .4 62.5 271.0 29.8 4.0 52.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 .1 .2 .2 .1 .1 .1 .7 .7 .2 .2 .5 - .1 .1 .1 .1 .6 .6 .5 .3 .1 .2 40.0 86.4 11.9 51.9 86.4 5.2 45.9 2.8 3.2 3.0 3.0 .5 3.0 30.0 30.0 23.0 30.0 - 2.0 2.0 1.6 .4 1.6 7.6 0.8 7.6 .8 .3 .1 7.5 18.5 18.5 .5 18.5 - 102.8 86.4 11.9 .8 114.7 87.2 32.1 45.9 33.9 18.6 3.5 12.8 1.4 1.4 .3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 - .- - .9 .9 .3 .9 18.4 18.4 6.1 18.4 7.1 7.1 .3 6.3 .6 .6 .6 .3 .6 29.8 29.8 7.3 1.4 6.3 18.4 3.7 continued 18 BUREAU OF GEOLOGY Table 6. Self-supplied water for industrial use, by counties in WRC subregions in Florida, 1970. Water withdrawn (million pflona per day) Fresh-water us by major clasuiications (million gallons per day) Water Pulp and Chemical Con. Phos- paper Catru Uime- products Ground water Surface water Ground and Surface srmed phate process process. rck process. County Fresh Saline Fresh Saline Freh Saline fresh mining ing ing mining ing Other )J./ D.i. I 3.- - .7 .4 1.1 .- I. 834 3.0 86.4 7.6 53.7 32.7 10.0 36.0 15.8 55.0 15.8 9.1 55.0 - 1.2 1.2 1,.2 20.2 36.0 15.8 56.2 15.8 9.3 55.0 1.2 2.0 .05 2.05 .5 2.0 .05 47.8 0.1 42.1 90.7 .1 27.1 26.2 -- 54.3 10.2 4.7 -4.7 1.6 4.7 10.3 10.3 5.2 9.5 .8 2 1.2 .2 1.2 6.O0 .1 42.95 108.95 .1 34.6 28.2 63.8 16.15 736.2 86.9 190.6 45.6 926.8 132.5 163.1 318.3 237.4 86.5 28.9 97.1 158.6 changed to an extent that reuse for the purpose withdrawn was not feasible without treatment. Chemical, bacteriological, or thermal pollution may increase with each withdrawal, and the quality of the resulting water may become a more important factor than the quantity of water in determining its suitability for reuse. Information regarding the quality of the water returned to a source was not available. WRC Subreg. 0312 Franklin Gadsdlen Je ttersn Lihcrtv Wakulla Suhreg. ltoil WRC Subreg. 0313 (.ialt JuaksN Suhieg. toll WRC Subreg. 0314 Bay Escainhia Hiulnera Okaiima Santa Ros Walton Wahinglon Sublehg. toral Siate Total INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 L SA * a,, .,- .. ....t -. " ^G^ 1 -' 1- - I AA EXPLANATION At,i ,, .,t. 1,"\ o J t I * SURFACE WATER Q0 GU WAE I" Million l I Ilons pDfy W .. f .. i 10olitef of circle < ,, I * 0 11 N)TI: Siall circles to) designale -w tintawal I-s ll ihan 5 1n1d. * Figure 4. Self-supplied industrial fresh-water (excluding thermoelectric power use) withdrawals by counties, in Florida, 1970 D!me 1ctI I0~ BUREAU OF GEOLOGY THERMOELECTRIC POWER SOURCE AND RELIABILITY OF DATA Estimates of water use for condenser cooling and of electrical power generated at thermoelectric power plants were obtained by personal communi- cation with power company officials or with plant superintendents. This water was self-supplied, and the estimates of water use were based on pumping records or power production records. These estimates are considered to be reliable. WATER WITHDRAWN Because large quantities of water are required for condenser cooling, most thermoelectric power plants in Florida are located on the coast and use saline or brackish water withdrawn from bays or estuaries. However, some plants are located inland and draw water from large rivers or lakes; Only a small amount of ground water is used for cooling and for other purposes at the plants (boiler feed, domestic use at plant, and sprinkling of plant grounds). Most of the water is used in a flow-through operation with no recycling. Some of the small generating plants located on fresh water bodies in the interior of the State probably recycle some of their cooling water and use cooling ponds or towers to remove part of the absorbed heat. However, quantitative informa- tion regarding recycling was not obtained as a part of this inventory. The data given in table 7 for water withdrawn for thermoelectric power production during 1970 in Florida totaled 11,100 mgd. About 9,300 mgd, or 84 percent, was saline surface water; 1,700 mgd, or 15 percent, was fresh surface water; and the remaining 1 percent was ground water. The most significant ground-water use was 50 mgd of saline water reported for Monroe County. Figure 5 shows the areal distribution of water use for thermoelectric power production. Power produced during 1970 by thermoelectric plants in Florida was reported for this inventory to be 57.3 billion kilowatt hours. (Preliminary figures released by the Federal Power Commission in 1971 show that 55.4 billion kilowatt hours was produced by thermoelectric plants in Florida in 1970.) An average of 70 gallons of water was required per kilowatt hour of power produced. INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 Table 7. Water used for thermoelectric power,by counties in WRC Subregions in Florida, 1970 Coolinl wateW Other water Ae Seotmpplied Sef applied W ons d A Ground water Public Surface Ground Pubpj -e (mid) Supply(mid) (mid) Supply ad_ Fqmsh Saine Presh Saline (mid) Freh FrSh (mid) FPre SUaine (KWIIx IO*) County WRC Subreg. 0307 Baker Nassau Subreg. Total WRC Subreg. 0308 Bravard Clay Duval Fligler Lake Marion Orange Putnam St. Johns Seminole Volusia Subreg. Total WRC Subreg. 0309 Broward Collier Dade Glades Hendry Highlands Indian River Lee Martin Monroe Okeechobee Osceola Palm Beach Polk St. Lucle Subreg. Total WRC Subreg. 0310 Charlotte Citrus DeSoto Hardee Hoernando Hillsborough Levy Manatee Pasco Pinellas Sarasota Sumter Subrog, Total WRC Subreg., 0311 Alachua Bradford Columbia Dixie Gilchrist Hamilton Lafayette Madison ,JSuwanne Union Subreg. Total - 6. - 6.5 - _- 6.5 : : : 0.2 (a). ,2 (a) 0.09 0.06 0.2 10.0 5,572 0.3 .2 7,5 4,183 0.1 ,5 231 = = .05 .65 364 .01 .04 3.15 1,750 .09 .06 .36 .14 4.7 17.5 12,100 0.3 .2 15.9 8,925 0.04 0.09 .1 10.3 5,788 .02 .4 245 .1 .3 177 .04 .06 .1 4.4 2,465 50.0 .2 .2 .5 308 .- .- -. -; s1 Small .5 .2 .2 7.4 4,166 .4 (1.4 (672 .02 .02 .4 202 50.0 1.22 .08 .57 2.7 39,2 22.948 0.02 .02 6.5 3,650 = b/ -. 8 0.05 1.2 .5 12.0 6770 43 - 43 - 1,077 0,3 767 = 1:8 123' 406 - 657 1,844 .3 S1,678 0,1 1,183 226 - 72 ,1 552 - 1.6 564 - illO = 150 - 336 4,199 1.8 112 1,899 - 954 - 2,965 - .3 7.1 4,020 .8 25.6 14,448 .8 406 .2 24 1.5 832 2.5 1,262 continued - .6 - .05 .02 1.8 - 1.0 - .2 - 1,0 .2 - - -O J- - --- -- -- I BUREAU OF GEOLOGY Table 7. Water used for thermoelectric power, by counties in WRC subregions in Florida, 1970. Cooling waker Other water Self suppUed Self supplied Water consumed Averae (md) annual Ground water Pubic Surface Ground Public gene (mid) Supply(nd) (ngd) Supply __tion Comuy Fresh Saline Fresh Saline (mgd) Fresh Fresh (mgd) Fresh Saline (KWH x 106) WRC Subreg. 0312 Franklin Gadsden Je!ferson Lher-y Taylor Wakulla Subreg. Total WRC Subreg. 0313 Calhoun Jackson Subreg Total WRC Subreg. 0314 Bay Escambia Holmes Okaluosa Santa Rosa Walton Washington Subreg. Total State Total 160 0.3 1.4 693 160 .3 1.4 705 144 1.4 .9 415 144 1.4 .9 415 274 .1 .3 3.5 1,962 205 15 .8 6.4 3,420 - I - 205 289 .9 6.7 3.5 5,382 1.675 9.340 10.9 50.1 2.3 1.0 2.5 19.7 86.0 57,260 ai Annual generation by two plants serving industries not reported. Ib Small amount (about 50 gpd) at plant. c; Small amount for drinking, baths, etc. at plant. CONSUMPTIVE USE In spite of the large quantities of water used in thermoelectric power production, little water is consumed. In 1970, the amount of fresh water consumed by thermoelectric power plants in Florida was estimated at 20 mgd, and the saline water at 86 mgd, both small in comparison with the water circulated through the plants. RURAL SUPPLY The quantity of water withdrawn for rural domestic and livestock supply in Florida is relatively small compared with other uses, and, therefore, no county-by-county estimates were made for 1970. Only regional (WRC Subregions) estimates were made by using per capital rates for population and livestock (table 8). Population estimates were from the U. S. Bureau of Census (1970) and livestock and poultry estimates were from the U. S. Department of Agriculture (1971). INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 Figure 5. Water 1970 withdrawn for thermoelectric power by counties in Florida, DOMESTIC USE Rural domestic use was estimated to be 120 gallons per day per person in 1970 (117 gpd in 1965). The population served by rural supply in 1970 was considered, in this report, to be the difference between the total population (6,789,400) and the population served by all public supply systems (5,410,500), or about 1,379,000 persons. The total rural domestic use in 1970, as shown in table 8, was estimated to be 165 million gallons per day of ground water, of which 80 percent, or 130 mgd, was estimated to be consumed. A L A S A A I .e/ C C 0"" *^ ?! 7 7 ^ -- A" *^ C I Aj = ^ ~ I-, "- ** *C ^ * 1-^f a,* I "e-4T k 1T EXPLANATION 0 FRESH WATER SALINE WATER Milton qollons pw day o oo Diauoete of CuCcle ,a SLAs NOTE: Nearly all waler is from 'urface wourcc.s. Table 8. Water for rural use by Water Resources Council subregions in Florida, 1970 Livestock use Withdrawn Domestic and Livestock use Withdrawn WRC subregion in Florida 0307 0308 0309 0310 0311 0312 0313 0314 With- drawn ground water (mgd) 2.2 53.0 23.0 48.0 9.0 8.0 3.3 18.5 Con- Con. sumed Surface water (mgd) (mgd) 1.5 0.1 41.0 .9 18.0 5.5 38.0 2.4 7.5 1.0 6.5 .8 2.5 .7 15.0 .6 Ground water (mgd) 0.4 3.5 5.2 5.4 1.7 .5 .2 1.1 All water (mgd) 0.5 4.4 10.7 7.8 2.7 1.3 .9 1.7 sumed Surface water (mgd) (mgd) 0.5 0.1 4.4 .9 10.7 5.5 7.8 2.4 2.7 1.0 1.3 .8 .9 .7 1.7 .6 Ground water (mgd) 2.6 56.5 28.2 53.4 10.7 8.5 3.5 19.6 All water (mgd) 2.7 57.4 33.7 55.8 11.7 9.3 4.2 20.2 Con- sumed 0 (mgd) 2.0 45.4 28.7 45.8 10.2 7.8 .3.4 16.7 Foidattl 150 100 1. 80 3. 00 1. 8. 9. 6. Domestic use 183.0 195.0 160.0 Florida total 165.0 130.0 12.0 18.0 30.0 30.0 12.0 INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 LIVESTOCK Estimates of water use by livestock in 1970 in Florida were computed as follows: Number of Use per head Total Livestock head (gpd) (mgd) Cattle 1,864,000 15 28.0 Sheep 5,600 2 - Hogs 374,000 3 1.1 Chickens 17,099,100 .04 .7 Total (rounded) 30 Based on information obtained by the more detailed inventory of rural water use in 1965, it was estimated that 18 mgd of water for livestock was ground water, and 12 mgd was surface water in 1970. The total amount used for livestock was considered to be consumed. SUMMARY OF ALL USES Table 9 summarizes by WRC subregion the estimated water withdrawal and consumption in Florida for 1970. Of the several uses, the major category of use of the total amount withdrawn was for electric power production. Of the 15,300 mgd total withdrawn from all sources, nearly 11,100, or 72 percent, was used for electric power production. However, 9,390 mgd of the 11,100 mgd was saline water used in the flow-through operation for condenser cooling. Less than 1 percent of the saline water used in this operation was consumed. The largest use of fresh water was for irrigation. The counties in southern Florida, constituting WRC subregion 0309, used 1,560 mgd or 75 percent of the total 2,100 mgd used in Florida during 1970. Industry, other than thermoelectric power plants, required 926 mgd of fresh water and 132 mgd of saline water, both self-supplied. An additional 166 mgd from public supply systems was estimated for industrial use. As shown in table 9, the total fresh water used in 1970 was obtained in nearly equal quantities from surface-water and ground-water sources, 2,900 mgd and 2,860 mgd, respectively. Considering both fresh and saline water, about 2,250 gpd per capital was used to meet all water requirements of Florida during 1970. Considering only fresh water, the