Dual spray equipment for airplane spraying tests


Material Information

Dual spray equipment for airplane spraying tests
Physical Description:
4 p. : ill. ; 27 cm.
Miller, J. M
Isler, D. A
United States -- Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Administration, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C
Publication Date:


Subjects / Keywords:
Spraying equipment -- Testing   ( lcsh )
Aerial spraying and dusting in agriculture   ( lcsh )
federal government publication   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )


General Note:
Caption title.
General Note:
General Note:
"March 1951."
Statement of Responsibility:
by J.M. Miller and D.A. Isler.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 030363271
oclc - 783580468
System ID:

Full Text

March 1951 .e PLAT BOAR ET-294

United States Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Administration
Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine


By J. M. Miller, Division of Forest Insect Investigations, Bureau of
Entomology and Plant Quarantine, and D. A. Isler, Division of Farm
Machinery, Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural Engineering

For several years the Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, in
cooperation with the Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils and Agricultural
Engineering, has been developing and testing aerial spray equipment for
use in controlling forest-insect pests. The principal objective of this
work has been to develop a system that will distribute a uniform deposit
of properly atomized spray over a swath of maximum width. In addition
to the problems involved in the design and construction of this equipment,
it has been difficult to devise a method of evaluating its performance, or
of comparing the effectiveness of various arrangements of its parts, of
different pump pressures, or of different insecticide formulations.
The performance of an aerial spray system is governed by many
factors, not all of which are controllable. The controllable factors
include type of nozzle or discharge orifice, position of the orifice,
pressure exerted on the spray, and insecticide formulation. The un-
controllable factors include direction and velocity of the wind, temperature
and humidity, and convection, inversion, and turbulence of the air. To
determine the most satisfactory nozzle to use, its correct position, or
the proper pressure, it is necessary to hold the remaining factors con-
stant. For wind direction and velocity this is practically impossible.
The method used in the past to evaluate performance has been to fly
the plane directly into the wind while liberating spray over the center of
lines laid out at right angles to the line of flight, collect samples of spray
deposit at regular intervals along these lines, and determine the quantity
by laboratory methods. Despite efforts to fly the plane directly into the
wind, slight shifts in wind direction while the plane was passing over the
sample lines frequently caused drifting of the spray. It was not unusual
for the wind to affect the deposit pattern to a greater extent than changes
in type or arrangement of equipment.
This paper describes the construction and installation of an aerial
spray apparatus with which various types and arrangements of spray
nozzles, pressures, and insecticide formulations can be tested under


identical meteorological conditions. Its use permits a direct comparison
of the effect of any of these factors on spray dispersal. While it does not
eliminate the need for replicating test flights, it does provide a simulta-
neous check flight for each test. This apparatus consists of two complete
spray systems, each consisting of a tank, pump, boom, and control acces-
sories mounted on a single plane.


The equipment used in constructing this dual spray system is a
modification of previously described equipment (U. S. Bur. Plant Indus.,
Soils, and Agr. Engin., Inform. Ser. 87), and it has been installed in a
Stearman N2S5 airplane. The layout of the two systems is shown in
figure 1.

Pressure gage
Pressure regulator
Shut-off valve

5. Centrifugal pump,
6. Gear pump, engine-driven
7. Boom and nozzle

Figure 1. --Schematic diagram of dual spray units.


Two spray tanks (1) are located in the front cockpit, one in the space
normally occupied by the front seat and the other immediately behind the
fire wall. A wind-driven 1 1/4-by 1-inch centrifugal pump (5) is used in
one system and an engine-driven gear pump(6)of the same size in the other.
The gear pump is used to produce higher pressures in tests of the effect
of pump pressure on spray dispersal. The centrifugal pump is mounted
between the landing-gear struts and the gear pump on the generator pad
of the aircraft engine.
Both systems are equipped with adjustable pressure regulators (3) in
order that desired spray pressures can be maintained uniformly. Each
system is equipped with an emergency dump valve located in the tank
outlet line (not shown in fig. 1), and in both the spray-control valves (4)
are of the quick-opening gate type. Controls for pressure regulators,
spray control valves, and dump valves are located in the cockpit, within
easy reach of the pilot.
Each spray system has its own boom. They are mounted one imme-
diately behind the other, approximately 9 inches below the lower surface
of the lower wing, and they extend from wing tip to wing tip (fig. 2 and 3).
The inboard half of each boom consists of 1 1/8-inch tubing, the outboard
half of 1-inch tubing. It will be noted in figure 2 that the boom outlets
are directed downward and to the rear at an angle of 45. Short nipples
and 45 elbows are used for attachment of the nozzles. This arrangement
prevents the spray from wetting the booms when tangential-type hollow-
cone spray nozzles are used with the orifices directed either forward or
backward. Variations in orifice direction are obtained by rotating the
booms on their long axes or by changing the fittings.

Results of tests with this dual spray system indicate that it is a distinct im -
provement over earlier systems. No longer is it necessary, for instance,
to attempt the well-nigh impossible task of duplicating meteorological
conditions in successive test flights to compare performances of various
nozzles, nozzle positions, and pump pressures.
Comparisons of performances between the two systems can be made
by using different dyes in the liquids of the two systems. For accurate
comparisons there must be little or no combining of the drops from one
system with those from the other while the spray is falling through the
air. Tests have shown that there is very little such combining of drops.
The quantity of spray delivered by each system at any point in the swath
is determined by the use of a sensitive spectrophotometer. To record
the quantity of the two dyes on the sample, it is only necessary to expose
the sample to two different specific wave lengths. The quantity of spray
deposited by each system at any station can be calculated from the quantity
of dye recorded by this means.



Figure 2. --Details of attachment of dual spray booms and nozzles.

Figure 3. --Stearman airplane with dual spray equipment.


S 1262 09242 9447111111111 11 11111111
3 1262 09242 9447