|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|
CITATION
THUMBNAILS
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EFFECTS OF ESTROGEN ON THE FUNCTIONAL OUTPUT OF THE BASAL GANGLIA By JEFFREY NEAL JOYCE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In the completion of this dissertation and attainment of this graduate degree, I was never truly alone. It would be difficult to express all my true appreciation for everyone's help. I would like to thank specifically those individuals that helped me learn how to think, as well as write, as a scientist. Thanks go to Dr. William Luttge and Dr. Adrian Dunn especially for their patience and helpful criticism over the last few years. I would like to further thank my primary mentors for all their help in forming me into a capable scientist: Dr. Merle Meyer, Dr. Neil Rowland and Dr. James Simpkins. In addition, tremendous support was given by my friends and my colleagues Ron Smith, Leslie Chambers, Cathy Gonzales, Linda Bellush and Janis Carlton. I also wish to express tremendous gratitude to Dr. Neil Rowland, Dr. Merle Meyer and the Center for Neurobiological Sciences for providing the necessary employment while pursuing my doctoral degree. The research included in this dissertation was supported by a Biomedical Research Grant to Dr. Carol Van Hartesveldt. I am pleased to acknowledge my gratitude to Elsevier Biomedical Press, publisher of European Journal of Pharmacology, for granting me permission to use the following article in my dissertation: J.N. Joyce, R.L. Smith and C. Van Hartesveldt. Estradiol suppresses then enhances intracaudate dopamine-induced contralateral deviation. European Journal of Pharmacology, Vol. 81, 1982, pp. 117-122. Finally, my dream to be a scientist and academician was carefully nurtured and supported by a few very important people in my life. Thanks go to Dr. Carol Van Hartesveldt for seeing me through the last six years towards the realization of that dream. I send my love to my closest friend and very special lady, Roberta Franks, whose love and caring have been a joy and blessing for me. My love and thanks go most of all to my parents, James and Maxine Joyce, who have always made a difference. I send this to them as a late Father's Day and Mother's Day present. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................ ii ABSTRACT .................................................... vi I GENERAL INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1 II EFFECTS OF ESTROGEN ON BRAIN DOPAMINE NEUROTRANSMITTER SYSTEMS ..................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................. 5 Effects of Estrogen on the Tuberoinfundibular Dopamine System .......................................... 8 Effects of Estrogen on the Mesostriatal Dopamine Transmitter System............... ..... .................... 18 III EFFECTS OF ESTROGEN ON BEHAVIORS MEDIATED BY THE MESOSTRIATAL DOPAMINE SYSTEM ............................... 32 Introduction .................................. ........ 32 Assessment of Central and Peripheral Actions of Estrogen.............................................. 34 Functional Effect of Estrogen on Striatal DA-Mediated Behaviors.................................... 38 Experiment 1. Estradiol Suppresses Then Enhances Intrastriatal Dopamine-Induced Contralateral Deviation................................................ 40 Experiment 2. Behaviors Induced by Intrastriatal Dopamine Vary Independently Across the Estrous Cycle...... ....... ................ .. ...... .............. 59 Experiment 3. Behaviors Induced by Intrastriatal Dopamine are Suppressed Differentially by Estradiol Benzoate....................................... 82 Experiment 4. Intrastriatal Implant of Estradiol Suppresses Apomorphine-Induced Postural Deviation......... 121 IV GENERAL DISCUSSION.......................................... 147 Experimental Studies..................................... 147 PAGE Eztrapyramidal Disorders and Estrogen ................. 154 REFERENCES................................................ 161 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ........................................ 188 Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy EFFECTS OF ESTROGEN ON THE FUNCTIONAL OUTPUT OF THE BASAL GANGLIA By Jeffrey Neal Joyce August, 1983 Chairman: Carol Van Hartesveldt Major Department: Psychology The present experiments were conducted to analyze the effects of estrogen on basal ganglia function in rats. Treatment with different doses of estrogen produced different effects on intrastriatal dopamine- induced postural deviation. Pharmacological doses of estrogen produced an initial suppression, followed by an enhancement of postural deviation in response to intrastriatal dopamine. In the second experiment, it was found that the magnitude of the intrastriatal dopamine-mediated behaviors, postural deviation and rotation, varied with changes in serum levels of estrogen across the estrous cycle of the rat. Both were suppressed when plasma titers of estrogen should be high (proestrus) and enhanced when the levels should be low (estrus, diestrus days 1 and 2). However, when moni- tored across the day of proestrus the postural deviation and rotation varied independently in magnitude. Moreover, neither behavior was enhanced when serum levels of estrogen should be low. Consistent with those findings, systemic administration of a small dose of estradiol benzoate to ovariectomized rats produced suppression, without later enhancement of intrastriatal dopamine-mediated postural deviation and rotation. The behaviors induced by dopaminergic stimulation of the striatum were differentially modulated by estrogen. Postural deviation was suppressed within 1/2 hour of one treatment with estradiol benzoate. Rotation was also suppressed, but the latency was longer and required that two treatments with estradiol benzoate be made. In contrast, loco- motor activity mediated by ventral striatal dopamine was not suppressed with estradiol benzoate treatment, and may require estrogen for a normal response to dopaminergic stimulation. Direct application of estrogen to the dorsal striatum suppressed postural deviation in response to apomorphine. The sites for this estrogen effect occur in the same region in which application of dopamine produces postural deviation. Estrogen did not produce a nonspecific suppression of the striatum. Increasing doses of apomorphine reduced, and at the highest dose completely reversed, the suppressive effects of estrogen. The specificity of estrogen's effect was also suggested by comparison of the effects of estrogen with 17a-estradiol; the implantation of 17a-estradiol into the striatum did not suppress apomorphine-induced behavioral activity. Additionally, the estrogen receptor antagonist CI-628 blocked estrogen's suppression of striatal dopamine-mediated postural deviation. CHAPTER I GENERAL INTRODUCTION The proposal that estrogen might regulate the functional output of the basal ganglia was based initially on observations in human patients suffering from disorders of DA systems in the basal ganglia (Bedard et al., 1979; Villeneuve et al., 1978; Donaldson et al., 1978; Zegart and Schwartz, 1968; Bickerstaff, 1975; Nausieda et al., 1979a). The response of those patients to drugs that act on DA systems of the basal ganglia was affected by their sex and hormonal condition (e.g., receiving estrogen). The proposal was strengthened by research in the early 1970's that indicated that gonadal hormones had biochemical effects on DA systems of the basal ganglia in animals (Jori and Cecchetti, 1973; Holzbauer and Youdin, 1973; Greengrass and Tonge, 1974). More recent behavioral and biochemical studies in animals have extended those findings emphasizing the diverse consequences of gonadal hormone treatment on the DA systems of the basal ganglia. Unfortunately, no consensus has been reached regarding the precise nature of the actions of estrogen on the DA systems of the basal ganglia; support for suppressive and enhancing effects of estrogen has been documented in both human patients (e.g., Bedard et al., 1979; Nausieda et al., 1979a) and laboratory animals (e.g., Becker et al., 1982; Bedard et al., 1983; Gordon, 1980). Nor has it been established where the estrogens act to alter the DA systems of the basal ganglia. Cell bodies of the DA fibers terminating in the basal ganglia and DA-sensitive neurons in the basal ganglia do not concentrate [3H]estradiol intracellularly (Heritage et al., 1980; McEwen, 1979; Stumpf and Sar, 1976). Therefore, there has been a tacit assump- tion that estrogen is exerting its effects on the basal ganglia through actions elsewhere. However, the 3H-steroid autoradiographic method of locating estrogen receptors is not an infallible guide in deciding where in the brain to look for the actions of estrogen (McEwen, 1980; McEwen et al., 1982). Not all brain areas where steroid receptors can be demonstrated by biochemical means contain estrogen-concentrating cells which can be visualized by autoradiography (McEwen et al., 1982). Con- sequently, it is not clear whether estrogen interacts with DA in the striatum to mediate behavior. In order to determine the nature of the dopamine-estrogen interaction in modulating the behavioral output of the striatum, several experiments were designed. In order to evaluate the hypothesis that estrogen can directly modify the actions of DA in the striatum, DA will be applied intra- cerebrally while plasma levels of estrogen are modified. First, unilateral injections of DA into the anterior-dorsal striatum result in a contralateral asymmetry of the animal's ongoing behaviors, which can be quantified by measuring the amount of time the animal spends producing behaviors to the side contralateral to the intrastriatal injection (Joyce et al., 1981). The behavioral response produced by the intrastriatal injection of DA, termed postural deviation, is a highly localized response (Joyce et al., 1981) which makes it useful for examining the effects of estrogen. Since the estrogen treatment-test interval is considered to be an important variable (Gordon, 1980), the effects of a single treatment with EB on the amount of contralateral postural deviation elicited by unilateral intrastriatal injection of DA will be tested at 2 and 6 days after hormone treatment in male rats. These two time points were chosen because the literature indicated that treatment with large doses of EB or EV induced an initial suppression of DA agonist effects lasting 24 to 48 hours (Gordon, 1980; Gordon et al., 1980) and a clear enhancement by 6 days post treatment (Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980a; 1980b). In previous studies, nonphysiological doses of estrogen were used, and it is of concern that only pharmacological responses to estrogen were measured. In order to test the effects of natural fluctuations of plasma levels of estrogen on dopamine-mediated functional output of the basal ganglia, the effects of intrastriatal dopamine on behavior will be measured throughout the estrous cycle of the female rat. The day of proestrus will be examined in greater detail because it shows the greatest changes in plasma levels of estrogen. Both dopamine and amphetamine will be injected intrastriatally, and both postural deviation and rotation will be measured. In a further test of the effects of physiological doses of estrogen on intrastriatal dopamine-mediated behaviors, female rats will be ovariectomized and administered a small dose of estrogen. Both dopamine and amphetamine-induced postural deviation and rotation will be measured at several time points after the treatment with estrogen. The specificity of the estrogen effects on behavior will be tested by administering an anti-estrogen. Finally, the technique of intracerebral application of estrogen has proved to be valuable in determining where in the brain estrogen acts to modify sexual behavior (e.g., Lisk, 1962; Davidson, 1972) and gonadotropin release (e.g., Ramirez and McCann, 1964). In this experiment, the intracerebral cannulation method will be utilized to investigate characteristics of estrogen action in the striatum. The behavioral measure, postural deviation, will be used to assess the effects of estrogen in the striatum. Postural deviation can be induced by altering the balance of dopaminergic activity between the two striata. If estrogen can directly alter the responsiveness of DA-sensitive neurons in the striatum, then unilateral application of estrogen to the striatum will result in postural deviation. In order to increase the sensitivity of this method, a DA agonist, APO, will be given which acts post- synaptically on DA-sensitive neurons in the striatum when administered systemically. Estrogen's alteration in the responsiveness of DA- sensitive neurons in the striatum will be monitored by measuring (1) the direction of the postural deviation, and (2) the potency of the effect. To determine the potency of estrogen's effects different doses of APO were tested. Examination of the regional specificity of estrogen's actions will also be initiated in order to determine whether estrogen was acting directly in the striatum. Since intrastriatal DA-induced postural deviation is elicited from a circumscribed region of the anterior dorsal striatum (Joyce et al., 1981), it will be determined if the effects of estrogen are also limited in this region. The specificity of estrogen's effects will be detailed by comparing the effects of E2 with cholesterol and 17cL-E2. CHAPTER II EFFECTS OF ESTROGEN ON BRAIN DOPAMINE NEUROTRANSMITTER SYSTEMS Introduction Recent research suggests that dopamine (DA) containing fibers originating in the midbrain and terminating in the basal ganglia, and/or DA-sensitive cells in the basal ganglia, are subject to regulation by estrogen. It is unclear how this regulation takes place because this region does not contain cells that concentrate estrogen. Hypothalamic neural systems thought to play a major role in the mediation of repro- ductive behavior and gonadotropin secretion are also modulated by estrogen, and the mechanisms by which estrogen acts to mediate these functions have been extensively studied. The guiding hypothesis, developed over the last 20 years, has been that estrogen acts in the brain by genomic mechanisms, involving intracellular steroid receptors (see Luttge, 1983; McEwen, 1979; 1980). Four areas of research catalyzed the development of this hypothesis with respect to estrogen-dependent behaviors. First crystalline hormone was implanted into particular brain regions to identify sites of action of systemic hormone treatment (Davidson, 1972; Davis et al., 1979; Lisk, 1962; Luttge, 1976; see also McEwen, 1979; McEwen et al., 1979). Second, 3H-steroids were used to delineate biochemically the temporal and regional profiles of hormone uptake and retention in the brain, followed by the characterization of the cytosol and cell nuclear receptors (Eisenfeld and Axelrod, 1965; Kahwanago et al., 1970; McEwen and Pfaff, 1970; McEwen et al., 1975). Subsequent work, utilizing 3H-steroid auto- radiography, mapped the brain for cell groupings containing high levels of steroid receptors (Stumpf and Sar, 1976; Pfaff and Keiner, 1973; McEwen, 1979). Third, to provide evidence that estrogen receptor- mediated genomic events could underlie reproductive behavior and gonadotropin secretion, antiestrogens, and biosynthetic inhibitors of RNA and protein synthesis, have been used to determine the time course of estrogen-dependent changes in genomic expression (McEwen et al., 1975; Quadagno and Ho, 1975; Rainbow et al., 1980; Roy and Wade, 1977; Terkel et al., 1973; Whalen et al., 1974; Morin et al., 1976). Fourth, estrogen induction of gene products in neural tissue has been examined, providing a rationale for the mechanism by which estrogen could mediate reproductive behavior and gonadotropin secretion (see below; Luttge, 1983; McEwen et al., 1981, 1982). Since the hypothalamus-preoptic area contains high concentrations of estrogen receptors ([3H]estradiol binding sites, McEwen, 1979; Pfaff and Keiner, 1973; Stumpf and Sar, 1976), it has been the focus of much of the research on estrogen's actions upon neural tissue. An integrated picture, at least with respect to certain aspects of reproductive behavior and control of gonadotropin secretion, has begun to emerge that is consistent with the hypothesis that estrogen acts through receptor- mediated genomic mechanisms to alter neural events (see McEwen et al., 1979, 1982). For example, estrogen is known to alter catecholamine release from hypothalamic tissue (Becker and Ramirez, 1980; Paul et al., 1979); modulate the number of noradrenergic (Vacas and Cardineli, 1980; Wilkinson et al., 1979) and serotonergic receptors in the hypothalamus (Biegon et al., 1980; Biegon and McEwen, 1982; Biegon et al., 1982); and increase the accumulation of cyclic AMP in hypothalamic tissue (Gunaga and Menon, 1973; 1974; Paul and Skolnick, 1977; Weissman and Johnson, 1976). However, even in the hypothalamus there are neural effects of estrogen, such as the modification of neuronal firing (Kelly et al., 1976; 1977a; 1977b; 1978; 1980; Poulain and Carette, 1980), which are so rapid as to preclude genomic mediation (see also; McEwen et al., 1981; 1982). This revelation has become increasingly important as evidence has accumulated which suggests that extrahypothalamic regions are also sensitive to the effects of estrogen, even regions which appear to contain no intracellular receptors for estrogen. The proposal that estrogen might regulate the functional output of the basal ganglia was based initially on observations in human patients suffering from disorders of DA systems in the basal ganglia (Bgdard et al., 1979; Villeneuve et al., 1978; Donaldson et al., 1978; Zegart and Schwartz, 1968; Bickerstaff, 1975; Nausieda et al., 1979a). The response of those patients to drugs that act on DA systems of the basal ganglia was affected by their sex and hormonal condition (e.g.,receiving estrogen). The proposal was strengthened by research in the early 1970's that indicated that gonadal hormones had biochemical effects on DA systems of the basal ganglia in animals (Jori and Cecchetti, 1973; Holzbauer and Youdin, 1973; Greengrass and Tonge, 1974). More recent behavioral and biochemical studies in animals have extended those findings emphasizing the diverse consequences of gonadal hormone treatment on the DA systems of the basal ganglia. Unfortunately, no consensus has been reached regarding the precise nature of the actions of estrogen on the DA systems of the basal ganglia; support for suppressive and 8 enhancing effects of estrogen has been documented in both human patients (e.g., Bedard et al., 1979; Nausieda et al., 1979a) and laboratory animals (e.g., Becker et al., 1982; Bedard et al., 1983; Gordon, 1980). Nor has it been established where the estrogens act to alter the DA systems of the basal ganglia. Cell bodies of the DA fibers terminating in the basal ganglia and DA-sensitive neurons in the basal ganglia do not concentrate [3H]estradiol intracellularly (Heritage et al., 1980; McEwen, 1979; Stumpf and Sar, 1976). Therefore, there has been a tacit assump- tion that estrogen is exerting its effects on the basal ganglia through actions elsewhere. However, the 3H-steroid autoradiographic method of locating estrogen receptors is not an infallible guide in deciding where in the brain to look for the actions of estrogen (McEwen, 1980; McEwen et al., 1982). Not all brain areas where steroid receptors can be demonstrated by biochemical means contain estrogen-concentrating cells which can be visualized by autoradiography (McEwen et al., 1982). Con- sequently, several questions concerning the role of estrogen in the mediation of DA systems in the basal ganglia remain unresolved. Before introducing the experiments designed to resolve some of these issues, evidence will be presented that estrogen can modulate brain DA systems. In this paper the term estrogen will refer to estradiol (E2), unless otherwise specified, because it is the principal ovarian estrogen and has been the most systematically studied (Luttge, 1983). Effects of Estrogen on the Tuberoinfundibular Dopamine System Evidence for estrogen-induced alteration of the release of prolactin, from the pituitary gland, through actions on the hypothalamic tubero- infundibular DA (TIDA) neurotransmitter system has had a significant impact on much of the research directed at understanding how estrogen acts on extrahypothalamic DA systems. DA-containing neurons of the arcuate nucleus and adjacent periventricular zone project a dense terminal system to the external layer of the median eminence, in close apposition to the hypophyseal portal capillaries (Moore and Johnston, 1982; Sawyer and Clifton, 1980). There is considerable support for the hypothesis that DA is released from the TIDA into the hypophyseal portal blood system, and is carried to the anterior pituitary gland, where it acts to inhibit tonically the release of prolactin (PRL) (Boyd and Reichlin, 1978; MacLeod, 1976; Neill, 1980). This system appears to operate as a classic short feedback loop. Conditions which result in elevated plasma levels of PRL lead to an enhancement in activity of the TIDA and a resulting suppression of PRL release (Anderson et al., 1981; Perkins and Westfall, 1978; Annunziato and Moore, 1978; Fuxe et al., 1977; Gudelsky et al., 1976). During the estrous cycle of the rat, fluctuations in the concentration of PRL in plasma are correlated with, and apparently stimulated by, similar fluctuations in the concentration of estrogen (Boyd and Reichlin, 1978; MacLeod, 1976; Neill, 1980). These two lines of evidence have prompted investigators to speculate that the estrogen-induced surge in the release of PRL that occurs on the after- noon of proestrus (Butcher et al., 1974; Smith et al., 1975; Demarest et al., 1981a; Anjika et al., 1972; Neill et al., 1971) might be mediated by actions of estrogen on the TIDA (Crowley et al., 1978a; Ben-Jonathan et al., 1977; Demarest et al., 1981a; Simpkins et al., 1979), and of estrogen on DA's actions upon PRL containing cells of the anterior pituitary gland (Heiman and Ben-Jonathan, 1982a; 1982b; Labrie et al., 1979; 1980). Estrogen's Suppression and Enhancement of the TIDA It has been assumed that during proestrus the increased concen- tration of estrogen antagonizes the tonic inhibitory actions of the TIDA, which results in an increase in the secretion of PRL. This is then followed by a decline in the concentration of estrogen, a resurgence in the inhibitory effects of the TIDA, and a decrease in the secretion of PRL. This proposed scheme is based primarily on the evidence that, during the estrous cycle in the rat, TIDA activity is correlated inversely with the concentration of estrogen in serum (Ben- Jonathan et al., 1977; Crowley et al., 1978a; Cramer et al., 1979; Demarest et al., 1981a; Fuxe et al., 1977; Simpkins et al., 1979). The concentration of estrogen in serum of rats increases dramatically on the morning of proestrus, with a peak surge at noon, then a rapid de- cline during the afternoon of proestrus (Butcher et al., 1974; Smith et al., 1975). Direct measurement of the concentration of DA in the hypophyseal portal blood of cyclic rats indicates that concentrations are lowest at noon of proestrus and highest on the morning of estrus; that is correlated inversely with the concentration of estrogen in systemic blood (Ben-Jonathan et al., 1977; Cramer et al., 1979). Con- sistent with the direct measure of DA release from TIDA is the evidence that the activity of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in the median eminence is low on the morning of proestrus and increases significantly between then and the morning of estrus (Crowley et al., 1978a; Demarest et al., 1981a). Measures of the turnover of DA in the median eminence indicate low activity of the TIDA on proestrus, with a rapid rise in activity by the morning of estrus (Demarest et al., 1981a; Fuxe et al., 1977). This would indicate that during the estrous cycle when estrogen levels are high, there is a suppression of the TIDA; and when they are lower, there is a rebound in the activity of the TIDA. Consistent with the hypothesis that estrogen suppresses the activity of the TIDA, ovariectomy or castration produces an increase in the activity of the TIDA (Honma and Wuttke, 1980; Kizer, 1978), which can be reversed with a single treatment of 50 pg estradiol benzoate (EB) (Crowley, 1982; Cardinali and Gomez, 1977). However, if measures of DA turnover are taken at 12 or more hours after an acute treatment with EB (Crowley, 1982; Fuxe et al., 1977b; L6fstr6m et al., 1977; Mansky et al., 1982; Simpkins et al., 1979), or with chronic EB treatment (Beattie et al., 1972; Demarest and Moore, 1980; Endr6czi and Szab6, 1973; Tobias et al., 1981; Dupont et al., 1981; Eikenburg et al., 1977; Wiesel et al., 1978), there is an increase in activity of the TIDA. It has been postulated that the increase in TIDA activity that occurs at long intervals after an acute injection of EB, or with chronic admin- istration of EB, is due to a compensatory feedback loop mediated by PRL (Demarest and Moore, 1980; Fuxe et al., 1977b; Gudelsky et al., 1976), an hypothesis supported by several lines of evidence. First, the increase in activity of the TIDA, induced by EB, is correlated with increases in the concentration of PRL in serum (Crowley, 1982; Fuxe et al., 1977b; Mansky et al., 1982). Secondly, hypophysectomy, which removes the source of PRL, abolishes both estrogen- and DA antagonist-induced increases in turnover of the TIDA(Gudelsky et al., 1976; Demarest and Moore, 1980; Eikenburg et al., 1977; Perkins et al., 1979). Third, TIDA activity is accelerated by systemic or cerebroventricular injection of PRL (Annunziato and Moore, 1978; Fuxe et al., 1977; Gudelsky et al., 1976), or by chronically increasing serum levels of PRL (Hohn and Wuttke, 1978; Krieger and Wuttke, 1980; Morgan and Herbert, 1980; Perkins et al., 1979). Fourth, it is now evident that PRL could act directly on the TIDA neurons to alter their activity (Gudelsky et al., 1978; Poulain and Carette, 1976; Yamada, 1975; Walsh et al., 1978). Recent studies show that PRL, like other anterior pituitary gland hormones, is able to reach the brain via retrograde portal blood flow (Bergland and Page, 1978). The results of these studies support the hypothesis that a prolactin-mediated feedback loop could be involved in the estrogen- induced enhancement of activity in the TIDA. The enhancement would, of course, follow the estrogen-induced suppression of the TIDA that is involved in the elevated plasma levels of PRL, and be consistent with the proposal that estrogen controls the fluctuations in the TIDA across the estrous cycle. Effects of Estrogen in the Pituitary While evidence presented in the preceding paragraphs does indicate that estrogen can alter the secretion of PRL by modulating the activity of the TIDA, it is also evident that there are effects of estrogen on the pituitary gland. Estrogens have long been known to directly cause hypertrophy of the anterior pituitary gland and an increase in the synthesis of PRL (Ajika at al., 1972; Kanemaster and Sawyer, 1963; Neill et al., 1971; Nicol and Meites, 1962; Ramirez and McCann, 1964). Con- sistent with the presumed genomic mechanism of action by estrogen (McEwen et al., 1979; McEwen, 1980), it requires many hours for these effects of estrogen to become apparent (MacLeod et al., 1969; Neill et al., 1971). It is also clear that this is not the sole means by which estrogen causes an increase in synthesis and secretion of PRL; more rapid effects are now well established that involve antagonism of the PRL-suppressing effects of DA. DA receptors located on the cells of the anterior pituitary gland, thought to mediate the inhibitory actions of DA on the PRL secreting cells (Labrie et al., 1979; 1980; Cronin, 1982), fluctuate in number during the estrous cycle (Heiman and Ben- Jonathan, 1982a), and can be altered with systemic administration of EB (Heiman and Ben-Jonathan, 1982b). As determined by [3H]spiroperidol binding, elevated serum levels of estrogen result in a decrease in the density of DA receptors, and a consequent decrease in the ability of DA to inhibit the secretion of PRL (Heiman and Ben-Jonathan, 1982b). There appears to be no change in the affinity of these binding sites. The estrogen-induced decrease in [3H]spiroperidol binding to anterior pituitary gland is probably not due to direct competition of estrogen with DA receptors, since estrogen does not have any significant affinity for pituitary gland DA receptors (Paden et al., 1982; Schaeffer and Hsueh, 1979). Moreover, estrogen's antagonism of the DA-inhibitory effect on PRL secretion in vivo and in vitro is noncompetitive (Ferland et al., 1979; Gudelsky et al., 1981; Nansel et al., 1981; Labrie et al., 1979; 1980). While admittedly a still highly speculative idea, there is in- creasing evidence that steroids may have membrane receptors which can mediate some of their cellular effects (Pietras and Szego, 1977; Szego, 1978). It is possible that some of the short-term effects of estrogen may be mediated by a membrane receptor (Zyzek et al., 1981), and could include changes in the membrane properties of the PRL- secreting cells that lead to a reduction in the effectiveness of DA (Dufy et al., 1979b). Several lines of evidence indicate this possibility and suggest that more than one receptor-mediated event could underlie the suppression of the effect of DA. Pretreatment with estrogen for one hour markedly suppresses the responsiveness of anterior pituitary gland cells to the inhibitory actions of DA agonists in vivo (Ferland et al., 1979; Gudelsky et al., 1981; Nansel et al., 1981) and in vitro (Labrie et al., 1979; 1980). It has also been shown, with anterior pituitary gland cells in culture, that incubation with DA consistently results in inhibition of electrical activity on the lactotropes; and this effect can be antagonized by very low concentrations of estrogen (0.1 nM) within milliseconds of estrogen application (Dufy et al., 1979b). Extracellular iontophoresis of estrogen onto anterior pituitary gland cells (Dufy et al., 1979a) or neurons in the anterior hypothalamus (Kelly et al., 1976; 1977a; 1977b; 1978; Poulain and Carette, 1981) produces immediate changes in electrical activity of these neurons. The results of these studies indicate that E2 is acting at a specific membrane receptor since (1) the effect of E2 is immediate; (2) the effect is not due to non- specific actions of the injection procedure itself, e.g., changes in current flow or pH; and (3) the selectivity for E2 was shown, since the inactive isomer of E2, 17 c-E2, is ineffective in producing changes. Recently, Kelly and associates (1980) have been able to record intra- cellularly from neurons of hypothalamic slices. They have shown that E2, which is biologically much more active than estrone (El) in other tissues, is also much more effective than El in altering the electrical activity of the hypothalamic neurons. Therefore, estrogen may inhibit the TIDA by altering the activity of neurons that synapse on TIDA neurons, or perhaps by modulating the electrical activity of the TIDA neurons directly. Estrogenic Effects of the Catechol Estrogens A major route of estrogen metabolism in brain and pituitary gland tissue leads to the formation of 2- and 4-hydroxylated estrogens (Ball and Knuppen, 1980; Paul et al., 1980). Several observations have led to the proposal that the formation in situ of these "catechol" estrogens could provide a direct biochemical link between estrogens, inductions of PRL secretion and suppression TIDA function (Fishman, 1981). First, 2-OH-E2 administered subcutaneously can induce the secretion of PRL in ovariectomized rats (Adashi et al., 1980; Shin et al., 1981; Yanai and Nagasawa, 1979; Rodriguez-Sierra and Blake, 1982). Conversion of estrogen (E2) to either 2-OH-E2 or 4-OH-E2 reduces its affinity for the estrogen receptor (Duax et al., 1983; Davies et al., 1975; Ball and Knuppen, 1980; Merriam et al., 1980; Fishman, 1981) and, therefore, its potency in eliciting estrogen receptor-mediated effects (Ball and Knuppen, 1980; Fishman, 1981; Luttge and Jasper, 1977; Naish and Ball, 1981). Secondly, by virtue of their catechol structure, 2- and 4-OH-E2 are capable of directly interacting with the hypothalamic TIDA system (Duax et al., 1983), being potent inhibitors of TH activity (Foreman and Porter, 1980; Lloyd and Weiz, 1978; Lloyd and Ebersole, 1980). It is hypothesized that under conditions where high concentrations of the catechol estrogens could be maintained, it is possible that a significant reduction in DA synthesis would occur (Ball and Knuppen, 1980; Hiemke and Ghraf, 1982), and be a means by which estrogen could suppress TIDA function. Consistent with this hypothesis, there are several lines of direct evidence that it is the catechol derivatives of E2, and not E2 itself, that suppress the activity of the TIDA. For example, ovariec- tomized rats treated with 4-OH-E2 (100 lg), but not with an equimolar dose of ethenylestradiol (EE2, 100 pg), showed a reduction in activity of the TIDA (Hiemke and Ghraf, 1982). Furthermore, although 17 a-E2 has very low affinity for the intracellular estrogen receptor the 17 a isomers of 2- and 4-OH-E2 are effective inhibitors of hypothalamic TH activity (Hersey et al., 1982). Third, it is extremely unlikely that 2- and 4-OH-E2 act in the pituitary gland to antagonize the effects of TIDA, since the catechol estrogens have low affinity for the pituitary gland DA receptor (Paden et al., 1982; Schaeffer and Hsuech, 1979). Additionally, the latency between the administration of 2-OH-E2 and the induction of PRL secretion is longer than with E2 (Adashi et al., 1980; Shin et al., 1981; Yanai and Nagasawa, 1979), and the latency with 2-OH-E2 is not affected by E2 pretreatment (Shin et al., 1981). This suggests it is not DA receptor blockade that is the site of action of 2-OH-E2 induction of PRL secretion. This is further substantiated by the finding that superfusion of the pituitary gland in vitro with 2-OH-E2 inhibits, not enhances, PRL release and fails to antagonize DA-induced suppression of PRL secretion (Linton et al., 1981). These findings would suggest that the most likely site of action of the catechol estrogens, for inducing PRL secretion, is suppression of TIDA activity through inhibition of TH (Ball and Knuppen, 1980), but there are some inconsistencies in the literature. There are no reports that 2-OH-E2 alter the activity of the TIDA (Heimke and Ghraf, 1982), and two groups have failed to find any evidence that the 2-hydroxylated catechol estrogens have any effects on serum PRL levels in women (Franks et al., 1981; Merriam et al., 1981). It may be that the 4-hydroxlated "catechol" estrogens, which are more potent than 2-hydroxylated estrogens on a number of comparative tests for their estrogenic effects (Ball and Knuppen, 1980; Franks et al., 1980; Merriam et al., 1980), might mediate some of estrogen's effects on the TIDA (Ball and Knuppen, 1980; Hiemke and Ghraf, 1982; Kirchoff et al., 1981). Summary. Considerable progress has been made in the past 10 to 15 years on determining the interaction of estrogen with hypothalamic neurotransmitter systems, and much of the attention has been focused on estrogen's modulation of the TIDA. In part, this emphasis has been due to the relatively good evidence that the TIDA is the principle system inhibiting PRL secretion (Boyd and Reichlin, 1978; MacLeod, 1976; Neill, 1980), and thus is logically a site for estrogen's active modulation of PRL secretion. There is sufficient evidence to propose that estrogen can suppress the activity and/or actions of the TIDA, as a part of the mechanism by which estrogen enhances PRL secretion. The suppression of the TIDA system appears to occur at several levels or mechanisms. Estrogen can inhibit the activity of TH (directly or indirectly) in TIDA neurons, inhibit release of DA, and could alter electrical activity of the TIDA neurons either trans-synaptically or directly. Following the suppression of the TIDA system by estrogen, the result- ing increase in secretion PRL leads to an enhancement in the activity of the TIDA. Estrogen also has important "postsynaptic" effects on the DA-sensitive PRL-secreting cells of the anterior pituitary gland. These effects can be broken down by their latency to produce (1) increased synthesis of PRL, which requires 24 hours from an injection of estrogen; (2) an alteration of DA receptor number, with a latency of many hours; (3) non- competitive antagonism of DA on PRL-secreting cells, with a latency of an hour or more; and (4) an almost immediate change in the electrical response of the anterior pituitary gland cells to DA, possibly through estrogen's actions at a membrane receptor. Additionally, systemic administration of DA produces rapid and extensive changes in lactotrope ultrastructure (Reifel et al., 1983; Gudelsky et al., 1980). These changes are thought to underlie some aspects of DA inhibition of PRL release, and are re- duced by pretreatment with estrogen (Gudelsky et al., 1981). A hormone, by definition, is a substance released into the blood- stream, to reach and act at distant targets. In that context, the TIDA system is a hypothalamic hormone system (Meites and Sonntag, 1981). Since interactions between hormones is a well established concept, it was not unreasonable for researchers to investigate interactions between estrogen and the TIDA system. Extension of these concepts to extra- hypothalamic DA systems has been considerably slower. This is indicated, for example, by the use of extrahypothalamic DA systems as control tissue in studies that have investigated the effects of estrogen on the activity of hypothalamic DA systems (e.g., Demarest and Moore, 1980; Eikenburg et al., 1977; Crowley et al., 1978). This is probably due, in part, to the considerable differences in the anatomy and physiological regulation of the TIDA and extrahypothalamic DA systems (Moore and Johnson, 1982; Moore and Wuerthele, 1979). Recent research does suggest, however, that the fact that estrogen alters the activity of the TIDA, and the means by which it does, are relevant to extrahypothalamic DA systems. Effects of Estrogen on the Mesostriatal Dopamine Transmitter System The DA-containing cell bodies of the midbrain substantiala nigra and ventral tegmental area) give rise to long ascending axons that terminate in circumscribed regions of the forebrain (Lindvall and Bjorklund, 1978; Moore and Bloom, 1978). These DA projection systems are referred to as the mesostriatal (nigrostriatal), mesolimbic and mesocortical systems. The mesostriatal DA system projects predominantly to the dorsal caudate- putamen (dorsal striatum) in the rat (Fallon and Moore, 1978; Fallon et al., 1978). The mesolimbic system terminates in the region referred to as the ventral striatum (Fallon et al., 1978; Heimer, 1978), which in the rat includes the ventral caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens and olfactory tubercle. The mesocortical system terminates in the frontal cortex and cingulum (Moore and Bloom, 1978). It is now common to refer to those regions in which the DA system terminate by the name of the pro- jection system, i.e., mesostriatal (dorsal striatum), mesolimbic (ventral striatum) and mesocortical (frontal cortex) regions. Effects of Estrogen on Presynaptic Components of the Mesostriatal DA System Although it is well established that estrogen can modulate the activity of the TIDA, it has become apparent only recently that estrogen can alter the activity of the mesostriatal DA system. This was first suggested by the reports of sex differences in striatal DA content and turnover in rats. Gordon and Shellenberger (1974) found that DA levels were higher in whole striata of female than male rats. However, two other groups report lower striatal DA levels in female rats (Crowley et al., 1978b; Greengrass and Tonge, 1974), and amphetamine (AMPHET)- induced efflux of DA from striatum in vivo and in vitro is greater in female than male rats (Becker and Ramirez, 1981b; Robinson et al., 1980). Further support for the hypothesis that estrogen modulates the meso- striatal DA system are the reports of variations in striatal DA content and turnover across the estrous cycle of rodents. Striatal DA levels are highest, and DA turnover lowest, on the day of proestrus (high plasma estrogen levels), with a significant increase in turnover by 12-24 hours after the proestrus surge in estrogen (Crowley et al., 1978a; Jori et al., 1976; Jori and Cecchetti, 1973; Holzbauer and Youdim, 1973). Additionally, amphetamine-induced efflux of DA from striatal tissue in vitro is low- est on proestrus and highest by estrus (Becker and Ramirez, 1981b). These studies, taken together, would suggest that increasing serum levels of estrogen result in a suppression of activity of the mesostriatal DA system. Attempts to determine whether estrogen treatment itself alters the activity of the mesostriatal DA system have resulted in contradictory reports. If measurement occurs within 6 to 18 hours of acute or chronic treatment with EB, E2 in saline or synthetic estrogens (mestranol, EE2), there is a decrease in TH activity coupled with an increase in DA con- tent of striatal tissue (Crowley, 1982; DiPaolo et al., 1982b; Dupont et al., 1981; Greengrass and Tonge, 1974; Gordon et al., 1977; Lzfstrim et al., 1977). If, however, the latency from treatment is less than 3 hours (Crowley, 1982; Wiesel et al., 1978) or more than 24 hours (Becker and Ramirez, 1981b; Crowley, 1982; Crowley et al., 1978c; Gordon et al., 1977) then alterations in the activity of the mesostriatal DA system are not observed. Although the discrepancies between those reports could be due to several variables, three methodological issues are of particular relevance. First, the interval between hormone treatment and measurement of meso- striatal DA activity is probably critical. The activity of the meso- striatal DA system can be modified rapidly through several feedback mechanisms (see Moore and Wuerthele, 1979), and any alterations in synthesis or release of DA induced by low doses of estrogen would exist for only a short time after termination of treatment. Additionally, by 12 hours after estrogen administration high serum levels of PRL are typically observed, and might cause an acceleration in striatal DA turnover (Perkins and Westfall, 1978; Chen and Ramirez, 1982; Perkins et al., 1979). Secondly, the sex of the animal used in the assay of estrogen's effects on the mesostriatal DA system may be important. Several groups have utilized male rats in the examination of the actions of estrogen and androgenic steroids on mesostriatal DA activity (Becker and Ramirez, 1981a; 1981b; Demarest and Moore, 1980; Eikenburg et al., 1977; Gordon et al., 1979; Alderson and Baum, 1981; Vermes et al., 1979). In contrast to the results found when using female rats and mice (Crowley, 1982; DiPaolo et al., 1982a; 1982b; Dupont et al., 1981; Greengrass and Tonge, 1974; Gordon et al., 1977; L6fstr6& et al., 1977), it has not been found that steroid hormones induce changes in DA turnover or AMPHET- induced efflux of DA from striatal tissue in male rats. This may indicate that there are sex differences in the ability of gonadal steroids to modulate the mesostriatal DA system. Third, another methodological problem refers to the use of the entire striatum in the biochemical studies of estrogen's effects, even though the striatum contains the fiber terminals from more than one DA system. This is relevant since these systems may be modulated differently by estrogen. Acute intravenous injections of estrogen can immediately alter the activity of dopaminergic cells located in the midbrain substantiala nigra), but the activity of one cell type is increased whereas the other is decreased (Chiodo and Caggiula, 1980). Furthermore, when these same cell types are examined 48 hours after EB administration for their suppression to low doses of apomorphine, the cells show either an enhanced or depressed response, respectively, depending on the cell type (Chiodo and Caggiula, 1980). It would be useful to determine if these separate cell types project to different parts of the striatum and thus differentially alter the output of the striatum. In summary, future investigation of estrogen's effects on the mesostriatal DA system should take into account the treatment-test interval, the sex of the research animal, and the possible differential effects of estrogen on separate populations of DA fibers terminating in the striatum. Effects of Estrogen on Postsynaptic Components of the Mesostriatal DA System In addition to modulation of the mesostriatal DA neurons, estrogen modulates, directly or indirectly, DA-sensitive events postsynaptic to the DA terminals. When measured shortly after acute estrogen treatment, estrogen suppresses the effects of DA agonists on striatal neurons, as indicated by a number of independent lines of research. First, the administration of DA agonists stimulates the accumulation of cAMP in striatal neurons, through activation of a DA receptor (Greengard, 1976; for additional references see Joyce, 1983), and this effect of DA agonists is antagonized by estrogen treatment (Tang and Cotzias, 1977). Second, the DA agonist apomorphine acts through a DA receptor to inhibit the activ- ity of acetylcholine (ACh) neurons, as indicated by the increased accumulation of ACh in these neurons, and estrogen modulates this apomorphine effect. Shortly after the administration of estrogen, the apomorphine (APO)-induced accumulation of ACh in striatal cholinergic neurons is antagonized (Euvrard et al., 1979; 1980). The fact that estrogen does not appear to alter the synthesis of ACh in these neurons (Euvrard at al., 1980; Daabees et al., 1981) further suggests a direct effect of estrogen on antagonism of DA agonist responses. Estrogen's antagonism of the APO effect can even occur in DA-denervated striatal tissue, thus suggesting that estrogen's actions can be independent of any modulation of the pre- synaptic DA fibers (Euvrard et al., 1979). Third, the inhibitory actions of DA on striatal neurons can be recorded extracellularly, and an intra- venous injection of estrogen reverses the effects of DA applied ionto- phoretically onto the striatal neurons (Arnauld et al., 1981). Fourth, at least one output from the striatum, the DA-sensitive striatonigral GABA neural system (Dray, 1981), has also been shown to be responsive to estrogen. Activity in the striatonigral GABA system is measured by changes in GAD activity in the substantial nigra (Dray, 1981), and shortly after an acute treatment with estrogen there is a measurable decline in GAD activity of the substantial nigra (Gordon et al., 1977; 1979; Perry et al., 1981a; Nicoletti et al., 1982; Tyler et al., 1979). While this response to estrogen is thought to be due to antagonism of dopaminergic events in the striatum, it is also possible that estrogen can directly inhibit GAD activity in neural tissue (Wallis and Luttge, 1980). On the basis of two pieces of evidence, one group has proposed that PRL mediates estrogen's dopaminergic antagonism (Euvrard et al., 1980). Using APO-induced accumulation of striatal ACh as the measure of DA agonist activity, they reported that estrogen suppression of the apomorphine response is eliminated by hypophysectomy. Secondly, these same authors reported that hyperprolactinemia for 10 days, produced by pituitary transplants under the kidney capsule, produces a partial antagonism of the APO effect (Euvrard et al., 1980). In contrast, two other lines of evidence suggest that PRL does not mediate estrogen's antidopaminergic effect. First, it has been shown that implantation of estrogen directly into the striatum on one side of the brain produces DA antagonism, as indicated by a specific decrease in activity of the DA-sensitive striatonigral GABA system of that brain (McGinnis et al., 1980b). Secondly, it has been shown that the estrogen-induced reversal of the effect of iontophoretically applied DA on striatal neurons (Arnauld et al., 1981) occurs well before estrogen could increase plasma PRL levels (DeLian et al., 1977; Horowski and Durow, 1981). Moreover, suppression of striatal DA activity during the estrous cycle (Becker and Ramirez, 1981b; Crowley et al., 1978a; Jori et al., 1976; Jori and Cecchetti, 1973; Holzbauer and Youdim, 1973) would not be correlated with elevated plasma levels of PRL (Smith et al., 1975; Butcher et al., 1974). However, in the DA iontophoresis study by Arnauld and coworkers (1981), hypophysectomy did eliminate both estrogen's alteration of striatal cellular activity, and estrogen's antidopaminergic effect. Thus, although a pituitary cofactor may be necessary for estrogen to have antidopaminergic effects, these datado not suggest that PRL mediates estrogen's antidopaminergic effects in the striatum. Investigators have been interested in determining if estrogen's suppression of DA agonist responses in the striatum might involve alterations in the affinity or number of DA receptors on striatal neurons. It is known that intact female rats have fewer [3H]spiroperidol binding sites in the striatum as compared to ovariectomized females and intact males (Hruska et al., 1982a; Fuxe et al., 1979). Although this finding suggests that estrogen decreases (down-regulates) the number of striatal DA receptors, there is still no convincing evidence that estrogen, or even the catechol estrogens, can directly interact with striatal DA receptors, except at extremely high (micromolar) concentrations (Paden et al., 1982; Schaeffer and Hsueh, 1979). Nonetheless, there are pre- liminary reports indicating that shortly after estrogen treatment there is a decrease in the amount of striatal binding of [3H]DA (Inaba and Kamata, 1979; Perry et al., 1981a). More complete reports, however, have shown that the binding density of [3H]spiroperiodol is unchanged at 24 hours after an acute treatment with EB (Fields and Gordon, 1982; Hruska et al., 1980a). These discrepancies may be explainable on the basis of estrogen- induced changes in the affinity of striatal DA receptors. Fields and associates (Fields et al., 1982) reported recently that within four hours after estrogen treatment there is a decrease in the affinity of striatal DA receptors for [3H]spiroperidol and [3H]2-amino-6,7 dihydrotertralin (ADTN), and that this alteration in affinity is lost by 48 hours after estrogen treatment (see also Fields and Gordon, 1982). Although this effect of estrogen needs further investigation, it might explain the results of the earlier, brief reports on estrogen-induced changes in binding of [3H]DA (Inaba and Kamata, 1979; Perry et al., 1981a). Thus, it appears unlikely that estrogenic modulation of the number of striatal DA receptors is a mechanism for the antidopaminergic actions of estrogen. With respect to the estrogen-induced antagonism, it may be more profitable to investigate estrogen modulation of DA receptor-linked mechanisms, such as adenylate cyclase (Tang and Cotzias, 1977; Kumakura et al., 1979). There is much better evidence that at long intervals after termination of acute estrogen treatment (Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980a; 1980b; Hruska et al., 1980a), or with chronic estrogen treatment (DiPaolo et al., 1979; 1981; Perry et al., 1981a), there is an increase in the number of DA receptors in striatum, as indicated by an increase in the number of [3H] spiroperidol binding sites. DiPaolo and associates (1982a) have observed an increase in the binding of several dopaminergic ligands ([3H]spiroperidol, [3H]spomorphine, [3H]haloperidol) with chronic estrogen treatment, even after denervation of the mesostriatal DA system,suggesting estrogen has direct postsynaptic effects. It has also been reported that GAD activity in the substantial nigra is increased at long intervals after estrogen treatment, suggesting that there is a rebound increase in activity of the striatonigral GABA system following the initial estrogen-induced suppression (McGinnis et al., 1980; Perry et al., 1981a). Gordon and associates (Fields and Gordon, 1982; Gordon and Diamond, 1981) have further hypothesized that estrogen can prevent the up- regulation of striatal DA receptors that normally occurs following cessation of chronic haloperidol or estrogen treatment (DiPaolo et al., 1981; Gordon and Diamond, 1981; Fields and Gordon, 1982). Estrogen administration during the first four days following cessation of the chronic administration of estrogen or haloperidol blocks the increase in striatal [3H]spiroperidol binding observed with oil administration. This effect was, however, not replicated (DiPaolo et al., 1981), and it is inconsistent with the evidence that estrogen cannot decrease the density of striatal DA binding sites when given acutely (Fields and Gordon, 1982; Hruska et al., 1980a). Thus, although there is not strong evidence that estrogen can antagonize DA agonist effects in the striatum through a modulation of DA receptors, estrogen's apparent antagonism may lead to compensatory changes in the striatum that includes an increase in the density of DA receptors. Alternatively, treatment with estrogen may trigger events that lead to the up-regulation of DA receptors, but be separable from the initial antagonism. Another area of research that has shown no signs of being clarified concerns the issue of whether PRL mediates the increase in density of striatal DA receptors observed both at 5-11 days (e.g., Hruska et al., 1980a) after acute treatment with a large dose of estrogen and after several days of chronic estrogen treatment (e.g., DiPaolo et al., 1982a). Hruska and associates (Hruska et al., 1980a) have reported that hypo- physectomy prevents the increase in 13H]spiroperidol binding to striatal tissue that occurs after a single treatment with estradiol valerate to intact male rats (Hruska et al., 1980a; Hruska and Pitman, 1982). Research from that laboratory also indicates that constant infusion of ovine PRL to male rats for 7 days increases striatal binding of [3H]spiroperidol (Hruska et al., 1980b; 1982b; Pitman et al., 1981), a finding corroborated by another laboratory (Levin et al., 1983). Consistent with those obser- vations, it has been reported that hyperprolactinemia produced by transplantation of anterior pituitary tissue under the kidney capsule increases the activity of the DA-sensitive striatonigral GABA system (Nicoletti et al., 1982). DiPaolo et al. (1982c) have reported findings that only partly support the proposal of Hruska (Hruska et al., 1980a; 1982b). DiPaolo and associates (1982c) have found that chronic treatment of ovariectomized female rats or intact male rats with E2 in saline or ovine-PRL results in elevated numbers of [3H]spiroperidol binding sites in striatum. However, the effects of E2 and PRL are independent and can occur in the absence of a pituitary gland. Hypophysectomy, itself, results in a de- crease in striatal [3H]spiroperidol binding, which is prevented with simultaneous treatment with E2 and PRL. To complicate matters further, Gordon and associates have found diametrically opposite results to those of DiPaolo et al. (1982c) and Hruska et al. (1980a; 1982b), reporting that hypophysectomy induces an increase in striatal DA receptor density which can be counteracted by simultaneous treatment with EB or PRL (Perry et al., 1980; Diamond and Gordon, 1981). In their hands, hypophysectomized and ovariectomized rats administered oil for 3 days show an increase in binding of [3H]spiroperidol to striatum at 24 hours after the last administration of oil, as compared to sham operated rats (Perry et al., 1980; 1981b). Simultaneous treatment with EB attenuates the increase in striatal [3H]spiroperidol binding of the hypophysectomized rats, but does not decrease striatal [3H]spiroperidol binding in sham operated rats (Perry et al., 1980; 1981b). Similar qualitative effects are seen with male rats hypophysectomized for 3 days and simultaneously administered PRL (Diamond and Gordon, 1981). The discrepancies between the work of Gordon and associates (Perry et al., 1980; 1981b; Diamond and Gordon, 1981) and the other laboratories (Hruska et al., 1980a; 1982b; DiPaolo et al., 1982c) could be attributed to several experimental variables, but a particularly important one may be the time from ovariectomy and hypo- physectomy to measurement of DA receptor binding. In any case, it is clear that a pituitary factor, possibly PRL, is important in the regulation of striatal DA receptors. It is also reasonable to presume that estrogen can modify the density of striatal DA receptors independently of a pituitary factor, but the interaction of estrogen with pituitary hormones in the striatum needs to be examined further. Summary. The classical hypothesis has been that estrogen's actions on the brain neurotransmitter systems are mediated by genomic mechanisms, requiring nuclear receptors that bind estrogen (McEwen et al., 1979; McEwen, 1980). Neurons in the neostriatum and the DA-containing cells of the midbrain do not concentrate [3H]estradiol intracellularly (Heritage et al., 1980; McEwen, 1979; Stumpf and Sar, 1976). Since striatal tissue has often been used as a control for measurement of the effect of estrogen on DA system (e.g., Eikenburg et al., 1977; Demarest and Moore, 1980; Crowley et al., 1978), it would appear that a tacit assumption has been that estrogen would not modify neuronal events in the striatum. Recent research has shown otherwise, and suggested important parallels with estrogenic modulation of the TIDA are clear. Acute treatment with estrogen results in a suppression of both the presynaptic components of the mesostriatal DA system, and DA-sensitive events in neurons postsynaptic to the mesostriatal DA fibers. This parallels estrogen's modulation of the TIDA, as does the apparent suppression of the mesostriatal DA system during proestrus parallel that of the TIDA. It appears that PRL is the major component of the feedback system controlling the activity of the TIDA, and clearly, estrogen's antagonism of the TIDA is modulated by PRL. The activity of the mesostriatal DA system is modulated differently; a much more rapid modulation can be effected by the presynaptic autoreceptors and the striatonigral feedback system (Dray, 1981; Moore and Wuerthele, 1979). There is only limited evidence that PRL administration alters the activity of the presynaptic components of the mesostriatal DA system. Some investigators report that hypophysectomy depresses striatal DA turnover (DiPaolo et al., 1982h; Gudelsky and Moore, 1977; Wiesel et al., 1978); PRL administration enhances release of DA from striatal nerve terminals (Perkins and Westfall, 1978; Chen and Ramirez, 1982); and there is one report that PRL increases striatal DA turnover (Perkins et al., 1979). Yet most investigators find no evidence that either intracerebroventricular or systemic injections of PRL alter DA turnover in the dorsal striatum caudatee putamen) Annunziato and Moore, 1978; Eikenburg et al., 1977; Fuxe et al., 1977a; 1977b; 1979; Gudelsky et al., 1976), and DA turnover in ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) is enhanced (Fuxe et al., 1977a; 1977b; 1979; Wiesel et al., 1978). The differences in these reports have been attributed both to the treatment-test interval for PRL's effects, and the sex of the animal. It has been suggested that the male is more sensitive to PRL's effects (Chen and Ramirez, 1982). This would not, however, explain the differences observed between PRL's effects on DA turnover in dorsal and ventral striatum of the same rats. Interestingly, the potential "postsynaptic" effects of PRL on the TIDA system have not been studied. Yet, the postsynaptic effects of PRL on DA sensitive striatal neurons, indicating an enhancing effect, have been reported consistently (Hruska et al., 1980a; Pitman et al., 1981; DiPaolo et al., 1982c; Wood et al., 1980; Nicoletti et al., 1982), but the interactions between PRL and estrogen are far from being understood. The demonstrated postsynaptic effects of estrogen and PRL may reflect the enhanced ability of hormones to act at this point of control of the mesostriatal DA system. It is very possible that the initial DA antagonism by estrogen either results directly in, or initiates events leading to, a delayed enhancement of postsynaptic components of the mesostriatal DA system. A cautionary note must be added to this discussion. It has been pointed out in the preceding section that estrogen, either directly or indirectly, may modulate more than one DA system terminating in the striatum. Estrogen can modulate DA containing cells of the midbrain in different directions (Chiodo and Caggiula, 1980); PRL may more potently modulate DA systems terminating in the ventral but not dorsal striatum; and estrogen treatment may not alter the density of DA receptors in the ventral striatum while doing so in the dorsal striatum (Hruska and Pitman, 1982). This differential control of striatal DA systems may be very 31 important in understanding the effects of estrogen on the functional output of the basal ganglia. Estrogen's potential regulation of other transmitter systems in the striatum has only begun to be investigated (Hong et al., 1982), but could be important for clarifying estrogen-DA interactions in the striatum. CHAPTER III EFFECTS OF ESTROGEN ON BEHAVIORS MEDIATED BY THE MESOSTRIATAL DA SYSTEM Introduction In the previous section, evidence was presented that estrogen alters neuronal transmission in the basal ganglia, through modulation of the mesostriatal DA system. Consequently, even though the striatum and substantial nigra do not concentrate 3H] estradiol intracellularly (Heritage et al., 1980; McEwen, 1979; Stumpf and Sar, 1976), estrogen could affect DA-mediated functional output of the basal ganglia. Evidence for such a proposition already exists in the literature on extrapyramidal dysfunction in humans. For example, it has long been known that the extrapyramidal symptoms associated with neuroleptic useage are more frequent in females, particularly geriatric females (Crane, 1968; Greyhan, 1957; Lehmann and Ban, 1974; Bell and Smith, 1978; Gratton, 1968; Ayd, 1961; Tepper and Haas, 1979; Simpson e al., 1978). Since neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms are thought to be due to a disturbance of the mesostriatal DA system (Joyce, 1983; Barbaccia and Trabucchi, 1979; Tarsy and Baldessarini, 1977), the sex-linked exacerbation of these symptoms likely reflects a further modification of the mesostriatal DA system. Estrogen, itself, may play an important role in inducing these apparent sex differences since (1) estrogens given to males or females increases the prevalence and severity of parkinsonian symptoms induced by neuroleptic treatment 32 (Gratton, 1960; Villeneuve et al., 1978); (2) estrogens given to males or females can decrease neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia symptoms (Bedard et al., 1979; Villeneuve et al., 1978, 1980); and (3) estrogen administered to female parkinsonian patients can decrease the dyskinetic episodes associated with L-dopa treatment (Bedard et al., 1979; Villeneuve et al., 1978). Furthermore, in certain individuals, estrogen treatment can reveal a latent hyperactivity of the extra- pyramidal system. In asymptomatic patients with a previous history of chorea and/or rheumatic fever, choreatic episodes have been known to occur during pregnancy (Donaldson, 1978; Lewis et al., 1966; McDowell et al., 1981; Zegart and Schwartz, 1968), or be induced by oral contra- ceptives (Bickerstaff, 1975; Nausieda et al., 1979a). These reports have led some investigators to suggest that estrogens may modify certain extrapyramidal disorders by acting on the mesostriatal DA system (Bedard et al., 1979; Nausieda et al., 1979a, 1979b). Although many clinical studies suggest an interaction between estrogen and the DA systems of the basal ganglia, two important issues still remain to be addressed. First, it is unclear whether estrogen modifies striatal DA-mediated behaviors by a direct (i.e., central) or an indirect (i.e., peripheral) action on the central nervous system. Second, it is also unclear what the acute, or initial, functional effect of estrogen is on DA-mediated behaviors involving the basal ganglia. The clinical reports are contradictory with respect to the presumed actions of estrogen, indicating both a suppression and enhancement of the mesostriatal DA system. In order to investigate these discrepancies, as well as to examine the mechanism of action of estrogen on the meso- striatal DA system, a variety of animal models have been developed. For example, the stereotypy model and the rotational model of dopaminergic activity have both been used to study the effects of estrogen on DA- mediated behaviors. Both of these behavioral paradigms do, however, have some inherent problems. The stereotypy model utilizes the systemic administration of DA agonists to intact (nondamaged) animals, and then a measurement of the resulting changes in their behaviors. In contrast, the rotational model requires that a lesion be made in the animal so that there is a loss of DA (i.e., as a result of denervation) from one side of the brain. The developing imbalance in dopaminergic activity between the two sides of the brain, particularly in the basal ganglia, is claimed to be the cause of a circling behavior in response to the systemic admin- istration of DA agonists. These pharmacological models have long been used for studying the efficacy of various DA agonists in the central nervous system (see Joyce, 1983). Assessment of Central and Peripheral Actions of Estrogen When rats are given high doses of amphetamine (AMPHET) or apomorphine (APO) systemically, the animals will display a limited repertoire of behaviors in a very repetitive (stereotypic) pattern for the duration of the effect of the drug. It has been observed that the particular type or class of stereotypic behavior displayed is dependent on the dose of the DA agonist given (Costall and Naylor, 1973; 1974; Costall et al., 1974; Creese and Iversen, 1974). Accordingly, most authors assign each class of stereotypic behavior a number on an ordinal scale. Effects of the hormone treatment are then evaluated by comparing the mean ratings of the animals' behavior. The validity of this method rests on the assumption that a difference in stereotypy rating indicates a difference in dopaminergic stimulation. Second, research conducted in the late 1960's indicated that dopaminergic manipulations of the caudate nucleus could produce stereotypic behaviors (reviewed in Fog, 1972); consequently, alterations in DA agonist-induced stereotypy are often presumed to occur in the caudate nucleus. Therefore, most authors that examine the effects of estrogen treatment on APO- and AMPHET- induced stereotypy assume that changes in the stereotypy rating reflect changes in the "intensity" of dopaminergic stimulation in the caudate nucleus (Beatty and Holzer, 1978; Chiodo et al., 1981; Gordon, 1980; Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980a; Koller et al., 1980; Nausieda et al., 1979b; Savageau and Beatty, 1981). It has been deduced from these experiments that estrogen acts in the brain to directly modify the response of DA agonists. However, the basic assumptions underlying these paradigms have been criticized seriously. For example, in contrast to the assumption that the caudate nucleus (dorsal striatum) is the sole mediator of stereotypic behavior, it is now known that different classes of stereotypic behaviors occur as a result of dopaminergic stimulation of different regions of the forebrain (Costall et al., 1977; 1980; for review see Joyce, 1983). Thus, a change in stereotypy ratings could be a reflection of changes in the types of stereotypic behaviors displayed, produced by an alteration in the distribution of dopaminergic agents in the brain, or by changes in the activity of drugs in various regions of the forebrain. Hence, an estrogen-induced alteration in stereotypy rating does not necessarily mean that a modulation of dopaminergic stimulation of the caudate nucleus has occurred. It is also possible that estrogen might modify the behavioral response to dopaminergic drugs by altering the baseline behavioral conditions of the animal (see Beatty, 1979, for review), resulting in an altered threshold for behaviors produced by the systemic administration of dopaminergic drugs. Neither of these effects of estrogen would be considered to be a direct modulation of the mesostriatal DA system; but animal models utilizing the systemic injection of dopaminergic drugs cannot discriminate between central and peripheral effects of estrogen. It has also been assumed that estrogen's modulation of the rotational response to DA agonists administered systemically reflects a change in the intensity of dopaminergic stimulation in the caudate nucleus (Bedard et al., 1978; Euvrard et al., 1980; Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980b). Inherent in these experiments is the naive and false assumption that an alteration in the rotational response is a conse- quence of changes in a unidimensional mechanism (see Ungerstedt et al., 1981). It has been presumed that the degree of rotation to DA agonists is related directly to the magnitude of DA stimulation in the caudate nucleus (Silbergeld and Calne, 1981). The evidence, however, clearly indicates that the rotational response involves DA-sensitive regions out- side the caudate nuclei (Kelly, 1977; Pycock and Marsden, 1978). It has also been argued that the response measured, i.e., the number of turns, is a reflection of activity in the nucleus accumbens (ventral striatum) and not in the caudate nuclei. The direction of rotation or postural deviation is thought to be under the control of the dorsal striatum, reflecting an imbalance of dopaminergic activity between the two striata (Kelly, 1977; Pycock and Marsden, 1978; Joyce et al., 1981). Yet, even this model may be overly simplistic since postural deviation may not reflect only striatal dopaminergic activity. For example, we have found that contralateral postural deviation induced by intrastriatal administration of DA is reversed to ipsilateral deviation with a systemic administration of APO (Joyce et al., 1983). Since we could not obtain any evidence that this effect was due to a change in the balance of dopaminergic activity between the two striata, it is entirely possible that these results were due to the activation of a DA-sensitive site outside the striatum. Another rotational model, involving animals with a unilateral lesion of the entopeduncular nucleus, may also have problems. Pazo and associates (1982) have obtained evidence that the rotational response to DA agonists, in animals with such a lesion, is not mediated by the classical striato-pallidal efferent pathways. Consequently, estrogen- induced alterations in rotational responses of these lesioned animals (Bidard et al., 1978, 1981) may not occur through the normal efferent output of the basal ganglia. Therefore, either rotational model, when used to determine estrogen's effects on striatal DA-mediated behaviors, has inherent problems. There are several reports that estrogen administration changes the duration and the rate of return to baseline of DA drug-induced behaviors, and the authors have hypothesized that estrogen is acting centrally for these effects (Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980b; Koller et al., 1980; Lal and Sourkes, 1972; Nausieda et al., 1979b; Naik et al., 1978). Yet, many of the dopaminergic drugs used in these studies are metabolized by microsomal enzymes in the liver. Therefore, the intensity and duration of their action may be altered by substances which either induce or suppress microsomal enzymes. In rats, the pituitary hormones and most of the steroid hormones influence the activity of liver microsomal enzymes (Conney,1967; Kato, 1974; Selye, 1971). This may account for the estrogen-induced differences in brain levels of [3H]AMPHET and [3H] spiroperidol observed upon systemic administration of the drugs (Becker et al., 1982; Chiodo, 1979; 1981; Groppetti and Costa, 1969; Meyer and Lytle, 1978). Therefore, the hypothesis that estrogen's modulation of DA-mediated behaviors occurs as a consequence of a modification of the mesostriatal DA system is confounded by problems with the method- ologies used to study the issue. Functional Effect of Estrogen on Striatal DA-Mediated Behaviors The second major issue addressed by the animal model literature regards the functional effects on striatal DA-mediated behaviors. The animal data, like that of the clinical literature, indicate that the consequences of estrogen's effects include both suppression (Bedard et al., 1978; Bedard et al., 1982; Naik et al., 1978) and enhancement (Becker et al., 1982; Chiodo et al., 1981; DiPaolo t al., 1981; Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980a; 1980b; Koller et al., 1980). Gordon (1980) has hypothesized that an important variable to consider in evaluating the effects of estrogen on brain DA systems is the time between estrogen administration and the behavioral test. He reported that ovariectomized rats showed a reversal in the effect of estrogen on the stereotypic response to APO between 24 and 48 hours after the last estrogen adminis- tration. At 24 hours after treatment with a large dose of EB, the rats had lower stereotypy scores than oil treated control rats, but by 48 hours or longer after EB treatment, they had higher scores. Gordon postulated that the initial DA antagonism produced with estrogen leads to a "withdrawal supersensitivity" to DA agonist effects (Gordon, 1980; Gordon et al., 1980a; Fields and Gordon, 1982). The suggestion that the estrogen treatment-test interval is a critical variable to consider in evaluating the effects of this hormone is supported by a review of the literature. A number of studies utilizing large doses of estrogen (EB, EV or E2 in saline) and a treatment-test interval of 24 hours or less report that the behavioral or pharmacological response to systemically administered DA agonist drugs are antagonized (Bgdard et al., 1978; Euvrard et al., 1979; 1980; Gordon et al., 1980a; 1980b; Naik et al., 1978; Tang and Cotzias, 1977). On the other hand, studies employing a treatment-test interval of 48 hours or greater report that the behavioral response to DA agonist drugs is enhanced with a large dose of estrogen (Chiodo et al., 1981; DiPaolo et al., 1981; Gordon et al., 1980a; 1980b; Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980a; 1980b; Koller et al., 1980). Although these studies evidence a role for estrogen in the suppression and enhancement of the behavioral responses of animals to dopaminergic drugs, the studies suffer from methodological problems associated with the use of systemic administration of drugs. In order to get around these methodological problems, some authors have either measured the brain levels of drugs given systemically, or made central manipulations of the mesostriatal DA system. Becker and associates (1982) measured whole brain and striatal levels of [3H]AMPHET produced by systemic administration of the drug. They determined doses of AMPHET that produced equivalent levels of the drug in both male and female rats, and then they examined the rats for their rotational response to AMPHET. Females were shown to have significantly more AMPHET-induced rotations than males, which may reflect a greater amount of DA in the striata of females in response to AMPHET (see Becker and Ramirez, 1981b; Robinson et al., 1980). In addition, while there were no estrous cycle-dependent differences in brain levels of AMPHET, the amount of rotations elicited by AMPHET did fluctuate with the estrous cycle. These same authors have also reported that contralateral rotation in response to electrical stimulation of the mesostriatal DA system (SNC) is attenuated by ovariectomy (Robinson et al., 1981) and varies in magnitude with different stages of the estrous cycle (Robinson et al., 1982). Steiner and associates (1980; 1981) have also reported that female rats show estrous cycle-dependent changes in magnitude of intracranial (SNS) self-stimulation. Although these reports indicate that fluctuations in plasma levels of hormones result in changes in the striatal DA-mediated behaviors, the authors did not specifically alter the plasma levels of estrogen. Chiodo et al. (1981) also measured brain levels of [3H]AMPHET and [3H]APO after systemic administration of the drugs in ovariectomized rats treated with 10 pg or 100 ig EB. Even though there were no differences in brain levels of these drugs between EB- and oil-treated animals, the EB-treated rats did have significantly greater stereotypy scores in response to AMPHET or APO than the oil- treated rats when assessed at 48 hours after hormone treatment. Chiodo et al. (1981) did not test the response of the animals to AMPHET or APO at any other time point after EB treatment, and may have missed different effects of EB occurring at earlier time points. To insure that the magnitudes of behaviors mediated by DA-sensitive neurons of the striatum are measured concurrently with manipulations of serum levels of estrogen, it is necessary to administer EB while directly manipulating DA levels of the striatum. The following experiment was designed specifically to provide this assessment. Experiment 1: Estradiol Suppresses and Then Enhances Intrastriatal Dopamine-Induced Contralateral Deviation In order to evaluate the hypothesis that estrogen can directly modify the actions of DA in the striatum, DA can be applied intra- cerebrally while plasma levels of estrogen are modified. Such a method allows for tests of behavioral responsiveness at different time points after estrogen treatment. In collaboration with others in this laboratory, I tested the behavioral effects of unilateral injection of DA into the anterior-dorsal striatum of male rats at different time points after a single subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of EB. Unilateral injections of DA into the anterior-dorsal striatum result in a contra- lateral asymmetry of the animal's ongoing behaviors, which can be quantified by measuring the amount of time the animal spends producing behaviors to the side contralateral to the intrastriatal injection (Joyce et al., 1981). The behavioral response produced by the intra- striatal injection of DA, termed postural deviation, is a highly localized response (Joyce et al., 1981), which makes it useful for examining the effects of estrogen. Since the estrogen treatment-test interval is con- sidered to be an important variable (Gordon, 1980), the effects of a single treatment with EB on the amount of contralateral postural deviation elicited by unilateral intrastriatal injection of DA was tested at 2 and 6 days after hormone treatment. These two time points were chosen because the literature indicated that treatment with large doses of EB or EV induced an initial suppression of DA agonist effects lasting 24 to 48 hours (Gordon, 1980; Gordon et al., 1980), and a clear enhancement by 6 days post treatment (Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980a; 1980b). Materials and Methods Stereotaxic surgery Male Long-Evans hooded rats weighing 250-300g at the time of surgery were implanted bilaterally with permanent cannulae. Stereotaxic surgery was carried out under sodium pentobarbital (W.T. Butler Co.) anesthesia. Guide cannulae were constructed from 21 GA stainless steel tubing and the injection cannulae were constructed using 27 GA tubing. Since the injection cannulae terminated 3.0 mm below the guide cannulae, the guide cannulae were located stereotaxically such that the injection cannulae were aimed for the anterior dorsal striatum using the following coordinates derived from Pellegrino et al. (1979): +2.0 to 3.0 mm with respect to bregma; 2.0 to 4.0 mm lateral to bregma; and 3.5 to 5.0 mm below the surface of the brain. Stainless steel stylets, made from closed 27 GA tubing, kept the guide cannulae patent when the animals were not being injected intracerebrally. Behavioral observations and drug injection procedures The intracerebral application of a drug was made by injecting the drug solution through the 27 GA cannula which was connected by silastic tubing to a Hamilton syringe mounted on a Sage syringe pump (Orion Research). The injection was made at a constant rate of 0.5 pl/min, and the injection cannula remained in place for an additional 30 sec after the completion of the drug injection. After the drug administration, the rat was placed into a circular, clear plexiglas observation chamber, 34 cm in diameter and 30.5 cm in height, and observed continuously for postural deviation. The amount of time the rats deviated contralateral and ipsilateral to the side of the intracerebral injection was recorded continuously by the principal investigator using a two pole switch connected in series to a time clock and a rack of cumulative counters. The cumulative durations of contralateral and ipsilateral deviation were recorded every 5 min for the entire 30 min observation period. Estradiol benzoate in peanut oil or peanut oil alone was administered subcutaneously into the neck through a 23 GA needle. Drugs. DA (Sigma) was dissolved in a phosphate buffer to a final pH of 7.4. The phosphate buffer solution was 7.0 mM sodium phosphate monobasic/149 mM sodium phosphate dibasic solution. The concentration of the DA solution was 25 ig/0.25 il. The drug control (VH) was a solution of sucrose (Malinckrodt) dissolved in the phosphate buffer adjusted to same osmolarity as the DA solution. Estradiol benzoate Steraloids), at a concentration of 1 mg/ml was dissolved in peanut oil by heating the oil to 60Q C. Experimental procedure Rats (n=30) were injected unilaterally in the anterior-dorsal striatum first with the VH (0.25 pl) and four hours later with DA (25 yg/0.25 pl). All animals were then placed immediately into the observation chamber and observed for 30 min. Following removal from the chamber, the animals were injected subcutaneously with either estradiol benzoate (EB, 50 pg/100 g body wt) or the oil vehicle (peanut oil, OIL) at 0.05 ml/100 g body wt. The behavioral effects of both VH and DA injected into the anterior-dorsal striatum were again measured, as above, at both 2 days and 6 days after the EB or OIL treatment. Histology. After behavioral testing, rats were administered an overdose of sodium pentobarbital and perfused intracardially with 0.9% saline followed by 10% buffered formalin. The brains were placed in a 20% sucrose-l0% formalin mixture for at least 24 hr. They were then frozen, sectioned at 30 im, stained with cresyl violet, and the locations of the cannula tips verified (Figure 1). Statistical analyses In order to obtain an index of the dominant direction of deviation, the time spent ipsilateral was subtracted from the time spent contra- lateral to the side of the injection (difference score). The difference scores for postural deviation were analyzed for each of the sequential TABLE 2-1 Postural Deviation Score for Intrastriatal DA or VH at Different Times Pre- or Post-Hormone Treatment HORMONE TIME COURSE Drug Pre-Treatment 2 Days 6 Days OIL DA 781(41)ab 812(46)bd 782(52)b VH -62(31) 45(40) 20(40) EB DA 846(46)b 196(32)c 1446(93)b'e VH 31(55) 35(31) -36(45) a mean score for total observation period, SD appears in brackets significantly different from VH score for that condition, g <0.01 c significantly different from pre-treatment EB, p <0.01 and 6 days EB significantly different from EB treatment at 2 days, p <0.01 egn cantly different from OIL treatment at 6 days <0.01 significantly different from OIL treatment at 6 days, p <0.01 Figure 1. Locations of cannula tips for unilateral injection of 25 yg DA or 0.25 ~i VH into the dorsal part of the anterior striatum (diagrams derived from Pellegrino et al., 1979). Open circles indicate rats treated with OIL (n=15); filled circles, rats treated with EB (n=15). Courtesy of Eur. J. Pharmacol. 46 0 O0O 0 0::0 \ .* o00 o * 'oo oo,^ 5 min blocks of the 30 min observation period as well as for the total 30 min observation period. In order to examine the time course of effects of EB treatment as compared to the time course of effects of OIL treatment, an analysis of covariance with sequence (6 levels of 5 min blocks) as the quantitative covariable was run. Subjects were nested within hormone treatment (2 levels, EB and OIL), crossed with drug (2 levels, DA and VH) and time course of hormone treatment (3 levels; 0, 2, 6 days). In order to determine whether the hormone treatment affected the sequence response for the drug (DA or VH), the slope of the response to the drug across the six 5-min blocks of the 30 min observation period was determined, and analyzed for differences in hormone effects at 0 (pre-hormone), 2 and 6 days of hormone treatment. Experimental Results The location of the injection cannulae sites for all animals are shown in Figure 1 (n=30), all sites are within the anterior dorsal striatum. There was no difference in the distribution of sites between EB-treated (n=15) and OIL-treated (n=15) rats. The pretreatment response of the OIL and EB groups to the intrastriatal injection of DA or the VH were not different (Table 2-1, Figure 2). Consistent with previous findings (Joyce et al., 1981), DA injected into the anterior dorsal striatum induced consistent contralateral deviation, whereas the intrastriatal injection of VH produced no significant change in postural deviation. For both the OIL and EB groups (Figure 2), the pretreatment response to an intrastriatal injection of DA was significantly different from the VH injections for 10-30 min after injection (p < 0.01). The groups were not different in the slope of the response to the drug (DA or VH) across the six sequential 5-min blocks of the 30 min observation period. Figure 2. Pre-treatment postural deviation scores for OIL and EB groups. The ordinate represents the average difference score for postural deviation expressed in 0.01 min. Ipsilateral devi- ation was subtracted from contralateral deviation for each animal to obtain an absolute difference score. Positive scores represent a predominantly contralateral deviation, and negative scores, an ipsilateral deviation. The graph represents the mean time + S.E.M. for each 5-min time block. For each hormone treatment group the filled symbols indicate scores for dopamine (DA); open symbols, for the vehicle (VH). The DA and VH scores for OIL group are indi- cated by circles and those for the EB group by squares. Courtesy of Eur. J. Pharmacol. 300 PRE OIL DA o---o VH 250- PRE EB S--- DA 0---- VH -50 5 10 15 MIN Rats administered OIL and tested 2 days later did not differ in their response to DA or VH as compared to pretreatment OIL scores (Table 2-1, Figure 3). Rats administered EB and tested 2 days after EB treatment did not differ in response to VH, but showed a significant decrease in contralateral deviation induced by an intrastriatal injection of DA (Table 2-1) as compared to pretreatment EB scores. This is indicated by the fact that the response to DA was not significantly different from VH for any 5 min block of the observation period (Figure 3). The reduction in the response to DA at 2 days after EB treatment was due to a reduction in the amount of contralateral deviation, and not due to an increase in ipsilateral deviation. While the absolute amount of contralateral deviation induced by DA was significantly different between EB and OIL groups at 2 days post-hormone treatment (Figure 3), the slopes of the response to the drug (DA or VH) across the six sequential 5-min blocks of the 30 min observation period were not different by hormone treatment. The OIL group was unchanged in its response to an intrastriatal injection of DA or VH at 6 days after OIL treatment as compared to the pretreatment OIL scores or 2 days post-OIL scores (Table 2-1, Figure 4). Rats administered EB and tested 6 days after EB were not different in response to an intrastriatal injection of VH, but had a significantly greater response to DA (Table 2-1, Figure 4) as compared to pretreatment EB scores or 2 days post-EB scores. This is indicated by the signifi- cantly greater response to DA at 10-30 min of the sequence (p < 0.01, Figure 4). The enhancement in the response to DA at 6 days after EB treatment is due solely to an increase in the amount of contralateral deviation, and not to a decrease in ipsilateral deviation. Six days after injection of either EB or OIL the response to DA was greater at Figure 3. Scores for OIL and EB groups at 2 days after OIL or EB treatment. All other details as in Figure 2. Courtesy of Eur. J. Pharmacol. 300- 2 DAYS *--* o o---o 250 2 DAYS o--a 200 POST OIL DA VH POST EB DA VH 15 20 25 30 MIN Figure 4. Postural deviation scores for OIL and EB groups at 6 days after OIL or EB treatment. All other details as in Figure 2. Courtesy of Eur. J. Pharmacol. 6 DAYS POST OIL p. DA o----o VH 6 DAYS POST EBT -- DA 0----0 VH 5 10 15 20 25 30 MIN 10-30 min in the EB group than in the OIL group, but the slopes of the response to the drug (DA or VH) across the six sequential 5-min blocks of the 30 min observation period were not affected by hormone treatment. Discussion. The results of this study suggest that estrogen can directly modify the actions of DA in the striatum; and,consistent with the hypothesis of Gordon (1980), the time after hormone administration is an important determinant of the behavioral response of animals to DA agonists. After a single administration of a large dose of EB, the male rats were initially depressed in their response to an intrastriatal injection of DA (2 days post-EB), but were later supersensitive in their response (6 days post-EB). A review of other animal research to date would also indicate that the time after the last estrogen administration is an important experimental variable. Administration of large doses of EB (greater than 50 hg) to rats or mice reduces the stereotypy scores induced by APO (Gordon et al., 1980; Fields and Gordon, 1982; Naik et al., 1978), AMPHET (Gordon et al., 1980; Naik et al., 1978), 0-phenylethylamine (Naik et al., 1978) and L-dopa (Tang and Cotzias, 1977), when tested within 24 hours of the last treatment of EB. Treatment with a smaller dose of EB (10 pg) can also antagonize APO and AMPHET-induced stereotypy (Gordon et al., 1980). Treatment with a 100 lg of moxestrol antagonizes the rotational response produced by APO in rats with unilateral forebrain depletions of DA (Euvrard et al., 1980). Similarly, treatment with 5 pg EB twice daily suppresses the rotational response or activity response produced by APO in rats with a unilateral lesion of the entopeduncular nucleus, if testing is done within 24 hours of hormone treatment (Bedard et al., 1980). In monkeys with a midbrain lesion involving the substantial nigra, a lingual dyskinesia can be observed, which can be markedly enhanced by systemic administration of APO (Bedard et al., 1982). The administration of 500 jg EB subcutaneously will induce a suppression of the APO effect at 24 hours after the EB treatment. When the behavioral response to DA agonists is measured at 48 hours or more after treatment with estrogen, the behavioral response is enhanced. Female rats administered 10 Pg EB (Chiodo et al., 1981; Gordon et al., 1980a; 1980b), 50 pg EB (Gordon, 1980) or 100 ig EB (Chiodo et al., 1981; Gordon, 1980) and tested from 2 to 7 days post-hormone treatment show enhanced stereotypy scores to APO and AMPHET. Male rats with lesion- induced depletions of DA from one striatum show an enhanced rotational response to AMPHET at 6 days after a single treatment with 125 hg estradiol valerate (EV; Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980b). Male rats administered 125 Vg EV and tested 6 days after treatment evidence an enhanced stereotypic response to both APO and AMPHET (Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980a). Primates with a midbrain lesion, exhibiting APO-enhanced lingual dyskinesia,show an initial suppression with EB treatment, but this is reversed to an amplification by two weeks post-EB treatment (Bedard et al., 1982). Interestingly, two groups report that at 48 hours after a high dose of EB (50 pg, 100 jg), female rats show an enhanced stereotypic response to APO (Gordon, 1980; Chiodo et al., 1981), whereas the results of this experiment evidence suppression of intrastriatal DA-induced deviation at this same time point. This discrepancy could be due to methodological differences, sex differences, dose of EB used or differences in the behavioral measures utilized. First, the behavioral changes observed by other groups, in response to systemic administration of dopaminergic drugs, may be due to both central and peripheral effects of estrogen. With the procedure used in this experiment, peripheral effects of estrogen, such as altered pharmacokinetics of the dopaminergic drugs, can be eliminated. Thus, in Gordon's experiment (Gordon, 1980) it is possible that the peripheral effects of estrogen may be masking the central effects of estrogen at 48 hours after EB administration. Second, the sex of the animals used may also be an important variable, since male rats were used in this experiment and female rats were used by Gordon (1980) and Chiodo (Chiodo et al., 1981). In male rats, a single admin- istration of estrogen does not result in an increase in striatal DA receptors, measured with [3H]spiroperidol, until 5 days post-treatment (Hruska et al., 1980a). Long-term ovariectomized (OVX) female rats are more sensitive to the DA-suppressing effects of estrogen (Euvrard et al., 1980), and may have different time-course to the enhancing effects of estrogen. Third, with larger doses of estrogen, greater suppression of various measures of striatal DA response are observed (Gordon, 1980; Euvrard et al., 1980). The dose of EB used in this study is about 150 Pg, which is approximately equal to that used by Hruska and Silbergeld (1980a; 1980b), but greater than that utilized by Gordon (Gordon, 1980) or Chiodo and associates (1981) with female rats. Finally, it is also reasonable to suggest that the behavioral measure of striatal DA activity used may be differentially sensitive to estrogen. The stereotypy, rotational and intrastriatal DA-induced postural deviation measures need not utilize the same neural systems, and could, therefore, be differentially sensitive to estrogen. Bdard and associates (1982) report that with monkeys given midbrain lesions, some APO-sensitive behaviors are modulated by estrogen and some are not. It is also worth noting that the suppression-enhancement switch that characterizes EB modulation of APO-stimulated lingual dyskinesia has a time course different from APO-stimulated behaviors measured in rats. Previous animal studies dealing with the effects of estrogen on striatal DA systems have made use of the systemic injection of DA agonists, or have not directly modulated serum levels of estrogen, when studying estrogen's modulatory effects. Nevertheless, these groups have concluded that estrogen is acting in the brain to modulate the behavioral output of the DA systems of the basal ganglia (Bedard et al., 1978; 1980; Euvrard et al., 1980; Gordon, 1980; Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980a; 1980b; Hruska et al., 1980a; Becker et al., 1982; Robinson et al., 1981). The results of the present study support this hypothesis more convincingly than previous studies, because DA was injected directly into the striatum, while serum levels of estrogen were being altered. With this paradigm, the time courses and slope of the response to the intrastriatal injection of DA were unaltered by estrogen administration, which suggests that it is an estrogen-induced alteration in the response of the cells postsynaptic to the mesostriatal DA fibers that underlies the behavioral changes. I cannot discount other possible estrogen-induced alterations in the mesostriatal DA system. Although estrogen does not alter the uptake of DA into striatal synaptosomes (Nixon et al., 1974; Wirz-Justice et al., 1974), it may be involved in sex- and estrous cycle-dependent changes in amphetamine-stimulated release of DA from striatal tissue (Becker and Ramirez, 1981a; 1981b). An estrogen-induced alteration in DA release has been postulated as a mechanism underlying sex- and estrous cycle- dependent variation in the amount of rotation elicited in rats with amphetamine (Becker et al., 1982) and electrical stimulation of the mesostriatal DA system (Robinson et al., 1982). The results of this experi- ment also support the hypothesis that the treatment-test interval is an important variable to consider when evaluating estrogen's modulation of the striatal DA system. This experiment suggests that the initial effect of estrogen is to suppress the behavioral effects of striatal dopaminergic activity. Experiment 2: Behaviors Induced by Intrastriatal Dopamine Vary Independently Across the Estrous Cycle Introduction Animal studies have been utilized to investigate the effects of gonadal hormones on the functional output of the basal ganglia. The intensity and duration of behaviors induced by the systemic administration of dopaminergic drugs have been shown to be influenced by gender (Becker et al., 1982; Robinson et al., 1980; 1981; 1982; Savageau and Beatty, 1981) and hormones (Bedard et al., 1978; 1980; Chiodo et al., 1979; 1981; DiPaolo et al., 1981; Euvrard et al., 1980; Gordon, 1980; Hruska and Silbergeld, 1980a; 1980b). In this and other laboratories animals given estrogen (EB) show an initial suppression of the behavioral responses to dopamine (DA) agonists, and only later an enhancement of the behavioral responses (Experiment 1: Bedard et al., 1982; Gordon, 1980). However, in these studies, nonphysiological doses of estrogen were used, and one must be concerned that only pharmacological responses to estrogen were observed. One way of studying the effects of physiological doses of estrogen is to utilize the natural fluctuations of estrogen in the estrous cycle. Researchers that have examined fluctuations of DA-mediated functional output of the basal ganglia across the estrous cycle have obtained results that are not clearly consistent with the findings reported in Experiment 1 and in other laboratories (Bedard et al., 1982; Gordon, 1980). Steiner and associates (1980; 1981) report that intracranial self- stimulation of the substantial nigra pars compact (SNC) shows regular fluctuations across the estrous cycle of the rat with a peak on the night between proestrus and estrus. Additionally, Steiner et al.(1980) report that bromocriptine-augmented wheel running shows a peak response on the same night, but apomorphine-induced stereotypic behavior shows no variation across the estrous cycle in rats. In contrast, Robinson and associates report that intranigral (SNC) electrical stimulation-induced rotational behavior (Robinson et al., 1982) and amphetamine-induced rotational behavior (Becker et al., 1982) in rats show a peak response on the night of estrus and a suppression on the night of diestrus day 1. Becker et al. (1982) also report that an additional measure of AMPHET- induced rotations, extra quarter turns, show a different pattern of variability across the estrous cycle. The fewest extra quarter turns occur on proestrus, with all other days being equal. These reports suggest a lack of any commonality in estrous cycle control of the various striatal dopaminergic behaviors. Moreover, the observed changes in the behaviors appear to bear little relationship to fluctuations in the plasma level of estradiol. An important aspect of those experiments is that the behav- ioral responses were obtained during the night (lights OFF) portion of the estrous cycle, yet the most significant rise in concentration of estradiol in the blood occurs on the morning (lights ON) of proestrus (Smith et al., 1975; Butcher et al., 1974). In order to more specifically test for the dopaminergic effects of physiologic concentrations of estradiol, it would be useful to test the behavioral effects of dopaminergic agents during the lights ON portion of proestrus. Since the intrastriatal application of dopaminergic drugs is a useful method to investigate the functional effects of estrogen on striatal dopaminergic behaviors, I used this procedure to test the effects of physiological changes in gonadal hormones on the functional output of the basal ganglia. In order to examine the effects of changes in levels of estradiol on intrastriatal DA-induced behaviors, I tested the animals on the morning of proestrus and subsequent mornings of each day of the estrous cycle (Experiment 2.1). Because I noted a dramatic change between the days of proestrus and estrus, in the second part of this experiment I tested for intrastriatal DA-induced behaviors at several time points on the day of proestrus (Experiment 2.2). Materials and Methods Animals Female Long-Evans hooded rats weighed 180-220 g at the beginning of the experiment. They were housed individually and maintained on a 12:12 light:dark cycle (lights ON, 0800-2000). Vaginal smears were taken twice daily (1000 hr, 1600 hr) and each day of the estrous cycle was determined with reference to the day of estrus. The rats were smeared for two weeks prior to surgery, and for two weeks prior to initiating behavioral testing. The rats were monitored for regularity of 4 day estrous cycles. Stereotaxic surgery The rats were implanted bilaterally with permanent cannulae under sodium pentobarbital (W.T. Butler Co.) anesthesia. Guide cannulae were constructed from 21 GA stainless steel tubing and the injection cannulae were constructed using 27 GA tubing. Since the injection cannulae terminated 3.0 mm below the guide cannulae, the guide cannulae were located stereotaxically such that the injection cannulae were aimed for the anterior dorsal striatum using the following coordinates derived from Pellegrino et al. (1979): +2.0 to 3.0 mm with respect to bregma; 2.0 to 4.0 mm lateral to bregma; and 3.5 to 5.0 mm below the surface of the brain. Stainless steel stylets, made from closed 27 GA tubing, kept the guide cannulae patent when the animals were not being injected intracerebrally. Behavioral testing The intracerebral application of a drug was made by injecting the drug solution through the 27 GA cannula which was connected by poly- ethylene tubing to a Hamilton syringe mounted on a Sage syringe pump (Orion Research). The injection was made at a constant rate of 0.5 pl/min, and the injection cannula remained in place for an additional 30 sec after completion of the drug injection. After the drug administration the rats were placed into a circular clear plexiglas observation chamber, 34 cm in diameter and 30.5 cm in height, and observed for 40 min. The duration of postural deviation, duration of laterally directed groom- ing and the number of 1/4 rotations that occurred both contralaterally and ipsilaterally to the side of intrastriatal injection were recorded. The amount of time the rats deviated and groomed contralateral and ipsi- lateral to the side of the intrastriatal injection was recorded contin- uously by the observer using a two pole switch connected in series to a time clock and a rack of cumulative counters. The cumulative durations of postural deviation, laterally directed grooming and number of 1/4 rotations were recorded every 5 min for 40 min. Drugs. Amphetamine (AMPHET; Sigma) and dopamine (DA; Sigma) were dissolved in the phosphate buffer solution to a final pH of 7.4. The phosphate buffer solution was 140 mM sodium phosphate dibasic/7.0 mM sodium phosphate monobasic solution. DA and AMPHET solutions were made at a concentration of 25 pg/0.25 pl. The control drug (VH) was the phosphate buffer adjusted to a pH of 7.4 with glacial acetic acid. Histology. After behavioral testing, rats were administered an overdose of sodium pentobarbital and perfused intracardially with 0.9% saline followed by 10% formalin. The brains were placed in a 20% sucrose-10% formalin mixture for at least 24 hr. The brains were frozen, sectioned at 30 pm, stained with cresyl violet, and the locations of the cannula tips verified. Cannula tip placements for Experiment 2.1 and Experiment 2.2 are shown in Figure 5. Experiment 2.1 Procedure. All rats (n=10) were injected unilaterally into the striatum with the VH, DA or AMPHET on separate days. Animals in this study each received all drugs on each day of the estrous cycle in a counterbalanced order, with a minimum of 48 hours between drug injections, to allow within-animal comparisons. Animals were tested between 1000-1200 hr of the day of proestrus and between 1000-1500 hr on all other days of the estrous cycle. Data analysis. Only rats which had regular 4 day estrous cycles during the entire experiment were used in the final analyses of the data. In order to obtain an index of the dominant direction of postural deviation (including lateralized grooming), the time spent ipsilateral was sub- tracted from the time spent contralateral to the side of the intracerebral injection (difference score). A dominant direction index was also obtained for the number of 1/4 rotations by subtracting the number of 1/4 rotations ipsilateral from the number contralateral to the side of the intracerebral injection. The difference scores were used as the drug response (for each drug) to examine if there were differences due to the day of the estrous cycle (HORMONE); and were analyzed for the total 40 min observation period (sum total) and across the eight 5-min blocks of the observation period (TIME). For the sum total scores, an analysis of variance was used to determine if the variables drug and day of the O04 4 .,-I - r- i . C) r. a - 41 4J P- rl 4.1 I, rA O4C to C 4H w-4 C w) 00. C) a 444 D4 0 0) nl^ J 4- uO trf a q ! u * -3 -^ 1-4 EI *o *o " c 1-1 *ri U inM In0 O \ e /o 06O estrous cycle (HORMONE) had significant overall effects. Tests for simple main effects were then made using Scheffe's method for multiple compari- sons (for equal sample size). An analysis of covariance was used to determine if the variables drug and day of the estrous cycle (HORMONE) had significant overall effects for the eight 5-min blocks of the obser- vation period (TIME as the quantitative covariable). For each drug response, differences due to the day of estrous cycle (HORMONE) were tested for significance using least squares means estimation with a quadratic function as the model. When testing for differences using drug response across the eight 5-min blocks of the observation period, it was assumed that the lines were parallel. Only the preplanned comparisons for each day of the estrous cycle (HORMONE) by drug were tested. Results. The difference score for postural deviation for each drug by day of estrous cycle are shown in Figure 6. The data are presented for the entire 40 min observation period by each 5-min block. The response to the unilateral intrastriatal injection of the VH was not significantly different from zero for any day of the estrous cycle. The response to both DA and AMPHET was significantly different from the VH for each day of the estrous cycle (p <0.01). Unilateral injections of DA or AMPHET produced contralateral deviation, as indicated by the positive difference scores across the eight 5-min blocks of the 40 min observation period (Figure 6). The difference score for postural deviation for the intrastriatal injection of DA for each day of the estrous cycle is shown in Figure 7. The response to DA was least on the morning of proestrus and greatest on the morning of estrus (p <0.01). Diestrus day 1 and diestrus day 2 were not different from one another, but were different from proestrus and estrus (p < 0.01). The difference score for postural Figure 6. Postural deviation scores for Experiment 2.1. The ordinate represents the average difference score for postural deviation expressed in 0.01 min. Ipsilateral deviation was subtracted from contralateral deviation for each animal to obtain an absolute difference score. Positive scores represent a pre- dominantly contralateral deviation, and negative scores, an ipsi- lateral deviation. The graph represents the mean time + S.D. for each sequential 5-min block of the 40 min observation period; the abscissa represents each 5-min time block. The response to the intrastriatal injection of dopamine (DA, 25 Jg/0.25 111), amphetamine (AMPHET, 25 ug/0.25 Il) and vehicle (VH, 0.25 il) are shown for each day of the estrous cycle (PROESTRUS, ESTRUS, DIESTRUS 1, DIESTRUS 2). 300 PROESTRUS ESTRUS 20 20 ............ OA 2 AW2 / / {, 200 00 ioo \ N l 0 0 io 20 00 30 i 40 0 ,S 3 4 TIME TIME 300 300 DIESTRUS I DIESTRUS 2 200 200 E \ Z0 2 j i - I. 0 < IS .- \ 5 f IS 20 23 30 30 40 5 1 11 20 230 30 3 40 TIME TIME Figure 7. Postural deviation scores for intrastriatal injection of DA at each day of the estrous cycle (Experiment 2.1); PROESTRUS, DIESTRUS 1, DIESTRUS 2, ESTRUS. All other details as in Figure 6. ESTROUS CYCLE DOPAMINE RESPONSE o--o PROESTRUS A.------A DIESTRUS I A-----... DIESTRUS 2 oa---i--a ESTRUS 200 - 150 - 100 I 50 - 15 20 25 30 35 40 TIME 5 10 I I a a i g | I I Figure 8. Postural deviation scores for intrastriatal injection of AMPHET at each day of the estrous cycle (Experiment 2.1); PROESTRUS, DIESTRUS 1, DIESTRUS 2, ESTRUS. All other details as in Figure 6. ESTROUS CYCLE AMPHETAMINE RESPONSE ----- PROESTRUS 300 A -------. DESTRUS I A-.-.-.A DIESTRUS2 o-i-i-a ESTRUS 250 \, 200 - 150 1 too I- 50 I I I I I 5 10 15 20 TIME I I I I 25 30 35 40 ~ TABLE 2-2 Intrastriatal DA- and AMPHET-Induced Deviation and Rotation on Separate Days of the Estrous Cycle PROESTRUS ESTRUS DIESTRUS 1 DIESTRUS 2 VH DEV 33.8(27)d 35(40) 10.8(28) 10.3(28) ROT 1.3(0.7) .2(.2) -1.4(1.2) -1.1(2.2) DA DEV 848.9(65)a'b 1496(121)a'b 1177(72)a 1189(77)a ROT 18.6(4.4)c 69.1(14)a 65.5(11)a 94(19)a AMPHET DEV 1017.8(34)a,b 1822(117) a,b 1508(51)a 1507(77)a ROT 127.4(33)ac 331.8(51)a 222(69)a 198(52)a different from VH for that hormone condition, p <.01 b proestrus different from estrus for that drug, p < .01 pro different from all others, p < .01 d same on Table 2-3 deviation for the intrastriatal injection of AMPHET for each day of the estrous cycle is shown in Figure 8. The response to AMPHET was least on the morning of proestrus and greatest on the morning of estrus (p < 0.01). Diestrus day 1 and day 2 were not different from one another, but were different from proestrus and estrus (p <0.01). Unilateral intrastriatal injections of DA and AMPHET produced contralateral 1/4 rotations greater in number than that produced by the VH (Table 2.2, p <0.01). Similar to the postural deviation response to DA and AMPHET, the number of 1/4 rotations varied across the estrous cycle (Table 2.2). The rotational response to DA was least on the morning of proestrus, and increased significantly by the morning of estrus (p <0.01). The rotational response to AMPHET was least on the morning of proestrus, and had increased significantly by the morning of estrus (p < 0.01). Experiment 2.2 The results of Experiment 2.1 indicate that behaviors induced by intrastriatal injections of DA and AMPHET vary in magnitude across the estrous cycle. Furthermore, consistent with the hypothesis that estrogen suppresses the behavioral responses to intrastriatal dopaminergic stimulation (Experiment 1) the responses were least on the morning of proestrus. This is when serum estradiol levels are highest (Smith et al., 1975; Butcher et al., 1974). Within 24 hours of the proestrus suppression, there was a significant enhancement in the behavioral responses to intra- striatal DA and AMPHET. This transformation potentially is related to the level of estrogen, since the surge in serum concentration of estradiol is over by the afternoon of proestrus (Butcher et al., 1974; Smith et al., 1975). This inverse correlation between levels of estrogen and the behavioral response to intrastriatal DA and AMPHET can be better examined by testing at various times during the day of proestrus, since the most significant changes in serum levels of estradiol occur then. Procedure. Rats (n=5) were given unilateral intrastriatal injections of DA and AMPHET at various times on the day of proestrus and the morning of estrus. Injections of the drugs were made on separate days, but all animals received each drug at 4, 7 and 11 hours after lights ON and again at 4 hours after lights ON at estrus. The drugs were administered in a counterbalanced order. All rats were monitored for their estrous cycles for two weeks prior to the initiation of behavioral testing. Data analysis. Only rats with regular 4 day estrous cycles throughout the entire experiment were used in the final analyses. The difference scores for the behavioral responses postural deviation and 1/4 rotations were analyzed for differences due to drug and time of day (HORMONE) using the sum total for the 40 min observation period. An analysis of variance was used to determine if the variables drug and time of day on proestrus and estrus (HORMONE) had significant overall effects. Tests for simple main effects were then made using Scheffe's method for multiple comparisons (equal sample size). Results. The behavioral responses deviation and rotations, induced by the unilateral intrastriatal injections of DA and AMPHET, varied across the day of proestrus. The postural deviation response to DA and AMPHET was suppressed at 4 and 7 hours after lights ON at proestrus, but was enhanced by 11 hours after lights ON (Table 2.3; p <0.01). The rotational response to DA and AMPHET was suppressed at 4, 7 and 11 hours after lights ON at proestrus, but enhanced by the morning of estrus (Table 2.3; p <0.01). TABLE 2-3 Intrastriatal DA- and AMPHET-Induced Deviation and Rotation at Various Times of Proestrus and Estrus PROESTRUS ESTRUS 4 hrs 7 hrs 11 hrs 4 hrs DA DEV 391(68)b'd 372(96)b 1075(162) 1092(159) ROT 54(16) 40(14) 43(26) 153(37) AMPHET DEV 753(135) b 669(153) b 1671(114)a 1572(150) ROT 308(52) 278(72) 258(73) 681(88)c aDA different from AMPHET, p <.01 different from Pro 11 hrs and Estrus 4 hrs, p < .01 Different from all other hormone conditions, p < .01 d scores for postural deviation and number of 1/4 rotations, SD appears in brackets Discussion Consistent with the interpretation that high levels of estrogen result in a suppression of intrastriatal DA-induced behaviors (Experiment 1), I found in Experiment 2.1 that intrastriatal DA- and AMPHET-induced behaviors were suppressed on the morning of proestrus. Both of the behaviors measured, postural deviation and number of rotations, were suppressed when plasma titers of estradiol should be high (Smith et al., 1975; Butcher et al., 1974) and enhanced when the levels should be low (estrus, diestrus days 1 and 2). This is in contrast to recent reports on estrous cycle changes in striatal DA-induced behaviors, indicating either no suppression on proestrus (Steiner et al., 1980) or a suppression on diestrus (Becker et al., 1982; Robinson et al., 1982). However, the results of this experiment are in agreement with biochemical studies of DA activity in the striatum across the estrous cycle. When animals are sacrificed during the lights ON portion of a standard light:dark cycle, biochemical indices of mesostriatal DA neuronal activity are lowest on proestrus, with a significant increase by estrus (Becker and Ramirez, 1981b; Jori and Cecchetti, 1973; Jori et al., 1976; Crowley et al., 1978a). Since previous authors have examined the estrous cycle vari- ation in striatal DA-induced behaviors during the lights OFF portion of the cycle, differences between studies might be due to the time of day the behaviors were measured. In Experiment 2.2, I examined changes in the intrastriatal DA- induced behaviors across the day of proestrus and the morning of estrus. I found that on proestrus, intrastriatal DA- and AMPHET-induced postural deviation showed increases by 11 hours after lights ON, but rotation was still suppressed. The rotational response, like that of postural deviation, was enhanced by the morning of estrus. These data indicate that the magnitude of one striatal DA-mediated behavior, postural deviation, changes dramatically during the day of proestrus, while that of another, rotation, does not. This suggests that striatal DA- mediated behaviors can be modulated separately by gonadal hormones, an observation made previously using monkeys (Bgdard et al., 1982). Those authors reported that the DA-related behaviors tremor and lingual dyskinesia, induced by a midbrain lesion involving the SNC, were differentially affected by EB. Lingual dyskinesia was enhanced by dopaminergic agonists, and this enhancement suppressed by the systemic administration of EB. In contrast, tremor was suppressed by dopaminergic agonists, and this suppression unaffected by estradiol benzoate. Thus, conflicts between various research groups that have investigated alter- ations in DA-mediated behaviors across the estrous cycle may be resolved with reference to the behaviors studied. Rotational behaviors induced by electrical stimulation of the SNC (Robinson et al., 1982) or systemic AMPHET (Becker et al., 1982) need not be correlated with intrastriatal DA-induced postural deviation. However, in this study (Experiment 2.2) the rotational response induced by the intrastriatal administration of DA and AMPHET is found to be suppressed at the night of proestrus and enhanced by estrus. This finding is inconsistent with the findings of other experimenters that have utilized rotation as their behavioral measure of dopaminergic activity of the striatum (Becker et al., 1982; Robinson et al., 1982). Those authors reported that their rotational measure was enhanced on the night of estrus, and suppressed on the night of diestrus day 1. However, in the study by Becker et al. (1982) only full 360 degree rotations were included in the data; when extra quarter turns are also included, there is a different response across the estrous cycle. The addition of the extra quarter turn data reveal that rotations were in fact suppressed on proestrus, and augmented on estrus, a finding consistent with the results of this study. The results of the present experiment (Experiment 2.2) also may not be inconsistent with those of Robinson et al. (1982). In that paper, electrical stimulation of the SNC at night pro- duced more rotations on estrus than diestrus day 1 and day 2, with a slight increase by proestrus. These data are inconsistent only with the data in Experiment 2.2 for 11 hours after lights ON of proestrus. However, since Robinson et al. (1982) took their measure later on proestrus than I did for Experiment 2.2, then it is unlikely that the magnitude of the rotational response would be the same. I have also noted that the rotational response to intrastriatal DA or AMPHET is reduced by long-term ovariectomy (more than 3 weeks), which again is consistent with the findings of others (Robinson et al., 1980; 1981). The postural deviation response to the intrastriatal administration of DA and AMPHET shows a time course similar to intracranial reward (SNC stimulation) and bromocriptine- augmented wheel running activity, which show an enhancement on the night of proestrus (Steiner et al., 1980). These data also suggest that rotation and deviation induced by intrastriatal application of DA and AMPHET are not necessarily mediated by the same neural system, since they showed separable variations in intensity across the estrous cycle. It has been presumed that rotation is mediated by the simultaneous activation of two DA systems, one terminat- ing in the ventral striatum and the other in the dorsal striatum (Kelly, 1977; Pycock and Marsden, 1978; see for further references, Joyce, 1983). The DA system terminating in the dorsal striatum is thought to mediate the deviation component of rotation, whereas the DA system terminating in the ventral striatum is thought to mediate the activity component of rotation. Yet, in the present study (Experiment 2), injections of DA or AMPHET into the dorsal striatum of female rats produced both postural deviation and rotation (see also Wolfson and Brown, 1983). This suggests that rotation and postural deviation could be mediated by a common DA-sensitive system in the dorsal striatum, in accord with the findings of others (e.g., Dunnett et al., 1981a). However, in the present experiment, rotation and deviation did not covary in intensity within the 40 min observation session. When plotted by the sequential 5-min blocks of the 40 min session, changes in the magnitude of rotation and deviation did not covary (data not shown). Moreover, the two responses did not covary across the day of proestrus with changes in gonadal hormones. This may indicate that the responses are mediated by separable neural systems within the dorsal striatum. It is possible that the changes in magnitude of rotation are due to fluctuation in general activity of the animal, but this is unlikely for several reasons. First, the observations in Experiment 2.1 that the responses to intrastriatal VH did not vary across the stages of the estrous cycle suggests that no major changes in activity was occurring. This conclusion is supported by reports that gonadal hormones do not alter open field activity (Beatty, 1979; Robinson et al., 1982). Secondly, any changes in active behaviors should be reflected in measures of postural deviation as well as rotation, since the measure "postural deviation" is a compilation of a number of separate behaviors. It has, however, been reported that ambulatory activity, induced by the peripheral administration of DA agonists, has a circadian variation (Holcslaw et al., 1975; Kuribara and Tadokoro, 1982; Nakano et al., 1980). It is unlikely that this circadian variation accounts for changes in the rotational response to intrastriatal DA and AMPHET across the day of proestrus (Experiment 2.2). The circadian variation in the activity response to DA agonists, administered systemically, is thought to be due to circadian variation in the drug-metabolizing enzyme activities in the liver (Holcslaw et al., 1975; Nakano et al., 1980). This could not account for the results of Experiment 2.2, since DA and AMPHET were administered intracerebrally. It might be argued that the rotational response to intrastriatal DA and AMPHET is due to diffusion of the drugs to the ventral striatum, where they induce increased locomotor activity, with a simultaneous induction of postural deviation from the dorsal striatum. If, additionally, the DA system terminating in the ventral striatum is sensitive to gonadal hormones (Savageau and Beatty, 1981; Menniti and Baum, 1981), then the changes in rotational activity could be due to an alteration of the ventral striatal (mesolimbic) DA system. However, spread of DA from the site of injection is probably minimal, and rotation appears not to be dependent on spread of DA to ventral striatum following a dorsal striatal injection (Brown and Wolfson, 1983; Wolfson and Brown, 1983). In order to be sure that changes in activity are not contributing to the changes in magnitude of the rotational response, experimental studies of estrogenic effects on the DA system terminating in the ventral striatum should be conducted. In order to better test whether postural deviation and rotation are indeed separately modulated by estrogen, it would be necessary to alter the serum levels of estrogen directly, and measure the time for suppression and enhancement of the response. It is also clear that changes in magnitude of both behaviors, postural deviation and rotation, are not correlated inversely with serum levels of estradiol on the day of proestrus. Four hours after lights ON at proestrus, when serum levels of estradiol should be high, the responses are suppressed; yet 3 hours later when the serum levels of estradiol should be low, the responses were not enhanced. This would suggest either that estrogen initiates events leading to an increase in the responses, or other hormones are involved. Experiment 3: Behaviors Induced by Intrastriatal Dopamine are Suppressed Differentially by Estradiol Benzoate Introduction The results of Experiment 1 indicated that estrogen can modulate the behavioral responses induced by the intrastriatal injection of DA, producing first a suppression and later an enhancement of the response. However, the study employed both male rats and a very large dose of EB, and thus a pharmacological response of estrogen may have been measured. To begin to determine if physiological levels of estrogen can alter striatal dopaminergic behaviors, the responses to intrastriatal DA and AMPHET were tested at various times of the estrous cycle, in Experiment 2. The results from this experiment indicated that postural deviation and rotation were both suppressed on the morning of proestrus and enhanced by estrus. This inverse relationship between behavioral responses to striatal dopaminergic stimulation and estrous cycle-related variations in the concentration of estrogen in blood does not, however, appear to hold under more careful scrutiny. For example, when tested at different times on the day of proestrus, both responses were suppressed when serum levels of estradiol should be high, but neither response was enhanced when the serum levels estrogen should be low. It should be noted, however, that serum levels of estrogen do not accurately reflect brain levels of estrogen (Landau, 1977; McEwen et al., 1975; Blaustein et al., 1979; Eaton et al., 1975); thus, the hypothesis of an inverse relationship between brain levels of estrogen and the behavioral response to striatal DA may not have been adequately tested in Experiment 2.2. To test if exposure to endogenous estrogen is producing the suppression of intrastriatal DA-mediated behaviors, and the withdrawal of estrogen results in their enhancement, a direct alteration of serum and brain estrogen levels, through peripheral injection of EB, should produce down and up regulation of intrastriatal DA-induced behaviors qualitatively similar to that observed during the estrous cycle. Previously, experimenters have used high doses of EB in the range of 50 to 150 ig to suppress striatal DA-mediated behaviors (Naik et al., 1978; Gordon et al., 1978), and the reversal of the suppression did not occur for 24-48 hours post EB treatment (Gordon, 1980), however, since low doses in the range of 1 to 3 pg EB, given suboutaneously, can induce sexual receptivity (Eaton et al., 1975; McEwen et al., 1975; Davidson et al., 1968), it would be instructive to see if a dose of EB in this latter range can produce a significant modulation of striatal DA-mediated behaviors. The results of Experiment 2.2 indicated that the responses to intra- striatal DA and AMPHET, postural deviation and rotation, did not covary in magnitude across the day of proestrus. If estrogen is modulating the behaviors postural deviation and rotation independently, then direct alterations in serum levels of estradiol should lead to differential changes in magnitude of the behavioral responses. The systemic injection of EB should result in an independent variation in magnitude of the two behaviors, over time, and not a covariation. Finally, it is possible that the rotational response to intra- striatal DA and AMPHET is due to spread of the drugs to the ventral striatum. Moreover, there is some evidence that the DA system terminating in the ventral striatum is sensitive to modulation by gonadal hormones (Menniti and Baum, 1981; Savageau and Beatty, 1981). This could account for the independent variation in magnitude of postural deviation and rotation, to intrastriatal DA and AMPHET, observed across the day of proestrus (Experiment 2.2). To test this possibility explicitly, intra- cerebral application of dopaminergic drugs into the terminal regions of the mesolimbic DA system can be made, while acutely altering serum levels of estrogen. Experiments 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 were designed to address these issues. Materials and Methods Animals Female Long-Evans hooded rats weighed 180-220 g at the beginning of the experiment. They were housed individually and maintained on a 12:12 light:dark cycle (lights ON, 0800-2000). The rats were ovariec- tomized bilaterally (OVX), under ether (Malinckrodt) anesthesia, 48 hours before stereotaxic implantation of cannulae. Stereotaxic surgery The OVX rats were implanted bilaterally with permanent cannulae under sodium pentobarbital (W.T. Butler Co.) anesthesia. Guide cannulae were constructed from 21 GA stainless steel tubing and the injection cannulae were constructed using 27 GA tubing. Since the injection cannulae terminated 3.0 mm below the guide cannulae, rats in Experiments 3.1 and 3.2 had the guide cannulae stereotaxically implanted such that the injection cannulae were located in the anterior dorsal striatum using the following coordinates derived from Pellegrino et al. (1979): +2.0 to 3.0 mm with respect to bregma; 2.0 to 4.0 mm lateral to bregma; 3.5 to 5.0 mm below the surface of the brain. Rats in Experiment 3.3 had guide cannulae stereotaxically implanted such that the injection cannulae were located in the medial-ventral striatum using the following coordinates derived from Pellegrino et al. (1979): +2.0 to 3.4 mm with respect to bregma; 1.0 to 2.0 mm lateral to bregma; 6.0 to 7.0 mm below the surface of the brain. Stainless steel stylets, made from closed 27 GA tubing, kept the guide cannulae patent when the rats were not being injected intra- cerebrally. Behavioral testing The intracerebral application of a drug was made by injecting the drug solution through the 27 GA cannula which was connected by poly- ethylene tubing to a Hamilton syringe mounted on a Sage syringe pump (Orion Research). The injection was made at a constant rate of 0.5 pl/min, and the injection cannula remained in place for an additional 30 sec after completion of the drug injection. For Experiments 3.1 and 3.2, after the drug administration, the rats were placed into a circular clear plexiglas observation chamber, 34 cm in diameter and 30.5 cm in height, and observed for 40 min. The duration of postural deviation and the number of 1/4 rotations that occurred both contralaterally and ipsilaterally to the side of intrastriatal injection were recorded. A 90 degree movement around the central axis of the rat was counted as a 1/4 turn. The amount of time the rats deviated contralateral and ipsilateral to the side of the intrastriatal injection was recorded continuously by the observer using a two pole switch connected in series to a time clock and a rack of cumulative counters. The cumulative durations of postural deviation and number of 1/4 rotations were recorded every 5 min and 40 min. For Experiment 3.3, the rats were administered intracerebral drugs bilaterally, and then placed into a glass box (30 cm by 30 cm) that rested on an electronic activity monitor (Stoelting 31400). The output of the monitor was fed into a printout counter, and cumulative counts for each 5-min block of the 60 min test were registered. Drugs. Amphetamine (AMPHET; Sigma) and dopamine (DA; Sigma) were dissolved in the phosphate buffer to a final pH of 7.4. The phosphate buffer was a 7.0 mM sodium phosphate monobasic/140 mM sodium phosphate dibasic solution. DA and AMPHET were made up at a concentration of 25 Vg/0.25 pl. Estradiol benzoate (Steraloids) at a concentration of 10 Ig/ml was dissolved in peanut oil by heating the oil to 600 C. Histology. After behavioral testing, rats were administered an overdose of sodium pentobarbital and perfused intracardially with 0.9% saline followed by 10% formalin. The brains were placed in a 20% sucrose- 10% formalin mixture for at least 24 hours. The brains were then frozen, sectioned at 30 nm, stained with cresyl violet, and the locations of the cannula tips verified. Cannula tip placements for Experiment 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 are shown in Figure 9. Experiment 3.1 If, during the estrous cycle, estrogen is producing a suppression and the withdrawal from estrogen an enhancement of intrastriatal DA behaviors, then the direct alteration of brain estradiol levels should produce a similar phenomenon. A peripheral injection of EB should produce down- and up-regulation of intrastriatal DA-induced behaviors that show a time course consistent with alterations in brain levels of estrogen. Administration of 1-3 ig EB subcutaneously produces a rapid increase in serum levels of estrogen, and a decline to undetectable levels by 36 hours 41 0 $4 10 (D 04 I 4 4 -. r oj 41 4, wy 13 4c Cd 0P (.d 0 a -.4 0C $) *V-,44 rtM .1 0 44 w d H $4 -H 0 t4 to w 'o; Ow -4 *^ aS i OwwO4..wW H )' C; m 0w'0-o(3 3 u +C> *w 44M 4 W U 4 . 0 .0 4.l 0 "4 H W w 40I H r4 u -4 u u .0 0) ul r. 10 4J m c o 'I)< r1i 0-. >4> to C'0 *n.4 0 H ] fl4 4 .,4 to k. p 4 j -q 4 ':4j 00 0. M0 W r0H*P en tr' 4J 0 -.4' 0 4 g (n H4 4 4 cU 4 N 0 St(a r-H Od C 4 Z o 3. g0 * P'J4I 0: 0 0 4 o ojr- *.~ a) .0) 4a, W + 0 H *4 M O.l4 J 4- 0. cN W A q r ao m 0 0 0P)4 w 41 44 (1)1 o - N 0 C *4 44 C w 0 (N Q <-1 w o 0 ) C'. 44-4 l 0 0 0 n +J 0 *n . 0 '0 *4 0 44.4 l -* *r4 C\i 13 J. ar,' 0 i aoa O I after treatment (Cheng and Johnson, 1974). Changes in brain levels of estrogen are delayed somewhat, and last for a longer period of time. Using doses of EB in the range of 1-3 Ug, subcutaneous injections produce significant increases in brain levels of estrogen by at least 3 hours after treatment, and are at undetectable levels by 24 (1 jg EB, Landau, 1977) to 60 hours (3 pg EB, Eaton et al., 1975) after treatment. Doses that are just slightly higher produce considerably higher brain and serum levels, that remain at detectable levels up to 96 hours after subcutaneous injection of the EB (Eaton et al., 1975; Cheng and Johnson, 1974). Previously experimenters have used high doses of EB, 50 jig or greater, to test for the time course of estrogen's modulation of striatal DA-mediated behaviors. With high doses of EB, it has been reported that suppression of striatal DA-mediated behaviors occurs as early as 2 hours after EB administration (Naik et al., 1978; Gordon et al., 1978), and the reversal from such a suppression does not occur for 24-48 hours post EB treatment (Gordon, 1980). Because the short latency to, and long duration of, the suppression seen with such large doses of EB could be due to pharmacological effects of estrogen, more appropriate physiological doses of EB need to be tested. Since, in Experiment 2.2, I did not observe increases in magnitude of intrastriatal DA-induced postural deviation with a decrease in serum levels of estrogen, withdrawal from estrogen may not lead to the enhancement observed on the day of proestrus. The enhancement of striatal DA-mediated behaviors observed with high doses of estrogen (e.g., Experiment 1; Gordon, 1980) may also be due to pharmacological effects of estrogen. Utilizing a smaller dose of EB, it may still be possible to observe a reversal from suppression to enhancement '-4 0 C4 4 E4 -4 43 0 'd E 4) m a -4f fli mmm fBi Bill gdi 4 a4 0 * 44 44 44 0 0 of striatal DA-mediated behaviors; if so, the time course could then be determined to see if it is correlated with a withdrawal from estrogen. In this experiment, OVX rats were given different regimens of EB treatment and then tested either for intrastriatal DA- or AMPHET-induced deviation and rotation at 3, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the last EB treatment. Animals were given 2 ig EB, s.c. in the neck. This treatment paradigm should produce serum levels of E2 approximately equal to that observed during proestrus, by 1 hour after treatment, and a return to the pre-treatment baseline level by 36 hours post-treatment (Cheng and Johnson, 1974). Such a dose is near the minimum amount needed to induce sexual receptivity in OVX rats (Davidson et al., 1968). Procedure. Rats (OVX) were divided into two groups that received unilateral intrastriatal injections of either 25 Jg/0.25 pi DA or AMPHET during each drug test. Rats were tested for intrastriatal DA- (n=6) or AMPHET- (n=6) induced behaviors prior to each hormone treatment, in order to obtain a PRE-HORMONE score. Each hormone regimen consisted of two hormone treatments, separated by 96 hours (EB+EB, OIL+EB and OIL+OIL; see Table 2-4). Rats were then injected intrastriatally with DA or AMPHET and tested at either 3, 24, 48 and 72 hours (DA) or 3, 24 and 48 hours (AMPHET) after the last hormone treatment. Rats (OVX) received each of the three hormone regimens in a counterbalanced order. EB (2 ig) in the oil vehicle (OIL) or OIL alone were given s.c. in the neck in a volume of 0.2 ml. No hormone was administered for 7 days after the last hormone treatment of the previous regimen. Data analyses. In order to obtain an index of the dominant direction of postural deviation (including lateralized grooming), the time spent ipsilateral was subtracted from the time spent contralateral to the side of the intracerebral injection (difference score). A dominant direction index was also obtained for the number of 1/4 rotations by subtracting the number of 1/4 rotations ipsilateral from the number contralateral to the side of the intracerebral injection. The difference scores for the behavioral responses postural deviation and 1/4 rotations were analyzed for differences due to intrastriatal injections of DA and AMPHET (DRUG), and hormone regimen (HORMONE) using the sum total for the 40 min observation period. An analysis of covariance was used to determine if the variables DRUG (two levels) and HORMONE (3 levels) had significant overall effects, with SEQUENCE (each drug test of HORMONE) as the quantitative covariable. Because of the split-plot design, tests of HORMONE effects used the within subject error term, and tests of between DRUG effects used subjects nested within DRUG error term. In addition, in those HORMONE conditions in which the SEQUENCE for the drug response to DA had one more value than that for AMPHET, missing values were estimated according to the SAS (Statistical Analysis System Institute) program. Tests for simple main effects were then made using Scheffe's method for multiple comparisons (equal sample size). Results. Although the effects of the three separate hormone regimens are qualitatively the same for both intrastriatal DA- and AMPHET-induced postural deviation and rotation, the effects are not quantitatively the same, and the data for each DRUG treatment will be presented separately. For both drugs, DA and AMPHET, the effects of EB treatment were different for the postural deviation and rotational responses. When the rats were administered EB (regimens OIL+EB, EB+EB) they showed a suppression of the contralateral postural deviation response to intrastriatal DA at both 3 and 24 hours after the final EB treatment (Figure 10-A, p <.01). By 72 hours after the last EB treatment the postural deviation response had returned to PRE-HORMONE levels (Figure 10-A). The hormone regimen OIL+OIL produced no significant alteration in the postural deviation response to intrastriatal DA at 3, 24 and 48 hours after the second OIL treatment, as compared to PRE-HORMONE scores. In contrast to results observed with the postural deviation response, the rotational response to intrastriatal DA was not altered by a single treatment with EB (hormone regimen OIL+EB) at any time tested (Figure 10-B). Two treatments with EB (hormone regimen EB+EB) did alter the rotational response to intrastriatal DA, but the time course was not the same as that observed with the postural deviation response measured at the same times. Although there was no significant alteration in the rotational response at 3 hours after the second EB treatment, there was a significant decrease in the number of rotations at 24 hours after the second EB injection (p <.01), as compared to the PRE-HORMONE drug response. Intrastriatal DA-induced responses, contralateral postural deviation and rotations did not show any carry-over effects for any hormone regimen. The magnitude of the responses, measured prior to any hormone regimen (Figure 10, PRE), did not differ significantly from the PRE-HORMONE response measured at 5 days after each hormone regimen (3 replications, data not shown). The responses postural deviation and rotation produced by intra- striatal AMPHET (Figure 11-A) showed a characteristic modulation to EB treatment that was similar to that observed with DA (Figure 10-A). Treatment with EB, hormone regimens OIL+EB and EB+EB, resulted in a diminished contralateral postural deviation response to AMPHET at 3 and 24 hours after the last EB treatment (p < .01), and a return to PRE-HORMONE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 54 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |