|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Front Cover | |
| Errata | |
| Title Page | |
| Table of Contents | |
| Acknowledgement | |
| Exploration | |
| Land | |
| Geophysics | |
| Rules and regulations | |
| Production | |
| Brine | |
| Prospects | |
| Bibliography | |
| Appendix 1: Exploratory well information,... | |
| Appendix 2: Summary of reservoir... | |
| Appendix 3: Offshore drilling | |
| Glossary | |
| Back Cover |
CITATION
SEARCH
THUMBNAILS
DOWNLOADS
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Downloads | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Front Cover
Front Cover Errata Errata Title Page Page i Page ii Table of Contents Page iii Page iv Acknowledgement Page 1 Exploration Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Land Page 7 Geophysics Page 8 Page 8a Page 9 Page 10 Rules and regulations Page 11 Production Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Brine Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Prospects Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 24a Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Bibliography Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Appendix 1: Exploratory well information, 1961 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Appendix 2: Summary of reservoir data, Sunniland field, Collier County, Florida Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Appendix 3: Offshore drilling Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Glossary Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Back Cover Page 81 Page 82 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
STATE OF FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF GEOLOGY FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert 0. Vernon, Director SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 FLORIDA PETROLEUM EXPLORATION, PRODUCTION, AND PROSPECTS By Clarence Babcock, Geologist 40o. F636 No.? TALLAHASSEE 1962 ERRATA FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 FLORIDA PETROLEUM EXPLORATION, PRODUCTION, AND PROSPECTS Page 3 (1st paragraph, 2nd line) 1 to 10, not 1 to 4. Page 8 (Table at top of page, heading of 2nd column) Florida offshore acreage under lease at the end of 1961, not Florida mainland acreage undbr lease in 1960. Figure 3, facing page 8 Legend at bottom of figure should read 1961, not 1962. Page 13 (Figure 4) Well "4" is an abandoned oil well, not a producer. (Figure 4) Dry hole spotted in sec. 24, T.48 S., R.29 E.,at the center of southeast quarter, add the figure "9". Page 15 (Table 2) GCRC 1, under heading "Present Status",add Abnd oil well. S(Table 2) GCRC 4, under same heading, Abnd oil well, not P & A. Page 25 (Table 4) South Florida Embayment, under column "Total thickness" a(418), not 418; also next column move 57+ up one line. Page 31 (Table 5) Footnote 2, 3rd line from bottom, 1 to 10, not 1 to 4. ENERRBa~ STATE OF FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF GEOLOGY FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert 0. Vernon, Director SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 FLORIDA PETROLEUM EXPLORATION, PRODUCTION, AND PROSPECTS By Clarence Babcock, Geologist TALLAHASSEE Z oo, 7l AGRI- CULTVRAL LIBRARy Completed manuscript received May 28, 1962 Printed by the Florida Geological Survey Tallahassee TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgments .......... ... ........................ 1 Exploration ................... ....................... 2 Land .............................................. 7 Geophysics ................. .... ....... ...... ......... 8 Rules and regulations ............................ ..... 11 Production .......................................... 12 Brine ...................................... ........ 19 Prospects .. ............ ..................... ... . 22 Bibliography .................... ........... ........ .. 53 Appendices: I Exploratory well information, 1961 . . . . . . . . . . 57 II Summary of reservoir data, Sunniland field, Collier County, Florida .. 67 III Offshore drilling ............................ ..... 71 Glossary ............... ......................... 75 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 Florida petroleum exploration and production . . . . . .facing 2 2 Marquesas area wells ......... ........... ........... 6 3 Offshore Florida State leases, December 31, 1961 ......... facing 8 4 Sunniland oil field and nearby prospects, Collier County, Florida. .. 13 5 Production statistics, Sunniland oil field, Collier County, Florida ....................................facing 18 6 Oil and gas provinces of Florida . . . . . . ... .. facing 24 7 Correlation of the Atkinson Formation . . . . . . ...... . 35 Table 1 Crew weeks of geophysical activity in Florida, 1941 to 1960, inclusive ....................................... 9 2 Completion data on Humble Oil and Refining Company wells, Sunniland field, Collier County, Florida . . . . . . . .. 15 3 Analyses of brines from the Humble Oil and Refining Company, Gulf Coast Realties Corporation No. 1, the discovery well for the Sunniland field ................................ 20 4 A tabulation by provinces of depths and thicknesses of important sections, and probable number of wells deep enough to test them. .. 25 5 Sunniland field outpost wells .......................... . 30 6 Forty-Mile Bend field outpost wells . . . . . . . . . .. 33 7 Thicknesses, porosities, and permeabilities of productive sands in the Pollard field .... ...................... ... .. 338 8 Depth and thickness to Lower Cretaceous plastic section in the Osceola Low Intermediate Province . . . . . . . . . .... 44 9 Thicknesses of the Atkinson Formation in the Ocala Uplift Province ... . ... ...... .. .. .. ........... ..... 47 FLORIDA PETROLEUM EXPLORATION, PRODUCTION, AND PROSPECTS By Clarence Babcock, Geologist ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Sincere appreciation is expressed to Robert O. Vernon, Director of the Florida Geological Survey, for his guidance and suggestions, received throughout the preparation of this report. Several members of the staff of the Florida Geological Survey read the report and offered constructive criticism, which considerably improved the report. The writer wishes especially to acknowledge the help of C.W. Hendry, Jr., assistant state geologist, and S.R. Windham, geologist, who clarified and improved various parts of the report, primarily those dealing with "Exploration." Discussions with the following oil company geologists were of great assistance: Mr. Joseph E. Banks and Mr. Wendell L. Roberts, of the Coastal Petroleum Company; Mr. E. L. Russell and Mr. J. F. Schindler, of the California Company; Mr. Robert Martin of the Gulf Oil Corporation, and Mr. Edward P. Riker, of the Sinclair Oil and Gas Company. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY EXPLORATION In 1961, eight exploratory wells were completed and all of these have been plugged and abandoned. A ninth exploratory test, the Cali- fornia Company, Florida State Lease 1011, No. 3 well was coring on December 31, 1961, at 12,390 feet with no shows reported. Data on these wells are given in appendix 1, and the wells are spotted onfigure 1. During the year, 87,737 feet of exploratory drilling was done in these nine wells. This is considerably more than the exploratory footage drilled in 1960 (53,866 feet). A summary by counties of highlights of exploratory drilling in Florida in 1961 follows: COLLIER COUNTY The Humble Oil and Refining Company, Miles Collier No. 1 well, located about 6 miles southeast of the Sunniland oil field, was drilled to a total depth of 11,737 feet in the original hole, and 11,646 feet in a sidetrack hole. An oil show was reached at 11,634 feet in the sidetrack hole, the operator coring 2 feet into the show. Apparently an additional 10 feet of hole was cored, the last 11Y feet of the core being a gray, porous, rudistid rubble or very fine carbonate gravel which carried salt water. Tests in the Sunniland pay interval of this well were as follows: 1. DST (drill stem test) open hole: 11,631-11,636 feet (according to the Microlog, the lower part of the tested interval occurs in the top of a 90-foot zone of good porosity). Choke : Y inch Duration : 3 hours 53 minutes Recovery : 4 barrels oil 41 barrels water 156,000 ppm (parts per million) Pressures : BHF (bottom hole flowing) 2,740 pounds BHSI (bottom hole shut-in) 5,165 pounds 2. The rock at the tested depth was swabbed, and during more than 33 hours of swabbing over a period of about 2 weeks, approxi- mately 50 barrels of oil and 3,000 barrels of salt water were recovered. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 This test information showed that whereas the oil-to-water ratio was 1 to 4 in the drill stem test, it was 1 to 60 in the swabbing test. This unsuccessful completion is considered to be the most promising oil show in the past few years. At the base of an anhydrite immediately overlying the limestone containing the Sunniland producing zones, this well lies at a structural elevation of about -11,555 feet, which is the same as that of the 1954 oil-water contact in the Sunniland field (Raasch, 1954, p. 30). The Fredericksburg Limestone of late Lower Cretaceous age was swabbed at 9,812 to 9,822 feet, but recovered only salt water (117,000 ppm). This was a seismic location. The Humble Oil and Refining Company, Miles Collier No. 2 well was located slightly less than 1 mile northeast of the Miles Collier No. 1 well, and reached a total depth of 12,961 feet. The Sunniland limestone in this well was tested as follows: Depth : 11,745-11,757 feet Choke : 4 inch Duration : 2 hours 28 minutes Recovery : 1 pint oil 9 gallons water Pressures : BHF 415 pounds BHSI 485 pounds The Sunniland zone tested in the Miles Collier No. 2 well is separate and distinct from that tested in the No. 1 well; it occurs about 107 feet lower in the Sunniland limestone interval. At the base of an anhydrite immediately overlying the limestone containing the Sunniland producing zones, the Miles Collier No. 2 well is about flat with the No. 1 well. Cores of the Fredericksburg section at 9,750 to 9,754 feet and 9,802 to 9,828 feet contained oil saturation. A subsequent open hole test of the interval 9,735 to 9,829 feet recovered 3 gallonsof brackish water containing a slight oil emulsion; pressures were very low. This was a seismic location. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COLUMBIA COUNTY The Barton, Strahan, and Anderson, W.M. Davidson No. 1 well bottomed at 160 feet in beds of Eocene Age. The operators originally proposed to drill this well to a depth of 3,000 feet to test the updip pinchout of Upper Cretaceous sediments on the west side of the Penin- sular Arch. Wells previously drilled in the vicinity of the W.M. Davidson No. 1 well found Early Ordovician (Beekmantown) sands, shales, and quartzites at about 3,000 feet. This location was based on subsurface information. ESCAMBIA COUNTY The Emmette F. Gathright, State Lease 833, No. 1 well was drilled to a total depth of 7,043 feet, terminating in the Lower Tuscaloosa section of Upper Cretaceous Age. This test was located about 10 miles northeast of Pensacola. Though the Gathright well was permitted for 12,500 feet (which probably would have tested the deeper Lower Creta- ceous section) it is reported that the intention was to abandon after testing the Lower Tuscaloosa section if the well was normal. This was a gravity location. FRANKLIN COUNTY- OFFSHORE The California Company and Coastal Petroleum Company, State Lease 224-A, No. 2 well was drilled to a total depth of 10,566 feet, about 13 miles offshore from Carrabelle. This general area is high, according to regional gravity and magnetic surveys. A core taken at 10,324Y2 feet consisted of quartzite with coal inclusions containing pollen of probable Jurassic Age. There previously has not been such strong evidence that the Jurassic sea reached this far north and west in Florida and it is hoped that paleontology will provide information that will allow the subdivision of the thick Mesozoic carbonate and evaporate section of south Florida. It was postulated by Robert B. Campbell (unpublished report, 1934) that at least part of Florida was underlain by Jurassic rocks, which extended northward from the known Jurassic of Cuba. Campbell's 1934 paper refers to an opinion of J. Whit- ney Lewis (stated in Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 16, SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 p. 537) that the Jurassic of Cuba is the source of most of the oil and asphalt that occurs in the seeps and pools of Cuba. This was a seismic location. LEE COUNTY OFFSHORE The California Company and Coastal Petroleum Company, State Lease 224-B, No. 2 well reached a total depth of 12,600 feet in rock of Lower Cretaceous (Coahuila ? ) Age. This well was located offshore and about 26 miles west of Fort Myers. It also lies about 3 miles north- east of California's offshore State Lease 224-B, No. 1 well, a dry hole that was plugged and abandoned in November 1960, at a total depth of 14,000 feet in lime and dolomite of undesignated age. In the No. 2 well the massive anhydrite was topped at 11,520 feet; on this marker the No. 2 well is 47 feet higher than the No. 1 well. Two drill stem tests were run on State Lease 224-B, No. 2 well. The first tested a section of lower Upper Cretaceous age at 8,212 to 8,235 feet and recovered 2,439 feet of salt water. The second tested the Sunniland limestone of Lower Cretaceous (Glen Rose) Age at 11,285 to 11,355 feet and recovered 8,534 feet of salt water, analyzing 260,000 ppm total dissolved solids. For comparison, the total dissolved solids of the salt water produced in the Sunniland field from this formation, in the Humble Oil and Refining Company, Gulf Coast Realties Corporation No. 1 well, was 240,600 ppm. This location was made on subsurface information. MONROE COUNTY OFFSHORE In the Marquesas area four wells were drilled. The locations, drilling data, and the locations and data on other Marquesas area wells drilled in prior years, are shown on figure 2. The California Company, Outer Continental Shelf, Lease 0672, Block 44, No. 1 well bottomed at a depth of 4,687 feet in sediments of Eocene Age when the drill pipe twisted off and could not be recovered. Originally the California Company proposed to drill this well to 7,500 feet because information from other Marquesas area wells indicated that this depth probably would have revealed the top of the Lower Cretaceous section. 