Report of the chief of the Bureau of Safety covering investigation of an accident which occurred on the St.Louis-San Fra...

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
Report of the chief of the Bureau of Safety covering investigation of an accident which occurred on the St.Louis-San Francisco Railroad near Adamsville, Ala., August 9, 1919
Physical Description:
10 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.
Language:
English
Creator:
United States -- Interstate Commerce Commission. -- Bureau of Safety
Borland, W. P
Publisher:
Govt. Print. Off.
Place of Publication:
Washington
Publication Date:

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Railroad accidents -- Alabama -- Adamsville   ( lcsh )
Railroads -- United States   ( lcsh )
Genre:
non-fiction   ( marcgt )

Notes

General Note:
Caption title.
General Note:
At head of title: Interstate Commerce Commission.
General Note:
November 6, 1919.
General Note:
Submitted by W. P. Borland Chief Bureau of Safety.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 004954684
oclc - 61730934
System ID:
AA00012223:00001


This item is only available as the following downloads:


Full Text








INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION.


REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF THE BUREAU OF SAFETY COVERING
INVESTIGATION OF AN ACCIDENT WHICH OCCURRED ON THE
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD NEAR ADAMSVILLE,
ALA., AUGUST 9, 1919.
NOVEMBER 6, 1919.
To the Commission:
On August 9, 1919, there was a collision between an Illinois Cen-
tral freight train and a St. Louis-San Francisco work train on the
St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad near Adamsville, Ala., which re-
sulted in the death of 3 employees and injuries to 28 employees.
After investigation, I respectfully submit the following report:
The Birmingham subdivision of the southern division of the St.
Louis-San Francisco Railroad, on which this accident occurred, is a
single-track line over which trains are operated by time table,
train orders transmitted by telephone, and an automatic block-
signal system. Between Birmingham and Jasper, Ala., a distance
of 41 miles, trains of the Illinois Central Railroad are operated
over the tracks of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad, under
the jurisdiction of the latter company. It was on this joint track
that the accident occurred. Between Adamsville and Coal Creek,
a distance of 4.8 miles, the line consists of a series of sharp curves
and deep cuts, and there is no place between these stations where
an approaching train can be seen for a distance of more than 1,500
feet. Approaching the point of accident from the south, there is a
tangent about 670 feet long, followed by an 80 curve to the left
approximately 800 feet long, leading through a rock cut nearly 50
feet deep. The collision occurred nearthe center of this curve. Ap-
proaching from the north, there is a 60 curve to the left, about 800 feet
in length, followed by the 8 curve to the right on which the collision
occurred. The range of vision of engine crews is less than 200 feet.
The grade is approximately 1 per cent descending for northbound
trains. At the time of the accident the weather was clear.
The trains involved in this accident were St. Louis-San Francisco
work extra 1622 and Illinois Central extra 1736. Extra 1622 con-
sisted of locomotive 1622, 5 empty flat cars, and a caboose, in ehnrge
of Conductor Bazemore and Engineman McGowan. This train had
149524-19





INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORTS.