water requirements were 849 gpd per capital. Table 9. Summary of estimated water withdrawal and consumption by Water Resources Council subregions in Florida, 1970 Total water withdrawn (mgd) Sources of water withdrawn Thermo- WRC Total electric Total sub- popula- Rural power Self- Ground Surface water region tion Public domestic (electric supplied Total con- in (thou- sup- and live- Irriga- utility) industrial with- sumed Florida sands) plies stock action use use drawals fresh saline fresh saline (mgd) 0307 29.8 3 3 0 43 52 101 56 0 0 45 5 191 432 141 27 186 1,556 330 12 2,500 4,588 2,965 180 160 145 495 151 3,085 357 6,967 202 3,694 30 261 86 275 72 224 109 705 489 1,404 563 86 108 27 130 701 1,314 80 175 167 181 286 1,872 4,199 2,965 0 0 16 289 234 1,155 372 43 25 15 85 6,789.5 884 195 2,099 11,076 1,059 15,313 2,864 159 1,598.2 2,856.1 1,425.5 201.6 181.4 52.1 444.8 0308 0309 0310 0311 0312 0313 0314 Florida total 2,904 9,386 1,934 INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 The estimated total water consumed by all uses in 1970 was 1,930 mgd, most of which was fresh water. About one third of all the fresh water withdrawn from the source was consumed. TRENDS IN WATER USE, 1950-70 Trends in population and water withdrawn for major uses in Florida for 1950 to 1970 are shown in table 10 and figure 6. Estimates for 1950, 1955, and 1960 are given in reports by MacKichan (1951, 1957) and by Mackichan and Kammerer (1961). Estimates of water use in 1956 are given in a report by the Florida Water Resources Study Commission (1956). The 1965 estimates are from county-by-county inven- tories made by the Florida District for the national report by Murray (1968) and given by Pride (1970). The 1970 estimates are given in this report. Population estimates are from the U. S. Bureau of Census (1950, 1960, 1970) and the Florida Development Commission (1955, 1956, 1965). Figure 6 shows that public supply use has increased uniformly at the same general rate as population growth. The trend of water use for irrigation has also increased but is not as uniform as the trend for public supply use. The dashed line in figure 6 shows the trend of water use for irrigation from 1950 to 1970. The solid line connects the estimated water use for irrigation at 5-year intervals and for 1956. The estimate of use for irrigation in 1970 is considered to be more reliable than that for any previous year. The 1965 estimate is now considered to be too high, both in irrigated acres and in withdrawal rates. The dashed line is, thus, a more representative estimate of water use for irrigation than the individual estimates shown. The downward trend from 1965 to 1970, indicated by the solid line, is considered to be incorrect, and water use for irrigation probably increased from 1965 to 1970. Industrial water use, as shown in figure 6, includes water used for the production of thermoelectric power and for other industries that supply their own water. Both fresh and saline water is included. Saline water accounted for 3,360 mgd of the total industrial water use in 1960, 6,260 mgd of the total in 1965, and 9,540 mgd of the total use in 1970. Before 1960, the relative quantities of fresh and saline water for industrial use was not reported. The average per capital use of all water increased from 332 gpd in 1950 to about 2,250 gpd in 1965 and 1970. Considering fresh water only, the average per capital use increased from 590 gpd in 1955 (the first year for which records are available on the differentiation between fresh and saline water) to 759 gpd in 1960, and 1,180 gpd in 1965, and decreased to 849 gpd in 1970. Although the total use of water continues to increase sharply, the per capital use of fresh water seems to be somewhat stabilized or even reduced from 1965 to 1970. However, as previously mentioned, the estimates of water Table 10. Population and estimated water use in Florida, 1950-70 Per capital Total water withdrawn (mgd) c use Industrial uses All uses (gpd) Total Total popula- Rural Thermo- water Years on domestic electric All Fresh con. Included (thou- Public and Iri- power Other industrial ,All water All sumed in inventory sands) supplies livestock nation production industry uses Fresh Saline water only water (mgd) 1950 1955 1956 1960 1965 1970 2,771 3,670 3,941 4,951 5,805 6,789 170 55 319 38 390 (a) 530 110 710 142 884 195 410 510 1,182 660 3,200 2,099 (a) (a) (a) 4,800 8,100 11,076 (a) (a) (a) 1,020 961 1,059 286 1,945 2,227 5,820 9,061 12,135 (a) 2,167 (a) 3,760 6,852 5,768 (a) 645 (a) 3,360 6,261 9,545 921 2,812 3,799 7,120 13,113 15,313 (a) 590 (a) 759 1,180 849 332 766 964 1,438 2,259 2,255 (a) (a) (a) 1,210 1,639 1,934 (a) Data not available. INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 Figure 6. Trends in population and withdrawals of water in Florida, 1950-70 30 BUREAU OF GEOLOGY used for irrigation made in 1965 now seem to be considerably too high, which would account for part of the apparent reduction in per capital use from 1965 to 1970. The greatest increase in use from 1950 to 1970 was for saline water used for condenser cooling in thermoelectric power production. SELECTED REFERENCES Florida Department of Natural Resources, 1970, Report on water and related land resources availability and use in the St. Johns River basin and adjoining coastal area. Florida Development Commission, 1965, Population of Florida. '-Florida Division of Water Resources, 1966, Report on land and water resources needs and availability in the Florida west coast tributaries area. Florida Water Resources Study Commission, 1956, Florida's water re- sources: Report to the Governor of Florida and the 1957 legislature. Healy, H. G., 1972, Public water supplies of selected municipalities in Florida, 1970: Florida Bureau of Geology Inf. Circ. (in preparation). MacKichan, K.A., 1951, Estimated use of water in the United States, 1950: U.S. Geol. Survey Circ. 115. 1957 Estimated use of water in the United States, 1955: U. S. Geol. Survey Circ. 398. MacKichan, K. A. and Kammerer, J. C., 1961, Estimated use of water in the United States, 1960: U. S. Geol. Survey Circ. 456. Murray, C. R., 1968, Estimated use of water in the United States, 1965: U. S. Geol. Survey Circ. 556. tL- Murray, C. R. and Reeves, E. B., 1972, Estimated use of water in the United States in 1970: U. S. Geol. Survey Circ. 676. Pride, R. W., Estimated water use in Florida, 1965: Florida Bureau of Geol. Map Series 36. Snell, L. J. and Anderson, Warren, 1970, Water resources of northeast Florida: Florida Bureau of Geol. Rept. of Inv. 54. U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, 1967, Irrigation water requirements, Soil Conserva- tion Service, Technical Release 21. 1970, Florida Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, Ann. Rept. 1971, Livestock and poultry inventory, January 1: Statis- tical Reporting Service, Crop Reporting Board, Ann. Rept. INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 83 31 U. S. Dept. of Commerce, 1971, 1970 Census of Population, Number of Inhabitants, Florida. U. S. Federal Power Commission, 1971, Production of electric energy by electric utilities by states and type of plant-1970 (preliminary) with comparative 1969 data: Florida Power Commission News Release, March 18, 1971. 'University of Florida, 1969, DARE Report: Institute of Food and Agricul- tural Sciences, Publ. 7. 1971, The DARE Report-1971: Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Publ. 10. Water Resources Council, 1970, Water resources regions and subregions for the national assessment of water and related land resources. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 60 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |