Group Title: Interview with Marjory Stoneman Douglas. Videotaped at the Douglas House in Coconut Grove, June 15, 1983.
Title: Joe Browder and Jetport Controversy
ALL VOLUMES CITATION DOWNLOADS PDF VIEWER THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/FI07010807/00007
 Material Information
Title: Joe Browder and Jetport Controversy
Series Title: Interview with Marjory Stoneman Douglas. Videotaped at the Douglas House in Coconut Grove, June 15, 1983.
Physical Description: Archival
Creator: Marjory Stoneman Douglas
Publication Date: June 15, 1983
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida -- South Florida
 Notes
Funding: Florida International Univerity Libraries
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: FI07010807
Volume ID: VID00007
Source Institution: Florida International University
Holding Location: Florida International University
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: SPC951_7

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:

PDF ( PDF )

MP3 ( 6 MBs ) ( MP3 )


Full Text










-A 7alle of iJwo Women
Marjory Stoneman Douglas and Mlaijoric 1larris Carr



Segment: Joe Browder and Jetport Controversy

Source: Interview with Marjory Stoneman Douglas: a tale of two women / produced by Florida
International University Learning Resources for FIU/FAU Joint Center. Videotaped at the Douglas House
in Coconut Grove, June 15, 1983.

Length of Segment: 00:04:48

Transcript and audio recording are copyright 1983-2009 Florida International University.



TRANSCRIPT

Interviewer: (17:03)This brings up a theme of all the years when there was great opposition to returning
or maintaining the natural system, or returning the system to some semblance of the natural system,
with time with the years when the drainage system was put into place and then when that wasn't
effective for controlling flooding there was more and more build. And that brings us up the jetport
controversy also. I think between the time... what I'd like for you talk about for us is...

MSD: (interrupting) Well, there wasn't, there wasn't any, well I wouldn't say opposition to the business
of having the water flow correct; they have their system. There wasn't so much opposition, it was the
developing people, it was the developers and people who wanted to go in and develop. The parks
should be reserved to the proper use of the system. There was no active opposition; it was active
intrusion of commercial interests into the area with not enough people who were for the proper
handling of the Everglades system. There weren't enough people to be heard, to make themselves
heard. That's why it has been so important to get people to understand the whole nature of the
Kissimmee-Okeechobee-Everglades basin. We are now having better and better support all the time,
but actually at the time in '69 and '70 after the engineers had put in that canal down the Kissimmee
River. Then we had the Miami airport, the Port Authority trying to establish a jet port down just north
of the Tamiami Trail that would have been on the edge of the Big Cypress and it would have right in the
middle of whatever was left of the sheetflow. That's when the opposition developed; a man named Joe
Browder who represented the National Audubon Society, was the one who began to oppose the jetport
two years after they had begun to buy out the land. He heard about it, and I know he came to me and
said he needed more organized support and that's when I started the Friends of the Everglades to give
him support to get rid of the jetport. And Joe Browder himself with what support people could give him,










suddenly Joe Browder himself got rid of the jetport. And the consequence, we made the federal
government buy up some of that land of the Big Cypress as a water preserve and got the State to buy up
an additional lot of land as a buffer state. That is why we have any state control at all of the Big Cypress,
but of course we couldn't and what's been the trouble in the Big Cypress is that we could not buy, we
did not have money enough to buy the mineral rights, and the oil people got in and bought the mineral
rights, that is why the oil people have been in the Big Cypress, although they don't get a very good
grade. The first oil they got from the Big Cypress, was no better than the number two, that came in the
number two, Sunniland oil well on the Immokalee road. The oil is so thick and crude, it's got so much
sulfur in it that its not much better than liquid asphalt, and the expenses of refining it are very great.
But the engineer, the oil people went on and have since developed at Raccoon Point oil field, where
they've been getting more than what they did at the other place, which is about 100 barrels a day,
which is nothing. They've been getting more than that, but I don't think they're getting very much
better oil than what they've always been getting. Why they should want to get it at all, with the glut of
oil there is and the expense of refining it, I don't see, I don't see why they don't leave it in the ground at
least, and not try to get it out. So the oil people have complicated our conservation of the Big Cypress,
they've complicated it enormously. (21:49)




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs