Alexander Hamilton: The West Indian Â“Founding FatherÂ” William F. Cissel Historian, Christiansted Nationa l Historic Site, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior July, 2004 The two hundredth anniversary of the death of Alexander Hamilton has generated renewed interest in the extrao rdinary life of this Founding Fa ther, who helped define the government and financial structure of the United States of America.1 Up to the twentieth century, HamiltonÂ’s association with the We st Indies was either reduced to a few anecdotes or ignored altogether. Gertrude Atherton, Holger Utke Ramsing, Broadus Mitchell, and Harold Larson pioneered effort s to understand the triu mphs and tragedies of HamiltonÂ’s formative years through archiv al research. In spite of monumental contributions to Hamilton scholarship in the last sixty five years,2 we continue to see literature Â“Â…in which truth and legend are hope lessly intermingled. Old errors continue to be repeated, and new ones added.Â”3 Every story has a beginning, and that of Alex ander Hamilton starts with his mother. Rachel Faucett (also spelled Faucette or Fawcett), born a bout 1729 on the British island of Nevis,4 is far less understood than her famous son. RachelÂ’s father, John Faucett, was a physician and planter of French Hugue not ancestry. Her English mother, Mary (born Uppington or Uppingham), was John FaucettÂ’s second wife.5 Of the children of FaucettÂ’s two marriages, only Rachel and an older half-sister, Ann, survived early
2childhood.6 In mid-1745, Mary Faucett and 16-year old Rachel came to St. Croix, the largest of the Â“Danish Islands in America,Â” to visit A nn and her planter husband, James Lytton.7 The LyttonÂ’s sugar plantati on at No. 9 CompanyÂ’s Quarter8 was situated 1-1/2 miles southwest of Christiansted.9 RachelÂ’s unwilling marriage to the older Johan Michael Lavien was quickly Â“arrangedÂ” by her mother, who was apparently motivated by financial if not social prospects. Lavien, a former Â“merchant in NeevisÂ” and now an aspiring planter on St. Croix, has been estimated to be 12 to 22 years older than Rachel.10 At the time of their marriage, Lavien owned a 75-acre cotton plantation, No. 12b CompanyÂ’s Quarter.11 A son, Peter, was born to the couple there in 1746.12 The marriage lasted less than five years. The failure of the relationship is in sharp contrast to one modern biographerÂ’s roma ntic imagery of Lavien Â“Â…riding into Christiansted in his carriage with his br ide and liveried servan ts, and on credit buying furniture and luxuries for his house in the expensive shops of the capital.Â”13 Suffice it to say that Christiansted only ten years after its founding would neither have conveyed such amenities nor elegance! The cause of the break-up has been the subject of much speculation: difference in age, incompatib ility of temperament, the squandering of RachelÂ’s inheritance, financial reversals,14 psychological if not physical abuse, and RachelÂ’s promiscuity if not infidelity. N one of these are provab le, although some are more plausible than others. The fact rema ins that by early 1750, Rachel had left her husband and child. Lavien petitioned the Danish au thorities to have his errant wife jailed. He did not accuse her of adulte ry at this time, but implied that she was flirtatious and had refused to live with him as husband and wife.15 After several months imprisonment in
3Fort Christiansvaern,16 Lavien had Rachel released, thinking that, Â“Â…everything would change for the better and that she, as a wedded wife, [would] change her unholy way of life and as is meet and proper live with himÂ…Â”17 It didnÂ’t work out that way. It is believed that Rachel subsequently resided fo r a short time on property belonging to Town Captain ( Stadthauptmand ) Bertram Pieter de Nully, after which she and her mother left St. Croix for St. Kitts in the fall of that same year.18 The census register ( Mandtalslist ) for 1748 indicates that Lavien sold No. 12b CompanyÂ’s Quarter and purchased half of an ad jacent tract, No. 19. Af ter he sold that in 1753, Lavien could no longer be considered a planter in his own right. In 1753-1754 and again in 1758-1759, Lavien worked his slaves on one or more plan tations belonging to the brothers Pieter and Johannes Heyliger19 in KingÂ’s Quarter. He did the same for Governor-General Christia n Lebrecht Baron von Prck20 in 1757 and 1760 at No. 19a QueenÂ’s Quarter, which together with No. 20 KingÂ’s Quarter would be called Â“La ReineÂ” (the Queen). These were possibly contract s to clear wooded tract s to facilitate sugar cultivation. The short duration of LavienÂ’s ownership of planta tion tracts has been thought to reflect his declining finances However, between 1748-1760, the various registers consistently record hi s ownership of sixteen or seve nteen slaves, of which ten to eleven were capable adults, and the rest were children under si xteen years of age.21 From 1761 until his death on February 28, 1771, Lavien lived in Frederiksted, earning income by renting out his remaining slaves a nd speculating in town real estate,22 but this evidence may only mask the reality of being Â“land poor.Â”
4Probably on St. Kitts, Rachel--separated but not divorced from Lavien--met and fell in love with a 32-year old Sc otsman named James Hamilton,23 who was working for the mercantile firm of Archibald Ingram in Basseterre, St. Kitts.24 Under the system of primogeniture prevailing in Great Britain, the eldest son inherited vi rtually everything. Other male siblings may seek an appointment in the government, army, navy, or the church, or (like James) migrate to the colonies to find their fortune.25 Daughters were simply expected to marry well. Rachel and James lived together in a seemingly stable common-law relationship on Ne vis for almost 15 years.26 They had two sons: James, born in 1753,27 and Alexander, born on January 11, 1755.28 Unfortunately, very little if any documentation or unaltered physical eviden ce relating to them survives on St. Kitts or Nevis.29 The question of RachelÂ’s marital status was resolved in 1759 when Johan Michael Lavien filed for divorce in St CroixÂ’s matrimonial court ( Tamperret ). He now accused her of having committed Â“such mistakes which among married people are indecent and very suspect,Â” and of Â“whoring with everyone.Â”30 Corroborating witnesses31 were never examined during the divorce proceedings. The language of the courtÂ’s summons to Rachel reflected LavienÂ’s bitterness. Rach el never received the summons because it was delivered to her last two known addre sses on St. Croix--nine years earlier!32 In the absence of her response, a divorce was gran ted to Lavien by Gove rnor-General Baron von Prck in his capacity as the colonyÂ’s highest judicial authority. Rachel was adjudged to be guilty, forbidden by Danish law to re marry, and forfeited any current or future claim on Johan Michael Lavien.33 The divorce decree would not be LavienÂ’s last word on the matter.
5As the aggrieved party, no impediment to remarriage was placed on Lavien. Head-tax registers ( Kopskatlister ) provide interesting clues. In 1758 and 1759, we find a woman and boy (presumably Peter Lavien, age 12) e numerated as part of LavienÂ’s Â“white family.Â” Since LavienÂ’s marriage was still binding at that point the womanÂ’s presence should have had the same negative legal impli cations as was applied to Rachel, but it did not. No breakdown was given in the register for 1760. The to tals remained the same in 1761. Two boys are listed in 1762 and 1763, one of them likely the issue of LavienÂ’s second relationship. The following year, the re gister tallied two si blings, a boy and now a girl. Eighteen-year old Peter Lavien by that time had probably migrated to South Carolina, where he lived for the rest of his life. Only the girl appeared in the childrenÂ’s subcategory in 1765 and 1766. Neither the wo man nor any children were recorded in 1767 and in subsequent years. It can be reasonably assumed that they had died.34 In May, 1765, the Hamiltons traveled from Ne vis to Christiansted, capital of the Danish West Indies. James Hamilton was sent with power-of-attorney ( fuldmgt ) to collect a debt on behalf of his employer.35 It marked the beginning of the eight most eventful years of Alexander HamiltonÂ’s youth. By the end of July, for reasons now unknown, Rachel and James had gone their separate ways.36 After collecting the debt through the VisitorÂ’s Court ( Gsteret ) in early January, 1766, the senior Hamilton left St. Croix, never to see or support his ch ildren again. He returned to Nevis for a while, but may have moved to Tobago before 1771, where a Â“Mr. HamiltonÂ” was wounded in a slave uprising.37 James Hamilton was certainly present on Bequia, in the Grenadines, in 1774,38 and on St. Vincent in 1793, where his death was recorded six years later.39
6At Christiansted, Rachel appears in th e combined property ownership registers ( Matrikler ) and head-tax registers for 1765-1768, in the column for Â“white familiesÂ” ( Blanke Familier ).40 For the first two years, she was listed under her maiden name, Faucett (which the clerk spelled Â“FatziethÂ” ). She was subsequently found under her former married name (Â“LewineÂ” and Â“LewinÂ”), but never as Hamilton! Rachel supported her family by running a sma ll store selling plantation supplies. Her consumables inventory included Â“pork, beef, sa lted fish, rice, flour, and apples,Â” bought wholesale from her landlord, Thomas Dipnall, and from the import-e xport firm of David Beekman and Nicholas Cruger.41 RachelÂ’s store and residence was located at No. 34 Company Street,42 although there was a temporary move to No. 23 on the same street in 1767.43 This move may have been necessary if No. 34 sustained damage in one or more of three tropical storms that affected St. Croix between Ju ly 14 and October 7, 1766. The principal structure was typi cally two story, with the st ore on the ground floor and the residence above. Unfortunately, neither build ing dating from Alexander HamiltonÂ’s time has survived. Nos. 23 and 34 Company Street were located half a block from the Sunday Market, an important economic and cultural venue for th e slave population. Accounts contemporary with Hamilton convey a sense of the marketÂ’s physical setting and activity familiar to him during his years in Christiansted. Â“The public markets are held on Sundays onlyÂ… They are supplied by the slaves who, having this day to themselves, come in from the plantations with the littl e articles which they have for sale. There is a small grove in each
7town devoted to this object. Under these trees, and generally on the ground, is spread their marketing.Â” Items for sale included bi rds and fowl, pigs, goats, tubers, beans, a wide variety of fruit and vegetables, and ca ssava bread. Â“One s ees the towns swarming with many hundreds of Negroes on Sunday, and wh en they have sold their wares, they purchase for themselves necessities such as fish, codfish, meat, rum, candles, head scarves, cloth[,]Â… or other si milar items; after which near evening they go home, with singing, merriment, and sometimes a little drunkÂ….Â”44 To help his family financially, eleven year old Alexander Hamilton went to work for Beekman and Cruger in 1766. Local tradition ha s long placed CrugerÂ’s business at Nos. 56-57 King Street, across from Government House, but this is in error. The origin for this persistent legend likely stemmed from th e fact that Cruger did own that propertyÂ— beginning in 1781, eight years afte r Hamilton had left the island!45 Prior to that, property records locate Cruger at Nos. 7-8 King Street.46 The store and adjacent warehouses (which extended up King Cross Street) were ev entually replaced by a large masonry town house.47 In the 18th century, details of upper class childrenÂ’s lives were seldom recorded, much less those in the lower strata of society. James and Alexander Hamilton would have spent a good part of their day helping their mo ther in her store or working elsewhere. Alexander HamiltonÂ’s supposed familiarity with Â“Grange,Â” where he Â“spent happy childhood hours,Â”48 is a fantasy. There was no longe r a family connection to that plantation by the time the Hamiltons arrived at St. Croix in 1765: James Lytton had sold
8it the previous December, and had rented a residence on Market Street where he lived with his wife and a granddaughter.49 Assertions that Â“the Lyttons Â… got [Rachel] readmitted to the Anglican Church despite the divorce, which thus enable d the boys to attend church schoolÂ….with a mixed group of children who among them spoke English, Frenc h, Dutch and Danish, most of whom tried to learn the strange Dutch Creole patoisÂ”50 should be read with caution. If the authors intended to the local congregation, Rachel coul d not be readmitted to a parish that was not established until ten years afte r she had left St. Croix in 1750. Â“ReadmissionÂ” also prompts a consideration of the familyÂ’s denominational affiliation in the West Indies. On Nevis, the Estab lished ChurchÂ—the Church of EnglandÂ—was preeminent. No baptismal or other church re cords for Rachel Fauce tt and her sons, James and Alexander, are known to exist there. This is probably due to na tural disasters, the French occupation in1783, or poor archival conditions.51 In raising their children on that island, there is no indication that Rachel Lavien and James Hamilton were concerned with Â“religionÂ” beyond the nominal cultural and social conventions of the time.52 St. Croix, on the other hand, was rema rkable for its religious diversity.53 Its inhabitants54 were able to attend Lutheran, Dutch Reform ed, Anglican, Roman Catholic, Presbyterian, or Moravian services.55 Relative indifference about re ligion was apparently not as pervasive as elsewhere. Hans West, rector of the West Indian School Institute at Christiansted (1788-1791), not ed that Â“Â…one often finds the churchesÂ…full of
9members.Â” There was, he said, a Â“Â…benevol ence toward the needy which many places would not easily equal.Â”56 In the 18th century and beyond, religi ous identity was in large measure determined by cultural heritage and family tradition. Rachel (and her children by extension) would not have affilia ted with some of the denominations at Christiansted for doctrinal reasons or because their services were conducted in languages other than English.57 A few biographers58 have stated that Alexander Ha milton was, for all practical purposes, Calvinist because of the influence of his Scots Pr esbyterian father, French Huguenot mother, and Dutch Reformed employer. This premise is not accurate in all respects. With no Presbyterian or French Calvinist congregation on Nevis, it was unlikely that Rachel would have grown up as a practicing Huguenot without the support and encouragement of co-religionists. Th e affiliation attributed to HamiltonÂ’s Christiansted employers is in error; both we re members of the Anglican Church. An association with th e Presbyterian church59 would have been plau sible because of the influence of his Scottish father. The Rev. Hugh Knox,60 pastor for that congregation beginning in 1772, did take a genuine interest in Alexander HamiltonÂ’s education and spiritual welfare, and strongly influenced hi s later views of mora lity, propriety, and integrity. That congregationÂ’ s sole physical presence, at the intersection of Prince Street and Water Gut, was first recorded almo st five years after R achelÂ’s death, and the same year that Alexander left the island! The other probable choice was the Church of England. St. JohnÂ’s Anglican Church61 was
10founded in 1760 to minister to the increasing num bers of British subj ects on St. Croix. Rachel, James, and AlexanderÂ—residing only a very short distance awayÂ—would have likely worshipped there, but th ere is no way to determine frequency. They would have sat on benches provided for the majority of th e congregation who did not pay pew-rent. Hans West characterized the parish as Â“High Church,Â”62 that is to say, very liturgical by Protestant standards. The orig inal wooden Â“TÂ”-shaped church,63 so familiar to Rachel and her sons, was destroyed in the 1772 hurricane.64 By 1780, the cruciform Gothic Revival church that exists today ha d been completed on the same site.65 Individuals closely associated with Alexander Ha milton between 1765-1773Â—the Lyttons; his employers, David Beekman66 and Nicholas Cruger;67 Thomas Stevens68 and family, especially Edward Stevens69--were all prominent parishioners. Rachel and her two sons lived a trying but re latively stable existe nce until February 10, 1768, when she and Alexander were likely stricken with yellow fever.70 Medical bills later submitted to the probate court help us understand the general progr ess of the illness. For the first week, Rachel and Alexande r were cared for by a white woman, Ann McDonnell.71 When their conditions failed to improve, Dr. Agedius Heering72 was called in on February 17. He performed a bloodletting73 on Rachel and gave her Â“fever medicine.Â” The next day, she received an emetic74 and more fever medicine; Alexander got Â“cooling medicine.Â” On the 19th, Dr. Heering gave Rachel Â“fever medicine with valerian,Â”75 a Â“decoction,Â”76 and Â“alcohol for her head.Â” For `Elicks,Â’ he ordered a chicken, and administered a Â“clysterÂ”77 and bloodletting. The treatments ultimately proved ineffective for Rachel. She died at 9:00 pm that night, at the age of 38.78
11Rachel Lavien was buried the following day ( 20 February) at the Lytton family cemetery at Â“Grange,Â” which had been reserved by them when the plantation was sold.79 RachelÂ’s entry in the St. JohnÂ’s burial register indicates that the se rvice was conducted by Â“D.O.Â” Although scholars have long assumed that the offi ciating minister was the parishÂ’s rector, the Rev. Cecil Wray Goodchild, the initials match those of the parish clerk, Daniel Oxley.80 The Burial Office was read from th e 1662 Book of Common Prayer. There are, however, some discrepancies in the regi ster. RachelÂ’s age is listed as 32 instead of 38. If this was correct, she would have been born in 1735, married to Lavien at age 10 (talk about child brides), and would ha ve given birth to her first son, Peter, at the age of 11! Her date of burial was recorded as Februa ry 26 instead of February 20. Finally, the preceding entry--in the midst of otherwis e consecutive listings--was for March 16.81 Since all entries in the burial register between 1761-1775 were equally spaced and written in the same handÂ—which changed notic eably in the latter yearÂ—the evidence suggests that the existing regist er is a transcription of the original, which, water-damaged in the 1772 hurricane, would account for the errors In 1901, American author Gertrude Atherton di scovered that Rachel had been buried at Â“Grange.Â” Although traces of the Ly tton cemetery had long disappeared,82 Atherton paid for a granite monument out of her own funds, and had it erected on the estate in RachelÂ’s memory. The monument was inscribed with an erroneous birth date of 1736,83 based on RachelÂ’s age in the burial register.
12Because primary source material about Rachel is scarce, most Hamilton biographers have treated her as an enigma. Her physical appe arance is unknown, in spite of conjecture by Atherton. Aside from Lavien, who was certa inly not reticent e xpressing his opinions about her character before the matrimonial cour t, the head-tax lists, probate records, and the church register were non-judgemental. In later life, Alexander Hamilton would describe his mother as a woman of Â“supe rior intellect,Â” Â“elev ated and generous sentiments,Â” and Â“unusual elegance of person and manner,Â”84 although one should consider the possibility that this was Â“gildi ng the lilyÂ” for the sake of posterity. Atherton cast Rachel in the role of a romantic hero ine. James Thomas Flexner judged Rachel harshly both as a wife and mo ther, but cites no evidence to su pport his contention that she was neglectful of, abusive to, or an immoral influence on her sons.85 What can we honestly infer? Rachel was reasonably well educated for a woman in the West Indies, and endeavored to provide the same opportunity to Alexander. She was indisputably a very strong-willed and independent woma n--perhaps unusually so even for the de facto role and influence of women of the time. If she chose to flaunt certain social and cultural conventions, she at least had the strength of character to live with the consequences. James and Alexander Hamilton suffered othe r misfortunes following their motherÂ’s death. There was the matter of their small inheritance. Accord ing to the Dealing (probate) CourtÂ’s assessment of her estate Rachel was a competent businesswoman; it noted that Â“her bookkeeping was in good order, and [that] she could apparently meet her payments.Â”86 RachelÂ’s modest estate included th e usual clothing, furniture, furnishings, a few domestic slavesÂ—and 34 books!87 Books in the 18th century were relatively
13expensive and published in limite d quantities. Even though th e titles were not recorded, these books would typically have included works on literature, history and mythology, philosophy, romance languages, mathematics and science. They are worth noting because they hint at the classical foundations of Alexander HamiltonÂ’s early education. As RachelÂ’s estate was in probate, Johan Michael Lavien re-entered the picture. Wielding his divorce decree, he insisted that the Hamilton boys had no legal right to any inheritance, bei ng Â“whore children.Â”88 The Dealing Court agreed, and awarded everything to Peter Lavien, by then 22 y ears of age and living in South Carolina.89 When RachelÂ’s effects were auctioned off, the books and a few other items were purchased by her nephew, Peter Lytton,90 but we do not know of their further disposition. Who would now care for the Hamilton boys? The natural father, James Hamilton, had been absent and non-supporting for more than two years. Their maternal aunt, Ann Lytton, had already died, and her husba nd James Lytton (senior) was busy coping with financial and legal problems caused by some of their children.91 James and Alexander Hamilton were entrusted to the ca re of their cousin, Peter Lytton, but this arrangement proved relatively short-lived. Peter Lytton committed suicide 17 months later, despondent ove r financial reverses.92 James Hamilton was apprenticed to Christ iansted carpenter Thomas MacNobeny, who resided in Water Gut.93 JamesÂ’ life is otherwise a bla nk slate. He surfaced briefly in 1783 to ask his now-famous brot her for financial assistance.94 Alexander HamiltonÂ’s reply, dated June 22, 1785, reflected the anguish of years of separation. Â“The situation
14you describe yourself to be inÂ” he wrote, Â“gives me much painÂ…. My affection for youÂ…will not permit me to be ina ttentive to your welfare, an d I hope time will prove to you that I feel all the se ntiment of a brother.Â”95 He never got the chance. James Hamilton died on St. Croix the next year at age 33. He presumably left a widow, Â“Madame Anna Hamilton,Â” in Frederiksted. There is no indication that the couple had children.96 Alexander continued to clerk for Cruge r. Professor Waldemar Westergaard97 astutely observed that Â“whenÂ…Alexander Hamilton wa s serving his apprenticeship [with]Â…the firm of Nicholas CrugerÂ…, he was near the economic center of gravity in the New World.Â” Christiansted was a busy internationa l port, with connections to Europe, West Africa, the circum-Caribbean, and British Nort h America. Imports included necessities and luxuries: building materials, plantation equipment and supplies, livestock, furniture, crystal, porcelain, silver, linens, other household goods, clothing, f ood and drink. Local exports for the most part consisted of sugar, molasses, rum, cotton, and tropical dyeand hardwoods such as logwood, lignum vitae and furniture-grade mahogany.98 The town was also an integral part of the Danish sl ave trade. Slaves procured primarily in Guinea99--now GhanaÂ—were shipped across the A tlantic along the route known as the Â“Middle Passage.Â”100 It has been calculated that ei ghty five percent of the estimated 60,000 slaves brought to St. Croix betw een 1747-1803 passed through Christiansted.101 Slave auctions took place either in the compound of the Dani sh slave trading company at the wharf, or in the yards of privat e importers such as Nicholas Cruger.102 As a clerk for Cruger, Alexander Hamilton learned the prin ciples of international trade, foreign
15exchange,103 and credit.104 Hamilton would later tell his children that his dealings with shipsÂ’ captains, customs officials, mercha nts and planters, as well as his duties in warehousing and retail105 were Â“the most useful part of his education.Â”106 Where did the Hamilton boys live after their motherÂ’s death? James and Alexander Hamilton lived with their guardian, Peter Ly tton, from February, 1768 until his death in July, 1769. Tallies in the property register for that year hint th at they were then taken in by Thomas Stevens and family, who resided was on King Street. Va rious sources have suggested that James subsequently boarde d with Thomas MacNobeny and his wife in Water Gut, but the enumerations in the property registers fo r 1770-1773 do not confirm this.107 While a few biographers have stated that Alexander Hamilton roomed above CrugerÂ’s store, variances in the annual regist ers similarly call this claim into question. Most Hamilton scholars subscribe to the premis e that he lived with the merchant Thomas Stevens. Speculation about a familial relationship between Stevens and Rachel remain exactly that.108 Alexander Hamilton and the StevensÂ’ second son, Edward (Â“NedÂ”) had become the best of friends.109 On November 11, 1769, Alexander wrote a candid personal letter to Edward, who was then studying at KingÂ’s Colleg e in New York City. Hamilton hinted at his ambition to Â“exalt his station,Â” condemned the Â“grovÂ’ling and condition of a Clerk,Â” and recognized that the only chance for his advancement was to leave the island. Â“I wish,Â” he wrote, Â“there was a War!Â”110 Little did he know at the time how prophetic those words would prove to be.
16The catalyst for Alexander HamiltonÂ’s journey to greatness was the hurricane of August 31, 1772. It was described at the time as Â“the most dreadful Hurricane known here in the memory of Man.Â”111 The center, or Â“eye,Â” of the storm passed over St. Croix, wreaking frightful destruction. According to th e local Royal Danish American Gazette Â“All the houses near the shore [were torn] even to th e foundations; beams, pl anks, and stones flew through the air like feathersÂ… The wall around the KingÂ’s store house, which was above a yard thick, was tumbled down to the gr ound, and hurled a hundred yards offÂ… [The sea] swelled up to 70 feet above the usual heightÂ… inÂ…a rapid mannerÂ….At Christiansted 460 houses were thrown down, and all except three at Frederiksted. All the shipsÂ…were cast ashore, 50 or 100 yards on the land. The damage at St. Croix is computed at 5,000,000 of dollars.Â”112 HamiltonÂ’s own vivid imp ressions were recorded in a remarkable letter, half de scriptive and half philosophical, to his father in Tobago: Â“Good God! What horror and de structionÂ—its impossible for me to describeÂ—or you to form any idea of it. It seemed as if a tota l dissolution of nature was taking place. The roaring of the sea and windÂ—fiery meteors flyi ng about in the airÂ—the prodigious glare of almost perpetual lightningÂ—the crash of the falling housesÂ—and the ear-piercing shrieks of the distressed, were sufficien t to strike astonishment into Angels.Â”113 At Length, Rev. Knox persuaded the reticent Ha milton to have the letter published anonymously in the newspaper.Â”114 It caused a literary sensation! Alexander HamiltonÂ’s exceptional intelligence convinced Hugh Knox to try and further the young manÂ’s education. Financial assistance has been attributed to female relatives (which was not possible), popul ar subscription, and specifi cally to Nicholas Cruger.115
17Knox provided letters of introduction to infl uential people in New York and New Jersey, and especially to his alma mater the College of New Jersey at Princeton.116 Not long after June 3, 1773, 18-year old Alexander Ha milton left St. Croix for British North America.117 His arrival in New York City coin cided with heightened political and economic tensions the British North American colonies on the eve of the Revolution. Hamilton would have his war! The rest is history. Alexander Hamilton never returned to the is lands of his youth. There were more than enough opportunities to keep him occupied in his adopted homeland. Within twelve years of the arrival of this poor, obscure im migrant in British North America, the old political order had changed, and a very differe nt one was taking its place. During that short time, HamiltonÂ’s career went from college student to artillery officer, Revolutionary War hero, lawyer, abolitionist, congressman, Constitutional essayist, banker, newspaperman, and the first Secretary of the Treasury.118 His rise to one of the Founding Fathers of the new nation could not be simp ly explained on the basis of remarkable intelligence, boundless Â“drive,Â” or coincidence. It was his destiny! In order for the nation to survive and pros per, Alexander Hamilton envisioned a strong central government, sound moneta ry policies, and an econom y based on manufacturing and commerce. True nationalism would suppl ant narrow and divisive state or regional interests.119 There were others who espoused a very different visi on, and disagreed strenuously. The struggle between the two ideologies was passionate, and at times quite uncivil.
18Alexander Hamilton certainly re membered and applied the less ons he had learned on St. Croix. International trade, the need for a st andardized currency, and a sound fiscal policy are obvious, while other associations become ap parent as his youth is better understood. Take, for example, HamiltonÂ’s career as a lawyer. His thoroughness of preparation and presentation was so remarkable that Chief Justice of the United States John Marshall would compare his intellect to HamiltonÂ’ s Â“Â…like a candle `beside the sun at noonday.Â’Â”120 The impetus for HamiltonÂ’s unwavering support of justice based on equitable laws was in part provided by the expe riences of his mother at the hands of the Danish West Indian matrimonial court, and of his brother and hims elf in the probate court. And then there was the issue of slavery. Among the Founding Fathers, Hamilton viewed slavery from a unique socio-economic (orphaned and relatively impoverished) and geog raphic (West Indian) perspective. As a young man, he had observed first-hand the c onditions on slave ships and at auctions;121 understood the contributions of the black popul ationsÂ—slave and fr ee--to the urban and rural economies;122 and witnessed the harsh punishme nts imposed to maintain the established order.123 One should not expect an automatic sense of outrage in the 18th century, given societyÂ’s general conditioni ng about the Â“peculiar institution.Â” For Alexander Hamilton, moral perspective was ac hieved through Rev. KnoxÂ’s influence. Hamilton became an outspoken opponent of slav ery both as a moral issue and on legal grounds.124
19In a similar vein, Alexander Hamilton was also counted among the few officers who advocated a meaningful role fo r blacks in the military. Du ring the Revolutionary War, the Patriot side was chronically short of many things. In 177 9, as the British took the war into the South, Colonel John Laurens proposed ra ising several battalions of slaves to fight for the cause of American Independence in exchange for their freedom upon its successful conclusion. Lieutenant Co lonel Hamilton, George WashingtonÂ’s aide-decamp vigorously supported the plan. Not su rprisingly, the proposal met with strong opposition by vested interests, and was never approved.125 Hamilton was probably reminded of the example of the Free Negro Company ( Frineger Compagnie ) at Christiansted, which had been established in the 1760s.126 Enrollment was mandatory for all able-bodied free black males between the age of 16 and 60, but the company itself was made up of 50-60 of the best men.127 A Free Negro Captain was appointed from their ranks. Officers were specifically required to belong to either the Lutheran or Dutch Reformed Church, but all ranks had had to Â“hav e religionÂ” (that is to say, be baptized), possess a trade, and take an oath of loyalty to the Danish Crown.128 The companyÂ’s responsibility was to patrol th e streets of the town on Sunda ys and holidays to Â“forestall disorder,Â”129 as well as hunt maroons Â—runaway slaves.130 The Christiansted experience was rather unusual for its time. Few slaveowning societies trusted blacks to be trained and armed. HamiltonÂ’s philosophies, political influence,131 personality traits--ambitious, forthright, opinionated, a nd uncompromisingly tenacious132Â—and even the rare moral lapse in his persona life133 gave rise to controversy. Opposition to his agendas
20often manifested itself as character assassination, as well as political espionage and sabotage. Hamilton was derided as a Â“forei gnerÂ” (a curious concept, since all the Founding Fathers had been British subjects, re gardless of whether they were born in North America or in the West Indies) with que stionable loyalty to the new nation and to principles of democracy and Â“RepublicanÂ” government.134 John Adams, who came to regard Alexander Hamilton as his Â“Arch Ennemy,Â”135 considered him Â“another [Napoleon] BonaparteÂ….born on a Speck more obs cure than Corsica, from an Original not only contemptible but infamousÂ….Â”136 Adams would also desc ribe Hamilton as Â“the bastard brat of a Scotch PedlarÂ”137 and a Â“little man.Â”138 Thomas Jefferson, patrician theoretician of the Revolution, sneered that Hamilton was Â“a man whose history, from the moment at which histor y can stoop to notice him is a tissue of machinations against the liberty of the countryÂ”139 [emphasis added]. They all, in their own way, wished that Hamilton would return from whence he came. Hamilton, all too familiar with such pettiness and jealousy from his West Indian days, knew how to respond in kind. During his life, and for decades after his death, Alexander HamiltonÂ’s political and philosophical adversaries dispar aged his integrity and labored to dismantle what he had achieved.140 The effect was so profound that ev en today Alexander Hamilton is among the least honored of the Foundi ng Fathers of the first rank. More politically detached, some European leaders regarded Hamilton rather differently. Charles Maurice Talleyrand-Perigord,141 the eminent French statesman and diplomat who served Louis XVI, Napoleon Bonaparte and Louis XVIII (but hi mself best of all), would write at the close of his life, Â“I consider Napoleon, Fox,142 and Hamilton the three greatest men of our
21time, and if I were to chose be tween the three, I w ould give first place to Hamilton. He foretold Europe Â”143 Another Â“colonial,Â” from a different tim e and place, provided a fitting summation of Alexander HamiltonÂ’s star-crossed life when he wrote, Â“What lies ahead of you and what lies behind you is nothing comp ared to what lies within youÂ…Â”144Â—Mohandas Gandhi.
22NOTES 1 Crossen (2004). 2 Atherton (1902), Ramsing (1939), Mi tchell (1951), and Larson (1952). Ramsing, rarely cited because he wrote in Danish, referenced many valuable archival sources found only in the State Archives (R igsarkiv ), Copenhagen. An excellent English translation of Ra msing by Solvejg Vahl (1951) can be found in the New York Public Library, but there are infrequent and minor inaccuracies in translation. The compilation of HamiltonÂ’s papers by Syrett (19611987) and selections of the same by Freeman (2001) include all of his known correspondence from or about St. Croix and his parentsÂ’ lineages. These provide rare glimpses into HamiltonÂ’s devel oping personality. 3 Larson (1952:139). Alexander Hamilton himself, in a letter to William Jackson dated August 26, 1800, contributed to the confusion. He prefaced an account of his family by stating, Â“Â…I am pained by the consciousness that it [his birth] is not free from blemish.Â” He then desc ribes Lavien as Â“a Dane, a fortune hunter,Â” who courted Rachel on Nevis. The marriage between Rachel and Lavien was Â“unhappy and ended in a separation by divorce.Â” As far as he was con cerned, Â“Â…a marriage between them [HamiltonÂ’s parents] ensued, followed by many years of cohabitation and several [emphasis added] children,Â” but in the end the divorce proved Â“qualified, and th ence the second marriage was not lawfulÂ” (Freeman 2001:930-931). In another account, Hamilton concluded the saga of his parents thus: Â“Â…my fa therÂ’s affairs at a very early day went to wreckÂ….This occasioned a separation between him and me when I was very youngÂ…Â” (Freeman 2001:880). Errors in popular literature (e.g., newspape rs, tourism pamphlets) often result from a nave dependence on secondary and tertiary sources and hearsay. There has certainly been no end to speculation. Alexander HamiltonÂ’s paternity has been attributed to George Washington on his trip to Barbados in 1751 (Flexner 1978:19) or to Ernst Frederik von Walterstorff, Governor-General of th e Danish West Indies 17941796 (Ramsing 1939:270; Larsen 1940:118). The question of racial identity has been around for decades. Bobb (1955:5) noted a Â“fable throughout the Caribbean islesÂ” of HamiltonÂ’s Â“quarter colored bloodÂ” through his maternal grandmother, with an editorial in the St. Croix Avis (1982) and Davis (2004) becoming progressively more fictional. Other aspects of HamiltonÂ’s early life have been equally distorted. Newman (1918:6) stated that HamiltonÂ’s mother had died while he was an infant, and that he was sent to live with an aunt on St. Croix, arriving at Frederiksted. Carson (n.d.:1; Zabriskie 1918:47) located Nicholas CrugerÂ’s business on Â“Â…Bay [Strand] Street, fronting the road steadÂ…[where] Alexander HamiltonÂ…had worked as a clerkÂ…Â” 4 Ramsing 1939:248. 5 Ramsing 1939:226; Larson 1952 :141; Flexner 1978:8-9. 6 Ramsing 1939:227; Flexner ( loc cit .). 7 Mother and daughterÂ’s visit to St. Croix coincided w ith the baptism of one of the LyttonÂ’s children (Ramsing 1939:230). John Faucett had already died, leaving all hi s property (including slaves) to his daughter Rachel. Given Mary FaucettÂ’s legal separation from her husband in 1741 (Randall 2003:12 ), it is curious that he left her to administer RachelÂ’s inheritance! 8 This plantation, consisting of 150 Danish acres (Hatchett 1859:25), was later named Â“GrangeÂ” (McGuire 1925:85). St. Croix maps by von Jgersberg/ Cronenberg (1750), Beck (1754), Zllner (1760), Kffner (1768), and Oxholm (1778; 1799) are essential in tracing th e development of this and other pl antations in the second half of the 1700s. 9 Christiansted (literally, Â“ChristianÂ’s placeÂ”) was formally es tablished in May, 1734, when King Street was laid out. The town, named in honor of King Christian VI of Denmark and Norway, served as the capital of the Danish West Indies from 1755-1871. Christiansted was the first planned town in the Lesser Antilles, and was originally envisioned to rival Ch ristiania (now Oslo), Norway. Stra ight and parallel main streets and cross-streets of hardpacked earth with cobblestone or brick gutters, intersected at right angles. The building code of 1747 regulated street width, uniform frontages access between lots, orderl y and timely development, and defined the Free Negro quarter. Generally speak ing, government buildings (with the exception of fortifications and batteries) and tow nhouses were built in the neoclassical style, with tropical modifications. Stores occupied somewhat smaller two-story buildings the ground floor serving as a place of business and
23the second floor as the residence. One-story wooden cottages housed blacks and poor whites. Some of the historic churches in ChristianstedÂ—notably the Anglic an and the Dutch ReformedÂ—r eflect the architectural traditions of their countries of orig in. Until the 1880s, most roofs were shingled. Plastered exterior walls were whitewashed, with contrast provided by hurricane doors and shutters painted in a range of solid colors (Pocket Companion 1780:19-20; Svensson 1980:7, 52-53, 58-59, 71; Chapman and Taylor 1986:5; Cissel 2003:2-3). 10 The surname is spelled Â“Lavine,Â” Â“Lavin,Â” Â“Lawien,Â” Â“Lawin,Â” Â“LeVine,Â” Â“Lewine,Â” Â“Lewin,Â” or Â“LovienÂ” in various registers and documents. Ramsing (1939: 229, 230) and Flexner (1978:12) referenced LavienÂ’s prior career as a merchant in Nevi s. Ramsing (1939:230) gave an age difference of 12 years, while Randall (2003:13) estimated 22 years. In keeping with the cust om of the time, the wedding would likely have been performed in a private residenceÂ—in this case, the Ly ttonsÂ’. Some sources (e.g ., Randall 2003:8, 13) have stated that Johan Michael Lavien was a German Je w, while others (e.g., Larson 1952:142) disagreed. Ramsing (1939:237), crediting Professor L. L. Hammerich, believed that the surname was originally Slavic east of the Elbe, and noted that there was a small town in western Poland called Lowien They believed, as did Flexner (1978:12), that LavienÂ’s nationality was No rth German. Given the prevalent anti-semitism of the time, some factors suggest that Lavien was not Jewish: (a) He was not identified as a Jew ( Joder ) in annual registers, even though Article I, Chapter XX, Book III of the Code of Christian V (1756:203) clearly stated that Â“no Jew shall be permitted to enter this Kingdom, or reside therein, without special License from the King, under Penalty of a thousand Dollars.Â” (b) Jews listed in the annual St. Croix property, population, and head-tax registers ( Landlister/Matrikler, Mandtalslister and Kopskatlister, respectively) bore Sephardic surnames (e.g., de Cordua, Aboab, Melhado, la Pena, Mendes, Robles and Mothas de Gotero). Although Oldendorp (1777 1:244) characterized St. CroixÂ’s Jews as merchants, there is clea r indication that a number of them were engaged as money lenders and real estate speculators (Ram sing 1939:235). (c) Marriage between individuals of different religions (as distinct from denominations) was rare and would likely have generated some passing comment. 11 According to Ramsing (1939:229, 235), Lavien owned No. 21 QueenÂ’s Quarter (1744); No. 12 CompanyÂ’s Quarter (1745-1748); and No. 19 CompanyÂ’s Quarter (1748-1753). Lavien is not found at No. 21 QueenÂ’s Quarter in the 1744 property register ( Landlist ), likely due to a very brief ow nership (financial default?) that occurred before the enumeration. Between 1745-1748, his possession of half of No. 12 CompanyÂ’s Quarter is confirmed in the property registers ( pp. 54, 46) and the population registers ( Mandtalslister, p. 18). Ramsing (1939:229) asserts that in the latter year Â—1748--Lavien sold No. 12 to Merrich Turnbull (not reflected in the property register until 1749 [p. 48] and in the population register until 1750 [p. 15]) and purchased half of No. 19 CompanyÂ’s Quarter from Anna PoulÂ’s heirs (first noted in the population register in 1750 [p. 17] and in the property register in 1751 [p. 39]). The cause of these discrepancies (e.g., the result of very tardy completion of annual registers) has not been determined. From 1750 until 1753, there is again general agreement about LavienÂ’s title to No. 19. In the latter year, the property register (p. 44) notes a change of ownership, to read Â“n ow Aron Mothas de Gottero.Â” Fle xnerÂ’s (1978:13) and RandallÂ’s (2003:13) assertion that No. 12 CompanyÂ’s Quarter was ironically called Â“ContentmentÂ” in 1745 is incorrect because that name was associated with a plantation tract never owned by Lavien! 12 Ramsing (1939:230); Flexner (1978:13). 13 Randall (2003:14). 14 Assumptions of LavienÂ’s unstable or diminishing fi nances have been based on his relatively short-term ownership of plantations (see Fns. 11 and 21). This is not corroborated by the relatively constant number of slaves owned by him between 1747-1760, e.g., 10 capable adult slaves, 4 invalid slav es, and 6 children in the 1758 Kopskatlist for KingÂ’s Quarter (Tyson 2004). It was not an uncommon practice in the 18th century to sell a plantation after 5-7 years ownership, because it was believed that longer ownership diminished profitability. Furthermore, relevant to LavienÂ’s death, the Royal Danish American Gazette (1771:March 6) ran the following notice: Â“On Thursday next [i.e., March 14], at 10 oÂ’clock forenoon, will be sold at Publick Vendue, at Mr. RoederÂ’s tavern in Fredericksted [ sic .], 3 houses, some lots of land, and other effects, belonging to the estate of John Michael Lovien deceased.Â” 15 Ramsing (1939:232), Larson (1952:143), and McDonald (1982:6). 16 Ramsing (1939:230, 234). The location of RachelÂ’s ce ll--not the dungeon, as implied by Flexner (1978:13)-was one of adjoining two rooms in the west curtain, identified by Oxholm (1779b; see also Olsen 1960:178), as Arrest Kamer for blanke Mand og Fruentimer (Â“cell for white man and womanÂ”). Both rooms had a brick floor, and were separated by a wooden partition with a connecting door. The partition was replaced by a
24solid masonry wall between 1784-1816 (Olsen 1960:69-70, 73). Originally, each cell had two smaller, barred windows facing west, with an unimpeded view of the wharf area and the eastern end of King Street. The outer defensive wall between the southwest and northw est bastions was not built until 1835 (Olsen 1960:95). A door from the courtyard led into th e menÂ’s cell. The position of th is door corresponds with Oxholm (o p c it .) The window in the womenÂ’s cell that faced th e courtyard was converted into a door between 1784-1816 (Olsen 1960:71). 17 Ramsing (1939:232); Flexner (1978:14). 18 Ramsing (1939:234); Flexner (1978:14). In 1750, Majo r de Nully owned No. 35 QueenÂ’s Quarter (later known as Â“PeterÂ’s RestÂ”) as well as a house on King Street, Christiansted. In the 1750 Matrikler only slaves were listed as living on that plantatio n, but whites were in residence in town (Tyson 2004). The de NullysÂ— French Huguenots--fled to Holland shortly before the re vocation of the Edict of Nantes, and from there to the Dutch West Indian island of St. Eustatius before coming to St. Croix (Ramsing 1939: 268). Lewisohn (1970:149), without attribution, stated that the family migrated fr om France to Martinique, which is not logical if their emigration had been unde rtaken for religious considerations. 19 Calmeyer (1973:128-129; 132, 134-135). 20 Baron von Prck was born in Bayreuth (the seat of the Margraves of Brandenburg-Kulmbach) in Franconia, Germany, in 1716. Appointed by King Frederik V of Denmark as the first governor-general of the Â“Danish Islands in America,Â” von Prck served in that capacity from 1755-1766 (Bricka 1887 13:302-3; Larsen 1940:34, 99). 21 LavienÂ’s half of No. 19 CompanyÂ’s Quarter was sold in that year to the Â“Jew ish money lendersÂ” Jacob de Cordua and Emanuel Aboab (Ramsing 1939:235). Genealogi cal information about the Heyliger brothers, of the prominent Dutch colonial family from St. Eusta tius, is found in Calmeyer (1973:128-129 and 132-135). Baron von PrckÂ’s ownership of his pl antation in KingÂ’s Quarter is referenced in Ramsing (1939:235) and McGuire (1925:112). LavienÂ’s presen ce in KingÂ’s and QueenÂ’s Quarters between 1753-1760 is found in the Landlister and the combined Matrikler and Kopskatlister 22 Ramsing (1939:235-237). 23 Ramsing (1939:232). James Hamilton was the fourth son of the Laird of Grange. 24 Laird is the title for minor Scottish nobility--in this case, the Hamiltons of Cambuskeith. Their estate, Â“Grange,Â” was in Stevenston Parish, Ayrshire. For an overview of James HamiltonÂ’s ancestry, see Ramsing (1939:231-232) and Flexner (1978:16-18), with the most detailed summary by far written by Chernow (2004:12-15). 25 Flexner (1978:17). 26 According to Flexner (1978:23), a 1758 baptismal record on St. Eust atius (the denomination was not specified, but probably either Anglican or Dutch Reformed) referenced Â“James Hamilton and Rachel Hamilton, his wife.Â” If this implied a formal wedded state, the existence of the instrument of marriage is not known. Such a relationship would have been invalid at any rate, because Rachel was legally married to Lavien until 1759, and forbidden to remarry under th e subsequent Danish divorce decree (see Fn. 33). 27 James was named after his father. Ot her than his age mentioned in his moth erÂ’s probate file, there is no other known contemporary source from which a year of birth can be calculated. 28 Alexander was named after his pate rnal grandfather. Ramsing (1939:232) and Bobb (1955:7) accepted 1755 as the birth year for Alexander Hamilton based on information in the St. Croix Dealing (i.e., probate) Court records for his motherÂ’s estate. Flexner (1978: 18, 31-32), McDonald (1982:366-367), and Brookhiser (1999:16) support 1757 for various reasons, not the least being that it was given once by Hamilton himself. Brookhiser dismisses the earlier date because Â“Â…the clerk was not perfe ct, for he misspelled the name Lavien.Â” Variant spellings were fa irly common (see Fn. 132). Perusal of the annual registers for St. Croix, 1745-1768, show that government clerks often resorted to Germanic conventions in pronunciation when attempting to spell unfamiliar English and French su rnames. Furthermore, English given names were sometimes translated into German. German was the language of the Danish Court until the scandal involving the Queen and Court Physician Joha nn Friedrich Struensee in 1772.
2529 The website of the Nevis Historical and Conservation Society ( http://www.nevis-nhcs.or g/nevishistory.html ) states that Â“Â…a Caribbean Georgian buildingÂ…was bu ilt on the foundation of the structure where Alexander Hamilton was bornÂ…Â” Anot her Nevisian website ( http://www.nevis1.com/mus eum_of_nevis-history.html ) claims that the original building Â“Â…was destroyed by an earthquake in 1840.Â” Bobb (1955:7) and Lewisohn (1970:150) have declared, without attribution, that James and Alexander Hamilton were not eligible for church school on Nevis because they were illegitima te. Flexner (1978:24) cites John Church HamiltonÂ’s biography of his father, which stated, Â“Rarely as he dwelt upon his personal history, he mentioned having been taught to repeat the decalogue [Ten Commandments ] in Hebrew at the school of a Jewess, when so small that he was placed sta nding by her side on a table.Â” 30 Ramsing (1939:232-233). 31 In 1759, the witnesses identified by Lavien were Ja mes Hendricks of King Stre et, Christiansted; Jemima (spelled Â“JeahomieÂ”) Gorley of Market Street, Ch ristiansted; and James William (germanicized as Â“WilhelmÂ”) Ash. Ramsing (1939:234) characterized th em as Â“people of little means who owned few or no slaves at all.Â” Tyson (2004) states that Ash did no t own No. 32 KingÂ’s Quarter as claimed by Ramsing, but rather Nos. 45b and 46a (half-plantations of 75 acres each) in the same Quarter. 32 Fort Christiansvrn (her place of imprisonment) and a property of Stadthauptmand de Nully (Ramsing 1939:234). See Fn. 18 for a discussion on the possibility of each location. 33 For the details of the divorce decree, issued June 25, 1759, see Ramsing (1939:234-235) and Larson (1952:141-142). 34 Ramsing (1939:235-236). In the combined Matrikler and Kopskatlister LavienÂ’s entries in KingÂ’s Quarter are 1758 (p. 21), 1759 (p.27), 1760 (p. 23), and 1761 (p. 12). 35 Alexander Moir, of the mercantile firm of Alexande r Moir and Alexander Gordon, Christiansted, had filed official notice of his intention to leave for Europe, triggering the collection effort (Ramsing 1939:237). 36 The 1765 Matrikler ; see Ramsing (1939:238) and Flexner (1978:25). Randall (2003:19) advanced the theory that James and Rachel Hamilton may only have become aware of the divorce and its terms when they arrived at Christiansted: Â“LevineÂ’s [divorce] decree not only made [Rachel] a bigamist and an adulterer but also deprived her younger sons of all i nheritance rights and formally declar ed them bastards.Â” Ramsing (1939: 238), for his part, stated tactfully that James Hamilton probably found Â“Â…his marital situation to be as unstable as his financial situation.Â” 37 A correspondent to the Royal Danish American Gazette (January 26, 1771) reported a recent Â“CoromantieÂ” [ sic .] slave insurrection on Tobago. It read in part, Â“They attacked Mr. HamiltonÂ’s house the night I left [for Grenada]; wounded three white men desperately, two of whom are since dead; Mr. Hamilton was shot through the thigh, but is recovering.Â” Ramsing (1939: 238) speculated that Â“Mr. HamiltonÂ” was Alexander HamiltonÂ’s father because of the islandÂ’s proximity to St. Vincent, where James Hamilton was ultimately traced (see Fn. 38). Ramsing, however, erroneously placed the revolt on Grenada. 38 Chernow (2004:40) is the first work to document James Hamilton in Bequia, in the Grenadines. 39 Hamilton wrote to his son, Alexande r, from St. Vincent on June 12, 1793. He probably remained on that island for the remainder of his life, and was burie d there on June 3, 1799 (Ramsing 1939:238). In her endnotes, Atherton (1928:534) included a tr anscription from the Register of Bu rials, St. GeorgeÂ’s Cathedral, Kingston, St. Vincent, for 1790: Â“June 3d. James Hamilton Â– Father of General Hamilton in America killed by Col. BairdÂ” [ sic .: Burr]. Lewisohn (1970:147) misread the entry, assuming that the victim was James Hamilton (senior). 40 Ramsing (1939:238). Evidence to support a renewed local assertion that Ra chel FaucettÂ—and as a consequence Alexander Hamilton--were black or of mixed race has not been forthcoming. The distinctive phrase used by the claimant with regard to skin color was shortly thereafter repeat ed exactly by Davis (2004) in a local newspaper account. Valdem ar A. Hill, Sr. (1971:25 -26), author of several books on Virgin Islands history with distinctly afrocentric perspectives, unequivocally stated that Hamilton was Â“white.Â” 41 Ramsing (1939:244). The Beekman-Cruger partnership is noted in the 1766-1769 head tax lists (Ramsing 1939:265). In the latter year, Cruger had a new busi ness partner, Cornelius Kortright. Nicholas Cruger finally closed his business on St. Croix in 1785 and moved to New York (Ramsing 1939:269).
2642 This property was rented from Thomas Dipnall for 12 Rigsdaler a month from August 1, 1765 until an undetermined date in 1767, and again from early January 1768 until her death. The entry number does not reflect the lot number, but the order in which the pr operty was enumerated. Lot numbers were not assigned until well after RachelÂ’s death, and the number and size of lots within a block varied in a twenty year period-compare town plans by Zllner (1760) and Oxholm ( 1779b). Short of a very tim e-consuming analysisby tracing the ownership of lots in descending order, we are dependent on Ramsing (1939:238) for the current lot number. DipnallÂ’s property was described as being Â“Â…on the north side of the street, close to the English [i.e., Anglican] chur ch and school houseÂ” (Ramsing 1939:244), which coincides with the deed to St. JohnÂ’s Church by M. de Francis [the name would infer a Free Colored person] on May 4, 1847 (Deeds, VI:158). With the exception of Â“Samuel HartfordÂ’s widowÂ” in the 1766 Matrikler Rachel and her two sons were the only whites in residence at this locati on. In the 1766 Matrikler, the principal physical feature of this property was a Huus which meant either a building or a residence. Tropical storms on July 14, September 19-20, or October 7, 1766, may have resulted in sufficient da mage to warrant a temporary relocation to No. 23 Company Street in 1767. At the time of RachelÂ’s d eath, this property containe d a Â“lumber roomÂ” and two Â“warehouses in the yardÂ” (Ramsing 1939: 245). Those struct ures may well have been impacted by any of the 17 hurricanes and 9 tropical storms that affected St. Croix between 1772-1928 (Cissel 1996), or ultimately removed due to an advanced stage of deterioration if they were of entirely wooden construction. Compare the footprint of structures for this location in Oxhol m (1779b) with Svensson (1980:61, 63, 65, 67, 69). This lot does not appear in the list of properties affected by the Sunday Market fire of February 5, 1866, which burnt the Anglican church, its sc hoolhouse, and 38 other houses (Avis 1866:February 6, 9; April 3, 13; Svensson 1980:57), but this author is not entirely convinced. The lot is completely devoid of any structures today. 43 This property was rented from Captain William Eg an (also spelled Â“EgganÂ”) from early 1767 until early January, 1768 (Ramsing 1939:244-245). The 1767 Matrikler does not indicate the presence of any whites other than Rachel and her two boys living on this property as well. See Fn. 42 for a discussion on lot number, size, and lack of survival of historic structures An Â“outbuildingÂ” on this lot was included in the list of properties burned or otherwise destroyed by the 1866 Sunday Market fire (see Fn. 42). Title to No. 23 Company Street was last transferred from Joseph E. Bough to the Missionary Society of the Most Holy Redeemer (Roman Catholic Church) (Deeds, VI:143). 44 Smith (1840:44-45); West (1793:77-78). West enumerat ed the following items for sale at the Sunday Market: Â“Â…hens, guinea fowl, ducks, pigeons, chickens eggs, pigs, goats, yams, batatas, pumpkin, cassava bread, beans of various sorts, cucmber, melons, oranges, mamee, papayas, bell apples, cashew, limes, guava, sugar apples, soursop, guavaberry, okra, bananas, bacu ba, tannia, turnips, carrots parseley, cabbage and all the above sort of fru it and vegetables.Â” 45 Ramsing (1939:265), Larson (1952:147), and Randall ( 2003:25). de Booy (1918:218-219) noted that Â“Â…the house where [Alexander Hamilton] resided [ sic .] is still pointed out to visitors.Â” Bough (1932:1) observed that Cruger became owner of this property in 1781, whic h may explain the origin of this persistent myth. This building was destroyed by fire in 1967; as a result of reconstruction, only the faade facing King Street remains from the 18th century. The fire consumed a collectio n of Hamilton memorabilia belonging to the propertyÂ’s owner (Lewisohn 1970:150-151). 46 Ramsing (1939:265) and Larson (1952:147). Ramsing ( loc cit .) stated, Â“At the new Matricul for Christiansted in 1777, it appears that Cruger was the sole owner of the two lo ts Nos. 7, 8, in King Street at which he started the firm with Davi d Beckman, but had enlarged the business by the purchase of Nos. 23 and 26 in King Cross Street.Â” 47 CrugerÂ’s establishment was laid out like a capital Â“L,Â” with the storefront facing King Street and the warehouses extending along King Cross Street (Oxholm 1779b). 48 Lewisohn (1970:147). 49 Ramsing (1939:243). 50 Lewisohn (1970:150) probably copied from Bobb (1955:8) without acknowledgement. No records for St. JohnÂ’s Church address RachelÂ’s Â“readmissionÂ” or the boys Â’ schooling. Only scattere d references to a Â“Poor schoolÂ” are found in the parishÂ’s Vestry Minutes (1797:May 22; 1799:Ma rch 24, September 27; 1801:April 14), 24 years and more after HamiltonÂ’s departure. This Â“Poor schoolÂ” should no t be confused with the parishÂ’s Sunday School building erected in 1848, nor the We st Indian Institute established in 1788 as the first government-sponsored high school (West 1789:49). Only the reference to the 34 books in RachelÂ’s estate
27provides circumstantial evidence for Alexander HamiltonÂ’s education on St. Croix (see Fn. 87). It is likely that the Hamilton boys would have picked up a few words and phrases in Dutch Creole, the linguistic form unique to the Danish West Indies that facilitated communication between Europeans and the more than 60 distinct West African tribes an d linguistic groups identified by Oldendorp (1777 1:424-436) between 17671769, of which fifteen were statistically significant. However, the demographics of the white population had shifted in favor of a numerical majority of British (Engl ish, Irish, and Scots), so that English (or the local dialect thereof, later called Cruc ian) became the common language. Ha ns Tjellesen, Danish Lutheran missionary at Christiansted (1788-1795), complained that the growing numbers of Â“EnglishÂ” were Â“crowding outÂ” Dutch Creole Â“since they would under no circum stances hear any other language than their ownÂ” (Larsen 1950:157). 51 Since 1729, many hurricanes and tropical storms have a ffected Nevis. The French occupied the island in 1783, during the Revolutionary War; prior to departing, they burned many civil and ecclesiastical records. 52 Flexner (1978:23); Brookhiser (1999:15); Randall (2003:17) During his student days in New Jersey and New York City, Hamilton was descri bed by a close friend as Â“attentiv e to public worship,Â” (Brookhiser 1999:112-117). However, he attended church very infrequ ently during and after the Revolutionary War. As an adult, Hamilton philosophically c onsidered Christianity to be indispensable for social morality and political stability. Like countless others before and si nce, Hamilton rediscovered his spiritual dimension at a time of profound personal crisisÂ—the death of his el dest son, Phillip, in 1801. Hamilton thereafter made it a practice to read Matins (Morning Prayer) and Vespers (Evening Prayer) according to the rites of the Episcopal Church at hom e daily with his family (Randall 2003:4). Th e following anecdote, if correctly cited, only serves to complicate the question of Alexander HamiltonÂ’s denominational affiliation in the West Indies. Mortally wounded in the famous duel with Aaron Burr in 1804, Hamilton requested the presence of the Right Reverend Benjamin Moore, Episcopal Bishop of New York, for Holy Communion and the last rites of that Church. Randall (2003:3-5) states that Bishop Moore initially Â“Â…re fused Hamilton Holy Communion after he learned that HamiltonÂ…had never been baptized an Episcopalian Â…..Â” [emphasis added]. Chernow (2004:707), however, attributes MooreÂ’s reluctance to his aversion to dueling and the fact that Hamilton was not a regular churchgoer. In the event that the duel went badly for him, Hamilton had written a touching farewell letter to his wife couched in religious terms: Â“I shall cherish,Â” he said Â“the sweet hope of meeting you in a better worldÂ” (Freeman 2001:1019). Alexander Hamilton finally did receive Communion and the last rites of the Church, and, according to Bishop Moore, died peacefully. 53 When Denmark purchased St. Croix from France in 1733, the French insisted on certain stipulations. One was that only Danes could settle on th e island. This was intended to exclude traditional rivals like the English and the Dutch. The Danes, however, were una ble to encourage sufficient numbers of their fellow countrymen to migrate to St. Croix and establish plan tations. The governing Danish West India & Guinea Company turned a blind eye to increasing numbers of Dutch and English settlers from nearby islands. During Company rule, denominations were limited to the Lutheran (t he Danish state church), Dutch Reformed, andÂ—eventuallyÂ—Moravian. After St. T homas, St. John, and St. Cr oix became Danish Crown colonies in 1754, many administrativ e, economic, and social changes occu rred. Toleration was extended to include Anglicans, Presbyterians, and Roman Catholics. Allowing the non-Danish white majority to worship according to their own national customs was a small concession by the Danish Crown in exchange for relative contentment. The small Sephardic Jewish presen ce was not included, but they traditionally observed the Sabbath in their homes (Cissel 2002:1, 3). 54 The white population consisted of Dane s, Dutch, Germans, English, Irish Scots, and French Huguenots in varying ratios (Oldendorp 1777 1:232-233). The black popula tion was made up of West African tribal and linguistic groups ranging from the Senegambia region to Angola, not including the present-day Ivory Coast (Oldendorp (1777 1:270-298). 55 Oldendorp (1777 1:48, 267) and West (1793:50). The location and Â“footprintÂ” (building outline) of these churches are shown in Oxholm (1779b). 56 Â“Â…to send food, wine and refreshment to the ailing, to provide for the education and future well-being of godchildren, to give poor widows a certain amount of assistance, to assist im poverished families by subscription, or [by] collections to take care of the departure travel expenses of the needyÂ…Â” (West 1793:4546, 50). 57 Likely excluded from considerati on were Roman Catholics for doctrina l differences, and Lutherans, Dutch Reformed, and Moravians, whose serv ices were conducted in Danish, Dutc h, Low German, or Dutch Creole. Although there is no indication that Alexander Hamilton learned any other foreign language than French,
28Chapman and Taylor (1986:71) have stated, without attr ibution, that he worshipped at the Dutch Reformed church. 58 Flexner (1978:59); McDonald (1982:10-11); Randall ( 2003:36). On Nevis, only the marriage of Â“John Fauseet and Mary UppinghamÂ” (RachelÂ’s parents) wa s recorded at St. GeorgeÂ’s Anglican Church, Gingerland Parish, on April 21, 1718 (Flexner 1978:8-9). This may imply that one or both were Anglicans. To assume that Rachel was a Huguenot simply on the basis of her paternal ancestry (Flexner 1978:8; McDonald 1982:6; Randall 2003:10-11) is hardly incontrove rtible proof. About Nicholas Cruger, see Fn. 67. 59 Property ownership by the Presbyterian church ( den presbyterianske Kirke ) appears for the first time in the 1773 Matrikler Oxholm (1779b) showed the Presbyterian church at the northwestern corner of Prince Street, at the intersection of that street with Water Gut. The building had an Â“LÂ”-shaped plan, quite unlike the rectangular plans of the other 18th century churches on St. Croix. The building was described by Larsen (1950:96-97) as an Â“unpretentious dwelling,Â” but this s hould be read with caution, since statements about other historic churches in Christians ted (e.g., Fn. 65) have proven inaccura te. The size of the congregation is not known, but it had diminished to the point where it was disbanded by early 1818. The Â“Bond of Elliot Moore, dated 9th March last  for ps. 3000 payable by Installments with Interest, and secured by Mortgage on the Lot No. 29 Princess [ sic .] Street, together with Thomas Dalton as security & self Debtor, being proceeds of the sale of the old ChurchÂ…Â” was transferred to the Wardens of St. JohnÂ’s Church, with the stipulation that the proceeds be used for the Â”r elief and benefit of the poor belonging to the ChurchÂ” (Vestry Minutes 1819:June 16). If the church shown by Oxholm ( op cit .) and the referenced No. 29 Prince Street are one and the same, they do not correspond w ith location for that lot number on the Department of Public Works map of Christiansted (1940s), which rais es the possibility that the lot numbering system had been changed at some point. 60 Hugh Knox was born in 1727. Different internet sources give his place of birth as Belfast, Ireland, or Glasgow, Scotland. He migrated to British North America, earned a degree from the College of New Jersey at Princeton, and was ordained a Presbyterian minister He served the Dutch Reformed congregation on the island of Saba from 1755-1771. Ramsing (1939:263-264) ga ve his permanent arrival at Christiansted in 1772, while Bobb (1955:98) and Randall (2003:34) posit 1771 Rev. KnoxÂ’s influence with and on behalf of the young Alexander Hamilton has been ably treated by Mitchell (1951). His first meeting with Hamilton would most likely in the context of CrugerÂ’s business. Knox died on St. Croix on October 9, 1790, at the age of 63 (Ramsing 1939:265). 61 The Church of England established the parish in 1760, although ownership of the lot on King Street in the name of den engelske Kirke (Â“the English ChurchÂ”) appeared in the 1752 Mandatallist. It was the first formal Anglican presence in the Danish West Indies The parish, called Â“St. JohnÂ’s,Â” was funded by the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts (S.P.G.), the missionary arm of the Church of England in the Americas. The S.P.G. strove to provi de an Â“orthodox and learned clergyÂ” to counter Â“the neglect of Christian ordinances, and the relaxation of moralsÂ” (Buchanan 1813:19, 35, 59). St. JohnÂ’s first rector (1760-1785) was the Rev. Cecil Wray Goodchild. The Danish planter Reimert Haagensen said of him, Â“The BritishÂ…have a pastor who holds services on Sundays in town [Chr istiansted] and again on the west end, in order to spare those who live far from town a l ong trip. This greatly satisfi es his congregation, which pays him an annual salary of 1,000 Rdlr. [ Rigsdaler ; see Fn. 103]. In addition, he has income from several other sources and he lives in comfortÂ” (Highfield 1995: 43). GoodchildÂ’s plantation, half of No. 9 in PrinceÂ’s Quarter, is referenced in the 1767 Matrikler His town properties were obvi ously badly damaged in the 1772 hurricane: Â“To be sold, two lots of land, with ruins therein, laying on the Hill above Watergut, and belonging to Cecil Wray Goodchild Minister of the Eng lish ChurchÂ…Â” (Royal Da nish American Gazette 1772: November 11). Rev. Goodchild, his wife and children subsequently lived in the house on King Street belonging to the parish (1773 Matrikler) 62 In the original, hie-engelske-Â“High EnglishÂ” (West 1793:50). 63 Oldendorp (1768). 64 in the original, nedblast i Orkan-Â“blown down in the hurricaneÂ” (1773 Matrikler ). 65 Larsen (1950:82) perhaps assumed the existing bu ilding postdated 1848 from a marble plaque, dated 1850, set high on the exterior of the north transept. This statement was repeated and elaborated on by Chapman and Taylor (1986:75): Â“The present St. John Anglican c hurchÂ…was built in 1849Â… in keeping with the widely influential prescriptions of the Lo ndon based Ecclesiological Society [ N.B .: established 1845].Â” The existing church building was completed by 1780, and was so noted in the Matrikler for that year as Â“the new English
29churchÂ” ( den nye engelske Kirke ). The church was lengthened at the east and west endsÂ—and not rebuiltÂ— beginning in 1849, to accommodate a growing black membership following emancipation (Vestry Minutes 1849:June 7; 1852:January 16). 66 David Beekman (also spelled Beckman) was born in New York on January 17, 1733. From 1766-1768, Beekman resided with his business partner Nicholas Cruger at their business, No. 7-8 King Street, Christiansted. After the dissolution of the partnershi p in 1769, Beekman lived alone in John P. RichardsonÂ’s house at No. 21 Strand Street. On April 2, 1772, he ma rried Sarah Harris, widow of planter George Harris (who had died three year earlier), on St. Croix (Ramsing 1939:265, 266-268). His tombstone, embedded in the center aisle in the nave of St. JohnÂ’s church, reads Â“In memory of / DAVID BEEKMAN / who was born at New York / the 19th of January 1733 / and departed this life / the 13th of July 1793 / SARAH BEEKMAN / Relict of DAVID BEEKMAN / who de parted this life on the / 8th of January 1818 / in her 82d YearÂ…Â” Note that Â“relictÂ” is archaic English for Â“widow.Â” TaylorÂ’s (1996:4) a ssertion that, Â“Alexander HamiltonÂ’s employers and benefactors, Beckman and Cruger of New York, were associated with St. PaulÂ’s [Anglican Church, Frederiksted]Â” is questionable, considering evidence presented of their places of residence in Christiansted and the fact that sa id church was not built until 1812. 67 For an overview of the political, social, and financ ial standing of the Cruger family in New York, see Brookhiser (1999:19), Randall (2003:26), and Chernow (2004: 30). Nicholas Cruger married Anna de Nully (daughter of Stadthauptmand Betram Pieter de Nully) on April 15, 1772 in the Dutch Reformed church, which is perhaps the basis for assuming his denominati onal affiliation. After her death, he married Ann Markoe (of a prominent St. Croix family of Fren ch Huguenot descent, with important Philadelphia connections during the American Re volution) on May 27, 1785. Nicholas Cruger was a member of St. JohnÂ’s Church. Returning to St. Croix from the United St ates for the last time in January, 1800, he amended his will. Cruger died on March 11 of that year (Ramsing 1939:268-269). He was buried the following day. Lewisohn (1970:199) notwithstanding, the entry in St. JohnÂ’s general register (interspersed baptisms, marriages, and burials) reads, Â“1800Â…. March 12th The Body of Nicholas Cruger (lately from America) was Deposited in the Family Vault, belonging to Mr. Hendrickson, in the Town of Fraederickstd [ sic .].Â” 68 Thomas Stevens was born on Antigua ca. 1724. He married Ann Andsley there in December, 1745. The couple had three sons and two daughters, of which Edwa rd [see Fn. 69] was the second oldest. The family moved to Christiansted by 1758, where he made a livin g as a merchant. The earliest reference to their residence on King Street was in the combined 1759 Matrikler and Kopskatlister Thomas Stevens served as a vestryman and warden for St. JohnÂ’s Church. He died May 24, 1778 (Ramsing 1939:259), and was buried the next day. The parish burial register reads, Â“Thomas Stevens in Do. [Â“ditto,Â” referring to Â“the Church yardÂ”] May 25 Aged 54.Â” His wifeÂ’s burial is recorded in the same register: Â“The Body of Ann Stevens /. Aged [left blank] Years, was Interd in the Church Ground on the 28th July 1799. By the Revd William Niles.Â” Note the difference of the date of her death, April 1, 1789, given in Ramsing ( loc cit .), which is obviously an error in transcription. 69 Edward Stevens was the second son of Thomas Steven s (see Fn. 68), born in Antigua in 1754. Stephens studied at KingÂ’s College, New York (1769-1773) and at the University of Edinburgh (1775-1777), and the University of Copenhagen (1782), becoming a noted doctor. He was elected a member of St. JohnÂ’s Vestry (Vestry Minutes 1789:November 10; 1790:April 5; 1793:Apri l 1). StevensÂ’ first wi fe, Eleanor, died March 13, 1792. The following year, the Vestry granted Steven s permission to erect a monument in memory of his deceased wife inside the church Â“in a space betw een the southern door and eastern windowÂ…Â” (Vestry Minutes 1793: September 3; see also Ramsing 1939: 260). This monument no l onger exists, possibly removed during the 1849 expansion (s ee Fn. 65). Edward Stevens ne xt married Hester Amory (born Kortright). Dr. Stevens died on St. Croix, and was buried at Â“Grove PlaceÂ” (Nos. 13, 20, and 21 PrinceÂ’s Quarter) on September 30, 1834 (R amsing 1939:260-262; McQuire 1925:90). 70 The likelihood of yellow fever, a viral disease spread by the Aedes gypti mosquito, is based RachelÂ’s symptoms documented in Ramsing (1939:245, 246) in comparison with Holvey (1972:80-81). Note the similarities for the active phase of the illness: increasing high fever, headache, and distress of the stomach and intestines. Geill (1981:8-19), while providing a good overview of yellow fever in the Danish West Indies, only deals with outbreaks after 1850. Anot her possible diagnosis is malaria, although the comparables are more limited (Holvey 1972:193-195). 71 Ramsing (1939:245) referred to McDonnell as kone (Â“womanÂ” or Â“domestic he lpÂ”), while Randall (2003:6) made her a Â“nurse midwife.Â” She lived at Doctor PenthenyÂ’s House on Queen Street, Christiansted (1768 Matrikler ).
3072 Dr. Heering, his wife, 2 white female serv ants, and slaves lived on Queen Street (1768 Matrikler ). 73 By removing Â“taintedÂ” blood from the pa tient, the disease would be purged. 74 Emetics induced nausea and vomitingÂ—another purgative. 75 Â“Valerian,Â” a plant-based drug, acted as a sedative. 76 Â“DecoctionÂ” was the result of extr acting a water-soluble drug by boiling. 77 Â“ClysterÂ” is an enema. 78 Ramsing (1939:245, 246). 79 Ramsing (1939:244, 246). 80 Ramsing (1939:246). The relevant entry in the St. J ohnÂ’s Burial Register for 1768 reads Â“Rachael Levine Feb. 26 at Mr. TuiteÂ’s Plant. by D.O. age 32.Â” Buri als on plantations (here abbr eviated Â“Plant.Â”) were not uncommon in the 18th century, and were not often preceded by a church ceremony. Ramsing (1939:246) asserted that Rev. Goodchild (Rector, 1760-1785) pe rformed the burial, while the Â“Anglican Deacon [ Degn ] Daniel OrlyÂ” issued notice for the funeral and convened the pallbearers. The surname Â“OrlyÂ” has not been found in a survey of the combined Matrikler and Kopskatlister for Christiansted between 1767-1769. There was a Daniel Oxley who is found in the Matrikler residing on Company Street as early as 1761. His death is recorded in the St. JohnÂ’s Burial Regi ster several months after RachelÂ’s: Â“Daniel Oxley Octr. 14th in do. [i.e., Â“Church YardÂ”] aged 42.Â” Since the parish did not have a deacon, OxleyÂ’s indicate that he was the parish clerk, who was responsible for recording bap tisms, marriages, and burials, as well as assisting at Sunday services and offi ciating at funerals in the priestÂ’s absenc e (see Vestry Minutes 1792:July 3). Â“D.O.Â” appears in scattered burial entries from October, 1761 until October, 1768, which corresponds with OxleyÂ’s death. Lewisohn (1970:154) statemen t that RachelÂ’s death Â“Â…was record ed later in the Anglican church register of Nevis, and the entry indicates she intended to leave some slaves to her two sonsÂ” is very peculiar, and has not been verified. 81 Justification for the conjecture that Â“Rachel hersel f possibly contributed to the information of her younger ageÂ” (Ramsing 1939:248) and that Â“Possibly she had exer cised the feminine prerogative of forgetting a few of her yearsÂ” (Larson 1952:141) was not explained. 82 Atherton found that Rachel was buried at Â“GrangeÂ” when she traveled to St. Croix to do documentary research for her Â“historical nove lÂ” about Hamilton, The Conqueror (1902). Unfortunately, her archival discoveries were largely obscure d by the romantic fiction. 83 1736 instead of 1729. 84 McDonald (1982:6); Brookhiser (1999:17); Chernow (2004:16). 85 Flexner (1978:25-27) strongly asserted that Rachel remained promiscuous, but cited no evidence to support this beyond the wording of the arrest warrant (1750) and divorce petition (1759). 86 Ramsing (1939:244). 87 In addition to the 34 books, RachelÂ’s estate was enumerated as follows: Â“5 female Negro slaves, one of which has a child called Rachael, and 3 Negro boys [one boy named Ajax was to have been given to Alexander, and one named Christian given to James].Â” In a room, Â“6 silver spoons, 7 silver teaspoons, 1 sugar tongs, 4 dresses, 1 red skirt, 1 wh ite skirt, 1 black silk sun hat. 1 ch est of drawers, 1 chest, 1 bed with 1 feather comforter, 1 long pillowÂ…Â” In the lumber room Â“Â…6 leather chairs, 3 different tables, 14 porcelain plates, 11 cups and saucers, 3 ston e platters, 1 porcelain basin, 2 irons 1 iron pot, 2 metal candleholders, 1 mirror in a brown frameÂ” (Ramsing 1939:245-246) 88 Ramsing (1939:247); Larson (1952:146). 89 The St. Croix records are largely silent about Peter Lavien. The 1765 Matrikler infers his emigration to South Carolina, at the age of 16, by his absence in th e tally of his fatherÂ’s residence in Frederiksted; the probate of his motherÂ’s estate; and his reappear ance on St. Croix in late November, 1769, for the
31disbursement of his inher itance. A most curious entry appears in the St. JohnÂ’s Church register (mixed baptisms, marriages, and burials), recording the baptism of Â“Peter, Son of Jno. Michael & Rachel LeVine Novr: 30th, born 1746.Â” It was not customary to list sponsors (or godparents) for baptisms at this time. Given his fatherÂ’s feelings about Rachel, her reference as a (deceased) parent had to be at PeterÂ’s request to reinforce the legitimacy of his claim against her estate If the entry reflected a second baptism for whatever reason, it contravened the theology and doctrine of the Church of EnglandÂ—see the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion, XXV (Â“Of the SacramentsÂ”) and XXVII (Â“BaptismÂ”). Holding the office of church warden in St. HelenaÂ’s parish, South Carolina Peter Lavien was presupposed to have already been baptized. 90 Ramsing (1939:246). 91 Ann Lytton died during a trip to Nevis between the end of 1765 and before January, 1767, when her husband, James Lytton (senior), returned to St. Croix (R amsing 1939:239, 244, 253-254; Larson 1952:144). His burial is recorded in the St. JohnÂ’s Church regi ster in 1769: Â“Jam es Lytton Aug. 12th at Mr. TuiteÂ’s Grange Planta. aged 67.Â” 92 He was found in his bedroom, dead by su icide, on July 16, 1769 (Ramsing 1939: 244). 93 Mc Nobeny, who also owned rental hous es elsewhere in town, is recorded at this location with his wife in the 1767 Mandtalslist and the 1769 Matrikler ; see also Ramsing (1939:248) an d Larson (1952:147). They are the only whites living on the property. In the 1770 Matrikler and thereafter, he is alone; his wife had likely died. 94 Ramsing (1939:249); Larson (1952:147). 95 Freeman (2001:140-141). 96 According to Ramsing (1939:249-250), James Hamilton did not appear in any of the annual Kopskatlister The Matrikler for 1786 and 1787 lists a Â“Madame Anna Hamilton,Â” living in the house of Madame Ashbourne in Frederiksted. Ramsing presumed that Anna Hamilton was James HamiltonÂ’s widow, since he could find no other person surnamed Hamilton in the St. Croix records for those years. Her date of death was given as December 19, 1787. 97 Westergrd (1917:249). 98 Oldendorp 1777 (1:245, 246-249). 99 For the procurement of slaves in We st Africa, see Oldendorp (1777 1:347-356). 100 DenmarkÂ’s participation in the Afri can slave trade (unt il 1803) was carried out through a succession of royally chartered companies and private enterprises. Two excellent introductory essays on the Danish slave trade, by Arnold R. Highfield and Svend E. Holsoe, are found in Tyson (1994:1146). For a description of the Middle Passage, see Oldendorp (1777 1:357-368). 101 For points of origin and distribution of slaves in Christiansted and Frederiksted, see Cissel (2002a:2). 102 Slave auctions took place either in the compound of the Danish West India & Guinea Company at the wharf, or in the yards of private importers. Although most slaves were purchased by planters and urban professionals, some were bought by Free Blacks to be re nted out to generate income (Cissel 2002a:2)! Vivid accounts of slave auctions at Chri stiansted are related by Oldendorp (1777 1:368-372) and Isert (1788:290291). 103 Currencies commonly circulating at St. Croix in th e late 1760s included Spanis h pieces of eight and p atagons (Spanish Thalers), worth eight and twelve r eales respectively; Portuguese Johannes (Â“JoesÂ”); Saxon t haler ; Danish ducats (worth 20 reales), Rigsdaler, and skilling; Dutch stiver ; British pounds sterling; and French pistols (Oldendorp 1777 1:245-6). For images of Danish West Indian coinage of the period, see Higgie (1962:6-7, 11-20). The Royal Danish American Gazette (1770:August 15) announced the local publication of a Â“Table of MoneyÂ” ra nging from Â“one Ryal [ real ] to one Thousand Pieces of Eight,Â” but a surviving example has not yet been found.
32 104 Randall (2003:30, 33-34) 105 Brookhiser (1999:19); Randall (2003:29-34). For exampl es of customs regulations and duties (taxes) at Christiansted in HamiltonÂ’s time, see Oldendorp (1777 1:249-251) and Pocket Companion (1780:32-33). 106 Flexner (1978:37); Brookhiser (1999:20) 107 See Fn. 93. 108 Bobb (1955:96) and Randall (2003:25) have asserted that his room was at Nos. 7-8 King Street. During the years that Hamilton worked for Cruger, his employer lived at that address. His part ner, Beekman, also lived there until the partnership was dissol ved, after which he rented a house on Strand Street (see Fn. 65). In searching the Matrikler one should be cautious about drawing in ferences from the presence of a white boy and a white male servant in the registers for 1766 a nd 1767Â—before RachelÂ’s death. The white boy is not listed in 1768 or thereafter. Two white men are consiste ntly listed between 1768-1773, but it is very difficult to explain how the enumerator would have initially cl assified the 13 year-old Hamilton as a man when one compares the treatment of Peter Lavien in KingÂ’s Quarter and Frederiksted prior to his migration to South Carolina (see Ramsing 1939:235-236). Ramsing (1939: 249), Larson (1952:147), and Randall (2003:23) have given credence to Hamilton residing with the Thomas Stevens family, whose home was on King Street--not Strand Street. The Stevens had 3 sons and 2 daughters. The 1769 Landlist for their residence tallied that number of boys in the family. The enumeration, taken early in the year before the second son (Edward) went to New York to study at KingÂ’s College (see Fn. 69), also noted the presence of 2 Â“white male servantsÂ” [Danish : karl ]Â—possibly both Hamilton brothers, taken in afte r the death of Peter Lytton! The 1772 register shows 3 white boys in the family but no white servants, so Alexander Hamilton may have been Â“upgradedÂ” in relationship. His brother James was living elsewhere. 109 Larson (1952:147). 110 Ramsing (1939:260); Bobb (1955:97); Freeman (2001:3). Of the Â“seventy letters [that] survive from HamiltonÂ’s St. Croix yearsÂ” (Randall 2003:24), this appe ars to be the only personal correspondence. In the early 1770s, Christiansted had 3,579 inhabitants, of which 971 (or 27%) were white (Ramsing 1939:252). This increased to 3,730 inhabitants, of which 1,060 (or 40%) were white ten years later (Pocket Companion 1780: ad pag 13). While Ramsing ( loc cit .) postulated that, Â“Â…this was not the place for a young man with ambitions,Â” one would think that le gitimacy, social class, and inherited wealth-not minority status--would have affected a white personÂ’s chance for advancement. 111 Royal Danish American Gazette (1772: September 9). 112 GentlemanÂ’s Magazine (1772:590). 113 Royal Danish American Gazette ( loc cit .). 114 The letter, dated September 6, 1772, was published in the Royal Danish American Gazette (1772:October 7). The full text is found in Syrett (1961 1:34-38) and Freeman (2001:6-9). 115 The story of the Â“two generous aunts,Â” noted in Lars on (1952:148), is apocryphal. RachelÂ’s half-sister, Ann Lytton, had already died in 1765 [see Fn. 90]. Her da ughter, Ann Lytton Venton (later Mitchell)--Alexander HamiltonÂ’s cousin--was in no position to contribute to HamiltonÂ’s education, sinc e she and her husband had fled to New York in 1763 following his bankruptcy (Ramsing 1939:239, 244, 253-254; Larson 1952:144). de Booy (1918:204) wrote, Â“[HamiltonÂ’s] letter attracted so much attention from admiring friends and relatives that it was decided to give him the chance he longed for to go to the United States [ sic .] to secure a college education.Â” Ramsing (1939:270) was c onfident that the funds were provide d by Nicholas Cruger. Randall (2003:40) stated that Rev. Knox arranged pledges to taling 400 pounds from Â“wealth y merchants[,]Â…Nicholas Cruger[,]Â…Cornelius Kortright[,]Â…Thomas Stev ens, the probate judge, and the son of Stadthauptmand de Nully.Â” Chernow (2004:37-38) supports some form of popular subscription; however, a survey of the Royal Danish American Gazette between September, 1772 and July, 1773, did not show any notice for a public subscription. 116 Randall (2003:40).
33117 This timeframe is based on a receipt signed by Ha milton on St. Croix on behalf of his cousin, Ann Lytton Venton, for whom he served as agent (Ramsing 1939: 252; Flexner 1978: 453-454). Compare this with the rationale for a 1772 departure by Brookhiser (1999:20) and Randall (2003:41). 118 Chernow (2004:5). 119 Chernow (2004:3-4). 120 Brookhiser (1999:10). 121 As clerk for Nicholas Cruger, Hamilton would have w itnessed and recorded the sales for the slave auction which notice appeared in the Royal Danish American Gazette January 26, 1771. 122 An assessment of Free Negroes and slave craftsme n, house servants, and field workers in 1767-1769 are provided by Oldendorp (1777 1:401-403, 380-381, 379380, and 381-383) and West (1793:57-59, 59-61, and 61-72). 123 Tyson and Highfield (1994b:16-17) have conveyed the range of punishments for blacks prevalent in the Danish West Indies up to 1747. Oldendorp (1777 1: 386-393) records conditions dur ing his residency on St. Croix, 1767-1769. 124 HamiltonÂ’s opposition to slavery and his role in the New York anti-slavery movement are summarized by Brookhiser (1999:175-178), Randall (2003:162-163, 291-294), and Chernow (2004:210-211). Hamilton alleged ownership of slaves (see Chernow 2004:210211, 581) has been refuted by McDonald (1982:373, note 12) and Brookhiser 1999:176). 125 Flexner (1978:258-259); Brookhiser (1999:41-42, 176); Randall (2003:163-165); Freeman (2001:56-58). 126 Oldendorp (1777 1:267); Hst (1791:160, 165). 127 Oldendorp (loc cit.); Hst (1791:165, 166). 128 Oldendorp (loc cit.); Hst (1791:165). 129 Oldendorp (loc cit.); Pocket Calendar (1780:18); Hst (1791:162). 130 Oldendorp (1777 1:396); Hst (1791:167). 131 During WashingtonÂ’s presidency, HamiltonÂ’s influe nce was not limited to fi nance and economics, but extended to foreign policy, to the great annoyance of Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton even drafted WashingtonÂ’s farewell address, which was se rialized in the Royal Danish American Gazette 132 Chernow (2004:5). 133 James Monroe failed to honor his pledge of confidentia lity about the details of HamiltonÂ’s extra-marital affair with Maria Reynolds and his subseque nt blackmail, conveying the information instead to Thomas Jefferson. Newspaper editor James Callen der was induced to publicize the scandal in a series of pamphlets (Brookhiser 1999:97-100, 132-5; McCollough 2001:492-493). Callender even tually defected to the Federalists after his request for a political appointment wa s refused. He then exposed Jeffe rsonÂ’s rumored relationship with one of his slaves, Sally Hemings, whom the Federalist press referred to as the Â“African VenusÂ” and Â“Montecellian SallyÂ” (McCullough 2001:577-81). 134 These accusations stemmed from HamiltonÂ’s semi-arist ocratic demeanor; pro-British sympathies; misgivings that the Constitution gave carte blanche for government by the Â“mob,Â” which he inherently distrusted; his personal preference for a select nationa l government headed by a President for Life; and his abhorrence of the excesses against persons and religion during the Fren ch Revolution, especially the Reign of Terror. 135 Knott (2002:19). 136 Jeffersonian congressmen tried repeatedly but unsuccessf ully to charge Hamilton with financial improprieties in his capacity as Secretary of the Treasury (Brookhiser 1999:111-112); see also Knott (2002:19) and McCullough (2001:538).
34 137 Brookhiser (1999:3); Knott (2002:19). 138 Brookhiser (1999:1-2) may have misunderstood the cultural implications of this phra se. In that context, Â“little manÂ” did not refer to stature or physique (Hamilton was a slender 5Â’7Â”, compared to the shorter and portly Adams), but rather to very humble origins or low social status. 139 Brookhiser (1999:109). 140 The most comprehensive treatment of this subject is by Knott (2002). 141 Talleyrand (1754-1838) is regarded as one of the most influential individuals in Fr ench foreign policy. His life was a Machiavellian odyssey: the priesthood (he was ultimately bishop), early supporter and near-victim of the Reign of Terror, plotter of political assassi nations, inveterate accumula tor of wealth, notorious womanizer, and ultimately traitor to his heads of state! 142 Charles James Fox (1749-1806), British politician havi ng held occasional ministerial appointments. Talleyrand presumably wished to recognize Fox for his initial enthusiasm for the French Revolution, his antiwar stance, and his persistent calls for a negotiated peace during the Napoleonic Wars. 143 Â“ Je considre Napoleon, Fox, et Hamilt on comme les trois plus grands homes de notre poque, et si je devais me prononcer entre les trois, je donne rais sans hsiter la premire place Hamilto n. Il avait devin lÂ’Europe Â” (Atherton 1928:title page). 144 http://home.att.ne t/~quotesexchange/m ahatmagandhi.html
35Works Cited Anonymous. The Danish Laws: or the Code of Christian the Fifth faithfully translated for the use of the English Inhabitants of the Danish Settlements in America London: Printed for N. Gibson, in Charles-street. 1756. Anonymous. The St. Croixian Pocket Compani on, or a brief sketch of the Chief things necessary to be known by the dwelle rs in, or traders to the Island Coppenhagen. 1780. Atherton, Gertrude. The Conqueror. A Dramatized Biography of Alexander Hamilton New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company, Publishers. 1928. ----------. Â“The Hunt for HamiltonÂ’ s Mother.Â” North American Review 175 (June, 1902):229-242. Bobb, Dorothie. Â“The Boyhood of Alex ander Hamilton.Â” American Heritage June, 1955. Vol. VI, Number 4, pp. 4-9, 96-99. Bricka, C. F. Dansk Biografisk Lexikon Vol. 13. Kjbenhavn: Gyldendalske Boghandels Forlag (F. Hegel & Son). 1887. Brookhiser, Richard. Alexa nder Hamilton: American The Free Press/Simon & Schuster Inc. 1999. Bough, James A. to Lt. Governor Lawrence W. Cramer. Correspondence re: Alexander Hamilton. Christiansted, VI September 1, 1932. Copy in the St. Croix Landmarks Society archives. Buchanan, Rev. Claudius, D.D. Colonial E cclesiastical Establishment: being a Brief View of the State of the Colonies of Great Britain, and of her Asia tic Empire, in respect to Religious Instruction: prefaced by some Considerations on the National Duty of Affording it London: Printed for Cadell and Davies, in the Strand. 1813. Calmeyer, M[ichael] R[ichard] H[ enrik]. Het Geslacht Heyliger Jaarboek Centraal Bureau voor Genealogie. Den Haag. 1973. Chapman, William and William A. Taylor. Hist oric Churches of the Virgin Islands. St. Croix: Antilles Graphics Arts. 1986. Chernow, Ron. Alexander Hamilton New York: The Penguin Press. 2004. Cissel, William F. Â“The Danish Slave Trad e.Â” Christiansted National Historic Site, National Park Service. February, 2002.
36----------. Â“The Danish West India & Guin ea Company Warehouse. Proposed Restoration and Slave Trade Museum.Â” Christiansted Nation al Historic Site, Nati onal Park Service. Revised January, 2000. ----------. Â“History of St. J ohnÂ’s Anglican Church, Christians ted, St. Croix.Â” Draft ms. 1996. ----------. Â“Religious Diversity.Â” Christia nsted National Historic Site, National Park Service. February, 2002. ----------. Â“Rise from Obsc urity. The West Indian B oyhood of Alexander Hamilton.Â” Christiansted National Hist oric Site, National Park Service. February, 2002. ----------. Â“Some Observations on Colonial Christiansted.Â” A Symposium on Virgin Islands History : University of the Virgin Islands (S t. Croix), Society of Virgin Islands Historians, and Christian Albrecht Un iversity (Kiel). 31 July, 2003. Crossen, Cynthia. Â“JeffersonÂ’s revered but weÂ’ve become HamiltonÂ’s America.Â” Guest Opinion. The Daily News (U.S. Virgin Islands). February 19, 2004, p. 24. Reprint from The Wall Street Journal February 4, 2004. Davis, Olasee. Â“Alexander HamiltonÂ’s link to Nevis-St. Kitts, St Croix.Â” The Daily News (U.S. Virgin Islands). October 23, 2001, p. 20. ----------. Â“Remembering Alexander Hamilton a nd his strong Virgin Islands link.Â” The Daily News (U.S. Virgin Islands). February 5, 2004, p. 19. De Booy, Theodoor and John T. Faris. The Virgin Islands: Our New Possessions and the British Islands. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company. 1918. Flexner, James Thomas. The Young Hamilton: A Biography. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 1978. Freeman, Joanne B. Alexander Hamilton. Writings New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc. 2001. Geill, Torben. Â“Den gule Feber i dansk Vestindien.Â” Dansk Vestindisk Selskab Vol. 16, Nr. 2, pp. 8-19. Maj, 1981. Hatchett, P. B. Statistics regarding La nded Properties on the Island of St. Croix St. Croix: Printed at the Â“AvisÂ” Office. 1859. Highfield, Arnold R. and Vladimir Barac (trans. and eds.) A Caribbean Mission United States of America: Karoma Publishers, Inc. 1987.
37Highfield, Arnold R. (trans. and ed.) Reimer t Haagensen. Description of the Island of St. Croix in America in the West Indies 1758. St. Croix: Virgin Islands Humanities Council, 1995. Higgie, Lincoln W. The Colonial Coinage of the U.S. Virgin Islands Racine, Wisconsin:Whitman Publishing Company. 1962. Hill, Valdemar A., Sr. Rise to Recogniti on (An Account of Virgin Islanders from Slavery to Self-Government) Published in the United States of America. 1971. Holvey, David N., M.D. (ed.) The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy 12th Edition. Rahway, New Jersey: Merck Shar p & Dohme Research Laboratories. 1972. Hopkins, Daniel. Â“The Danish Cadastral Survey of St. Croix, 1733-1754.Â” Doctoral dissertation. Louisiana Stat e University and Agricultura l and Mechanical College. August, 1987. Hst, Georg. Efterretninger om en Sanct T homas og dens Gouverneurer, optegnede der paa Landet fra 1769 indtil 1776. Kjbenhavn: Trykt og forlagt af Nicolaus Moeller og Sn, Kongelige Hof-Bogtrykkere. 1791. Issert, Paul Erdmann. Reise nach Guinea und den Caribaischen Inseln in Columbia, in Briefen an seine Freunde beschrieben Kjbenhavn: J. F. Morthorst. 1788. Knott, Stephen F. Alexander Hamilton and the Persistence of Myth Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. 2002. Larsen, Jens. Virgin Islands Story. A Hi story of the Lutheran State Church, Other Churches, Slavery, Education, and Culture in the Danish West Indi es, now the Virgin Islands Philadelphia: Muhl enberg Press. 1950. Larsen, Kaj. Guvernrer, Residenter, Kommanda nter og Chefer samt enkelte andre fremtrdende Personer I de tid legere danske Tropekolonier Kbenhavn: Arthur Jessens Forlag. 1940. Larson, Harold. Â“Alexander Hamilton: The Fa ct and Fiction of His Early Years.Â” The William and Mary Quarterly. April, Third Series, Vol. IX, No. 2, pp. 139-51. 1952. Lewisohn, Florence. St. Croix under Seven Flags Hollywood, Florida: The Dukane Press. 1970. McCullough, David. John Adams New York: Simon & Schuster. 2001. McDonald, Forrest. Alexander Hamilton: A Biography New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 1982.
38McGuire, James William. Geographic Dictionary of the Virgin Islands of the United States Special Publication No. 103, Serial N o. 269. Department of Commerce, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office. 1925. Mitchell, Broadus. Â“The Man who Discovered Hamilton.Â” Proceedings of the New Jersey Historical Society Vol. 69, pp. 88-114. April, 1951. Â“Moore Family on St. CroixÂ” (1820-1880). Ca. 1880s. Annotations by Eva Lawaetz (Researcher/Translator, Christ iansted Public Library), December, 1967, from pages lent out by Mr. Victor Gibean, Chri stiansted. Typescript in th e possession of the St. Croix Landmarks Society. Newman, E. M. Â“The Virgin Islands of the United States of America.Â” The Mentor Serial No. 161, Vol. 6, Number 13. August 15, 1918. Office of the Recorder of Deeds, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Christiansted: No. 23 Company Street Register VI, p. 143. 1920:December 1. Christiansted: No. 34A B Company Street. Regist er VI, p. 158. 1847:May 4. Oldendorp, Christian Georg Andr eas. Geschichte der Mission der Evangelischen Brder auf den Caraibischen Inseln S. Thomas S. Croix und S. Jan 2 Vols. Barby: Johann Jakob Bossart. 1777. Olsen, Herbert. Â“Historic Structures Report. Part I. Fort Christiansvaern, Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands.Â” Christia nsted National Historic Site, National Park Service, United States Depa rtment of the Interior. 1960 Ramsing, H[olger] U[tke]. Â“Alexander Hamilt on og Hans Modrene Slgt. Tidsbilleder fra Dansk Vestindiens Barndom.Â” Personalhistorisk Tidsskrift. 60de rgang, 10. Rke, 6. Bind, 3-4 Heft, pp. 225-70. Kbenha vn: I Kommission Ejnar Munksgrds Forlag. 1939. Randall, Willard Sterne. Al exander Hamilton: A Life New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc. 2003. Royal Danish American Gazette Christiansted, St. Croix. 1770:August 15. 1771:January 26; March 6. 1772:September 9; October 7; November 11. 1773:April. St. Croix Avis 1866:February 6, 9; April 3, 13. 1982:February 2.
39St. JohnÂ’s Anglican Church, Christiansted, St. Cr oix. Â“A Register of all the Burials in the Parish of Christianstadt in the Island of St. Croix in Amer ica. Cecil Wray Goodchild, Minister.Â” 1761. ----------. Â“Register, belongi ng to St. JohnÂ’s Church of E ng[land,] situated within the Jurisdiction of Christianstd, the Island of Saint Croix in America (commonly called West India), commencing September 1st: 1799.Â” ----------. Vestry Minutes. 1789:November 10. 1790:April 5. 1792:July 3. 1793:April 1; September 3. 1797:May 22. 1799:March 24; September 27. 1801:April 14. 1849:June 7. 1852:January 16. Smith, James, Esq. The Winter of 1840 in St. Croix with an Excursi on to Tortola and St. Thomas New York: Printed for the Author. 1840. Svensson, Ole (ed.). Three Towns: Conservation and Renewal of Charlotte Amalia, Christiansted, and Frederiksted of the U.S. Virgin Islands Copenhagen: Scantryk. 1980. Syrett, Harold C. and Jacob E. Cooke (eds.) The Papers of Alexander Hamilton 25 vols. New York: Columbia University Press. 1961-1987. [Taylor, William Anglin]. St. PaulÂ’s Restoration . The GentlemanÂ’s Magazine London. Volume LXII, p. 590. 1772. Tyson, George F. Personal communicat ion with William F. Cissel. April 27, 2004. Tyson, George F. and Arnold R. Highfield (eds.) The Danish West Indian Slave Trade. Virgin Islands Perspectives. St Croix: Antilles Press. 1994. ----------. The Kamina Folk. Slavery a nd Slave Life in the Danish West Indies U.S. Virgin Islands: Virgin Isla nds Humanities Council. 1994. Vestindiske Lokalarkiver. Â“Kopskat lister: St. Croix.Â” 17581759, 1761-1769. Rigsarkivet, Copenhagen. ----------. Â“Landlister: St Croix.Â” 17431749, 1751, 1753, 1754, 1768-1773. Rigsarkivet, Copenhagen. ----------. Â“Mandtalslister: St. Croi x.Â” 1748-1761, 1767. Rigsarkivet, Copenhagen.
40 ----------. Â“Matrikler: St. Croix.Â” 1750, 1758-1761, 1765-1770, 1773, 1780, 1786-1787. Rigsarkivet. Copenhagen. West, Hans. Bidrag til Beskrivelse over Ste. Croix med en Ko rt Oversigt over St. Thomas, St. Jean, Tortola, Spanishtown og Crabeneiland Kibenhavn: Trykt hos Friderik Wilhelm Thiele. 1793. ----------. Tiltrdelsestale hol den, da Skolen i Christianst d paa St: Croix blev aabnet den 8de October 1789 Christiansted: Trykt hos Daniel Thibou. 1789. Westergaard, Waldemar. The Danish We st Indies under Company Rule (1671-1754), with a Supplementary Chapter, 1755-1917 New York: The Macmillan Company. 1917. Zabriskie, Luther K. The Virgin Islands of the United States of Amer ica. Historical and Descriptive, Commercial and I ndustrial, Facts, Figures, and Resources. New York: G. P. PutnamÂ’s Sons/The Knickerbocker Press. 1918.
41Illustrations Anonymous. Miniature of Nic holas Cruger. Christiansted National Historic Site, St. Croix. Beck, Jens Mikkelsen. Â“Kort over Eylandet St Croix udi America Saaledes som det ved en acurat udmaaling er befunden med Qv arterernes Navne og enhver Plantagies NummerÂ….Tegning over Byen Christianstd paa Eylandet St. Croix saavit den allerede er bebygt.Â” 1754. Kongelige Bibliotek, Copenhagen. Beenfeldt, Henrik Gottfried. Â“Forrestilling af Warfet paa en St. Croix i Westindien.Â” 1815. Rigsarkiv, Copenhagen. Bellin, Jacques Nicolas. Â“Car te de lÂ’Isle de Nieves.Â” Le Petit Atlas Maritime Vol. I, No. 84. Paris. 1764. Government of the Virgin Islands U.S.A., Public Works Dept., St. Croix V.I. Â“Map of the Old Limits of Christiansted Town.Â” [1940s]. von Jgersberg, Johann Cristoph Jger and J ohann Cronenberg. Â“Charte over Eilandet St. Croix.Â” 1750. Kongelige dans k Farvandsvsenet, Copenhagen. Kffner, Paul. Â“Die Insel Sainte Croix mit den Namen der Plantagen die bestndig Sind.Â” Nrnberg. 1767. Oldendorp, Christian Georg Andreas. Â“Aufsi cht von Friedensthal von der Westseite.Â” Nrnberg. 1768. Oxholm, Peter Lotharius. Â“No. 1. Situations Plan af Byen Chri stianstd med den Havn kaldet Bassinen.Â” 1778. Rigsarkiv, Copenhagen. ----------. Â“No. 2 Grundriss af Byen Ch ristianstd med derudi liggende Fort Christiansvrn opmalt i Aaret 1779.Â” Rigsarkiv, Copenhagen. ----------. Â“No. 8a. Grund riss af Christians vrn Fort og dets Indretning paa Hoij.Â” 1779. Rigsarkiv, Copenhagen. ----------. Â“Charte over den Danske e St Croix i America forfrdiget i Aaret 1794, og udgivet i Aaret 1799 af P. L. Oxholm, Oberst af Infanteriet.Â” 1799 Peale, Charles Willson. Portrait of Alexander Hamilton. 1791. Independence National Historical Park, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. von Rohr, Julius. Â“Christianstd paa St. Croi x.Â” J. D. Phillipin (engr.) Copenhagen. 1760. Handelsog Sfartsmuseet, Kronborg. Zllner, Heinrich. Â“Plan ber der Stadt Christianstd in America.Â” 1760.