|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Title Page | |
| Acknowledgement | |
| Table of Contents | |
| List of Figures | |
| Abstract | |
| Introduction | |
| Methods | |
| Ultrastructure | |
| A comparison of amniote sperma... | |
| A comparison of avian spermato... | |
| Summary | |
| Appendix A: Figures 1-73 | |
| Appendix B: Classification and... | |
| Literature cited | |
| Biographical sketch |
CITATION
THUMBNAILS
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title Page
Page i Acknowledgement Page ii Page iii Table of Contents Page iv Page v List of Figures Page vi Page vii Abstract Page viii Page ix Page x Introduction Page 1 Page 2 Methods Page 3 Page 4 Ultrastructure Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 A comparison of amniote spermatozoa Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 A comparison of avian spermatozoa Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Summary Page 38 Appendix A: Figures 1-73 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Appendix B: Classification and list of species studied Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Literature cited Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Biographical sketch Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Ultrastructure and Phylogenetic Significance of Avian Spermatozoa By ROBERT W. MciFARIANE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR, THE D:EGREP OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1971 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by grants-in-aid from the Frank M. Chapman Memorial Fund of the American Museum of Natural History, the Society of the Sigma Xi and RESA Research Fund, and the Organization for Tropical Studies. I am grateful for the support provided by the Bowdoin Scientific Station, Kent Island, New Brunswick; the Carib- bean Conservation Corporation, Tortuguero, Costa Rica; and the Pacific Ocean Biological Survey Program, Smithsonian Institution. The many individuals who have assisted in the field work of this study are unfortunately too numerous for individual recognition. I can only hope that their memories of our offtimes brief association are as pleasant as mine. I wish to extend my deepest appreciation to Professor Pierce Brodkorb for his advice, criticism, and constant encouragement. I wish to thank Drs. Ernst Kallenbach, Frank Nordlie, James Gregg, and Carl Feldherr for their criticism of the manuscript. Special thanks are due Dr. William P. Callahan, formerly of the Department of Anatomical Sciences of the University ii of Florida. His generous and continuous support in innumerable ways was totally responsible for the completion of this research. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . LIST OF FIGURES . ABSTRACT . . INTRODUCTION . . METHODS . . ULTRASTRUCTURE . . The Head . . Nucleus . . Acrosome . . Helical Membrane . Apical Spine or Body The Tail . Axoneme . . Neck . . Middle Piece . . o * . o o S . . o . . o . . 5 0 . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . o o . . o . o . . . * S i . o . Principal Piece and End Piece Cytoplasmic Membrane and Annulus . . 23 SI S1 S S S S S Si S S S S Page ii vi viii 1 3 5 6 7 10 11 13 14 14 16 19 22 O A COMPARISON OF AMNIOTE SPERMATOZOA . The Head . . . . The Tail . . . . A COMPARISON OF AVIAN SPERMATOZOA . SUMMARY . . . . APPENDIX A. FIGURES 1 73. . . Key to Abbreviations . . APPENDIX B. CLASSIFICATION AND LIST OF STUDIED . . . LITERATURE CITED . . . BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH . . . Page 24 25 26 31 . 0 0 . * 0 0 o 0 0 5 5 5 SPECIES * 0 5 0 6 5 . . . o . . . LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. 2-4. 5. 6-11. 12. 13-15. 16-21. 22. 23-24. 25-31. 32. 33-36. 37-40. 41. 42-45. 46-50. 51. The spermatozoon of Alectoris graeca . Alectoris graeca .. . . . The spermatozoon of Sterna fuscata . . Sterna fuscata . . . The spermatozoon of Columba livia . Columba livia . . . Columba livia . . . The spermatozoon of Centurus carolinus . Centurus carolinus . . . Centurus carolinus . . . The spermatozoon of Myiarchus crinitus . Myiarchus crinitus . . . Tyrannus verticalis . . The spermatozoon of Tachycineta thalassina. Tachycineta thalassina . . Tachycineta thalassina . . . The spermatozoa of Parus bicolor and Vireo olivaceus . . . 52-55. Parus bicolor and Vireo olivaceus . . vi Page 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 Figure 56. The spermatozoa of Turdus migratorius and Piranga rubra . . . 57-59. Turdus migratorius, Piranga rubra, and Tangara gyrola . . . 60. Testicular section of Piranga rubra . 61-63. Testicular sections of Piranga rubra . 64-65. Testicular sections of Pipilo ery- throphthalmus . . .* 66-73. Some representative sperm . . . vii Page 78 80 82 84 86 88 Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy THE ULTRASTRUCTURE AND PHYLOGENETIC SIGNIFICANCE OF AVIAN SPERMATOZOA By Robert W. McFarlane August, 1971 Chairman: Dr. Pierce Brodkorb Major Department: Zoology Avian spermatozoa exhibit considerable variation in both gross and fine structure and may be useful indicators of phylogenetic relationship but knowledge of their ultra- structure is required. The spermatozoa of 281 species of birds were surveyed with phase-contrast microscopy. Of these, 177 species were viewed with the electron microscope and the ultrastructure of 18 species was studied in detail. The head is typically cylindrical or fusiform, and the nucleus contains granular chromatin limited by a double membrane. In non-passerines the acrosome is conical with a blunt or pointed tip and limited by a single membrane. In passerines it has a lateral extension forming a helix and is limited by a double membrane. Subacrosomal structures include apical spines, spheres, and granular material in some, but not all, species. The tail has a typical 9+2 flagellum. Accessory fibers are known for only two orders. The fibers are very small in viii Galliformes but well developed in Passeriformes. They are cylindrical, uniform in size, remain attached to the peri- pheral doublet tubules at maturation, and terminate at a common point on the distal axoneme. The proximal centriole of the neck is adjacent to the nucleus, at approximately a right angle to the flagellar axis. The implantation fossa may be shallow, deep, or tangential. The distal centriole is continuous with the peripheral doublets of the axoneme, whose central tubules arise at its distal margin. Pas- serines apparently lack the proximal centriole. Instead, the anterior ends of the accessory fibers surround the dis- tal centriole and form a connecting piece. The mitochondria of the middle piece may be oblate or polygonal, loosely grouped or highly organized, and vary in number from one to more than 1000. The mitochondrial cristae are parallel to and thicker than the outer mitochondrial membrane. Intermitochondrial granules are found in Columbi- formes. The middle piece of non-passerines composes 5 to 75 per cent of the tail. Passerines have a single helical mitochondrion, which may extend along the tail for 10 to 90 per cent of its length. Some passerines have a granular substance of unknown origin or function around the proximal axoneme. It is difficult, and perhaps unnecessary, to distinguish between the principal piece and the end piece of the tail. ix The highly structured fibrous sheath of reptiles and mammals is absent in avian sperm. The Galliformes and Tinamiformes have an amorphous sheath, but in all other species the axoneme is encased in only the cytoplasmic membrane. An annulus is present in Gallus but has not been observed in other species. The spermatozoa of five avian orders whose ultrastruc- ture is known can be differentiated on their fine structure. The most distinctive is the helical configuration of the Passeriformes, which demonstrates a complete evolution from a small, slightly coiled form in primitive families to a large, elongate, and markedly helical shape in those families most recently evolved. The helical configuration, whose functional significance remains unknown, has independently evolved in two other orders. The helical spermatozoa of the Scolopacidae are quite distinct from those of six other chara- driiform families. A helical acrosome occurs in Procel- lariidae but is lacking in two other procellariiform families, the Dio'.edeidae and Hydrobatidae. The spermatozoon of the Columbiofrmes is also distinct from any other of the twenty orders which have been examined, principally because of its middle piece. The Piciformes have a generalized sperm which superficially resembles that of several other orders. INTRODUCTION In recent years numerous investigations have revealed the fine morphological details of representative spermatozoa for most animal phyla, and a number of phylogenetic compari- sons have been made (Baccetti, 1970). My objectives were to determine the extent of morphological variation among the spermatozoa of the Class Aves and to identify any morpholo- gical characteristics which might serve as indicators of phylogenetic relationship among the various orders and families of birds. An earlier study (McFarlane, 1963) had demonstrated the feasibility of such comparison. Sperm samples of 281 species of birds were collected and surveyed with phase-contrast microscopy (appendix B). All spermatozoa exhibit variations upon a basic cylindrical form, generally of 0.5p diameter or less. Inasmuch as the limit of resolution with light optics is 0.2p, much of the fine detail is lost or obscured by diffraction images. The greater resolution and depth of field of electron microscopy were utilized to study the gross morphology of 177 species. Most knowledge of the ultrastructure of vertebrate spermatozoa is based upon numerous investigations of mammalian 1 2 species, while birds have been virtually ignored. Only one avian species, the domestic fowl, Gallus gaj.lus, has been adequately studied. Nagano (1962) described the fine structure of the developing spermatid, Nicander and Hellstrom (1967) studied mitochondrial changes, McIntosh and Porter (1967) described the role of microtubules in effecting changes in the shape of the head during spermiogenesis, and Lake et al. (1968) described the ultrastructure of the mature fowl spermatozoon. Studies of the fine structure of the tail for the house sparrow, Passer domesticus,were contri- buted by Sotelo and Trujillo-Cenoz (1958), and fcr the tree sparrow, Passer montanus,and the munia, Uroloncha (=Lonchura) striata, by Yasuzumi (1956a) and by Masuda (1958). Yasuzumi (1956b) also commented on the structure of the nucleus in the spermatid of the tree sparrow, Passer montanus, Furieri (1962-63) described the mature spermatozoa of the chaffinch, Fringilla coelebs, and Nicander (1968, 1970) illustrated some aspects of the spermatozoon of the zebra finch, Taenijo.gia castanotis (=Poepila guttata). Thus all references to the ultrastructure of avian spermatozoa are based upon only six species, limited to only three of the 177 living families of birds (Wetmore, 1960). I have investigated the ultrastructure of an additional 18 species of birds (appendix B). METHODS The preferred fixatives for ultrastructural investi- gations are osmium tetroxide and glutaraldehyde. Both of these chemicals deteriorate rapidly at normal environmental temperatures, and osmium requires that dehydration quickly follow fixation. Optimum preservation of fine structure requires that fixation occur at near-freezing temperature. The collection of spermatozoa from an adequately large number of species for comparative study necessitates fixation under field conditions where refrigeration is unavailable or impractical. My comparative tests demon- strated that phosphate-buffered formaldehyde was stable at all temperatures, and fresh tissue preserved in this fixative could remain immersed for extended periods without deterio- ration or further processing, even for several years. While the quality of such fixation does not equal that of osmium treatment, it is a satisfactory compromise and was used for the majority of the specimens collected. In a few instances, wild birds were captured and taken alive to the laboratory, or tissues were fixed in the field in 1 per cent phosphate-buffered osmium in an ice bath and 3 .4 quickly returned to the laboratory for further processing. Other specimens initially fixed in 10 per cent phosphate- buffered formalin were subsequently post-fixed in osmium to utilize the staining properties of the metal. All tissues used for ultrastructural studies were dehydrated in a graduated ethanol and propylene oxide series and embedded in Araldite epoxy. Sections were cut with glass knives and stained with lead citrate, uranyl acetate, or vanadium molybdate. Unsectioned sperm were supported by a parlodion film over a copper grid. Some specimens were shadowed with chromium to effect a third dimension in the electron micrographs. All specimens were observed in a RCA EMU-3C electron microscope at 50 kV and recorded on sheet film. The spermatid undergoes the final stages of maturation while traversing the vas deferens, a reduction in head size and increase in tail length. Therefore, all descriptions of mature spermatozoa are based upon sperm taken from the distal portion of the vas deferens, or the seminal glomerule. In a few instances, sections of testicular material were made (see fig. 60-63) to aid in identification of the various spermatozoan components. No attempt was made to determine the details of spermiogenesis for any species. ULTRASTRUCTURE The function of any spermatozoon is the transmission of the hereditary material, the chromatin, to a complemen- tary egg cell, and gaining entry into the egg once encoun- tered. Thus a sperm has two very different problems to solve: it requires a means of locomotion to propel it to- wards the egg, and a mechanism to penetrate the several mem- branes surrounding the egg in order that the male chromatin may enter into the cytoplasm of the egg. The propulsive force is provided by the primary component of the tail, the axoneme and its associated structures, which include a source of energy. Egg penetrance is the task of the head, which contains the chromatin within its nucleus, and is achieved through the little understood role of the acrosome and its associated structures. Most knowledge of the ultrastructure of vertebrate spermatozoa is based upon mammalian species, and some degree of standardization of the nomenclature has resulted (Fawcett, 1965; Hancock, 1966). This terminology is generally appli- cable to birds, but certain ambiguities result, particularly concerning the term "head". The head of a spermatozoon con- 5 6 sists of two major structures, the nucleus and the acrosome. The tail of a sperm has four distinct regions: a very small neck, attaching the tail to the nucleus; the middle piece, where a sheath of mitochondria encircles the axial filament; the principal piece, with the axial filament surrounded by a protein sheath; and the end piece, where the axial fila- ment is covered only by the cytoplasmic membrane. The juncture of the head and tail of mammalian sperm is easily determined for the heads tend to be large and spatulate, and the tails slender and cylindrical. However, the heads of all avian sperm are basically cylindrical or fusiform, so that it is usually difficult to determine the juncture between the nucleus and the middle piece. Fre- quently, the most conspicuous juncture is between the middle piece and the principal piece. Thus what first appears to be the head actually includes the anterior segment of the tail. Head and tail are still very useful terms and in view of their long acceptance it seems unnecessary to employ new terms. But the potential ambiguity must be remembered in comparisons with non-avian species. The Head The structures which may be observed as components of the head include the nucleus, the acrosome, the apical spine or apical body, and the helical membrane which is 7 associated with the acrosome of many species. The Nucleus The nucleus, which contains the chromatin of the gamete, is the raison d'etre for all other sperm components. It is derived from the nucleus of the spermatid. During spermio- genesis the spermatid nucleus undergoes a change in shape and texture from a round, homogeneous body to a smaller dense body with short strands of tightly packed chromatin (fig. 60), and finally achieves a very dense and granular appearance. In the mature spermatozoon the nuclear material is rarely homogeneous and frequently contains a number of small irregular cavities randomly distributed (fig. 52). These cavities are not membrane-limited and cannot be consi- dered true vacuoles. They are found in the spermatozoan nuclei of many non-avian species and are believed to result from incomplete condensation of the chromatin. The nucleus is typically limited by a double membrane (fig. 7, 16, 26, 31). Excess nuclear membrane accumulates in the neck region of Gallus (Lake et al., 1968), similar to the scrolls described in mammals (Fawcett, 1970). This has not been observed in other avian species. The chromatin of the mature spermatozoon is electron opaque and very resistant to impregnation by the embedding medium. Thin sections of embedded material occasionally 8 split under the electron beam, and this split invariably begins in the nuclear area (note the small holes in the nucleus of fig. 18). The nucleus of Columba exhibits large, electron-dense strands in a semi-transparent matrix (fig. 13, 16). This may be an artifact but it has also been observed by light microscopists (Smith, 1912; Mehrota, 1951) using several different fixatives. The nucleus of most non-passerines is a straight cylinder. That of Gallus has a definite curvature, not necessarily planar (McIntosh and Porter, 1967). Passerine nuclei tend to reflect the helical nature of the acrosome and middle piece. The wave length of the helix is highly variable and characteristic of the family. The nuclei of some species deviate only slightly from a straight axis. In others the nucleus may complete one or more helical revolutions. Some species have a helical constriction which resembles a furrow, spiralling the length of the nucleus (fig. 52). In general, the nucleus is the most conservative of all sperm components, exhibiting the least variation when inter-specific comparisons are made (Allen et al., 1968). McIntosh and Porter (1967) have described two sequential sets of microtubules that effect the final nuclear shape in Gallus. The first set is a thin helical band, only one tubule deep, which effects the shrinkage and transformation 9 of the spherical nucleus into its elongate form. This set disappears and is replaced by the manchette, straight tubules lying parallel to the nucleus and extending from the acrosome to the anterior tail. The manchette is also lost during maturation. Nicander (1967, 1970) states that only one transitory set of microtubules is found in Taeniopygia (=Poephila). This occurs as a twisted bundle which includes cisternae of endoplasmic reticulum. It winds around the nucleus and proximal tail during formation of the helix and is shed during final maturation. Sotelo and Trujillo-Cenoz (1958) describe similar tubules for Passer. The fixatives utilized in this study are notoriously deficient for the preservation of microtubules, which are best preserved with glutaraldehyde (McIntosh and Porter, 1967). Nevertheless, microtubules have been observed in Passerina, Pipilo, and Tachycineta after Os04 fixation. They occur as a spindle-shaped, membrane-limited bundle extending from the acrosome to the tail and are seen only in the developing spermatid (fig. 60-65). During their formation they incorporate cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum (fig. 64). The cisternae subsequently collapse and remain as isolated membranes within the bundle (fig. 62-65). The bundles are apparently sloughed off during final 10 maturation and are conspicuous in the cellular debris found in the vas deferens. In one favorable section of the spermatid of Thryothorus a small number of microtubules can be seen adjacent to the acrosome. This raises the possibility that proper glutaral- dehyde fixation might reveal other microtubules similar to those observed in the fowl. The asymmetrical microtubule spindle, which is believed to effect the helical configuration of the spermatozoon, would not appear to be sufficient to effect the initial shrinkage and elongation of the nucleus. The Acrosome Nagano (1962) and McIntosh and Porter (1967) have described the development of the acrosome from the Golgi complex in Gallus. It attaches to the nucleus as a spheri- cal body, then elongates to its final form. The acrosome is the most variable of all sperm components, both in size and shape. In non-passerines it remains much smaller than the nucleus and is essentially conical, with a pointed or blunt anterior tip. Crypturellus has a spade-like anterior projection (fig. 68). The plane of contact between the acrosome and the nucleus may be perpendicular or oblique to the longitudinal axis. Among the passerines, the size varies from a small minor component to a very large struc- ture, which dominates the head and is several times larger than the nucleus. 11 The acrosome is limited by what generally appears to be a single membrane. However, in favorable sections the acrosomes of three passerines (Myiarchus, Pipilo, and Piranga) are definitely limited by a double membrane (fig. 34, 60, 61). The acrosomal material of non-passerines appears to be uniform throughout, although it frequently has a granular composition (fig. 8). Membrane-limited vacuoles are present in the acrosome of Centurus (fig. 25, 27), but have not been observed in other species. Among those passerines with an extensive helical membrane, the acrosome appears to have a dense core, which is not membrane-limited, and has a less dense matrix at the base of the helix (fig. 42, 45). The Helical Membrane This structure is a lateral extension of the acrosome forming a left-handed helix that is highly variable in both length and width. It is a feature of all passerine species and has arisen independently in at least one family of two other orders (Procellariiformes and Charadriiformes). In some instances it is restricted to the very tip of the acrosome but in most of the passerines it extends the full length. In Myiarchus the acrosome is relatively small and of uniform density throughout (fig. 34). In Tachycineta, the acrosome is large, being three times longer than the nucleus 12 and a sagittal section (fig. 42) reveals a dense core, a less dense matrix, and dense material at the lateral extre- mity of the membrane. In transverse section (fig. 45) the dense extremity appears less conspicuous and apparently results from the angle of sectioning. The sagittal section of Parus (fig. 52) would seem to verify this explanation. If one examines the developing spermatid of Piranga (fig. 60) it seems obvious that two types of acrosomal material are present: a dense core, not membrane-limited, and a less dense asymmetrical matrix. Transverse sections of Piranga spermatids (fig. 61) demonstrate two conditions. Some of the acrosomes have a dense core surrounded by a less dense matrix. An area of intermediate density is found at the apex of the membrane. Other acrosomes have a homogeneous density. Longitudinal sections of mature Piranga sperma- tozoa demonstrate the same discrepancy. Some acrosomes are completely homogeneous from tip to nucleus, and from the center to the lateral edge of the membrane, while others have three distinct zones of different densities. All sec- tions underwent identical fixation and staining. Apparently the zonation of early development disappears at full matu- ration. Micrographs of whole mounts of the sperm of many passerine species demonstrate a decreasing density gradient 13 from the core to the lateral edge corresponding to the decreasing thickness of the membrane, with no indication of high density material at the lateral extremity (fig. 58). The Apical Spine or Body -Some species possess an accessory structure located between the acrosome and the nucleus. This is known to occur-in at least three forms: (1) a long spine embedded within the anterior portion of the nucleus and extending forward into a cavity of the acrosome, but external to the limi ing membranes of both structures (fig. 3); (2) a long spine extending forward from the nucleus into a cavity of the acrosome but enclosed within the nuclear membrane (fig. 18); and (3) a spherical body partially embedded in the anterior end of the nucleus and partially enveloped by the acrosome but external to the limiting membranes of both (fig. 7-9). Nagano (1962) has described the formation of the apical spine-of Gallus from a dense granule which appears in a cytoplasmic cavity formed at the surface of the nucleus where the acrosome has attached. Lake et al. (1968) des- cribe the spine as densely-packed, longitudinally arranged, layered material, slightly more electron-dense than the acrosome. They also demonstrate a granular material between the anterior portion of the spine and the acrosome. 14 The apical spine of Columba (fig. 18) is a projection of the nucleus, definitely enclosed by the double nuclear membrane. It is surrounded and separated from the acrosome by amorphous electron translucent material. The apical body of Sterna (fig. 7-9) appears to have intimate contact with the acrosome, and no intervening substance has been observed. It does not appear to be an integral part of the nucleus. A similar structure may be present in Sula. The Tail Sperm tails are comprised of an axoneme or axial filament complex and its associated structures. The tail is normally divided into four distinct areas: the neck, where the axoneme is attached to the nucleus by a connecting piece; the middle piece, where the axoneme is surrounded by mitochondria; the principal or main piece, enclosed by a protein sheath of some nature; and the end piece, where the axoneme is enclosed by only the cytoplasmic membrane. These definitions are based primarily upon mammalian sperm, and certain difficulties arise in trying to apply them to avian sperm. The Axoneme In non-passerines, the axoneme has the standard pattern of most flagella, namely a pair of single tubules surrounded by nine doublet tubules, the so-called 9+2 configuration. 15 The axoneme is derived from the distal centriole of the spermatid, and the nine peripheral doublet tubules are con- tinuous with the nine triplet tubules of this centriole. The two central tubules appear to originate at the posterior end of the distal centriole (fig. 17). The unit tubules of the doublets appear differently in some transverse sections. One of the pair appears hollow, the other appears as a dense rod with two short arms or appendages attached (fig. 20). In other sections, parti- cularly in the posterior axoneme but occasionally in the middle piece (fig. 49), both members of the pair appear hollow. In favorable sections a series of lines may be seen radiating from the center of the complex to each of the doublets (fig. 21). In passerines, the axoneme has an additional set of nine large accessory or dense outer fibers lying distal to the peripheral tubules, a feature known in a number of non- avian species and designated the 9+9+2 configuration. These outer fibers arise as lateral outgrowths of the peripheral doublets (Fawcett and Phillips, 1970) and secondarily fuse with a connecting piece at the base of the nucleus (fig. 42, 46-50). In transverse section they are usually circular in outline and uniform in size. In the proximal axoneme of some species they are wedge-shaped (fig. 42, 49). They 16 extend from the neck to the principal piece and remain in direct contact with the peripheral doublets at all times. In the region of the end piece only 9+2 tubules are present. Nagano (1962) describes small dense fibers proximally in Gallus doublets,-but they have not been observed in other non-passerine species. The diameter of the axoneme in all species diminishes in size fromanterior to posterior. The Neck- The fine structure of the neck is difficult to ascertain because of its complexity and the lack of agreement among authors as to the boundary between the neck and the middle piece. Nagano (1962) considers both the proximal and distal centrioles to be included in the neck of Gallus. Lake et al. (1968) include only the proximal centriole. The matter is further complicated by comparison with other vertebrates. ..In mammals, the distal centriole is not present in mature spermatozoa (Fawcett and Phillips, 1969), and in snakes a unique structure, the neck cylinder, extends beyond the posterior end of the distal centriole (Hamilton and Fawcett, 1968).. For purposes of description, I will consi- der the avian neck to include both proximal and distal centrioles, for the axoneme is not complete (it lacks the central tubules) anterior to the posterior margin of the distal centriole. Birds can once again be divided into two groups, the passerines and the non-passerines, based upon the character- istics of the neck. In the passerines the dense outer fibers continue anteriorly to a small connecting piece at the base of the nucleus and dominate the morphology of the area. Among the non-passerines studied, those sections in which the details of the region are not apparent have been labeled as the centriolar complex. Nagano (1962) and Lake et al. (1968) have shown that in Gallus the proximal centriole is located at right angles to the sperm axis at the base of the nucleus within a small nuclear cavity, the implantation fossa. The distal centriole is adjacent to, and perhaps fused with, the proximal centriole. In Columba the implantation fossa is but a slight con- cavity in the base of the nucleus. The proximal centriole is oriented at an angle of 750 to the sperm axis and fused to the larger distal centriole (fig. 16, 17, 19). In passerines, the components of the neck are even less well known. The only description of ultrastructure during spermiogenesis for a passerine is that of Sotelo and Trujillo-Cenoz (1958) for Passer domesticus, and they were unable to describe the complete sequence of events. They do 18 describe the distal centriole as having direct contact with the nucleus, and the disappearance of the proximal centriole at the same time that a juxtanuclear body appears. The neck of mammalian sperm contains a cross-banded connecting piece linking the dense outer fibers to the base of the nucleus (Fawcett, 1970). This structure is absent in non-passerines, which do not have the outer fibers. It is present in the developing spermatid of Piranga (fig. 60) but has not been observed in the mature sperm. Nicander (1970) indicates that only one modified centriole is present in mature Taeniopygia (=Poephila) sperm, which apparently do have a striated connecting piece. In comparison with non-passerines, the neck of passerine sperm is very short, may incorporate only one centriole, and the central tubules of the axoneme extend further anteriorly (fig. 46, 48). The nine dense outer fibers continue forward to the base of the nucleus where they terminate in either a striated or a knob-like body of unknown fine structure, the connecting piece (fig. 50). The base of the nucleus may have a shallow implantation fossa (fig. 35, 38, 46), a deeper concavity (fig. 52), or may articulate tangentially (fig. 55). The Middle Piece This portion of the tail is generally defined as the segment in which mitochondria surround the axoneme, although in some species small mitochondria extend into the neck region. The middle piece of one of the most variable of sperm components. The mitochondria may be oblate or polygonal, loosely grouped or highly organized, and vary in number from one to more than 1000. The portion of the axoneme encircled by the mitochondrial sheath varies from less than 5 per cent in Alectoris and Sterna to 75 per cent in Columba. Nicander and Hellstrom (1967) have demonstrated that during spermiogenesis in Gallus the inner mitochondrial mem- branes thicken considerably and eventually become 50 per cent thicker than the outer mitochondrial membrane. This pheno- menon has been confirmed by this study (fig. 15) but may not be universal among birds (fig. 23, 24). The cristae of the mitochondria are parallel to the long axis, not perpendicular as in somatic cells (fig. 15). The mitochondria of non-passerine sperm are much smaller than those of the somatic cells of the vas deferens or even of the cellular debris of spermatids and Sertoli cells found in the lumen of the tubule. The mitochondria of Sterna retain their oblate shape, and 30 to 40 are loosely arranged 20 in the middle piece (fig. 6, 11). Lake et al. (1968) describe the mitochondria of Gallus as rectangular plates curved along the longitudinal axis, with approximately 30 arranged helically around the axoneme in a single helix. In Centurus approximately 70 polygonal mitochondria are tightly packed in a single helix about 600 from the longi- tudinal axis (fig. 23, 24), with five mitochondria required to complete a revolution around the axoneme (fig. 27). The middle piece in Columbiformes is the most extreme of all birds studied. These sperm are the longest of all non-passerine species, and the middle piece encircles 75 per cent of the axoneme. The mitochondria are polygonal plates, with five rows forming a shallow 30 helix (fig. 13, 14) around the axoneme. Approximately 1300 mitochondria are present in the middle piece of Columba. Columba has an additional structure, not observed in any other avian species, in the form of numerous small dense granules interspersed between the mitochondria (fig. 13, 15, 21). These granules may be analogous to the pleo- morphic dense plaques described in snakes (Hamilton & Fawcett, 1968). The middle piece of passerines is unique in that a single, greatly elongated mitochondrion extends as an asymmetrical left-handed helix. It may encompass almost the entire length of the tail (fig. 57, 59) or be relatively 21 short and complete only a single revolution. In Myiarchus and Tyrannus the mitochondrion is kidney- shaped in transverse section (fig. 38-40). In Tachycineta the helical mitochondrion is triangular in transverse section proximally, cylindrical distally, and has a lateral exten- sion which encircles the axoneme for 2700 at the base of the neck (fig. 48). One or two spherical mitochondria are also present at the base of the neck. The Turdidae have a very large helical mitochondrion which results in a helix of greater diameter than the helical membrane of the acro- some (fig. 57). The derivation of helical mitochondria is poorly under- stood. In the spermatid, mitochondria are already consider- ably larger than the mitochondria of adjacent Sertoli cells (fig. 60). There is some indication that the large size results from the coalescence of smaller mitochondria (Masuda, 1958; Mehrota, 1951). The anterior portion of the middle piece of some pas- serines contains a unique granular substance surrounding the axoneme (fig. 42, 46, 47). In some species (Tachycineta, Parus, Vireo) the mitochondrion extends forward to the neck, and the granular substance occupies the area around the mitochondrion and the axoneme for a short distance caudad. In other species (Thryothorus, Parula, Piranga, Pipilo, 22 Junco, Richmondena, Passerina) the granular substance com- pletely occupies the middle piece adjacent to the neck, and the mitochondrion begins several microns distal to the neck. The granular substance is conspicuous in the spermatid (fig. 60) but remains of unknown origin and function. The Principal Piece and the End Piece Among mammals and reptiles, that section of the tail caudad to the middle piece is encased in a fibrous sheath, generally consisting of a series of small, dense transverse ribs attached to two longitudinal columns. This sheath ex- tends over most of the flagellum and distinguishes the principal piece of the tail from the end piece, where the axoneme is encased in only the cytoplasmic membrane. A highly structured sheath of this nature is absent in all birds. In only two orders, Galliformes and tinami- formes, has a sheath of any nature been found. An amorphous sheath of medium density as seen in Gallus (Nagano, 1962; Lake et al., 1968) is also present in Alectoris (fig. 2). A similar sheath can be seen in the tinamous Crypturellus and Nothoproctus (fig. 67). Thus the traditional distinction between the principal piece and the end piece, the presence or absence of the fibrous sheath, is not applicable to avian sperm. What was believed to be the principal piece by light microscopists is, 23 in fact, the middle piece. The distal end of the flagellum is smaller in diameter, and the cytoplasmic membrane is more closely applied to the axoneme. No distinct boundary between the principal piece and the end piece can be distinguished. At the very tip of the flagellum the sym- metry of the axoneme is lost. The Cytoplasmic Membrane and Annulus The entire spermatozoon is ensheathed by a plasma mem- brane originally derived from the spermatid. It tends to adhere closely over the acrosome and anterior part of the nucleus. It becomes somewhat slack over the posterior portion of the nucleus, the neck, and middle piece, and then adheres progressively tighter as it proceeds down the re- mainder of the flagellum. All mammalian sperm have a dense ring or annulus associated with the cytoplasmic membrane at the caudal end of the mitochondrial sheath. The annulus of Gallus has been described by Nagano (1962) and Lake et al. (1968) but this structure has not been observed in other birds (fig. 36). A COMPARISON OF AMNIOTE SPERMATOZOA The fine structure of avian spermatozoa can be compared with that of other vertebrates to determine which components they share and which may be unique to birds. The sperm of fishes and amphibians present such major differences (Baccetti, 1970) that comparisons with birds are beyond the scope of this study. Since birds and mammals have reptilian origins, comparison of the amniotes is more reasonable. With one exception, spermatozoa of mammals can be dis- tinguished from those of birds by cursory examination. They are generally ovate or falciform and flattened dorsoven- trally. The exception is the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus, whose spermatozoon is quite avian or reptilian in appearance - a thin, very elongate, fusiform body with a pointed acro- some (Rothschild, 1962). This prototherian possesses a number of reptilian characteristics, but the ultrastructure of its spermatozoon is unknown. Spermatozoa of reptiles are superficially very similar to those of birds, so much so they were considered together as the "sauropsid" type by early microscopists. They both 24 25 possess a cylindrical or fusiform head, frequently with a pointed acrosome. Their fine structure, however, reveals that they are quite different. A comparison of bird and crocodilian sperm would be the most interesting phylogeneti- cally, because of their common archosaurian origin, but the morphology of crocodilian sperm is totally unknown. The various components of bird spermatozoa are compared below with those of mammals (Fawcett, 1965, 1970; Fawcett and Phillips, 1970; Hancock, 1966) and reptiles (Hamilton and Fawcett, 1968; Furieri, 1970). The Head In mammals, the acrosomal membranes extend caudally to cover part of the nucleus, a situation that does not exist in birds. Some mammals possess an apical body or subacro- somal material (Hadek, 1969) that may be analogous to the apical body and associated material described in some birds (Galliformes, Charadriiformes, and Columbiformes). In reptiles, a considerable amount of subacrosomal material occurs (Furieri, 1970). The acrosomal membranes do not extend over the nucleus, but a slender, tapered exten- sion of the nucleus projects forward into the subacrosomal material. This situation resembles that found in the Columbi- formes except that the projection is identical to the rest of the nuclear material, not differentiated as in the 26 Columbiformes. The subacrosomal material of reptiles appears paracrystalline and may include several accessory structures that are absent in both birds and mammals. The Tail All amniotes have a 9+2 axoneme but vary considerably in the presence and arrangement of other tail components. All mammalian spermatozoa whose fine structure is known possess nine accessory or dense outer fibers in the flagellum (Fawcett, 1970). These arise from the peripheral doublet tubules but separate from them with maturation, remaining attached only at their distal extremity. These fibers assume highly varied and irregular shapes, which differ among species, and vary considerably in size. They also tend to terminate distally at different levels of the axoneme. Reptiles also have accessory outer fibers but they remain much smaller and less exaggerated than in mammals. In turtles, the accessory fibers are uniquely located on the inner side of the peripheral doublets, within the axoneme proper. In lizards and snakes they arise from the outer side of the peripheral doublets and two of them migrate out to the fibrous sheath, becoming the longitudinal columns to which the circumferential ribs attach. 