Versions project : exploring mashup culture

MISSING IMAGE

Material Information

Title:
Versions project : exploring mashup culture
Physical Description:
Project in lieu of thesis
Creator:
Lyn, Francesca
Publisher:
College of Fine Arts, University of Florida
Place of Publication:
Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date:

Notes

Abstract:
Music mashups are transformative works of art made up of pre-existing songs. Mashups have broken new ground, not only in music but also in new approaches to art and learning. My research of this form of music has given insight on how our configurable culture is influencing areas of design, commerce, and education. Mashup culture is indicative of where culture as a whole is headed. My research involved interviewing mashup artists. Artist were contacted online and asked to participate by answering a short questionnaire. Online communities such as music mashup forums and tutorial websites were investigated as well. The data collected combined with a thorough literature review was used to form conclusions on mashup's role within culture. These conclusions were deployed in two formats: both online and a live presentation. The online presence resulted in a personal blog for the project (located at: http://www.versions.blogspot.com/) as well as involvement with a website, Ideal Mashup, maintained by the content management system Drupal. The live presentation of the research was performed at Digital Worlds Institute's Research Education and Visualization Environment (REVE).
General Note:
Digital Arts and Sciences terminal project

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida Institutional Repository
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID:
AA00004981:00001


This item is only available as the following downloads:


Full Text

PAGE 1

1 THE VERSIONS PROJECT: EXPLORING MASHUP CULTURE By FRANCESCA LYN SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Benjamin DeVane, CHAIR Melinda McAdams, MEMBER James Oliverio, MEMBER A PROJECT IN LIEU OF THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF

PAGE 2

2 MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011

PAGE 3

3 2011 Fra ncesca Lyn To everyone who has encouraged me to never give up, this would have never happened without all of you.

PAGE 4

4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a pleasure to thank the many people who made this thesis possible. T hank you to my thesis chair Professor Ben DeVane and to my committee. I know that I was lucky enough to be guided by experts in their fields and I am extremely gra teful for all of the assistance. I am grateful for every mashup artist that filled out a survey or simply retweeted a link. Special thanks goes to Kris Davis, the architect of idealMashup who encouraged me to become more of an activist with my work And th ank you to my parents and all of my friends.

PAGE 5

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS page INTRODUCTION.. Remix Hip The Hy SURVEY RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION APPENDIX SURVEY LIST OF REFERENCES .44 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

PAGE 6

6 Summary of Project Option in Lieu of Thesis Presented to the College of Fine Arts of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts THE VERSIONS PROJECT: EXPLORING MASHUP CULTURE By FRANCESCA LYN August 2011 Chair: Benjamin DeVane Major: Digital Arts and Sciences Music mashups are transformative works of art made up of pre existing songs. Mashups have broken new ground, not only in music but also in new approaches to art and learning. My research of this form of music has given insight on how our configurable culture is influen cing areas of design, commerce, and education. Mashup culture is indicative of where culture as a whole is headed. My research involved interviewing mashup artists. Artist were contacted online and asked to participate by answering a short questionnaire. Online communities such as music mashup forums and tutorial websites were investigated as well. The data collected combined These conclusions were deployed in t wo formats: both online and a live presentation. The online presence resulted in a personal blog for the project (located at: http://www.versions.blogspot.com/ ) as well as involvement with a website, Ideal Ma shup, maintained by the content management system Drupal. The live presentation of the research was

PAGE 7

7 (REVE). INTRODUCTION 1 as just another upbeat pop hit. However, the song is actually at the cutting edge of media creation. Created by DJ Earworm for his United State of Pop series this work is actually a combination of preexisting songs, specifically the tw enty five biggest hits of 2010 as reported by Billboard Magazine create a new composition. In this case, DJ Earworm has used his mashup as a commentar y on the current state of homogeny in today's popular music. With the evolution of the mashup over the past decade, music itself has become both a raw material and a tool for new creation. This new musical form has become increasingly widespread and infl uential in popular culture. In 2008, mashup artist Girl Talk's fourth album Feed the Animals was one of Time magazine's top ten albums of the year. In October of 2009, the television show Glee aired. Glee centers on a high school show Stroke of Geine musician Brian Burton, under the stage name Danger Mouse, released The Grey Album The 1 http://djearworm.com/united state of pop 2010 dont stop the pop.htm

PAGE 8

8 G rey Album combines a capella verses from Jay Z's The Black Album with instrumental samples from the ninth album from The Beatles, popularly known as The White Album Mashups often combine disparate songs in unexpected ways to produce a new, cohesive piec e of popular music. These new cohesive pieces often contain recognizable elements of existing songs but reproduce them in unique and creative ways using new sampling and editing sound technologies. Frequently made by non professional, hobbyist artists who share and disseminate their work online, mashups are a fascinating nexus where changing audio technologies, participation in online communities and popular culture fandom intersect. In this thesis I present a broad snapshot of music mashup culture. Mashu p artists are creating new, transformative works that challenge many aspects of popular culture. First, presenting relevant literature on remix culture as well as examining the historical a ntecedents of mashups structures my argument. Then, a study of cont emporary mashup artists was conducted. Artist s were contacted online and asked to participate by answering a short questionnaire. Online communities such as music mashup forums and tutorial websites were investigated as well. This data combined with a thor ough literature review was used to form conclusions on the nature of music mashup culture. It is important to understand that, while mashups grow out of other techniques for resampling and recycling other popular music, they represent a new and distinct genre of music practice. They exist separately from remixes. Mashups are often confused with remixes. Remixes are alternate versions of songs that already exist. Mashups are distinguishable from remixes because they repurpos e multiple songs into a more or less cohesive structure. In a remix samples of other songs may be added but the original work still has some sort of authority. With mashups, no one song truly dominates. But

PAGE 9

9 because the mashup grows out of remix culture, it is instructive to understand the history of the remix form and remix culture. Remix Culture and Broader Forms Music mashups exist within a larger, evolving subset of new media sometimes referred to as remix culture. Remix culture is multi faceted and aspects of it can be seen every where. Literature on the subject is incredibly diverse as remix culture affects art, commerce, and law. Remix culture is an increasingly significant area of study. This cultural revolution of sampling, remix, and beyond has given rise to consumers of music who are also user producers. Encountering issues of copyright are inevitable when discussing remix culture. While the focus of this investigation is on artistry and the creative process, legal issues are often inextricable from the larger narrative. For example, many mashup artists have to release their creations for free over the Internet to avoid threats of lawsuits. This affects both the creation and distribution of this art form. Therefore, major areas of contention and dispute are set within this la rger context. Mashups have broken new ground, not only in music but also in new approaches to art and learning. My research of this form of music has given insight on how our configurable culture is influencing areas of design, commerce, and education. Fo r example, the Ushahidi project is an open sou rce project that combines crowd sourcing with mashup technology. Ushahidi works by collecting reports sent in by email or text message and placing those reports on a Google Map. Data mashups are applications us ing and combining preexisting data such as a Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed and an application programming interface (API) to create some new service or interaction. Yahoo! Pipes is a web application that lets users easily

PAGE 10

10 create data mashups. The a pplication provides a graphical user interface (GUI) to easily aggregate RSS feeds and edit data. EARLY ANTECEDENTS Mashups have roots that stretch deep into the history of popular music, even as the contemporary mashup is a form of music that arose within the last ten years. In order to understand mashup s unique situation within remix culture, it is instructive to look at the history of popular music that gave rise to the form. Though the mashup is unique in the ways in which it blends existing songs together to produce a novel but cohesive whole, it is not without antecedent in popular music. In Audio Mashup Construction Kit Roseman, also known as DJ Earworm, offers a brief history of mashups to accompany his mostly instructive texts. Roseman cites Dickie Goodman and Bill Buchanan's novelty records as early predecessors of today's mashups. Called break in records these were made by splicing snippets of popular music and adding in their own comedic dialogue. A popula 2 prerecorded manipulated tape loops creat ed by The Beatles as being another early mashup Many relate Beat Generation figure William S cut up technique to this kind of manipulat ion. Burroughs practices this technique, which involves taking a prepared text and 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oxx8WZZD0Q

PAGE 11

11 physically cutting it up and rearranging it to create a new work. Though Burroughs popularized the technique beginning in the late 1950s, it had been practiced in some form at least as early as the Dada artists of the 1920s. Burroughs himself cited The Waste Land, a poem by T.S. Eliot that incorporated newspaper clippings as an early example of cut up technique. Negativland 3 is another frequently cited early contributor to mashup culture. Filmmaker Craig Baldwin created Sonic Outlaws (1995), a documentary about the controversy surrounding Negativland. The film itself uses scavenged and repurposed film stock to illustrate the narrative. over the use of unauthorized sampling as well as the album artwork, which made it appear that consumers were buying an album by U2 entitled One song in the album used found recordings of popular radio disc jockey Casey Kasem. The selection f eatured Kasem losing his temper while introducing a U2 song. Kasem Hip hop The genre of hip hop is often cited as being particularly relevant to mashups. Hip hop has always relied on sampling Sampling is taking a selection of music, known as the sample, and using it in another work. Samples can be as small as isolating a single drumbeat or they can be as expansive as inserting a whole chorus into a new work. The Disc Jockey or DJ also rose to prominence with hip hop. Early hip hop in particular relied heavily on the skills of DJs to create impressive sounds. DJs became an icon, r epresenting the whole scope of hip hop. Eventually, DJing became its own art with its own subculture. 3 http://www.negativland.com/

PAGE 12

12 Hip hop is a story still being told. Jeff Chang's Can't Stop Won't Stop is the defining text about the birth of the movement. Chang, a hip hop journalis t, uses an engaging accessible tone. Can't Stop Won't Stop begins in the South Bronx, New York in the summer of 1977. We then move with Chang to the streets of Kingston, Jamaica. Chang relates hip hop's formation with the birth of Rastafarianism. Samplin g has been a key component of both dub and hip Marcus also recounts the shared history of dub and hip hop. He then moves into sampling as a postmodern art form. Like many other authors, he talks of sampling in terms of collage and deconstruction. More interestingly, he mentions the idea of rap artists using sampling as a way of paying homage to earlier African American artists. Many early h ip hop records can be seen as almost proto mashups as having firm roots within hip the 1986 collaboration with rap group Run DMC, as having much in common with a combination of Herb Albert's instrumentals with the rap vocals of Pub lic Enemy's Chuck D. Hip hop also popularized the megamix an important mashup antecedent. The megamix can be thought of as an extension of the song medley. In Regressive and Reflexive Mashups in Sampling Culture Eduardo Navas differentiates medleys f rom meg amixes by identifying medleys as being performed by only one band a playlist of songs are played in a sequence. A megamix is similar but relies on a DJ to play brief, sampled sections of songs that are sequenced

PAGE 13

13 together to create an assemblage. G randmaster Flash experimented with the megamix when he This work was performed on turntables and produced in a studio. It included samples of songs by The Sugarhill Gang, The Furious Five, Queen, and Blondie. THE MODERN MASHUP ERA The modern mashup era has a very recent origin. Roseman's Audio Mashup Construction Kit dates the advent of the modern mashup era as starting around 2001. That year Erol Alkin mashed up singer Kylie Minogue' Monday : The Illegality and Hypereality of Mashups Liam Maloy identifies 2003 as a pivotal year for mashups. That year hip hop artist Jay Z, recognizing the power of remix culture, publicly released the a capella vocals from The Black Album This release resulted in a number of mashup albums, including DJ Dangermou The Grey Album 4 ramifications of The Grey Album nct stages are sacrifice, representation, repetition, and composition. Gunderson is primarily concerned with composition. This final stage is where music is produced for and by its own consumers. The Grey Album reveals some of t he essential oppositions within the work that make it so compelling. It is a work that combines the music of a Caucasian British rock band with the lyrics of an African America rapper. It combines what is now considered a classic record with what was immed iately a contemporary hit album. Gunderson 4 http://www.illegal art.org/audio/grey.html

PAGE 14

14 sees Danger Mouse as a historian. Danger Mouse himself is both British and Black. Hip roots can be traced back to sixties era rock music. In turn rock music owes much to early American blues written by Afric an Americans. Collison Course In 2004, the EP Collision Course was released. Collision Course was a collaboration between rapper Jay Z and rock band Linkin Park. This EP is composed entirely of tracks that combine elements of one already existing song from Jay Z with an existing song from Linkin Park. Listening to Collison Course is a voyeuristic experience. Though this was not produced in a bedroom studio o r recorded in a garage, the finished tracks smartly leave in short asides or exchanges betwe en Jay Z and Linkin Park. Yet, Collision Course operates differently than most mashups. This recording has the distinctio n of being collaborative live recordings of previously recorded Jay Z and Linkin Park songs. Most mashup producers can only dream about the incredible access to equipment, studios and sound engineers that either Jay Z or Linkin Park has Collision Course would eventually reach #1 o n the Billboard 200. Since the commercial success of Collision Course mashups have had much more mainstream attention given to them. NEW MEDIA ARTIFACTS Mashups are considered new media artifacts. New media artifacts, like traditional media artifacts, a re subject to criticism. Also, like traditional media artifacts much attention is given to the broader cultural effects these artifacts have. New media artifacts have inherent properties that are unique to them. They also have a distinct social practice; m ashups particularly exist in a culture of participation and engagement.

PAGE 15

15 The Hyperreal The concept of the original is of particular concern within our contemporary networked culture. Simulacra and Simulation by Jean Baudrillard presents a theory of cont emporary culture. Baudrillard addresses the crisis of reproduction with the concept of the simulacrum the idea of a copy without an original. Within our networked culture we have access to nearly every image ever reproduced, every film ever made, and every song recorded. In The Work of Art in the Age of it's Technological Reproducibility, Walter Benjamin wrote about the danger of duplicates of an artwork lacking a unique existence in a particular place (21). Benjamin is still concerned with the idea of au thenticity. In his definition, the authenticity of a work is somehow embedded within the original, forming an aura. With Baudrillard, this aura has been lost entirely in a hall of mirrors. Most importantly for remix culture, Baudrillard introduces us to the idea of the hyperreal. Disneyland exists within such extreme, car efully controlled artifice that it embodies a hyperreal America a sanitized miniature world that never existed. Baudrillard identifies our interest in instant nostalgia, our love of ghosts. He could easily be talking about mashup production rather than cinema. Baudrillard claims everything is equivalent and is mixed indiscriminately in the same morose and funereal exaltation, in the same retro fascination (44). ines how the film of that name embodies the hyperreal. This film can be compared to the work of mashup artist Girl

PAGE 16

16 Talk in that Apocalypse Now aural assault. The film, directed by Francis For d Coppola, is set during the Vietnam War. The Heart of Darkness a novella about an Englishman taking a job as a ferryboat captain in Africa. Apocalypse Now centers o n a US Army Special Operations o fficer who is s ent into the jungle to assass inate an insane Special Forces c olonel. on screen drama and violence, the films production itself was also turbulent. This is wel l documented in (1991). Both Apocalypse Now and the music of Girl Talk are a celebration of fantasy and special effects. His music uses a large number of samples in each song to achieve an overpowering, disorien ting effect. Each sample begins to lose its meaning, leaving no room to be interpreted critically with no redeeming moral onstage and interact with him. They b ecome participants rather than viewers. 5 four orders of signification. Maloy argues that an original master recording constitutes reality and that the mashup is the simulacrum. A first order simulation would be an original vinyl record A second order simulation would constitute a digitized version of the vinyl record. A third order simulation would be an electronic extract or sample. The fourth order simulation would be a mashup. Maloy extrapolates that the order of signification for l ive music would be 5 http://www.mashuptown.com/2007/01/wild_rock_music.html

PAGE 17

17 would be a tribute band that impersonates the origi nal band using costumes and props. Third order simulations would be a tribute band that stays in character off stage or has some sort of crossover with the originating band. Properties of New Media New media forms like mashups have inherent properties th at distinguish it from old media. In The Language of New Media, Lev Manovich presents a robust critical theory. Manovich views new media primarily through cinematic theory. Manovich explores how the a. While music is not discussed in depth, visual culture is the focus, new media is where digital sampling lies. The Language of New Media is organized in chapters each tackle one distinct concept or s about the medium itself. The second the relationship of humans with the computer screen. This chapter also discusses operating systems, as they are the primary w ay most people interact with the computer screen. Mashup artists interact primarily with the computer screen to create and distribute their art. Later in this paper more will be discussed about the specific software and tools artists use to create their ma shups. Scholars such as Manovich relate the screen to much older, analog equivalents such as paintings. The screen indicates that another space exists, one that is virtual. Images depicted on screens are still described with painting terminology. Landscape mode refers to a horizontal format while portrait mode refers to a vertical format. Issues of choice and selection are prevalent in discussions about new media art.

PAGE 18

18 Manovich argues that so much comes predefined in any software package. Yet he allows that even before the advent of new media, other scholars have critiqued the idea of the true artist someone who creates everything on his or her own and relies solely on their imagination has been always questioned. tist. Somehow we are still uncomfortable designating someone who works predominately on the computer as an artist. Still, artists have long interfaced with the screen. Manovich views the rise the best example of new media theory in action, someone who relies on selection and the rapid combination of preexisting elements. While Manovich defines the DJ as someone who mixes live and also relies on assorted electro nic hardware devices, the mashup artist also embodies the new logic of selection. Scholars are already trying to envision what culture will look like beyond the remix. track mixers as what made the birth of remix culture possible. Mixers made it much simpler to quickly manipulate and change elements be applied to other types of manipulation. Community Jenkins (2006) organizes his arguments around specific case studies, one for each section. The first section uses an examination centered on reality television show Survivor to discuss how a virtual c ommunity learns and processes knowledge. The second section discusses television

PAGE 19

19 talent show American Idol's success and its effect on commerce and media convergence. The third section examines the movie The Matrix and the transmedia world that was created to Star Wars? made films based on the popular and now iconic characters of George Lucas's Star Wars Media Literacy and created literature set in the fantasy world created by J.K. and subversion of popular culture can be applied to elements of political activism. Jenkins concludes Convergence Culture with the idea that participatory skills are going to be applied everywhere and that extending those skills beyond entertainment is going to be increasingly important. Jenkins places a lot of importance on fan communities. Though Jenkins says nothing about music in Convergence Culture his ideas are particularly relevant to the DIY communities of music mashups. Remix Culture Contempor ary culture is concerned with the remix, recombining information to make new creations. Rip! A Remix Manifesto written and directed by filmmaker Brett Gaylor is an excellent introduction to the world of remix. Gaylor starts his film with performance footage of Girl Talk. Gaylor claims that Girl Talk's music is obviously creative. Gaylor then relates the history of the Internet with his own personal history. This film is organized around a manifesto set forth by Gaylor and those within the remix community. Similar in scope to Rip! A Remix Manifesto the documentary Good Copy, Bad Copy (2007) also explores remix culture. Produced by mashup artist Girl Talk the film explores the

PAGE 20

20 inhibitions placed upon certain creative works due to copyright law. Good Copy, Bad Copy explores several important cases such as one involving a lawsuit against rap group NWA. The film features experts that have chronicled instances of conflict involving individuals who have wanted to create n ew works with copyrighted material. Scholar Siva Vaidhyanathan The Grey Album Girl Talk also explains the difficulties of securing licensing to use copyrighted work. Pirated films are also discussed. Since Good Copy, Bad Copy revolves around our online, networked culture online piracy is the focus. Online piracy is seen as much more dangerous than older forms of illegal copying because of how rapidly copies can be dist ributed. Pirate Bay, a Swedish BitT or r ent website, was accused of acts of copyright infringement by the United States. The event became so controversial that a political par t y was formed as a reaction. Lawrence Lessig, a champion of Creative Commons, is also featured in the f ilm. Lessig represents a middle ground between anti copyright activists and the militant upholders of copyright. He believes that with Creative Commons, artists can license their work in a fair way. The film then departs to Nigeria to examine the film production and distribution that is In fact, Nigerian film is a completely unique situation. The Nigerian film industry arose in a country that had no existin g copyright laws. Nigerian films are also released differently than those made in the United States and many other countr ies They are almost always released straight to DVD rather than to movie theaters. Aside from film, Good Copy, Bad Copy focuses stron gly on the crisis of illegal downloading of music. VP Records, the largest reggae record company in the world is profiled.

PAGE 21

21 They blame illegal downloading for their significant decrease in total sales. Solutions to the problem of illegal downloading are als o suggested. The tecno brega movement in Brazil is explored. Tecno brega is a style of music unique to Brazil. Tecno brega producers blend and remix pop music with Brazilian percussion to create new dance tracks. Distribution of CDs function as promotio nal items producers of tecno brega rely on large outdoor dance party performances to generate revenue. CDs are also produced on site at these large live performances and sold. Scholars have attempted to tackle the issues surrounding our rapidly evolvin g remix culture. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy written by Lawrence Lessig posits solut ions to problems that have arisen in our remix culture. Lessig is a Ha rvard l aw professor. Lessig offers a comprehensive account of the conflicts artists and other producers have had with copyright law. Lessig is also the author of Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. Lessig offers a comprehensive history on copyright law. He explains th at a lot of innovations came out of piracy. Lessig uses many illustrations to show how complicated copyrights are. He believes that current copyright laws are much too restrictive and that they harm creativity. Lessig is a major champion of the Creative Commons licenses. Creative Commons provides licenses that people can easily attach to their conten t. Creators can use these licens es to grant certain freedoms for others In Remix he argues for a reform of copyright, finding the current state too limitin g of creativity and even detrimental to the economy. Lessig advocates for a change in the law and the use of Creative Commons. This book is organized in three sections. The first part concerns how our culture has changed. Lessig divides our culture into two categories: Read/Write (RW) culture and Read/Only (RO) culture. RW

PAGE 22

22 culture allows consumers to change and adapt the culture around them. RO culture is a much more passive participation, with consumers simply viewing or experiencing the culture. The sec ond section explains how much our economy has changed as a result of that cultural shift. various changes while still promoting cultural progress and economic gro wth. Some scholars are critical of Lessig's reliance on Creative Commons and his interpretation of the problems within out remix culture. You A re Not a Gadget: A Manifesto written by Jaron Lanier offers a differing opinion from Lessig's. Lanier emphas izes the power of the individual. He is concerned that we elevate technology to levels that diminish the value of human input. You A re Not a Gadget is organized in sections around general themes. The first section questions what it means to be human in r view that our culture, as a result of relying on metaphors related to computation, has become You are Not a Gadget and offers some possible directions for the future. Lanier argues that one group of technologists has more influence over our culture than any other. He includes individuals from Creative Commons, Linux, and many others. He feels that many of these peop le emphasize the crowd rather than the individual. And, he believes that in emphasizing the crowd you have to diminish the individual. In his opinion this results in a loss

PAGE 23

23 of humanity. Lanier believes that this emphasis on the crowd results in a hostile a nd unproductive networked culture. Lanier is extremely critical of mashups. He groups them in with his idea of flatness. He uses the example of an anonymous mashup artist combining footage from the film Blade Runner econd disjointed, nonsensical juxtaposition could never compete with the original film, an example of what Lanier sees as an original, non derivative work. Interestingly, Lanier views hip hop as the last hop artists were able to overcome the sterility of digital production by the stark contrast of the rigidity of a sequencer with the raw vibrancy of the human voice. Mashups have also been a tool fo r activism. Music and Cyberliberties written by Patrick Burkart and part of the Music/Culture series from Wesleyan University Press discusses various cyberactivism movements about music. Burkhart derives much of his methodology through Jurgen Habermas's Th eory of Communicative Action Compared to other musicians, mashup artists must rely on different methods to get their music heard. In the first chapter of Music and Cyberliberties Burkart mentions the illegal distribution of DJ DangerMouse's Grey Album without explaining what exactly made the content illegal. Most mashup artists do not have the means to get permissions from the artists they use in their songs. Gunderson explains that Danger The Grey Album resulting in a cease and desist letter being sent to the artist. This resulted in an Internet websites provided T he Grey Album for easy download. Consumers downloaded copies of the album for free over one million times. Burkart does place DJ DangerM ouse alongside groups

PAGE 24

24 These groups rely on subversion of mainstream operations to communicate their message. Ot her scholars approach mashups holistically, evaluating the implication of this new art form as it relates to culture as a whole. Mashed Up: Music, Technology, and the Rise of Configurable Culture by Aram Sinnreich explores music mashups based on how techno logy and networked culture is allowing us to rapidly configure and reconfigure music. In the introduction, Sinnreich discusses critical information studies the ways in which culture and information are regulated and thus the relationships among regulatio n and commerce, creativity, science, technology, politics, and other human affairs. Sinnreich organizes his examination in three sections. The first section concerns the existing paradigm of music and how that paradigm is changing. The second section ex amines themes within mashup culture that arose from Sinnre i ch's surveying and interviewing both mashup artists and regular Americans. The third section discusses some conclusions brought about by interviews and surveys from the second section. Sinnreich at tempts to apply these ideas to the changing paradigm of music. To perform research on changing views of music Sinnreich relied in two sources of data. The first was a quantitative survey of a diverse range of Americans asking them about their awareness of configurable culture practices. Sinnreich mostly uses the last qualitative question from this survey an open ended question of what people thought about mashup culture. The second data source was a series of interviews with people involved with music produ ction mashup artists, music attorneys, and music industry executives. Mashup Culture s, edited by Stefan Sonvilla Weiss extends the idea of mashups to include the related ideas of data mashups and other Web 2.0 practices. The contributors are an incredib ly diverse group made up of media scholars with wildly different interests. The

PAGE 25

25 introduction, written by Stefan Sonvilla Weiss outlines what his ideas about mashup culture are as well as introducing each investigation in order. Mashup Culture s is organized his contribution. Many contributors to Mashup Cultu res are concerned with how mashups relate to ideas Henry Jenkins relates the story of educator Ricardo Pitts Wiley teaching the novel Moby Dick to incarcerated youth. Pitts Wiley created a play, Moby Dick: Then and Now that was adapted from the original text. The incarcerated juveniles contributed to this adaptation, they modernized the characters while remaining true to the motivations of the original text. Moby Dick minded obsession with capturing a rare white whale. In Moby Dick: Then and Now the obsession shifts to the modern cocaine cartel. Jenkins also discusses an important question brought up by many students. Why is it appropriation when Melville borrows from various texts and plagiarism when they do the same? ws as well as changing attitudes towards what constitutes originality and artistry. In Mashed Up Sinnreich discusses new media literacy in terms of artistry. He attempts to identify what is truly artistic within mashup c ulture. Sinnreich determines that the more transforma tive and innovative the work is, with evidence of true media literacy the higher the level of artistry. It is possible to associate socialization is measured by the exposure to m edia messages ( p. 80). Mashup artists are

PAGE 26

26 immersed in media and are seen as savvy so they are sometimes regarded as geniuses due to their skillfulness of their innovation or transformative artistry. Sound Unbound is a diverse anthology of remix culture e dited by Paul D. Miller (2008). Contributors to Sound Unbound include artists, academics, journalists, and law yers. Each section stands on it Miller describes Sound Unbound : famishe d souls of a geography of now Reich recounts his history with electronic music. Reich's work has been characterized with its extensive use of phasing and looping. Reich is an enthusiastic user of sampling. He cautiously approves of lapt op based composers but maintains that there will always be a place for the performance of live music. explain remix culture. He argues that remixing has exploded due to the networked nature of our technology. In remix culture, ownership is usually a subject of contention The term that appropriation has always been an essential part of creative works. He uses William S Burroughs as a starting point for structuring text as a collage. Lethem recognizes that some

PAGE 27

27 Plagiarism is a reoccurring theme within Sound Unbound he Musician as Thief: remix more accessible to the masses. She also discusses how sampling culture and copyright law often clash and that fair use doctrine is problem atic. Keller argues that recording technology has just increased and further enabled our existing tendency of reuse. She states that our culture has now buil performance into raw sonic collage took a long time to make and was difficult to do. The artists were also limited to whatever physical tapes they had to manipulate. sound and extends that idea to music. Jordan posits that the very nature of digital technology directs artists to create new conne ctions and breakdown boundaries between genres. He argues that since computers being able to break down all media into discrete data, all information can be recombined. Jordan also argues that music can be more easily disseminated so musicians today are mo re easily able to draw from a wide range of influences. SURVEY METHODOLOGY Subjects were asked to fill out a short online survey about their experiences creating mashups. Questions ranged from how many mashups they had created to whether they performed their mashups live. Many subjects were found by posting a link to the survey on GYBO 6 a popular online music mashup forum. Other subjects were found using social media platforms such as Twitter and facebook. Man y of the mashup artists shared the link with each 6 http://www.gybo5.com/

PAGE 28

28 other. Some retweeted the link to all of their Twitter followers. Ten subjects responded. A copy of the survey may be found in the appendix of this document. The questions asked were purposely left extrem ely open ended. Since there is not much research in the field of music mashup in general, it was important to try and establish baseline questions of inquiry. Further research is needed to see if this very small sample is generalizable. There is also almos t no research on how or why people make music mashups. RESULTS Data collected from the study resulted in several conclusions about the nature of mashup artists. First, mashup artists are mostly self taught. Also, mashup artists belong to a sophisticated fan community and actively exchange ideas. There are also implications that the democratization of technology is resulting in mashups being crafted and shared much faster that ever before. Finally, the creators of mashups often credit hip hop as the most r elevant ancestor of mashups as predominantly self taught. Mashup artists seem to identify greatly with this term. There seems to be significant DIY ethos within the whole movement of remix culture; mashup creation is no exception to this. Mashup artists seek out instruction for their work themselves, rather than wait passively for instruction to be brought to them Responses varied from Captain Obvious's taught with a f Ableton Live for about two hours one night and we learned the rest on our own, self taught Ian he started creating mashups. Mashup artists seem to align their definition of self taught with having little or no institutional education on music. Only a few identified themselves as being

PAGE 29

29 musicians before gett ing into creating mashups. Even those that did identify as musicians, such Though the mashup artists who responded all claimed to be self taught most conditioned that response with some sort of statement that they received some tip or production tric k from a friend. Besides A plus D, Maxwelljump also mentions learning re pitching and changing the tempo of songs through a fri end who was learning Pro Others like artist ToToM said they learned a certain software package for other music purposes and then adapted that knowledge to apply it towards making mashups. Music mashup tutorials abound online. A casual search will yield hundreds of thousands of results, ran ging from high school lesson plans incorporating them to advanced audio techniques utilizing multiple software applications. Many mashup tutorials can be found on YouTube, a popular video sharing website. YouTube is primarily a forum for sharing user gener ated content, and so sharing elements of remix culture such as mashup tutorials seems particularly appropriate. YouTube is easily accessible. It also has a low entry point in terms of participation; anyone can create a free account and start adding content Additionally, YouTube automatically generates an embed code, allowing easy insertion of video clips into blogs and other websites. YouTube is also a major venue for video mashups remixing preexisting videos to create some new commentary. Music mashup v ideo tutorials tend to all have a similar structure. Most have the author of the tutorial narrating the steps while a video of the computer screen actually shows the software program in action. The tutorial can be easily followed as the actions performed b y the author are indicated by the computer's cursor. Rarely do we actually see the author of the tutorial.

PAGE 30

30 Other mashup tutorials use primarily text to instruct. For example, the tutorial Bootcamp: Mashing for Beginners 7 instructs potential new mashup artists on how to create mashups using the software package Tracktion. This tutorial begins with a brief definition of mashups. Next, the key components of what is needed to com plete this tutorial are outlined This tutorial focuses on making a mashup that combines two songs, the instrumental of one song with the a cappella vocals of another. The tutorial then goes through the concepts that are to be learned to create the mashup. The first concept is setting a tempo grid. A tempo grid is crucial as it make the whole composition easier to line up. The next step involves removing vocals from a track if necessary. This tutorial explains how to use phase reversal to effectively disguise and remove the vocals from a song. Example audio clips are given to show wha t the various steps of this process sound like. Then, the acapella track is dealt with and the two tracks are combined. Mashup producers tend to be technologically savvy. Some mentioned the mashup forum GYBO specifically as a source of inspiration and a p lace to receive guidance. GYBO is an acronym, short for g et your bootleg on In this forum users can post their completed work in several categories: mashups, remixes, original songs, and even links to video mashups they have also hosts challenges, contests where mashup artists can show off their skills. Many mashup artists use audio distribution platforms such as SoundCloud 8 Music uploaded to SoundCloud is easily shared. Tracks can be embedded into websites and shared on Twitter. Official.fm 9 is a music club 7 http://paintingbynumbers.com/bootcamp 8 http://soundcloud.com/ 9 http://official.fm/

PAGE 31

31 In addition to sharing their music digitally, aspects of live performance also figure greatly performed their work for an audience at some point. The few who had not performed live expressed interest in performing in the f uture. Some came to mashups through the more established practice of live DJing. Other mashup artists consider mashups something that is not really a live medium. Some distinguish mashups from songs mixed together and performed live as part of a DJ set. The artists A Plus Plus D is also affiliated with SmashUp Derby, a rock band that does live versions of mashups. A made is a bit false Most mashup artists have personal websites to share their music and get feedback. All but one subject answered that they listened to mashups made by other artists. In fact, most cited more than ten other mashup artists that they list ened to regularly. Eight out of the ten mashup producers interviewed used the software product Ableton Live to create their mashups. Ableton Live is a robust digital audio workstation (DAW) that is designed to work as a loop based sequencer. Using Ableto n Live has many benefits for the music mashup artist. Ableton Live is a unique software product. Unlike many other DAWs, Ableton Live is also designed to work as an instrument for live performance. Ableton Live can operate in two different views, Session V iew and Arrangement View. Session View allows for nonlinear composition while arrangement view is a more traditional, linear sequencer view. It is Session View that makes Ableton Live so useful for mashup artists. Ableton Live also has dedicated hardware i nstruments like Akai's APC40, a MIDI controller designed specifically to interface for

PAGE 32

32 use with Live. Live is also able to automatically beat match different songs a helpful feature when making mashups. Live's target audiences are DJs and other electroni c music artists. Some mashup artists interviewed were first introduced to Live while working on other electronic music projects. They then adapted Live to making mashups. Live also has a relatively low entry point for cost and free trials can be downloaded from the official website. Live is a popular software suite, as a result tutorials abound online. Music production was not always so accessible. Prior to such robust software, music production was often prohibitively expensive with limitations also bein g posed by the availability of physical space. Large drum machines, effects racks, synthesizers, and other electronic music instruments had to be purchased separately and installed in some sort of music studio. Now many mashup artists use just one laptop or computer with primarily one software package. Mashup artists had an extremely wide range of answers when asked why they created mashups. CHEEKYBOY said he only made new mashups if he loved the song. Captain Obvious Other responses might not otherwise hear A plus respons while the tools and creativity are there people will keep creating DISCUSS ION

PAGE 33

33 Mashup artists seem to have the attitude that what they are doing is simply the next of the creation of mashups has several implications for new media le arning. Mashups are challenging works of intertextuality. Also, mashup artists themselves are erudite artists. They are hop. They emphasis the community they create in and for. This is significant in that it echo es many ideas about remix culture put forth by Henry Jenkins. Mashup artists are an interesting counterpoint to the theories set forth by Jaron Lanier as well as those of Baudrillard. Mashup artists are already applying the types of new media learning t hat scholars are stressing will only become more and more important. Mashups can serve as a model for future in a remix era Remix is now an inescapable part of li fe. Since we cannot avoid remix practices, is useful to study mashup artists learning about how to make mashups as they can be a model of how we interact with any software. To learn, mashup artists rely on collaborative practices, the most prevalent being the online forum. Intertextuality meanings by other texts. Mashups subvert the authority of a text. By combining disparate works they create a new dialog. Scholar s such as Jaron Lanier fear that the nature of the web, with i t s potential for anonymity could lead to the death of authorship. He believes that the loss of this authorship correlates with a lack of humanistic thought. These anonymous comments in blog post s or forums will somehow lead to a loss of personal creativity. Yet, scholars have long I mage, Music, Text

PAGE 34

34 written work as something that becomes divorced from the writer upon its completion. The distinction of mashups as intertexual works is quite different from al igning mashups Manovich discusses how works using montage or collage rely on distinct, jarring oppositions. The successes of many mashups rely on how unobtrusive the samples are. Samples are edited and changed to fit within a coherent whole. Also, traditional collage is a destructive act. The original is cut up and then used in a new composition. With mashups created on a computer, samples can be saved in the form they were acquired and manipulated endlessly. Mashups remove any illusion of authority of the author of the component tracks may nature of mashups. Barthes views dimensional space in which a variety his view, the removal of the author is productive in that it eliminates the misguided notion th at there is some sort of final authority on a text. The inherent nature of mashup achieves the same deciphered This attitude towards disentangling texts rat her than forcing a sort of imperfect translation is helpful when considering mashups. Many mashup artists saw hip hop as mashup's most recent and relevant ancestor. A few even claimed hip hop as their gateway into creating mashups. For example, Maxwellj ump asserted interest in sampling as early as first h Way S urprising ly given to the academic focus on m ashup's roots in plunderphonics, none of the subjects interviewed mentioned that as an influence.

PAGE 35

35 Music Mashup Culture Mashup artists are actively engaged in a culture of participation and interaction. Mashup artists seem to align closely with many ideas brought forth by Henry Jenkins. Mashup artists are fans of music in general and mashups in particular. Mo st subjects reported that they listened to several other mashup artists' work. Many also mentioned music mashup online forums as a place to share and learn about music mashups. Belonging to a participatory culture feels natural to states: Mex with chopsticks while listening to reggae and i.e., when damn near everything presents itself a s familiar Mashup artists operate in a unique position within the realm of music creation. In the author makes a clear distinction between the music one plays and the music one listens to. Mashup artists use the music that they listen to as the raw material for their own work. That music becomes the music they play for an audience. This audience can be solely online, live performance, or a combination of both. Jenkins explores fan fiction. He explores how fans of media take el ements they are drawn to and adapt them to create their own stories. Jenkins sees Moby Dick as making more sense of a mashup. He explains how Melville used disparate elements from the Bible to 19 th century whaling lore to tell the story. He argues that some of the same practices that occur in crafting fan fiction occur during creating works on the level of Moby Dick Writers

PAGE 36

36 synthesize what they have read from other works. They borrow references fro m the Bible or make allusions to works by Shakespeare. Music education can benefit from similar practices utilizing mashups. Influences of multiple music styles can be illustrated quickly and also serve as sonic representations of various musical concepts Mashups also encourage users to use sophisticated software programs. These are often complex programs with many settings and endless options. Since mashup artists are dealing with preexisting media, they can focus on mastering the skills needed to use th e software. They can immediately start using new media tools to create. Mashups have inherent conflict within them. They blend together different narratives and the author discusses how difficult i t is to use language to describe music. Barthes views most music criticism as poor because it relies engenders description. Barthes argues that the whole scope o f music criticism would have to be reexamined and changed. Yet, mashup artists show reverence to their source material. They show great care in their grain i s that it is the intersection of a language and a voice. The grain is a visceral experience. Barthes explains his definition of the grain in terms of his experiences with specific voice. He relates his experiences much like a fan does, valuing greatly emot ional experience as well as technical difficulty. Mashup artists behave in much of the same way. They seek to honor the original grain of each source material by creating transformative works. In Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Econo my Lawerence Lessig tackles the issue of the grain from a slightly different perspective. He explains that remixers, like

PAGE 37

37 mashup artists, are aware of the cultural reference that the source material contains. We have shared memories of certain media. Song s that become popular enter the public consciousness and will forever have associations tied to it. This is powerful. Using your own original content cannot achieve this, as it will not contain the same type of embedded symbolic meaning. In other words, it will lack the same sort of grain. Issues of professional versus amateur are always prevalent in discussions of any type of artistry. Mashup artists are no exception. Barthes also views the music that people play 9). Some may perceive mashups as being removed from the same kind of manual manipulation. However, the metaphors of composition and computation seem firmly entrenched in the physical. Some artists interviewed related their work in terms of older, analog re cording systems. Others mentioned DJing, an incredibly physical medium. Most discussed hardware tools as well as software. Mashup artists also offer an interesting counterpoint to Jaron Lanier's You are not a Gadget Lanier (2010) states: comments, vapid video pranks, and lightweight mashups may seem trivial and harmless, but as a whole, this widespread practice of fragmentary, impersonal Lanier believes that the freedom of our networked culture is an illusion. He argues that our reliance on metaphors of computation has resulted in a decline of creativity and a general He feels that the advancement of technology has come at a price that we are simply mashin g up already existing art to create purely derivative works devoid of meaning. But m ashup artists do value individual creativity, as evidenced by their admiration for specific other mashup artists. Lanier claims to value the individual yet does not seem to consider

PAGE 38

38 the motivations of individuals who wish to create mashups or other remix works. This is action However, mashups are a product of both reaction and a ction. Mashups have an illusion of ease to them. Since all of the media used to make them is already present, many think they are simple constructions. However, even the simplest mashups involving only two songs require a lot of time to create Lanier seem s to view mashup creators as people who mindlessly combine media with no thought to the end result. Simply uploading two songs and instantly outputting a finished product is not how mashups are made. Individuals within the mashup community praise ingenuit y. Most mashup creators valued thoughtful juxtaposition of music rather than making a more random sound collage. Mashup artists that employ the most skillful manipulations get the most attention within online communities Artists interviewed were intereste d with innovating on the genre rather than revisiting already covered territory. Lanier also seems to think that remix artists let the technology that facilitates making mashups make most of the decisions. Most mashup artist s interviewed mentioned being ac tive on online forums honing their craft as well as trading production techniques with others. Today I will check off my to do list without touching a pen or paper. A click of the mouse will cross off tasks completed. As Manovich states in The Language of New Media We have accepted the immateriality of today. Comparisons of mashups to the theories of Bau Alive in Da C mashups in terms of signification is intriguing but flawed. Aligning mashups within this system

PAGE 39

39 seems overly simplistic. Maloy does not include remixes of original songs. Maloy also does not explore the problem of different artists covering the same song. Also, the mashup performed with a live band is another quandary. Mashup artist A plus D mentioned being affiliated with a live mashup band, Smashup Derby. Also, singer songwrite r Butch Walker is known for doing both covers of popular songs and mashups at his live shows. Walker has performed a rendition of Yeah, Yeah, Yeahs 10 Some scholars h ave attempted to argue that the mashup genre has already become stagnant. First, mashups have already become widely commercially accepted. Mashups have been featured on television shows like Glee a mainstream network program set in a high school. Mashup s have also been featured in commercials. In Mashed Up: Music, Technology, and the Rise of Configurable Culture, The success as being the catalyst for mashups going mainstream (189). Journalist s immediately jumped on the mashup bandwagon, and mashups were legitimized in the press. Another sign of stagnation is statements from the mashup artists themselves. Some mashup artists interviewed seemed cynical towards remix culture. However, mashups ar e a response to the commodification of music as a whole. Genres are contrived, rather than being the result of a natural development of diverse music practices. Often the categories of music seem arbitrary or overly reductive. Mashups can be seen as a reac tionary movement against this commodification. Take for example the genre of pop music. Rather than being characterized by any one sound, pop music is simply defined as being what is popular music today. As a result, genres 10 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pik5DLgq48Y

PAGE 40

40 have collapsed. A pop radio station is very likely to play rap music immediately after a rock hit. It is telling that works like The Grey Album resonated so deeply. Since the majority of people that acquired the album did so by downloading, the album was o btained for free. This work became something that existed outside of commodification. Many other mashup artists distribute their work for free via the Internet. Often, their work often cannot be something they profit off of directly because they are unable to legally use their source material in commercial works. CONCLUSION William S. Burroughs, Break Through in Grey Room In This is Your Brain on Music professor and neuroscientist Daniel J. Levitin suggests that the desire to engage in collective music making may be an evolutionary response to support social bonding. Mashup artists may be working with computers with powerful processing power, but what they seem to value most is contributing to a com munity. Though the tools to create are constantly evolving, we still have the same impetus to create and share. Remix culture is an important area of study as it emphasizes sharing over our networked culture. Mashups are a prevalent example of those remix culture and serve as markers for this connection. The study of mashup culture still has a long way to go. Production techniques are under documented. Individual mashup artists are rarely interviewed unless they have some sort of mainstream success. The l earning process that accompanies mashup creation has not yet been fully do cumented. Rather, we assume a learning process exists as finished mashups often exhibit a high sophistication of technical literacy. Many mashup tutorial sites exist yet there is no academic documentation on their effect on remix culture or their efficacy. We still do not know

PAGE 41

41 yet if there is a dominant creative pedagogy. It has not yet been established if there is a typical music mashup artist. A wider net must be first cast to est ablish this. A reas of interest for future research include investigating cross cultural music mashup works such as Brazil's tecno brega. Tecno brega often combines hits from the United States or Europe with locally produced Brazilian percussion. Ideally, some some tecno brega artists could be interviewed in person and observed performing as most of these works are geared towards live performance at large outdoor dance parties. It would be interesting to see how this particular subgenre of music aligns wit h contemporary theories on remix culture. Mashups of visual culture are also an area of interest. As stated before, mashups are often imperfectly compared to collage. Many contemporary artists have engaged in new versions of collage that rely on a more bl ended concept rather than stark juxtapositions. This work seems to be a contemporary response to living in remix culture. The artist Wangechi Mutu is of particular interest as she appropriates a diverse array of imagery from clippings from fashion magazi nes to images from medical textbooks. These images are then incorporated into new, mixed forms, often of a figural nature. New media artists known as video jockeys or VJs are another interesting area for future research. Scholars such as Lev Manovich have long aligned the development of electronic music pop culture with the development of electronic visual culture. VJs improvise with visual information in much of the same way mashup artists can improvise with songs. VJs are firmly entrenched in remix cultu re. Most of them appropriate found footage to create new interactions and meanings. They also seem to define themselves as largely self taught. Since the remix era is well under way, some have questioned what comes next. Some have claimed that mashups and our remix culture have ushered in a new era of creativity by

PAGE 42

42 allowing a degree of participation that has never been seen before. These individuals claim that this creativity will grow and flourish. Others claim that mashups signal the exact opposite. They believe that mashups and remix culture are the dirges of creativity. They feel that this new type of music is a cultural dead end. However, from what is known about mashups, the level of innovation and artistry can only be a signal of a bigger movement. W elcome to the mashup era.

PAGE 43

43 SURVEY QUESTIONS What is your DJ/performance name if you have one? Do you have a website where you share your work? Please include a website address if desired. Do you listen to mashups made by other artists? If yes, whose mashups do you listen to? Who are you a fan of? What mashup tracks are your favorite? What made you first want to make your own mashups? What do you use to make your mashups? (What software, kind of computer, etc....) How did you learn how to make your mashups? Did someone else teach you? Did you follow online tutorial? Are you entirely self taught? How long have you been making mashups? About how many mashups have you made? Do you perform your mashups live? Why do you continue to make m ashups?

PAGE 44

44 LIST OF REFERENCES Barthes, R. (1977). Image. Music. Text. New York, NY: Hill and Wang. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation. (S. F. Glaser, Trans.) Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1981). Benjamin, W. (2008). The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility and other writings on media M. W. Jennings, Ed. (E. Jephcott Tran s.) Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press. Burkart, P. (2010). Music and cyberliberties Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide New York: New York University Press. Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Manovich, L. ( 2007) What comes after Remix? http://manovich.net/ Accessed: December 22, 2010 Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal (4), 767 790. Miller, P. D. (Ed.) (2008). Sound unbound Cambri dge, MA: MIT Press. Power, Aaron. (2006). Mouse that Roared: Addressing the Post Modern Quandary of Mash ups through Traditional Fair Use Analysis. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 8 (3), 531 540. Robinson, K. (2010). Ableton Live 8 and Suite 8: C reate, produce and perform. Burlington, MA: Focal Press.

PAGE 45

45 Sinnreich, A. (2010). Mashe d up: M usic, technology, and the rise of configurable culture Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press. Sonvilla Weiss, S. (Ed.) (2010). Mashu p cultures. New York, NY: Springer Verlag/ NewYork

PAGE 46

46 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Francesca Lyn was born on May 5, 1985 in Hollywood, Florida. She grew up in North Lauderdale, Florida and graduated from the International Baccalaureate program at concentra tion in Painting from the University of Florida in 2008. Upon completion of her with idealMashup.