i3---Ai endment No.
1. M-.Amendment No. 2
Registry No. 248-1-02
.... .. ... .. ..
l NlATIONAL RECOVERY ADMINISTRATION
CODE OF FAIR COMPETITION
.. : INDUSTRY
AS APPROVED ON JUNE 15, 1934
WE DO OUR PART
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
fi g pmrintendiBn or Dfcamente. Wauhingto, D.C Price 5 cent.
: x x:. .:
This publication is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington, D.C., and by district offices of the Bureau of
Foreign and Domestic Commerce.
DISTRICT OFFICES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.
Atlanta, Ga.: 504 Post Office Building.
Birmingham, Ala.: 257 Federal Building.
Boston, Mass.: 1801 Customhouse.
Buffalo, N.Y.: Chamber of Commerce Building.
Charleston, S.C.: Chamber of Commerce Building.
Chicago, Ill.: Suite 1706, 201 North Wells Street
Cleveland, Ohio: Chamber of Commerce.
Dallas, Tef.: Chamber of Commerce Building.
Detroit, Mich.: 801 First National Bank Building.
Houston, Tex.: Chamber of Commerce Building.
Indianapolis, Ind.: Chamber of Commerce Building.
Jacksonville, Fla.: Chamber of Commerce Building.
Kansas City, Mo.: 102S Baltimore Avenue.
Los Angeles, Calif.: 1163 South Broadway.
Louisville, Ky.: 408 Federal Building.
Memphis, Tenn.: 229 Federal Building.
Minneapolis, Minn.: 213 Federal Building.
New Orleans, La.: Room 225-A, Customhouse.
New York, N.Y.: 734 Customhouse.
Norfolk, Va.: 406 East Plume Street.
Philadelphia, Pa.: 422 Commercial Trust Building.
Pittsburgh, Pa.: Chamber of Commerce Building.
Portland, Oreg.: 215 New Post Office Building.
St. Louis, Mo.: 506 Olive Street.
San Francisco, Calif.: 310 Customhouse.
Seattle, Wash.: 809 Federal Office Building.
Approved Code No. 363-Amendment No. 2
AMENDMENT TO CODE OF FAIR COMPETITION
MEN'S NECKWEAR INDUSTRY
As Approved on June 15, 1934
AMENDMENT TO CODE OF FAIR COMPETITION FOR THE MEN'S NECKWEAR
An application having been duly made pursuant to and in full
compliance with the provisions of Title I of the National Industrial
Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, for approval of an amend-
ment for the Code of Fair Competition for the Men's Neckwear
Industry, and opportunity to file objections having been afforded
and the annexed report on said amendment, containing findings with
respect thereto, having been made and directed to the President:
NOW, THEREFORE, on behalf of the President of the United
States, I, Hugh S. Johnson, Administrator for Industrial Recovery,
pursuant to authority vested in me by Executive Orders of the
President, including Executive Order No. 6543-A, dated December
30, 1933, and otherwise; do hereby incorporate, by reference, said
S annexed report and do find that said amendment and the Code as
constituted after being modified comply in all respects with the
S pertinent provisions and will promote the policy and purposes of
said Title of said Act, and do hereby order that said amendment be
and it is hereby approved, and that the previous approval of said
Code is hereby amended to include an approval of said Code in
its entirety as amended.
SHUan S. JOHNSON,
Administrator for Industrial Recovery.
.... SOL A. ROSENBLATT,
June 15, 1934.
REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT
The White House.
SIR: An application has been duly made pursuant to and in full
compliance with the provisions of Title I of the National Industrial
Recovery Act for an Amendment to Article III, Section 5 of the
Code of Fair Competition for the Men's Neckwear Industry ap-
proved on March 24th, 1934.
The Code Authority for the Men's Neckwear Industry, acting in
accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article III, Section 5 of the Code,
recommended on May 4th, 1934, a Schedule of Piece Rates to cover
the manufacture of the open margined, lined large end, French,
small and closed, short pieced tie, a style of tie for which Piece
Rates were not established in the original Code as approved.
On May 29th a notice of opportunity to file objections to the Ad-
ministrator's announced inntetion of approving said Piece Rates
recommended by the Code Authority was issued by the Administrator
and distributed by the Code Authority to every member of the
Industry. The objections which were filed pursuant to this notice
although carefully considered by the Deputy Administrator, were
not deemed to be of sufficient importance to warrant the disapproval
of the action taken by the Code Authority in recommending the
approval of the piece-rates.
The Deputy Administrator in his final report to me on said
amendments to said Code having found as herein set forth and on
the basis of all the proceedings in this matter:
I find that:
(a) The amendments to said Code and the Code as amended are
well designed to promote the policies and purposes of Title I of the
National Industrial Recovery Act including the removal of obstruc-
tions to the free flow of interstate and foreign commerce which tend
to diminish the amount thereof, and will provide for the general
welfare by promoting the organization of industry for the purpose
of cooperative action among trade groups, by inducing and main-
taining united action of labor and management under adequate gov-
ernmental sanction and supervision, by eliminating unfair competi-
tive practices, by promoting the fullest possible utilization of the
present productive capacity of industries, by avoiding undue restric-
tion of production (execpt as may be temporarily required), by
increasing the consumption of industrial and agricultural products
through increasing purchasing power, by reducing and relieving
unemployment, by improving standards of labor, and by otherwise
(b) The Code as amended complies in all respects with the perti-
nent provisions of said Title of said Act, including without limita-
tion Subsection (a) of Section 3, Subsection (a) of Section 7, and
Subsection (b) of Section 10 thereof.
P 3 3
S (a) The Code empowers the Code Authority to present the afore-
Ssaid amendments on behalf of the Industry as a whole.
(d) The amendment and the Code as amended are not designed
to and will not permit monopolies or monopolistic practices.
(e) The amendments and the Code as amended are not designed
* to and will not eliminate or oppress small enterprises and will not
operate to discriminate against them.
(f) Those engaged in other steps of the economic process have
Snot been deprived of the right to be heard prior to approval of
.For these reasons, these amendments have been approved.
HUGH S. JOHNSON,
JuNE 15, 1934.
AMENDMENT TO CODE OF FAIR COMPETITION FOR
THE MEN'S NECKWEAR INDUSTRY
AMENDMENT NO. I
The following is added to Article III, Section 5, Machine-Made,
open-Margined lined large end, French, small and closed, h4l ..
Sewing margin lining on large end, small end French,
piecing and running up ----- ------ --------- $0. 14%
Turning_--------_-------------------------- --- .05
Pressing ----------- __--- _------------------- .05
Turning Pocket ------------------------------- .01%
Pressing Pocket------------- ------------------ .01%
Tacking small end ---------- ------------ .01
(The above rates shall apply for ties selling at Wholesale at not
more than Two and 25/100 Dollars ($2.25) per dozen.)
SApproved Code No. 363-Amendment No. 2.
Registry No. 248-1-02.
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
3 1262 08482 8192