Cotton fiber and processing test results

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
Cotton fiber and processing test results
Physical Description:
v. : ; 27 cm.
Language:
English
Creator:
United States -- Agricultural Marketing Service. -- Cotton Division
Publisher:
Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Cotton Division
Place of Publication:
Clemson, S.C
Creation Date:
1978
Frequency:
biweekly during harvesting season, with comprehensive report at end of season
other
normalized irregular

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Cotton -- Testing -- Periodicals   ( lcsh )
Cotton -- Varieties -- Periodicals   ( lcsh )
Genre:
serial   ( sobekcm )
federal government publication   ( marcgt )

Notes

Citation/Reference:
American statistics index
General Note:
Description based on: Rept. no. 1, (Sept. 7, 1979)

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 000328589
oclc - 01799482
notis - ABV8141
lccn - 75642828 //r81
issn - 0566-5469
Classification:
lcc - TS1542 .U35
ddc - 677/.21/305
System ID:
AA00008566:00024

Related Items

Preceded by:
Cotton fiber and processing results

Full Text




REPORT NO. 5


nrr E-a







COTTON FIBER AND PROCESSING TEST RESULTS,


CROP 07 1978


Discussion of Test Results


The average Fibrograph 2.5% span
the Southwest through October 27
according to the Cotton Division,
Cottons are less uniform and fine
gage strength tests but weaker at
Shirley Analyzer. nonlint content


Yarns


from


these


grades are higher.
is lower.

Medium staple samp
a year ago. Both
are lower. Yarns
appearance grades.
is higher.

South Central medi
fiber strength tea
lower. Picker and
these samples show
fections are lower


samples


sho


length of


short staple.cotton


is considerable
Agricultural
r. Samples te
1/8" gage tes
and.picker and
w weaker yarn


Imperfections are


fewer.


y sh
Mark
sted
ts f
car
store
he a


'les tested from the Southeast are
Shirley Analyzer nonlint content
spun from these samples are stron
Yarn imperfections are lower.


'um staple
its than a
card was
weaker s
. The sp


samples are shorter
year ago. Shirley
te is higher than a
strength and lower ap
inning potential is


tested fax


,orter from a year ag,
eting Service, USDA.
are stronger at sere.
rom a year ago. BUtl o
d waste are higher.
ngth. Yarn appeal
average spring pofl


longer, and fine
and picker and a;f
ger, but have lower
The spinning potential


and stronger at
Analyzer nonlint
year ago. Yarns
ipearance grades.
lower.


*^ w* ::


conten ilsl
**y.^ *".n i~rar.^i r :::** :: :*::
span ffrom~KB'.:-*: *:'"."****
Tarn.^ imper-^3^^ l *. :::./3 !::M


Medium staple sample
stronger at both zer
and picker and card
samples show weaker
potential yarn number

Average test results
less uniform and str
stage of the harvest
card waste are high
appearance grades.
potential yarn number


s from the Southwest are shorter, less uniform and
o and 1/8" gage strength tests. Both Shirley Anat~il.
waste are higher than a year ago. Yarns spun from these
yarnm strength and lower appearance grades. The spinning
r is lower. S -

for all medium staple samples show fibers to be sh rt
longer at zero fiber strength than a year ago at t
. Both Shirley Analyzer nonlint content and picke an.
r. Yarns spun from these samples are weaker and loer
Yarn imperfections are lower. The average spinni
r is lower.
Bo" SAeStd.
r.Yrs pnfrmtes apesaewekran oe


These reports are published bi-weekly during the harvesting season and will
be summarized in a comprehensive report at the end of the crop year. A
Atonla1 Aa n rnrin4 nn nE rha tOata h.m hSnr i rha ronnr* saw ha fnirnl in Ih


!M'
::1


:***
'. ..1
El ...


iiiiii
ij















iiic


a *
U-
*eu*


V.~


041.l


I~


U'\

I

[016-


I'


0at


U"


'tins
rSfr%

N







Qr4





oa'


t'0
* S
tnt


gr




CO
a'o'r



o'aO
o'0Q


'-40



* *C
iulf


rIOQ
*;h


(~cr4
'fl r'

-4
U.'
'I




eF4


oho'




Ct


r-ci








Cfl0







IAN
00O
p4"'l


'0
60


O;1N


'CC.


*;


(ruCi
e~Ce i


~i0



~I



i







4,


'DC9


cqJt


CJI O
OJrt


-tr%
c nc


'tm,


cr404


w'o'C


ctcr


-It


"4"'l


'-4"'


"4"


Oalin
NStr4


*9
I


'U
4,r
'9-'

CIQ


ow a


e.1Ir4


mi ...


L


Sg








IE
Sc1


.14rl


rxpk
4, tr
w.r~ =g%


" p





Un:









>4 I
Th"s


IE












1 t


-4-


xx


o











































0

V








a
~I4




:i









I





















"13

a







4)


LU. w
Li L
Ul
we0 wlto
oQrnlCrl


9
U' W
\ U
z


'a
Li
0" WIN
NU O.M


,-iN


we w U
~Jl eJ
Ca


4 w
WttIn ..JU
2


0'I
C3d


























































-:
4C0P
*0r4




Sri
NWO


4)

.0


xx x









xxE
4


:r
** -

a










a"
^


N



pi












-a

wirn


Cr


a r









tat
4**S


.40


r-r--


*4 -


* *a
MM


04
S* *
Z aft


w
U)

wuo
ee.


Mm


NN


a1p-
I rE
..j U


U

fNN
n .


w1
2
CFNN
I- N~
It)


1Y r *' 1


* *


"S.4


Sf'


-4 -^


'T '*























































































- -







'C-

d.4r
V!


-8-


'V




-9-


A i
V":







I,


4"


I"
KS
Ix





II


;~ ~ 4
10
4'
a


* r


U H
aiI1 Z


S'I

a- wX

r4~H


N4'



r~rjk
4.
H


VI

4r4e


O


E vt 4
'U
0


I,-
U

Qmr@


in -M


Co
o~r4







tr~r

a S1



Li

a-


-let
-'-.


"<. -^






UNIVERSITy OF FLORIDA

3 1282 08583 1377