|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Front Matter | |
| Front Cover | |
| Title Page | |
| Letter of transmittal | |
| Table of Contents | |
| List of Illustrations | |
| A preliminary paper on the Florida... | |
| Some Florida lakes and lake... | |
| The artesian water supply of eastern... | |
| Preliminary report on the peat... | |
| Index of plant names | |
| Index | |
| Back Cover |
ALL VOLUMES
CITATION
SEARCH
THUMBNAILS
DOWNLOADS
PDF VIEWER
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Downloads | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Front Matter
Front Matter Front Cover Front Cover 1 Front Cover 2 Front Cover 3 Front Cover 4 Title Page Title Page 1 Title Page 2 Letter of transmittal Page i Page ii Table of Contents Page iii List of Illustrations Page iv A preliminary paper on the Florida phosphate deposits Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 32a Page 32b Page 32c Page 32d Page 32e Page 32f Page 32g Page 32h Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Some Florida lakes and lake basins Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 64a Page 64b Page 64c Page 64d Page 64e Page 64f Page 64g Page 64h Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 The artesian water supply of eastern Florida Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 88a Page 88b Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 96a Page 96b Page 96c Page 96d Page 96e Page 96f Page 96g Page 96h Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 120a Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Preliminary report on the peat deposits of Florida Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 204a Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 232a Page 232b Page 232c Page 232d Page 232e Page 232f Page 232g Page 232h Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 248a Page 248b Page 248c Page 248d Page 248e Page 248f Page 248g Page 248h Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 280b Page 280c Page 280d Page 280e Page 280f Page 280g Page 280h Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Index of plant names Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Index Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Back Cover Page 401 Page 402 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Go ogle This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world's books discoverable online. It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file a reminder of this book's long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you. Usage guidelines Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. We also ask that you: + Make non-commercial use of thefiles We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes. + Refrainfrom automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. + Maintain attribution The Google "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. + Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe. About Google Book Search Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web at http://books.google.com/ NANDINA -N art Scale of Miles 0 8 BERKELEY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EARTH SCIENCES LIBRARY zed by Googe FLORIDA STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THIRD ANNUAL REPORT 1909-1910 E. H. SELLARDS, Ph.D., STATE GEOLOGIST PUBLISHED FOR THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TALLAHASSEE. 1910 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. To His Excellency, Hon. Albert W. Gilchrist, Governor of Florida. Sir:-In accordance with the Survey Law I submit herewith a report of the progress of investigations made by the Geological Survey for the year ending June 30, 1910. The work of the Survey has progressed actively during the past year. This report contains papers on the phosphate deposits, the peat deposits, the lakes and the artesian water supply. In connection with the report on water supply I would respect- fully call attention to the evidence of the loss of flow in some of the artesian wells, and to the danger of a material reduction in the artesian supply in some localities, if tne waste of water is not pro- hibited by law. The generous interest you have taken in the work of the State Survey is appreciated. Very respectfully, E. H. SELLARDS, State Geologist. Tallahassee, Florida, October I, r91o. 2842699 CONTENTS. PACE Administrative Report ............................................... 9 A Preliminary Paper on the Florida Phosphate Deposits. By E. H. Sellards. (Plates r to 5) ................................. 17 Some Florida Lakes and Lake Basins. By E. H. Sellards. (Plates 6 to 9; text figures I to 5).............. 43 The Artesian Water Supply of Eastern Florida. By E. H. Sellards and Herman Gunter. (Plates xo to 15; text figures 6 to 16) ................................................... 77 A Preliminary Report on the Florida Peat Deposits. By Roland M. Harper. (Plates 16 to 28; text figures 17 to 3) ......... 197 Index ....................................... ..................... 377 ILLUSTRATIONS. PLATE NO. FOLLOWING I'ACE. I. Fig. I. Phosphate washer ................... Fig. 2. Drill used in prospecting for hard rock phosphate....... Fig. 3. View of incline to pit .................................. 3- 2. Fig. I. Pit of hard rock phosphate mine..................... Fig. 2. Top surface of Miami oolitic limestone ................. Fig. 3. View showing laminated structure of plate rock deposit. 32 3. Fig. I. Pit of land pebble phosphate, Mulberry. ................. Fig. 2. View showing indurated overburden in pebble phosphate. Fig. 3. View of abrupt break in the phosphate stratum.......... 32 4. Fig. i. Irregular top surface of bed rock of land pebble........... Fig. 2. Unconformity of the phosphate stratum ................ Fig. 3. Irregular line of contact between yellow and gray sand.... 32 5. Pit of plate rock phosphate mine showing very irregular top sur- face of limestone ....................................... 32 A PRELIMINARY PAPER ON THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS E. H. SELLARDS. THE HARD ROCK PHOSPHATE.-DUNNELLON FORMATION. The area of hard rock phosphate at present productive, lies in the western part of central peninsular Florida and extends as a narrow strip parallel with the gulf coast in a general north and south direction from southern Suwannee and Columbia Counties to Hernando County, a distance of one hundred miles. Mining has been carried on continuously in this section since 1888. Sev- enty-four plants under the ownership of twenty mining com- panies operated in this section during 1909. These plants were distributed as follows: Suwannee County, one; Columbia Coun- ty, three; Alachua County, twenty-two; Marion County, twelve; Citrus County, thirty-four; Hernando County, two. Owing to the depressed condition of the phosphate market a number of these plants closed either temporarily or permanently early in the year while many others closed before the end of the year. At the beginning of 191o, the number of plants in actual operation was thirty-seven. These plants were distributed as follows: Suwannee and Columbia Counties, one plant each; Alachua County, four- teen plants; Marion County, eight plants; Citrus County, twelve plants; Hernando County, one plant. Each phosphate plant opers up in the process of mining one to several pits offering exception- ally good exposures of the phosphate bearing formation. The following notes are based on observations of the exposures made at these and at the many other plants that have operated in this section during the past several years. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION. The phosphate-bearing formation as developed in this sec- tion includes a mixture of materials from various sources and of the most diverse character, further complicated by pronounced 22 FL6ORDA GEOLOGICAL "SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. chemical "ativihy within the formation itself. Although exceed- ingly variable from place to place the prevailing phase of the for- mation is feebly coherent, more or less phosphatic, light gray sands. Aside from these sands the principal materials of the for- mation are clays, phosphate rock, flint boulders, limestone inclu- sions, pebble conglomerate, erratic and occasional water-worn flint pebbles, vertebrate and invertebrate fossils. The gray sands may be observed in every pit that has been excavated in this section. Moreover, from drill and prospect holes it is known that these sands occur very generally over the intervening or barren area. The sands are of medium coarse texture, the grains being roughly angular. The amount of phos- phate associated with the sands is variable. They are also more or less calcareous in places. Upon prolonged exposure, as seen in numerous abandoned pits, these sands oxidize at the surface assum- ing a pink or purple color. When affected by slow decay and by water carrying more or less iron in solution they become reddish or ochre-yellow in color. The clays in this formation occur locally as clay lenses imbed- ded in the sand, or separating the sand from the phosphate rock, or overlying the phosphate rock. The clays are often of a light buff, or blue color. When lying near the surface, however, they often oxidize to varying shades of red. The relative amount of clay in the phosphate-bearing formation increases in a general way in passing to the south. The exposures in the southern part of the area show as a rule more clay than do similar exposures in the northern part of the area. Flint boulders occur locally in this formation in some abun- dance, and occasionally phosphate pits which are otherwise work- able are abandoned on account of the number of flint boulders encountered. The flint boulders are usually oval or somewhat flat- tened in shape and are of varying size, some weighing several tons. The exterior is usually of a light color. Some of the boulders are hollow and are occasionally filled with water. Others are solid, compact and of a bluish color throughout. Fossils or casts of fos- sils occur frequently within the boulders. Limestone inclusions from the Im,., i. ;;- formations are frequent in this formation. The pebble conglomerate feature is not of frequent occur- rence but may occasionally be observed in the northern part of the Jhard rock section. Such an exposure of a true pebble con- glomerate may he seen in one of the pits of plant No. 5 of the Cummer Lumber Company about one mile southwest of New- berry. The matrix at this exposure consists of more or less water worn fragments of varying sizes together with round or oval wate: THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. worn, dark colored flint pebbles. This phase of the formation may be seen through a distance of ten or fifteen feet along the side of the pit. Water worn pebbles weighing one or more pounds occur occasionally in the northern part of the field. The invertebrate fossils found are mostly contained in the lime- stone inclusions which come largely from the underlying Vicks- burg limestones. The vertebrate remains occurring in the phos- phate include among others, shark teeth, manatee, turtle and mas- todon remains. Phosphate rock, although the constituent of special economic interest, nevertheless makes up a relatively small part of the forma- tion. The phosphate in this section occurs as fragmentary rock. boulder rock, plate rock or pebble. A certain portion of soft phos- phate, unavoidably lost in mining, is also present. The relative amount of material that it is necessary to handle to obtain a definite amount of phosphate is always variable with each pit and with the different parts of any one pit. In general the phosphate rock ob- tained from the matrix of the grade demanded by the market will not exceed ten to twenty percent of the whole. The workable deposits of phosphate lying within this formation or representing locally a phase of this formation, occur very irregularly. While at one locality the phosphate may lie at the surface, elsewhere it may be so deep as not to be economically worked; while a deposit once located may cover more or less continuously a tract of land of some acres in extent, elsewhere a deposit appearing equally prom- ising on the surface, may be found to be in reality of very limit- ed extent. As to location, depth from the surface, extent into the ground, lateral extent, quantity and quality, the hard rock l hosphate deposits conform to no rule. The desired information regarding location, character and extent of deposits is to be obtain- ed only by extensive prospecting and sampling. The phosphate rock may lie beneath the gray sands, or above the gray sands or may be entirely surrounded by them. In some in- stances the phosphate is interbedded with the sands. Such inter- bedding of sand and phosphate was observed by the writer in the Central Phosphate Company pit No. 25 about three miles west of Clark. This phase of the relation of sand and phosphate occurs not infrequently and is confined to no particular part of the phos- phate field. Gray sands surrounding the phosphate rock may be observed as previously stated in practically every pit throughout the phosphate section. As a rule the phosphate rock extends to and rests upon the underlying limestone. This relation, how- ever, is by no means invariable as gray sands were observed under- lying the phosphate rock at several localities. Gray sands above 24 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. the phosphate are ordinarily of frequent occurrence both in pits and in prospect holes. MATERIALS LYING ABOVE THE PHOSPHATE. A superficial deposit of pale yellow incoherent sand occurs generally throughout the phosphate section. The thickness of this sand varies exceedingly. Five to fifteen feet may be given as an average as seen in the pits, although a thickness of as much as thirty feet has been observed. The character and manner of occurrence of these sands leads the writer to the belief that they may be residual in origin. These incoherent sands rest in some localities upon a red clay- ey sand stratum known to the miners as "hardpan." This sand stratum contains sufficient clay to give it coherence and stands usually as a vertical wall in mining. This stratum is fre- quently absent, and when present varies greatly in thickness. The top surface of this red sand stratum presents irregularities which might be taken to mark an unconformity between this for- mation and the incoherent sands above. Such irregularities as occur in the top surface, however, present rounded depressions rather than sharp irregularities. Moreover the top surface of the red sands frequently conforms to the surface contour. Both the superficial sands and the red sands are, as far as the writer has observed, non-fossiliferous. RELATION OF THE PHOSPHATE-BEARING FORMATION TO THE UNDERLYING FORMATIONS. The phosphate-bearing formation rests in this section, wher- ever observed, upon the Vicksburg limestones. In the northern part of the section the pits are ordinarily worked out to the limestone. affording favorable opportunity for observing the contact. The top surface of the limestone is strikingly irregular, the rock pro- jecting as rounded peaks. The numerous shells and other inver- tebrate fossils of which the limestone is largely made up are eroded off plane with the surface of the limestone. Passing to the south the limestone lies as a rule at a greater distance beneath the sur- face, and frequently is not reached by the ordinary processes of mining. It is occasionally reached, however, and wherever seen, throughout this entire section the relation between the phosphate formation and the limestone is the same, that is, the phosphate- bearing formation lies upon and fills up irregularities in the top sur- face of the limestone. (PI. 2, Fig. r and Pl. 5) THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. LOCAL DETAILS. SUWANNEE COUNTY. The southern and southeastern part of Suwannee County has produced some phosphate although only one mine was in operation in this county during 1909. A variable thickness of pale yellow sand occurs in the pits of this section. At the pits of plant No. o1 of Dutton Phosphate Company, 2 miles north of Hildreth from two to twelve feet of this incoherent sand rests directly upon the phos- phate bearing matrix. In one of the pits of this plant the phos- phate matrix grades at the bottom into a yellow phosphatic clay overlying the limestone to a depth of 4 or 5 feet. In one of the pits at this plant are observed, as frequently seen elsewhere in the hard rock section, many large round elongate siliceous boulder interbedded in the phosphate matrix. The underlying formation here is the Ocala Limestone which occurs as peaks, and as "hog backs" of lime projecting into or even through the phosphate mat- rix. COLUMBIA COUNTY. The southern part of Columbia County adjacent to Suwannee County has produced considerable phosphate, although only one mine in this county was in actual operation at the close of 90o9. At plant No. 2 of the Dutton Phosphate Company about one- half mile west of Ichatucknee Springs the following section was obtained: Pale incoherent sand................................... 10 to 20 feet Phosphate-bearing matrix .... ........ .. .............20 to 25 feet Buff yellow phosphatic clays ..... ........................ 5 to 6 feet Dark sandy phosphatic clays (exposed) ................ 4 feet The incoherent sands in this pit, as at Dutton No. o1, rest di- rectly upon the phosphate stratum the top of which is exceedingly irregular. Clay lenses 6 to 12 inches thick are of frequent occur- rence especially near the top. The underlying Ocala Limestone is reached in places. The buff yellow phosphatic clay observed in Dutton No. Io is seen here also and is underlaid by 4 feet of dark sandy phosphatic clay. The following section was made in one of the pits of the Schilman & Bene Phosphate plant about two miles northwest of Ft. Wlite: Pale yellow incoherent .sand........................... 3 to 5 feet Red clayey sands ............... ....... ......... : ..... 5 to to feet Phosphate matrix ................... ............... 15 to 25 feet Limestone at the bottom of the pit. 26 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. This section differs from the preceding chiefly in.the presence of the red clayey sands which are sufficiently coherent to form a vertical wall in the pit. This clayey sand stratum when present is referred to by the miners as "hardpan." The phosphate matrix in this exposure as in Dutton No. Io, grades below into yellow phosphatic clay. The overburden at this pit, is not removed as it is found practicable to allow the en- tire overburden to be taken up with the phosphate and to pass through the washer. In the pit of the Fort White Hard Rock Company one-half mile southeast of Ft. White, the foundation rock, as is usual in this section, is the Ocala Limestone. The top of this limestone is exceedingly irregular, projecting as rounded peaks. Shells, sea ur- chins, and other fossils are partly eroded away, the limestone having a comparatively smooth surface. The phosphate rock consists chiefly of angular fragmental pieces, plates, pebbles and boulders imbedded in a sandy or clayey matrix. This matrix fills up the irregularities in' the underlying limestone. In sev- eral instances the phosphate matrix was seen to fill up cavities and solution channels in the limestone. Slickensides occur due to the settling of the phosphate matrix as the underlying limestone dis- solved away. Limestone inclusions and siliceous boulders occur in the phosphate stratum. The following section is seen in an abandoned pit of this plant. Pale yellow incoherent sand .............................. to 15 feet Phosphate matrix .......... ... .. ........... .......... to 20 feet Limestone top surface exceedingly irregular The phosphate producing area of southern Columbia and Su- wannee Counties lies adjacent to and in the angle between the Su- wannee and Santa Fe Rivers including the low lying and intensively eroded parts of each County. The limestone lies near the surface in this section and as a rule the phosphate is mined out by dry min- ing, the limestone being exposed in the abandoned pits. Dredging which is applicable in the southern part of the phosphate area is not used in this section. ALACHUA COUNTY. The west central part of Alachua County is actively produc- ing phosphate, twenty-two plants having operated in this county during 1909. Pit No. 25 of the Central Phosphate Company west of Clark, gave the following section: THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. Pale yellow incoherent sands............................ 5 to Io feet Red clayey sands................................ ....... 5 to To feet Phosphate-bearing formation....... .....................to to 25 feet Limestone at bottom of pit. The phosphate matrix consists of gray sands, yellow, buff and blue clays, and phosphate rock. At one place in this pit a stratum of gray sand V' to 2 feet thick is seen interbedded with the phos- phate rock. The incline leading to a new pit being opened up by M. C. and T. A. Thompson near Neal gave the following section: Pale yellow incoherent sands ............................5 to o1 feet Red clayey sands ...................................... 7 to Io feet Gray phosphatic sands (exposed) ........................ 15 feet The gray sands give place laterally to phosphate rock. Pit No. 2 of the Cummer Lumber Company is perhaps the largest single pit in operation in the hard rock phosphate section. This pit is reported to include at the present time about thirteen acres. Pit No. 5 of this Company, one mile west of Newberry, gives an exposure of the sandstone and flint pebble conglomerate al- ready referred to as occurring occasionally in the hard rock de- Fosits. The pebbles are round and more or less flattened. They vary in size from very small pebbles to pebbles weighing five to sev- en pounds. In the pit of the Union Phosphate Company at Tioga a con- siderable number of rounded elongate siliceous boulders occur. These vary in size, the largest approximating a ton in weight. They are embedded in the phosphate-bearing matrix. The many other pits which are now being worked, or which have recently been abandoned, although varying much even within a single pit in details are in general much the same as those de- scribed. The limestone in this county as a rule, lies relatively near the surface. In most instances the limestone is encountered before or very soon after reaching the water level. The phosphate is thus largely worked out by dry mining and dredges are not in use. The limestone is encountered at varying depths. One pit may show a great.deal of limestone projecting as peaks, while another pit of equal depth near by may scarcely reach the limestone. Some of the limestone peaks project 15 to 25 feet above the general level of the bottom of the pit. The ph sphate-bearing matrix here as elsewhere fills up the irregularities in the lime- stone. The top surface of the limestone is as elsewhere entirely 28 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. irregular. In general clay lenses in the phosphate matrix are most frequent in the upper part of the formation. The red clayey sand called "hardpan" by the miners may be present or lacking in the pits of this section. The loose pale yel- low sand is practically always present varying in thickness from I to 25 feet. MARION COUNTY. The plate rock deposit found in the vicinity of Anthony and Sparr in the north central part of Marion County represents an eastward extension of the phosphate-bearing formation. The relation of the phosphate matrix to the underlying limestone is the same as previously described. The limestone projects into the phosphate matrix as rounded peaks. (P1. 5.) Circular depres- sions similar in appearance to pot holes or to "natural wells" are frequent in this section. These through subsidence are filled with the phosphate matrix. One of these depressions observed by the writer had been cut into, in the process of mining. This depres- sion was about three and one-half feet in diameter at the top. fifteen feet deep and narrowed gradually to the bottom. Other depressions variable in diameter and in depth occur. The lime- stone lying below the line of the underground water level has us- ually a rough and jagged surface owing to solution by water in contact with the limestone. Above the water level the limestone has a smooth rounded surface. The shells and other fossils below water level are often removed by solution; above this level they are eroded off plane with the general rock surface. The plate rock beds show evidence of having been originally faintly strat- ified. Much of the stratification that originally existed, however, has been destroyed through repeated local subsidence as the un- derlying limestone was removed by solution. The stratification lines in the plate rock are frequently much curved and distorted ow- ing to this irregular subsidence. (P1. 2, Fig. 3.) The chief difference noted between the plate rock and the ty- pical hard rock region is in the relatively large amount of fragmen- tary phosphate rock and small amount of boulder rock. In other words the mechanically transported rock in this section predom- inates over the rock formed chemically in situ. Flint and lime- stone boulders chemically formed are likewise absent or rare. The deposits at Standard and at Juliette in the western part of Marion County are similar in general character to the hard rock deposits as previously described. The mines in this section are THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. dry mines and usually reach to the bottom of the phosphate formation in places encountering the limestone. In the southwestern part of Marion County and in Citrus County the hard rock phosphate-bearing formation reaches its maximum thickness. The underlying limestone dips in passing to the south, and is ordinarily encountered at a considerable depth from the surface. Many of the phosphate pits in this section are worked as dry mines to the underground water level and afterwards as dredge mines to such depth as the dipper will reach. Some of the pits on higher lands are mined as dry mines only. The pit at the Dunnellon Phosphate Company plant No. Io was one of the first pits regularly worked in the phosphate section and has been continuously in operation for the past twenty years. This mine is operated by a dredge. The bottom of the phosphate is not reached in this pit and the full thickness of the formation at this place has not been determined. CITRUS COUNTY. The conditions in Citrus County are in a general way similar to the conditions in the vicinity of Dunnellon in Marion County. The underlying limestone is only occasionally seen in the pits in this section. It is, however, frequently reached in the dredge operations below the water level. The surface of the limestone wherever seen projects as rounded peaks similar in character to the conditions further north. There is on an average more clay to be seen in the phosphate formation in this section than in the northern part of the field. In a few instances, notably that of the pit of the Istachatta Phosphate Company, the water level is within a few feet of the surface and the phosphate formation is entirely submerged. Only the pale sands of the overburden are here visible. HERNANDO COUNTY. Phosphate is being produced in Hernando County in the vic- inity of Croom. The mine in operation here is a dredge mine. The relation of the phosphate formation to the underlying lime- stone as seen in an abandoned pit several miles west of Croom is the same as that in other parts of the phosphate section, the lime- stone projecting as rounded peaks. The material above the phos- phate stratum consists largely of incoherent sands. The usual gray phosphatic sands weathering purple on exposure are seen sur- rounding the phosphate rock. In the mines near Croom a con- siderable amount of clay is associated with the phosphate. 80 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. THICKNESS. The phosphate-bearing formation is exceedingly variable in thickness. In general it is of reduced thickness in the northern part of the area. In Suwannee, Columbia, Alachua and northern Marion Counties, the formation may reach a thickness of from 30 to 50 feet, although in places it is much reduced or even absent. The maximum thickness of the formation is probably found in southern Marion County and in Citrus County. Drillings made by the Dunnellon Phosphate Company along the Withlacoochee. River indicate a thickness of from 60 to 70 feet on the particular tract of land being prospected. Similar drillings by the J. Buttgenbach Company gave in one instance for the phosphate formation along the river, a thickness of about 75 feet. Extensive prospecting carried on by the Southern Phosphate Development Company near Inverness, indicated for the phos- phate formation a thickness of 50 tbo oo feet; 70 feet being a fair average for the particular deposits prospected. It is prob- able that the depth may in places approach 200 feet, although this maximum thickness is probably only local. SOURCE OF MATERIALS. The very complex and mixed character of the material making up the phosphate-bearing formation has already been mentioned. The determination of the source or sources of all this material is a problem of no little difficulty. A part of the material is of chemical origin formed in situ. This applies particularly, in the writers' opinion, to boulder phosphate rock and to flint boulders. Of the limestone inclusions some constitute a part of the for- mation as originally accumulated: others doubtless represent less soluble remnants left behind as the surrounding limestone dis- solved permitting the phosphate stratum to subside and enclose them. The gray sands find their closest resemblance lithologically to the sands of the Alum Bluff formation. Indeed as developed locally at many places one scarcely finds characters on which to distinguish the gray phosphatic sands of this formation from the similar gray phosphatic sands of the Alum Bluff formation, as seen at the type locality on the Apalachicola River. That these sands are residual from the Alum Bluff formation seems probable although the possibility of their origin from some of the later for- mations must be admitted. That they remain as residual from the Vicksburg Limestone the writer cannot believe. THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. The source of the dark colored water worn flint pebbles and of the pebble conglomerate occasionally observed especially in the northern part of the field is at present scarcely more than con- jectural.. So far as the writer's observations have extended, ma- terials of this character occur more frequently in the Miocene than in any other of the formations of the State. 7 he presence of mastodon remains indicates admixture of Pliocene material from some source. The origin of the phosphate is perhaps the most difficult prob- lem connected with these and, in fact, with phosphate deposits in general. In the case of the Florida deposits the writer is in- clined to the view that the phosphoric acid has been very gradual- ly concentrated from various formations in which it exists in only very small quantities. Enrichment by the addition of phos- phoric acid is a well known process. Many instances have come to light of shells originally calcareous now completely phosphatized, the phosphoric acid having replaced the carbonic acid. In many in- stances the shape and markings of the shell are retained. The bones imbedded in the phosphate also are more or less completely phos- phatized. The formation of the phosphate boulders in situ seems evident. The plate and fragmental rock represent boulders formed during a preceding stage and subsequently broken, more or less transported and finally deposited in their present position. The pebble phosphate found among the rock phosphate is prob- ably largely water worn detritus mechanically accumulated. CONDITIONS OF DEPOSITION. The variable and mixed character of the formation, the fre- quent clay lenses, the faint tendency to stratification, the occasion- al local accumulation of loose or conglomerate material indicate to the writer that the material accumulated in shallow water with conflicting currents. Much of the material may indeed have been scarcely at all transported being residual from formations that have decayed in place. The local accumulation of pebble con- glomerate, however, as well as the local occurrence of clay lenses implies conflicting currents in comparatively shallow water. The faint tendency to stratification leads to the same conclu- sions. Such stratification as existed, however, has been much distorted by the settling of the formation as the underlying lime- stone was removed by solution. The conditions of deposition do not, in the writer's opinion, necessarily indicate complete resub- mergence of this area, although such may have been the case. It is extremely probable that the formations which have gone to decay 32 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. in this section include, aside from the Vicksburg limestones of Lower Oligocene age, Upper Oligocene formations of the Apal- achicola group, Marine Miocene formations, and more or less of Pliocene or later materials since all of these formations occur in position in the adjacent and uneroded high-lands to the north- east. In the course of the decay and lowering of the general land surface there is naturally more or less shifting of material attended probably by the formation of temporary small lakes and streams. It is possible that the conditions thus arising may have been suffi- cient to account for the mixed condition of the materials, the ten- dency to stratification in places and other evidence of action by water without the necessity of assuming a complete resubmergence. On this point, however, the writer feels that evidence has not been accumulated to form a final opinion. FORMATION NAME. It is thus apparent that the formation contains a mixture of material largely residual from several formations from as early as the Lower Oligocene and as late at least as the Pliocene, fur- ther complicated by subsequent chemical action within the for- mation itself. The residual material moreover has been reworked and in places transported and redeposited. The term Dunnelion formation is suggested for these deposits since they were first found and are best developed in the vicinity of Dunnellon, Florida. EXPLANATION OF PLATE I. Fig. I. Phosphate washer for hard rock phosphate in use at pit No. 3, Cummer Phosphate Company, Alachua County. Fig. 2. Drill for prospection for hard rock phosphate, in use by the Southern Phosphate Development Company. The prospect holes are drilled through the phosphate formation to the underlying formation, the Vicksburg Limestone, which is reached at this locality at a depth of 75 to o10 feet. Fig. 3. View of incline to pit, in the Croom mine of the Buttgenbach Phosphate Company. FLORIDA GE(TOI.OICG\I. SURHVEY. THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. PL. I. EXPLANATION OF PLATE 2. Fig. r.-View in ph No. 25 of Central Phosphate Company in Alachua County, showing irregular top surface of the Vicksburg Limestone (Ocala for- mation) after removal of the phosphate deposit. The limestone here as else- where in the phosphate section projects as peaks. Fig. 2.-View showing the irregular top surface of the Miami oolitic lime- stone, Dade County, after the removal of the superficial sands. Photo by R M. Harper. Fig. 3:--View in the plate rock phosphate pit at Anthony, showing the laminated structure of the plate rock deposit. The solution of the underlying limestone has permitted subsidence of the phosphate deposit, the folding being due to irregular subsidence. THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. PL. 2. V LAtt :gle FLORIDA GEO)LOGICAL, SURVEY. EXPLANATION OF PLATE 3. Fig. .--View in pit No. 5, Prairie Pebble Phosphate Company, Mulberry, showing overburden of land pebble phosphate. The contact between the light- colored incoherent sand and the somewhat indurated sand is well marked. The overburden in this pit is being removed by hydraulics. Fig. 2.-View in pit of Florida Mining Company, showing a place where the overburden beneath the superficial sand is indurated, making it necessary to resort to blasting. Fig. 3--View in pit of the Pierce Phosphate Company, Pierce, Fla., showing an abrupt break in the pebble phosphate stratum. The break is seen near the right side of the picture, where slickensides have developed as the overburden slid down past the phosphate stratum. lTIIl D AN N UAL REPORT. PL. 3. S-0 b d i^r FLORIDA GE010CICAL SIANFY. EXPLANATION OF PLATE 4. Fig. .--View in pit of Pierce Phosphate Company, showing the irregular top surface of the bed rock (Arcadia marl) after the removal of the phosphate stratum. Phosphate plant in the background. Fig. 2.-View in the pit of the Coronet Phosphate Company, Lakeland, Fla. Unconformity between the coarse phosphate above and the finer pebble phosphate below. This unconformity, although imperfectly shown in the pho- tograph, is well marked at this locality. The material above is a coarse con- glomerate, that beneath is fine pebble imbedded in clay. Fig. 3--View in pit of Standard Phosphate Company, showing irregular line of contact, apparent unconformity, between the loose surface sand and the more indurated sand beneath. THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. PL. 4. :gle FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. 0 ri, 114 p Z 0 0 3 pE/) z> * 4aL 0 ) i~rRr~ Jb,. rZ > 03 T P4L >;c ww CK;P Mw cc k.o Digitized by Google THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. THE LAND PEBBLE PHOSPHATE-BONE VALLEY FORMATION. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION. The land pebble formation to which Matson and Clapp applied the term "Bone Valley Beds" was briefly described in the Second Annual Report. This formation includes a lower phosphate bear- ing member and an upper sand or sandstone member. The lower member of the formation contains the workable phosphate de- posits. The upper member forms the overburden which must be removed in mining. The phosphate bearing member of this formation is more or less definitely stratified, the stratification line being frequently continuous along the full length of the pit, a distance of a half mile or more. Elsewhere the stratification is irregular and cross bedding is evident. Although variable from place to place this part of the forma- tion has an average thickness of from 8 to 12 feet; its maximum thickness is possibly 18 or 20 feet. The matrix in which the phos- phate pebble is imbedded consists largely of clay, sand and soft phos- phate. The pebble phosphate makes up in the workable deposits some ten to twenty-five per cent. of the whole. This member shows certain characteristics which are fairly persistent. The lower 2/2 to 3 feet is usually olive green in color, and contains pebble im- bedded in clay. The next 3 to 5 feet is frequently dark blue in color although oxidizing on exposure to drab or yellow. The up- per 2 to 4 feet of this member differs much particularly in the northern part of the area from that which lies below. This upper part contains coarser material and has a highest percentage of pebble phosphate in proportion to the matrix. The break between the coarser material at the top and the more clayey material be- neath is particularly well marked as seen in the pit of the Coro- net Phosphate Company in Hillsboro County (PI. 4, Fig 2.) The break is here so abrupt as to constitute a distinct unconformity. The line of contact is marked by the presence of water worn corals, bone fragments and very coarse conglomerate of phosphate pebbles. Passing to the south the contact line becomes less marked, the conglomerate character of the upper part largely disappearing at the south end of the phosphate area. The indurated sand above the phosphate has an average thick- ness of from 10 to 14 feet. Its maximum thickness, however, is much greater. On the other hand owing to decay and erosion these sands are in places much reduced and may be locally entirely 34 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT.. absent, the phosphate lying at the surface. Usually the sand con- tains sufficient admixture of clay to give it coherence. Under these conditions it oxidizes red near the surface. While this is the prevailing phase of the sand it is nevertheless subject to con- siderable variation from place to place. Not infrequently the sand is firmly cemented forming the so called "hardpan" which gives much trouble in prospecting and frequently necessitates blasting in mining. (Plate 3, Fig. 2.) In places the sand has a calca- reous or phosphatic cement. Locally it varies also to an indurated rock with innumerable small cavities which gives a vesicular ap- pearance to the mass. A sample of this rock was found to contain I5.56% phosphoric acid (equivalent to 33.97% tri-calcium phos- phate). The phosphate bearing member contains vertebrate remains including both marine and land animals. Most of the bones are more or less rolled and water worn although occasional whole skeletons are found. In the sands above the phosphate, fossils are rare. The writer has obtained, however, through the kindness of Mr. M. A. Waldo, Manager of the Dominion Phosphate Com- pany a single tooth of the mastodon preserved as a cast in the phosphatic sands of the overburden. Aside from a few casts near the bottom of the phosphate bed invertebrates have not been found in this formation. MATERIALS LYING ABOVE THE PHOSPHATE FORMATION. As in the case of the hard rock section the surface material con- sists of incoherent pale yellow sand. The depth of this sand is vari- able, ranging from four to ten or more feet. A very definite and often irregular line separates these loose sands from the formation beneath. (P1. 3, Figs. I and 2, and P1. 4, Fig. 3.) This line Matson interprets as an evident unconformity.* This may be true al- though the fact must not be overlooked that seeming unconfor- niities in materials lying near the surface may in reality repre- sent only lines of decay. The writer is inclined to regard the loose surface sands in this section as residual, the irregular line representing the line of complete disintegration of the original sandy formation. A similar explanation has been offered previously by the writer for the surface sands of Gadsden County as well as for the sands overlying the hard rock phos- phate formation. (ante P. 24.) *Florida Geol. Survey. Second Annual Report, p. 139, 1909. tFlorida Geol. Survey. Second Annual Report, p. 263, 1909. rHE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. RELATION TO THE UNDERLYING FORMATION-ARCADIA MARL? The land pebble formation rests upon a pale yellow phosphatic marl, referred to by the miners as "bed rock". The relation is apparently as stated by Matson, that of unconformity. This is observed in the pit of the Pierce Phosphate Company, six miles south of Mulberry. The marl as exposed in this pit has a very roughly eroded surface. (PI. 4, Fig. I.) The phosphate matrix fills these irregularities. The "bed rock" although varying in character is found to underlie the phosphate wherever observed in Hillsboro, Polk and DeSoto Counties. The marl beneath he phosphate is probably of Pliocene age. In 1892 Dall applied the term Arcadia marl to a marl exposed on Mares Creek, six miles above Arcadia.* This marl Dall' re- garded as slightly older than the Caloosahatchee marl. Matson is of the opinion that the Arcadia marl may be only a phase of the Caloosahatchee marl. The exposure on Mares Creek examined by the writer occurs at and near the mouth of the creek. The marl as seen here has in lithologic character no very striking resemblance to the Caloosahatchee marl but is lithologically very similar to the marls seen at numerous places elsewhere on Peace Creek and un- derlying the Bone Valley formation. From the continuity of exposures and similarity in character it seems probable that the "bed rock" of the land pebble phosphate is the Arcadia marl. LOCAL DETAILS. HILLSBORO COUNTY. The northernmost plant in the land pebble section is that of the Coronet Phosphate Company located in Hillsboro County three miles southeast of Plant City. The following sections were ob- served in pits Nos. I and 2 of this plant. SECTION IN PIT NO. I, CORONET PHOSPHATE COMPANY. Pale yellow incoherent sand .............................. 4 feet Gray indurated sand...................... .... ... ........ 4 feet Conglomerate of phosphate pebble, bone fragments, water worn flints and pebbles ............................. to 1 Y feet Buff yellow and olive green clay ...................... 2 to 5 feet Yellow clay and marl, "bed rock" at bottom of pit. SECTION IN PIT NO. 2, CORONET PHOSPHATE COMPANY. Incoherent sand.................. ............................. 6 feet Indurated sands grading at base into a conglomerate of phos- *Dall, Wm. H., U. S. Geol. Survey, Bull. No. 84, 892, pp. 131-132. 36 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. phate pebble, bone fragments, water worn flints and coral..34 .feet Buff yellow and olive green clay matrix in which phosphate pebble is embedded .......... ......... .............. 5 feet The superficial pale yellow sand is of fine texture and is non- fossiliferous. The indurated gray sand is also non-iossilifen-us in the upper part. Towards the base, however, this sand grades into the conglomerate previously mentioned, the lower one to one and one-half feet being a very rich phosphate conglomerate. The break between the phosphate pebble conglomerate and the underlying phosphate matrix is very abrupt representing a local unconformity. (PI. 4, Fig. 2.) Aside from the phosphate there is found in this conglomerate lying along the line of contact a con- siderable amount of coral occurring as water worn fragments, some of which weigh as much as 8 or io pounds. The larger corals us- ually lie immediately upon the contact line. Water worn flint pebbles of one or two pounds in weight, also occur together with fragments of bone. The phosphate stratum lying beneath this unconformity is chiefly of.bluish color which upon exposure oxidizes to a light buff yellow. Occasional bones and flint pebbles are found also in this part of the formation. The-water worn corals, however. were not observed below the unconformity. That part of the phosphate matrix below the unconformity contains also many rounded pieces of soft phosphate while that above the unconformi- ty contains hard pebble rock only. POLK COUNTY. A pit operated by the Standard Phosphate Company near Medulla is notable for the extreme irregularity in the stratifica- tion of the phosphate bearing member. The strata here are ob- served to dip at an angle of as much as 45 degrees from the hori- zontal. The bed rock which consists of the usual yellow clay marl is likewise irregular and is observed to rise as much as fourteen feet in a horizontal distance of 50 feet. In the pit of the Medulla Phosphate Company at Christina, the following section was observed: Incoherent pale yellow sand............................ 2 to 5 feet Gray sand, iron stained near surface....................... 8 feet Phosphate bearing matrix.............................. I5 to 20 feet Yellow clayey marl, "bed rock" (exposed) ................ 4 feet In Pit No. 3 of the Prairie Pebble Phosphate Company, near Mulberry the following section was observed: THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. Incoherent sand ............................. ....... .... 2 to 4 feet Indurated gray sand grading below into phosphate matrixI2 to 16 feet Workable phosphate stratum........................... 10 to 12 feet Yellow clay marl, "bed rock" (exposed).................. 5 feet The upper 5 or 6 feet of the sand of this section contain some clay and are stained red by iron oxide. At the base the sands pass gradually into the pebble rock conglomerate. Beneath the pebble rock conglomerate the matrix is more clayey while near the base the clays of the matrix are olive green in color. The conglomerate as seen in this pit differs from that seen in the pit of the Coronet Phos- phate Company in the absence of corals along the contact line. The relation between the phosphate bearing formation and the underlying marl or limestone is well seen in the pit of the Pierce Phosphate Companiy, six miles south of Mulberry. The marl exposed in this pit, as previously stated, has a very roughly eroded surface. (PI. 4, Fig. I.) The phosphate matrix fills these irregularities. At this pit there is observed in places below the workable phosphate matrix one to three feet of material consisting of quartz sand intimately mixed with small black phosphatic peb- bles. An old stream channel crosses this pit. In the bed of the stream is fine loose, more or less stratified dark colored sand. This stream where examined has cut down to the coarse part of the phosphate matrix and at one point almost cut out this coarse part of the matrix, that is it has cut through the sand and the upper part of the phosphate formation. This stream occupies approximately the bed of an existing stream and probably indicates that conditions were such formerly as to permit the stream to cut its bed deeper than now, the channel subsequently having been ag- graded. Near by in the same pit is a sudden dip in the sand over- burden. (Pl. 3, Fig. 3.) The point of break gives very much the character of a sink hole. CONDITION OF DEPOSITION. In attempting to determine the condition under which the land pebble phosphate formation accumulated, the characteristics of the formation itself should be borne clearly in mind. The formation is more or less definitely stratified. The stratification, however, is irregular, and cross bedding and local sand deposits occur. The phosphate bearing part of the formation is highly fossilifer- ous containing both land and marine vertebrates. Most of these fossil bones are more or less eroded and water worn, indicating that they have been rolled or washed before reaching their final resting place. Occasionally, however, a complete skeleton occurs. Water worn bones of both the land and marine vertebrates could 38 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD 'ANNUAL REPORT. have as suggested by Matson*, washed into this deposit from some pre-existing formation. This can not apply, however, to the oc- casional complete skeletons that are found in these deposits. It is probable that the formation accumulated in comparatively shallow water. That the water was not deep is evident from the irregu- larity of the stratification and from the occasional cross bedding. Also that the place of accumulation was not far removed from land is indicated by the comparatively coarse material and by the presence of numerous bones of land animals. CHANGE OF CONDITIONS DURING DEPOSITION. The land pebble phosphate formation, as previously stated, is not of uniform character throughout, indicating that the conditions varied from time to time during the accumulation of the material. The earliest phase of the formation observed consists of clear quartz grains and very small black pebble phosphate forming a stratum one to four feet in thickness. This material occurs only locally and is non-workable, the phosphate pebble being too small to separate from the sand. This phase of the formation may be observed in the pit of the Pierce Phosphate Company, six miles south of Mulberry. The formation divides itself into the workable phosphate stratum and the indurated sands forming a part of the overburden previously described. Stratigraphically the most pronounced break in the formation is that which occurs within the phosphate stratum itself, particularly in the northern part of the phosphate field, where the pebble phosphate con- glomerate rests upon the underlying clayey phosphate matrix. This conglomerate grades above very gradually into the overlying gray sands. A change in condition in deposition is clearly in- dicated. This change probably indicates elevation of the land to the north. Following this elevation there was brought in first the coarse phosphatic material accompanied by the flint and corals, and later the sands which make up the upper member of the for- mation. STATE AND GOVERNMENT LANDS IN THE PHOSPHATE SECTION. Both the State and the National Governments still own lands in the phosphate sections of the State. All State lands have been withdrawn from sale by order of the Internal Improvement Board until properly classified. The President, by executive order has withdrawn during the year 27,400 acres of Government land in the phosphate section of Florida. *Florida Geol. Survey, Second Annual Report, p. 140, 19o9. THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. PHOSPHATE COMPANIES OPERATING IN FLORIDA DURING 1909 Thirty-six companies in all were engaged in mining phosphate in Florida during all or part of the year 9gog. Of these twenty companies operated in the hard rock section. Of this number, however, not more than fourteen were actually producing phos- phate during any considerable part of the year, others being tem- porarily closed or preparing for subsequent operations. In the land pebble district sixteen companies were engaged in mining phosphate during all or a part of the year. List of companies operating during all or part of 1909: NAMES. OFMCEL MINES. I Arm6ur Fertilizer Co.......... Fort Meade........ Pebble 2 Bradley, Peter B. and Robert S.Floral City......... Hard Rock. 3 Buttgenbach, J. & Co........... Dunnellon.... .. .. Hard Rock. 4 Camp Phosphate Co............ Ocala... ......... Hard Rock. 5 Campagnie Generale des Phos- phates de la Floride............ Anthony............. Plate Rock. 6 Charleston, S. C. Mining and Manufacturing Co.... ........ Charleston, S. C..... Pebble. 7 Central Phosphate Co............ Newberry.......... Hard Rock. 8 Coronet Phosphate Co......... Lakeland.... .... .. Pebble. 9 Cummer Lumber Co............Jacksonville...... .Hard Rock. zo Dominion Phosphate Co........ Bartow.... ..... Pebble. zi Dennis & Blanton ...... .......Gainesville...... ... Hard Rock. 12 Dunnellon Phosphate Co......... Rockwell. .. ...... Hard Rock. 13 Dutton Phosphate Co........... Gainesville........ Hard Rock. 14 Florida Mining Co............. Mulberry ...... .... Pebble. 15 Fla. Phosphate Mining Corpo'n.. Norfolk, Va.........Pebble. i6 Franklin Phosphate Co........... Newberry.. .. .... Hard Rock. 17 Ft. White Hard Rock Co........ Baltimore, Md.. .. Hard Rock. 18 Germofert Mining Co........... Charleston, S. C.... Pebble. 19 Holder Phosphate Co........... Ocala.... .. .. .. ..Hard Rock. 2o International Phosphate Co..... Ft. Meade.. .. .... Pebble. 21 Istachatta Phosphate Co........ Istachatta.. .... Hard Rock. 22 John McDowell................Newberry..........Hard Rock. 23 Medulla Phosphate Co.......... Christina.. ...... Pebble. 24 Mutual Mining Co............ Savannah, Ga.. .... Hard Rock. 25 Palmetto Phosphate Co......... Baltimore, Md.. ...Pebble. 26 Phosphate Mining Co.......... New York...... ..Pebble. 27 Pierce Phosphate Co............ New York........ Pebble. 28 Prairie Pebble Phosphate Co.... Savannah Ga.... .. Pebble. 29 Schilman & Bene.............. Ocala.... ........ Hard Rock. 30 Southern Phosphate Develop- ment Co.................. ... Ocala.... .. .......Hard Rock. 31 State Phosphate Co........... Bartow...... .. .Pebble. 32 Standard Phosphate Co........ Christina ......... Pebble. 33 Thompson, M. C. & T. A........ Willeford...... ....Hard Rock. 34 Tilghman Phosphate Co.........Bowling Green...... Pebble. 35 Union Phosphate Co.......... Tioga.. .......... Hard Rock. 36 Williams Phosphate Co.........Inverness...... .. Hard Rock. 40 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. THE PRODUCTION OF PHOSPHATE DURING 9og9. The total production of phosphate in Florida for the year 1909 shows a slight decrease over that of the preceding year. The total production for 19o8, exclusive of river pebble, was 1,918,o0 long tons. Including river pebble the total production for 1908 was 1,950,961 long tons, while for the year 1909 the total production was 1,862,151 long tons. The decrease in production occurred entirely within the hard rock section, the output of land pebble hav- ing actually increased. The shipment of phosphate for the year 1909 practically equall- ed the production both of hard rock and of land pebble. Hard rock shipments amounting to 514,1To long tons have been reported as against the production of 527,582 long tons. For the pebble rock, shipments have been reported amounting to 1,329,102 long tons against the production of 1,334,569 long tons. The phosphate market continued very much depressed during the year. Hard rock phosphate was reported to have been sold as low as from $5 to $6 per ton f. o. b. at mines, while land pebble was sold from $2.75 to $4.25 per ton f. o. b. at mines. HARD ROCK PHOSPHATE. The production of hard rock phosphate during 1909 shows a decided falling off from that of the preceding year, the output hav- ing been curtailed by the operators on account of the l,,w prices. The amount mined during 1908 was 768,0II long tons, while for the year 1909 the total production reported is 527,582 long tons, a decrease of about 240,000 tons, or about 30 per cent. As in former years practically all of the hard rock phosphate shipped, was consigned to foreign markets. The total amount of hard rock phosphate consigned for use in the United States during 1909 was 17,456 long tons. Of this amount 13,726 tons were used in Florida. The amount exported during 1909 was 496,645 long tons. PEBBLE PHOSPHATE. While the production of hard rock phosphate was reduced dur- ing 1909, the output of pebble was increased. The amount of pebble rock mined in 1908 was approximately I,I5o,ooo long tons. For the year 1909 the total production of pebble phosphate was 1,334,569 long tons, an increase of over 150,000 tons. Shipments listed by the "American Fertilizer" show that the total pebble rock exported during 1909 was 509,341 long tons. THE FLORIDA PHOSPHATE DEPOSITS. 41 The amount consigned for use within the United States as reported by the operators was 819,761 long tons. The mining of pebble rock on Peace River discontinued during the latter part of 1908 was not resumed during 1909. A small shipment of 3,215 tons of this rock during 1909, mined in 1908, is included in the total domestic shipments of pebble rock as given above. SUMMARY OF PRODUCTION AND SHIPMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1909. Hard rock...... LONG TONS. Total production. ............ ................... 527,582 Consigned for use in U. S.......................... 17,456 Exported ........... ... ................... 496,646 Total shipments... ....... ...................... 514,10 Pebble rock...... Total production ......... ... ............... ,334,569 Consigned for use in U. S.......................... 819,761 Exported......................................... 509J41 Total shipments .............................. ,329,102 Total production of hard and pebble rock...........................1,862,151 Total shipments of hard and pebble rock.............................. 1,843,203 COMPARATIVE TABLE OF PRODUCTION AND SHIPMENT OF FLORIDA PHOSPHATE FOR THE YEARS 1908 AND 90o9. (LONG TONS.) PRODUCTION Consned for Ue EXPORTED t in e U EXPORT D 1908 1909 1909 190 1909 768.011 9.900 17456 631,001 496645 1,150,000 I 2 .. 421,781 819.701 470,270 509,341 1.918.011 1,862.151 431.681 837.217 1,101,271 1,0.5,986 Total Shtpments 1908 1909 631,001 r61 1^i 90J.519 ^', r 1,531,520 1,843,208 Hard Rock........... Pebble Rock........ Totals ................. --- SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS BY E. H. SELLARDS. _ _~~_____ ___~~_ ~__~~_~11_11_~___.1_1_____1_~__1__ CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction ............... . ...... ................. ............... 47 Location of the Lakes .............. . ................................ 48 Characteristics .................................................... 48 Origin and History of Development.................................... 49 Relation of the Basins to the Level of Permanent Underground Water.... 52 Descriptions of Typical Lakes.......................... ............ 53 Lake lamonia, Leon County...................................... 53 Lake Jackson, Leon County......................................... 56 Lake Lafayette, Leon County ........................................ 57 Lake Miccosukee, Jefferson County ..... .......................... 58 Alligator Lake, Columbia County.................................. 61 Alachua Lake, Alachua County.................................... 62 Ocheesee Lake, Jackson County.................................... 67 Methods of Drainage- By Surface Ditching .................. ........................... 68 By Wells ..................... ................................ 68 Summary .......... ............. ...................... 74 -. | ILLUSTRATIONS. PLATE No. FOLLOWING PA;K, 6. Miccosukee Basin, Low Water Stage of 19o9 ........... .......... 64 7- Fig. i. Lake Jackson ........................................... Fig. 2. Alligator Lake ........... ............................. 64 8. Fig. i. The Sink of Lake Lafayette................ ......... Fig. 2. Paynes Prairie, Looking Out From the Sink.............. Fig. 3. View of Paynes Prairie From Near the Sink............. 4 9. Two views of Spouting Well Near Orlando ..................... 