|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Front Cover | |
| Title Page | |
| Table of Contents | |
| Preface | |
| Keynote: War | |
| General industrial rocks and... | |
| Clays, limestones, and dolomites;... | |
| Origin, diagenesis and economic... | |
| Back Cover |
CITATION
SEARCH
THUMBNAILS
DOWNLOADS
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Downloads | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Front Cover
Front Cover 1 Front Cover 2 Front Cover 3 Front Cover 4 Title Page Page i Page ii Table of Contents Page iii Page iv Preface Page v Page vi Keynote: War Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 General industrial rocks and minerals Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Clays, limestones, and dolomites; their occurrences, properties and uses Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 162a Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Origin, diagenesis and economic geology of phosphate deposits Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Back Cover Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- ^ L ^,^.- -^- -- -.---. -.r. ,^&i ^- -^ q:i'fl
1 I UIF.UERB * p.L~1 1\ ' O X ., '4 .._r;- UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LIBRARIES _ __ PROCEEDINGS EVENT FORUM on GEOLOGY of IDUSTRIAL MINERALS PRIL 28-30,1971 t\APA, FLORIDA EIEME: EOLOGY of PHOSPHATE, OLOMITE, LIMESTONE and LAY DEPOSITS SF F. LIBRARIES P.Puri,Editor cial Publication No.17 ida Department of Natural Resources ion of Interior Resources au of Geology . hassee,Florida, June,1972 ' ^,,S" nw*. : * PROCEEDINGS SEVENTH FORUM on GEOLOGY of INDUSTRIAL MINERALS APRIL 28-30,1971 TAM\PA, FLORIDA THEME: GEOLOGY of PHOSPHATE, DOLOMITE, LIMESTONE and CLAY DEPOSITS H.S. Puri,Editor Special Publication No.17 Florida Department of Natural Resources Division of Interior Resources Bureau of Geology Tallahassee,Florida, June,1972 CONTENTS Page Preface, by H.S. Puri and B.J. Timmons ................................................ v Keynote: War, by R.O. Vernon ................... ........ .. .................... 1 THEME I GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ROCKS AND MINERALS Mineral Resource Law: The Spectre of Ecology, by D. Wallace Fields ............. Conflicting Land Use in the Florida Land-Pebble Area, by J.W. Sweeney ............ Sedimentary Fractionation and Industrial-Mineral Deposits, by Robert L. Bates . . . . . Economic Geology of Florida Heavy Minerals, by Thomas Garnar . . . . . . . . Origin, Diagenesis, and Structure of Bauxite Deposits in Southeast Alabama, by Glenn P. Jones Sand and Gravel Exploration Methods, by Hill McDonald . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . o ',. t THEME II CLAYS, LIMESTONES, AND DOLOMITES; THEIR OCCURRENCES, PROPERTIES AND USES Fuller's Earth and Bentonite in Southeastern States, by Sam Patterson . . . . . . . ..... .. .. . . . .. 37 Vertical Variability in the Attapulgite Mining Area, by Charles E. Weaver and Kevin C. Beck . . ..... . . . ...... 51 Absorption Characteristics of Opaline Clays from the Eocene of Georgia, by Robert E. Carver . . . . . . . ... .. 91 Future of the Kaolin Industry in Southeastern United States, by B.F. Buie . . . . . . . ..... . . . ...... ..103 Miocene Clay Deposits of Peninsular Florida, by F. Michael Wahl, and Bobby J. Timmons . . . . . . . .. ... ..109 Apatite Deposits East Central Bahia Brazil, by Gus H. Goudarzi, Pedro Antonio Couto, and Carlo Henrique de Souza ..... ..117 On the Origin of Dolomites, by Bruce B. Hanshaw and William Back . . . . . . . .... ........ . . .139 Crystallochemical and Geochemical Comparisons of Recent With Older Dolomites, by Lynton S. Land, Emilio Mutis, and W. F. Bradley ............................................... 155 Petrography of Carbonate Rocks by Image Analysis, by Richard D. Harvey and John C. Steinmetz . . . . . . ..... ..161 Compositional Variations in High-Calcium Limestone Deposits in Western Kentucky, by Garland R. Dever, Jr. and Preston McGrain 171 THEME III ORIGIN, DIAGENESIS AND ECONOMIC GEOLOGY OF PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS The Role of Florida Producers in World Phosphate Market, by Joseph L. Weaver . . . . . . . ... ... Phosphate Industry and Environmental Control, by Bruce Congleton . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Program for Ore Control in the Central Florida Phosphate District, by Richard C. Fountain and Michael E. Zellars Hard-Rock Phosphate in Florida, by N.K. Olson .................................... The Origin of Some Phosphatic Minerals in Coastal Plain Sediments, by John K. Adams . . . . . . . . The Relationship Between Silicic Volcanism and the Formation of Some Sedimentary Phosphorites, by D.R. Lowe . Georgia Phosphate Stratigraphy and Economic Geology of the Chatham County Deposit, by James W. Furlow . . . . ... .181 . . ... .185 . . ... .187 ....... .195 . . . . .211 . . ... .217 . . ... .227 . . . " PREFACE The Seventh Forum on Geology of Industrial Minerals was held in Tampa, Florida, on April 28-30, 1971. Twenty-six papers were presented during the three technical session of the Forum, and are herein arranged in the order of presentation at the meeting. The entire program was planned around the general theme: "Geology of Phosphate, Dolomite, Limestone and Clay Deposits", with the papers presented in three sessions. The evolution of the art of mining from pick and shovel days to that which supports the needs of a highly complex society has by its very nature pricked the conscience of the environmentally-minded public. Consequently, a paper by D.W. Fields on "Mineral Resource Law: The Spectre Of Ecology" presented a timely summary of the evolution of laws at local, State, and Federal levels and their effect on the industry. The public demand for better housing, cleaner air, purer water, unlimited recreational areas, faster and safer highway networks, and future urban planning is requiring multiple land-use concepts, such as cities rising on mined-out lands and being built with clays and limestones obtained from these excavations. Our keynote address by Dr. R.O. Vernon discussed some of the problems associated with public awareness of the environmental issues and possible recourses. A second session was devoted mainly to "Clay, Limestones, and Dolomite, and Their Properties and Uses". With phosphate being Florida's greatest valued mineral product, nine papers comprised a session on the "Origin, Diagenesis, and Economic Geology of Phosphate Deposits". The presentation of papers was followed with a one-day field trip through the Florida Phosphate District where the participants had a first hand opportunity to examine the geologic occurrence and mining operations of International Minerals Corporation. The Bonnie Phosphoric Acid Plant of C.F. Chemicals, Inc. was also visited for a first-hand look at the "wet process' phosphoric acid manufacture. Gratitude is expressed to the management of I.M.C. and C.F. Chemicals, Inc. for making their facilities available to use, with a special note of thanks to I.M.C. for preparation and printing of the field trip guidebook. Many persons have contributed to the success of the Forum. We would like to express thanks to the members of the Program Committee for soliciting timely papers, to the contributing authors for their cooperation, and to the Arrangement Committee for the meeting and registration. H.S. Puri, Chairman BJ. Timmons, Co-chairman Seventh Forum on Geology of Industrial Minerals Tallahassee, Florida October, 1971 KEYNOTE ADDRESS: WAR By Robert O. Vernon Chief, Bureau of Geology I extend the warmest kind of welcome to the "Friends of the Earth," the "Everglades Coalition," "Conservation 70's," "Sierra Club," Defenders of the Environment," various organized lovers of birds and beasts, and to those trying to earn a living and clean-up afterwards. You are well aware of the citizen forces pitted against each other today. "Affluence versus underdevelopment," development against the 'concerned citizen' or 'concerned scientist'; the conservationist and the preservationist competing with the producer and the extractive interest. In Florida the trick is to learn to spell ecology and pronounce ecosystem and you graduate as an expert in the field of environmental awareness. With apologies to Bob Brumfield of the Cincinnati Enquirer, as a professional, I'm thinking seriously of becoming an environmental dropout and telling the rest of the world to go to hell! In doing so I'd say "Look you freaky ingrates, we're beating our brains out to provide you the best water in the land, to take-up, treat and recover your wastes and make them useful, to make your homes warmer in the winter cooler in the summer, because you asked for it. 'We've provided you the raw-mineral resources for stronger and lighter building products, so that structures could be built higher and more safely. We've nurtured you from the nutrients taken from the earth so that we are the best fed and clothed people of the world and have moved to restore the land to higher values than the original raw earth, because that's our business, done at your insistence. 'We've provided you with the best park systems, guaranteed you potable water long into the future, developed long range electrical and fossil fuel plants for production of heat and power, heated your water, provided landscaped arterials that are unexcelled and that have increased your crop yields, outlined and mapped water crop areas, eliminated infestation and disease because that was your desire. 'We've done just about everything for you except tie your lousy shoes, and now you sit around on your fat can, too lazy and insensitive to put out a few bread crumbs for the sparrows, and you blame us because the East African Blue-billed Yodeling Crane is almost extinct. 'Tell you what, Mac. ..., why don't you waddle off somewhere and feel warm alligator eggs." The appointed defenders of America helped to form, if they didn't indeed shape up Parkinson's newest law, "The law of delay" -which reads, "Delay is the deadliest form of denial." Knowing the difficulty of organizing a needed public works project, or a new minerals extraction venture, getting it authorized, obtaining funds and keeping the local enthusiasm alive, such organizations can quite sincerely view with alarm the effects of the search for hydrocarbons, the construction of power plants in warm areas or the processing or mining of minerals will be on the environment. The benefits are never mentioned, as if they didn't exist; data and facts are often misstated and misinterpreted or so confused as to be meaningless. Only those adverse ones are cited. Such curbstone professionals in fact, sell their professionalism cheaply and cost progress dearly-delay, lie and confuse until all resource development becomes stagnant. We can no longer afford to construct monumental dedications to the futile effort to preserve a passing way of life, with little to no benefits to the people. A works project today must meet a multipurpose use or we can't afford it-regardless of the pressures to preserve the cut-over, channelized, snagged and polluted "primitive ecosystems" of the nation. Florida, lovely state that it is, has the purest of water, the freshest of breezes, broad reserves of needed mineral resources, largely unsullied beaches and waterways, yet at the same time, it has the highest growth rate in the continental United States. The demand to clean our environment meets head-on with the need for raw mineral resources. Some citizens have forgotten, or have never known, that man is part of the evolutional sequence and competition between species is fierce and will continue-the rapid expansion of the human species drains the energies from many other species, uses up their nesting grounds, makes it difficult for them to reproduce, to feed and to exist-species will continue to be endangered and to disappear as man continues to over-populate and dominate-unless we control our own passions for reproduction, selfish possession, waste and failure to purge our environments of unneeded and toxic gases, liquids and solid wastes. Man, our most corrosive geologic agent today, has permitted his need for, and use of, raw mineral products virtually to exhaust his requirements for the esthetics of environmental quality. You, as earth scientists, must provide the means and the forum necessary to express the greater need for mineral and fluid resources, to express the boundaries for utilizing these for reclamation, reuse and restoration of disturbed lands. Who, but you, are positioned to give direction to the adequate distribution of these resources and the means of forming corrective input relative to an improved environment. Become an activist, even a radical for conservation (wise use), attend civic, commission and state committee meetings and demand that your views be given consideration. Stand for public office--but let's have a beginning at continuing America's affluence and at the same time purging it of wastes. To some the expertise possessed by earth scientists is the basis of environment. Yet, I find that increasingly in the dialogue now occurring between the preservationist and the developer, in the control of pollution and improvement of the environment, the earth scientist is not meeting his responsibility to participate in town meetings, to lead the awareness-student groups, to advise the Legislature and other public bodies, even to the point where we no longer wear the white hats and we are considered part of the problem rather than the basis of the solution. Perhaps the difference arises out of two diametrically opposed needs of society, to acquire raw minerals and to reverse the trend of a rapidly deteriorating environment brought about partially by search, discovery and use of resources and reserves. Obviously the search, discovery, extracting, processing, and use of minerals (including the fluid resources) of the past have been wasteful and destructive of the environment and must be regulated for the common good. It is no small wonder that we find the Florida Legislature introducing legislation that seeks to forbid the drilling for oil within 12 miles of the shoreline, upon the wetlands, and it is seriously considering the limiting of mining. The frequency of the conflict of affluence with environment GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS indicates that earth scientists are failing to alert the people of their dependence upon resources of raw minerals and to the need to produce these, and to clean-up afterwards. If dinosaurs were part of contemporary life and became totally unsuited to cope with their environment, as they did during the Jurassic, I would assure you there would be instantaneous outcries from the preservationist, that man was ruining the environment and an appropriation must be made by the Congress to be used to construct a habitat and maintain the bog humidity and large plant growths so necessary to save the dinosaurs, "the endangered species of that time and that place." There was a time when we gave very little thought to mining of fertilizers which are necessary to our survival. Why worry about soil or nutritional additives when we had but to clear another "40" and let the last cultivated one lay fallow for a few years. Suddenly and inevitably, our tillable 40's became scarce. The next forty had to be revitalized and pridefully this was sired by our Florida phosphate industry. It has indeed been the sire of a prolific dam as that additional forty has been reborn time and time again. This propagation has not been without pain, and as the farm grows older the associated ills become greater and more frequent. When the prairie, floodplains and hills were converted to farms, the response of the people began to be heard and it now resounds throughout the land. Through meetings such as this, and as a perusal of your past proceedings would substantiate, your direction is devoted to supplying the necessary minerals, while meeting the demands of a complete recovery period, leading to total land use through reclamation and aesthetic planning. A period, an era, a crossroads in time, where re-evaluation of our most important resources is in keeping with the need. Demand, as now being expressed by America, is dependent upon many other functions. Demand for a new type of housing, demand for cleaner air, purer water, less noise. Demands that must be met, while hopefully, not initiating new problems. Demands of an advanced technology which must be supplied through alloying, utilization of by-products, recycling of used items, and, certainly discovery of new resources and reserves. Fortunately, these demands are not limited to those of us that practice in the physical sciences, but they encompass us as individuals, parents, civic leaders, corporate members, club members and charter members of the human race, supposedly endowed with that singular ability to cope with the total demand. Supply must nearly always equal demand in a healthy economy, and therefore, makes it understandable to geologists, distributors, salesmen, contractors, and others through fluctuations in value. Our forests, through wise and efficient management, are renewable within time limitations. Our air and water supplies are not diminished, but are rendered temporarily unusable at times, due to our short-sightedness. Not so our mineral resources; the supply is finite, but its wise utilization can expand its life until technology provides adequate substitutes and/or extended life periods. Demand and supply upgrade our professional capabilities by taxing our ingenuity. Our ingenuity yields, with more efficient planning, bountiful harvests in the fields of usable by-products, and recycled economic wastes. You are now facing an aesthetic variable of proportions never before faced by the minerals industry, industrial or otherwise. The odds are definitely against your having precedents or established company policy to guide you on these new, "gray" areas. Therefore, a "new frontier" may be present in the minerals industry, fostered by you and me, and domesticated only through us. To those of you intimately associated with the petroleum industry, you admit with lip-biting reluctance, that the success ratio of the 60's was approximately the same as that of the 30's. This, on the surface, would not speak well for the scientific community, but those of us who derive our paycheck from providing the raw resources recognized that a less affluent society reaped the benefits of easy finds and who can say that this was not proper. A young, struggling republic seemed to have been nurtured by Mother Nature herself as she readily gave up her riches to those so needy. Demand, has virtually exceeded our ability to supply and meet the demands for improved aesthetic values. The basic framework for solution of the "war" between resources and aesthetics must be: (1) complete and systematic recovery of the known mineral resources; (2) multiple simultaneous and/or sequential land use where possible; (3) adequate planning with consideration for all resources, now or here-in-after affected: (4) intensive and extensive exploratory work to uncover new reserves; (5) design of plants, mines, etc., with a smaller profit margin in mind and vastly extended production life; and finally, (6) an honest awareness of the total effect of our endeavors. These are not insurmountable tasks and are consonant with the faith that nurtured this nation. They are simple challenges which spur us to new heights of achievement. We here in Florida are experiencing a growth rate unexcelled in our history. Fortunately for us, the minerals needed to support this growth are present in fantastic amounts. Supplies of construction materials, hydrocarbons and phosphate are found in abundance throughout much of the state, but their recovery is being considered more carefully than ever before. An apparent reckless high volume, extraction period is cushioned by a period of sincere considerations for ore tenor, possible air and water pollution problems, noise abatement, landscaping of spoils, and complete utilization of all possible products, both primary'and secondary. Florida has 100% open pit and dredge mining with a resultant maximum modification of the surface. No communications gap exists between those concerned citizens and the extractive minerals industry. Industry hears about the problems it creates in no uncertain terms, and even those of us in administrative posts within the government are held equally responsible for these acts of degradation. These acts are defined too often, on relativity. If an evident change occurs without local benefit, then it is bad. If, however, these changes are made to afford large numbers of human beings a higher standard of living, then they become good. Such is the role of the mineral producer today. Your job has taken on a new dimension, and this, according to Peter Flawn, is the creation of a "realistic social attitude." Society must be made to realize that a continuing supply of minerals, including water and energy fuels, is necessary to perpetuate our way of life. We can and we must "have our cake and eat it too." Preferably, the creation of this realistic social attitude toward our mineral resources, would be initiated by society itself. ..It would have us pause to consider its population trends, its economic path, and its environmental requirements and necessities and temper its demands accordingly. A return to a less affluent way of life is a probability but so many of us are too old, too tired, or too proud to accept what is commonly believed to be regressive action. However, "Government itself", being the ultimate steward of .he land, decrees that, the severed minerals shall be taxed and the land restored, a land use plan be filed before extractions begin and all must combine to supply the community's total needs. Utopia? Hardly!! But certainly a potential improvement in the ecology and environment would assist those responsible for supplying our mineral needs. Those of you employed directly with the production of our industrial minerals, may now occupy one of the most influential VERNON: KEYNOTE ADDRESS: WAR positions since the time that land reclamation was recognized as necessary, by providing the necessary professional knowledge to meet The Challenge. The continued success of our way of life depends upon your abilities, both in a development and a discovery sense. Your ability to orderly, efficiently, systematically, develop our known mineral resources and discover new reserves, substitutes, and methods of complete utilization of all resulting products, will be the measure of your success. Your geologic techniques must be re-examined for clues heretofore too hidden to be of significance, your mining practices must continue to utilize the common sense, "use-it-all" philosophy inherent in many of your mine foremen, and you must assist your training institutions, .tell them what you need in the way of new graduates. Compel them to develop minds to the degree of practical competence required to solve practical mining problems. I do not want to infer, however, that this entire task is yours alone. Our present Lt. Governor, when he was Secretary of State, made a statement to the Southern Water Resources Conference in 1968 at Miami Beach. "You scientists have told us what you need. Now it is up to us as politicians to devise the 'how' and provide that legislation." So they, the politicians, must provide the instruments and the framework that will allow the minerals producers to mine or drill in the ways now being demanded. MINERAL RESOURCE LAWS: THE SPECTRE OF ECOLOGY By D. Wallace Fields Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A. Attorneys at Law Tampa, Florida ABSTRACT Increasing public pressure and demands from various tiers of government have generated a legislative maze of statutory and administrative requirements facing industries involved in mineral extraction and processing. Each tier of government has asserted concurrent jurisdiction and threats of harsh measures if industry does not satisfy all requirements. In the field of water pollution control, federal requirements have increased, carrying with them increasing techniques of enforcement ranging from injunctions through criminal penalties. Federal laws have required that states formulate water quality standards as an adjunct to federal regulation. Florida has reacted with the Water Pollution Control Act of 1967. This act incorporates state water quality standards and permit requirements for any installation constituting a potential source of pollution, and provides for civil sanctions as well as injunctive relief. The federal government has utilized an 1899 law to require a permit for discharges into navigable waterbodies a term which has been judicially defined to include any watercourse capable, after reasonable improvement, for use in the transportation of waterborne traffic. Failure to secure these permits can result in the issuance of an injunction or civil or criminal penalties. The Corps of Engineers will not issue these permits without the approval of the discharge by state, local and other federal agencies. Air pollution similarly is regulated by a multi-tiered network of laws and administrative standards. Federal regulation has increased from early research support in the 1950's through the development of Air Quality Standards and their enforcement by large fines, injunctions, administrative conferences and public hearings. Florida regulation, under the Florida Air Pollution Control Act of 1967, parallels federal law but grants concurrent regulations, requirements and enforcement tools to local and state agencies. Although previous state regulation was minimal, consisting only of three acts passed in 1891, 1899, and 1911, in the future the mining industry will have to contend with this increasing network of ecological requirements. It is recommended that the industry take the initiative by involving Florida in the Interstate Mining Compact, as well as seeking the passage of a state reclamation law funded by a severance tax. MINERAL RESOURCE LAW: THE SPECTRE OF ECOLOGY The world has turned to the care and cure of the environment. The determination of its people to have fresh air to breathe and pure sparkling lakes, rivers and estuaries to enjoy once again, is evidenced by the enactment of new laws, many laws, with "teeth" in them, to insure that result. The people have spoken and industry must listen, before it is too late. If industry does not begin the cure itself, departments, bureaus and commissions of the United States, the States or local authorities will do it for them, at such great cost that many industries will not be able to survive. What has sparked this great demand for change? Those who are most vocal were not born until after our country became polluted. Perhaps the answer lies in the fact that during the last quarter-century our economic system has gone through the greatest change in all history. We worked our way out of the depression of the thirties and have kept on working, to the point where now our people have such an abundance in goods and services that our appetites have been satisfied. Some, therefore, have become complacent. They have turned away from our competitive heritage and taken up the pursuit of humanistic and social goals. But, the spark generated by those few has lighted a fire and the fire has spread and spread to the point where the people are now mad and determined. They are willing, even anxious, to put pollutants out of business. Evidence of this fact is appearing in laws, harse laws, that recently have been passed by Congress and by our State Legislature. As I outline these laws to you, please notice the pattern. Congress, in its laws, threatens the States by saying, if you do not pass and enforce laws to abate pollution we will assume jurisdiction and do so. Our Legislature has then passed laws saying to the Counties and Municipalities, if you do not pass and enforce ordinances and regulations to abate pollution, the State will do so. The Counties and Municipalities, jealous of their own jurisdiction, have passed ordinances and regulations to this end. On the assumption that the lower jurisdiction in each case would take up the fight, and to insure this result, the Congressional Acts and the Florida laws are structured with interweaving tiers of concurrent jurisdiction. At each tier there is a right to force you to act in a preferred fashion, with the threat of tough and harsh sanctions if you fail to act. Hence in the future it will be necessary to satisfy the environmental desires of your city, county, state and federal government. Keeping but one of these happy will not be enough. Federal requirements in the field of water pollution began in 1948 with passage of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The basic act, amended four times since then, comprises the present federal water pollution control program. Administration has changed from one federal bureaucracy to another. Originally placed in the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, it was transferred to the Department of the Interior in 1966, and was placed in the newly created Environmental Protection Agency last year. The heart of the Act is the enforcement provision. Broadly speaking, the Act provides for proceedings to abate any pollution affecting interstate waters, or waters which might be found to be navigable, or even any waters which affect other navigable waters. State abatement action is encouraged, with the underlying threat that the federal enforcement is imminent without state action. The Act called for formulation of water quality standards and a plan implementing the standards; quality control and enforcement plans were to be established by the states. If the state did not submit acceptable standards within one year of the Act, the federal government would have determined the water standards. If material discharged into the water reduces water GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS quality below the standards set, a federal court could enforce the act. In addition, the act provides for abatement proceedings involving conferences, hearings and court action. The 1967 session of the Legislature passed the Florida Air and Water Pollution Control Act. Although authority to enforce this act was initially in the hands of the Cabinet, in 1969 the functions, powers and duties of the Cabinet sitting as the Florida Air and Water Pollution Control Commission were transferred to a new Department of Air and Water Pollution Control. This should provide an even stronger impetus for forceful and strict enforcement. The Department adopted Rules satisfying the federal requirements by establishing quality standards. Now the state can compel any person engaging in an operation that may result in pollution to file reports to be used in determining methods for controlling or preventing such pollution. The state has established a system of permits regulating the operation, construction or expansion of any installation that might be a source of pollution. Enforcement is provided by authorizing a civil penalty of $1,000 a day for violation of any order. In addition, violation of any order is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $5,000. Each day of violation constitutes a separate offense. Failure to pay the fine can result in loss of the right to carry on business in Florida. The Department of Air and Water Pollution Control has the control and supervision over underground water, lakes, rivers, streams, canals, ditches and coastal waters insofar as their pollution may "affect the public health or impair the interest of the public." The legislation authorizes both temporary and permanent injunctions. The act, as amended in 1970, authorizes the state director to procure an injunction if he finds that "a generalized condition of air or water pollution exists that creates an emergency requiring immediate action to prevent harm to property or to animal, plant, or aquatic life." The rules of the Department of Air and Water Pollution Control provide that when certain elements occur in any amount in any individual body of water, they shall be suspected of degrading the quality of that particular lake or stream; phosphates, nitrates, sulphates, sulphides and free mineral acids are included in this list of constituent elements. The state statute further authorizes local pollution control programs. These programs must satisfy state requirements, but are authorized to go beyond the state requirements to provide stricter and more extensive regulation. In addition, the state Department may authorize area-wide pollution control programs. The state Department specifically is barred from exercising jurisdiction "over local acts of a stricter or more stringent nature." Unsatisfied with the rate of progress under these federal and state statutes, the President in December of last year announced a new program of enforcement utilizing a Federal act called the "Refuse Act" that had been in existence since 1899. The Refuse Act prohibits the discharge of any refuse matter into navigable waters or tributaries, except that flowing from streets or sewers, without a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. Violators of the act are subject to criminal prosecution and/or a civil injunction. Decisions of the United States Supreme Court have construed this act to include pollution as well as obstruction to navigation. A recent decision by the federal Court of Appeals for this Circuit hints that the act might have possible application to any pollution affecting any watercourse which might affect a navigable water body or might affect interstate commerce. The new permit program announced by the President will require all present and prospective dischargers to obtain a permit under the Refuse Act. A deadline of July 1st of this year was set for the permit applications. Before a permit may be issued, the Corps of Engineers will require state acknowledgment that the discharge will be consistent with applicable water quality standards. These could include both state and local standards. If the water receiving the discharge is subject to federal jurisdiction under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the state recommendation relating to the permit will be subject to further review and approval by the Environmental Protection Agency. No permit will be issued without the recommendation of either the Environmental Protection Agency or the appropriate state agency. In the realm of air pollution it is probable that Florida and most other states would not have created a regulatory air pollution program had it not been for federal impetus. Federal activity in the air pollution field began in 1955 when Congress funded the Public Health Service in the Department of Health, Education and Welfare to do research in air pollution control. Pressures for further federal activity prompted the enactment of the Clean Air Act of 1963. The Act evolved from a Senate committee study showing that the states, other than California, were doing little to cope with air pollution problems. Although repeating the principle that the prevention and control of air pollution was the primary responsibility of state and local governments, it incorporated provisions authorizing a stronger federal role. It provided, among other things, for the development of air quality standards by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, to be used in local enforcement and in federal abatement proceedings. In 1965 the act was amended to authorize Health, Education, and Welfare to make findings and recommendations following public conferences on potential air pollution. In 1967 Congress passed the Air Quality Act setting in motion a regional approach to establish and enforce federal and state air quality standards. According to that Act, the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare designated air quality and control regions within a state or within an interstate region, and promulgated air quality criteria for those regions. The states were entitled to set standards limiting the level of pollutants described in the criteria; if the state failed to do this, the Secretary was empowered to set the standards. After the states developed air quality standards, they had to establish comprehensive plans for implementing such standards. Enforcement under the 1967 amendments included the use of conferences, recommendations by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, hearing board findings and recommendations, and enforcement suits. The act also authorized, where pollution is presenting "imminent and substantial endangerment to the health of persons" and state or local officials have not acted, the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare could request the Attorney General to institute suit to enjoin any contributor to such pollution. Amendments to this act in 1970 made it even stronger and harsher upon the polluter of the air. The Act, as amended, is now enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency. The new act set up dual ambient air quality standards, one relating to public health and the other to public welfare. The amendment permits states and local government agencies to establish more stringent standards than national criteria, and to shorten the deadline for attainment to less than the three year federal period. Furthermore, the federal government now shall identify specified hazardous pollutants, and shall determine the emission levels for those pollutants which will insure an ample margin of safety for the public health. New facilities emitting any of these pollutants may be prohibited or constructed only if they meet such standards. These hazardous air standards, within the next two years, will be applied to existing sources of air pollution. If the state fails to enforce the federal or state standards, the federal Environmental Protection Agency may enforce those requirements through administrative orders or court action. Knowing violations of an Environmental Protection Agency order or of federal standards shall be punishable by a fine of not FIELDS: MINERAL RESOURCE LAWS more than $25,000 per day of violation or by imprisonment for not more than one year. For second or subsequent violations the fine is not more than $50,000 and imprisonment for not more than two years. Extensive litigation under the federal act may be expected because of the 1970 amendment authorizing suits by citizens claiming to suffer the adverse effects of the pollution. Those citizens can sue the government at all levels for failure to prosecute the pollution standards. At the state level powers similar to those mentioned earlier in conjunction with water pollution are available where the state feels that an activity is creating air pollution or might generate further pollution. Construction permits for emissions into the atmosphere are required. Local regulation of air pollution is authorized, so long as that regulation is more stringent or as stringent as the state requirements. The enforcement tools available to the Department of Air and Water Pollution Control for air pollution are the same as those mentioned earlier in the realm of water pollution. Regulation does not stop here. In an attempt to define national policy for the environment, Congress in December of 1969 passed the National Environmental Policy Act. The Act declared a national policy of preserving and protecting the environment and required any and every federal program to be evaluated in terms of its impact upon the environment. This affects grants which our state might now be receiving or could receive in the future from federal sources. Furthermore, the Act is to be applied in conjunction with other federal statutes, so as to provide a further standard and check upon state regulation. The breadth of this new act is indicated by the fact that it was the vehicle utilized by the President and the federal courts in stopping the construction of the Cross-Florida barge canal. Further regulation may evolve. On January 12th of this year, the Acting Secretary of the Interior, in an address before the American Mining Congress in Washington, D.C. predicted government regulation requiring recovery of everything that can be extracted in the mining and refining process, not just what could be recovered at the lowest price. The Secretary predicted that mining interests would have to prevent pollution drainage and to reclaim the land and plant it with grass and trees after use. In terms of the air affected by mine operations, he projected that industry will have to clean the air or convert it to elements that are compatible with nature's recycle. Water used in mining and refining operations will have to be purified before it is returned to any surface or underground water body. Prior to the passage of the Florida Air and Water Pollution Control Act in 1967, the mining industry lived in complete harmony with nature insofar as the regulatory laws of Florida were concerned. In fact, for the period between 1911 and 1967, or 56 years, not a single law was enacted or enforced which directly affected mining activities pollution or otherwise. The only laws on the books during all those years were the following: In 1911 Ch. 533 F.S. was enacted. This law made it unlawful for any person to permit waste, wash or debris to escape from a mine into any of the streams and rivers of the State. However, the act goes on to say that the escape of water slightly discolored shall not be construed as the escape of waste, wash and debris. In 1891 Sec. 768.10 F.S. was adopted. This law made it unlawful for any person to leave a pit or hole open which had a depth or breadth of more than two feet, unless the same was enclosed by a fence to prevent horses, cattle or other domestic animals from falling into the same. The act goes on to say, however, that the law shall not apply to persons engaged in mining operations so long as those operations continue. In 1899 the Legislature passed Sec. 828.11 F.S. which required all phosphate mining operations to be fenced where the waste had collected in quantities sufficient to bog up cattle, sheep, hogs, horses and other animals. The penalty for violation was a fine of not less than $10.00 nor more than $100.00, and the violator was also to be held liable civilly to the owner of any livestock that may be lost, killed or injured as a consequence of non-compliance with the law. So, from the beginning of time until 1967, the only Florida laws directly governing mining operations were the three simple little laws I have just mentioned. With startling suddenness, laws have now been passed making the mining industry more strictly regulated by Federal, State and Local authorities than the liquor industry, small loan companies, banks, trust companies, food processors and many other businesses and institutions which for the past fifty years or more have been under the watchful eye of beaureaucratic enforcement Boards and Commissions. If the mining industry cannot survive under our present laws, and I forecast that it cannot, then what can it do about it? The answer is inescapable. The industry must in great haste obtain the passage of laws in Florida which will largely permit the industry to police itself. This can be accomplished if all mining interests will join together and obtain the passage of a statute making Florida a member of the Interstate Mining Compact. Next, agree to the passage of a Reclamation Law under the jurisdiction of a Board or Commission composed of a cross-section of people aware of the nature and problems of the industry, mixed with representation from the Florida Department of Natural Resources and Air and Water Pollution Control, to make the Commission membership consistent with the previous desires of the Legislature. Finally, agree to a severance tax to support the Commission; such a tax law should contain a provision that the tax is in lieu of all other ad valorum taxes which might be otherwise imposed because phosphate or other valuable minerals were located beneath the surface. Only three states have joined the Interstate Compact so far - Kentucky, Pennsylvania and North Carolina but when the Federal, State and local authorities begin strict and harse enforcement under the existing legislation, I am sure that many more states will join the compact and agree to the less onerous laws which the Compact fosters. You will ask the question whether joining the Compact and agreeing to Reclamation and Severance Tax Laws will relieve the industry from complying with the existing laws. The answer is no, it will not. But, if the industry will agree to be governed by Reclamation Acts and laws fostered by the Compact, it will have a good chance somewhere down the road to obtain the passage of Laws reducing the impact on the industry of existing legislation. At the very least, it reasonable can be anticipated that the governing authorities will act with tolerance in enforcing those laws against an industry that is doing a good job in policing itself. I fully recognize what a traumatic effect forced reclamation would have on the industry. But it is to be hoped that land values have increased to the point where reclamation is economically feasible. We would also hope that an "in lieu of" severance tax would not, when added to real estate taxes, increase the amount of taxes now being paid. The lawyers of Florida are self-disciplined. Every practicing attorney must belong to the Integrated Bar of Florida and the Bar prosecutes violators of the rules and regulations it established to govern the conduct of its members. Penalties range from private or public reprimand for minor infractions to disbarment for major offenses. Many Florida lawyers have been disbarred. A case is brought against a violator much like a criminal is prosecuted in court. A lawyer is appointed to prosecute, a referee is appointed as a trier of the facts and to make recommendations to the Board of Governors of the Bar. The Board of Governors reads the record of the trial, determines the guilt or innocence of the accused and fixes the punishment, if any. If a lawyer is found guilty by the Board of Governors, he may appeal his case to the Supreme Court of Florida sitting in judgment as the final authority. GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS I can assure you that more lawyers are disciplined in this manner than would be if disciplinary laws were established by the Legislature and those laws enforced as criminal charges. The mining industry could govern itself in like manner if it chose to do so. Self-enforcement can take the place of the quagmire of conflicting, confusing laws and regulations. The question then is: Who shall govern the governed? LAND USE CONFLICTS AND PHOSPHATE MINING IN FLORIDA By J.W. Sweeney Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of Interior Tallahassee, Florida ABSTRACT The Florida land-pebble mining industry of central Florida was examined to identify trends in land use; conflicts in land use; and the effect of the conflicts on mineral resources. Many conflicts exist in the study area, such as conflicts with other users of land resources and land surface; conflicts with high revenue land users; conflicts for land surface in urban and suburban areas; and conflicting restrictions concerning utilization. Projections are made showing that lands in phosphate company ownership are expected to be made available to help meet the need for future urban expansion in the study area. Some phosphate resources have been lost due to land use conflicts, however, most of the resource loss has been small. Land use conflicts and phosphate mining are reconcilable and considerable progress toward their maximum and multiple use of land and mineral resources can be resolved through farsighted planning based on factual data. INTRODUCTION As part of a Bureau of Mines national study on mineral resources and land use conflicts, the Florida phosphate mining industry was examined to identify trends in land ownership and use, conflicts in land use, and the effects of the conflicts on phosphate resources. The Florida land-pebble phosphate district is an important segment of the national mining industry and produced about 79 percent of the total United States marketable production of phosphate rock in 1969. The area of study is the Central Florida land-pebble phosphate district comprising about 2,000 square miles in Polk, Hillsborough, Manatee, and Hardee Counties, Florida. Of this area about 520 square miles, or 26 percent, is controlled by the phosphate industry and an estimated 200 square miles is classified as urban and suburban land. The five major cities in the study area are almost completely surrounded by phosphate industry holdings, making the phosphate industry an important controlling factor in the future use of this land. The population within the study area was about 750,000 in 1970 and is projected to be over 900,000 by 1975 (a 20 percent increase); about 60 percent of the people live in urban portions of the study area, indicating that additional land will be needed for urban expansion. The remaining 1,280 square miles of the area is mainly in private ownership and is used for agricultural purposes. There are many land use conflicts in this section of Florida; the population of rural areas and cities is growing rapidly, and the need for land for both urban and suburban development is increasing. TRENDS IN LAND OWNERSHIP AND USE Let's examine the present trends in land ownership and use for the following categories: urban and suburban lands, mineral lands, agricultural lands, and public, private, and recreational lands. There is a need for additional land in the study area for urban and suburban use. Until recently, the cities had enough land for expansion, but they have now almost reached a saturation point and additional land for residential and industrial growth is needed. The phosphate industry is in a position to make this land available, and present and projected trends in land use depend on cooperation from the phosphate industry, since it holds the key for future urban expansion. The industry believes there can be compatible development between urban areas and industry; they have pledged that they will try to make lands available to the cities. Nevertheless, dependency of some of the 1Chesson, M.W. Talk given to the Florida Conservation Workshop, Florida Southern College, Lakeland, Florida, July 6, 1966. urban areas on land being made available by the phosphate industry could retard growth rates. The phosphate industry maintains mineral exploration programs to improve its reserves position. Exploration has moved southward into Manatee and Hardee Counties where both established and new companies have purchased phosphate reserve lands. High grade deposits in the central part of the district in Polk and Hillsborough Counties are being mined out, and all mining will eventually move southward. The phosphate industry stated in 1965, "that it will reclaim about 80 percent of the land mined in the future."' This reclaimed land could then be made available for residential, industrial, or agricultural uses. The phosphate industry controlled about 520 square miles in 1967; about 80,000 acres or 125 square miles had been mined and about 10,000 acres had been reclaimed through 1965, mostly in Polk County. However, 65 percent of land mined in 1961-70 has been reclaimed. There is very little public land in the study area. The federal government owns the mineral rights to some acreage. There is about 1,200 square miles of private land in the area; the most significant acreages are large tracts of land currently in citrus groves and large cattle ranches. Some of these lands are underlain by phosphate, and in all probability the land will be made available to the phosphate industry sometime in the future for mining. The main recreational areas are those that have been donated by the phosphate industry for public use. These lands have either been deeded outright to the county or State or leased for long terms. EFFECT OF LAND USE CONFLICTS CONFLICTS WITH OTHER USERS FOR LAND RESOURCES What are the effects of land use conflicts? First, let's identify conflicts with other users of the land resources the water. The four large users of water in the area are the phosphate industry, citrus industry, food packing companies, and municipalities. Under normal conditions, water is in abundant supply; however under drought conditions, there may be competition for the water supply. Projected water needs in the southwest Florida Basin are adequate through the year 2015. However, it is anticipated that soon after 1980, some of the more industrialized subbasins which have expanding urban populations will have water shortages. Water will then have to be GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS diverted from subbasins with an abundant water supply to the areas in need.2 CONFLICTS WITH OTHER USERS FOR LAND SURFACE Secondly, let's identify conflicts with other users of the land surface agriculture, urban, and suburban lands. There is a conflict in the area for the land surface, and it has become more acute in recent years. The phosphate industry started mining in Florida in the late 1880's; many small companies were formed and land acquisition of the known high-grade deposits was active. By the 1930's much of the reserve lands that are owned today had been acquired by the phosphate industry. The phosphate industry's growth contributed to the expansion of cities and towns in the area, but much of the land adjacent to the cities is owned by the phosphate industry. The rapid urbanization of the study area within the past decade has made the use of land for mining and water conservation a matter of concern to the public as well as to industry. The influx of population has created a need for land not only for housing and industry, but also to replace land removed from agricultural and recreational used by urbanization and mining activities. Phosphate mining operations have had in the past and could, in the future, have adverse and limiting effects upon agricultural production in the study area. Croplands are reduced through phosphate industry expansion. However, the land may still be used for agricultural purposes both before mining and after mining; but during mining and reclamation agricultural productivity on these lands is reduced. Phosphate property will not be available for development for other uses until after mining and reclamation. Until recently, mining usually rendered the land unsuitable for many other uses; but since 1961, the phosphate mining companies have been operating under a voluntary policy to reclaim the mined-out land to "help meet the aesthetic and practical needs of the community," as stated by the industry's Florida Phosphate Council. REGULATIONS AND CONTROLS ON LAND USE Thirdly, let's look at the laws and controls that affect the mineral industry. These include various zoning ordinances, requirements, and public opinion. Hillsborough, Manatee, and Sarasota Counties have zoning ordinances regulating mining. Mining is permitted in Hillsborough County in the agricultural zones; however a permit is required to build a phosphate washer, chemical plant, or other structure exceeding building requirements in these zoned areas. Manatee County adopted an amendment to its zoning ordinance in 1966 to regulate all mining operations in the county. This amendment constitutes a complete program for mining, including posting of bonds for reclamation of mined lands. Sarasota County adopted a resolution in 1965 to regulate the mining of phosphate and other minerals in the county. The cities of Lakeland, Mulberry, Fort Meade, and Plant City do not permit mining within their respective limits. Mining would only be allowed by passage of a special ordinance. Adverse public opinion has caused one phosphate company to relocate a proposed new chemical plant and another to abandon plans for mining under a lake. The Southwest Florida Water Management District requires all phosphate mining companies to submit a mining plan whenever mining would affect drainage in the Southwest Florida Basin. Florida Board of Conservation, Division of Water Resources. Florida Land and Water Resources, Southwest Florida. 181 p. REGULATIONS CONCERNING UTILIZATION Lastly, let's look at some of the regulations which may restrict the utilization of the phosphate resources. There are taxes, reclamation requirements, waste disposal requirements, and pollution control requirements; many requirements of this nature are, of course, necessary to maintain environmental quality. Agricultural lands purchased by the phosphate companies are taxed on the potential worth of the land rather than on the lower agricultural assessment, though the lands are used for agricultural purposes until mined. Several severance tax bills have recently been proposed to levy tax on all solid minerals in Florida. Legislation on the State level has been proposed that would require the industry to reclaim mined lands. Several of the proposed severance tax bills allow credit for reclamation. In 1970, Polk County passed an ordinance requiring the phosphate industry to reclaim all surface areas mined or disturbed. Manatee and Sarasota Counties have ordinances requiring phosphate companies to reclaim mineral land. The City of Bartow has a resolution in its code stating if and when permission is granted for mining within the city, restoration of the land must meet certain requirements and be completed before a specified date. Air and water pollution in the phosphate industry is regulated and enforced by the Florida Department of Air and Water Pollution Control. The Department has set minimum requirements for the construction of earthen dams at phosphate mining operations to try to eliminate or reduce dam failures. Construction of new plants is regulated by a permit system which allows only a given number of plants to put effluents into the air in a given area, thus attempting to keep pollution to a minimum. Hillsborough, Manatee, and Sarasota Counties have codes on air and water pollution control. EFFECT OF LAND CONFLICTS ON MINERAL RESOURCES There have been two instances in the study area where lands with phosphate values have been lost to the phosphate companies. One company lost approximately 36 acres that were taken for use in the Interstate Highway System; although the company was compensated, the contained mineral comprising 275,000 tons of phosphate rock was lost. Another phosphate company lost 38 acres of phosphate reserves land due to relocation and four-laning of a state highway; the company was compensated for the surface but the contained mineral was lost. Phosphate occurrences are found under many lakes in the study area. Attempts have been made to obtain legal permission to mine these lakes; but permission has thus far been denied. Phosphate probably occurs under most of the cities in the area. These lands are being put to their most valuable use; therefore, most of the mineral deposits under them will be lost. However, in several instances lands within the city limits of Bartow have been mined and reclaimed. These lands were in swampy areas, and unsuitable for other purposes in their original form. After mining and reclamation, the lands were made available for other uses. It has been projected that there will be a water shortage after 1980 in some of the more industrialized basins. A water shortage in the study area could hamper future phosphate production. Mineral values would not be lost, but a serious conflict could arise with other users of water affecting mineral production. SWEENEY: LAND USE CONFLICTS METHODS OF RESOLVING LAND USE CONFLICTS PAST AND CURRENT TRENDS Probably the major effort of the phosphate industry to alleviate land use conflicts was to eliminate former practices that did not consider the public interest. The primary effort has been land reclamation activities and the installation of pollution abatement equipment. The industry undertook its land reclamation program to present a better public image, gain public acceptance, and in some cases to realize a profit. While the economics of reclaiming mined-out phosphate land in remote areas are still none too promising, it is now considered good business and good public relations to restore mined-out land. CONCLUSIONS Many land use conflicts exist, but the current situation in the area should not be considered too serious as far as loss of mineral resources are concerned; most of the conflicts can be resolved. Mining has the least flexible land requirements of any of the major users of land. Agricultural, community, and industrial development can be accommodated in many areas, but mining is naturally limited to the specific area in which the resource is found. Clear and reasonable zoning laws concerning mineral resources should be worked out with county governments to most efficiently use available resources to the benefit of the community and the industry. Close cooperation between industry and government, and public awareness of mineral resource problems and potential conflicts are necessary. Mineral resources must be wisely conserved, and the mineral policies we pursue must be farsighted, planned with thought, and based on fact. SEDIMENTARY FRACTIONATION AND INDUSTRIAL-MINERAL DEPOSITS By Robert L. Bates ABSTRACT The natural separation of one element or compound from others in the earth's crust is a rare geological phenomenon; accumulation of large quantities of a separated substance forms mineral deposits of value. Although igneous and metamorphic processes are effective at times, by far the most significant fractionation is sedimentary. High-silica sandstone, high-purity limestone and dolomite, salt, and anhydrite-gypsum occur in very large deposits and are termed first-order fractionates. The marine diatomite of California, the trona of Wyoming, and the kaolin of Georgia and South Carolina are in deposits of comparable purity but smaller size, and are designated second-order fractionates. The paper considers the various processes and environments in which such industrially valuable deposits were formed. INTRODUCTION The earth's crust is a heterogeneous mixture, in which roughly 100 chemical elements are combined in manifold ways into about 2,000 minerals, and the minerals in turn form a complex array of rocks. In this mixture of substances, only rarely do we find large deposits of any single material to the virtual exclusion of all others. It is the purpose of this paper to examine those deposits that, with little or no beneficiation, are pure enough and big enough to be of value for large-scale chemical, ceramic, refractory, or other special uses; and to review the processes by which such deposits formed. The requirements of purity and size rule out deposits of the naturally occurring elements, whether metallic or nonmetallic. Such sought-after substances as native gold, native copper, diamond, graphite, and sulfur occur in minuscule amounts and with abundant gangue from which they must be separated. The same is true, furthermore, of metallic ores generally. Porphyry-copper deposits are commonly considered to be very large, but they drop out of consideration when we recall that over 99 percent of such deposits is waste rock. The piles of waste in lead-zinc districts, and the tailings ponds at gold mines, remind us of the fractionation that man must do because nature didn't. Igneous and metamorphic processes produce ore deposits - small complex pockets of mixed-up rock from which a metal may be profitably won but only sedimentary processes can form deposits of earth material so pure that they can be used essentially as is, and of a size measurable in billions of tons. Four varieties of sedimentary rock, which occur in deposits of exceptional purity and great size, are here termed first-order fractionates. These are high-silica sandstone, high-purity limestone (and dolomite), salt, and anhydrite-gypsum. Materials of comparable purity but in smaller deposits, the second-order fractionates, include California diatomite, Wyoming trona, and kaolin of Georgia and South Carolina. All these deposits are at least 90 percent pure; a grade of 95 to 97 percent is not uncommon for most of those named. This purity requirement rules out such large concentrations as the potash deposits of Saskatchewan and the phosphate rock of Florida, in which the concentration of desired mineral material falls far below 90 percent. HIGH-SILICA SANDSTONE The St. Peter Sandstone of the east-central United States averages 97 percent rounded and frosted quartz grains, the chief impurity being clay. White clean sandstones of this general nature are not uncommon in the geologic column, but the St. Peter averages 75 feet in thickness over an area of about 225,000 square miles. This is hardly the common or garden variety of sandstone deposit. In this single formation there are some 2,500 cubic miles of rock, nearly all of which is quartz. The St. Peter is a source of high-silica sand in northern Illinois, in the St. Louis area, and (under the alias of a correlative formation) in the Wichita Mountains of Oklahoma. How did such a sedimentary unit form? The St. Peter is the record of a Middle Ordovician sea that slowly transgressed northwestward onto a continental platform of low relief, carrying its white sandy beach with it (Dapples, 1955). As the platform subsided very gradually and the sea advanced, 'quartz-rich sediment' was supplied from the Canadian Shield by streams. No doubt the source of this sediment was one or more older sandstones, themselves perhaps second-generation rocks. Thus the St. Peter Sandstone consists of material that has been washed and winnowed repeatedly in the channels of ancient rivers and on long-vanished beaches. The dimensions of the St. Peter as it exists today make it comparable to a sheet of bond paper 13 feet by 13 feet. Thus it is actually little more than a film. Gradual sinking of the continental platform continued into post-St. Peter time, and the film of sand was covered with limestones and shales. Sands that accumulate in eugeosynclines are commonly diluted with mud or other nonsiliceous matter, but in miogeosynclines transgressive shoreline conditions may persist long enough for an appreciable amount of clean quartz sand to accumulate. The Oriskany Sandstone (Lower Devonian) and the Tuscarora quartzitic sandstone (Lower Silurian) are well-known Appalachian examples. The Oriskany locally rivals the St. Peter; the Tuscarora, as much as 400 feet thick, is 97 to 98 percent quartz over hundreds of square miles. The Eureka Quartzite (Middle Ordovician) of California is a Cordilleran example. It contains a member 250 feet thick that is reported to be more than 99 percent quartz. All these rocks have been or are being quarried for glass sand or other high-silica raw material. GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS Thus the seemingly formless, unfocused work of waves in the shore zone can in time refine certain resistant earth materials to a high degree of purity. The amount of material that can be involved is suggested by the immense stretches of quartz sand along the Atlantic Coast from New Jersey to Florida. It is easy to believe that silicon and oxygen are the most abundant elements in the earth's crust when we consider the essentially pure silica that has been isolated and preserved in times past and continues to accumulate today. HIGH-PURITY CARBONATE ROCKS Among the purest materials to accumulate in large quantities are those limestones and dolomites from which all but 2 or 3 percent of foreign matter (generally clay) has been excluded. A few limestones that accumulated under geosynclinal conditions meet this requirement; notable examples are two Middle Ordovician limestones of the Appalachians, the Valentine and the New Market. The upper 70 feet of the Valentine limestone ('Bellefonte ledge') of central Pennsylvania is 70 feet thick and averages 97 to 98 percent calcium carbonate. The New Market limestone, in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, is 40 to 250 feet thick and is at least as pure. Both these formations are quarried on a large scale. As with sandstone, however, we find that the most extensive deposits of high-purity carbonates form on the continental platform. Two Middle Devonian limestones of northeastern Michigan, the Dundee and the overlying Rogers City, total about 200 feet in thickness and produce a greater tonnage of high-calcium limestone than any other formation in the country. The upper 40 feet of the Columbus Limestone of Ohio (Middle Devonian) is of high- calcium quality from the central part of the state to Lake Erie, and for some 50 miles from the outcrop down the regional dip toward the east. This part of the formation totals about 40 cubic miles of rock. Several quarries and one mine are active. Middle Silurian dolomites that extend from northwestern Ohio to northern Illinois are sheet deposits of high purity, much utilized for fluxstone and as raw material for refractories. The Racine Dolomite, a representative of these strata in Illinois, is characterized by the presence of reefs, which range from a few feet in width and height to at least a mile in diameter and 150 feet in thickness. Typically, reef cores and flanking strata are high-purity stone; an analysis of reef rock from the famous Thornton quarry south of Chicago shows 98.87 percent carbonates. Interreef strata carry as much as 30 percent of clay and silt and are not utilized. Invertebrate animals and certain marine algae were the humble agents that extracted pure calcium carbonate from the shallow clear warm waters in which the creatures lived. From time to time, waves ground up the shelly material, and currents spread it over the sea floor. Great distance from land, or very low relief of land, was an important part of the picture. The general aspects of the environment of deposition can be seen on the Bahama Banks of today. At those times when appreciable noncarbonate sediments did enter the sea, only the reefs and their flanking strata, standing above the general sea floor, were the sites of deposition of pure carbonate. Wholesale dolomitization of marine fossiliferous limestones of the Middle Silurian may have taken place during early diagenesis, or much later, perhaps when the rocks were blanketed by Upper Silurian evaporites that have since been eroded away. SALT In sheer size of deposits, rock salt exceeds the other first-order fractionates. There are at least 3,000 cubic miles of salt in the Upper Silurian rocks of the New York, Ohio, and Michigan basin, 10,000 cubic miles in the Upper Permian rocks of West Texas-New Mexico, and probably far more than that in the Louann Basin of the Gulf Coast. Other major North American deposits are in the Pennsylvanian of the Paradox Basin of Utah and in the Devonian of Saskatchewan. Large parts of these enormous salt bodies contain only 2 to 3 percent of impurities, chiefly anhydrite and clay. Whereas the natural habitat of pure sandstone and limestone is the broad continental platform, salt deposits are more characteristic of the basins on that platform-basins that were shallow at any given time but subsided concurrently with deposition, so as to allow accumulation of several hundred to several thousand feet of salt and associated sediments. As a result of this depositional habitat, salt deposits tend to have the shape of a lens, or mega-lens, rather than a sheet or film. Once deposited, sandstone and limestone can be counted on to stay put. Not so with salt, which is highly mobile in the earth's crust. Salt movement has had profound influence on the architecture of major crustal units as diverse as the Appalachian Basin and the Texas-Louisiana continental slope. Salt movement has helped localize immense stores of oil and gas, and current theory holds that brines derived from salt basins were instrumental in forming many ore deposits of the Mississippi Valley type. It has long been the conventional view that the dominant process in the formation of salt deposits is evaporation, the sedimentary basin acting as an immense salt pan, under a sun so torrid that for long periods the loss of water to the atmosphere exceeded inflow by streams. This concept is variously modified to account for replenishment by increments of normal sea water and escape of residual brines after removal of salt. Orthodox views have been challenged, however, by Sloss (1969) and Schmalz (1969), who suggest that much salt may have been deposited from deep water, in density-layered brines occupying basins that did not dry up and were not salt pans at all. It is clear that the origin of major salt deposits continues to present problems, as it has done since the time of Ochsenius nearly 100 years ago. Until strong counterevidence comes along, salt will probably continue to be referred to as an evaporite. Rock salt produced in the solid form and also as artificial brine is one earth substance of which there is an essentially limitless supply. Our affluence in this commodity is definitely not in jeopardy. ANHYDRITE-GYPSUM Most of the salt-bearing basins contain a second product of chemical precipitation, anhydrite. This rock has been hydrated to gypsum in the near-surface parts of sedimentary basins. Ancient seas left behind considerably less calcium sulfate than sodium chloride, but still there are large amounts of the former in some parts of the geologic section. Conservative figures indicate, for example, more than 2,000 cubic miles of anhydrite-gypsum in the Permian Basin. Though there is a disproportionately smaller amount in the Silurian basin of New York, Ohio, and Michigan, adequate supplies of gypsum exist along the outcrop belt to support large mines and quarries. Equivalent anhydrite beds in the subsurface are generally thicker. Gypsum deposits show considerable variation in purity, and it may be assumed that anhydrite deposits do also. The better gypsum deposits, such as those of the Salina Formation of New York and the Blaine of Kansas, contain no more than 4 to 5 percent of impurities, chiefly shale and dolomitic limestone. Viewed in the large, anhydrite-gypsum deposits take the lenticular form, like salt. The calcium sulfate is believed to have formed as an evaporite, anhydrite being the parent material and gypsum the result of hydration in the zone of weathering. Thus BATES: SEDIMENTARY FRACTIONATION gypsum deposits are shallow deposits, and an operator cannot expect to carry his mine indefinitely down the dip or beneath heavy cover. Gypsum is widely utilized in the manufacture of plaster and wallboard, but anhydrite is little used, at least in this country. It is a potentially limitless source of sulfur. As this is written, however, the last thing that industry needs is a new and limitless supply of sulfur. Consequently we consider the larger, anhydritic part of this fractionate to be a mineral resource only in the potential sense. SECOND-ORDER FRACTIONATES The three second-order fractionates to be discussed here - diatomite, trona, and kaolin have in common a purity of 90 percent or greater, a size of deposit smaller than those previously discussed, a lenticular form of deposit, and rarity or even uniqueness of occurrence. In other geologic respects the members of the group have little resemblance to each other. DIATOMITE One of the country's major concentrations of nonclastic silica is in the Monterey Formation (Miocene) and the overlying Sisquoc Formation (Miocene-Pliocene) of the Coast Ranges of California. The silica is in the form of bedded chert, hard opaline cherty shale, diatomaceous claystone, volcanic ash, and diatomite. At Lompoc, on the north flank of the Santa Ynez Mountains, there occurs about 1,000 feet of exceptionally pure porous friable light-colored diatomite, much of which approaches 100 percent silica. This rock is made up of the microscopic siliceous envelopes or tests of the minute floating plants called diatoms. A single cubic inch of diatomite may contain 40,000,000 tests. The tests are of many shapes and forms, most of which are angular, and are lavishly ornamented with ridges, spines, holes, dimples, grillwork, and other decorations down to the micron dimension. Angularity of grain produces loose packing, which imparts good insulating properties; siliceous composition means immunity to many chemical reagents; and the nature of the grains imparts tremendous surface area, which is utilized in diatomite filter aids. The rock is selectively mined, and is processed into many grades with a wide range of applications. Unusual conditions must have existed in the arm of the sea that occupied southern coastal California in the Miocene and Pliocene. One was a negligible inflow of land-derived sediments. A second was a continuing supply of nutrients phosphates and nitrates in small amounts, and silica in large amounts for the propagation of billions of billions of diatoms over a long period of time. Phosphates and nitrates tend to move in a cycle, returning to surface waters for re-use by the floating diatoms, but silica, once incorporated into diatom tests, is taken out of circulation. Thus an exceptionally large and continuous supply of silica must have been available. Beds of volcanic ash are prominent in the Monterey formation, and there seems to be little doubt that volcanic activity was the source of the silica utilized by the teeming diatom population and locked up in this part of the geologic section. Bramlette (1946) believes that the procelaneous and cherty shales of the Monterey Formation were originally diatomaceous beds, which were altered to their present form by solution and reprecipitation of silica. There are many other deposits of diatomite in the western states besides the one at Lompoc. All are of fresh-water rather than marine origin, are smaller than the Lompoc deposit, and are associated with volcanic rocks. A deposit at Clark, Nevada, which supports mining operations, is very pure, hundreds of feet thick, and is reported to contain several million tons. TRONA Trona, or natural sodium carbonate (Na2C03.NaHCO3.2H20), is mined by three companies in the Green River Basin of southwestern Wyoming. The mineral occurs in the Green River Formation (Eocene) as one of the sediments deposited in Gosiute Lake, a most unusual, not to say unique, body of water that was named by Bradley (1964). The trona, a light amber translucent mineral, occurs both as crystals disseminated in shale, and as discrete beds. Many other rock types were laid down in the lake, among them laminated marlstone, green clay shale, volcanic ash, and thin beds of oil shale. There are 25 beds of trona that are 3 feet or more in thickness and at least 100 square miles in area. Two of these beds are being mined. Altogether, some 75 billion tons are estimated to be recoverable. A grade of 90 percent trona is common, and 'within a single mine substantial areas may contain minable beds averaging 93 to 94 percent trona and smaller areas may go as high as 97 percent' (Mannion, 1969). The principal impurity is shale. In some beds halite occurs with the trona, and Bradley believes that the latter is an evaporite, deposited at a stage when Gosiute Lake shrank and its waters became supersaturated under an arid climate. If the St. Peter Sandstone is a sheet deposit par excellence, the Green River trona is the very ultimate in lenticularity. The salt-bearing section constitutes a lens within the Wilkins Peak member of the Green River Formation; the Wilkins Peak is a lens, and the Green River Formation itself is a great lens sandwiched between the stream deposits of the red Wasatch Formation below and the dark stream- and lake- deposited beds of the Bridger Formation above. Of the trona deposits Bradley (1948) has written, 'It seems to me another illustration of the remarkable phenomenon of geology wherein a rare combination of factors provides the necessary environment for the formation of an unusual mineral and then persists without significant change until huge quantities of the rare product have formed... I confess that contemplation of these laboratories of nature where a complex dynamic system remains so long in apparent perfect balance fills me with something very close to childlike wonder.' One can certainly sympathize with this feeling. How did 75 billion tons of sodium carbonate become concentrated only in this place and only at this time? Mannion (1969) ascribes the concentration to surface drainage from granitic rocks surrounding the lake basin. But streams flowed across granitic rocks into other Rocky Mountain basins during the Tertiary; why did trona accumulate in none of those basins? Besides, we are attempting to account for a geochemical anomaly of a very high order, which geologic business-as-usual can hardly be expected to explain. It seems more reasonable to relate the concentration of sodium carbonate to volcanic processes. Increments of ash that repeatedly fell into Gosiute Lake may have contributed sodium directly, and, as these same ash falls must have blanketed the surrounding area, streams would have added more sodium in solution. Bradley and Eugster (1969) lists eight thermal springs in the inferred hydrographic basin of the lake, several of which are rich in alkalies. It thus seems likely that sodium could also have been contributed from Eocene hot springs. The 'laboratory of nature' that produced the trona was, then, like the one that provided the silica for the Lompoc diatomite, in the last analysis presided over by Vulcan. KAOLIN OF GEORGIA AND SOUTH CAROLINA Lenses of white kaolin as much as 40 feet thick and a mile across are enclosed in coarse micaceous sands of the Tuscaloosa GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS Formation (Upper Cretaceous) in two districts on the coastal plain of Georgia and South Carolina. Material mined runs at least 94 percent kaolin. Impurities are detrital quartz and mica. How such masses of pure clay could become emplaced in the midst of cross-bedded stream-laid sands poses a nice problem in sedimentation. According to a hypothesis presented by Kesler (1957), rapid erosion of granitic rocks of the adjacent Piedmont Province produced unweathered sediments that were transported directly to the ocean by streams. Growth of vegetation in the source area prevented iron from becoming oxidized, and it was carried to the sea in the ferrous state, bypassing the plastic sediments. Detrital feldspar, quartz, and mica were built into a series of coalescing delta deposits above sea level, and subjected to prolonged weathering. Kaolinite, formed by decomposition of feldspar grains disseminated through the delta sands, was washed into cutoff stream segments containing fresh water. As kaolin accumulated, sand was periodically washed into and over the edges of the deposits. The kaolin-filled ponds were eventually covered by sands and preserved, forming the lenticular deposits that are mined today. Buie (1964) points out that the kaolin deposits occur in a part of the geologic column that contains much evidence of volcanic activity in Texas, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Puerto Rico. He suggests that volcanic ash from vents in the Mississippi Embayment and Gulf Coast regions settled on land, was washed into valleys and lagoons, and became altered first to montmorillonite and later to kaolinite. Purity of the clay, absence of fossils, and lack of bedding are reasonably accounted for under this hypothesis. Thus it may turn out that these pure kaolins join diatomite and trona in having a volcanic ancestry. SUMMARY Potential contaminants of the St. Peter and other high-silica sandstones were kept out of the deposits by bypassing if finer-grained, by grinding up and washing away if weaker, or by otherwise failing to survive the rigorous and long-continued wave abrasion on ancient beaches. Distance from shore, or low relief of land areas, kept terrigenous detritus from the high-purity limestones and the Lompoc diatomite. The aridity that caused precipitation of salt and gypsum in the shallow sea and trona in Gosiute Lake inhibited stream flow and hence the delivery of much plastic material to the sites of deposition. And sand-size detritus was kept out of kaolin pockets on a deltaic complex because streams either filtered clay-size material from the surrounding sediments or washed in fine volcanic ash from adjacent lands. Diverse sedimentary processes, operating in widely varying environments at different times and places, have had one attribute in common: the capacity to produce large mineral deposits of great purity. REFERENCES CITED Bradley, W. H., 1948, Limnology and the Eocene lakes of the Rocky Mountain region: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 59, p. 635-648. -- 1964, Geology of Green River formation and associated Eocene rocks in southwestern Wyoming and adjacent parts of Colorado and Utah: U.S. GeoL Survey Prof. Paper 496-A. and H. P. Eugster, 1969, Geochemistry and paleolimnology of the trona deposits and associated authigenic minerals of the Green River Formation of Wyoming: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 496-B. Bramlette, M.N., 1946, The Monterey formation of California and the origin of its siliceous rocks: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 212. Buie, B. F., 1964, Possibility of volcanic origin of the Cretaceous sedimentary kaolin of South Carolina and Georgia (abstract) in W. F. Bradley, ed., Proc. 12th Nat. Conf on Clays and Clay Mins.: New York, Macmillan, p. 195. Dapples, E. C., 1955, General lithofacies relationship of St. Peter sandstone and Simpson group: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 39, p. 444-467. Kesler, T. L., 1957, Environment and origin of the Cretaceous kaolin deposits of Georgia and South Carolina: Georgia Mineral Newsletter, v. 10, no. 1, p. 1-8. Mannion, L.E., 1969, The trona deposits of southwest Wyoming: Intermountain Assoc. Geologists, 16th Ann. Field Conf. Guidebook, p. 195-204. Schmalz, R.F., 1969, Deep-water evaporite deposition: a genetic model: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 53, p. 798-823. Sloss, L.L., 1969, Evaporite deposition from layered solutions: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 53, p. 776-789. ECONOMIC GEOLOGY OF FLORIDA HEAVY MINERAL DEPOSITS by T.E. Garnar, Jr. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. Starke, Florida ABSTRACT Heavy mineral mining has been a small,- but important Florida industry over the past sixty years. Early geologic history of each deposit is similar up to point of deposition in alluvium, deltaic sediments, or along shorelines. Later geological development through reworking and concentration is different for each deposit. The Trail Ridge deposit was formed by reworking Citronelle sediments of the Lake Wales ridge. Post depositional leaching of iron from ilmenite makes Trail Ridge an important source of titanium minerals for TiO2 pigment manufacture. Research leading to the separation and sale of by-product heavy minerals from Florida deposits has been important in maximizing profitability. Advances in mineral dressing technology will lead to future mining of lower grade reserves. Future needs for heavy minerals seem certain to expand, with increased activity in exploration and development of mining operations. INTRODUCTION Heavy minerals have always been important to Florida. Although heavy mineral mining is small compared to phosphate and other minerals mined in Florida, its continuing importance to the state makes it appropriate that a program on industrial minerals should have this industry represented. The first beach sand mining operation was located at "Mineral City" on the coast just south of Jacksonville Beach. During World War I, rutile was mined for use in producing titanium tetrachloride for tracer bullets. Following the war, this operation became inactive and the site is now the Ponte Vedra Country Club. There was only a small amount of activity and interest in heavy minerals in the intervening years until World War II. The Humphreys Mining Company operated a heavy minerals mine just east of Arlington near Jacksonville from 1944 through 1964. Hobart Brothers operated a mine near Vero Beach to produce rutile for their welding rods during the 1946-1963 period. Both of these are inactive at the present time. The Jacksonville deposit was mined out and Humphreys moved their equipment to Folkston, Georgia to mine a deposit belonging to the E.I. du Pont de Nemours Company. Hobart phased out their operation after securing other rutile sources. A deposit at the south end of Amelia Island owned by Union Carbide was scheduled for mining in the late 1950's. Plans to mine it were abandoned and the property was sold in 1970 for development as a recreational area. The only heavy mineral mines now operating in Florida are the Du Pont mines at Starke and Lawtey; however, another mine is under development just south of Green Cove Springs near Penny Farms. This will be operated by Titanium Enterprises, a joint venture between the Union Camp Corporation and American Cyanamid Company. All of these deposits are operated primarily for titanium minerals. The purpose of this paper is to bring together the geology, mineralogy, and economic uses for Florida heavy minerals, and relate them to present and future exploration, mining, and markets. GEOLOGY The geology of a heavy mineral deposit is complex and has its' beginning eons before final deposition and many miles from the deposit. None of the valuable minerals associated with heavy mineral deposits are known to occur as primary minerals in Florida rocks. The presence of crystalline rocks in an area called the Hinterland by J.L. Gillson (1959), is the most necessary prerequisite to formation of a heavy mineral beach sand deposit. Peneplanation and formation of soil zones during which time magnetite is decomposed and leached out by ground waters is the second required step. Uplift and erosion of the soil zone is the third, followed by transportation and deposition in alluvium, deltaic sediments, or along shorelines. To this point, all of the heavy mineral deposits have similar history. From this point on, however, each deposit has its own individual geologic history, equally complex and each different from the other. I will discuss a typical case using the Trail Ridge deposit as an example. Early workers, like Spencer (1948), believed the source of Trail Ridge heavy minerals was Marion, Lake, Polk, and Highland counties. Erosion of barrier islands, bars, and spits there released heavy minerals which were washed northward to be reconcentrated along Pleistocene shorelines. Important contributions were made to the geology of the deposit by Bishop (1956), and Brooks (1966). The most recent contribution has come from Pirkle and Yoho (1970). They point out that the Trail Ridge along which the heavy minerals occur is younger than the Lake Wales Ridge extending down the center of the state to Lake Wales. The Lake Wales Ridge is composed of coarse Citronelle sediments containing almost identical mineral assemblage to that of the Trail Ridge ore body. These are distinctive through the absence of epidote, garnet, and monazite which are common in heavy minerals throughout the rest of Florida. The Trail Ridge sands were localized by currents impinging on the northern end of the Lake Wales remnant. These sands wrapped around the remnant. Much of the sand deposited along the eastern side of the remnant was later removed through erosion. Along the western side of the Lake Wales remnant, Trail Ridge sands were built into beach ridges. Some of the sands were blown inland to form a blanket over Citronelle sediments. The part of Trail Ridge that is banked up behind, and that encroaches on, the Lake Wales remnant is the part that contains the heavy mineral ore body. Dune and wind-blown sands are important parts of Trail Ridge. The important part of Pirkle and Yoho's theory is that the presence of the Lake Wales remnant was critical to the formation and concentration of the heavy minerals deposit. The Trail Ridge deposit is approximately 18 miles long and averages about one mile in width and ranges between 25 and 70 feet in depth. The heavy minerals are disseminated in cross-bedded sands. Organic material (humate) made up of carbonized plant residues and kaolinite occur throughout the deposit. In localized areas, the humate is present in sufficient concentrations to cement the sand grains into a poorly consolidated sandstone. The cemented sandstone areas are lenticular and occur randomly with no apparent correlation as to depth. These features probably represent sites of ancient swamps present during development of the deposit. GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS MINERALOGY Heavy mineral composition is the most important consideration in evaluating economics of a potential ore. Ilmenite with 65% or less TiO2 is used by pigments manufacturers with the sulfuric acid process. The higher the TiO2 content, the more value it has to them., The high TiO2 leucoxenes and rutile are insoluble in sulfuric acid and therefore cannot be used in that process. They are used in the production of titanium tetrachloride which in turn is used in the manufacture of pigment and titanium metal. Ilmenite by definition is a mineral with composition FeO'TiO2. This mineral is rarely found in nature in its theoretical form. The rock ilmenites occur in close association with magnetite and hematite. Excess Fe2zO can enter the ilmenite lattice; however, this exsolves and is removed by leaching. This takes place in Area "A" of the triangular diagram shown in figure 1. Ilmenite is liberated by rock weathering and with other minerals transported by water and deposited. As shown in the Area "B" to "C" of the triangular diagram, the ilmenite oxidizes and Fe203 forms at the expense of FeO. The structure is destroyed leaving a mixture of amorphous Fe and Ti oxides. This is shown by the Trail Ridge ilmenite x-ray pattern in figure 2. As oxidation to Fe203 progresses down the "boomerang", leaching is accelerated and the insoluble particles become enriched in TiO2. The remaining TiO2 between "C" and "D" begins to recrystallize in the form of secondary rutile as shown by the Trail Ridge leucoxene x-ray pattern. We have separated particles from the Trail Ridge titanium mineral fraction for each of the points shown on the area "C" through "E". Details of this alteration sequence is given by Temple (1960). One of the most controversial aspects of the titanium ore science is the accurate naming of the alteration products of ilmenite minerals. Most workers in the titanium mineral field recognize the inadequacy of the names ilmenite and leucoxene. Many have proposed new names: Gillson (in Carpenter et. al. 1953) wanted to adopt the name "arizonite"; Lynd (1960) wanted to call it ilmenite (qualified with an appropriate adjective) and use the word leucoxene for alteration products. Temple (1966) proposed the name "pseudorutile" for the intermediate TiO2 minerals having composition Fe203'3TiO2. Because present nomenclature is well established with pigments-oriented geologists, I believe that future workers will continue to call the black, opaque, para-magnetic grains containing less than 65% TiO2 by the name "ilmenite"; the less magnetic, lighter colored, alteration products from ilmenite containing from 85% Ti2O to 98% TiO2 will continue to be called "leucoxene". The primary unaltered rutile grains associated with heavy minerals have always been called rutile - even though some of these grains may be anatase or brookite. A test has been devised for simplifying identification of these products. Heating samples to 2000 F produces color changes as shown below: Mineral Color Before Color After %TiO2 Heating Heating Ilmenite 65% Black Altered Ilmenite 70-85% Brownish-Black Leucoxene 85-98% Tan, Gray to Black Primary Rutile 98% Dark Red Unchanged-Black Brownish to Dark Red Yellow to White Unchanged- Dark Red As mentioned earlier, all heavy mineral deposits are operated for the titanium minerals. In mining and processing, the concentrators are normally set for best overall heavy mineral recovery, so many of the heavy mineral silicates present in the ore are recovered with the titanium minerals. In the interest of economy and conservation of natural resources, uses and markets should be sought for these non-TiO2 minerals. The common heavy mineral silicates and their uses are discussed below. GARNET A garnet is an isotropic, colorless to red, translucent mineral which is strongly paramagnetic. It occurs in all known southeastern heavy mineral deposits except Trail Ridge. It has been separated and sold as an abrasive. None is produced from Eastern beach sand deposits at the present time. STAUROLITE Staurolite is a red to brown, anisotropic, translucent mineral which is strongly paramagnetic. It occurs in most of the southeastern deposits. It is produced by magnetic separation of the titanium mill high tension tailings at Starke. The mineral was originally sold for its Fe2zO and A1203 content to the Florida cement industries. Coarse staurolite (plus 48 mesh) is sold as an abrasive. A special grade of staurolite is soon to be introduced as specialty foundry sand and will be marketed under the trade name "BIASILL". the name "BIASILL" is the acronym for "basic iron-aluminum-silicate". Du Pont is the only source of staurolite mineral of this type in the world. TOURMALINE Tourmaline is a dark green to black, pleochroic, translucent mineral having about the same magnetic properties as staurolite. No market has been developed which would warrant development of a separation process for this mineral alone. EPIDOTE Epidote is a colorless to green, anistropic, translucent mineral with practically the same magnetic properties as staurolite. It occurs in most of the southeastern deposits except Trail Ridge. No commercial applications are known for this mineral. Its chemical composition is unsuitable for cement manufacture. Low refractoriness and unfavorable expansion characteristics would not make it a candidate for foundry or refractory use. MONAZITE Monazite occurs as very fine (-150 mesh) almost spherical grains. Color ranges from very pale yellow to green. Its magnetic properties are similar to those of staurolite. It occurs in most southeastern deposits, but is essentially absent in the Trail Ridge deposit. High specific gravity and magnetic character are used in separating this mineral. It was once valued for its thorium content which was originally used in lamp.mantles and later in nuclear applications. More recently, it has been in demand for use in manufacturing color television phosphors. At the time of this writing, monazite markets are reportedly declining. XENOTIME Xenotime occurs as very fine grains similar in color and other properties to monazite. Grains are frequently irregular shaped and angular. It can be easily recognized by its extreme birefringence and its relief which is very similar to calcite. It has recently been in demand for its rare earth content. It occurs in many of the southeastern deposits, but is absent in the Trail Ridge deposit. GARNAR: ECONOMIC GEOLOGY REFERENCES CITED Zircon occurs as colorless to slightly pink (hyacynth), highly birefringent elliptical grains. It is non-magnetic except in a few rare grains containing inclusions of magnetic minerals (Fe304). Its very high specific gravity and non-magnetic character allows this mineral to be separated into very high grade concentrates. Zircon was produced as a by-product from the Ponte Vedra mine in the 1920's and the operators patented its use as a "refractory sand". Only limited use was made of zircon until the late Forties" when it began to gain wide acceptance in the steel industry as a mold facing sand and later as a mold wash in flour form. Only small amounts of the zircon produced goes into refractories, zirconium chemicals, and metal. It is ubiquitous in southeastern heavy mineral deposits. Du Pont is the only major producer of high grade zircon in the United States at the present time. ALUMINUM SILICATES The lighter (specific gravity 3.2 to 3.5) non-magnetic heavy mineral fraction of most southeastern suites consist of kyanite, sillimanite, and corundum with small amounts of topaz. Spectrographic analysis of these minerals shows trace amounts of beryllium, suggesting the presence of beryl in some deposits. These minerals are being separated at Trail Ridge and marketed by Du Pont under the trade name "KYASILL". Grain size, shape, refractoriness, and excellent resin coating properties of this product are superior to any other known specialty foundry sand in certain applications. At Starke, we are nearing our goal of utilizing all of the recoverable heavy minerals and leaving only the silica sand behind. This has been achieved through continuing research efforts: First, to find economic processes to separate and concentrate the various heavy mineral fractions; and second, assiduous search for new uses and markets which can utilize special properties of these non-TiO2 heavy minerals. MINERAL DRESSING Advancing technology in mineral dressing will probably change grade requirements for future deposits. An Australian separator called the "Reichert" cone concentrator is a new development in high tonnage processing. It consists of a series of pinched sluices and cones which upgrade low grade ores to a point where they can be finished in a conventional spiral plant. Another high-tonnage-low investment device called a "Lamflow Sluice" is being marketed by Carpco in Jacksonville. Use of this type of equipment will allow .deposits which heretofore were considered uneconomic for spiral processing to be worked, thus assuring sufficient heavy mineral production to meet future needs. FUTURE MARKETS The need for heavy minerals in the future seems certain to increase. It seems unlikely that a satisfactory white pigment substitute for TiO2 will be found in the foreseeable future. Considering that heavy mineral deposits furnish the highest TiO2 raw materials for pigment manufacture, then it seems reasonable to assume that exploration for heavy mineral deposits will continue and new mining operations will open at an increased rate. Supporting evidence is the new mine which begins operation at Green Cove Springs next year; the new ASARCO ilmenite operation now in the planning stages for the Lakehurst, New Jersey area; and the exploratory activity for heavy minerals in the Tennessee area. Bailey, S.W., Cameron, E.N., Spedden, H.R., and Weege, RJ., 1956, The alteration of ilmenite in beachsands: Econ. Geology, v. 51, p. 263-279. Bishop, Ernest W., 1956, Geology and ground-water resources of Highlands County, Florida: Florida Geological Survey, Rept. of Invest., No. 15, 115 p. Brooks, H.K., 1966, Geological history of the Suwannee River, in Geology of the Miocene and Pliocene series in the north Florida-south Georgia area, N.K. Olson, Ed.: Atlantic Coastal Plain GeoL Assoc. 7th Field Trip, Southeastern Geol. Soc. 12th Field Trip, Guidebook, p. 37-45. Cannon, Harry B., 1950, Economic minerals in the beach sands of the southeastern United States: Symposium on Mineral Resources of the Southeastern United States, Snyder, F.G., Ed., Univ. of Tenn. Press, p. 202-210. Carpenter, J.H., Detweiler, J.C., Gillson, J.L., Weichel, E.C. and Wood, J.P., 1953, Mining and concentration of ilmenite and associated minerals at Trail Ridge, Fla.: Mining Eng., v. 5, p. 789-795. Creitz, E.E. and McVay, T.N., 1948, A study of opaque minerals in Trail Ridge, Florida dune sands: Am. Inst. Mining Metall. Engineers, Tech. Pub. No. 2426, p. 1-7. Gillson, J.L., 1959, Sand deposits of titanium minerals: Mining Eng., v. 11, p. 421-429. Grogan, R.M., Few, W.G., Garnar, T.E. and Hager, C.R., 1964, Milling, at Du Pont's heavy mineral mines in Florida: Milling Methods in the Americas, Nathaniel Arbiter, Ed.: VII International Mineral Processing Congress, N.Y., Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, p. 205-229. Lynd, L.E., Sigurdson, H., North, C.H. and Anderson W.W., 1954, Characteristics of titaniferous concentrates: Mining Eng., v. 6, p. 817-824. Lynd, L.E., 1960, Alteration of ilmenite: Econ. Geology, v. 55, p. 1064-1068. Lynd, L.E., 1960, Study of the mechanism and rate of ilmenite weathering: Am. Inst. Mining Metall. Engineers, Trans., v. 217, p. 311-318. Palache, C., Berman, H. and Frondel, C., 1944, The system of mineralogy of J.D. Dana and E.S. Dana: John Wiley and Sons, 7th Ed., v. 1, 834 p. Pirkle, E.C. and Yoho, W.H., 1970, The heavy mineral ore body of Trail Ridge, Florida: Econ. Geology, v. 65, p. 17-30. Spencer, R.V., 1948, Titanium minerals in Trail Ridge, Florida: U.S. Bur. Mines, Rept. of Invest. No. 4208, 21 p. Swanson, V.E. and Palacas, J.G., 1965, Humate in coastal sands of northwest Florida: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. No. 1214-B, 29 p. Temple, A.K., 1966, Alteration of ilmenite: Econ. Geology, v. 61, p. 695-714. ZIRCON GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 100% FeO 50% FeO 50% Ti02 ROCK ILMENITES MAGNETITE Fe0 Fe203j 100% Fe203 HEMATITE Fe2Ti05 PSEUDOBROOKITE 50% Fe203 50% Ti02 / Available / literature * does not show *\any analyses in , this area 100% Ti02 RUTILE ANATASE BROOKITE Figure 1. Triangular diagram showing chemical relationship of various iron and titanium oxide minerals. GARNAR: ECONOMIC GEOLOGY .,,,,l .............. .......... l. ..i .n.i.. 4, IIl , ffurlif F.u... .-r \.... ....rn ..... ..1 min F 2.X- d.-- pftiTe -.o- Tr Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of Trail Ridge titanium minerals. ORIGIN, DIAGENESIS AND STRUCTURE OF BAUXITE DEPOSITS IN SOUTHEAST ALABAMA by Glenn P. Jones General Refractories Company Stevens Pottery, Georgia ABSTRACT Laterization of syenite and other rocks in north Alabama produced material which was picked up and carried by streams to southeast Alabama. These streams deposited the aluminum rich material in the sinkholes of a karst topography developed on the Clayton Limestone. Measurement of the bearing of the long axis of each deposit in the Screamer area, along with plotting the location of these deposits on a map, indicate a depositional pattern controlled by local fractures or solution zones in the Clayton Limestone. The sinkholes and channels dictated the original structure of the deposits. Additional structure changes have resulted since compaction of the deposits by continued solution of the underlying limestone. The original material in these deposits was enriched by the removal of silica to form bauxite and bauxitic kaolin during deposition and compaction. Subsequent ground water action has reintroduced silica into the deposit leaving a core of bauxite. INTRODUCTION The bauxite producing area of Southeast Alabama is in Henry and Barbour Counties and extends over approximately 180 square miles (figure 1). This area is in the Coastal Plain Province, with the bauxite being found in the lower Eocene deposits of the "Nanafalia Formation." Directly under the sand member of the Nanafalia Formation is a porous limestone of the Midway group, known as the "Clayton Formation" (MacNeil, 1945). The contact between the Nanafalia and the Clayton Formation is an erosional unconformity. The bauxite and surrounding deposits are easily recognizable as sedimentary with the apparent bauxite source material being found in North Alabama. The limestone underlying the bauxite is responsible for the presence and structure of the deposits. Changes within the deposits have taken place since deposition, as evidenced by the halo of bauxitic clay and kaolin around a core of bauxite. For exploration and mining purposes a deposit is generally graded by the alumina or silica content. Figure 2 is a graph showing the aluminum oxide on a raw and calcine basis, with the corresponding percentage of loss on ignition. The third line shows the same relationship between the silica content and loss on ignition. The ore is divided into three categories, depending on the percent of aluminum oxide present. On a raw basis ore with greater than 50% aluminum oxide is considered bauxite; 45%-50% is bauxitic kaolin; 40%-45% is kaolin. Material with less than 40% aluminum oxide is clay and is generally not usable for refractories because of the presence of illite, montmorillonite and other clay minerals. ORIGIN Residual clay deposits in the Piedmont Province of North Alabama indicate this area was a source for the Southeast Alabama bauxite deposits (Clark, 1963). This was the closest source for the large mica flakes which are associated with the bauxite deposits. Laterization of igneous and metamorphic rocks in the Piedmont Province produced the residual clay deposits, which were carried by streams crossing the area south to be deposited in the Karst topography of Southeast Alabama. DIAGENESIS The material originally deposited in the sinkholes was probably very similar to the clay which is present in the lower portion of the present deposits. This clay appears to have undergone little or no diagenesis and contains primarily kaolin, illite and silica. The change from the original clay sediments to bauxite with the intermediate stages of kaolin and bauxitic kaolin can best be explained by the leaching of the silica. Silica is soluble in pure water and is more soluble in slightly alkaline waters (Harder, 1933). Percolating ground water passing through the clay deposit would become slightly alkaline and more readily remove the silica cation from the clay. MacNeil (1945) has shown that marine deposits of the Nanafalia Formation are present just to the south of the bauxite district. This would indicate a low lying area in which meandering, shifting streams were depositing clay minerals in the quiet waters of the sinks, with the sands deposited at the entrance to the sink. The sand at the entrance would cause the stream to shift, leaving a pool or lake filled with clay sediments. Once the stream had shifted, there would not be the continued introduction of silica into the deposit by stream water. The lignite deposits associated with these bauxite deposits indicate ample rainfall to provide water for leaching the silica. Lignite deposits may be found in any position around the deposit. Infrequently, lignite may be found on top of the deposit. The lignite below the bauxite deposits formed before deposition of the clay sediments and during the development of the Karst topography. When the limestone collapsed, a more rapid drainage occurred in the sinkhole which was full of clay sediments. This drainage prevented the growth of vegetation and the formation of lignite deposits by draining the moisture away from the surface. As the kaolin became more indurated, drainage through the deposit became slower, permitting the growth of enough vegetation to form lignite on top of some deposits. The leaching of silica by percolating water would begin near the top of the deposit and progress gradually downward. After the overlying Nanafalia and Tuschoma Formations were deposited, silica was reintroduced into the bauxite by ground water saturated with silica which the water had picked up from the overlying sediments. Both the leaching and reintroduction of silica have left a gradational contact between the core of bauxite and surrounding bauxitic kaolin and kaolin. As could be expected, this gradational contact is irregular, with the deepest penetration of the leaching or reintroduction of silica occurring along the course followed by the water. In a small road cut approximately 1000 feet north of Price's Store on the Cotton Hill Road in Barbour County, Alabama, (SW4, Sec. 22, TO1N, R27E), a deposit of kaolin and clay is exposed. For the most part, the deposit is clay enclosing small pockets of kaolin. The contacts between the clay and kaolin are gradational. GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS S--Bauxite Producing Area Omi 75mi p p I Figure 1. Map of Alabama showing bauxite producing area. JONES: STRUCTURE OF BAUXITE DEPOSITS 0 o 0 Ci . 0 C M 04 -4 o M 00 r %0 rn t cn o o\ co t- %o L T f> c4 1- q Mn MC M Mc 4 Cv, Cq C4 04 C Co N Ji C r4 r4N -l N-4 r- 4 rl-4 r4N i PERCENT L.O.I. JONES: STRUCTURE OF BAUXITE DEPOSITS 80 \\ II O 0 ev) cv 0 O- 0- O/ -& 0/ 0 OI O a, .-l 0 o ar F0 as /II O 6 O G> GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 02, /00 2.00 50I Figure 4. Map of bauxite deposits and bearings of long axes in Screamer, Alabama area. GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS Examination of a mining face in a bauxite pit will also show gradational contacts between the bauxite, bauxitic kaolin and kaolin. These changes in alumina content are almost always accompanied by a change in texture of the ore. Cores taken from deposits show clearly the change in texture and related alumina content. The kaolin has a smooth texture, while the bauxite frequently has an appearance like sugar granules, especially when rubbed between the fingers. The texture of bauxitic kaolin lies between the kaolin and bauxite. Bauxite is frequently more difficult to recover in a core because it is less cohesive than the kaolin and falls apart easily. STRUCTURE Drilling has shown the bauxite deposits are located in limestone sinks. These sinks are shaped roughly like a cone with the pointed end down. Pinnacles of limestone often rise higher than the top of a deposit. A map view of a deposit shows it to be irregular in shape and generally longer than it is wide (figure 3). Considerable ground water has passed through the deposits, as evidenced by the slumping which has taken place in the ore deposits as a result of solution and collapse of the underlying limestone. Many deposits have what is called an "umbrella" effect. This results from much of the ground water being diverted over the edge of the deposit around the less permeable clay. The additional water accelerated the solution of the underlying limestone, permitting the edge of the deposit to collapse forming a dome-like structure. Not all sinks in the bauxite area contain clay sediments. It appears the deposition of the clay sediments were controlled by streams which crossed sinks in the Karst topography. The location of the sinks may be a result of solution along fracture zones in the limestone, with the formation of caves which later collapsed. It has been suggested that the long axes of the bauxite deposits are oriented parallel to each other because of solution along regional parallel fracture zones. Measurements of the bearings on the major axes on thirty-three different deposits do not indicate any pattern or alignment of the deposits over a wide area (figure 3). However, there is some alignment between deposits located in proximity, as shown in figure 3. CONCLUSIONS The existence of lateritic conditions prior to the deposition of the bauxite deposits in Southeast Alabama is shown by the presence of the residual clay deposits in North Alabama. These conditions continued at least through early Eocene is indicated by the presence of the bauxite deposits. All the necessary conditions existed to produce the Southeast Alabama bauxite deposits by laterization. The orientations of the fracture and solution zones in the limestone are of local extent and are not related to regional structure patterns, which have a strike of N 500E. The fact that local fracture and solution zones sometimes created more than one sink in an area, which may have become filled with clay sediments, should indicate to the geologist to look thoroughly at the adjoining area once the first deposit has been found. REFERENCES CITED Clark, O.M., Jr., 1963, Residual Clays of the Piedmont Province in Alabama: Alabama GeoL Survey Cir. 20-A, 60 p. Harder, E.C., 1933, Origin of bauxite deposits: Econ. Geol. v. 28, p. 395-398. MacNeil, F.S., 1945, The Midway and Wilcox Stratigraphy of Alabama and Mississippi: U.S. Geol. Sur. Strategic Minerals Inv. Prelim. Map 3-195. SAND AND GRAVEL EXPLORATION METHODS Hill McDonald The Standard Slag Company Youngstown, Ohio ABSTRACT Sand and gravel deposits may be explored by many different methods. The methods used by The Standard Slag Company are primarily two in nature. One is using an auger which is limited in depth by various soil conditions. The other is a heavy wall dry sampler and a heavy wall wet sampler. The heavy wall dry sampler takes continuous uncontaminated samples up to seven inches in diameter. The heavy wall wet sampler takes continuous uncontaminated samples up to six inches in diameter. For us, the maximum depth of the heavy wall samplers has been two hundred fifty feet of which one hundred feet was above the water table and one hundred fifty feet was below the water table. AUGER METHOD We use an auger type drill that is similar to the ones used by electric power and telephone company pole-setting crews. Our auger is a special model that is designed to drill to a total depth of twenty-two feet. The auger bit size is eight inches in diameter, two feet in length and the flights are approximately five inches apart. We weld a hard surface to all parts of the auger bit that are exposed to the abrasiveness of sand and gravel We have tried twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four inch diameter auger bits but found that the eight inch diameter auger bit is the best. The auger type drill is mounted on a six by six truck with dual tandem rear wheel assembly and single wheel front assembly that can be converted to dual wheels when necessary. The truck is also equipped with a front end winch for movement through soft or steep terrain. The auger is mounted on a deck plate truck bed so the derrick can be raised into a vertical position. We added a depth indicator that registers the drilled depth to the nearest half-foot. We use a two-man crew because of safety and efficiency although the drill can be operated by one person. The auger bit has power rotation both clockwise and counter-clockwise. Downward pressure and upward pressure may be applied to the auger bit. After drilling through the overburden which is usually clay, we advance the auger bit one foot into the sand and gravel by rotating it clockwise. The auger bit is then pulled out of the ground and the material on the flights of the auger bit is placed in a coal or scuttle bucket. The bucket is emptied into a sample box compartment. The sample boxes contain six compartments each six inches deep, six inches wide and twelve inches long. We use four of these boxes and the compartments are numbered one to twenty-two. After the hole is completed, an equal amount from each compartment is placed into a sample bag. We use an iron coal shovel level full for our "equal amount" and a cloth bag the same size as a ninety-four pound cement bag is used for a sample bag. The sample bag is tagged both inside and outside with a cloth tag that identifies the sample. (See figure 1). We fill out a drillers log (See figure 2). Under the Description we use the following terms: Very fine sand, fine sand, sand, sand some gravel, sand and gravel (50% of each), gravel some sand, gravel The size of the largest gravel is also recorded as well as color, water content, dirty (as far as wash loss is concerned), clay seams, coal or any other materials. All material under one-fourth inch is considered sand. We use a mortar hoe to immediately fill the completed test hole. Believe it or not using a mortar hoe is a lot easier than any type of shovel We overfill the hole by building a conical shaped mound as high as possible directly over the hole. Usually these holes must be refilled, especially if drilled in a permanent pasture. Holes drilled in wooded areas have been found yetrs after they have been drilled. The soil conditions that often prevent us from drilling the complete depth of twenty-two feet are as follows: Figure 1. Cloth Tag. 1. Sand and gravel so clean or free of any binding material will "cave in" or "fall in" so that we cannot drill the next foot and pull our auger bit up through the cave-in. 2. Material such as hard shale, limestone, sandstone, and other bedrock. We can drill beneath water but we can't obtain a true sample of sand and gravel because the sand and gravel won't adhere to the flights of the auger bit. HEAVY WALL SAMPLER METHODS We use a medium sized churn or percussion type drill with the heavy wall samplers. We mount this drill on the same type truck as described in the above auger type drill. More care is taken to set up this machine because the string of tools must always be centered over the pipe. We set the rear dual tandem wheels on "setting planks" that are thirty inches wide, three inches thick and six feet long. The back tandem wheels are "chucked" with two four inch by four inch by eight foot long timbers in such a GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS manner that the drill cannot move forward or backward. Jacks are placed under the rear frame of the drill, under the middle of the truck frame, and under the front bumper. A wooden platform about six feet by eight feet is built around the test hole. Two men are required to operate this drill. The pipe, heavy wall dry sampler, heavy wall wet sampler, and the quadruple flap valve are illustrated in figure 3. The weld between the coupling and pipe is to prevent the pipe from "telescoping" into the coupling when the pipe is being driven into the ground. The weld also keeps the coupling and pipe from "pulling apart" when the pipe is pulled or driven from the ground. The quadruple flap valve is only used when the material is either wet or a very fine sand. When this valve is used in a heavy wall wet sampler and the sampler is driven or forced down into the material, the separate valves turn upward on their hinges. From a side view the valve now looks like a crown of four equal sized pieces of pie with "the first bite" up. The heavy wall dry sampler is used when the material is dry to moist. We start the test hole with the larger size heavy wall dry sampler, 7 7/8" O.D. and 7" I.D. and use the standard eight inch pipe. When we encounter the water table, we change to the smaller size heavy wall wet sampler, 5 7/8" O.D. and 5" I.D. and use the standard six inch pipe. In figure 4 we are illustrating the sampling steps used with either one of the heavy wall dry samplers. The "string of tools" is composed of a rope socket, drill stem, jars and heavy wall dry sampler. The rope socket, drill stem, and top half of the jars weigh approximately twelve hundred pounds and are actually the drive hammer for the heavy wall dry sampler. Between Step 1 and Step 2 the rope socket, drill stem, and top half of jars have been put into a thirty inch up and down motion thus driving the heavy wall dry sampler ahead of the pipe for a distance of two feet. The up and down motion or stroke occurs about fifty times per minute. Between Step 2 and Step 3 the string of tools have been pulled out of the pipe and placed over the sample or "coal" bucket and the sample has dropped into the "coal" bucket. Step 4 shows the pipe after it has been driven down two feet. If, after driving the pipe, the sampler won't "free fall" to its original depth in Step 2, we know there has been a "cave in" of the last sample material which would reduce the accuracy of the next sample. We again drive the sampler to that depth, pull out the string of tools, and discard this "cave in" material. Step 5 is a reproduction of Step 1, only everything is two feet deeper. All of the material in the sample bucket is emptied into a sample bas as described in the auger method, and tagged inside and out. We put one two foot sample of the larger 7 7/8" sampler into one sample bag but we put two two=foot samples of the smaller 5 7/8" sampler into one sample bag. When sampling under water, we use exactly the same procedure as shown in figure 4 except the pipe is driven four to eight feet beyond the sample depth. Now the pipe has a four to eight foot "plug" until two feet of "plug" remain. The pipe is again driven four to eight feet beyond the sample depth. We follow this method to keep sand and gravel from "heaving" up the pipe. If we sample beyond the end of the pipe and pull out the string of tools, occasionally the sand and gravel, especially sand, will "heave" or fill the pipe up to the water table. If this happens, then we must "clean out" the "heave" and discard all the material. A driller's log as described in the auger method section is filled out for each test hole. After the test hole is finished, we pull the pipe out by using a "slotted head" pipe puller or pipe pulling jars (See figure 5). Either one of these reverses the pipe driving process by driving up instead of down on the pipe. The hole is then filled in the same manner as described in the auger method except excess material is hauled to the test hole. CONCLUSIONS We have discovered that any material which can be sampled by either of the above methods may be excavated without the use of explosives. Time wise, we can complete one auger method test hole to a depth of twenty-two feet every hour. With the heavy wall samplers we can average approximately four feet an hour. The final figure 6 is taken from "Subsurface Exploration and Sampling of Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes" -a report on a research project of the American Society for Civil Engineers, prepared by Hvorslev (1949, p. 26). Figure 6 shows in black outline our methods as compared to other methods used in subsurface sampling. As we must take samples to our laboratory to be analyzed, the two methods, especially the heavy wall sampling, has proved to be the most accurate. In one deposit of several million tons, our estimated ratio of sand to gravel was within one percent of the final tonnages produced. REFERENCES CITED Hvorslev, Mikael Juul, 1949, Subsurface exploration and sampling of soils for civil engineering purposes: Vicksburg, Miss., Waterways Experiment Station, 521 p. McDONALD: SAND AND GRAVEL LOG Farm Date Hole No. Elev. Location of Hole Sample No. Depth.ft. Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Remarks Figure 2. Drillers Log GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS L/Ne N . kit erssc -- COUuFL/C - .CVUSLTNRD 8 26 -S/dog7ao 6 /9 i 7lpeer ZLoVe 8 V rWetK:AD~-- ____L I tW-I^E ^^-- e r7AT7reOd 4-o47 7r1rL7 I .S'O -- I << t'ARs, Of 5PtC/AL ,Ao /EAVY" WALL T7U//A6 n q, 0 7'a/O'D.- 7I. . - -o o 7-TV-r4 %6 V4/z i/ /iI ,/P5d A f ^'A AIEAVY' WALL D Y SA44PLE, API pv --- OcL .,7 ,4'?/ /vC L S5\ ,W 7 Rc0L. rj.^t //\ 14 tY W/A I I- 1 \ E5l0A 7? ..0 & 7!7 A jER6FOf4 AL4' LV'GE /Vkr7e/ATrD /o40_a 0/4A(/PL0 57E. M//.E S0 FLAP VaLVE ACML/ .f_ P ^^S AI f; F-// ^ hle^r7.,-'o /040 A 4zzay // rE^ ie. 1040 V//--------Y0 ZeL o \ c. QL MisY1 / 4LP LET 141/44Pz QW/E/^ ^/5 tLZAP VALVE .. I Figure 3. Pipe, heavy wall dry sampler, heavy wall wet sampler, and a quadruple flap valve. _I McDONALD: SAND AND GRAVEL 33 c L __ Q~ j -a: 'z3 9.a W~ i 'i 0 CL 1,7, cza l E i 19 a) d c 1. i O O o oO o w R 0I .. c, O ~a Z0) u ~JJ-o t Ea D~ ~ 5 0> ~~ 'y '~ a 1 P P~ 0 ii.; 90Zr .wi a. I9 a ,I I- u 0 r GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS PIPE PULLING JARS Pipe pulling jars are used to pull strings of pipe that have been driven into gravel or tight earth. With tool joints on both ends, this tool is assembled between the rope socket and drill stem. The knocking head screws into the pipe coupling and is tightened by inserting a rod in one of the holes near the top. The weight of the drill stem below keeps the jar straight in the knocking head, given a good solid blow while jarring up. The drive clamps, when placed on the upper wrench square of the jars, permits jarring both ways. SLOTTED PIPE PULLING HEAD A slotted pipe pulling head for pulling short strings of pipe either by a direct pull or jarring up. Its collar is slotted so that it may be slipped over the drilling cable and screwed into the pipe cou- pling Figure 5. Pipe pulling jars and slotted pipe pulling head. McDONALD: SAND AND GRAVEL FULLER'S EARTH AND BENTONITE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN STATES' By Sam H. Patterson U.S. Geological Survey Beltsville, Maryland ABSTRACT Fuller's earth and bentonite are two clay commodities that are interrelated either by mineral composition or use. Because of this interrelation and the sale of both for many different uses, some ambiguity in their classification has resulted. The term "fuller's earth" has no compositional or mineralogical meaning, and it is used more or less as a catchall for any clay or earthy material suitable for certain uses. Most, but not all, of these uses require absorbent properties Bentonite by geologic definition must have formed from volcanic ash or tuff or the glassy material in volcanic rock; most bentonites consist chiefly of montmorillonite but other clay minerals may be present.) In industrial usage the term bentonitee" is applied to any clay consisting chiefly of montmorillonite, irrespective of origin. Georgia and Florida have historically been the leading States in the production of fuller's earth; bentonite has been produced in Alabama on a small scale.The first major use of fuller's earth was in refining of oils)Other materials have replaced fuller's earth for this purpose to a major extent, but many new uses for fuller's earth have been found, and production has increased in recent years. The new uses include absorbent products, insecticide and pesticide carriers, drilling mud, and many others) The bentonite now produced in Alabama is of the "southern," "low selling," or "calcium" type and is used mainly as foundry-sand bond. Most of the fuller's earth mined now is in the Hawthorn Formation of Miocene age; a lesser amount is produced from the Twiggs Clay Member and other beds in the Barnwell Formation of Eocene age. Inactive pits from which fuller's earth was produced from other formations occur at several localities. The bentonite now mined in Alabama is in beds of Cretaceous age; several years ago bentonite was produced from Eocene beds in this State. INTRODUCTION Extensive deposits of fuller's earth occur in the Southeastern States, and this region has long been a major producer of this commodity. Bentonite also occurs at several localities in the region and is now produced on a minor scale in Alabama. Some ambiguity exists in the classification and the reporting of production and consumption of fuller's earth and bentonite because the two commodities are interrelated. The difficulty results from the indefinite definition of fuller's earth as compared with the more precise geologic definition of bentonite, and from the loose usage of the term bentonitee" by industry. Some clay sold as fuller's earth actually is bentonite by geologic definition, and not all clay classed as bentonite by industry fulfills the geologic definition. Further complications in the classification and reporting on these commodities come about from the use of both for many different products and from the sale of both for the same or very similar products, such as drilling mud. The term "fuller's earth" has no compositional or mineralogical meaning, and it is more or less a catchall for clay or other fine-grained earthy material suitable for certain uses. The origin, of the term dates back into antiquity; it was first applied to material used in cleansing and fulling wool, thereby removing the lanolin and dirt from it. When in the latter half of the last century it was found that some earths used for fulling would also serve in decolorizing and purifying mineral, vegetable, and animal oils, the term "fuller's earth" was modified to include this usage. Extensive use of fuller's earth in processing mineral oils in the first half of this century and the virtual end of its use in fulling fiber led to the general application of the term "fuller's earth" as meaning primarily earth used in petroleum processing. Further modification of the meaning came about as other uses developed for the earth. Now these other uses have replaced oil processing as the major use, but the term "fuller's earth" is retained for a wide variety of materials used for many purposes. Most of these uses require absorbent properties in one form or another, and, 1 Publication authorized'by the Director, U.S. Geological Survey. therefore, the valuable property is similar to the one originally required for fulling wooL However, the properties required for some uses, such as certain drilling muds and fillers, are other than absorbency and, therefore, result in further abridgment of the term. The classification and understanding of fuller's earth is also complicated by several terms with more or less duplicate or overlapping meanings. When applied in the oil-processing sense, fuller's earth has the same meaning as "naturally active clay." Fuller's earth and other clay which are treated with acid to improve their desirable properties are called "activated clay." The term "bleaching clay" or "bleaching earth" is applied mainly to naturally active and sctivated clay, but it also includes activated bauxite (Rich, 1960, p. 93). Both naturally active and activated clays are included under the term adsorbentt clays" (Nutting, 1943) and, therefore, this term has nearly the same meaning as bleaching clay. The term "absorbent clay" is applied to fuller's earth used for a wide variety of purposes which are different from that of processing oils. Bentonite by most accepted geologic definitions must have formed from volcanic ash or tuff or the glassy material in volcanic rock; most bentonites consist chiefly of montmorillonite, but other clay minerals and impurities may be present. In industrial usuage, the term bentonite is applied to any clay consisting chiefly of montmorillonite, irrespective of origin. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Several people aided in the preparation of this article. Mr. James D. Cooper of the U.S. Bureau of Mines, Atlanta, Georgia, reviewed it while it was in the manuscript stage and made several helpful suggestions. Messrs. S. M. Pickering, Jr., and James Furlow of the Georgia Department of Mines, Mining and Geology also read the manuscript and suggested improvements. U.S. Geological Survey personnel who contributed to the report GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS include Mr. Robert W. Banks, who supervised the drafting of the illustrations, and Miss Anne Sangree, who made editorial refinements. FULLER'S EARTH HISTORY AND USES Published reports give rather confusing accounts of the discovery of fuller's earth in the United States. Several state that fuller's earth was discovered in this country in 1893 near Quincy, Florida, by the Owl Commercial Company (predecessor of the present makers of White Owl cigars) during an attempt to burn brick from clays on tobacco property. The clay was unsuitable for making brick, but an Alsatian immigrant employed as a farm worker recognized that it was similar to fuller's earth mined in Germany. His observation led to development of the first mine near Quincy 2 years later and to the use of this clay in processing mineral oils. Fuller's earth had been mined on a small scale, however, in Arkansas in 1891 (Miser, 1913, p. 208) and tested for use in the refining of cottonseed oil. Both of these discoveries are related to the use of fuller's earth in processing oils and fail to note its earlier use for other purposes. Clays and other earthy materials were undoubtedly used by the early settlers from Europe in cleansing wool and other materials. The author made little effort to search the historical records and document this, but he did find that soldiers stationed near Perth Amboy, New Jersey, used Woodbridge fire clay for cleansing buckskins during the Revolutionary War (New Jersey Geological Survey, 1878, p. 1), and fuller's earth associated with iron-ore bed near Kent, Connecticut, had been mined prior to 1820 (Silliman, 1820, p. 217). Also, American Indians are reported to have used bentonite in cleaning blankets, and they probably dug it for other cleansing purposes before the Columbian period. The use of fuller's earth in the refining of oils continued to be the major one for many years. The demand for fuller's earth for processing mineral oil increased rapidly in the first part of this century and reached a peak of approximately 317,00 tons in 1930 (fig. 1); this was 97.1 percent of the total United States production that year. The production of fuller's earth for this purpose began to decrease thereafter, especially when activated bauxite was introduced in 1937 and magnesium silicate in 1940 as more efficient substitutes. In recent years, the production of fuller's earth for use in refining mineral oils has maintained a rather uniform rate of 35,000 to 40,000 tons per year. The use of fuller's earth in processing animal and vegetable oils has never been a major one and has decreased to the point where it is included as a part of the miscellaneous uses in the U.S. Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbooks. Fuller's earth was first sold for drilling mud in 1941. The market for this use expanded slowly and has maintained a level of 8 to 10 percent of the total United States production during the last few years. Most of the fuller's earth sold for drilling mud comes from the southern part of the Meigs-Attapulgus-Quincy district of Georgia and Florida (fig. 3). Attapulgite clays produced in this area are superior to most other fuller's earth for muds used in drilling salt formations, but they are inferior to bentonite where the rocks drilled contain no salt water. Fuller's earth was used in significant quantities as a carrier for insecticides and fungicides by 1950, and the market for this use has grown at a rather uniform rate since that year. In 1969, nearly 20 percent of the fuller's earth produced was used for this purpose. The use of fuller's earth granules for absorbent purposes began during the 1930's, but this use did not expand significantly until the World War II period when fuller's earth was used as an absorbent for greases, oil, water, chemicals, and other undesirable substances on the floors of factories, filling stations, canning plants, aircraft hangers, decks and engine rooms of ships, and other installations. The absorbent granules are porous and ordinarily weigh less than 30 pounds per cubic foot; most granules sold are (8 mesh and )60 mesh (U.S. standard-sieve sizes). Because of their light weight, size, porosity, and absorbent properties, the granules are suitable for many uses, and since World War II, many different markets for them have developed. Among other uses, they are now sold for litter and bedding for poultry, pets, and other animals, as a soil conditioner in greenhouses and for golf courses. In 1969, 620,000 tons of fuller's earth was sold for absorbent uses; this tonnage was nearly 63 percent of the total fuller's earth produced in the United States that year. The foregoing discussions apply only to those uses consuming sufficient quantities of fuller's earth to be classified separately by the U.S. Bureau of Mines in the Minerals Yearbook. In addition, smaller quantities of fuller's earth are or have been produced for many miscellaneous uses. According to Oulton (1965,p.5), more than 90 different grades of fuller's earth are produced. Some of these grades are used for pharmaceuticals designed to absorb toxins, bacteria, and alkaloids; for treatment of dysentery; for purifying water and dry-cleaning fluids; dry-cleaning powders and granules; for the manufacture of NCR (no carbon required) multiple-copy paper; for the manufacture of wallpaper; and as extenders or fillers for plastics, paints, and putties. Fuller's earth mined near Ellenton, Florida, was used for making lightweight aggregate for the construction of concrete barges during World War II (Calver, 1957, p. 80; Greaves-Walker, Bugg, and Hagerman, 1951, p. 14, table 3). Still other uses of fuller's earth and its suitability for uses in new products are outlined by Haden and Schwint (1967) and Haas (1970). Some reports also note that fuller's earth is used in making cement. Probably the basis for these reports is the mining of the Twiggs Clay Member of the Barnwell Formation near Clinchfield, Georgia, and its use in making portland cement. It is used for this purpose mainly to obtain the desired chemical composition in the clinker from which the cement is made. The classification of this clay as fuller's earth results from the fact that the Twiggs Clay Member is mined for fuller's earth, and this unit is widely known in Georgia as a source of fuller's earth. PRODUCTION The total production of fuller's earth in the United States during the years 1895-1969 was 18.3 million tons, valued at more than 325 million dollars. Florida was the leading fuller's earth-producing State for many years after the first mine was opened in 1895. Mining of fuller's earth began in Georgia at Attapulgus in 1907, and for more than a decade Georgia ranked second or third among the States in the production of this commodity. Georgia became the leading State in production in 1924 and held this position for several years. In recent years, the production of Georgia and Florida has been lumped, and the relative standings of the two States are not available. Their production, however, was 81 percent of the national total during the 10-year period 1960-1969 (fig. 2) and was 72 percent of all production since 1895, amounting to 13.2 million tons. The value of the fuller's earth produced in these two States from 1960 to 1969 was 133 million dollars, which is approximately 86 percent of the national total In 1971, seven plants were producing fuller's earth in Georgia, and two others were under construction (table 1; fig. 3). In addition, one plant operated by the Penn-Dixie Cement Corp, at Clinchfield, Georgia, was using fuller's earth from the Twiggs Clay Member of the Barnwell Formation in making portland cement. Three fuller's earth plants were active in Florida, and plants formerly existed at five other localities in this State (table 2). PATTERSON: FULLER'S EARTH AND BENTONITE U .E Ho 0 I) 4) P , o'l bO o C 0) . N I 0 cO N Ld flU r m *S m bJD 0 0) a4 0 C 0 -4m 0I Mh m >^ 0 o(a f 4) P.. Pu n a, 0 3 ) p4 cU ' 02tj (CI2 en| M? CV rn n| El4 .0 Ho 02 .0O k4 C o.4 o 0 0 q u C0 0 O - 4 0 u o0 41 UO 4O C3 0 o -4 04 --4 0) -I a U U 4 0 0 4 u 0 -4 C. 0 Ud k 0 0 O o .- . p.4 "o 0 . U 0 0 '4 40 (0 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 42 CD 0 C! 0} 'S v, m( n M C to 4121 I1 i .-4 oo t P. p *t -^ i CL -4 C--4 o o " , d Ou . * CO - o 1^ 0 C3 0- o k 3 o ed o 0 N -d4 wCD S-4 O J c 01 " c2 P, (A m| Cf| PATTERSON: FULLER'S EARTH AND BENTONITE 41 e -4 co 'M4 O 4 ) -,4 '4 0 0 a - .2 -I o 4 S o o o Cd 0 o o3 ' 4a 0 W '-4 0 j "0 0 C- 4 -4, ,-4 a) 02 S*-4 -4 (M a, o c o .-,I .-' '1 "r4 l | > '- j 0 - -44 10 r- 40 a ) ('S 0 r0 4rl -I -; u 0 *w ; o 0 U 4 C _Q o -d c' d ~ - O(' E 4 Ci GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS do C 14 0 SU , a 0 o 0 k 0 10 0 -o 0o 0 H- O HU B M r 4) h 1-e 3 I 4) -4 -4 a 10 S-0 0 o Cd) cd cm N q pq o so (^ _,|U- CT o 1-1 -^ -) * 0 o 0 CO '-0 Fo 0 O' ff m M a) a U Ci 0- ( W^ 0tr bo k Pn 0 clC4 0 o b.0 U 4 ~0 0 U Sm 0 .,I S4 QV g .2 U- ^ h i 0 a, 0" cr 0 pq U 4) 4) c-4 -4 4) uLO Qd Crt - .4 1-4 u 0 U u 0 ed ^ cul a PT cdr do C 4 k c d a ed - '^i TO PATTERSON: FULLER'S EARTH AND BENTONITE tao 0 cdN M o o 4) 4C P-I -4 n)CT Mcd bo& Cd, 6Cd a rd 0 Cd- bOn Co F9( 0 2o 4 bo -- 4 o 1 cd cd0 M cd C ed Cd $N .0 Cd 3 rt U2 W n l) 41 -4 An 00 0" N o 1 -4 Cd 0 F9 e O n 0 2 c u S 0 d V '*- 4.3 o-4 Q 0 S*d C N cn en 0 *-4 0*' , 0^ k : 0 i-4 4) t (M. o o o o0 4 Cd Pq 0 z4 0 0 o -4 Mn GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS MINING After a suitable fuller's earth deposit has been proved by drilling and testing, the first step in mining is the removal of the overburden. Bulldozers and scrapers are used for this purpose by all companies active in the region, and one company uses a large walking dragline powered with electricity to do much of its stripping. Thicknesses of overburden stripped range from a few feet to approximately 75 feet, but in some mines the maximum overburden removed along ridge lines is as much as 100 feet thick. Most of the overburden is sufficiently unconsolidated to be loosened with a bulldozer, but in the southern part of the Meigs-Attapulgus-Quincy district of Georgia and Florida (fig. 3) some of the overburden consists of limestone and cemented sandstone which must be blasted before removal with heavy equipment. In most mines, overburden is removed in panels, and after the earth in one panel is mined, the overburden from the next panel is dumped in the mined-out area. After stripping, the fuller's earth is loaded on trucks by dragline and hauled to the plant. In the early part of the century, mine trams were used for hauling, and some of the stripping was done by hydraulic methods, but neither method has been used in recent years. PROCESSING The raw fuller's earth, as it is delivered to the plant, contains approximately 50 percent volatile matter, and some of it contains as much as 10 percent undesirable impurities. The volatile matter is chiefly free and combined water. The processing of fuller's earth involves mainly crushing or slicing the crude clay, drying or firing to drive off the volatile matter and improve the desired properties, grinding, grading by particle size, and packaging. Different commercial grades and products, each with its own specific properties and applications are made by varying the raw material and processing (Oulton, 1965, p. 5). One plant uses an extruding process before drying to improve the properties for certain products. In this process the crushed clay is fed into a pug mill, and water is added to obtain the desired plasticity. It is then extruded into rods which are approximately % inch in diameter. Drying in most plants is done in gas- or oil-fired rotary dryers, which are as large as 10 feet by 65 feet, but one plant in Georgia uses a fluid bed-type dryer. The temperature at which the clay is dried or fied ranges from 300 to 12000F in the different processing depending on the use of the product. In processing, the clay is ground in rod or other types of mills and sized to yield a variety of granular and pulverized grades. Some plants that produce mainly absorbent granules actually beneficiate their product by discarding the fines. This is possible because in some deposits most of the impurities are in the sand and silt size and, therefore, are distinctly finer than the granular-sized product. Plants that produce many grades of pulverized and granular fuller's earth commonly recycle their material, and the raw clay processed is selected with considerable care. One of the products resulting from selective mining and processing is 95 percent finer than 10 microns in particle size. OCCURRENCE The fuller's earth in the Southeastern States is scattered throughout sedimentary rocks of Tertiary age, and small quantities were mined many years ago from sinkhole fillings which may be younger. Fuller's earth is now and has been mined at several localities (tables 1 and 2; fig. 3, locations 3-6) from the extensive Twiggs Clay Member of the Barnwell Formation of Eocene age and from discontinuous deposits in this formation which are probably younger than the Twiggs Clay (table 1; fig. 3, location 2). The deposits mined most extensively, however, occur in the Hawthorn Formation of early and middle Miocene age. These deposits occur in large lenticular units and discontinuous beds. The deposits mined range in thickness from about 2 feet to as much as 47 feet. The most extensive Hawthorn deposits are in the Meigs-Attapulgus-Quincy district, Georgia and Florida (fig. 3). Fuller's earth in the Hawthorn Formation is also mined near Lowell, Florida (fig. 3, location 24), and deposits in this formation were formerly worked near Ellenton, Florida (fig. 3, location 25). Several decades ago, fuller's earth was mined near Lumpkin, Georgia (fig. 3, location 7), and near Clayton, Alabama (fig. 3, location 9), from deposits of Paleocene age (table 2). Shortly after the turn of the century, small quantities of fuller's earth were produced near Salters Depot, South Carolina (fig. 3, location 1), from beds that are probably the ones in the Black Mingo Formation of Paleocene and Eocene age referred to as opal claystone by Heron, Robinson, and Johnson (1965, p. 19,20). Fuller's earth thought to occur in sinkhole fill deposits and to be probably of Pleistocene age (Jones, 1926, p. 128) was once mined on a small scale near Fort Payne, Alabama (fig. 3, location 8). MINERAL COMPOSITION The fuller's earth in the Southeastern States varies considerably in clay-mineral composition and the quantity of the mineral impurities present. The fuller's earth mined in South Carolina many years ago probably was opal-bearing claystone which forms much of the Black Mingo Formation. Part of this claystone is almost pure opal and part is montmorillonite (Heron, Robinson, and Johnson, 1965, p. 19, fig. 14). The fuller's earth in the Barnwell Formation mined near Wrens, Georgia, is probably mainly claystone consisting chiefly of opal or cristobalite and montmorillonite (Sandy, Carver, and Crawford, 1966, p. 21; Carver, this volume). The Twiggs Clay Member of the Barnwell Formation, which has been the source of fuller's earth at several localities in Georgia, consists mainly of cristobalite or .opal and montmorillonite, but it contains minor quantities of illite and kaolinite (Brindley, 1957; Heron, Robinson, and Johnson, 1965, p. 59). The fuller's earth in the Meigs-Attapulgus-Quincy district, Georgia and Florida, has been investigated by the author and several other geologists and mineralogists (see footnote, table 1 for references). Attapulgite is the dominant mineral in deposits in the southern part of the district, and montmorillonite is very abundant in the northern part. Opal and possibly other forms of amorphous silica are common in the northern part of the district and occur in the form of diatom remains and rare rounded and ovoid concretions. Small quantities of the magnesian clay, sepiolite, are commonly present, and kaolinite occurs in the weathered parts of some deposits. Impurities are mainly plastic quartz, dolomite, and calcite, and each of these are so sbundant locally that deposits are bypassed in mining. Phosphate pellets and plastic heavy minerals occur in trace amounts in most deposits. The marine fossils present include diatoms, fish remains, and pelecypods. A sample of fuller's earth mined near Lowell, Florida, was described by Grim (1933, p. 358) as being 90 percent montmorillonite and 10 percent isotropic siliceous material and grains of quartz, albite, and other feldspar. Other samples from this area described by Espenshade and Spencer (1963, p. 20-21) contained both montmorillonite and attapulgite. The deposit mined also contains poorly bedded and irregular masses of opal or another form of silica which is bypassed in mining and is presumably the material referred to by Espenshade and Spencer as chalcedony. PATTERSON: FULLER'S EARTH AND BENTONITE BENTONITE The so-called "calcium," "low swelling," or "southern" bentonite, which is now produced mainly for bonding foundry, sand, occurs in Coastal Plain rocks. Most of the "southern" bentonite in Southeastern States is in Alabama, but it also has been reported in South Carolina. The bentonite in Alabama is mainly in strata of Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary age. The deposits mined to supply a plant operated by American Colloid Co. near Sandy Ridge, Lowndes County, since 1964 are in the Ripley Formation, and they have been described by Monroe (1941, p. 112-114). Deposits of clay referred to as bentonite by Harper (1940, p. 43) and as bleaching clay by Bramlette, Bay, and Munyan (in Lang and others, 1940, p. 232) occur in the upper 10 or 15 feet of the Tallahatta Formation of middle ocene age along the Tombigbee River near Cummingham, Clarke County, Alabama. This clay was mined on a small scale in he 1930's, but none has been produced at this locality in recent years. The bentonite in South Carolina (Robinson, Buie, and Johnson, 1961, p. 3, map) occurs in the Hawthorn Formation of Miocene age. It is 15 to 20 feet thick over a large area in the vicinity of Coosawhatchie, Jasper County. This clay has been described as being almost pure montmorillonite (Heron, obinson, and Johnson, 1965, p. 24; Heron and Johnson, 1966, 53-56). No mining of this bentonite has been reported, but the results of preliminary tests indicate that it is suitable for use as foundry-sand bond (Johnson, 1958, p. 97-98). REFERENCES CITED 0Bay, H.X., and Munyan, A.C. 1935, The bleaching clays of Georgia: Georgia GeoL Survey Inf. Circ. 6, 4 p. iBrindley, G.W., 1957, Fuller's earth from near Dry Branch, Georgia, a montmorillonite-cristobalite clay: Clay Minerals Bull, v. 3, no. 18, p. 167-169. Buie, B.F., and Gremillion, L.R., 1963, Attapulgite in fuller's earth deposits of Georgia and Florida: Georgia Mineral Newsletter, v. 16, nos. 1-2, p. 20-25. Calver, J.L, 1957, Mining and mineral resources: Florida Geol. Survey Bull 39, 132 p. Espenshade, G.H., and Spencer, C.W., 1963, Geology of the phosphate deposits of northern peninsular Florida: U.S. GeoL Survey Bull 1118, 115 p. Greaves-Walker, A.F., Bugg, S.L, Hagerman, RS., 1951, The development of lightweight aggregate from Florida clays: Florida Eng. and Indus. Expt. Sta. (Florida Univ. Eng. Prog., v. 5, no. 9) Bull. 46, 23 p. Gremillion, L.R., 1965, The origin of attapulgite in the Miocene strata of Florida and Georgia: Florida State Univ., Ph.D. thesis, 139 p. Grim, R.E., 1933, Petrography of the fuller's earth deposits, Olmstead, Illinois, with a brief study of some non-Illinois earths: Econ. Geology, v. 28, no. 4, p. 344-363. Haas, C.Y., 1970, Attapulgite clays for future industrial mineral markets [abs]: Mining Eng., v. 22, no. 12, p. 63. Haden, W.L., Jr., and Schwint, I.A., 1967, Attapulgite, its properties and applications: Indus. and Eng. Chemistry, v. 59, no. 9, p. 58-69. Harper, R.H, 1940, Statistics of mineral production in Alabama, 1926 to 1938: Alabama Geol. Survey Bull. 44, 55 p. Heron, S.D., Jr., and Johnson, H.S., Jr., 1966, Clay mineralogy, stratigraphy, and structural setting of the Hawthorn Formation, Coosawhatchie district, South Carolina: Southeastern Geology, v. 7, no. 2, p. 51-63, 1 fig. Heron, S.D., Jr., Robinson, G.C., and Johnson, H.S., Jr., 1965, Clays and opal-bearing claystones of the South Carolina Coastal Plain: South Carolina State DeveL Board, Div. Geology Bull 31, 65 p. Hurst, VJ., Crawford, T.J., and Sandy, John, 1966, Mineral resources of the central Savannah River area, v. 1-2: Washington, D.C., U.S. Econ. DeveL Adm., v. 1, 467 p., v. 2, 231 p. Johnson, H.S., 1958, Geological activities in South Carolina during 1958: South Carolina State DeveL Board, Div. Geology Bull, v. 3, no. 1, p. 89-101. Jones, W.B, 1926, Index to the mineral resources of Alabama: Alabama GeoL Survey Bull. 28, 250 p. Kerr, P.F., 1937, Attapulgus clay Am. Mineralogist, v. 22, no. 5, p. 534-550. LaMoreaux, P.E., 1946, Geology and ground-water resources of the Coastal Plain of east-central Georgia: Georgia GeoL Survey Bull. 52, 173 p. Lang, W.B., King, P.B., Bramlette, M.N., McVay, T.N., Bay, H.X., and Munyan, A.C., 1940, Clay investigations in the Southern States, 1934-35: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull 901, 346 p. McClellan, G.H., 1964, Petrology of Attapulgus clay in north Florida and southwest Georgia: Univ. Illinois, Ph.D. thesis, 119 p. Miser, H.D., 1913, Developed deposits of fuller's earth in Arkansas: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 530, p.207-220. Monroe, W.H., 1941, Notes on deposits ofSelma and Ripley age in Alabama: Alabama GeoL Survey Bull. 48, 150 p. New Jersey Geological Survey, 1878, Report on the clay deposits of the Woodbridge, South Amboy, and other places: New Jersey GeoL Survey, 381 p. Nutting, P,D., 1943, Absorbent clays, their distribution, properties, production, and uses: U.S. GeoL Survey Bull. 928-C, p. 127-219. Oulton, T.D., 1965, Mining, production, and uses of attapulgite clay products: Am. Inst. Mining, Metall. and Petroleum Engineers, Soc. Mining Engineers, Preprint 65H39, 10 p. Parson, C.L., 1913, Fuller's earth: US. Bur. Mines Bull. 71, 38 p. Pickering, S.M, Jr., 1970, Stratigraphy, paleontology, and economic geology of portions of Perry and Cochran quadrangles, Georgia: Georgia Dept. Mines, Mining, and Geology Bull. 81, 67 p. Rich, A.D., 1960, Bleaching clay, in Gillson, J.L., and others, eds., Industrial minerals and rocks (Nonmetallics other than fuels): 3d ed., New York, Am. Inst. Mining, MetalL, and Petroleum Engineers, p. 93-101. Ries, H.R., 1927, Clays: their occurrence, properties, and uses, with special reference to those of the United States and Canada: 3d ed., New York, John Wiley and Sons, 613 p. Robinson, G.C., Buie, B.F., and Johnson, H.S., Jr., 1961, Common clays of the Coastal Plain of South Carolina and their use in structural clay products: South Carolina State Devel. Board, Div. Geology Bull. 25, 71 p. Sandy, John, Carver, R. E., and Crawford, T. J., 1966, Stratigraphy and economic geology of the Coastal Plain of the central Savannah River area, Georgia, in GeoL Soc. America, Southeastern Sec., Ann. Mtg., Athens, Ga., April 13-16, 1966, Guidebook, Field Trip No. 3: Athens, Ga., Univ. Georgia Dept. Geology, 30 p. Sellards, E.H., 1908, Mineral industries: Florida GeoL Survey Ann. Rept. 1, p. 26-53. ------ 1910, The fuller's earth deposits of Florida: Mineral Industry, 1909, v. 18, p. 267-270. ------------, 1914, Mineral industries and resources of Florida: Florida Geol. Survey Ann. Rept. 6, p. 21-114. Sellards, E.H., and Gunter, Herman, 1909, The fuller's earth deposits of Gadsden County, Florida, with notes on similar deposits found elsewhere in the State: Florida GeoL Survey Ann. Rept. 2, 1908-09, p. 253-291. 46 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS Shearer, H.K., 1917, A report on the bauxite and fuller's earth of the Coastal Plain of Georgia: Georgia GeoL Survey Bull. 31, 340 p. Shrum, R.A., [1970], Distribution of kaolin and fuller's earth mines and plants in Georgia and north Florida: Georgia Dept. Mines, Mining, and Geology, map. Silliman, Benjamin, 1820, Art. III. Sketches of a tour in the Counties of New Haven and Litchfield in Connecticut, with notices of the geology, mineralogy, and scenery, etc.: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 2, no. 2, p. 201-235. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Minerals Yearbooks, 1927-1969. Vaughn, T.W., 1902, Fuller's earth of southwestern Georgia and western Florida: U.S. GeoL Survey, Mineral Resources of the United States, 1901, p. 922-934. Vaughn, T.W., 1903, Fuller's earth deposits of Florida and Georgia: U.S. GeoL Survey Bull. 213, p. 392-399. Zapp, A.D., and Clark, L.D., 1965, Bauxite in areas adjacent to and between the Springvale and Andersonville districts, Georgia: U.S. Geol Survey Bull. 1199-H, 10 p. PATTERSON: FULLER'S EARTH AND BENTONITE Figure 1. Fuller's earth sold or used by producers for specified uses, 1927-1969. 1930 1940 1950 1960 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 S40 30 3 -20 I- 0 0) I a- 10 wa w 10 1970 Figure 2. National and Georgia-Florida production of fuller's earth and average value per ton, 1895-1969. 1000 900 PATTERSON: FULLER'S EARTH AND BENTONITE 200 MILES EXPLANATION A Active fuller's earth plant A6 Cement plant using fuller's earth O Inactive or dismantled fuller's earth 0 Active bentonite plant plant or inactive district 9 Inactive bentonite plant Numbers refer to localities in tables 1 and 2 Figure 3. Location of active plants producing fuller's earth and bentonite and inactive plants and districts. VERTICAL VARIABILITY IN THE ATTAPULGITE MINING AREA By Charles E. Weaver and Kevin C. Beck School of Geophysical Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology ABSTRACT A core from the La Camelia attapulgite mine in north Florida was studied in detail to determine the detailed vertical variability and the relations of the various parameters. The structural, textural, mineralogical and chemical data indicate there are two major depositional cycles represented within the minable interval. The sediments deposited during the two cycle differ in detail but in general are similar. The environments of deposition grade from shallow marine to lagoonal to tidal flat to marsh. The sedimentary structure (lamination, burrows, pebble conglomerate), mineralogy (attapulgite, montmorillonite, sepiolite, dolomite, calcite) chemistry (Al, Mg, Fe) are closely related to each other and their nature is determined by the depositional environments. Most of the clay minerals and carbonate minerals are authigenic and are therefore particularly sensitive to environmental differences. The variability and environmental features seen in this core are characteristic of the sediments in the general attapulgite mining area. A detailed understanding of the relationships discussed should be of value in prospecting, mining and processing. INTRODUCTION For several years the authors have been making a regional stratigraphic, petrographic, and geochemical study of the Miocene of the southeastern United States. This paper reports the results of a detailed study of one core from the commercial mining area. The core was studied in detail in an attempt to find parameters that could be used to identify depositional environments. This information in conjunction with other data can be used to determine the physical and chemical conditions under which the authigenic attapulgite, montmorillonite, apatite and dolomite form. From a more practical standpoint, studies of this type should be of value in exploration, mining, and processing. The 28 foot core was a production core from near the Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation, La Camelia Mine near Attapulgus, Georgia. The core was kindly supplied by the company. The clay mined in this area is relatively pure attapulgite of Miocene age. The formation is considered to be the Hawthorn. Figure 1 is a generalized litholoPic description of the core. There are two pure clay beds (1.6 to 4.8' and 20.0' to 23.8') that consist of relatively pure, parallel laminated clay (figure 2). Though these clay beds are generally similar, they have a number of significant mineralogic differences. Each clay interval is part of a lithologic sequence; both sequences or cycles differ. The lower interval starts with a clayey sand. This is followed by a thin interval of mud cracked clay infilled with a coarser sandy clay (figure 3). Some of the pebbles are partially dolomitized. There is another thin sandy zone with clay pebbles and then the clay bed proper. There is a thin sand zone in the middle of the clay bed and some worm burrows near the top. This is followed by another bed of reworked (with little movement) clay pebbles in a matrix of coarser sandy clay (figure 4); round sand size clay grains are also abundant in this bed. This bed is overlain by' a sandy clay bed with a vertical, slightly slickensided fracture pattern (figure 5). Many fractures are coated with a thin film of clay. The lower half contains organic stains and clay grains and the upper half burrows. Treatment with NaOH indicates much of the organic material is in the form of humic acid. This interval may represent a soil or marsh zone and appears to be the uppermost position of the lower cycle. For the sake of convenience it will be referred to as a soil. This interval is overlain by a sandy bed which is a greenish clayey sand with irregular mottles of white sand and worm tubes (figure 6). This interval is overlain by a white sand containing pelecypode shells. The mixing in the lower part of the sand is apparently due to both burrowing and current action. There is a gradual transition from sand to dolomitic clay (11.5' to 9.3'). A pure clay bed containing patches of dolomite extends up to 8 feet. At 7.6 feet dolomite becomes predominate and there is 2.8 feet of clayey dolomite (figure 7). The dolomitic bed is overlain by 3.2 feet of pure clay. The lower two-thirds has excellent parallel bedding; the upper one-third has an irregular, massive appearance with some irregular vertical fracture surfaces. This clay bed grades into an interval which consists largely of the same type of clay, but heavily burrowed and infilled with a coarser clayey sand (figure 8). This is the top of the core. It is overlain by a clayey sand similar to the type that occurs in the burrows in the top of the core. Thus on gross lithology, there appears to be two similar, but different, depositional units. Both units appear to be topped by a hiatus of some sort, and both start with a sand bed of probably marine origin. The lower unit is characterized by mud cracked and locally reworked sediments and the upper unit by dolomitic beds. CLAY MINERALOGY X-RAY Attapulgite is the predominate clay in the section. Montmorillonite is second in abundance followed by sepiolite. Illite and mica are present in minor amounts throughout the section. The estimated relative clay mineral content, based on x-ray patterns of oriented slides, is shown in figure 9. The clay mineral suite is closely related to the lithology and thus presumably depositional environments. In addition, there are significant differences between the upper and lower depositional units. The clay in the basal sand is largely montmorillonite with minor amounts of attapulgite and trace amounts of sepiolite. The amount of attapulgite systematically increases and montmorillonite decreases upward, through the clay bed, to the top of the lower clay bed (20 feet). Attapulgite remains relatively constant or decreases slightly through the pebbly clay zone then decreases abruptly in the overlying sandy zone. Sepiolite is present throughout the lower section. In the pebbly zone (20 to 16.5 feet) the pebbles have a high attapulgite content; the clayey sand matrix is composed largely GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS of montmorillonite (figure 9). Small (0.1 to 0.2 inch) rounded tan pebbles are similar in composition to the large mud crack-type blocks. Sepiolite is present throughout this interval in the clay pebbles and grains but not in the matrix. The clay suite of the matrix is similar to that of the overlying montmorillonitic sand zone. If the matrix and pebble values are averaged the percent montmorillonite trend tends to parallel that of the percent quartz (figure 14). Montmorillonite is uniformly high, and has a maximum concentration in the soil zone. Also, sepiolite reaches a maximum at the bottom of the soil zone and is not present in the overlying sediments. This is the only interval that contains more sepiolite than attapulgite. A detailed study of the bottom part of the soil zone indicates that the clay mineral suites are inhomogeneously distributed. The greenish sandy clay is composed almost entirely of montmorillonite, with variable amounts of biotite. Some small white pebbles have a composition similar to the underlying large pebbles (attapulgite) montmorillonite) sepiolite). Also present are some small tannish grains (0.1 0.2 inches) and a thin tannish coating on the vertical fracture surfaces. In both of these types of samples montmorillonite is the dominant clay and sepiolite is more abundant than attapulgite. Thus the "sepiolite-rich" suite has a distinctive occurrence. The distribution suggests the clay may be secondary and have formed by post depositional leaching of the upper part of the soil interval and growth in the bottom. Tannish grains in the upper portion of the soil zone are composed almost entirely of attapulgite, sometimes with dolomite. Thus pebbles in the lower portion of the soil interval have a mineral suite similar to the underlying section and those in the upper portion resemble the overlying section. Burrows in the 13 to 16 foot montmorillonite-rich interval are composed largely of attapulgite indicating clay has been worked down from as much as 5 or 6 feet above. No sepiolite is present so the clay has not come from below. The burrows contain no dolomite which suggest that either the animals selectively by-passed the dolomite rhombs or that a clay bed has been eroded and replaced by the sand at 11 to 13 feet. In the overlying shelly sand zone attapulgite increases and becomes relatively abundant within the sand; however, the mottles and pebbles of greenish clayey sand in this interval have a high montmorillonite content similar to that of the underlying interval Thus some of the mixing is probably due to current reworking of the lower material into the upper, rather than burrowing which would cause a downward mixing. The large shells in this interval (11-12 feet) have been converted to dolomite suggesting that there was a relatively abrupt increase in available Mg. Through the transition interval from clayey sand to clay (11 feet to 8 feet) the attapulgite content remains high and constant. Attapulgite is at a maximum through the dolomitic and upper clay bed. There is a slight decrease in attapulgite in the clays of the uppermost burrowed zone. The burrows are filled with a sandy montmorillonite clay derived from the overlying montmorillonitic sand bed. Thus, in the upper interval attapulgite occurs in the basal sand unit and over an interval of less than a foot becomes the dominant clay present. The upper clay bed has more attapulgite than the lower clay bed but as the lower bed contains sepiolite the montmorillonite content of the two beds is about the same. ELECTRON MICROGRAPHS Electron micrographs were made of both replicated and dispersed samples. Replicas of the attapulgite-rich pebbles from the 25 foot interval show 0.5 to 1.0 p attapulgite laths or needles and thin, uniform sheets of montmorillonite (figure 10). The laths do not tend to form bundles and show little orientation, one to another. In the lower clay bed the laths tend to form bundles and there is a definite orientation pattern (figure 11). The montmorillonite occurs as thin patches 0.5 to 1.0 pl in diameter, the orientation pattern is more likely due to authigenic growth than sedimentation. A few laths up to 10 p in length are present. Most fibers are near 1 p in length but, throughout the lower interval fibers longer than 5 p are present. Samples from the soil zone show thin continuous sheets of montmorillonite with scattered unoriented attapulgite laths. High magnification pictures (figure 12), show that the montmorillonite consists of thin laths 0.05 p wide and 0.25 p long. Many of the montmorillonite laths are oriented parallel to one another and are draped over the coarser attapulgite fibers. This orientation suggests growth in place. The montmorillonite flakes in the underlying interval are subsequent in shape and no evidence of laths was noticed. At least in this core the lath-shaped montmorillonite is apparently restricted to the soil zone. The overlying sandy and clayey sand interval contains 1 p long attapulgite fibers with a fair degree of orientation. In the dolomitic zone dolomite rhombs range from 0.1 p up to 10 1p in width. The attapulgite laths have little obvious orientation to each other and to the dolomite rhombs (figure 13). Interpenetrating rhombs indicate the dolomite is authigenic or diagenetic. The upper clay bed is composed of 1 p long fibers. There is some orientation into bundles but the bundles have little systematic orientation with each other. Small rounded particles, averaging 0.1 p in diameter, are common. These may be phosphate grains. There is nothing in the electron micrographs to suggest either clay mineral has formed by alteration of the other. The two types of clay are intimately mixed but it is not obvious which, if either, might be authigenic. In the attapulgite clay beds the montmorillonite occurs as .1 to 1.0 p subsequent patches intimately interlayered with the attapulgite. The restricted size of the montmorillonite areas, the random distribution, and lack of any continuous sheets suggest the montmorillonite may be floccules that settled among the attapulgite laths. The random orientation of the attapulgite aggregates is more apparent than real. Some pictures (figure 11) suggest that in a given plane the attapulgite laths are nearly'parallel but the next layer of laths may be oriented perpendicular to the underlying layer. TEXTURE SIZE ANALYSES Twenty one samples were sieved at half 4 intervals. The samples were disaggregated by pounding with a vertical motion. This tended to break the non-clay minerals from the clay with a minimum of damage. The material greater than 4.30 ( and coarser was considered to be the "sand" fraction. Microscopic examination indicates most of the clay "broke-down" and passed through the 325 mesh sieve. Figure 14 shows the amount of non-clay material and its composition. The sands at the base of each unit contain 60 to 80% sand, most of which is quartz. The clay beds and dolomite bed contain from 0.3 to 7.2 percent sand. Texturally, the two major units are quite distinct. The lower unit generally consists of a moderately sorted sand with a modal value ranging from 3.1 to 3.5 ). The upper unit is characterized by bimodal frequency curves. At about 15 feet depth the curves become distinctly bimodal With a new coarser mode occurring at 2.5 to 2.8 ). The beginning of this mode can be seen in the sample from 16.5 feet. By 12 feet the finer mode is gone and an even coarser secondary mode develops at 2.2 ). By 10 feet the WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY sample resembles that at 15 bimodall, approximately equal amounts of 2.8 and 2.2 4 material). Samples from 8 to 9 feet have a single mode (3.1 4) but most of the sand (5 to 7%) is calcite, probably authigenic. The 7 foot dolomitic sample is bimodal with most of the coarse material being calcite and the finer material quartz. The sample from the top of the dolomitic interval is also bimodal with a coarse mode occurring at 2.2 ). Both size materials are primarily calcite but of a different morphology than the calcite in the underlying sample. The non-clay material from the middle of the upper clay bed is composed predominantly of silt size quartz. The amount of quartz and the grain size increases in the top part (one foot) of the clay zone where some burrowing is evident. The coarse mode at 3.1 4 is presumably the quartz sand which the burrowing organisms have brought down from the overlying sand bed. The 3.8 ( very fine sand is the quartz sands that was originally deposited with the clay. Sorting values, means, etc. are not too meaningful as most samples contain several minerals, some of which are detrital and some authigenic. The calcite was dissolved from the sieved fractions of two samples (25 feet and 19.5 feet) and frequency curves constructed for the calcite (plus phosphate) fraction and the quartz fraction (figure 15). The non-clay portion (68.5%) of the clayey sand sample from 28 feet is composed almost entirely of quartz. It has a symmetrical peak with a well defined mode at 3.2 4; sorting value is j=0.81 or moderately sorted. The sample from the overlying reworked zone (25 feet) contains 24.6% non-clay material which consists of 59% calcite (plus minor phosphate) and 41% quartz. The sorting (0q) value for the quartz component is 0.51 which Folk (1968) classes as moderately well sorted. The value for the combined samples is 1.33 or poorly sorted. The calcite, apparently authigenic, has a coarsely skewed size distribution. In this sample and in the other samples size distribution parameters are closely related to mineralogy. The detrital quartz in the lower interval, whether it comprises 67% or less than 1% of the sample, is moderately sorted with a well defined symmetrical mode at 3.2 to 3.5 4 (figure 16). As the depositional environments indicate a wide range of energies were operative the source area for the quartz sand must have had a uniform texture throughout deposition of the lower unit. The quartz in the sample from 19.5 feet (figure 17) has the same modal value as the 25 foot sample but the sorting is slightly poorer (O=0.58) with the quartz being skewed towards the coarser size. This may reflect the presence of coarse volcanic quartz (thin section) (figure 26). The HCI soluble fraction (11%, with calcite being about twice as abundant as phosphate) has a trimodal distribution which can also be related to mineralogy. The coarsest mode is largely due to knobby appearing calcite grains which may be aggregates. The two finer modes are due to phosphate grains and a more well crystallized form of calcite. Clear, perfect rhombs are common in the finer sizes. The series of frequency curves (16.5 feet to 10.0 feet) in figure 18 shows the textural, and transition from the lower interval to the upper interval. In the soil zone between 16.5 feet and 13.5 feet the proportion of the sand mode characteristic of the lower interval decreases and a newer, coarser, but similarly sorted, quartz sand suite increases. The amount of clay, phosphate and calcite grains are not sufficient to account for the new mode and most of the new, coarser mode is made up of quartz sand, presumably from a metamorphic source (as indicated by this section and heavy mineral studies). At 13.5 feet where the mottled sand and shelly sand zone starts the mode characteristic of the lower interval is completely gone and the new mode at 2.8 P is dominant; however, this is accompanied by an even coarser new mode at 2.3 ). This new material is made up largely of clay grains, though there is appreciable quartz in this size range. As the clay-rich interval starts at about 10 feet, the two quartz sand modes characteristic of the transition interval (16.5 feet to 11.3) reappear and comprise the bulk of the non-clay material. Above this interval the amount of quartz is minor; also, it is much finer, being mostly in the silt range. The quartz in the upper clay bed is distinctly finer grained than that in the lower clay bed (figure 19); the coarser mode in the 3.5 foot sample is due to calcite. Extremely fine grained quartz also characterized the underlying dolomitic body. The coarser fraction in this interval is calcite. In the interval which shows evidence of reworking (lower interval) and burrowing (upper interval) the quartz in the matrix clay tends to be coarser grained than in the indigeneous or reworked material. As would be expected, the reworking currents are probably of higher energy than those in the environment in which the mud cracks formed and would carry a coarser load of detrital material. Also, the burrowing organisms appear to prefer a sandy coarser grained substrate and then burrowing down into more clayey material carrying coarser material with them. COMPOSITION OF SAND GRAINS The sieved fractions of the greater than 4.38 4 fraction (non-clay fraction) was studied with the microscope and by x-ray diffraction (figure 14). Quartz is present in all samples and is generally highly polished though much of the quartz in the sand samples from 13.5 feet to 10 feet have thin clay coating. Varying amounts of K-feldspar is present in all but the upper two feet. Well-rounded white to light tan phosphate grains (figure 20) are present in amounts ranging from less than one to 15 percent of the greater than 4.38 4 fraction in all samples but the top burrowed zone. The phosphate in general is more abundant in the lower interval (figure 14). Phosphate is two to three times more abundant in the lower clay bed than in the upper clay bed. The origin of the phosphate is not clear. The clayey sand interval at 10 feet contains hollow cylinders, that appear to be worm tubes, with the walls of the cylinders made of light tan apatite (figure 21). This same interval contains paper thin flakes of material that also appears to be apatite (larger sheets of phosphate occur at 13 feet). Thus it appears that phosphate is relatively abundant in the sandy interval between the two basic depositional units. This phosphate is, at least indirectly, organic in origin. This suggests that some of the round phosphate grains could be locally deposited fecal pellets. The phosphate content of the "non-clay" fraction of at least one sample (18 feet) is nearly as high as that of commercial sands (approximately 20% which indicates that a relatively minor winnowing could produce commercial phosphate deposits from these sandy clay zones. Calcite, in amounts ranging from 2 percent to 78 percent, is present in nearly all but the upper two feet of the section. From the bottom, up to nine feet, the calcite grains are generally subequant in shape with some clear rhombs and a minor amount of rice-shaped grains. The dolomitic unit, from nine to seven feet, contains an abundance of distinctive rice-shaped calcite grains (figure 22) that are apparently authigenic in origin. The calcite in the upper part of the dolomitic zone and the upper clay bed is largely subequant in shape. Calcite is most abundant in the intervals which contain considerable dolomite. Well-rounded clay grains (figure 23) are fairly abundant in the central sandy interval and in the uppermost burrowed interval. The clay grains are probably more abundant than indicated in figure 14 as some probably broke up and others are so coarse as GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS not to be included in the sieve analysis. Visual examination of the samples indicate clay grains range from silt size up to an inch or more in diameter. Samples from the upper clay and dolomitic zones and the lower portion of the lower clay zone contain a few dark metallic sand size grains that are probably ilmenite. Many have rusty, oxidized patches. Of perhaps more interest is the presence of authigenic pyrite. The pyrite is in the form of rosettes (figure 24) and elongated ovals. The pyrite is restricted to the upper clay and dolomitic zone (7.5 to 1.5 feet). This suggests that reducing conditions existed at some stages during deposition of this interval The major differences in the two clay beds is the presence of pyrite in the upper bed and none in the lower and the presence of more phosphate in the lower bed. THIN SECTION Thin section studies indicate the basal clayey sand has approximately 2 percent K-feldspar. The sand is composed largely of plutonic quartz and a minor amount embayed quartz which is presumably volcanic in origin. Minor phosphate is also present. The sand grains are floating in a clay matrix and there is little grain-to-grain contact. Presumably the clayey sand has been completely reworked by burrowing organisms or it was deposited abruptly in a low energy environment with little or no reworking. A third possibility is that the sand was periodically transported by winds or water into a quiet area where a clay gel was being deposited. The most likely environments are shallow marine or tidal The clay in the lower clay bed is very well oriented parallel to the bedding and was deposited in a low energy environment. Near the top of the bed thin (2-4 grains thick) horizontal laminae of quartz grains (figure 25) are relatively common. These lamina also contain some clay and phosphate grains; the clay grains appear to be montmorillonite; the matrix of the lamina consists of unoriented attapulgite clay similar to that in the clay bed. The detritus in these lamina was presumably carried into the low energy environment (lagoonal) by wind or relatively gentle periodic water currents. The matrix material in the pebbly zone overlying the clay bed consists of clayey sand and sandy clay. K-feldspar, phosphate and clay grains are relatively common. Large, embayed, volcanic quartz grains are common (figure 26). A few composite, metamorphic quartz grains are present in this interval and in the overlying sands. These are not present in the basal sand which suggest there was a partial change in the source area during deposition of these sediments. The patchy, irregularly mixed green and white sand at 15 feet is poorly sorted. Volcanic and metamorphic quartz grains are present. Much of the clay and some clay grains appear to be iron stained and show little orientation. The dolomitic, sandy clay (9.5 feet) contains scattered rhombs of dolomite (figure 27). The rhombs are idiomorphic and many have dark centers that appears to be organic material. A few aggregates of fine dolomite are present but most occur as isolated rhombs. Thin lamina are present which contain quartz, phosphate and calcite grains that are rice-shaped. These same types of grains ( 10 percent) occur scattered throughout the clay. The clay is relatively well oriented. The clay shows no particular orientation with respect to the coarser grains with the exception of one large phosphate grain (figure 27). A relatively wide band of clay is oriented parallel to the grain boundaries. It would appear that the dolomite grew in the clay mud penecontemporaneously or else was washed in from a nearby environment. On a megascopic scale much of the dolomite occurs as patches and nodules suggesting that it formed in place. In the overlying clayey dolomite interval (5 feet to 7.5 feet) there is a fair amount of grain to grain contact but the rhombic shape is maintained. In addition to organic (?) centers some of the larger rhombs have carbonate cores (figure 28), probably dolomite according to x-ray data. The rhombs range in size from less than 0.005mm to .025mm with most being 0.015mm. Even though some of the grains are relatively large it is unlikely that they have a replacement origin; however, the shells in the underlying sandy interval are composite of the similar type of dolomite indicating that replacement has taken place in some intervals of the section. The clay in the overlying clay bed is highly oriented in a horizontal direction except for the upper part (1.5 to 2.5 feet) which has a patchy pattern with the clay in the patches being well-oriented (figure 29). A few thin veins of montmorillonite are also present. This interval appears to have been reworked, probably by burrowing organisms, and a minor amount of clay has been carried by water from the overlying montmorillonitic clay. This bed grades upward into an obviously burrowed interval (figure 30). The attapulgite clay contains abundant burrows containing a sandy montmorillonitic clay and pebbles and grains of attapulgite. Much of the burrow material and some of the attapulgite pebbles have a dark brown stain which may be iron and/or organic material but appears to be a thin film of montmorillonite. Most of the burrowed material has been carried down from the overlying montmorillonitic sandy clay (not present in the core). The intense burrowing suggest there was a hiatus between the deposition of the upper attapulgite clay bed and the overlying montmorillonitic marine section. HEAVY MINERALS In order to determine if volcanic material was a major source material, the heavy minerals were collected from the lower (23 feet) and upper (3 feet) clay beds and the soil zone. The lower clay bed contains significant amounts of zircon, tourmaline, rutile, apatite, staurolite, kyanite and sillmanite. The heavy mineral suite suggest a mixed metamorphic-igneous source with, probably, relatively little volcanic material. Phosphate grains are common and many of them contained diatom fragments (figure 31). As diatoms have not been found in this section (but do occur further to the North). The phosphate is presumably detrital A few phosphatic grains with concentric growth rings are observed. The heavy mineral suite from the soil zone is similar except that the metamorphic suite was relatively more abundant. Thin section examination also indicates metamorphic quartz is more abundant in this section. This new source material presumably accounts for the occurrence of bimodal frequency curves in this interval (figure 18). Most of the heavy minerals from the upper clay bed are opaques. A few grains of tourmaline are found. Round phosphate grains commonly contain fine grains of quartz and are darker than those in the lower bed. No phosphate grains with diatom fragments were found. Thus, there is little evidence that volcanic material was a major source of the sediments in this section. The heavy minerals, particularly phosphate, give further indication that the upper and lower clay beds were deposited under slightly different conditions. BULK MINERALOGY X-ray analyses were made of bulk samples randomly packed in aluminum holders. It did not seem necessary to determine the absolute amount of non-clay minerals present so only relative numbers were determined (figure 32). The height of the following peaks were measured: quartz 4.27A feldspar 3.24A, calcite 3.03A, dolomite 2.90A. The relative proportion of each were calculated. Apatite peaks were detected in most patterns WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY but comprised less than five percent in all except a few selected subsamples. The (10T4) reflection of the dolomite ranges from 2.90A to 2.91A rather than the ideal 2.89A. These peaks are also relatively broad. The material is poorly crystallized and apparently contains 5 percent or more excess CaC03. The dolomite or protodolomite is typical of the authigenic and penecontemporaneous dolomite found in recent sediments. The shells in the 11 to 12 foot interval are composed of a similar dolomite. K-feldspar is relatively abundant in the interval below 11 feet; however, there is little sand above this depth. Dolomite is concentrated in the interval between eleven and four feet and is virtually absent below this depth except for some dolomitic pebbles at 25 feet. Solubility data indicates the sample from five feet contains 53 percent dolomite and one from seven feet 61 percent dolomite. There is a thin pure attapulgite clay bed (8.5 feet to 9.5 feet) within the dolomite interval, however, there are patches of dolomite in the clay. Thin shells in the 11 to 13 feet interval are composed of dolomite indicating some replacement of calcite has occurred. Calcite is a major component in several samples. The calcite is granular and occurs as thin crust and fracture fillings. Nearly pure phosphate, consisting of poorly crystallized apatite, occurs in a few thin, one inch square particles in the top six inches of the soil zone (and in smaller particles through the upper foot of the zone). No phosphate was detected in the lower soil zone but it was detected in over half the samples below this zone. Above the soil zone it was found as a minor component of only two samples (5 feet and 5.5 feet). Phosphate is appreciably more abundant in the lower lithic sequence than the upper. CHEMICAL DATA Chemical analyses (atomic absorption) were made of the material scrapped from the slides used for x-ray analyses. This was done so that the chemical data could best be related to the mineralogic data. In general Al 03 and MgO are inversely related (figure 33). The A1203/MgO ratio is relatively high (5) in the basal sands and decreases to a value of approximately 1.5 in the lower clay bed. Pure attapulgite from this area has a ratio "1.0. The ratio reflects variations in the relative amounts of montmorillonite plus feldspar (Al203) and attapulgite, sepiolite and dolomite (MgO). In the pebble intervals the pebbles have a low ratio and the montmorillonite ratio has a high ratio. The ratio is highest in the montmorillonitic soil zone, being a maximum at 15 feet near the center of the zone. The ratio systematically decreases upward reaching a minimum (0.5) in the dolomitic zone. The ratio is lower and the absolute amount of Mg is higher in the upper section than the lower section. Even though the MgO-rich clay sepiolite (Al203/MgO = 0.1) is relatively abundant in the lower clay bed the upper clay bed has a larger percentage of MgO. Thus presumably something other than Mg ion concentration determines whether sepiolite or attapulgite will form. The Fe23O values (figure 33) are at a minimum (1.0 1.5%) in the lower sand and the upper dolomite zone. The maximum amount (6%) occurs near the base of the soil zone and is relatively high through the soil and overlying sand zone. This could be interpreted as evidence for a soil leaching profile. There is little difference in the Al203/Fe203 ratio of the upper and lower sequence. CaO values are relatively constant at 1-2% except for the dolomitic zone where 8 to 10% is present. The K20 distribution is similar to that of A1203. The upper sequence has K2 0 values close to 0.5%, the values for the lower sequence average 0.75%. Higher values, 1.0 to 1.7% occur in the soil zone where the mica content is relatively high. The highest value occurs at 13 feet reflecting a high K-feldspar content. In order to botain some idea of the vertical variation in the composition of the interstitial water and to see if it was in equilibrium with the mineral suite, 10 grams of dry clay was washed with distilled water and the water analyzed. The distribution of cations is fairly uniform throughout the section. Ca is the dominant cation comprising 48% to 62% of the cation suite. There is a slight but systematic decrease in Ca with depth. Mg values range from 21 to 27% and also decrease slightly with depth. Na (5 to 14%) and K (7 to 16%) are present in approximately equal amounts and both increase slightly with depth, the Na more than the K. The high Ca content and the decrease with depth suggest the calcite (largely in shells) in the overlying section controls the chemistry of the downward percolating rain water. It also accounts for the secondary calcite filling fractions and coating on bedding plains. The process probably has been going on since Miocene time. INTERPRETATION Table 1 summarizes the differences between and the similarities of the two depositional units. It is evident from the study of this one core that these Miocene sediments were deposited in a shallow water environment near the strand line. An environmental interpretation based on the study of one core is of questionable validity and a final interpretation will be deferred until the more comprehensive study is complete; however, enough regional work has been done to present a preliminary interpretation. In general the montmorillonitic sandy intervals appear to be of shallow marine origin. The horizontal bedded clay-rich attapulgite beds must have been deposited in a quiet lagoon, probably hypersaline; the dolomitic beds were deposited in a similar environment possibly during periods of increased salinity or decreased in available Si and Al. The pebble and mud-crack beds represent lagoonal deposits that were later reworked by invading marine currents and sediment. The vertically oriented sandy, montmorillonitic, organic clay bed appears to represent a marsh environment, perhaps with some secondary soil-like weathering. Burrowing is evident throughout but is particularly important in the environments (shallow) closing the end of each depositional cycle. The depositional cycles started off with a sand or sandy shell bed which acted as barriers. Shallow water lagoons developed in back of these relatively thin barriers. In some instances these lagoons were evaporated to dryness and mud cracks developed. When the barriers were breached clayey marine sands were mixed with the mud clasts. This situation seemed to be characteristic of the lower depositional unit. This lower unit is topped by marsh-like sediments suggesting the overall unit is regressive. This regression is followed by an abrupt transgression (shelly marine sand) which might reflect only a minor lateral shift of environments. The upper depositional unit shows little reworking and a relatively thick lagoonal sequence (dolomite and attapulgite clay bed), which suggest a more permanent-type of barrier plus a decrease in available Si and Al. This interval appears to end in a shallowing regressive environment (burrows and reworking), to be followed by a relatively abrupt marine transgression. Thus, both depositional units appear to represent a seaward migration of a shallow water marsh-lagoon-barrier sequence. Whenever the migration was interrupted by a sustained marine transgression a new cycle begins. GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS The lithology indicates that the lower unit was probably more effected by physical energy (marine envasions) and the upper by chemical energy (dolomite). The detailed mineral and chemical differences between the two units likely reflect only minor environmental and source differences; however, from a practical standpoint these differences can be used to identify the different clay beds and for stratigraphic interpretation and exploration. This detailed data indicates that with the accumulation of additional data the chemical and physical conditions which favored the formation of the various authigenic minerals in this Miocene section can be specified in detail. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The study was supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant GA-1330. The authors wish to thank Mr. Jack Williams of the Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals Corporation for supplying the core and giving background information. Horace Bledsoe obtained some of the laboratory data. REFERENCES CITED Folk, RL. 1968, Petrology of Sedimentary rocks: Hemphill's, Austin, Texas, 170 p. WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY TABLE 1 Differences Similarities CLAY MINERALOGY Differences Basal sand Clay bed Upper portion of clay dis- turbed Burrows near top Secondary cal- cite Burrows through- out section Dolomite abundant Shells in basal sand Burrowed unit at top Transition from mont. to attap. occ. within basal sand Upper unit pred. mont. Attap. cont. higher Mud cracks & clay pebbles abundant Soil at top Basal sand thicker SAND MINERALOGY Sepiolite present CHEMISTRY Similarities Ca-rich dolomite Differences Phos. worm tubes Authigenic pyrite More metamorphic quartz Phosphate more abundant Phosphate with diatom fragments Differences Higher MgO content Lower Al203/MgO ratio Relatively high inter- stitial Ca and Mg Higher K2O Relatively high interstitial Na & K LITHOLOGY Upper Similarities Lower TEXTURE Upper Differences Coarser grains in basal sand Qtz. in clay bed finer and less abundant Rice calcite abundant More quartz in clay bed Lower GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS FEET pebbley clay with vertical burrows and fractures filled with sandy clay unlaminated clay vertical surfaces horz. laminated clay calcareous layers horz. laminated fine clayey dol. burrow horz. laminated clay dolomitic dol. patch gradual transition from sd. to clay dolomitic shells It. gray sd. shells green clayey sd. white sd. patches and worm tubes clayes sd. vertical irreg. sickensides, mica ab. worm burrows, clay grains organic stain (lower half) flat horizontal pebbles in clayey sd. ab. sd. size clay grains round clay grains parallel laminated clay, worm burrows clayey sd. matrix cal. and clay pebbles v. clayey sd. few pebbles flat clay pebble cgl. clayey sd. matrix mud cracks clayey sand Figure 1. Generalized lithologic description of core from La Camelia Mine, North Florida. WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY -t..11 * ~d-~~i*.-~ ;sy4. ,w- -ii.ci * '' 't S "' ': '1 FrTI "- ' ,,4 *.. .' . rf', ^t?^'1' g^, l-*" 0.' i ' ^*. , 5:1 '--.4 K>: 1-'. . 2F-" * .^ .. 'y : ' ^x- Figure 2. Horizontally laminated attapulgite clay from lower clay bed (23 feet). -WI~ r -~ GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS - ~ -. 4: .e .. '. 1 ' ,.- .. .^ * j '^~ SB ; ^-y^^^ i ^.*v. ^--g a SE i,~ %f. . . -'- ,.L Z yaV -. '. , Figure 3. Mudrocks in attapulgite clay infilled with sandy montmorillonitic clay (25 feet). 7..~:%i: S. 4-- "' :5; r - I.~R~~ ' 6 ~i~ I - * I* i* ^t^^ ^< '*' ~ ~ `T 3?' 'f f ^'" WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY V.. * ' p ">^ I* * .4r a. am Figure 4. Side view of horizontally laminated and mud-cracked attapulgite clay infilled with sandy montmorillonitic clay (19 feet). " *I. 4!. . si :t 1 .. ~ .: i .... -F '~.' GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS ''a I , 1 1' 4 t .'I v. a s, r - II a,;a Figure 5. "Soil" sample with vertical fractures and vertical sandy burrow (16 feet). A.. %t. 4, ti i * 9 I .*I WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY vL.;-i i - .:. . r.p. * . .r. ' I~, .* V. . . . . d a I ~ , rr: (~ r~f~ ~c *1' A-- -*- C -t . -4b<*nrr. **'1 Figure 6. White and green mottled sand with clay clast (13 feet). . 4 iI ^A ' NAI 9!A, . ^ F., E ,6' .:.C GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS S* Figure 7. Horizontally laminated attapulgite containing dolomite (5.5 feet). Lamination is apparent only after desicatinn. WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY * A.:,. -. 0. A *j 0 Ike>.. ~ #,Ntr ..-- -.'. 4 ;' .. -t ,' '.4 .' S,-. ... .. l lc o*^ , ...:?-. ^,. c- ,. .- ., .^, -t:. A. . . :^ .Ji~E 1.4 q *~ r~ Figure 8. Attapulgite clay containing burrows filled with sandy montmorillonitic clay and light colored fragments of attapulgite clay (1 foot). r.: "' . GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS ATTAPULGITE 0 50 w -- '-A rroc 'Ill i izz, - o-. LLW I/- ~ot o - '**^/ ,$ - ?rc ''?'= MONTMORILLONITE 100 50 Figure 9. Distribution of clay minerals. SEPIOLITE % 100 50 WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY c/0o-Xo4(.Ol4e- # 0# ) -(-?-/? #1/ 1700 x Figure 10. Electron micrographs of clay clast (25 feet) showing attapulgite laths and thin patch of montmorillonite (46,700x). * _ . GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS caa 0(6 -9,- I -/-09 6 9, ?so x I l 0. I Figure 11. Bundles of attapulgite laths from lower clay bed (22 feet). Thin patches of montmorillonite are also present (69,800x). ,V- r-6 , WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY ----,r, ~~Tlo""-e~~9s~--Iirrp ~~ - --~`rr--~~i~m~.~~-q~ ~h c 4 i~ TI~L ~rrlc ?0~'' '"' r a' I I 0.1 Figure 12. Sample from soil zone (15 feet). Montmorillonite is in the form of thin ribbons. Attapulgite bundles are relatively small. (88,300x). /0 -(/oo)- T?)300/ GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS '&0 0 1(s4oOX-q- /, I/k Figure 13. Interpenetrating dolomite rhombs in attapulgite matrix (7 feet). (10,400x). WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY % GREATER THAN 4.38 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 % COMPOSITION Figure 14. Amount and composition of the coarser-than 325 mesh material. The bars in the left graph show the total amount of greater-than 325 mesh material. The vertical connecting line indicates the amount of quartz in each sample. The right graph shows the composition, in percent, of each sample. GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Figure 15. Frequency distribution curves of the matrix sandy clay sample from 25 feet. Broken-line curve is for total sample. The other two curves show the distribution for quartz and calcite grains. 80 70 60 I- z *. 50 I- u CJ 40 30 20 WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY 1 2 figuree 16. Frequency distribution curves for non-clay grains of basal sand and lower clay bed. Sand from 28 feet constitutes 68.5 percent of ample. Sand fraction from 25 feet constitutes 1.6% of sample. 80 70 60 I,- uu 50 i- u cc 40 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Figure 17. Frequency distribution curves of the matrix sandy clay sample from 19.5 feet. Broken-line curve is for total sample. The other two curves show the distribution for quartz and calcite. The trimodal distribution of calcite is due to the presence of several types of calcite. 60 I- z a- "O- u 50 LU C, 40 a4 40 WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY Figure 18. Series of frequency curves of samples from the transition interval between the two major depositional units showing the systematic development of coarser modes with decreasing depth. 76 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 100 90 - 2.5' 80 - 70 S3.5' 60 S21' r, 0. 50 I-J 22'23 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Figure 19. Frequency curves of the greater-than 325 mesh material from the upper and lower clay beds. The modal values for the shallower samples must be in the fine silt size range. WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY J. U -~ ~K'IW\ 4 - DJ -g Figure 20. Round phosphate grains (dark grains in the 19.5 foot sample). LU~rn~ .f Ai- :,ds GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS Lad, w Figure 21. Phosphatic (poorly crystallized apatite) cylinders in the 10.5 foot sample. Cylinders are probably organic in origin. ~a~Ba~ sis , WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY ~ il~i~:^^^ ^ S -r * *"* , t *'i ,,7 . J I & 1"_' r/ p.' 41 Figure 22. Rice calcite crystals (9 feet); calcite formed after initial deposition of sediments. k3r-~ GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS / P, #1~ -g I- Figure 23. Clay (white) and quartz grains in 18 foot sample. . P r WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY L , L ~..~ 4 ; Y 7W Figure 24. Pyrite rosette in the 3.5 foot sample. " ~ q Ad* 82 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS I S. ..r. C " 4P q: Figure 25. Thin, sandy laminae in upper portion of lower clay bed (20.5 feet). -yi G~~ yC aES n^ i <^J~~ITI WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY pQf eq p-~u .~3 I,~~r' S I * a.. 4'. Figure 26. Large quartz grain with embayment; probably volcanic in origin. Rounded darker grains are phosphate (19.5 feet). * *: I Rab. N ;r; -. it. 1 *-s -. .-.1a 84 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS " - . 0 "-e,- ji." - 4 *- v -V.~ -esms Figure 27. Dolomitic (white rhombs) attapulgite clay with phosphate grain (black). Clay is oriented with respect to phosphate grain (9.5 feet). ik N - P0 ^ WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY 85 11 -Li plo A% If. iP .. % f 4 VCi 4%, 40.1 Figure 28. Clayey (attapulgite) dolomite. Many rhombs have dark organic centers; some, near center, have dolomite centers (7 feet). 86 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS I "?' _(c 41 ti : twI, t .1 P4 4Ve 3 41-1 4 Figure 29. Irregular patches of oriented attapulgite from top of upper clay bed (2 feet). WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY '. 'V Cj4 L k Figure 30. Sand filled burrow and grains of attapulgite clay (1 foot). a ~Z$ ~1 ' c -C 1 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS ir- K ; C-.- Figure 31. Round phosphate grain with diatom (27 feet). Lr* f= WEAVER AND BECK: VERTICAL VARIABILITY RELATIVE AMOUNT OF NON-CLAY MINERALS 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Figure 32. Relative amount of non-clay minerals based on x-ray analysis of bulk samples. APATITE 1.03 0.80 GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS A1203 Mg 0 Fe203 I n 1 5 Figure 33. A1203, MgO, Fe203 distribution. Broken-line graph connects A1203/MgO values. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 24 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |