Highlights of symposium on child welfare

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
Highlights of symposium on child welfare
Physical Description:
11 p. : ; 28 cm.
Language:
English
Publisher:
U.S. Dept. of Health
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C
Publication Date:

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Child welfare -- United States   ( lcsh )
Child welfare -- Israel   ( lcsh )
Child welfare -- Russia   ( lcsh )
Genre:
federal government publication   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )

Notes

General Note:
Cover title.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 004966635
oclc - 367816071
System ID:
AA00012234:00001


This item is only available as the following downloads:


Full Text
... .. ..., ,.. .. .,. .. ,. .., .. ... .. ., ... ....
'............"' .: ... .. .. .. -: '' "'" "" ... .."" .: .....; ..... ..'
. .' -.... '.' -. ". '. ; .- ..' .; 'P .. '" -;. '... .. '.. .





;-. ;.';. :.'. ;. ..;-.i.;.; ...'; .; '; '' '. :...;


.. -. .. .. ...-..'..'.
.. .. ... ..:- S :.:. ..!
. .. ..... .. .... ... .... .. ... .. ......... .. . .
....... .... ...:i:Z::i .i:.i. :. :::':.." "". : .' ."- .

.::'. : ........ ':.'. :.:.. .. .- '-. ...::. ..." .? i.". ." Z ." .Z -



. .. . .. .. .. .. ...... .::...:-.. .
. ........ .. .. ..... .. .... .. .......... .... .....: ... .... .. .. .. .

.. .. .. ....... .......... .. .. .. .:: ::i:i@ ;.-:i .:. !:: ." Z .: : -
.. .. . .. ...".. ,
.............. .i .. :i :: i! : ..X .! .: : ...: Z :..... .. .
.. ............. .. .. ............ .... .. .. .:: i : : : :. :
....... .... .. ::" "' :" -: :' .. ".. .. ...."....".'
. . .. ... .
.. ... ..:~ i:i" :Z~ ''i~ ::::" ."i!'i! :: ........... ... .... '~ .. v ": .". !" iii~ i'i i'' : i







This publication covers highlights of the Washington Symposium
on Child Welfare which was co-sponsored by the Children's Bureau and
the International Union for Child Welfare. The Bureau will continue
to study child welfare practices and experiments -- not only in this
country but in other countries as well.

One major problem confronting most of our metropolitan areas
today is the influx of low-income, minority group families who come
from rural and mountain areas. Among these families, there is a heavy
marital breakdown. As a result, tremendous loads are being placed on
welfare departments in caring for infants, preschool and school age
children.

Several studies show that large numbers of well babies are still
being kept in hospitals because of the lack of foster family homes or
other foster care resources. The problem of the homeless infant and
young child who require long time care needs current examination.

The Bureau and all organizations concerned with children need
to further their thinking in order to develop a fully rounded comple-
ment of old and new services to meet these new challenges in providing
sound child welfare.




Katherine B. Oettinger
Chief, Children's Bureau
Welfare Administration











HIGHLIGHTS OF SYMPOSIUM ON CHILD WELFARE


Sponsored by:


Co-chairmen:



Attending:


The Children's Bureau, Welfare Administration,
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare

and

The International Union for Child Welfare


Mrs. Katherine B. Oettinger, Chief, Children's Bureau
Mr. Leonard W. Mayo, President, International Union
for Child Welfare

Forty-three specialists in child development and wel-
fare. Most of them were policy and program personnel
from public and voluntary agencies and organizations.


Objectives

To hear about some of the experimental programs in other countries --
particularly the group care programs for children introduced by the
Youth Aliyah of Israel and the "Shkola Internat" of the Soviet Union.


To identify the relationships of the Israel and the Russian programs to
the rearing of children and the use of group care programs in the
United States.


To find out what, if anything, the United States, Israel, and Russia
can learn from each other.


To consider if ideas or activities in the Israeli and Russian experi-
ments -- which put a great deal of emphasis on what happens to the
child outside the home -- might be adapted or applied to child rear-
ing in this country -- where most emphasis is put on what happens
to the child inside his own home.







To see if any part of the two programs can be used to ease hardships
existing in culturally and economically deprived families and com-
munities in this country.




The Washington Symposium -- often referred to as a "clinic for
ideas" -- along with a similar symposium held in New York City, are the
first held in this country. Previously, similar symposiums were held
in Europe and elsewhere.

In opening the symposium, Mrs. Oettinger said that one of the rea-
sons for calling together the specialists was the expanding international
activities of the International Union and the Children's Bureau.

"We cannot afford to be uninformed of the ways other nations are
rearing their children," Mrs. Oettinger told the symposium.

"Unless we watch carefully, we may be denying our children cer-
tain stimulations -- intellectual and otherwise -- that are being exper-
ienced by boys and girls of other nations -- children our children must
meet and deal with when they are adults.

"The depth of our understanding about the role today's children
will play in shaping the future of man's destiny is in direct ratio to
our knowledge of the ways those children live -- their ideology, goals,
culture.

"Realizing that, we must ever be mindful of the experience of
other countries with their children. We must constantly reexamine and
weigh our methods of child care and compare them with those of other
nations.

"In the United States, we believe that the home is the keystone
of our society," Mrs. Oettinger said, first voicing an idea that was to
be rephrased again and again during the day's symposium.

"But, for one reason or another," Mrs. Oettinger reminded, "far too
many of our children in many sections of our country are being deprived of
the wholesome and stimulating influences which good family life brings.
So, I repeat and underscore 'let us never end our evaluation of the best
methods for the care of our children away from their homes.'

"With that in mind," Mrs. Oettinger ended, "all of us who work
to better the welfare of children must inspect and judge carefully what


- 2 -







is going on elsewhere in the world. Only to the degree that we are flexi-
ble in our own approach to the tools of helping children grow up into use-
ful, productive citizens, will we be fulfilling our obligations to assure
each child a chance to develop to his and her fullest potential in our
democratic society."

Mrs. Oettinger said that this symposium was only a beginning and
that she would appoint a small committee from the Bureau staff to explore
the ideas brought out during the day's sessions.

Symposium Co-chairman Mayo reviewed the objectives of the Inter-
national Nnion for Child Welfare. Among them: to help and protect all
children of any race, nationality, or creed; to distribute information
and to carry out research in child welfare problems; to stimulate child
welfare work through conferences, working groups,.and publications; and
to link member organizations with the United Nations and its specialized
agencies which have granted the International Union for Child Welfare
consultative status.


The Program for Youth Aliyah in Israel

Mr. Moseh Kol, for 10 years director of Youth Aliyah of Israel
told the symposium participants about that program.

In brief Mr. Kol said:

The 30 year old Youth Aliyah movement began after the Nazi rise to
power in Germany. It had two purposes: to rescue Jewish children from
the Nazi tyranny and to absorb them into Israel's life.

To the present time, Youth Aliyah has absorbed 110,000 orphans and
semi-orphans -- girls from 12 years of age, boys from 13 to 18. These
children have come from over 80 countries in Europe, Asia, Africa and
Latin America. Most (95%) have remained in the country and hold im-
portant positions. They continue their contact -- especially in their
spiritual attitudes -- with the settlements and educational centers where
they receive their training.

Today Youth Aliyah is working to integrate the young generation
(12,000 trainees) into its society where they can share in the cultural
values, attitudes and behavior which two generations of the new Israel
has developed.

Since Youth Aliyah started, new directives regarding absorption
and education uphold the basic ideals of Youth Aliyah, the principles of


- 3 -






social education, the role of manual labor in education, the aspiration
towards better human relationships, the edification of man who believes
in a better and more beautiful world.

Youth Aliyah does not compete with government facilities, organiza-
tions, or institutions caring for children and youth. It provides for,
children for whom an ordinary solution cannot be found and who cannot be
rehabilitated within the existing facilities. This includes gifted and
intelligent youth as well as weak and retarded ones.

Some of the Youth Aliyah children are healthy mentally and physi-
cally, but retarded socially and culturally.

For youngsters who do not fit in a school framework, or if facili-
ties do not fit their needs, youth day centers have been set up. In
these centers, they study and work as well as promote social and cul-
tural values. Many enter training facilities in youth groups at Kibbutz
or cooperative settlements in children's villages and in educational
centers with vocational trends. For the backward or mentally disturbed,
special facilities adapted to their levels are being provided.

With the help of psychological clinics, and normal pupils who are
tolerant and sympathetic to these children, many have been integrated into
various classes according to their age and intelligence. Children so
badly disturbed that they cannot be included in the normal framework even
with special assistance, are placed in special educational units in the
youth village and vocational apprentice homes.

For youngsters immigrating to Israel alone, everything possible is
done to continue child-parents contact and to continue love and understand-
ing between them. When the parents come to Israel, they are expected to
show understanding of their children's new ways of life -- ways Israel
feels is better for the future of both children and parents.


Upbringing in Collective Settings in the USSR

Dr. Urie Bronfenbrenner, Professor, Psychology and Child Develop-
ment and Family Relationships, Cornell University, reported his exper-
iences during three visits to the Soviet Union in the past 3k years, the
last trip as an exchange scientist of the Institute of Psychology.

In brief, Dr. Bronfenbrenner said:

I would like to describe Soviet Russia's nationwide program of in-
stitutional upbringing introduced by Khrushchev in 1956, with the stated


-4-






aim of creating the new Soviet man. To accomplish this, major responsi-
bility for child rearing in the Soviety society is being shifted from the
family to the children's collective. Beginning at 2 months, the young-
sters are being brought up first in nursery and kindergarten and then in
special organized boarding schools, and so-called schools of the prolonged
day, which are essentially boarding schools, the only difference being the
children go home at night and sleep.

The new type of schools -- originally conceived as boarding
schools -- would complement the usual academic subjects with training in
two spheres held essential to the upbringing of a communist for produc-
tive work and collective living. Khrushchev said, "The plan will solve
the problem of imparting communist upbringing to the rising generation.
At the same time, millions of women will be released from household chores
and child rearing and will find productive jobs in the construction of the
communist society."

Such nurseries and kindergartens serve children frop the age of 2
months to 6 years, both on a boarding and day care basis.

Soviet educators claim the following advantages for the institu-
tional environment as a context for child rearing. First, not having re-
ceived adequate communist upbringing, many parents lack the quality of
character necessary for proper child rearing. Second, since families
differ in cultural background, this factor gives unfair advantage to
others. Third, and above all, it is essential that a child be given
experience and training in collective living as early as possible,
preferable in the first year of life. Thus the children learn early
to identify themselves with the collective and to subordinate selfish
desires to the welfare and productivity of the group.

At the present time, 7 million children, representing almost 10
percent of the Soviet population of preschool and school age are being
raised in institutions of this kind. The program is expected to involve
one-third of all Soviet children by 1970 and 100 percent by the 1980's.

Most parents are eager to have their children enroll. The fees
are scaled to income, and it is quite low in most instances. The mother
is free to work or study full time, thus increasing her immediate or
subsequent earning power. There is more space in the apartment. Food
costs are appreciably reduced.

At the present time the broken home gets priority.

Soviet parents see the new institutions as offering benefits to
the child which cannot be provided by the family or the ordinary day
school. These include enriched diet, special exercise, early training in


-5-






language, music, dance, and especially the development of skills, working
attitudes, and habits which enhance the child's chance of acquiring
further education and achieving success in Soviet society.

The boarding schools are always very near to a nursery kindergar-
ten, in some instances in a single so-called "kombinat." In one partic-
ular school, 400 are in the boarding school and approximately 100 in the
nursery.

The ratio of upbringer to youngsters is 4 to 16. The upbringers
are on three 8-hour shifts, giving the youngsters multiple mothering.

There is a great deal of emphasis on self-care, self-sufficiency.
By 18 months, the children are dressing themselves. I was told that by
18 months they are toilet trained and that no further concern need be
given to that matter.

The emphasis is on group activity. The child is constantly re-
enforced in the notion that it is more fun to be in a group.

In some of the nurseries, approximately a third of the children
were under boarding care and the remaining under day care. In the first
year, all children are taken home at night. By law, every Soviet mother
gets a half hour off every 3 hours to breast feed her child.

The task of the upbringers is to forge a self-pufficient collective,
so that the upbringer operates by remote control in order that the chil-
dren themselves are maintaining their own collective. The collective con-
tinues all year round even though the school is closed.

The children can organize and maintain collective play longer than
in the United States. Observers noticed two features of these children:
their self-confidence and their camaraderie.

The younger children are responsible for the cleanliness and up-
keep of the entire school. How clean the school is each day goes down
on their record. They plant the trees. They have to maintain them.

The Russian preschoolers show strikingly less aggression both
towards each other and towards adults. They cry far less frequently,
are more obedient and appear to be better able to take care of them-
selves. They impress one by their emotional blandness. One misses the
smiles, the spontaneity, and the interest in the other person commonly
expected in youngsters of this age. An analogous contrast appears in
the behavior of the older children in the boarding school. In their
external actions, they are well mannered, attentive, industrious. In
informal conversation they reveal strong motivation to learn, a readiness


-6-







to serve their society, and perhaps what is best described as an idealistic
and sentimental attitude toward life.

A growing body of research by American social scientists suggests
that methods of pressure currently employed for the creation of the new
Soviet man tend to enhance compliance, distortion and displacement of ag-
gression. If so, we must consider the possibility that future generations
of Russians will exhibit still wider prevalence of such reactions. At
the same time, it is possible that the new institutions of collective up-
bringing carry within them the seeds of their own undoing in terms of these
kinds of procedures, and that they entail side effects deleterious to so-
ciety whici will bring about modification of the system along more human-
istic lines. But whatever direction the Soviet development takes, this
is an experiment of unprecedented scope and significance.

Repugnant as the Soviet method of upbringing may seem to us, it
speaks to problems which are not unique to the socialist camp. Throughout
the Western world, increasing numbers of children are spending ever greater
portions of their formative years in settings outside the family.

In the economically deprived segments of our nation, notably among
Negroes, millions of innocent young children are being brought up in
psychologically impoverished environments, devoid of personal attention,
perceptual stimulation necessary for normal development and growth. By
comparison, the children in Soviet state nurseries are probably being
better served by their country and will be able to make a better contri-
bution to the function of the government. I feel strongly about this
matter, and I am sure those of you who have seen the conditions under
which millions of American children grow up will agree.

The new phenomenon of middle class delinquency in American society
may well represent an extreme expression of the changes in social morality,
resulting from the substitution of the peer group for the family as a
basis for inner conflicts that develop in children. In our society, as
distinguished from the USSR, the peer group is an autonomous agent by and
large free from adult control.

Another View of Group Care of Children


Another View of Group Care of Children, was presented by Dr. Martin
Wolins, Associate Professor, School of Social Work, University of
California, Berkeley, California.

In Brief, Dr. Wolins said:


-7 -






There are many rights and many wrongs in relation to this whole
matter of child rearing. No one-clearly knows the answer.

Why compare Russia, Israel, and the United States? There are many
reasons. First of all, the Israelis and the Russians have been quite
creative. For whatever reasons, they have been creative. We may not like
their creations. But that's another matter.

Because it has been in the American tradition to extol laissez-
faire solutions in child rearing as well as in commercial and industrial
activity, we find it surprising and even discomforting to encounter
formalized societal intervention in what may well be the most important
societal function -- child rearing. And this, of course, is exactly the
role of the Russian boarding school, the Shkola Internat, and the group
care facilities that you have heard about from Mr. Kol, and also of
course the group care facilities of the Kibbutz. They exist to enhance
and promote socialization, the process of acquiring the socially neces-
sary attitudes, values, and behaviors. Adding to our discomfort with
these processes is their objective, and that is primary concern for the
collectivity, for the social matrix and not just the individual alone.

High pressure for change has led the Russians to other than
laissez-faire principles not only in industrial and commercial life but
also in psychosocial enterprises, such as child rearing and education.

The aim of the boarding schools, according to the journal for
that program, states: The task is to develop minds in accordance
with communist ideology and thus create great people and every
activity consists of facilitating the development of ideological
maturity to better form their communist convictions, sense of duty, and
a feeling of responsibility of each individual with respect to the col-
lective.

In Israel, the acculturative task has been to convert immigrants
of-the most desperate backgrounds to a national allegiance, enlightened
innovation, and self-sacrifice and hard physical work.

The Israelis dealing with immigrant youth also ascribed a central
position to the collective.

In Russia, there is great concern about the work with parents,
the way the child relates to the parents, what the parents think of the
Shkola Internat, and what will be the consequences of all this.

Three major reasons for the Soviet development are employment of
women, scarce housing, and the cultural or ideological lag.


-8-






In the Soviet Union, foster family care does not exist. Russians
hearing foster family care described shake their heads in disbelief and
say: "Now, that just can't be. Such a thing just can't exist."

In Israel, foster family care is a minor program, of little im-
portance and of little prospect of substantial growth.

We have in all some 150,000 foster homes, surely an inadequate
number even for their present tasks. And even this small number of foster
homes is laden with defects. The identity of a child in such a home is
rarely clear; his stay is uncertain. Maas./ has shown that in nearly half
of the casgs, the child finds himself a wanderer, packing up his affec-
tions if any, and his problems always, and transferring them to at least
several foster homes before he matures and escapes this cruel rite.

The bad institutional program still suffers from monotony, re-
straint, lack of individualization, isolation. But it is improper, it
seems to me, to continue treating these as unavoidable qualities of group
care. In this possible revision of views lies the major contribution of
the views of our two preceding speakers.

Whether Russian and Israeli group care programs are as good as seen
by their supporters still needs much detailed follow-up and research in-
vestigations.

Is it true that individualization is impossible in group care? It
is a myth that group care must result in isolation. Does a program
oriented around the peer group always ignore the parents?

Group care needs not be possessed of the negative attitudes we as-
sign to it, and which it may very well have, providing of course that we
accept two rather crucial notions: first, that the individual's competi-
tiveness is not necessarily the most ennobling of all states: that self
in society may be a greater achievement than self and society, and cer-
tainly more acceptable than self against society. We have slowly begun
heading in that direction for a good many years.

Accepting group care as-an alternative worth investigating will
open up some hitherto unexplored but most interesting paths. Youth Aliyah
has pointed out at least two of these: the possible care and treatment of
disturbed children in an institution for normal children, and the use of
the institutional setup for children of high academic potential but low
achievement. I am very impressed with what both the Russians and the
Israelis do with the concept of "socially useful work."


1/ Maas, Henry and Engler, Richard: CHILDREN IN NEED OF PARENTS. New
York: Columbia University Press, 1959. 462 pp.


-9-






Questions and Answers


Question and answer periods followed each address, bringing out
this information:

There are analogous periods in the development of our country and
the development of Soviet Russia. Residential group care in the form of
orphanages was used extensively in the period 1860-1910, not only as a
way to free mothers for employment but also to train the children in
the puritan culture. Regardless of those differences, the American way
of life stresses the value of the individual; the Russians stress the
group and the collective system.

The Soviet boarding school child and the Israeli Kibbutz child
will have a strong "moral" commitment for the welfare of their society.

The Kibbutz children are much more guarded in their relationships
with people than the other Israeli children.

The prestige of the educator is relatively high in the Russian
boarding school system. They are dedicated to the concept that the State
is the major authority for the cultural and ideological rearing of the
child -- not the family or the community.

Hopefully as we Americans think of child rearing we can be socially
inventive, not only about the things we can do in institutions, but also
what we can do with parents to better enable children to function as
human beings.

Both the Israeli Kibbutz and the Youth Aliyah programs as well as
the Russian boarding school system emphasize the concept of "socially
useful work." This is not the case in the educational curriculum of
American public or private schools.

Residential group care in the United States has been improving a
great deal during the last few decades, especially in the staffing and
programs of treatment centers for moderately or more disturbed children.
However, only a small segment of the public is aware of this uplift in the
quality of care.

In Israel and the United States, the number of children in group
care is very small compared to the number in Russia, which country plans
to involve eventually all of its children in group living away from their
own families.


- 10 -







Some ideological aspects of rearing may be involved in reaching the
culturally deprived youngster in the United States who needs an image
other than that of the long term poverty of his parents.

American educators are experimenting with providing stimulating
activities for parents and their kindergarten children in an effort to
overcome some of their cultural disadvantages.

Russian ideology is moving more mothers into employment. Nine
million mothers in the United States are now employed for reasons of
economy and "self improvement."

Creative group centers may be encouraged to bring economically
and culturally deprived groups back into the American life stream.

Imaginative programs will be needed, especially for parents and
children on Indian reservations.


- 11 -




UNBVER-ITI OF FLORIDA
11111111 ll Is 111t1t1111t111111t 1 1111111111 1111
3 1262 08858 2035

.. '.'. .. .. : -:.:i 'i: :: : : i~


.. .. ... :. :

":i ~ ~ ~ .. .-.:...." ..'.."i: .::i':.:::i!ii:!






i:!': ...i'i'i... ..'. .. "" : i ': 2: .:'i ii..... ...
'''
.. .. .. .. ....















.. .. ....: .


,,.,-.. ....',
..' '.-. .

.. .. ... ,......-.
".. ...













....... .. .... .:.. .:...
.. -. .. -. ..
." ... ...







.. .. ......,.... .






.. ...,'..,.




Full Text
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID EGPX3LTBR_S7M8WD INGEST_TIME 2012-10-15T13:52:33Z PACKAGE AA00012234_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES