Cotton fiber and processing test results

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
Cotton fiber and processing test results
Physical Description:
v. : ; 27 cm.
Language:
English
Creator:
United States -- Agricultural Marketing Service. -- Cotton Division
Publisher:
Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Cotton Division
Place of Publication:
Clemson, S.C
Creation Date:
1978
Frequency:
biweekly during harvesting season, with comprehensive report at end of season
other
normalized irregular

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Cotton -- Testing -- Periodicals   ( lcsh )
Cotton -- Varieties -- Periodicals   ( lcsh )
Genre:
serial   ( sobekcm )
federal government publication   ( marcgt )

Notes

Citation/Reference:
American statistics index
General Note:
Description based on: Rept. no. 1, (Sept. 7, 1979)

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 000328589
oclc - 01799482
notis - ABV8141
lccn - 75642828 //r81
issn - 0566-5469
Classification:
lcc - TS1542 .U35
ddc - 677/.21/305
System ID:
AA00008566:00023

Related Items

Preceded by:
Cotton fiber and processing results

Full Text




REPORT NO.4


I
K


S/SI.l


rs1JC *IWA


S'3 <)


A si r iI B rn tI Mn ar a Carta


I fl


U~~l"




C.
'u;
i
EijE" "EX
;;


COTTON FIBER AND PROCESSING TEST RESULTS,


CROP OF 1978


Discussion of Test Results


The average fiber length of short staple samples tested from the Sout st
through October 13 is considerably shorter than a year ago at this time,
according to the Cotton Division, Agricultural Marketing Service,
Cottons are stronger at zero gage strength tests than a year ago. 0So
Shirley Analyzer nonlint content and picker and card waste are higher. rns
spun from these samples are weaker with higher appearance grades.
imperfect ions are fewer than a year ago. The average spinning pote t ye
number is lower.


Medium stapl
less uniform
Analyzer and
from these s
factions are


e samples tested from the South
, finer and weaker at zero gage
picker and card waste are sli
amples are stronger with lower
fewer this year. The' spinning


east
than
ghtly
appeal
pote


show fibers to be .o..
a year ago. Both* hre
lower this year. Yas spun
rance grades. Yarn Aer-


ntial


is higher.


South Centr
finer than
lower, while
weaker with
year ago.


al medium st
last season.
e picker and
lower appea
The average


aple samples are slightly shorter, les
The average Shirley Analyzer nonlint
waste is higher. Yarns spun from the
rance grades. Yarn imperfections are
spinning potential is lower.


s unifoe, a
content is
se samples are
fewer than a


Medium staple samples from the Southwest are shorter, less uniform, corner
and stronger at both zero and 1/8" gage strength tests. Both Shirley lyze
nonlint content and picker and card waste are higher. Yarns spun from tese
samples show weaker skein strength and lower appearance grades than a year
ago. The average spinning potential yarn number is lower.


These reports
be summarized
detailed desc
summary report
request from


are published
in a comprehe
ription of the
t for the prev
the Standards


bi-weekly during the harvesting season ad
nsive report at the end of the crop year. A
tests shown in this report may be found in thg
ious season. I/These reports are available a
Section. Cotton Division. Agricultural Marke




































51
0'







i ^
g:^^j3""


a ,




;a*r4








~ S

4k


sew


U '
tR\


S t


b% t


a'


r4H


OOr!


h~o
u-l-


-4


fc)lu,


'fluC


met,


nan V


"".0


me


Mnl
CI('4




rCIr-
w0CO




'.0Lt~


00


NM


'f/lu'


w-1r4


rN re


Hr4


Hr4


4tH~


*-- ~ I-------- -


S
(44
*04


tw o
0,0P
H
c~4
Mar


0
do)

rUN


Sa
0:


.1:


rr


rr)4


1 *.


WhU




-4-


I


*0n4

NbDHl


:: 4
M4'i



N


i


417 t
0EE


4*E

*;
0::
~",""4

V 4i
44I



to
u~






fri,
,0,
B~ &
4*-
0:


ZT












































































-E -




'44)
rts40"




-i



A


3-
20
wr
Ii
Ur
Lua
am


'U


a,


I-
In

4.



Cu


'0
0
.4.







YI
In


*


Ill


dE























a a~

0:i r


0:
r~00


0; O2O
:E"0
S0


0 B


Exx
x:<* .

xx ..x




! x x. *
1^
4 /





!M<


x 0xxxx


IA
t,

U'

o C

'-4J


.0~



~I



a1


Ir



:0;r







C:


; Ii~l~~i


~ titr
Ri%





-7-


:i


::



i~jr



:::

BEE?""":i
I
,E





j:i":

$.,

ii;,


Y", r

"i
::


iii


9 f
4"
P4 0*


m. I.- *p
I S


a B a}








0
3? t i*
ffi MI
iFt I-iC
mmrmm .l


-tel
ctfln


(S.l
-4u

COI

C-
-4-


w
U1
SZ
'U-,-l
6.4*t


jE ~:8"
B:::::xc,~::








UNIVERSITY OP FLORIDA





3 1262 08583 1211
















































,J
xx












*::"
































** *
/^.
xx

























1:::





x : .
xx




xx



,Xx
xx~ Ei
xx"





xxE







xx"

xx












xx xx