This item is only available as the following downloads:
Fruin Mini Grant Application Packet Fall 2013 ( PDF )
Fruin Mini Grant Answers to GMC Questions Fall 2013 ( PDF )
Christine Fruin: 1) Could you revise the coversheet to include the funding amount requested? The original cover sheet has been amended to reflect our requested budget of $5000. 2) What faculty will be surveyed (January 2014)? Our project team represents includes liaisons to the Colleges of Journalism, Liberal Arts and Sciences, Medicine, and IFAS. Faculty in these colleges represent a cross section of disciplines in the humanities, social science, natural sciences and life sciences, and liaisons will call upon their contacts within these colleges for survey completion. The library liaisons will use this project as an opportunity to reach out to faculty within their subject assignments whom they have not had regular contact with. The presumption is that regular contacts are already aware of and users of the IR. Project team members will have to identify new contacts who are likely unaware of or not current users of the IR. These new contacts will not only serve as survey recipients but will also likely be the subjects of the user testing. Our hope is to identify 30 faculty members for this part of the project. We may also solicit additional survey and user testing participants by posting a public survey link on the Librarys home page. 3) How will you choose a cross section of UF faculty? This question has been answered in my response to #2 above. 4) What increase does the target rate 600 in 6 months represent over current contribution rates? I have requested data from the IR Coordinator Christy Shorey about the average monthly deposits into the IR that are not ETDs or library related uploads but that data has not yet been produced. We estimate that our marketing efforts will inspire at least 60 new faculty participants to deposit 10 new items each into the IR in the 6 months following release of the infographic and videographic. 5) How might you include Christy Shorey in your project? At the time the mini grant proposal was submitted, a hiring decision on the position of IR Coordinator had not been publicly announced. Now that Christy has been officially hired into this position, the project proposal has been shared with her and her supervisor, Lois Widmer. Their consent to participation and the estimated cost share for Christys time are attached. 6) If you choose a bidder who has bid over $5,000, what will be the source for the additional funds? The project team has met and ranked the bids that were submitted. Our first two choices came in under the $5000 budget maximum. In the event we had to work with someone who had bid over $5000 we would ask that they revise their bid to come within our budget. 7) Are you going to count the number of uploaded videos to the UF Libraries streaming video server in your assessment? Success of this project will be measured by comparing the number of scholarly works deposited by faculty into the IR in the 6 months following dissemination of the final versions of the infographic and videographic. We hope to see an increase in the number of items deposited as a result of this marketing
initiative. Another measurement of success will be the number of views or hits each of the graphics receive in the 6 months following their public dissemination. 8) Have you determined how the graphic video will be uploaded? The video will be either hosted on the UF Libraries YouTube page and in the UFDC. The finished video will be produced in a format that is workable with existing technology.
1 Fruin A Graphical Approach to Marketing the Institutional Repository at the University of Florida Project Proposal and Budget Narrative A. Project Description This project proposal seeks $5000 to support the creation of two graphical marketing devices to promote the Institutional Repository at the University of Florida (IR@UF). Through development and dissemination of these new graphic marketing devices, A Graphical Approach to Marketing the IR@UF will endeavor to reach new contributors to the IR@UF, educate the UF faculty about the many benefits of contributing their scholarly works to the IR@UF, and foster further communications with faculty about issues such as authors rights and open access. Since the IR@UFs launch in 2006, no formal marketing plan has been developed for its promotion. Rather, its advertisement and exposure has been limited to a simple brochure, web site mentions, and word of mouth. This project will be completed in multiple steps as detailed in Part E of this proposal. The two graphical marketing devices that will be completed by the conclusion of the project are an infographic1 and a videographic2. The project will entail surveying faculty from various disciplines about their usage, perception, and value of the IR@UF; development of concepts and sharing of perspectives to inform the development an infographic and a videographic about the IR@UF; consultation and collaboration with a professional graphic designer in the design and drafting of an infographic and videographic; and testing of the infographic and videographic with faculty from various disciplines, including the humanities, social sciences, natural sciences and medicine with feedback informing the final versions of the infographic and videographic. The final versions of the two graphics will be distributed through various channels as determined by a dissemination plan to be developed by the project team. A creative brainstorming session was held in September 2013 with prospective project team members and other library faculty and staff to facilitate development of this proposal. The results of the brainstorming session can be viewed in Appendix A. The importance of the IR@UF and the need to better inform UF faculty of its importance and function in the larger realm of scholarly communication resonated with several attendees as evidenced by the collected responses. Further, a Bid Request for Creative Services was drafted and submitted to various graphic design professionals in the Gainesville area. The Bid Request form is attached to this proposal as Appendix B. As of the date of this proposal, four bids have been submitted in response to the request and they have been attached to this proposal as Appendices C F. The project team will meet and review the bids and rank the bids according to preference while we await decision on this mini grant proposal. B. Project Importance Institutional repositories (IR) serve academic institutions by capturing and preserving the intellectual output of the universities. Faculty participating in their universitys IR realize numerous benefits from depositing their scholarly works and other materials into the repository. These benefits include, among other things, wider readership, increased impact, and early dissemination. Despite the benefits that it can deliver, the IR has not been readily adopted without the aid of promotional tools that target the needs of faculty. Many universities have adopted build it and they will come approaches to IR marketing. However, more active and dynamic marketing strategies are critical in communicating the 1 For examples of infographics, see ALAs Weathering the Storm ( http://www.ala.org/research/plfta s/2011_2012/weat heringthestorm ) or ARLs Fair Use ( http://www.arl.org/storage/ documents/publications/fair use infographic aug2013 letter format.pdf ) 2 For examples of videographics, see the whiteboard comics by RSA Animate ( http://www.thersa.org/events/rsaanimate ) or PhD Comics Open Access Explained video ( http://youtu.be/L5rVH1KGBCY )
2 Fruin value of the institutional repository. Since there is often competition for faculty attention, the marketing messages and vehicles must be creatively tailored to capture the reader/viewers attention in a way to increase the likelihood of eliciting the desired response, which is faculty participation in the IR.3 In a recent article on the importance of IRs, the president of BePress, an IR platform provider, states: The best way forward, and the best way for the university to reconnect with its core mission... is to rediscover the IR as a place for authors. This requires a new way of presenting it.4 The IR@UF not only benefits faculty and the University but also benefits the larger cause of scholarly publication reform. Participation in the IR@UF helps expand access to scholarly research, provides faculty with a means of managing copyright in their scholarly works, brings control over dissemination of the Universitys scholarly output back to the University, and brings heightened relevance to the mission and goal of the UF Libraries to produce, disseminate and preserve scholarly works. Further, a well populated IR serves as a tangible indicator of the Universitys scholarly productivity and helps to demonstrate the scientific, societal, and economic relevance of UFs research activities. By modifying the current approach to marketing the IR@UF to a more quick, creative, engaging and informative method, the project team increases the likelihood of faculty awareness, exploration and utilization of the IR. Since its launch in 2006, marketing of the IR@UF has largely depended upon a single brochure that is distributed at orientations and workshops and that has not been updated since 2006, a LibGuide ( http://guides.uflib.ufl.edu/ufir ), and word of mouth via library presentations. The content of these marketing devices primarily describe the content of the IR@UF and the steps for depositing content. However, after several years of this strategy, UF faculty still express a lack of awareness about and an understanding of the benefits of the IR@UF. Marketing strategies should change as an IR matures. During the early stages of IR development, marketing efforts typically focus on the mechanics of the IR, including software, policies, benefits, and processes for getting started with the service. But as the IR matures, marketing activities should shift to the development of resources intended to educate the university community on issues such as open access, copyright, and scholarly communication and to generate teachable moments which give rise to opportunities to talk about the IR within the context of larger issues facing academia.5 It is important that the direct benefits of participating in an IR are articulated clearly, emphatically, and often to engender faculty support.6 It is the project teams intention to create graphical campaign that achieves this purpose. C. Comparisons With Other Projects There are numerous articles in library science literature on the successes that individual campuses have had with respect to developing and marketing their IR. However, all of the case studies reviewed in preparation for this proposal submission involved the traditional methods of marketing (e.g. web sites, brochures, library liaison word of mouth) that already have been employed at the Libraries. A review of other universities or academic libraries IR marketing strategies has not revealed evidence of infographic or videographic vehicles for promoting the benefits of participating in IRs. Further, this proposal presents for the first time an iterative, multimedia marketing campaign to promote a service of the Libraries that benefits the entire spectrum of UF faculty. This project presents 3 Nancy Fried Foster and Susan Gibbons, Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories, D Lib Magazine 11, no. 1 (2005): 5 www.dlib.org/dlib/january 05/foster/01foster.html 4 Jean Gabriel Bankier and Irene Perciali, The Institutional Repository Rediscovered: What Can a University Do for Open Access Publishing? Serials Review, 34, no. 1 (2008): 22. 5 Marisa Ramirez and Michael Miller, Approaches to Marketing an Institutional Repository to Campus in The Institutional Repository: Benefits and Challenges, ed. by Pamela Bluh and Cindy Hepfer (2011): 32 33. 6 Raym Crow, The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper (2002): 22
3 Fruin an opportunity for librarians from multiple disciplines, including health sciences, humanities, and social sciences, and the faculty they serve to collaborate through user testing on a marketing project promoting a service of the Libraries. D. Resources Grant funds will be used to pay for the creative services provided by an outside professional graphic designer. Four bids have been submitted in response to the Bid Request for Creative Services. The bids range from $3500 5532. The PI will contribute an average of one hour of time per week during the grant period. The PI will serve as the subject expert on the benefit of the IR@UF to promotion of scholarly communication issues such as authors rights and open access. The PI will lead creation of the ideas to be expressed in the infographic and the script to accompany the videographic. The co PI will also contribute an average of one hour of time per week during the grant period. The co PI is the subject expert on marketing and communications and will lend her expertise to developing effective and creative marketing devices. Project team members will contribute an average of one hour cost share per week during the grant period. Project team members will provide expertise in user testing, completion of content (scripts) and videography as well as providing faculty contacts within multiple UF colleges. Project team members have also demonstrated knowledge of scholarly communications and the IR@UFs role in promoting scholarly communications. This expertise will be used to: develop and distribute the faculty survey based on current perceptions of the IR@UF; develop the concepts and content for the infographic and videographic, and facilitate user testing. E. Plan of Action TIMELINE Date Tas k Responsible Person November 2013 Finalize hiring of outside graphic designer PI Nov./Dec. 2013 Devise survey of faculty use and perceptions of the IR@UF and begin brainstorming concepts, style examples, and content for infographic/videographic Project Team January 2014 Distribute survey to faculty Project Team February 2014 Meet with Graphic Designer and share initial ideas about concepts, styles and content as well as faculty feedback from survey Project Team and Graphic Designer March 2014 Graphic Designer prepares and presents three initial sketches or drafts of infographic and solicits feedback from Project Team Project Team and Graphic Designer March 2014 Project Team solicits outside feedback from user groups on efficacy of infographic drafts and shares feedback with Graphic Designer Project Team April 2014 Create 2 script versions for videographic Project Team April 2014 Develop dissemination plan for infographic and videographic and seek user input on dissemination plan Project Team April 2014 Produce draft infographic and present to project team for feedback Graphic Designer and Project Team May 2014 Finalize infographic. Graphic Designer June 2014 Create 2 storyboard versions of videographic Graphic Designer June 2014 Review videographic storyboards and solicit feedback from users. Project Team July 2014 Modify and finalize videographic script Project Team July 2014 Provide final feedback on videographic to Graphic Designer Project Team August 2014 Produce draft videographic Graphic Designer
4 Fruin September 2014 Test videographic and provide feedback to Graphic Designer Project Team Sept/Oct 2014 Produce final version of videographic Graphic Designer Oct. 2014 Disseminate final versions of infographic and videographic Project Team F. Collections Not Applicable G. Assessment To measure the success of the project, the project team will conduct user testing of draft versions of the infographic and videographic. The project team intends to test the graphics on 20 persons representing a cross section of UF faculty. The results of user testing will inform the final products. Success of the dissemination of the final versions of the graphics will be measured through view counts of the infographic and videographic at the sites that they are posted. The project team anticipates that in the six months following dissemination of the final graphics, visual products will each receive 1,200 views. Success also will be measured through an increase in new items added to the IR@UF. The project team estimates that 600 new items will be deposited by UF faculty in the six months following dissemination of the final graphics. This estimate is based current views of uploaded videos by the Libraries to YouTube and current upload statistics for the IR. H. Dissemination A dissemination plan for delivering the final infographic and videographic will be developed during the grant period. The project team anticipates that the dissemination plan will involve printing poster sized versions of the infographic for display in all of the Libraries at UF as well as in the individual academic colleges. The videographic will be linked from the Libraries homepage and several LibGuides. Both graphics will be announced through the Libraries news feed, through the weekly faculty update, and through targeted emails. I. Financial Implications This project does not implicate any long term financial commitments. Grant funds support the one time creation of two graphical products; recurring monies are unnecessary to continue use of these graphics once they are completed. J. Equipment/Supplies The project team will not purchase any equipment or supplies that will need to be distributed at the end of the project. Existing equipment and supplies will be utilized.
5 Fruin Budget Narrative Grant funds will be used to compensate a professional graphic designer who will assist in the design and production of the infographic and videographic. The project team solicited bids for the performance of these creative services and received the following four bids in response to the request (see Appendices C F for the full bid proposals): Morgan Boecher $4000 Tom Hart/SAW $3900 5450 Rachel Smith/neutral7 $5532 Anna Vittone $3500 The project team will be meeting to review the bids while awaiting decision on the proposal. The bids will be ranked for priority based on portfolio reviews and quality of bid responses. The PI will contribute an average of one hour of time per week during the grant period. The PI is the subject expert on the benefit of the IR@UF to promotion of scholarly communication issues such as authors rights and open access. The PI will lead creation of the ideas to be expressed in the infographic and the script to accompany the videographic. To satisfy the cost share requirement of this grant, the co PI and other members of the project team will contribute an average of one hour of time per week during the grant period. This equates to a cost share of $10,660. See the budget spreadsheet at Appendix I for a breakdown of individual cost share contributions. The co PI and project team members will be lending their expertise in the following capacities: Infographic Development Team: Barbara Hood, April Hines, Cindy Craig, and Graphic Designer Videographic Development Team: Barbara Hood, Shelley Arlen, April Hines, and Graphic Designer User Testing Team: Val Minson, Jennifer Lyon and Cindy Craig. **The PI will serve on all three teams.
6 Fruin Appendices A. Results of Creative Brainstorming Session B. Bid Request for Creative Services C. Bid from Morgan Boecher D. Bid from Tom Hart and the Sequential Artists Workshop E. Bid from Rachel Smith and neutral7 Design Group F. Bid from Anna Vittone G. Letter of Support from David Oppenheimer H. Letter of Support from Sophia Acord I. Budget Spreadsheet
Comments from Brainstorming Session Infographic Steps to Create Use online infographic builder piktochart.com Hire me (Morgan) Use graphic design software such as Adobe suite or open source software such as Gimp Hire a real illustrator or graphic designer Graphic design or marketing/advertising course project or contest for design Narrow the concepts Have an overall theme or image Infographic Considerations, Content, Style Most are too busy, static nature is a problem Posters humor, visual, to the point One infographic per issue One page only Stay on brand colors, personality copy Dont dumb it down too much Focus short scripts Humor is always good Easy to understand visuals to convent important information use symbols, metaphors Infographic Delivery, Distribution Brochures at Info Desk Post on Library website Print large posters and banners to post around campus Email to faculty and staff Post it everywhere elevators, faculty lounges, waiting rooms Faculty Update Infographic User testing Methods With classes Maria Rogal, Terry Harpold, Don Ault, etc. Get out of the library Focus group Videographic Steps to Create Script, examples, team, narrator (faculty), production folks, test in house Use Camtasia or Premier Pro Course project or contest for design
Videographic Considerations, Content, Style Should be a story, not a lecture Whimsical Fast paced Testimonies/testimonials Should have same branding/look as Infographic Story and outcome based Dont dumb it down too much Keep it short/brief Hire a real illustrator (like me, says Morgan in response!) Videographic User Testing Methods Work with student/faculty scholars with no open access knowledge what makes sense to them? Focus group Videographic Delivery, Distribution Professionally done Narrator = well known/liked faculty member UF Faculty Update On Website, LibGuide, UFL site Social media outlets Faculty and graduate student list serv Benefits Succeeds no matter what as outreach to faculty promoting awareness this is awesome! Reach larger audience Eye catching Get more faculty into IR Convey the benefits of OA but must openly confront risks, too Brevity Can convey the essence in a moment in a friendly approach Risks Over simplification Tenure and promotion pressures are real not perceived. There are A list journals, publishers, etc. Not that an open access journal cant make the A list Library loses credibility as objective Faculty see as threat to scholarly society funding
It will work! Using this format? Low risk Should not seem library centric Resources Barbara Hood Subject Liaisons Need a focus group tester group Leverage faculty senate Graphic design specialist Hire a professional designer/illustrator Why Do Scholars Deposit work in the IR? Reports Tenure impact factors Immediacy loving having a URL to point to Preservation Ease of CV support, share research, archive work, permanent reference Publish unpublished scholarly works Have your work/ideas out there Ability to get feedback on ideas before a final publication Ability to share raw data Stats of visits Why Dont Scholars Deposit in the IR? IR is library speak Not in their workflow for research Dont know enough about open access journals Libraries arent doing it Dont know it exists Seems complex, techie, time consuming Not in their thoughts of things to do; what are the benefits for them and their data If my work is already accessible, why would publishers still be interested they want to make money Dont understand what it is Time Dont understand the kinds of materials they can pu in IR to extend access posters, multimedia, white papers May interfere with future book contracts or publishing (have professors in humanities advocating not to contribute to IR or have thesis publics until book or journal published)
They think it will hinder other publication opportunities Emphasize keeping copyright ownership, accessible to colleagues internationally Dont know or think it is too much trouble A steep learning curve IR as separate from subject digital collections, viewed together is more successful Want to focus on own personal web sites Tenure impact factors Dont know about it. If so, dont know why it is a good idea Other ways to engage/inform scholars to deposit in the IR? Who should we be emulating? Work with subject liaisons for department workshop Video on how to deposit Emulate Wayne State University and Grand Valley State University Open Access Week UNT faculty send CV to IR assistant who checks and harvests Depositing in IR is potentially the way open access will succeed. Consider it an essential part Tap graduate students IR can count as publication help determine impact Harvard users email stuff to IR coordinator who does deposit Encourage assignments that publish student work in IR Examples of ones in IR being used in productive ways testimonials, examples of easy finding features Get to the grad students future faculty Encourage students to post thesis projects Make part of the formal project/thesis/dissertation submittal process Appeal to self interest testimonial Publicize OA award winners What else are you thinking regarding this project? Similar project style options to raise awareness with specifics journal editors group, with library supporting out of print faculty books, etc. Too broad ACRL roadshow Dont make it boring
Bid Request for Creative Services Bids are sought for performance of creative services to support an internal grant proposal by Christine Fruin (PI) and Barbara Hood (co PI) at the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida (Libraries) Project Summary The Institutional Repository at the University of Florida (IR@UF) is the open access digital archive of the scholarly output of the University of Floridas community of scholars, researchers, and students. Contribution of monographs, journal articles, dissertations, data, technical reports and more into the IR@UF by members of the University of Florida community not only preserves and showcases the Universitys intellectual output, but also increases the findability of their efforts by interested readers and researchers worldwide. The Libraries have endeavored to educate University of Florida faculty, staff and students about depositing their materials in the IR@UF through brochures, workshops, and web sites. However, participation is inconsistent across campus. This is due, in part, to lack of awareness of the IR@UFs existence; it is also due to confusion about the process for and the usage of deposited works. Therefore, in order to advertise the existence of the IR@UF and educate the UF community about its purpose and its usage, the PIs of this proposed grant endeavor to produce and test two creative and clever graphical instruments: an infographic and a videographic comic.1 The project team will consist of the Libraries Scholarly Communications Librarian (PI), the Libraries Director of Communications (co PI), librarians representing departments in the humanities, social sciences, natural sciences and health sciences who have expertise in user testing, instruction, and video creation, and a graphic artist who will provide the creative services outlined in this request. Members of the project team will collaborate on surveying University of Florida faculty about their perceptions of the IR@UF, on providing style/image and content examples to the graphic artist, on drafting a script for the videographic, and on soliciting and communicating appropriate feedback to the graphic artist in a timely manner. Work on the project will commence November 15, 2013 and end by approximately October 1, 2014. Summary of Creative Services Requested from the Graphic Artist Participate in meetings with project team Work collaboratively with co PI on design concepts Create 3 storyboards/sketches for infographic concepts Modify draft infographic based upon project team feedback Produce final version of infographic upon receipt of user testing feedback 1 For infographics examples, please see http://www.ala.org/research/plfta s/2011_2012/weatheringthestorm and http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/fair use infographic aug2013 letter format.pdf For examples of a videographic comic please see http://www.thersa.org/events/rsaanimate and http://www.phdcomics. com/comics.php?f=1533
Create 2 storyboards/sketches for videographic (finished video will be 2 3 minutes in length) Modify videographic draft upon receive of project team feedback Produce final videographic upon receipt of user testing feedback Response Requirements In submitting a response to this bid request, please include the following: Name, address, telephone number, and email address Brief statement (250 500 words) on why this project is of interest Work sample (please provide digital samples or links to web sites containing representative works) Budget request for provision of creative services (Note grants funded under this internal program have a maximum total budget of $5000) Bids should be submitted to Christine Fruin ( firstname.lastname@example.org ) by October 4, 2013. Questions may be directed to Christine Fruin at email@example.com or (352) 273 2710.
MORGAN R. BOECHER 1824 NW 5th Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32603 Tel: (352) 562-1032 | firstname.lastname@example.org Dear Ms. Fruin, I have been convinced of the merits of visual communication ever since childhood when reading Calvin and private organizations, I understand how words with pictures can add value by communicating ideas clearly and leaving lasting, emotional impressions. I want to be the graphic artist for the Smathers Libraries project of promoting the purpose and usage of the Institutional Repository at the University Designing communication materials for universities has been a part of my professional experience since 24-page alumni magazine at New College of Florida. Following that role, the Columbia University that promoted, advocated, and fundraised for the organization. My designs were used in mass e-mails to over 3,000 people, in print at high-level events, including the Gala, and in social media campaigns. As a freelance designer, a top priority is creating a product that aligns with what the client wants and the product improve. The IR@UF promotional project is exciting because it has the strength of a team disciplinary perspectives that I may translate into cohesive designs are creative havens. Whats Normal Anyway? got published after a successful crowdfunding campaign to which 163 readers contributed $5,666. Dozens of readers have sent messages appreciative of how the comic allowed them to understand the transgender experience. I want to bring this motivation and creativity to Smathers Libraries and continue Please visit http://www.behance.net/mboecher to view my portfolio. I am available for follow up at (352) 562-1032, at email@example.com 1824 NW 5th Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32603. Best regards, Morgan Boecher
MORGAN R. BOECHER 1824 NW 5th Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32603 Tel: (352) 562-1032 | firstname.lastname@example.org September 26, 2013 Dear Ms. Fruin, The cost of quality infographics and videographics range in the thousands of dollars, with revisions and extra meetings. Considering the limited budget for this project, I will design the infographic with one revision at $1,500 and the videographic with one revision at $2,500, with additional revisions costing $100 each. This $4,000 includes all of the work stated in the Summary of Creative Services Requested from the Graphic Artist. Best regards, Morgan Boecher
10/01/2013 Proposal for the Institutional Repository@UF Prepared by Tom Hart of Sequential Artists Workshop (SAW) PO Box 13077 Gainesville, FL 32604 718-687-7434 email@example.com Concept: Develop materials that will represent the Institutional Repository (IR)s mission in a lively and engaging wa y. Materials should speak to modern users, informing them of the IR and inviting them to become a part of the history and flow of information. Deliverables: One Infographic: a graphic design incorporating information, data and statistics about the IR that eng ages the potential users modern understanding and curiosit y about such quantitative and comparative ideas. Traditional work in this field lately have a clean vector look, inspired by airplane safety cards, but with a modern sensibility designed to look clean next to the vi sual noise of our day. The IR has provided examples that have inspired them. One Videographic: an animation no more than 3 minutes in length explaining the IR to web users a nd exciting them, through compelling narrative and lively drawings to engage with it. The IR has provided examples of these whiteboard ani mations that have inspired them. Concerns and ideas to be examined in meetings: The main concern is that the info graphic and videographic examples provided are two different styles, t he infographics being comprised of clean, vector-based, cold, id eograms and design. However the animations particular to the RSA-st yle of animations, white-board animations, explainer animations etc. are warm, cartoony, loose, etc.
To maximize budget and also brand/i nformation recognition, it might be advisable to condense into one cons istent style, using assets from one for the other as well. Infographic: Other questions about the infographic are: What data is going to be interesting to users (perhaps: stats of use, years in use, oldest images, most used asset, oldest text, most famous archive or contributor, comparison of UF to other institutions, context of IR in other digital collections, etc.) Animation: The main question, worth investigating, if its decided to use a White Board Animation, is to use the abbreviated software on the m arket, such as PowToon or Sparkol or to create a drawing live and film it, thus requiring proper lighting, photography, etc. Is it possible to have nongeneric while utilizing streamlin ing software? Another question we would ask: is this the best form for the story we want to tell? Perhaps it is. It is certainly popular form, is it possibly oversaturated? SAW Team: Tom Hart: Artist, chief anim ator and chief project manager. Justine Mara Andersen: Chief artist Sally Cantirino, Anna Mack: St udent artists and developers. Tom Hart has created interactive work with the Burson-Marsteller agency in New York City for severa l years. His most notable client was The United States Treasury duri ng their relaunch of the 20-dollar bill (and subsequent 10 and 5), fo r whom he created or co-created 3 online childrens games, a children s CD-Rom, several interactive instructional videos, a poster, and an animated instructional video. Much of this can be seen at www. moneyfactory.com. He also created works for The Dallas Water Depart ment, Entergy, Transitions Eyewear, and more. As a cartoonis t, he has created work for Mad Magazine, DC Comics, and more. His website, which doesnt feature
a lot of this commercial work is ht tp://www.tomhart.net Samples of animation and client work provided upon request. Justine Mara Andersen worked for ye ars as a main illustrator for Wizards of the Coast, creators of Dungeons and Dragons and Magic: The Gathering She also was inker for w ork in DC Comics such as Swamp Thing and The Invisibles Her illustration website is barefootjustine.com Students Sally Cantirino and Anna Mack are two of our best students, with excellent drawing and narrative skills. Budget and Pricing: Well work with you to keep the p roject to the budget of $5000. To this end, well use a combination of the senior team of Tom Hart and Justine Andersen and the junior team of Sally Cantirino and Anna Mack. We are envisioning a breakdown of the following services utilizing the structure of the bullet-poi nt template of the initial bid request: Infographic: Participate in meetings swith project team o Estimated at $175-$200 Work collaboratively with co-PI on design concepts o Estimated at $200-$350 Create 3 storyboards/sketche s for infographic concepts o Estimated at $350-$550 Modify draft infographic bas ed upon project team feedback o Estimated at $200-$350 Produce final version of infographi c upon receipt of user testing feedback o Estimated at $350-$500 Infographic Estimate: $1225-$1950 Participate in meetings with project team o Estimated at $175-$200 Work collaboratively with co-PI on design concepts o Estimated at $200-$350
Create 2 storyboards/sketches fo r videographic (finished video will be 2-3 minutes in length) o Estimated at $350-$500 Modify videographic draft u pon receive of project team feedback o Estimated at $200-$350 Produce final videographic upon receipt of user testing feedback o Estimated at $1500-$2000 Videographic Estimate: o $2625-$3400
1 www.neutral7.comIndex proposalUF George A. Smathers Libraries
2 www.neutral7.comIndexDear Christine, Please accept this proposal for the request for Creative Services. The attached proposal is a rough estimate based on the information provided in the RFP. The information was somewhat vague, so we would love to meet with your team to discuss the project in more detail and develop a process prior to the approval of the proposal. While we do not have many examples of illustrative work in our portfolio, we have a network of artists that we work with and we will line up an illustrator for this project to work collaboratively with the neutral7 and IR@UF team. At neutral7 we see ourselves as an extension of our clients marketing team and eorts. In taking on this project, the challenges described in the RFP for promoting awareness for the IR@UF will become our own collective goal. By creating a case study of this campaign, our team will become even more invested in its success. This will allow us to work out sections of the proposal to be pro bono to t your designated budget. Please review the information in this proposal for more information about our team and check out our work on neutral7.com. On behalf of the neutral7 team, thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information and/or documentation. Sincerely, Albey Coronel & the n7 team 2444 NE 1st Blvd, Ste 700 Gainesville, FL 32609 firstname.lastname@example.org 352.376.4221
3 www.neutral7.comIndex about neutral7neutral7 is the best source for all marketing, graphic design, web and printing projects. The one-stop brand management design studio leader since 2007. neutral7 design group redenes the way visual communication for businesses is conceptualized, designed, produced and delivered. By fostering the culture of collaboration and innovation we provide multiple creative services and products ranging from marketing strategy, graphic design for print and web, as well as printing in various formats, display and sign production, and a few other fun things between our clients visions and our imagination. Our team is composed of highly involved and connected individuals with a few things in common: An appreciation and passion for the beauty in great design, the desire to help others through our craft, and our commitment to positively engage with each other, our clients and our community.
mission and vision statement4 www.neutral7.comIndexOur Missionneutral7 is a collaborative group of business minded creative professionals dedicated to the mutual success of both our clients and our agency through extraordinary design, strategic marketing ideas, and quality graphic products.Our VisionOur passion is driven by the desire and commitment to help people achieve success in their journey to live better lives, live in a better world and share the joy of success with others. Our Approachneutral7 is not only redening the way our clients view their visual communication but also how they experience working with a design studio. We do this by maintaining a high level of communication, attention to detail and clear focus on the objectives for every project. We closely work with our clients to help choose the best solutions both in services and products, helping them meet their budgets and deadlines. We become an extension of their team and bring projects from concept to completion, on budget and on time!
5 www.neutral7.comIndexwhy neutral7?We embrace the power of collaboration. The spirit of collaboration has been part of neutral7 since day one. We understand that great talent ows from dierent sources and in dierent styles. Through the years weve partnered with multiple individuals, companies and agencies to take a truly custom approach to projects. Weve also successfully created a framework to mentor and engage the next wave of leaders in this industry through our internships and our involvement with projects outside of neutral7.We are branding experts.A company brand is not just a logo. As branding experts, we have the experience of helping our extensive list of clients maintain consistency throughout their visual image and message. When it comes to your business, we look at the big picture, even in the smallest project. We dont do good design, we do great design. In a perfect world, the most advanced software, computer and operating system would produce beautiful design but that is not the case. At neutral7 our work is created from concepts and ideas in a process where a computer is merely a nalizing tool. By closely listening to our clients goals, research and well contrived art direction, the result is award winning design with a purpose.We have experience. Design is what we know. Design is what we do. Design is what we live for. Aside from having over 17 years of experience in the eld, we hold professional degrees in everything from advertising, marketing, graphic design, print making, visual communication and art history. We are professionals.We design and produce locally, we are your neighbors.With a 3,000 square foot in-house production facility, we are the only one-stop shop for all your design, printing, signage and marketing materials. We design local, we produce local. Stop in and take a tour!We get involved.neutral7 is synonymous with community. The team at neutral7 is dedicated to the support and growth of the Gainesville area through sponsorships, facilitating and producing community events and bringing together a network of partners. Our goal is to enhance and encourage the local economy and put Gainesville on the map. Were fun!neutral7 is not only redening the way our clients view their visual communication, but also how they experience working with a design rm. Our sta is creative, energetic and friendly. When you work with us, you work directly with one team from concept to completion. Our tight-knit team is easily accessible to make sure that your project gets the personal care and attention needed to produce the best result!
6 www.neutral7.comIndexadditional references CONTEMPORA RYMANAGEMENTCONCEPTS, LLLP Nora Kilroy Director of O Campus Life, University of Florida, Division of Student Aairs neutral7 design group has assisted our oce in creating a new marketing plan that included a new oce logo, promotional items, consistent advertising, and completely redesigning the layout of O Campus Lifes annual publication. neutral7s design assistance allowed us to create a more consistent image and message and in the process reach more students and become memorable with students.Hirofumi Leung President, Imagin Asia Restaurant GroupOur expectation at Dragony Sushi is extremely high and we do not work with anyone that produces mediocre results and neutral7 design group is top class. Amazing quality work. Always delivers on time and excellent hands on work to ensure that the work is completed to your 100% satisfaction.Sonia Fox President/Partner, Contemporary Management ConceptsContemporary Management Concepts (CMC) has been working alongside Albert and the neutral7 design group for many years here in Gainesville. Our image design and branding has remained crisp, modern, relevant but most of all appealing to our target audience. Its tough nding a happy medium sometimes, especially when youre working in multi-family industry but neutral7 design group always steers us in the right direction. Weve found ways to come up with new, eye-catching graphic and print items for our company from print brochures, postcards and oor plans to large scale banners and site signs for our properties. Its always a treat to see what their design minds come up with, taking what we just say in conversation and making it into something tangible and terric.Erin Ferraro Creative Manager, The Collier Companies I have had the pleasure of working with Albert and neutral7 design group, on many occasions. He is professional, creative and always punctual. On numerous jobs he has made my job signicantly easier and continues to make me look good for my superiors. I highly recommend Albert and his company neutral7 design group.
7 www.neutral7.comIndexScott CostelloPublisher, HOME: Living in the Heart of FloridaHOME Magazine hired Albey Coronel and the neutral7 design group to help us with our business branding. As a publishing company, you would think we would have the market on creative ideas. Sometimes, it makes sense to bring in an outside viewpoint. Albey came to the oce and oered suggestions to improve our lobby. It was very impressive to see how his mind works and listen to his ideas. Quite frankly, he came up with ideas that I never would have thought of. I am comfortable recommending neutral7 because I know from the design consultation, through the actual design and production and up through the nal product, neutral7 will take great care of my referrals and treat them as if they are the only client on the planet.Jose Jordan Architect, DLR GroupAlbert Coronel brings a level of quality in the eld of graphic design and production, that supersedes that of anyone else in the Central Florida Area. On a larger scale, the amazing talent and creative direction neutral7 design group provides can denitely compete with any other graphic design companies in general. They are an asset to growing businesses and a worthwhile business partner. Kyle Bromley Photographer, kbromleyphoto.com Thank you so much, everything looks GREAT! Im super happy with my new business branding, logo and everything neutral7 design group has done. My business needed a facelift bad, and this is awesome. Ive had numerous people ask me who created my business logo... Thanks again for everything.
PR O POSA LDate: Cus tom e / A dd res s G e or m a ther r a r s Chr s u O B es er m s : Depo em c hr ros u e ec t aph deo aph tur e _ __ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ _ __ _ % de cat ed to p or r des qua c p roduc t c ue a er c us tom er s er c eas e us k ere e c do m p e th us k ou & O U C O Ite m Des c e t des Cos t ot P : o V ic QU A e 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 RA P ee g w o o ee g x y 3 ) 3 4 9. 00 4 00 ... o 5 g o w w 2 9 5. 00 2 9 5. 00 ou e 0 9 5 .0 0 9 50 .0 0 io 0 25 .0 0 0 00 w g o y w g: P y y w u 0 o e g io eg 0 0. 00 0. 00 O A $ 39 2 .0 0 V RA P ee g w o io ee x 5 ) 5 4 9. 00 2 4 5. 00 ... o 5 g o w w 2 9 5. 00 2 9 5. 00 io : 2 o u x 5 c ) 0 25 .0 0 50 00 ou e x 5 c x ) e x ) x 5 ) 9 5. 00 6 6 5. 00 A io o -3 u eo / 2 o y 5 0 49 .0 0 4 90 .0 0
PR O POSA LDate: Cus tom e / A dd res s G e or m a ther r a r s Chr s u O B es er m s : Depo em c hr ros u e ec t aph deo aph tur e _ __ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ _ __ _ % de cat ed to p or r des qua c p roduc t c ue a er c us tom er s er c eas e us k ere e c do m p e th us k ou & O U C O Ite m Des c e t des Cos t ot Co w g C o w g: P w u ef o e g /illu io eg G D P RF g: P e f f f o u /u 9 9 O $ 4, G e o P o g o ck o g o io o e P o of ll g 3 ce io oo f w il e $ 5 o ou e o f $9 5 g o g f lie o ll o f o eci fi $ 5 ,5 32 $ 5 ,5 32 $
11 www.neutral7.comIndex thank you for the opportunityFor more information please visit neutral7.com
1 Fruin, Christine From: Anna Vittone
1 Fruin, Christine From: Oppenheimer,David G Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 11:50 AM To: Fruin, Christine Subject: Letter of SupportDear Christine, I believe your project to promote th e Institutional Repository at the Univ ersity of Florida (IR@UF) to UF Faculty will greatly benefit UF and the UF research community, and am writing to express my enthusiastic support. As you know, I am a strong supporter of IR@UF as an integr al part of UFs Open Access initiative and believe that promoting IR@UF will benefit UF in the following ways: First, IR@UF will increase the visibility of UFs res earch output on the web. As the number of articles in the repository grows, links to articles in IR@UF will be increasingly more common in the top search results for information related to research conducted at UF. This will lead to increased global visibility of UF and increased impact of UFs research output. Therefore pr omoting IR@UF to UF faculty will lead to increased global visibility of UF by promoting growth of the repository. Second, Individual Faculty will also dire ctly benefit from from the increased visibility and impact provided by IR@UF. Because open access articles typically have a larger readership than cl osed access (subscription) articles, IR@UF will improve the overall citati on impact of UFs research activities. Third, IR@UF can be used as a strategic marketing tool to showcase the research out put of UF to prospective students, staff, and other interested clients. Promoti ng IR@UF to UF faculty will provide increased breadth and depth of the research acti vities recorded therein as the repository grows. Finally, promoting IR@UF to UF faculty will facilitate th e curation of UFs research output. As more articles are deposited in IR@UF, the repository will become a c onvenient tool for evaluating UFs research programs. I wish you the best of luck with your proposal. All the best, David David G. Oppenheimer Associate Professor Department of Biology, UF Genetics Institute, and Plant Molecular & Cellular Biology Program University of Florida 220 Bartram Hall, PO Box 118525 Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
The Foundation of the Gator Nation An Equal Opportunity Institution College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Center for the Humanities and the Public Sphere 200 Walker Hall P.O. Box 118030 Gainesville, FL 326 11 tel. 352.392.0796 fax 352.392 5378 www.humanities.ufl.edu 10 October 201 3 To members of the Smathers Libraries Mini Grant Committee, I am happy to provide a letter of support of the internal library grant proposal submitted by Ch ristine Fruin UF Scholarly Communications Li brarian The project, to create an infographic and videographic to promote the Institu tional Repository at UF (IR@UF) is a vital way for the Library to support faculty staff, and students at the University of Florida. As a member of the University Library Committee, I can say that this project is a response to a pressing need to generate and circulate accessible information about the IR@UF in preparation for campus wide discussions about an open access policy. I also see the production of this infor mation as an important way that the Library demonstrates its significant resources and ongoing relevance for our colleagues in the STEM fields at UF, some of whom have a misguided perception that libraries are less and les s necessary in the digital age. As a faculty member myself, I try to promote use of the IF@UF to my colleague s and students, but a lack of understanding about what the IR@UF is, and how IRs in general wo rk, is an obstacle. This project will close this gap of understanding I have also had the pleasure of seeing the idea for this grant proposal devel op. T his included a creative brainstorming session with faculty across the university to develop this project, and the proposed project was further refined through feedbac k received via email and other meetings. As a result, significant faculty and student buy in for this project has already been secured. As a result of the extensive work that has gone into creating and refining this project con c ept, I am confident that the project will be very successful if funded. If I can be of further assistance please feel free to cont act me. Best regards, Sophia Krzys Acord, Ph.D. Associate Director, Center for the Humanities and the Public Sphere Lecturer, Department of Sociology and Criminology & Law email@example.com
MINI GRANT PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION Mini Grant Budget Form 1. Salaries and Wages (no fringe benefits required) Name of PersonSalary times % of effortGrant FundsCost ShareTotal Christine Fruin2.50%$0.00$0.00$1,989.00 Barbara Hood2.50%$0.00$1,718.00$1,718.00 Shelley Arlen2.50%$0.00$2,039.00$2,039.00 Cindy Craig2.50%$0.00$1,540.00$1,540.00 April Hines2.50%$0.00$1,434.00$1,434.00 Jennifer Lyon2.50%$0.00$1,984.00$1,984.00 Valrie Minson2.50%$0.00$1,945.00$1,945.00 SUBTOTA L $0.00$10,660.00$12,649.00 2. Equipment ItemQuantity times CostGrant FundsCost ShareTotal $0.00$0.00$0.00 SUBTOTA L $0.00$0.00$0.00 3. Supplies ItemQuantity times CostGrant FundsCost ShareTotal $0.00$0.00$0.00 SUBTOTA L $0.00$0.00$0.00 4. Travel From/To# of people/# of daysGrant FundsCost ShareTotal $0.00$0.00 SUBTOTA L $0.00$0.00$0.00 5. Other (services vended, etc.) ItemQuantity times costGrant FundsCost ShareTotal Services by Outside Graphic Designer $5,000.00$0.00$5,000.00 $0.00$0.00$0.00 $0.00$0.00$0.00 $0.00$0.00$0.00 $0.00$0.00$0.00 SUBTOTA L $5,000.00$0.00$5,000.00 Grant FundsCost ShareTotal Total Direct Costs (add subtotals of items 1-5) $5,000.00$10,660.00$17,649.00 A Graphical Approach to Marketing the Institutional Repository at the University of Florida