64 TEXT FIGURE No. PAGE I. Sketch Map Showing Location of Lakes lamonia, Jackson, Lafay- ette, and Miccosukee ................. ..................... 54 2. Lake Jackson ............... ............ .. ............ 56 3. Lake Lafayette ........................................ 58 4. Lake Miccosukee .................... ..................... 60 5. Sketch Map of Hogtown Prairie and Surroundings............... 66 SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. E. H. SELLARDS. INTRODUCTION. Florida is justly celebrated for the number and beauty of its lakes. These lakes vary in size from the small ponds which scarce- ly exceed a few rods in circumference to the great Okeechobee, the surface area of which exceeds 700 square miles. Okeechobee is in fact noteworthy as being, with the exception of Lake Michigan, the largest fresh water lake lying wholly within the United States. In depth the Florida lakes are likewise variable, and in fact the depth is frequently in inverse ratio to the size. Many of the large lakes are comparatively shallow, while some of the small lakes are deep. This is particularly true of the small sink-hole lakes, some of which, while not exceeding a few rods in circumference have a depth of one to two hundred or more feet. In origin and his- tory of development the Florida lakes are as variable as in other characteristics. The lakes described in this paper include only a few of the many Florida lakes and represent a type peculiar in character and in manner of development. They are fresh water lakes, often of con- siderable size, although usually relatively shallow as compared to their areal extent. Moreover they are variable in character. Un- der normal conditions they are clear water lakes abounding in fish and the favorite haunt of the wild duck. They have as a rule no surface outlet, yet from many of them the water has at times disappeared in a manner seemingly inexplicable. In most instances the lakes thus disappearing have refilled slowly. Some of them, however, have remained dry a number of years. A correct under- standing of these lakes together with the origin and development of the basins which they occupy is necessarily based on a study of the geologic formations which underlie them. The fall of 1909 offered an exceptionally favorable time for in- vestigating lakes of this character. The prolonged dry weather of the past few years had reduced these lakes to a low stage offer- ing an opportunity of examining the soil and vegetation as well as the geologic structure of their basins. At the Tallahassee sta- tion in Leon County, near which several of these lakes are located, the rainfall at the close of 1909 had been below normal as shown by the weather bureau records for two years in succession. At the Gainesville station in Alachua County, the rainfall had been 4S FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. below normal during the preceding four years and at the Lake City station the rainfall had been below normal for at least three years in succession and apparently, from some imperfect records, had not reached normal during the preceding seven years. Under these circumstances it was deemed advisable to make use of the favorable opportunity during the fall of 1909 for investigat- ing the geology of these lake basins. Attempts have been made to drain some of these lakes as the land is more or less valuable for agricultural purposes. In some instances drainage operations have been delayed owing to legal difficulties arising from the variable character of the lakes. The lake basins claimed by the State under the title of swamp and overflowed lands were likewise claimed by abutting property owners under the privilege of riparian rights. A recent decision of the State Supreme Court vests the title of the lands in question with the State, not, however, as swamp and overflowed land but as navigable water. LOCATION OF LAKES. The lakes described in this paper occur in the upland section of the interior of Florida. In general they may be said to occur in a belt extending with interruptions from the Ocklocknee Rivex east and south paralleling the Gulf of Mexico to Hernando and Pasco Counties. The largest and best known examples are found in Leon, Jefferson, Columbia and Alachua Counties. Smaller but no less typical lakes of this type occur in Madison, Suwannee, Marion, Levy, Orange, Hernando and probably some other counties adjacent to those mentioned. West of the Apalachicola River small lakes of similar character occur in Jackson County and pos- sibly also in Holmes County.* The lakes selected for description as illustrating this type include Lakes Iamonia, Jackson, and La- fayette, in Leon County; Lake Miccosukee in Jefferson County: Alligator Lake in Columbia County; Alachua Lake in Alachua County; and Ocheesee Lake in Jackson County. The belt >f country through which these lakes occur, although now broken up through natural processes of erosion into several more or less well defined sub-divisions, was probably at one time continuous. CHARACTERISTICS. The leading characteristics of these lakes have been mentioned. They do not occur along the coast nor in the level low lying parts *For location of counties, see map plate 1o, following page 121. SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. of the state. On the contrary they are on the uplands, and occur in sections having a hilly or rolling topography. Sinks or open- ings occur through which the water escapes into the underlying formations. These sinks are located ordinarily, at the foot of a steep bluff bordering the lake. Around the main sink one finds ordinarily other sinks of more recent formation indicating the man- ner and direction of enlargement of the basin. The sinks through which the water escapes are variable in depth but reach in all cases to underlying limestones. A channel as a rule leads back from this sink across the lake bottom representing the main channel of flow of trater to the sink. Aside from this channel the bottom of the lake is relatively flat and- level, although slight local depressions occur involving in some instances differences of level, of ten to fifteen feet. The soil in the lake basins varies considerably. In some of the lakes-those which seldom go dry-there is an accumulation of muck or peat formed largely from pond lilies and other aquatic vegetation. Local depressions in the lake often have an accumu- lation of this material amounting to several feet. Some of the other lakes which frequently go dry have little or no muck except in de- pressions which hold water even in dry seasons. Beneath the .,uck is usually found light colored sand washed and blown from the neighboring highlands. This sand may be several feet deep in places, elsewhere it is largely absent. Ordinarily a sandy clay occurs beneath the sand. When these lakes dry up the water is commonly reported as running out very suddenly. This, however, is usually not the case. As long as the lake has sufficient water to cover the entire basin the lowering of the water surface proceeds very slowly. Subse- quent-ly when the total surface area of the lake becomes much re- stricted the lowering of the water surface proceeds much more rapidly. This leads to the statement that the water of the lake dis- appeared suddenly while as a matter of fact in many cases the water escapes through the sink no faster and indeed hardly so fast during the dry season as-it had been escaping when the lake was full during the season of normal rainfall. It is true, however, that new sinks occasionally form in the bottom of the lake. In the case of the formation of new sinks the rate of escape of the water is increased. ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT. The origin of these lake basins is a part of the history of de- velopment of the general topography of the region. In this ce- velopment both mechanical erosion and erosion by .:,lut;.-i have 50 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. had a part.. The land surface when first elevated above sea was evidently much more nearly level than at present. Upon being lifted above sea level irregularities in topography rapidly develop. A first step in the process of erosion is the development of stream channels and valleys, largely through mechanical erosion. In addition to mechanical erosion, crusion by solution due to under- ground water is likewise in process especially in sections underlaid by limestones. As illustrating the efficiency of underground water as an erod- ing agent, the writer in a previous report computed the rate of erosion by solution in the sections of the state underlaid by lime- stones.* The estimate of the rate of solution given below is taken from that report. Solution is the most apparent, and geologically the most im- portant result of underground water circulation. Rain water, while passing through the air, takes into solution a small amount of C02 gas. To this is added organic and mineral acids taken up while passing through the soil. Increased pressure, as the water descends into the earth, enables the water to hold in solution greater quantities of gases, acids and salts, all of which greatly increase the dissolving power of the water. That underground water is efficient as a solvent is evident from the analyses of well and spring waters. 'Rain water entering the earth with almost no solids in solution, returns to the surface through springs and wells with a load of mineral solids in solution determined by the length of time it has been in the ground, the distance traveled, and the character of the rocks and minerals with which it comes in contact. The mineral matter thus taken into solution is carried along with water, and, while some of it is re-deposited, a large amount is removed annually. An estimate of the total mineral solids thus removed is difficult. A conception of the largeness of the amount removed is obtained from a consideration of some of the individual springs. The water of Silver Springs contains, as shown by analysis, 274 parts solids per million parts water. Otherwise expressed, each million pounds of water is carrying with it 274 pounds of solids in solution. Silver Spring is estimated to flow a little more than three million pounds of water per minute (368,913 gallons). The interior of Florida is thus being carried into the ocean through Sil- ver Springs at the rate of more than 340 pounds per minute, or about six hundred tons per day. *Fla. Geol. Survey Bulletin No. I, pp. 46, 47, 48, 19o8 SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. The total solids removed in solution through six other springs of central Florida, expressed in tabular form, gives the following results:* Name of Spring County. Blue ................. Marion Blue ...................Levy Ichetucknee ........... Columbia Newland ............... Suwannee Weekiwachee .......... Hernando White Sulphur ........Hamilton Suwannee .............Suwannee Total solids Est. flow (parts per (gals. per million) min.) 112.1 349.166 196.8 25,00o 211.6 18o,ooo 233.5 75,00o 227.8 o00,000 166.6 32,400 332-7 19,747 As the basis of an estimate of the total solids removed annually from the interior, let it be assumed, ( ) that the average total solids in spring water amount to as much as 219 parts per million, this average being obtained from eight of the typical large springs of central Florida; (2) that the annual escape of the underground water approximates the annual in-take, amounting, as previously estimated to 460,536,689 gallons per square mile. Upon these estimates the mineral solids removed amount to a little more than four hundred tons annually per square mile. Of the minerals thus removed, calcium carbonate or limestone greatly predominates, exceeding the combined weight of all other minerals. From the analyses it appears that magnesium carbonate, magnesium and calcium sulphates are present in variable, although usually limited, quantities. Chlorides are normally present in small amount, although occasionally, as in the case of Perrian Spring, they are exceptionally high. Silica is present in amounts varying from 5 to 25.5 parts per million. Traces of phosphoric acid and of iron and alumina are usually present. The several undetermined factors which enter into the above estimates of mineral solids removed make it difficult to formulate a concrete statement of the rate of lowering of the general surface level. Nevertheless, such statements are desired and have a com- parative value. Assuming for the rock removed, most of which is *For 340 in the second line from the bottom on the preceding page read 840. tOrganic matter is deducted from the total solids as given for Suwannee Sulphur and White Sulphur Springs. The organic matter occurring in the other springs is of small amounts and was not separately determined. Analyses of the water of these springs were given in Bulletin No. I, pp. 72-75, 1908. Solids re- moved lbs. per day. 469,698 59,040 457,056 210,150 273,360 64,771 78,8z6 62 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. limestone, an average specific gravity of 2.5, a layer one foot thick over one square mile should weigh about two and one-sixth million tons. The calculated rate of removal of this rock is about four hundred tons per square mile per year. From these estimates it would appear that the surface level of the central peninsular sec- tion of Florida is being lowered by solution at the rate of a foot in five or six thousand years. With due allowance for a wide margin of error in the above estimates it is still evident that a very great amount of mineral solids is being removed annually in solution. The first effect of solution in limestone is to develop cavities through the rock along the line of ready flow of underground water. These cavities grad- ually enlarge until the overlying material, no longer able to support its own weight, caves in, forming a sink. The formation of a sink is a first step in the development of the many basins large and small occupied by these temporary lakes. A sink usually retains connection with the underlying limestone for some time after its formation and water entering the sink escapes into the limestone. Under these circumstances more or less of the material lying immediately around the sink is carried by surface wash through the sink. Moreover the large amount of water entering through the sink results in rapid solution in the limestone of that immediate vicinity. The result is frequently the formation of other sinks in close proximity to the first. As old sinks become clogged or partly filled, new sinks form by this pro- cess continually enlarging the basin. Not infrequently a sink forms in or near the bed of a stream. When this occurs the lower course of the stream, or a part of it, may be reversed. Where many sinks form in succession or through a long period of time the valley of the stream is thereby enlarged and is frequently carried to a level lower than the original oulct. Lakes lamonia and Lafayette in Leon County and Alachua Lake in Alachua County are illustrations of basins of this type. RELATION OF THE LAKE BASINS TO THE LEVEL OF PERMANENT UNDERGROUND WATER. It is important to note the relation of the3j lake basins to the permanent underground water level of the formation into which they drain. It is a well established fact that solution by under- SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. ground water goes on more rapidly above the level of permanent underground water than below this level. The term "belt of weathering" is commonly applied to that part of the earth's crust lying above the underground water level; while the term "belt of cementation" is applied to that part lying immediately below this level. According to Van Hise "the most characteristic reaction oc the belt of weathering is solution. In contrast with this the most characteristic reaction in the belt of cementation is deposition in the openings of the rocks."* The rapid solution in the belt of weather- ing is due to a number of causes. First of all the water in this part of the earth's crust moves freely, while in the belt of cemen- tation the water often moves very slowly. Moreover water is cap- able under given conditions of carrying a definite amount of min- eral solids in solution and as the water from the surface enters the earth with little or no load, until it becomes saturated it takes materials into solution readily. In accordance with this principle it is found that the largest of these basins are, as a rule, reduced practically to the level of un- derground water. Many of the smaller basins, it is true, have not reached the permanent water level, and stand at varying heights above that level. The relation of the basins to the underground water has a practical bearing and will be referred to again in con- nection with methods of drainage of the lakes. DESCRIPTIONS OF TYPICAL LAKES. LAKE IAMONIA. Lake lamonia lies near the north line of Leon County. The lake basin is irregular in outline, but has an average width of from one to one and one-half miles. The total length of the lake is from twelve to thirteen miles. At its west end the lake basin connects with the swamp of the Ocklocknee River. During 11-..t seasons the river overflows into the lake. Similarly a high stage in the lake results in an overflow into the river. Small tributary streams enter the lake from both the north and the south side as well as from the east end. The tributaries are small flat-bottomed streams which are dry. except during the rainy season. The lake fluctuates much according to the rainfall. The lake basin when full covers an area of about 65oo acres. Except at the west end, where *Treatise on Metamorphism Mol. U. S. Geol. Survey, XLVII, p. 165, 1904. 54 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. it joins the Ocklocknee River, the lake is largely surrounded by the red clay hills characteristic of this part of the State. These hills rise to an elevation of from 50 to 75 feet above the level of the lake. Fig. I.-Sketch map showing the location of lakes lamonia, Jackson, Lafayette and Miccosukee in Leon and Jefferson Counties. The sink through which the water escapes from this lake occurs along the north border. When visited May 7, 1910, the sink was practically dry, having only a small amount of water in the bottom. Limestone rock, probably of Upper Oligocene age, is exposed near the bottom of the sink, the water escaping through or under these rocks. Above the limestone partly decayed sandy clays occur. These contain few fossils, although oyster shells were found in abundance at one locality. The total depth of the sink below the general level of the lake is not less than 50 feet. The sink occurs, as is usual in this type of lake, facing an abrupt bluff 30 feet or more in height. A considerable number of sinks occur around the border of the lake especially in the vicinity of the one large sink which receives ,the drainage of the lake. The formation of these sinks is doubtless due, as previously stated, to the fact that the water entering the drainage sink spreads laterally in the underlying lime- stone and dissolves the rock rapidly. The result is the formation by subsidence of numerous sinks adjacent to the drainage sink. The presence of these sinks also indicates the manner of enlargement of the lake basin, and indicates in each case the direction of most rapid enlargement at the present time. At other times the enlarge- SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. ment by solution and subsidence may have been most active in some other locality or direction or part of the lake basin. This lake only occasionally goes entirely dry and as a result a covering of muck or peat occurs over the greater part of the bottom of the lake. This deposit of muck reaches a considerable thickness in such natural depressions as occur over the lake bottom. Be- neath the muck is usually found a deposit of light colored sand and beneath this is the red sandy clay. The fact that the Ocklocknee River at flood stage flows into this lake makes any attempt at drainage doubtful of success. An effort which proved unsuccessful was made at one time to prevent the river water from entering the lake by means of a dam. It seemed to be the views of the party constructing the dam that if the water of the Ocklocknee River could be kept out the sink would carry off the water from the lake. This, however, is not probable, since in the several other lakes to be described the sinks have not proved sufficient to carry off the water except in times of greatly reduced rainfall. Lake Iamonia basin represents apparently a stream valley lowered by solution and enlarged laterally by sub- sidence through the formation of sinks. Originally a small stream tributary to the Ocklocknee River flowed through this section. In this part of the county soluble limestones occur at no great distance from the surface, and in the course of -the natural processes of ero- sion the stream approached sufficiently near this limestone to permit of the formation of sinks and the escape of the water of the stream through the sinks. The enlargement of the valley to its pre- sent size has proceeded through the formation and partial filling of successive sinks. As each sink forms, it carries down to or below the lake level, a certain small area of land. Moreover the water passing through the bottom of the sink carries with it more or less detrital material so that the surrounding area is somewhat lower- ed by wash through the sink. In the course of time other sinks form, while the older sinks become clogged and usually partly fill up. The direction of active enlargement of each lake can be de- termined from the location of the recent sinks. As previously re- marked this rapid enlargement is usually around the sink which is at present actively receiving the drainage. 68 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. LAKE JACKSON. SLake Jackson lies near the western border S of Leon County within one and a half or two miles of the Ocklocknec River. This lake is ir- regular in shape, and has a total area of about 4,- 500 acres. The bound- aries of the basin are sharply marked by the surrounding highlands which rise 75 to 1oo feet Above the level of the lake. Several sinks oc- Scur in the southern half of the lake. The largest Sof these, known locally as the "lime sink," is located well out in the basin and in the angle between the north and east arms. (See map). An opening in the bottom of this sink Fig. 2.-Lake Jackson. e in May, 1907, permitted the water to run out, leaving the sink dry, and also draining the lake or such part of it as was connected with the sinks. An indefinitely defined broad depression or slough extends to the south-east from the lime sink. Several water holes representing old sinks occur along the line of this depression. A new sink oc- curred along the bottom of the depression.about one mile south- east of the lime sink in June, 1907. A compact limestone showed in the bottom of this sink at a depth of about 25 feet from the sur- face. At the time this sink formed the lake was low, a part of the water having been carried off through the opening which had formed in the lime sink a month earlier. All the water that could reach the new sink was carried off in the course of two or three days. leaving the lake dry except for occasional water holes. When examined in September, 1909. a small open sink was found in the slough which carried away all of the water that reached it from the surrounding parts of the lake. SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. The surface soil in the basin is quite generally a gray sand dark- ened by admixture of organic matter. In the lower parts of the lake, quite generally covered by water, more or less muck or peat occurs formed from the accumulation of aquatic vegetation. Sand lighter in color and lacking the organic matter occurs at a depth of I /2 or 2 feet to 3 or 4 feet. Beneath this sand is the usual red sandy clay. This lake as already mentioned became dry, or nearly so, in the early spring of 1907. It was partly filled by the summer rains of the same year, but became dry or nearly so again during the summer of 1909. The accompanying photograph of this lake was taken July 5, 1909 and shows an unusually low water stage of the lake for that season of the year. (PI. 7, Fig. I). LAKE LAFAYETTE. Lafayette Basin or Lake Lafayette lies in the eastern part of Leon County between Tallahassee and Chaires. The basin begins three and one half miles east of Tallahassee, and extends to within one mile of Chaires, having a total length of about five and one-half miles, and a width of one-half to one mile. An arm of the lake extends north from near the east end of the lake. The bottom of the basin is nearly level with the exception of occasional slight de- pressions. The tributaries to the lake are flat-bottomed streams with relatively broad valleys and no well defined channel. The soil in these stream valleys is a sandy loam, and the streams are or- dinarily dry, carrying water only during the rainy season. A drainage sink in this basin occurs near the west end of the lake along the northern border (See Fig. 3). The sink when measured in September, 1909. was found to have a total depth of 75 feet. The sink is found, as is usual in this type of lake basin, facing a prominent bluff. A second sink is formed beyond the lake border, thus indicating the enlargement of the lake basin in that direction by subsidence, due to underground solution. This new sink is one hundred yards or more in circumference, and when formed carried down to the lake level, land which stood fifty feet or more above the lake and was being used previous to the subsidence as a cemetery. That part of the lake basin which surrounds the sink lies at a slightly lower level than the more remote parts of the basin and is the first to be submerged at the approach of the rainy season. This area is entirely devoid of trees, and during the dry season( becomes a prairie. The greater part of the basin lying to the south of the railroad is thickly set with small cypress trees. 58 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. The soil in the basin is prevailingly a gray sand usually darkened by the presence of organic matter. At a depth of from one to two feet the amount of organic matter is reduced, the sand being lighter in color. Sandy clays are reached as a rule at a depth of from two and a half to three feet. During a season of normal rainfall this basin is occupied by a lake having a total area of approximately two thousand acres. Following a period of prolonged drought the basin becomes entire- ly dry, water remaining only at the sink. In times of excessive rainfall the lake overflows at the east end, the water discharged reaching streams tributary to the St. Marks River. Fig. 3.-Lake Lafayette. This basin has much the character of an elongated valley. The general course of the streams of this part of the county, the shape of the basin and particularly the topography of the surrounding country indicate that the drainage of this section was originally through these streams into the St. Marks River. The formation of sinks diverted the drainage to a subterranean course, the west end of the basin having been reduced to a level somewhat lower than the east end. The further enlargement of the basin is being carried on through the formation of sinks along the border. The largest of the newly formed sinks is found near the present drainage sink. LAKE MICCOSUKEE Miccosukee Basin or Lake Miccosukee lies between Leon and Jefferson Counties, the west border of the lake forming the county line. A small arm of the lake, however, near the north end reaches into Leon County. SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. Miccosukee Basin has a total area of about 5,000 acres. In its northern part the basin is bordered by sharply defined bluffs, which rise from 50 to 75 or 1oo feet above the lake bottom. Farther south these bluffs fall back and give place to a gradual rise of elevation from the lake border. At the south end bluffs are lack- ing. A drain known as Miccosukee drain enters from the east side. This drain consists of a low, swampy area from one-fourth to three-fourths mile in width. This swamp land supports a thick growth of hardwood trees. When full, Miccosukee Basin is covered with water to a depth of from 2 to 5 feet. Toward the south end around the border of the lake grass and button bushes project above the water even when the lake is full. The sink of Lake Miccosukee is located near the north-west corner (see Fig. 4). The sink is bordered by a bluff having an elevation of from 75 to 1oo feet. Landslides along the border of the sink show recent enlargements of the basin. Numerous sinks occur along the border of the lake at this locality, showing enlargement of the lake basin through subsidence. The greatest depth of water found in the sink when examined September 7, 1909, was 38 feet. A channel leads back from this sink across the prairie in a south-easterly direction. This channel has cut to a depth of from twenty to twenty-five feet. Followed back from the sink the channel is of gradually reduced depth finally at a distance of about two miles merging into the general level of the lake bottom. When examined September 8, 19o9, this stream was carrying water into the sink at a rate estimated to be 200 gal- lons per minute. Notwithstanding the inflow from the stream the water in the sink was being gradually lowered. Heavy rains oc- curred in this vicinity on September 21, 1909, and this stream when seen two days later was carrying approximately 7,000 gallons of water per minute. At this time the sink was being rapidly filled, hav- ing filled several feet during the two preceding days. From these observations it appears that the opening at the bottom of this sink permits the escape of water at a rate in excess of 200 gallons per minute, but much less than 7,ooo gallons per minute. From the behavior of the sink it is probable that not more than I,ooo gal- lons of water are escaping per minute, and the rate of escape may be much less. The principal escape of water from Lake Miccosukee when the lake is full is through a drain which leads out from the south end of the lake and enters a sink about two and one-fourth miles from the south end of the lake. This sink is formed in a light colored limestone of Upper Oligocene age, probably representing the Chat- 60 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. Fig. 4.-Lake 'Miccosukee. SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. tahoochee formation or the Tampa formation. The drain from the lake as it approaches the sink passes through a narrow gorge cut in this limestone. About one-half mile farther south (Sec. 14) another sink is found. This third sink receives the flow from Mill Creek, a small stream draining considerable territory lying south of the Seaboard Air Line Railway and east of Lloyds. During a season of excessive rains these sinks are unable to carry away the water. Under these conditions the overflow from Lake Miccosukee as well as from Mill Creek ultimately finds its escape by flowing to the south-west past Lloyds to the St. Marks River. The surface in Miccosukee Basin is covered with muck to a varying depth. Borings put down near the north end of the basin, out from the margin of the drain, indicated the presence of muck for a depth of from six inches to one foot. Beneath the muck in this part of the basin was found a gray sand. This sand is un- derlaid, at a variable depth, by the usual red sandy clay. At the south end of the lake the sand is largely absent, the muck which is from one to three or more feet deep resting, so far as observed, di- rectly upon the red clay. Lake Miccosukee probably represents a basin developed by solu- tion near the headwaters of streams originally tributary to the St. Marks River. Previous to the formation of 'Miccosukee Basin the drainage of this part of the country doubtless passed through small streams, to the south past the present village of Lloyds, thence to the Gulf through the St. Marks River. The lake basin since its formation has enlarged to the north-west, the lowest part of the basin now being found near the sink in the noith-west corner. Mill Creek which now enters from the south and disappears through a sink a few miles north of Lloyds illustrates the reversal of flow of a stream due to the formation of a sink This stream, previous to the formation of the sink, flowed south-west to 'the St. Marks River. At the present time it flows north and enters the sink. At times of excessive rainfall the sink is unable to carry off the water and the stream under these conditions flows in its' earlier course to the St. Marks River. ALLIGATOR LAKE. Alligator Lake lies in the central part of Columbia County, from one and a half to two miles southeast of Lake City. The lake basin has a total area of about i,ooo acres. Numerous smaller lakes occur to the west and north of this large lake. The sur- 62 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. rounding country is in general level or rolling and lies at an eleva- tion approximating 200 feet above sea. The basin along its western side is bordered by a bluff which rises to an elevation of from 50 to 75 feet above the level of the jake. .\long the eastern and southeastern side the basin passes gradually into low lying swampy hammock land, or cypress swamp. The sink of Alligator Lake occurs along the southwestern border. The escape of water at the present time is through this sink. In the country bor- dering the lake around this sink numerous other sinks occur. The lake is said to overflow at high water stage to the south through a small stream known as Clay Hole Branch. A soil boring put down fifty yards from the edge of the basin along its southwest border gave the following section: Black muck with admixture of clay ........................... ft. Yellow sand loam .............................. .............. V ft. Fine light gray sand........................................... I ft. A pit made by Mr. Greer in his garden near the border of the lake gave the following section: Brownish colored imperfectly decayed vegetable matter (peat)....I ft. Black muck with admixture of sand and clay ...................2 ft. Red very sandy clay ............ ..... ... .................. ft. It is reported that at the time of the early settlements in Co- lumbia County, 1835 or thereabouts, Alligator Basin was a prairie or savanna and was used at that time by the Indians as pasture land. The lake was dry in the fall of 1891, and again in the fall of 1899 or 19oo. It was dry again during the winter and spring of 1909, but was partly filled by rains during the following summer. Approximately complete records of rainfall are available at the Lake City station for the year 1897 and succeeding years. The rainfall for the year 1899, at which time the lake became dry, was much below normal, amounting for the year to only 30.49 inches. The next period of unusually low rainfall was the year 1908. During this year the rainfall amounted to only 29.83. The rainfall during the year 1909 was likewise slightly below normal. amounting at Lake City to 49.68 inches. ALACHUA LAKE. Alachua Lake or Paynes Prairie is the central and largest of the several lake basins of southeastern Alachua County. This basin is about eight miles long and varies in width from one and a half SOME FLORIDA' LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. to four miles. It contains about twelve thousand acres. Low divides scarcely exceeding ten feet in elevation separate this basin from Kanapaha and other prairies on the west and from Levy, Led- with, and numerous smaller lakes on the south, and from Newnans Lake on the northeast. The total area embraced within these vari- ous basins is not less than fifty square miles. For a map of this section the reader may consult the Arredondo topographic sheet of the U. S. Geological Survey. When dry or nearly so, this basin supports a dense growth of grasses and weeds. On the more elevated and dryer parts dog- fennel prevails, growing to a height of eight or ten feet, while on the lower and wetter parts of the basin maiden cane abounds. The principal stream entering this basin is a creek flowing from Newnans Lake. This creek enters at the east side of the basin and flows west and northwest to the sink. The "sink" of Alachua Basin is located in the northeast border. Two sinks occur here. The waters from these sinks enter the Vicksburg Limestone. The sinks are partly surrounded by bluffs rising to an elevation of thirty or forty feet above the general level of the basin. Numerous sinks occur along the border of the lake showing enlargement of the lake basin in this direction. The stream entering the more westerly of the two sinks was car- rying water when examined in October, 1907, at an estimated rate of 20,ooo gallons per minute. At this time the water level in the sink was only 2.01 feet above the general level of water in the Vicksburg Limestone as shown by the Gainesville city well,* in- dicating that the sink was carrying water at its full capacity or near- ly so. In November, 1909, the water in the sink stood approximately one and one-half feet above the level of the water in the sur- rounding limestone. During seasons of heavy rainfall the stream draining from Newnans Lake and other smaller streams carry water so rapid- ly that the water is unable to escape through the sink as rapidly as it flows in. Under these conditions the basin fills, becoming tem- porarily a lake. It is probable also that the drainage sink be- comes more or less completely clogged at times retarding the escape of water, and in this case the prairie may continue as a lake through a succession of years. Variation in this lake has been more or less perfectly recorded since the time of the earliest settlements in this section. When *Bull No. I, Fla. Geol. Survey., p. 60, Igo8. 64 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. visited by Bartram in 1776 this basin was known as "Alachua savannah" and served as grazing ground for stock belonging to the Indians.* The basin was visited by James Pierce in 1824 and was dry at that time. The water in the basin is said by W. W. Cameron who lives near its margin to have been very low in 1861. When visited by Dr. E.'A. Smith in 1880 the basin was comparatively full, forming a lake. The basin in fact is reported to have continued as a lake from 1871 or 1873 to 1891. In the fall of 1891 the basin became dry, and, with the exception of' temporary overflows has been dry much of time since that date. It is possible that the higher water stage in the basin during the years from 1871 to 1891 was due to partial clogging of the sink. The records of rainfall during these years for this section is unfortunately lacking. The following account of the disappearance of Alachua Lake appeared in the Providence Journal for September 14, 1891. The account is given with some omissions as quoted by Dr. W. H. Dall in Bull. 84, U. S. Geol. Survey p. 94, 1892. "A curious spectacle was to be seen on the outskirts of Gainesville, Florida, recently. Alachua Lake * is no more. On its banks were lying thou- sands of dead fish * and the atmosphere was heavy with noxious gases. Men and boys were there in throngs with hoes and rakes, dragging to shore hundreds of fish which had sought the pools for refuge. The waters were fairly alive with their struggles for existence. Except for a small stream known as Payne's Creek flowing from Newnan's Lake into the Sink, the two main basins of the Sink, and a few stagnant pools, no water is now to be seen where a few years ago steamers were ploughing their way. This is tne second time since 1823 that a similar occurrence has taken place. At that time the bed of the lake was a large prairie-Payne's Prairie-having in it a body of water called the Sink and a small creek. In 1868 heavy rains filled up the prairie, but the water disappeared after a short time and the prairie was again dry land. In 1873, after a series of heavy rains, the Sink overflowed and the creek swelled to the dimensions of a lake. During several years the waters increased till a larger lake was formed, and for fully fifteen years sufficient depth of water stood over the prairie to allow of small steamers. During the last two years, however, the waters have been gradually low- ering, and about four weeks ago they commenced going down with surprising rapidity, the lake falling about eight feet in ten days, until now nothing is left of Alachua Lake but the memory of it. The Sink is considered the cause of this change. There is evidently an underground passage connected, and for some reason not understood, this underground passage has been acting as a drain until all the water in the lake has been drawn off." In this account the fact is noted as is usually the case that after the lake became somewhat restricted the water seemed to escape *Bartram's Travels, First Edition, page 203, 1791. Philadelphia. Digitized by Google EXPLANATION OF PLATE 7. Fig. i.-Lake Jackson. View taken from the north end of the lake. Pho- tograph by R. M. Harper. Fig. 2.-Alligator Lake. View taken from the bluff overlooking the lake. Photograph by A. M. Henry. j 40 S4, Dt- Digitized by Google EXPLANATION OF PLATE 8. Fig. I.-The sink of Lake Lafayette. Fig. 2.-Paynes Prairie at low water stage. View from the sink. Photo- graph by E. Peck Greene. Fig. 3.--Paynes Prairie at low water stage. Photograph by R. M. Harper. THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. PL. S. gIe __ ~Y FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. FL. 9. 4 -. ' q O' s *. **I S.'-.'. . . .* .*. ' *., I' .5 ha .. I .-., .'. .' . Spouting well near Orlando. Photograph by T. P. Robinson. FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. with great rapidity. The rapid lowering of the surface is due, how- ever, as previously stated, not to greater rapidity in the escape of the water, but to the fact that the total surface area of the lake be- came greatly restricted so that the escape of a given amount of water lowered the surface much more rapidly. The following remarks regarding the lake appeared in the Washington Evening Star of September 19, 1891. This quotation is also from Dr. Dall's report. "The Star recently printed an account of the disappearance of Alachua Lake in Florida, a lake that was so well established that a steamboat line was main- tained on it. A U. S. Geological Survey party has been engaged at work in that region. A member of this party, Mr. Hersey Munroe, who is now in the city, gave an interesting account of the lake, or rather the ex-lake, to a Star reporter. "Alachua Lake," said Mr. Munroe, "is situated in north latitude 290 35' and west longitude 820 20'in Alachua County, Fla., and 2 miles south of Gainesville, the county seat. The lake was formerly a prairie, known as Alachua prairie before the Seminole War during 1835-37. It has since been named Payne's Prairie, after King Payne, an old Seminole chief of an early day. The prairie was a great grazing spot for the Indians' cattle and later was used for a like purpose and for tillage by the whites, some fine crops of corn and cotton being grown. The prairie lands are immense meadows, covered by the finest grass, interspersed with clumps of beautiful oak trees and palmettoes. These lands are subject to inundation during the summer season. Hatchet Creek rises 3 miles north of Gainesville and flows in every direction of the compass for a distance of Io miles, emptying into Newnans Lake, a beautiful sheet of water covering o1 square miles. "HOW THE LAKE WAS FORMED. "The overflow from Newnans Lake forms a large creek named Prairie Creek, which wended its way through Paynes Prairie to Alachua Sink, one of the curiosities of the State. There the waters found their way into a subterra- nean passage. Visitors, to have their curiosity gratified by seeing what the effect would be to have logs thrown into the sink, were the probable cause of the over- flow of Paynes Prairie. The legs would float out to the center of the sink, whirl around in a circle and suddenly disappear. This choking of the outlet to the waters of Prairie Creek caused the overflow and made a sheet of water sufficient to float small steamers and other crafts. "One steamer in particular had a splendid freight traffic, during the vegetable season carrying shipments of vegetables from its wharf on Chacala pond across Alachua Lake to the mouth of Sweetwater branch, the nearest point to Gaines- ville, the principal place for shipment north. After the overflow and the forming of a lake it was christened Alachua Lake. This name has been decided tuon by the United States Board on Geographic Names. Alachua Lake is 8 miles long, east and west, and in one place 4 miles in width, north and south, covers 16,ooo acres, and the average depth is from 2 to 14 feet. "LOWERING FOR SEVERAL YEARS. "For several years the lake has been gradually lowering. The elevation of the water above sea level as given by the Savannah, Florida and Western Rail- 6 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. road some years ago is 64 feet. By accurate levels run by one of the topograph- ical parties of the Geological Survey working in this section during the winter of I89o-g9 the elevation of the water was found to be 58 feet, thus showing that the lake had been changing elevation; and about two weeks ago I was informed that Alachua Lake had disappeared entirely, that only small pools remained and the usual amount immediately around the sink." The early geological history of that section of Alachua County now occupied by these larger basins and lakes was apparently as follows: Originally the surface runoff from southeastern Alachua County made its way through Orange Creek and the Ocklawaha River into 'the St. Johns River. These streams were then heading Fig. 5.-Sketch map of Hogtown Prairie and surroundings, illustrat- ing a stage in the development of a solution basis. From the Arredondo topographic sheet, U. S. Geol. Survey. The 6o-foot contour line borders the prairie. back in the plateau region of Alachua County, and were fed both by the surface runoff and by the numerous small springs issuing from the clays and sands of the Apalachicola group underlying the SOME FLORIDA: LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. plateau. In the course of time the streams cut down to or nearly to the underlying Vicksburg Limestone. The result of the close approach to this limestone was the formation of sinks due to sold- tion in the limestone. After the formation of the sinks it became possible for the water to pass through the sinks and find its escape by subterranean drainage. This process of solution and subsidence continued through long intervals of time has resulted in the forma- tion of these numerous basins. Some of these basins have been carried to a level equal to or below their original outlet through Orange Creek. Basins may be seen at the present time in varying stages of de- velopment. In the plateau itself no basins are found. Even here, however, are found occasional sinks, the first evident effect of the reduction by solution. An illustration, of a partially developed basin may be found in Sanchez Prairie near Hague. The country surrounding this small basin stands at a level of about I80 feet. The basin itself occupying an area of a few hundred acres is re- duced to an elevation of about Ioo feet above sea. Hogtown Prai- rie near Gainesville (Text figure 5) represents a more advanced basin. Hogtown Creek probably originally flowed through Ala- chua Basin, thence to the St. Johns River through Orange Creek. The formation of the sink, however, permitted a subterranean escape and around this sink is formed Hogtown Prairie, now sepa- rated from Paynes Prairie by elevations amounting to twenty or thirty feet. OCHEESEE LAKE., Of the few lakes occurring in Jackson County Ocheesee Lake is perhaps the largest. This lake lies in the southeastern part of the county extending from near Grand Ridge in a southeasterly di- rection to within three or four miles of the Apalachicola River. The total length of the lake is six or seven miles. In breadth it varies from a few rods to possibly three-fourths of a mile. At the northwest end the surrounding country rises very gradually. The southwest part of the lake, however, is surrounded by red sandy hills which rise from 75 to Ioo feet above the bottom of the lake. The lake is perhaps best described in this instance as a swamp. the greater part of the lake bottom being occupied by a growth of cy- press. Near the east end open water occurs over an area of about Ioo acres. The water sinks into the Chattahoochee Limestone at the south-east end of the lake. The history of the development of this lake is very clear. Originally the drainage from this part of the county passed by 68 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. a surface stream to the Apalachicola River. At a distance of three or four miles from the river, this stream, after cutting its channel some depth, reached the Chattahoochee Limestone. When this formation was reached the water passed into the earth, the drain- age becoming subterranean. Subsequent erosion carried the basin to its present level. METHODS OF DRAINAGE. Two methods of draining basins of this type may be considered. (I) drainage by surface ditching to some stream or other outlet lying at a lower level: or (2) drainage into the underlying water bearing formation. DRAINAGE BY SURFACE DITCHING. Surface ditching usually suggests itself as the more natural method of drainage, and it is often inferred in the absence of de- finite information that the lakes lie at a higher level than near-by streams. This is not always the case, and such an assumption may lead to a very costly error. A lake or prairie of this type a few miles southeast of Citra was connected many years ago by canal at considerable expense with a tributary of the Ocklawaha River. Upon completion of the canal it was found that the lake basin was at a lower level than the stream bed. The peculiar method of formation of these lake basins by solution, as previously explained, carries them frequently to a lower level than the stream which served in earlier stages as an outlet. Lake lamonia as previously stated lies practically on a level with the Ocklocknee River, and receives the overflow of that river during high water stages. Alachua Lake basin lies, as shown by the topographic map, at practi- cally the same level as Orange Lake and the headwaters of Orange Creek which served formerly as the outlet. DRAINAGE INTO THE UNDERLYING FORMATIONS BY WELLS. Drainage into the underlying formations takes place naturally through the sinks already existing. Artificial drainage consists either in enlarging the sinks, or in making artificial openings in the form of dug or drilled wells through to the water bearing for- mation. In either case the principle is the same. The underlying limestone is porous and cavernous, and is filled with water to a definite although slightly variable line or level known as the per- manent underground water level. SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. Solution in the limestone occurs both above and below the water line, but chiefly above. As solution continues the overlying ma- terial is no longer able to support its own weight and caves in, form- ing a sink or natural opening from the surface to the limestone. As long as this sink remains open, water passes through and escapes readily into the limestone. Drilled or dug wells serve as artificial openings to the same formation. Wells drilled into this limestone will serve either as supply wells from which water may be pumped or as drainage wells into which water may be conducted. It is generally the case that a well entering this formation that can not be appreciably affected by pumping, will also conduct water readily. If the openings at the mouth of the well are sufficiently free to per- mit ready flow to the well when being pumped, they are, converse- ly, sufficiently open to allow the water to spread rapidly from the well when used as a drainage well. The amount of water held in the pores and cavities of the limestone is so great that the water level is not appreciably affected either by the water removed when a well is being pumped, or by the water added when a well or sink is used for drainage purposes. Attempts to enlarge existing sinks or to re-open sinks that have become clogged have usually proved futile. It is doubtless true that the opening through sinks is a more or less winding channel and to re-open this when clogged with debris is difficult. Better success has been obtained by dug or drilled wells. Where the underlying porous formation into which the well is to be drained lies near the surface, dug wells can be used to advantage and may be preferable. Dr. H. Bjystra has used this method in draining a small lake or "prairie" on his farm near Brooksville, Florida. At this locality the cavernous limestone lies near the surface and is reached by relatively shallow wells. The one difficulty experienced as reported by Dr. Bjystra is the fact that during the summer rainy season in one or two instances the rainfall has been so heavy within a short space of time that the wells were unable to carry away the water as fast as it fell, the result being temporary overflow of the farm and serious injury to growing crops. It is probable that this danger can be removed in this instance by digging additional wells. Drilled or bored wells have been in some instances notably suc- cessful. An advantage in the drilled well is that it can be put down to any required depth. When properly cased and screened drilled wells are permanent. The effectiveness of the well is de- pendent upon the structure of the formation penetrated. If the water-conducting power of the formation reached by the well is TO FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. slight a limit is thereby placed on the effectiveness of the well. Un- less the flow of water at the bottom of the well is tree the in-take of water is necessarily limited. Assuming free movement of the water at the bottom of the well, the rapidity of in-take and hence the efficiency of the well is in- fluenced by (a) size of well; (b) construction of well; (c) depth of water above the mouth of the pipe; (d) distance from the top of the pipe to the underground water level.* (a) The capacity of a drain pipe increases rapidly with in- creased diameter. The area of the section of the pipe is propor- tionate to the square of the diameter. Thus the area of the cross section of a 12-inch well is nine times that of a 4-inch well. More- over, for a given velocity the friction of movement is less in a large than in a small pipe. (b) The construction of a well also affects its rapidity of in- take. When the pipe is cut off squarely at the top according to the usual custom, the full capacity of the well is not realized. The rapidity of in-take may be appreciably increased by the use of a flared or bell-shaped mouth at the top of the pipe. (c) If the underground water level lies some distance, from the surface and if there is free discharge at the bottom of the well. siphonage or draft-tube action increases the rate of flow. When the distance from the top of the pipe to the underground water level is 33 feet or over, the maximum possible draft-tube head of 32.8 feet. may be available. (d) The influence of the depth of water above the mouth of the pipe is as follows: Assuming that the water flows into the pipe as through an orifice, the in-take at the mouth of the pipe will be proportionate to the square root of the depth of the water above the mouth of the pipe. The velocity of flow in the drainage well may be measured by means of Pitot's tube. This is a bent tube one arm of which is graduated, used to determine the velocity of running water. To make the measurement insert the tube vertically in the top of the pipe, the short end projecting upward and having its mouth a few inches below the top of the drain pipe. The velocity of flow in the pipe is expressed within close limits by the following formula in which h is the height in inches to which the water rises in the long arm above the surface of the lake.* V- V 64.32 22 12 .32 VR *U. S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Paper, 145, p. 36, 1905. R. E. Horton. SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. The flow in cubic feet per second into the well will be d2 T7 Q = 0.0055 dV 80 nearly In this formula Q represents the flow in cubic feet per second; d is the inside diameter of the pipe in inches, and h the height in inches to which the water rises in the long arm alive the surface of the lake. V is the velocity of flow. A notably successful instance of drainage by wells where the interests of a municipality were involved occurred at Orlando, Florida, and was given in Bulletin No. I, as follows: "A very considerable land area south and east of Orlando, em- bracing possibly fourteen square miles, lies in an irregular basin with many lakes, marshes, and ponds. The overflow from this area originally drained to and disappeared through a natural sink about one mile east of the city. This sink became clogged in April. 1904. Unsuccessful efforts were made to re-open this sink, first by removing hyacinths accumulated around the opening, and later by the use of dynamite. In the meantime, heavy and continued rains formed a lake around the sink, overflowing the surrounding lands. In August, 1904, efforts were made to dispose of the water through drainage wells. The first well put down was a two-inch test well. The well reached a porous stratum and was thought to justify the expense of a larger and deeper well. Difficulty and de- lay were experienced in the drilling, but by August, 1905, two wells, one eight-inch and one twelve-inch, put down at the side and near the original sink, had been completed. Two other wells were started and abandoned owing to the difficulties in drilling. The two successful wells were running at full capacity. It was thought probable that the two wells already put down would prove suffi- cient. Heavy rains followed, and by January, 1906, a considerable area, including some cultivated ground, was flooded, practically all county roads leading into Orlando from the east were partly un- der water and impassable. The colored settlement known as Jones- town in the suburbs of Orlando was partly under water and unin- habitable; the water was approaching the city of Orlando itself and the situation was becoming alarming. Levels taken by the county authorities indicated that drainage through surface canals was im- possible or impracticable. Two additional twelve-inch wells were bored in November and December of 1906. The effect of these- was evident at once, the lake beginning to fall. By February a third twelve-inch well had been completed, making in all one eight- 72 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. inch well and four twelve-inch wells running at this time. By the end of March the water had returned practically to its normal level and has since been kept under control. "Four of these drainage wells are located near the original sink and have a uniform depth of 140 feet, a cavity several feet in diameter having been reached at that depth. The fifth well is lo- cated one-half mile west of the sink, and terminates- in a porous stratum at a depth of 340 feet." Since the completion of these wells by the city a number of other drainage wells have been put down by individuals, used largely to reclaim trucking and farming lands. One of these drainage wells near Orlando developed recently the unusual phenomenon of spouting. The well is located three miles north of Orlando on land belonging to Charles T. Myers. It was drilled in 1907 jointly by Mr. Myers and Messrs. McNeal and Davis, the latter gentlemen having the property leased for farming purposes. The well is twelve inches in diameter and has a total depth of 260 feet, and is cased 60 feet. It is located at the edge of a small lake. The level of permanent underground water at this locality is 33 feet from the surface. Trucking is carried on around the border of the lake and the well is intended, by carrying off the surplus water, to prevent the lake from rising above a given level, since to do so would flood the farming land. The well is similar in character to the other drainage wells of this locality and, as in the case of most of the other wells, terminates in a cavity in the limestone. The well was first seen by the writer October 4, 1910. At this time the water-of the lake stood a few inches above the level of the pipe and the well was receiving water at much less than its full car- rying capacity. At intervals of a few minutes the well would re- verse itself and spout, throwing a column of water into the air. The spouting comes on gradually. First the well ceases to receive water and begins bubbling; the column of water follows rising with considerable force to a height of twenty feet or more above the surface, the spout occurring with tolerable regularity at intervals of four minutes. Mr. R. D. Unis, who has charge of the farm, states, however, that the intervals between spouts vary from two to fifteen minutes, being probably influenced by varying conditions under which the water enters the well. (P1. 9). Although drilled about three years ago and receiving water more or less constantly since that time the phenomenon of spout- ing developed for the first time on September 26, 1910o, the first spouting having occurred about eight o'clock on the morning of that SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. day. The well continued spouting without interruption for a little more than a week and until shut off by the owner. Various fanciful theories have been advanced to account for the spouting, including supposed occurrence of gas and oil, and the supposed influence of recently formed sinks in the interior of the State. The true explanation is evidently much more simple. At the present stage of the lake the well is receiving water at less than its full carrying capacity and as the water enters the vertical pipe it forms a suction carrying a large amount of air into the well, which doubtless collects in a chamber or cavity along the side or at the bottom of the well. As the well continues receiving water the air accumulates under pressure in this chamber until ulti- mately the pressure under which the air is confined is sufficient to overcome the weight of the overlying water and hence rushes out with considerable force carrying the column of water with it. The fact that the well when first drilled did not spout and afterwards began spouting doubtless indicates that the essential conditions were subsequently developed either by caving or by other changes in the underground conditions. The spouting of the well is therefore on the principle of the air- lift pump in which air under pressure is conveyed into the well through a special tube for that purpose and being liberated in the well lifts a column of water to the surface. In this spouting well, however, the air pressure is developed within the well. This well may, therefore, be classed as a self pumping well. When partly shut off so that only a limited amount of water enters, the air taken into the well is able to return to the surface freely. Under these conditions spouting ceases. It is probable that if an elbow is placed on the well, allowing the water to enter laterally instead of vertically, the amount of air taken into the well will be so far reduced that the spouting will cease. Likewise when the lake rises so that the water stands several feet above the top of the pipe entering the well it is to be expected that the spout- ing will cease, since the pipe will then be carrying water at its full capacity, and little or no air under these conditions entering the well.* The drainage wells are themselves remarkable and found in such perfection only under geological conditions similar to those existing in Florida. Of the many peculiarities of these wells, *Since the above was written very heavy rains attending the storm of October 17, I9xo, caused the lake to rise 18 or 2o inches, and Mr. Unis writes that when the water rose in the lake the well ceased spouting. A similar well at Albany, Georgia, is reported by McCallie. Science, XXIV, p. 694, 90o6. 74 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. however, that of spouting is certainly the most striking and re- markable. In considering the use of wells for drainage purposes the re- lation of the lake basin to the underground water level should first be definitely determined. The effectiveness of the well is re- duced as the water level is approached, and it is of course obvious that the water in the lake can in no case be carried below the under- ground water level. Many of the larger lake basins are known to lie very close to the water level. If the lake basin lies as low as the permanent water level it is obvious that the water in the lake can not be drained by wells, moreover since the effectiveness of the well is affected by the near approach to the water level, it is hardly prac- ticable to reduce the water in the lake quite to the permanent under- ground water level. It must also be borne in mind that while the un- derground water is a permanent supply the water level or water line is not stationary, but varies with the seasons. The amount of varia- tion for the locality concerned should be determined. The fact that a lake basin stands somewhat above the water line at the close of a long dry season is not proof that it will be found to stand above the water line after a season of heavy rainfall. In some sections of the state the range of variation of the water line has been found to be as much as ten feet, and may in some instances exceed that amount. The relation between the level of the lake basin and the under- ground water has been determined for a few of the lakes. Meas- urements of Alachua Lake were made in 1907 and again in 1909. When measured in October, 1907, the water level in Alachua Lake- was found to be 2.01 feet above the level of the underground water of the Vicksburg Limestone formation as determined from. the Gainesville City well.* When measured in November, 1909. the water in the sink stood approximately 1.4 feet above the water level in the limestone as indicated by the city well. At the time- these measurements were made the lake was at a low water stage. The underground water level was likewise at a low stage. From these measurements it appears that Alachua Lake during the dry seasons at least is lowered by natural drainage through the sink to or practically to the underground water level. During the rainy season the water in the lake doubtless rises above this level, although it must be borne in mind that the water line also rises during the rainy season. It is evident, therefore, that the difference between the water level in the lake and the underground water line is great- *For a record of this well, see Bull. No. I, pp. 30 and 88-89, 1908. SOME FLORIDA LAKES AND LAKE BASINS. est during the rainy season when the lake is receiving a large amount of surface drainage. Approximate measurements of the water level in Alligator Lake near Lake City have also been made. This is one of the smaller basins and the measurements indicate that the level of the water in the lake stands appreciably above the underground water level. In this instance the measurements of the water level and the lake level were made at different seasons of the year and the results can be only approximately compared. The data on this lake are as follows: Levels made by Professor N. H. Cox, on June 19, 1903, showed that the water in Alligator Lake stood 94.22 feet below the Union Depot at Lake City. The lake at the time the levels were made was at medium full stage. The water of the Lake City public well located near, and on about the same level as the depot was found at the time the well was completed in 1907 to stand 134 feet from the surface. Allowing for any correction that it might be necessary to make owing to the fact that the measurements of lake level and ground water level were not made at the same time it would still seem that the -lake basin in this instance stands somewhat above the water level. The drainage of this lake by wells should be possible pro- vided the underlying limestone at this locality proves to be suffi- ciently porous and cavernous to conduct water readily. SUMMARY. The basins of the temporary lakes have their origin in erosion by solution and by mechanical wash. Some of them appear to represent the enlarged valleys of what was originally a small stream. Sinks form along these streams diverting the course of the water into the underlying limestones. Other basins originate from sinks in no way connected with stream valleys. The origin of the sink was due primarily to solution in the limestone. After the sink is formed the general level of the surrounding area is low- ered somewhat by mechanical wash, the material being carried into the sink. Subsequently other sinks form in the immediate vicinity. The formation of these new sinks is due also to solution. The large amount of water which entered the limestone from the first sink facilitates solution and results in the formation of additional sinks. The continuance of this process through a long period of time re- sults in the development of the large basins occupied by these lakes. From their manner of development it follows that the steepest bluffs as a rule are those immediately facing the active sinks. Likewise for reasons already given new sinks occur most frequently in the area immediately surrounding the active sink. T7 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. It is doubtless true that some of the lakes, especially the smaller ones, could be drained by surface ditching. Any attempt at drainage should be preceded, however, by the preparation of a *carefully made topographic map of the region, or at least suffi- cient exact leveling should be made to determine definitely the rela- tion of the lake basin to the proposed outlet, and to the intervening country. While some of these lakes can be drained by bored wells it is not to be assumed that all can be so drained. As has been shown some of these lake basins, especially the larger ones, have been low - ered by solution practically to the permanent underground water level. Before attempting drainage by wells definite data should be obtained as to the relation between the level of the lake basin and the underground water level of that locality. This information can often be obtained by running a line of levels from the lake to a near by deep well and comparing the level of water in the lake with the level at which the water stands in the well. If necessary, test wells may be drilled before undertaking large wells. Such lakes as have been lowered by natural drainage actually to the under- ground water level can of course be lowered no further by wells TESIAN WATER SUPPLY OF FLORIDA BY E. H. SELLARDS AND HERMAN GUNTER. THE AF EASTERN I _ _____.. CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction ......................................... .... ......... 85 The area treated ..................................................... 86 Geology ...................... ....... .................................... 86 Oligocene ........................................... ................. 86 Vicksburg group .................. ....................... ........... 86 Apalachicola group ................ ......................... 88 Miocene ........................................................... 89 Pliocene ....................................................... go Pleistocene ...... ................................................. 9 Earth movements during the Pleistocene .............................. 91 Topography and Drainage ............................................. 92 Elevations ....................................... .................... 92 Rivers ................. . .. ... ........ ....... ..................... 92 The Lake Region.............. .................................. 93 Clim ate .................................. ........ ..................... .. 94 Temperature ....................................... ..... ....... 94 Precipitation .......................................... ....... 95 Soils ......................................... ... ...... . 96 General discussion of underground waters ............................ 99 Source ..................................... ........ ... ......... 99 Annual rainfall ................. ......... ............ ..... Disposition of rainfall .......................................... .... aoo Amount available for the underground supply....................... o02 Underground circulation of water..................................... 102 Cause of movement......... ....................................... 102 Rate of movement................................................. 102 Depth of underground water ........................................ 102 Hydrogen sulphide in underground water.............................. 104 Sulphur water not evidence of beds of sulphur....................... 1o6 Sulphur deposits formed from hydrogen sulphide..................... 106 Absence of hydrogen sulphide from certain waters in Florida........... o6 Amount of hydrogen sulphide influenced by pressure.................. T07 Artesian water .................... ... .... ............. ................ 107 Artesian water defined.................................... ........ 107 Conditions necessary to retain artesian water.......................... 108 Artesian basin .................... ................................. o8 Artesian slope ............................................... Io Artesiam water from unconfined horizontal beds ...................... Io Artesian water from solution passages.............................. III Source of artesian water in Florida.................................. II Formations supplying artesian water.................. .............. 112 Depth of artesian water ............................................. 112 Cost of wells ..................................... .... ......... 2 Increased flow with increased depth ................................ 113 Increased head with increased depth.................................. 113 Increased temperature with increased depth............................. 114 Loss of head and reduction in flow.................................... 115 Cause of the loss of flow ........................... .............. ix6 CONTENTS.-(Continued.) PAGE Table showing loss of flow of artesian wells .......................... 117 Waste of artesian water......................... ........... ri8 Method of measuring flow of artesian wells ............................ t Tables for determining yield of artesian wells...................... 12 Area of artesian flow in Florida .................... .... ........ 122 Discussion by counties ............. ............... .... ....... 125 N assau County ................. ................. ................ 126 Location and surface features .......................... ........... 126 Water-bearing formations ..................................... 126 Area of artesian flow........... ................................ 128 Local details ................ ................................... 128 Callahan ................... .................. ............ 128 Crandall ............ .............................. 130 Evergreen .................. ........... ............... ..o Fernandina ..................................... .. ...... 3 Hilliard ................................ .. ..... ......... r33 Italia .............. ....................... .. ...... .. 133 King's Ferry ................................... ... . 33 Lessie ............ ... ..... ............... .... .... :33 Lofton .... ...................................... 133 Duval County .................. ... ..... .................... 135 Location and surface features ............. .. .............. .. 135 Water-bearing formations ...................................... 136 Area of artesian flow....................... ............ 137 Local details .......................... ........................ T .. Baldwin ......................... .. .... ..................... 138 Bayard ..... ................................................ 133 Jacksonville ............................. ................... ri Mandarin .. ........... ... .............................. 141 Maxville....... ..... .................................. 41 St. Johns County......................... .... ..................... 141 Location and surface features ............ .................. 1. Water-bearing formations .......... .... .................... 142 Area of artesian flow ... ............ ..... ... .......... 144 Local details ................. ..... ...... .................... 144 Anastasia Island ................................. .... 144 Armstrong ............ ........................................ 144 Bunnell ............................... ............. 1r44 Dinner Island ...................... ....................... 145 Elkton ........... ........... ............ .... .... ..... 145 Espanola ... .............. ....... ..................... 145 Federal Point ................. ............................. 145 Hastings.. ............. .......................................... 146 Holy Branch ...................... .. ........ .............. 147 Hurds ........... ............. ........................ 148 Moultrie ... .............. ... .... .. ....................... 148 Picolata ................ ......... . ....... ... ............ 148 Riverdale .............. ..... ................. ............ 149 Roy .................. .... ............... ............... 50 St. Augustine. ..................... ....... ... ... ... ....... 150 Switzerland ............. ..................... ... ....... 152 CONTENTS.--(Continued.) PAGE Yelvington ............................... ............. 153 Clay County ... ............. ...... ............. .......... ..... I53 Location and surface features ....................... ....... .. 153 Water-bearing formations ..................................... 154 Area of artesian flow ............ ... . .................. ........ 154 Local details ........................................................ 156 Doctors Inlet ................... ................... ............. 56 Green Cove Springs ...................... ............... ....... 156 H ibernia ................. ..................... ..... .... ....... 157 Leno ............. .. ........................................ 158 M agnolia Springs ................................ ....... .. .. ... 158 Middleburg .......................... .......... ........... 15 Peoria ............................. .. ........... .. 159 Russell .................... .. ............... .. .... .......... 16 Walkill ...................... ............. .............. 6o West Tocoi .................... ................... 6o Williams Crossing ............................................ 16o Putnarp County ...................................................... 160 Location and surface features ....................................... i6o Water-bearing formations .......................................... 61 Area of artesian flow ............................................... 161 Local details ........................................................ 161 Bostwick .................................................. 161 Crescent City .................................................. .52 Orange Mills ................................................... 162 Palatka ............................................. .... 163 Penial ...................................................... 16 Rice Creek ....................................................... 16 Rodman ........................................................... 16 San Mateo ...................................................... 165 Satsuma .................................... ................... 166 Welaka .................................................... 166 Woodburn ................ ................................ 67 Orange County ................. .................... ...... ... ..... 107 Location and surface features ....................................... 167 Water-bearing formations ................ ........................ )6U Area of artesian flow ................ ............................. 168 Local details ..................................... ............. .... 168 Chuluota .............. ...... ...... .................. ........ 168 Geneva ................ ..................... ........... 168 Orlando ........................ ....................... 69 O viedo .............. ..................................... 170 Sanford ............... ... ........... ..... ................ 170 Volusia County ................ ................. .... ...... ....... 174 Location and surface features........................... ......... 174 Water-bearing formations ........................................ 174 Area of artesian flow............................................... 175 Local details ................................................ 175 Daytona .............................................. 175 DeLand .................................................. 176 Enterprise ....................................................... 177 CONTINTS.-(Continued.) PAGE Lake Helen ................ ......................... ......... 178 N ew Sm yrna ..... ....... ....... .................. ............ 179 Oak Hill .......... ........................ ...... ............. 179 Orange City ............ ... ........................... 80 Ormond ............. ................................ ........... i8o Pierson ..... ........... ............. ..... ......... 181 Seville ........................................ ..... ........ 18r Brevard County ................ .. ..... ............. ............. 182 Location and surface features ................................... 182 Water-bearing formations .............. ........................ 182 Area of artesian flow ............................................ 182 Local details .......... .... ........... ...................... 183 Chester Shoals ............... ................... .......... 183 City Point ............. ........... ......... ..... ........ 183 Cocoa ............. ................... ......... .......... 184 Eau Gallic .................. ............................. 185 Frontenac ......................................... 85 G rant ................ ... ........ ....... ..... 186 Malabar ......... .............................. ........ 186 Melbourne .......................................... 86 M erritts Island ................. .. ........................... 188 RMio ..c................... ....... ......................... 189 Sharpesdge ................ .......................... ........ 190 Shares ............. ........................................ zgo Tillman ................. ......................... 191 T itusville ........................................................ I91 Valkaria ..................................... ........ 192 St. Lucie County .............. ...................... ............... 192 Location and surface features .................. ................... 192 W ater-bearing formations ................... .......... ... .... 193 Area of artesian flow............................................. 193 Local details.............. ........................... ........... 193 Eden ................................. . .......... 93 Ft. Pierce ......................................... .. ......... I93 Narrows .......... ............................ ..... 19 Orchid ................................ ............. ........ .. 194 SRoseland ............. ................. ....... ......... 194 Sebastian ........... ....... ................................ 195 ILLUSTRATIONS. PLATE No. FOLLOWING PAGi 10. Fig. i. Exposure of hardpan at Black Bluff on Clark's Creek, eight miles from Fernandina....................... Fig. 2. Artesian well used for power, Melbourne, in Brevard County ......................................... 88 II. Fig. r. Palmetto flatwoods, Amelia Island..................... Fig. 2. Palmetto flatwoods, Ft. Myers ......................... 6 12. Fig. I. Scrub, east side of Lake Kingsley, Clay County.......... Fig. 2. Sandy pineland, DeLeon Springs...................... Fig. 3. Open flatwoods, three miles east of DeLeon Springs...... 96 13. Fig. r. Everglades west of Ft. Lauderdale................... Fig. 2. Small prairie, four miles west of Sebastian............. Fig. 3. Turnbull Hammock, one mile west of Daytona.......... 96 14. Fig. x. Sand dune near Mayport ......................... Fig. 2. Ancient sand dune, two miles west of Daytona........... Fig. 3. Exposure at Saw Pit landing, St. Marys River........ 96 15- Map showing areas of artesian flow in Florida .................. 22 TEXT FIGURES. Fig. 6. A rtesian basin .................... .................... .... o Fig. 7. Artesian slope ........................ ................. .... o Fig. 8. Artesian flow from unconfined horizontal strata................. I Fig. 9. Artesian flow from cavities in limestohe..................... II Fig. 1o. Method of measuring artesian flow ............................ 9 Fig. II. Map of flowing area of Nassau and Duval Counties................ 135 Fig. 12. Map of flowing area of St. Johns County ....................... 43 Fig. 13. Map of flowing area of Clay and Putnam Counties............. 155 Fig. 14. Map of flowing area of Orange County ........................ 167 Fig. 15. Flowing well on Lake Jessup, Orange County .................... 172 Fig. 16. Map of flowing area of Volusia County .............. ....... 175 THE ARTESIAN WATER SUPPLY OF EASTERN FLORIDA E. H. SELLARDS AND HERMAN GUNTER. INTRODUCTION. A study of the water supply of Florida was begun in 1907 as co-operative work between the Florida State Geological Survey and the National Geological Survey. The first paper was issued in I908 as Bulletin No. I of the Florida State Geological Survey, and relates to the underground water of central Florida. This paper, the second of the series to be published by the State Survey, extends the study of the water supply to the counties of eastern Florida. The writers are indebted tcd the many well drillers and well owners who have contributed data regarding wells. Among the many who have given assistance the following should be especially mentioned: Messrs. Bellough & Melton, J. M. Chambers, C. I. Cragin, Dr. E. S. Crill, Capt. R. N. Ellis, Hughes Specialty Well Drilling Co., W. E. Holmes, John McAllister, Dr. J. N. Mac Gonigle, McGuire & McDonald, W. J. Nesbitt, Hugh Partridge. H. Walker. Dr. De Witt Webb, J. W. Wiggins, H. Van Dorn and W. D. Holcomb. Extensive well records made in 1907-1908 in cooperation with the U. S. Geological Survey by Messrs. Geo. C. Matson and F. G. Clapp have been utilized in the preparation of this report. Data regarding climate and rainfall have been sup- plied by Hon. A. J. Mitchell, Director of the Florida section of the U. S. Weather Bureau. Most of the analyses included have been made in the office of the State Chemist especially for this report. Others have been made at various times by other chemists. Credit is given with each analysis. The general discussion and introductory chapters of this paper were written by the senior author. The account of the public, city and private supplies and of individual wells was written chiefly by the junior author. 8s FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. THE AREA TREATED. The area considered in detail in this report includes the follow- ing counties: Nassau, Duval, Clay, St. Johns, Putnam, Volusia. Orange, Brevard and St. Lucie. This section borders the Atlantic Coast for a distance of 250 miles, and comprises the princi- pal artesian area of the east coast. While central Florida, described in the preceding paper on water supply* is prevailingly a limestone country, having limestone for- mations at or near the surface, this eastern section of the State is prevailingly a section free from limestones. These differences, due primarily to differences in geologic structure, have given rise to marked differences in the topography, drainage, soils and water supply of the two sections. GEOLOGY. A knowledge of the geologic structure is essential to a clear understanding of the underground water conditions. The prevail- ingly level country of East Florida renders geologic observations difficult. Some favorable exposures occur, however, and these together with data obtained from well samples and well records permit a reasonably full understanding of the structure of this part of the State. The geologic periods in eastern Florida in the order of occur- rence are: Oligocene, Miocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene. Of these divisions the Oligocene is the oldest; the Pleistocene the most recent. OLIGOCENE. VICKSBURG GROUP. The oldest or deepest formations reached in well drilling ii eastern Florida are the Vicksburg limestones. The Vicksburg is an extensive deposit underlying all of Florida and extending into adjacent states. In central peninsular Florida from Columb-a to Sumter Counties, as described in the preceding paper on water supply, these limestones are frequently exposed at the surface. Passing to the east from central Florida they dip beneath the surface and while nowhere exposed at the surface in eastern Florida, are reached by all deeper wells. It is in fact from these limestones that the principal water supply of eastern Florida is obtained. *Fla. State Gc:l. Surv. ull. No. i, 1908. THE ARTESIAN WATER SUPPLY OF EASTERN FLORIDA. The Vicksburg is very characteristic in appearance and structure, and when once seen is not likely to be mistaken for any other for- mation in this part of the State. The first one or two hundred feet is of light color. This limestone as seen in well samples has a granu- lar appearance and may contain many small shells. This phase of the limestone is frequently spoken of by the drillers as the "coral" formation. As a matter of fact, however, the formation contains relatively few corals. After passing through this limestone one or two hundred feet a more compact limestone is encountered. This part of the formation often has a slightly pinkish cast, the rock being very hard, and the drilling difficult. While these are the general characteristics of the Vicksburg, yet its texture is not uniform. Hard layers usually alternate with soft layers, the water supply as a rule increasing as each hard layer is penetrated. Not infrequently masses of flint are found imbedded in the limestone which in some instances have given much difficulty in drilling. While, as already stated, the Vicksburg limestones dip on pass- ing to the east approaching the Atlantic, yet the dip is not uniform and the depth at which it is encountered varies from place to place. In the wells at Jacksonville the Vicksburg is reached at a depth of from 500 to 525 feet. At Callahan and at Fernandina in Nassau County, although no samples have been obtained, the Vicksburg is believed, from well records, to be reached at about the same depth as at Jacksonville. Along the St. Johns River the Vicksburg maintains a similar depth for some distance. At Ortega, seven m'les south of Jack- sonville, the limestone was reached at a depth of about 500 feet. At Magnolia Springs, and Green Cove Springs, thirty miles south of Jacksonville, and on Black Creek, while no well samples were ob- tained, the Vicksburg is believed from well records to occur at :t depth of from 325 to 400 feet. Passing to the south the Vicksburg lies nearer the surface. Samples of drillings from wells at St. Augustine and at Hast'ngs in St. Johns County and at Orange Mills in Putnam County show that the Vicksburg in this section lies at a depth of 13o to 225 feet, the greater depth being at St. Augustine and the minimum depth at Orange Mills. Passing to the south the Vicksburg lies, so far as well records indicate, at a fairly uniform level for a dis- tance of 150 miles. At Sanford, 75 miles south of Orange Mill's. the Vicksburg is reached at a depth of from 113 to.125 feet. At Daytona, although samples are lacking, the depth of this formation is believed, judging from well records, not to ex- ceed 150 feet. At Cocoa the Vicksburg is reached at a depth not 88 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. exceeding 190 feet, while at Melbourne Beach, 150 miles south of St. Augustine, its depth in one well was found to be 221 feet. Passing to the south from this point the Vicksburg dips rapidly. At Palm Beach, Ioo miles farther south, this limestone was reach- ed at a depth of approximately I,ooo feet, *a dip of about 750 feet in 1oo miles or 7Y2 feet per mile. The Vicksburg was not reached in a well 700 feet deep drilled by the Florida East Coast Railway Company at Marathon Key, 175 miles south of Palm Beach.t At Key West, however, the formation is believed to have been reached at a depth of 700 feet.f It is thus seen that the Vicksburg forms a broad arch extending from central Florida to the Atlantic Ocean. St. Augustine lies near the north slope of this arch, while Melbourne, as nearly as can be determined, lies near the south slope. On either side of the arch the limestone dips at a moderate rate. On the north side of the arch the maximum depth recorded in Florida is 500 feet. Passing to the south a maximum of approximately I,ooo feet is recorded at Palm Beach. While the occurrence of this formation is thus known in a general way the data are as yet imperfect. In view of the importance of the Vicksburg as an artesian water reservoir the depth at which it is to be expected is a matter of very great importance and it is to be hoped that well drillers will find it possible to keep accurately labeled well samples in order to determine more definitely the distribution of this formation. APALACHICOLA GROUP. The Apalachicola group of formations is of a much less uniform character than the Vicksburg and is also of less importance in connection with the water supply. A full description of this group of formations will be found in the preceding Annual Report of this Survey, pp. 67-106. The formations which make up the Apalachicola group include the Chattahoochee and Alum Bluff formations, well exposed along the Apalachicola River; the Hawthorne formation in central Flor- Sida; and the Tampa formation in southern Florida. The relative position of three of these, the Chattahoochee, the Hawthorne and the Tampa formations has not been definitely determined, and they may be largely contemporaneous. The Alum Bluff formation lies above the Chattahoochee formation. The limestone of this group consists largely of impure clayey material which upon decay *Darton, N. H.; Amer. Journ. Sci. (3) XLI, p. 105-6. 189i. tFlorida Geol. Survey. SecondAnnual Report, p. 206, 9gog. tHovey, E. O. Mus. Comp. Zool. Bull. XXVIII, pp. 65-91, 1896. THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. PL. 10. Fig. i.-Exposure of hardpan along Black Bluff on Clarks Creek, eight miles from Fernandina. Fig. 2.-Artesian well used for power belonging to H. T. Bowden, Mel- bourne, Brevard County. The water from the artesian well affords power by which water is pumped from a near-by shallow well. Digitized by Coogle FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. THE ARTESIAN WATER SUPPLY OF EASTERN FLORIDA. weathers to a sticky blue clay. The Chattahoochee Limestone Is difficult to recognize in well samples. Fossils in this formation are comparatively rare and such as occur are preserved as casts and are largely destroyed in drilling. In surface exposures it may be recog- nized by its lithologic characters and by the characteristic cubical blocks into which some of the strata break upon exposure. The Apalachicola group has not been recognized from well drillings in East Florida. Clays taken by Mr. S. L. Hughes from the new city well at Jacksonville at the depth of 320 feet have a very close resemblance to the fullers earth clays which occur in the Apalachicola group above the Chattahoochee Limestone. Onr the other hand Matson obtained from Jacksonville a Miocene shark's tooth from a well sample supposed to come from the depth of 496 feet. In order to determine more fully the area and extent of the Apalachicola group of formations in eastern Florida it will be necessary to obtain large and carefully collected well samples. The wide distribution of this group in West and South Florida leads one to believe that it is likely to occur very generally underlying Eas; Florida. MIOCENE. The Miocene deposits are well developed in eastern Florida. At the city water works at Jacksonville this formation was encountered in excavating for the basin for the city water supply,* and was also reached in the city wells at a depth of from 35 to 36 feet. At Jacksonville this formation has a considerable, although un- determined, thickness. It consists of a buff limestone grading to a lighter color, more or less phosphatic, grading below to phosphatic sands and sandy marls. The formation is in places fossiliferous. although the shells are usually preserved as casts. In Clay County the Jacksonville formation is extensively ex- posed along Black Creek. The exposure of this fo nation appears along both the south and north fork, of Black Creek some miles above Middleburg, and may be observed for five or six miles below Middleburg. The following section was observed at High Bluff. on the south fork of Black Creek about five miles above Middle- burg: *Dall, W. H., U. S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 84, 124-125, 1892. J90 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-THIRD ANNUAL REPORT. Covered and sloping ................ ..................... 5 feet Sloping, some sticky clay exposed ..... ................. 5 feet Yellow sand ................. ............. .. ........ 8 feet Buff colored sandy limestone, containing a small proportion of black phosphatic pebbles ....................... ........ 12 feet Same, with greater amount of phosphate ...,.................. 5 feet Same, with some phosphate ............ ..... .. ...........12 feet This is the thickest exposure of the Jacksonville formation ob- served at any one place along Black Creek. The following section was observed in the pit of the Jackson- ville Brick Company two miles southwest of Jacksonville: Incoherent sand and soil.................... ....... ...... 2.4 feet Sandy clays, the top 5 or 6 feet oxidized yellow. .............6 feet Bluish fossiliferous marl .......... .... ............... 4 feet Beneath this marl as shown by numerous well drillings the sandy limestones of the Jacksonville formation occur. Miocene deposits in Florida were first recognized by Dr. E. A. Smith,* at Rock Springs in the northwestern part of Orange County. The limestone exposed here is a light sandy fossiliferous limestone and is probably of the Jacksonville formation. PLIOCENE. Pliocene is known to occur in eastern Florida, although the extent and distribution of the deposits have been but imperfectly determined. The shell deposits of this period occurring in the St. Johns valley and along the east coast have been described' by Messrs. Matson and Clapp.t Localities mentioned by them are Nashua on the St. Johns River in Putman County and at DeLand ;and near Daytona in Volusia County. Other localities at which these deposits were observed to be exposed are one-half mile above the Atlantic Coast Line bridge over the St. Johns River in Putnam County; on the east side of the St. Johns River about five miles north of the Atlantic Coast Line bridge in Volusia County. Plio- cene beds were also recognized from a well near Kissimmee. From the exposures thus recognized it is evident that Pliocene beds under- lie a considerable area of eastern Florida. SirM;tlh. E. A, On the Geology of Florida. Amer. Journ. sci. 3d Ser., V 1. XXI, pp. 302-303. lla (l;-. Snrv. S c. Ann. Rpt.. pp. 12 7133. 1 (Q09. THE ARTESIAN WATER SUPPLY OF EASTERN FLORIDA. PLEISTOCENE. The marine Pleistocene deposits have been recognized at several localities in eastern Florida. Messrs. Matson and Clapp obtained collections from Eau Gallie, Titusville and Minis in Brevard County. It 'is probable that marine Pleistocene shell deposits are somewhat widely distributed along the east coast and perhaps in the St. Johns River valley. Here again satisfactory determination can be made only from large and carefully kept samples obtained in well'drill- ing. The coquina rock which occurs extensively at St. Augustine and extends along the coast to the south for 250 miles, is also to be placed with the Pleistocene. Some of the older sand dunes of the east coast also probably belong to the Pleistocene. EARTH MOVEMENTS DURING THE PLEISTOCENE. Changes in the relation of land and water have occurred recently along the east coast, probably during Pleistocene time. The best evidence of these changes is that offered by the sand dunes and the coquina rock bordering the east coast: The line of sand dunes along the coast is well developed and largely continuous. From Daytona south these dunes occur, not on the present beach, but back from the beach a variable distance depending upon the configura- tion of the country. At Daytona the sand dune lies back from the Halifax River about two miles. From Daytona to Titusville the dunes are to be seen lying mostly to the west of the East Coast Railroad at a distance of one or two miles from the coast. At Titusville -the dunes lie back from the Indian River two to two and one-half miles. At Rockledge the dunes approach closer to the coast. They recede again, however, to the south and at no place directly face the ocean. The dunes are now quiescent and are covered with a thick growth of trees indicating that they have been undisturbed for a long time. In the same way the coquina rock, found facing the ocean at. Anastasia Island in St Johns County, falls back from the coast to the south extending at places a few miles inland. The presence of this ledge of coquina rock bordering the coast together with the sand dunes lying back clearly indicates that the land level formerly stood lower than at present, the coquina rock and sand dunes having accumulated along what was then the beach. Conrad as early as 1846 noted the occurrence of marine shell, of post-Pliocene age along the bank of the St. Johns River at ani elevation of from ten to fifteen feet above the present high tide. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 51 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |