|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Cover | |
| Title Page | |
| Frontispiece | |
| Main |
CITATION
SEARCH
THUMBNAILS
DOWNLOADS
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cover
Page i Page ii Title Page Page iii Frontispiece Page iv Main Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
STATE OF FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF CONSERVATION Ernest Mitts, Director FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert O. Vernon, Director SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 2 CONTRIBUTIONS TO FLORIDA VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY PAPER NO. 2 THE SKULL OF Leptarctus ancipidens FROM THE FLORIDA MIOCENE By S. J. Olsen Florida Geological Survey Tallahassee, Florida April, 1958 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LIBRARIES P K YONGE LIBRARY . OF FLORIDA HISTORY STATE OF FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF CONSERVATION Ernest Mitts, Director FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert 0. Vernon, Director SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 2 CONTRIBUTIONS TO FLORIDA VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY PAPER NO. 2 THE SKULL OF Leptarctus ancipidens FROM THE FLORIDA MIOCENE By S. J. Olsen Florida Geological Survey Tallahassee, Florida April, 1958 G@s '1 22-. VZ- -- SPOSTGLENOIDFOR. EXT. AUD. MEATUS B ATTACHMENT SITE FOR XT AUD. MEATUS DIGASTRICUS STYLOMASTOID FOR. -- C "-''^-POSTGLENOID FOR. 1Bf- FOR. OVALE FOR. HYPOGLOSSI OR. MAGNUM -- ----- -- ----- Figure 1. Skull of Leptarctus ancipidens, F. G. S. V-5706; A. Right lateral view; B. Dorsalview; C. Ventral view. Skull is distorted due to lateral crushing. Missing areas indicated by dashed lines. THE SKULL OF Leptarctus ancipidens FROM THE FLORIDA MIOCENE S. J. Olsen Vertebrate Paleontologist Florida Geological Survey Leptarctine remains have been reported from several localities, of Miocene age, within the United States and in only four instances has there been enough cranial material preserved to warrant its published description (Dorr 1954, 1956; Gazin 1936; Stock 1930; Matthew 1924). This dearth of crania is particularly true in the case of the animal from the Florida Miocene, Leptarctus ancipidens, which hereto- fore has been known only from partial upper dentitions, sup- plemented by a lower jaw and several isolated molars and premolars (Olsen 1957a,b; White 1941). A nearly complete skull (fig. 1) of Leptarctus ancipidens was recovered during the 1957 excavations at the Thomas Farm by the Florida Geological Survey and is the basis for this contribution to the cranial anatomy of this rare Tertiary mustelid. The knowledge gained by the comparison of this skull of the Thomas Farm species ancipidens(F. G. S. V-5706) with those of other members of the genus Leptarctus has further strengthened the writer's original opinion, based on dentition alone, that this is indeed a species of Leptarctus rather than representing a new genus of mustelids as de- scribed by White (1941). The comparison of the monotypic genus Mephititaxus, with the known Leptarctines, and its reduction to the synonomy of the genus Leptarctus was dis- cussed in an earlier contribution by thewriter (Olsen 1957b). The types, with casts of the types or figured specimens of the following species, have been at hand for comparison or have been examined: Leptarctus primus Leidy, A. M. N. H. 18241; Hypsoparia bozemanensis Dorr, C.M. 9574; Cratero- gale simus Gazin, U.S.N.M. 13801; Leptarctus ancipidens (White), M.C.Z. 3658. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Family MUSTELIDAE Subfamily LEPTARCTINAE Genus LEPTARCTUS Leptarctus ancipidens (White) Mephititaxus ancipidens White 1941, p. 91-94; Romer 1948, p. 1-11; Olsen 1957a, p. 452-454. Leptarctus ancipidens (White), Olsen 1957b, p. 1-7. Hypodigm: Type M. C. Z. 3658, right and left P2- Mi ; M. C. Z. 3659, partial right maxilla with P- and roots o: M/-; F. G. S. V-5706, nearly complete skull; F. G. S. V- 5694, unworn right P4 M-; F. G. S. V-5655, nearly complete right mandible; F. G. S. V-5654, unworn lefi M ; F. G. S. V-5656, symphysis of left mandible witt P Pg ; F. G. S. V-5697 (formerly University of Floridz 1659), partial left mandible with P4 MI . Horizon and Locality: Lower Miocene, Thomas Farm, Gil. christ County, Florida. DISCUSSION The most striking characters of the skull of L. ancipidens are the double temporal ridges, the bony projections of the bullae and the relatively slight rostrum as compared with the thickened and rugose area that supported the craniomandib- ular and neck musculature. TemporalRidges: The temporal ridges originate at the postorbital processes of the frontals and diverge backward to merge with the lamboidal crests which curve downward to terminate at the mastoid processes (fig. IB). Dual crests of a similar nature, but not so proportionally massive as those found in Leptarctus, are known to occur in the present day genera ofTaxidea andMartes. This strong up-thrusting SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 2 PAPER NO. 2 3 S~ "4 0I- y / ^oi il e ..-0 .XI \ | -- I >- z5 rI .- ,1 In -i 0 S" -- 0 00 t0 0 A .5 I- a .--x- ..< -' 0 M" 4 ) c. 0 44 I\ r- ." ' p . 00 o w cd L ta FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY of the temporal crests indicates a hypertrophied muscula- ture. This is particularly disturbing inasmuch as the teeth and the mandibular articulations do not indicate an especially powerful masticatory function for this animal. Bullae: The bony projections that extend in an antero- ventral direction from the bullae are, as far as is known, found only in Leptarctine skulls (fig. lA, 2). Gazin (1936) described their function as being an attachment for the di- gastric muscle. In carnivores, the attachment of the digastric muscle is typically associated with the paroccipitalprocess and the ridge connecting this with the mastoid process (fig. lA, C; 3). In Leptarctus ancipidens, this same attachment site is marked by a scar plainly visible on the described specimen. The sole function of the digastric muscle is that of de- pressing the lower jaw and opening the mouth. The muscle performing this operation in the carnivores is composed of 1 two fusiform flattened bellies, united by a round tendon. I do not believe that the digastricus, performing the slight function that it does, would have need for such a rugose at- tachment site as indicated by the bony process of the tym- panic. Undescribed specimens of Leptarctus in the collection of the Frick Laboratory at the American Museum of Natural History, indicate that this process can vary in size and that the foramen or aperture can be present or entirely lacking (Frick, personal communication, October 1957). This open- ing which is present in the Florida form and absent in some specimens from other localities, may be due to the incom- plete fusion of the twin inferiorly directedprocesses arising from the auditory bullae. The muscles that are associated with this area are those which depress the head at the atlanto- occipital articulationbutwhether or not any of these muscles 1These bellies fuse in the dog and the hame digastricus or "two-bellied" does not apply (Miller 1952, Sisson 1953). SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 2 PAPER NO. 2 5 6 co N a; d 41 00 omm 0 0 < h \~~~ a < FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY were associatedwith this tympanic projection cannot be stated with certainty. The tympanic, although crushed in the figured specimen, has enough of its internal structure preserved to warrant a more detailed description (fig. 2). The tympanic cavity does not extend into the twin lobes of the process but ends short of the foramen or aperture that pierces the distal end of the process. The two lobes consist of compact bone and do not contain nutrient foramina. The interior of the tym- panic cavity has two radiating septa, one arising from the anteromedial wall of the cavity and ending at the wall of the internal meatus and the other radiating from the lateral wall of the tympanic and fusing with the more or less crescent shaped crista tympanica. There is considerable space between the crista tym- panica and the ventral floor of the tympanic cavity; a similar condition is found in the badger (Pocock 1921, Segall 1943). The bulla of the badger is very similar to that of Leptarctus having four additional septa or "rafters" plus the two found in the Miocene form (Van der Klaauw 1931). The external auditory meatus has no external ring or tube, being instead an opening similar to those marking the entrance of the larger bloodvessels having a rounded margin to the external open- ing. The meatus enters the tympanic cavity at a nearly right angle to the median sagittal plane. Foramina: The external opening of the stylomastoid foramen is located at the base of the mastoidprocess andits course can be traced by a tube-like swelling visible on the roof of the tympanic cavity to its terminus at the posterior base of the crista tympanica. The area of the cavity above this opening and that of the internal auditory meatus has been destroyed by crushing so that it cannot be interpreted with any degree of confidence. The postglenoid foramen is located, as in the badger, at the base of the postglenoid process. The foramen ovale SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 2 PAPER NO. 2 7 is situated at the anterior base of the bullaand in a posterior position in relation to the pterygoid process. The foramen hypoglossihas its external opening at the posteromedial base of the bulla, again similar to that found in the badger (fig. 1A, C). The lacrimal duct and the infraorbital foramen are po- sitioned as in the badger and there is a noticeable swelling on the anterior margin of the lacrimal. This swelling is also present in the types of Craterogale simus and Hypsoparia bozemanensis. Zygomatic Arch: The fact that the zygomatic archis much heavier in proportion to the other dimensions of the skull has been the cause of much discussion among the de- scribers ofLeptarctine skulls. Dorr (1954) used this feature as main distinction between his new genus Hypsoparia and the other genera of Leptarctines. There are not enough cranial remains known of Leptarctus to evaluate to what de- gree these animals varied but that they did vary considerably is brought out in the two lower jaws that are preserved, both possessing Mi. In F.G.S. V-5655, the depth of ramus be- low M- is 30 percent greater than the same measurement in F. G. S V-5697. The anteroposterior diameter of M- is only 17 percent greater in the deeper jawed specimen. Consider- able variation among badger skulls was noted by Hall (1946) and applied to his study of the Pliocene form Pliotaxidea. This variation also holds true for Leptarctines. Hall (1951) figures a number of mustelid skulls in which the width of the zygomatic arch varies considerably and yet these specimens are of the same species, Mustela frenata (pl. 32, 33; fig. a, d). The dentition of H. bozemanensis is morphologically indistinguishable from other members of the genus Leptarctus. The proportion of width versus length in M- has already been discussed in a previous paper (Hall 1936, p. 61; Olsen 1957b, p. 4). Validity of Hypsoparia: I believe that the allocation of the species bozemanensis to a new genus Hypsoparia is not FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY valid, when such an assignment is based ona variable char- acter as a zygomatic arch, known in only one specimen. I propose that the genus Hypsopariabe reduced to the synonymy of the genus Leptarctus. The rostrum is slight in build compared to the heavy zygomatic arch, the temporal crests and the strong attach- ment site for the digastric muscle. The sutures, bounding the various elements making up the skull cannot be distin- guished from the post-fossilization cracks so it is not pos- sible to determine, with any degree of accuracy, which of these elements have undergone the most change in regardto growth or reduction. Dentition: The dentition of L. ancipidens has the fol- lowing formula: I-, Cl' P3, Mi. The teeth, with the ex- ception of the incisors and canines, have been previously figured and described (Olsen 1957a,b; White 1941). The incisors and canines are lacking in the figured specimen but their size and location are determined by the preserved al- veoli as being quite similar to those of the living badgers. The teeth of Craterogale do vary morphologically from those of the genus Leptarctus. The hypocone of P is lack- ing inCraterogale and although this same tooth varies some- what inthe known species of Leptarctus, this cusp is always present. The projection of the auditory bulla of Craterogale also has more of a forward or anterior deflection than those found in Leptarctus. Just why an animal so similar to the present daybadger would require as heavy an occipital musculature as postu- lated by the muscle attachments and yet have a mandible of "normal" badger proportions is a puzzling question that is not answerable from the material now at hand. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 2 PAPER NO. 2 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Iwish to thank Dr. Childs Frick for information relating to specimens of Leptarctus in the Frick collection at the American Museum of Natural History, and Dr. C. L. Gazin for permission to study the type of Craterogale which is in the collection of the U. S. National Museum. Dr. D. Dwight Davis of the Chicago Natural History Museum was particu- larly helpful in relation to my inquiries regarding the otic region of this mustelid. The accurate and detailed draw- ings are the work of Mr. Andrew Janson, Scientific Artist for the Florida Geological Survey. The credit for the dis- covery of this fine specimen goes to Mr. J. William Yon, Jr., Geologist with the Florida Geological Survey, without whose careful excavation this singular skull would undoubt- edly have been lost beyond recovery. REFERENCES Dorr, J.A. 1954 Hypsoparia bozemanensis; a new genus and species of Leptarctine mustelid from the late Miocene Madison Valley formation of Montana: Annals of the Carnegie Mus. art. 9, vol. 33, p. 179-184. 1956 Anceney local mammal fauna, latest Miocene, Madison Valley formation, Montana: Jour. Paleontology, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 62-73. Gazin, C.L. 1936 Hall, E.R. 1936 A new mustelid carnivore from the Neocene beds of northwestern Nebraska: Washington Acad. Sci. Jour., vol. 26, no. 5, p. 199-207. Mustelid mammals from the Pleistocene of North America: Carnegie Inst. Washington Pub., Contr. Paleo. 473, p. 43-119. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1946 A new genus of American Pliocene badger, with remarks on the relationships of badgers of the northern hemisphere: Carnegie Inst. Washington Pub., Contr. Paleo. 551, p. 11- 23. 1951 American weasels: Univ. Kansas Pub. Mus. Nat. History, vol. 4, p. 1-466. Matthew, 1924 W.D. Miller, M. E 1952 Olsen, S.J. 1957a Third contribution to the Snake Creek fauna: Am. Mus. Nat. History Bull., vol. L, art. 2. p. 59-210. Guide to the dissection of the dog: M. E. Miller, Ithaca, N.Y., p. 1-369. The lower dentition of Mephititaxus ancipidens from the Florida Miocene: Jour. Mammalogy, vol. 38, no. 4, p. 452-454. 1957b Leptarctines from the Florida Miocene: Am. Mus. Novitates, no. 1861, p. 1-7, 2 fig. Pocock, R.J. 1921 The auditorybulla and other cranial characters in the Mustelidae: Zool. Soc. London Proc., p. 473-486. Romer, A.S. 1948 The fossilmammals of the Thomas Farm, Gil- christ County, Florida: Florida Acad. Sci. Quart. Jour., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1-11. Segall, W. 1943 The auditory region of the arctoid carnivores: Field Mus. Nat. History Pub., Zool. Series, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 33-59. SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 2 PAPER NO. 2 Sisson, S. 1953 Stock, C. 1930 White, T.E. (and Grossman, J. D.) The anatomy of the domestic-animals: W.B. Saunders, Philadel- phia, p. 1-972. Carnivora new to the Mascall Miocene fauna of eastern Oregon: Carnegie Inst. Washington Pub., Contr. Paleo. 404, p. 45-48. 1941 Additions to the Miocene fauna of Florida: Zool. Club New England Proc., vol. 18, p. 91-98. Van der Klaauw, C.J. 1931 On the auditorybulla in some fossil mammals, with a general introduction to this region of the skull: Am. Mus. Nat. History Bull., vol. 62, art. 1, p. 1-352. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 20 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |