Notices of judgment under the insecticide act


Material Information

Notices of judgment under the insecticide act
Physical Description:
v. : ; 23 cm.
United States -- Insecticide and Fungicide Board
United States -- Food, Drug, and Insecticide Administration
United States -- Food and Drug Administration
United States -- Agricultural Marketing Service
United States -- Agricultural Marketing Administration
United States -- War Food Administration. -- Office of Distribution
United States -- Office of Marketing and Services
United States -- Dept. of Agriculture. -- Production and Marketing Administration
U.S. G.P.O.
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C
Publication Date:
completely irregular


Subjects / Keywords:
Insecticides -- Periodicals   ( lcsh )
serial   ( sobekcm )
federal government publication   ( marcgt )


Dates or Sequential Designation:
Began with no. 73.
Dates or Sequential Designation:
-2041/2066 (Jan. 1951).
Numbering Peculiarities:
Some nos. issued together.
Issuing Body:
Issued by: no. 73-1100, U.S. Insecticide and Fungicide Board; no. 1101/1125-1166/1175, Food, Drug and Insecticide Administration; 1176/1190-1731/1745, Food and Drug Administration; 1746/1762-1790/1800, Agricultural Marketing Service; 1801/1811-1812/1825, Agricultural Marketing Administration; 1826/1840-1885, Food Distribution Administration; 1886/1895-1896/1910, War Food Administration, Office of Distribution; 1911/1925, War Food Administration, Office of Marketing Services; 1926/1949-2041/2066, Production and Marketing Administration.
General Note:
Description based on: 1101/1125 (Dec. 1928); title from caption.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 004700296
oclc - 13957905
lccn - sn 86034178
ddc - 632.951 U61
System ID:

Related Items

Preceded by:
Notice of insecticide act judgment

Full Text

".** .. **:*. *: .
* :' .WE| K .
w at t*

~arTit&. H9r
~tk H *
'.j 12
Air' rH' I
* t&eta*i of

.9 -

*.. %.
.' U!
M' teji I

of th 64stici4e Uet!


I I .
S *
ig t .a C.,
Washfagton, I. C.,

April 15, 1932]

Sjp -W~sER *flB~rt 6uywnit. .V. v. George H. Garnet.
i#.r 1tejS. (t.A No. 1537. Don. No. 027o038.)
.. .. eth ereilic. compound showed that the article
5elZ h.cqtrol1ng tpngi.,(bateria) and tailed to bear a.
t 'of. the name..ands percentage amount of each inert in-
uithrq,- the .ame... nd ,percentage amount of each active
..1. 1 CeDete of the inert ingredients, as required by law.
1 tIh Ubted States attorney for the Eastern District of
"..]]I~s ..'t by thb Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the
S ...ed' .or-the d4stri t aforesaid an information
*Garnet, Allentown, Pa., alleging shipment by said defend-
ptai... Supply o., on. or about April 2, 1930, from the'the ...State of New York, of a quantity of the said
ad| ::a. misbrsaded fungicide. within ,thie.
m.. A 4 : 1 8 1 0 ... : .. -. '.
W &:: ^tPa4tioso th.t; the aFtiqle 1was wisbranded. in that
Hi.e*'t- t3bs.btance, to wyit, water and glyceritn, that is
IaA*. vqut, festroys repel,, or mitigate fungi (baq?
uu@&,hi .magenlaapt of each and every one of the said.
w*s.kNithwere !rot .stated plainly and correctly, or
--W. .". .t i drna comj niag the. article nor, in Hlien
p ina .t.Atage amern, of each and every substance
..4et). -opes, ,and .the tdtati percentage of the
a.i.. .:itt t e,,. stated plainly and correctly, or .at;
W* *' .'' *," S. .. *t ,., defendant 'tered a. plea of guilty. to the informa-
*at;a-e:: .... .. 4.5
iI" *!1I *: .,, t. '." 'R"..ea ry of A gri.lure.
*f1.3 -a* .' -* S'" |

- -

f esilrlim arsenalte. U. S. v. 5 lrMie
u oearet omademnation. Prodaet
. o. 155, -No. -.)



mixture of lead arsenate and lim,. Misbranding was alleged ..j. ...
reason that the article contained tEfric in water-soluble form,, *ii
of arsenic in water-soluble form, pressed as per centum of .:taq s
was ziot Stated on the lab. .. -: .t i :*i
On December 14, 1931, the Yeatma. Gray Grocery Co., Batesrifl ...''
ant; having admitted the all tion .of- the libel and. "aving .Cia""
entry of a decree, judgment'.0f condemnation as' entered 'afi d .tU
by the court that the product be rleeased to the said. eolaitnant.I
of costs and the execution of a boed in the sum of $250, cc
that it should not be sold or otherwise disposed of contrary tof ti
of the insecticide act of 1910, or. the laws of any State,!Nrietorye '
MATHUR M. HYDE, eoretaryfl ** 4% *

1218. Adulteration
Cenol Co.

Examination of sa
contained a much sm
properties, namely, so
dient that did not pc
On October 10, 1931
Illinois, acting upon
District Court of the
against the Cenol Co
company, in violation
1929, from the State
louse destroyer Wthich


misbranuling of Cenol
of guilty. Fine, fO00.

: f ... I :. *"
loume adest rowr ;
(1. P. 'No. 15520a
~ I.

mples of, Cenol louse destroyer showed th;. S
aller proportion of the ingredient possesitgMI
dium'flubride, and a much larger proportioM .'*
assess insecticidal properties, than declared ..:
, the United States attorney for the Northen)
a report by the. Secretary of Agricatur. j.
United: States for the district aforesad 1:
., a 'corporation, Chicago,. II. alleging-
of the insecticide act of 1910, on or about...
of Illinois into the State of Ohio, of .-.
was adulterated and misbranded. -. ....

It was alleged in the information that the
the statements, "Commercial Sodium.Fluoride
borne on the label affixed to the an contain
that its standard and quality were such that
fluoride in the proportion of .70 per. cent, and
substances that do not prevent, destroy, repelt
tion of not more than 30 per cent; whereas

article Ws adit4i
10% Ineet Mattec1|0
ing the-said artfrI4
it contained. eoI
coatained iertimatj
or mitigate tes tiK
the .o S .M
the at. -h i[.i iM,ii' ..

article fell below the professed. standard and quality b.n [r ".
in that it contained sodium fluoride in a proportion m.ul" .
cent, and contained inert matter in a Dronortion mueh turreat l



of gptajty.s

, would
itions s
edA to -
j. *

rt ,by th
States to.
trading .as

t e',. i 1931, fropn
y..f a. quantity of the

. a

. ..... -- -" Do--.
iashowed th~t the bong db the
e. air in hcw alu e&., wouid sterl-
nt at certid di utions, whereas it
I not.steJes 11 4,. and would not
pegied on the label. anmination
eclare the 'aipi and percentage of
i. partnerr proyided by law.
y ey ftor tthe Eastern District of
p .tcretary of Agriculture, filed in
.r' T': district, aforesaid an informa-
t.. ,.Bullen Chemical Co., Folcroft,
,'irib,,lation ot, the insecticide act
thie. tate .of Pennsylvania into the
said Qre-Bol-You,,which was a mis-

tiu .thqe xaning of the said act.
,h information. that the article
... "I'ections for Hospitals an
event the spread of infectious d
me 1 to 8 ounces, of Cre-Bol-You t(
To purify the air in toilets, th
Cd to destroy disease germs, use c
100 gallons of water.. Mop floors,

was misbranded i
was misbranded in

d Sick
o one g
mne gall


Rooms. To keep
from sputum and
allon of water, as
schools, factories
on of Cre-Bol-You
or sprinkle freely

r:iexzeme eases sprinkling cart may be used. Cre-Bol-You
B. temulsion when mixed in water. Suitable for sterilizing linens,"
Sabel affixed to the can containing the said article, were false and
.s.d by reason of the said statements the article was labeled and
B ...:to eceiye. and mislead the purchaser, in that they represented that
used as directed would keep the air in hospitals and sick rooms
jfiftfy: the air in toilets, theaters, schools, factories and public
M .roul .act as a disinfectant at the weaker dilution specified upon
,ft." ,l g:ion. of the article to 200 gallons of water, and would be
. sliszg linen; whereas the article when used as directed would
i ti. -hospitals and. ick rooms pure, would not purity the air in
bett.rk, schools, factories, and public places, and would not act as a
mat at the weaker dilution specified on the label, to wit, 1 gallon to
us of water, and would not be suitable for sterilizing linens.
nding was alleged for the further reason that the article conisted
of an inert substance, to wit, water, that is to say, a substance that
prevent, destroy, repel, or mitigate fungi (bacteria), and the name
.a mount of the said inert substance so present therein were not
46 Correctly, or at all, on .the label affixed to the can containing
; S or, :.t liau thereof, were the name and percentage amount
'vy. substance having fungicidal (bactericidal) properties, and the
."jb of the inert substance So present stated plainly and correctly,
tt~wsaid label,
A, 192, the defendant entered a plea of guilty to the informa-
.... ....... .. ...... .... Armis .. HYm, Secretary of A griculture.
', :: ::.; :. ":. : : i", ".""... "
":II":L""FI :"" .m :~~.'" "' .:....... "" .. :

Miabranding ewa
per cent (inertt)'P
leading, and by re
deceive and mrlsai


10 ier cent of

proportion much greater thae .[i0:
further reason that the statement
represented that the packages ei
whereas the net weight of the said'

~j~Jj~4 7~

of the packages, in thaF the net 'flrt^a 1t
On January 21, 193i the defend& t ettede
tion and the court imposed' a finue f$35 ; *""

. / '


Calcium arsenate:
Moeby, J. L., jr:'.-
Cenol louse destroyer:
Ce ol Co__. -.- ..
Bullen Chemical Co_.


N.'J. No.




* Awn...jc'

* .. j. it...

* *"*.: ". :,H-
rt~ .:.EL
! :1d e eee

Red Cross deodeM
Tevna, _h.
Wyeth lcesyUc ri

.1 -121

I L~. H*
..... *L:!IEjfl.


111111111iI11111 11111 11111111111111111111111111111111111 iII
3 1262 08582 4760

; 'V .ttfl*)~1Ji A
* -~ I I*I.1~

tIttflta4It it.
4. -.--- H
ar **r5
I'll, ~qt

..;r I 'q

~II~ C

'S I1.:


.: .1*

I~ ~ ,*..