6 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 0 b I I II 41 i 0" / :S '-24 4 0= I 40 i- 0a i < " ,/ / L 4 CL / / \\ \ \ / / )...r 5 / 0- / I \ C SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 This was a seismic location. The California Company, State Lease 1011, No. 2 well reached a total depth of 7,722 feet. This location was based on seismic information and was drilled to fulfill a lease obligation. The California Company, State Lease 1011, No. 3 well was located 790 feet southeast of the California Company No. 2 well. The No. 3 well was planned as a Lower Cretaceous test with a proposed depth of 12,800 feet. As of December 31, 1961, the terminal date of this report, this well was coring at 12,390 feet. No shows had been recorded. The Gulf Oil Corporation-California Company, Outer Continental Shelf Block 46, No. I well reached a total depth of 7,871 feet. Originally it was proposed that this well would be drilled to 13,000 feet, but drilling was discontinued when the drill pipe twisted off. Despite the fact that the fish was recovered, drilling was never resumed. This well penetrated sediments of Upper Cretaceous Age. This was a seismic location. LAND FLORIDA MAINLAND The latest detailed leasing information available to the Division of Geology pertains to 1960, and is from the International Oil and Gas Development Year Book of 1961, part 1, volume 31, page 63. This source, as supplemented by information from the State Land Office relative to offshore acreage, reveals that 12 companies in 1960 held oil and gas leases on undeveloped mainland acreage in 57 of Florida's 67 counties, as follows: Florida mainland acreage Company under lease in 1960 Coastal 643,969 Continental 297,055 Gulf 76,830 Humble 1,437,792 Mobil 290,129 Shell 136,337 Sinclair 199,160 Sun 192,626 Texaco 222,545 Tidewater 24,849 Union 15,742 3,537,034 8 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLORIDA OFFSHORE At the end of 1961, Florida acreage offshore from the west coast of Florida, according to information from the State Land Office, was held by three companies under oil and gas lease as tabulated below: Company California Coastal Gulf Florida mainland acreage under lease in 1960 734,760 3,910,460 979,160 5,624,380 An additional area of approximately 2,500,000 acres offshore from the Gulf Coast of Florida a distance of 3 leagues (10.36 miles) were available for lease at the end of 1961. These consist of water bottoms leased under the provision of State leases 833 and 826 (Blocks A-J and O-U). Furthermore, the offshore Atlantic Coast of Florida, out to a distance of 3 miles, is available for oil and gas leasing except where beaches not owned by the State are located. The lessor, approximate locations and outlines of State leases located offshore from the west coast of Florida, acreage contained in each lease, and bonuses and annual rentals paid are shown onfigure 3. All leases provide that the State's share of production shall be one- eighth of the value of the oil at the wellhead. GEOPHYSICS Summary of geophysical activity in Florida in 1961: County and company Collier Humble Oil and Refining Co. Hendry Sinclair Oil and Gas Co. Sun Oil Co. Santa Rosa Olin Oil Company Plymouth Oil Company Texaco Company Method Deep core drill Experimental seismograph Experimental seismograph Seismograph Seismograph Gravity Total crew weeks 1 6 (est.) 5 5 (latter part 1961) 2 (continued working area In 1962) The area of lease 833, N formerly leased to Commonwealth Oil Company, reverted to the State pC on December 6, 1961. Now available for lease. SThis area (extending to shore and including bays and sounds) now available for lease. FLORIDA OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS LEASES BONUS ANNUAL PAID RENTAL STATE'S SHARE OF ANY PRODUCTION The California Co. 1011 Tr. I 489,000 1011 Tr. 2 245,760 TOTAL 734,760 Coastal Petroleum 224-A,Blks. -5 224-B,Blks.6-8 TOTAL Commonwealth Oil Corp. 833 (expired) 1,936,100 1,974,360 3,910,460 375,147. $1,069,262,00 5C/acre $ 500./block $ 22,566.40 $500./block $27,048.00* Offshore It/acre $ 10,500.00 Bays 8 Sounds : 2C/acre Gulf Oil Co. 826 Blks. A-J a O-U(expired) 1,914,246 826 BIks. K,L,M, N,V,W,X,Y,Z 979,160 TOTAL 2,893,406 $ 500./block IC/acre" $ 500./block I/acre' This area,formerly included in lease 826 held by the Gulf Oil Corporation, reverted to the State on September 26,1961. Now available for lease. State offshore acreage held under oil and gas lease: 5,624,380 Acres Gulf Coast offshore acreage open for oil and gas lease: 2,500,00OAcres Rental increasing annually after first two years at rate of 5% of the original amount. ano R7 86R 85 8 LEASE OUTLINES APPROXIMATE ONLY 23- Q 20 40 80 120 160 APPROXIMATE SCALE 220- Figure 3. Offshore Florida State leases, December 31, 1962. COMPANY AND LEASE ACRES 1/8 1/8 26- 25*- I SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 9 There was much more geophysical activity in Florida during the preceding year of 1960, for which period 89 crew weeks are recorded by Vernon and Hendry (1960, p. 7). Crew weeks of geophysical activity in Florida, by counties, over the 20-year interval, 1941-1960, inclusive, were obtained from the Oil and Gas Year Book pertaining to each of the included years, and are shown in table 1. Table 1. Crew Weeks of Geophysical Activity in Florida, 1941 to 1960, Inclusive Air Core County Gravity Mag. Mag. Resist drill seismic Total Alachua 42 14 0.33 7 63. 33 Baker 26.66 16.33 .33 43.32 Bay 60.25 15 1.33 11 18 105.58 Bradford 12.33 3 .33 15.66 Brevard 13.66 4.75 14 32.41 Broward 6 0.5 2 2 10.50 Calhoun 67 3 .33 17 14 101.33 Charlotte 25 3.5 1 13 70 112. 50 Citrus 28 10 .5 38. 50 Clay 13.33 13.33 3.5' 30.16 Collier 33.5 7.5 4 313.5 158 516. 50 Columbia 41.5 5 3 7.16 56.66 Dade 21 4.25 53 78.25 DeSoto 31 1.5 17 60 109.50 Dixie 31.5 19.5 71 12 134.00 Duval 17.5 17.66 3.25 38.41 Escambia 64 11 3 95 62 235.00 Flagler 28 4 2 34.00 Franklin 26.33 .33 12 31 69.66 Gadsden 37.5 17 .33 27 21 102.83 Gilchrist 26. 5 4.5 .33 31. 33 Glades 25 2.5 16 27 70. 50 Gulf 60.75 8 .33 12 61 142.08 Hamilton 20.83 4 .33 18 43. 16 Hardee 42.5 3 35.5 19 100.00 Hendry 21 1.5 63 68 153.50 Hernando 33.5 13.25 46.5 93.25 Highlands 38.5 6.25 16 56 116.75 Hillsborough 59 2 16 21 98.00 Indian River 9 2.33 29 40.33 Holmes 67. 83 29 1 47 144. 83 Jackson 73.33 27 .33 52 31 183.66 Jefferson 38.33 15 .33 53.66 Lafayette 35. 5 6. 5 .33 43 12 97. 33 Lake 34.33 9.25 6 49.58 10 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Table 1. (Continued) County Gravity Lee 11 Leon 45 Levy 45 Liberty 30.33 Madison 49 Manatee 23 Marion 36 Martin 4 Monroe 69. 5 Nassau 15.5 Okaloosa 77. 3 Okeechobee 25 Orange 17.83 Osceola 23. 5 Palm Beach 41 Pasco 58 Pinellas 18. 5 Polk 100.5 Putnam 14.66 Santa Rosa 82. 5 St. Johns 20 St. Lucie 6 Sarasota 12 Seminole 18 Sumter 18 Suwannee 46. 33 Taylor 53 Union 12 Volusia 29. 33 Wakulla 23.66 Walton 100. 83 Washington 72 Total 2410.23 Activity not broken down by counties, for 1951,'52, '53, and '58 (with percent of Grand Total) 82(3/ Grand Total 2492.23 Air Core Mag. Mag. Resist.I drill Seismic Total 3. 5 13.75 22.91 10 10 9 28.25 1.33 17.25 13.66 14 6.25 8.75 7. 33 10 4 1 12 10.5 11 6. 5 6.75 5. 5 4. 75 6.75 6.66 7 7 2 4 22 23. 5 621.79 0. 33 .33 .33 .33 5 6 .33 .33 .33 4 2. 33 28. 93 4 11.00 27 6 14.5 6 6 3 26 30 23 28. 5 20 60 66. 5 167 28 46 31 58 16. 5 1563.00 16 3 40 2 10 116 4 22 60 1 45 45 17 104 2 20 13 1. 5 6 112 34. 5 1642.91 97. 50 65.08 82.74 62.66 68. 33 72.00 66.25 18. 33 202. 75 33. 16 144.30 121.25 50. 58 104.33 116.00 122.00 19. 50 196.00 25. 16 370. 50 28. 50 32. 75 58. 50 22. 75 24. 75 100. 82 91. 33 19.00 31. 33 33. 99 296.83 152.83 6277.86 250(104I 1214(42%)I 1546gOy) 621.79 28.93! 11.00 181 3.01~ 2856.91 7823.86 621.79 7823.86 28.93' 11.00 181100 2856. 91 SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 In 1959 there was an additional 17 crew weeks of seismic activity over water bottom acreage which lies beyond the jurisdiction of the State of Florida (further offshore than 3 leagues or 10.36 statute miles). RULES AND REGULATIONS The rules and regulations by which Florida's oil and gas law (Florida Statutes, chapter 377, 1961) is administered, are implemented by the twelve I-page forms listed below which are self-explanatory: Form 1 Organization Report 2 Notice of Intention to Drill or Deepen 3 Bond for Plugging a Single Well 4 Blanket Bond for Plugging 5 Notice of Intention to Abandon and Plug Well 6 Monthly Producer's Report 7 Producer's Report of Condensate . . 8 Monthly Producer's Natural Gas Report 9 Well record 10 First Production or Retest Report 11 Producer's Certificate of Compliance and Authorization to Transport Oil from Lease 12 Affidavit on Plugging Completion The following forms are given special consideration: Form 2 Notice of Intention to Drill or Deepen: To obtain a permit to drill, this form, accompanied by a fee of $50.00, shall be presented to the Administrator, Oil and Gas Section, State Board of Conservation, P.O. Box 631, Tallahassee, Florida. To obtain a permit to deepen, the same procedure is followed, but the $50.00 fee is not required. No permit is required for workover operations as long as the well remains completed in the same reservoir. Form 5 Notice of Intention to Abandon and Plug Well: To obtain a permit to abandon, this form, accompanied by a fee of $15.00, shall be presented to the Administrator, Oil and Gas Section, who may elect to send a representative to supervise the plugging of the well. All abandoned wells shall be plugged within 30 days of abandonment. A primary objective of regulations regarding the plugging of oil tests is to avoid contamination of fresh water supplies. Form9 Well Record: This form ". . shall describe progressively the strata, water, oil or gas encountered in drilling a well with such FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY additional information as to gas volumes, pressures, rate of fill-up, water depths, caving strata, casing record, shooting, perforating, chemi- cal treatment, etc., as are usually recorded in the normal procedure of drilling. Any electrical logging or surveying of the well shall also be recorded.. ." It is stipulated that the operator supply the Oil and Gas Section, Division of Geology, the following items within the time limit (following completion of the well) specified: Item Time limit Form 9 30 days Well samples 90 days Electrical logs (or other surveys) 6 months Florida's oil and gas law is administered in accordance with the rules and regulations set out in a pamphlet designated as "General Rules and Regulations Governing the Conservation of Oil and Gas in Florida." The law, the rules and regulations pamphlet, and oil and gas forms 1 through 12 (discussed previously) conform closely with the pattern suggested by the Interstate Oil Compact Commission. This material may be obtained without charge by writing to the following: Administrator, Oil and Gas Section Division of Geology P. O. Box 631 Tallahassee, Florida PRODUCTION Florida's only current production is from the Sunniland oil field, which is located in Collier County in southern Florida. The locations of specific wells in the field, as well as of the 15 dry outposts to the field, are shown on figure 4. The field was discovered in September 1943 by the Humble Oil and Refining Company. The discovery well, the Gulf Coast Realties Corporation No. 1, was drilled on the strength of core-drill information supported by a seismic and gravity anomaly. The field now produces from 11 wells, all pumpers. It has had 13 productive wells, most of which flowed initially. The oil lifting cost in the field is low because an efficient water drive permits the wells to be pumped from a depth of only 3,500 to 4,000 feet. Most of the wells are open-hole completions. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 13 R27E - A 0 R 28 E R 29 E +- Southwest Lake TraffoTd- SProspect r CI - *OILWELL -DRY HOLE +ABANDONED OIL WELL R 30 E LOCATION OF COLLIER COUNTY and SUNNILAND FIELD Figure 4. Sunniland oil field and nearby prospects, Collier County, Florida. '*^ FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Completion data on the 20 Sunniland field wells, including dry as well as productive tests, are shown in table 2. At the present time the Sunniland field produces about 1,000 barrels of oil per day. Production figures for 1961 are: Month Barrels January 33,324 February 29,977 March 32,093 April 29,513 May 30,550 June 29,359 July 30,195 August 30,400 September 31,718 October 28,520 November 30,719 December 37,872 Total 374,240 The cumulative production of the field during its 18-year history to January 1,1962, is 6,852,620 barrels of oil. The monthly production of oil and water for the field during its 18-year life is shown as a graph in figure 5. The best wells in the Sunniland field are the Gulf Coast Realties Corporation No. 6 and No. 13, which, up to January 1, 1960, produced 1,148,792 and 731,883 barrels, respectively (Banks, 1960, p. 1738). The Sunniland crude oil is black and medium in weight (190-260 API [American Petroleum Institute] gravity; table 2). It is associated with little gas (gas-oil ratios are about 100 to 1; table 2). This crude oil is suitable principally for fuel products. According to Schweyer (1949, p. 12, 13) it is a mixed base oil possessing properties inter- mediate between those of the "paraffinic" base oils of Pennsylvania and those of the "naphtenic" base oils of Texas; the Sunniland crude oil is comparable to the high sulphur asphaltic crude oils from California. DISTRIBUTION At the present time Sunniland crude oil sells for $2.39Y2 per barrel at the wellhead. It is moved by tank trucks from the field to Port Ever- glades just south of Fort Lauderdale, where tankers ship it to the refinery located at Bay Way, New Jersey. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 I 0 id 3 .2 ;t Na : Mv... Oko8 04,Qr 0 N. 00s 0... ON N0 0 00 .- - o N >, 04 N F"- u , Io I g ,5I Ua" n I I I tj "" TT T T - E Q~ E'0. F N I NI IN Nn '0 N F N - - - [- IL -- .' N N r N N - ^ *f N N 0 *- n m o C' ^ S N 'S E 2 N UC 3 0 N - -U C' 0.N -'. 0.n 0. 0 T --. S0Co Co C C 0 o C &* CT C ^O Cj [i fCj Ci f < Q -b I 3 0 N O a N o 4) 4) 4, 4) 4) 4) < 0 N N < N < N '0 .0 2 2 .a 2 a 0 0 00 4' ' '"0 C.. U 0 a m a: N O P, 0 o o FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a.- .00 cll E -, 0l, .0 v 8 C- o E. 0' ~ I ~ C~ X I 0'- I X .c o [- ,- - " CL : . j 1 ~ I i I I 00 1 I r 3 ) ol N N N N Nl" N U SI ., I I :- I i U I N -- N^ t I > > " o C C C C C C 0 o ~ o Co C o o oC 0'0 ~ J 0 N' N 0 - D C 0 .-. C C C .-.Qo Q N4 Nb4 - I I. S. I. 4. a E i S E E ca E 00 < 0. 0. ['0 <2 < 0. 0 0. a 0 . U U _ Iu 0. U U U 0 U H. H.1 .-b .-bm O O I D I O L I r I r I r "' " m o a I a I I n u, NNN VI I O I O I YI D N I -IYI O I O I O I O ~ I C n I N I F ~ I O I ~ I N a I O I " E *o z (1 0 0 -0 > o0 v 0 "N 0 4.0 o n c u o 368 000 0>0. ai; 00 3c (. 00H C >b U U -^| ** s mo 0 -, i *N C * 0 010 ~)I "1 N SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 RESERVOIR Geologically, the Sunniland structure is a northwest-southeast dome about 2 miles wide and 4Y miles long. Puri's and Banks' paper of 1959 showed that the domal structure has a maximum vertical relief of about 154 feet, but that tilting to the northeast has reduced vertical closure to about 36 feet. An unpublished master's thesis submitted to the graduate faculty of Florida State University in 1954 by Albert C. Raasch, Jr., page 3 (written after 13 oil wells and 7 dry holes had been drilled in the Sunniland field) stated that the field was estimated to contain 2,356 productive acres. Also, Raasch (1954, p. 30) stated that that the oil-water contact occurred at a subsea depth of approximately 11,555 feet. There are two adjoining Sunniland pay zones and they are in Lower Cretaceous limestone of Glen Rose Age. The more productive of the two zones is the lower one which consists of a porous Chamid or rudistid reef. It is probable that the two Sunniland pay zones form a single reservoir. They have a combined thickness in the Sunniland field ranging from 5 to 45 feet, and are found at an approximate depth of 11,550 feet. A description of the reservoir rock in the Humble Oil and Refining Company, Gulf Coast Realties Corporation No. 2 well, used as the type section of the Sunniland field, is quoted from Raasch (1954, p. 29,30), with underlining by the present writer for emphasis: "Two zones of porosity in the upper part of the middle member of the Sunniland formation produce all the oil at Sunniland. These are in the 'upper producing' zone and the underlying 'Chamid' zone. The upper zone . is composed of a maximum of fifteen feet of light to dark brown, hard, dense to porous, microfossiliferous limestone. Porosity ranges from 5 per cent to 22 per cent with an average porosity of 10 oer cent. "The main production is located in the top part of the 'Chamid* zone just below the 'upper producing' zone. The 'Chamid' zone at Sunniland is made up of fossil fragments (caprinids) and chalky cement . . When both the cement and the caprinids are recrystallized, the resulting inter- crystalline porosity is at its highest with little remaining of the original shell fragments except brown outlines from which minute calcite crystals project. "The main producing zone has a maximum thickness of thirty feet . . Porosity ranges from 11 to 33 per cent with an average porosity of 18 per cent. "Permeability determinations are not available on all wells in the field because of poor core recovery. Permeability is very poor, both horizontally and vertically, in the south and southeast parts of the field. In the northwestern part of the field, the permeability is considerably better, but the porosity is not as good." FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Pressler (1947, p. 1862) stated that the producing zone in the Sunniland field has an average permeability of 312 millidarcys parallel with the bedding and 84 millidarcys perpendicular to the bedding. Sunniland has had a low decline rate, the production of 1960 being less than that of 1950 by about 25 percent. The essential absence of free gas, low gas-oil ratios, small decrease in bottom-hole pressures, and the general pattern of continued increase in water production show that reservoir energy is primarily from water drive. A summary of reservoir data is provided in appendix 2, which itemizes specific information on the following reservoir parameters: bottom-hole reservoir pressure, present producing pressure differentials, and gas-oil ratios. Production statistics, by months, for the field during its 18-year life are shown on figure 5. In an endeavor to estimate the additional oil which may be produced from the Sunniland field, consideration must be given to the following three factors; (1) Figure 5 shows that over the past 7 years there has been a gradual increase in the percentage of salt water production as compared to oil production. At the present time the field produces slightly more than 60 percent salt water, whereas early in 1955 it produced only about 50 percent salt water. Figure 5 also shows that in 1956 and 1957 the percentage of salt water production as compared to total production fell sharply to about 43 percent. Beginning with January 1958, however, the salt water percentage returned to about the value which would have been expected had there been no decline in 1956 and 1957. The decline may have been due to some production practice which has been dis- continued. It is not known what policy relative to salt water control the operator plans to follow in the future. (2) During the last 10 years the annual percentage of production decline for the field has been in the neighborhood of 5 to 10 percent. Within this approximate range it has fluctuated rather sharply (determined from the production statistics shown in figure 5). (3) At the present time the Division of Geology has no information on the production figure at which the economic limit of the field will be reached. The element of lifting cost, however, should not be unduly high since an efficient water drive permits the wells to be pumped from a depth of only 3,500 to 4,000 feet. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 In view of these considerations, a close estimate of the additional economically recoverable reserves of the field is not ventured. However, it appears reasonable to assume that the field has a good chance of being commercially exploitable for another 20 years, even though salt water incursion probably will have become very advanced within that period of time. If the Sunniland field produces another 20 years, and the per- centage of production decline is about 5 to 10 percent per year, about 3 to 4Y2 million additional barrels of oil will be produced. DRILLING PRACTICES The casing program used in drilling the Sunniland field wells was was described by Pressler (1947, p. 1862) as follows: "Typical drilling procedure at Sunniland is to start with a 24-inch hole that is drilled to approximately 80 feet in depth where 20-inch conductor pipe is set. A 17%-inch hole is carried to approximately 1,000 feet where 13 3/8-inch casing is set and cemented to the surface. This setting cases off the surface sand, gravel, and sandy limestone, and protects the Ocala limestone water zone from contamination. From this depth, a 12'4-inch hole is drilled to the total depth of 5,700 feet. Between the depths of 1,600 and 3,000 feet, complete circulation is lost in the cavernous limestones and dolomites of the middle and lower Eocene. At 5,700 feet, or near the top of the Upper Cretaceous chalky limestone, 9 5/8- incn casing is set. This setting restores circulc.:on, and the wells are completed with 8 5/8-inch bits." Most of the Sunniland wells were drilled with water to a depth of several hundred feet above the producing horizons, at which point drilling mud was added to prevent blowouts (Raasch, 1954, p. 31). Raasch (1954, p. 31) stated that the time required to drill the Sunniland wells ". . to a total depth of approximately 11,600 feet ranged from over seven months for the first well drilled (in 1943) to slightly over two months for the last well drilled (in 1949) . . BRINE The Humble Oil and Refining Company, Gulf Coast Realties Corpo- ration No. 1, which was the discovery well for the Sunniland field, was converted to a salt water disposal well in 1947. This well originally was completed December 2, 1943, at a total depth of 11,626 feet. Since it was unable to flow, pumping equipment was installed. Production FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY during the test conducted December 6, 1943, was 111 barrels of oil and 475 barrels of salt water. The well was operated until June 16, 1946, at which time the oil production had decreased to 10 barrels per day and the salt water had increased to 600 barrels per day. The well produced a cumulative total of 20,550 barrels of oil prior to being converted to salt water disposal. The chemical analyses of the brine from the Sunniland field indi- cates it might be commercially exploited. Two analyses of brine produced from the Gulf Coast Realties Corporation No. 1 well are presented: Table 3. Analyses of Brines from the Humble Oil and Refining Company, Gulf Coast Realties Corporation No. 1, the Discovery Well for the Sunniland Field Florida State U. S. Bureau Chemist Laboratory of Mines Radicals (milligrams per liter) (milligrams per lite Silica (SiO ) 30. 0 0.0 Iron (Fe) 75. 0 (+Al) 0 Calcium (Ca) 28, 100.0 25, 204.0 Magnesium (Mg) 4,000.0 3,110.0 Sodium (Na) 51,000. 0 (est. ) 58,491.0 Fluoride (F) .0 .0 Potassium (K) 4, 700. 0 Not tested Carbonate radical (CO3) 0 .0 Bicarbonate radical (HCO ) .0 146. 0 Sulphate radical (SO4) 260.0 275.0 Chloride radical (Cl) 145, 000. 0 143,601.0 Nitrate (NO3) .0 .0 Bromide radical (B ) 600. 0 Not tested Iodide radical (I) .0 .0 Hydrogen sulphide (H S) .0 .0 Total hardness as (CaCO3) .0 .0 Specific conductance (Kxl0. 5 at 25C.) .0 .0 Total dissolved solids 240,600.0 (at 180'C) 230,827.0 Suspended matter 20.0 --- Specific gravity 1. 159 1. 162 SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 By calculation, the radicals determined by the Florida State Chemist Laboratory would form the quantities of salt compounds shown below: Compounds formed from Sunniland brine (milligrams per liter) NaSO4KCI 897 KCI NaCI 137,453 NaBr CaSO4" 2 H 20 CaCI2 77,817 CaCO3 MgSO4 328 MgCI2 15,398 Fe203 231.893 Comparison of the Sunniland brine with sea water, as analysed by Igelsrud (1932, p. 188) indicates that the brine contains nine times more bromine, almost three times more magnesium, and six times more total salts. Of the elements contained in this brine, most are commercially ex- tracted from sea water, or from salt such as that present in the Permian Basin of southeastern New Mexico. Two elements, however, are produced to an important extent from salt wells. Information on these two elements is: (1) Bromine: The Michigan Chemical Corporation recovers bromine from oil well brines at El Dorado, Arkansas, and in 1960 this company expanded its El Dorado facilities. Also Arkansas Chemicals, Incor- porated, a new company formed by the Great Lakes Chemical Corporation and the Houston Chemical Corporation, plans to extract bromine from well brines at a new plant to be constructed near El Dorado. (Information source: Stipp and Roman, Minerals Yearbook, 1960, p. 283-284.) Bromine is also extracted from brine produced from wells in Michigan and West Virginia. (Information source: Stipp and Roman, op.cit., p. 283). (2) Magnesium: Of the magnesium produced in the United States 70 percent comes from brines. The source of these brines is specified as "well brines, raw sea water, and sea water bitterns." (Comstock and Baker, Minerals Yearbook, 1960, p. 749-750.) FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The Sunniland brine could be delivered to an extraction plant from the oil separator at relatively low cost. There are few oil field brines as saline as the Sunniland brine, which is concentrated suf- ficiently to cause some of the dissolved solids to precipitate upon standing. It appears that these brines might be commercially exploitable for their high bromine and magnesium content; also, the extraction of other radicals may be feasible. It is interesting to note that, according to the Geological and Economic Survey of the State of West Virginia, a large chemical plant in South Charleston, West Virginia, has operated on a brine containing about 9 percent sodium chloride and 12 percent total salt. For comparison, the Sunniland brine contains calculated percentages of 13.7 percent sodium chloride and 23.2 percent total salt. In 1960 the Sunniland field produced 619,000 barrels of brine, or about 1,700 barrels per day. This brine production is the equivalent of about 80 tons of total salts daily. PROSPECTS The subsurface axis of the Florida Peninsula (and of the Florida Plateau) is the Peninsular Arch (Applin, 1951, p. 3). Information from wells showed that on the pre-Mesozoic surface the crest of this feature is in the center of northern peninsular Florida, in Columbia County, and that on this surface the feature has a south-southeast trend which extends from southeastern Georgia into central Florida with a regional southeasterly dip of about 50 feet per mile (Applin, 1951, fig.2). Further- more, the structural configuration and trend of Upper Cretaceous rocks at the base of beds of Austin Age, according to the Tectonic Map of 1961 (U.S. Geological Survey and American Association of Petroleum Geologists), on which the area of Florida was contoured by Paul L. Applin, is very similar to that of the pre-Mesozoic surface. Regional gravity control (Lyons, 1950) indicates, however, the existence of ex- tensive gravity anomalies with predominantly northeast-southwest trend approximately at right angles to the pre-Mesozoic and Upper Cretaceous Peninsular Arch. Some of these gravity anomalies may reflect uplifted Ordovician and Silurian lithology deposited in a northeast-southwest trending Early Paleozoic "basin" as tentatively interpretated by Applin (1951, p. 12, fig. 5; p. 17). These gravity anomalies in some cases also may reflect certain Tertiary features of northeast-southwest align- ment as contoured by Vernon (1951, pl. 2) from close well control on SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 top of the Inglis Formation of the Ocala Group of Eocene Jackson Age. In the general area of the Peninsular Arch 25 wells penetrated Upper or Lower Cretaceous beds overlying Early Ordovician sandstone and quartzite (Puri and Vernon, 1959, pl. 1). These are the oldest rocks to be drilled in the State, and lie at depths from 2,813 feet, in the Sun Oil Company, Ruth M. Bishop No. 1 well, located in central Columbia County, to 7,720 feet, in the Ohio Oil Company, Hernasco Corporation No. 1 well, located in southwestern Hernando County. These Early Ordovician rocks were laid down on a continental shelf under shallow water marine conditions (Gunter and Vernon, 1954). In general, similar conditions of deposition have controlled the character of sediments laid down subsequently. Sedimentary rocks of the Cenozoic, Mesozoic, and Paleozoic eras, with a cumulative thickness of 18,000tfeet, underlie Florida (Roberts and Vernon, 1961). This column is relatively thin over the Peninsular Arch, and thick in southern Florida and in the Florida Panhandle. The upper part of this column, consisting of rocks of Tertiary and Cretaceous ages, has a thickness as great as 15,000- feet. These sediments under- lie the entire State and are primarily carbonates and evaporates in southern Florida and clastics in western Florida. In general, the lime. stones spread northward in successively younger stages and encroach upon the clastics (Applin, 1944, p. 1679, 1680). The limestones and sands of the Cretaceous System are important as oil and gas prospects. On the Florida mainland they vary in thickness from 1,000 to about 10,000 feet. In the Florida Panhandle, the Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy (exclusive of that laid down in Taylor time) has been described in cross sections, maps, and text by Applin and Applin (1947). For the eastern part of the Florida Panhandle, as well as the remainder of the State, Upper and Lower Cretaceous stratigraphy has been published in a series of cross sections designated as "Mesozoic Cross Sections A-A', B-B', C-C', D.D', and E-E'," prepared by the Southeastern Geological Society (1949). Florida contains about 40 million mainland acres underlain by thick sequences of sedimentary rocks. Only 369 oil tests have been drilled but not more than three-fourths of these wells were deep enough to reach the Cretaceous horizons which present information indicates are the primary oil objectives. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The oil and gas provinces of Florida, as discussed in this report, are outlined on figure 6. The Offshore Province encompasses the area extending from shore to a water depth of 200 feet, mostly off the west coast of Florida. The Osceola Low Intermediate Province, in which postulated pinchout of deeper Lower Cretaceous sands against base- ment rocks is the most attractive possibility, mainly is delineated to conform with the possible outline of a basement feature as indicated by regional gravity control. The other provinces are based primarily on stratigraphy, and are intended to enclose depositional areas in which the conditions of oil and gas occurrence and exploration would be similar. Accordingly, the South Florida Embayment Province is outlined as it probably existed during Trinity Age when Lower Cretaceous reservoir and oil source rocks were deposited. Similarly, other province outlines for the remainder of the State are shown as they probably existed during important parts of the Eagle Ford-Woodbine (or Eutaw-Tuscaloosa) Age when Upper Cretaceous rocks were laid down, A tabulation by province of depths and thicknesses of important sections, and approximate number of wells deep enough to test them, is presented in table 4. OFFSHORE PROVINCE Water bottom acreage under various depths of water from shore to 200 feet (considered the economic limit of water depth for commercial drilling operations on the basis of information presented in appendix 3) is shown on figure 6. This province provides an area for prospective offshore drilling slightly greater than that of the Florida mainland. Of the 11 offshore wells which were probably deep enough to have reached Lower Cretaceous beds, 5 are located in the Marquesas area. Data on these wells are shown on figure 2. On the Sunniland marker, the Marquesas area lies at a structural elevation about 800 feet lower than that of the Sunniland field, located 130 miles to the north- northeast. Also, the Lower Cretaceous section down to the Sunniland marker is about 1,800 feet thicker in the Marquesas area than it is in the Sunniland field. In general, seismic records of southern Florida contain much background interference making interpretations difficult. It would be helpful in interpretations if seismic records over water bottom acreage were found to have a relatively minor amount of background interference. SOUTHWEST GEORGIA EMBAYMENT PROVINCE OIL EXPLORATION PROVINCES (also see Table 4, p.25) PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Offshore Prob. Cret. South Florida Embayment Province L.Cret. Is. Gulf Embayment Province U.Cret. sd. Apalachicola Embayment Province U. Cret. sd. Osceola Low Intermediate Province L. Cret. sd. Ocala Uplift Province U. Cret. sd. Peninsular Arch Province U.Cret. sd. Southeast Georgia Embayment Province U. Cret. sd. tI Applin and Applin ,1947, show that missing members of the Atkinson Formation (Woodbine and Eagle Ford Ages),which thins from NW to SE,are: In Area 'A": Middle members In Area 'B: Middle and lower members In Area "C" The entire Atkinson Formation is thin or absent. In Area "D" per Joseph E. Banks (personal communication): The Atkinson Formation is present but not divided into members WATER BOTTOM AREAS (Water depths taken from U S C and G S Maps 1003, 1111 and 1112): From shore to Approximate acres 60 feet 14,382,000 120 feet 31,119,000 200 feet 41,227,000 To facilitate comparison: Florida's mainland contains about 40,000,000 acres. 24- Information compiled from many sources, including Applin and Applin,1947; Mesozoic Cross- section A-A' by the Mesozoic Committee of the Southeastern Geological Society, 1949 ; Regional Gravity Map of Florida (after Lyons, 1950 ); 23_ Vernon (1951); Paul L. Applin (1951); Jordan (1952); and Vernon and Puri (1959). 0 20 40 80 120 160 22 - APPROX. SCALE 82* 81* I I Figure 6. Oil and gas provinces of Florida. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 25 0 . 0.00 0 oo z 0 C r o .0.-. < no 0t Z >. 0 mO n o 0 N) N 0 V0 > E A. 0 0 n _ C 0-'0 0 0 [N 00 mo-- or..- to 'I N o 0 0 i g5to -- 0-s N' 0 -- = 5 0 -. C-N N C..- N r ' 0N0 00n O~ O 0 0 0 0 N3 0 U- +! 0 o "r 2 o' '-2'0 ~~~oE o~ ,,o - u m o I .0 .0 '0 00.- s(3 0> 0 | o k o N3 N > ~ - C. 0t r g a.- tFi Ni z 2 0 0c 0m 00 'o 0. *3 0 0 N 0 00 i- 0 0 I I .- g'0 ^s g> -s to ON " :j 66 Id!2 I s < i r ^ g ^ i " o&4S- ^'s .b0 00i -S' _ -S + ! S. &o en -0' o t S o en S, 0. .. N 00 C 00N oso 0) N Oo. 0 -0. 0 ) 0a T ox 0 V0 0 0 CX ".0 0 0 0 4) '0> '0 > 0' r [ on 0 E '0 0 .d N J' N N .0 S r a 2 u' . o 4 -' o a Z 0 N 31 '0 N 0 S0l 0 o r 0 U0 m N0 NN Cri..0 [N .d.(0.l ^ ~ No 0 j 0 4 . 00 00 0 0 . Nr N N C, =s Id Id ' 0 0 0 N 0 k to >. 0. u00.Uu9 )uL .0 N, N C. .'0o .0 N 0 C 006 m or 0 0~ To 0 .0 . .4 N .. 0>. C. C. 0 0 N 0 0 r0 0 0 N N 0 _'0 Z:) 0 0 En 0.0 0 U 0 0 2. O N g 00 0 u 0 N U 4 0 U) 0 0 u ) .0 U0 ' VJ- d0 f FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TESTS AND SHOWS IN THE FLORIDA KEYS The Gulf Oil Corporation, State Lease 826-Y well, the most north- ward and eastward of the Marquesas area wells, recovered from the calcareous Lower Cretaceous Sunniland interval 14.1 barrels of black salt water with strong sulphur odor, and 15 barrels of oil (fig. 2). This well probably could have been developed as a producer if it had been located on land and the oil present at shallow depth. A deeper section initially appeared promising in the State Lease 826-Y well; core recovery from this section revealed good staining. Results of a drill stem test of this interval, which occurs below the top of the Lower Cretaceous massive anhydrite, were negative, as shown: Depth : 14,642.14,702 feet Chokes : 1-inch bottom and '4-inch top Duration : hours 18 minutes Recovery : 106 barrels salt water 21.3 barrels sea water cushion No show Pressures : Packers were stuck in the hole, and the pressure recorders could not be recovered A section of alternating carbonates and anhydrites below the top of the Lower Cretaceous massive anhydrite also contained shows in another Gulf Oil Corporation test, State Lease 373 (Big Pine Key), which was located about 44 miles east of the State Lease 826-Y well. This test was structurally about 1,700 feet the higher of the two wells on the top of the Sunniland marker. In the test a 2-foot recovery from a cored interval of 5 feet (12,752 to 12,757 feet) had slight intermittent oil staining in hard limestone. Cores of a deeper calcareous and anhy- dritic section 224 feet thick (14,470 to 14,694 feet) had several zones of slight porosity and very slight oil stain. Apparently none of the shows were tested. SOUTH FLORIDA EMBAYMENT PROVINCE The South Florida Embayment, as contoured by J. E. Banks (1960) on an anhydrite near the Sunniland pay interval, is a large basin, has a gentle regional southwest dip of about 20 feet per mile, and has low relief features (Banks, 1960, p. 1743). The contoured anhydrite lies unconformably beneath about 10,000 to 12,400 feet of sediment. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 The Sunniland formation extends north of the South Florida Embay- ment Province perhaps halfway into the Osceola Low Intermediate Province. The boundary which separates these provinces, as they are delineated on figure 6, is based on well control; it also conforms in general with the alignment of a broad regionally high trend depicted on gravity maps. Generally the area north of this boundary contains dense carbonate development in the stratigraphic equivalent of the section of Trinity Age, whereas to the south the Trinity section is characterized by the more favorable Chamid reefal development. This accounts for the fact that north of this boundary few oil and gas shows have been reported from the Sunniland pay interval, whereas to the south most of the 57 wells drilled deep enough to test this zone have recorded good shows. Though well control in the South Florida Embayment Province has revealed that oil occurrence is common, it is inadequate to supply more than very regional structural information. Furthermore, geophysical techniques have been unsuccessful in providing detailed information on structures. The difficulties connected with reflection seismology were summarized in 1946 by John D. Todd, who stated: "The seismograph . has encountered almost overwhelming difficulties in this province (South Florida). The cavernous surface, ground roll, absence of deeper reflection changes, (and) acute lateral velocity variations . have combined to hold reliable reflection seismograph results to a bare minimum." Despite its limited effectiveness, Todd (1946) concluded: ". . by using a shallow reflection, the Petty Company was able to do mapping in the southern part of the state. And by refractions the position of the basement can be located, and the top of the Selma often can be mapped." (Editor's note: The Selma Group comprises the uppermost of the beds of Upper Cretaceous Age in peninsular Florida, according to Puri and Vernon, 1959, fig. 3.) During the past year the Seismograph Service Corporation has been working in areas of Hendry and Collier counties using the new vibration system in connection with their seismic prospecting. Operations are particularly difficult here. Because the subsurface sediments consist predominantly of carbonates, there are relatively few deep refraction and reflection changes. Furthermore, the sandy crust in parts of the area tends to obscure the record. However, the vibration system, which produces continuous vibrations, should yield more conclusive and characteristic records than the isolated tremors produced by dynamite, and there should FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY be less distortion on records made by the vibration system than on those made by dynamite. There are large regional and many untested local gravity anomalies in southern Florida. It is unlikely that these are due entirely to lithology changes, and some structures must be present, although wells in Florida are too sparse to verify this. THE MIDDLE MEMBER OF THE SUNNILAND FORMATION The most prospective horizon in this province is the middle member of the Sunniland formation, of Lower Cretaceous (Trinity Glen Rose) Age, as defined in Raasch's type section (1954, p. 11). This member is 250 feet thick and consists predominantly of limestone. Its top occurs at the base of a prominent anhydrite that produces a characteristic electrical log marker. There are two pay zones in this member. The "upper producing" zone, the production of which is of secondary im- portance, occurs at the very top of the member and consists of 36 feet of hard limestone interbedded with anhydrite and dolomite. Immediately underlying this is a more productive zone which consists of 41 feet of Chamid reefal carbonates. A third zone, occurring from 109 to 131 feet below the Chamid reef, was productive on test in the Commonwealth Oil Company, et al., M. B. Wisehart and State Board of Education No. 1 well, located in western Dade County in the abandoned Forty Mile Bend field. This zone was acidized through perforations (11,464 to 11,486 feet) and during a pumping test it yielded 20 barrels of oil per day plus considerable salt water. In the areas that have been productive, the Sunniland pay zones contain dolomite. In some Sunniland field wells, production is obtained from a dolomitic section as thin as 5 feet, occurring somewhere within the interval of the upper two pay zones described above. Completion operations must be handled with great care and precision to avoid salt water incursion. The middle member of the Sunniland formation is reached near the northern boundary of the province at about 10,000 feet; in the Sunni- land field at about 11,550 feet, and offshore to the south in the Marquesas Keys area, which is in the deepest part of the basin drilled to date, at about 12,400 feet. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 The Sunniland pay zones are the source of all of the oil produced in the approximately 10-million barrel Sunniland field, already described in this report under "Production." Structurally, the Sunniland field lies in a saddle between two gravity maxima, with seismic, gravity, and core drill results contributing to its discovery (Baum, 1953, p. 351). All of the production of the 2-well Forty Mile Bend field, amounting to 33,888 barrels of oil before the field was abandoned for technical reasons, also is from the Sunniland pay zones. Figure 1 locates this field about 48 miles southeast of the Sunniland field. In the Forty Mile Bend area there is overwhelming evidence that petroleum source beds are present in the part of J.E. Banks' cyclothem (1960) which corresponds to the middle member of Raasch's (1954, p. 11) Sunniland formation. Banks (1960, p. 1743) stated that ". . more than 15,000 barrels per acre of solid bitumen and 5,000 barrels of petroleum are indicated by physical and chemical tests of limestone cores." The discovery well for the field was the Commonwealth Oil Company, M. B. Wisehart State Board of Education No. 1, which was acidized through perforations 11,322 to 11,339 feet), and during a pumping test yielded 60 barrelsof oil and 90 barrels of salt water. The Chamid reef of the Sunniland pay section in most south Florida producing wells was not present in the discovery well of the Forty Mile Bend field (Banks, 1960, p. 1740, fig. 3). In this well the producing zone was a thin dolomite with 19 to 22 milli- darcys of permeability and 19 percent porosity, which produced 14,742 barrels of oil during about 15 months in 1954 and 1955 (Banks, 1960, p. 1741, 1742). An analysis is presented in table 5 of the 10 dry outpost wells located from 4j/ to 11Y2 miles from Sunniland field production. In these wells the top of the middle member of the Sunniland formation is com- pared with the oil-water contact of the Sunniland field, which stood in 1954 at a datum of -11,555 feet according to Raasch (1954, p. 30). This comparison shows that the datum in nine of these outposts ranged from 0 to 261 feet lower than the oil-water contact specified. Included in this group is the Humble Oil and Refining Company, Miles Collier No. 1 well, completed in 1961, in which the Sunniland marker occurs at the same structural elevation as the 1954 oil-water contact of the Sunniland field. This test had an excellent oil show from Sunniland reservoir rock and, according to the Microlog, good porosity. Only one of the dry outpost wells was structurally high on the basis described. This well is the Humble Oil and Refining Company, Collier Corporation B-1, which was 75 feet higher than the 1954 oil-water contact; large fluid recovery from FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Table 5. Sunniland Field Outpost Wells1 Wells Comment LTCL Co. No. 3 (West Harker Prospect) Sec. 28, T. 47 S., R. 29 E. -4- mi. NW of production LTCL Co. No. C-l (West Sunniland Prospect) Sec. 7, T. 48 S., R. 29 E. -5 mi. W of production GCRC No. B-1 (West Sunniland Prospect) Sec. 23, T. 48 S., R. 28 E. -7 mi. W of production GCRC No. D-1 (NW Sunniland Prospect) Sec. 3, T. 48 S., R. 28 E. -8- mi. WNW of production GCRC No. C-1 (SW L. Trafford Prospect) Sec. 21, T. 47 S., R. 28 E. -10 mi. WNW of production GCRC No. E-1 (SW L. Trafford Prospect) Sec. 19, T. 47 S., R. 28 E. -11i mi. WNW of production Curry No. 1 (West Lake Trafford Prospect) Sec. 8, T. 47 S., R. 29 E. -8 mi. NW of production Collier Corporation B-1 (NE Sunniland Prospect) Sec. 14, T. 47 S., R. 31 E. -114 mi. NE of production 69' low. Completed in 1947. T.D. 11,943'. 261' low. Completed in 1949. T. D. 11,894'. 152' low. Completed in 1948. T. D. 12,220'. 264' low. Completed in 1949. T. D. 11,900'. 167' low. Completed in 1948. T. D. 12,120'. 178' low. Completed in 1949. T. D. 12,210'. It is understood that this well had a good test. The Division of Geology has no record of it, however. 12' low. Completed in 1955. T. D. 11,937'. DST in Sunniland pay interval recovered salt water (150,000 ppm.), no oil. 75' high. Completed in 1952. T. D. 11,796'. DST: 11,549-585' Choke: 5/8" Duration: 7 hrs. 40 min. Recovery: 10,205' salt water SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 Table 5. (Continued Wells Comment Miles Collier No. 2 (SE Sunniland Prospect) Sec. 18, T. 49 S., R. 31 E. -6 mi. SE of production Miles Collier No. 12 (SE Sunniland Prospect Sec. 18, T. 49 S., R. 31 E. -6 mi. SE of production O' low. Test: 11,745-757' Choke: " Duration: 2 hrs. 28 min. Recovery: 1 pint. oil, 9 gal. water Pressures: BHF, 415 pounds BHSI, 485 pounds According to the Microlog, this test was made in the upper 5 feet of a 90-foot interval of good porosity. 0' low. The Sunniland formation was drill stem tested in the open hole as follows: Depth: 11,631-11,636' Choke: " Duration: 3 hrs. 53 min. Recovery: 4 bbls. oil 41 bbls. water (156, 000 ppm. ) Pressures: BHF, 2,740 pounds BHSI, 5,165 pounds A brief summary of structural and drilling data for the 10 dry outpost wells located at distances ranging from 41 to 111 miles from Sunniland field production, and all drilled by the Humble Oil and Refining Company. Structural data at the base of an anhydrite immediately overlying the Sunniland pay interval in the dry wells are compared with Raasch's 1954 oil-water contact in the Sunniland field of -11, 555 feet. 2Several swabbing tests are reported to have recovered a total of about 50 barrels of oil and 3, 000 barrels of salt water. A comparison of the drill stem test recovery with the reported total recovery of the swabbing tests shows that whereas the oil-to-water ratio in the drill stem test was I to 4, it was 1 to 60 in the swabbing tests. This unsuccessful completion is considered to be the most promising oil show in the past few years. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY the Sunniland pay zones, though consisting entirely of salt water, indi- cated the presence of good porosity and permeability. A similar analysis of the five dry outpost wells of the Forty Mile Bend field is summarized in table 6. The McCord Oil Company, Damoco No. 1 well is very low on Trinity Age Lower Cretaceous horizons as compared with all of the other wells in the Forty Mile Bend area. Cor- relating on the top of Banks' Lower Cretaceous Comanche interval Dade Unit D-4, this well is 270 feet lower than the Gulf Oil Corporation, State Lease 340 No. 1 producer. In the McCord Oil Company, Damoco No. 1 well the Sunniland Chamid reef appears to be absent. The remainder of the dry outposts to the Forty Mile Bend field ranged from 3 feet to about 54 feet low on the top of the middle member of the Sunniland formation as compared with the Gulf State Lease 340 No. 1 producer. A paper by Roberts and Vernon (1961) stated that there is a trend of porosity in the Sunniland pay interval about 200 miles long and 30 to 50 miles wide trending through Sarasota, Charlotte, Lee, Hendry, Collier, Broward and Dade counties. Probably several factors contributed to the formation of porosity traps. There are cases in which porosity in carbon- ates is formed where shoal areas pinchout against the denser carbonates and anhydrites that were deposited in deeper waters) Roberts and Vernon, 1961). Banks (1958, p. 7) stated that the pay section which trends across Florida is a very porous reef limestone that abuts against dense anhydrite on one side and is covered by anhydrite. Also, according to Gunter and Vernon (1954) "Much of the porosity . is formed as bio- strome and bioherm reefs, with porosity pinchouts in the inner reef areas and where pores have been filled with secondary anhydrite." Porosity in carbonate rocks also might result from wave action over shallow areas during regressions and transgressions of the sea, whereby the fine rock particles are removed and the coarser particles remain as conglomerates. Regressions could produce "summit" con- glomerates at the top of a formation just as naturally as transgressions could produce basal conglomerates at the base of a formation (Banks, 1958, p. 7). "Summit" conglomerates especially would occur at the top of a marine cycle when wave energy had a chance to act on reefs or other carbonate rocks. According to Banks, such conglomerates are present in the Sunniland pay interval. OTHER POSSIBLE PAYS Both above and below the middle member of the Sunnilandformation, porous limestones and dolomites have carried shows of oil which oc- casionally have been tested. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 Table 6. Forty Mile Bend Field Outpost Wells Wells Comment Commonwealth, et al. State Lease 1055 No. 1 Sec. 11, T. 54 S., R. 35 E. (About 2 mi. NE of production) McCord Oil Company Damoco No. 1 Sec. 31, T. 53 S. R. 35 E. (About 4 mi. NW of production) Gulf Oil Corporation State Lease 340 No. 2 Sec. 19, T. 54 S., R. 36 E. (About 1 mi. S of production) Gulf Oil Corporation State Lease 340 No. 3 Sec. 19, T. 54 S., R. 36 E. (About 3/4 mi. S of production) Humble Oil & Refining Co. State Lease No. 1 Sec. 30, T. 55 S., R. 36 E. (About 8 mi. S of production) Low (54'?). Completed in 1959. T. D. 11,676'. DST: 11,395-456' Choke: 5/8" Duration: 1 hr. 45 min. Recovery: 6 bbls. mud and salt water Pressures: BHF, 3,212 pounds BHSI, 5,220 pounds About 270' low. The reef does not appear to be developed in this well. Completed in 1951. Corr. T.D. 11,690'. 5' low. The reef is probably present, but poorly developed in this well. Microlog not legible above salt water level. Completed in 1954. T. D. 11,597'. 3' low. The reef is probably present but poorly developed in this well. Completed in 1955. T. D. 11,625'. DST: 11,342-346' Chokes: 3/8" and 1/4" Duration: 9 hrs. Recovery: 30' oil and 2, 370' salt water Pressures: BHF, 221 pounds 3' low. Completed in 1945. T. D. 11,794'. A brief summary of the five dry outpost wells located within an 8-mile radius of the field. Structural elevation of the electrical log marker occurring at the base of an anhydrite immediately overlying the Sunni- land pay interval in the dry wells are compared with the datum of this marker (-11,312 feet) in the Gulf Oil Corporation, et al., State Lease 340No. 1 producer (sec. 19, T. 54 S., R. 36 E., Dade County). FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Relatively few shows have been reported from the Tertiary section. A show was encountered in the Coastal Petroleum Company, John Tiedtke No. 1 well, located in southeastern Glades County and in the northern part of the province, at a depth from 3,567 to 3,587 feet. This is in the upper part of the Cedar Keys Limestone of Paleocene Midway Age (the interval of the show in the Tiedtke well is porous dolomite with thin interbedded black shale). The rate of penetration through this interval was 1 to 2 minutes per foot. A layer of stratified anhydrite, 28 feet thick, lies upon the dolomite. The show is described by the Coastal Petroleum Company as "orange brown, sticky hydrocarbon spotted in porosity. Black shale is oily. Good cut with CCI4." Throughout the province, porosity is well developed above the Cedar Keys Limestone in the Oldsmar Limestone of Lower Eocene and Upper Paleocene Wilcox Age. In fact, much of the Oldsmar Limestone is a zone of "lost circu- lation" which must be cased off before drilling to deeper depths; unfortunately, this zone is commonly flooded with salt water. The Upper Cretaceous section in most wells in the South Florida Embayment Province has contained no sand. A few wells have had from 10 to 20 feet of very calcareous, tight, shaly sand with glauconite inclusions in the lowermost part of the Upper Cretaceous section. Oil shows are persistently reported in the Fredericksburg Lime- stone of Lower Cretaceous Age, which is penetrated at a depth of about 9,800 feet in the Sunniland field. Contours by Paul L. Applin of the top of Lower Cretaceous beds of Washita Age are shown on the Tectonic Map of 1961 (U. S. Geological Survey and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists) to enclose a basin which is generally similar in configuration to a deeper basin contoured by Banks (1960, p. 1739) on an anhydrite near the Sunniland pay zone. As compared with the strati- graphically deeper basin, the upper basin is somewhat shallower, the main part of the basin plunges to the west rather than to the southwest, and its axis is about 40 miles further north. The structural markers used to define these two basins are separated by an interval of 3,200 feet in the Sunniland field; the top of the Fredericksburg Limestone is approximately midway between these markers. GULF EMBAYMENT PROVINCE This province consists of the Florida Panhandle westward from the Chattahoochee Arch, and includes the structural depression known as the Apalachicola Basin, a syncline that widens and plunges to the southwest (Gunter, 1944), off the flank of the Chattahoochee Arch. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 UPPER CRETACEOUS The age and stratigraphic correlation of the Atkinson Formation (mainly with the Tuscaloosa Group of Mississippi and Alabama), which is an important Upper Cretaceous target in this province as well as in other provinces dealt with in this report, are shown in figure 7, a cor- relation chart. MISSISSIPP SURFACE SECTION I SOUTHERN ALABAMA NORTHWEST TEXAS MISSISSIPPI GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY and EAGLE SURFACE SECTION CRETACEOUS COMMITTEE RE-SELMA UPPER CRETACEOUS and POLLARD FIEID.1954 CRETACEOUS CORRELATION CHART STRATIGRAPHY OF WESTERN NORTH FLORIDA ALABAMA I SUBSURFACE I FEBRUARY.1946 A A PG BULL VOL 30. p 187-212.1946 AUSTIN CHALK and EQUIVALENT FORMATIONS EAGLE FORD SHALE WOODBINE FORMATION MOOREVILIE UPPER EUTAW LOWER EUTAW UPPER TUSCALOOSA MIDDLE TUSCALOOSA LOWER TUSCALOOSA SELMA GROUP I Lower aorll EUTAW FORMATION McSHAN FORMATION GORDO FORMATION COKER FORMATION EOLINE FORMATION COTTONDALE FORMATION -- a < EUTAW FM IN W CENTRAL ( ALABAMA ( Y 'K <2> 1 1.-'- I S MARINE BEDS 0 MARINE So FACES 3: IW FLORIDA, IO SWA L FACI LITTORAL FAC1E5 E MOOREViLE EUTAW UPPER TUSCALOOSA MILLER SAND MARINE TUSCALOOSA 0 < MOYE PIloll SAND MASSIVE SAND 0 t T O LOWER CRETACEOUS TOWER CRETACEOUS IOWER CRETACEOUS COMANCHEAN PALEOZOIC ROCKS I UNDIFFERENTIATEDI IUNDIFFERENTIATEDI Aftlr APLIN nd APLIN. 1947 After WINTER,1954 Figure 7. Correlation of the Atkinson Formation. I FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY As proposed by the Applins in 1947, the Atkinson Formation is divided into three members which are lithologically and ecologically distinctive over extensive areas of northern Florida. In Panhandle Florida the upper member contains deposits designated as shallow- water marine (updip) and deeper-water marine (downdip); whereas the middle member contains marine beds (Applin and Applin, 1947). The lower member grades southward from the unfossiliferous littoral deposits of Alabama and Georgia into a fossiliferous marine facies (Esther R. Applin, 1955, p. 187). Joseph E. Banks (personal communication) thinks that oil may be present in this lower member in areas where there is a gradation from a littoral to a marine facies. Exploration concentrated on the marine-littoral gradational trend of this lower member may find oil in northwestern Florida. The validity, significance, and usefulness of the division of the Atkinson Formation into three members were not nullified nor questioned when Esther R. Applin (1955, p. 187), in order"To clarify the correlation of the Atkinson formation of the subsurface in the southeastern Gulf region with the Eagle Ford and Woodbine formations of Texas," redefined the Atkinson Formation "to consist of two members, an upper member of Eagle Ford age as formerly used, and a lower member of Woodbine age consisting of the former lower and middle members." Applin and Applin in 1947 considered the lower sediments of their Atkinson Formation, which they designated as belonging to the Woodbine Stage, to have been deposited in the early part of the Upper Cretaceous Epoch (fig. 7). This assignment of an Upper Cretaceous Age to these sediments received support in 1952 from Cobban and Reeside (chart 10b, facing p. 1011) who would include the Woodbine Stage of the Gulf Coastal Plain, as well as the upper part of the under- lying Washita Stage, in the Upper Cretaceous Series. These Cretaceous correlations by Cobban and Reeside are followed by the U. S. Geological Survey (1959, Wilson, et al., p. 410, 422). It should be noted, however, that the Mesozoic Cross Section Committee of 1949 of the Southeastern Geological Society considered the lower part of the Atkinson Formation to be of Lower Cretaceous Age. It is possible that the correlations shown on figure 7 need further study, since Loeblich and Tappan (1961, p. 263) stated that planktonic and benthonic Foraminifera point to an Eagle Ford Age for a part of the section which Esther R. Applin (1955, p. 187) considered to be of Woodbine Age. The fossils cited by Loeblich and Tappan are a part SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 of the "Barlow fauna" described by Esther R. Applin (1955, p. 190), which occurs below the upper member of the Atkinson Formation in sections ranging from 3 to 60 feet in thickness in 13 wells located in Florida, Georgia, and Alabama. In the Gulf Embayment Province the most prospected horizon to date consists of the Atkinson Formation, which is shown to have a thickness from about 800 to 1,400 feet in Applin and Applin's Cross Sections C-C' and D.D'. The sands of the middle and lower members of the Atkinson Forma- tion make up the productive intervals in the Pollard field, located just 4 miles north of the Florida State line in Escambia County, Alabama. The Pollard field was discovered in 1952 by the Humble Oil and Refining Company. The cumulative production of this field up to Janu- ary 1, 1961, was 6,665,531 barrels of 260 to 290 gravity oil. In 1960, a total of 35 wells produced in the field, all by artificial lift (Oil and Gas Year Book of 1961, pt. 2, p. 22). The petroleum accumulation is controlled by closure against a northwest-southeast fault, downthrown to the northeast. A paper by C. Victor Winter (1954, p. 121) showed that production is from the Miller sand of the Upper Tuscaloosa Forma- tion (Eagle Ford Age) on the downthrown side of the fault, and from the Moye (Pilot) and Massive sands of the Lower Tuscaloosa Formation (Woodbine Age) on the upthrown side. Depths to production from these sections range from 5,624 to 5,905 feet. Thicknesses, porosities, and permeabilities of productive sands in the Pollard field are shown in table 7. The Miller sand is included in the lowest part of the upper member, and the Moye (Pilot), which is the most prolific section in the Pollard field, and Massive sands are included in the lower member of the At- kinson Formation as defined by Applin and Applin (1947; correlation based especially on well No. 23 of Cross Section D-D'). The Oil and Gas Year Book of 1961 (pt. 2, p. 22) showed that the Pollard field also produced from the "Eagle Ford" sand, which is reached at an average depth of 5,196 feet and had an average thickness of 6 feet. No permeability or porosity figures are given for this sand. Exploration with the core drill appears to have contributed to the discovery of the Pollard field (Baum, 1953, p. 355). FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Table 7. Thicknesses, Porosities, and Permeabilities of Productive Sands in the Pollard Field Thickness (feet)1 Net Gross Effective Permeabilities2 Porosities2 Sand Av. Rge. Max. Av. (millidarcys) (percent) Miller -- 15-30 18 13 600 32 Moye 91 -- 40 -- -- 30 (Pilot) Massive 240 -- 23 -- 495 29 2Winter, 1954 Oil and Gas Year Book of 1961, pt. 2, p. 22 Two additional Alabama fields which produce from Upper Creta- ceous sands are present in this province. They are South Carlton (13 wells pumping from the Lower Tuscaloosa section), and Gilbertown (59 wells pumping from the Selma Chalk and Eutaw sections), located 50 to 85 miles, respectively, northwest of the Pollard field. LOWER CRETACEOUS PROSPECTS In this province the stratigraphic column also contains the sands of the Rodessa-Pine Island section of Glen Rose Age, which produce in the Citronelle field of Mobile County, Alabama, located about 36 miles west of the Florida Panhandle. The Citronelle field was dis- covered in October 1955, and to January 1, 1961, 254 wells had been drilled in the field and cumulative production was 21,072,619 barrels of 400 to 450 (API) oil. Depths to the tops of producing formations range from 10,870 to 11,399 feet, with all wells producing by artificial lift. In the Citronelle field the productive structure is anticlinal, and production is from a sand of 19 millidarcys permeability and an estimated porosity of 13 percent (Oil and Gas Year Book of 1961, pt. 2, p. 22). In the Gulf Embayment Province of Florida only two tests definitely have reached the Rodessa Formation. These wells were the Socony, SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 St. Regis No. 1 well in northwestern Santa Rosa County, and the Zach Brooks, Caldwell No. 1 well in southern Escambia County. Depths to the top of this formation in these wells were 10,218 and 12,120 feet, respectively. The Rodessa Formation as drilled in the St. Regis well was 1,072 feet thick, but no porosity logs are available to the Division of Geology on this well. A Microlog over a 390-foot interval (12,120- 12,510 feet) occurring in the upper part of the Rodessa Formation in the Caldwell well indicates that the interval is relatively tight. Ac- cording to a Hycalog, no oil or gas shows were found in this 390-foot section. The Hosston Formation of Lower Cretaceous Age was reached at a depth of 11,290 feet in the Socony, St. Regis well, and the well was terminated in these sediments at 12,525 feet. Both the St. Regis and Caldwell wells were about normal to the regional strike, based on the top of both the Selma Formation and the Eutaw Formation of Upper Cretaceous Age. Several oil companies are known to be studying the possibility of further testing of the Rodessa- Pine Island and Hosston sections. STRUCTURES Structures in the Gulf Embayment Province are considered to be narrow, limited, and hard to find. Some of the gravity maxima, however, may .e caused by faults (Todd, 1946). Four probably related, essentially northwest-southeast faults cut beds of Upper Cretaceous Age and extend a distance of possibly 40 miles or more from the area of Pollard field, Alabama, into the northern half of Santa Rosa County, Florida. Included in this group of faults is a regional graben; this structurally negative feature embraces several subordinate essentially northwest-southeast faults, all downthrown to the northeast, one of which is the Pollard Fault which traps the oil accumulated in the Pollard field. With the exception of the area em- braced by this graben, the major regional faults which belong to this system in Florida are downthrown to the southwest. The more east- wardly of these movements appear to be almost strike faults, whereas the most southwestwardly fault cuts the strike of Upper Cretaceous beds at almost 450. In Florida, this fault system has produced as much as 470 feet of vertical displacement (between the Sunniland Contracting Company, T. J. Nicholas No. 1 well, and the Gulf Oil Corporation, FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Cleveland H. Bray, et al., unit No. 1 well. Both of these wells are located in northern Santa Rosa County, with the second well being 1 1/3 miles northeast of the first) in Upper Cretaceous beds on top of a high resistivity curve in the Eutaw Formation. Distorted Upper Creta- ceous beds, as contoured from relatively close well control in Florida, indicates that there has been some horizontal fault movement whereby blocks originally in Florida have moved in the direction of Alabama, (Puri and Vernon, 1959, p. 22, fig. 6; Winter, 1954, p. 128, fig. 4). DRILLING COSTS Drilling costs over most of this province are low, and for this reason quite a lot of the drilling has been done by independents. Be- tween 8 and 13 rock bits will usually cut an average hole to test lower Upper Cretaceous sands (Jeffreys, 1953). Gunter and Vernon (1953) reported that at the date of their writing it cost from $18,000 to $150,000 to drill a well in the Florida Panhandle. APALACHICOLA EMBAYMENT PROVINCE This province is bounded on the west by the Chattahoochee Arch, a gentle regional uplift on the flanks of which oil may be trapped. On the east the Apalachicola Embayment Province is bounded by the east- ward limit of the middle member of the Atkinson Formation of Upper Cretaceous Age as drawn by the Applins (1947, map 2,3). This eastern boundary lies about 5 to 40 miles east of the synclinal axis of the Suwannee strait as contoured by the Applins. In its southerly part the Applins depict the Suwannee strait as widening and becoming fanlike so that it covers a large part of the lower half of the province. As this feature widens and deepens toward the south it progressively loses much of its identity and significance as a strait, until it becomes an embayment. The Suwannee strait appears to have an important bearing on the petroleum prospects of this area. Paul L. Applin (1952, p. 1162) stated that this feature is ". . probably partly structural and partly topo- graphic in origin." Hull (1962, p. 120) suggested that it may have been formed as an area of nondeposition. In any event, the late Upper Creta- ceous beds of Navarro Age and the upper part of the underlying beds of Taylor Age (Paul L. Applin, 1952, p. 1162) are not present. Hull (1962, p. 119) recorded that the strait is as narrow as 20 to 30 miles, is more SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 than 200 miles long, and has relief on top of the Cretaceous of more than 800 feet. In Pressler's Florida Cross Section A-B (1947, p. 1855, fig. 2), the general area in which the Suwannee strait is located is shown to lie at a depth of 3,000 feet, as referred to the top of the Selma Forma- tion of Upper Cretaceous Age. The Suwannee strait is the boundary between two distinct facies of Upper Cretaceous rocks. Hull (1962, p. 119) noted that, "North of the strait is a sandy calcareous shale Af the coastal plain. Just south of the strait are the Florida reef and bank deposits of the Florida Peninsula." UPPER CRETACEOUS In the Apalachicola Embayment province there are a variety of Upper Cretaceous prospects. Thinning of the middle member of the Atkinson Formation may produce on updip stratigraphic porosity pinchout. Unconformities which overlie sections from which Upper Cretaceous rock sequences are missing may serve as oil traps. The relationships of plastic to carbonate facies, which characterizes beds of Upper Creta- ::ous Age may produce traps. Oil accumulation may be present in the Upper Cretaceous carbonate reef which, according to Hull, is present just south of the Suwannee strait. If the Suwannee strait is partly struc- tural in origin, as suggested by Paul L. Applin, structural traps may be present. To date the Upper Cretaceous sediments of the Atkinson Formation (Eagle Ford and Woodbine ages) have been the most highly regarded section in the Apalachicola Embayment Province. The combined thick- ness of the Applins' upper and middle members of this formation over most of the province ranges from about 400 to 630 feet (Applin and Applin, 1947, map 3). Inclusion of the lower member, the base of which is very difficult to pick, increases the above thickness figures by about one-third (Applin and Applin, 1947, Cross Section D-D', wells 46 and 50). The J. R. Sealy, Fee No. 1 well, located in southwestern Decatur County, Georgia, and in the northwestern part of the Apalachicola Embay- ment Province about 5 miles north of Florida, recovered gas (and salt water) from the Eutaw section at 3,005 feet. A sample of the gas analyzed by the U. S. Bureau of Mines contained 74 percent methane. Wellhead pressure was above 30 pounds per square inch, and was probably due to water pressure primarily. R. O. Vernon (personal communication) is of the opinion that storable quantities of gas such as were present in this show are commonly associated with, and can be separated from, subterranean salt water. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert B. Campbell (1940, p. 3) stated that the Central Florida Oil and Gas Company, G. W. Rhodes No. 1 well, located in southern Leon County, was reported to have a good show in the Selma Chalk Formation of Upper Cretaceous Age from depths beginning at 3,000 feet. The well drilled through the Selma Chalk Formation at 3,465 feet. At a total depth of 3,755 feet, at which point the well was abandoned (prob- ably still in Upper Cretaceous sediments), considerable free oil was reported to have been bailed from the hole, but this report has never been substantiated. OTHER POSSIBLE PAYS The files of the Division of Geology record reports of shows in the Tertiary section which were even better than those described above. These were recorded by promoters and associates as being present in in the Bonheur Development Company, B. M. Cates No. 1 well, located in northeastern Wakulla County, about 8 miles south-southwest of the Rhodes well. The Cates well is structurally 85 feet higher than the Rhodes well on top of the Lituonella zone, as correlated on the basis of a paleontological examination by Paul L. Applin. The Cates well was reported to have encountered a 32-foot section of oil sand at 2,!37 feet continuing to the total depth of the well at 2,169 feet. The interval in which the shows occurred is included in the Avon Park Lituonella zone of Eocene Claiborne Age. Subsequently, a third well, the Revlin- Brown Trustees, Phillips No. 1, located about 2 miles east of the Rhodes well, was drilled to a sufficient depth to test the zones in which oil shows were reported in the Rhodes and the Cates wells. The Phillips well was a dry hole and was plugged and abandoned when the shows reported in the Rhodes and Cates wells were not encountered. "Possible first red Rodessa sand" (early Glen Rose age) was found in the Gulf Coast Drilling and Exploration Company, U.S.A. Forest Service No. 1 well, located in the southwestern part of the Apalachicola Embayment Province and in southwestern Liberty County. The top of this formation was reached at 7,580 feet in this well, and from this point to the total depth at 10,010 feet the section is predominantly arenaceous. Seven sidewall cores taken at depths of 8,486, 8,880, 8,986, 9,058, 9,252, 9,263, and 9,510 feet, respectively, recovered primarily reddish brown sand, with occasional silty and slightly mica- ceous, or glauconitic sands; no shows were reported. These sands, though cored, were not tested and they appear to carry salt water. Ac- cording to the Microlog, the 2,430-foot interval from 7,580 to 10,010 feet SPECIAL PUBLICATION-NO. 9 contains 55 zones of good porosity (calculated porosity of a typical interval, 9,414 to 9,418 feet, is 24 percent) varying from 3 to 42 feet in thickness and having a combined thickness of about 584 feet. This well is regionally about normal on both the Selma and Eutaw formations of Upper Cretaceous Age. These seemingly porous "possible first red Rodessa sands" could be made to produce if they carried hydrocarbons further updip, or on structure. BASEMENT LeGrand (1961, p. 1558, fig. 2) using the Tectonic Map of the United States (1961), showed that "basement" in the northeastern corner of the province lies at about 6,000 to 7,000 feet, and probably dips rather steeply toward the southwest. PROBABLE JURASSIC A core taken at 10,324Y2 feet in the California Company and Coastal Petroleum Company, State Lease 224-A, No. 2 well, located about 13 miles offshore from Carrabelle, contains pollen of probable Jurassic Age. This well is located in an area which regional gra'.ity and magnetic control shows to be high. DRILLING PROBLEMS J. E. Banks (1950) stated that "East and south of Tallahassee... unusual drilling problems start at the surface and continue until the widespread zone of lost circulation or water flow is completely penetrated and cased." OSCEOLA LOW INTERMEDIATE PROVINCE This is designed as an intermediate province because both the Tertiary and Cretaceous sediments grade into sediments that characterize the adjoining provinces. The postulated pinchout of Lower Cretaceous clastics against the pre-Cretaceous basement appears to be the most attractive possibility in this province. Therefore, the province boundaries are drawn to con- form with the possible configuration of a large, generally negative FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY basement feature as indicated by gravity control. The boundaries also enclose the locations of wells in which questionable pre-Cambrian (Applin, 1951, p. 2, fig. 1) crystalline rocks were penetrated by wells drilled on structural highs, including uplifted fault blocks (Vernon, 1951, pl. 2). These relatively high structural areas lie in the north- eastern part of the province. The quantity of disseminated particles of igneous material variously described as arkose and feldspar increases in the direction of these highs, which thus are indicated to have served as a source area of the Lower Cretaceous clastics. This material is especially prevalent in the Humble Oil and Refining Company, N. Ray Carroll No. 1 well, located in northeastern Osceola County, which reached weathered granite at the relatively shallow depth of 8,030 feet. The Lower Cretaceous plastic section is comparatively thin in the southern part of the province, where it occurs at greatest depth, and appears to be farthest from the source areas of the clastics probably toward the north. The plastic sediments thicken in the northwestern part of the province where they are penetrated at comparatively shallow depths, and appear to have been deposited near a source area. The depth to the top of this Lower Cretaceous plastic section, and its thick- ness, in selected wells are presented in table 8. Table 8. Depth and Thickness to Lower Cretaceous Clastic Section in the Osceola Low Intermediate -Province Depth to top Thickness of Well of section section Humble C. C. Carlton No. 1 (Southwestern Highlands County) 12,200 485 Amerada Swenson No. I (Western Okeechobee County) 10, 550 200 Humble N. Ray Carroll No. 1 (Northeastern Osceola County) 7, 525 505 Ohio Hernasco No. 1 (Southwestern Hernando County) 6,360 1, 340 SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 In the Osceola Low Intermediate Province the Lower Cretaceous plastic section consists of terrestrial-marine clastics and red and green terrestrial clastics interbedded with evaporites. E. H. Rainwater, in a well study made in 1946, designated these Lower Cretaceous rocks as "possible" Hosston sediments (Coahuilan Series) in the Humble Oil and Refining Company, C. C. Carlton No. 1 well, located near the southern boundary of the province. The Lower Cretaceous sediments in this well carried salt water and the section was not tested. However, a Microlog of a correlative section in the Continental Oil Company, C. C. Carlton, et al., No. 1 well, located 1Y miles to the west-northwest, indicates fair porosity. Rainwater has stated, also in the 1946 well study, that the sediments in the Carlton well that underlie the Lower Cretaceous section are of "possible" Jurassic Age. Lewis (1932, p. 537) is of the opinion that the Jurassic section of Cuba is the source of most of the oil and asphalt that occurs in the seeps and pools of Cuba. The Hosston Formation is productive in Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Tesas (Murray, 1957, p. 112). According to Jordan (1954, p. 375) oil shows have been found in the Hosston Formation in southern Florida. Dead oil stains in the Lower Cretaceous section from 8,110 to 8,150 feet were found in the Humble Oil and Refining Company, Hayman No. 1 well, located in southern Osceola County. OTHER SECTIONS The Upper Cretaceous section contains relatively little quartz sand in most of the province, but it becomes more arenaceous to the west and northwest. The prospects in this area will be discussed in the part of this report devoted to the Ocala Uplift Province, which overlaps the western portion of the Osceola Low Intermediate Province. The interval corresponding to the Sunniland field pay zone of Lower Cretaceous (Glen Rose) Age changes characteristics almost entirely in this province. Dense carbonates, with the percentage of dolomite increasing toward the north, replace the Chamid reefal develop- ment which occurs further to the south in the South Florida Embayment Province. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OCALA UPLIFT PROVINCE Deposition of the Atkinson Formation of Upper Cretaceous Age, appears to be incomplete in all parts of the Ocala Uplift Province as delineated on figure 6. This condition prevails in Area A, Area B, and Area C (after Applin and Applin, 1947, map 3, 6), which embrace most of the province. It also appears to exist in the southern part of the province, designated as Area D on figure 6, in which the thinness of the Atkinson Formation suggests deposition of only part of the section. In Area D the Atkinson Formation, though present, has not been divided into members (Joseph E. Banks, personal communication). The Ocala Uplift Province includes most of the structures referred to the Ocala Uplift, which was formed in Tertiary beds, probably during Early Miocene Age (Vernon, 1951, p. 53). Vertical dip slip faults paral- leling the crest of the Ocala Uplift have flattened its crest and lengthened its cross section (Vernon, 1951, p. 56). Small domes also give gentle reversal of dip (Vernon, 1951, fig. 13, section C-C'). This information is based on control which extends into the Avon Park Limestone of Eocene Claiborne Age. Such control is a better guide to Tertiary petro- leum prospects than is the shallower control of the extensively outcropping and eroded Ocala Group of Upper Eocene Age, which in the past was widely used as a structural key. It is unlikely, however, that Tertiary structures reflect, in most cases, the deeper highs. In connection with this, Vernon (1951, p. 53) stated that ". . on the crest of the Ocala Uplift . Tertiary beds which are structurally high overlie Mesozoic beds which are structurally low. . ." UPPER CRETACEOUS Drilling experience to datehas shownthat the sandsof the Atkinson Formation (Eagle Ford and Woodbine ages) provide the most promising section in this province. These sands thin from north to the south in this province, as shown by the thicknesses tabulated for selected wells in table 9. All of the Atkinson section is considered prospective, and areas of pinchout are especially interesting. See Area A, Area B, Area C (after Applin and Applin, 1947, map 3, 6), and Area D, all drawn on figure 6. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 Table 9. Thicknesses of the Atkinson Formation in the Ocala Uplift Province Thickness of the Atkinson Formation Well Stanolind St. Joe Paper Co. No. 1 (Leon County) Coastal Larsh No. 1 (Jefferson County) Stanolind-Sun Perpetual Forest No. 1 (Dixie County) 790' 420' 190' Coastal Wright No. 1 (Pinellas County) Socony Manatee No. 1 (Pinellas County) Thickness of individual members of the formation Upper Middle Lower 412' 220' 200' Not differentiated Not differentiated The basal shales of Austin Age which overlie the Atkinson Forma- tion or that lie upon eroded Paleozoic rocks, are reported by Jordan (1954) often to have a petroliferous odor in the area of the Peninsular Arch. All of the exposed sediments in this province, the oldest being the Avon Park Limestone, carry fresh water. Gas shows were reported in the Eutaw (?) Formation of Eagle Ford Age at -3,672 feet in the Florida Oil and Gas Company, Cedar Keys No. 2 well, located near the west coast in Levy County (Todd, 1946). This gas was similar to that produced in Georgia by J. R. Sealy and was separated from flowing, gas-saturated, salt water. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OTHER SECTIONS The Lower Cretaceous clastics penetrated at depth in the Ocala Uplift Province are generally red to variegated, calcareous sandstones. To the south the upper third of the section, which is included in the Comanche Series, is a tight dolomite with thin beds of limestone and anhydrite. In the Ohio Oil Company, Hernasco No. 1 well, located in south- western Hernando County and toward the southern part of the Ocala Uplift Province, Lower Cretaceous terrestrial-marine clastics and red and green terrestrial clastics are interbedded with evaporites. The investigation of the prospects of these Lower Cretaceous rocks was presented inthe preceding section which dealt with the Osceola Low Intermediate Province, the western part of which overlaps the Ocala Uplift Province. A thickness of 2,285 feet of Paleozoic sediments, which appear to be mostly quartzitic sandstone, was drilled in the Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, Perpetual Forest No. 1 well, located in western Dixie County. This test bottomed in Paleozoic sandstone at a depth of 7,510 feet but no porosity log is available. OTHER PROVINCES The two remaining provinces of Florida are considered to be of secondary significance as oil and gas prospects at the present time. They are designated as the Peninsular Arch Province and the Southeast Georgia Embayment Province. The primary targets in both were the sands of Upper Cretaceous Age. These provinces lie on the eastern flank of the Peninsular Arch as contoured by Jordan (1952, fig. 8) on the base of the Upper Cretaceous section. The northwestern boundary of the Peninsular Arch Province, as shown on figure 6, encompasses an area, covering a large part of the province, in which the Upper Cretaceous section rests upon Paleozoics (Jordan's dashed area, 1954). The bound- ary between these two remaining provinces mainly is based on subsurface information from one well (St. Mary's River Oil Corporation, Hilliard Turpentine Company No. 1, located in northwestern Nassau County), and hence is very indefinite, especially to the south and away from the control well. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 PENINSULAR ARCH PROVINCE A well with an encouraging Upper Cretaceous interval is the Sun Oil Company, Powell Land Company No. 1 well, located in northern Volusia County, which cored 140 feet of Atkinson clastics. Core re- covery revealed this plastic section to contain thick sequences of black shale. The upper 35 feet of this section, penetrated at a depth of 4,955 feet, is a fine grained, glauconitic sand or silt, with associated shale, about 8 feet from the top of which, according to the operator's core description, occurs 2 feet of "green, glauconitic, salt and pepper sand with black shale partings (and) kerosene odor." The Lower Cretaceous sediments deposited to the south within the province immediately downflank from the Paleozoic subcrop into Upper Cretaceous rocks is a red sandstone of the Comanche Series. Further to the southeast in the province and toward the east coast, the Lower Cretaceous section thickens to a maximum of about 700 feet, and the upper two-thirds of the section becomes an alternating sequence of limestone, dolomite, and anhydrite. Pre-Cretaceous sediments or igneous rocks of undetermined ages for the most part lie at depths ranging from about 3,000 to 6,000 feet, with the column being thickest toward the south. Much of the sediment of the Peninsular Arch Province are saturated with fresh water which may have flushed out oil accumulations. Baker County, located in the north central part of the province, is saturated with fresh water to depths of about 3,000 feet (Gunter and Vernon, 1954). The Hunt Oil Company, H. L. Hunt No. 1 well, which bottomed at 3,349 feet, and which is selected as representative of the subsurface section of Baker County, reached the tops of the formations underlying this area at the following depths: Taylor (late Upper Cretaceous age) 2,393 feet; Austin (late Upper Cretaceous age) 3,038 feet; and Paleozoics, 3,339 feet. SOUTHEAST GEORGIA EMBAYMENT PROVINCE Only one deep well has been drilled in this province, and therefore little can be said about its petroleum prospects. The stratigraphic column here should be somewhat thicker than it is in the westwardly adjoining Peninsular Arch Province. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The sole deep well drilled here is the St. Mary's River Oil Corpo- ration, Hilliard Turpentine Company No. 1, located in the northwestern part of the province in Nassau County. The total depth of this test was 4,824 feet. The Cretaceous and pre-Cretaceous sections drilled in this well, according to Mesozoic Cross Section D-D' prepared by the Southeastern Geological Society in 1949, are: Thickness (feet) Navarro-Taylor-Austin 1,505 Atkinson 305 Comanche 30 Paleozoic 210 Basic igneous 24 Campbell (1940, p. 7) stated that he and R. S. Bassler considered the Paleozoics in the St. Mary's well to be of Chattanooga (Lower Missis- sippian) Age. Bassler's opinion is based on the presence in these sediments, which include black shales, of an ostracod cf. Amphissites (Campbell, 1940, p. 7). This specimen was lost after identification and cannot be checked. Bridge and Berdan (1950, fig. 6) show this material to be of Silurian or Ordovican Age. W. Storrs Cole (1944, p. 94) is of the opinion that the St. Mary's well bottomed in 16 feet of igneous dike, which he tentatively classified as Triassic in age. Bridge and Berdan (1950, fig. 6) stated that this well terminated in "diabase," which was post-Paleozoic, and probably Triassic, in age. In most of this province Upper Cretaceous prospects probably lie below the zone of fresh water saturation. The section in Duval County, which is located in the middle of the province as drawn on figure 6, is saturated with fresh water to a depth of about 2,400 feet (Gunter and Vernon, 1954). The top of sediments of Upper Cretaceous Navarro Age in the St. Mary's well, according to Mesozoic Cross Section D-D', lies at a depth of 2,750 feet. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 CONCLUSIONS Florida's oil and gas prospects primarily are in Cretaceous rocks. In northern Florida the Upper Cretaceous is the most promising section, whereas in southern Florida the Lower Cretaceous section is the most attractive. In figure 6, Florida is divided into seven provinces intended to enclose depositional areas in which conditions of oil and gas occurrences and exploration would be similar. On the basis of present information, the most promising provinces appear to be the South Florida Embayment Province, the Gulf Embayment Province, and the Apalachicola Embay- ment Province. The Offshore Province, though as yet hardly tested, contains a thick sedimentary section and provides an area slightly larger than mainland Florida for prospective drilling. In table 4 is a tabulation by provinces of the depths and thicknesses of important sections, and probable number of wells deep enough to test them. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 53 BIBLIOGRAPHY Anonymous 1961 Big stride in the gulf: Service (a publication of Cities Service), p. 2-5, 8 photographs. Applin, Esther R. (also see Applin, Paul L. 1955 A biofacies of Woodbine age in southeastern Gulf Coast region: U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 264.1, 11 p.,1 fig. Applin, Paul L. 1944 (and Applin, Esther R.) Regional subsurface stratigraphy and structure of Florida and southern Georgia: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 28, no. 12, p. 1673-1753, 30 fig., 5 pl. 1947 (and Applin, Esther R.) Regional subsurface stratigraphy, struc- ture, and correlation of Middle Cretaceous rocks in Alabama, Georgia, and north Florida: U. S. Geol. Survey Oil and Gas Investi- gations Preliminary Chart 26 (in 3 sheets). Price: 904 a set from U. S. Geological Survey, Washington 25, D.C. 1951 Preliminary report on buried pre-Mesozoic rocks in Florida and adjacent states: U. S. Geol. Survey Circ. 91, p. 1-28, 5 fig., 5 tables. 1952 Sedimentary volumes in Gulf Coastal Plain of the United States and Mexico: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 63, no. 7-12, p. 1159- 1164, 3 fig. Atwater, Gordon I. 1959 Geology and petroleum development of the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico: 5th World Petroleum Congress, Sec. 1, paper 21, 25 p., 17 fig. Baker, Jeanette I. (see Comstock, H. B.) Banks, J. E. (also see Puri, Harbans S.) 1950 Wildcatting in Florida: The Oil and Gas Journal, June 22 issue, 4 p. 1960 Petroleum in Comanche (Cretaceous) section, Bend Area, Florida: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 44, no. 11, p. 1737- 1748, 5 fig., 4 tables. Boscom, Willard 1961 A hole in the bottom of the sea: Doubleday and Company, Garden City, New York. Baum, Robert B. 1953 Oil and gas exploration in Alabama, Georgia, and Florida: Geo- physics, v. 18, no. 2, p. 340-359, 20 fig. Berdan, Jean M. (see Bridge, Josiah) Bridge, Josiah 1952 (and Berdan, Jean M.) Preliminary correlation of the Paleozoic rocks from test wells in Florida and adjacent parts of Georgia and Alabama: in Florida Geol. Survey, Guidebook, Am. Assoc. State Geologists 44th Ann. Meeting, Field Trip, April 1952, p. 29-38, 1 table, 1 fig. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bramlette, M. N. (see W. R.) Campbell, Robert C. 1940 Status of oil exploration in Florida, v. 1, p. 1-79, 34 fig., 14 photo- graphs. Closed file report of The Peninsular Oil and Refining Company, April 4. Cobban, W. A. 1952 (and Reeside, J.B. Jr.) Correlation of the Cretaceous formations of the western interior of the United States: Geol. Soc. of America, v. 63, no. 10, p. 1011-1043, 1 correlation chart, 1 fig. Cole, W. Storrs 1938 Stratigraphy and micropaleontology of two deep wells in Florida: F;orida Geol. Survey Bull. 16, 73 p., 12 pl., 2 fig., 1 table. Comstock, H. B. 1960 (and Baker, Jeannette I.) Magnesium compounds: Minerals Year- book, p. 74 9-758. Gunter, Herman 1944 Florida geology and petroleum: Interstate Oil Compact Commission Quarterly Bull., December issue, 6 p. 1950 Exploration for oil and gas in Florida: Florida Geol. Survey Inf. Circ. No. 1 (1949 Supplement) revised, 38 p., 2 fig., 3 tables. 1954 (and Vernon, Robert 0.) Florida U. S. Oil Frontiers: Petroleum Engineers, February issue, 4 p. Hanson, Blanche E. (see Wilson, Druid) Hendry, Charles W. (see Vernon, Robert 0.) Hull, Joseph P. D., Jr. 1962 Cretaceous Suwannee Strait, Georgia and Florida: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 46, no. 1, p. 118-122, 3 fig. Igelsrud, Iver 1932 Formation of Oceanic salt deposits (part of a paper entitled "Chemistry of the Sea," by Thompson, Thomas G., and Robinson, Rex J.): Nat. Research Council Bull. No. 81, June issue, p. 188. Jeffreys, E. G. 1953 Northwestern Florida . a new oil province: World Oil, August issue, 4 p., 2 fig. Jordan, Louise 1952 Preliminary notes on the Mesozoic rocks of Florida: A summary of the geology of Florida and a guidebook to the Cenozoic expo- sures of a portion of the State (prepared for the field trip of the 44th annual meeting of the Assoc. American State Geologists) p. 39-45, 2 fig. 1954 A critical appraisal of oil possibilities in Florida: The Oil and Gas Journal, November issue, p. 370-375, 4 fig. Keroher, Grace C. (see Wilson, Druid) SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 Ladd, H. S. (see Riedel, W. R.) LeGrand, H. E. 1961 Summary of geology of Atlantic Coastal Plain: Am. Assoc. Petro- leum Geologists Bull., v. 45, no. 9, p. 1557-1571, 8 fig., 3 tables. Lewis, J. Whitney 1932 Geology of Cuba: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 16, no. 6, p. 533-555, 1 map, 1 fig. Loeblich, Alfred R. 1961 (and Tappan, Helen) Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera, part 1 - Cenomanian: Micropaleontology, v. 7, no. 3, p. 257-304, 8 pls. Lyons, Paul L. 1950 A gravity map of the United States: Tulsa Geol. Soc. Digest. Describes and shows a regional Bouguer anamoly gravity map of the United States based on previously published sources and data supplied by the Carter Oil Company. Murray, Grover E. 1957 The Gulf Coastal Province . how and where its oil and gas occur: The Oil and Gas Journal, November issue, p. 109-116, 13 fig., 1 table. Pressler, E. D. 1947 Geology and occurrence of oil in Florida: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 31, no. 10, p. 1851-1862, 3 fig. Puri, Harbans S. 1959 (and Banks, Joseph E.) Structural features of the Sunniland oil field, Collier County, Florida: Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. Trans., v. 9, p. 121.126, 21 fig. 1959 (and Vernon, Robert 0.) Summary of the geology of Florida and a guidebook to the classic exposures: Florida Geol. Survey Spec. Pub. No. 5, 255 p. Raasch, Albert C., Jr. 1954 The Sunniland oil field of Collier County, Florida. Unpublished Master Thesis, Florida State University, p. 1-33. Florida State University Strozier Library file no. 553.28 R 111 s. 1955 Sunniland oil field of Collier County, Florida (abst.): Meeting Program of Eastern Section, Geol. Soc. America Bull., p. 17. Reeside, J. B. Jr. (see Cobban, W. A.) Riedel, W. R. 1961 (and Ladd, H. S., Tracey, J. I., Jr., and Bramlette, M. N.) Pre- liminary drilling phase of Mohole project part 2 (summary of coring operations, Guadalupe site): Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geolo- gists Bull., v. 45, no. 11, p. 1793-1798, 1 fig. 1 table. Roberts, Wendell L. 1961 (and Vernon, Robert 0.) Florida . more extensive drilling might discover big oil and gas producing areas: The Oil and Gas Journal, March issue, 6 p. 3 fig. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Roman, Victoria M. (see Stipp, Henry E.) Schweyer,H. E. 1949 Some notes on Florida crude petroleum: Florida Engineering and and Industrial Experiment Station, Leaflet no. 11, 22 p. Southeastern Geological Society 1949 Mesozoic cross sections A-A', B-B', C-C', D-D', and E-E', pre- pared by the Mesozoic Committee of the Southeastern Geological Society. (Members: Louise Jordan, Chairman; Esther Applin, Eleanor Caldwell, L. C. Kirby, J. Law, E. H. Rainwater, T. D. Rodgers and H. A. Sellin.) Price: $10.00 per set from South- eastern Geological Society, P. O. Box 1634,Tallahassee, Florida. Stipp, Henry E. 1960 (and Roman, Victoria M.) Bromine: Minerals Yearbook, p. 283-288. Tappan, Helen (see Loeblich, Alfred R.) Todd, John D. 1946 North Florida Province is geologically attractive: World Petroleum, March issue, 6 p. Tracy, J. I., Jr. (see Riedel, W. R.) Tectonic Map of the United States 1961 (exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii) Prepared by a committee of the United States Geological Survey and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (George V. Cohee, Committee Chairman; work on "Upper Mississippi Valley Embayment, Gulf and Atlantic coastal plains," by Paul L. Applin). Scale 1:2,500,000. Vernon, Robert 0. (also see Gunter, Herman; Puri, Harbans S.; Roberts, Wendell) 1951 Geology of Citrus and Levy counties, Florida: Florida Geol. Survey Bull. 33, 256 p. 1961 (and Hendry, Charles W., Jr.) Exploration for oil and gas in Florida: Florida Geol. Survey 1960 Supplement to Information Circular No. 1 (revised), 16 p., 1 fig., 4 tables, 1 photograph. Wilson, Druid 1959 (and Keroher, Grace C., and Hansen, Blanche E.) Index to the geologic names of North America: U. S. Geological Survey Bull. 1056-B. Winter, Victor C. 1954 Pollard field, Escambia County, Alabama: Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. Trans., v. 4, p. 121-141, 14 fig. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 APPENDIX I EXPLORATORY WELL INFORMATION, 1961 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY .4.----- o . .U - oo .0 0 o5 o p ,4 rn 41 M o 4 0 S-o c o v . >I; BB ' g 4, Ct 0" 4 -14Co S, 4vt g 0 C. o C - V u U- to U S 0 v m > 0 44 10 4S 0 4 4 S< 0 ^ * 2. ^ O B , (1- 4.1 4 4. S .5. 4. 4. 4, 0 S .0 - s S ; c 2 z* C 0n z 2 1, M ul ci0 SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 C ^? *- 0' ~oco ull, t '" "~ m a i| '00 ,. >.< C^") 2 ~ rt M C0.C o C0 o ~ 0 ?C -] 'r Co CO ^ C C- m ar 2 C, C -' ". CS^ ^l' C)i 5 C CO C >- -* ^~ ^ ^' : '2 ~ *- 0-- C .c oa : C z c F^ . .. r N 2S ? E i U ... C 3 Id o. C 0 e 3- "Q o 3-C -O "1 C 3 C C 3C ~~~~~ Cm0 1 ..C 0 H oo Co - S-S. 0 C C C - C ^, S " '0 CC 2 i2 ' '0 C C '03 ^ C C )h ^ C C 0~~' C ^ u 2 mm '0 C 0 i3 L o S. s .i - C '0 CC 0C C4 C C C. C -.E l 0 .0 ES -"S & ulO 2 0 ' C 0' c Cu d 0- - '0 0 - C 0' COo FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 0 N u 4) 00 ME z 4) *rr sD - -0 0 ,0 0 oo >* | Q r r~ 'o 0 uo M ~ ~ U ,4 0 >, 5 -" 2 0a c ", " 'O > U 0- .- 4) > 4 I 1 )4) .1 .C 0 -r 0 S " S" r a * 4)'04) 'og N* 0' CM S-, ,; . 04)g-' '-'5o. o. . -g o . '0 " 44. S4 .- -n 0' 4 .4) c~r -'' C -. '5 m '0d .4) 4)o o.4) >) 4) O 4)4)"3 4)F o4 ) *4 4) 0 ~ 4) ' 4) t4 '% 0 0 0. - -~1 C m to -r S~ . 4). P V- in-,~ m ' 4)) u,:" N SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 - 4 V (4o t * N -S _* 4) t N~k 0 . s - > 0 N 1 j o o" o N(0 (4.) -iH (40U Nd~ ^fc 0) .0 44 4) 44( .Ed ,UX4 wuh &m = -J'e~ 0 fr-a 6 -. 6^ Y MC tnO B in, r^o In ;s 3S' g- (4 0.0( 4) ~O44 r 0. or ow0 .0 4) eoo o - SB" -0(4 44j 0)^ 0 '0 4) - U 0 ~c5 '-'W043 0e 2 40C S N (4~ O N U3 S s ? 2 0 . ^i^* *cde C;, Mum .i FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 0 1 - i- vl '0 an a + 0^' -3 N - o 3 -. a- '. ^".* *lom aV 0 . V a. O N - N N E E N *, * ^ ,M .4 0) N rt m) ;j1 ao o 3- 2 uo 'E ra" rn " o m 0 X : o i. aa .0 0o oo nc U-.. .2 o':33 a. Uoag 2|0. fMYO SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 0 0 - '-en u u M0E-' z o ^ a enm C (,-, ' 0 0 0 0 0 . S Si 0o p- 00 00 o 0 0 0 en .2 Si N 0 e - 0 0'- 0- e Sin >0 0. O um~~ rut Nf r^c43 - 0 052 u g;s W 0 -0 0 5 l5 en c .s 0 0 V 00 Si 0 0 I 00 e 0 .5 0> -H Q - N en 0 0 - .. mm: 0 0 en ,.*- V - - 0o 0 i r en 0 S* 0 > a> P ' en n e n ,I -^ e en 5 s ^ 'si - .. 0 t.. n.. n- 0 .- o u en 0" en Si i- U 0 o i 0n o ^^ Si 0 g 0 "0 S i *" en - 000 I 0. s U ftc eO3n - en 0 0 hi| - ^?. .- '2 S. 0' O- r On en en .. n.e... nen Si Si.e ?* S ? .2e . 0, a ( r i 0u Si (f OJ J Si: no n r 2o 0 .. 0.n Si'. 0 -e fo H Q m . ag en .0 1'- FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY .4 3 .5 0 o O`om 0- `D3 *4 0 I .0 0 0 t, 0 o to~ c'o ~ 0 NC ti 0 -- .) .o c oo 2' *-o. o -N ^to t ot ,NO 0. N o? 5.o ^ E s Ci 1^ d 43 0o o o D L N UOt .. S jJ " I a 3 >a - t 0 ' C S MC .o o - 2 to ) .o cl cl m~ B a u -. 04) 4) o. g t '0 4OC 0)0 " 0 u^ crP > S. o a Co S tS -S to C]'04 >' 0. 0 4) S 03 I ~* .8 | r.h I rt m00 "c~ S m vr 0n .> ~ QZa 4)i U C to 004 U Ni to to." -: 'c, .o c'C ] SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 ~ IdN OP-O 0' 0" -' C'- 4:- -0 ON 1 ' I *> I. NUE-' '. ; Q~id - 0 ol 44 1 "" .0. 0 il PUE cr 4 r 5 ^05 N N NO u o 0 ^~ "-: o En) ,~a '4 En 0 m13. 1 d 'd o , U cd 'I 0 0 '4 u C *$> 0 CU oC -o l~14. *4:4 ! I P4k G*" - s mCU '004) 4U14 ' n !& .2~ * ! rC'4 -U'C Suu OaOE S*S =34 .4 olE *0. 14 a' *o tS.5o is ^s t4 0 EE 00 3, 0 P. 0 1 o 0 o - 0 U *0 0 *a 0.- 0.W SIni a'D N a'l M C; 0i5 M S u E SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 APPENDIX II SUMMARY OF RESERVOIR DATA SUNNILAND FIELD, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 SUMMARY OF RESERVOIR DATA SUNNILAND FIELD, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Structural trap: NW-SE dome (2 miles wide and 4Y miles long)with a maximum vertical relief of about 154 feet, but which has been tilted to the NE so that vertical closure is reduced to about 36 feet.l Oil-water contact: About -11,5552 feet. Productive area: Estimated to be 2,356 acres.2 Producing formation: Though they probably form a single reservoir, there are two adjoining pay zones which occur in Lower Cretaceous limestone of Glen Rose Age. The main pay zone is a Chamid or rudistid reef. The total thickness of the producing interval ranges from 5 to 45 feet. Average porosities range from 18 percent, for the reefal limestone, to 10 percent for that which is nonreefal. The average permeability is 312 millidarcys parallel with the bedding and 84 millidarcys perpendicular to the bedding. In the northwestern part of the field the permeability is considerably better, but the porosity is not as good. Production: During its approximately 18-year life the field has produced 6,852,620 barrels of oil (up to January 1, 1962). There has been initial production from 13 wells, most of which flowed initially. The field now produces about 1,000 barrels per day from 11 pumping wells. The 1960 production was less than that of 1950 by about 25 percent. In 1961 salt water production has been slightly more than 60 percent of total production. Early in 1955, or about 7 years ago, the field produced only 50 percent salt water. Crude: 190-260 API, high sulphur asphaltic base. Drive: Water drive. Bottom hole pressures: In March 1958, the reservoir pressure, at a depth of reference of -11,548 feet, was 4,638 PSIG (pounds per square inch per gauge), and had declined an average of 654 PSIG from its original value (5,292 PSIG). Present producing pressure differential: Since all of the Sunniland wells are pumpers, there is no specific information on this point. However, in March 1958, production tests on these pumpers showed that the difference be- tween shutin pressures and the estimated bottom hole flowing pressures, at a depth of reference of -11,548 feet, ranged from 58 to 1,533 PSIG. Gas-oil ratios: Gas-oil ratios have not been measured in recent years. How- ever, due to the level of pressure maintenance it is believed to have 2Puri and Banks, 1959. 3Unpublished thesis by Albert C. Raasch, Jr., 1954 Pressler, 1947. 70 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY remained essentially constant at about 100 cubic feet per barrel. Thus it appears that the reservoir has not suffered a loss of gas energy since the discovery of the field. The Division of Geology estimates that if Sunniland produces another 20 years, and the percentage of production decline is about 5 to 10 percent per year, about 3,000,000 to 4,500,000 additional barrels of oil will be produced. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 APPENDIX III OFFSHORE DRILLING SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 OFFSHORE DRILLING WATER AND DRILLING DEPTHS (A presentation of several points of information, with sources to indicate present capacities.) A. OF IMMEDIATE ECONOMIC INTEREST: (1) Atwater, Gordon I., Geology and Petroleum Development of the Continental Shelf of the Gulf of Mexico, 1959, sec. 1, paper 21, of the 1959 Fifth World Congress, p. 6), states: "A maximum water depth of 200 feet is considered as marking the limit of economic accessibility for petroleum exploration of the continental shelf under present conditions of production costs and product prices." This quotation applies to the water bottom acreage offshore from Florida. (2) "Big Stride in the Gulf," Service (a publication of the Cities Service Oil Company), October 1961, p. 6, states: "The latest big stride in the march from shore was a drilling effort in water 180 feet deep and at the fartherest offshore site - 70 miles out in the history of drilling off Louisiana. The struc- ture designed for this type of exploration is as tall, from Gulf bottom to derrick top, as a 33-story building. This unique platform represents a technological breakthrough in offshore drilling, and its different design prepares the way for operations in deeper and deeper water." (3) Wilson, Howard, "Giant Sale Should Guarantee Offshore Activityin Gulf for 5 years," The Oil and Gas Journal, January 22, 1962, v. 60, no. 4, p. 36, states: ". . this week Shell is starting to drill (one of the tracts in the south extensions of Grand Isle and South Timbalier areas, located offshore from Louisiana). It will use a floating drilling barge operating in 287 ft. of water, the deepest ever tried in the Gulf of Mexico." This article also states (p. 34) that, as a result of the March 16, 1962, sale of acreage offshore from Louisiana, there will be an "increased (d) demand for floating drilling equipment. Many of the tracts are in waters deeper than 200 ft. and some are close to 600 ft." B. OF SCIENTIFIC INTEREST PRIMARILY (1) Bascom, Willard, A Hole in the Bottom of the Sea, 1961 (the story of the Mohole project to date), page 15, states, in effect, that: The Mohole will be drilled 31,000 feet beneath the sea, and in water about 13,000 feet deep. 74 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (2) Riedel, W. R., Ladd, H. D., Tracey, J. I., Jr., and Bramlette, M. N., "Preliminary Drilling Phase of Mohole Project (II. Summary of Coring Opera- tions)," AAPG, v. 45, no. 11, p. 1793-1798, discloses, in effect that: Experimental Mohole 7 drilled in water 11,706 feet deep and re- covered a basalt core from a depth of 595 feet. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 GLOSSARY OF OPERATING TERMS AND PHRASES USED IN THE OIL INDUSTRY (from Ira Rinehart's and others) A/, acidized with A, Abstract (example: A-10) abnd, abandoned ac, acres addl, additional alg, along amt, amount AOF, absolute open flow AW, acid water B/, base BAW, barrels of acid water bbl, barrel BCPD, barrels of condensate per day BCPH, barrels of condensate per hour BDPD, barrels of distillate per day BDPH, barrels of distillate per hour BFPH, barrels of fluid per hour BHC, bottom hole choke BHFP, bottom hole flowing pressure BHP, bottom hole pressure BHSIP, bottom hole shutin pressure bid, bailed bldg, building big, bailing Blk, Block BLO, barrels of load oil bir, bailer BNO, barrels of new oil BO, barrels oil BOPD, barrels oil per day BOPH, barrels oil per hour BP, back pressure BPD, barrels per day BPH, barrels per hour brkn, broken BS&W, basic sediment and water btm, bottom btm ch, bottom choke BW, barrels water BWPD, barrels water per day BWPH, barrels water per hour C, center C/, contractor (example: C/John Doe) calc, calcareous CD, contract depth CFG, cubic feet gas CFGPD, cubic feet gas per day ch, choke CHG, choke cht, chert circ, circulate or circulation clng, cleaning cmt (ed), cement (ed) CO, cleaning or cleaned out COF, calculated open flow comb, combination comp, completed or completion cond, condensate conn, connection cor, corner corr, corrected C&P, cellar and pits CP, casing pressure CPSI, casing pressure shut in crd, cored crg, coring crk, creek csg, casing cse gr, coarse grained CSL, County School Lands CT, cable tools D&A, dry and abandoned DC, drill collar DD, drilling (ed) deeper FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY decr, decrease or decreasing deg, degrees DF, derrick floor dim, diminish or diminishing dispel, displaced or displacement dist, distillate DO, drilled out DP, drill pipe D/P, drill plug or drill(ed)(ing) plug DPM, drill pipe measurement drk, derrick drid, drilled drlg, drilling DRLR, Drlr, driller DST, drill stem test DT, drillers tops E, east EL, electric log ELEV, elevation EL/T, electric log tops Est, estate est, estimate or estimated et al, "and others" et ux, "and wife" et vir, "and husband" E/BL, East boundary line E of W/L, east of west line FEL, from east line FNL, from north line FSL, from south line FWL, from west line FNEL, from northeast line FNWL, from northwest line FSEL, from southeast line FSWL, from southwest line FS & WLs, from south and ,est lines f-gr, fine gained FIH, fluid in hole fld, field fluor, fluorescence flw (d) (g), flowed or fie foss, fossiliferous FP, flowing pressure FQG, frosted quartz gra fr, from frac, fractured, used for Hydrafrac, Sandfrac, Stratafrac fract, fractures fsg, fishing ft or ', foot or feet GA, gallons acid gal (s), gallon or gallons GC, gas cut GCM, gas cut mud GCR, gas condensate ratio gd o&t, good odor and taste GDR, gas distillate ratio GLR, gas liquid ratio ggd, gauged gge, gauge G&O, gas and oil G&OCM, gas and oil cut mud GO, gas odor GOR, gas-oil ratio grad, gradual or gradually grd, ground grn, green gray, gravity hd, hard HFO, hole full oil HFW, hole full water HGOR, high gas oil ratio HO&GCM, heavily oil and gas-cut mud HP, hydrostatic pressure hr (s), hour or hours hvly, heavily hvy oil, heavy oil incl, included or inclusions irr sec, irregular section IP, initial production or initial potential IPF, initial potential flowed IPP, initial potential pumped J&A, junked and abandoned KB, kelly bushing KO, kicked off L, line Lab, Labor lam, laminated SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 Id (s), land or lands Lge, League li, lime or limestone Ioc, location or located Ise, lease MCF, thousand cubic feet med gr, medium grained mi, miles MI, moving in mic, micaceous MICT, moving in cable tools MID, moving in derrick MIM, moving in materials min, minutes MIR, moving in rig MIRT, moving in rotary tools MIST, moving in standard tools MIT, moving in tools mid, milled mig, milling MO, moving out N, north not, natural NCT, non-contigJous tract NE, northeast NF, no fluorescence OAW, old abandoned well OC, oil cut OCM, oil cut mud OF, open flow O&G, oil and gas O&GCM, oil and gas cut mud OH, open hole OIH, oil in hole 00, oil odor op, open (ed) orig, originally 0 sd, oil sand OS&W, oil and salt water OTD, old total depth OWDD, old well drilled (ing) deeper OWPB, old well plugged back OWWO, old well worked over P&A, plugged and abandoned PB, plugged back PBTD, plugged back total depth PD, per day perf, perforated (example: perf 23/2900 -20', means perforated with 23 snots from 2900.2920') perf csg, perforated casing perm, permeable or permeability pkr, packer PL, pipeline pid, pulled pig, pulling PLO, pipeline oil POP, putting on pump Porc, Porcion por, porosity or porous pot'/, potential P/, pumped ppp, pinpoint porosity prep, preparing press, pressure prod, produced or producing PSI, pounds per square inch PSIG, pounds per square inch per gauge PSL, Public School Lands PT, potential test qts, quarts R, range RA, right angles RB, rotary bushing rds, roads rec, recovered redrid, redrilled rep, repairs or repairing ret, retainer rmg, reaming rng, running RP,rock pressure RT, rotary tools; or rotary table when used after elevation FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RU, rigging up RUCT, rigging upcable tools RUP, rigging up pump RUR, rigging up rotary RUST, rigging up standard tools 5, south sat, saturated or saturation SC, show condensate SCHL, Schlumberger SD, shut down SDO, shut down for orders SDR, shut down for repairs SE, southeast Sec, section SG, show gas SGSC, show gas and condensate SG&D, show gas and distillate sh, shale shly, shaley shis, shells SI, shut in SIBHP, shut in bottom hole pressure SICP, shut in casing pressure SIP, shut in pressure SITP, shut in tubing pressure sli, slight sly OCM, slightly oil cut mud SLM, steel line measurement sd, sand or sandstone sdy, sandy sd w/SG, sand with shows gas sd w/SO, sand with show oil SLM, steel line measurement sits, siltstone SMPL, smpl, sample SO, show oil SO&G, show oil and gas SO&W, show oil and water spud, spudded sqzd, squeezed SSG, 'light show gas SSO, slight show oil S/T, sample top stds, stands stdy, steady STH, sidetracked hole stk, stuck strks, streaks strgr, stringer subd, subdivision sul, sulphur sul wtr, sulphur water Sur, survey surf, surface SW, salt water or southwest swb (d) (g), swabbed or swabbing SWC, sidewall cores SWS, sidewall samples sx, sacks T/, top T-, township (example: T-4S) T-A, Temporarily Abandoned TC, top choke tbg, tubing tbg ch, tubing choke TD, total depth temp, temporary th, thence TP, tubing pressure TOP, testing on pump /"T/"B, top and bottom choke measur- ment T/pay, top pay TPSI, tubing pressure shut in tr, tract, trace T/sd, top sand tstg, testing twp, township U/, upper (i.e., U/Laramie) U/rmg, underreaming vert, vertical VHOCM, very heavily oil cut mud W, west w/, with WB, water blanket SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 9 WC, wildcat or water cushion when used in DST W'ly, westerly WI, washing in WO, waiting on, work over WOC, waiting on cement WOCT, waiting on cable tools WOO, waiting on orders WOPT, waiting on potential test WOR, waiting on rig WORT, waiting on rotary tools WOST, waiting on standard tools WOT, waiting on test WP, working pressure WS, whipstock wtr, water WW, wash water XIn, crystalline SYMBOLS: @ . at, seated . core ' .. feet after number (or minutes when used in giving directions: S 45030' W) " .. inches after number (or seconds when used in giving directions: S 4 530'22" W) o. . degrees S... pounds after a number (and stands for number before a number,i.e., #1) 5%"-5779'/800 sx . means 5Y" casing cemented at 5779 feet with 800 sacks of cement. SW . salt water AGRi- CULTURAL LIBRARY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 138 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |