<%BANNER%>

CAREER AND EMPLOYMENT FACTORS OF GRADUATE STUDENTS IN STUDENT AFFAIRS

University of Florida Institutional Repository
MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
CAREER AND EMPLOYMENT FACTORS OF GRADUATE STUDENTS IN STUDENT AFFAIRS
Series Title:
FACTORS THAT IMPACT CAREER AND EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCES IN GRADUATE STUDENTS ENROLLED IN A STUDENT AFFAIRS PROGRAM
Physical Description:
RESEARCH DATA
Creator:
Robertson, Thomas
Publication Date:

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Data related to thesis / dissertation
Genre:
Spatial Coverage:

Notes

Abstract:
RESEARCH DATA FOR DISSERTATION - SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
Acquisition:
Collected for University of Florida's Institutional Repository by the UFIR Self-Submittal tool. Submitted by Thomas Robertson.
Publication Status:
Unpublished

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida Institutional Repository
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All rights reserved by the submitter.
System ID:
IR00001185:00001

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
CAREER AND EMPLOYMENT FACTORS OF GRADUATE STUDENTS IN STUDENT AFFAIRS
Series Title:
FACTORS THAT IMPACT CAREER AND EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCES IN GRADUATE STUDENTS ENROLLED IN A STUDENT AFFAIRS PROGRAM
Physical Description:
RESEARCH DATA
Creator:
Robertson, Thomas
Publication Date:

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Data related to thesis / dissertation
Genre:
Spatial Coverage:

Notes

Abstract:
RESEARCH DATA FOR DISSERTATION - SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
Acquisition:
Collected for University of Florida's Institutional Repository by the UFIR Self-Submittal tool. Submitted by Thomas Robertson.
Publication Status:
Unpublished

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida Institutional Repository
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All rights reserved by the submitter.
System ID:
IR00001185:00001

Full Text

PAGE 1

1 TABLES: CAREER AND EMPLOYMENT FA CTORS OF GRADUATE STUDENTS IN STUDENT AFFAIRS Figure 4 1 Population demographics Gender: Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Male 89 25.3 25.6 25.6 Female 258 73.3 74.4 100.0 Total 347 98.6 100.0 Missing System 5 1.4 Total 352 100.0 Ethnicity: Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Other (please specify) 3 .9 .9 .9 African American 36 10.2 10.3 11.2 Asian/Pacific Islander 10 2.8 2.9 14.1 Caucasian 279 79.3 80.2 94.3 Hispanic / Latino 11 3.1 3.2 97.4 Multiracial 8 2.3 2.3 99.7 Native American 1 .3 .3 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 Current Age: Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 18 25 years 227 64.5 65.2 65.2 26 30 73 20.7 21.0 86.2 31 39 26 7.4 7.5 93.7 40 49 11 3.1 3.2 96.8

PAGE 2

2 50 above 11 3.1 3.2 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 Figure 4 2 Pilot Study Demographics Sex: Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Male 80 23.9 29.5 29.5 Female 191 57.0 70.5 100.0 Total 271 80.9 100.0 Missing System 64 19.1 Total 335 100.0 Age: Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 18 25 years 126 37.6 46.5 46.5 26 30 51 15.2 18.8 65.3 31 39 52 15.5 19.2 84.5 40 55 38 11.3 14.0 98.5 56 above 4 1.2 1.5 100.0 Total 271 80.9 100.0 Missing System 64 19.1 Total 335 100.0 Ethnicity: Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid African American 27 8.1 10.0 10.0 Asian 8 2.4 3.0 13.0 Caucasian 212 63.3 78.8 91.8 Hispanic 16 4.8 5.9 97.8 Multiracial 4 1.2 1.5 99.3 Other 2 .6 .7 100.0

PAGE 3

3 Total 269 80.3 100.0 Missing System 66 19.7 Total 335 100.0 Table 4 1 Future employment preferences by institutional type (frequency) Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Other (please specify) 23 6.5 6.6 6.6 Doctoral Graduating Universities (Land Grant Universities an 114 32.4 32.6 39.1 Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities (Typically regio 68 19.3 19.4 58.6 Baccalaureate Colleges (Schools may offer graduate programs 119 33.8 34.0 92.6 Community Colleges or State Colleges 26 7.4 7.4 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Table 4 2 Institutional type preference and gender (frequency) Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. Gender: Total Male Female Other Count 3 18 21 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 3.4% 7.0% 6.1% % of Total .9% 5.2% 6.1% Doctoral Graduating Universities Count 35 78 113

PAGE 4

4 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 31.0% 69.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 39.3% 30.5% 32.8% % of Total 10.1% 22.6% 32.8% Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities Count 17 49 66 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 19.1% 19.1% 19.1% % of Total 4.9% 14.2% 19.1% Baccalaureate Colleges Count 28 87 115 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 24.3% 75.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 31.5% 34.0% 33.3% % of Total 8.1% 25.2% 33.3% Community Colleges or State Colleges Count 5 21 26 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 19.2% 80.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 5.6% 8.2% 7.5% % of Total 1.4% 6.1% 7.5% For Profit Colleges or Universities Count 1 3 4 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 1.1% 1.2% 1.2% % of Total .3% .9% 1.2% Total Count 89 256 345

PAGE 5

5 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% Table 4 3 Institutional type preference and gender (Chi Square) Chi Square Tests Type and Gender Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.189 a 4 .527 Likelihood Ratio 3.243 4 .518 Linear by Linear Association .657 1 .417 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.93. Table 4 4 Institutional type preference and ethnicity (frequency) Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. Ethnicity: Crosstabulation Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. Other (please specify) Count 2 0 21 23 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 8.7% .0% 91.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.5% .0% 7.5% 6.6% % of Total .6% .0% 6.1% 6.6% Doctoral Graduating Universities (Land Grant Universities an Count 11 14 88 113 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 9.7% 12.4% 77.9% 100.0%

PAGE 6

6 % within Ethnicity: 35.5% 38.9% 31.5% 32.7% % of Total 3.2% 4.0% 25.4% 32.7% Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities (Typically regio Count 2 6 59 67 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 3.0% 9.0% 88.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.5% 16.7% 21.1% 19.4% % of Total .6% 1.7% 17.1% 19.4% Baccalaureate Colleges (Schools may offer graduate programs Count 12 12 93 117 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 10.3% 10.3% 79.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 38.7% 33.3% 33.3% 33.8% % of Total 3.5% 3.5% 26.9% 33.8% Community Colleges or State Colleges Count 4 4 18 26 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 15.4% 15.4% 69.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.9% 11.1% 6.5% 7.5% % of Total 1.2% 1.2% 5.2% 7.5% Total Count 31 36 279 346 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% Table 4 5 Institutional type preference and ethnicity (Chi Square) Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)

PAGE 7

7 Pearson Chi Square 9.071 a 8 .336 Likelihood Ratio 12.075 8 .148 Linear by Linear Association 1.163 1 .281 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 4 cells (26.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.06. Table 4 6 Institutional type preference and age (frequency) Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. Current Age: Crosstabulatio n Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. Other (please specify) Count 15 8 23 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 65.2% 34.8% 100.0% % within Current Age: 6.6% 6.7% 6.6% % of Total 4.3% 2.3% 6.6% Doctoral Graduating Universities (Land Grant Universities an Count 69 44 113 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 61.1% 38.9% 100.0% % within Current Age: 30.5% 36.7% 32.7% % of Total 19.9% 12.7% 32.7% Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities (Typically regio Count 47 20 67 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 70.1% 29.9% 100.0% % within Current Age: 20.8% 16.7% 19.4% % of Total 13.6% 5.8% 19.4% Baccalaureate Colleges Count 84 33 117

PAGE 8

8 (Schools may offer graduate programs % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 71.8% 28.2% 100.0% % within Current Age: 37.2% 27.5% 33.8% % of Total 24.3% 9.5% 33.8% Community Colleges or State Colleges Count 11 15 26 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 42.3% 57.7% 100.0% % within Current Age: 4.9% 12.5% 7.5% % of Total 3.2% 4.3% 7.5% Total Count 226 120 346 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 65.3% 34.7% 100.0% % within Current Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 65.3% 34.7% 100.0% Table 4 7 Institutional type and age (Chi Square) Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.837 a 4 .043 Likelihood Ratio 9.548 4 .049 Linear by Linear Association .002 1 .962 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.98. Table 4 8 Preferred institutional type and current institutional type Institution type currently enrolled. Total

PAGE 9

9 Doctoral Graduating Iniversity Masters/Bachelo rs College & University Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. Other (please specify) Count 15 8 23 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 65.2% 34.8% 100.0% % within Using the drop down menu, please select the university or college in which you are currently enrolled. 8.7% 4.7% 6.7% % of Total 4.3% 2.3% 6.7% Doctoral Graduating Universities (Land Grant Universities an Count 72 40 112 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 64.3% 35.7% 100.0% % within Using the drop down menu, please select the university or college in which you are currently enrolled. 41.6% 23.3% 32.5% % of Total 20.9% 11.6% 32.5% Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities (Typically regio Count 29 37 66 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 43.9% 56.1% 100.0% % within Using the drop down menu, please select the university or college in which you are currently enrolled. 16.8% 21.5% 19.1% % of Total 8.4% 10.7% 19.1% Baccalaureate Colleges (Schools may offer graduate programs Count 49 69 118 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 41.5% 58.5% 100.0%

PAGE 10

10 % within Using the drop down menu, please select the university or college in which you are currently enrolled. 28.3% 40.1% 34.2% % of Total 14.2% 20.0% 34.2% Community Colleges or State Colleges Count 8 18 26 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 30.8% 69.2% 100.0% % within Using the drop down menu, please select the university or college in which you are currently enrolled. 4.6% 10.5% 7.5% % of Total 2.3% 5.2% 7.5% Total Count 173 172 345 % within Please select the institution type you plan to work for after completing your graduate program. 50.1% 49.9% 100.0% % within Using the drop down menu, please select the university or college in which you are currently enrolled. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.1% 49.9% 100.0% Table 4 9 Preferred institutional type and current institutional type (Chi Square) Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 19.476 a 4 .001 Likelihood Ratio 19.759 4 .001 Linear by Linear Association 17.342 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.47.

PAGE 11

11 Table 4 10 Factors related to selecting next position. Campus facilities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 94 26.7 26.9 26.9 2 Somewhat Important 191 54.3 54.6 81.4 3 Neutral 47 13.4 13.4 94.9 4 Less Important 15 4.3 4.3 99.1 5 Not at all Important 3 .9 .9 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Familiarity with school or institution type Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 85 24.1 24.4 24.4 2 Somewhat Important 155 44.0 44.4 68.8 3 Neutral 64 18.2 18.3 87.1 4 Less Important 39 11.1 11.2 98.3 5 Not at all Important 6 1.7 1.7 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Geographical location Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 219 62.2 62.9 62.9 2 Somewhat Important 99 28.1 28.4 91.4 3 Neutral 15 4.3 4.3 95.7 4 Less Important 11 3.1 3.2 98.9 5 Not at all Important 4 1.1 1.1 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0

PAGE 12

12 Institution's reputation Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 127 36.1 36.4 36.4 2 Somewhat Important 180 51.1 51.6 88.0 3 Neutral 33 9.4 9.5 97.4 4 Less Important 8 2.3 2.3 99.7 5 Not at all Important 1 .3 .3 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Institution's mission & purpose Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 169 48.0 48.6 48.6 2 Somewhat Important 146 41.5 42.0 90.5 3 Neutral 23 6.5 6.6 97.1 4 Less Important 8 2.3 2.3 99.4 5 Not at all Important 2 .6 .6 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 77 21.9 22.0 22.0 2 Somewhat Important 121 34.4 34.6 56.6 3 Neutral 58 16.5 16.6 73.1 4 Less Important 57 16.2 16.3 89.4 5 Not at all Important 37 10.5 10.6 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0

PAGE 13

13 Professional development (i.e. resources and support for life long learning opportunities) Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 200 56.8 57.1 57.1 2 Somewhat Important 130 36.9 37.1 94.3 3 Neutral 18 5.1 5.1 99.4 4 Less Important 2 .6 .6 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Promotion opportunities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 173 49.1 49.6 49.6 2 Somewhat Important 145 41.2 41.5 91.1 3 Neutral 20 5.7 5.7 96.8 4 Less Important 8 2.3 2.3 99.1 5 Not at all Important 3 .9 .9 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Salary & benefits Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 184 52.3 52.4 52.4 2 Somewhat Important 150 42.6 42.7 95.2 3 Neutral 13 3.7 3.7 98.9 4 Less Important 4 1.1 1.1 100.0 Total 351 99.7 100.0 Missing System 1 .3 Total 352 100.0 Sense of community with the institution

PAGE 14

14 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 243 69.0 69.0 69.0 2 Somewhat Important 101 28.7 28.7 97.7 3 Neutral 7 2.0 2.0 99.7 4 Less Important 1 .3 .3 100.0 Total 352 100.0 100.0 Student body Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 166 47.2 47.6 47.6 2 Somewhat Important 150 42.6 43.0 90.5 3 Neutral 27 7.7 7.7 98.3 4 Less Important 5 1.4 1.4 99.7 5 Not at all Important 1 .3 .3 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Supervisor & colleagues Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Very Important 251 71.3 72.1 72.1 2 Somewhat Important 86 24.4 24.7 96.8 3 Neutral 8 2.3 2.3 99.1 4 Less Important 3 .9 .9 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 Table 4 11 Factors related to selecting next position and age (Frequency) Campus F acilities Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Important 190 91 281

PAGE 15

15 5 Not Important 36 29 65 Total 226 120 346 Familiarity with S chool or I nstitution T ype Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 144 94 238 5 Not at all Important 81 26 107 Total 225 120 345 Geographical L ocation Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 206 108 314 5 Not at all Important 20 10 30 Total 226 118 344 Institution's R eputation Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 199 104 303 5 Not at all Important 27 15 42 Total 226 119 345 Institution's M ission & P urpose Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 202 110 312 5 Not at all Important 24 9 33 Total 226 119 345 Opportunity to C ontinue in a D octoral P rogram Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 126 69 195 5 Not at all Important 100 51 151 Total 226 120 346

PAGE 16

16 Professional D evelopment Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 213 113 326 5 Not at all Important 14 6 20 Total 227 119 346 Promotion O pportunities Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 207 109 316 5 Not at all Important 20 10 30 Total 227 119 346 Salary and B enefits Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 216 114 330 5 Not at all Important 11 6 17 Total 227 120 347 Sense of C ommunity with the I nstitution Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 221 119 340 5 Not at all Important 6 2 8 Total 227 121 348 Student B ody Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 209 103 312 5 Not at all Important 17 16 33 Total 226 119 345

PAGE 17

17 Supervisor and C olleagues Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Very Important 218 115 333 5 Not at all Important 8 3 11 Total 226 118 344 Table 4 12 Factors related to selecting next position and age (Chi Square) Chi Square Tests Campus Facilities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.486 a 1 .062 Continuity Correction b 2.967 1 .085 Likelihood Ratio 3.392 1 .066 Fisher's Exact Test .082 .044 Linear by Linear Association 3.476 1 .062 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.54. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Familiarity with School Type Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square 7.515 a 1 .006 Continuity Correction b 6.860 1 .009 Likelihood Ratio 7.784 1 .005 Fisher's Exact Test .007 .004 Linear by Linear Association 7.493 1 .006 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 37.22. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

PAGE 18

18 Chi Square Tests Geographic Location Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .014 a 1 .907 Continuity Correction b .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .014 1 .907 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .540 Linear by Linear Association .014 1 .907 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.29. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .032 a 1 .859 Continuity Correction b .000 1 .996 Likelihood Ratio .031 1 .859 Fisher's Exact Test .864 .493 Linear by Linear Association .031 1 .859 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.49. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Mission & Purpose Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .842 a 1 .359 Continuity Correction b .526 1 .468 Likelihood Ratio .871 1 .351 Fisher's Exact Test .443 .237 Linear by Linear Association .839 1 .360 N of Valid Cases 345

PAGE 19

19 Chi Square Tests Mission & Purpose Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .842 a 1 .359 Continuity Correction b .526 1 .468 Likelihood Ratio .871 1 .351 Fisher's Exact Test .443 .237 Linear by Linear Association .839 1 .360 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.38. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Opportunity to continue in doctoral program Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .097 a 1 .755 Continuity Correction b .039 1 .843 Likelihood Ratio .097 1 .755 Fisher's Exact Test .820 .422 Linear by Linear Association .097 1 .755 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 52.37. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Professional Development Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .182 a 1 .670 Continuity Correction b .034 1 .854 Likelihood Ratio .185 1 .667 Fisher's Exact Test .810 .436 Linear by Linear Association .181 1 .670 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.88. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

PAGE 20

20 Chi Square Tests Promotion Opportunities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .016 a 1 .898 Continuity Correction b .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .016 1 .898 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .536 Linear by Linear Association .016 1 .898 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.32. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Salary & Benefits Value df Asymp Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .004 a 1 .950 Continuity Correction b .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .004 1 .950 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .569 Linear by Linear Association .004 1 .950 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.88. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Sense of Community Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .345 a 1 .557 Continuity Correction b .045 1 .832 Likelihood Ratio .363 1 .547 Fisher's Exact Test .719 .432 Linear by Linear Association .344 1 .558 N of Valid Cases 348

PAGE 21

21 Chi Square Tests Sense of Community Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .345 a 1 .557 Continuity Correction b .045 1 .832 Likelihood Ratio .363 1 .547 Fisher's Exact Test .719 .432 Linear by Linear Association .344 1 .558 N of Valid Cases 348 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.78. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Student Body Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.162 a 1 .075 Continuity Correction b 2.514 1 .113 Likelihood Ratio 3.031 1 .082 Fisher's Exact Test .085 .058 Linear by Linear Association 3.153 1 .076 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.38. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Supervisor & Colleagues Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .249 a 1 .618 Continuity Correction b .031 1 .860 Likelihood Ratio .258 1 .611 Fisher's Exact Test .755 .443 Linear by Linear Association .248 1 .618 N of Valid Cases 344

PAGE 22

22 Chi Square Tests Supervisor & Colleagues Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .249 a 1 .618 Continuity Correction b .031 1 .860 Likelihood Ratio .258 1 .611 Fisher's Exact Test .755 .443 Linear by Linear Association .248 1 .618 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.77. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Table 4 13 Factors related to selecting next position and gender (Frequency) Campus facilities Gender: Total Male Female 1 Important 71 210 281 5 Not Important 18 46 64 Total 89 256 345 Familiarity with school or institution type Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 60 177 237 5 Not at all Important 29 78 107 Total 89 255 344 Geographical location Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 77 236 313 5 Not at all Important 12 18 30 Total 89 254 343

PAGE 23

23 Institution's reputation Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 75 227 302 5 Not at all Important 13 29 42 Total 88 256 344 Institution's mission & purpose Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 78 233 311 5 Not at all Important 11 22 33 Total 89 255 344 Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 51 143 194 5 Not at all Important 38 113 151 Total 89 256 345 Professional development Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 82 243 325 5 Not at all Important 7 13 20 Total 89 256 345 Promotion opportunities Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 80 235 315 5 Not at all Important 9 21 30 Total 89 256 345

PAGE 24

24 Salary and B enefits Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 83 246 329 5 Not at all Important 6 11 17 Total 89 257 346 Sense of community with the institution Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 88 251 339 5 Not at all Important 1 7 8 Total 89 258 347 Student body Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 77 235 312 5 Not at all Important 11 21 32 Total 88 256 344 Supervisor and C olleagues Gender: Total Male Female 1 Very Important 84 248 332 5 Not at all Important 4 7 11 Total 88 255 343 Table 4 14 Factors related to selecting next position and gender (Chi Square) Chi Square Tests Campus Facilities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .222 a 1 .637 Continuity Correction b .098 1 .754 Likelihood Ratio .219 1 .640 Fisher's Exact Test .637 .372

PAGE 25

25 Linear by Linear Association .222 1 .638 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.51. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Familiarity with school or institution type Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .123 a 1 .726 Continuity Correction b .047 1 .828 Likelihood Ratio .122 1 .727 Fisher's Exact Test .790 .411 Linear by Linear Association .122 1 .727 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27.68. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Geographical location Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.379 a 1 .066 Continuity Correction b 2.625 1 .105 Likelihood Ratio 3.111 1 .078 Fisher's Exact Test .081 .057 Linear by Linear Association 3.369 1 .066 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.78. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Institution's reputation Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .725 a 1 .395

PAGE 26

26 Continuity Correction b .439 1 .508 Likelihood Ratio .700 1 .403 Fisher's Exact Test .450 .250 Linear by Linear Association .723 1 .395 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.74. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Institution's mission & purpose Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.060 a 1 .303 Continuity Correction b .673 1 .412 Likelihood Ratio 1.009 1 .315 Fisher's Exact Test .302 .203 Linear by Linear Association 1.056 1 .304 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.54. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .056 a 1 .813 Continuity Correction b .013 1 .910 Likelihood Ratio .056 1 .813 Fisher's Exact Test .901 .456 Linear by Linear Association .056 1 .813 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 38.95. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests

PAGE 27

27 Professional development Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .939 a 1 .332 Continuity Correction b .498 1 .480 Likelihood Ratio .883 1 .347 Fisher's Exact Test .428 .234 Linear by Linear Association .937 1 .333 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.16. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Promotion opportunities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .303 a 1 .582 Continuity Correction b .110 1 .740 Likelihood Ratio .294 1 .587 Fisher's Exact Test .662 .360 Linear by Linear Association .302 1 .582 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.74. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Salary and B enefits Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .857 a 1 .354 Continuity Correction b .411 1 .521 Likelihood Ratio .803 1 .370 Fisher's Exact Test .394 .253 Linear by Linear Association .855 1 .355 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.37. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

PAGE 28

28 Chi Square Tests Sense of community with the institution Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .742 a 1 .389 Continuity Correction b .204 1 .651 Likelihood Ratio .859 1 .354 Fisher's Exact Test .685 .348 Linear by Linear Association .740 1 .390 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.05. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Student body Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.433 a 1 .231 Continuity Correction b .969 1 .325 Likelihood Ratio 1.353 1 .245 Fisher's Exact Test .286 .162 Linear by Linear Association 1.429 1 .232 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.19. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Chi Square Tests Supervisor and C olleagues Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .683 a 1 .409 Continuity Correction b .226 1 .634 Likelihood Ratio .635 1 .426 Fisher's Exact Test .482 .303 Linear by Linear Association .681 1 .409 N of Valid Cases 343

PAGE 29

29 Chi Square Tests Supervisor and C olleagues Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (2 sided) Exact Sig. (1 sided) Pearson Chi Square .683 a 1 .409 Continuity Correction b .226 1 .634 Likelihood Ratio .635 1 .426 Fisher's Exact Test .482 .303 Linear by Linear Association .681 1 .409 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.82. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Table 4 15 Factors related to selecting next position and ethnicity (Frequency) Campus facilities Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Important 24 28 229 281 5 Not Important 8 8 49 65 Total 32 36 278 346 Familiarity with school or institution type Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Very Important 23 25 190 238 5 Not at all Important 9 11 87 107 Total 32 36 277 345 Geographical location Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Very Important 28 30 256 314 5 Not at all Important 3 6 21 30 Total 31 36 277 344

PAGE 30

30 Institution's reputation Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Very Important 24 31 248 303 5 Not at all Important 8 5 29 42 Total 32 36 277 345 Institution's mission and purpose Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Very Important 30 31 251 312 5 Not at all Important 2 5 26 33 Total 32 36 277 345 Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Very Important 23 24 148 195 5 Not at all Important 9 12 130 151 Total 32 36 278 346 Professional development Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian (i.e. resources and support for life long learning opportunities) 1 Very Important 31 36 259 326 5 Not at all Important 1 0 19 20 Total 32 36 278 346 Promotion opportunities Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian

PAGE 31

31 1 Very Important 30 31 255 316 5 Not at all Important 2 5 23 30 Total 32 36 278 346 Salary & benefits Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Very Important 28 36 266 330 5 Not at all Important 4 0 13 17 Total 32 36 279 347 Sense of community with the institution Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Very Important 31 36 273 340 5 Not at all Important 1 0 7 8 Total 32 36 280 348 Student body Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Very Important 29 33 250 312 5 Not at all Important 3 3 27 33 Total 32 36 277 345 Supervisor and colleagues Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Very Important 31 34 268 333 5 Not at all Important 1 2 8 11 Total 32 36 276 344

PAGE 32

32 Table 4 16 Factors related to selecting next position and ethnicity (Chi Square) Chi Square Tests Campus Facilities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.334 a 2 .513 Likelihood Ratio 1.267 2 .531 Linear by Linear Association 1.328 1 .249 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.01. Chi Square Tests Familiarity with school or institution type Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .148 a 2 .928 Likelihood Ratio .151 2 .927 Linear by Linear Association .128 1 .720 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.92. Chi Square Tests Geographical location Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.343 a 2 .188 Likelihood Ratio 2.813 2 .245 Linear by Linear Association 1.592 1 .207 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.70. Chi Square Tests Institution's reputation Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.775 a 2 .056

PAGE 33

33 Likelihood Ratio 4.816 2 .090 Linear by Linear Association 4.888 1 .027 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.90. Chi Square Tests Institution's mission and purpose Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.195 a 2 .550 Likelihood Ratio 1.160 2 .560 Linear by Linear Association .000 1 .990 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.06. Chi Square Tests Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program Value df Asymp Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.789 a 2 .055 Likelihood Ratio 5.970 2 .051 Linear by Linear Association 5.762 1 .016 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.97. Chi Square Tests Professional development Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.190 a 2 .203 Likelihood Ratio 5.318 2 .070 Linear by Linear Association 2.353 1 .125 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.85.

PAGE 34

34 Chi Square Tests Promotion opportunities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.530 a 2 .465 Likelihood Ratio 1.380 2 .502 Linear by Linear Association .074 1 .786 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.77. Chi Square Tests Salary and benefits Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.857 a 2 .053 Likelihood Ratio 6.480 2 .039 Linear by Linear Association .867 1 .352 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.57. Chi Square Tests Sense of community with the institution Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .995 a 2 .608 Likelihood Ratio 1.811 2 .404 Linear by Linear Association .094 1 .759 N of Valid Cases 348 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .74. Chi Square Tests Student body Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)

PAGE 35

35 Pearson Chi Square .075 a 2 .963 Likelihood Ratio .078 2 .962 Linear by Linear Association .038 1 .846 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.06. Chi Square Tests Supervisor and Colleagues Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .727 a 2 .695 Likelihood Ratio .616 2 .735 Linear by Linear Association .244 1 .621 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.02. Table 4 17 Level of interest in career fields Academic Advising Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 204 58.0 58.5 58.5 2 Neutral 84 23.9 24.1 82.5 3 Not Interested 61 17.3 17.5 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Admissions / Enrollment Management Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 174 49.4 49.9 49.9 2 Neutral 105 29.8 30.1 79.9 3 Not Interested 70 19.9 20.1 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9

PAGE 36

36 Admissions / Enrollment Management Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 174 49.4 49.9 49.9 2 Neutral 105 29.8 30.1 79.9 3 Not Interested 70 19.9 20.1 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Adult Learner Services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 57 16.2 16.4 16.4 2 Neutral 129 36.6 37.1 53.4 3 Not Interested 162 46.0 46.6 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 Alumni Affairs & Development Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 121 34.4 34.7 34.7 2 Neutral 116 33.0 33.2 67.9 3 Not Interested 112 31.8 32.1 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Assessment / Research Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 90 25.6 25.7 25.7 2 Neutral 121 34.4 34.6 60.3 3 Not Interested 139 39.5 39.7 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6

PAGE 37

37 Assessment / Research Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 90 25.6 25.7 25.7 2 Neutral 121 34.4 34.6 60.3 3 Not Interested 139 39.5 39.7 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Athletics Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 102 29.0 29.4 29.4 2 Neutral 95 27.0 27.4 56.8 3 Not Interested 150 42.6 43.2 100.0 Total 347 98.6 100.0 Missing System 5 1.4 Total 352 100.0 Career Services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 141 40.1 40.4 40.4 2 Neutral 118 33.5 33.8 74.2 3 Not Interested 90 25.6 25.8 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Campus Ministry Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 59 16.8 17.0 17.0 2 Neutral 88 25.0 25.4 42.4 3 Not Interested 200 56.8 57.6 100.0 Total 347 98.6 100.0 Missing System 5 1.4

PAGE 38

38 Campus Ministry Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 59 16.8 17.0 17.0 2 Neutral 88 25.0 25.4 42.4 3 Not Interested 200 56.8 57.6 100.0 Total 347 98.6 100.0 Missing System 5 1.4 Total 352 100.0 Commuter Services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 50 14.2 14.5 14.5 2 Neutral 127 36.1 36.7 51.2 3 Not Interested 169 48.0 48.8 100.0 Total 346 98.3 100.0 Missing System 6 1.7 Total 352 100.0 Counseling Services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 122 34.7 34.9 34.9 2 Neutral 104 29.5 29.7 64.6 3 Not Interested 124 35.2 35.4 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Disability Services & Student Accomodations Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 62 17.6 17.7 17.7 2 Neutral 133 37.8 38.0 55.7 3 Not Interested 155 44.0 44.3 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6

PAGE 39

39 Disability Services & Student Accomodations Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 62 17.6 17.7 17.7 2 Neutral 133 37.8 38.0 55.7 3 Not Interested 155 44.0 44.3 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Financial Aid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 48 13.6 13.8 13.8 2 Neutral 85 24.1 24.5 38.3 3 Not Interested 214 60.8 61.7 100.0 Total 347 98.6 100.0 Missing System 5 1.4 Total 352 100.0 First Year Experience Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 267 75.9 76.3 76.3 2 Neutral 60 17.0 17.1 93.4 3 Not Interested 23 6.5 6.6 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Greek Affairs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 103 29.3 29.6 29.6 2 Neutral 94 26.7 27.0 56.6 3 Not Interested 151 42.9 43.4 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0

PAGE 40

40 Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 84 23.9 24.1 24.1 2 Neutral 129 36.6 37.1 61.2 3 Not Interested 135 38.4 38.8 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 International Students & Programs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 120 34.1 34.3 34.3 2 Neutral 124 35.2 35.4 69.7 3 Not Interested 106 30.1 30.3 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Intramurals / Campus Recreation Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 87 24.7 24.9 24.9 2 Neutral 110 31.3 31.5 56.4 3 Not Interested 152 43.2 43.6 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 139 39.5 39.8 39.8 2 Neutral 97 27.6 27.8 67.6 3 Not Interested 113 32.1 32.4 100.0

PAGE 41

41 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Leadership Development Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 252 71.6 72.6 72.6 2 Neutral 68 19.3 19.6 92.2 3 Not Interested 27 7.7 7.8 100.0 Total 347 98.6 100.0 Missing System 5 1.4 Total 352 100.0 LGBT Services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 93 26.4 26.6 26.6 2 Neutral 120 34.1 34.4 61.0 3 Not Interested 136 38.6 39.0 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Multicultural Affairs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 150 42.6 42.9 42.9 2 Neutral 114 32.4 32.6 75.4 3 Not Interested 86 24.4 24.6 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Orientation Programs

PAGE 42

42 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 227 64.5 65.0 65.0 2 Neutral 85 24.1 24.4 89.4 3 Not Interested 37 10.5 10.6 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Registrar Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 55 15.6 15.8 15.8 2 Neutral 103 29.3 29.5 45.3 3 Not Interested 191 54.3 54.7 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Residence Life & Housing Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 139 39.5 39.9 39.9 2 Neutral 84 23.9 24.1 64.1 3 Not Interested 125 35.5 35.9 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 Service Learning & Volunteer Programs Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 160 45.5 45.7 45.7 2 Neutral 122 34.7 34.9 80.6 3 Not Interested 68 19.3 19.4 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0

PAGE 43

43 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Student Activities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 237 67.3 67.9 67.9 2 Neutral 77 21.9 22.1 90.0 3 Not Interested 35 9.9 10.0 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Student Union Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 155 44.0 44.5 44.5 2 Neutral 120 34.1 34.5 79.0 3 Not Interested 73 20.7 21.0 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 Teaching Faculty Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 106 30.1 30.5 30.5 2 Neutral 104 29.5 29.9 60.3 3 Not Interested 138 39.2 39.7 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 Women's Resources Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 Interested 106 30.1 30.6 30.6

PAGE 44

44 2 Neutral 125 35.5 36.1 66.8 3 Not Interested 115 32.7 33.2 100.0 Total 346 98.3 100.0 Missing System 6 1.7 Total 352 100.0 Table 4 18 Level of interest in career fields and age (Frequency) Academic Advising Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 127 75 202 2 Neutral 56 28 84 3 Not Interested 42 18 60 Total 225 121 346 Admissions / Enrollment Management Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 107 65 172 2 Neutral 72 33 105 3 Not Interested 46 22 68 Total 225 120 345 Adult Learner Services Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 30 27 57 2 Neutral 84 44 128 3 Not Interested 112 48 160 Total 226 119 345 Alumni Affairs & Development Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 80 41 121 2 Neutral 78 36 114

PAGE 45

45 3 Not Interested 67 44 111 Total 225 121 346 Assessment / Research Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 47 42 89 2 Neutral 85 36 121 3 Not Interested 94 43 137 Total 226 121 347 Athletics Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 67 34 101 2 Neutral 64 30 94 3 Not Interested 92 57 149 Total 223 121 344 Career Services Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 91 48 139 2 Neutral 76 42 118 3 Not Interested 58 31 89 Total 225 121 346 Campus Ministry Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 36 23 59 2 Neutral 58 28 86 3 Not Interested 131 68 199 Total 225 119 344

PAGE 46

46 Commuter Services Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 36 14 50 2 Neutral 78 47 125 3 Not Interested 110 58 168 Total 224 119 343 Counseling Services Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 69 52 121 2 Neutral 75 28 103 3 Not Interested 82 41 123 Total 226 121 347 Disability Services & Student Accomodations Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 31 30 61 2 Neutral 95 36 131 3 Not Interested 100 55 155 Total 226 121 347 Financial Aid Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 26 21 47 2 Neutral 49 36 85 3 Not Interested 148 64 212 Total 223 121 344 First Year Experience Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 174 90 264 2 Neutral 42 18 60

PAGE 47

47 3 Not Interested 10 13 23 Total 226 121 347 Greek Affairs Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 75 27 102 2 Neutral 61 33 94 3 Not Interested 89 61 150 Total 225 121 346 Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 52 32 84 2 Neutral 86 40 126 3 Not Interested 86 49 135 Total 224 121 345 International Students & Programs Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 69 50 119 2 Neutral 80 42 122 3 Not Interested 77 29 106 Total 226 121 347 Intramurals / Campus Recreation Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 53 33 86 2 Neutral 78 31 109 3 Not Interested 95 56 151 Total 226 120 346

PAGE 48

48 Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 91 46 137 2 Neutral 62 34 96 3 Not Interested 72 41 113 Total 225 121 346 Leadership Development Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 164 85 249 2 Neutral 43 25 68 3 Not Interested 16 11 27 Total 223 121 344 LGBT Services Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 66 26 92 2 Neutral 76 42 118 3 Not Interested 83 53 136 Total 225 121 346 Multicultural Affairs Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 97 51 148 2 Neutral 71 42 113 3 Not Interested 58 28 86 Total 226 121 347 Orientation Programs Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 157 67 224 2 Neutral 52 33 85

PAGE 49

49 3 Not Interested 17 20 37 Total 226 120 346 Registrar Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 22 32 54 2 Neutral 67 36 103 3 Not Interested 136 53 189 Total 225 121 346 Residence Life & Housing Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 99 37 136 2 Neutral 55 29 84 3 Not Interested 72 53 125 Total 226 119 345 Service Learning & Volunteer Programs Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 102 55 157 2 Neutral 85 37 122 3 Not Interested 39 29 68 Total 226 121 347 Student Activities Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 165 69 234 2 Neutral 41 36 77 3 Not Interested 19 16 35 Total 225 121 346

PAGE 50

50 Student Union Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 113 39 152 2 Neutral 82 38 120 3 Not Interested 30 43 73 Total 225 120 345 Teaching Faculty Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 61 45 106 2 Neutral 61 41 102 3 Not Interested 102 35 137 Total 224 121 345 Women's Resources Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above 1 Interested 64 40 104 2 Neutral 86 38 124 3 Not Interested 75 40 115 Total 225 118 343 Table 4 19 Level of interest in career fields and age (Chi Square) Academic Advising Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.165 a 2 .559 Likelihood Ratio 1.178 2 .555 Linear by Linear Association 1.160 1 .281 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.98. Admissions / Enrollment Management Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)

PAGE 51

51 Pearson Chi Square 1.384 a 2 .501 Likelihood Ratio 1.386 2 .500 Linear by Linear Association .982 1 .322 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.65. Adult Learner Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.612 a 2 .060 Likelihood Ratio 5.461 2 .065 Linear by Linear Association 5.000 1 .025 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.66. Alumni Affairs and Development Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.703 a 2 .427 Likelihood Ratio 1.693 2 .429 Linear by Linear Association .799 1 .371 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 38.82. Assessment / Research Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 8.076 a 2 .018 Likelihood Ratio 7.880 2 .019 Linear by Linear Association 4.957 1 .026 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 31.03. Athletics Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)

PAGE 52

52 Pearson Chi Square 1.159 a 2 .560 Likelihood Ratio 1.159 2 .560 Linear by Linear Association .672 1 .412 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 33.06. Career Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .033 a 2 .984 Likelihood Ratio .033 2 .984 Linear by Linear Association .005 1 .945 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 31.12. Campus Ministry Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .676 a 2 .713 Likelihood Ratio .668 2 .716 Linear by Linear Association .258 1 .612 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.41. Commuter Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.457 a 2 .483 Likelihood Ratio 1.486 2 .476 Linear by Linear Association .232 1 .630 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.35. Counseling Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)

PAGE 53

53 Pearson Chi Square 6.307 a 2 .043 Likelihood Ratio 6.313 2 .043 Linear by Linear Association 2.462 1 .117 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 35.92. Disability Services and Student Accommodations Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 8.675 a 2 .013 Likelihood Ratio 8.548 2 .014 Linear by Linear Association 1.394 1 .238 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.27. Financial Aid Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 6.095 a 2 .047 Likelihood Ratio 6.039 2 .049 Linear by Linear Association 5.498 1 .019 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.53. FYE Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.445 a 2 .066 Likelihood Ratio 5.188 2 .075 Linear by Linear Association 1.818 1 .178 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.02. Greek Affairs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.381 a 2 .068 Likelihood Ratio 5.483 2 .064 Linear by Linear Association 5.296 1 .021

PAGE 54

54 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 32.87. Health, Drug, Alcohol Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.038 a 2 .595 Likelihood Ratio 1.043 2 .594 Linear by Linear Association .016 1 .898 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29.46. International Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.320 a 2 .070 Likelihood Ratio 5.353 2 .069 Linear by Linear Association 5.303 1 .021 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 36.96. Intramurals / Campus Recreation Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.777 a 2 .249 Likelihood Ratio 2.826 2 .243 Linear by Linear Association .004 1 .949 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29.83. Judicial Affairs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .211 a 2 .900 Likelihood Ratio .211 2 .900

PAGE 55

55 Linear by Linear Association .203 1 .652 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 33.57. Leadership Development Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .560 a 2 .756 Likelihood Ratio .552 2 .759 Linear by Linear Association .550 1 .458 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.50. LGBT Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.798 a 2 .247 Likelihood Ratio 2.846 2 .241 Linear by Linear Association 2.659 1 .103 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 32.17. Multicultural Affairs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .476 a 2 .788 Likelihood Ratio .476 2 .788 Linear by Linear Association .038 1 .846 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29.99. Orientation Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.024 a 2 .011

PAGE 56

56 Likelihood Ratio 8.727 2 .013 Linear by Linear Association 8.774 1 .003 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.83. Registrar Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 17.998 a 2 .000 Likelihood Ratio 17.313 2 .000 Linear by Linear Association 15.827 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18.88. Residence Life Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 6.655 a 2 .036 Likelihood Ratio 6.677 2 .035 Linear by Linear Association 6.633 1 .010 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28.97. Service Learning / Volunteer Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.921 a 2 .232 Likelihood Ratio 2.894 2 .235 Linear by Linear Association .550 1 .458 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.71. Student Activities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.571 a 2 .008 Likelihood Ratio 9.405 2 .009 Linear by Linear Association 7.811 1 .005 N of Valid Cases 346

PAGE 57

57 Student Activities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.571 a 2 .008 Likelihood Ratio 9.405 2 .009 Linear by Linear Association 7.811 1 .005 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.24. Student Union Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 24.817 a 2 .000 Likelihood Ratio 23.979 2 .000 Linear by Linear Association 21.050 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 25.39. Teaching Faculty Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.170 a 2 .010 Likelihood Ratio 9.363 2 .009 Linear by Linear Association 7.941 1 .005 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 35.77. Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.542 a 2 .462 Likelihood Ratio 1.544 2 .462 Linear by Linear Association .289 1 .591 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 35.78. Table 4 20 Level of interest in career fields and gender (Frequency)

PAGE 58

58 Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Academic Advising 1 Interested Count 46 155 201 % within Academic Advising 22.9% 77.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 51.7% 60.5% 58.3% % of Total 13.3% 44.9% 58.3% 2 Neutral Count 26 58 84 % within Academic Advising 31.0% 69.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 29.2% 22.7% 24.3% % of Total 7.5% 16.8% 24.3% 3 Not Interested Count 17 43 60 % within Academic Advising 28.3% 71.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 19.1% 16.8% 17.4% % of Total 4.9% 12.5% 17.4% Total Count 89 256 345 % within Academic Advising 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Admissions / Enrollment Management 1 Interested Count 47 125 172 % within Admissions / Enrollment Management 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 52.8% 49.0% 50.0% % of Total 13.7% 36.3% 50.0% 2 Neutral Count 24 80 104 % within Admissions / Enrollment Management 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 27.0% 31.4% 30.2% % of Total 7.0% 23.3% 30.2% 3 Not Interested Count 18 50 68

PAGE 59

59 % within Admissions / Enrollment Management 26.5% 73.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 20.2% 19.6% 19.8% % of Total 5.2% 14.5% 19.8% Total Count 89 255 344 % within Admissions / Enrollment Management 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Adult Learner Services 1 Interested Count 7 50 57 % within Adult Learner Services 12.3% 87.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 8.0% 19.5% 16.6% % of Total 2.0% 14.5% 16.6% 2 Neutral Count 42 85 127 % within Adult Learner Services 33.1% 66.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 47.7% 33.2% 36.9% % of Total 12.2% 24.7% 36.9% 3 Not Interested Count 39 121 160 % within Adult Learner Services 24.4% 75.6% 100.0% % within Gender: 44.3% 47.3% 46.5% % of Total 11.3% 35.2% 46.5% Total Count 88 256 344 % within Adult Learner Services 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female

PAGE 60

60 Alumni Affairs & Development 1 Interested Count 35 86 121 % within Alumni Affairs & Development 28.9% 71.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 39.3% 33.6% 35.1% % of Total 10.1% 24.9% 35.1% 2 Neutral Count 24 90 114 % within Alumni Affairs & Development 21.1% 78.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 27.0% 35.2% 33.0% % of Total 7.0% 26.1% 33.0% 3 Not Interested Count 30 80 110 % within Alumni Affairs & Development 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 33.7% 31.3% 31.9% % of Total 8.7% 23.2% 31.9% Total Count 89 256 345 % within Alumni Affairs & Development 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Assessment / Research 1 Interested Count 28 60 88 % within Assessment / Research 31.8% 68.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 31.5% 23.3% 25.4% % of Total 8.1% 17.3% 25.4% 2 Neutral Count 36 85 121 % within Assessment / Research 29.8% 70.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 40.4% 33.1% 35.0% % of Total 10.4% 24.6% 35.0% 3 Not Interested Count 25 112 137 % within Assessment / Research 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 28.1% 43.6% 39.6%

PAGE 61

61 % of Total 7.2% 32.4% 39.6% Total Count 89 257 346 % within Assessment / Research 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Athletics 1 Interested Count 31 70 101 % within Athletics 30.7% 69.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 35.2% 27.5% 29.4% % of Total 9.0% 20.4% 29.4% 2 Neutral Count 28 65 93 % within Athletics 30.1% 69.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 31.8% 25.5% 27.1% % of Total 8.2% 19.0% 27.1% 3 Not Interested Count 29 120 149 % within Athletics 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 33.0% 47.1% 43.4% % of Total 8.5% 35.0% 43.4% Total Count 88 255 343 % within Athletics 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Career Services 1 Interested Count 23 116 139 % within Career Services 16.5% 83.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 25.8% 45.3% 40.3% % of Total 6.7% 33.6% 40.3% 2 Neutral Count 34 83 117

PAGE 62

62 % within Career Services 29.1% 70.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 38.2% 32.4% 33.9% % of Total 9.9% 24.1% 33.9% 3 Not Interested Count 32 57 89 % within Career Services 36.0% 64.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 36.0% 22.3% 25.8% % of Total 9.3% 16.5% 25.8% Total Count 89 256 345 % within Career Services 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Campus Ministry 1 Interested Count 13 46 59 % within Campus Ministry 22.0% 78.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 14.8% 18.0% 17.2% % of Total 3.8% 13.4% 17.2% 2 Neutral Count 24 61 85 % within Campus Ministry 28.2% 71.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 27.3% 23.9% 24.8% % of Total 7.0% 17.8% 24.8% 3 Not Interested Count 51 148 199 % within Campus Ministry 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 58.0% 58.0% 58.0% % of Total 14.9% 43.1% 58.0% Total Count 88 255 343 % within Campus Ministry 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total

PAGE 63

63 Male Female Commuter Services 1 Interested Count 9 41 50 % within Commuter Services 18.0% 82.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 10.2% 16.1% 14.6% % of Total 2.6% 12.0% 14.6% 2 Neutral Count 31 93 124 % within Commuter Services 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 35.2% 36.6% 36.3% % of Total 9.1% 27.2% 36.3% 3 Not Interested Count 48 120 168 % within Commuter Services 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 54.5% 47.2% 49.1% % of Total 14.0% 35.1% 49.1% Total Count 88 254 342 % within Commuter Services 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Counseling Services 1 Interested Count 24 97 121 % within Counseling Services 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 27.0% 37.7% 35.0% % of Total 6.9% 28.0% 35.0% 2 Neutral Count 31 72 103 % within Counseling Services 30.1% 69.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 34.8% 28.0% 29.8% % of Total 9.0% 20.8% 29.8% 3 Not Interested Count 34 88 122 % within Counseling Services 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 38.2% 34.2% 35.3% % of Total 9.8% 25.4% 35.3% Total Count 89 257 346 % within Counseling Services 25.7% 74.3% 100.0%

PAGE 64

64 % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Disability Services & Student Accomodations 1 Interested Count 17 44 61 % within Disability Services & Student Accomodations 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 19.1% 17.1% 17.6% % of Total 4.9% 12.7% 17.6% 2 Neutral Count 38 92 130 % within Disability Services & Student Accomodations 29.2% 70.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 42.7% 35.8% 37.6% % of Total 11.0% 26.6% 37.6% 3 Not Interested Count 34 121 155 % within Disability Services & Student Accomodations 21.9% 78.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 38.2% 47.1% 44.8% % of Total 9.8% 35.0% 44.8% Total Count 89 257 346 % within Disability Services & Student Accomodations 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Financial Aid 1 Interested Count 11 36 47 % within Financial Aid 23.4% 76.6% 100.0% % within Gender: 12.5% 14.1% 13.7% % of Total 3.2% 10.5% 13.7%

PAGE 65

65 2 Neutral Count 24 60 84 % within Financial Aid 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 27.3% 23.5% 24.5% % of Total 7.0% 17.5% 24.5% 3 Not Interested Count 53 159 212 % within Financial Aid 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 60.2% 62.4% 61.8% % of Total 15.5% 46.4% 61.8% Total Count 88 255 343 % within Financial Aid 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female First Year Experience 1 Interested Count 68 195 263 % within First Year Experience 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 76.4% 75.9% 76.0% % of Total 19.7% 56.4% 76.0% 2 Neutral Count 16 44 60 % within First Year Experience 26.7% 73.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 18.0% 17.1% 17.3% % of Total 4.6% 12.7% 17.3% 3 Not Interested Count 5 18 23 % within First Year Experience 21.7% 78.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 5.6% 7.0% 6.6% % of Total 1.4% 5.2% 6.6% Total Count 89 257 346 % within First Year Experience 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab

PAGE 66

66 Gender: Total Male Female Greek Affairs 1 Interested Count 28 74 102 % within Greek Affairs 27.5% 72.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 31.8% 28.8% 29.6% % of Total 8.1% 21.4% 29.6% 2 Neutral Count 26 67 93 % within Greek Affairs 28.0% 72.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 29.5% 26.1% 27.0% % of Total 7.5% 19.4% 27.0% 3 Not Interested Count 34 116 150 % within Greek Affairs 22.7% 77.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 38.6% 45.1% 43.5% % of Total 9.9% 33.6% 43.5% Total Count 88 257 345 % within Greek Affairs 25.5% 74.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.5% 74.5% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs 1 Interested Count 22 62 84 % within Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs 26.2% 73.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 25.0% 24.2% 24.4% % of Total 6.4% 18.0% 24.4% 2 Neutral Count 35 90 125 % within Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs 28.0% 72.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 39.8% 35.2% 36.3% % of Total 10.2% 26.2% 36.3% 3 Not Interested Count 31 104 135 % within Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs 23.0% 77.0% 100.0%

PAGE 67

67 % within Gender: 35.2% 40.6% 39.2% % of Total 9.0% 30.2% 39.2% Total Count 88 256 344 % within Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female International Students & Programs 1 Interested Count 26 93 119 % within International Students & Programs 21.8% 78.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 29.2% 36.2% 34.4% % of Total 7.5% 26.9% 34.4% 2 Neutral Count 30 91 121 % within International Students & Programs 24.8% 75.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 33.7% 35.4% 35.0% % of Total 8.7% 26.3% 35.0% 3 Not Interested Count 33 73 106 % within International Students & Programs 31.1% 68.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 37.1% 28.4% 30.6% % of Total 9.5% 21.1% 30.6% Total Count 89 257 346 % within International Students & Programs 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total

PAGE 68

68 Male Female Intramurals / Campus Recreation 1 Interested Count 42 44 86 % within Intramurals / Campus Recreation 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 47.2% 17.2% 24.9% % of Total 12.2% 12.8% 24.9% 2 Neutral Count 24 85 109 % within Intramurals / Campus Recreation 22.0% 78.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 27.0% 33.2% 31.6% % of Total 7.0% 24.6% 31.6% 3 Not Interested Count 23 127 150 % within Intramurals / Campus Recreation 15.3% 84.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 25.8% 49.6% 43.5% % of Total 6.7% 36.8% 43.5% Total Count 89 256 345 % within Intramurals / Campus Recreation 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability 1 Interested Count 45 91 136 % within Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability 33.1% 66.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 50.6% 35.5% 39.4% % of Total 13.0% 26.4% 39.4% 2 Neutral Count 29 67 96 % within Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability 30.2% 69.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 32.6% 26.2% 27.8% % of Total 8.4% 19.4% 27.8%

PAGE 69

69 3 Not Interested Count 15 98 113 % within Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 16.9% 38.3% 32.8% % of Total 4.3% 28.4% 32.8% Total Count 89 256 345 % within Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Leadership Development 1 Interested Count 66 182 248 % within Leadership Development 26.6% 73.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 74.2% 71.7% 72.3% % of Total 19.2% 53.1% 72.3% 2 Neutral Count 19 49 68 % within Leadership Development 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 21.3% 19.3% 19.8% % of Total 5.5% 14.3% 19.8% 3 Not Interested Count 4 23 27 % within Leadership Development 14.8% 85.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 4.5% 9.1% 7.9% % of Total 1.2% 6.7% 7.9% Total Count 89 254 343 % within Leadership Development 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female

PAGE 70

70 LGBT Services 1 Interested Count 26 66 92 % within LGBT Services 28.3% 71.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 29.5% 25.7% 26.7% % of Total 7.5% 19.1% 26.7% 2 Neutral Count 28 90 118 % within LGBT Services 23.7% 76.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 31.8% 35.0% 34.2% % of Total 8.1% 26.1% 34.2% 3 Not Interested Count 34 101 135 % within LGBT Services 25.2% 74.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 38.6% 39.3% 39.1% % of Total 9.9% 29.3% 39.1% Total Count 88 257 345 % within LGBT Services 25.5% 74.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.5% 74.5% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Multicultural Affairs 1 Interested Count 34 114 148 % within Multicultural Affairs 23.0% 77.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 38.2% 44.4% 42.8% % of Total 9.8% 32.9% 42.8% 2 Neutral Count 32 80 112 % within Multicultural Affairs 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 36.0% 31.1% 32.4% % of Total 9.2% 23.1% 32.4% 3 Not Interested Count 23 63 86 % within Multicultural Affairs 26.7% 73.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 25.8% 24.5% 24.9% % of Total 6.6% 18.2% 24.9% Total Count 89 257 346 % within Multicultural Affairs 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

PAGE 71

71 Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Multicultural Affairs 1 Interested Count 34 114 148 % within Multicultural Affairs 23.0% 77.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 38.2% 44.4% 42.8% % of Total 9.8% 32.9% 42.8% 2 Neutral Count 32 80 112 % within Multicultural Affairs 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 36.0% 31.1% 32.4% % of Total 9.2% 23.1% 32.4% 3 Not Interested Count 23 63 86 % within Multicultural Affairs 26.7% 73.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 25.8% 24.5% 24.9% % of Total 6.6% 18.2% 24.9% Total Count 89 257 346 % within Multicultural Affairs 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Orientation Programs 1 Interested Count 52 172 224 % within Orientation Programs 23.2% 76.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 59.1% 66.9% 64.9% % of Total 15.1% 49.9% 64.9% 2 Neutral Count 24 60 84 % within Orientation Programs 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 27.3% 23.3% 24.3% % of Total 7.0% 17.4% 24.3% 3 Not Interested Count 12 25 37 % within Orientation Programs 32.4% 67.6% 100.0% % within Gender: 13.6% 9.7% 10.7% % of Total 3.5% 7.2% 10.7%

PAGE 72

72 Total Count 88 257 345 % within Orientation Programs 25.5% 74.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.5% 74.5% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Registrar 1 Interested Count 12 42 54 % within Registrar 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 13.5% 16.4% 15.7% % of Total 3.5% 12.2% 15.7% 2 Neutral Count 28 74 102 % within Registrar 27.5% 72.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 31.5% 28.9% 29.6% % of Total 8.1% 21.4% 29.6% 3 Not Interested Count 49 140 189 % within Registrar 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 55.1% 54.7% 54.8% % of Total 14.2% 40.6% 54.8% Total Count 89 256 345 % within Registrar 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Residence Life & Housing 1 Interested Count 43 92 135 % within Residence Life & Housing 31.9% 68.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 48.9% 35.9% 39.2% % of Total 12.5% 26.7% 39.2% 2 Neutral Count 26 58 84 % within Residence Life & Housing 31.0% 69.0% 100.0%

PAGE 73

73 % within Gender: 29.5% 22.7% 24.4% % of Total 7.6% 16.9% 24.4% 3 Not Interested Count 19 106 125 % within Residence Life & Housing 15.2% 84.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 21.6% 41.4% 36.3% % of Total 5.5% 30.8% 36.3% Total Count 88 256 344 % within Residence Life & Housing 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Service Learning & Volunteer Programs 1 Interested Count 38 119 157 % within Service Learning & Volunteer Programs 24.2% 75.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 42.7% 46.3% 45.4% % of Total 11.0% 34.4% 45.4% 2 Neutral Count 33 89 122 % within Service Learning & Volunteer Programs 27.0% 73.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 37.1% 34.6% 35.3% % of Total 9.5% 25.7% 35.3% 3 Not Interested Count 18 49 67 % within Service Learning & Volunteer Programs 26.9% 73.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 20.2% 19.1% 19.4% % of Total 5.2% 14.2% 19.4% Total Count 89 257 346 % within Service Learning & Volunteer Programs 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0%

PAGE 74

74 Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Student Activities 1 Interested Count 60 174 234 % within Student Activities 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 67.4% 68.0% 67.8% % of Total 17.4% 50.4% 67.8% 2 Neutral Count 27 50 77 % within Student Activities 35.1% 64.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 30.3% 19.5% 22.3% % of Total 7.8% 14.5% 22.3% 3 Not Interested Count 2 32 34 % within Student Activities 5.9% 94.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 2.2% 12.5% 9.9% % of Total .6% 9.3% 9.9% Total Count 89 256 345 % within Student Activities 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Student Union 1 Interested Count 42 110 152 % within Student Union 27.6% 72.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 47.2% 43.1% 44.2% % of Total 12.2% 32.0% 44.2% 2 Neutral Count 32 88 120 % within Student Union 26.7% 73.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 36.0% 34.5% 34.9% % of Total 9.3% 25.6% 34.9% 3 Not Interested Count 15 57 72 % within Student Union 20.8% 79.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 16.9% 22.4% 20.9%

PAGE 75

75 % of Total 4.4% 16.6% 20.9% Total Count 89 255 344 % within Student Union 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Teaching Faculty 1 Interested Count 35 71 106 % within Teaching Faculty 33.0% 67.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 39.3% 27.8% 30.8% % of Total 10.2% 20.6% 30.8% 2 Neutral Count 29 72 101 % within Teaching Faculty 28.7% 71.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 32.6% 28.2% 29.4% % of Total 8.4% 20.9% 29.4% 3 Not Interested Count 25 112 137 % within Teaching Faculty 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 28.1% 43.9% 39.8% % of Total 7.3% 32.6% 39.8% Total Count 89 255 344 % within Teaching Faculty 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% Crosstab Gender: Total Male Female Women's Resources 1 Interested Count 7 97 104 % within Women's Resources 6.7% 93.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 7.9% 38.3% 30.4% % of Total 2.0% 28.4% 30.4% 2 Neutral Count 32 92 124

PAGE 76

76 % within Women's Resources 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 36.0% 36.4% 36.3% % of Total 9.4% 26.9% 36.3% 3 Not Interested Count 50 64 114 % within Women's Resources 43.9% 56.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 56.2% 25.3% 33.3% % of Total 14.6% 18.7% 33.3% Total Count 89 253 342 % within Women's Resources 26.0% 74.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 26.0% 74.0% 100.0% Table 4 21 Level of interest in career fields and gender (Chi Square) Chi Square Tests Admissions / Enrollment Management Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .626 a 2 .731 Likelihood Ratio .634 2 .728 Linear by Linear Association .109 1 .741 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.59. Chi Square Tests Adult Learner Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.161 a 2 .010 Likelihood Ratio 9.831 2 .007 Linear by Linear Association .899 1 .343 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.58. Chi Square Tests

PAGE 77

77 Alumni Affairs / Development Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.084 a 2 .353 Likelihood Ratio 2.128 2 .345 Linear by Linear Association .106 1 .745 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28.38. Chi Square Tests Assessment / Research Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 6.746 a 2 .034 Likelihood Ratio 6.942 2 .031 Linear by Linear Association 5.827 1 .016 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.64. Chi Square Tests Athletics Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.306 a 2 .070 Likelihood Ratio 5.405 2 .067 Linear by Linear Association 4.403 1 .036 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.86. Chi Square Tests Career Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 11.662 a 2 .003 Likelihood Ratio 11.928 2 .003 Linear by Linear Association 11.315 1 .001 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.96.

PAGE 78

78 Chi Square Tests Campus Ministry Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .702 a 2 .704 Likelihood Ratio .710 2 .701 Linear by Linear Association .113 1 .737 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.14. Chi Square Tests Commuter Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.308 a 2 .315 Likelihood Ratio 2.416 2 .299 Linear by Linear Association 2.196 1 .138 N of Valid Cases 342 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.87. Chi Square Tests Counseling Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.521 a 2 .172 Likelihood Ratio 3.608 2 .165 Linear by Linear Association 2.039 1 .153 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 26.49. Chi Square Tests Disability Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.148 a 2 .342 Likelihood Ratio 2.163 2 .339 Linear by Linear Association 1.412 1 .235

PAGE 79

79 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.69. Chi Square Tests Financial Aid Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .547 a 2 .761 Likelihood Ratio .541 2 .763 Linear by Linear Association .003 1 .955 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.06. Chi Square Tests FYE Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .221 a 2 .895 Likelihood Ratio .228 2 .892 Linear by Linear Association .070 1 .791 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.92. Chi Square Tests Greek Affairs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.134 a 2 .567 Likelihood Ratio 1.141 2 .565 Linear by Linear Association .834 1 .361 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.72. Chi Square Tests Health Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .887 a 2 .642

PAGE 80

80 Likelihood Ratio .891 2 .641 Linear by Linear Association .406 1 .524 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.49. Chi Square Tests International Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.613 a 2 .271 Likelihood Ratio 2.581 2 .275 Linear by Linear Association 2.487 1 .115 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27.27. Chi Square Tests Intramurals / Campus Recreation Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 33.242 a 2 .000 Likelihood Ratio 31.312 2 .000 Linear by Linear Association 29.306 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.19. Chi Square Tests Judicial Affairs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 14.010 a 2 .001 Likelihood Ratio 15.154 2 .001 Linear by Linear Association 12.192 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 24.77.

PAGE 81

81 Chi Square Tests Leadership Development Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.939 a 2 .379 Likelihood Ratio 2.154 2 .341 Linear by Linear Association .848 1 .357 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.01. Chi Square Tests LGBT Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .571 a 2 .752 Likelihood Ratio .566 2 .754 Linear by Linear Association .209 1 .648 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.47. Chi Square Tests Multicultural Affairs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.108 a 2 .575 Likelihood Ratio 1.112 2 .574 Linear by Linear Association .573 1 .449 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.12. Chi Square Tests Orientation Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.969 a 2 .374 Likelihood Ratio 1.924 2 .382 Linear by Linear Association 1.948 1 .163 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.44.

PAGE 82

82 Chi Square Tests Registrar Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .508 a 2 .776 Likelihood Ratio .518 2 .772 Linear by Linear Association .129 1 .719 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.93. Chi Square Tests Residence Life / Housing Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 11.138 a 2 .004 Likelihood Ratio 11.782 2 .003 Linear by Linear Association 9.272 1 .002 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.49. Chi Square Tests Service Learning / Volunteer Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .348 a 2 .840 Likelihood Ratio .349 2 .840 Linear by Linear Association .258 1 .611 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.23. Chi Square Tests Student Activities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 10.502 a 2 .005 Likelihood Ratio 12.538 2 .002 Linear by Linear Association 1.406 1 .236 N of Valid Cases 345

PAGE 83

83 Chi Square Tests Student Activities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 10.502 a 2 .005 Likelihood Ratio 12.538 2 .002 Linear by Linear Association 1.406 1 .236 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.77. Chi Square Tests Student Union Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.238 a 2 .538 Likelihood Ratio 1.280 2 .527 Linear by Linear Association 1.005 1 .316 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18.63. Chi Square Tests Teaching Faculty Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 7.400 a 2 .025 Likelihood Ratio 7.567 2 .023 Linear by Linear Association 7.029 1 .008 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 26.13. Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 38.949 a 2 .000 Likelihood Ratio 42.914 2 .000 Linear by Linear Association 38.825 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 342

PAGE 84

84 Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 38.949 a 2 .000 Likelihood Ratio 42.914 2 .000 Linear by Linear Association 38.825 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 342 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27.06. Table 4 22 Level of interest in career fields and ethnicity (Frequency) Academic Advising Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 20 21 161 202 % within Academic Advising 9.9% 10.4% 79.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 62.5% 58.3% 57.9% 58.4% % of Total 5.8% 6.1% 46.5% 58.4% 2 Neutral Count 6 7 71 84 % within Academic Advising 7.1% 8.3% 84.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 19.4% 25.5% 24.3% % of Total 1.7% 2.0% 20.5% 24.3% 3 Not Interested Count 6 8 46 60 % within Academic Advising 10.0% 13.3% 76.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 22.2% 16.5% 17.3% % of Total 1.7% 2.3% 13.3% 17.3% Total Count 32 36 278 346 % within Academic Advising 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% Admissions / Enrollment Management Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian

PAGE 85

85 1 Interested Count 18 19 135 172 % within Admissions / Enrollment Management 10.5% 11.0% 78.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 56.3% 52.8% 48.7% 49.9% % of Total 5.2% 5.5% 39.1% 49.9% 2 Neutral Count 7 9 89 105 % within Admissions / Enrollment Management 6.7% 8.6% 84.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 21.9% 25.0% 32.1% 30.4% % of Total 2.0% 2.6% 25.8% 30.4% 3 Not Interested Count 7 8 53 68 % within Admissions / Enrollment Management 10.3% 11.8% 77.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 21.9% 22.2% 19.1% 19.7% % of Total 2.0% 2.3% 15.4% 19.7% Total Count 32 36 277 345 % within Admissions / Enrollment Management 9.3% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.3% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% Adult Learner Services Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 4 6 47 57 % within Adult Learner Services 7.0% 10.5% 82.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.5% 16.7% 17.0% 16.5% % of Total 1.2% 1.7% 13.6% 16.5% 2 Neutral Count 15 14 99 128 % within Adult Learner Services 11.7% 10.9% 77.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 46.9% 38.9% 35.7% 37.1% % of Total 4.3% 4.1% 28.7% 37.1% 3 Not Interested Count 13 16 131 160 % within Adult Learner Services 8.1% 10.0% 81.9% 100.0%

PAGE 86

86 % within Ethnicity: 40.6% 44.4% 47.3% 46.4% % of Total 3.8% 4.6% 38.0% 46.4% Total Count 32 36 277 345 % within Adult Learner Services 9.3% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.3% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% Alumni Affairs and Development Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 9 8 104 121 % within Alumni Affairs & Development 7.4% 6.6% 86.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 28.1% 22.2% 37.4% 35.0% % of Total 2.6% 2.3% 30.1% 35.0% 2 Neutral Count 13 14 87 114 % within Alumni Affairs & Development 11.4% 12.3% 76.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 40.6% 38.9% 31.3% 32.9% % of Total 3.8% 4.0% 25.1% 32.9% 3 Not Interested Count 10 14 87 111 % within Alumni Affairs & Development 9.0% 12.6% 78.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 31.3% 38.9% 31.3% 32.1% % of Total 2.9% 4.0% 25.1% 32.1% Total Count 32 36 278 346 % within Alumni Affairs & Development 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% Assessment / Research Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian

PAGE 87

87 1 Interested Count 10 7 72 89 % within Assessment / Research 11.2% 7.9% 80.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 31.3% 19.4% 25.8% 25.6% % of Total 2.9% 2.0% 20.7% 25.6% 2 Neutral Count 14 13 94 121 % within Assessment / Research 11.6% 10.7% 77.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 43.8% 36.1% 33.7% 34.9% % of Total 4.0% 3.7% 27.1% 34.9% 3 Not Interested Count 8 16 113 137 % within Assessment / Research 5.8% 11.7% 82.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 25.0% 44.4% 40.5% 39.5% % of Total 2.3% 4.6% 32.6% 39.5% Total Count 32 36 279 347 % within Assessment / Research 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% Athletics Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 10 8 83 101 % within Athletics 9.9% 7.9% 82.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 31.3% 22.2% 30.1% 29.4% % of Total 2.9% 2.3% 24.1% 29.4% 2 Neutral Count 8 12 74 94 % within Athletics 8.5% 12.8% 78.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 25.0% 33.3% 26.8% 27.3% % of Total 2.3% 3.5% 21.5% 27.3% 3 Not Interested Count 14 16 119 149 % within Athletics 9.4% 10.7% 79.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 43.8% 44.4% 43.1% 43.3%

PAGE 88

88 % of Total 4.1% 4.7% 34.6% 43.3% Total Count 32 36 276 344 % within Athletics 9.3% 10.5% 80.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.3% 10.5% 80.2% 100.0% Career Services Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 15 14 110 139 % within Career Services 10.8% 10.1% 79.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 46.9% 38.9% 39.6% 40.2% % of Total 4.3% 4.0% 31.8% 40.2% 2 Neutral Count 10 14 94 118 % within Career Services 8.5% 11.9% 79.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 31.3% 38.9% 33.8% 34.1% % of Total 2.9% 4.0% 27.2% 34.1% 3 Not Interested Count 7 8 74 89 % within Career Services 7.9% 9.0% 83.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 21.9% 22.2% 26.6% 25.7% % of Total 2.0% 2.3% 21.4% 25.7% Total Count 32 36 278 346 % within Career Services 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% Campus Ministry Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 8 8 43 59 % within Campus Ministry 13.6% 13.6% 72.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 25.8% 22.2% 15.5% 17.2% % of Total 2.3% 2.3% 12.5% 17.2%

PAGE 89

89 2 Neutral Count 4 10 72 86 % within Campus Ministry 4.7% 11.6% 83.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.9% 27.8% 26.0% 25.0% % of Total 1.2% 2.9% 20.9% 25.0% 3 Not Interested Count 19 18 162 199 % within Campus Ministry 9.5% 9.0% 81.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 61.3% 50.0% 58.5% 57.8% % of Total 5.5% 5.2% 47.1% 57.8% Total Count 31 36 277 344 % within Campus Ministry 9.0% 10.5% 80.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.5% 80.5% 100.0% Commuter Services Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 2 8 40 50 % within Commuter Services 4.0% 16.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.7% 22.9% 14.4% 14.6% % of Total .6% 2.3% 11.7% 14.6% 2 Neutral Count 12 13 100 125 % within Commuter Services 9.6% 10.4% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 40.0% 37.1% 36.0% 36.4% % of Total 3.5% 3.8% 29.2% 36.4% 3 Not Interested Count 16 14 138 168 % within Commuter Services 9.5% 8.3% 82.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 53.3% 40.0% 49.6% 49.0% % of Total 4.7% 4.1% 40.2% 49.0% Total Count 30 35 278 343 % within Commuter Services 8.7% 10.2% 81.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 8.7% 10.2% 81.0% 100.0%

PAGE 90

90 Counseling Services Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 13 15 93 121 % within Counseling Services 10.7% 12.4% 76.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 40.6% 41.7% 33.3% 34.9% % of Total 3.7% 4.3% 26.8% 34.9% 2 Neutral Count 9 10 84 103 % within Counseling Services 8.7% 9.7% 81.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 28.1% 27.8% 30.1% 29.7% % of Total 2.6% 2.9% 24.2% 29.7% 3 Not Interested Count 10 11 102 123 % within Counseling Services 8.1% 8.9% 82.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 31.3% 30.6% 36.6% 35.4% % of Total 2.9% 3.2% 29.4% 35.4% Total Count 32 36 279 347 % within Counseling Services 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% Disability Services & Student Accommodations Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 7 7 47 61 % within Disability Services & Student Accommodations 11.5% 11.5% 77.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 21.9% 19.4% 16.8% 17.6% % of Total 2.0% 2.0% 13.5% 17.6% 2 Neutral Count 14 15 102 131 % within Disability Services & Student Accommodations 10.7% 11.5% 77.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 43.8% 41.7% 36.6% 37.8% % of Total 4.0% 4.3% 29.4% 37.8% 3 Not Interested Count 11 14 130 155

PAGE 91

91 % within Disability Services & Student Accommodations 7.1% 9.0% 83.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 34.4% 38.9% 46.6% 44.7% % of Total 3.2% 4.0% 37.5% 44.7% Total Count 32 36 279 347 % within Disability Services & Student Accommodations 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% Financial Aid Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 7 5 35 47 % within Financial Aid 14.9% 10.6% 74.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 22.6% 13.9% 12.6% 13.7% % of Total 2.0% 1.5% 10.2% 13.7% 2 Neutral Count 7 10 68 85 % within Financial Aid 8.2% 11.8% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 22.6% 27.8% 24.5% 24.7% % of Total 2.0% 2.9% 19.8% 24.7% 3 Not Interested Count 17 21 174 212 % within Financial Aid 8.0% 9.9% 82.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 54.8% 58.3% 62.8% 61.6% % of Total 4.9% 6.1% 50.6% 61.6% Total Count 31 36 277 344 % within Financial Aid 9.0% 10.5% 80.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.5% 80.5% 100.0% First Year Experience Ethnicity: Total

PAGE 92

92 Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 24 27 213 264 % within First Year Experience 9.1% 10.2% 80.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 75.0% 75.0% 76.3% 76.1% % of Total 6.9% 7.8% 61.4% 76.1% 2 Neutral Count 6 8 46 60 % within First Year Experience 10.0% 13.3% 76.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 22.2% 16.5% 17.3% % of Total 1.7% 2.3% 13.3% 17.3% 3 Not Interested Count 2 1 20 23 % within First Year Experience 8.7% 4.3% 87.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.3% 2.8% 7.2% 6.6% % of Total .6% .3% 5.8% 6.6% Total Count 32 36 279 347 % within First Year Experience 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% Greek Affairs Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 6 12 84 102 % within Greek Affairs 5.9% 11.8% 82.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 33.3% 30.2% 29.5% % of Total 1.7% 3.5% 24.3% 29.5% 2 Neutral Count 8 12 74 94 % within Greek Affairs 8.5% 12.8% 78.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 25.0% 33.3% 26.6% 27.2% % of Total 2.3% 3.5% 21.4% 27.2% 3 Not Interested Count 18 12 120 150 % within Greek Affairs 12.0% 8.0% 80.0% 100.0%

PAGE 93

93 % within Ethnicity: 56.3% 33.3% 43.2% 43.4% % of Total 5.2% 3.5% 34.7% 43.4% Total Count 32 36 278 346 % within Greek Affairs 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 3 9 72 84 % within Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs 3.6% 10.7% 85.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 9.4% 25.0% 26.0% 24.3% % of Total .9% 2.6% 20.9% 24.3% 2 Neutral Count 14 10 102 126 % within Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs 11.1% 7.9% 81.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 43.8% 27.8% 36.8% 36.5% % of Total 4.1% 2.9% 29.6% 36.5% 3 Not Interested Count 15 17 103 135 % within Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs 11.1% 12.6% 76.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 46.9% 47.2% 37.2% 39.1% % of Total 4.3% 4.9% 29.9% 39.1% Total Count 32 36 277 345 % within Health, Drug, & Alcohol Programs 9.3% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.3% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% International Students and Programs Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian

PAGE 94

94 1 Interested Count 19 4 96 119 % within International Students & Programs 16.0% 3.4% 80.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 59.4% 11.1% 34.4% 34.3% % of Total 5.5% 1.2% 27.7% 34.3% 2 Neutral Count 7 19 96 122 % within International Students & Programs 5.7% 15.6% 78.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 21.9% 52.8% 34.4% 35.2% % of Total 2.0% 5.5% 27.7% 35.2% 3 Not Interested Count 6 13 87 106 % within International Students & Programs 5.7% 12.3% 82.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 36.1% 31.2% 30.5% % of Total 1.7% 3.7% 25.1% 30.5% Total Count 32 36 279 347 % within International Students & Programs 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% Intramurals / Campus Recreation Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 9 7 70 86 % within Intramurals / Campus Recreation 10.5% 8.1% 81.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 29.0% 19.4% 25.1% 24.9% % of Total 2.6% 2.0% 20.2% 24.9% 2 Neutral Count 6 10 93 109 % within Intramurals / Campus Recreation 5.5% 9.2% 85.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 19.4% 27.8% 33.3% 31.5% % of Total 1.7% 2.9% 26.9% 31.5% 3 Not Interested Count 16 19 116 151

PAGE 95

95 % within Intramurals / Campus Recreation 10.6% 12.6% 76.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 51.6% 52.8% 41.6% 43.6% % of Total 4.6% 5.5% 33.5% 43.6% Total Count 31 36 279 346 % within Intramurals / Campus Recreation 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 9 16 112 137 % within Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability 6.6% 11.7% 81.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 29.0% 44.4% 40.1% 39.6% % of Total 2.6% 4.6% 32.4% 39.6% 2 Neutral Count 12 8 76 96 % within Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability 12.5% 8.3% 79.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 38.7% 22.2% 27.2% 27.7% % of Total 3.5% 2.3% 22.0% 27.7% 3 Not Interested Count 10 12 91 113 % within Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability 8.8% 10.6% 80.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 32.3% 33.3% 32.6% 32.7% % of Total 2.9% 3.5% 26.3% 32.7% Total Count 31 36 279 346 % within Judicial Affairs / Student Accountability 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% Leadership Development Ethnicity: Total

PAGE 96

96 Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 22 26 201 249 % within Leadership Development 8.8% 10.4% 80.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 68.8% 72.2% 72.8% 72.4% % of Total 6.4% 7.6% 58.4% 72.4% 2 Neutral Count 7 9 52 68 % within Leadership Development 10.3% 13.2% 76.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 21.9% 25.0% 18.8% 19.8% % of Total 2.0% 2.6% 15.1% 19.8% 3 Not Interested Count 3 1 23 27 % within Leadership Development 11.1% 3.7% 85.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 9.4% 2.8% 8.3% 7.8% % of Total .9% .3% 6.7% 7.8% Total Count 32 36 276 344 % within Leadership Development 9.3% 10.5% 80.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.3% 10.5% 80.2% 100.0% LGBT Services Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 10 12 70 92 % within LGBT Services 10.9% 13.0% 76.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 31.3% 33.3% 25.2% 26.6% % of Total 2.9% 3.5% 20.2% 26.6% 2 Neutral Count 9 9 100 118 % within LGBT Services 7.6% 7.6% 84.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 28.1% 25.0% 36.0% 34.1% % of Total 2.6% 2.6% 28.9% 34.1% 3 Not Interested Count 13 15 108 136

PAGE 97

97 % within LGBT Services 9.6% 11.0% 79.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 40.6% 41.7% 38.8% 39.3% % of Total 3.8% 4.3% 31.2% 39.3% Total Count 32 36 278 346 % within LGBT Services 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% Multicultural Affairs Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 23 30 95 148 % within Multicultural Affairs 15.5% 20.3% 64.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 71.9% 83.3% 34.1% 42.7% % of Total 6.6% 8.6% 27.4% 42.7% 2 Neutral Count 6 4 103 113 % within Multicultural Affairs 5.3% 3.5% 91.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 11.1% 36.9% 32.6% % of Total 1.7% 1.2% 29.7% 32.6% 3 Not Interested Count 3 2 81 86 % within Multicultural Affairs 3.5% 2.3% 94.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 9.4% 5.6% 29.0% 24.8% % of Total .9% .6% 23.3% 24.8% Total Count 32 36 279 347 % within Multicultural Affairs 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% Orientation Programs Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 21 25 178 224 % within Orientation Programs 9.4% 11.2% 79.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 65.6% 69.4% 64.0% 64.7%

PAGE 98

98 % of Total 6.1% 7.2% 51.4% 64.7% 2 Neutral Count 6 9 70 85 % within Orientation Programs 7.1% 10.6% 82.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 25.0% 25.2% 24.6% % of Total 1.7% 2.6% 20.2% 24.6% 3 Not Interested Count 5 2 30 37 % within Orientation Programs 13.5% 5.4% 81.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 15.6% 5.6% 10.8% 10.7% % of Total 1.4% .6% 8.7% 10.7% Total Count 32 36 278 346 % within Orientation Programs 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% Registrar Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 6 9 39 54 % within Registrar 11.1% 16.7% 72.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 25.0% 14.0% 15.6% % of Total 1.7% 2.6% 11.3% 15.6% 2 Neutral Count 11 4 88 103 % within Registrar 10.7% 3.9% 85.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 34.4% 11.1% 31.7% 29.8% % of Total 3.2% 1.2% 25.4% 29.8% 3 Not Interested Count 15 23 151 189 % within Registrar 7.9% 12.2% 79.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 46.9% 63.9% 54.3% 54.6% % of Total 4.3% 6.6% 43.6% 54.6% Total Count 32 36 278 346 % within Registrar 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0%

PAGE 99

99 Residence Life and Housing Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 14 19 103 136 % within Residence Life & Housing 10.3% 14.0% 75.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 43.8% 52.8% 37.2% 39.4% % of Total 4.1% 5.5% 29.9% 39.4% 2 Neutral Count 6 4 74 84 % within Residence Life & Housing 7.1% 4.8% 88.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 11.1% 26.7% 24.3% % of Total 1.7% 1.2% 21.4% 24.3% 3 Not Interested Count 12 13 100 125 % within Residence Life & Housing 9.6% 10.4% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 37.5% 36.1% 36.1% 36.2% % of Total 3.5% 3.8% 29.0% 36.2% Total Count 32 36 277 345 % within Residence Life & Housing 9.3% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.3% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% Service Learning and Volunteer Programs Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 16 11 130 157 % within Service Learning & Volunteer Programs 10.2% 7.0% 82.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 50.0% 30.6% 46.6% 45.2% % of Total 4.6% 3.2% 37.5% 45.2% 2 Neutral Count 12 15 95 122

PAGE 100

100 % within Service Learning & Volunteer Programs 9.8% 12.3% 77.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 37.5% 41.7% 34.1% 35.2% % of Total 3.5% 4.3% 27.4% 35.2% 3 Not Interested Count 4 10 54 68 % within Service Learning & Volunteer Programs 5.9% 14.7% 79.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.5% 27.8% 19.4% 19.6% % of Total 1.2% 2.9% 15.6% 19.6% Total Count 32 36 279 347 % within Service Learning & Volunteer Programs 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% Student Activities Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 23 25 186 234 % within Student Activities 9.8% 10.7% 79.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 71.9% 69.4% 66.9% 67.6% % of Total 6.6% 7.2% 53.8% 67.6% 2 Neutral Count 6 6 65 77 % within Student Activities 7.8% 7.8% 84.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 16.7% 23.4% 22.3% % of Total 1.7% 1.7% 18.8% 22.3% 3 Not Interested Count 3 5 27 35 % within Student Activities 8.6% 14.3% 77.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 9.4% 13.9% 9.7% 10.1% % of Total .9% 1.4% 7.8% 10.1% Total Count 32 36 278 346 % within Student Activities 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0%

PAGE 101

101 Student Union Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 12 17 123 152 % within Student Union 7.9% 11.2% 80.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 38.7% 48.6% 44.1% 44.1% % of Total 3.5% 4.9% 35.7% 44.1% 2 Neutral Count 14 8 98 120 % within Student Union 11.7% 6.7% 81.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 45.2% 22.9% 35.1% 34.8% % of Total 4.1% 2.3% 28.4% 34.8% 3 Not Interested Count 5 10 58 73 % within Student Union 6.8% 13.7% 79.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 16.1% 28.6% 20.8% 21.2% % of Total 1.4% 2.9% 16.8% 21.2% Total Count 31 35 279 345 % within Student Union 9.0% 10.1% 80.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.1% 80.9% 100.0% Teaching Faculty Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 10 10 86 106 % within Teaching Faculty 9.4% 9.4% 81.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 32.3% 27.8% 30.9% 30.7% % of Total 2.9% 2.9% 24.9% 30.7% 2 Neutral Count 10 8 84 102 % within Teaching Faculty 9.8% 7.8% 82.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 32.3% 22.2% 30.2% 29.6% % of Total 2.9% 2.3% 24.3% 29.6% 3 Not Interested Count 11 18 108 137 % within Teaching Faculty 8.0% 13.1% 78.8% 100.0%

PAGE 102

102 % within Ethnicity: 35.5% 50.0% 38.8% 39.7% % of Total 3.2% 5.2% 31.3% 39.7% Total Count 31 36 278 345 % within Teaching Faculty 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% Women's Resources Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian 1 Interested Count 14 14 76 104 % within Women's Resources 13.5% 13.5% 73.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 45.2% 40.0% 27.4% 30.3% % of Total 4.1% 4.1% 22.2% 30.3% 2 Neutral Count 6 13 105 124 % within Women's Resources 4.8% 10.5% 84.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 19.4% 37.1% 37.9% 36.2% % of Total 1.7% 3.8% 30.6% 36.2% 3 Not Interested Count 11 8 96 115 % within Women's Resources 9.6% 7.0% 83.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 35.5% 22.9% 34.7% 33.5% % of Total 3.2% 2.3% 28.0% 33.5% Total Count 31 35 277 343 % within Women's Resources 9.0% 10.2% 80.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.2% 80.8% 100.0% Table 4 23 Level of interest in career fields and ethnicity (Chi Square) Academic Advising Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.667 a 4 .797 Likelihood Ratio 1.682 4 .794 Linear by Linear Association .004 1 .947

PAGE 103

103 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.55. Admissions and Enrollment Management Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.013 a 4 .733 Likelihood Ratio 2.098 4 .718 Linear by Linear Association .089 1 .765 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.31. Adult Learner Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.648 a 4 .800 Likelihood Ratio 1.624 4 .805 Linear by Linear Association .053 1 .819 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.29. Alumni Affairs and Development Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.344 a 4 .361 Likelihood Ratio 4.526 4 .340 Linear by Linear Association 1.675 1 .196 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.27. Assessment / Research Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.783 a 4 .436 Likelihood Ratio 4.001 4 .406 Linear by Linear Association .568 1 .451 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.21.

