State safety code comparison studies

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
State safety code comparison studies
Physical Description:
vii p., 17 folded sheets : ; 28 cm.
Language:
English
Creator:
United States -- Bureau of Labor Standards
Publisher:
U.S. Dept. of Labor, Wage and Labor Standards Administration, Bureau of Labor Standards :
For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C
Publication Date:

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Safety regulations -- States -- United States   ( lcsh )
Genre:
federal government publication   ( marcgt )
statistics   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )

Notes

General Note:
"00S LS-51."
General Note:
"These six code comparison studies were started in 1965 and completed in 1967"--P. vii.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 004978614
oclc - 30151858
System ID:
AA00008460:00001

Full Text
~_;I i ti~


OOS


LS-51


-p r4r pr i
MAW C- ij
-s:
a ~:
ai 41aE i



c


aa


-rw~ alu
an-
______ ____
PWC
-ruuu o
nsa coin
am -



eng SSn
- --~
- a---


ST


ATE


FETY


RISO


STUDIES


COD


CO


































This booklet


was


prepared in the Bureau


of Labor Standards, Office of Occupational Safety.
Direct requests for information to the Bureau of


Labor Standards,


Code


Washington, D.C. 20210, Attention


3-223


For sale by the Superintendent of D)ocuments, U.S. Government Printing Office
Washington, D.C. 20402 Price 75 cents














STATE
SAFETY
CODE
COMPARISON
STUDIES


UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
WAGE AND LABOR STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION


BUREAU OF LABOR STANDARDS




































Digitized by the Internet Archive


in 2011 with


funding from


University of Florida, George A. Smathers Libraries with support from LYRASIS and the Sloan Foundation




















FOREWORD

These code comparison studies are the prod-
uct of a cooperative effort between the States


and the Bureau of Labor Standards.


ciate each State's


We appre-


contribution which enabled


us to evaluate the requirements


of that State


safety codes and to have our evaluation
firmed by the appropriate State officials.


We have


con-


incorporated with each chart


appraisal of the State


s safety rulemaking


tivity


to pe


rmit each study to be used


inde-


pendently


. When removed from the booklet


review


specific
complete.


different
standards,


The several I


safety


parties


concerned
comparison


standards


committees


now acti


vely reviewing and revising the stand-


included


latest


study wil


this study very enlightening.


believe this booklet of


serve


as a useful means


code comparisons
of communicating


information


of the


national


posture


in safety


standards


to all


the States and to the safety


standards committees and their sponsors who


devote


much


time and effort to


the develop-


ment and promotion of national voluntary stand-
ards. We thank particularlythoseState agencies
and officials who assisted our staff in making


these


studies.

























TABLE OF CONTENTS


Foreword.


. 4 II


Background on the


Code Comparison


Studies


CHARTS AND PROGRESS REPORTED


ompar


son of State


Safety Codes With USAS


- Woodworking


Machinery


01.1 -1954


(R1961


Compar


son of State Safety


Codes With USAS


- Laundry


Machinery and Operations,


Z8.1-1961


Comparison of State Safety Codes With USAS


. 4 4 5


- Window


Cleaning, A39.1-1959 .


S7


Comparison of State


Safety


Codes


Power-Transmission Apparatus,


With USAS
B15.1-1958


- Mechani


Comparison of State
Code, L1.1-1956


Safety


Codes


With USAS


- Texti


Safety


Comparison of State Safety Codes


With USAS


-The U


Care,


and Protection of Abrasive


Wheels, B7.1 -1 964.


YJ I




III

















CODE


COMPARISON STUDIES


BACKGROUND

The Bureau of Labor Standards' Code Com-


prison


Studies


compare


applicable


requ ire-


ments


of each State'


safety laws and codes


with nationally
United States of


recognize(
America


standard


Standards


s of the
institute.


Early in 1950,


the Bureau initiated a prelim-


i nary study on


the degrees


of conformity be-


tween State safety codes and national


safety


standards.
President's


This came as
Conference on


a result of the first
Industrial Safety in


which


reiterated the


lack of


uniformity


prevalent


in State codes.


In 1958 the Bureau began a


ensive


more compre-


code comparison program covering 20


codes; this was completed in
17 national safety standards


At least


used in the com-


parsons


are in the process of being or


have


been revised.


The purpose of this


impact study


six code comparisons, is to detail the


made during the


last 5


to 15


years


covering
progress
in State


safety rulemaking activity for selected areas


and to show the degree


of uniformity of the


State


safety codes


with the nationally recog-


nized safety standards.


These six code com-


parson


studies


were


started


completed in 1967.


The comparison studies


show the degree of


conformity


State


requirements


those of the national voluntary standards' re-


quirements, a ls,
among the States


the degree
regulations.


of uniformity



















WOODWORKING MACHINERY

In 151 a code comparison study was made
of the applicable State safety regulations and
the then "American Standard Safety Code for
Woodworking Machinery." This study disclosed
that 20 States had administratively promulgated
mandatory safety regulations, and one State


was using statutory provisions only.


Twenty-


eight States had no mandatory minimum safety
regulations for woodworking machinery. The de-
gire of uniformity among State regulations for
worker protection in this area was poor.
In 1981 another code comparison study was
made of the applicable State safety regulations


and the
Woodwork


"American Standard Safety Code for


ling


Machinery,


01 .1-1954


(R1961). At this time, 36 States, Puerto Rico,
and the District of Columbia had administra-
tively promulgated minimum mandatory safety
codes, and three States were using statutory


provisions only.
have any safety


Eleven States still


did not


requirements covering


rda. of waodworkino machinery,


and the


*: I N uniformity for worker protection im-
proved insignmficantly.


The impact study made in the same manner
as the earlier studies now shows 40 States,
.Pejrto lio., and the District of Columbia have


.minhimi



... tn
I hh


:.* "::.::.** ::;::. ^


awe
WltY.


safety requirements for woodworking
Of the 40 States, three are still


attutory provi:uSions only. The degree of
fty for worker protection from the haz-
V woodworking machinery has improved


;tumifary oveAr this 1S-year period, 16


bass~j


hIme purmDlgated safety codes or
*::Wi: l$t1 noe requirements ex-


S.hi. W I Saes, 114 promulgated
,S -4rr, .. lmrity id lester d by the
.3:* a admrini ai rnt iiiive depart-
His


.......... .....


..,..ifrV
:I :" .:: t. ..... :,
S"" :.:h
-:=m:-.. =.. .... .. ...
*. *:. *. .: *. .
4 Hw: Ht."-- '.,==.=4 -- -.
-~ = =u ... : *: .
ing ...gr:.:or 4n.- .. .. .:*-.:-. .


COMPARISON OF STATE SAFETY CODES WITH USAS-WOODV

S*u DMFiuiONS PLANT LAYOUT MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT

-
SHEET 1 t. --- E







I-o- o DDE c I 5,, I I i
annw- I lu l Is I I I -I I I I I
'OF i i- P 1 i-
2sNHEETs oo I I I I I I I I I I .








I owOZ '5,,D
FLO"'"IDAL CODEr I J'lJl l / 4
I-A-A''-- co0" I I ] 1 11_^ :;. ; i 1 _1 1 1 I I




'..ZON co" ... 1 | S




TE.INSSE CODE |
INRIANA CODE |
EONNUCA co0,. ."t a I .. ..


OINMw LND I I 1

IDA OI CODf 1





--------- ----- -"---, w-r-, -- ---'.-- -'-"-
IOWI I I i--T--E \ i I ; -






_NVAD A |__CO_ : __ I IF
MAINEW

M ASSA CHU II I I I ICI I / I \ I ,




MICHIGAN
MoNOANAADIA D I ~ aS


NEW OHIMPSWi COOE | I l l i e \\1 ''

NEW M EXICO 1
NEW LVNIA COK Y S I I -
No.IH CA.ODINA COD.E_ : m




WNSNVitINI. 0ODE e I a





UTwc sODE can. ** I I .*~ '.* I ----^.-.-
--_. __ p _. I *i \ -

WYOSINGTO N cQDE^ ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ i ~~
WE- VIRINIA CODE [ --- -*
WO a ~ ^
WDISOMIN G COUMI D i I I I | I .
D--- 01 COIM.I. ._. .I -- '
------------ ----------- loot S?^ > I? c-( r-= S" '. rl




I






COMPARISON OF STATE SAFETY CODES WITH USAS-WOODWORKING MACHINERY, 01.1-1954 (R1961)
SANDERS VENEER MACHINERY COOPIRAGE MACHINERY
MACHINE s GENERAL NOTES
SHEET 2 S O August 24, 196, the American Standards Asso
SAS stituted as the United States of America Standards
OF S ~ Sa aids approved as American Standards are now design
2 O F 3 e i no chan .ne iSHE!n oir index id. i.i.
2 I > z S 0 w O S e S 1 The charts in this series are Intended to show a c
oSHEETS S3tSl 2 I 6 I laws with applcable provisions of the standards oft
o 0 = l x I0 S- 5a0g32+ merica Standards nstatute. The charts do not atten
Ei |i I I g State enforcement procedures or to weigh the import
-- Z 0 O visions. The charts should be considered only as
---- N ~- --- S means of evaluating the State program for protection
STATE d.. d area covered by the State law.
AAAMA Coo SPECIFIC NOTES
D e 1The Department of Industial Relations otherwise Iee
AiZNA CO o I ican Standards Association's .American Standard Sa
.. ., Ce- worktg Plants,' ASA 01
__,___,________,__ so___ _- _2 e One of the applicable law s is restricted to logging an
SThe applicable law (or one such law) is restricted to
COLOHADO CODE
CONNICTICUT COD6 one of the applicable aws is restricted to woodwo,
=w,,, -- e ,o ofo the Basic Safety Manual effectivee June 8, 1959)
IAWARE CO "Mchinery, tools, or other devices not covered by t
FtLOIoA CODe *, codes of the State of Arkansas) shall be safeguar
with the applicable provisions of the *American S
oOgQ IA CODE? h tion safety Code apppllying heret.' "
HAWAII COD5 sThe industrial Commission by Resolution. dated M
,o. "o :OD, P + .- ., rtinued in effect certain codes of the American Star
IDAHO COE that the Commission had approved as Safety Codes
iUNOI *cOV V tme ** e- Whethe or not this Resolution has the force of
ILNDC______OD determined.
_-_INDIANA CODE ** 6The Labor Department on August 15, 1961, adopted
IOWA S,,AU,, .' *** .i. :.* ulations t'o apply oi all places of employment with t
-of law, the American Standard "Safety Code for Wo
KANISAS _STATTe_ 1ery," ASA 01.1-1954 CR1961).
KINTUCKY CODe P a s *a* ._ a a 7 Rule 60 of the Commissioner of Labor, ,ade pu
l.OUISIANA 54-122(d) of the Georgia statute, states that operatic
U i not covered by other rules, shall be governed by cod
MAINE I Standards Association.
MAYAND CoDS The Comnssioner ofa Labo state Section 44-36
MA$SACHUSETTS CODE^5 *< (*.v!;- l K1 *; *I *. r. *." G Oenral to provide authority to the Kansas Oepartm
Squre -recognized standards for industrial safety and I
MICHIGAN Department of Labor administratively adopted .
MINNESOTA CODE S S e as a minimum requirement for industrial safety and hi
M ISIt i I. jl'e Department of Labor and Industry on June 1,
MISSOURI STATUTE a a issued as regulations to apply In all places of er
force and effect of law, the American Standard Saf'
MONtANA COD8E 5a S working Machinery, ASA 01.1-1954 (R1961).
NIIIBRASKA CODE "3 | I |
s'Ne o ,,, a-++10Ruhe 1 of General Rules, North Dakota Industrial Sa
NE. ASACo *' s a*** a E sa, Juloy ,11, 1960),provides that no machine, tool, or oth
"NEVAD -as__ used which does not comply with the applicable
N EWHAM HII COE S American Standards Association.
NEW JESoE. ,SY CODE n 1One of the applicable laws is restricted to sawmill
NEW MtXICO plants.
NEWYORK ICOD! C aSo S s ** e' *
NORTH CAROLINA cow ,_
NORTH DAKOtA COD|10 | a|
. ssx" o I. .eZ. ee8 ,.. | | i
WHOMA e "COE ||||__ l_~sE| | S.Xw ,' .'


O AHO LMAN CO %" ""

SOUTH CAOLUNA___
SOUTH DAKOTA






WASHNMON CaO S m 5g S i I s r^




l w __ ___ I 1 I |



IOEGND
MEW II.Rs nI aARuTMsuT nr i fRnn
GEND
I1+]. BFDARTUI MT IIF I ARflR











I I
I ~
I






COMPARISON OF STATE SAFETY CODES WITH USAS-LAU


SHEET 1

OF

1 SHEET



AMAf






COLORADO
CONMI ACU
DILAWAII
FLORIDA
0rAOIA0N


HAWAII
i------ .^" -^-"~<
AlIItKA
|1--.11-- --*I J^:|l-J-:---:- ---


INDIANA
IOWA


MASSACHUIJWTS
MICHIGAN
MWNHISOTA


CODE
CODA


coDEW
CODE

CODE
rcoow



CODE
'cO'r'""^


CONt
coat
Farvv+


GENERAL


DEINITIONS


MN [III&N


MISSISSP coaLL6 E
- -- -- 11 1 > **il il >i1 111 f li h nt l n 1 i ....i i 1111111 1 Iiiiiin iiiii iiiii, iiiiiii iiii:.- ,i,,,, II,., -- .. ... _._


MISSOURI
MONTANA
NICIA1KA
NIVADA4
NIW HAMSiHISI

MIW MIKICO
OW YORKt


VIIMOWN
VIINIA
WAmHIOTON
WIST VIhINIA
WISCONSIN
IWMIHN
D|t 0 tOwMUMIA
fi09owum"A


COM
CODI


Co N
coot


CONl
CODE
CON
Coot

CON
CODN


LPDE**"i^""---


CON



CODAE
Coot
STATUTE





cook
t001


00


&


- *


WASHROOM
MACHINES


-It


STARCHING AND DRYING
MACHINES


S


M I


AnsOn


mm


- ---1__.~ _..LII I_ I I


S

Si,
* a
s-rn


OURCE: United slatas of AmoIca Standatd Safety Code for LAUNDRY MACHINERY AND OPERATIONS, USAS Z8.1-1961, adf cotlesponding plov
LEGEND


ddN

S


isions of available


FINISHING MACHINES


LX

T11XT177


C

I


I
4
9





s



I'

*1


2.0










ii



&i


r.
r


State laws (statutory and


U.S. DEPARTMENT (
WAGE AND LABOR STANDARD
SEPTEMBER]


SSame at i sito ta standfrd
rm fiet ,evnriive c hn standard
li31' te1 *I r .than c ondoad
OI No t110410 or code


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I


I- omi I I I


no


mmmm^


Bbgpg zg I q i


IW^m


MM -


r4MaMaMM maima8mah


om


coo t
CONK*
coot"1


ij


nm^


ma


Munn mnuu un.
. . .
mmmmmmu 0.
MMF ....... mmmuu.
mffl ........... . .


I.-

























I








































WINDOW CLEANING

The initial codo comparison itudy between
the "Amarican Safety Code for Window Clean-
Ing," ASA A39.1-1U^and the applicable Ste
afety regulations woe made in 1963, At that
time 24 States, Puem Rico, and the District of
Columbia had mandatry safety codes for win-
dow cleaning, end only two States wn stlll
uling statutory provislana. Thie left 24 States
which had no mintilum n inditory safety re-
qul mna for th9 .intard of window leaning.
'=iiii i: unlainitt: faworkler .pmstion under the

l..a of tht. ktea: pooa.

11t oi t stfludy ihow a e mall improve-
nrant~ aN 2. Sati lJack asIe type of safety
trequirment for window cleaning. There is ap-
prelarble change in the degree of uniformity
far -wmer- protection.
















*: :

3.
.: "" "
:ii" i .ii= i.ii.i"i"

...



*:::: :::::::::*:::::: m*:: m m::::: :**:m: m


jil #lW Illl ll -lO~( I III


OF 'IA.' I' :I itn~ jayI~ .t~ 9D *:' -' B' L ol
li1~r
.11i 91j:ill ii~jj t
ti !.- -i:
I. *.g -e -
-, -I:ir' 'i


taO.-'
C .c'.c '
[LAa*
't*CI
-A-a..
.105.


*,-.IIdi
i e'n tni


-, *0




hoi~l. *O*
to.,I..c -.JI


**I0w1 ri ia





0ll4GIC





D**0C-0
IDn' Cul t


L~ I I


.4


S
h~ t$i~f.:t


- 4
* U. ~I-t**~'
'V -- ~Ec~Nt
.~. -xx-
..


& -1


I3..;~S


V:5` -r&\-';*,W


.^ ^-^,^- .t4
:-*4?, is r;^ <.\.^.. o


::: ::: .


.. ,,
- ** -* 5

~. ...r.
*. .- a a....* *1* ..*


*: 4
*
i..,











. .i




S.. *
* S S \: .




I* a
a- *-* &

i l. .


* ~ r4
* 8 .
I 14


-.- .


":


i .t f.


SI:


.4t
L l.A .~: ~:&


- .-


XI I~~~a


LElEku


.
*.. :... .....
,'ai~l


*
* .
*.4


:.:1.:;:.:.:.
i .i-. a al i
. J *... *..E *


^\ %* .. s .
h J '. S


r~."Fzvrv"


, f, ,':-*,, ..r. .;
i l***** "" -" "* :" : ."- .'.- .

-iii ali- ^ -' I


* .*. .. .

- -. S
1---N9


.r I


11 *::1 I-'- -::;;
*. ....A I1I
-Z --


*:: .'
.a


DIrINITaNI


%l Ii l' I.


i-,. S



a a*
.4
TA4

I
*


~'~*: 'v't


*, i

.*:. ''*t .


' i..--


:~:~'~ ~a:
Isa .--.. Tr
"4 *1
N',
* I.


% b...u *

liT O S i In :;
* tf** ** '



'I I I




,, I


K :


T S

* w~t r *tX '*' v'' "
m^^^& .
,p ? t : m


S1 t


-t
I n


V. i..--


. ,- : ,


L

h '

ab S- ?: *:d ;
a nml t I


* '.0*

* ~ *:
a


r#; ;::; ^


ii"

I.


t-:
b






:Ii
a.

U,
jI


a


J S DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
nAGE AND LABOR STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
ApIl I196


a .. "
.* *E -**,


ri a .*. II


GENERAL NOTES
r' .-r m ,* a 1i *


I'.l .15 ,~~ I *

aP *. .. 9' '. *'' I,,I, El( I.,,,..1 *..'I


*IrrlIIII **p *'I., *. -. *EI *E. f
It'I *~lE* *I'**'' *r E*I .j' '-5' 1


1 I


.. Im .


I -p- i ,I.
I E *


, ar


I


mI *r .


--


:


r


I


I'


I II ~
























I





II
I
r
I

a
liE













S






I









MAE

AIM




oMW


An,










rmot

04W







Ht4




-~r

M11





IW



Notl



on',
owr
pmN
tIC0


COMPARISON OF STATE SAFETY CODES WITH USAS-MECHANICAL POWER-TRANSMISSION APPARAT'


MNEETI



OF


SHEET












M






10-A





PI-


MIX



MCHm

lbIA







'YI






MICA -
WAmnr

MAMW4I
ANSI,

you

rN1 CANOON
INDKt

U4OMI

V N
DI Unto


Coo,







C-(

Ii

Snyutt


Coot
Irn


Coot
Coos
Coot
Cc,,


WAS4INtO Coo




Ci~tW~uJ~4A_ oot

If?.O ico coo


Fitv~f


WIRA V







lii


a
a
a
a
S
U
S
a
*
U
S




-- S
C
a

a
a
I
*S
S
SS* a
S I S
S. S C
*
5*]





S.
a *
a a.



C
S
S.C
.5
a S
a-'
S
S
S
S
S


N

a

S. 1'.

S
a
S

S
S

A?


IS a
* a
a
S


a1
S.

S


a,
U



U
*
C


aLTt, OPE, AND CHAIN DuKtS


IIntT a 51C
DMIVEC


K jm~\h


'a



a S
* a a




~SS U
S.

S
U
S.



* **
US
~uS -
~1

I

* a S
S. U




CU#* S C
* U S U C
S*UU a C
Cal. -I
C S
* CJ
lbs.
I
a~
54
U
* S U
a...
S
S
S

4---

SC. S
S S
S

a..
5 U
a.. U
a:> *:

.~* S
*





U. S
S S
U. I


-w



A
'a
a
It
I.
* N



N





N
I.


a
I.


H~~~~ <*'y'I '.sS.L
i ; :S
C.1~M~


rO~~~t ~SM: of~r All~inlr ~is rl d artc $trh.h$or SPfely C 0i)(iti ittIrStut, *41i5 tBAt?,S Lf A.51 matI SS -I
Illl~nil l~iin~ lIlili DIlt[CflIrI 1 P D Il I tSSrlil 55V5ttW S 4I ,~


U,S, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
WAGE AND LAOR STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
APRIL BT


Ij


























I.S


+



i1























4


















































































1;:r






COMPARISON OF STATE SAFETY CODES WITH US AS--tEXTILE SA~Y CODE, L"

1, D[RNIIIQNI I a, I o~wmuntaumtrm

SHEET 1 f,;
Li;P P
OF I B i B 3 E ii I I/j
I I
6"" g r ii
P~ a
"" 3 3 f/l 3 r nrr i~esis
EE~ sis Bis 33
x, e; tir
'T"~'; CL 4 Y: Z 31~1flll~~lilf141~ ;i 5 i:I fl~l:if 11151111~19131515 141a 1~13 1119131314 i I if /f If /91$15111? 1 I~ I II i II; If ir
nWI~M ito#l
I IODE I I i I i I i I I I i / i I I I I I I I ) i I I I I I I I ~\U I / ( / / I I i 1 ~1~1~1 i i:I,
urwwu,
nKlu~xl itaorl I ~\Y I I I i I i I I i h\Y i i i I i I I I i i i I I I i ~\U I i I i I I I i I
tMlrauru I Cool I I I I I I i I i I I i i i i I k\Y i i I i I I I I I I I I i i i I I I i I ~Vl~jZlfifi
carotn ccxrt I I I i I I I I i I I i I I i I i i i i I I I i I I I I I I i I i I i I I I i I I I I i Pi'
roWmcrvt icoDE
DIUWMIE
Rnnu I root I I I k\Y I fi\~\U i I i I I I i i I h\Y~I] i I 1'1
0801911 11(1#1
~1 11001
Ipilrr Iroot I I I i I i i i I i I I h\Y i I I I I i i I I i I i I i I I i I i I I I i I I I I I I I LiI PI
luwoll i CODE
Iwrru i root I L~U i I i i I i i I I ~\U I / I I I / i I I I I i i I I ~\Y I i i I I I I I I I I I I h\U L'I
KIWII I ltmne I I I i / i i i I i I I I I I I I i i / i I I i i i i I I I I I j i I I I / i I I I I I CI~
UNUI IllrE'
IUMUM(I i tOor; r
UIUIIIANL I Coot
MA# ICoDt
mlmnurrr loot"
mr~r i rrmnr I I I I I i I i i i I I i I I I i I I i I I I I I I I i I I I I i i I i i i I I I I I I ~II 1'1
MIIWIW i srrrun / I i I I I i I i I I i I j I i i i i i I I i I i I I i I I I I i I I i I I i I I I I I Pi
mmnesorn (topt I ~y I I I i I I i I i I i I i i i I i I i i I i I I i i h\Y I i I I i I I i I I I L'I1 14r
mlllRlm cootl I I I I I I i I I i I I I i I i i i I i I I i I I I i i I i I I i i I i I I I I I I I I I I C~
rmlloUu I rr*vn I I I I I I I I I i I i I i i i i i I I I I I I I I i i I I i I i I I I I I I I I I I I Lf
NtINIINI
wunnu icocr
wnrru i root I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I h\U ii,
I HAMIIMI i roM I I I I I I I i i I I I I i I I I I I i i I I I I I I i I I I I I I i i I I i i I I I I L',
Nm imm itoa
IIIWMU(ICO i root
Nnv rann IObt I I I I I I i h~ I I I I I i I 1 I 1 I h\Y T i i i
mnnr urtouru I toot I I i i i I I I i i I I i I I I i I i I i I I I I i i i I h\Y I i I I I I I i I I I I I E";I i"i
rromrarmorr EODtB I I I I I j I I I I I I I i I I i I I I I I I I I j 1
o~lo I EOOt I I I I I I I I I I h\Y i I i I i I I I I i I i I I I i i i i I I I I I I
OKUHoMn Itooc
DFoDN IEODE I I I I I I I I I I I fi\~Y I j I I I i I I I I I I I I I h\Y'I
AYrrrvlV1Wlk I EOI
Ilawlxnra rot I h\y I i I i I i I I I ~U I I i I i I I I I I I i ~U i i i i I I I I 1"1
~Exn#nu I Coot
SOUIIIPIIKOlrr
nmMs root
mur Coot
U~UI ~O" I I I I I I I I I I i i I I I I I i i I I I I I i I i I I i I I I I i I i I i I I I I I iII
VSMDNI toot 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I:,
0130000 imrv~~ I I I i I i I I I i I I I i I i I I I i I I i I I I I I I I I i I i I i I I i I I I I I C" I,
~OH I root I I i I i I I I I h\y I i I I i I I I I I I I I i i I I i I i I i I I i I I I I I
mnmomu imx~r: I I I I I I I i I i I I I I I i I I I i I I I I I I I i i I i i I i I i I I i I I 1 111~ ~1 E~
mrumun irwr I I I I I I I I I I I I h\Y I I I I I i I I i I I I I i I I I i I i I i I I i I I I I 1 ~5
J~"" I I i I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I i I I i I I I I~ Ef
0""~0"""n1~0~ I I I I i I i I i I I i I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I R\U I I I I I I I i I I Ct;~;l;l;f
nnroruw, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I i I I i` I I I I I I I Ct;
SOUAeE: UnilarlL$i olkn~liu laulnl T*lila 331313 Cp~(, USIIS No, L1,11OSb, and e~lslppndinl plovalsnl pr tvlila~le 31313 Illwr islllulwy aml adlinUraBvbl,
LEGEND DEFINIIIONS

Soa oI or rimil.r i..tand.rd U.S. OEPIRTMEWT OF LIBOR
SIATUTE-IDII( IPw modcd by
Oolr legillolion. WAGIIIO LXIIOI ICTIIWOIIRDS IDMIISTIIII'IIOW
M.n nm)m~ then .hmd~,d l.fll~ nn
EODE-hovirionl, promulllplad
rt3 1n rminin ihon ..ndord bl Sl.r odmlnil(rotnr
Pgtnrl, hpvinl ihr kn Pnd
C3 NO 1)Dhlh 01 (Dd Rc, ol lor.













SHEET 2

OF

2 SHEETS


Ut|


rig



*B z
b10$


I.".


AWn ~ It to n '" IS.

it^V~m f-H~i~fnwmim -"-i --- -- *-**iiri-^---
11 1 ~


Wit lhit7I


F-f-ti-thii


COMPARISON OF STATE SAFETY CODES WITH USAS-TEXTILE SAFETY CODE, 1i.1-1956


IHTII

vWIf o 1"' ~ X111101 s l


iii! a I z. I
I~~ ~ i'B


ALjAMAf COPIN ------------------------------------- -- -- -- -- ----^^ ---- ------^ ---------- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- --- _-----1 5- *S^ fi
ALASKA CODI


A S SANIACODl
COIOI ADO-

CONNICTAC COD



HAWAII COW -----__---------------------------_ __--_-------------- -S
IDAHO CON
---- ---
0 fMI lCOM
InFA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .^ ^ *
INDPANA COD
IOWA str
KANSAS STATT

LOUISIANA CO .
MAINS Cot I
MAI'YLANO COot
MASSACHUMIWI $T4NTV .
MICHIOAN SATUTt
MINNUiOA COD
MISIIIPPI COO t7
MISSOUI StAIUI
MONTANA

NMVA*A CCaI
nImOa cowR oo



NW MI ICO Coit
HNI CxD *. *,





NOR h A CI*OOS
NOICW LAIfil COW -
cue CON
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .. .. --------------------------------------------------------------------------_ _



OkIHOIMA CO *
NNrfLAlIA COW
-AH M -------------------------------------------------- - -- --- ---- --.- _- __ __y






sins
11At CO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -
TIXM___-------------------------------- -- ---------------- --- -
WfU ______wwt..................... -- -- .---_^ _
'MM M-l -m~ -O -" --------------------------------------------------- -- --------------- --- ------------------ -A- -_-_ ____ ^_ ^.

y'M............... -^ ^ -~ "~~ "~ ~ ~" -- ---- ------ -- -- ------ .-^^


.I!'PHTW -


main
ifc $i US ,lSrw I. fl~t
U in..~ #tltIW Ithn ,fl0
La a:silcmw nft
fDl bren n


--1II I II 1 II I1 1 1 In


illI~I Il


Is.] ~O'I4D


4I442443~


4S5.


I I Ii

hi I I I


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
WAGE AND LABOR STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
Aupat 1967


On Auast 24, 196, I
United States of Amenl
Standards ae now desl
destification 1 lechni
The charts in his seie
plclBble provisions ot 1
slttute. The clalts do
to welii' the timpo tanc
only as one of a number
workers n the area cOV



The Depaartment of
can Standards Ass
2Rule 1 of the Ba
part, that "Machint
(safety codes of I
ance with the app
citlion's Safety Co
3 Rule 60 of the Co
of the Georiga stall
by other lules, sh
Association,
The Commissionei
Kansas Statutes,
eral to provide au
recognized stand.r
pastment of Labo'
minimum requiremr
5The Industrial Safe
the American Star
tor use as a guide
employee, safety e
6The Oepartment of
sued as regulalior
and effect of law
1956.
7The Scope or the
of Industrial Esta
Health, effective
for compliance wi
the owner, superin
8 Rule 1 of Genera
July I, 1960), pro
used which does i
cran Standards Ass


...~ --- -- -- ----


-- __ __ __
1lll,,,,,,,,i,,~. ..


i~l~ialililai~


?lal.l-la


I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I


till















,,I






COMPARISON OF STATE SAFETY CODES WITH USAS-THE USE, CARE, AND PROTECTION OF ABRASIVE


SHEET 1


2 SHEETS


ALABAMA


AR1lONA
AREANIIA
CAUPXORNIIA
COLOADDO
CO~NECTICUT
Of LAtIN
FLORIDA
OEORSIA


ILLINOIS


WIN TUCIC
LOUIItAN


MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHISAN
MINNESOTA
MISSIISIPP
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NE8RASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NOUTH CAROLINA
ROlTH OAKOTA


OKLAN 0 MA
ORESON
PEINSYLVAHIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA


VERMONT


SRcOE ID OEFNmrItio


WASMINWToN C -



YOI -
DIST F oOLUMI A CODE
PUERTh RICO
S(RI~CE: Un IIV S ot Aw OIa SMttie y Ct.o tvCft Use, C~a,d PI i. ol At*nne ltm ls USAS BTI LS cit. a oespo sl pow s oj val i tae Stale I t (sfatultoq ; a t rsa .
tnts'll


Les i"Rlntlnc4 mao sBndoMd

U3*lbR~


~sUIanca


U,5. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
WAGE AND LABOR STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
AUGUST 1967


STAUTrE: 8r~ra~ 1 ejce
COD -P,.~iptogl
ty 4 Posta, r Msi t at,* Sj
hivilrng #tt c. M lftI


~la1313


~3~ LlslU. liUIIIB 1(11~131

B var laarbn Mn ,acbn


li,,,,,,,illl,,lsl,;;,ii










COMPARISON OF STATE SAFETY CODES WITH USAS-THE USE, CARE, AND PROTECTION OF ABRASIVE WHEELS, B7.1-1964


SHEET 2


2 SHEETS


ALABAMA
ALASKA


CAlIFORNIA
COlORADOP
CONNICTIC00t


DEILAWAREI
FlORIDAi
GEO1tI


HAWAII11
IDAHO
ILLINOIS


KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
AftRYL AND


MASSACHUSETTI


MINNESOTA
MISt S SIPPI
MIISSORI
MONTANA
NEbRAStlKA


NIVAOA


NW HAMIIPHIRN
NEW JRSEY
NEW MExico
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DOAOTA
OHIO ,
OKLAHOMA
PRISON
PSNNSVLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
WtfTH ClAOLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA


tfllftttU
tlESS


VIRSINIA
WAEMII(ttON
1:WEIT VIASCINI


WIMORSIRGO



-"I
UflMISI rrrbrm~
-a-- -.


iOUNiltIG


.?I2


On AUGust 24. 166, he Amercan Steraard Aisocialios was reteo.
sltduled as Ihe United SbIes Ql Ameuca Slsdrdt InsliltWi. Stand
ards appnvd as American Suardalds are now dsi~naIed USA ShItars.
There is no change her index identificalion or Itchoricl couten.
The aiart s inis series are intended to show a coans of State
laws with aplicakle provislns ol the standards of the United Sta es
of Arineca Standaolf linhluTe, The darts do nol aUe~ t l evaluete
the State enforcernit pociiduls ot to *I ti the lt artanc of specific
provisions. The chails should Ne considered only as on ot a onumboe
ofl ~ans o evaluating the State pro/grai for protection ol woke's 1i
Ihe .re, coveted t the State law


The applicable law or onIe sch law) i lrestriuled to cn ,ituctin o


'Rule I o Ie the Basic Safey anatl (e/feclive June 8, 1959 slates, 10 wt, th l "Macrnety,
tools, or other devices not cowered bv Ithose codes (safely codes of Ihe State o Alansas]
shall be saflteided im accordance will thi applicable provisaos of the 'Aeican Stand-
ards Assorialion Safety Code applying I teo. This rule is in terpetedt ttie Coimis-
sioner of Labor ai applying to the latest UASI standard.
'The industrial Commission by gesolulton, dated May 26, 19I5. continued in eiteci ce ltin
codes o1 the Amelitca Sladtids Assoiasioln Itial Ihe Commission had approved as Safely
Codes on April 4, Il, D Wtieher 01 naot is ResfllliOn has Ite i 0fce of law has not been
delermined
Rulte 60 of the Comffmissioner o LabOr, made pul st lto Section 54-122() o the Goigra
slatute, slltes that o atios and equipment, not covered by other rules, shall be governd
by codes of the American Stsrandas Associatiio It is inlerpreled y the ConiiSsioCiCe ol
labot as applying to Ite lalest USAS! standard
'The Collmissioner of Lao states "Sectni 443 and 44137 oF tihe Kaisas Sliatte,
1.49, s interpreted by the offce of theAlt rney CGertal lo provide alllhrly to the Kansas
Dlepartlent ia Laor lto t require lrecolized standards lor industrial safely and health The
Kansas Departient of Labi adminstratively adopted this ASA Stladaid as a
minimum (reEqu rieol for indostial safety and health>"


LThe Departlmen of Late. and Industry ao June I~5 adopleu n iin ssued as regulalions
to apply in all place. of employment with lie force ai effllect of law the United
SCales Stlandard Safety Code for The Use, Care and Prolection of Arasive Wheels,"
USAC 871-1964
'Rule of GenEial Riles, North Dakola General Safely Code (adapted July I, 196
provides that no machine. tool, o other device shalt be used which does not comply with
wilh ihe applicable safet code i3 the American Stand~lds Association.
LThe Oeparmentl of Labor and Industry on July Il. 1S adopted iAnd issued as regula-
lions wilh Ile 0ole and efectl f law ie "United Slates ci America Standard Safety Code
la i he Use, Cane and Proflecion of Abaisve ieets," US AS8 -14,
'The Miminiuli Wap and Industrial Saetly 6ord uses approved Unsled States of America
Slianaids linslitle's safety codes as guides In correct hands and haardtious conditions


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR


tnt UU ttttilltn thor, stndard

NOJ listult or ~d,


WAGE AND LABOR STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION


See Sheet No, I or
DEFINITIONS












































~




UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
1 IB II I li 1 11111111 11111111111 III III
3 1262 08859 2471


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
WAGE AND LABOR
STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
BUREAU OF LABOR STANDARDS
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20210
POSTAGE AND FEES PAID
OF FACIAL BUSINESS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

THIRD CLASS MAIL
-_ -_ _.