Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ ( Publisher's URL )
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/IR00001544/00001
 Material Information
Title: Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration
Physical Description: Fact Sheet
Creator: Haile, Solomon G.
Publisher: University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2008
Acquisition: Collected for University of Florida's Institutional Repository by the UFIR Self-Submittal tool. Submitted by Melanie Mercer.
Publication Status: Published
General Note: "Original publication date September 2008."
General Note: "AE435"
 Record Information
Source Institution: University of Florida Institutional Repository
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the submitter.
System ID: IR00001544:00001


This item is only available as the following downloads:

AE43500 ( PDF )

Full Text


AE435 Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration1 Solomon G. Haile, Clyde W. Fraisse, Vimala D. Nair, and P.K. Ramachandran Nair2 1. This document is AE435, one of a series of the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date September 2008. Visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Solomon G. Haile, postdoctoral research associate, Soil and Water Science Department; Clyde W. Fraisse, assistant professor, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Vimala D. Nair, research associate professor, Soil and Water Science Department; P.K. Ramachandran Nair, professor, School of Forest Resources and Conservation; Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Larry Arrington, Dean Climate has regularly changed since the Earth was formed. However, many members of the scientific community attribute current climate changes to increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs), caused by human activities. In the last half of the 20th century, carbon dioxide (CO2) was the first GHG conclusively demonstrated to be increasing in the atmosphere. At the current rate of emission, atmospheric CO2 is projected to double by the end of the 21st century. Climate change mitigation will require reducing GHG emissions, as well as removing CO2 from the atmosphere and sequestering it in different reserves. This document addresses some basic questions regarding the prospects of carbon (C) sequestration in forest and agricultural lands in the United States in general and Florida in particular. Specifically, it examines the C sequestration potential of different land management practices that could play a role in GHG mitigation strategies. What is greenhouse gas? Greenhouse gas is a collective name given to atmospheric gases that are mostly of natural origin, including water (H2O) vapor, CO2, carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), nitrogen oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3). GHGs produced by human activities include compounds of hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. What is the greenhouse effect? Energy from the sun drives the earth's climate. Atmospheric GHGs trap some of this energy, creating a natural greenhouse effect. The temperature in a greenhouse is warmer than ambient temperature because the glass that covers the greenhouse does not allow long-wave radiation to be emitted outward. Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, especially water vapor, CO2, O3, and CH4, act like the glass in a greenhouse to trap infrared radiation in a similar manner. The extent to which atmospheric temperature is elevated depends on the concentration of GHGs in the atmosphere (Lal et al., 1999). Water vapor,


Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration 2 followed by CO2, is the most abundant GHG in the atmosphere. However, changes in water vapor concentration are also considered to be a result of climate response related to the warming of the atmosphere rather than a direct result of industrialization. Methane, NO, O3, and several other gases present in the atmosphere in small amounts also contribute to the greenhouse effect (IPCC 2007). Several human-induced (anthropogenic) activities increase atmospheric concentrations of GHGs, particularly CO2. Atmospheric CO2 concentration increased from 280 ppm (parts per million) in the 1950s to 379 ppm in 2005. The annual rate of increase was higher over the past 10 years (1995 2005 average: 1.9 ppm per year) than it has been since the beginning of continuous direct atmospheric measurements (1960 2005: 1.4 ppm) (IPCC 2007). From approximately 1850-1899 to 2001-2005, total temperature increased an average of 1.37F, with a range between 1.03F and 1.71F (IPCC 2007). While the resulting increase in heat-trapping ability for a given concentration of GHGs can be predicted with precision, the ultimate impact on climate can not. Projections of climate change are based on complex models that describe the circulation of air and ocean currents, as well as how energy is transported within the climate system. Recent model simulations suggest that global surface temperature could increase an average of 1.0.4F by 2100 (IPCC, 2007). The ranges of temperature projections are larger because model simulations increasingly depend on specific emissions scenarios. Between 2000 and 2030, the global GHG emissions are projected to increase by 25 to 90% (IPCC 2000b). What is carbon sequestration? It is widely believed that reducing the atmospheric concentration of CO2 could reduce future climate-related damage and would be more beneficial than costly. Options for achieving this goal include reducing future emissions as well as sequestering CO2 that has already accumulated. Carbon sequestration involves "removing C from the atmosphere and depositing it in a reservoir" (UNFCCC 2006). Carbon can be sequestered in two major ways: biological and geological. Geological sequestration, which has a fairly large technological potential, has not yet been demonstrated on a scale anticipated to mitigate CO2 emissions. It is also more costly. Thus current discussions are focused on biological methods for sequestering C. What is biological carbon sequestration? Biological C sequestration transfers C (from CO2) in the atmosphere to biomass through photosynthesis and ultimately stores it in plants (foliage, wood, and roots) and soils. Biological sequestration encompasses various ways of using agricultural and forest land to enhance the natural storage of atmospheric CO2. Examples include planting or preserving trees, altering crop production practices, planting vegetation in areas prone to soil erosion, and changing the way grazing lands are managed. When forests, croplands, and grazing lands sequester C, they are referred to as C sinks". Forest and agricultural lands have received considerable attention as potential C sinks. In most cases, atmospheric CO2 removal through C sequestration exceeds CO2 emissions from these land-use types, particularly from forests. According to the U.S. GHG Inventory 2006 (EPA 2008), land use, land-use change, and forestry activities comprise a net sequestration of 883.7 million metric tons (mmt) of CO2-Eq. This represents an offset of approximately 14.8 percent of total U.S. CO2 emissions, or 12.5% of total greenhouse gas emissions. Over 84% of this net sink occurs on forest lands. Between 1990 and 2006, total land use, land-use change, and forestry net C flux resulted in a 20% increase in CO2 sequestration, primarily due to an increase in the rate of net C accumulation in forest C stocks, particularly in aboveground and belowground tree biomass. In contrast, the agriculture sector is a net emitter of GHGs (EPA 2008). In 2006, CH4 and N2O were the primary greenhouse gases emitted by agricultural activities. Methane emissions from enteric fermentation and manure management represented about 23% and 7% of total CH4 emissions from anthropogenic activities, respectively.


Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration 3 The use of biomass and biofuels to replace CO2 emitting petroleum based fuels as energy sources has great potential for mitigating GHG emissions in the southeastern United States (EPA 2005). Over the coming decades, Florida forestry and agriculture could significantly offset and reduce the projected emission increases in the state. Florida's forest cover declined 36% between 1945 and 2002 (although it still covers 43% of the 34.3 million land acres); during the same period, crop and pasture lands increased by 22% (USDA/ERS, 2006). Improved management of forests and agricultural lands could provide an effective tool to help stabilize atmospheric GHGs. What are the major pools of sequestered carbon in agricultural and forest lands? In a forest ecosystem, C sequestration occurs in four components of the system: soil, trees, forest floor, and understory vegetation. The total amount sequestered in each part varies greatly depending on the region, type and age of the forest, the quality of the site, and land use history. On average, the soil and above-ground parts of trees hold the major portions, roughly 60% and 30% respectively, of the total C stored in a forest; the rest is mostly in forest litter (9%) and understory vegetation (1%) (Birdsey, 1992). According to the IPCC (2000), potential increases in C storage may occur in agricultural and forest lands via (1) improved management within a land use, (2) conversion to a land use with higher C stocks, or (3) increased C storage in harvested products. Achieving those increases will vary according to the new land use and management practices, net emissions of GHGs associated with additional management activities, and land use policies. The scientific literature to evaluate diverse scenarios for increasing C storage is currently limited. However, one such scenario, presented in Table 1, illustrates the potential range for C stock increases through some broadly defined activities. It provides data and information on C stock changes for some candidate activities for the year 2010. The greatest potential for C sequestration occurs when land-use becomes more sustainable, with the largest dividend estimated when arable land is changed to agroforestry (Table 1). Integrated production systems like silvopastoral agroforestry systems, where trees were integrated into pasture animal production, can increase net C storage. When both the tree and grass components are well-managed, an increase in net C storage compared with pasture or forest alone can be achieved. Sharrow and Ismail (2004) reported from their studies in Oregon that the silvopastoral system accumulated approximately 299 kg acre-1yr-1 more C than forests and 210 kg acre-1 yr-1 more C than pastures. The agroforests were silvopastures of 11-yr-old Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) with perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and clover (Trifolium sp.) pasture. The combination of pasture and trees also stored 214 kg acre-1 more N aboveground than the forest, and the pasture stored 486 kg N acre-1 more N aboveground than the forest. More efficient sharing of site resources between tree and pasture plants and microclimate modification by trees may increase overall net production of phytomass available for storage (Table 2). What practices could be used as strategies for enhancing carbon sequestration? Forestry practices: Afforestation/reforestation of marginal cropland and pasture. Planting trees on land previously used for other purposes could result in substantial gains in C storage in biomass and soils. Estimates show that afforested lands raise annual C sequestration by the equivalent of 2.2 to 9.5 metric tons of CO2 acre-1 for 120 years; (Birdsey, 1996). For reforestation (planting trees on land recently devoted to forestry, such as severely burned areas), the increase is smaller (4 to 28 metric tons acre-1 CO2-eq sequestration for the same time frame). Improved forest management. Carbon storage can also be improved by changing silvicultural practices. Since these practices are usually developed and applied for purposes other


Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration 4 Table 1. Global estimates of potential net change in carbon storage through improved management within land-use and change in land-use activities. Values shown are average rates during this period of accumulation. Additional Activities Total area (10 6 acre) Area under activity a n (%) Net annual change (Metric tons of CO2 acre-1 yr-1) Estimated net change in 2010 (10 6 Metric tons of CO2 yr-1) Improved management within land use Cropland b n 3212 30 0.4 385 Forest land c n 10008 10 0.6 600 Grazing land d n 8401 10 1 840 Agroforestry area e n 988 20 0.4 79 Urban land f n 247 5 0.4 5 Change in land use Agroforestry g n 1557 20 4.6 1432 Grassland h n 3707 3 1.2 133 Wetland restoration i n 568 5 0.6 17 Table 2. Estimates of carbon dioxide sequestered in three different land-use systems in Oregon, USA Compartment Metric tons of CO2 acre-1 Pasture Agroforests Plantation Tree 0 18 10 Understory 1 2 3 Soil (0-45 cm) 152 142 137 Total 154 162 150 than C sequestration, it may be difficult to quantify the magnitude of increased total C storage when practices change. For instance, increasing timber growth will not necessarily increase biomass growth and soil C storage. Nevertheless, estimates of such increases range from 2.1 to 3.1 metric tons of CO2eq acre-1 yr-1. Twenty to 45% of the C in the salable portion of harvested timber is sequestered in wood and paper products during their usable lives and afterwards in landfills (Gorte, 2007). Thus, increases in C from timber management do not have a fixed time horizon. Reduced conversion of forest land to non-forest use (Avoid deforestation). Conversion of forest land to non-forest use usually means permanent loss of all or a substantial part of live biomass and reduction of organic matter in soils and in the forest floor. Some C may be sequestered in wood products if the harvested biomass is utilized. Carbon dioxide and other GHGs are emitted when the remaining biomass and organic matter is burned or decomposed. Protecting and conserving forests should maintain or increase C


Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration 5 pools in the short term. Carbon in wood and paper products remains sequestered and is emitted to varying degrees depending on how products are made, used, and disposed. Sequestration in products and uses can be increased by altered processing methods, shifts in products used, end-use durability, and landfill management. Sequestration in forests and products can be maximized by coordinated understanding of forest ecosystems and product utilization. Agricultural and grassland practices Compared with forests, above-ground biomass stocks in agricultural and grassland ecosystems are fairly small (typically less than 15 metric tons of CO2-eq acre-1). Prospects for C sequestration in agricultural and grassland ecosystems are largely centered on the soil. Hence, strategies for increasing C stocks in these systems revolve around maximizing the amount of C that can be delivered to the soil and maximizing its residence time in the soil. Carbon sequestration in agricultural and grass lands can be enhanced by intensifying prime agricultural lands, land conservation, and restorations. These options include a variety of land use practices that could be adapted as best management practices by landowners. Prospects for C sequestration in grasslands include (1) optimizing grazing intensity, because C accrual on optimally grazed lands is often greater than on non-grazed or over-grazed lands (Liebig et al. 2005); (2) increasing grass productivity through increased fertilization and improved soil quality; and (3) introducing grass species that are more productive or have higher C allocation to the roots. In the case of croplands, C sequestration strategies include (1) improved agronomic practices that increase yield and generate higher crop residue; and (2) improved tillage and residue management such as reduced tillage, or no-till, that reduces soil disturbance, consequently reducing C losses through enhanced decomposition or soil erosion. Table 3 lists the various strategies that can be used for C sequestration in U.S. croplands. Lal et al. (1999) estimated that 302 to 763 mmt CO2-eq yr-1 could be sequestered in arable lands of the United States by adopting these improved practices, of which about 50% is due to conservation tillage and residue management, 6% to supplemental irrigation and water table management, and 25% to adoption of cropping systems. The practices listed above, if adopted by Florida's agricultural and forestry sectors hold great potential to increase the rate of C sequestration in the state. However, further advances in developing cost-effective ways to monitor and quantify the amount of C sequestered in agricultural and forest lands is required. In addition, developing C best management practices (BMPs) that provide incentives for adopting strategies to enhance C sequestration is crucial. Eventually, these combined with the growing C market can lead to an increased contribution of agricultural and forest sectors to the mitigation of climate change. Lists of References Birdsey, R. A. 1992. Carbon storage and accumulation in United States forest ecosystems. General Technical Report W0-59. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Forest Service. Birdsey, R. A. 1996. Regional estimates of timber volume and forest carbon for fully stocked timberland, average management after final clear-cut harvest. p. 309. In R.N. Sampson, and D. Hair. (eds.). Forests and global change: Vol. 2: Forest management opportunities for mitigating carbon emissions. American forests. Washington, D.C. Gorte, R. W. 2007. Carbon sequestration in forests, Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress RL31432. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA. IPCC. 2000a. Land use, land use change and forestry. Special report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.


Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration 6 IPCC. 2000b. Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Lal, R., J.M. Kimble, R.F. Follett, and C.V. Cole. 1999. The potential of US cropland to sequester carbon, and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press LLC. Lewis publishers. Liebig, M.A., J.A. Morgan, J.D. Reeder, B.H. Ellert, H.T. Gollany, and G.E. Schuman. 2005. Greenhouse gas contributions, and mitigation potential of agricultural practices in Northwestern USA, and Western Canada. Soil and tillage research. 83:25. Sharrow S.H., and S. Ismail. 2004. Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agrofor. Syst. 60:123. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 2008. Essential background: Glossary of climate change acronyms. Available at http://unfccc.int/essential_background/glossary/items/ 3666.php Cited 08 May 2008. United States Department of Energy (DOE).1999. Carbon sequestration: State of science. Draft report. Ch. 4: Carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems. p.29. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2006. EPA 430-R-08-005 United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Greenhouse gas mitigation potential in US forestry and agriculture. EPA 430-R-05-006.


Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration 7 Table 3. Strategies for increasing carbon (C) sequestration using different land-management practices in croplands of the United States. Mitigation option Management practice Estimated potential (mmt1CO2-eq yr-1) A. Intensification of croplands Conservation tillage, and residue management a. Conservation tillage Use no-till, minimum till, ridge till, or sod till on crop land to decrease C loss due to soil erosion and net mineralization, and to increase soil aggregation. 88-147 b. Crop residue, and other biomass management Select crops that produce sufficient quantities of residue, plant a cover crop, and/or leave crop residues on the soil surface. 40-246 Irrigation/water management a. Supplemental Supplement with irrigation to increase biomass production, especially in dry areas; an increase of 2 to 5 times in biomass production could be attained. 7-22 b. Sub-irrigation on poorly drained soils Recycle drainage water during summer to improve moisture content and biomass yield. 11-18 Improved cropping systems a. Fertilizer managementMaintain soil fertility by adding manure and inorganic fertilizer when needed. 22-66 b. Organic measures, and by-products Apply organic manure or compost to increase soil C content. 11-33 c. Rotation winter cover cropsPlant cover crops after harvesting. Examples in the Southeast include crimson clover, hairy vetch, common vetch, crown vetch, alfalfa, lupines, arrow leaf clover, and red clover. 18-67 d. Summer fallow elimination Replace summer fallow system with intensive cropping system to increase soil organic C. 4-11 e. Management of rice strawImprove management of rice straw through compost, and mulch farming rather than burning. 2-6 f. Idle land conversion to biofuel production Use available idle lands, and marginal croplands to produce biofuel. 11-18 B. Land conversion and restoration Land-use conversion a. Conservation reserve program (CRP), as a provision of the 1985 and 1990 Farm Bills. Convert highly erodible (erosion rate 19.1 tons acre-1 or more) land from active crop production to permanent vegetative cover for a 10-year period (e.g. tree plantation, growing cover crops). 18-40 Conversion buffers Install vegetative strips, ranging from 5 to 50 m wide, along streams and agricultural lands to minimize soil erosion and the risk of transporting non-point source pollutants into the stream. 4-7 c. Wetland reserve program (WRP) Restore, enhance, and protect wetlands through WRP to accumulate peat. 1-3 Land/ soil restoration a. Eroded land Restore moderately eroded crop lands (erosion rate 5 to 19.1 tons/acre-1). 33-73


Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Forest and Agricultural Lands: Carbon Sequestration 8 Table 3. Strategies for increasing carbon (C) sequestration using different land-management practices in croplands of the United States. b. Mine land Reclaim mine-spoil lands by re-vegetating with legumes, grasses, and woody plants; selection of species depends on climate. Application of an organic amendment is recommended for a long-term source of N. 2-7 c. Salt affected soils Use amendments (e.g., gypsum, organic matter, and green manure), leach salts out of the root zone, and choose crops with high salinity tolerance to improve above and below-ground biomass. 4-11 Total potential 302-763 mmt = million metric tons Source: Lal et al. (1999)