been working in the vicinity of mile post 719, between Adamsville
and Coal Creek, under authority of train order No. 5, reading as
follows:
Engiiic 1622 work 6 a. m. to 8.30 p. m. between Pratt City and Dora, pro-
tecting against second and third class trains. All trains north except first
class wait at Adamsville until 9 a. m.
Pratt City and Dora are located south and north, respectively, of
the territory involved in this accident. One flagman of extra 1622
was stationed at Coal Creek and another at Adamsville, the latter
flagmani having verbal instructions to inform all except passenger
trains to proceed under control, expecting to find the work extra at
any point between Adamsville and Coal Creek. At about 3.20 p. m.,
while at Coal Creek allowing southbound extra 1619 to pass, Con-
ductor Bazemore called the dispatcher over the telephone and in-
quired as to the next train north and was told that there would be
nothing ahead of train No. 926, a first-class train due out of Adams-
ville at 4.48 p. m. The crew then decided to go to Adamsville for
train No. 926. The work extra accordingly followed extra 1619 out
of Coal Creek, the entire train being operated backing up, passed the
two block signals between Coal Creek and Adamsville, both of which
displayed caution indications, and was proceeding at a rate of speed
between 6 and 8 miles an hour when it collided with extra 1736.
Northbound extra 1736 consisted of Illinois Central locomotive
1736 and a caboose, in charge of Conductor Hargett and Engineman
Parker. At Pratt City, the Birmingham terminal for Illinois Cen-
tral freight trains, the crew received a copy of train order No. 5,
previously quoted. Extra 1736 left Pratt City at 3.40 p. m. and
arrived at Adamsville at 4.15 p. m., taking the siding to meet south-
bound extra 1619. While on the siding, the engineman was notified
verbally by the flagman of the work extra that that train was work-
ing near milepost 719, 3 miles north of Adamsville, but to run care-
fully, expecting to find the train anywhere between Adamsville and
Coal Creek. As soon as extra 1619 passed Adamsville, or about
4.25 p. m., extra 1736 headed out upon the main line and on reach-
ing signal 721.4, located just north of the north passing-track switch,
found it to be in the stop position. The engineman did not stop,
but proceeded at reduced speed of about 6 miles an hour and sounded
the whistle several times between the signal and the point of acci-
dent. When the engineman of extra 1736 saw the work extra com-
ing around the curve he made an emergency application of the
brakes and, according to the statements of the crew, had brought
his train to a stop before it was struck by the caboose of the work
extra, the collision occurring at 4.30 p. m.
The caboose of the work extra and the flat car next to it were
badly damaged, the body of the caboose coming to rest on top of





ACCIDENT NEAR ADAMSVILLE, ALA.


the wreckage of the flat car. Engine 1736 was not derailed, but lhad
the pilot broken off, the pilot beam broken, and the headlight
knocked off. The track was not damaged. The three employees
killed and all but two of the injured were riding on the flat ;atr.
Conductor Bazemore, of the work extra, stated that he had one
flnagian stationed at Adamsville and one at Coal Creek, the former
with oral instructions and the latter with written instructions. Flag-
man McCormick, stationed at Adamsville, was instruited to advise
all trains except, passenger trains to proceed into that territory under
control, expecting to find extra 1622 working at any point ,btween
_Ada isville and Coal Creek, but not to deignate any definite point.
The conductor said he told the flagmnan that he wanted him to im-
press upon enginnmen that they were liable to find his train at any
place between-Adamsville and Coal Creek. He called the dispatcher
by telephone from Coal Creek at about 3.20 p. m., asked for a line-up,
and was informed that the first northbound train would be No. 926,
due out of Adanisville at 4.48 p. m. He then advised his engineman
of this fact, also that southbound extra 1619, the connection of train
No. 135, would be out of Coal Creek at about 3.45 p. m., that they
were not to delay that train, and that they would follow extra 1619
to Adamsville and there await train No. 926. He stated that the
dispatcher informed him that the engine of extra 1619 was in poor
condition and therefore not to delay that train on the hill, otherwi-e
he would have placed a flagiman on extra 1619 to protect the move-
ment of the work extra to Adamsville. After extra 1619 passed Coal
Creek the work extra departed, at about 4.05 p. m., having waited
until signal 717.7, near the south passing track switch, went from
stop to caution. The first block signal south of Coal Creek was
displaying a stop indication and they slowed down, but just before
they got to it, it went to caution, as did the next signal, No. 720.1,
the last southbound signal passed previous to the collision. With
two section foremen Conductor Bazemore was riding on the rear
platform of the caboose. He estimated that the train was proceed-
ing at a speed of 7 or 8 miles an hour when he saw the engine of
extra'1736 approaching around the curve about 200 feet distant and
moving at a speed he estimated at 10 or 12 miles an hour. He at-
tempted to reach the air hose and apply the brakes, but was pushed
away from it by one of the section foremen getting off.
Bulletin No. 191, issued by the superintendent of the southern
division of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad, under date of De-
cember 5, 1918, reads in part as follows:
When conductors on work trains drop off flags to one or both directions
where they are at work, and who leave with these flagmen written flagging
instructions to other trains to look out for them, they must not have these
instructions to read to the approaching train to disregard the block; when
*





INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORTS.


the approaching train receives these written flagging instructions he must on
arrival at block which is against him, flag through this territory until the work
train is found. After closing in upon work train he may flag on work train
to next passing track where his clear block is found. *
Instructions are intended to avoid the indiscriminate use of flag-
ging instructions by conductors authorizing the ignoring of the blocks which
they have no right to do and to avoid the possibility of trains which appear to
be under control colliding with work trains which might be moving within
work limits.
Bulletin No. 310, issued by the same authority under date of
April 21, 1919, reads as follows:
All engineers:
Please be governed by the following instructions:
When a flag is at a red block with written instructions, the instructions will
carry the engineer through from this red block to the next red block, but an
intervening red block must not be passed. It will be necessary to flag through
that territory. Conductors will be governed accordingly and where possible
to do so, place their flag with written instructions at a point where there
will be no intervening block between where the flag is located and where the
work train is to be driven into the passing track or clear.
Conductor Bazemore stated that he had seen Bulletin No. 191 on
the bulletin boards at Dora and Birmingham, but had not seen Bul-
letin No. 310. He also said that, according to his understanding of
the rules, a train order was required for the movement of his train
under the existing circumstances, but that it had been his custom to
act on a verbal line-up received from the dispatcher.
Engineman McGowan, of the work extra, stated that he was ac-
quainted with the instructions given the flagman at Adamsville, was
with Conductor Bazemore in the telephone booth at Coal Creek while
the conductor was talking with the dispatcher, and was told that
there would be nothing ahead of train No. 926. After this conversa-
tion they agreed that they would follow extra 1619 south to Adams-
ville for train No. 926 on the information given them, and he thought
that seven or eight minutes elapsed before they followed extra 1619
out of Coal Creek. He stated that he proceeded at a speed of from
6 to 10 miles an hour, observed all of the block signals as he ap-
proached them, and that they displayed caution indications. He did
not see extra 1736 approaching, and was working steam when the
collision occurred, at which time the speed of his train was between
6 and 8 miles an hour. He stated that he had seen Bulletin No. 191
on two bulletin boards, but did not know of Bulletin No. 310 before
the accident.
Flagman McCormick, of extra 1622, stated that he saw the orders
under which they were working on the day of the accident, and that
Conductor Bazemore placed him at Adamsville station after ver-
bally instructing him to inform all northbound trains except first-





ACCIDENT NEAR ADAMSVILLE, ALA.


class that extra 1622 was working between Adamsville and Coal Creek
and was likely to be anywhere between the two stations. When in-
structed by his conductor, he did not ask that these instructions be
in writing, although he knew the rules so prescribed. Extra 1736
was in the passing track at Adamsville when he flagged it and got up
on the engine to give the engineman instructions, informing him that
extra 1622 was working between Adamsville and Coal Creek, to look
for them at Mile Post 719-10, and to have them let him by at Coal
Creek, but that they might be encountered anywhere between the
two stations; he said nothing to the engineman about the block sig-
nals. He stated that he had seen Bulletin No. 191, but had not seen
Bulletin No. 310.
Section Foremen Goldsby, Guin, and Mullins, who were riding on
the renar platform of the caboose of the work extra, gave various
estimates concerning the speed of extra 1736 when it was first seen
by them, their estimates ranging from 10 to 20 miles an hour; two
of them stated that extra 1736 was in motion when the collision
occurred. All agreed that the work extra was not moving over 8
miles an hour at the time of the collision, and all corroborated the
conductor's testimony that the block signals were at caution when
passed.
Engineman Parker, of extra 1736, stated that while his train
was in the passing siding at Adamsville and before extra 1619
passed, the flagman of the work extra, after flagging him, got up on
the engine and informed him that the work extra was at milepost
719 and to proceed to where the work train was located and have
that train go to Coal Creek to let them by, but to look for the
extra anywhere else on the main line, as it might have moved from
milepost 719. Extra 1619 left Adamsville at 4.24 p. m., and im-
mediately upon its departure extra 1736 pulled out of the siding
upon the main line, at 4.25 p. m. He stated that when he reached
the northbound signal just north of the north passing track switch,
No. 721.4, it was in the stop position. He did not stop, but passed
.at a speed of 6 miles an hour and sounded the road-crossing whistle
signal twice between there and the point of accident, as well as cau-
tioning the two firemen to keep a careful watch. Just as the engine
started around the curve, both firemen called to him that the work
extra was coming, and he immediately applied the brakes in emer-
gency and reversed the engine, bringing it to a stop before it was
struck by extra 1622. He further stated that he considered that
he had a right to pass signal 721.4 at danger on the instructions he
had received from the flngman of extra 1622, and produced a copy
of bulletin No. 310 as his authority, but later he admitted that he
had never seen this bulletin prior to the accident and did not know





INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORTS.


that it had been issued, neither had he seen bulletin No. 191 until
after the accident, and he did not think these bulletins had been
posted on the bulletin boards to which he had access. Having seen
neither of these bulletins, the only instructions he had, therefore,
were those contained in the book of rules, and he stated that, as it
had been customary to pass red blocks, he had inquired and was told
that there was authority for the practice. Under the book of rules
trains in single-track territory are required to stop five minutes at a
red block and then proceed under flag protection. This rule, No.
971, reads as follows:
Trains on single track finding signal in stop position will stop before enter-
ing block, and immediately send flagman in advance, wait full 5 minutes, and
then follow flag through the block under control.
Conductor Hargett, of extra 1736, stated that he saw the flagman
of the work extra at Adamsville, but did not talk to him or know
why he was there, neither did he make any inquiry concerning him.
The speed of his train after leaving Adamsville was 8 or 10 miles
an hour. He heard the engineman sound two road-crossing signals,
but did not notice the indications of the automatic signals as he was
busy figuring on where to meet an opposing passenger train. His
first intimation of the accident was when he noticed the engineman
applying the air in emergency; the train had been brought to a stop
when the collision occurred. He had not seen either Bulletin No.
310 or No. 191 before the accident, but said a copy of the former bu-
letin was mailed to him afterwards. He had been on engines which
passed red blocks on flagmen's verbal instructions. He had no au-
thority for doing so except custom, and he said that in this case he
would not have sent a flag ahead had he known he was passing a
stop signal.
Flagman Allen, of extra 1736, stated that he saw the flagman
get on the engine at Adamsville, and thought he was flagging the
work extra. He did not know what instructions the flagman gave
Engineman Parker and did not see the position of the northbound
signal at the north switch at Adamsville. The speed leaving Adams-
ville did not exceed 10 miles an hour and he thought Engineman
Parker had reduced speed to about 6 miles an hour just before the
collision, which occurred after his own train had been brought to a
stop. He further stated that he had on previous occasions been on
trains which had passed red blocks on verbal instructions.
Fireman Garner of extra 1736 stated that he overheard the in-
structions given Engineman Parker by the flagman of extra 1622
to proceed and look out for the work extra on the hill, and to run
by that train at Coal Creek. He saw the signal at the north switch
at Adamisville displaying a stop indication, and said that his train





ACCIDENT NEAR ADAMSVILLE, ALA.


passed it at a speed of 6 or 8 miles an hour. The engineman cau-
tioned him to keep a sharp lookout and twice su- nded the ro;ad
crossing whistle signal. He was riding on the seat box when he saw
the caboose of the work extra coming around the curve and called to
Engineman Parker, who brought the train to a stop before the col-
lision occurred. He thought the work extra was traveling at a speed
of 20 mlies an hour before the collision.
Fireman's Helper Striclin, of extra 1736, stated that he heard the
flagman of the work extra give Engineman Parker instructions at
Adamsville to go through the block and look out for the work extra,
which would let them pass at Coal Creek. He saw the signal at the
north end of Adamsville passing track in the stop position. Engine-
man Parker cautioned them to keep a sharp lookout and the train
proceeded at a speed of 6 or 8 miles an hour. He was on the fire-
man's side when he saw the caboose of extra 1622 about 250 yards
away, and called to the engineman, who immediately stopped the
train. He said on some occasions the instructions given to engine-
men by flagmen were written, and at other times they were verbal.
Brakeman Crawford, of extra 1736, who was riding in the cupola
of the caboose, stated that up to the time of the accident they had
been traveling at about 8 miles an hour. He saw the caboose of the
work extra as it came around the curve and felt the air brakes apply
on the caboose, the train being stopped before the collision occurred.
He had heard whistle signals sounded, but as he was not paying close
attention he did not know what they were.
Dispatcher Gentry, on duty until 4 p. m., stated that the work
extra was at Coal Creek for trains Nos. 1301 and 105, and that at
3.15 p. m., Conductor Bazemore called him on the telephone from
that point, and he gave him some time on train No. 105. The only
southbound trains he had listed were trains Nos. 921 and 135, the
latter with a car of stock, and he instructed Conductor Bazemore
not to delay it. While they were talking, the operator at Dora re-
ported over the telephone that train No. 135 was then passing that
station. Conductor Bazemore said he would be delayed quite a while
if he waited at Coal Creek for train No. 135 and asked permission
of the dispatcher to proceed to Adamsville ahead of that train. In
reply to the dispatcher's question as to where he was working, Con-
ductor Bazemore told him: "About half way up the hill," and then
asked him if there was any train ahead of northbound train No. 926.
The dispatcher informed him there was not, and Conductor Baze-
more then said he would precede train No. 135 into Adamsville. The
dispatcher stated that he assumed that this movement was being made
and at the time he gave Conductor Bazemore the line-up of trains,
he did not expect extra 1736 to be ahead of No. 926. He stated he





INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORTS.


did not give Conductor Bazemore the line-up to be used as an order,
but would have given him orders had he requested them. He made
no record of the information he had given Conductor Bazemore on
his transfer when he went off duty.
This accident was caused by the failure of Engineman Parker and
Conductor Hargett, of extra 1736, properly to obey automatic block
signal indications.
Operating rule No. 971, as well as Bulletins Nos. 191 and 310, is
involved in this case, but these employees stated that previous to the
accident they had not seen either of these bulletins, and there is some
evidence indicating that they were not properly posted. Not knowing
of the existence of these two bulletins, rule No. 971 was the control-
ling rule and its requirements should have been rigidly observed.
Had extra 1736 stopped five minutes at signal 721.4 and sent a flag-
man ahead, a, required by this rule, the accident would have been
prevented. Had Conductor Hargett been riding in the cupola of
the caboose, or had he required the flagman to ride there, he would
have known that Engineman Parker had passed a stop signal. On
the other hand, however, he had seen the flagman at Adamsville,
but did not know why he was there or make any inquiry concerning
him, and his statements indicate that he would not have stopped
his train even if he had known it was passing a red signal. Under
these circumstances he is equally at fault with Engineman Parker.
Engineman Pariker was employed as a fireman in 1903 and pro-
moted to engineman in 1906. Conductor Hargett was employed as
a fl;igl ian in 1907 and promoted to conductor in 1908. At the time
of the accident both of these employees had clear records. Engine-
man Parker had been on duty about 7 hours and Conductor Hargett
about 6 hours, after 12 or more hours off duty.
The crew of the work extra knew about Bulletin No. 191, while
the crew of extra 1736 said they had not seen it. Neither of these
crews knew of the existence of Bulletin No. 310. These bulletins do
not authorize trains to pass red blocks unless flagmen are stationed
at such blocks. This was not the case in this instance; consequently
the provision of these bulletins did not apply. But this does not
alter the dangerous condition resulting from bulletins being in effect
without the knowledge of employees. There can be no excuse for
the existence of such a condition on any railroad, and the responsible
operating officials of this railroad should take immediate steps to
see that all bulletins are properly posted and that all employees are
fully acquainted with their contents.
There was evidence to the effect that the crew of the work
extra should not have attempted the move to Adamsville without
train orders; in fact, the conductor himself, in answer to questions





ACCIDENT NEAR ADAMSVILLE, ALA.


by the general superintendent of the St. Louis-San Francisco Rail-
road, stated that he was making a movement not authorized by the
book of rules. The basis for this general opinion is not clear. The
work extra was in possession of an order fixing its working limits
and directing it to protect against second and third class trains.
In the Forms of Train Orders, Example H-3, and the explanation
thereof, as contained in the book of rules, the words "not protect-
ing against extras" are included in the work order when such pro-
tection is not'to be afforded. These words were not included in train
order No. 5, and under the order as issued, therefore, the work extra
was required to protect against extras. In accordance with this re-
quirement, flagmen were stationed at Coal Creek and at Adamsville,
between which points the train was working. The flagnrani at
Adamsville had oral instructions to notify all except passenger trains
that the work extra was between those two points and to look out
for the work extra at any point. The flagman at Coal Creek had
written instructions to hold all freight trains, and to have them
call the work train in by means of whistle signals. Having sent out
these flagmen with these instructions, and thereby provided pro-
tection against second and third class trains and extras, the work
extra had a right to move back and forth at will between Coal Creek
and Adamsville, provided it cleared the time of first-class trains, and
no order of any kind was required to permit it to move from Coal
Creek to Adamsville whenever it so desired. The conductor of the
work extra should have given written instructions to both of his
flagmen. Failure to do this, which is required by the bulletins re-
ferred to, has often resulted in accidents due to misunderstanding
of flagging instructions, and Conductor Bazemore is to be censured
accordingly. His failure fully to obey this requirement, however,
did not have any bearing on this accident, as the statements of the
engineman of extra 1736, as well as of the flagman of the work extra,
indicate that the flagging instructions were properly and correctly
communicated.
While under the circumstances as they existed in this case the crew
of extra 1736 is responsible for this accident, attention is called to
the fact that had the flagman at Adanmsville been stationed at signal
721.4 instead of at Adamsville station, the crew of extra 1736 would
have had the right, under Bulletin No. 310, to pass this red block and
proceed until either the work extra or another red block was en-
countered. Had this been the case, the accident undoubtedly would
have occurred, without any violation of rules on the part of either
of the two crews involved, and the responsibility therefore would
have rested upon the officials who authorized the issuance of Bul-
letin No. 310, for such an arrangement would have resulted in both
*.E






10 INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORTS.

trains having right to the track between signal 721.4 and the suc-
ceeding northbound automatic signal. Bulletins or rules authorizing
trains to pass red blocks on single-track line, under any circum-
stances without full flag protection, are a serious detriment to safety
in train operation. Immediate steps should be taken by the operat-
ing officials of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad to correct the
dangerous situation created by the terms of Bulletin No. 310.
Respectfully submitted.
W. P. BOtLAND,
Chief, Bureau of Safety.










ADDITIONAL COPIES
OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
AT
5 CENTS PER COPY
V





















































































































II





UNIVERSITY 6F FLORIDA


3 1262 08856 1898




Full Text
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E8G5DRQBS_AIEYPG INGEST_TIME 2012-10-23T16:28:15Z PACKAGE AA00012223_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES