Notices of judgment under the Federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
Notices of judgment under the Federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act
Physical Description:
v. : ; 23 cm.
Language:
English
Creator:
United States -- Agricultural Research Service
United States -- Plant Pest Control Branch
United States -- Plant Pest Control Division
United States -- Agricultural Research Service. -- Pesticides Regulation Division
Publisher:
The Service
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C
Publication Date:
Frequency:
irregular
completely irregular

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Pesticides -- Law and legislation -- United States   ( lcsh )
Genre:
serial   ( sobekcm )
law report or digest   ( marcgt )
federal government publication   ( marcgt )

Notes

Dates or Sequential Designation:
Nos. 170-200 (issued Apr. 1954)-
Dates or Sequential Designation:
Ceased with June 1970 issue: Nos. 869-919.
Issuing Body:
Issued 1954-1957 by the service's Plant Pest Control Branch; 1958-Feb. 1962 by the service's Plant Pest Control Division; Sept. 1962-<Sept. 1965> by the service's Pesticides Regulation Division.
General Note:
Title from caption.
Statement of Responsibility:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ...

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 004700307
oclc - 01780408
lccn - sn 98047303
System ID:
AA00008500:00011

Related Items

Preceded by:
Notices of judgment under the Federal insecticide, fungidide, and rodenticide act
Succeeded by:
Notices of judgment under the Federal insecticide, fungicide and rodenticide act

Full Text
IVVa SLV7Lz75Ll
b^3-^


N., I.F.R. 397-421


Iu t Augugst


UNITED


STATES


DEPARTMENT


OF


AGRICULTURE


AGRICULTURAL


RESEARCH


SERVICE


PESTICIDES REGULATION DIVISION


NOTICES


JUDGMENT
FUNGICIDE,


UNDER


AND


THE


FEDERAL


RODENTICIDE


INSECTICIDE,


ACT


Nos.


397-421


The following notices of judgment relate to cases arising in the United States
District Courts and are approved for publication as provide in section 6 of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 tC. 135d).


M, R. OLASKSON,
tidg Ad min&rator.


WASHINGTON

397. Lack of r
more or
Consent
for the
No. 452.
The product
Fungicide, anz
statement.
On June 12,
acting upon a
District Court
cases, more or
Baltimore, Md
had been tran


I
r

!


D.C.


, May


registration
less, each
decree of
purpose of
I.D. No. 4


1963


and misbranding of
containing twenty-foi
condemnation and rel4
bringing it into comp
1930.)


"DRANO" was not registered under secticide,
d Rodenticide Act,~ itA lab ela :failed to an ingredient
1962, the United States Attorney for the District of Maryland,
report by the Secretary ot Agriculture, Jled in the United States
a libel praying seizure for condemnation and codnfstiol of 364
less, each containing twenty-four 12 ounce cans, of "DRANO," at
., and alleging that the product was an economic poison which
sported interstate on or about April 30, 1962, by e Drackett


Products Co., from East Stroudsburg, Pa., in violation of the act.
It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of
Agriculture as required by section 4 of the act.
It was alleged that the product was misbranded in that the label borne by
the product did not bear an ingredient statement giving the name and percentage
of each active ingredient, together th t total percentage of the inert ingredi-
ents in the product, or in the alternative, an ingredient statement giving the
name of each and total percentage of the inert ingredients, in the product
The Drackett Products Co., East Stroudsburg. Pa., claimed ownership of the
product and requested its release under bond for the purpose of bringing it into
compliance with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodentieide Act. On
October 8, 1962, a consent decree of condemnation was entered and it was ordered
by the Court that the product be released to the claimant Madn~ 4d.


J.,,A ns of w-, dratrfl. antl mbiakrQmn.l.


-- n.r "rDV1nnt~P nrnt'VT nnnrv'c'


-U fI*






324


INSECTICIDE,


FUNGICIDE,


AND


RODENTICIDE


ACT


[I.F.R.N.J.


condemnation and confiscation of 720 on
"PK DEO-FECT DEODORIZES AND DII
and alleging that the product was an econoi
interstate on or about December 1 1961
view, Ill., m violation of the act.
It was alleged that the product was
Agriculture as required by section 4 of the a
It was alleged that the product was m
act in that its labeling bore the statements:


re-pound containers, more or less, of
SINFECTS" at San Francisco, Calif.,
mic poison which had been transported
,by Chase P d., from


not registered w
tct.
isbranded within


ith


the Secretary


the meaning of the


4>^ 4> < Th4 ThBAThMIS


"PK


DEO-FECT
K. -


Deodorizes and Disinfects


DEO-FECT Germicidal and Deodorizer is a powerful germicidal-effective
against both gram positive and gram negative bacteria.
DEO-FEOTectively control resistant strains of staphylococci ("Staph");
salmonella typhosa (Typhoid); .shigella paradysenterine (Dysentery); salmo-
nella shottmuelleri (food-poisoning); ehericia coli (Colon infections) ; micro-
coccus pyogenes var. aureus, streptococcus pyogenes, mycobacterium smegmatis.
It is also effective against fungi such as trichophyton interdigitale (Molds or
Ringworm or Athlete'efoot).
DEO-EECT is an excellet deodoriser and chemically destroys odor producing
bacteria. Reduces hazards of airborne infectious viruses.
Use DEO-flCT to slanteeet surgical instruments, glass, tile, urinals, toilet
seats, wash bowls, shower stals, bath rtures, telephones, bed frames, and springs,
laundry chutes, door knob light *itches, diaper pails, refuse and garbage cans
and lockers.
Use DEO-FECT to santi~d fnd dd orize meet ing rooms, class rooms, churches,
sick rooms and restaurants.


DIREUIONS FOR


USE


Qlean object to be sprayed using sual cleans
As a germicidal surface spray, hold dispenser
from surface until surface is wet, Avoid contain
As a deodoriser and air sanitized, hold can
away from face. pray upwards ito corner of
filling room with mist.


ing methods.
upright and spray 6 to
aination of food stuff.
upright and point valve
room as well as center


8 inches

opening
of room,


and such statements were false and misleading since they implied or represented
that the product, when used as directed (1) would effectively control the disease
organisms named and (2) would 4isint the articles, surfaces and places named,
whbwos, the product when used as "direted (1) would not control the disease
organisms named and (2) would not disinfect the articles, surfaces or places
named.
O November 28, 192, no claimant having appeared, a default decree of con-
demnation and forfeiture was entered and it was ordered that the product be
delivered to the Sacrameto County Jail.
399. Lack of registration, lack of required information, and misbranding of
"OLD SCRATCHI CATTLE & HOG OIL." IU.S. v. 2 fifteen gallon drums, ;
mnra or tIpn anrod I thitv gallon drum of "OLD SCRATCH CATTLE & .i






397-421] NOTICES OF JUDGMENT 325

and 1 thirty gallon drum of "OLD SORATCH CATTLE & HQK OIL" at Iowa
City, Iowa, alleging that the product wasa an eonoic poison which had been
transported interstate on or about May S aia Septeber 15, 1961, by Sterenberg
and Son, from Sterling, Ill., in violation of the act.
It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of
qp, 'egqiredy section 4 of the act.
leged that the product was misbranded with the meaning of the act
ts hlp jid..not n tar an ingredient statement giving the name and per-
e of each active ingredient, together with the tot percentage of the inert
ingredients, in the product, or, in the alternative, ap ingredient statement giving
ifthe of each active i edient, together with the name of each and total
percentage of the inert Tents,a the product.
sa further alleged that tht product was misbranded within the meaning
pt in that its labels did not contain directions for use which are necessary
implied with, adequate for the protection of the public.
r2& was further alleged that the product did not bear a label giving the name
and address of the manufacturer, registrant, or person for whom manufactured.
S rther alleged that the label for the product did not bear a statement
eight or measure of the contents of the container.
terenberg and Son, Sterling1 IU., claimed ownership of the product, requested
t release whder bond for purpose of bringing it into compliance with the act,
?4aoweated to the entry- of a condemnation decree. On January 2, 1963, a
Sdeeree of condemnation was entered and it was ordered that the product
released to the claiunt under such bond.
*@. Ltac of registration and misbranding of "CARSON'S SCARLET WOUND
SPRAY." iU.S. v. 140 six-ounce cans, more or less, of "CARSON'S
ARi :LET WOUND SPRAY." Default decree of condemnation, forfeit-


0 | pre and destruction.
K^ KK K ^,


(Ii'.


& R.


No. 465.


I.D. No.


40625.)


Th e


States


product "CARSON'S SCARLET WOUND SPRAY" was not registered
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. An examination
Tro t t frowed that the labels borne by the product did not bear an in-
t ttemenp as required by the act.
17, 1962, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of
tern plvision, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture,
T U tIed States district Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation
ation of 140 six-ounce cans, more or less, of "CARSON'S SCARLET
BP SPR,4 t Coltubus, Ohio, and alleging that the product was an
in poison which had been transported interstate, on or about May 17,
by rasqyr OepAnicals, Inc., from New Castle, Ind., in violation of the act.
r 4eged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of
lture as required by section 4 of the act.
Stpeire .alleged that the product was misbranded in that its labels did
rgp zi redient statement giving the name and percentage of each active
tn together with the tot percentage of the inert ingredients, ix the
t, o; in fte alternative, an ingredient statement giving the name of each
t edipnt, teg er with the name of each and total percentage of the
eadients, in ae product.
er 1ie, nno claipmant having appeared, a default decree of condemna-
rfrihtre. and resftrution was entered, and it was ordered that the United
Marshal destroy the product,


401. Lack of registration and misbranding of "WILLIAMS TOP CROP GETS-
OATS 3" and "WILLIAMS TOP CROP GETS-OATS 4." ..U.S. v. 551


B,,






326


INSEOICIDE


FUNGICIDE,


AND


RODENTICIDE


ACT


I I.F.R......


Itifted States District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and con-
fiscation of 5581 eighty-pound bags, more or less, of "WILLIAMS TOP CROP
GETS-OATS 3" and 60 eighty-pound bags, more or less, of "WILLIAMS TOP
CRQP GETS-OATS 4", at Mppow Idaho, and alleging that the products were
economic poisons which had been transported interstate, on or about April ,5
14, 16, 17, and 24, 1962, by Greenacres Gypsum Company, Inc., from Greenacres,
Wash., in violation 6 he k
It was alleged ttat the products were not registered with the Secretary of
Agriculture as requr seion 4 f the act.
It was further allege tt the products were msanded within the
of the act in that thei r labels not ber an ingredient statement giving the
name and percentage of each active ingredient, tothr with the total percent-
age of the inert ingredientS, in the proacts, or, in the alternative, an ingredient
statement giving the name of each actively ingredient, together with the name
of each and total percentage of the inert lgredient, in the products.
Williams, Inc., Mhoscow, IdhQo, claimed ownership of the products and re-
quested their release under tbnd for the purpose of bringing the products into
compliance with the act, and consent to the entry of a condemnation deeree.-
On January 24, 1963, a consent dcre of condemnation was entered and it was
ordered that the products bireleas4 to the claimant under bond.
402. Lack of registration and required information on label and misbranding
of "STERI-FLEECE." .S. v. 4 fifty-pound drums, more or less, of
"STERI-FLEECE." Default decree of condemnation and forfeiture, and
release of merchandise to the Warden, United States Penitentiary, Mc-
Neil Island, Washington. (I.. & R. No. 482. I.D. No. 41260.)


The product "STERI-FLEBTEE was not registered under the Federal In-
secticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. An examination of the product
showed that the labels Eailed to bear adequate directions for use or an ingredient
statement.
On July 13, 1962, the United States Attorney for the Western District of Wash-
ington, Northern Division, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture,
filed in the United States District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation
and confiscation of 4 fifty-pound drums, more of less, of "STERI-FLEECE," at
Seattle, Wash., and alleging that the product was an economic poison which
had been transported interstate on br about March 6, 1962, by Calusa Chemical
Company, Inc., from Los Angeles, Calif., la violation of the act.
It was alleged that the product was flbt registered with the Secretary of
Agriculture, as required by section 4 of the act.
It was further alleged that the product was misbranded within the meaning
of the act in that its labels did not bear an ingredient statement giving the name
and percentage of each active ingredient, together with the total percentage of the
inert ingredients, in the product, or, in the alternative, an ingredient statement
giving the name of each active ingredient, together with the name of eaci a;d
total percentage of thd inert ingredients; in the product.
It was further alleged that the product was misbranded within the meaning
of the act in that its labels did not contain directions for use which are necessary
and, if complied with, adequate for the protection of the public.
On November 26, 1962, no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation
and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered that the United States Marshal
deliver the merchandise to the Warden, United States Penitentiary, McNeil
Island, Washington, for use by said Warden as he best deems fit at said
Penitentiary.






397-421] NOTICES


OF JUDGMENT


327


that the product was an economic poison
on or about April 27, April 30, and June
Inc., from Los Angeles, Calif., in violation
It was alleged that the product was
Agriculture as required under section 4 of
On August 15, 1962, no claimant having
and forfeiture was entered and the United
the product.


which had been transported interstate
4, 1962, by Calusa Chemical Company,
of the act.
not registered with the Secretary of
the act,
ig appeared, a decree of condemnation
I States Marshal was ordered to destroy


404. Lack of registration of "STERI-FLEECE POWDER." U.S. v. one 1rum,
containing 150 pounds, more or less, of "STERI-FLEECE POWDER."
Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. ,(I.F. & R.
449X I.D. No. 40917.)
The product "STERI-FLEECE POWDER" was not registered under the Fed-
SaIn secticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
On July 18, 1962, the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada,
acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United States
District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation of
one drum, containing 150 pounds, more or less, of "STERI-FLEECE POWDER,"
at Las Vegas, Nev., and alleging that the product was an economic poison which
had been transported interstate on or about April 27, 1962, by Calusa Chemical
Company, Inc., from Los Angeles, Calif., in violation of the act.
wasn alleged that the. product was not registered with the Secretary of
Agrrdulture as required under section 4 of the act.
On August 31, 1962, no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation
and forfeiture was entered and the United States Marshal was ordered to
destroy the product.
405. Lack of registration of "STERI-FLUFF POWDER ANTI-BACTERIAL


FABRIC
"STERI-
Ib~6m It


I I."E" ::4**. l --i^.v

The product
ENER" was no
4tS*A A ... i


SOFTENER" U.S. v. 4 fifty-pound drums, more or less, of
FLUFF POWDER ANTI-BACTERIAL FABRIC SOFTENER."
decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. (I.F. & R.
I.D. No. 24453.)
"STERI-FLUFF POWDE ANTI-BACTERIAL FABRIC SOFT-
t registered under the Federal Insecticide,, Fungicide, and Roden-


LAiiUte AflL.
On August 8, 300, theUmnited States Attorney for the District of Colorado1
acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United States
District Court a libel, praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation, of
4 Tflty-pound drums, more or less, of "STFRI-FLUFF POWDER ANTI-BAC-
TERIAL FABRIC SOFTENER," at Denver, Colo., and alleging that the product
was an economic poison which had been transported interstate on or about
April 5, April 13, and June 5, 162, by Oalvsa Chemical Company, Inc., from
in violation of the act. .
TI was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of
Agriculture as required under section 4 of the act.
On October 19, 1962, no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation
and forfeiture was entered and the United States Marshal was ordered to


406. Lack of
T T B ^^T
..... <*.::..*:::..*............ .... ... ... : x ^ ^B --KKK ^ K KKKKKK: : T ^ fK ^Jf ^ B ^


oduct.
registration, lack of required information on labels, and misbrand-
'ALGI-CURIE," and a *LG AWAY." U.S. v. 117 packages, more
, each containing nine tabllets oQf a product labeled in part, "ALGI-
P 500 circulars, more or less, bearing the statement "ALGI-CURE
flVTRTrnwr jtT ATr V V TtV A A nfl fMlnn A nnxKrrinm AW /nTr 'T A fl


i


lilX""


,






38


INSECTICIDE,


FUNGICIDE,


AND


RODENTICIDE


ACT


I F.R.AN.J.


On August 7, 1962, the United States Attorney for the Western Distiict
Missouri, Western Division, acting upon a report by "the Secretary of Agricula
filed in the United States Districf Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation
and confiscation of 117 packages, mote or less, each containing nine tablets, of
a product labeled in part,"ALGI-OUl" I cl irculars, more or less, bearing t
statement "ALGI-OURE UNCONDITi ONALLY GUARANTEED FOR A CRYS-
TAL-CLEAR, ALAE-FREE AQUAk IUMl!", f6 three-ounce bottles, more or less,
of a product labeled in part, "alg away", and 500 circulars, more or less,
bearing the statement "alg away FOR A BEAUTIFULLY CLEAR GARDEN
POND", at Kansas City, Mo., alleging that the products were economic poisons
which had been transported interstate on or about May 3, 1962, by the General
Developments Corp., from Milwaukee, Wis., in violation of the act.
It was alleged that the products were not registered with the Secretary of
Agriculture as required by section 4 of the act.
It was further alleged that the products were misblranded within the meaning
of the act in that their labels did not bear an ingredient statement giving the
name and percentage of each active ingredient, together with the total percentage
of the inert ingredients, in the products, or, in the alternative, an ingredient
statement giving the names of each active ingredient. together with the name
of each and total percentage of the nert ingredients, in the products.
It was further alleged that the pructs failed to comply with the provisions
of the act in that the labels on their immediate containers did not bear a state-
ment of the net weight or measure of the content of the containers.
On December 19, 1962, no claimant having appeared, a default decree of con-
demnation and forfeiture was entter, and it was ordered that the products be
destroyed.
407. Misbranding and adulteration of "BYE BYE BRAND FLY SYRUP." U.S.
v. 500 one-pint plastic bottles, more or less, and 380 one-half pint plastic
bottles, more or less, of "BYE BYE BRAND FLY SYRUP." Default
decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. (I.F. & R. No. 479.
I.D. No. 41718.)
The product "BYE BYE BRAND FLY SYRUP" was represented to contain
00.5% Dimethyl Diehlorovinyl Phosphate amd 99.5% Ilert ingredients. However,
upon examination it was fotnd that the product contained no dimethyl dichloro-
vinyl phosphate (dimethyl 2,2-dichlorovinyl phosphate) and more than 99.5%
inert ingredients, and the product when used as directed, would not be effective
against flies.
On September 10, 1962, the United States Attorney for the District of Massachu-
setts, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United
States District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation
of 500 one-pint plastic bottles, more or less, and 380 orie-half pint plastic bottles,
more or less, of "BTE BYE BRAND FLY SYRUP," at Ipswich, Mass., and
alleging that the product was an economic poison which had been transported
interstate on or about June 20, 1960, by Gardiner Products, from Albany, N.Y.,
in violation of the act.
It was alleged that the product was mit~ randed within the meaning of the
act in that its labeling bore the Afttement :


* bye *
BRAND *
FLY






397-421]


NOTICES


OF JUDGMENT


329


DIRwETIONS


Squeeze out thin ribbons of BYE BYB-fly syrup on horizontal or verti-
cal surfaces. BYE BYE will stick to surfaces to which applied, thereby
minimizing possibility of contaminating areas Where use of poisons
should be avoided.
SWhen applying BY BYE fly syrup, select areas where houseflies
eMongregate such as sunny areas around doors, windows, etc.
i in livestock pens, dairy barns, milk rooms, poultry buildings, and
outdoors around restaurants, loading docks, and other outdoor areas
with severe fly problems."
and such statements were false or misleading since they implied or represented
that the product contained 0.5% of dimethyl dichlorovinyl phosphate (dimethyl
22-dichlorovinyl phosphate) and 99.5% inert ingredients and that the product,
i sed as directed, would be effective against flies; whereas, the product
ed no dimethyl dichlorovinyl phosphate (dimethyl 2,2-dichlorovinyl phos-
plate) and more than 99.5% inert ingredients, and the product when used as
4d would not be effective against flies.


trther alleged that the product was adulterated within the meaning
of the act in that its strength or purity fell below the professed standard or
quality as expressed on its labeling, since its labeling bore the statement:
"tcwe ingredients; Dimethyl Dichlorovinyl Phosphate 00.5%"
aid such statement represented that the product contained 0.5% of dimethyl
4blorovinyl phosphate (dimethyl 2,2-dichlorovinyl phosphate); whereas, the
product contained less than 0.5% of dimethyl dichlorovinyl phosphate (dimethyl
tichlorovinyl phosphate).
tber 15, 1962, no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation
and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered that the product be destroyed.
408. Lack of registration, lack of required information on labels, and misbrand-
Saig of "BARQUAT OE 40" and lack of registration and misbranding of
"ABBOTT ALGAECIDE." U.S. v. 20 cartons, more or less, each contain-
ing 6 one-quart containers of "BARQUAT OE 40," and 16 one-quart
containers, more or less, of "ABBOTT ALGAECIDE." Default decree of
condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. i(I.F. & R. No. 473. I.D. No.
41731.)
The prodets "BARQUAT OE 40" and "ABLBOTT ALGAECIDE" were not
regiuder the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, and
an examination of the products showed that the labels affixed to the containers
of the products did not bear ingredient statements as required by the act. The
examination further showed that the labels for the product "BARQUAT OE 40"
dii tot b6r statements of net weight or measure of contents of the containers;
d~i tias for Use; or the name and address of the manufacturer, registrant, or
mnliS tA whllom manufacture
On July 23, 1962, the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts,
acting upon a report by the secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United States
District Court a 1lIb1 paying seizure for condemnation and confiscation of 20
cartons, more or less, each containing 6 owe-quart containers, of 'BARQUAT
OE 40," and 16 one-quart conhiinetr, more or less, of a product labeled in part,
"ABBOTT ALGAEBIDE", at Norwood, Mass., alleging that the products were
Monomic poisons which ha be tanspoted interstate on or about July 13,
1 W George Mann & pouny, Inc., from Providence, RI., in violation of the


~l~li iii~llil;


I~lii






330


INSECTICIDE,


FUNGICIDE,


AND


RODENTICIDE


ACT


[I.F.R.N.J.


use which are necessary and, if complied with, adequate for the protection of
the public.
It was further alleged that the product "BARQUAT OE 40" was in violation


of the act in that the labels did not bear a statement of
of the contentsof the containers.
It was further alleged that the product "BARQUA!
of the act, in that the labels on the immediate contain
meant of the me and address of the manufacturer,
whom manufactured.
On September 24, no claimant having appeJ


'the net weight or measure
T OE 40" was in violation
ners did not bear a state-
registrant or peson for


ared,


a default decree of


condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered that the products
be destroyed.


04 09 Lack of renistratton of "ALGIMASTER."


U.S. v. 70 one-quart plastic bot-


ties, more or less, f "AL IMAlTER." Default defree of condemn
forfeiture, and destruction. 4(1.,. &i No. 486. I.D. No. 40649.)
The product "ALGIMASTER" was nt registered under the Federal
cide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
On October 3, 1962, the United State Attorney for the Western Disi
Tennessee, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed
United StateS District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation a]
flscation of 70 one-quart lstic bottles, more or less, of "ALGIMASTI
Memphis, Tenn., and alleging that theproduct was an economic poison
had been transported interstate on o about June 27, 1962, by Michigan
cal Corporation, from St. Louis, M,, in violation of the act.
It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secrel
Agriculture as required by section 4 of the act.
On November A 1962, no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemn
and forfeiture was entered and the United States Marshal was order
destroy the product.


nation,

Insecti-
trict of
in the
nd con-
ER" at
which
Chemi-


tary


nation
ared to.


410. Lack of required information on label and misbranding of "FLY CAKES."
U;S. v. one drum containing 423 "FLY CAKES," more or less. Default
decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. ,(I.F. & R. No. 482.
I.D. No. 42301.)
An examination of the product "FLY CAKESB showed that the labeling borne
by the containers of the product did not bear a statement of the net weight or
measure of the contents; a statement of name, brand, or trademark under which
the product was sold; an ingredient statement; or adequate directions for use.
On September 24, 1962, the United States Attorney for the District of New
Mexico, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United
States District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation
of one drum containing 428 "FLY CAKES," more ot less, at Portales, New
Mexico, and alleging that the product was an economic poison which had been
transported interstate on or about July 24, 1962, by E. Joseph Cossman and
Company, from Hollywood, Calif., in violation of the act.
It was alleged that the product was misbranded within the meaning of the
act in that the labels on the lnmedlate containers did not bear a statement of
the net weight or measure of the eontets of t container.
It was alleged that the product was misbranded within the meaning of the ,
act in that the labels on the immediate containers did not bear a statement of ""
the name, brand, or trademark under which the product was sold.
It was further alleged that the product was misbranded in that the labels
tiffivodurln tha +hatn rnntinhar elrP rf Hti rniiit+ MA nn+ hoi an in n oraiantt a-atanon*





807-4211


NOTICES


JUDGMENT


;t~ i:3< At


an


411. Lack of registration and
ROPHENE BLEACH."
24 eleven-ounce contain
WITH HEXACHLOROI
nation and release und<
The product "KROMA-X W
registered under the Federal
examination of the product sh
bear an ingredient statement
product bore statements which


On October 3, 1962, the United
Wisconsin, acting upon a report
United States District Court a lit
fiseation of 200 cases, more or les
of a product labeled in part
BLEACH," at Milwaukee, Wis.,


misbranding of "KROMA-LWITH REXACHLOr
IU.S. v. 200 cases, more or less, each containing
ners of a product labeled in part "KROMA-X
PHENE BLEACH." Consent decree of condem-
er bond. (I.F. & R. No. 484. I.D. No. 42047.)
ITH HEXACHLOROE~f NE BLEACH" was not
Insecticide, Fungicide;,and Rodenticide Aet. An
owed that the labels borne by the product did not
as required by the act; and the labeling for the
were false or misleading..


States


by
>el
Is,
aK
al


poison which had been transported
the Hilex Company, Inc., from St. Pa
It was alleged that the product


Attorney If


~te Eastern District of


the Secretary t Agriculture, filed in the
praying seizure for condemnation and con-
each containing 24 eleven-ounce containers
ROM'A-X WITH HEXACHLOROPHENE
leging that theyproduct was an economic
interstate on or about August 16, 1962, by
ul, Minn., in violation of the act.
was not registered with the Secretary of


Agriculture as required by section of the act
It was alleged that the prodtait was misbranded within the meaning of the
act in that its labels did not bear an ingredient statement giving the name and
percentage of each of the active ingredients, together with the total percentage
of the inert ingredients, or an ingredient statement giving the names of each of
~t eative and each at the inert ingredients in the descending order of the
percentage of each present in each classification, together with the total per-
e ageof the inert ingredients
It was alleged that the product was further xisbtanded within the meaning
of the act in that its labeling bore fhe statements:


WITH HEXACHLOROPHENE
,BLEACH

KEEPS OO THS ::i Safe for
GERM AND ODOR FREE i FINE
FABRICS
-and everything
you wash
FOLLOW DIRECTIONS


WATER TEM XPE lATJRES


COOL B, HOT
for NYLO, .RLO O WHITE and
WOOL DACRO AYO( FAST COLORED
SILKS'. LEd EI'{S Cottons, Linens


FOR THOSE EASY BASI
WASHINGS-use enough


N







332 INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT [I.R.N.M |

WASHING MAOHINESB -- ,
AUTOMATIC or WRINGER




"< vv
r~ rpi 0
I


Add 1 cup KROMA-X to
your regular solution.
BABX'S DELICATE THINGS
Wash as above to helB keep
Baby's nice things FRESH
ODORLESS, GERM FREE.
TILE and PORCELAIN-SINKS--
STOVES-REFRIGERATORS
WALLS-WOODWORK etc.
Sprinkle KROMA-X on damp
cloth and go over all surfaces.


KROMA-X also contains
hexachlorophene to
Shelp keep garments fresh


;i: "4


V4~
A
4t 4f M~~


i
"
~" "a ": ",
r"
ii


and odorless and germ
free. Use KROMA-X for
nylon, orlon, rayon, wool,
sheer cottons, fine fabrics
and colors. It renews
whiteness and brightness
with every wash.
Try KROMA-X for
other uses, too, for
dishwashing and for
washing walls,
woodwork and floors.
KROMA-X "with
HEXACHLOROPHENIE"-
helps to protect and
lengthen the life of
Sfabrics-does not cause
pinholding-does not
damage washable fabrics.
APPRECIATED USES ..
KROMA-X-1 cup in
your bath helps insure
added cleanliness
and sanitation.
Sick room linen and
uniforms are greatly
benefited by KROMA-X


:I




Li


rA




'Ij

I


I1
Ij
~s~r~m~m Th~tfl
4i


to help keep sa
odorless, and germ


me
free.


- -


4ri
4ai~i


~(g l.i ;
~J: "


~;s*(


~ifii ~(:idS






897z-4211.


NOTICES


JUDGMENT


4


2 K


.432.


Misbranding and adulteration of
BASE' FLY KILLER." U.S. v.
.of "FARNAM DIE-FLY 3-WAY
decree of condemnation, forfeit
I.D. No. 41279.)


I "FARNAM DIE-F4LY 3WAY. SUGARR
178 one-pound containers mo less
'SUGAR-BASE' FLY KILLIRY
ure, and destruction. (IF. & .N. 4,0.


The product "FARNAM DIE-FLY 3-WAY 'SUGAB-BASWE FL KILLER
was misbranded in that its labeling bore statements which were false or mislead-


Sing. The product was ad
labeling bore a statement
dichlorovinyl phosphate ;
0,0-dimethyl, 2,2-dichlorovi


ulterated within the meaning* o
that the product contained 05%
whereas, the product contain
nyl phosphate.


t the act in that its
of 0,Odimethyl, 2,2-
I less than 0.5% of


On September 11, 1962, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District
of Washington, Northern Division, acting upon a report by the Secretary of
Agriculture, filed in the United States District Court a libel praying seizure for
condemnation and confiscation of 178 one-pound containers, more or less, of
?FARNAM DIE-FLY 3-WAY 'SUGAR-BASE' FLY KILLER," at Spokane,
Wash., and alleging that the product was an economic poison which had been
transported interstate on or about July 17, 1962, by The Farnam Company, from
Omaha, Nebr., in violation of the act.
It was alleged that the product was misbranded within the meaning of the
act in that its labeling bore the statements: i


'4*


ACTIVE INGREDIENT
0,0-dimethyl, 2,2-dichlorovinyl
INERT INGREDIENTS.....---


phospateV
--------- --- -- ------ a a -


0.5%
99.5%


TOTAL-------------------------- ----
ms m m"


and such statements were false
that the product contained 0.5%
99.5% of inert ingredients; wh
0,0-dimethyl, 2,2-dichlorovinyl
ingredients.
The product was adulterated '
or purity fell below the profe
labeling, since its labeling bore th


-- 100.09W~


or misleading since they implied or represented
of 0,0-dimethyl, 2,2-dichlorovinyl phosphate and
ereas, the product contained less than 0.5% of
phosphate and more than 99,5c% of inert

within the meaning of the act in that its strength
ssed standard or quality as express d oti its
ie statement:


ACTIVE INGREDIENT
0,0-dimethyl, 2,2-dichlorovinyl phosphate -- -
S..,," 1 t "


and such statement represented that the product contained 0.5
2,2-dichlorovinyl phosphate; whereas, the product contained
0,0-dimethyl, 2,2-dichlorovinyl phosphate.
On November 16, 1962, no claimant having appeared, a de
tion and forfeiture was entered, and the United States Mai
to destroy the product.


413. Lack of registration of "ALGIMY
more or less, of "ALGIMYCIN 'J
ing the statement "CLEAR ..
WATERS WITH ALGIMYCIN
and release under bond. (I.F.


- 05%xl
"II


% of 0,0-dimethyl,
less than 0.5% of


cree of condemna-
rshal was ordered


'CIN '200'." U.S. v. 959 one-quart bottles,
200'" and 100 placards, mone or les, bear-
* ALGAE-FREE a WIiiMING OJOL
'200'." Consent decree of ndetio action
& R. No. 491. ;:D. No. 40924:) <







INSECTICIDE,


FUNGICIDE,


AND


RODENTICIDE


ACT


[I.FR.N.J.
Aii:


28, 1962, by Great Lakes Biochemical Company, Inc., from Milwaukee, Wit.,
in violation of the act.
pt w alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of
Afrelture as required by section 4 of the act.
Great Lakes Biochemical Company, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis., registered the
product under protest, and claimed ownership of the product and requested
its lease under bond pursuant to the act and consented to the entry of a con-
demnation deree On December 17, 1962, a consent decree of condemnation
Sa. hetere d and t was ordered that the condemned product be released to
W cliS ^Ijjyfcit~ r b. III Wa Ur"t9lLiarj Lic ,uU~iltU UrUUC UC dC


414. Misbranding p "NEW TRAV'L-GARD WITH TRANSAN." U.S. v.
,, 116 tw ty ce aerosols, more or less, of "NEW TRAVWL-GARD **
2. TH NS I alt dr of condemnation, forfeiture, and

liiodittt "'NEW TRAV'L-GARD WITS I RANSAN" was misbranded
Within the meaning of ihe tctfn that when ued as directed the product would
btdiditiifeCtotlsetsWt gtwddul nbttki1 genits on public toilet seats.
On November 13, 1962, the United States Atto y for the District of Rhode
Mald, thg up a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United
States District Court a libel praying e for condemnation and confiscation of
116 twenty cc aerosols, more or les of* NEW TRAV'L-GARD WITH
TRANSAN," at Cumberland, R.I., and alleging that the product was an economic
poison :which had been transported interstate on or a uJuly 20, 1962, by The
Town It was. alleged that the product was misbranded within the meani of the
act in that its labeling bore the statements:
"EEiTi *


Tw Trav'1-Gard
, ItLs

GERMS
ON
PUBLIC
TOILET
SEATS
ON CONTACT
7"* r/ f ^ t- 4*


>bH::h


4


*4


Effective aerosol spr wih TRANSA


i.;1 ~ >4rid


Al. 1~


i I BL~l Z:B<


<4" ~;


\ i ;8: .E .i


AU )


,li,Vt Ut.i "~


STrav'l-Gard .
24-35 APPLICATIONS WIl ThAMa
Tra .'ard ;
SPRAY DISINFECTANT OtR TOILET SEATS


24T0 85
APPLICATIONS
DRIES
SECONDS
S--EVEN
* 3r6O'INFANTS
FITS POCKET
OTJRPURSE


S- -. .


C



0


ii


'"EEEEB


^^


..


i :


:I" I Pr


a: I


:i""


::"
I~


"
"E


,t
id


:""lp P


": r




II





I.
I'
Ii:
I


NOTICES


OF J-UGIw


335


and such statements were false or misleading in that they implied or repem-
sented that the product, when used as dire ed, would disinfect toilet seats and
kill all germs on public toilet seats; whereas, the product; when used as direct*
would not disinfect toilet seats and would not kill all germs on public toilet seat~
On January 7, 1963, no claimant having appeared, a default decree of eaT
demnation and forfeiture was entered, and the United States Marshal wa
ordered to destroy the product.

415. Lack of registration and misbranding of "DARK CREOSOTE WOOD PRE-
SERVATIVE." U.S. v. 35 one-gallon cans, more or less, of "DARK
CREOSOTE WOOD PRESERVATIVE." Default decree of condemnation,
forfeiture, and destruction. (I.F. & I. No. 496. L.D. No. 40660.)
The product "DARK CREOSOTE WOOD PRESERVATIVE" was not regis-
tered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, and ita
label failed to bear an ingredient statement.
On November 6, 1962, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of


Ohil
filed
and
WO
was
Jun


the
It
Agr,
It
of t
and
the
men
and
0
and
the
416.


o, Western Division, acting upon a
i in the United States District Court
confiscation of 35 one-gallon cans,
OD PRESERVATIVE" at Cincinna
an economic poison which had be
e 6, 1962, by M. J. Daly Company,


act.
was alleged that the produce
culture as required by section 4
; was further alleged that the
he act in that its label did not
percentage of each active ing
inert ingredients, in the produ
it giving the name of each acti
total percentage of the inert
n February 25, 1963, no claim
forfeiture was entered and the
Product.


report by the Secretary of Agriculture,
a libel praying seizure for condemnation
more or less, of "DARK CREOSOTE
ti. Ohio, and alleging that the product
en transported interstate on or about
Inc., from Ludlow, Ky., in violation of


:t was not registered with the Secretary of.
I of the act.
product was misbranded within the meaniiig
bear an ingredient statement giving the name
redient, together with the total percentage oft
ict, or, in the alternative, an ingredient state-
ive ingredient, together with the name of each!
ingredients, in the product. Ji
Int having appeared, a decree of condemnation
United States Marshal was ordered to destr


Lack of registration of "MAW KIENOL INSECTICIDE." U.S. v. 54 one.
pint bottles, more or less, 42 one-quart bottles, more or less, and 12 onle-
half gallon bottles, more or less, of "MAW KIENOL INSECTICIDE."
Consent decree of condemnation and release of the product under bond
for the purpose of relabeling. ( I.F. & R. No. 470. J;D. No. 41288.) r


The product "MAW KIENOL INSECTICIDE" was not registered under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
On August 15, 1962, the United States Attorney for the District of Oregow
acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriecultre, filed in the United State
District Court a libel praying sizure for coiidemnation and confiscation of 54
one-pint bottles, more or i On ut bottles, more or less, and 12 one-halt
fffls tiMa r eia | ri f MAW KIEINOtL NSECToICtDE"l at Portland
re., alleging that the product was an economic poison which had been trans-
ported interstate on or about May 22, 1962, by Mawn Manufacturing CompanyL
from Santa Monica, Calif., in violation of the aee <
It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of
Agriculture as required by section 4 of the act,. r


Maw Manufacturing Con
r44Vi. n4 n .,* wA dm n jankdni AL


npany of Santa Moniesca, Clif eiaimed ownership of
,d*. u' ,,. A r. .a n...A l ,A ,r1 n e ..nan4- 4,. a n A aS


397-421]






S


INSECTICIDE,


FUNGICIDE,


AND


RODENTICIDE


ACT


[I.F.R.N.J.


0 October 29, 1962, the United States Attorney for the District of Massachu-
t, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United
Sei Ditstrit Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and condfiscation
S1 fou ~ oun c plastic bottles, more or less, of a product labeled in part "AIRE
OHEMITBON A1R-ALrPURU" .at Springfield, Mass., and alleging that the
poucht was an economy poison which had been transported interstate on or
about August 13, 1962, by Uncle Sam Chemical Co., Inc., from New York, N.Y.,
In violation of the act.
It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of
~reulture as required under section 4 of the act.
On January 14, 196%3, no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation
and forfeiture was entered and the United States Marshal was ordered to
destroy the product.
418. Lack of registration, lack of required information, and misbranding of
"HARI-KARI LINDANE VAPORZING UNITS" U.S. v. 177, more or
less, "IARI-KARI LINDANE VAPORIZING UNITS" and 100 pamphlets,
more or less, bearing the statement ARI-LARI MEANS DEATH TO
PESTS & INSECTS." Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and
destruction. (I.F. & R. No. 490. ID. No. 4.)


The product "HARI-KARI LINDANE VAPORIZING UNITS" was not regis-
tred under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticde Act. An exam-
ination of the product showed that the labels affixred to the containers of the
product did not bear a statement of net weight or measure of the contents or an
ingredient statement as required by the act.
On October 18, 1962, the United States Attorney for the District of Idaho,
flstern Division, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in
ate United States District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and
confiscation of 177, more or less, "HARI-KARI LINDANE VAPORIZING
UNITS" and 100 pamphlets, more or less, bearing the statement "HARI-KARI
MEANS DEATH TO PESTS & INSECTS," at Blackfoot, Idaho, alleging that
the products were economic poisons which had been transported interstate on or
about August 22, 1962, by The Neodane Company, from Torrance, Calif, in viola-
tion of the act.
It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of Agri-
culture as required by section 4 of the act.
It was further alleged that the product was misbranded within the meaning
of the act in that its labels did not bear an ingredient statement giving the name
and percentage of each active ingredient, together with the total percentage
of the inert ingredients, in the product, or, in the alternative, an ingredient
statement giving the name of each active ingredient together with the nape
of each and total percentage of the inert ingredients, in the product.
It was further alleged that the product failed to comply with the provzhlons
of the act in that the labels affixed to the containers of the product did not
bdar a statement of the net weight or measure of the contents of the containers.
On February 1, 196, no claimant having appeared, a default decree con-


dennation and forfeiture was entered, and the United States Marshal was
ordered to destroy the product and pamphlets. +
4it Lack of registration of 'L"LfLY' FGANIC FEED & WEED MORCROP."
U.S. v. 250 fifty-pound bags, more or less, and 85 twenty-five pound bags,
more or less, of "LILLrS ORGANIC FEED & WEED MORCROP."
,Consent decree of condemnation and relish tu claimant (I.F. & R. No.
492. I.D. No. 42229.)


;


..


-- -







397-121]


NOTICES


3UDGMEN~T


337


It was alleged that
Agriculture as required


The Charl
the product,
product into
tion decree.
product was


es H. Lilly
requested
compliance
On Januai
released to


the product was t registered with te Eerefariy of
under section 4 otf *e) act.
Company, Mounf Vernon, Wash., claimed ownersth of
its release under bond for the purpose of bringing the
with the act and consented to the entry of a condemna-
ry 21, 1963, a decree of condenmiation was entered and the
the claimant.


420. Misbranding of "NADCO NON-SELECTIVE AEROSOL DISINFECTANT,"
and "NADCO AERO SPICE DEODORIZER AIR SANITIZER GERMI-
CIDE." U.S. v. 140 fifteen-ounce containers, more or less, of "NADCO
NON-SELECTIVE AEROSOL DISINFECTANT," and 152 fourteen-ounce
containers, more or less, of "NADCO AERO SPICE DEODORIZER AIR
SANITIZER GERMICIDE." Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture,
and destruction. (I.F. & R. No. 444. I.D. Nos. 40584, 40585.)
The products "NADCO NON-SELECTIVE AEROSOL DISINFECTANT" and
"NADCO AERO SPICE DEODORIZER AIR SANITIZER GERMIOIDE" were


misbranded within
Rodenticide Act in
disinfectant or germ
On May 17. 1962,
nessee, Nashville Di
filed in the United


tion and
NON-SE]
trainers,
TIZER (
economic
1962, by
It was
INFECT
stated in


confisca
LECTIV
more or
;ERMIIC
poisons
James V
alleged
ANT" w
part:


the meaning of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
that when tested the products were found to be ineffective as
icide for the uses claimed on the labels.


the U
vision
States


tion of 1


E AE
less,
IDE,
which
arley
that


I.
S


;RO
of
'at


united States Attorney for the Middle District of Ten-
, acting upon a report by the Secrefary of Agriculture,
District Court, a libel praying seizure for condemna-
40 fifteen-ounce containers, more or less, of "NADOO
SOL DISINFECTANT," and 152 fourteen-ounce con-
NADCO A IRO SPICE DEODORIZER AIR SANI-
Nashville, Tenn., and alleging that the articles were


h had been transported interstate on or about February 9,
& Sons, Inc., from St. Louis, Mo., in violation of the act.
the product "NADOO NON-SELECTIVE AEROSOL DIS-


as misbranded within the meaning of the act in that the label


"NADOO
NON-S ELECTIVE
AEROSOL
DISINFECTANT


THE MULTI-PURl
HOSPITALS, HC
HOMES


A COCOENTRAiED DISINFECTANT,
DEODORANT, BACTEBRIIDE
A SURFACE GERMICIDE .
POSE DEODORIZER GERMICIDE *
ITELS, INST1PUTIONS, SlOOtiS, o]


SANITIZER FOR
OFFICES, iOTETL,


HIROeTIONS FOR GENERAL TJUi:
ay urfce suspected of harboring
baceria until damp. Remove etces moisture
with a clean cloth. Spray wash basins, mirrors,
telephones, table tops, refuse cans, laundry
chutes, door knobs, laundry carts, toilet seats,
bed frames, bath mats, bath tubs, appliances,
:* :. .:...:.*: :. :. -* 4 *- a .... J


""iiiiiiii "






338


INSECTICIDE,


FUNGICIDE


AND


RODENTICIDE


ACT


[ I.F.R.N.J.


thoroughly
Non-Seect
are damp
spray. ."


Instrumen
by usual p
and wipe
manner.


by usual procedure. Spray with
ive Disinfectant. Be sure surfaces
with spray, then wipe off excess

ts: Clean instruments post-operatively
procedure. Spray with this product
off excess spray. Sterilize in usualI


DIRECTIONS FOR USE IN SIKOO AND
WARDS:


Spray freely into atmosphere. Contaminated
equipment or utensils should be sprayed di-
rectly to control foul odors. Mattresses and
pillows should e sprayed lightly for de-
odorizing. Spray freely in burn or cancer
wards to control odors. Where rooms become
"stuffy" or stale odored a light spraying will
"condition" the air nicely. Excellent for use
in laboratory or small operating rooms for
controlling odors. Should Be pse daily in all
bath rooms to keep air freshly deodorized.


* *1


whereas, when used as directed, the product would not disinfect equ
instruments in hospitals, industry, surgery, dentistry or laboratory,
germicide to disinfect wash basins, mirrors, telephones, table tops, i
laundry chutes, door knobs, laundry carts, toilet seats, bed frames,
bath tubs, appliances, urinals, nemesis dishes or other objects of g
It was alleged that the product "NADCO AERO SPICE DEODOF
SANITIZER GERMICIDE" was misbranded within the meaning of
that the label stated in part i


ipment and
or act as a
:efuse cans,
bath mats,
generall use.
tIZER AIR
* the act in


THE GLYCOLIZED MULTI-PURPOSE DEODORIZER---GERMICIDE-SAN I-
TIZER FOR HOSPITALS, HOTELS, INSTITUTIONS, SCHOOLS, OFFICES,
MOTELS, HOMES
NADCOO
ABRO SPICE
DEODORIZER
AIR SANITIZER
GERMICIDE
DIRECTIONS FOR USE IN THE HOME
BATHROOMS:
After routine cleaning of fixtures spray this DEO-
DORIZER AIR-SANITIZBER n toilet bowl, seat,
lavatory, tub, or shower stall thoroughly to disinfect.


***fls


whereas, when used as directed, the product
seats, lavatories, tubs, or shower stalls, and
germicide for spaces and surfaces in hospitals,
motels, and homes.
On March 18, 1963, no claimant having a]
demnation and forfeiture was entered, and t1
dered to destroy the nrnd lcts.


would not disinfect toilet bowls,
it would not act as an effective
hotels, institutions, schools, offices.

appeared, a default decree of con-
he United States Marshal was or-


-0







397-421 ]


NOTICES


JUDGMENT


339


tion showed that the labels on thp containers did not bear a statement of the
net weight or measure of the contents of the containers and an ingredient state-
ment as required by the act. The products "NEODANE PELLETIS" and "HARI-
KARI FLY BAIT" were not registered under th'e Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rlndontiido Ant


On June 20,
acting upon a
District Court
more of less,
more or less,
one-pound con
que, N. Mex.,
been transport


1961, the United States Attorney for the District of New Mexico,
report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United States
: a libel praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation of 47,
"HARI-KARI LINDANE VAPORIZING UNITS"; 12 cartons,
each containing 12 packages of "NEODANH PELIMTS"; and 10
itainers, more or less, of "HARI-KARI FLY BAIT," at Albuquer-
and alleging that tfe products were economic poisons which had
Led interstate on or about May 9, 1961, by The Neodane Company,


from Torrance, Calif., in violation of the act.
It was alleged that the products were not registered wil
Agriculture as required by section 4 of the act.


th


the Secretary


It was alleged that the "HARI-KARI LINDANE VAPORIZING UNITS" were
misbranded in that their labels did not bear an ingredient statementt giving the
name and percentage of each of the active ingredients, together with the total
percentage of the inert ingredients, in the units, or in the alternative, an ingre-
dient statement giving the name of each active ingredient, together with the
name of each and total percentage of the inert ingredients, in the units.
It was further alleged that the "HARI-KARI LINDANE VAPORIZING
UNITS" were in violation of the act in that they did not bear a statement of the
net weight or measure of the contents of the cartons.
On May 2, 1963. no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation and
forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered that the products be destroyed.


INDEX TO


NOTICES OF


JUDGMENT 397-421


N.J. No.
Abbott Algaecide
George Mann & Co., Inc.--. 408
Aire Chemitron Air-All-Pure
Uncle Sam Chemical Co.,
Inc.----... ....- ---- -- 417
Alig. Away
General Developments
Corp -..---. ...---.--- 40
Alg Away for a Beautifully
Clear Garden Pond
General Developments
Corp .--.--.--------- -- 406
Algi-Cure
G e n er a I Developments
Corp .---- -..... -.- 406
Algi -Oure Unconditionally
Guaranteed for a Crystal-
Clear, Algae-Free Aquarium
$ezeral Developments
Corp. -- -.. 406
Algimaster
;" eigan Chemical Corp... 409
mr S nw Alt)


N.J. No.


Clear Algae-Free Swim-
ming Pool Waters with Algi-
mycin '200'
Great Lakes Biochemical
Co., Inc ......_ _------
Dark Creosote Wood Preserva-
tive
M. J. Daly Co., Inc----


Drano


The Drackett Products Co_
Farnam Die-Fly 3-Way 'Sugar
Base' Fly Killer
The Farnam Co.....
Fly Cakes
E. Joseph Cossman ^- Co --
Hari-Kari Fly Bait
The Neodane Co--- ..-
Hari-Kari Lindane Vaporizing
Unit
The Neodane Co .- .--
Hari-Kari Lindane Vanorizine






$0


INSECTICIDE,


FUNGICIDE,


AND


RODENTICIDE


ACT


[I.F.R.N.J.


The har i "
Maw Kienol Inse<
Maw Manufa


N.J. No.
weed


00...


Natco Acrm pies c odorins6-

Nadeo *n eieve

Neoid r a Pel

The Neoane Coo....___n
New Trav'l-Gard with
Transan
The Town Cnc--
Old Scratch OaIit &O
Sterebetg and on .-


410
416


noi


N.J. No.


PK Deo-Tect Deorizes an
Disinfects
C" ase Products Co........


Steri-Fleec
Calusa


Steri-fluk


e
i Chemical
q Powder
I Chemical
SPowder
Chemical
Powder


Co., Inc__

Co., Inc--

Co., Inc-_
Anti-Bae-


tg^1 Yabric Softener
OC la Chemical Co., Inc.-
Wflitams Top Crop Gets-Oats 3
'Greenacres 'Gypsum Co.,
.nc -- -m-m --------- -
Williams Top Crop Gets-Oats 4
Greenacres Gypsum Co.,
Ine- --- - -..


402

403

404

405

401

401


i ?li"B


Ed ~~$"E~;I















I



































I.

L










H
II








UNIVERSITY OF Fi

3 1262 name.


~n ~iutJ c"
;"; )iri,~ r r~ai~sa; i
,: T h: V: l:
r;0
aV