RSS
|
|
|
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|
 CITATION 
 PDF VIEWER 
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 STANDARD VIEW
 MARC VIEW
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Downloads | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PAGE 7 tikpa barbecho cutilpo PAGE 8 cutilpo tikpa barbecho cutilpo PAGE 12 cutilpo tikpa cutilpo PAGE 13 tikpa cutilpo tikpa cutilpo PAGE 14 tikpa cutilpo tikpa cutilpo tikpa PAGE 15 cutilpo tikpa tikpa tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo barbech o cutilpo PAGE 18 Background Leptinotarsa decemlineata Alternaria PAGE 19 Alternaria solani Globodera spp. Epitrix tuberis Premnotrypes PAGE 20 The Problematic Situation PAGE 21 Objectives and Research Questions PAGE 22 Study Sites PAGE 23 Methodology and Theoretical Frameworks PAGE 24 Relevance PAGE 27 Introduction encomienda reducciones Ayllus PAGE 28 Epitrix tuberis Alternaria solani PAGE 29 Phytophthora infestans Globodera spp Leptinotarsa decemlineata PAGE 30 The Mantaro Valley PAGE 31 Solanum PAGE 32 Oxalis tuberosa Ullucus tuberosus Tropaeolum tuberosum Study Site Methodology PAGE 34 Results Informal E thnographic C onversations History of the community of Aymar and its former cropping practices tikpa PAGE 35 San Jose de Aymar current cropping s ystem PAGE 36 Vicia faba Lupinus Chenopodium quinoa Lepidium meyenii PAGE 38 primera segunda segunda tercera cuarta chu o chu o Chuo chuoChuo PAGE 39 Farmers Focus Group Results P otato in tikpa volteo champas champas tikpa Tikpa Potato in barbecho terroneo PAGE 40 tikpa Potato in cutilpo Cutilpo kutishi barbecho Other Andean tubers kalpeo PAGE 41 Adioristidius Oats huapal Labor requirements by crop barbecho cutilpo tikpa barbecho Farmers Survey Results Livestock holdings PAGE 42 Aymars cropping pattern tikpa tikpa barbecho cutilpobarbecho cutilpo Dates of planting and harvest tikpa cutilpo barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo tikpa barbecho cutilpo PAGE 43 Pota to yields in rel ation to potato type and type of planting and non potato tuber yields tikpa barbecho cutilpo tikpa barbecho cutilpo Fertilizer and pesticide use tikpa cutilpo tikpa barbecho tikpa cutilpo PAGE 44 Potato weevil damage by potato type and type of planting tikpa barbecho barbecho cu tilpo Reason for planting in cutilpo cutilpo Factors increasing /decreasing yields for potato seeded in tikpa, barbecho, and cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo tikpa barbecho cutilpo Phytophthora infestans PAGE 45 Phoma Alternaria so lani cutilpo Phoma Reasons for harvesting late Discussion tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo PAGE 46 cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo PAGE 47 cutilpo cutilpo barbecho cutilpo PAGE 50 tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo PAGE 52 tikpa barbe cho cutilpo PAGE 54 tikpa barbecho cutilpo PAGE 56 tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo PAGE 58 tikpa barbecho cutilpo PAGE 59 tikpa barbecho cutilpo PAGE 60 tikpa barbecho cutilpo PAGE 61 cutilpo PAGE 62 Introduction Phyrdenus Premnotrypes, Rhigopsidius Premnotrypes PAGE 63 Solanum Harpalus turmalinus Metius Hylitus PAGE 65 Ma terials and Methods Study Sites tikpa cutilpo Avena sativa Ullucus tuberosus tikpa PAGE 66 Field Sampling for Weevils tikpa cutilpo Dete rmination of the Sampling Unit Size and Depth tikpa PAGE 68 tikpa cutilpo Determination of the Number of Sampling Units Needed per Field. PAGE 69 s x) baxs a b IT TIStStbaxs s a) +b log( x)+St log(x)+St2 log(x) +I log(x)+ T log(x) I T log(x) b xaxDtn t PAGE 70 Comparison of Weevil Overw intering Populations among Different Types of Potato Fields tikpa tikpa Relationship between the Weevil Infestation Level and Harvest Times of Potato Fields at Different Cropping Intensit ies PAGE 71 Comparison of Weevil Overw intering Sources in Different Types of Fields PAGE 72 Results Determinati on of the Sampling Unit Size and Depth tikpa cutilpo PAGE 73 Determination of the Number of Sampling Units Needed per Field. a b C omparison between Weevil Over w intering Populations in Different Types of Potato Fields PAGE 74 C omparison of Weevil Over w intering Sources in Different Types of Fields tikpa chuo chuo PAGE 75 Relationship between the Infestation Level and Harvest Times of Potato Fields with Different Cropping Intensities cutilpo tikpa cutilp otikpa Discussion tikpa tikpa Tikpa PAGE 76 b Premontrypes latithorax tikpa cutilpo PAGE 77 cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo PAGE 80 tikpa cutilpo PAGE 81 tikpa cutilpo PAGE 82 tikpa cutilpo PAGE 87 Introduction PAGE 88 Necrophorus humator PAGE 90 Materials and Methods Weevil Ranging and Host Plant Location Site of release PAGE 91 Processing of the study weevils PAGE 92 Weather monitoring Weevil tracking PAGE 93 Ranging and perceptual range model PAGE 94 H(r) log | |r| log (r) r PAGE 97 Movement Simulation under different weather conditions PAGE 98 Tuberization Architecture and Larval Colonization Tuber depth and infestation potential Solanum tuberosum) Horizontal tuber distance and infestation potential PAGE 99 Tuber size and infestati on potential Weevil infestation at the plot level Solanum tuberosum) Solanum goniocalyx barbecho PAGE 101 Results Weevil Ranging and Host Plant Location Environmental conditions Movement model selection and posterior simulation checks PAGE 103 Vel = wxp+wxn+wyp+wyn+(wxp)2+(wxn)2+ (wyp)2+(wyn)2123+wxn2+wyp2+wxp3+wyp3+ wyn3 w p wxp wy 123 Movement Simulation under Different Weather Conditions PAGE 104 Tuberization Architecture and Larval Colonization Tuber I nfestation Plot infestation Descriptive results PAGE 105 Field plot tuber architecture model results PAGE 106 Discussion PAGE 111 radius PAGE 112 N S W E PAGE 113 -100 0 100 200 300 -100 0 100 200 x y North R VP PF PAGE 114 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 1 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 2 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 3 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 4 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 5 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 6 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 7 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 8 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 9 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 10 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 11 -100 0 50 150 250 -100 0 100 200 300 12 -100 0 100 200 300 13 PAGE 115 2 4 6 8 10 12 85 90 95 day Displacement in x direction simulated observed prediction 95% CI PAGE 117 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 300 day Net squared displacement (m^2) PAGE 118 Distance in meters from origin Percent of Total 0 2 4 6 8 10 50 100 150 200 Distance in meters from origin Percent of Total 0 5 10 50 100 150 200 PAGE 119 Distance in meters from origin Percent of Total 0 2 4 6 8 10 50 100 150 200 PAGE 121 100 200 300 400 50 100 150 200 250 300 Plot distance in the x Plot distance in the y dir 100 200 300 400 50 100 150 200 250 300 Plot distance in the x Plot distance in the y dir 100 200 300 400 50 100 150 200 250 300 Plot distance in t Plot distance in the y dir 100 200 300 400 50 100 150 200 250 300 35 Plot distance in the x Plot distance in the y dire 100 200 300 400 50 100 150 200 250 300 Plot distance in the x Plot distance in the y dire 100 200 300 400 50 100 150 200 250 300 35 Plot distance in the x Plot distance in the y dire PAGE 124 12, 1 2 3 2 d wind 2 3 d wind 3 +wind +wind 2 1 2 + 3 + 1 d wind 1 2 d wind 2 3 d wind 3 +wind +wind 2 1 2 + 3 1 d wind 1 2 dwind 2 3 d wind 3 +wind 1 2 1 d wind 1 2 dwind 2 +wind+wind 2 1 2 + 3 1 d wind 1 2 dwind 2 +wind+wind 2 1 2 + 3 + 1 d wind 1 3 d wind 3 +wind +wind 2 2 + 3 2 d wind 2 3 d wind 3 +wind +wind 2 1 2 + 3 + 1 d wind 1 2 d wind 2 3 d wind 3 1 3 1 d wind 1 3 d wind 3 +wind+wind 2 PAGE 125 Downwind 1 Southward wind Northward wind Westward wind Eastward wind (Southward wind ) 2 (Northward wind ) 2 (Westward wind ) 2 (Eastward wind ) 2 1 2 3 1 Downwind 1 2 Northward wind 2 Westward wind 3 Eastward wind 3 Southward wind 3 Northward wind PAGE 126 Variable X stem X field (X field ) 2 Depth N of tubers PAGE 127 Introduction PAGE 128 Livelihood Systems Framework and Its Relation to Pest Management PAGE 130 Assessing Potential for the Adoption of Ecologically -Based Alternatives PAGE 131 Study Site tikpa barbecho cutilpo Methods Farmer Surveys and Informant Focus Groups PAGE 132 Perception of Benefits and Problems of Three Ecologically-Based Alternative Technologies kalpeo Ethnographic Linear Program Model PAGE 133 Max (or min): P= CjXj (j = 1. .n) Subject to: AijXj <= Rj (i = 1. .m) Xi >= 0 Cj Xj Aij j i Family labor use and expenses PAGE 135 tikpa barbecho cutilpo cutilpo barbecho Potato uses primera segunda segunda tercera cuarta Chuo Pest and disease management barbecho cutilpotikpa PAGE 136 Land use PAGE 137 Family Life Cycle Simulations, Initial Conditions and Model Description PAGE 138 Sensitivity Analysis of Pest Management Adoption Farmer Survey Results Perceptions of Benefits and Problems of Three EBA Practices PAGE 139 kalpeo PAGE 140 Results of the Ethnographic Linear Program Multiyear household simulation cutilpo tikpa PAGE 141 Ecological based alternatives, costs, and, labor tikpa tikpa tikpa cultilpo barbecho Ecologically based alternatives, percent damage, and, cost PAGE 142 cutilpo cutilpo tikpa Barbecho Barbecho cutilpo tikpa barbecho Ecologically based alternatives, percent damage, and, labor cutilpo barbecho PAGE 143 Ecologically based alternatives, percent damage, and, potato consumption cuarta, cuarta Discussion PAGE 145 cuarta tikpa cutilpo tikpa tikpa cut ilpo cuarta cutilpo cutilpo t ikpa cutilpo tikpa cutilpo tikpa PAGE 156 Native-Tikpa crop protection year 15 LaborCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Native-Tikpa crop protection year 24 LaborCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Native-Tikpa crop protection year 34 LaborCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 tikpa PAGE 157 Improved-Cutilpo crop protection yea LaborCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Improved-Cutilpo crop protection yea LaborCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Improved-Cutilpo crop protection yea LaborCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 cutilpo PAGE 158 Native-Tikpa crop protection year 15 Proportion damageCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Native-Tikpa crop protection year 24 Proportion damageCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Native-Tikpa crop protection year 34 Proportion damageCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 tikpa PAGE 159 Improved-Cutilpo crop protection yea Proportion damageCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Improved-Cutilpo crop protection yea Proportion damageCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Improved-Cutilpo crop protection yea Proportion damageCost 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 cutilpo PAGE 160 Native-Tikpa crop protection year 15 Proportion damageLabor 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Native-Tikpa crop protection year 24 Proportion damageLabor 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Native-Tikpa crop protection year 34 Proportion damageLabor 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 tikpa PAGE 161 Improved-Cutilpo crop protection yea Proportion damageLabor 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Improved-Cutilpo crop protection yea Proportion damageLabor 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Improved-Cutilpo crop potection yea Percent damageLabor 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 cutilpo PAGE 163 tikpa PAGE 164 tikpa PAGE 165 tikpa PAGE 166 barbecho cutilpo PAGE 167 barbecho cutilpo PAGE 168 barbecho cutilpo PAGE 171 cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo cutilpo t ikpa barbecho PAGE 172 cutilpo cutilpo PAGE 173 tikpa tikpa cutilpo cutilpo PAGE 174 cutilpo cutilpo PAGE 177 cuarta PAGE 179 Introducci n PARTE 1. Datos demogrf icos PAGE 180 PARTE 2. Produccin de animales PARTE 3. Produccin fertilizacin y destino de los cultivos promedio total Apuntar la cantidad sembrada y el mes por ejemplo: AGO (1) en agosto se sembro un saco. tikpa barbecho cutilpo tikpa barbecho PAGE 181 cuti lpo barbecho cutilpo tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecc ho cutilpo PAGE 182 tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo PAGE 183 total shiri tikpa shiri barbecho cutilpo shiri ti kpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo PAGE 184 shiri PAGE 185 Barbecho Tikpa Cutilpo PAGE 186 Practicas de Manejo Integrado de Plagas Leer: plantas cebo poner plantas fumigadas bajo yute en sus campos antes de la siembra PAGE 187 tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo sin usar insecticida tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo usando insecticidas tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo Barreras plsticas poner en el permetro barreras de plstico para evitar que el gorgojo llegue al campo. PAGE 188 tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho sin usar insecticida tikpa barbecho cutilpo barbecho cutilpo usando insecticidas tikpa/barbecho cutilpo barbecho kaillpar PAGE 189 Remocin de suelo arar el campo que ya ha sido sembrado el ao anterior con yunta o tractor o chakitacclla para volver a sembrar (cutilpo) sin usar insecticida cutilpo cutilpo usando insecticidas cutilpo cutilpo PAGE 190 Shiri tikpa barbech cutilpo barbecho cutilpo PAGE 191 Shiri cutilpo tikpa cutilpo barbecho cutilpo barbecho PAGE 193 Alcazar, J. 1976. Premnotrypes suturicallus Alcazar, J. 1995.In Alcazar, J. 1997.Epitrix Alcazar, J., and F. Cisneros. 1999. Premnotrypes Altieri, A. M., and C. Nicholls. 2004. In Altieri, M. A. 1995. Altieri, M. A., and C. I. Nichol. 1999. In Ambrogi, B. G., D. M. Vidal, P. H. G. Zarbin, and G. H. Rosado-Neto. 2009. Andow, D. A. 1992. Ostrinia nubialis Antezana, I., A. Fabian, S. Freund, E. Gehrke, G. Glimmann, and S. Seher. 2005. Apple, J. L. 1972. Arica, D., J. Kroschel, G. Forbes, and K. Saint Pere. 2006. PAGE 194 Bajwa, W. I., and M. Kogan. 2003. In Beets, W. 1990. Begon, M., J. Harper, and C. Twosend. 1990. Bentle y, J., and K. Andrews. 1996. Bernard, H. R. 2002. Bierzychudek, P., K. A. Warner, A. McHugh, and L. Thomas. 2009. Blanco, O. 1994. In Boiteau, G., J. D. Picka, and J. Watmough. 2008. Boiteau, G., F. Meloche, C. Vincent, and T. C. Leskey. 2009. Bolker, B. M., M. E. Brooks, C. J. Clark, S. W. Geange, J. R. Poulsen, M. H. H. Stevens, and J. S. S. White. 2009. Botrell, D. G. 1983. Brillinger, D. R. 2007. Brillinger, D. R., H. K. Preisler, A. A. Ager, J. G. Kie, and B. S. Stewart. 2002. Caballero, J. M. 1983. In PAGE 195 Carvajal, C. P. 1992. Premnotrypes latithorax Cataln, W., W. Villano, and A. Inquiltupa. 19 93. In Chavez, C. R. 1996. Premnotrypes sp. Conservation_International. 2009. Coronado, G. 2004. Cotlear, D. 1989. Crissman, C. C., Espinosa, C. E. H. Ducrot, D. C. Cole, and F. Carpio. 1998. In Dacke, M., M. J. Byrne, C. H. Scholtz, and E. J. Warrant. 2004. Davies, F. T., C. M. Caldero, Z. Huaman, and R. Gomez. 2005. Dollfus, O. 1982. Durand, J. A. 2001. Premnotrypes latithorax In Dusenbery, D. B. 1989a. Dusenbery, D. B. 1989b. Dusenbery, D. B. 1992. PAGE 196 Eckholm, E. P. 1975. Ellis, F. 1993. Ellis, F. 2000. Fahrig, L. 2007. Flynn, D. F. B., M. Gogol-Prokurat, T. Nogeire, N. Molinari, B. T. Richers, B. B. Lin, N. Simpson, M. M. Mayfield, and F. DeClerck. 2009. Franco, E., and D. E. Horton. 1979. Fry, W. E. 1994. In Fujimoto, A. 2005. Fujimoto, A., I. Miyaura, and R. Ugas. 2004. Gelman, A., and J. Hill. 2007. Gibbs, K. E., R. L. Mackey, and D. J. Currie. 2009. Harrel, F. 2001. Hayek, L.-A. C., and M. A. Buzas. 1997. Heinzel, H. G., and H. Bhm. 1989. Hildebrand, P., N. Breuer, V. Cabrera, and A. Sullivan. 2003. PAGE 197 Hildebrand, P. E., and A. J. Sullivan. 2001. Holland, J. M., and M. L. Luff. 2000. Horton, D. E. 1987. Jander, R. 1975. Johnson, S. N., and P. J. Gregory. 2006. Kabaluk, J. T., and R. S. Vernon. 2000. Epitrix tuberis Karandinos, M. G. 1976. Kaya, B., P. E. Hildebrand, and P. K. R. Nair. 2000. Kervyn, B. 1996. In Kjaerpedersen, C. 1992. Krebs, C. J. 1999. Kroschel, J., J. Alcazar, and P. Poma. 2009. Kuhne, M. 2007. Lima, S. L., and P. A. Zollner. 1996. Martnez, A., E. Nez, Y. Silva, K. Takahashi, G. Trasmonte, K. Mosquera, and P. Lagos. 2006. PAGE 198 Mayer, E. 1979. Mayer, E. 1992. Mayer, E. 2002. Meir, C., and S. Williamson. 2005. In MINAG. 2003. Morante, M. C., V. H. Ticona, W. C. Plata, and I. T. Tordoya. 2007. NietoCabrera, C., C. Francis, C. Caicedo, P. F. Gutierrez, and M. Rivera. 1997. Norman, D. W. 1983.In Norton, G. 2005. In Norton, G. A., and J. D. Mumford. 1984. Okubo, A., and P. Kareiva. 2001. In Olanya O. M., C. W. Honeycutt, R. P. Larkin, T. S. Griffin, Z. Q. He, and J. M. Halloran. 2009. Orlove, B., G. R., and P. Morlon. 1996.In Orr, A., and J. M. Ritchie. 2003. PAGE 199 Ortiz, O. 1997. Ortiz, O., and S. Swinton. 1999. Ortiz, O., J. Alcazar, W. Catalan, W. Villano, V. Cerna, H. Fano, and T. S. Walker. 1996. Oswald, A., S. De Haan, J. Sanchez, and R. Ccanto. 2009. Palis, F., S. Morin, and M. Hossain. 2002. Pelletier, Y., and R. Caissie. 2001. Pienkowski, R., and Z. Golik. 1969. Pimentel, D ., H. Acquay, M. Biltonen, P. Rice, M. Silva, J. Nelson, V. Lipner, S. Giordano, A. Horowitz, and M. Damore. 1992. Pinheiro, J., and D. Bates. 2000. PinstrupAndersen, P., and R. Pandya -Lorch. 1998. Pluke, R. W. 2004. Preisler, H. K., A. A. Ager, B. K. Johnson, and J. G. Kie. 2004. Pretty, J. N. 2005.In PAGE 200 Putter, C. 1987. Ravnborg, H. M., M. P. Guerrero, and O. Westermann. 2002. In Roling, N., and E. van de Fliert. 1994. Routledge, R. D., and T. B. Swartz. 1991. Sabelis, M. W., and P. Schippers. 1984. Schooley, R. L., and J. A. Wiens. 2003. Schooley, R. L., and J. A. Wiens. 2004. Schoonhoven, L., T. Jermy, and J. van Loon. 1998. Schultz, T. W. 1964. Scott, G. J. 1985. Sexson, D. L., and J. A. Wyman. 2005. Silva, Y., K. Takahashi, N. Cruz, G. Trasmonte, Kobi Mosquera, E. Nickl, R. Chavez, B. Segura, and P. Lagos. 2006. Sotelo, J. M. 1996. Sullivan, A. 2000. Taylor, L. R. 1961. PAGE 201 Thangata, P. H., P. E. Hildebrand, and F. Kwesigal. 2007. Thorner, D. 1986. In Thurston, H. D. 1994. In Turchin, P. 1998. Vacha, M., D. Drstkova, and T. Puzova. 2008. Valdivia, C. 2004. Van Tilborg, M., J. N. C. Van Der Pers, P. Roessingh, and M. W. Sabelis. 2003. Villano, W. V. 1994.Premnotrypes latithorax Visser, J. H. 1986. Walters, R. J., M. Hassall, M. G. Telfer, G. M. Hewitt, and J. P. Palutikof. 2006. Weisz, R., Z. Smilowitz, and B. Christ. 1994. Wiegers, E. S., R. J. Hijmans, D. Herve, and L. O. Fresco. 1999. Wilson, L. T. 1983. PAGE 202 Yabar, E. 1994. Zimmerer, K. S. 2002. Zollner, P. A., and S. L. Lima. 1999. Zuur, A. F., E. N. Ieno, A. A. Savelive, N. W. Walker, and G. M. Smith. 2009. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 39 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |
