UNT and UF Pilot Project of a Peer-to-Peer Process for Becoming a Trusted Digital Repository Handout for Joint Chairs Me...

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
UNT and UF Pilot Project of a Peer-to-Peer Process for Becoming a Trusted Digital Repository Handout for Joint Chairs Meeting on 12 Nov. 2014
Physical Description:
Presentation proposal
Language:
English
Creator:
Taylor, Laurie N.
Dinsmore, Chelsea
Publisher:
George A. Smathers Libraries, University of Florida
Place of Publication:
Gainesville, FL
Publication Date:

Notes

Abstract:
Handout for internal UF meeting of Joint Chairs in the Libraries on the collaborative project with the University of North Texas (UNT) for a collaborative process to each complete a full self-audit using the Trusted Repository Audit Checklist (TRAC). In addition to the self-audit, each institution agreed to participate in a peer review process evaluating and scoring each others self-audit and supplied documentation. The goals of the project were as follows: demonstrate the maturity of repository services, infrastructure and governance at both institutions, increase collaboration among project teams at UF and UNT, and pilot a peer review option that aims at offers more rigor and external feedback. The goals of the project are as follows: *Document the current repository services and systems, technical and human infrastructures, and overall operations following the TRAC process *Demonstrate the maturity of repository services, infrastructure and governance at both institutions *Share information and knowledge to support increasing the collaboration between project teams at UF and UNT *Pilot a peer review option that aims at offers more rigor and external feedback than a self-audit, but which also does not have the same financial requirements as a full external certification by a third party *Leverage the process internally at each institution to share information and knowledge to support increasing collaboration among different internal and external groups, including Research Computing and High Performance Computing groups at each institution

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:

This item is licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution License. This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon this work, even commercially, as long as they credit the author for the original creation.
System ID:
AA00024188:00007


This item is only available as the following downloads:


Full Text

PAGE 1

UNT and UF Pilot Project of a Peer to Peer Process for Becoming a Trusted Digital Repository Handout for Joint Chairs Meeting on 1 Oct. 2014 TRAC Sections and Goal Schedule A. Organizational Infrastructure: Sept. Dec. 2014 B. Digital Object Management: Jan. April 2015 C. Technologies, Technical Infrastructure, & Security: May August 2015 Recent and Upcoming Activities Oct. 8: Met with SASC for aggregation review / update (list: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/l/AA00017119/00033 ) U pdating aggregation s ; C ontact emails ( remove AskA) ; Rights Statements (plans for bulk updates or next steps for manual updates) ; Requests for collections needing OCLC records ; E nsuring all curators have rights to their collections for editing homepages ; U pdating/assisting on collection homepage updates ; Establishing standard homepage text for archival based colle ctions and/or other collections Oct. 27: DLF presentation : http://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00017119 C urrent: Working on documentation overall for a manual and two addit ional, compiled documents: Draft collection development plan (following http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/acquisition collection development/publications/gcdp en.pdf ) to cover major TRAC elements including: A1.1 Mission Statement A1.2 Succession plans? A3.1 Designated Communities A3.2 Things in place to review policies A3.3 process to capture legal permissions A3.4 F ormal Review of procedures ? A3.5 Feedback from users and challenges to data online A5.1 Legal rights to preserve talk about what we do and where they are located A5.2 Rights to collect preserve talk about what we do and where they are stored/located A5.3 Partnership agreements (appendix) A5.4 Rights and Restrictions (portal open, gateway open, digital open, restricted) A5.5 Process for handling challenges Staffing, planning, and finances document: much of the other information could fit into another document rela ted to: Staffing ; Planning; Finances ; other information for TRAC. Manual: E ssentially these two documents could cover the needed areas for TRAC purposes. In addition to the requirements specifically for TRAC, for UFs operational and organizational needs, the UF TRAC group has determined that a manual style document would be best for supporting operations,

PAGE 2

reporting, training, and other aspects, so the end products from TRAC will include new documentation specifically for TRAC and as related to TRAC for UF in a manualstyle format. TRAC Section A. Organizational Infrastructure A1. Governance & organizational viability A1.1 Repository has a mission statement that reflects a commitment to the long term retention of, management of, and access to digital information. A1.2 Repository has an appropria te, formal succession plan, contingency plans, and/or escrow arrangements in place in case the repository ceases to operate or the governing or funding institution substantially changes its scope. A2. Organizational structure & staffing A2.1 Repository has identified and established the duties that it needs to perform and has appointed staff with adequate skills and experience to fulfill these duties. A2.2 Repository has the appropriate number of staff to support all functions and services. A2.3 Repository has an active professional development program in place that provides staff with skills and expertise development opportunities. A3. Procedural accountability & policy framework (documentation) A3.1 Repository has defined its designated community(ies) and associated knowledge base(s) and has publicly accessible definitions and policies in place to dictate how its preservation service requirements will be met. A3.2 Repository has procedures and policies in place, and mechanisms for their review, update, and development as the repository grows and as technology and community practice evolves. A3.3 Repository maintains written policies that specify the nature of any legal permissions required to preserve digital content over time, and repository can demonstrate that these permissions have been acquired when needed. A3.4 Repository is committed to formal, periodic review and assessment to ensure responsiveness to technological developments and evolving requirements. A3.5 Repository has policies and procedures to ensure that feedback from producers and users is sought and addressed over time. A3.6 Repository has a documented history of the changes to its operations, procedures, software, and hardware that, where appropriate, is linked to relevant preservation strat egies and describes potential effects on preserving digital content. A3.7 Repository commits to transparency and accountability in all actions supporting the operation and management of the repository, especially those that affect the preservation of digit al content over time. A3.8 Repository commits to defining, collecting, tracking, and providing, on demand, its information integrity measurements. A3.9 Repository commits to a regular schedule of self assessment and certification and, if certified, commits to notifying certifying bodies of operational changes that will change or nullify its certification status. A4. Financial sustainability

PAGE 3

A4.1 Repository has short and longterm business planning processes in place to sustain the repository over time. A4.2 Repository has in place processes to review and adjust business plans at least annually. A4.3 Repositorys financial practices and procedures are transparent, compliant with relevant accounting standards and practices, and audited by third parties in acc ordance with territorial legal requirements. A4.4 Repository has ongoing commitment to analyze and report on risk, benefit, investment, and expenditure (including assets, licenses, and liabilities). A4.5 Repository commits to monitoring for and bridging ga ps in funding. A5. Contracts, licenses, & liabilities A5.1 If repository manages, preserves, and/or provides access to digital materials on behalf of another organization, it has and maintains appropriate contracts or deposit agreements. A5.2 Repository co ntracts or deposit agreements must specify and transfer all necessary preservation rights, and those rights transferred must be documented. A5.3 Repository has specified all appropriate aspects of acquisition, maintenance, access, and withdrawal in written agreements with depositors and other relevant parties. A5.4 Repository tracks and manages intellectual property rights and restrictions on use of repository content as required by deposit agreement, contract, or license. A5.5 If repository ingests digital content with unclear ownership/rights, policies are in place to address liability and challenges to those rights.