PAGE 104

104 Athletics Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.291 a 4 .863 Likelihood Ratio 1.319 4 .858 Linear by Linear Association .084 1 .772 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.74. Career Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.165 a 4 .884 Likelihood Ratio 1.156 4 .885 Linear by Linear Association .613 1 .434 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.23. Campus Ministry Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.823 a 4 .306 Likelihood Ratio 5.013 4 .286 Linear by Linear Association .994 1 .319 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.32. Commuter Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.784 a 4 .436 Likelihood Ratio 3.900 4 .420 Linear by Linear Association .006 1 .937 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 1 cells (11.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.37.

PAGE 105

105 Counseling Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.556 a 4 .817 Likelihood Ratio 1.534 4 .821 Linear by Linear Association 1.306 1 .253 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.50. Disability Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.309 a 4 .679 Likelihood Ratio 2.340 4 .674 Linear by Linear Association 1.971 1 .160 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.63. Financial Aid Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.575 a 4 .631 Likelihood Ratio 2.287 4 .683 Linear by Linear Association 1.630 1 .202 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.24. FYE Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.598 a 4 .809 Likelihood Ratio 1.781 4 .776 Linear by Linear Association .014 1 .905 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.12.

PAGE 106

106 Greek Affairs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.136 a 4 .388 Likelihood Ratio 4.249 4 .373 Linear by Linear Association .647 1 .421 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.69. Health Education Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.840 a 4 .211 Likelihood Ratio 6.721 4 .151 Linear by Linear Association 3.428 1 .064 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.79. International Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 18.202 a 4 .001 Likelihood Ratio 19.211 4 .001 Linear by Linear Association .950 1 .330 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.78. Intramurals / Campus Recreation Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.968 a 4 .410 Likelihood Ratio 4.162 4 .385 Linear by Linear Association .874 1 .350 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.71.

PAGE 107

107 Judicial Affairs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.880 a 4 .578 Likelihood Ratio 2.842 4 .585 Linear by Linear Association .168 1 .682 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.60. Leadership Development Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.113 a 4 .715 Likelihood Ratio 2.462 4 .651 Linear by Linear Association .015 1 .903 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.51. LGBT Services Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.659 a 4 .616 Likelihood Ratio 2.708 4 .608 Linear by Linear Association .179 1 .672 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.51. Multicultural Affairs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 44.271 a 4 .000 Likelihood Ratio 45.834 4 .000 Linear by Linear Association 32.723 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.93.

PAGE 108

108 Orientation Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.254 a 4 .689 Likelihood Ratio 2.390 4 .664 Linear by Linear Association .063 1 .802 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.42. Registrar Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 8.374 a 4 .079 Likelihood Ratio 9.370 4 .052 Linear by Linear Association .576 1 .448 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 1 cells (11.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.99. Residence Life / Housing Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.788 a 4 .216 Likelihood Ratio 6.312 4 .177 Linear by Linear Association .602 1 .438 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.79. Service Learning and Volunteer Programs Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.631 a 4 .327 Likelihood Ratio 4.803 4 .308 Linear by Linear Association .126 1 .722 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.27. Student Activities Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)

PAGE 109

109 Pearson Chi Square 1.533 a 4 .821 Likelihood Ratio 1.535 4 .820 Linear by Linear Association .073 1 .788 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.24. Student Union Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.061 a 4 .398 Likelihood Ratio 4.123 4 .390 Linear by Linear Association .026 1 .871 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.56. Teaching Faculty Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.053 a 4 .726 Likelihood Ratio 2.048 4 .727 Linear by Linear Association .073 1 .788 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.17. Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 8.087 a 4 .088 Likelihood Ratio 8.358 4 .079 Linear by Linear Association 3.150 1 .076 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.40. Table 4 24 Aspire to position level (frequency) Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career.

PAGE 110

110 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Other (please specify) 10 2.8 2.9 2.9 President 28 8.0 8.1 11.0 Vice President 61 17.3 17.6 28.5 Dean 99 28.1 28.5 57.1 Director / Coordinator 124 35.2 35.7 92.8 Faculty 16 4.5 4.6 97.4 Staff 9 2.6 2.6 100.0 Total 347 98.6 100.0 Missing System 5 1.4 Total 352 100.0 Table 4 25 Aspire to position level and gender (frequency) Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. Gender: Crosstabulation Gender: Total Male Female Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. Other (please specify) Count 2 7 9 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 2.2% 2.8% 2.6% % of Total .6% 2.0% 2.6% President Count 13 15 28 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 46.4% 53.6% 100.0% % within Gender: 14.6% 5.9% 8.2% % of Total 3.8% 4.4% 8.2% Vice President Count 20 41 61 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 32.8% 67.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 22.5% 16.1% 17.8% % of Total 5.8% 12.0% 17.8% Dean Count 24 74 98

PAGE 111

111 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 24.5% 75.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 27.0% 29.1% 28.6% % of Total 7.0% 21.6% 28.6% Director / Coordinator Count 20 103 123 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 16.3% 83.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 22.5% 40.6% 35.9% % of Total 5.8% 30.0% 35.9% Faculty Count 7 8 15 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 46.7% 53.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 7.9% 3.1% 4.4% % of Total 2.0% 2.3% 4.4% Staff Count 3 6 9 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 3.4% 2.4% 2.6% % of Total .9% 1.7% 2.6% Total Count 89 254 343 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% Table 4 26 Aspire to position level and gender (chi square) Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 17.385 a 6 .008

PAGE 112

112 Likelihood Ratio 16.843 6 .010 Linear by Linear Association 3.395 1 .065 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 3 cells (21.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.34. Table 4 27 Aspire to position level and ethnicity (frequency) Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. Ethnicity: Crosstabulation Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. Other (please specify) Count 0 1 8 9 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. .0% 11.1% 88.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 2.8% 2.9% 2.6% % of Total .0% .3% 2.3% 2.6% President Count 2 4 22 28 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 7.1% 14.3% 78.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.7% 11.1% 7.9% 8.1% % of Total .6% 1.2% 6.4% 8.1% Vice President Count 4 9 48 61 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 6.6% 14.8% 78.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 13.3% 25.0% 17.3% 17.7% % of Total 1.2% 2.6% 14.0% 17.7% Dean Count 7 11 80 98 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 7.1% 11.2% 81.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 23.3% 30.6% 28.8% 28.5% % of Total 2.0% 3.2% 23.3% 28.5% Director / Coordinator Count 13 10 100 123

PAGE 113

113 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 10.6% 8.1% 81.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 43.3% 27.8% 36.0% 35.8% % of Total 3.8% 2.9% 29.1% 35.8% Faculty Count 1 0 15 16 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 6.3% .0% 93.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 3.3% .0% 5.4% 4.7% % of Total .3% .0% 4.4% 4.7% Staff Count 3 1 5 9 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 33.3% 11.1% 55.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.0% 2.8% 1.8% 2.6% % of Total .9% .3% 1.5% 2.6% Total Count 30 36 278 344 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 8.7% 10.5% 80.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 8.7% 10.5% 80.8% 100.0% Table 4 28 Aspire to position level and ethnicity (chi square) Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 13.334 a 12 .345 Likelihood Ratio 13.153 12 .358 Linear by Linear Association .509 1 .476 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 8 cells (38.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .78.

PAGE 114

114 Table 4 29 Aspire to position level and age (frequency) Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. Current Age: Crosstabulation Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. Other (please specify) Count 6 3 9 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Current Age: 2.7% 2.5% 2.6% % of Total 1.7% .9% 2.6% President Count 20 8 28 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 71.4% 28.6% 100.0% % within Current Age: 8.9% 6.7% 8.1% % of Total 5.8% 2.3% 8.1% Vice President Count 39 22 61 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 63.9% 36.1% 100.0% % within Current Age: 17.4% 18.3% 17.7% % of Total 11.3% 6.4% 17.7% Dean Count 68 30 98 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 69.4% 30.6% 100.0% % within Current Age: 30.4% 25.0% 28.5% % of Total 19.8% 8.7% 28.5% Director / Coordinator Count 79 44 123 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 64.2% 35.8% 100.0% % within Current Age: 35.3% 36.7% 35.8% % of Total 23.0% 12.8% 35.8% Faculty Count 7 9 16

PAGE 115

115 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 43.8% 56.3% 100.0% % within Current Age: 3.1% 7.5% 4.7% % of Total 2.0% 2.6% 4.7% Staff Count 5 4 9 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% % within Current Age: 2.2% 3.3% 2.6% % of Total 1.5% 1.2% 2.6% Total Count 224 120 344 % within Please indicate the position level you aspire to in your career. 65.1% 34.9% 100.0% % within Current Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 65.1% 34.9% 100.0% Table 4 30 Aspire to position level and age (chi square) Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.946 a 6 .551 Likelihood Ratio 4.783 6 .572 Linear by Linear Association 1.601 1 .206 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 2 cells (14.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.14. Table 4 31 Experiences and employment preference (frequency) Elective graduate courses Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Important 104 29.5 30.0 30.0 Neutral 177 50.3 51.0 81.0

PAGE 116

116 Not important 66 18.8 19.0 100.0 Total 347 98.6 100.0 Missing System 5 1.4 Total 352 100.0 Graduate advisors and/or professors Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Important 198 56.3 57.1 57.1 Neutral 120 34.1 34.6 91.6 Not important 29 8.2 8.4 100.0 Total 347 98.6 100.0 Missing System 5 1.4 Total 352 100.0 Internships / practicums Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Important 245 69.6 70.0 70.0 Neutral 88 25.0 25.1 95.1 Not important 17 4.8 4.9 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Current job Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Important 265 75.3 75.7 75.7 Neutral 73 20.7 20.9 96.6 Not important 12 3.4 3.4 100.0 Total 350 99.4 100.0 Missing System 2 .6 Total 352 100.0 Former employment

PAGE 117

117 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Important 186 52.8 53.3 53.3 Neutral 123 34.9 35.2 88.5 Not important 40 11.4 11.5 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Undergraduate experience Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Important 267 75.9 76.5 76.5 Neutral 65 18.5 18.6 95.1 Not important 17 4.8 4.9 100.0 Total 349 99.1 100.0 Missing System 3 .9 Total 352 100.0 Professional associations Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Important 133 37.8 38.2 38.2 Neutral 170 48.3 48.9 87.1 Not important 45 12.8 12.9 100.0 Total 348 98.9 100.0 Missing System 4 1.1 Total 352 100.0 Table 4 32 Experiences and employment preference Gender (frequency) Elective Graduate Courses Gender: Total Male Female Important Count 24 79 103 % within Elective graduate courses 23.3% 76.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 27.0% 31.1% 30.0% % of Total 7.0% 23.0% 30.0%

PAGE 118

118 Neutral Count 50 124 174 % within Elective graduate courses 28.7% 71.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 56.2% 48.8% 50.7% % of Total 14.6% 36.2% 50.7% Not important Count 15 51 66 % within Elective graduate courses 22.7% 77.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 16.9% 20.1% 19.2% % of Total 4.4% 14.9% 19.2% Total Count 89 254 343 % within Elective graduate courses 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% Graduate Advisors and/or Professors Gender: Total Male Female Important Count 52 145 197 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 26.4% 73.6% 100.0% % within Gender: 59.1% 56.6% 57.3% % of Total 15.1% 42.2% 57.3% Neutral Count 31 87 118 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 26.3% 73.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 35.2% 34.0% 34.3% % of Total 9.0% 25.3% 34.3% Not important Count 5 24 29 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 17.2% 82.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 5.7% 9.4% 8.4% % of Total 1.5% 7.0% 8.4% Total Count 88 256 344 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

PAGE 119

119 Graduate Advisors and/or Professors Gender: Total Male Female Important Count 52 145 197 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 26.4% 73.6% 100.0% % within Gender: 59.1% 56.6% 57.3% % of Total 15.1% 42.2% 57.3% Neutral Count 31 87 118 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 26.3% 73.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 35.2% 34.0% 34.3% % of Total 9.0% 25.3% 34.3% Not important Count 5 24 29 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 17.2% 82.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 5.7% 9.4% 8.4% % of Total 1.5% 7.0% 8.4% Total Count 88 256 344 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% Internships / P racticums Gender: Total Male Female Important Count 54 188 242 % within Internships / practicums 22.3% 77.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 60.7% 73.2% 69.9% % of Total 15.6% 54.3% 69.9% Neutral Count 29 58 87 % within Internships / practicums 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 32.6% 22.6% 25.1% % of Total 8.4% 16.8% 25.1%

PAGE 120

120 Not important Count 6 11 17 % within Internships / practicums 35.3% 64.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 6.7% 4.3% 4.9% % of Total 1.7% 3.2% 4.9% Total Count 89 257 346 % within Internships / practicums 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Current J ob Gender: Total Male Female Important Count 67 198 265 % within Current job 25.3% 74.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 75.3% 77.0% 76.6% % of Total 19.4% 57.2% 76.6% Neutral Count 21 49 70 % within Current job 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 23.6% 19.1% 20.2% % of Total 6.1% 14.2% 20.2% Not important Count 1 10 11 % within Current job 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% % within Gender: 1.1% 3.9% 3.2% % of Total .3% 2.9% 3.2% Total Count 89 257 346 % within Current job 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0% Former Employment Gender: Total Male Female Important Count 45 140 185 % within Former employment 24.3% 75.7% 100.0% % within Gender: 50.6% 54.7% 53.6%

PAGE 121

121 % of Total 13.0% 40.6% 53.6% Neutral Count 33 87 120 % within Former employment 27.5% 72.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 37.1% 34.0% 34.8% % of Total 9.6% 25.2% 34.8% Not important Count 11 29 40 % within Former employment 27.5% 72.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 12.4% 11.3% 11.6% % of Total 3.2% 8.4% 11.6% Total Count 89 256 345 % within Former employment 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% Undergraduate Experience Gender: Total Male Female Important Count 65 198 263 % within Undergraduate experience 24.7% 75.3% 100.0% % within Gender: 73.9% 77.0% 76.2% % of Total 18.8% 57.4% 76.2% Neutral Count 19 46 65 % within Undergraduate experience 29.2% 70.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 21.6% 17.9% 18.8% % of Total 5.5% 13.3% 18.8% Not important Count 4 13 17 % within Undergraduate experience 23.5% 76.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 4.5% 5.1% 4.9% % of Total 1.2% 3.8% 4.9% Total Count 88 257 345 % within Undergraduate experience 25.5% 74.5% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.5% 74.5% 100.0%

PAGE 122

122 Professional Associations Gender: Total Male Female Important Count 42 90 132 % within Professional associations 31.8% 68.2% 100.0% % within Gender: 47.7% 35.2% 38.4% % of Total 12.2% 26.2% 38.4% Neutral Count 37 130 167 % within Professional associations 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Gender: 42.0% 50.8% 48.5% % of Total 10.8% 37.8% 48.5% Not important Count 9 36 45 % within Professional associations 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Gender: 10.2% 14.1% 13.1% % of Total 2.6% 10.5% 13.1% Total Count 88 256 344 % within Professional associations 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Gender: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% Table 4 33 Experiences and employment preference Gender (Chi square) Chi Square Tests Elective Graduate Courses Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.436 a 2 .488 Likelihood Ratio 1.439 2 .487 Linear by Linear Association .011 1 .915 N of Valid Cases 343 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.13. Chi Square Tests

PAGE 123

123 Graduate Advisors and/or Professors Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.158 a 2 .561 Likelihood Ratio 1.251 2 .535 Linear by Linear Association .589 1 .443 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.42. Chi Square Tests Internships / P racticums Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.924 a 2 .085 Likelihood Ratio 4.772 2 .092 Linear by Linear Association 4.517 1 .034 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.37. Chi Square Tests Current J ob Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.290 a 2 .318 Likelihood Ratio 2.636 2 .268 Linear by Linear Association .026 1 .872 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.83. Chi Square Tests Former Employment Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .452 a 2 .798 Likelihood Ratio .451 2 .798 Linear by Linear Association .368 1 .544 N of Valid Cases 345

PAGE 124

124 Chi Square Tests Former Employment Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .452 a 2 .798 Likelihood Ratio .451 2 .798 Linear by Linear Association .368 1 .544 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.32. Chi Square Tests Undergraduate Experience Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .596 a 2 .742 Likelihood Ratio .583 2 .747 Linear by Linear Association .153 1 .695 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.34. Chi Square Tests Professional Associations Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.463 a 2 .107 Likelihood Ratio 4.410 2 .110 Linear by Linear Association 3.901 1 .048 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.51. Table 4 34 Experiences and employment preference Ethnicity (frequency) Elective G raduate C ourses Ethnicity: Total

PAGE 125

125 Other (please specify) African American Caucasian Important Count 14 11 79 104 % within Elective graduate courses 13.5% 10.6% 76.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 45.2% 30.6% 28.5% 30.2% % of Total 4.1% 3.2% 23.0% 30.2% Neutral Count 12 15 147 174 % within Elective graduate courses 6.9% 8.6% 84.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 38.7% 41.7% 53.1% 50.6% % of Total 3.5% 4.4% 42.7% 50.6% Not important Count 5 10 51 66 % within Elective graduate courses 7.6% 15.2% 77.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 16.1% 27.8% 18.4% 19.2% % of Total 1.5% 2.9% 14.8% 19.2% Total Count 31 36 277 344 % within Elective graduate courses 9.0% 10.5% 80.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.5% 80.5% 100.0% Graduate Advisors / P rofessors Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian Important Count 19 21 157 197 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 9.6% 10.7% 79.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 61.3% 58.3% 56.5% 57.1% % of Total 5.5% 6.1% 45.5% 57.1% Neutral Count 7 12 100 119 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 5.9% 10.1% 84.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 22.6% 33.3% 36.0% 34.5%

PAGE 126

126 % of Total 2.0% 3.5% 29.0% 34.5% Not important Count 5 3 21 29 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 17.2% 10.3% 72.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 16.1% 8.3% 7.6% 8.4% % of Total 1.4% .9% 6.1% 8.4% Total Count 31 36 278 345 % within Graduate advisors and/or professors 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% Internships / P racticums Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian Important Count 25 26 191 242 % within Internships / practicums 10.3% 10.7% 78.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 78.1% 72.2% 68.5% 69.7% % of Total 7.2% 7.5% 55.0% 69.7% Neutral Count 5 9 74 88 % within Internships / practicums 5.7% 10.2% 84.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 15.6% 25.0% 26.5% 25.4% % of Total 1.4% 2.6% 21.3% 25.4% Not important Count 2 1 14 17 % within Internships / practicums 11.8% 5.9% 82.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.3% 2.8% 5.0% 4.9% % of Total .6% .3% 4.0% 4.9% Total Count 32 36 279 347 % within Internships / practicums 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0%

PAGE 127

127 % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% Current J ob Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian Important Count 23 28 214 265 % within Current job 8.7% 10.6% 80.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 71.9% 77.8% 76.7% 76.4% % of Total 6.6% 8.1% 61.7% 76.4% Neutral Count 5 8 57 70 % within Current job 7.1% 11.4% 81.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 15.6% 22.2% 20.4% 20.2% % of Total 1.4% 2.3% 16.4% 20.2% Not important Count 4 0 8 12 % within Current job 33.3% .0% 66.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.5% .0% 2.9% 3.5% % of Total 1.2% .0% 2.3% 3.5% Total Count 32 36 279 347 % within Current job 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.4% 100.0% Former Employment Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian Important Count 20 22 143 185 % within Former employment 10.8% 11.9% 77.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 62.5% 62.9% 51.3% 53.5% % of Total 5.8% 6.4% 41.3% 53.5% Neutral Count 9 9 103 121 % within Former employment 7.4% 7.4% 85.1% 100.0%

PAGE 128

128 % within Ethnicity: 28.1% 25.7% 36.9% 35.0% % of Total 2.6% 2.6% 29.8% 35.0% Not important Count 3 4 33 40 % within Former employment 7.5% 10.0% 82.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 9.4% 11.4% 11.8% 11.6% % of Total .9% 1.2% 9.5% 11.6% Total Count 32 35 279 346 % within Former employment 9.2% 10.1% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.1% 80.6% 100.0% Undergraduate E xperience Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian Important Count 23 30 211 264 % within Undergraduate experience 8.7% 11.4% 79.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 71.9% 83.3% 75.9% 76.3% % of Total 6.6% 8.7% 61.0% 76.3% Neutral Count 7 6 52 65 % within Undergraduate experience 10.8% 9.2% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 21.9% 16.7% 18.7% 18.8% % of Total 2.0% 1.7% 15.0% 18.8% Not important Count 2 0 15 17 % within Undergraduate experience 11.8% .0% 88.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.3% .0% 5.4% 4.9% % of Total .6% .0% 4.3% 4.9% Total Count 32 36 278 346 % within Undergraduate experience 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.2% 10.4% 80.3% 100.0%

PAGE 129

129 Professional A ssociations Ethnicity: Total Other (please specify) African American Caucasian Important Count 11 19 102 132 % within Professional associations 8.3% 14.4% 77.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 35.5% 52.8% 36.7% 38.3% % of Total 3.2% 5.5% 29.6% 38.3% Neutral Count 16 12 140 168 % within Professional associations 9.5% 7.1% 83.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 51.6% 33.3% 50.4% 48.7% % of Total 4.6% 3.5% 40.6% 48.7% Not important Count 4 5 36 45 % within Professional associations 8.9% 11.1% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.9% 13.9% 12.9% 13.0% % of Total 1.2% 1.4% 10.4% 13.0% Total Count 31 36 278 345 % within Professional associations 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 9.0% 10.4% 80.6% 100.0% Table 4 35 Experiences and employment preference Ethnicity (Chi square) Chi Square Tests Elective G raduate C ourses Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.946 a 4 .203 Likelihood Ratio 5.595 4 .232 Linear by Linear Association .698 1 .403

PAGE 130

130 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.95. Chi Square Tests Graduate Advisors / P rofessors Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.029 a 4 .402 Likelihood Ratio 3.741 4 .442 Linear by Linear Association .038 1 .845 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.61. Chi Square Tests Internships / P racticums Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.225 a 4 .695 Likelihood Ratio 2.454 4 .653 Linear by Linear Association .884 1 .347 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.57. Chi Square Tests Current J ob Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.602 a 4 .048 Likelihood Ratio 7.819 4 .098 Linear by Linear Association .960 1 .327 N of Valid Cases 347

PAGE 131

131 Chi Square Tests Current J ob Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.602 a 4 .048 Likelihood Ratio 7.819 4 .098 Linear by Linear Association .960 1 .327 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.11. Chi Square Tests Former Employment Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.060 a 4 .548 Likelihood Ratio 3.129 4 .536 Linear by Linear Association 1.833 1 .176 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.70. Chi Square Tests Undergraduate E xperience Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.588 a 4 .629 Likelihood Ratio 4.333 4 .363 Linear by Linear Association .089 1 .766 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.57. Chi Square Tests Professional A ssociations Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.204 a 4 .379 Likelihood Ratio 4.212 4 .378

PAGE 132

132 Linear by Linear Association .352 1 .553 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 2 cells (22.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.04. Table 4 36 Experiences and employment preference Age (frequency) Crosstab Count Elective G raduate C ourses Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above Important 66 38 104 Neutral 111 63 174 Not important 47 19 66 Total 224 120 344 Crosstab Count Graduate A dvisors / P rofessors Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above Important 136 61 197 Neutral 72 47 119 Not important 17 12 29 Total 225 120 345 Crosstab Count Internships / P racticums Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above Important 168 74 242 Neutral 53 35 88 Not important 5 12 17 Total 226 121 347

PAGE 133

133 Crosstab Count Current J ob Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above Important 174 91 265 Neutral 49 21 70 Not important 3 9 12 Total 226 121 347 Crosstab Count Former E mployment Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above Important 118 67 185 Neutral 85 36 121 Not important 23 17 40 Total 226 120 346 Crosstab Count Undergraduate E xperience Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above Important 184 80 264 Neutral 32 33 65 Not important 10 7 17 Total 226 120 346 Crosstab Count Professional A ssociations Current Age: Total 18 25 years 26 and above Important 88 44 132 Neutral 105 63 168

PAGE 134

134 Not important 31 14 45 Total 224 121 345 Table 4 37 Experiences and employment preference Age (Chi square) Chi Square Tests Elective G raduate C ourses Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 1.339 a 2 .512 Likelihood Ratio 1.371 2 .504 Linear by Linear Association .874 1 .350 N of Valid Cases 344 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.02. Chi Square Tests Graduate A dvisors / P rofessors Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.988 a 2 .225 Likelihood Ratio 2.975 2 .226 Linear by Linear Association 2.714 1 .099 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.09. Chi Square Tests Internships / P racticums Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 12.444 a 2 .002 Likelihood Ratio 11.893 2 .003 Linear by Linear Association 10.515 1 .001 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.93.

PAGE 135

135 Chi Square Tests Current J ob Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.273 a 2 .010 Likelihood Ratio 8.822 2 .012 Linear by Linear Association 1.837 1 .175 N of Valid Cases 347 a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.18. Chi Square Tests Former E mployment Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 2.570 a 2 .277 Likelihood Ratio 2.569 2 .277 Linear by Linear Association .002 1 .962 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.87. Chi Square Tests Undergraduate E xperience Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.977 a 2 .007 Likelihood Ratio 9.647 2 .008 Linear by Linear Association 6.745 1 .009 N of Valid Cases 346 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.90. Chi Square Tests Professional A ssociations Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)

PAGE 136

136 Pearson Chi Square .920 a 2 .631 Likelihood Ratio .923 2 .630 Linear by Linear Association .007 1 .931 N of Valid Cases 345 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.78. Table 4 38 Career preference (2006) Academic Advising Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 43 12.8 100.0 100.0 Missing System 292 87.2 Total 335 100.0 Admissions / Enrollment Management Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 34 10.1 100.0 100.0 Missing System 301 89.9 Total 335 100.0 Athletics Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 17 5.1 100.0 100.0 Missing System 318 94.9 Total 335 100.0 Career Services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 23 6.9 100.0 100.0 Missing System 312 93.1 Total 335 100.0 Counseling Services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 8 2.4 100.0 100.0 Missing System 327 97.6

PAGE 137

137 Counseling Services Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 8 2.4 100.0 100.0 Missing System 327 97.6 Total 335 100.0 Financial Aid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 7 2.1 100.0 100.0 Missing System 328 97.9 Total 335 100.0 First Year Experience Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 55 16.4 100.0 100.0 Missing System 280 83.6 Total 335 100.0 Greek Life Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 15 4.5 100.0 100.0 Missing System 320 95.5 Total 335 100.0 International Students Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 19 5.7 100.0 100.0 Missing System 316 94.3 Total 335 100.0 Intramurals & Campus Recreation Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 5 1.5 100.0 100.0 Missing System 330 98.5 Total 335 100.0 Registrar Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 4 1.2 100.0 100.0 Missing System 331 98.8 Total 335 100.0

PAGE 138

138 Residence Life & Housing Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 45 13.4 100.0 100.0 Missing System 290 86.6 Total 335 100.0 Student Activities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 43 12.8 100.0 100.0 Missing System 292 87.2 Total 335 100.0 Student Union Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 22 6.6 100.0 100.0 Missing System 313 93.4 Total 335 100.0 Undecided Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 26 7.8 100.0 100.0 Missing System 309 92.2 Total 335 100.0 Other Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 51 15.2 100.0 100.0 Missing System 284 84.8 Total 335 100.0 Table 4 39 Career preference Age (2006) Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 18 25 years 126 37.6 46.5 46.5 26 above 145 43.3 53.5 100.0 Total 271 80.9 100.0 Missing System 64 19.1 Total 335 100.0 Academic Advising Age: Total

PAGE 139

139 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 21 22 43 % within Please select one 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% Total Count 21 22 43 % within Please select one 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% Admissions / Enrollment Management Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 20 14 34 % within Please select one 58.8% 41.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 58.8% 41.2% 100.0% Total Count 20 14 34 % within Please select one 58.8% 41.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 58.8% 41.2% 100.0% Athletics Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 12 5 17 % within Please select one 70.6% 29.4% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 70.6% 29.4% 100.0% Total Count 12 5 17 % within Please select one 70.6% 29.4% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 70.6% 29.4% 100.0%

PAGE 140

140 Career Services Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 10 13 23 % within Please select one 43.5% 56.5% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 43.5% 56.5% 100.0% Total Count 10 13 23 % within Please select one 43.5% 56.5% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 43.5% 56.5% 100.0% Campus Ministry Age: Total 18 25 years Please select one Count 2 2 % within Please select one 100.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 100.0% 100.0% Total Count 2 2 % within Please select one 100.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 100.0% 100.0% Counseling Services Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 3 5 8 % within Please select one 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% Total Count 3 5 8 % within Please select one 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 37.5% 62.5% 100.0%

PAGE 141

141 Financial Aid Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 3 4 7 % within Please select one 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% Total Count 3 4 7 % within Please select one 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% First Year Experience Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 34 21 55 % within Please select one 61.8% 38.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 61.8% 38.2% 100.0% Total Count 34 21 55 % within Please select one 61.8% 38.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 61.8% 38.2% 100.0% Greek Life Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 11 4 15 % within Please select one 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% Total Count 11 4 15 % within Please select one 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

PAGE 142

142 Greek Life Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 11 4 15 % within Please select one 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% Total Count 11 4 15 % within Please select one 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% International Students Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 13 6 19 % within Please select one 68.4% 31.6% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.4% 31.6% 100.0% Total Count 13 6 19 % within Please select one 68.4% 31.6% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 68.4% 31.6% 100.0% Intramurals & Campus Recreation Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 3 2 5 % within Please select one 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% Total Count 3 2 5 % within Please select one 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%

PAGE 143

143 Judicial Affairs Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 12 10 22 % within Please select one 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% Total Count 12 10 22 % within Please select one 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% Leadership Development Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 39 23 62 % within Please select one 62.9% 37.1% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 62.9% 37.1% 100.0% Total Count 39 23 62 % within Please select one 62.9% 37.1% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 62.9% 37.1% 100.0% Orientation Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 31 16 47 % within Please select one 66.0% 34.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 66.0% 34.0% 100.0% Total Count 31 16 47 % within Please select one 66.0% 34.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 66.0% 34.0% 100.0%

PAGE 144

144 Registrar Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 2 2 4 % within Please select one 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Total Count 2 2 4 % within Please select one 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Residence Life & Housing Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 29 16 45 % within Please select one 64.4% 35.6% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 64.4% 35.6% 100.0% Total Count 29 16 45 % within Please select one 64.4% 35.6% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 64.4% 35.6% 100.0% Student Activities Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 31 12 43 % within Please select one 72.1% 27.9% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 72.1% 27.9% 100.0% Total Count 31 12 43 % within Please select one 72.1% 27.9% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 72.1% 27.9% 100.0%

PAGE 145

1 45 Student Union Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 17 5 22 % within Please select one 77.3% 22.7% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 77.3% 22.7% 100.0% Total Count 17 5 22 % within Please select one 77.3% 22.7% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 77.3% 22.7% 100.0% Undecided Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 11 15 26 % within Please select one 42.3% 57.7% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.3% 57.7% 100.0% Total Count 11 15 26 % within Please select one 42.3% 57.7% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.3% 57.7% 100.0% Other Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above Please select one Count 18 32 50 % within Please select one 36.0% 64.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 36.0% 64.0% 100.0% Total Count 18 32 50

PAGE 146

146 % within Please select one 36.0% 64.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 36.0% 64.0% 100.0% Table 4 40 Career preference Ethnicity (2006) Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Other 57 17.0 21.2 21.2 Caucasian 212 63.3 78.8 100.0 Total 269 80.3 100.0 Missing System 66 19.7 Total 335 100.0 Academic Advising Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 7 36 43 % within Please select one 16.3% 83.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.3% 83.7% 100.0% Total Count 7 36 43 % within Please select one 16.3% 83.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.3% 83.7% 100.0% Admissions / Enrollment Management Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 9 25 34 % within Please select one 26.5% 73.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 26.5% 73.5% 100.0% Total Count 9 25 34 % within Please select one 26.5% 73.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 26.5% 73.5% 100.0%

PAGE 147

147 Athletics Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 2 15 17 % within Please select one 11.8% 88.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 11.8% 88.2% 100.0% Total Count 2 15 17 % within Please select one 11.8% 88.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 11.8% 88.2% 100.0% Career Services Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 4 19 23 % within Please select one 17.4% 82.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 17.4% 82.6% 100.0% Total Count 4 19 23 % within Please select one 17.4% 82.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 17.4% 82.6% 100.0% Campus Ministry Ethnicity: Total Caucasian Please select one Count 2 2 % within Please select one 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 100.0% 100.0% Total Count 2 2 % within Please select one 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0%

PAGE 148

148 Campus Ministry Ethnicity: Total Caucasian Please select one Count 2 2 % within Please select one 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 100.0% 100.0% Total Count 2 2 % within Please select one 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 100.0% 100.0% Counseling Services Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 4 4 8 % within Please select one 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Total Count 4 4 8 % within Please select one 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Financial Aid Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 1 6 7 % within Please select one 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% Total Count 1 6 7 % within Please select one 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

PAGE 149

149 First Year Experience Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 11 43 54 % within Please select one 20.4% 79.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 20.4% 79.6% 100.0% Total Count 11 43 54 % within Please select one 20.4% 79.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 20.4% 79.6% 100.0% Greek Life Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 3 11 14 % within Please select one 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% Total Count 3 11 14 % within Please select one 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% International Students Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 6 13 19 % within Please select one 31.6% 68.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.6% 68.4% 100.0% Total Count 6 13 19 % within Please select one 31.6% 68.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.6% 68.4% 100.0%

PAGE 150

150 Intramurals & Campus Recreation Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 1 4 5 % within Please select one 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% Total Count 1 4 5 % within Please select one 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% Judicial Affairs Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 4 17 21 % within Please select one 19.0% 81.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.0% 81.0% 100.0% Total Count 4 17 21 % within Please select one 19.0% 81.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.0% 81.0% 100.0% Leadership Development Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 10 52 62 % within Please select one 16.1% 83.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.1% 83.9% 100.0% Total Count 10 52 62 % within Please select one 16.1% 83.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.1% 83.9% 100.0%

PAGE 151

151 Orientation Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 9 38 47 % within Please select one 19.1% 80.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.1% 80.9% 100.0% Total Count 9 38 47 % within Please select one 19.1% 80.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.1% 80.9% 100.0% Registrar Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 1 3 4 % within Please select one 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% Total Count 1 3 4 % within Please select one 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% Residence Life & Housing Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 13 31 44 % within Please select one 29.5% 70.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.5% 70.5% 100.0% Total Count 13 31 44 % within Please select one 29.5% 70.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.5% 70.5% 100.0%

PAGE 152

152 Student Activities Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 9 33 42 % within Please select one 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% Total Count 9 33 42 % within Please select one 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% Student Union Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 4 18 22 % within Please select one 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% Total Count 4 18 22 % within Please select one 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% Undecided Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 4 21 25 % within Please select one 16.0% 84.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.0% 84.0% 100.0% Total Count 4 21 25

PAGE 153

153 % within Please select one 16.0% 84.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.0% 84.0% 100.0% Other Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian Please select one Count 12 39 51 % within Please select one 23.5% 76.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 23.5% 76.5% 100.0% Total Count 12 39 51 % within Please select one 23.5% 76.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 23.5% 76.5% 100.0% Table 4 40 Career preference Gender (2006) Gender : Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Male 80 23.9 29.5 29.5 Female 191 57.0 70.5 100.0 Total 271 80.9 100.0 Missing System 64 19.1 Total 335 100.0 Academic Advising Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 10 32 42 % within Please select one 23.8% 76.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 23.8% 76.2% 100.0% Total Count 10 32 42 % within Please select one 23.8% 76.2% 100.0%

PAGE 154

154 % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 23.8% 76.2% 100.0% Admissions / Enrollment Management Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 9 24 33 % within Please select one 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% Total Count 9 24 33 % within Please select one 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% Athletics Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 9 8 17 % within Please select one 52.9% 47.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.9% 47.1% 100.0% Total Count 9 8 17 % within Please select one 52.9% 47.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 52.9% 47.1% 100.0% Career Services Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 6 17 23 % within Please select one 26.1% 73.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 26.1% 73.9% 100.0% Total Count 6 17 23 % within Please select one 26.1% 73.9% 100.0%

PAGE 155

155 % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 26.1% 73.9% 100.0% Campus Ministry Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 1 1 2 % within Please select one 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Total Count 1 1 2 % within Please select one 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Counseling Services Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 3 5 8 % within Please select one 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% Total Count 3 5 8 % within Please select one 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% Financial Aid Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 3 4 7 % within Please select one 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% Total Count 3 4 7 % within Please select one 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

PAGE 156

156 % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% First Year Experience Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 14 40 54 % within Please select one 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% Total Count 14 40 54 % within Please select one 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.9% 74.1% 100.0% Greek Life Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 5 10 15 % within Please select one 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% Total Count 5 10 15 % within Please select one 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% International Students Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 5 14 19 % within Please select one 26.3% 73.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 26.3% 73.7% 100.0% Total Count 5 14 19 % within Please select one 26.3% 73.7% 100.0%

PAGE 157

157 % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 26.3% 73.7% 100.0% Intramurals & Campus Recreation Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 3 2 5 % within Please select one 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% Total Count 3 2 5 % within Please select one 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% Judicial Affairs Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 9 13 22 % within Please select one 40.9% 59.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 40.9% 59.1% 100.0% Total Count 9 13 22 % within Please select one 40.9% 59.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 40.9% 59.1% 100.0% Leadership Development Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 17 44 61 % within Please select one 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% Total Count 17 44 61 % within Please select one 27.9% 72.1% 100.0%

PAGE 158

158 % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% Orientation Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 14 32 46 % within Please select one 30.4% 69.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.4% 69.6% 100.0% Total Count 14 32 46 % within Please select one 30.4% 69.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.4% 69.6% 100.0% Registrar Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 1 3 4 % within Please select one 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% Total Count 1 3 4 % within Please select one 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% Residence Life & Housing Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 21 24 45 % within Please select one 46.7% 53.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.7% 53.3% 100.0% Total Count 21 24 45 % within Please select one 46.7% 53.3% 100.0%

PAGE 159

159 % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 46.7% 53.3% 100.0% Student Activities Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 12 31 43 % within Please select one 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% Total Count 12 31 43 % within Please select one 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% Student Union Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 10 12 22 % within Please select one 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% Total Count 10 12 22 % within Please select one 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% Undecided Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 6 20 26 % within Please select one 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 23.1% 76.9% 100.0%

PAGE 160

160 Total Count 6 20 26 % within Please select one 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% Other Sex: Total Male Female Please select one Count 16 35 51 % within Please select one 31.4% 68.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0% Total Count 16 35 51 % within Please select one 31.4% 68.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0% Table 4 41 Institutional type preference (2006) Doctoral Graduating Universities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 117 34.9 45.3 45.3 2 40 11.9 15.5 60.9 3 45 13.4 17.4 78.3 4 33 9.9 12.8 91.1 5 23 6.9 8.9 100.0 Total 258 77.0 100.0 Missing System 77 23.0 Total 335 100.0 Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 71 21.2 27.4 27.4 2 134 40.0 51.7 79.2

PAGE 161

161 3 40 11.9 15.4 94.6 4 14 4.2 5.4 100.0 Total 259 77.3 100.0 Missing System 76 22.7 Total 335 100.0 Baccalaureate Colleges Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 39 11.6 15.1 15.1 2 56 16.7 21.7 36.8 3 124 37.0 48.1 84.9 4 31 9.3 12.0 96.9 5 8 2.4 3.1 100.0 Total 258 77.0 100.0 Missing System 77 23.0 Total 335 100.0 Community Colleges (2 year colleges) Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 23 6.9 8.9 8.9 2 21 6.3 8.2 17.1 3 34 10.1 13.2 30.4 4 141 42.1 54.9 85.2 5 38 11.3 14.8 100.0 Total 257 76.7 100.0 Missing System 78 23.3 Total 335 100.0 For Profit Colleges or Universities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 9 2.7 3.5 3.5 2 8 2.4 3.1 6.6 3 16 4.8 6.2 12.8 4 36 10.7 14.0 26.8

PAGE 162

162 5 188 56.1 73.2 100.0 Total 257 76.7 100.0 Missing System 78 23.3 Total 335 100.0 Table 4 42 Institutional type preference Age (2006) Doctoral Graduating Universities Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 52 65 117 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 44.4% 55.6% 100.0% % within Age: 41.6% 48.9% 45.3% % of Total 20.2% 25.2% 45.3% 2 Count 16 24 40 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 40.0% 60.0% 100.0% % within Age: 12.8% 18.0% 15.5% % of Total 6.2% 9.3% 15.5% 3 Count 28 17 45 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 62.2% 37.8% 100.0% % within Age: 22.4% 12.8% 17.4% % of Total 10.9% 6.6% 17.4% 4 Count 16 17 33 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 48.5% 51.5% 100.0% % within Age: 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% % of Total 6.2% 6.6% 12.8% 5 Count 13 10 23 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 56.5% 43.5% 100.0% % within Age: 10.4% 7.5% 8.9% % of Total 5.0% 3.9% 8.9% Total Count 125 133 258 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 48.4% 51.6% 100.0%

PAGE 163

163 % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.4% 51.6% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.913 a 4 .206 Likelihood Ratio 5.949 4 .203 Linear by Linear Association 2.230 1 .135 N of Valid Cases 258 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.14. Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 46 25 71 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 64.8% 35.2% 100.0% % within Age: 36.8% 18.8% 27.5% % of Total 17.8% 9.7% 27.5% 2 Count 64 70 134 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 47.8% 52.2% 100.0% % within Age: 51.2% 52.6% 51.9% % of Total 24.8% 27.1% 51.9% 3 Count 8 31 39 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 20.5% 79.5% 100.0% % within Age: 6.4% 23.3% 15.1% % of Total 3.1% 12.0% 15.1% 4 Count 7 7 14 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 5.6% 5.3% 5.4%

PAGE 164

164 % of Total 2.7% 2.7% 5.4% Total Count 125 133 258 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 48.4% 51.6% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.4% 51.6% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 19.815 a 3 .000 Likelihood Ratio 20.812 3 .000 Linear by Linear Association 11.699 1 .001 N of Valid Cases 258 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.78. Baccalaureate Colleges Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 19 20 39 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 48.7% 51.3% 100.0% % within Age: 15.2% 15.2% 15.2% % of Total 7.4% 7.8% 15.2% 2 Count 27 28 55 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 49.1% 50.9% 100.0% % within Age: 21.6% 21.2% 21.4% % of Total 10.5% 10.9% 21.4% 3 Count 62 62 124 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 49.6% 47.0% 48.2% % of Total 24.1% 24.1% 48.2% 4 Count 11 20 31 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 35.5% 64.5% 100.0% % within Age: 8.8% 15.2% 12.1%

PAGE 165

165 % of Total 4.3% 7.8% 12.1% 5 Count 6 2 8 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% % within Age: 4.8% 1.5% 3.1% % of Total 2.3% .8% 3.1% Total Count 125 132 257 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 48.6% 51.4% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.6% 51.4% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.469 a 4 .346 Likelihood Ratio 4.597 4 .331 Linear by Linear Association .000 1 .983 N of Valid Cases 257 a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.89. Crosstab Community Colleges (2 year colleges) Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 1 21 22 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 4.5% 95.5% 100.0% % within Age: .8% 16.0% 8.6% % of Total .4% 8.2% 8.6% 2 Count 14 7 21 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Age: 11.2% 5.3% 8.2% % of Total 5.5% 2.7% 8.2% 3 Count 18 16 34 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 52.9% 47.1% 100.0%

PAGE 166

166 % within Age: 14.4% 12.2% 13.3% % of Total 7.0% 6.3% 13.3% 4 Count 68 73 141 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 48.2% 51.8% 100.0% % within Age: 54.4% 55.7% 55.1% % of Total 26.6% 28.5% 55.1% 5 Count 24 14 38 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 63.2% 36.8% 100.0% % within Age: 19.2% 10.7% 14.8% % of Total 9.4% 5.5% 14.8% Total Count 125 131 256 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 23.314 a 4 .000 Likelihood Ratio 27.558 4 .000 Linear by Linear Association 8.500 1 .004 N of Valid Cases 256 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.25. For Profit Colleges or Universities Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 7 2 9 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 77.8% 22.2% 100.0% % within Age: 5.6% 1.5% 3.5% % of Total 2.7% .8% 3.5%

PAGE 167

167 2 Count 4 4 8 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 3.2% 3.1% 3.1% % of Total 1.6% 1.6% 3.1% 3 Count 9 7 16 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 56.3% 43.8% 100.0% % within Age: 7.2% 5.3% 6.3% % of Total 3.5% 2.7% 6.3% 4 Count 23 13 36 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 63.9% 36.1% 100.0% % within Age: 18.4% 9.9% 14.1% % of Total 9.0% 5.1% 14.1% 5 Count 82 105 187 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 43.9% 56.1% 100.0% % within Age: 65.6% 80.2% 73.0% % of Total 32.0% 41.0% 73.0% Total Count 125 131 256 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 8.498 a 4 .075 Likelihood Ratio 8.703 4 .069 Linear by Linear Association 5.414 1 .020 N of Valid Cases 256 a. 4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.91.

PAGE 168

168 Table 4 43 Institutional type preference Ethnicity (2006) Doctoral Graduating Universities Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 23 94 117 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 19.7% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 46.0% 45.9% 45.9% % of Total 9.0% 36.9% 45.9% 2 Count 6 32 38 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 15.8% 84.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.0% 15.6% 14.9% % of Total 2.4% 12.5% 14.9% 3 Count 8 36 44 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 16.0% 17.6% 17.3% % of Total 3.1% 14.1% 17.3% 4 Count 8 25 33 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 24.2% 75.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 16.0% 12.2% 12.9% % of Total 3.1% 9.8% 12.9% 5 Count 5 18 23 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 21.7% 78.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.0% 8.8% 9.0% % of Total 2.0% 7.1% 9.0% Total Count 50 205 255 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 19.6% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.6% 80.4% 100.0%

PAGE 169

169 Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .924 a 4 .921 Likelihood Ratio .919 4 .922 Linear by Linear Association .192 1 .661 N of Valid Cases 255 a. 1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.51. Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 18 51 69 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 26.1% 73.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 35.3% 24.9% 27.0% % of Total 7.0% 19.9% 27.0% 2 Count 27 107 134 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 20.1% 79.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 52.9% 52.2% 52.3% % of Total 10.5% 41.8% 52.3% 3 Count 5 34 39 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 12.8% 87.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 9.8% 16.6% 15.2% % of Total 2.0% 13.3% 15.2% 4 Count 1 13 14 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 7.1% 92.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 6.3% 5.5% % of Total .4% 5.1% 5.5% Total Count 51 205 256

PAGE 170

170 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 19.9% 80.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.9% 80.1% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.314 a 3 .229 Likelihood Ratio 4.707 3 .195 Linear by Linear Association 4.280 1 .039 N of Valid Cases 256 a. 1 cells (12.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.79. Baccalaureate Colleges Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 7 31 38 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 18.4% 81.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 13.7% 15.2% 14.9% % of Total 2.7% 12.2% 14.9% 2 Count 10 45 55 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 19.6% 22.1% 21.6% % of Total 3.9% 17.6% 21.6% 3 Count 25 98 123 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 20.3% 79.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 49.0% 48.0% 48.2% % of Total 9.8% 38.4% 48.2% 4 Count 7 24 31 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 22.6% 77.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 13.7% 11.8% 12.2% % of Total 2.7% 9.4% 12.2% 5 Count 2 6 8 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 3.9% 2.9% 3.1%

PAGE 171

171 % of Total .8% 2.4% 3.1% Total Count 51 204 255 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .435 a 4 .980 Likelihood Ratio .428 4 .980 Linear by Linear Association .371 1 .542 N of Valid Cases 255 a. 1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.60. Community Colleges (2 year colleges) Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 2 21 23 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 8.7% 91.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 3.9% 10.3% 9.1% % of Total .8% 8.3% 9.1% 2 Count 4 17 21 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 19.0% 81.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 7.8% 8.4% 8.3% % of Total 1.6% 6.7% 8.3% 3 Count 12 22 34 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 35.3% 64.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 23.5% 10.8% 13.4% % of Total 4.7% 8.7% 13.4% 4 Count 27 111 138

PAGE 172

172 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 19.6% 80.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 52.9% 54.7% 54.3% % of Total 10.6% 43.7% 54.3% 5 Count 6 32 38 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 15.8% 84.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 11.8% 15.8% 15.0% % of Total 2.4% 12.6% 15.0% Total Count 51 203 254 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 20.1% 79.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 20.1% 79.9% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 7.234 a 4 .124 Likelihood Ratio 6.989 4 .136 Linear by Linear Association .043 1 .836 N of Valid Cases 254 a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.22. For Profit Colleges or Universities Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 1 8 9 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 11.1% 88.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 3.9% 3.5% % of Total .4% 3.1% 3.5% 2 Count 4 4 8 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

PAGE 173

173 % within Ethnicity: 8.0% 2.0% 3.1% % of Total 1.6% 1.6% 3.1% 3 Count 1 15 16 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 6.3% 93.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 7.4% 6.3% % of Total .4% 5.9% 6.3% 4 Count 7 29 36 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 19.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 14.0% 14.2% 14.2% % of Total 2.8% 11.4% 14.2% 5 Count 37 148 185 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 74.0% 72.5% 72.8% % of Total 14.6% 58.3% 72.8% Total Count 50 204 254 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 19.7% 80.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.7% 80.3% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 6.908 a 4 .141 Likelihood Ratio 6.504 4 .165 Linear by Linear Association .001 1 .975 N of Valid Cases 254 a. 3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.57. Table 4 44 Institutional type preference Gender (2006) Doctoral Graduating Universities Sex: Total

PAGE 174

174 Male Female 1 Count 38 79 117 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 32.5% 67.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 50.0% 43.6% 45.5% % of Total 14.8% 30.7% 45.5% 2 Count 15 25 40 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 19.7% 13.8% 15.6% % of Total 5.8% 9.7% 15.6% 3 Count 11 34 45 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 24.4% 75.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 14.5% 18.8% 17.5% % of Total 4.3% 13.2% 17.5% 4 Count 8 25 33 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 24.2% 75.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 10.5% 13.8% 12.8% % of Total 3.1% 9.7% 12.8% 5 Count 4 18 22 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 9.9% 8.6% % of Total 1.6% 7.0% 8.6% Total Count 76 181 257 % within Doctoral Graduating Universities 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)

PAGE 175

175 Pearson Chi Square 4.070 a 4 .397 Likelihood Ratio 4.183 4 .382 Linear by Linear Association 2.805 1 .094 N of Valid Cases 257 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.51. Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 21 50 71 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 27.3% 27.6% 27.5% % of Total 8.1% 19.4% 27.5% 2 Count 42 92 134 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 31.3% 68.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 54.5% 50.8% 51.9% % of Total 16.3% 35.7% 51.9% 3 Count 11 29 40 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 27.5% 72.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 14.3% 16.0% 15.5% % of Total 4.3% 11.2% 15.5% 4 Count 3 10 13 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 3.9% 5.5% 5.0% % of Total 1.2% 3.9% 5.0% Total Count 77 181 258 % within Masters / Bachelors Colleges & Universities 29.8% 70.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.8% 70.2% 100.0%

PAGE 176

176 Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .536 a 3 .911 Likelihood Ratio .550 3 .908 Linear by Linear Association .184 1 .668 N of Valid Cases 258 a. 1 cells (12.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.88. Baccalaureate Colleges Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 10 29 39 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 13.0% 16.1% 15.2% % of Total 3.9% 11.3% 15.2% 2 Count 14 42 56 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 18.2% 23.3% 21.8% % of Total 5.4% 16.3% 21.8% 3 Count 44 79 123 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 35.8% 64.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 57.1% 43.9% 47.9% % of Total 17.1% 30.7% 47.9% 4 Count 8 23 31 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 10.4% 12.8% 12.1% % of Total 3.1% 8.9% 12.1% 5 Count 1 7 8 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.3% 3.9% 3.1% % of Total .4% 2.7% 3.1% Total Count 77 180 257 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

PAGE 177

177 Baccalaureate Colleges Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 10 29 39 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 25.6% 74.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 13.0% 16.1% 15.2% % of Total 3.9% 11.3% 15.2% 2 Count 14 42 56 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 18.2% 23.3% 21.8% % of Total 5.4% 16.3% 21.8% 3 Count 44 79 123 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 35.8% 64.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 57.1% 43.9% 47.9% % of Total 17.1% 30.7% 47.9% 4 Count 8 23 31 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 10.4% 12.8% 12.1% % of Total 3.1% 8.9% 12.1% 5 Count 1 7 8 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.3% 3.9% 3.1% % of Total .4% 2.7% 3.1% Total Count 77 180 257 % within Baccalaureate Colleges 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.400 a 4 .355 Likelihood Ratio 4.582 4 .333 Linear by Linear Association .083 1 .774 N of Valid Cases 257

PAGE 178

178 Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 4.400 a 4 .355 Likelihood Ratio 4.582 4 .333 Linear by Linear Association .083 1 .774 N of Valid Cases 257 a. 1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.40. Community Colleges (2 year colleges) Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 6 17 23 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 26.1% 73.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 7.9% 9.4% 9.0% % of Total 2.3% 6.6% 9.0% 2 Count 4 16 20 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 8.9% 7.8% % of Total 1.6% 6.3% 7.8% 3 Count 7 27 34 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 20.6% 79.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.2% 15.0% 13.3% % of Total 2.7% 10.5% 13.3% 4 Count 46 95 141 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 32.6% 67.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 60.5% 52.8% 55.1% % of Total 18.0% 37.1% 55.1% 5 Count 13 25 38 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 34.2% 65.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 17.1% 13.9% 14.8%

PAGE 179

179 % of Total 5.1% 9.8% 14.8% Total Count 76 180 256 % within Community Colleges (2 year colleges) 29.7% 70.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.7% 70.3% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 3.346 a 4 .502 Likelihood Ratio 3.499 4 .478 Linear by Linear Association 1.885 1 .170 N of Valid Cases 256 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.94. For Profit Colleges or Universities Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 2 6 8 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.6% 3.3% 3.1% % of Total .8% 2.3% 3.1% 2 Count 2 6 8 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.6% 3.3% 3.1% % of Total .8% 2.3% 3.1% 3 Count 4 12 16 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 6.7% 6.3% % of Total 1.6% 4.7% 6.3% 4 Count 10 26 36

PAGE 180

180 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 27.8% 72.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 13.2% 14.4% 14.1% % of Total 3.9% 10.2% 14.1% 5 Count 58 130 188 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 30.9% 69.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 76.3% 72.2% 73.4% % of Total 22.7% 50.8% 73.4% Total Count 76 180 256 % within For Profit Colleges or Universities 29.7% 70.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.7% 70.3% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square .522 a 4 .971 Likelihood Ratio .533 4 .970 Linear by Linear Association .461 1 .497 N of Valid Cases 256 a. 3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.38. Table 4 45 Factors impacting employment (2006) Campus facilities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 9 2.7 3.6 3.6 2 19 5.7 7.6 11.2 3 31 9.3 12.4 23.7 4 24 7.2 9.6 33.3 5 15 4.5 6.0 39.4 6 17 5.1 6.8 46.2 7 23 6.9 9.2 55.4

PAGE 181

181 8 18 5.4 7.2 62.7 9 16 4.8 6.4 69.1 10 28 8.4 11.2 80.3 11 30 9.0 12.0 92.4 12 19 5.7 7.6 100.0 Total 249 74.3 100.0 Missing System 86 25.7 Total 335 100.0 Familiarity with school or institution type Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 17 5.1 6.7 6.7 2 21 6.3 8.3 15.0 3 34 10.1 13.4 28.3 4 20 6.0 7.9 36.2 5 18 5.4 7.1 43.3 6 17 5.1 6.7 50.0 7 21 6.3 8.3 58.3 8 13 3.9 5.1 63.4 9 18 5.4 7.1 70.5 10 31 9.3 12.2 82.7 11 20 6.0 7.9 90.6 12 24 7.2 9.4 100.0 Total 254 75.8 100.0 Missing System 81 24.2 Total 335 100.0 Geographical location Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 100 29.9 39.4 39.4 2 43 12.8 16.9 56.3 3 25 7.5 9.8 66.1 4 17 5.1 6.7 72.8

PAGE 182

182 5 13 3.9 5.1 78.0 6 16 4.8 6.3 84.3 7 4 1.2 1.6 85.8 8 11 3.3 4.3 90.2 9 7 2.1 2.8 92.9 10 6 1.8 2.4 95.3 11 10 3.0 3.9 99.2 12 2 .6 .8 100.0 Total 254 75.8 100.0 Missing System 81 24.2 Total 335 100.0 Institution's reputation Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 19 5.7 7.6 7.6 2 45 13.4 18.0 25.6 3 38 11.3 15.2 40.8 4 27 8.1 10.8 51.6 5 16 4.8 6.4 58.0 6 20 6.0 8.0 66.0 7 15 4.5 6.0 72.0 8 13 3.9 5.2 77.2 9 21 6.3 8.4 85.6 10 20 6.0 8.0 93.6 11 7 2.1 2.8 96.4 12 9 2.7 3.6 100.0 Total 250 74.6 100.0 Missing System 85 25.4 Total 335 100.0 Institution's mission & purpose Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 53 15.8 20.9 20.9 2 47 14.0 18.5 39.4

PAGE 183

183 3 25 7.5 9.8 49.2 4 20 6.0 7.9 57.1 5 18 5.4 7.1 64.2 6 17 5.1 6.7 70.9 7 16 4.8 6.3 77.2 8 15 4.5 5.9 83.1 9 10 3.0 3.9 87.0 10 14 4.2 5.5 92.5 11 15 4.5 5.9 98.4 12 4 1.2 1.6 100.0 Total 254 75.8 100.0 Missing System 81 24.2 Total 335 100.0 Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 17 5.1 6.8 6.8 2 14 4.2 5.6 12.4 3 17 5.1 6.8 19.1 4 19 5.7 7.6 26.7 5 16 4.8 6.4 33.1 6 10 3.0 4.0 37.1 7 17 5.1 6.8 43.8 8 11 3.3 4.4 48.2 9 15 4.5 6.0 54.2 10 13 3.9 5.2 59.4 11 16 4.8 6.4 65.7 12 86 25.7 34.3 100.0 Total 251 74.9 100.0 Missing System 84 25.1 Total 335 100.0 Professional climate & environment

PAGE 184

184 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 67 20.0 26.4 26.4 2 43 12.8 16.9 43.3 3 30 9.0 11.8 55.1 4 21 6.3 8.3 63.4 5 21 6.3 8.3 71.7 6 17 5.1 6.7 78.3 7 10 3.0 3.9 82.3 8 11 3.3 4.3 86.6 9 10 3.0 3.9 90.6 10 12 3.6 4.7 95.3 11 5 1.5 2.0 97.2 12 7 2.1 2.8 100.0 Total 254 75.8 100.0 Missing System 81 24.2 Total 335 100.0 Promotion opportunities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 39 11.6 15.7 15.7 2 45 13.4 18.1 33.7 3 26 7.8 10.4 44.2 4 22 6.6 8.8 53.0 5 16 4.8 6.4 59.4 6 22 6.6 8.8 68.3 7 18 5.4 7.2 75.5 8 7 2.1 2.8 78.3 9 16 4.8 6.4 84.7 10 15 4.5 6.0 90.8 11 17 5.1 6.8 97.6 12 6 1.8 2.4 100.0 Total 249 74.3 100.0 Missing System 86 25.7 Total 335 100.0

PAGE 185

185 Salary & benefits Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 42 12.5 16.5 16.5 2 60 17.9 23.6 40.2 3 32 9.6 12.6 52.8 4 32 9.6 12.6 65.4 5 20 6.0 7.9 73.2 6 12 3.6 4.7 78.0 7 13 3.9 5.1 83.1 8 11 3.3 4.3 87.4 9 11 3.3 4.3 91.7 10 7 2.1 2.8 94.5 11 6 1.8 2.4 96.9 12 8 2.4 3.1 100.0 Total 254 75.8 100.0 Missing System 81 24.2 Total 335 100.0 Sense of community with the institution Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 49 14.6 19.5 19.5 2 43 12.8 17.1 36.7 3 42 12.5 16.7 53.4 4 20 6.0 8.0 61.4 5 17 5.1 6.8 68.1 6 15 4.5 6.0 74.1 7 8 2.4 3.2 77.3 8 17 5.1 6.8 84.1 9 10 3.0 4.0 88.0 10 7 2.1 2.8 90.8 11 12 3.6 4.8 95.6 12 11 3.3 4.4 100.0 Total 251 74.9 100.0 Missing System 84 25.1

PAGE 186

186 Sense of community with the institution Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 49 14.6 19.5 19.5 2 43 12.8 17.1 36.7 3 42 12.5 16.7 53.4 4 20 6.0 8.0 61.4 5 17 5.1 6.8 68.1 6 15 4.5 6.0 74.1 7 8 2.4 3.2 77.3 8 17 5.1 6.8 84.1 9 10 3.0 4.0 88.0 10 7 2.1 2.8 90.8 11 12 3.6 4.8 95.6 12 11 3.3 4.4 100.0 Total 251 74.9 100.0 Missing System 84 25.1 Total 335 100.0 Student body Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 33 9.9 13.0 13.0 2 48 14.3 19.0 32.0 3 31 9.3 12.3 44.3 4 29 8.7 11.5 55.7 5 13 3.9 5.1 60.9 6 16 4.8 6.3 67.2 7 8 2.4 3.2 70.4 8 18 5.4 7.1 77.5 9 18 5.4 7.1 84.6 10 15 4.5 5.9 90.5 11 16 4.8 6.3 96.8 12 8 2.4 3.2 100.0 Total 253 75.5 100.0 Missing System 82 24.5 Total 335 100.0

PAGE 187

187 Supervisor & colleagues Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 65 19.4 25.6 25.6 2 37 11.0 14.6 40.2 3 28 8.4 11.0 51.2 4 30 9.0 11.8 63.0 5 18 5.4 7.1 70.1 6 11 3.3 4.3 74.4 7 9 2.7 3.5 78.0 8 11 3.3 4.3 82.3 9 9 2.7 3.5 85.8 10 12 3.6 4.7 90.6 11 13 3.9 5.1 95.7 12 11 3.3 4.3 100.0 Total 254 75.8 100.0 Missing System 81 24.2 Total 335 100.0 Table 4 46 Factors impacting employment Age (2006) Campus facilities Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 3 6 9 % within Campus facilities 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Age: 2.5% 4.7% 3.6% % of Total 1.2% 2.4% 3.6% 2 Count 9 10 19 % within Campus facilities 47.4% 52.6% 100.0% % within Age: 7.4% 7.9% 7.7% % of Total 3.6% 4.0% 7.7% 3 Count 12 19 31 % within Campus facilities 38.7% 61.3% 100.0% % within Age: 9.9% 15.0% 12.5%

PAGE 188

188 % of Total 4.8% 7.7% 12.5% 4 Count 9 15 24 % within Campus facilities 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Age: 7.4% 11.8% 9.7% % of Total 3.6% 6.0% 9.7% 5 Count 7 8 15 % within Campus facilities 46.7% 53.3% 100.0% % within Age: 5.8% 6.3% 6.0% % of Total 2.8% 3.2% 6.0% 6 Count 9 8 17 % within Campus facilities 52.9% 47.1% 100.0% % within Age: 7.4% 6.3% 6.9% % of Total 3.6% 3.2% 6.9% 7 Count 11 11 22 % within Campus facilities 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 9.1% 8.7% 8.9% % of Total 4.4% 4.4% 8.9% 8 Count 12 6 18 % within Campus facilities 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Age: 9.9% 4.7% 7.3% % of Total 4.8% 2.4% 7.3% 9 Count 5 11 16 % within Campus facilities 31.3% 68.8% 100.0% % within Age: 4.1% 8.7% 6.5% % of Total 2.0% 4.4% 6.5% 10 Count 12 16 28 % within Campus facilities 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Age: 9.9% 12.6% 11.3% % of Total 4.8% 6.5% 11.3% 11 Count 16 14 30 % within Campus facilities 53.3% 46.7% 100.0% % within Age: 13.2% 11.0% 12.1% % of Total 6.5% 5.6% 12.1% 12 Count 16 3 19 % within Campus facilities 84.2% 15.8% 100.0%

PAGE 189

189 % within Age: 13.2% 2.4% 7.7% % of Total 6.5% 1.2% 7.7% Total Count 121 127 248 % within Campus facilities 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 17.974 a 11 .082 Likelihood Ratio 18.980 11 .061 Linear by Linear Association 5.336 1 .021 N of Valid Cases 248 a. 2 cells (8.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.39. Familiarity with school or institution type Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 9 7 16 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 56.3% 43.8% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 5.4% 6.3% % of Total 3.6% 2.8% 6.3% 2 Count 7 14 21 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Age: 5.6% 10.9% 8.3% % of Total 2.8% 5.5% 8.3% 3 Count 10 24 34 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 29.4% 70.6% 100.0% % within Age: 8.1% 18.6% 13.4% % of Total 4.0% 9.5% 13.4%

PAGE 190

190 4 Count 11 9 20 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 55.0% 45.0% 100.0% % within Age: 8.9% 7.0% 7.9% % of Total 4.3% 3.6% 7.9% 5 Count 7 11 18 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 38.9% 61.1% 100.0% % within Age: 5.6% 8.5% 7.1% % of Total 2.8% 4.3% 7.1% 6 Count 9 8 17 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 52.9% 47.1% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 6.2% 6.7% % of Total 3.6% 3.2% 6.7% 7 Count 12 9 21 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 57.1% 42.9% 100.0% % within Age: 9.7% 7.0% 8.3% % of Total 4.7% 3.6% 8.3% 8 Count 5 8 13 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 38.5% 61.5% 100.0% % within Age: 4.0% 6.2% 5.1% % of Total 2.0% 3.2% 5.1% 9 Count 11 7 18 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 61.1% 38.9% 100.0% % within Age: 8.9% 5.4% 7.1% % of Total 4.3% 2.8% 7.1% 10 Count 14 17 31 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 45.2% 54.8% 100.0% % within Age: 11.3% 13.2% 12.3% % of Total 5.5% 6.7% 12.3% 11 Count 13 7 20

PAGE 191

191 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 65.0% 35.0% 100.0% % within Age: 10.5% 5.4% 7.9% % of Total 5.1% 2.8% 7.9% 12 Count 16 8 24 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Age: 12.9% 6.2% 9.5% % of Total 6.3% 3.2% 9.5% Total Count 124 129 253 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 16.170 a 11 .135 Likelihood Ratio 16.488 11 .124 Linear by Linear Association 6.009 1 .014 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.37. Geographical location Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 39 61 100 % within Geographical location 39.0% 61.0% 100.0% % within Age: 31.5% 47.3% 39.5% % of Total 15.4% 24.1% 39.5% 2 Count 21 22 43 % within Geographical location 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% % within Age: 16.9% 17.1% 17.0% % of Total 8.3% 8.7% 17.0%

PAGE 192

192 3 Count 8 16 24 % within Geographical location 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 12.4% 9.5% % of Total 3.2% 6.3% 9.5% 4 Count 15 2 17 % within Geographical location 88.2% 11.8% 100.0% % within Age: 12.1% 1.6% 6.7% % of Total 5.9% .8% 6.7% 5 Count 8 5 13 % within Geographical location 61.5% 38.5% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 3.9% 5.1% % of Total 3.2% 2.0% 5.1% 6 Count 10 6 16 % within Geographical location 62.5% 37.5% 100.0% % within Age: 8.1% 4.7% 6.3% % of Total 4.0% 2.4% 6.3% 7 Count 1 3 4 % within Geographical location 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Age: .8% 2.3% 1.6% % of Total .4% 1.2% 1.6% 8 Count 5 6 11 % within Geographical location 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% % within Age: 4.0% 4.7% 4.3% % of Total 2.0% 2.4% 4.3% 9 Count 5 2 7 % within Geographical location 71.4% 28.6% 100.0% % within Age: 4.0% 1.6% 2.8% % of Total 2.0% .8% 2.8% 10 Count 3 3 6 % within Geographical location 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% % of Total 1.2% 1.2% 2.4% 11 Count 8 2 10 % within Geographical location 80.0% 20.0% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 1.6% 4.0%

PAGE 193

193 % of Total 3.2% .8% 4.0% 12 Count 1 1 2 % within Geographical location 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: .8% .8% .8% % of Total .4% .4% .8% Total Count 124 129 253 % within Geographical location 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 25.051 a 11 .009 Likelihood Ratio 26.804 11 .005 Linear by Linear Association 7.426 1 .006 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 9 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .98. Institution's reputation Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 6 13 19 % within Institution's reputation 31.6% 68.4% 100.0% % within Age: 4.9% 10.2% 7.6% % of Total 2.4% 5.2% 7.6% 2 Count 22 23 45 % within Institution's reputation 48.9% 51.1% 100.0% % within Age: 18.0% 18.1% 18.1% % of Total 8.8% 9.2% 18.1% 3 Count 14 24 38 % within Institution's reputation 36.8% 63.2% 100.0% % within Age: 11.5% 18.9% 15.3% % of Total 5.6% 9.6% 15.3%

PAGE 194

194 4 Count 9 18 27 % within Institution's reputation 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Age: 7.4% 14.2% 10.8% % of Total 3.6% 7.2% 10.8% 5 Count 8 7 15 % within Institution's reputation 53.3% 46.7% 100.0% % within Age: 6.6% 5.5% 6.0% % of Total 3.2% 2.8% 6.0% 6 Count 9 11 20 % within Institution's reputation 45.0% 55.0% 100.0% % within Age: 7.4% 8.7% 8.0% % of Total 3.6% 4.4% 8.0% 7 Count 10 5 15 % within Institution's reputation 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Age: 8.2% 3.9% 6.0% % of Total 4.0% 2.0% 6.0% 8 Count 5 8 13 % within Institution's reputation 38.5% 61.5% 100.0% % within Age: 4.1% 6.3% 5.2% % of Total 2.0% 3.2% 5.2% 9 Count 15 6 21 % within Institution's reputation 71.4% 28.6% 100.0% % within Age: 12.3% 4.7% 8.4% % of Total 6.0% 2.4% 8.4% 10 Count 13 7 20 % within Institution's reputation 65.0% 35.0% 100.0% % within Age: 10.7% 5.5% 8.0% % of Total 5.2% 2.8% 8.0% 11 Count 5 2 7 % within Institution's reputation 71.4% 28.6% 100.0% % within Age: 4.1% 1.6% 2.8% % of Total 2.0% .8% 2.8% 12 Count 6 3 9 % within Institution's reputation 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Age: 4.9% 2.4% 3.6%

PAGE 195

195 % of Total 2.4% 1.2% 3.6% Total Count 122 127 249 % within Institution's reputation 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 18.708 a 11 .067 Likelihood Ratio 19.109 11 .059 Linear by Linear Association 10.479 1 .001 N of Valid Cases 249 a. 4 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.43. Institution's mission & purpose Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 23 29 52 % within Institution's mission & purpose 44.2% 55.8% 100.0% % within Age: 18.5% 22.5% 20.6% % of Total 9.1% 11.5% 20.6% 2 Count 20 27 47 % within Institution's mission & purpose 42.6% 57.4% 100.0% % within Age: 16.1% 20.9% 18.6% % of Total 7.9% 10.7% 18.6% 3 Count 12 13 25 % within Institution's mission & purpose 48.0% 52.0% 100.0% % within Age: 9.7% 10.1% 9.9% % of Total 4.7% 5.1% 9.9% 4 Count 9 11 20

PAGE 196

196 % within Institution's mission & purpose 45.0% 55.0% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 8.5% 7.9% % of Total 3.6% 4.3% 7.9% 5 Count 7 11 18 % within Institution's mission & purpose 38.9% 61.1% 100.0% % within Age: 5.6% 8.5% 7.1% % of Total 2.8% 4.3% 7.1% 6 Count 11 6 17 % within Institution's mission & purpose 64.7% 35.3% 100.0% % within Age: 8.9% 4.7% 6.7% % of Total 4.3% 2.4% 6.7% 7 Count 8 8 16 % within Institution's mission & purpose 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 6.2% 6.3% % of Total 3.2% 3.2% 6.3% 8 Count 12 3 15 % within Institution's mission & purpose 80.0% 20.0% 100.0% % within Age: 9.7% 2.3% 5.9% % of Total 4.7% 1.2% 5.9% 9 Count 5 5 10 % within Institution's mission & purpose 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 4.0% 3.9% 4.0% % of Total 2.0% 2.0% 4.0% 10 Count 9 5 14 % within Institution's mission & purpose 64.3% 35.7% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 3.9% 5.5% % of Total 3.6% 2.0% 5.5% 11 Count 6 9 15

PAGE 197

197 % within Institution's mission & purpose 40.0% 60.0% 100.0% % within Age: 4.8% 7.0% 5.9% % of Total 2.4% 3.6% 5.9% 12 Count 2 2 4 % within Institution's mission & purpose 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% % of Total .8% .8% 1.6% Total Count 124 129 253 % within Institution's mission & purpose 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 11.383 a 11 .412 Likelihood Ratio 11.816 11 .378 Linear by Linear Association 2.340 1 .126 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 3 cells (12.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.96. Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 8 9 17 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 47.1% 52.9% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 7.0% 6.8% % of Total 3.2% 3.6% 6.8% 2 Count 8 6 14 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

PAGE 198

198 % within Age: 6.5% 4.7% 5.6% % of Total 3.2% 2.4% 5.6% 3 Count 11 6 17 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 64.7% 35.3% 100.0% % within Age: 8.9% 4.7% 6.8% % of Total 4.4% 2.4% 6.8% 4 Count 14 5 19 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 73.7% 26.3% 100.0% % within Age: 11.4% 3.9% 7.6% % of Total 5.6% 2.0% 7.6% 5 Count 8 8 16 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 6.3% 6.4% % of Total 3.2% 3.2% 6.4% 6 Count 4 6 10 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 40.0% 60.0% 100.0% % within Age: 3.3% 4.7% 4.0% % of Total 1.6% 2.4% 4.0% 7 Count 10 7 17 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 58.8% 41.2% 100.0% % within Age: 8.1% 5.5% 6.8% % of Total 4.0% 2.8% 6.8% 8 Count 8 3 11 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 72.7% 27.3% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 2.3% 4.4% % of Total 3.2% 1.2% 4.4% 9 Count 10 5 15 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Age: 8.1% 3.9% 6.0%

PAGE 199

199 % of Total 4.0% 2.0% 6.0% 10 Count 12 1 13 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 92.3% 7.7% 100.0% % within Age: 9.8% .8% 5.2% % of Total 4.8% .4% 5.2% 11 Count 9 7 16 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 56.3% 43.8% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 5.5% 6.4% % of Total 3.6% 2.8% 6.4% 12 Count 21 65 86 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 24.4% 75.6% 100.0% % within Age: 17.1% 50.8% 34.3% % of Total 8.4% 25.9% 34.3% Total Count 123 128 251 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 42.934 a 11 .000 Likelihood Ratio 46.005 11 .000 Linear by Linear Association 11.223 1 .001 N of Valid Cases 251 a. 1 cells (4.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.90. Professional climate & environment Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 23 43 66

PAGE 200

200 % within Professional climate & environment 34.8% 65.2% 100.0% % within Age: 18.5% 33.3% 26.1% % of Total 9.1% 17.0% 26.1% 2 Count 24 19 43 % within Professional climate & environment 55.8% 44.2% 100.0% % within Age: 19.4% 14.7% 17.0% % of Total 9.5% 7.5% 17.0% 3 Count 16 14 30 % within Professional climate & environment 53.3% 46.7% 100.0% % within Age: 12.9% 10.9% 11.9% % of Total 6.3% 5.5% 11.9% 4 Count 6 15 21 % within Professional climate & environment 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Age: 4.8% 11.6% 8.3% % of Total 2.4% 5.9% 8.3% 5 Count 12 9 21 % within Professional climate & environment 57.1% 42.9% 100.0% % within Age: 9.7% 7.0% 8.3% % of Total 4.7% 3.6% 8.3% 6 Count 9 8 17 % within Professional climate & environment 52.9% 47.1% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 6.2% 6.7% % of Total 3.6% 3.2% 6.7% 7 Count 5 5 10 % within Professional climate & environment 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 4.0% 3.9% 4.0% % of Total 2.0% 2.0% 4.0% 8 Count 8 3 11

PAGE 201

201 % within Professional climate & environment 72.7% 27.3% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 2.3% 4.3% % of Total 3.2% 1.2% 4.3% 9 Count 5 5 10 % within Professional climate & environment 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 4.0% 3.9% 4.0% % of Total 2.0% 2.0% 4.0% 10 Count 8 4 12 % within Professional climate & environment 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 3.1% 4.7% % of Total 3.2% 1.6% 4.7% 11 Count 3 2 5 % within Professional climate & environment 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within Age: 2.4% 1.6% 2.0% % of Total 1.2% .8% 2.0% 12 Count 5 2 7 % within Professional climate & environment 71.4% 28.6% 100.0% % within Age: 4.0% 1.6% 2.8% % of Total 2.0% .8% 2.8% Total Count 124 129 253 % within Professional climate & environment 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 16.119 a 11 .137 Likelihood Ratio 16.495 11 .124 Linear by Linear Association 6.527 1 .011

PAGE 202

202 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 6 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.45. Promotion opportunities Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 17 21 38 % within Promotion opportunities 44.7% 55.3% 100.0% % within Age: 14.2% 16.4% 15.3% % of Total 6.9% 8.5% 15.3% 2 Count 20 25 45 % within Promotion opportunities 44.4% 55.6% 100.0% % within Age: 16.7% 19.5% 18.1% % of Total 8.1% 10.1% 18.1% 3 Count 8 18 26 % within Promotion opportunities 30.8% 69.2% 100.0% % within Age: 6.7% 14.1% 10.5% % of Total 3.2% 7.3% 10.5% 4 Count 8 14 22 % within Promotion opportunities 36.4% 63.6% 100.0% % within Age: 6.7% 10.9% 8.9% % of Total 3.2% 5.6% 8.9% 5 Count 6 10 16 % within Promotion opportunities 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Age: 5.0% 7.8% 6.5% % of Total 2.4% 4.0% 6.5% 6 Count 13 9 22 % within Promotion opportunities 59.1% 40.9% 100.0% % within Age: 10.8% 7.0% 8.9% % of Total 5.2% 3.6% 8.9% 7 Count 10 8 18 % within Promotion opportunities 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% % within Age: 8.3% 6.3% 7.3% % of Total 4.0% 3.2% 7.3% 8 Count 2 5 7

PAGE 203

203 % within Promotion opportunities 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Age: 1.7% 3.9% 2.8% % of Total .8% 2.0% 2.8% 9 Count 13 3 16 % within Promotion opportunities 81.3% 18.8% 100.0% % within Age: 10.8% 2.3% 6.5% % of Total 5.2% 1.2% 6.5% 10 Count 12 3 15 % within Promotion opportunities 80.0% 20.0% 100.0% % within Age: 10.0% 2.3% 6.0% % of Total 4.8% 1.2% 6.0% 11 Count 11 6 17 % within Promotion opportunities 64.7% 35.3% 100.0% % within Age: 9.2% 4.7% 6.9% % of Total 4.4% 2.4% 6.9% 12 Count 0 6 6 % within Promotion opportunities .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Age: .0% 4.7% 2.4% % of Total .0% 2.4% 2.4% Total Count 120 128 248 % within Promotion opportunities 48.4% 51.6% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.4% 51.6% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 28.587 a 11 .003 Likelihood Ratio 31.949 11 .001 Linear by Linear Association 5.859 1 .015 N of Valid Cases 248 a. 4 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.90.

PAGE 204

204 Salary & benefits Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 12 29 41 % within Salary & benefits 29.3% 70.7% 100.0% % within Age: 9.8% 22.3% 16.2% % of Total 4.7% 11.5% 16.2% 2 Count 25 35 60 % within Salary & benefits 41.7% 58.3% 100.0% % within Age: 20.3% 26.9% 23.7% % of Total 9.9% 13.8% 23.7% 3 Count 15 17 32 % within Salary & benefits 46.9% 53.1% 100.0% % within Age: 12.2% 13.1% 12.6% % of Total 5.9% 6.7% 12.6% 4 Count 15 17 32 % within Salary & benefits 46.9% 53.1% 100.0% % within Age: 12.2% 13.1% 12.6% % of Total 5.9% 6.7% 12.6% 5 Count 13 7 20 % within Salary & benefits 65.0% 35.0% 100.0% % within Age: 10.6% 5.4% 7.9% % of Total 5.1% 2.8% 7.9% 6 Count 7 5 12 % within Salary & benefits 58.3% 41.7% 100.0% % within Age: 5.7% 3.8% 4.7% % of Total 2.8% 2.0% 4.7% 7 Count 7 6 13 % within Salary & benefits 53.8% 46.2% 100.0% % within Age: 5.7% 4.6% 5.1% % of Total 2.8% 2.4% 5.1% 8 Count 9 2 11 % within Salary & benefits 81.8% 18.2% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 1.5% 4.3% % of Total 3.6% .8% 4.3% 9 Count 5 6 11

PAGE 205

205 % within Salary & benefits 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% % within Age: 4.1% 4.6% 4.3% % of Total 2.0% 2.4% 4.3% 10 Count 6 1 7 % within Salary & benefits 85.7% 14.3% 100.0% % within Age: 4.9% .8% 2.8% % of Total 2.4% .4% 2.8% 11 Count 6 0 6 % within Salary & benefits 100.0% .0% 100.0% % within Age: 4.9% .0% 2.4% % of Total 2.4% .0% 2.4% 12 Count 3 5 8 % within Salary & benefits 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Age: 2.4% 3.8% 3.2% % of Total 1.2% 2.0% 3.2% Total Count 123 130 253 % within Salary & benefits 48.6% 51.4% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.6% 51.4% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 25.619 a 11 .007 Likelihood Ratio 28.932 11 .002 Linear by Linear Association 11.899 1 .001 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 6 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.92. Sense of community with the institution Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 27 22 49 % within Sense of community with the institution 55.1% 44.9% 100.0% % within Age: 22.1% 17.2% 19.6%

PAGE 206

206 % of Total 10.8% 8.8% 19.6% 2 Count 15 28 43 % within Sense of community with the institution 34.9% 65.1% 100.0% % within Age: 12.3% 21.9% 17.2% % of Total 6.0% 11.2% 17.2% 3 Count 26 16 42 % within Sense of community with the institution 61.9% 38.1% 100.0% % within Age: 21.3% 12.5% 16.8% % of Total 10.4% 6.4% 16.8% 4 Count 5 15 20 % within Sense of community with the institution 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Age: 4.1% 11.7% 8.0% % of Total 2.0% 6.0% 8.0% 5 Count 10 6 16 % within Sense of community with the institution 62.5% 37.5% 100.0% % within Age: 8.2% 4.7% 6.4% % of Total 4.0% 2.4% 6.4% 6 Count 8 7 15 % within Sense of community with the institution 53.3% 46.7% 100.0% % within Age: 6.6% 5.5% 6.0% % of Total 3.2% 2.8% 6.0% 7 Count 2 6 8 % within Sense of community with the institution 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Age: 1.6% 4.7% 3.2% % of Total .8% 2.4% 3.2% 8 Count 6 11 17 % within Sense of community with the institution 35.3% 64.7% 100.0% % within Age: 4.9% 8.6% 6.8% % of Total 2.4% 4.4% 6.8%

PAGE 207

207 9 Count 7 3 10 % within Sense of community with the institution 70.0% 30.0% 100.0% % within Age: 5.7% 2.3% 4.0% % of Total 2.8% 1.2% 4.0% 10 Count 3 4 7 % within Sense of community with the institution 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Age: 2.5% 3.1% 2.8% % of Total 1.2% 1.6% 2.8% 11 Count 6 6 12 % within Sense of community with the institution 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 4.9% 4.7% 4.8% % of Total 2.4% 2.4% 4.8% 12 Count 7 4 11 % within Sense of community with the institution 63.6% 36.4% 100.0% % within Age: 5.7% 3.1% 4.4% % of Total 2.8% 1.6% 4.4% Total Count 122 128 250 % within Sense of community with the institution 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 48.8% 51.2% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 18.787 a 11 .065 Likelihood Ratio 19.277 11 .056 Linear by Linear Association .092 1 .762 N of Valid Cases 250 a. 5 cells (20.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.42.

PAGE 208

208 Student body Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 19 14 33 % within Student body 57.6% 42.4% 100.0% % within Age: 15.3% 10.9% 13.1% % of Total 7.5% 5.6% 13.1% 2 Count 25 23 48 % within Student body 52.1% 47.9% 100.0% % within Age: 20.2% 18.0% 19.0% % of Total 9.9% 9.1% 19.0% 3 Count 11 20 31 % within Student body 35.5% 64.5% 100.0% % within Age: 8.9% 15.6% 12.3% % of Total 4.4% 7.9% 12.3% 4 Count 12 17 29 % within Student body 41.4% 58.6% 100.0% % within Age: 9.7% 13.3% 11.5% % of Total 4.8% 6.7% 11.5% 5 Count 6 6 12 % within Student body 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 4.8% 4.7% 4.8% % of Total 2.4% 2.4% 4.8% 6 Count 9 7 16 % within Student body 56.3% 43.8% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 5.5% 6.3% % of Total 3.6% 2.8% 6.3% 7 Count 4 4 8 % within Student body 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 3.2% 3.1% 3.2% % of Total 1.6% 1.6% 3.2% 8 Count 9 9 18 % within Student body 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 7.0% 7.1% % of Total 3.6% 3.6% 7.1% 9 Count 7 11 18

PAGE 209

209 % within Student body 38.9% 61.1% 100.0% % within Age: 5.6% 8.6% 7.1% % of Total 2.8% 4.4% 7.1% 10 Count 10 5 15 % within Student body 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Age: 8.1% 3.9% 6.0% % of Total 4.0% 2.0% 6.0% 11 Count 9 7 16 % within Student body 56.3% 43.8% 100.0% % within Age: 7.3% 5.5% 6.3% % of Total 3.6% 2.8% 6.3% 12 Count 3 5 8 % within Student body 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Age: 2.4% 3.9% 3.2% % of Total 1.2% 2.0% 3.2% Total Count 124 128 252 % within Student body 49.2% 50.8% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.2% 50.8% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 7.810 a 11 .730 Likelihood Ratio 7.900 11 .722 Linear by Linear Association .013 1 .908 N of Valid Cases 252 a. 4 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.94. Supervisor & colleagues Age: Total 18 25 years 26 above 1 Count 29 36 65 % within Supervisor & colleagues 44.6% 55.4% 100.0%

PAGE 210

210 % within Age: 23.4% 27.9% 25.7% % of Total 11.5% 14.2% 25.7% 2 Count 14 23 37 % within Supervisor & colleagues 37.8% 62.2% 100.0% % within Age: 11.3% 17.8% 14.6% % of Total 5.5% 9.1% 14.6% 3 Count 16 11 27 % within Supervisor & colleagues 59.3% 40.7% 100.0% % within Age: 12.9% 8.5% 10.7% % of Total 6.3% 4.3% 10.7% 4 Count 14 16 30 % within Supervisor & colleagues 46.7% 53.3% 100.0% % within Age: 11.3% 12.4% 11.9% % of Total 5.5% 6.3% 11.9% 5 Count 7 11 18 % within Supervisor & colleagues 38.9% 61.1% 100.0% % within Age: 5.6% 8.5% 7.1% % of Total 2.8% 4.3% 7.1% 6 Count 6 5 11 % within Supervisor & colleagues 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% % within Age: 4.8% 3.9% 4.3% % of Total 2.4% 2.0% 4.3% 7 Count 6 3 9 % within Supervisor & colleagues 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% % within Age: 4.8% 2.3% 3.6% % of Total 2.4% 1.2% 3.6% 8 Count 6 5 11 % within Supervisor & colleagues 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% % within Age: 4.8% 3.9% 4.3% % of Total 2.4% 2.0% 4.3% 9 Count 5 4 9 % within Supervisor & colleagues 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% % within Age: 4.0% 3.1% 3.6% % of Total 2.0% 1.6% 3.6% 10 Count 7 5 12

PAGE 211

211 % within Supervisor & colleagues 58.3% 41.7% 100.0% % within Age: 5.6% 3.9% 4.7% % of Total 2.8% 2.0% 4.7% 11 Count 8 5 13 % within Supervisor & colleagues 61.5% 38.5% 100.0% % within Age: 6.5% 3.9% 5.1% % of Total 3.2% 2.0% 5.1% 12 Count 6 5 11 % within Supervisor & colleagues 54.5% 45.5% 100.0% % within Age: 4.8% 3.9% 4.3% % of Total 2.4% 2.0% 4.3% Total Count 124 129 253 % within Supervisor & colleagues 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% % within Age: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 49.0% 51.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 7.205 a 11 .782 Likelihood Ratio 7.266 11 .777 Linear by Linear Association 2.858 1 .091 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 4 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.41. Table 4 47 Factors impacting employment Ethnicity (2006) Campus facilities Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 2 7 9 % within Campus facilities 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 3.5% 3.7% % of Total .8% 2.8% 3.7% 2 Count 6 13 19

PAGE 212

212 % within Campus facilities 31.6% 68.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.8% 6.5% 7.7% % of Total 2.4% 5.3% 7.7% 3 Count 8 23 31 % within Campus facilities 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 17.0% 11.6% 12.6% % of Total 3.3% 9.3% 12.6% 4 Count 5 19 24 % within Campus facilities 20.8% 79.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.6% 9.5% 9.8% % of Total 2.0% 7.7% 9.8% 5 Count 3 11 14 % within Campus facilities 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.4% 5.5% 5.7% % of Total 1.2% 4.5% 5.7% 6 Count 2 15 17 % within Campus facilities 11.8% 88.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 7.5% 6.9% % of Total .8% 6.1% 6.9% 7 Count 2 21 23 % within Campus facilities 8.7% 91.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 10.6% 9.3% % of Total .8% 8.5% 9.3% 8 Count 1 16 17 % within Campus facilities 5.9% 94.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 8.0% 6.9% % of Total .4% 6.5% 6.9% 9 Count 3 13 16 % within Campus facilities 18.8% 81.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.4% 6.5% 6.5% % of Total 1.2% 5.3% 6.5% 10 Count 5 22 27 % within Campus facilities 18.5% 81.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.6% 11.1% 11.0% % of Total 2.0% 8.9% 11.0%

PAGE 213

213 11 Count 5 25 30 % within Campus facilities 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.6% 12.6% 12.2% % of Total 2.0% 10.2% 12.2% 12 Count 5 14 19 % within Campus facilities 26.3% 73.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.6% 7.0% 7.7% % of Total 2.0% 5.7% 7.7% Total Count 47 199 246 % within Campus facilities 19.1% 80.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.1% 80.9% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 7.856 a 11 .726 Likelihood Ratio 8.462 11 .671 Linear by Linear Association 1.034 1 .309 N of Valid Cases 246 a. 9 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.72. Familiarity with school or institution type Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 5 12 17 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 29.4% 70.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.2% 5.9% 6.8% % of Total 2.0% 4.8% 6.8% 2 Count 5 16 21 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 23.8% 76.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.2% 7.9% 8.4% % of Total 2.0% 6.4% 8.4%

PAGE 214

214 3 Count 4 29 33 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 12.1% 87.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.2% 14.4% 13.1% % of Total 1.6% 11.6% 13.1% 4 Count 6 14 20 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.2% 6.9% 8.0% % of Total 2.4% 5.6% 8.0% 5 Count 1 17 18 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 5.6% 94.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 8.4% 7.2% % of Total .4% 6.8% 7.2% 6 Count 1 16 17 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 5.9% 94.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 7.9% 6.8% % of Total .4% 6.4% 6.8% 7 Count 6 15 21 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.2% 7.4% 8.4% % of Total 2.4% 6.0% 8.4% 8 Count 3 10 13 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.1% 5.0% 5.2% % of Total 1.2% 4.0% 5.2% 9 Count 4 13 17 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 23.5% 76.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.2% 6.4% 6.8% % of Total 1.6% 5.2% 6.8% 10 Count 7 24 31

PAGE 215

215 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 22.6% 77.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 14.3% 11.9% 12.4% % of Total 2.8% 9.6% 12.4% 11 Count 4 16 20 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.2% 7.9% 8.0% % of Total 1.6% 6.4% 8.0% 12 Count 3 20 23 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 13.0% 87.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.1% 9.9% 9.2% % of Total 1.2% 8.0% 9.2% Total Count 49 202 251 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 10.275 a 11 .506 Likelihood Ratio 11.379 11 .412 Linear by Linear Association .077 1 .782 N of Valid Cases 251 a. 10 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.54. Geographical location Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 20 77 97 % within Geographical location 20.6% 79.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 40.8% 38.1% 38.6%

PAGE 216

216 % of Total 8.0% 30.7% 38.6% 2 Count 10 33 43 % within Geographical location 23.3% 76.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 20.4% 16.3% 17.1% % of Total 4.0% 13.1% 17.1% 3 Count 8 17 25 % within Geographical location 32.0% 68.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 16.3% 8.4% 10.0% % of Total 3.2% 6.8% 10.0% 4 Count 2 15 17 % within Geographical location 11.8% 88.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 7.4% 6.8% % of Total .8% 6.0% 6.8% 5 Count 2 11 13 % within Geographical location 15.4% 84.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 5.4% 5.2% % of Total .8% 4.4% 5.2% 6 Count 2 14 16 % within Geographical location 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 6.9% 6.4% % of Total .8% 5.6% 6.4% 7 Count 1 3 4 % within Geographical location 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 1.5% 1.6% % of Total .4% 1.2% 1.6% 8 Count 1 10 11 % within Geographical location 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 5.0% 4.4% % of Total .4% 4.0% 4.4% 9 Count 2 5 7 % within Geographical location 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 2.5% 2.8% % of Total .8% 2.0% 2.8% 10 Count 1 5 6 % within Geographical location 16.7% 83.3% 100.0%

PAGE 217

217 % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 2.5% 2.4% % of Total .4% 2.0% 2.4% 11 Count 0 10 10 % within Geographical location .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 5.0% 4.0% % of Total .0% 4.0% 4.0% 12 Count 0 2 2 % within Geographical location .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 1.0% .8% % of Total .0% .8% .8% Total Count 49 202 251 % within Geographical location 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 8.373 a 11 .680 Likelihood Ratio 10.617 11 .476 Linear by Linear Association 2.647 1 .104 N of Valid Cases 251 a. 13 cells (54.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .39. Institution's reputation Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 10 9 19 % within Institution's reputation 52.6% 47.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 20.8% 4.5% 7.7% % of Total 4.0% 3.6% 7.7% 2 Count 11 34 45 % within Institution's reputation 24.4% 75.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 22.9% 17.1% 18.2%

PAGE 218

218 % of Total 4.5% 13.8% 18.2% 3 Count 7 31 38 % within Institution's reputation 18.4% 81.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 14.6% 15.6% 15.4% % of Total 2.8% 12.6% 15.4% 4 Count 2 24 26 % within Institution's reputation 7.7% 92.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.2% 12.1% 10.5% % of Total .8% 9.7% 10.5% 5 Count 4 12 16 % within Institution's reputation 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.3% 6.0% 6.5% % of Total 1.6% 4.9% 6.5% 6 Count 1 19 20 % within Institution's reputation 5.0% 95.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 9.5% 8.1% % of Total .4% 7.7% 8.1% 7 Count 3 12 15 % within Institution's reputation 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.3% 6.0% 6.1% % of Total 1.2% 4.9% 6.1% 8 Count 4 9 13 % within Institution's reputation 30.8% 69.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.3% 4.5% 5.3% % of Total 1.6% 3.6% 5.3% 9 Count 4 17 21 % within Institution's reputation 19.0% 81.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.3% 8.5% 8.5% % of Total 1.6% 6.9% 8.5% 10 Count 1 18 19 % within Institution's reputation 5.3% 94.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 9.0% 7.7% % of Total .4% 7.3% 7.7% 11 Count 0 6 6 % within Institution's reputation .0% 100.0% 100.0%

PAGE 219

219 % within Ethnicity: .0% 3.0% 2.4% % of Total .0% 2.4% 2.4% 12 Count 1 8 9 % within Institution's reputation 11.1% 88.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 4.0% 3.6% % of Total .4% 3.2% 3.6% Total Count 48 199 247 % within Institution's reputation 19.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.4% 80.6% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 24.742 a 11 .010 Likelihood Ratio 24.958 11 .009 Linear by Linear Association 6.901 1 .009 N of Valid Cases 247 a. 10 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.17. Institution's mission & purpose Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 17 35 52 % within Institution's mission & purpose 32.7% 67.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 34.7% 17.3% 20.7% % of Total 6.8% 13.9% 20.7% 2 Count 11 35 46 % within Institution's mission & purpose 23.9% 76.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 22.4% 17.3% 18.3% % of Total 4.4% 13.9% 18.3% 3 Count 4 20 24

PAGE 220

220 % within Institution's mission & purpose 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.2% 9.9% 9.6% % of Total 1.6% 8.0% 9.6% 4 Count 2 18 20 % within Institution's mission & purpose 10.0% 90.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 8.9% 8.0% % of Total .8% 7.2% 8.0% 5 Count 4 14 18 % within Institution's mission & purpose 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.2% 6.9% 7.2% % of Total 1.6% 5.6% 7.2% 6 Count 3 14 17 % within Institution's mission & purpose 17.6% 82.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.1% 6.9% 6.8% % of Total 1.2% 5.6% 6.8% 7 Count 3 13 16 % within Institution's mission & purpose 18.8% 81.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.1% 6.4% 6.4% % of Total 1.2% 5.2% 6.4% 8 Count 2 13 15 % within Institution's mission & purpose 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 6.4% 6.0% % of Total .8% 5.2% 6.0% 9 Count 0 10 10 % within Institution's mission & purpose .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 5.0% 4.0% % of Total .0% 4.0% 4.0% 10 Count 1 13 14

PAGE 221

221 % within Institution's mission & purpose 7.1% 92.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 6.4% 5.6% % of Total .4% 5.2% 5.6% 11 Count 2 13 15 % within Institution's mission & purpose 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 6.4% 6.0% % of Total .8% 5.2% 6.0% 12 Count 0 4 4 % within Institution's mission & purpose .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 2.0% 1.6% % of Total .0% 1.6% 1.6% Total Count 49 202 251 % within Institution's mission & purpose 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 13.205 a 11 .280 Likelihood Ratio 15.755 11 .150 Linear by Linear Association 8.465 1 .004 N of Valid Cases 251 a. 11 cells (45.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .78. Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 2 15 17 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 11.8% 88.2% 100.0%

PAGE 222

222 % within Ethnicity: 4.2% 7.5% 6.9% % of Total .8% 6.0% 6.9% 2 Count 6 8 14 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.5% 4.0% 5.6% % of Total 2.4% 3.2% 5.6% 3 Count 8 9 17 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 47.1% 52.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 16.7% 4.5% 6.9% % of Total 3.2% 3.6% 6.9% 4 Count 3 16 19 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 15.8% 84.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.3% 8.0% 7.7% % of Total 1.2% 6.5% 7.7% 5 Count 3 13 16 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 18.8% 81.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.3% 6.5% 6.5% % of Total 1.2% 5.2% 6.5% 6 Count 1 9 10 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 10.0% 90.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 4.5% 4.0% % of Total .4% 3.6% 4.0% 7 Count 2 15 17 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 11.8% 88.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.2% 7.5% 6.9% % of Total .8% 6.0% 6.9% 8 Count 1 10 11 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 5.0% 4.4%

PAGE 223

223 % of Total .4% 4.0% 4.4% 9 Count 2 12 14 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.2% 6.0% 5.6% % of Total .8% 4.8% 5.6% 10 Count 5 8 13 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 38.5% 61.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.4% 4.0% 5.2% % of Total 2.0% 3.2% 5.2% 11 Count 0 15 15 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 7.5% 6.0% % of Total .0% 6.0% 6.0% 12 Count 15 70 85 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 17.6% 82.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 31.3% 35.0% 34.3% % of Total 6.0% 28.2% 34.3% Total Count 48 200 248 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 19.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.4% 80.6% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 23.060 a 11 .017 Likelihood Ratio 23.192 11 .017 Linear by Linear Association 2.454 1 .117 N of Valid Cases 248 a. 11 cells (45.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.94.

PAGE 224

224 Professional climate & environment Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 16 50 66 % within Professional climate & environment 24.2% 75.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 33.3% 24.6% 26.3% % of Total 6.4% 19.9% 26.3% 2 Count 12 31 43 % within Professional climate & environment 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 25.0% 15.3% 17.1% % of Total 4.8% 12.4% 17.1% 3 Count 9 21 30 % within Professional climate & environment 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 18.8% 10.3% 12.0% % of Total 3.6% 8.4% 12.0% 4 Count 1 19 20 % within Professional climate & environment 5.0% 95.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 9.4% 8.0% % of Total .4% 7.6% 8.0% 5 Count 3 18 21 % within Professional climate & environment 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.3% 8.9% 8.4% % of Total 1.2% 7.2% 8.4% 6 Count 4 12 16 % within Professional climate & environment 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.3% 5.9% 6.4% % of Total 1.6% 4.8% 6.4% 7 Count 1 9 10

PAGE 225

225 % within Professional climate & environment 10.0% 90.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 4.4% 4.0% % of Total .4% 3.6% 4.0% 8 Count 1 10 11 % within Professional climate & environment 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 4.9% 4.4% % of Total .4% 4.0% 4.4% 9 Count 0 10 10 % within Professional climate & environment .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 4.9% 4.0% % of Total .0% 4.0% 4.0% 10 Count 1 11 12 % within Professional climate & environment 8.3% 91.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 5.4% 4.8% % of Total .4% 4.4% 4.8% 11 Count 0 5 5 % within Professional climate & environment .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 2.5% 2.0% % of Total .0% 2.0% 2.0% 12 Count 0 7 7 % within Professional climate & environment .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 3.4% 2.8% % of Total .0% 2.8% 2.8% Total Count 48 203 251 % within Professional climate & environment 19.1% 80.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.1% 80.9% 100.0%

PAGE 226

226 Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 16.172 a 11 .135 Likelihood Ratio 21.053 11 .033 Linear by Linear Association 9.817 1 .002 N of Valid Cases 251 a. 10 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .96. Crosstab Promotion opportunities Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 12 26 38 % within Promotion opportunities 31.6% 68.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 26.1% 13.0% 15.4% % of Total 4.9% 10.6% 15.4% 2 Count 16 29 45 % within Promotion opportunities 35.6% 64.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 34.8% 14.5% 18.3% % of Total 6.5% 11.8% 18.3% 3 Count 1 24 25 % within Promotion opportunities 4.0% 96.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.2% 12.0% 10.2% % of Total .4% 9.8% 10.2% 4 Count 2 19 21 % within Promotion opportunities 9.5% 90.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 9.5% 8.5% % of Total .8% 7.7% 8.5% 5 Count 2 14 16 % within Promotion opportunities 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 7.0% 6.5% % of Total .8% 5.7% 6.5% 6 Count 4 18 22 % within Promotion opportunities 18.2% 81.8% 100.0%

PAGE 227

227 % within Ethnicity: 8.7% 9.0% 8.9% % of Total 1.6% 7.3% 8.9% 7 Count 4 14 18 % within Promotion opportunities 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.7% 7.0% 7.3% % of Total 1.6% 5.7% 7.3% 8 Count 0 7 7 % within Promotion opportunities .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 3.5% 2.8% % of Total .0% 2.8% 2.8% 9 Count 1 15 16 % within Promotion opportunities 6.3% 93.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.2% 7.5% 6.5% % of Total .4% 6.1% 6.5% 10 Count 2 13 15 % within Promotion opportunities 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 6.5% 6.1% % of Total .8% 5.3% 6.1% 11 Count 2 15 17 % within Promotion opportunities 11.8% 88.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 7.5% 6.9% % of Total .8% 6.1% 6.9% 12 Count 0 6 6 % within Promotion opportunities .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 3.0% 2.4% % of Total .0% 2.4% 2.4% Total Count 46 200 246 % within Promotion opportunities 18.7% 81.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 18.7% 81.3% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 23.271 a 11 .016

PAGE 228

228 Likelihood Ratio 25.919 11 .007 Linear by Linear Association 9.121 1 .003 N of Valid Cases 246 a. 11 cells (45.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.12. Salary & benefits Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 16 25 41 % within Salary & benefits 39.0% 61.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 32.7% 12.4% 16.3% % of Total 6.4% 10.0% 16.3% 2 Count 14 44 58 % within Salary & benefits 24.1% 75.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 28.6% 21.8% 23.1% % of Total 5.6% 17.5% 23.1% 3 Count 4 28 32 % within Salary & benefits 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.2% 13.9% 12.7% % of Total 1.6% 11.2% 12.7% 4 Count 6 26 32 % within Salary & benefits 18.8% 81.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 12.2% 12.9% 12.7% % of Total 2.4% 10.4% 12.7% 5 Count 3 17 20 % within Salary & benefits 15.0% 85.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.1% 8.4% 8.0% % of Total 1.2% 6.8% 8.0% 6 Count 1 11 12 % within Salary & benefits 8.3% 91.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 5.4% 4.8% % of Total .4% 4.4% 4.8% 7 Count 2 11 13 % within Salary & benefits 15.4% 84.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 5.4% 5.2%

PAGE 229

229 % of Total .8% 4.4% 5.2% 8 Count 0 11 11 % within Salary & benefits .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 5.4% 4.4% % of Total .0% 4.4% 4.4% 9 Count 1 10 11 % within Salary & benefits 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 5.0% 4.4% % of Total .4% 4.0% 4.4% 10 Count 0 7 7 % within Salary & benefits .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 3.5% 2.8% % of Total .0% 2.8% 2.8% 11 Count 1 5 6 % within Salary & benefits 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 2.5% 2.4% % of Total .4% 2.0% 2.4% 12 Count 1 7 8 % within Salary & benefits 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 3.5% 3.2% % of Total .4% 2.8% 3.2% Total Count 49 202 251 % within Salary & benefits 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 18.497 a 11 .071 Likelihood Ratio 20.793 11 .036 Linear by Linear Association 10.038 1 .002 N of Valid Cases 251 a. 9 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.17.

PAGE 230

23 0 Sense of community with the institution Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 11 38 49 % within Sense of community with the institution 22.4% 77.6% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 23.4% 18.9% 19.8% % of Total 4.4% 15.3% 19.8% 2 Count 11 31 42 % within Sense of community with the institution 26.2% 73.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 23.4% 15.4% 16.9% % of Total 4.4% 12.5% 16.9% 3 Count 7 35 42 % within Sense of community with the institution 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 14.9% 17.4% 16.9% % of Total 2.8% 14.1% 16.9% 4 Count 4 16 20 % within Sense of community with the institution 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.5% 8.0% 8.1% % of Total 1.6% 6.5% 8.1% 5 Count 2 14 16 % within Sense of community with the institution 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 7.0% 6.5% % of Total .8% 5.6% 6.5% 6 Count 4 10 14 % within Sense of community with the institution 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.5% 5.0% 5.6% % of Total 1.6% 4.0% 5.6% 7 Count 2 6 8 % within Sense of community with the institution 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

PAGE 231

231 % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 3.0% 3.2% % of Total .8% 2.4% 3.2% 8 Count 1 16 17 % within Sense of community with the institution 5.9% 94.1% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 8.0% 6.9% % of Total .4% 6.5% 6.9% 9 Count 2 8 10 % within Sense of community with the institution 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 4.0% 4.0% % of Total .8% 3.2% 4.0% 10 Count 2 5 7 % within Sense of community with the institution 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.3% 2.5% 2.8% % of Total .8% 2.0% 2.8% 11 Count 1 11 12 % within Sense of community with the institution 8.3% 91.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 5.5% 4.8% % of Total .4% 4.4% 4.8% 12 Count 0 11 11 % within Sense of community with the institution .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 5.5% 4.4% % of Total .0% 4.4% 4.4% Total Count 47 201 248 % within Sense of community with the institution 19.0% 81.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.0% 81.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests

PAGE 232

232 Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.220 a 11 .602 Likelihood Ratio 11.784 11 .380 Linear by Linear Association 3.187 1 .074 N of Valid Cases 248 a. 9 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.33. Student body Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 5 28 33 % within Student body 15.2% 84.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.4% 13.9% 13.2% % of Total 2.0% 11.2% 13.2% 2 Count 13 35 48 % within Student body 27.1% 72.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 27.1% 17.3% 19.2% % of Total 5.2% 14.0% 19.2% 3 Count 4 26 30 % within Student body 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.3% 12.9% 12.0% % of Total 1.6% 10.4% 12.0% 4 Count 7 22 29 % within Student body 24.1% 75.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 14.6% 10.9% 11.6% % of Total 2.8% 8.8% 11.6% 5 Count 3 10 13 % within Student body 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.3% 5.0% 5.2% % of Total 1.2% 4.0% 5.2% 6 Count 4 11 15 % within Student body 26.7% 73.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.3% 5.4% 6.0% % of Total 1.6% 4.4% 6.0%

PAGE 233

233 7 Count 1 6 7 % within Student body 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 3.0% 2.8% % of Total .4% 2.4% 2.8% 8 Count 5 13 18 % within Student body 27.8% 72.2% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 10.4% 6.4% 7.2% % of Total 2.0% 5.2% 7.2% 9 Count 2 16 18 % within Student body 11.1% 88.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.2% 7.9% 7.2% % of Total .8% 6.4% 7.2% 10 Count 0 15 15 % within Student body .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: .0% 7.4% 6.0% % of Total .0% 6.0% 6.0% 11 Count 3 13 16 % within Student body 18.8% 81.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 6.3% 6.4% 6.4% % of Total 1.2% 5.2% 6.4% 12 Count 1 7 8 % within Student body 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.1% 3.5% 3.2% % of Total .4% 2.8% 3.2% Total Count 48 202 250 % within Student body 19.2% 80.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.2% 80.8% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.578 a 11 .569 Likelihood Ratio 12.313 11 .341 Linear by Linear Association 1.180 1 .277

PAGE 234

234 N of Valid Cases 250 a. 8 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.34. Supervisor & colleagues Ethnicity: Total Other Caucasian 1 Count 16 48 64 % within Supervisor & colleagues 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 32.7% 23.8% 25.5% % of Total 6.4% 19.1% 25.5% 2 Count 8 29 37 % within Supervisor & colleagues 21.6% 78.4% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 16.3% 14.4% 14.7% % of Total 3.2% 11.6% 14.7% 3 Count 7 21 28 % within Supervisor & colleagues 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 14.3% 10.4% 11.2% % of Total 2.8% 8.4% 11.2% 4 Count 4 26 30 % within Supervisor & colleagues 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.2% 12.9% 12.0% % of Total 1.6% 10.4% 12.0% 5 Count 4 14 18 % within Supervisor & colleagues 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 8.2% 6.9% 7.2% % of Total 1.6% 5.6% 7.2% 6 Count 2 9 11 % within Supervisor & colleagues 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 4.5% 4.4% % of Total .8% 3.6% 4.4% 7 Count 1 7 8 % within Supervisor & colleagues 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 3.5% 3.2% % of Total .4% 2.8% 3.2% 8 Count 1 9 10 % within Supervisor & colleagues 10.0% 90.0% 100.0%

PAGE 235

235 % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 4.5% 4.0% % of Total .4% 3.6% 4.0% 9 Count 2 7 9 % within Supervisor & colleagues 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 3.5% 3.6% % of Total .8% 2.8% 3.6% 10 Count 2 10 12 % within Supervisor & colleagues 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 4.1% 5.0% 4.8% % of Total .8% 4.0% 4.8% 11 Count 1 12 13 % within Supervisor & colleagues 7.7% 92.3% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 5.9% 5.2% % of Total .4% 4.8% 5.2% 12 Count 1 10 11 % within Supervisor & colleagues 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 2.0% 5.0% 4.4% % of Total .4% 4.0% 4.4% Total Count 49 202 251 % within Supervisor & colleagues 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% % within Ethnicity: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 19.5% 80.5% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.541 a 11 .902 Likelihood Ratio 6.043 11 .870 Linear by Linear Association 3.330 1 .068 N of Valid Cases 251 a. 8 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.56. Table 4 48 Factors impacting employment Gender (2006)

PAGE 236

236 Campus facilities Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 4 5 9 % within Campus facilities 44.4% 55.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.4% 2.9% 3.6% % of Total 1.6% 2.0% 3.6% 2 Count 3 16 19 % within Campus facilities 15.8% 84.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 9.2% 7.7% % of Total 1.2% 6.5% 7.7% 3 Count 12 18 30 % within Campus facilities 40.0% 60.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 16.2% 10.3% 12.1% % of Total 4.8% 7.3% 12.1% 4 Count 10 14 24 % within Campus facilities 41.7% 58.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 13.5% 8.0% 9.7% % of Total 4.0% 5.6% 9.7% 5 Count 4 11 15 % within Campus facilities 26.7% 73.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.4% 6.3% 6.0% % of Total 1.6% 4.4% 6.0% 6 Count 5 12 17 % within Campus facilities 29.4% 70.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.8% 6.9% 6.9% % of Total 2.0% 4.8% 6.9% 7 Count 6 17 23 % within Campus facilities 26.1% 73.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.1% 9.8% 9.3% % of Total 2.4% 6.9% 9.3% 8 Count 6 12 18 % within Campus facilities 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.1% 6.9% 7.3% % of Total 2.4% 4.8% 7.3% 9 Count 2 14 16

PAGE 237

237 % within Campus facilities 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 8.0% 6.5% % of Total .8% 5.6% 6.5% 10 Count 9 19 28 % within Campus facilities 32.1% 67.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 12.2% 10.9% 11.3% % of Total 3.6% 7.7% 11.3% 11 Count 7 23 30 % within Campus facilities 23.3% 76.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.5% 13.2% 12.1% % of Total 2.8% 9.3% 12.1% 12 Count 6 13 19 % within Campus facilities 31.6% 68.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.1% 7.5% 7.7% % of Total 2.4% 5.2% 7.7% Total Count 74 174 248 % within Campus facilities 29.8% 70.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.8% 70.2% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.128 a 11 .610 Likelihood Ratio 9.558 11 .571 Linear by Linear Association .910 1 .340 N of Valid Cases 248 a. 3 cells (12.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.69. Familiarity with school or institution type Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 7 10 17

PAGE 238

238 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 41.2% 58.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.2% 5.6% 6.7% % of Total 2.8% 4.0% 6.7% 2 Count 3 18 21 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 3.9% 10.2% 8.3% % of Total 1.2% 7.1% 8.3% 3 Count 11 23 34 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 32.4% 67.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 14.5% 13.0% 13.4% % of Total 4.3% 9.1% 13.4% 4 Count 8 12 20 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 40.0% 60.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 10.5% 6.8% 7.9% % of Total 3.2% 4.7% 7.9% 5 Count 4 14 18 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 7.9% 7.1% % of Total 1.6% 5.5% 7.1% 6 Count 1 16 17 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 5.9% 94.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.3% 9.0% 6.7% % of Total .4% 6.3% 6.7% 7 Count 3 18 21 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 3.9% 10.2% 8.3% % of Total 1.2% 7.1% 8.3% 8 Count 5 8 13

PAGE 239

239 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 38.5% 61.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.6% 4.5% 5.1% % of Total 2.0% 3.2% 5.1% 9 Count 9 9 18 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 11.8% 5.1% 7.1% % of Total 3.6% 3.6% 7.1% 10 Count 14 17 31 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 45.2% 54.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 18.4% 9.6% 12.3% % of Total 5.5% 6.7% 12.3% 11 Count 7 13 20 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 35.0% 65.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.2% 7.3% 7.9% % of Total 2.8% 5.1% 7.9% 12 Count 4 19 23 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 17.4% 82.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 10.7% 9.1% % of Total 1.6% 7.5% 9.1% Total Count 76 177 253 % within Familiarity with school or institution type 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 21.447 a 11 .029 Likelihood Ratio 23.267 11 .016 Linear by Linear Association .327 1 .567

PAGE 240

240 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 1 cells (4.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.91. Geographical location Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 27 73 100 % within Geographical location 27.0% 73.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 36.0% 41.0% 39.5% % of Total 10.7% 28.9% 39.5% 2 Count 12 31 43 % within Geographical location 27.9% 72.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 16.0% 17.4% 17.0% % of Total 4.7% 12.3% 17.0% 3 Count 10 15 25 % within Geographical location 40.0% 60.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 13.3% 8.4% 9.9% % of Total 4.0% 5.9% 9.9% 4 Count 5 12 17 % within Geographical location 29.4% 70.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% % of Total 2.0% 4.7% 6.7% 5 Count 3 10 13 % within Geographical location 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.0% 5.6% 5.1% % of Total 1.2% 4.0% 5.1% 6 Count 5 11 16 % within Geographical location 31.3% 68.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.7% 6.2% 6.3% % of Total 2.0% 4.3% 6.3% 7 Count 1 3 4 % within Geographical location 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.3% 1.7% 1.6% % of Total .4% 1.2% 1.6% 8 Count 3 8 11

PAGE 241

241 % within Geographical location 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.0% 4.5% 4.3% % of Total 1.2% 3.2% 4.3% 9 Count 5 2 7 % within Geographical location 71.4% 28.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.7% 1.1% 2.8% % of Total 2.0% .8% 2.8% 10 Count 2 4 6 % within Geographical location 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 2.2% 2.4% % of Total .8% 1.6% 2.4% 11 Count 2 7 9 % within Geographical location 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 3.9% 3.6% % of Total .8% 2.8% 3.6% 12 Count 0 2 2 % within Geographical location .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Sex: .0% 1.1% .8% % of Total .0% .8% .8% Total Count 75 178 253 % within Geographical location 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.022 a 11 .620 Likelihood Ratio 8.881 11 .633 Linear by Linear Association .278 1 .598 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 12 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .59.

PAGE 242

242 Institution's reputation Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 11 8 19 % within Institution's reputation 57.9% 42.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 14.5% 4.6% 7.6% % of Total 4.4% 3.2% 7.6% 2 Count 12 32 44 % within Institution's reputation 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 15.8% 18.5% 17.7% % of Total 4.8% 12.9% 17.7% 3 Count 10 28 38 % within Institution's reputation 26.3% 73.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 13.2% 16.2% 15.3% % of Total 4.0% 11.2% 15.3% 4 Count 6 21 27 % within Institution's reputation 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 7.9% 12.1% 10.8% % of Total 2.4% 8.4% 10.8% 5 Count 6 10 16 % within Institution's reputation 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 7.9% 5.8% 6.4% % of Total 2.4% 4.0% 6.4% 6 Count 7 13 20 % within Institution's reputation 35.0% 65.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.2% 7.5% 8.0% % of Total 2.8% 5.2% 8.0% 7 Count 8 7 15 % within Institution's reputation 53.3% 46.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 10.5% 4.0% 6.0% % of Total 3.2% 2.8% 6.0% 8 Count 2 11 13 % within Institution's reputation 15.4% 84.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.6% 6.4% 5.2% % of Total .8% 4.4% 5.2% 9 Count 4 17 21

PAGE 243

243 % within Institution's reputation 19.0% 81.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 9.8% 8.4% % of Total 1.6% 6.8% 8.4% 10 Count 5 15 20 % within Institution's reputation 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.6% 8.7% 8.0% % of Total 2.0% 6.0% 8.0% 11 Count 2 5 7 % within Institution's reputation 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.6% 2.9% 2.8% % of Total .8% 2.0% 2.8% 12 Count 3 6 9 % within Institution's reputation 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 3.9% 3.5% 3.6% % of Total 1.2% 2.4% 3.6% Total Count 76 173 249 % within Institution's reputation 30.5% 69.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.5% 69.5% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 15.406 a 11 .165 Likelihood Ratio 14.813 11 .191 Linear by Linear Association .998 1 .318 N of Valid Cases 249 a. 6 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.14. Institution's mission & purpose Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 15 38 53

PAGE 244

244 % within Institution's mission & purpose 28.3% 71.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 19.7% 21.5% 20.9% % of Total 5.9% 15.0% 20.9% 2 Count 15 32 47 % within Institution's mission & purpose 31.9% 68.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 19.7% 18.1% 18.6% % of Total 5.9% 12.6% 18.6% 3 Count 6 19 25 % within Institution's mission & purpose 24.0% 76.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 7.9% 10.7% 9.9% % of Total 2.4% 7.5% 9.9% 4 Count 9 11 20 % within Institution's mission & purpose 45.0% 55.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 11.8% 6.2% 7.9% % of Total 3.6% 4.3% 7.9% 5 Count 5 13 18 % within Institution's mission & purpose 27.8% 72.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.6% 7.3% 7.1% % of Total 2.0% 5.1% 7.1% 6 Count 7 10 17 % within Institution's mission & purpose 41.2% 58.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.2% 5.6% 6.7% % of Total 2.8% 4.0% 6.7% 7 Count 5 11 16 % within Institution's mission & purpose 31.3% 68.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.6% 6.2% 6.3% % of Total 2.0% 4.3% 6.3% 8 Count 4 11 15

PAGE 245

245 % within Institution's mission & purpose 26.7% 73.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 6.2% 5.9% % of Total 1.6% 4.3% 5.9% 9 Count 4 6 10 % within Institution's mission & purpose 40.0% 60.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 3.4% 4.0% % of Total 1.6% 2.4% 4.0% 10 Count 2 11 13 % within Institution's mission & purpose 15.4% 84.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.6% 6.2% 5.1% % of Total .8% 4.3% 5.1% 11 Count 3 12 15 % within Institution's mission & purpose 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 3.9% 6.8% 5.9% % of Total 1.2% 4.7% 5.9% 12 Count 1 3 4 % within Institution's mission & purpose 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.3% 1.7% 1.6% % of Total .4% 1.2% 1.6% Total Count 76 177 253 % within Institution's mission & purpose 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 6.426 a 11 .843

PAGE 246

246 Likelihood Ratio 6.458 11 .841 Linear by Linear Association .341 1 .559 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 7 cells (29.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.20. Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 6 10 16 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.2% 5.6% 6.4% % of Total 2.4% 4.0% 6.4% 2 Count 4 10 14 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.5% 5.6% 5.6% % of Total 1.6% 4.0% 5.6% 3 Count 3 14 17 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 17.6% 82.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 7.9% 6.8% % of Total 1.2% 5.6% 6.8% 4 Count 3 16 19 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 15.8% 84.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 9.0% 7.6% % of Total 1.2% 6.4% 7.6% 5 Count 5 11 16 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 31.3% 68.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.8% 6.2% 6.4% % of Total 2.0% 4.4% 6.4% 6 Count 6 4 10 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%

PAGE 247

247 % within Sex: 8.2% 2.3% 4.0% % of Total 2.4% 1.6% 4.0% 7 Count 6 11 17 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 35.3% 64.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.2% 6.2% 6.8% % of Total 2.4% 4.4% 6.8% 8 Count 2 9 11 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 18.2% 81.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 5.1% 4.4% % of Total .8% 3.6% 4.4% 9 Count 2 13 15 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 13.3% 86.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 7.3% 6.0% % of Total .8% 5.2% 6.0% 10 Count 3 10 13 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 23.1% 76.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 5.6% 5.2% % of Total 1.2% 4.0% 5.2% 11 Count 5 11 16 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 31.3% 68.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.8% 6.2% 6.4% % of Total 2.0% 4.4% 6.4% 12 Count 28 58 86 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 32.6% 67.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 38.4% 32.8% 34.4% % of Total 11.2% 23.2% 34.4% Total Count 73 177 250 % within Opportunity to continue in a doctoral program 29.2% 70.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

PAGE 248

248 % of Total 29.2% 70.8% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 11.423 a 11 .409 Likelihood Ratio 11.553 11 .398 Linear by Linear Association .171 1 .679 N of Valid Cases 250 a. 10 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.92. Professional climate & environment Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 20 47 67 % within Professional climate & environment 29.9% 70.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 26.7% 26.4% 26.5% % of Total 7.9% 18.6% 26.5% 2 Count 15 28 43 % within Professional climate & environment 34.9% 65.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 20.0% 15.7% 17.0% % of Total 5.9% 11.1% 17.0% 3 Count 5 25 30 % within Professional climate & environment 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.7% 14.0% 11.9% % of Total 2.0% 9.9% 11.9% 4 Count 5 16 21 % within Professional climate & environment 23.8% 76.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.7% 9.0% 8.3% % of Total 2.0% 6.3% 8.3% 5 Count 6 15 21

PAGE 249

249 % within Professional climate & environment 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.0% 8.4% 8.3% % of Total 2.4% 5.9% 8.3% 6 Count 5 12 17 % within Professional climate & environment 29.4% 70.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% % of Total 2.0% 4.7% 6.7% 7 Count 6 4 10 % within Professional climate & environment 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.0% 2.2% 4.0% % of Total 2.4% 1.6% 4.0% 8 Count 3 8 11 % within Professional climate & environment 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.0% 4.5% 4.3% % of Total 1.2% 3.2% 4.3% 9 Count 3 6 9 % within Professional climate & environment 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.0% 3.4% 3.6% % of Total 1.2% 2.4% 3.6% 10 Count 1 11 12 % within Professional climate & environment 8.3% 91.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.3% 6.2% 4.7% % of Total .4% 4.3% 4.7% 11 Count 3 2 5 % within Professional climate & environment 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.0% 1.1% 2.0% % of Total 1.2% .8% 2.0% 12 Count 3 4 7

PAGE 250

250 % within Professional climate & environment 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.0% 2.2% 2.8% % of Total 1.2% 1.6% 2.8% Total Count 75 178 253 % within Professional climate & environment 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 13.259 a 11 .277 Likelihood Ratio 13.459 11 .264 Linear by Linear Association .233 1 .629 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 8 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.48. Promotion opportunities Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 12 27 39 % within Promotion opportunities 30.8% 69.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 16.4% 15.4% 15.7% % of Total 4.8% 10.9% 15.7% 2 Count 14 31 45 % within Promotion opportunities 31.1% 68.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 19.2% 17.7% 18.1% % of Total 5.6% 12.5% 18.1% 3 Count 7 19 26 % within Promotion opportunities 26.9% 73.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.6% 10.9% 10.5% % of Total 2.8% 7.7% 10.5% 4 Count 8 14 22

PAGE 251

251 % within Promotion opportunities 36.4% 63.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 11.0% 8.0% 8.9% % of Total 3.2% 5.6% 8.9% 5 Count 4 12 16 % within Promotion opportunities 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.5% 6.9% 6.5% % of Total 1.6% 4.8% 6.5% 6 Count 7 15 22 % within Promotion opportunities 31.8% 68.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.6% 8.6% 8.9% % of Total 2.8% 6.0% 8.9% 7 Count 3 14 17 % within Promotion opportunities 17.6% 82.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 8.0% 6.9% % of Total 1.2% 5.6% 6.9% 8 Count 3 4 7 % within Promotion opportunities 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 2.3% 2.8% % of Total 1.2% 1.6% 2.8% 9 Count 3 13 16 % within Promotion opportunities 18.8% 81.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 7.4% 6.5% % of Total 1.2% 5.2% 6.5% 10 Count 1 14 15 % within Promotion opportunities 6.7% 93.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.4% 8.0% 6.0% % of Total .4% 5.6% 6.0% 11 Count 9 8 17 % within Promotion opportunities 52.9% 47.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 12.3% 4.6% 6.9% % of Total 3.6% 3.2% 6.9% 12 Count 2 4 6 % within Promotion opportunities 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 2.3% 2.4% % of Total .8% 1.6% 2.4%

PAGE 252

252 Total Count 73 175 248 % within Promotion opportunities 29.4% 70.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.4% 70.6% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 11.827 a 11 .377 Likelihood Ratio 12.646 11 .317 Linear by Linear Association .021 1 .885 N of Valid Cases 248 a. 7 cells (29.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.77. Salary & benefits Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 17 25 42 % within Salary & benefits 40.5% 59.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 22.7% 14.0% 16.6% % of Total 6.7% 9.9% 16.6% 2 Count 15 45 60 % within Salary & benefits 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 20.0% 25.3% 23.7% % of Total 5.9% 17.8% 23.7% 3 Count 11 21 32 % within Salary & benefits 34.4% 65.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 14.7% 11.8% 12.6% % of Total 4.3% 8.3% 12.6% 4 Count 11 21 32 % within Salary & benefits 34.4% 65.6% 100.0% % within Sex: 14.7% 11.8% 12.6% % of Total 4.3% 8.3% 12.6% 5 Count 7 13 20

PAGE 253

253 % within Salary & benefits 35.0% 65.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.3% 7.3% 7.9% % of Total 2.8% 5.1% 7.9% 6 Count 2 10 12 % within Salary & benefits 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 5.6% 4.7% % of Total .8% 4.0% 4.7% 7 Count 4 9 13 % within Salary & benefits 30.8% 69.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 5.1% 5.1% % of Total 1.6% 3.6% 5.1% 8 Count 2 8 10 % within Salary & benefits 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 4.5% 4.0% % of Total .8% 3.2% 4.0% 9 Count 1 10 11 % within Salary & benefits 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.3% 5.6% 4.3% % of Total .4% 4.0% 4.3% 10 Count 3 4 7 % within Salary & benefits 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.0% 2.2% 2.8% % of Total 1.2% 1.6% 2.8% 11 Count 0 6 6 % within Salary & benefits .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Sex: .0% 3.4% 2.4% % of Total .0% 2.4% 2.4% 12 Count 2 6 8 % within Salary & benefits 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 3.4% 3.2% % of Total .8% 2.4% 3.2% Total Count 75 178 253 % within Salary & benefits 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.6% 70.4% 100.0%

PAGE 254

254 Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 10.793 a 11 .461 Likelihood Ratio 12.991 11 .294 Linear by Linear Association 2.703 1 .100 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 9 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.78. Sense of community with the institution Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 18 31 49 % within Sense of community with the institution 36.7% 63.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 24.3% 17.6% 19.6% % of Total 7.2% 12.4% 19.6% 2 Count 7 36 43 % within Sense of community with the institution 16.3% 83.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.5% 20.5% 17.2% % of Total 2.8% 14.4% 17.2% 3 Count 14 28 42 % within Sense of community with the institution 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 18.9% 15.9% 16.8% % of Total 5.6% 11.2% 16.8% 4 Count 5 15 20 % within Sense of community with the institution 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.8% 8.5% 8.0% % of Total 2.0% 6.0% 8.0% 5 Count 10 7 17 % within Sense of community with the institution 58.8% 41.2% 100.0%

PAGE 255

255 % within Sex: 13.5% 4.0% 6.8% % of Total 4.0% 2.8% 6.8% 6 Count 0 14 14 % within Sense of community with the institution .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Sex: .0% 8.0% 5.6% % of Total .0% 5.6% 5.6% 7 Count 3 5 8 % within Sense of community with the institution 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 2.8% 3.2% % of Total 1.2% 2.0% 3.2% 8 Count 6 11 17 % within Sense of community with the institution 35.3% 64.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.1% 6.3% 6.8% % of Total 2.4% 4.4% 6.8% 9 Count 4 6 10 % within Sense of community with the institution 40.0% 60.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.4% 3.4% 4.0% % of Total 1.6% 2.4% 4.0% 10 Count 1 6 7 % within Sense of community with the institution 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.4% 3.4% 2.8% % of Total .4% 2.4% 2.8% 11 Count 3 9 12 % within Sense of community with the institution 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 5.1% 4.8% % of Total 1.2% 3.6% 4.8% 12 Count 3 8 11 % within Sense of community with the institution 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 4.1% 4.5% 4.4%

PAGE 256

256 % of Total 1.2% 3.2% 4.4% Total Count 74 176 250 % within Sense of community with the institution 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.6% 70.4% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 20.157 a 11 .043 Likelihood Ratio 23.830 11 .013 Linear by Linear Association .048 1 .827 N of Valid Cases 250 a. 7 cells (29.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.07. Student body Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 8 25 33 % within Student body 24.2% 75.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 10.8% 14.0% 13.1% % of Total 3.2% 9.9% 13.1% 2 Count 15 33 48 % within Student body 31.3% 68.8% 100.0% % within Sex: 20.3% 18.5% 19.0% % of Total 6.0% 13.1% 19.0% 3 Count 8 23 31 % within Student body 25.8% 74.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 10.8% 12.9% 12.3% % of Total 3.2% 9.1% 12.3% 4 Count 6 23 29 % within Student body 20.7% 79.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.1% 12.9% 11.5%

PAGE 257

257 % of Total 2.4% 9.1% 11.5% 5 Count 2 10 12 % within Student body 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 5.6% 4.8% % of Total .8% 4.0% 4.8% 6 Count 8 8 16 % within Student body 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 10.8% 4.5% 6.3% % of Total 3.2% 3.2% 6.3% 7 Count 2 6 8 % within Student body 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 2.7% 3.4% 3.2% % of Total .8% 2.4% 3.2% 8 Count 7 11 18 % within Student body 38.9% 61.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.5% 6.2% 7.1% % of Total 2.8% 4.4% 7.1% 9 Count 7 11 18 % within Student body 38.9% 61.1% 100.0% % within Sex: 9.5% 6.2% 7.1% % of Total 2.8% 4.4% 7.1% 10 Count 4 11 15 % within Student body 26.7% 73.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.4% 6.2% 6.0% % of Total 1.6% 4.4% 6.0% 11 Count 6 10 16 % within Student body 37.5% 62.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 8.1% 5.6% 6.3% % of Total 2.4% 4.0% 6.3% 12 Count 1 7 8 % within Student body 12.5% 87.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.4% 3.9% 3.2% % of Total .4% 2.8% 3.2% Total Count 74 178 252 % within Student body 29.4% 70.6% 100.0%

PAGE 258

258 % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 29.4% 70.6% 100.0% Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 9.267 a 11 .597 Likelihood Ratio 9.263 11 .598 Linear by Linear Association .632 1 .427 N of Valid Cases 252 a. 6 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.35. Supervisor & colleagues Sex: Total Male Female 1 Count 21 44 65 % within Supervisor & colleagues 32.3% 67.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 27.6% 24.9% 25.7% % of Total 8.3% 17.4% 25.7% 2 Count 9 28 37 % within Supervisor & colleagues 24.3% 75.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 11.8% 15.8% 14.6% % of Total 3.6% 11.1% 14.6% 3 Count 8 20 28 % within Supervisor & colleagues 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% % within Sex: 10.5% 11.3% 11.1% % of Total 3.2% 7.9% 11.1% 4 Count 9 20 29 % within Supervisor & colleagues 31.0% 69.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 11.8% 11.3% 11.5% % of Total 3.6% 7.9% 11.5% 5 Count 5 13 18 % within Supervisor & colleagues 27.8% 72.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.6% 7.3% 7.1%

PAGE 259

259 % of Total 2.0% 5.1% 7.1% 6 Count 1 10 11 % within Supervisor & colleagues 9.1% 90.9% 100.0% % within Sex: 1.3% 5.6% 4.3% % of Total .4% 4.0% 4.3% 7 Count 3 6 9 % within Supervisor & colleagues 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 3.9% 3.4% 3.6% % of Total 1.2% 2.4% 3.6% 8 Count 5 6 11 % within Supervisor & colleagues 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.6% 3.4% 4.3% % of Total 2.0% 2.4% 4.3% 9 Count 3 6 9 % within Supervisor & colleagues 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 3.9% 3.4% 3.6% % of Total 1.2% 2.4% 3.6% 10 Count 5 7 12 % within Supervisor & colleagues 41.7% 58.3% 100.0% % within Sex: 6.6% 4.0% 4.7% % of Total 2.0% 2.8% 4.7% 11 Count 4 9 13 % within Supervisor & colleagues 30.8% 69.2% 100.0% % within Sex: 5.3% 5.1% 5.1% % of Total 1.6% 3.6% 5.1% 12 Count 3 8 11 % within Supervisor & colleagues 27.3% 72.7% 100.0% % within Sex: 3.9% 4.5% 4.3% % of Total 1.2% 3.2% 4.3% Total Count 76 177 253 % within Supervisor & colleagues 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Sex: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

PAGE 260

260 Chi Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided) Pearson Chi Square 5.269 a 11 .917 Likelihood Ratio 5.709 11 .892 Linear by Linear Association .188 1 .665 N of Valid Cases 253 a. 7 cells (29.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.70.