27 Among birds, only one order, Passeriformes, is known to have fully developed accessory fibers. These are all of equal size and regular shape. They remain attached to the peripheral doublet and terminate simultaneously along the distal axoneme. Gallus has very small accessory fibers, but their presence among other galliform families or other orders remains to be demonstrated. Two centrioles are present in reptiles and non-passerine birds. In passerines only the distal centriole persists in the mature spermatozoon, but in mammals it is the proximal centriole. Reptiles possess a neck cylinder which has no counterpart among birds or mammals (Hamilton and Fawcett, 1968). It encircles the base of the flagellum and the non- striated connecting piece. All mammals have a striated connecting piece which fuses with the proximal end of the accessory fibers. Among birds, only the passerines have a striated connecting piece and not all species of this order possess it. The middle piece of turtle sperm has the greatest diameter of the gamete and contains globular mitochondria that have concentric cristae and occasionally dense centers. Among lizards, the individual mitochondria are not in direct contact but are separated by, and in some species embedded within, a dense, opaque material. In snakes the mitochondrial 28 sheath covers two-thirds of the flagellum, and in some species the mitochondria are slender and convoluted, with pleomorphic dense bodies interspersed between them. The mitochondria of mammals form a single or double helix about the axoneme, remain as separate entities, and display considerable species variation in size, shape, number, and pitch of helix (Fawcett, 1962). Among birds, they may or may not form a helix, and in at least one order only a single elongate mitochondrion is present. Dense intermitochondrial bodies are found only in Columbiformes. The principal piece of reptiles and mammals is enclosed by a fibrous sheath of circumferential ribs connected by two longitudinal columns. In reptiles this sheath extends forward to the base of the neck, and the mitochondria are concentrically placed external to the sheath. In mammals the mitochondria are in direct contact with the axoneme, and the fibrous sheath encloses the axoneme from the distal end of the middle piece caudally. The juncture of the middle and principal pieces is marked by a dense annulus in mammals and reptiles. Only two avian orders, Galliformes and Tinamiformes, have a sheath, and it is amorphous rather than a series of rings. An annulus is present in the fowl but absent among the other orders studied. 29 Fawcett (1970) has discussed the principal advances of mammalian spermatozoa over the primitive spermatozoon (9+2 axoneme with a simple ring of mitochondria at the base of the flagellum, as found in numerous phyla). He considers them to be: (1) the addition of the accessory fibers to the axoneme, (2) the enlargement of the middle piece, and (3) the acquisition of the fibrous sheath of the principal piece. Reptilian spermatozoa have made similar advances. Although the accessory fibers are not fully developed in some species, all have an enlarged middle piece and a fibrous sheath. In birds the middle piece is highly variable in length but always larger than that of the primitive spermatozoon. The fibrous sheath occurs only in Galliformes and Tinami- formes. Accessory fibers are known only in Galliformes and Passeriformes. The Charadriiformes, Columbiformes, and Piciformes lack both the fibrous sheath and accessory fibers. The scarcity of these three characters may indicate that avian sperm are relatively primitive. Fawcett (1970) postulates that the lengthened middle piece of vertebrate spermatozoa has evolved to meet the energy requirements of the accessory fibers, and both are correlated with the development of internal fertilization. 30 All avian species have internal fertilization but only two orders are known to have accessory fibers. All passerines have accessory fibers but some have a relatively short middle piece. Many avian orders lack accessory fibers but have a middle piece equal to or longer than that found among mammals. The Columbiformes have an extremely elongate middle piece but no accessory fibers. Therefore, analysis of the avian middle piece and accessory fibers would seem to discount this hypothesis. A COMPARISON OF AVIAN SPERMATOZOA It was originally hoped that a comparative investi- gation of avian sperm might shed some light on the evolu- tionary history of birds. However, as so often befalls the introduction of a new taxonomic character, be it morphological, physiological, or biochemical, an examination of sufficient depth reveals greater variation within a particular family or order than that which exists between like taxa. Frequently the most difficult task for a taxono- mist attempting to define a family or order is to determine characters common to all members of a group and absent in all other groups. As the exceptions to the rules become more numerous, the initial exuberance yields to the reali- zation that only an arduous, detailed investigation of a large and almost complete sampling will reveal the secrets of phylogeny. This study included examination of sperm from 19 of the 27 living orders of birds (Wetmore, 1960). A 20th, the ostrich, has previously been described (Retzius, 1911a). Those orders which are lacking are comprised of only a few species each, i.e. the rheas, emus, kiwis, loons, grebes, penguins, and colies. Most of the species studied (200 of 31 32 281) represent the single order Passeriformes which includes about 57 per cent of the living species of the world. At the family level, a more equitable representation has been attained, with 32 non-passerine and 35 passerine families included (of 177 living families in the world). The spermatozoan ultrastructure of only five orders has been investigated and each is different. It is readily apparent that the remaining orders need to be similarly studied. Convergence frequently creates a problem in deciphering phylogenetic relationships, and sperm morphology is no exception. One excellent example is already known (McFarlane, 1963). The Columbiformes have a unique middle piece which is readily apparent at low magnifications. Six genera have been examined (Claravis, Columba, Columbigallina, Leptotila, Zenaida, Zenaidura) and all possess an extremely elongate middle piece. The dense intermitochondrial granules and. nuclear spine are also unknown in other orders. Galliform spermatozoa have an axonemal sheath, an api- cal spine, and accessory fibers. The Tinamiformes appear to possess a similar axonemal sheath (fig. 67) in the prin- cipal piece but their ultrastructure is unknown. The illustrations of Retzius (1909) indicate that apical spines may exist among other birds (perhaps in Anseriformes, 33 Gruiformes, Psittaciformes, Cuculiformes). The Piciformes seem to have relatively unspecialized spermatozoa but a number of other orders (Apodiformes, Strigiformes, Ardeiformes, Pelecaniformes) resemble them in general appearance and may share some ultrastructural details. The sperm of the Passeriformes differ from those of all other birds, and the evolutionary trend of sperm development in this order seems clear. A detailed analysis of passerine sperm is beyond the scope of this study, but several gener- alizations are appropriate. The most conspicuous change in the head has been the relative size of the acrosome and nucleus. The acrosome of lower passerines is quite small but it subsequently comes to dominate the structure of the head, being several times larger than the nucleus. Simul- taneously it develops a helical, lateral extension of the acrosome, a feature that becomes quite exaggerated in some families. This acrosomal arrangement results in the largest sperm heads among birds. Equally significant variations have occurred in the tail of passerines. It has greatly increased in length, and concurrently the middle piece has extended farther down the axoneme. A similar situation exists in the Columbiformes, which have the tail and middle piece very long, but the passerines differ in having only a single mitochondrion. The 34 dense outer fibers of the passerine axoneme have also increased in diameter with the evolution of the longer tail, and the mechanical attachment of the tail to the nucleus has altered, although the fine structural details of the neck are poorly known. The most distinctive trend among passerines is the development of their overall helical configuration. The families of the suborder Tyranni progress from a very gentle coil of one revolution in the Dendrocolaptidae and Furnari- idae to a tightly wound corkscrew in Formicariidae, Pipridae, Cotingidae, and Tyrannidae. The helix is primarily a feature of the nucleus, with only a minimal helical membrane on the small acrosome. The middle piece in these families is very short. The families of the suborder Passeres begin with the helix primarily restricted to the nucleus, with a short middle piece, in the Corvidae and Laniidae. Both the acrosome and middle piece increase in size and helical development in some families (e.g. Paridae and Vireonidae). In others (Parulidae, Icteridae, Thraupidae, Fringillidae) the nucleus shortens, the acrosome lengthens and develops a wide helical membrane, and the helical mitochondrion extends almost the full length of the tail. The functional advantage of this helical configuration remains obscure. The helical membrane of the acrosome would 35 undoubtedly impart a counterclockwise rotary motion during the forward progression of the spermatozoon, and this has been observed in passerines (Nicander, 1970). Thompson (1966) experimented with models of nudibranch sperm, which closely resemble those of passerines but have a right-handed helical membrane attached to the nucleus instead of the acrosome. He was able to duplicate the rotary motion observable in living Archidoris sperm. The low profile of the mitochondrial helix would not appear to increase the rotation of the spermatozoon to any great extent, except in the Turdidae where the tail helix dominates. The function of the mitochondrial helix may be to reduce the force necessary to propagate wave motion down the flagellum. Apparently the development of an extremely long tail in a species utilizing internal fertilization requires that energy sources remain close to the axoneme for most of its length. A helical mitochondrion would offer less resistance than a straight rod or sheath (Andre, in Baccetti, 1970, p. 272), particularly if the waves are biplanar. In any event, rotary motion appears to have some selective advantage, which has resulted in its development among the most recently evolved families of birds. It has independently arisen in some members of two other phyla, Annelida and Mollusca (Franzen, 1970), and in two other orders of birds. The Charadriiformes are one of the larger avian orders, and their sperm are now rather well known. The early light microscopists (Ballowitz, 1888, 1913; Retzius, 1909) studied 9 species of this order. I have studied an addi- tional 21 species from 7 families. The sperm of 6 of these families (Jacanidae, Charadriidae, Recurvirostridae, Laridae, Rynchopidae, Alcidae) are remarkably uniform, exhibiting variation in the relative size of the acrosome and middle piece but with the same basic morphology (fig. 5). The sperm of the sandpipers (Scolopacidae) are drama- tically different from those of the other Charadriiformes but resemble passerine sperm. The entire head is helical, as is the middle piece in some species, and the acrosome has a helical membrane (fig. 71). This configuration is consistent in the six genera whose sperm is known (Actitis, Capella, Catoptrophorus, Scolopax, Totanus, Tringa). This situation is particularly interesting because the sandpipers and the plovers (Charadriidae) are considered by some taxo- nomists to be so closely related as to merit only subfamily distinction, yet those plovers whose sperm is known (Chara- drius, Vanellus) have sperm typical of the other charadriiform families (fig. 72). The ultrastructure of neither group is known, nor have the spermatozoa of intermediate forms, such as Arenaria, been studied. A similar but less well documented case is found in the Procellariiformes. In this instance three families are known from a single species each. Oceanodroma (Hydrobatidae) and Diomedea (Diomedeidae) have blunt, rounded acrosomes (fig. 70), but Puffinus (Procellariidae) has a short and strongly helical acrosome (fig. 69). Thus we see an excellent example of convergent evolu- tion. The appearance of the helical acrosome in only one of three procellariiform families and one of seven charadri- iform families can hardly indicate relationship with the passerines, where we find the full spectrum from slight to full helix within a single order. The Passeriformes are thought to be the most recent order to appear in the evolutionary history of birds. On the basis of sperm morphology, the passerines display no relationship to any of the other orders whose sperm is known, including the Piciformes, which have frequently been suggested as ancestral to the Passeriformes (Furbringer, 1888). SUMMARY Avian spermatozoa exhibit considerable variation in both gross and fine structure and may be useful indicators of phylogenetic relationship but knowledge of their ultra- structure is required. The spermatozoa of 281 species of birds were surveyed with phase-contrast microscopy. Of these, 177 species were viewed with the electron microscope and the ultrastructure of 18 species was studied in detail. The highly structured fibrous sheath of the principal piece, found in both reptiles and mammals, is absent in birds, although two avian orders (Galliformes and Tinami- formes) have an amorphous sheath. The accessory fibers of the axoneme, common in reptiles and highly developed in mammals, also occur in two avian orders (small in Galliformes but well developed in Passeriformes). On the other hand, the acrosome of many passerines has achieved a degree of development unequalled among other vertebrates. APPENDIX A. Figures 1 73 KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS acr acrosome ap.b. apical body ap.s. apical spine a.s. amorphous sheath ax axoneme c.c. centriolar complex c.m. cytoplasmic membrane c.p. connecting piece d.c. distal centriole d.g. dense granule e.p. end piece g.s. granular substance mi mitochondrion m.p. middle piece m.s. microtubular spindle n.m. nuclear membrane nuc nucleus o.f. dense outer fiber p.c. proximal centriole p.p. principal piece Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of the spermatozoon of the chukar, Alectoris graeca. (Galliformes, Phasianidae) A, X2,000; B, X10,000; C I, X50,000 A. Entire spermatozoon. Total length = 90p. B. Head and middle piece. Length of acrosome = 1.8p, nucleus = 11.3p, middle piece = 3.7p. C. Sagittal section of the anterior head. The conical acrosome has a deep posterior cavity that slips over the proximal nucleus and encloses the apical spine. The spine is embedded within the nucleus but is exterior to the nuclear membrane. A cytoplasmic mem- brane ensheaths the entire spermatozoon. D. Sagittal section of the anterior tail. The axoneme arises from the centriolar complex and is surrounded by the plate-like mitochondria of the middle piece. E. Cross section of the head at level e-e, intersecting the acrosome and apical spine. F. Cross section of the head at level f-f, intersecting the acrosome, nucleus, and apical spine. G. Cross section of the middle piece at level g-g, intersecting the mitochondrial sheath and the axoneme. H. Cross section of the principal piece at level h--h, intersecting the amorphous sheath and axoneme. I. Cross section of the end piece at level i-i, inter- secting only the axoneme and cytoplasmic membrane. acr acrosome ap.s. apical spine a.s. amorphous sheath ax axoneme c.c. contriolar complex c.m. cytoplasmic membrane mi mitochondrion m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus p.p. principal piece I I acr ap. nuc mi- mi- c.m. O.s. axI ax E F p. P.- Figures 2 4. Alectoris graeca. Buffered formalin fixation. Fig. 2. Fig. 3. Fig. 4. Os04 post-fixation. Longitudinal section of the nucleus and an axoneme. Numerous transverse sections the tail, demon- strating the changes in morphology and reduction in diameter caudally. Note sections of the middle piece with surrounding mitochondria, the principal piece and its amorphous sheath, and the axoneme of the end piece. X20,000 Longitudinal section of anterior nucleus and acrosome. The apical spine is embedded in the nucleus and extends forward into a cavity of the acrosome. X75,000 Longitudinal section of the middle piece and nucleus. The centriolar complex at the base of the nucleus gives rise to the axoneme which is surrounded by the mitochondria of the middle piece. X21,000 acr ap.s. ax cc.c e.p. m.p. nuc p.p. - acrosome - apical spine - axoneme - centriolar complex - end piece - middle piece - nucleus - principal piece w . wit ki. 7? mb, 'P" -s C. S- wI, t ^u ~- n4.c. -%. t. 4% 1'.. a. *Vi .Ass ,--rr -2r'--- 3*- alM, l " Sn-*~ I, ~,"~eat. ri;" - F 0. , l* 'I 'il . 41N a 2,1 4z. zsv N* ft Figure 5. Diagrammatic representation of the spermatozoon of the sooty tern, Sterna fuscata. (Charadriiformes, Laridae) A, X2,000; B, XI0,00; C F, X40,000. A. Entire sperm. Total length = 60p. B. Head and middle piece. Length of acrosome = 0.9p, nucleus = 7.2p, middle piece = 2.2p. C. Sagittal section of the anterior head. A spherical apical body is embedded in the nucleus and capped by the short, conical acrosome. All are encased by the cytoplasmic membrane. D. Sagittal section of the anterior tail. The centriolar complex at the base of the nucleus gives rise to the axoneme. The mitochondria are loosely arranged about the axoneme and do not form a helix. E. Cross section of the proximal principal piece at level e-e. The axoneme is surrounded by only the cytoplasmic membrane. F. Cross section of the distal principal piece at level f-f. The only change from (e) is a reduction in' diameter of the axoneme. In the absence of a sheath or accessory fibers there is no reliable distinction between a principal piece and an end piece. acr acrosome ap.b. apical body ax axoneme c.c. centriolar complex c.m. cytoplasmic membrane mi mitochondrion m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus p.p. principal piece B I p. p. * Q P; ;; 46 - acr C.c mi f f\ E P."i F Sterna fuscata. Fig, Fig. Fig. 6. Fig. 7. Fig. 8. 6, 7, 8, & 11 Os04 fixation, uranyl acetate stain. 9 & 10 formalin fixation, whole mount. Longitudinal section of sperm head. The nucleus contains numerous cavities randomly scattered throughout the granular chromatin. The centriolar complex closely adheres to the base of the nucleus, and the mitochondria are oblate and loosely arranged about the axoneme. X27,000 Subtangential section of anterior head. The double nuclear membrane contrasts with the single membrane of the acrosome. The plane of section intersects the edge of the apical body. X42,000 Parasagittal section of sperm head. The apical body can be seen embedded in the tip of the nucleus. X54,000 Fig. 9. View of anterior sperm head and apical body with acrosome detached. X36,000 Fig. 10. View of anterior sperm head with acrosome intact. X36,000 Fig. 11. Longitudinal section of anterior tail. The axoneme can be seen emanating from the centriolar complex. X48,000 acr acrosome ap.b. apical body ax axoneme c.c. centriolar complex mi mitochondrion n.m. nuclear membrane nuc nucleus Figures 6 11. .5l 4' "!:" .! , ..::. ... E: E 4w w . ..^3 ,:. '.-C OP&. b. Figure 12. Diagrammatic representation of the spermatozoon of the rock dove, Columba livia. (Columbiformes, Columbidae) A, X2,000; B, X10,000; C F, X50,000 A. Entire sperm. Total length = 160p. The termination of the mitochondrial sheath of the middle piece is indicated by an arrow. B. The head. Length of acrosome = 2.4p, nucleus = 16.Op, middle piece = 105p. C. Sagittal section of anterior portion of head. The apical spine is an extension of the nucleus and is limited by the double nuclear membrane. D. Cross section of the head at level d-d, intersecting the acrosome and apical spine. E. Sagittal section of anterior tail. The proximal centriole lies at an angle of 750 to the longitudinal axis, the distal centriole is parallel to the axis. The peripheral doublets of the axoneme are continuous with the triplets of the distal centriole, and the central tubules arise at the caudal end of the distal centriole. Dense granules are interspersed among the mitochondria of the middle piece. F. Sagittal section of anterior tail, view rotated 90 from (E), demonstrating the triplets of the proximal centriole. acr acrosome ap.s. apical spine ax axoneme c.m. cytoplasmic membrane d.c. distal centriole d.g. dense granule mi mitochondrion m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus p.c. proximal centriole 50 A B C S, --. ! ocr d-- -': - ':""""' ......* d *d.g. m 11 p. -' nyc m.p. 0 ax ib- a ;l. **7/ ^ ^Av- | _nu ^S i~: "-I- j 4 Figures 13 15. Os4 fixation. Lead citrate stain. Fig. 13. Fig. 14. Fig. 15. Longitudinal section of posterior nucleus, anterior middle piece, and centriolar complex. Note the dense granules among the polygonal mitochondria. X24,000 Longitudinal section of middle piece, demon- strating the extreme elongation of this com- ponent and the helical arrangement of the five rows of polygonal mitochondria surrounding the axoneme. X11,000 Longitudinal section of the middle piece. The dimorphic character of the peripheral doublets and the numerous dense granules (arrows) are apparent. X39,000 c.c. centriolar complex m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus Columba livia. 52 I P43. 4 or 9- S., e 4 Figures 16 21. OsO4 fixation. Lead citrate stain. 4 Fig. 16. Fig. 17. Fig. 18. Fig. 19. Fig. 20. Fig. 21. Longitudinal section of posterior nucleus and centriolar complex. The relative positions of the proximal and distal centrioles, and the double nuclear and single cytoplasmic membranes are apparent (arrows). X48,000 Longitudinal section of the centriolar complex perpendicular to the axis of the proximal centriole. Note the dimorphic character of the peripheral doublets and their continuation into the distal centriole, the termination of the central tubules at the caudal end of the centriole, and the triplets of the proximal centriole. The cristae of the mitochondria are parallel with the main axis and the dense granules (arrows) are present right up to the base of the neck. X52,000 Sagittal section of anterior head. The apical spine is continuous with the nucleus and within the double nuclear membrane. It is surrounded by an electron translucent material and does not directly contact the acrosome. X68,000 Cross section of the proximal centriole, demon- strating the triplet character of the centriolar tubules (arrow). X52,000 Cross section of the middle piece, demonstrating the five rows of mitochondria and the peripheral doublets, and central singlets of the axoneme. X96,000 Cross section of the middle piece. The central tubules are linked by two arcs, and spokes lead from the center of the axoneme to each of the doublets. The five rows of mitochondria and a dense granule are visible. X110,000 acr ap. s. d.c. d.g. mi nuc p.c. - acrosome - apical spine - distal centriole - dense granule - mitochondrion - nucleus - proximal centriole Columba livia. ~2ot Ii lq 9 : fil Figure 22. Diagrammatic representation of the spermatozoon of the red-bellied woodpecker, Centurus carolinus (Piciformes, Picidae). A, X2,000; B, X10,000; C F, X50,000 A. Entire spermatozoon. Total length = 90p. B. Head and middle piece. Length of acrosome = 1.2p, nucleus = 13.0p, middle piece = 5.4p. C. Surface view of acrosome. D. Sagittal section of acrosome, demonstrating the oblique juncture of acrosome and nucleus, and the absence of an apical spine or body. E. Sagittal section of proximal portion of tail, with deep implantation fossa of nucleus surrounding the centriolar complex. Note the closely packed mitochondria. F. Side view of head-tail juncture. Caudal projections of the nucleus form a partial hood around the centriolar complex. G. Transverse section of the middle piece. acr acrosome ax axoneme c.c. centriolar complex c.m. cytoplasmic membrane mi mitochondrion m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus p.p. principal piece G m.p. Centurus carolinus Serial sections of the middle piece of four spermatozoa. Os4 fixation. Uranyl acetate stain. Fig. 23. Fig. 24. Longitudinal section. The undulation of the spermatozoa through the plane of section results in a median section of the axoneme and a subtangential section of the nucleus. X30,000 Subtangential section of the middle piece and principal piece. Note the tightly packed polygonal mitochondria and the implantation fossa of the nucleus surrounding the centriolar complex. X30,000 ax axoneme c.c. centriolar complex m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus p.p. principal piece Figures 23 and 24. 23. 24. V i ." : -'. .. -C * , ., Ji tPt CtCt Erf .p r;s~ "'1~ "" *" C. p.. Y I . I - Figures 25 31. Os4 fixation. Fig. 25. Fig. 26. Fig. 27. Fig. 28. Fig. 29. Fig. 30. Fig. 31. Centurus carolinus Uranyl acetate stain. Longitudinal section of the spermatozoon head. Note the junction of the nucleus and the acrosome, and the acrosomal vacuole (arrow). X35,000 Longitudinal section of the spermatozoon head. Note the nucleus-acrosome junction and the double nuclear membrane (arrow).. X35,000 Cross section of middle piece, acrosome, and distal axoneme. Note the three membrane-limited vacuoles of the acrosome (arrow). X35,000 Oblique section of the nucleus-acrosome juncture. X61,000 Oblique section of head-tail juncture. The centriolar complex closely adheres to the implantation fossa of the nucleus. X45,000 Oblique section through the centriolar complex, surrounded by the hood-like extensions of the nucleus. X58,000 Oblique section of the nucleus-tail juncture. Compare with fig. 29 and 30. The nucleus extends farther posteriorly in this aspect, demonstrating the asymmetrical hood. The double nuclear and single cytoplasmic membranes are apparent (arrow). X42,000 acr acrosome ax axoneme c.c. centriolar complex m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus T .4 S.l. I ~ I r H i' Figure 32. Diagrammatic representation of the spermatozoon of the great crested flycatcher, Myiarchus crinitus (Passeriformes, Tyrannidae). A, X2,000; B, X10,000; C J, X50,000 A. Entire spermatozoon. Total length = 50p. B. Head and middle piece. Length of acrosome = 2.5u, nucleus = 18.5u, middle piece = 3.3p. The entire nucleus is helical, with the helix continued anteriorly by the helical membrane of the acrosome, and posteriorly by the single helical mitochondrion around the axoneme. C. Sagittal section of the acrosome-nucleus juncture, which is slightly oblique. D. Longitudinal section of the nucleus-tail juncture. The nucleus has only a shallow implantation fossa to receive the centriolar complex. The single mitochondrion is displaced laterally and completes one helical revolution. E. Sagittal section of the caudal extremity of the middle piece. There is no annulus around the axoneme. F. Cross section of the acrosome at level f-f. G. Cross section of the acrosome-nucleus juncture at level g-g. H. Cross section of the middle piece at level h-h. Note the asymmetry of the 9+9+2 axoneme and the laterally displaced mitochondrion. I. Cross section of the principal piece at level i--i. J. Cross section of the end piece at level j--j. The dense outer fibers of the axoneme are not present. acr acrosome ax axoneme c.c. centriolar complex mi mitochondrion m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus A B acr I 'a.. J C h- m.p. ax Figures 33 36. Os04 fixation. Fig. 33. Fig. 34. Fig. 35. Fig. 36. Myiarchus crinitus Lead citrate stain. Entire head, whole mount. Arrow denotes the juncture of the middle piece and nucleus. X8,000 Longitudinal sections of nucleus, the nucleus- acrosome juncture, and acrosome tip (note double membrane at arrow). Cross sections of acrosome and acrosome tip, and numerous cross sections of principal piece. The very dense, irregular areas are precipitated lead. X38,000 Longitudinal section of nucleus-tail juncture. X36,000 Sagittal section of distal end of the middle piece. There is no annulus posterior to the mitochondrion. The dense outer fibers are in intimate contact with the peripheral tubules of the axoneme. X37,000 acr acrosome mi mitochondrion nuc nucleus p.p. principal piece S3. 64 F-1 .il tff 1 / *I . Figures 37 40. Western kingbird, Tyrannus verticalis (Passeriformes, Tyrannidae) Formalin fixation. Os4 post-fixation (fig. 38-40). Fig. 37. Entire spermatozoon. Whole mount. Arrows denote the anterior and posterior limits of the nucleus. X5,200 Fig. 38. Longitudinal section of anterior middle piece. Note the asymmetrical mitochondrion. X32,000 Fig. 39. Oblique section of anterior middle piece. X47,000 Fig. 40. Cross section of middle piece. Note the asym- metry of the mitochondrion and the 9+9+2 axoneme. X145,000 ax axoneme mi mitochondrion nuc nucleus 31. I 'YICI~ :C Figure 41. Diagrammatic representation of the spermatozoon of the violet-green swallow, Tachycineta thalassina (Passeriformes, Hirundinidae) A, X2,000; B, X10,000; C J, X25,000 A. Entire spermatozoon. Total length = 285p. B. Head. Length of acrosome = 13.5p, nucleus = 4.5p. C. Sagittal section of acrosome-nucleus juncture. D. Sagittal section of anterior tail. The dense outer fibers are continuous with the connecting piece at the base of the nucleus. The helical mitochondrion has a lateral extension which curves around the axoneme. One or two small spherical mitochondria may also be present. The granular substance surrounds the mito- chondrion and the axoneme and extends a short distance posteriorly. E. Sagittal section of the middle piece at the posterior termination of the granular substance. The helical mitochondrion has a triangular cross section at this point. F. Cross section of the acrosome at level f-f. G. Cross section of the acrosome at level g-g. H. Cross section of the middle piece at level h--h, through the lateral extension of the helical mitochondrion. Note the 9+9+2 axoneme. I. Cross section of the mitochondrion at level i-i, intersecting the granular substance and the triangular helical mitochondrion. J. Cross section of the middle piece at level j--j. Note the asymmetry of the helical mitochondrion and the 9+9+2 axoneme. acr acrosome c.p. connecting piece g.s. granular substance mi mitochondrion m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus o.f. dense outer fibers F nuc nuc Tachycineta thalassina. Formalin fixation. Fig. 42 & 45 stained with uranyl acetate. Fig. 43 & 44 shadowed with chromium. Fig. 42. Longitudinal section of spermatozoon head. Note the dense core area of the acrosome, the less dense surrounding material, and the dense cross sections of the helical membrane. In the lower right-hand corner is a cross section of the anterior middle piece, distal to the granular substance. Note the triangular mitochondrion. X13,000 Fig. 43. Fig. 44. Fig. 45. Whole head, shadowed with chromium. denotes the direction of shadowing. The arrow X8,000 A portion of the middle piece, shadowed with chromium. The helical configuration of the mitochondrion and the individual dense outer fibers are apparent. X26,000 A longitudinal section of the posterior acrosome and its junction with the nucleus (lower) and a cross section of the acrosome (upper). Note the dense core of the acrosome and the less dense material at the base of the helical membrane. X23,000 acr acrosome mi mitochondrion m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus o.f. dense outer fibers Figures 42 45. 70 P , u ;*0 V 45. ,, ".& -. . ; .1 2i tL. 4 S a A 2. Figures 46 50. Tac Formalin fixation. Fig. 46. Fig. 47. Fig. 48. Fig. 49. Fig. 50. hycineta thalassina. Uranyl acetate stain. Longitudinal section of the anterior middle piece. The dense outer fibers continue into the connecting piece at the base of the nucleus. The granular substance surrounds the mitochondria and the axoneme. X30,000 Longitudinal section of the anterior middle piece. Note the short length of the granular substance which extends from the neck down the middle piece for 4u. X18,000 Cross section of the anterior middle piece, immediately posterior to the neck. Note the large mitochondrion with a lateral extension encircling the axoneme through an arc of 2700, and the smaller spherical mitochondrion at the same level. X38,000 Cross section of the middle piece. Note the dense outer fibers attached to the peripheral doublets of the axoneme, and the triangular mitochondrion. X70,000 Oblique section of the nucleus-tail juncture, and two cross sections of the posterior middle piece, where the elongate mitochondrion has assumed a cylindrical configuration. X33,000 c.p. connecting piece g.s. granular substance mi mitochondrion m.p. middle piece o.f. dense outer fibers S. --- -- at .: a .^Iif *A *B" -^ 'gad ;46. a ^jf -w Sc'. _ a-. 49. 0 Figure 51. Diagrammatic representation of the spermatozoon of the tufted titmouse, Parus bicolor (Passeriformes, Paridae) and the red-eyed vireo, Vireo olivaceus (Passeriformes, Vireonidae). A & B, X15,000; C & D, X8,300 A. Parus bicolor. Head. Total length of spermatozoon = 90p, acrosome = 7.11, nucleus = 5.8p, middle piece = 50p. The nucleus is helical and has a secondary helical constriction which forms a slight furrow along its length. B. Parus bicolor. Sagittal section of A. C. Vireo olivaceus. Head and middle piece. Total length of a spermatozoon = 80p, acrosome = 8.0p, nucleus = 5.5p, middle piece = 10.p. The middle piece extends for only one-sixth of the 66p tail. D. Vireo olivaceus. Sagittal section of C. acr acrosome m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus acr nuc m. Parus bicolor and Vireo olivaceus. Fig. 52. Fig. 53. Fig. 54. Fig. 55. Parus bicolor. Sagittal section of head and middle piece. The granular chromatin contains numerous cavities and has a secondary helical constriction which runs the full length of the nucleus. A deep implantation fossa encompasses the centriolar complex. Glutaraldehyde fixation. Uranyl acetate stain. X17,000 Parus bicolor. Head, whole mount. Formalin fixation. X9,300 Vireo olivaceus. Head and middle piece, whole mount. The anterior and posterior limits of the middle piece are indicated by the arrows. Formalin fixation. X4,800 Vireo olivaceus. Sagittal section of nucleus and middle piece. The axoneme is tangentially attached to the base of the nucleus. Glutaralde- hyde fixation. Uranyl acetate stain. X23,000 acr acrosome ax axoneme c.c. centriolar complex mi mitochondrion nuc nucleus p.p. principal piece Figures 52 55. 76 s6. .rr. 5 *. VAA V C.C. -Va "I to 'In, i, p... Ii [ k' i Figure 56. Diagrammatic representation of the spermatozoa of the robin, Turdus migratorius (Passeriformes, Turdidae) and the summer tanager, Piranga rubra (Passeriformes, Thraupidae). A & B, X15,000; C & D, X13,000 A. Turdus migratorius. Head. Total length of spermatozoon = 70p, acrosome = 6.7p, nucleus = 2.5p, middle piece = 46p. This family is characterized by a very large helical mitochondrion, resulting in the mitochondrial helix having a larger diameter than the helical membrane of the acrosome. B. Turdus migratorius. middle piece. Sagittal section of head and anterior C. Piranga rubra. Head. Total length of spermatozoon = 170p, acrosome = 12.0p, nucleus = 3.Op, middle piece = 146p. This family is characterized by an extremely wide helical membrane on the acrosome. Narrow exten- sions of the acrosome extend to the edge of the helix. D. Piranga rubra. Sagittal section of head. acr acrosome m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus *acr nuc- nuc m. Figures 57 59. Fig. 57. Fig. 58. Fig. 59. Turdus migratorius. Head and middle piece. Whole mount. The arrows mark the anterior and posterior limits of the middle piece, which extends for most of the axoneme length. Formalin fixation. X8,200 Piranga rubra. Head, demonstrating the broad helical membrane of the acrosome. Formalin fixation. X7,600 Tangara gyrola, the bay-headed tanager (Passeri- formes, Thraupidae). Entire spermatozoon. Total length 148p. Arrows denote the anterior and posterior limits of the middle piece. Formalin fixation. X2,900 a Figure 60. Testicular section of developing spermatids of Piranga rubra. A striated connecting piece can be observed at the posterior end of one nucleus. The acrosome contains material of differing densities, as does the proximal middle piece, where the granular substance is contrasted with the microtubular spindle. Compare the large, elongate mitochondrion of the spermatid with the numerous, smaller typical mitochondria of the surrounding Sertoli cells. OsO4 fixation. X20,000 acr acrosome c.p. connecting piece g.s. granular substance mi mitochondrion m.s. microtubular spindle *. '4 I I 11 A k, 2A F ~rT t~e 4 PYA Figures 61 63. Testicular sections of developing sperma- tids of Piranga rubra. Os04 fixation. Fig. 61. Fig. 62. Fig. 63. Transverse sections of acrosomes. Some shi three distinct density areas, with dense material at the apex (arrows) while other sections, apparently more anterior, have a uniform medium density. Some of the acro- somes exhibit a definite double limiting membrane. X1 ow 6,000 Cross sections of the middle piece. Three distance structures are present: the 9+9+2 axoneme, the helical mitochondrion, and the microtubular spindle, which can be seen to include cisternae of endoplasmic reticulum, both open and collapsed. X60,000 Cross sections of the middle piece. Isolated membranes from the collapsed cisternae can be seen within the microtubular spindles. X30,000 mi mitochondrion m.s. microtubular spindle I v). A i w6 1 * 2p*i 444. .~ h' *4 R . * *9^ JC - 4. .a~ i r ~ v r L: I r! si. S"9 .eq * .. 1 I s~ L s ~b": Figures 64 & 65. Os04 fixation. Fig. 64. Fig. 65. Testicular sections of spermatids of the rufous-sided towhee, Pipilo erythrophthalmus. (Passeriformes, Fringillidae) Uranyl acetate stain. Microtubular spindles can be seen adjacent to the acrosome-nucleus juncture at far left and far right, and the nucleus at center right. Cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum have been enclosed within the spindle at far left. The double membrane of the acrosome is readily apparent (arrow). The transverse section of the nucleus (center right) suggests that the micro- tubules may actually be within the perinuclear cisterna. X27,000 The microtubular spindle extends caudad to the middle piece, where it coils about the axoneme. The collapsed cisternae of endoplasmic reticulum appear as random membranes within the bundles of tubules. Compare the typical mitochondria of the Sertoli cells with the elongate helical mitochondrion of the spermatid, whose cristae have not completed their reorientation to the longitudinal axis. X14,000 acr acrosome mi mitochondrion m.s. microtubular spindle nuc nucleus 86 ''1.1 , "r ;i | r? o-e 00, Ilkt ..... 14% ... . .,i E `Z ,lo. PsI "b '"~ ' '' .' sl!- B'yC e r' .. .~~ i ,, .: Some representative spermatozoa. Formalin fixation. Whole mounts Fig. 66. The head of the Tataupa tinamou, Crypturellus tataupa (Tinamiformes, Tinamidae). X1l,000 Fig. 67. Crypturellus tataupa. A break in the sheath of the principal piece reveals the axoneme and the thickness of the sheath. X27,000 Fig. 68. Crypturellus tataupa. The acrosome has a spade- like anterior projection. X76,000 Fig. 69. The head of the wedge-tailed shearwater, Puffinus pacificus (Procellariiformes, Procellariidae), demonstrating the helical acrosome. X13,000 Fig. 70. Fig. 71. Fig. 72. Fig. 73. The head of the Laysan albatross, Diomedea immutabilis, which lacks the helical acrosome. X9,000 The head of the common snipe, Capella gallinago (Charadriiformes, Scolopacidae), with helical acrosome and nucleus. X9,000 The head of the killdeer, Charadrius vociferous (Charadriiformes, Charadriidae) with cylindrical nucleus and blunt acrosome. X16,000 The head and tail of the three-wattled bellbird, Procnias tricarunculata (Passeriformes, Cotingidae) which is representative of the most extreme helical configuration among the suborder Tyranni. X9,000 acr acrosome m.p. middle piece nuc nucleus p.p. principal piece Figures 66-73. CLcr IuC &cr 73. mmh,, -- iii* *i 'ii ilI: i "* ::::'i, l l ^I'.'"'2l :'*::i ^ ^ Acr hueA APPENDIX B. CLASSIFICATION AND LIST OF SPECIES STUDIED Orders and Families follow Wetmore, 1960. Asterisk (*) indicates ultrastructure studied. Tinamiformes Tinamidae Nothoprocta cinerascens N. pentlandii Procellariiformes Diomedeidae Diomedea immutabilis Procellariidae Puffinus pacificus Hydrobatidae Oceanodroma leucorhoa Pelecaniformes Phaethontidae Phaethon rubricauda Sulidae Sula dactylatra S. leucogaster Anh ingidae Anhinga anhinga Fregatidae Fregata minor Ciconiiformes Ardeidae Ardea herodias Butorides virescens Ixobrychus exilis Threskiornithidae Eudocimus albus Anseriformes Anatidae Somateria mollissima Crypturellus tataupa S. sula Bubulcus ibis Casmerodius albus Falconiformes Cathartidae Cathartes aura Accipitridae Buteo lineatus Galliformes Tetraonidae Bonasa umbellus Phasianidae *Alectoris graeca Callipepla squamata Gruiformes Rallidae Fulica americana Rallus longirostris Charadriiformes Jacanidae Jacana spinosa Charadriidae Charadrius vociferus Scolopacidae Actitis macularia Catoptrophorus semipalmatus Recurvirostridae Himantopus mexicanus Laridae Larus atricilla L. argentatus L. marinus Gelochelidon nilotica Anous minutus A. stolidus Rynchopidae Rynchops nigra Alcidae Fratercula nigra Columbiformes Columbidae *Columba livia C. nigrirostris Columbigallina passerina C. talpacoti B. platypterus Colinus virginianus Gallus gallus Gallinula chloropus C. wilsonia Capella gallinago Sterna albifrons *S. fuscata S. hirundo S. lunata S. paradisaea Gygis alba Claravis pretiosa Leptotila verreauxi Zenaida asiatica Zenaidura macroura |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 36 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |