|
FLOYD HALL
A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Prepared for
ARC 5810
Professor F. B. Reeves, FAIA
Professor H. Shephard, FAIA
Professor S. Tate, AIA
>�
Gregory Alan Hall
Spring 1985
FLOYD HALL
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
GENERAL
This structural report contains general information and an
objective evaluation of Floyd Hall, the Agriculture Building,
based upon recognized professional standards and "rules of thumb"
It is understood that the advise and services of professional
engineers, registered architects, and other qualified profession-
als, experienced in the analysis and assessment of historic
structures must be obtained prior to the commencement of work
at Floyd Hall. It should be known that several evaluations of
the stucture have been completed in the past and these reports
should be sought out and compared to any new analysis. This
comparison would serve as an indication of how rapidly the struc-
ture is deteriorating.
EVALUATION
Floyd Hall was one of the four original brick masonry class-
room buildings built at the University of Florida, Gainesville.
This three story building had simple span wood floor joists
resting on exterior brick masonry walls and interior wood bear-
ing partitions.
The first floor of the building is at approximately +4 feet
above grade. An examination of the crawl space, to the south,
reveals perimeter foundation walls and structural brick piers
at the interior of the building. It appears that the pier loc-
- 2 -
cations correspond with the locations of the interior wood col-
umns; however selective demolition would be required to verify
this assumption. The foundation walls and piers appear to be in
good repair, showing no evidence of cracking, loose material, or
other signs of failure. The crawl space, to the north, has been
filled with dirt and could not be inspected visually. The out-
side surface of the perimeter walls, however, were accessible
and appeared to be in good repair. Because of the infill, the
interior condition and location of bearing foundations and
piers can only be obtained through selective demolition.
The brick exterior walls of the building are also in good
repair. With the.exceptions of leaching lime, missing mortar,
and a few cosmetic cracks, the building does not show any signs
of structural or material failure. All doors and windows are
still operational, indicating the walls have not significantly
sagged or wracked. The exterior walls appear to be both plumb
and true.
Original drawings indicate that the openings in the exterior
walls were to be spanned by concealed brick arches. This is
believed to be the case, as one of the arched openings is exposed
to view at the southern end of the first floor. Furthermore,
investigations in the gable ends of the attic space reveals
brick arches over each window grouping in those areas. All
of the window openings in the exterior walls are spanned by
decorative terra cotta lintles. Selective demolition would
verify the method by which these windows were spanned structur-
ally.
- 3 -
The exterior walls have been tied to the wood floor joists
by metal channels and tierods. Research did not reveal the
date of this modification, however, the ties were not original
to the structure. Since the exterior walls are ~s'good condi-
tion, it appears that the modifications have stabilized the struc-
ture. It will be necessary to consult with a professional eng-
ineer during the planning stages of any adaptive use project to
determine the limitations these structural modifications will
put upon the proposed design. At that time, a more architec-
turally pleasing exterior tie anchor plate will have to be sub-
stituted for the existing metal channels, which are not contrib-
utory to the architectural quality of the structure.
The first and second floor heigths are 13 feet to the under-
side of the floor decking above. The third floor, part of the
roof structure, is 10 feet in heigth. Investigations reveal
the floor framing appears to be structural grade, 2"X14" joists
at 12" on center. Selective demolition will have to be performed
in all areas to verify the uniformity of the underlying floor
structure. In particular the first floor framing_) in the north-
ern half, will have to be checked for possible damage due to
rising damp through the earthen infilled crawl space.
The floor systems appear to be sound, showing no evidence
of excessive deflection or warping. There is some water damage
to the floor covering and subflooring in isloated locations. At
these locations selective demolition would reveal any damage to
the floor joists.
- 4 -
The roof of Floyd Hall is in an advanced state of deter-
ioration. The entire roof membrane and sheathing is ineffective'<
or missing, allowing for the dirprect penetration of storm
waters. It does not appear that the water has caused any sig-
nificant structural damage; however, the plaster ceilings, floor
coverings, subfloor materials, land other interior finishes have
either been destroyed by the water or are in a rapidly deter-
iorating state.
The major failure of the structure, as designed, is at the
juncture of the lower end of the hip roof��where the roof rafters
meet the brick masonry walls. The wooden rafters do not properly
tie into the third floor framing, thus causing a lateral, or
outward, thrust on the masonry walls. This thrust, if left
unchecked, could have caused great damage. However, the struc-
ture had been shored up by connecting the rafters to the third
floor framing by metal collars and tierods. Further analysis
will have to be performed by a registered engineer to determine
if this condition will adequately support an adaptive use.
Investigations in the attic space of the building reveal the
location of five pairs of 6"X6" wood columns. These columns are
aligned on an east-to-west and a north-to-south axis. The col-
umns are located around the approximate center of the building
and are assumed to continue downward into the corridor partition
walls below. Selective demolition would verify the vertical
continuity to the columns and any possible change in size or
shape 'from the supporting foundations to the roof structure.
CONCLUSION
This report has tried-te provides a general overview-with-
respect-to the structural systems,-of Floyd Hall. The major
considerations-looked at were the foundations, exterior brick
bearing walls, interior wood bearing columns, wood floor spaning
joists, and wood roof framing members.
Site investigations have revealed that the building prxper,
Flyd-Itai, is in good repair structurally. However, the storm
water infiltrationk-through the missing roof membrane and sheath-
ing,4 poses an imminent threat to the building's overall struc-
tural stability.
Further investigations, through selective demolition by
qualified professionals, are needed to assure the suitability
of any proper adaptive use.
|